|
|
|
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013
or
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-5828
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION |
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter) |
Delaware |
|
23-0458500 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.O. Box 14662 Reading, Pennsylvania |
|
19610 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
610-208-2000 |
(Registrants telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:
Large accelerated filer: |
þ |
|
Accelerated filer: |
o |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer: |
o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company: |
o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the issuers common stock as of April 25, 2013 was 52,718,330.
|
|
|
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
(in millions, except share data)
|
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
| |||
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
294.7 |
|
|
$ |
211.0 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
353.8 |
|
|
354.2 |
| ||
Inventories |
|
686.9 |
|
|
642.0 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
- |
|
|
10.6 |
| ||
Other current assets |
|
65.5 |
|
|
31.9 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
1,400.9 |
|
|
1,249.7 |
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
1,080.6 |
|
|
924.6 |
| ||
Goodwill |
|
256.7 |
|
|
260.5 |
| ||
Other intangibles, net |
|
98.5 |
|
|
109.9 |
| ||
Other assets |
|
79.6 |
|
|
83.1 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,916.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,627.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
226.0 |
|
|
$ |
236.1 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
230.3 |
|
|
217.1 |
| ||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
101.0 |
|
|
101.0 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
557.3 |
|
|
554.2 |
| ||
Long-term debt, net of current portion |
|
604.4 |
|
|
305.9 |
| ||
Accrued pension liabilities |
|
231.2 |
|
|
377.3 |
| ||
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
177.8 |
|
|
179.8 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
61.4 |
|
|
31.4 |
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
66.2 |
|
|
66.1 |
| ||
Total liabilities |
|
1,698.3 |
|
|
1,514.7 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Contingencies and commitments (see Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued 54,924,148 shares at March 31, 2013 and 54,809,735 shares at June 30, 2012; outstanding 52,718,269 shares at March 31, 2013 and 52,412,967 shares at June 30, 2012 |
|
274.6 |
|
|
274.0 |
| ||
Capital in excess of par value |
|
255.1 |
|
|
252.7 |
| ||
Reinvested earnings |
|
1,186.0 |
|
|
1,109.6 |
| ||
Common stock in treasury (2,205,879 shares and 2,396,768 shares at March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively), at cost |
|
(110.3 |
) |
|
(120.0 |
) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(387.4 |
) |
|
(412.5 |
) | ||
Total Carpenter stockholders equity |
|
1,218.0 |
|
|
1,103.8 |
| ||
Noncontrolling interest |
|
- |
|
|
9.3 |
| ||
Total equity |
|
1,218.0 |
|
|
1,113.1 |
| ||
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,916.3 |
|
|
$ |
2,627.8 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(in millions, except per share data)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| |||||||||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
| |||||||||||
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
NET SALES |
|
$ |
581.4 |
|
|
$ |
539.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,659.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,385.1 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
480.4 |
|
|
434.8 |
|
|
1,346.9 |
|
|
1,114.5 |
| ||||
Gross profit |
|
101.0 |
|
|
105.1 |
|
|
313.0 |
|
|
270.6 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
48.0 |
|
|
41.5 |
|
|
145.7 |
|
|
115.3 |
| ||||
Acquisition-related costs |
|
- |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
- |
|
|
11.7 |
| ||||
Operating income |
|
53.0 |
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
167.3 |
|
|
143.6 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
(5.0) |
|
|
(5.6) |
|
|
(14.7) |
|
|
(18.4) |
| ||||
Other income, net |
|
1.2 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
1.4 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income before income taxes |
|
49.2 |
|
|
51.8 |
|
|
157.8 |
|
|
126.6 |
| ||||
Income tax expense |
|
16.3 |
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
46.0 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
|
32.9 |
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
80.6 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(0.5) |
|
|
(0.3) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO CARPENTER |
|
$ |
32.9 |
|
|
$ |
33.0 |
|
|
$ |
105.1 |
|
|
$ |
80.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
1.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
1.97 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic |
|
52.9 |
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
45.3 |
| ||||
Diluted |
|
53.5 |
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
46.0 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
($ in millions)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| |||||||||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
| |||||||||||
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
|
$ |
32.9 |
|
|
$ |
33.0 |
|
|
$ |
105.6 |
|
|
$ |
80.6 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Pension and post-retirement benefits, net of tax of $(2.5), $(1.2), $(7.7) and $(3.7), respectively |
|
4.4 |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
6.0 |
| ||||
Net gain (loss) on derivative instruments, net of tax of $(1.1), $3.1, $(4.6) and $18.3, respectively |
|
1.8 |
|
|
(4.9) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
(29.9 |
) | ||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net of tax of $(0.2), $0.0, $(0.2) and $1.0, respectively |
|
0.2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
(0.2) |
| ||||
Foreign currency translation |
|
(1.7) |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
(10.0 |
) | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
4.7 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
(34.1 |
) | ||||
Comprehensive income |
|
37.6 |
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
130.9 |
|
|
46.5 |
| ||||
Less: Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
|
- |
|
|
(0.3) |
|
|
(0.7) |
|
|
0.6 |
| ||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Carpenter |
|
$ |
37.6 |
|
|
$ |
36.3 |
|
|
$ |
130.2 |
|
|
$ |
47.1 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
($ in millions)
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| |||||
|
|
March 31, |
| |||||
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
105.6 |
|
|
$ |
80.6 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
77.1 |
|
|
58.5 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
37.3 |
|
|
18.2 |
| ||
Net pension expense |
|
51.7 |
|
|
30.3 |
| ||
Net loss on disposal of property and equipment |
|
1.0 |
|
|
1.0 |
| ||
Changes in working capital and other: |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
|
0.7 |
|
|
(3.3 |
) | ||
Inventories |
|
(41.7 |
) |
|
(110.6 |
) | ||
Other current assets |
|
(32.6 |
) |
|
(3.4 |
) | ||
Accounts payable |
|
(10.5 |
) |
|
(3.8 |
) | ||
Accrued liabilities |
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
20.2 |
| ||
Pension plan contributions |
|
(143.3 |
) |
|
(19.3 |
) | ||
Boarhead Farms settlement |
|
- |
|
|
(21.8 |
) | ||
Other, net |
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
1.3 |
| ||
Net cash provided from operating activities |
|
31.7 |
|
|
47.9 |
| ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Purchases of property, equipment and software |
|
(223.5 |
) |
|
(107.3 |
) | ||
Proceeds from disposals of property and equipment |
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.6 |
| ||
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired |
|
- |
|
|
(12.9) |
| ||
Proceeds from sale of equity method investment |
|
7.9 |
|
|
- |
| ||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities |
|
- |
|
|
30.4 |
| ||
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
(215.2 |
) |
|
(89.2) |
| ||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of discounts and offering costs |
|
297.0 |
|
|
- |
| ||
Payments on long-term debt assumed in connection with acquisition of business |
|
- |
|
|
(153.7 |
) | ||
Payments on long-term debt |
|
- |
|
|
(100.0 |
) | ||
Dividends paid |
|
(28.7 |
) |
|
(24.2) |
| ||
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interest |
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
- |
| ||
Tax benefits on share-based compensation |
|
3.7 |
|
|
1.3 |
| ||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
2.3 |
|
|
1.6 |
| ||
Net cash provided from (used for) financing activities |
|
265.9 |
|
|
(275.0 |
) | ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
1.3 |
|
|
(1.1 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
83.7 |
|
|
(317.4 |
) | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
211.0 |
|
|
492.5 |
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
294.7 |
|
|
$ |
175.1 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 AND 2012
(Unaudited)
($ in millions, except per share data)
|
|
Carpenter Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Par |
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Value |
|
Excess of |
|
Reinvested |
|
Stock in |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total | |||||||
|
|
Of $5 |
|
Par Value |
|
Earnings |
|
Treasury |
|
Loss |
|
interest |
|
Equity | |||||||
Balances at June 30, 2012 |
|
$ 274.0 |
|
|
$ 252.7 |
|
|
$ 1,109.6 |
|
|
$ (120.0 |
) |
|
$ (412.5 |
) |
|
$ 9.3 |
|
|
$ 1,113.1 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
105.6 |
|
Pension and post-retirement benefits, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Net gain on derivative instruments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Purchase of subsidiary shares from noncontrolling interest |
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
(8.4 |
) |
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
Cash Dividends: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common @ $0.54 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28.7 |
) |
Share-based compensation plans |
|
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Stock options exercised |
|
0.6 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Tax windfall on share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Balances at March 31, 2013 |
|
$ 274.6 |
|
|
$ 255.1 |
|
|
$ 1,186.0 |
|
|
$ (110.3 |
) |
|
$ (387.4 |
) |
|
$ 0.0 |
|
|
$ 1,218.0 |
|
|
|
Carpenter Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
Par |
|
Capital in |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
Value |
|
Excess of |
|
Reinvested |
|
Stock in |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Noncontrolling |
|
Total | |||||||
|
|
Of $5 |
|
Par Value |
|
Earnings |
|
Treasury |
|
Loss |
|
interest |
|
Equity | |||||||
Balances at June 30, 2011 |
|
$ 273.7 |
|
|
$ 235.4 |
|
|
$ 1,022.1 |
|
|
$ (532.2 |
) |
|
$ (233.3 |
) |
|
$ 10.3 |
|
|
$ 776.0 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
80.6 |
|
Pension and post-retirement benefits, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Net loss on derivative instruments, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(29.9 |
) |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
(10.0 |
) |
Cash Dividends: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common @ $0.54 per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
Share-based compensation plans |
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Stock options exercised |
|
0.3 |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Treasury shares issued in connection with acquisition of business |
|
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
406.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415.5 |
|
Tax windfall on share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Balances at March 31, 2012 |
|
$ 274.0 |
|
|
$ 251.6 |
|
|
$ 1,078.3 |
|
|
$ (122.9 |
) |
|
$ (266.5 |
) |
|
$ 9.7 |
|
|
$ 1,224.2 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair statement of the results are reflected in the interim periods presented. The June 30, 2012 consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all the disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Carpenters annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 (the 2012 Form 10-K). Operating results for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for any future period.
As used throughout this report, unless the context requires otherwise, the terms Carpenter, the Company, Registrant, Issuer, we and our refer to Carpenter Technology Corporation.
2. Acquisition
Latrobe Specialty Metals, Inc.
On February 29, 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of Latrobe Specialty Metals, Inc. (Latrobe) for a total purchase price of $427.0 million, net of cash acquired (the Latrobe Acquisition). The purchase price includes the issuance of 8.1 million shares of the Companys common stock to former Latrobe stockholders in exchange for their Latrobe capital stock and $11.5 million of cash paid at closing, net of cash acquired of $2.5 million, to satisfy certain costs of the sellers. The fair value of the shares issued as part of the consideration paid for Latrobe was determined based on the closing market price of the Companys shares on the acquisition date. The Company also assumed $153.7 million of indebtedness which was paid off in cash concurrently with the closing of the acquisition.
Latrobe manufactures and distributes high-performance specialty metals serving customers across end-use markets including the aerospace and defense, energy and industrial markets. The manufacturing operations of Latrobe are based principally in Latrobe, Pennsylvania.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following is a summary of the purchase price allocation in connection with the Latrobe Acquisition.
($ in millions) |
|
|
| |
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
67.0 |
|
Inventory |
|
242.6 |
| |
Property, plant and equipment |
|
172.4 |
| |
Intangible assets |
|
87.1 |
| |
Other |
|
9.8 |
| |
Accounts Payable and accrued liabilities |
|
(64.1 |
) | |
Long-term debt |
|
(153.7 |
) | |
Pension and other postretirement liabilities |
|
(100.8 |
) | |
Deferred income taxes |
|
(43.9 |
) | |
Total identifiable net assets |
|
216.4 |
| |
Goodwill |
|
210.6 |
| |
Total purchase price, net of cash acquired and debt assumed |
|
$ |
427.0 |
|
The goodwill recognized in connection with the Latrobe Acquisition consists of the value associated with the immediate increase in the Companys premium melt capacity to meet strong customer demand, improvements in the Companys position in attractive end use markets such as aerospace and defense and energy, the complementary asset capabilities which the Company expects will lead to enriched, higher margin product mix and operating cost synergies as well as the capabilities for commercialization of new Carpenter products under development. None of the goodwill recognized is deductible for income tax purposes. The Company conducted an annual impairment review for the goodwill associated with the Latrobe Acquisition as on February 28, 2013 and determined that there was no goodwil impairment.
In connection with the Latrobe Acquisition, the Company incurred approximately $11.7 million and $2.4 million of acquisition-related costs during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These costs were expensed as incurred and represent incremental legal, accounting and investment banking fees incurred in connection with the transaction as well as approximately $5.2 million of liability for costs associated with the sale of certain Latrobe assets necessary to obtain approval for the transaction from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). As part of the FTC approval, the Company entered into a consent decree to transfer assets and technical knowledge to Eramet S.A. and its subsidiaries, Aubert & Duval and Brown Europe, which will allow them to become a second manufacturer of two specific alloys in order to provide customers with a supply alternative in the marketplace.
The consolidated net sales for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2012 includes approximately $42.0 million of net sales related to the Latrobe business. The Companys operating income for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2012 includes approximately $5.1 million related to the operations of the acquired Latrobe business.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The unaudited pro forma results presented below include the effects of the Latrobe Acquisition as if it had occurred as of July 1, 2011. The unaudited pro forma results reflect certain adjustments related to the acquisition, such as the depreciation and amortization associated with estimates for the fair value of the property and equipment and acquired intangible assets and the impacts of the elimination of Latrobe debt that was repaid at closing. The supplemental proforma earnings were adjusted to exclude acquisition-related costs in the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2012.
|
|
Three |
|
|
Nine |
| ||
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
| ||
($ in millions, except per share data) |
|
2012 |
|
|
2012 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Revenue |
|
$ |
622.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,696.0 |
|
Earnings |
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
$ |
104.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Earnings per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Basic |
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
$ |
1.98 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
The pro forma results do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the acquisition. Accordingly, the unaudited pro forma financial information above is not necessarily indicative of either future results of operations or results that might have been achieved had the acquisition been completed on the dates indicated.
3. Earnings Per Common Share
The Company calculates basic earnings per share using the two class method. Under the two class method, earnings are allocated to common stock and participating securities (nonvested restricted shares and units that receive non-forfeitable dividends) according to their participation rights in dividends and undistributed earnings. The earnings available to each class of stock is divided by the weighted average number of shares for the period in each class. Because the participating securities have no obligation to share in net losses, losses are not allocated to the participating securities in this calculation.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The calculations of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, | ||||||||||||
(in millions, except per share data) |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income attributable to Carpenter |
|
$ |
32.9 |
|
|
$ |
33.0 |
|
|
$ |
105.1 |
|
|
$ |
80.3 |
|
Less: earnings and dividends allocated to participating securities |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
(0.7 |
) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Earnings available to Carpenter common stockholders |
|
$ |
32.7 |
|
|
$ |
32.7 |
|
|
$ |
104.5 |
|
|
$ |
79.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, basic |
|
52.9 |
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
45.3 |
| ||||
Effect of shares issuable under share based compensation plans |
|
0.6 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
0.7 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, diluted |
|
53.5 |
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
53.4 |
|
|
46.0 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
1.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
1.97 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
The following awards issued under share-based compensation plans were excluded from the above calculations of diluted earnings per share because their effects were anti-dilutive:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, | ||||||||
(in millions) |
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
Stock options |
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
4. Marketable Securities
The fair value of the Companys marketable securities was based on quoted market prices or estimates of fair value as of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012. The following is a summary of marketable securities, all of which were classified as available-for-sale as of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012:
March 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
| |||
($ in millions) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Non-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Municipal auction rate securities |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
June 30, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
| |||
($ in millions) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Non-current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Municipal auction rate securities |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
(1.0 |
) |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
For the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities were $0.0 million and $30.4 million, respectively.
5. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following components as of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012:
($ in millions) |
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, | ||||
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 | ||||
Raw materials and supplies |
|
$ |
122.8 |
|
|
$ |
114.1 |
|
Work in process |
|
329.2 |
|
|
312.4 |
| ||
Finished and purchased products |
|
234.9 |
|
|
215.5 |
| ||
Total inventory |
|
$ |
686.9 |
|
|
$ |
642.0 |
|
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Cost for inventories is principally determined using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
6. Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012:
($ in millions) |
|
March 31, |
|
June 30, |
| ||
|
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||
Accrued pension liabilities |
|
$ |
93.4 |
|
$ |
70.0 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
39.3 |
|
50.1 |
| ||
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
17.2 |
|
17.2 |
| ||
Derivative financial instruments |
|
17.6 |
|
26.5 |
| ||
Other |
|
62.8 |
|
53.3 |
| ||
Total accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
230.3 |
|
$ |
217.1 |
|
7. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
The components of the net periodic benefit cost related to the Companys pension and other postretirement benefits for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Three months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement | |||||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Pension Plans |
|
Plans | |||||||||||||
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
| |||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
| |
Interest cost |
|
13.3 |
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
2.9 |
| |||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
(1.6 |
) | |||||
Amortization of net loss |
|
7.0 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.6 |
| |||||
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit) |
|
0.2 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
(2.0 |
) | |||||
Net pension expense |
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Nine months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement | |||||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Pension Plans |
|
Plans | |||||||||||||
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
| |||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
24.4 |
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
| |
Interest cost |
|
39.8 |
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
8.4 |
| |||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(41.1 |
) |
|
(39.7 |
) |
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
(4.8 |
) | |||||
Amortization of net loss |
|
21.0 |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
1.9 |
| |||||
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit) |
|
0.6 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
(5.9 |
) | |||||
Net pension expense |
|
$ |
44.7 |
|
|
$ |
28.4 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
During the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company made $143.3 million and $19.3 million, respectively of contributions to its defined benefit pension plans. The Company currently expects to make approximately $90.0 million of contributions to its defined benefit pension plans during the remainder of fiscal year 2013.
8. Debt
On February 26, 2013, the Company completed its offering and sale of $300 million in aggregate principal amount of its 4.45% Senior Notes due 2023 (the Notes). The Notes accrue interest at the rate of 4.45% per annum, with interest payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on each March 1 and September 1, commencing September 1, 2013. The Notes will mature on March 1, 2023. The Notes will be senior unsecured indebtedness of the Company, ranking equally in right of payment with all its existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness and senior to its future subordinated indebtedness. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the issuance of the Notes to repay in full $100 million in aggregate principal amount of its senior unsecured notes due May 2013. The Company intends to use the remaining net proceeds from the issuance of the Notes for general corporate purposes, which may include discretionary pension contributions, additions to working capital, capital expenditures, repayment of debt, the financing of acquisitions, joint ventures and other business combination opportunities or stock repurchases.
The Company has a $350 million syndicated credit agreement (Credit Agreement) that extends to June 2016. Interest on the borrowings under the Credit Agreement accrue at variable rates, based upon LIBOR or a defined Base Rate, both determined based upon the rating of the Companys senior unsecured long-term debt (the Debt Rating). The applicable margin to be added to LIBOR ranges from 0.65% to 1.95% (1.20% as of March 31, 2013), and for Base Rate-determined loans, from 0.0% to 0.95% (0.2% as of March 31, 2013). The Company also pays a quarterly facility fee ranging from 0.10% to 0.45% (0.2% as of March 31, 2013), determined based upon the Debt Rating, of the $350 million commitment under the Credit Agreement. In addition, the Company must pay certain letter of credit fees, ranging from 0.65% to 1.95% (1.20% as of March 31, 2013), with respect to letters-of-credit issued under the Credit Agreement. The Company has the right to voluntarily prepay and reborrow loans and to terminate or reduce the commitments under the facility. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had $7.2 million of issued letters of credit under the Credit Agreement, with the balance of $342.8 million available for future borrowings.
The Company is subject to certain financial and restrictive covenants under the Credit Agreement, which, among other things, require the maintenance of a minimum interest coverage ratio (3.5 to 1.0 for March 31, 2013). The interest coverage ratio is defined in the Credit Agreement as, for any period, the ratio of consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and non-cash net pension expense (EBITDA) to consolidated interest expense for such period. The Credit Agreement also requires the Company to maintain a debt to capital ratio of less than 55%. The debt to capital ratio is defined in the Credit Agreement as the ratio of consolidated indebtedness, as defined therein, to consolidated capitalization, as defined therein. As of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants of the Credit Agreement.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
9. Contingencies and Commitments
Environmental
The Company is subject to various federal, state, local and international environmental laws and regulations relating to pollution, protection of public health and the environment, natural resource damages and occupational safety and health. Although compliance with these laws and regulations may affect the costs of the Companys operations, compliance costs to date have not been material. The Company has environmental remediation liabilities at some of its owned operating facilities and has been designated as a potentially responsible party (PRP) with respect to certain third-party Superfund waste-disposal sites and other third party-owned sites. Additionally, the Company has been notified that it may be a PRP with respect to other Superfund sites as to which no proceedings have been instituted against the Company. Neither the exact amount of remediation costs nor the final method of their allocation among all designated PRPs at these Superfund sites has been determined. The liability for future environmental remediation costs is evaluated by management on a quarterly basis. The Company accrues amounts for environmental remediation costs that represent managements best estimate of the probable and reasonably estimable undiscounted future costs related to environmental remediation. During the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2013, no additional accruals were recorded. The liabilities recorded for environmental remediation costs at Superfund sites, at other third party-owned sites and at Company-owned current or former operating facilities were $4.9 million at both March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012.
Estimates of the amount and timing of future costs of environmental remediation requirements are inherently imprecise because of the continuing evolution of environmental laws and regulatory requirements, the availability and application of technology, the identification of currently unknown remediation sites and the allocation of costs among the PRP's. Based upon information currently available, such future costs are not expected to have a material effect on Carpenters financial position, results of operations or cash flows over the long-term. However, such costs could be material to Carpenters financial position, results of operations or cash flows in a particular future quarter or year.
Boarhead Farms
In June 2002, the Company was named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by a group of plaintiffs in the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania titled Boarhead Farm Agreement Group v. Advanced Environmental Technology Corporation et al. (since amended to include the individual members). The suit alleged that the Company and the other named defendants contributed to damages caused at Boarhead Farms, a Superfund site located in Bridgeton, Pennsylvania. The Boarhead Farms site was the home of a now defunct chemical and waste hauling company that the Company and many others engaged to dispose of certain wastes during the 1970s. The plaintiff group was individually named as PRPs for the Boarhead site in the Environmental Protection Agencys Record of Decision in November 1998. Their June 2002 lawsuit against various defendants, including Carpenter, sought contributions for a portion of costs incurred for various site cleanup activities as well as contributions to future cleanup efforts. The suit went to trial in June 2008. Prior to trial, all of the named co-defendants, except for Carpenter, reached an out of court settlement with the plaintiffs. Carpenter denied the claims made by the plaintiff group. On August 18, 2008, the Court awarded the plaintiffs judgment against the Company for 80 percent of the plaintiffs past costs of remediating the site, including prejudgment interest from June 18, 2002 to January 1, 2008, and held the Company liable for 80 percent of future costs of the cleanup activities at the site. The Company appealed the Courts decision and oral arguments took place before the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on December 17, 2009. On April 12, 2010, the
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacated the previous judgment by the District Court and remanded the case for further proceedings. On July 19, 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement providing for a dismissal of the lawsuit and a complete release, in the Companys favor, by all parties to the litigation in exchange for a payment of $21.8 million, which the Company paid in September 2011. The Company expects that no additional liabilities will be incurred related to this matter.
Export Regulations Violations
During fiscal year 2008, the Company became aware of potential violations of federal export regulations at a business unit that had been recently divested. Upon investigation, the Company discovered that approximately 40 foreign nationals employed over time at the business units facility may have been exposed to protected technical data related to the production of various products for military applications. An export license from the Department of State and the Department of Commerce is required prior to the exporting of technical data for military applications. The Company has applied for and received similar applications for other business units, but did not have such a license for the divested business unit. Violations of Federal export regulations can be subject to civil penalties depending upon the severity of the violation. The Company filed voluntary disclosures with the Department of State and the Department of Commerce before the divestiture of the business unit in March 2008. The Department of State responded to the voluntary disclosure without assessing civil penalties. The Department of Commerce has not responded to the voluntary disclosure. The applicable statute of limitations for this matter has expired. As a result, the Company has not recorded any liability for potential penalties as of March 31, 2013 and does not expect to incur any liabilities related to this matter.
Other
The Company is defending various routine claims and legal actions that are incidental to its business, and that are common to its operations, including those pertaining to product claims, commercial disputes, patent infringement, employment actions, employee benefits, compliance with domestic and foreign laws, personal injury claims and tax issues. Like many other manufacturing companies in recent years, from time to time, the Company has been named as a defendant in lawsuits alleging personal injury as a result of exposure to chemicals and substances in the workplace. The Company provides for costs relating to these matters when a loss is probable and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. The effect of the outcome of these matters on the Companys future results of operations and liquidity cannot be predicted because any such effect depends on future results of operations and the amount and timing (both as to recording future charges to operations and cash expenditures) of the resolution of such matters. While it is not feasible to determine the outcome of these matters, management believes that the total liability from these matters will not have a material effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows over the long-term. However, there can be no assurance that an increase in the scope of pending matters or that any future lawsuits, claims, proceedings or investigations will not be material to the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows in a particular future quarter or year.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
10. Fair Value Measurements
The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the inputs used to determine fair value. Level 1 refers to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 refers to observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. Level 3 refers to unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs. Currently, the Company does not use Level 3 inputs. The following tables present the Companys assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.
March 31, 2013 |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
| |||||
($ in millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Total |
| |||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Municipal auction rate securities |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
- |
|
2.1 |
|
2.1 |
| |||
Total assets |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Derivative financial instruments |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
45.4 |
|
$ |
45.4 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
| ||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Total |
| |||
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Municipal auction rate securities |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
Derivative financial instruments |
|
- |
|
2.6 |
|
2.6 |
| |||
Total assets |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Derivative financial instruments |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
56.5 |
|
$ |
56.5 |
|
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The Companys derivative financial instruments consist of commodity forward contracts, foreign exchange forward contracts and interest rate swaps. These instruments are measured at fair value using the market method valuation technique. The inputs to this technique utilize information related to foreign exchange rates, commodity prices and interest rates published by third-party leading financial news and data providers. This is observable data; however, the valuation of these instruments is not based on actual transactions for the same instruments and, as such, these instruments are classified as Level 2. The Companys use of derivatives and hedging policies are more fully discussed in Note 12.
The Company has currently chosen not to elect the fair value option for any items that are not already required to be measured at fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The carrying amounts of other financial instruments not listed in the table below approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of Carpenters financial instruments not recorded at fair value in the financial statements were as follows:
|
|
March 31, 2013 |
|
June 30, 2012 |
| ||||||||
($ in millions) |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
|
Carrying |
|
Fair |
| ||||
|
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
Value |
| ||||
Long-term debt, including current portion |
|
$ |
705.4 |
|
$ |
741.1 |
|
$ |
406.9 |
|
$ |
427.7 |
|
Company-owned life insurance |
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
The carrying amount for company-owned life insurance reflects cash surrender values based upon the market values of underlying securities, net of any outstanding policy loans. The carrying value associated with the cash surrender value of these policies is recorded in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The fair values of long-term debt as of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012 were determined by using current interest rates for debt with terms and maturities similar to the Companys existing debt arrangements and accordingly would be classified as Level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
11. Other Income, Net
Other income, net consisted of the following:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
| ||||||||
($ in millions) |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||||
Unrealized gains on company owned life insurance contracts and investments held in rabbi trusts |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
$ |
2.9 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries |
|
0.1 |
|
0.4 |
|
1.4 |
|
0.2 |
| ||||
Interest income |
|
- |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.8 |
| ||||
Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act receipt |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
| ||||
Other income |
|
0.5 |
|
0.4 |
|
0.6 |
|
0.2 |
| ||||
Total other income, net |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
$ |
1.7 |
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
12. Derivatives and Hedging Activities
The Company uses commodity swaps and forwards, interest rate swaps, forward interest rate swaps and foreign currency forwards to manage risks generally associated with commodity price, interest rate and foreign currency rate fluctuations. The following explains the various types of derivatives and includes a recap about the impact the derivative instruments had on the Companys financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.
Cash Flow Hedging Commodity forward contracts: The Company enters into commodity forward contracts to fix the price of a portion of anticipated future purchases of certain critical raw materials and energy to manage the risk of cash flow variability associated with volatile commodity prices. The commodity forward contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges. The qualifying hedge contracts are marked-to-market at each reporting date and any unrealized gains or losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income to the extent effective, and reclassified to cost of sales in the period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings or it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur.
Cash Flow Hedging Forward interest rate swaps: From time to time, the Company has entered into forward interest rate swap contracts to manage the risk of cash flow variability associated with fixed interest debt expected to be issued. The forward interest rate swaps have been designated as cash flow hedges. The qualifying hedge contracts are marked-to-market at each reporting date and any unrealized gains or losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income to the extent effective, and reclassified to interest expense in the period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings or it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur. In connection with the issuance of the $300.0 million of fixed rate notes during the third quarter of fiscal year 2013, all outstanding forward interest rate swaps were settled resulting in a gain of $2.7 million that has been recognized in AOCI. This gain will be amortized as a reduction to interest expense over the term of the notes.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Cash Flow Hedging Foreign currency forward contracts: The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge a portion of anticipated future sales denominated in foreign currencies, principally the Euro and Pound Sterling, in order to offset the effect of changes in exchange rates. The qualifying hedge contracts are marked-to-market at each reporting date and any unrealized gains or losses are included in accumulated other comprehensive income to the extent effective, and reclassified to net sales in the period during which the transaction affects earnings or it becomes probable that the forecasted transaction will not occur.
The Company also uses foreign currency forward contracts to protect certain short-term asset positions denominated in foreign currency against the effect of changes in exchange rates. These positions do not qualify for hedge accounting and accordingly, are marked-to-market at each reporting date through charges to other income and expense. As of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the fair value of the outstanding foreign currency forwards not designated as hedging instruments and the charges to income for changes in fair value for these contracts were not material.
Fair Value Hedging - Interest rate swaps: The Company uses interest rate swaps to achieve a level of floating rate debt relative to fixed rate debt where appropriate. The Company has designated fixed to floating interest rate swaps as fair value hedges. Accordingly, the changes in the fair value of these instruments are immediately recorded in earnings. The mark-to-market values of both the fair value hedging instruments and the underlying debt obligations are recorded as equal and offsetting gains and losses in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income. As of both March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the total notional amount of floating interest rate contracts was $45.0 million. For both the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, net gains of $0.4 million were recorded as a reduction to interest expense. For the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, net gains of $1.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively, were recorded as a reduction to interest expense. These amounts include the impact of previously terminated swaps which are being amortized over the remaining term of the underlying debt.
The fair value and location of outstanding derivative contracts recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets were as follows as of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012:
March 31, 2013 |
|
Interest |
|
Foreign |
|
Commodity |
|
Total |
| ||||
Asset Derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other current assets |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
Other assets |
|
0.2 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.2 |
| ||||
Total asset derivatives |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
Liability Derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
$ |
16.7 |
|
$ |
17.6 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
- |
|
- |
|
27.8 |
|
27.8 |
| ||||
Total liability derivatives |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
$ |
45.4 |
|
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2012 |
|
Interest |
|
Foreign |
|
Commodity |
|
Total |
| ||||
Asset Derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Other current assets |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
Other assets |
|
1.2 |
|
- |
|
- |
|
1.2 |
| ||||
Total asset derivatives |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
Liability Derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
$ |
25.0 |
|
$ |
26.5 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
- |
|
0.4 |
|
29.6 |
|
30.0 |
| ||||
Total liability derivatives |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
$ |
54.6 |
|
$ |
56.5 |
|
Cash Flow Hedges
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transactions affect earnings. The following is a summary of the (losses) gains related to cash flow hedges recognized during the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012:
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
($ in millions) |
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
| ||||||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship: |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||||
Commodity contracts |
|
$ |
(4.0) |
|
$ |
(14.5) |
|
$ |
(10.6) |
|
$ |
(63.0) |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
0.6 |
|
(0.1) |
|
1.2 |
|
0.5 |
| ||||
Forward interest rate swaps |
|
3.6 |
|
- |
|
2.7 |
|
- |
| ||||
Total |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
(14.6) |
|
$ |
(6.7) |
|
$ |
(62.5 |
) |
($ in millions) |
|
Location of (Loss) |
|
Amount of (Loss) Gain Reclassified from AOCI |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Gain Reclassified from |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
Derivatives in Cash Flow |
|
AOCI into Income |
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
| ||||||||
Hedging Relationship: |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||||
Commodity contracts |
|
Cost of sales |
|
$ |
(3.0) |
|
$ |
(7.0) |
|
$ |
(19.1) |
|
$ |
(15.2 |
) |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
Net sales |
|
0.1 |
|
0.4 |
|
(0.1) |
|
0.8 |
| ||||
Forward interest rate swaps |
|
Interest expense |
|
- |
|
- |
|
0.1 |
|
- |
| ||||
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
(2.9) |
|
$ |
(6.6) |
|
$ |
(19.1) |
|
$ |
(14.4 |
) |
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The Company estimates that $7.5 million of net derivative losses included in AOCI as of March 31, 2013 will be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months. No significant cash flow hedges were discontinued during the quarter ended March 31, 2013. There was no ineffectiveness during the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012.
The changes in AOCI associated with derivative hedging activities during the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
| ||||||||
($ in millions) |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||||
Balance, beginning |
|
$ |
(26.9) |
|
$ |
(22.4) |
|
$ |
(32.8) |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
Current period changes in fair value, net of tax |
|
0.1 |
|
(9.0) |
|
(4.2) |
|
(38.8 |
) | ||||
Reclassification to earnings, net of tax |
|
1.8 |
|
4.1 |
|
12.0 |
|
8.9 |
| ||||
Balance, ending |
|
$ |
(25.0) |
|
$ |
(27.3) |
|
$ |
(25.0) |
|
$ |
(27.3 |
) |
According to the provisions of the Companys derivative arrangements, in the event that the fair value of outstanding derivative positions with certain counterparties exceeds certain thresholds, the Company may be required to issue cash collateral to the counterparties. The Companys contracts with these counterparties allow for netting of derivative instrument positions executed under each contract. As of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the Company had no cash collateral held by counterparties.
The Company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by counterparties on its derivative instruments as well as credit or performance risk with respect to its customer commitments to perform. Although nonperformance is possible, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by any of the parties. In addition, various master netting arrangements are in place with counterparties to facilitate settlement of gains and losses on these contracts.
13. Income Taxes
The effective tax rate used for interim periods is the estimated annual effective consolidated tax rate, based on the current estimate of full year results, except that taxes related to specific events, if any, are recorded in the interim period in which they occur.
Income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $16.3 million, or 33.1 percent of pre-tax income as compared with $18.8 million, or 36.3 percent of pre-tax income for the three months ended March 31, 2012. For the nine months ended March 31, 2013, income tax expense was $52.2 million, or 33.1 percent of pre-tax income, as compared with income tax expense of $46.0 million, or 36.3 percent of pre-tax income, for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The current year includes tax benefits of $1.7 million related to the retroactive extension of the research and development credit and bonus depreciation. In addition, the current period tax provision includes $2.9 million of unfavorable impacts associated with the Companys plans to make certain discretionary pension contributions. The prior year periods were negatively impacted by a state tax exposure and non-deductible acquisition-related expenses associated with the Latrobe Acquisition.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
14. Dissolution of Strategic Partnership
In November 2012, the Company dissolved its strategic partnership with Sandvik Materials Technology (Sandvik). Prior to the dissolution of the strategic partnership, the Company owned a 40 percent interest in Sandvik Powdermet AB, which the Company accounted for as an equity method investment. In addition, Sandvik owned a 40 percent interest in Carpenter Powder Products AB which has historically been reported as a noncontrolling interest. Under the terms of the dissolution agreement, the Company received $7.9 million of proceeds from the sale of its investment in Sandvik Powdermet AB and paid $8.4 million to repurchase the shares of Carpenter Products AB from Sandvik. The dissolution resulted in a $1.9 million gain related to the sale of the investment in Sandvik Powdermet during the quarter ended December 31, 2012. No gain or loss was recognized related to the repurchase of the Carpenter Powder Products AB shares.
15. Business Segments
The Company has three reportable segments, Specialty Alloys Operations (SAO), Latrobe, and Performance Engineered Products (PEP). During the first quarter of fiscal year 2013, the Company moved the Specialty Steel Supply (SSS) business acquired in connection with the Latrobe Acquisition from the Latrobe segment to the Performance Engineered Products segment.
The SAO segment is comprised of the Company's major premium alloy and stainless steel manufacturing operations. This includes operations performed at mills primarily in Reading, Pennsylvania and the surrounding area, South Carolina, and the new premium products manufacturing facility being built in Limestone County, Alabama. The combined assets of the SAO operations are managed in an integrated manner to optimize efficiency and profitability across the total system.
The Latrobe segment is comprised of the operations of the Latrobe business acquired effective February 29, 2012. The Latrobe segment provides management with the focus and visibility into the business performance of these newly acquired operations. The Latrobe segment also includes the results of Carpenters distribution business in Mexico. As the Latrobe business becomes integrated with Carpenter, its results will likely be combined and reported together with the SAO business segment sometime in the future.
The PEP segment is comprised of the Company's differentiated operations. This includes the Dynamet titanium business, the Carpenter Powder Products business, the Amega West business and the SSS distribution business that was acquired in connection with the Latrobe Acquisition. The businesses in the PEP segment are managed with an entrepreneurial structure to promote speed and flexibility and drive overall revenue and profit growth.
The service cost component of the Companys net pension expense, which represents the estimated cost of future pension liabilities earned associated with active employees, is included in the operating income of the business segments. The residual net pension expense, which is comprised of the expected return on plan assets, interest costs on the projected benefit obligations of the plans, and amortization of actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs, is included under the heading Pension earnings, interest & deferrals.
On a consolidated basis, there were no significant individual customers that accounted for more than 10 percent of the total net sales during the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The historical segment information for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2012, which is set forth below, was recast to conform to the fiscal year 2013 presentation.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
Segment Data |
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
| ||||||||
($ in millions) |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2013 |
|
2012 |
| ||||
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Specialty Alloys Operations |
|
$ |
392.8 |
|
$ |
426.0 |
|
$ |
1,122.8 |
|
$ |
1,122.2 |
|
Latrobe |
|
129.5 |
|
51.5 |
|
365.3 |
|
71.1 |
| ||||
Performance Engineered Products |
|
90.4 |
|