Edgar Filing: HARRIS & HARRIS GROUP INC /NY/

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(A) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]

Check the appropriate box:

[ ] Preliminary Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting Material Pursuant to ss.240.14a-11(c) or ss.240.14a-12

HARRIS & HARRIS GROUP, INC.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD MAY 5, 2005

To the Shareholders of Harris & Harris Group, Inc.:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2005 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of
Harris & Harris Group, Inc. (the "Company") will be held on May 5, 2005, at 3:30
p.m., local time, on the Concourse Level at 780 Third Avenue (between 48th and
49th Street), New York, New York 10017. This meeting has been called by the
Board of Directors of the Company, and this notice is being issued at its
direction. It has called this meeting for the following purposes:

1. To elect 10 directors of the Company to hold office until the next
annual meeting of shareholders or until their respective successors
have been duly elected and qualified;

2. To approve a proposal to authorize the Company to offer long-term
rights to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at an
exercise price that, at the time such rights are issued, will not be
less than the greater of the market value of the Company's common
stock or the net asset value of the Company's common stock. Such
rights may be part of or accompanied by other securities of the
Company (such as convertible preferred stock or convertible debt);

3. To amend our Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of common stock from 25,000,000 to 30,000,000;

4. To remove certain investment restrictions that date back to before
we became a business development company that are not applicable to
business development companies:

4A. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding
concentration;

4B. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding borrowing
and the issuance of senior securities;

4C. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding lending;

4D. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding underwriting
securities;

4E. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding the purchase
or sale of real estate;

4F. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding the purchase
or sale of commodities; and

4G. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding making short
sales.

5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the
meeting or any postponement or adjournments thereof.

We encourage you to contact us at (212) 582-0900, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. EST, if you have any questions.

Holders of common stock of record at the close of business on March 14,
2005, will be entitled to vote at the meeting.

Whether or not you expect to be present in person at the meeting, please
sign and date the accompanying proxy and return it promptly in the enclosed
business reply envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United
States, so you will be represented at the Annual Meeting.

By Order of the Board of Directors

April 5, 2005 /s/ Susan T. Harris
New York, New York ----------------------------------
Susan T. Harris
Secretary

IMPORTANT: PLEASE MAIL YOUR PROXY PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.
THE MEETING DATE IS MAY 5, 2005

Harris & Harris Group, Inc.
111 West 57th Street
New York, New York 10019
(212) 582-0900

PROXY STATEMENT
FOR
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 5, 2005

General Information

This proxy statement is being furnished in connection with the
solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Harris & Harris Group, Inc.
(the "Company," "us," "our," and "we"), to be voted at the 2005 Annual Meeting
of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting"), to be held on May 5, 2005, and at any
adjournment thereof. This document will give you the information you need to
vote on the matters listed on the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of
Shareholders. Much of the information in this proxy statement ("Proxy
Statement") is required under rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC"); some of it is technical. If there is anything you do not understand,
please contact us at (212) 582-0900.

The Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, May 5, 2005, at 3:30 p.m.,
local time, on the Concourse Level at 780 Third Avenue (between 48th Street and
49th Street), New York, New York. At the Annual Meeting, our shareholders will
be asked to elect 10 directors to serve on the Board of Directors of the Company
and to hold office until the next Annual Meeting and to vote on the other
matters stated in the accompanying Notice and described in more detail in this
proxy statement. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting,
the persons named on the proxies will, unless the shareholder otherwise
specifies in the proxy, vote upon such matters in accordance with their best
judgment. The enclosed proxy card and this proxy statement and annual report on
Form 10-K are being first transmitted on or about April 5, 2005, to our
shareholders.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on March 14, 2005,
as the record date for the determination of our shareholders entitled to receive
notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on the
record date, an aggregate of 17,248,845 shares of common stock were issued and
outstanding. Each such share will be entitled to one vote on each matter to be
voted upon at the Annual Meeting. The presence, in person or by proxy, of the
holders of a majority of such outstanding shares is necessary to constitute a
quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.

Solicitation and Revocation; Vote Required

All properly executed proxies received prior to the Annual Meeting will be
voted at the meeting in accordance with the instructions marked thereon or
otherwise as provided therein. Unless instructions to the contrary are marked,
shares represented by the proxies will be voted "for" all the proposals.

Any proxy given pursuant to this solicitation may be revoked by a
shareholder at any time, before it is exercised, by written notification
delivered to our Secretary, by voting in person at the Annual Meeting, or by
executing another proxy bearing a later date. If your shares are held for your
account by a broker, bank or other institution or nominee, you may vote such
shares at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain proper written authority, from
your institution or nominee, that you present at the Annual Meeting.

Approval of any of the matters submitted for stockholder approval requires
that a quorum be present. The presence, in person or by proxy, of at least a
majority of the total number of outstanding shares of common stock entitled to
vote is necessary to constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will
be counted as shares present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining
the existence of a quorum. Broker non-votes are proxies received by us from
brokers or nominees when the broker or nominee neither has received instructions
from the beneficial owner or other persons entitled to vote nor has
discretionary power to vote on the particular matter.

If a quorum is present (in person or by proxy), (i) for Proposal 1, the
directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes cast (i.e., the highest
number of votes cast for each of the 10 director slots); (ii) for Proposal 2,
the financing proposal will be approved if a majority of the votes cast are cast
in favor; (iii) for Proposal 3, the proposed amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation will be approved if a majority of the shares outstanding and
entitled to vote are cast in favor; and (iv) for Proposals 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E,
4F and 4G, approval of the proposal with respect to the removal of each
investment restriction will be approved if either (a) more than 50 percent of
the shares outstanding on the record date are cast in favor or (b) 67 percent or
more of the shares represented at the meeting are cast in favor. All other
matters being submitted to shareholder vote pursuant to the Notice of Annual
Meeting will be approved if a quorum is present in person or by proxy and a
majority of the votes cast on a particular matter are cast in favor of that
matter. For purposes of Proposals 1, 3 and unspecified matters that come before
the meeting, votes withheld or abstentions will not be counted as votes cast on
the matter and will have no affect on the result of the vote.

A broker "non-vote" occurs when a broker holding shares for a beneficial
owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the broker does not have
discretionary voting power for that particular item and has not received
instructions from the beneficial owner. If your broker holds your shares in its
"street" name, the broker may vote your shares on Proposal 1 (Election of
Directors), Proposal 3 (Amend the Certificate of Incorporation) and unspecified
matters that come before the meeting even if it does not receive instructions
from you. For purposes of Proposal 2 (Financing), and Proposals 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D,
4E, 4F and 4G (Removal of Investment Restrictions), because abstentions and
broker non-votes are treated as shares present but not voting, any abstentions
and broker non-votes will have the effect of votes against these proposals.

Proxies are being solicited by Innisfree M&A Incorporated, pursuant to its
standard contract as proxy solicitor, the cost of which will be borne by us and
is estimated to be approximately $7,500. Proxies will be solicited by telephone
or by mail. All expenses of preparing, printing, mailing, and delivering
proxies, and all materials used in the solicitation of proxies, will be borne by
us. Proxies may also be solicited by officers and regular employees of the
Company personally, by telephone or otherwise, but these persons will not be

specifically compensated for such services. Banks, brokers, nominees and other
custodians and fiduciaries will be reimbursed for their reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses in forwarding solicitation material to their principals, the beneficial
owners of our common stock. It is estimated that those costs will be nominal.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Proposal No. 1)

The 10 nominees listed below, all of whom currently serve as directors,
have been nominated to serve as our directors until the next Annual Meeting or
until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. Although it is
not anticipated that any of the nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve,
in the unexpected event that any such nominees should become unable or decline
to serve, it is intended that votes will be cast for substitute nominees
designated by our present Board of Directors.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" ALL THE NOMINEES.

Nominees

Certain information, as of March 14, 2005, with respect to each of the 10
nominees for election at the Annual Meeting is set forth below, including their
names, ages and a brief description of their recent business experience,
including present occupations and employment, certain directorships held by each
and the year in which each became a director of the Company. All the nominees
have agreed to serve if elected and consent to being referred to in this proxy
statement. The nominees for election as directors of the Company have been
divided into two groups -- interested directors and independent directors.
Interested directors are "interested persons" as defined in the 1940 Act or
persons who may be considered an "interested person" because of consulting work
done for us. All 10 nominees are currently directors of the Company. We do not
have an advisory board.

Interested Directors

Charles E. Harris. Mr. Harris, age 62, has been a Director and Chairman of
our Board of Directors since April 1984 and a Managing Director since January
2004. He also served as our Chief Compliance Officer from February 1997 to
February 2001. Mr. Harris is a Director of Harris & Harris Enterprises, Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of Harris & Harris Group, Inc., since 1998. He served as
a member of the Advisory Panel for the Congressional Office of Technology
Assessment. Prior to joining us, he was Chairman of Wood, Struthers and Winthrop
Management Corporation, the investment advisory subsidiary of Donaldson, Lufkin
and Jenrette. He is a member of the New York Society of Security Analysts. He
has served as a control person, director and trustee of various public and
private companies and not-for-profit institutions. Currently, he is Co-Chairman
of the President's Council of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a not-for-profit
institution that conducts research and education programs in the fields of
molecular biology and genetics. He also serves as a Trustee and head of the
audit committee of the Nidus Center, a not-for-profit life sciences business
incubator in St. Louis, Missouri, and he is a life-sustaining fellow of MIT and
a shareholder of its Entrepreneurship Center. He was graduated from Princeton
University (A.B., 1964) and Columbia University Graduate School of Business
(M.B.A., 1967). He is an "interested person" as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of
the 1940 Act, as a beneficial owner of more than five percent of our common
stock, as a control person and as one of our officers. In addition, his wife
serves as our corporate secretary.

Kelly S. Kirkpatrick. Ms. Kirkpatrick, age 38, has served as a member of
our board of directors since March 2002. She has served as a consultant to us on
nanotechnology and in our due diligence work on certain prospective investments.
She is an independent business consultant assessing and advising on early stage,
technology start-ups for venture capital companies. From 2000 to 2002, she
served in the Office of the Executive Vice Provost of Columbia University as
Director of the Columbia University Nanotechnology Initiative and as Director
for Research and Technology Initiatives. From 1998 to 2000, she served in the
White House Office of Science and Technology Policy as a Senior Policy Analyst
involved in the National Nanotechnology Initiative. She was graduated from
University of Richmond (B.S., Chemistry with a business option) and Northwestern
University (Ph.D., Materials Science and Engineering). She may be considered to
be an "interested person" of the Company because of the consulting work she does
for us.

Lori D. Pressman. Ms. Pressman, age 47, has served as a member of our
board of directors since March 2002. She has served as a consultant to us on
tiny technology, intellectual property and in our due diligence work on certain
prospective investments. She also acts as an observer for us at board meetings
of certain investee companies in the Boston area. She is a business consultant
providing advisory services to start-ups and venture capital companies. She
consults internationally on technology transfer practices and statistics, for
non-profit and government organizations. From 1999 to 2001, she was Chair of the
Survey Statistics and Metrics Committee of the Association of University
Technology Managers. From September 1989 to July 2000, she was employed by MIT
in its Technology Licensing Office, as a Technology Licensing Officer from 1989
to 1995 and as Assistant Director from 1996 to 2000. She was graduated from the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (S.B., Physics) and the Columbia School of
Engineering (MSEE). She may be considered to be an "interested person" of the
Company because of the consulting work she does for us.

Independent Directors

Dr. C. Wayne Bardin. Dr. Bardin, age 70, has served as a member of our
board of directors since December 1994. Since 1996, he has served as the
President of Bardin LLC, a consulting firm to pharmaceutical companies. From
1998 to 2003, he served as President of Thyreos Corp., a privately held,
start-up, pharmaceutical company. His professional appointments have included:
Professor of Medicine, Chief of the Division of Endocrinology, The Milton S.
Hershey Medical Center of Pennsylvania State University, and Senior
Investigator, Endocrinology Branch, National Cancer Institute. He has also
served as a consultant to several pharmaceutical companies. He has been
appointed to the editorial boards of 15 journals. He has also served on national
and international committees and boards for the National Institutes of Health,
World Health Organization, The Ford Foundation and numerous scientific
societies. He was graduated from Rice University (B.A.), Baylor University
(M.S., M.D.) and he received a Doctor Honoris Causa from the University of Caen,
the University of Paris and the University of Helsinki.

Dr. Phillip A. Bauman. Dr. Bauman, age 49, has served as a member of our
board of directors since February 1998. He is Senior Attending of Orthopedic
Surgery at St. Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital Center in Manhattan and has served as
an elected member of the executive committee of the Medical Board since 2000. He
has been Assistant Professor of Orthopedic Surgery at Columbia University since
1998 and Vice President of Orthopedic Associates of New York since 1995. He was
elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons in 1991. He is
a member of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, American Orthopaedic
Society for Sports Medicine, the New York State Society of Orthopaedic Surgeons
and the American Medical Association. He was graduated from Harvard College
(B.A.) Harvard University (M.S., biology) and the College of Physicians and
Surgeons at Columbia University (M.D).

G. Morgan Browne. Mr. Browne, age 69, has served as a member of our board
of directors since June 1992. He is President since 2004 and a Trustee since
2000 of Planting Fields Foundation, a historic estate arboretum. From 2001 to
2003, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a
not-for-profit institution that conducts research and education programs in the
fields of molecular biology and genetics. From 1985 to 2001, he was the
Administrative Director of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. He serves as Chairman
of the Audit Committee of Huntington Hospital Association since mid-2003 and as
a director since 1987. He is a Trustee and Finance Commissioner of the Village
of Mill Neck. In prior years, he was active in the management of numerous
scientifically based companies as an officer, as an individual consultant and as
an associate of Laurent Oppenheim Associates, Industrial Management Consultants.
He is a Director of OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("OSI"), a publicly held company
principally engaged in drug discovery based on gene transcription. He was a
founding director of the New York Biotechnology Association. He was graduated
from Yale University.

Several shareholder class action lawsuits were filed in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of New York against OSI, the Board of
Directors of OSI (including Mr. Browne) and certain members of senior management
of OSI. The complaints allege violations of various sections of the Securities
Act of 1933 and the Securities Act of 1934 and the rules promulgated thereunder.

Dugald A. Fletcher. Mr. Fletcher, age 75, has served as a member of our
board of directors since 1996. He has served as President of Fletcher & Company,
Inc., a management consulting firm, since 1984. Until the end of 1997, he was
Chairman of Binnings Building Products Company, Inc. His previous business
appointments include: adviser to Gabelli/Rosenthal LP, a leveraged buyout fund;
Chairman of Keller Industries, building and consumer products; Senior Vice
President of Booz-Allen & Hamilton; President of Booz-Allen Acquisition
Services; Executive Vice President and a Director of Paine Webber, Inc.; and
President of Baker, Weeks and Co., Inc., a New York Stock Exchange member firm.
He is currently a Trustee of the Gabelli Growth Fund and a Director of the
Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund, Inc. He was graduated from
Harvard College and Harvard Business School (M.B.A.).

Mark A. Parsells. Mr. Parsells, age 45, has served as a member of our
board of directors since November 2003. Since February 2004, he is the Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Montpelier Ventures, a management
consulting firm. From 2001 to 2004, he was the Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Fusura LLC, a start-up insurance company backed by AIG
company that is an Internet-based, direct-to-consumer, auto insurance business.
From 2000 to 2001, he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Citibank
Online. Previously, he worked in executive positions for Bank One and American
Express and acted as Special Assistant to U.S. Senator John Heinz. He was
graduated from Emory University (B.A,), Cornell University (M.B.A) and Vlerick
LeuvenGent Business School (M.B.A.).

Charles E. Ramsey. Mr. Ramsey, age 62, has served as a member of our board
of directors since October 2002. He has been a consultant since 1997. He is a
retired founder and principal of Ramsey/Beirne Associates, Inc., an executive
search firm that specialized in recruiting top officers for high technology
companies, many of which were backed by venture capital. An active investor, he
is a director of one privately held company. He works on construction projects
in Nicaragua as a member of the Nicaraguan Initiative Committee for the
Presbyterian Churches of the Hudson River and as Chair of Bridges to Community,
a non-governmental organization dedicated to construction projects in Nicaragua.
He was graduated from Wittenberg University (B.A.).

James E. Roberts. Mr. Roberts, age 59, has served as a member of our board
of directors since 1995. Since 2002, he has been Executive Vice President and
Chief Underwriting Officer of the Reinsurance Division of Alea North America
Company. From October 1999 to November 2002, he was Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Insurance Corporation of New York, Dakota Specialty Insurance
Company, and Recor Insurance Company Inc., all members of the Trenwick Group,
Ltd. From October 1999 to March 2000, he served as Vice Chairman of Chartwell
Reinsurance Company. Prior to assuming those positions, he was Vice Chairman of
Trenwick America Reinsurance Corporation from May 1995 to March 2000. He was
graduated from Cornell University (A.B.).

Set forth below is the dollar range of equity securities beneficially
owned by each director or nominee as of March 14, 2005.

=========================================== ====================================
Dollar Range of Equity Securities
Name of Director or Nominee Beneficially Owned (1)(2)(3)
------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------

Independent Directors
---------------------
Dr. C. Wayne Bardin Over $100,000
Dr. Phillip A Bauman Over $100,000
G. Morgan Browne Over $100,000
Dugald A. Fletcher Over $100,000
Mark A. Parsells $10,001-$50,000
Charles E. Ramsey Over $100,000
James E. Roberts Over $100,000

Interested Directors
--------------------
Charles E. Harris (4) Over $100,000
Kelly S. Kirkpatrick (5) $50,001 - $100,000
Lori D. Pressman (5) $50,001 - $100,000
=========================================== ====================================

(1) Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule
16a-1(a)(2) of the 1934 Act.

(2) The dollar ranges are: none, $1-$10,000, $10,001-$50,000, $50,001-$100,000
and over $100,000.

(3) The dollar ranges are based on the price of the equity securities as of
March 14, 2005.

(4) Denotes an individual who is an "interested person" as defined in the 1940
Act.

(5) Denotes an individual who may be considered an "interested person" because
of consulting work performed for us.

Board of Directors and Committees

In 2004, there were 10 meetings of the Board of Directors of the Company,
and the full Board acted 11 times by unanimous written consent. No director
attended fewer than 75 percent of the aggregate of Board of Directors' and
applicable committee meetings on which each director served (during the periods
that they so served).

It is a policy of the Company that a portion of our directors are
encouraged to attend annual meetings of shareholders. In 2004, six directors
attended the annual meeting.

Shareholders and other interested parties may contact the Board or any
member of the Board by mail. To communicate with the Board or any member of the
Board, correspondence should be addressed to the Board or the Board members with
whom you wish to communicate by either name or title. All such correspondence
should be sent c/o Harris & Harris Group, Inc., 111 West 57th Street, Suite
1100, New York, New York 10019. Such correspondence will be forwarded to the
appropriate board member or members after screening to eliminate marketing and
junk mail.

The Company's Board of Directors currently has six committees comprised of
the following members, all of whom except Mr. Harris are independent both under
the rules of the NASD and for the purposes of the 1940 Act:

Board Committees

---------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------
Executive Audit Compensation
---------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------

Charles E. Harris (1) Dugald A. Fletcher (1) James E. Roberts (1)
Dr. C. Wayne Bardin Dr. Phillip A. Bauman Dr. Phillip A. Bauman
G. Morgan Browne G. Morgan Browne Mark A. Parsells
James E. Roberts James E. Roberts Charles E. Ramsey
---------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------

---------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------
Nominating Valuation Independent Directors
---------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------

Dr. C. Wayne Bardin (1) Dugald A. Fletcher (1) G. Morgan Browne (1)
Dr. Phillip A. Bauman Dr. C. Wayne Bardin Dr. C. Wayne Bardin
Mark A. Parsells G. Morgan Browne Dr. Phillip A. Bauman
Charles E. Ramsey Mark A. Parsells Dugald A. Fletcher
James E. Roberts Mark A. Parsells
Charles E. Ramsey
James E. Roberts
---------------------------- ------------------------- -------------------------

(1) Denotes the Chairman of the Committee.

Executive Committee

The Executive Committee meets from time to time between regular meetings
of the Board of Directors and exercises the authority of the Board to the extent
provided by law. The Executive Committee did not meet as a separate committee
and did not act by unanimous written consent in 2004.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee (i) oversees all material aspects of our accounting
and financial reporting processes, internal control and audit functions, (ii)
monitors the independence and performance of our independent accountants, (iii)
provides a means for open communication among our independent accountants,
financial and senior management and the Board, and (iv) oversees compliance by
us with legal and regulatory requirements.

The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter approved by our
Board of Directors, which was attached to our proxy statement for fiscal year
ending December 31, 2003, as Appendix A. The Audit Committee Charter sets out
the responsibilities, authority and duties of the Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee met four times and acted by unanimous written consent three times in
2004.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has the full power and authority of the Board
with respect to all matters pertaining to the remuneration of our employees. The
Compensation Committee met one time and acted by unanimous written consent one
time in 2004.

Nominating Committee

The Nominating Committee acts as an advisory committee to the Board by
identifying individuals qualified to serve on the Board as directors and on
committees of the Board, and to recommend that the Board select the Board
nominees for the next annual meeting of shareholders. The Nominating Committee
met one time in 2004.

The Nominating Committee will consider director candidates recommended by
shareholders. In considering candidates submitted by shareholders, the
Nominating Committee will take into consideration the needs of the Board and the
qualifications of the candidate. The Nominating Committee may also take into
consideration the number of shares held by the recommending shareholder and the
length of time that such shares have been held. To have a candidate considered
by the Nominating Committee, a shareholder must submit the recommendation in
writing and must include:

o The name of the shareholder and evidence of the person's ownership
of shares of the Company, including the number of shares owned and
the length of time of ownership;

o The name of the candidate, the candidate's resume or a listing of
his or her qualifications to be a Director of the Company and the
person's consent to be named as a Director if selected by the
Nominating Committee and nominated by the Board; and

o If requested by the Nominating committee, a completed and signed
director's questionnaire.

The shareholder recommendation and information described above must be
sent to the Company's Corporate Secretary, c/o Harris & Harris Group, Inc., 111
West 57th Street, Suite 1100, New York, New York 10019, and must be received by
the Corporate Secretary not less than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of
the Company's most recent annual meeting of shareholders or, if the meeting has
moved by more than 30 days, a reasonable amount of time before the meeting.

The Nominating Committee believes that the minimum qualifications for
serving as a director of the Company are that a nominee demonstrate, by
significant accomplishment in his or her field, an ability to make a meaningful
contribution to the Board's oversight of the business and affairs of the Company
and have a reputation for honest and ethical conduct. In addition, the
Nominating Committee examines a candidate's specific experiences and skills,
time availability in light of other commitments, potential conflicts of interest
and independence from management and the Company. The Nominating Committee also
seeks to have the Board represent a diversity of experience. We do not pay any
third party a fee to assist in the process of identifying and evaluating
candidates. The Nominating Committee evaluates all candidates for the Board
based on the above qualifications regardless of whether the candidate was
nominated by an officer, Board member or shareholder.

The Nominating Committee operates pursuant to a written charter approved
by our Board of Directors. The Nominating Committee Charter sets out the
responsibilities, authority and duties of the Nominating Committee. The
Nominating Committee Charter of the Company was attached to our proxy statement
for fiscal year ending December 31, 2003, as Appendix B.

Valuation Committee

The Valuation Committee has the full power and authority of the Board in
reviewing and approving the valuation of our securities for reporting purposes
pursuant to our Valuation Procedures that were established and approved by the
Board of Directors. The Valuation Committee met five times in 2004.

Independent Directors Committee

The Board of Directors approved the appointment of an Independent
Directors Committee on March 10, 2004, which has the responsibility of proposing
corporate governance and long term planning matters to the Board of Directors,
and making the required determinations pursuant to the 1940 Act. The Independent
Directors Committee met three times in 2004.

Audit Committee Report

Our Audit Committee presents the following report:

The Audit Committee of the Company has performed the following functions:
(i) the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial
statements of the Company with management, (ii) the Audit Committee
discussed with the independent auditors the matters required to be
discussed by the Statements on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended,
(iii) the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter
from the independent auditors required by ISB Standard No. 1, as amended,
and has discussed with the auditors the auditors' independence and (iv)
the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of the Company
that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the past fiscal year.

Dugald A. Fletcher (Chair)
Dr. Phillip A. Bauman
G. Morgan Browne
James E. Roberts

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLC ("PwC") has been selected as the independent
registered public accounting firm by our Audit Committee and ratified by a
majority of our Board, including a majority of the Independent Directors by vote
cast in person, to audit the accounts of the Company for and during the
Company's fiscal year ending December 31, 2005. We do not know of any direct or
indirect financial interest of PwC in the Company.

Representatives of PwC will not attend the Annual Meeting in person but
will be available to respond to appropriate questions by telephone.

Audit Committee's Pre-Approval Policies

Since March 2003, the Audit Committee of the Company has pre-approved all
audit and non-audit services provide by PwC to us. On November 11, 2003, the
Audit Committee adopted Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures which provide that
requests or applications to provide services that require approval by the Audit
Committee (or the Chairman pursuant to delegated authority) must be submitted to
the Audit Committee or the Chairman, as the case may be, by both the independent
auditor and the Chief Financial Officer.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by PwC, in
connection with their annual audit of the Company's consolidated financial
statements, reviews of the consolidated financial statements included in the
Company's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004, and the review of documents and matters associated with our 2004 public
offering, were approximately $268,500; and for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2003, the aggregate audit fees were approximately $98,800.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees for professional services rendered by PwC for tax
services for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, were approximately
$18,000; and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, they were
approximately $14,500. The nature of the services was tax return preparation.

All Other Fees

There were no fees for professional services rendered by PwC during the
last two fiscal years other than the audit and tax fees described above. The
Audit Committee has determined that the provision of non-audit services that
were provided during 2004 is compatible with maintaining PwC's independence in
performing audit services for the Company.

Principal Shareholders and Ownership by Directors and Executive Officers

Set forth below is information, as of March 14, 2005, with respect to the
beneficial ownership of our common stock by (i) each person who is known by us
to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of the outstanding shares
of the common stock, (ii) each of our directors and (iii) all of our directors
and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated, to our
knowledge, all shares are beneficially owned and investment and voting power is
held by the persons named as owners. The information in the table below is from
publicly available information that may be as of dates earlier than March 14,
2005. At this time, we are unaware of any shareholder owning five percent or
more of the outstanding shares of common stock other than as noted below. Unless
otherwise provided, the address of each holder is c/o Harris & Harris Group,
Inc., 111 West 57th Street, Suite 1100, New York, New York 10019.

Amount and Nature of Percentage of Outstanding
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner Beneficial Ownership Common Shares Owned
------------------------------------ -------------------- -------------------------

Independent Directors:
Dr. C. Wayne Bardin.......................... 22,317(1) *
Dr. Phillip A. Bauman........................ 23,483(2) *
G. Morgan Browne............................. 34,172 *
Dugald A. Fletcher........................... 15,537 *
Mark A. Parsells............................. 1,028(3) *
Charles E. Ramsey............................ 28,830 *
James E. Roberts............................. 17,265 *

Interested Directors:
Charles E. and Susan T. Harris............... 1,050,893(4) 6.1
Kelly S. Kirkpatrick......................... 4,210 *
Lori D. Pressman............................. 4,769 *

Executive Officers:
Alexei A. Andreev............................ 0 *
Sandra M. Forman............................. 0 *
Douglas W. Jamison........................... 625 *
Daniel V. Leff............................... 300 *
Mel P. Melsheimer............................ 80,210(5) *
Helene B. Shavin............................. 3,000 *
Daniel B. Wolfe.............................. 0 *

All directors and executive officers as
a group (18 persons).......................... 1,286,639 7.5

5% Shareholders:
Essex Investment Management Co., LLC
125 High Street, 29th Floor
Boston, MA 02110............................... 950,411(6) 5.51

_________
* Less than 1%.
(1) Includes 3,786 shares owned by Bardin LLC for the Bardin LLC
Profit-Sharing Keogh.
(2) Includes 5,637 shares owned by Ms. Milbry C. Polk, Dr. Bauman's wife; 100
shares owned by Adelaide Polk-Bauman, Dr. Bauman's daughter; 100 shares
owned by Milbry Polk-Bauman, Dr. Bauman's daughter; and 100 shares owned
by Mary Polk-Bauman, Dr. Bauman's daughter. Ms. Milbry C. Polk is the
custodian for the accounts of the three children.
(3) All shares are owned jointly with Mr. Parsells's wife.
(4) Includes 1,039,559 shares owned by Mrs. Harris, our Corporate Secretary,
and 11,334 shares owned by Mr. Harris.
(5) Includes 13,334 shares which are owned jointly by Mr. Melsheimer and his
wife. Mr. Melsheimer retired, pursuant to our Executive Mandatory
Retirement Plan, on December 31, 2004.
(6) As of February 28, 2005.

Executive Officers

Our executive officers who are not directors are set forth below.
Information relating to our executive officers who are directors is set forth
under "Election of Directors - Nominees." Our executive officers are elected to
serve until they resign or are removed, or are otherwise disqualified to serve,
or until their successors are elected and qualified.

Douglas W. Jamison. Mr. Jamison, age 35, has served as President, Chief
Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer since January 1, 2005, and as a
Managing Director since January 2004. He is also a Director of Harris & Harris
Enterprises, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Harris & Harris Group, Inc.,
since January 2005. He served as a Vice President from September 2002 through
December 2004. He is a director of NanoOpto Corporation and Nextreme Thermal
Solutions, privately held nanotechnology-enabled companies in which we have an
investment. Prior to joining us, he worked for five years as a senior technology
manager at the University of Utah Technology Transfer Office, where he managed
intellectual property in physics, chemistry and the engineering sciences. He was
graduated from Dartmouth College (B.A.) and the University of Utah (M.S.).

Mel P. Melsheimer. Mr. Melsheimer, age 65, retired pursuant to our
Executive Mandatory Retirement Plan on December 31, 2004. He served as
President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer from February
1997 through December 2004, as a Managing Director from January 2004 through
December 2004, as Chief Compliance Officer from February 2001 through July 2004,
and as Treasurer from July 2001 through December 2004. From March 1994 to
February 1997, he served as a nearly full-time consultant to us or as an officer
to one of our portfolio companies. From November 1992 to February 1994, he
served as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary of
Dairy Holdings, Inc. He was graduated from Occidental College (B.A.) and the
University of Southern California (M.B.A.).

Daniel V. Leff. Mr. Leff, age 36, has served as an Executive Vice
President and a Managing Director since January 2004. Prior to joining us, he
was a senior associate with Sevin Rosen Funds in the firm's Dallas, Texas,
office where he focused on early-stage investment opportunities in
semiconductors, components and various emerging technology areas. He previously
worked for Redpoint Ventures in the firm's Los Angeles office. In addition, he
previously held engineering, marketing and strategic investment positions with
Intel Corporation. He is a director of Nanomix, Inc., and Solazyme, Inc.,
privately held nanotechnology-enabled companies in which we have an investment.
He was graduated from the University of California, Berkeley (B.S., Chemistry),
The Anderson School at UCLA (M.B.A.), where he was an Anderson Venture Fellow
and UCLA's Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry (Ph.D., Physical Chemistry),
where his thesis advisor was Professor James Heath.

Alexei A. Andreev. Mr. Andreev, age 32, joined us in March 2005, as an
Executive Vice President and as a Managing Director. Prior to joining us, he was
an associate with Draper Fisher Jurvetson, a venture capital firm, from 2002 to
March 9, 2005. In 2001, he was a summer associate with TLcom Capital Partners, a
London-based venture capital fund backed by Morgan Stanley. From 1997 to 2000,
he was employed by Renaissance Capital Group/Sputnik Funds, a venture capital
fund in Moscow, Russia. Previously, he was a researcher at the Centre of
Nanotechnology, Isan, in Troitsk, Russia. He is a director of privately held
EoPlex Technologies, Inc., a tiny technology-enabled company, and of the
American Business Association of Russian Expatriates. He was graduated with a
B.S. with honors in Engineering/Material Sciences and a Ph.D. in Solid State
Physics from Moscow Steel and Alloys Institute and with an M.B.A. from Stanford
Graduate School of Business.

Sandra Matrick Forman. Ms. Forman, age 38, has served as General Counsel,
Chief Compliance Officer and Head of Human Resources since August 2004. Prior to
joining us, she was an associate at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, in
the Investment Management Group, from 2001 to 2004. From May to August 2000, she
was a summer associate with Latham & Watkins LLP in its London office. She was
graduated from New York University (B.A.), where her honors included National
Journalism Honor Society, and the University of California Los Angeles (J.D.),
where her honors included Order of the Coif, and she was a member of the Law
Review.

Daniel B. Wolfe. Mr. Wolfe, age 28, has served as a Vice President since
July 2004. Prior to joining us, he was a consultant to Nanosys, Inc., CW Group
and Bioscale, Inc. From February 2000 to January 2002, he was the Co-founder and
President of Scientific Venture Assessments, Inc., a provider of scientific
analysis of prospective investments for venture capital placements and of
scientific expertise to high-technology companies. Mr. Wolfe was graduated from
Rice University (B.A., Chemistry), where he worked with Professor Naomi Halas
and from Harvard University (Ph.D., Chemistry) in June 2004, where his thesis
advisor was Professor George Whitesides.

Helene B. Shavin. Ms. Shavin, age 51, has served as a Vice President and
Controller since November 2001. Prior to joining us, she was a Vice President
with Citicorp Venture Capital, from 1986 to 2000. She was graduated from Queens
College (B.A.) and Baruch College (M.B.A.), and she is a certified public
accountant.

Remuneration of Chief Executive Officer and Other Executive Officers

The following table sets forth a summary for each of the last three years
of the cash and non-cash compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our
Chief Executive Officer and our other executive officers.

=======================================================
Annual Compensation
=======================================================
================================ ========== ================= ================== ================== ================
Name and Other Annual All Other
Principal Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation Compensation
------------------ ---- ------ ----- ------------ ------------
($) ($)(1) ($)(2) ($)(3)
-------------------------------- ---------- ----------------- ------------------ ------------------ ----------------

Charles E. Harris 2004 229,778 0 42,193 245,778
Chairman of the Board, 2003 224,567 0 43,006 318,296
Chief Executive Officer (4)(5) 2002 221,217 10,503 46,570 165,468

Mel P. Melsheimer 2004 260,001 0 0 16,000
Former President, Chief 2003 254,106 0 0 14,000
Operating Officer, Chief 2002 250,327 3,224 0 12,000
Financial Officer, Treasurer &
Chief Compliance Officer

Douglas W. Jamison (6) 2004 153,183 0 0 13,000
President, Chief Operating 2003 137,182 0 0 12,000
Officer & Chief Financial 2002 35,936 0 0 1,050
Officer, Former Vice President

Daniel V. Leff 2004 228,667 0 0 13,000
Executive Vice President

Sandra Matrick Forman (7) 2004 66,667 16,500 0 7,587
General Counsel & Chief
Compliance Officer
================================ ========== ================= ================== ================== ================

(1) For 2002, these amounts represent the actual amounts earned as a result of
realized gains during the year ended December 31, 2002, and paid out in
2003, under the Harris & Harris Group Employee Profit-Sharing Plan. You may
find more information on our Employee Profit-Sharing Plan under Incentive
Compensation Plans. For 2004, the amount shown for Ms. Forman represents a
signing bonus.

(2) Other than Mr. Harris, amounts of "Other Annual Compensation" earned by the
named executive officers for the periods presented did not meet the
threshold reporting requirements. The amounts reported for Mr. Harris
represent benefits including personal use of an automobile and garage,
membership in a private club, membership in a health club and use of a
trainer, medical care reimbursement, consultation with a financial planner,
long-term disability insurance, group term life insurance and long-term
care insurance for him and his wife.

(3) Except for Mr. Harris, amounts reported represent our contributions on
behalf of the named executive to the Harris & Harris Group, Inc. 401(k)
Plan. For 2004, Mr. Harris's "All Other Compensation" consists of: $16,000
401(k) Plan employer contribution and $229,778 for his 2004 SERP
contribution. With respect to 2002 and 2003, an additional $73,739 was
accrued for Mr. Harris's SERP account in 2002, but not paid until 2003.

(4) Mr. Harris has an employment agreement with us.

(5) Mr. Harris's wife was employed by a subsidiary in 2002 and 2003 and earned
salary and all other compensation of $15,035 and $9,522, in 2002 and 2003,
respectively. In 2004, she received compensation of $17,000 for serving as
our Secretary.

(6) Commenced employment September 9, 2002.

(7) Commenced employment August 1, 2004.

Incentive Compensation Plans

As of January 1, 2003, we implemented the Amended and Restated Harris &
Harris Group, Inc. Employee Profit-Sharing Plan, which we refer to as the 2002
Plan.

The 2002 Plan (and its predecessor) provides for profit sharing for our
officers and employees equal to 20 percent of our "qualifying income" for that
plan year (the "Payout Amount"). For the purposes of the 2002 Plan, qualifying
income is defined as net realized income as reflected on our consolidated
statements of operations for that year, less nonqualifying gains, if any.

For purposes of the 2002 Plan, our net realized income includes investment
income, realized gains and losses, and operating expenses (including taxes paid
or payable by us), but is calculated without including dividends paid or
distributions made to shareholders, payments under the Plan, unrealized gains
and losses, and loss carry-overs from other years, which net realized income we
refer to as qualifying income. The proportion of net after-tax realized gains
attributable to asset values as of September 30, 1997, is considered
nonqualifying gain, which reduces qualifying income. As soon as practicable
following the year-end audit, the Audit Committee will determine whether, and if
so how much, qualifying income exists for a plan year. Once determined, 90
percent of the Payout Amount will be paid out to Plan participants pursuant to
the distribution percentages set forth in the Plan. The remaining 10 percent
will be paid out after we have filed our federal tax return for that plan year.

On October 15, 2002, our shareholders approved the performance goals under
the 2002 Plan in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Code, effective as of
January 1, 2003. The Code generally provides that a public company such as we
are may not deduct compensation paid to its chief executive officer or to any of
its four most highly compensated officers to the extent that the compensation
paid to the officer/employee exceeds $1,000,000 in any tax year, unless payment
is made upon the attainment of objective performance goals that are approved by
our shareholders.

Under the 2002 Plan, awards previously granted to the four current
Participants (Messrs. Harris and Melsheimer and Ms. Shavin and Matthews, herein
referred to as the "grandfathered participants") have been reduced by 10 percent
with respect to "Non-Tiny Technology Investments" (as defined in the 2002 Plan)
and by 25 percent with respect to "Tiny Technology Investments" (as defined in
the 2002 Plan), and these reduced awards became permanent. These reduced awards
are herein referred to as "grandfathered participations." The amount by which
the awards are reduced will be allocable and reallocable each year by the
Compensation Committee among current and new participants as awards under the
2002 Plan. The grandfathered participations will be honored by us whether or not
the grandfathered participant is still employed by us or is still alive (in the
event of death, the grandfathered participations will be paid to the
grandfathered participant's estate), unless the grandfathered participant is
dismissed for cause, in which case all awards, including the grandfathered
participations, will be immediately cancelled and forfeited. With regard to new
investments and follow-on investments made after the date on which the first new
employee begins participating in the 2002 Plan, both current and new
participants will be required to be employed by us at the end of a plan year in
order to participate in profit-sharing on our investments with respect to that
year.

Notwithstanding any provisions of the 2002 Plan, in no event may the
aggregate amount of all awards payable for any Plan Year during which we remain
a "business development company" within the meaning of the 1940 Act be greater
than 20 percent of our "net income after taxes" within the meaning of Section
57(n)(1)(B) of the 1940 Act. In the event the awards as calculated exceed that
amount, the awards will be reduced pro rata.

The 2002 Plan may be modified, amended or terminated by the Compensation
Committee at any time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the grandfathered
participations may not be further modified. Nothing in the 2002 Plan will
preclude the Compensation Committee from naming additional participants in the
2002 Plan or, except for grandfathered participations, changing the Award
Percentage of any Participant (subject to the overall percentage limitations
contained in the 2002 Plan). Currently, under the 2002 Plan, the distribution
amounts for non-grandfathered investments for each officer and employee
currently are as follows: Charles E. Harris, 7.790 percent; Douglas W. Jamison,
3.75 percent; Daniel V. Leff, 3.483 percent; Helene B. Shavin, 1.524 percent;
Sandra M. Forman, 1.50 percent; Daniel B. Wolfe, 1.5 percent; and Jacqueline M.
Matthews, 0.453 percent, which together equal 20 percent. In one case, for a
former employee who left other than due to termination for cause, any amount
earned will be accrued and may subsequently be paid to the participant.

The grandfathered participations are set forth below:

Grandfathered Participations
-----------------------------------------------
Name of Officer/Employee Non-Tiny Technology (%) Tiny Technology (%)
------------------------ ----------------------- -------------------

Charles E. Harris 12.41100 10.34250
Mel P. Melsheimer 3.80970 3.17475
Helene B. Shavin 1.37160 1.14300
Jacqueline M. Matthews 0.40770 0.33975
TOTAL 18.00000 15.00000

Accordingly, an additional two percent of qualifying income with respect
to grandfathered Non-Tiny Technology Investments, five percent of qualifying
income with respect to grandfathered Tiny Technology Investments and the full 20
percent of qualifying income with respect to non-grandfathered investments are
available for allocation and reallocation from year to year. Currently, Douglas
W. Jamison, Daniel V. Leff, Sandra M. Forman and Daniel B. Wolfe are allocated
0.7329229 percent, 0.6807388 percent, 0.2931692 percent and 0.2931692 percent,
respectively, of the Non-Tiny Technology Grandfathered Participations and
1.8323072 percent, 1.701847 percent, 0.7329229 percent and 0.7329229 percent,
respectively, of the Tiny Technology Grandfathered Participations.

We perform a calculation to determine the accrual for profit-sharing. We
calculate 20 percent of qualifying income pursuant to the terms of the plan and
estimate the effect on qualifying income of selling all the portfolio
investments that are valued above cost (i.e., that are in an unrealized
appreciation position). Although the accrual will fluctuate as a result of
changes in qualifying income and changes in unrealized appreciation, payments
are only made to the extent that qualifying income exists. During 2003, we made
no accrual for profit sharing. At December 31, 2004, we have $ 311,594 accrued
for profit sharing.

401(k) Plan

As of January 1, 1989, we adopted an employee benefits program covering
substantially all employees under a 401(k) Plan and Trust Agreement. As of
January 1, 1999, we adopted the Harris & Harris Pension Plan and Trust, a money
purchase plan that would allow us to stay compliant with the 401(k) top-heavy
regulations and deduction limitation regulations. In 2001, Congress enacted the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 which has increased
the deduction limits for plans such as the 401(k) Plan. This Act eliminated the
need for us to maintain two separate plans. Effective December 31, 2001, the
Pension Plan merged into the 401(k) Plan, with the 401(k) Plan being the
surviving plan. Contributions to the plan are at our discretion. During 2004,
contributions to the plan charged to operations were approximately $99,249.

Medical Benefits

On June 30, 1994, we adopted a plan to provide medical and health
insurance for retirees, their spouses and dependents who, at the time of their
retirement, have 10 years of service with us and have attained 50 years of age
or have attained 45 years of age and have 15 years of service with us. On
February 10, 1997, we amended this plan to include employees who "have seven
full years of service and have attained 58 years of age." The coverage is
secondary to any government or subsequent employer provided health insurance
plans. Based upon actuarial estimates, we provided an original reserve of
$176,520 that was charged to operations for the period ending June 30, 1994. As
of December 31, 2004, we had a reserve of $613,447 for the plan.

Mandatory Retirement Plan

On March 20, 2003, in order to begin planning for eventual management
succession, the Board of Directors voted to establish the Executive Mandatory
Retirement Benefit Plan for individuals who are employed by us in a bona fide
executive or high policy making position. There are currently three such
individuals, Charles E. Harris, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer,
Douglas W. Jamison, the President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial
Officer and Mel P. Melsheimer, the former President, Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Financial Officer. Under this plan, mandatory retirement will take place
effective December 31 of the year in which the eligible individuals attain the
age of 65. On an annual basis beginning in the year in which the designated
individual attains the age of 65, a committee of the Board consisting of
non-interested directors may determine to postpone the mandatory retirement date
for that individual for one additional year for our benefit.

Under applicable law prohibiting discrimination in employment on the basis
of age, we can impose a mandatory retirement age of 65 for our executives or
employees in high policy-making positions only if each employee subject to the
mandatory retirement age is entitled to an immediate retirement benefit at
retirement age of at least $44,000 per year. The benefits payable at retirement
to Mr. Harris and Mr. Melsheimer under our existing retirement plans do not
equal this threshold. A plan was established to provide the difference between
the benefit required under the age discrimination laws and that provided under
our existing plans. The expense to us of providing the benefit under this new
plan as it relates to Mr. Harris and Mr. Melsheimer is currently estimated to be
$267,426. Currently, there is no accrual for Mr. Jamison. On December 31, 2004,
Mr. Melsheimer retired pursuant to the mandatory retirement plan. Under the
mandatory retirement plan, he will receive an annual benefit of $22,915, the
difference between the benefit required under the age discrimination laws and
that provided under our existing plans.

Employment Agreement

On October 19, 1999, Charles E. Harris signed an Employment Agreement with
us (the "Employment Agreement"), which superseded an employment agreement that
was about to expire on December 31, 1999. The Employment Agreement expires on
December 31, 2004 ("Term"); provided, on January 1, 2000 and on each day
thereafter, the Term extends automatically by one day, unless at any time we
decide or Mr. Harris decides, by written notice, not to extend the Term, in
which case the Term will expire five years from the date of the written notice.
Accordingly, if we or Mr. Harris were to provide notice on June 30, 2003, the
Term would expire on June 30, 2008. On October 14, 2004, Mr. Harris entered into
an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement for the purpose of changing the
termination date to be consistent with the date in the Executive Mandatory
Retirement Benefit Plan. The revised employment agreement provides that the Term
of Mr. Harris's employment may not be extended beyond December 31, 2008, the
mandatory retirement date pursuant to the Executive Mandatory Retirement Benefit
Plan, unless a committee of the Board consisting of non-interested directors
extends the date by one year pursuant to the plan, and Mr. Harris agrees to
serve beyond December 31, 2008.

During the period of employment, Mr. Harris shall serve as our Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer; be responsible for our general management of the
affairs and all subsidiaries, reporting directly to our Board of Directors;
serve as a member of the Board for the period of which he is and shall from time
to time be elected or reelected; and serve, if elected, as our President and as
an officer and director of any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company.

Mr. Harris receives compensation under his Employment Agreement in the
form of base salary, with automatic yearly adjustments to reflect inflation,
which amounts to $235,609 for 2005. In addition, the Board may increase such
salary, and consequently decrease it, but not below the level provided for by
the automatic adjustments described above. Mr. Harris is also entitled to
participate in our Profit-Sharing Plan as well as in all compensation or
employee benefit plans or programs, and to receive all benefits, perquisites,
and emoluments for which salaried employees are eligible. Under the Employment
Agreement, we furnish Mr. Harris with certain perquisites which include a
company car, membership in certain clubs and up to a $5,000 annual reimbursement
for personal, financial or tax advice.

The Employment Agreement provides Mr. Harris with life insurance for the
benefit of his designated beneficiaries in the amount of $2,000,000; provides
reimbursement for uninsured medical expenses, not to exceed $10,000 per annum,
adjusted for inflation, over the period of the contract; and provides Mr. Harris
and spouse with long-term care insurance and with disability insurance in the
amount of 100 percent of his base salary. These benefits are for the term of the
contract.

The Employment Agreement provides severance pay in the event of
termination without cause or by constructive discharge and also provides for
certain death benefits payable to the surviving spouse equal to the executive's
base salary for a period of two years.

In addition, Mr. Harris is entitled to receive severance pay pursuant to
the severance compensation agreement that he entered into with us, effective
August 15, 1990. The severance compensation agreement provides that if,
following a change in our control, as defined in the agreement, such
individual's employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive
within one year of such change in control, the individual shall be entitled to
receive compensation in a lump sum payment equal to 2.99 times the individual's
average annualized compensation and payment of other welfare benefits. If Mr.
Harris's termination is without cause or is a constructive discharge, the amount
payable under the Employment Agreement will be reduced by the amounts paid
pursuant to the severance compensation agreement.

SERP

The Employment Agreement provides that we adopt a supplemental executive
retirement plan (the "SERP") for the benefit of Mr. Harris. Under the SERP, we
will cause an amount equal to one-twelfth of Mr. Harris's current base salary to
be credited each month (a "Monthly Credit") to a special account maintained for
this purpose on our books for the benefit of Mr. Harris (the "SERP Account").
The amounts credited to the SERP Account will be deemed invested or reinvested
in such mutual funds or U.S. Government securities as determined by Mr. Harris.
The SERP Account will be credited and debited to reflect the deemed investment
returns, losses and expenses attributed to such deemed investments and
reinvestments. Mr. Harris's benefit under the SERP will equal the balance in the
SERP Account and such benefit will always be 100 percent vested (i.e., not
forfeitable). Mr. Harris will determine the form and timing of the distribution
of the balance in the SERP Account; provided, however, in the event of the
termination of Mr. Harris's employment, the balance in the SERP Account will be
distributed to Mr. Harris or his beneficiary, as the case may be, in a lump-sum
payment within 30 days of such termination. We contributed $229,778 during 2004
to a rabbi trust established for the purpose of accumulating funds to satisfy
the obligations incurred by the Company under the SERP. The restricted funds for
the SERP Plan total $1,591,971 at December 31, 2004. Mr. Harris's rights to
benefits pursuant to this SERP will be no greater than those of a general
creditor of the Company.

Remuneration of Directors

The following table sets forth the compensation paid by us for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004, to our directors. During the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004, we did not pay any pension or retirement benefits to
directors.

Total Compensation Paid to
Name of Director Aggregate Compensation ($) Directors ($)
---------------- -------------------------- -------------

Independent Directors:
Dr. C. Wayne Bardin 27,000 27,000
Dr. Phillip A. Bauman 25,000 25,000
G. Morgan Browne 28,000 28,000
Dugald A. Fletcher 31,000 31,000
Mark A. Parsells(1) 25,163 25,163
Charles E. Ramsey 21,000 21,000
James E. Roberts(2) 24,097 24,097

Interested Directors:
Kelly S. Kirkpatrick(3) 26,620 26,620
Lori D. Pressman(4) 123,861 123,861
Charles E. Harris(5) 0 0

____________________
(1) Includes $2,163 for reimbursement for travel expenses to attend board
meetings.
(2) Includes $1,097 for reimbursement for travel expenses to attend board
meetings.
(3) Includes $2,032 for reimbursement for travel expenses to attend board
meetings and $3,588 for consulting services. Ms. Kirkpatrick may be
considered an "interested person" because of consulting work performed for
us.
(4) Includes $2,486 for reimbursement for travel expenses to attend board
meetings and $99,375 for consulting services. Ms. Pressman may be
considered an "interested person" because of consulting work performed for
us.
(5) Mr. Harris is an "interested person" as defined in the 1940 Act.

In 2005, the directors who are not officers will receive $1,500 for each
meeting of the Board of Directors and $1,500 for each committee meeting they
attend, in addition to a monthly retainer of $750. From June 18, 1998, through
December 2004, directors who were not officers received $1,000 for each meeting
of the Board of Directors and $1,000 for each committee meeting they attended,
in addition to a monthly retainer of $500. Prior to June 18, 1998, the directors
were paid $500 for committee meetings and no monthly retainer. We also reimburse
our directors for travel, lodging and related expenses they incur in attending
board and committee meetings. The total compensation and reimbursement for
expenses paid to all directors in 2004 was $237,971.

In 1998, the Board of Directors approved that effective January 1, 1998,
50 percent of all director fees be used to purchase our common stock from us.
However, effective March 1, 1999, the Board of Directors approved that directors
purchase our common stock in the open market, rather than from us. During 2000
and 2001, the outside directors (i.e., all directors except Mr. Harris) bought a
total of 15,818 and 7,944 shares, respectively, in the open market. In 2002, the
outside directors bought 9,524 shares in the open market and 43,426 shares
through exercise of rights in a public offering of our common stock. In 2003 and
2004, the directors bought 7,860 and 9,543 shares, respectively, in the open
market.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our officers
and directors, and persons who own more than 10 percent of our common stock, to
file reports (including a year-end report) of ownership and changes in ownership
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") and to furnish the
Company with copies of all reports filed.

Based solely on a review of the forms furnished to us, or written
representations from certain reporting persons, we believe that all persons who
were subject to Section 16(a) in 2004 complied with the filing requirements.

SALE OF RIGHTS TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK AT NOT
LESS THAN THE GREATER OF THE MARKET VALUE OR THE
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE

(Proposal No. 2)

Proposal

During the coming year, the Board of Directors believes it would be in our
best interest to have the ability to offer long-term rights (which may be
accompanied by or be part of other securities -- e.g., convertible debt,
convertible preferred securities, warrants and debt securities or warrants and
preferred securities) to purchase common stock at an exercise price that will
not be less than the greater of the market value or the net asset value per
share at the time of issuance of such long-term rights. For example, if the
securities are priced for issuance on June 30 and at that time the net asset
value per share is $3.00 and the market price is $7.00, the exercise price will
not be less than $7.00, subject to anti-dilution adjustments. Section 61(a) of
the 1940 Act permits a business development company such as us to sell such
securities on such terms (and to issue shares of common stock upon their
exercise) only if several conditions are satisfied. Specifically, such proposal
must be approved by a majority of the independent directors and shareholders of
the issuer within 12 months prior to sale. In addition, a majority of the
issuer's independent directors must determine in good faith that the issuance of
such securities is in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders and
that the price at which such rights or other securities are to be sold (which
refers to the exercise or conversion price in the case of rights such as
warrants, options or conversion rights) is not less than a price which closely
approximates the market value for the underlying shares of common stock at the
time of issuance of such rights or other securities. Finally, the long-term
rights or other securities outstanding at any particular time may not be
exercisable or convertible for more than 25% of the common stock outstanding at
that time. The subsequent issuance of shares upon exercise of properly
authorized rights is permitted without regard to net asset value or market value
at the time of exercise. As our Board of Directors has done each year since
2002, it has approved and recommends to the shareholders for their approval a
proposal authorizing us, over the next year, to issue long-term rights to
purchase common stock (subject to the 25% limitation stated above) at exercise
prices that will not be less than the greater of the market value or the net
asset value per share at the time of issuance of such rights. Upon obtaining the
requisite shareholder approval, we will comply with the foregoing requirements
in connection with any financing undertaken pursuant to this proposal. See below
for a discussion of the risks of dilution and leverage.

We may determine to issue such rights and/or other securities in a
registered public offering or may issue them in a private placement either with
or without an obligation to seek to register their resale at the request of the
holders. We may also determine to use an underwriter or placement agent to
assist in selling such securities if we conclude that doing so would assist in
marketing such securities on favorable terms.

Reasons for the Proposal

Management and the Board of Directors have determined that it would be
advantageous to us to have the ability to sell, either alone or as part of
another security, warrants, options or rights to purchase common stock in
connection with our financing and capital raising activities. This ability may
give us a cost-effective way to raise capital. Our Board of Directors has
determined that it would be in the best interest of the Company and our
shareholders to be in a position to increase our assets so that we may be in a
better position to be a lead investor more often, to make follow-on investments
and take advantage of attractive new investment opportunities in tiny
technology, including nanotechnology, microsystems and microelectromechanical
systems (MEMS), augment working capital, increase the diversification of our
portfolio and achieve other net benefits to us. We believe that our prior
investment and expertise in the tiny technology sector are likely to lead to
several attractive investment opportunities in the tiny technology sector
becoming available to us over the next one to two years. We do not have any
current plans to issue rights or other securities and would determine to do so
only after reviewing the pace at which we are investing the proceeds of our
recent stock offerings and the level and attractiveness of investment
opportunities becoming available.

The Board also believes that increasing our assets will lower our expense
ratio by spreading our fixed costs over a larger asset base. The issuance of
additional common stock resulting from the exercise might also enhance the
liquidity of our common stock on the Nasdaq National Market.

Although we are permitted without shareholder approval to engage in rights
offerings to our existing shareholders of short-term rights to purchase common
stock at less than net asset value per share, these offerings must either be
non-transferable, in which case shareholders who decide not to participate will
have no means of capturing any portion of the value of the right to acquire
shares at a discount, or, if they involve transferable rights, must be limited
in frequency and size in such a manner that we can increase our capital base in
any particular year by only approximately 25 percent less the effect of the
discount. In addition, offerings of transferable rights for which the exercise
price is at a discount to net asset value may be made only once per year. In
2002, we made such a transferable rights offering and believe that the
investment opportunities in tiny technology over the coming year are likely to
be sufficient to justify raising capital should we choose to do so. Any such
decision to raise capital would take into account likely investment
opportunities and liquid assets on hand, including possible sale of freely
marketable corporate securities. Inasmuch as the Board of Directors believes
that it would not be in the best interests of shareholders for us to engage in
large scale nontransferable rights offerings at a discount, it believes that the
proposal is an attractive way to give us additional flexibility over and above
the limited amount that can be raised in any year without shareholder approval
through short-term transferable rights offerings to take advantage of investment
opportunities that may arise over the next one or two years.

The Board of Directors has approved and is seeking shareholder approval of
the proposal described above to sell, either alone or as part of another
security, warrants, options or rights to purchase common stock. The final terms
of any such sale, including price, term, and vesting requirements, would be
determined by the Board of Directors at the time of issuance of the rights.
Also, the nature and amount of consideration that would be received by us at the
time of issuance and the use of any such consideration would be considered and
approved by the Board of Directors at the time of issuance. Any such issuance
may be made pursuant to either a registered or non-registered offering, as
determined by the Board of Directors in an appropriate manner prior to the time
of issuance. Any such sale would be anticipated to result in a potential
increase in the number of outstanding shares of common stock. The long-term
rights or other securities outstanding at any particular time may not be
exercisable or convertible for more than 25% of the common stock outstanding at
that time.

Dilution

Any such sale, other than to existing shareholders, would be potentially
dilutive to the voting power of existing shareholders and could be dilutive with
regard to dividends and other economic aspects of the common stock. Because the
number of shares of common stock that could be so issued and the timing of any
issuance is not currently known, the actual dilutive effect cannot be predicted.
In addition, because the exercise price per share at the time of exercise could
well be less than the net asset value per share at the time of exercise and
because we could well incur expenses in connection with any such sale, such
exercise could result in a dilution of net asset value per share at the time of
exercise for all shareholders. Such dilution would disproportionately affect
shareholders who own less than their proportional share of such rights.

Leverage

Any long-term rights issued may be accompanied by or be part of other
securities, including convertible debt or convertible preferred securities. If
we issue convertible debt or convertible preferred securities or debt or
preferred securities accompanied by long-term rights, such issuance would result
in the use of leverage by us and would require us to make periodic interest or
dividend payments. The use of leverage results in additional risks and can
magnify the effect of any losses. If the income and gains earned on securities
purchased with the proceeds of such convertible securities are greater than the
cost of leverage, our return on the shares will be greater than if leverage had
not been used. Conversely, if the income or gains from the securities purchased
with such proceeds does not cover the cost of leverage, the return to us will be
less than if leverage had not been used. There is no assurance that a leveraging
strategy will be successful. Also, the cost of interest or dividend payments on
any debt or preferred securities issued will be borne by the common
shareholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THIS PROPOSAL.

AMENDMENT OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE
THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FROM 25,000,000 TO 30,000,000

(Proposal No. 3)

Proposal

We propose to amend paragraph 4 of the Certificate of Incorporation to
increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 25,000,000 to
30,000,000.

Of the 25,000,000 shares authorized for issuance under our Certificate of
Incorporation, there are only approximately 5,922,415 shares unissued, 3,550,000
of which are registered pursuant to our shelf registration statement on file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our proposed amendment would
increase the number of authorized shares of common stock by 5,000,000 shares.

The rights of additional authorized shares would be identical to the
rights of the shares you now hold. The authorization will not, in itself, have
any effect on your rights as a stockholder. If the Board were to issue
additional shares for other than a stock split or dividend, however, it could
have a dilutive effect on your voting power. This proposal is not in response to
any effort we know of to accumulate our common stock or to obtain control of the
Company. The Board of Directors has no present plans, agreements, commitments or
understandings for the issuance or use of these proposed additional shares.

Reason for the Proposal

We believe that the proposed increase is in the best interests of the
Company and our shareholders. It is important for the Board of Directors to have
the flexibility to act promptly to meet future business needs as they arise.
Sufficient shares should be readily available to maintain our financing and
capital raising flexibility. By having additional shares readily available for
issuance, the Board of Directors will be able to act expeditiously without
spending the time and incurring the expense of soliciting proxies and holding
special meetings of shareholders.

We do not have any current plans to issue any newly authorized additional
shares of common stock and would determine to do so only after reviewing the
pace at which we are investing the proceeds of our recent stock offerings and
our other liquid assets, including our holdings of freely marketable corporate
securities, and the level and attractiveness of investment opportunities
becoming available and likely to become available.

Dilution

Issuance of new shares of common stock, other than to existing
shareholders, would be potentially dilutive to the voting power of existing
shareholders and could be dilutive with regard to dividends and other economic
aspects of the common stock. Because the number of shares of common stock that
could be so issued and the timing of any issuance is not currently known, the
actual dilutive effect cannot be predicted. In addition, we could well incur
expenses in connection with any such sale of additional shares, which could
result in a dilution of net asset value per share at the time of sale for all
shareholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THIS PROPOSAL.

REMOVAL OF CERTAIN INVESTMENT RESTRICTIONS

(Proposals No. 4A-4G)

Proposals

The Board of Directors, including the independent directors, has proposed
that shareholders approve the elimination of certain fundamental investment
restrictions we adopted years ago, prior to our becoming a business development
company, when we were an investment company. We are proposing this change
because we are concerned that these investment restrictions are outdated and
could inappropriately limit our operations going forward. The Board recently
reviewed each of our investment restrictions and determined that it would be in
the best interests of shareholders to eliminate certain investment restrictions
that are not required under applicable law.

Under the 1940 Act, a registered investment company is required to recite
its policy with respect to certain investment activities. Under the 1940 Act, an
investment policy that is classified as "fundamental" may not be changed without
the approval of a company's shareholders. When we were a registered investment
company, we adopted certain fundamental investment restrictions as required by
the 1940 Act. The provisions of the 1940 Act regarding fundamental investment
restrictions and objectives are not applicable to business development
companies. When we elected to be treated as a business development company, we
did not formally remove these investment restrictions. Although we believe that
we were not required to take any action to remove these restrictions, because
their removal is inherent in becoming a business development company, the 1940
Act does not expressly provide this result and our Board of Directors is
recommending that the shareholders approve these proposals to ensure there is no
doubt that they are not applicable. We reserve the right to take the position
that none of the restrictions are in effect even if shareholders do not approve
their removal.

Although the proposed elimination of the investment restrictions generally
would give us broader authority to make certain investments or engage in certain
investment practices, we do not currently intend to change in any way our
investment strategy or operations. In addition, many of the investment
restrictions are no longer relevant to our business strategy. The proposal was
approved by the Board of Directors, subject to shareholder approval, at a
meeting held on March 10, 2005.

At the Annual Meeting, shareholders will vote on the proposal to remove
the investment restrictions listed below. If approved, the removal of these
investment restrictions will become effective immediately. If these proposals
are not approved, the current restrictions will remain in effect unless we are
correct in our assessment that they do not apply. If these restrictions do
remain in effect, we will be limited in our future ability to implement certain
techniques, while other business development companies will be able to implement
those techniques because they do not have these restrictions.

PROPOSAL 4A

ELIMINATION OF THE INVESTMENT
RESTRICTION REGARDING CONCENTRATION

The fundamental investment restriction regarding concentration currently
reads as follows:

"[We may not] invest more than 25% of the value of our total assets in any
one industry."

We now make new venture capital investments exclusively in tiny
technology. Tiny technology is not an industry, and tiny technologies permeate a
variety of industries. Accordingly, the Company has no present intention to
concentrate in any one industry, although it desires the freedom to do so to the
extent its investment opportunities develop in that manner. If we become focused
in an industry, shareholders may have more risk of loss than if we were more
broadly diversified over numerous industries.

The Board of Directors proposes that shareholders remove the
above-referenced investment restriction regarding industry concentration,
because such an investment restriction is not required for a business
development company, although the Company has no present intention to
concentrate in any one industry.

PROPOSAL 4B

ELIMINATION OF THE INVESTMENT RESTRICTION REGARDING
THE BORROWING AND THE ISSUANCE OF SENIOR SECURITIES

The fundamental investment restriction regarding issuing senior securities
currently reads as follows:

"[The Company may not] issue senior securities other than:

(a) preferred stock not in excess of the excess of 50% of our
total assets over any senior securities described in clause
(b) below that are outstanding,

(b) senior securities other than preferred stock (including
borrowing money, including on margin if margin securities are
owned and through entering into reverse repurchase agreements,
and providing guaranties) not in excess of 33 1/3% of our
total assets, and

(c) borrowings of up to 5% of our total assets for temporary
purposes without regard to the amount of senior securities
outstanding under clauses (a) and (b) above; provided,
however, that our obligations under interest rate swaps, when
issued and forward commitment transactions and similar
transactions are not treated as senior securities if covering
assets are appropriately segregated; or pledge our assets
other than to secure the issuances or in connection with
hedging transactions, short sales, when-issued and forward
commitment transactions and similar investment strategies.

For purposes of clauses (a), (b) and (c) above, "total assets" shall
be calculated after giving effect to the net proceeds of any
issuance and net of any liabilities and indebtedness that do not
constitute senior securities except for liabilities and indebtedness
as are excluded from treatment as senior securities by the proviso
to this item ...."

Use of debt or preferred stock as a source of capital entails two primary
risks. The first risk is that the use of debt leverages our available common
equity capital, magnifying the impact on net asset value of changes in the value
of our investment portfolio. For example, a business development company that
uses 33% leverage (that is, $50 of leverage per $100 of common equity) will show
a 1.5% increase or decline in net asset value for each 1% increase or decline in
the value of its total assets. The second risk is that the cost of debt or
preferred stock financing may exceed the return on the assets the proceeds are
used to acquire, thereby diminishing rather than enhancing the return to
shareholders. To the extent that we utilize debt or preferred stock financing
for any purpose, these two risks would likely make our total return to
shareholders more volatile. In addition, we might be required to sell
investments, in order to meet dividend, interest or principal payments, when it
may be disadvantageous for us to do so.

The Board of Directors proposes that shareholders remove the
above-referenced investment restriction regarding the issuance of senior
securities because such an investment restriction is not required for a business
development company, although the Company has no present intention to issue
senior securities. In fact, this restriction is inconsistent with the capital
structure authorized by the 1940 Act for business development companies such as
us. These provisions would permit us, subject to some exceptions, to issue debt
or preferred stock, so long as our total assets immediately after the issuance,
less some ordinary course liabilities, exceed 200% of the sum of the debt and
any preferred stock outstanding. Business development companies may also issue
senior debt securities accompanied by warrants, options and rights to subscribe
or convert to voting securities under certain conditions.

PROPOSAL 4C

INVESTMENT RESTRICTION REGARDING LENDING

The fundamental investment restriction regarding making loans currently
reads as follows:

"[The Company may not] make loans of money or property to any person,
except through loans and guaranties to entities, loans of portfolio
securities, the acquisition of fixed income obligations consistent with
our investment objective and policies or the acquisition of securities
subject to repurchase agreements."

Although we have no present intention to make loans of money or property
to any person, except through loans and guaranties to entities, if we were to do
so, we could be subject to a default on the loan resulting in a loss of such
assets.

The Board of Directors proposes that shareholders remove the
above-referenced investment restriction regarding making loans, because such an
investment restriction is not relevant to the Company, which does not have an
investment objective and is not required to have any policy regarding loans.

PROPOSAL 4D

INVESTMENT RESTRICTION REGARDING
UNDERWRITING SECURITIES

The fundamental investment restriction regarding underwriting securities
currently reads as follows:

"[The Company may not] underwrite the securities of other issuers, except
to the extent that in connection with the disposition of portfolio
securities or the sale of its own securities we may be deemed to be an
underwriter."

Although the modern structure of underwriting securities entails little
risk to the underwriters, who rarely enter into an underwriting agreement
covering more shares than they have sold, it is possible that engaging in
underwriting would impose on us a risk of loss on unsold securities. The Board
of Directors proposes that shareholders remove the above-referenced investment
restriction regarding underwriting securities, because such an investment
restriction is not required for a business development company, although we have
no present intention to underwrite securities.

PROPOSAL 4E

INVESTMENT RESTRICTION REGARDING THE PURCHASE
OR SALE OF REAL ESTATE

The fundamental investment restriction regarding the purchase or sale of
real estate currently reads as follows:

"[The Company may not] purchase or sell real estate or interests therein
in excess of its total assets or interests therein in excess of its total
assets."

If we were to purchase real estate, we would be subject to the risk that
the value in such real estate could decline because of adverse developments
affecting the real estate that we had purchased and/or the real estate industry
and real property values. In addition, real estate can be less liquid and be
difficult to value.

The Board of Directors proposes that shareholders remove the
above-referenced investment restriction regarding the sale of real estate,
because such an investment restriction is not required for a business
development company, although we have no present intention to purchase or sell
real estate.

PROPOSAL 4F

INVESTMENT RESTRICTION REGARDING THE
PURCHASE OR SALE OF COMMODITIES

The fundamental investment restriction regarding the purchase or sale of
commodities currently reads as follows:

"[The Company may not] purchase or sell commodities or purchase or sell
commodity contracts except for hedging purposes or in connection with
business operations and except for precious metals and coins."

The prices of the commodities, currencies and other instruments are
volatile and market movements are difficult to predict. Therefore, there could
be a risk that our ability to dispose of a commodities contract or enter into an
offsetting contract may be limited.

The Board of Directors proposes that shareholders remove the
above-referenced investment restriction regarding the purchase or sale of
commodities, because such an investment restriction is not required for a
business development company, although the Company has no present intention to
purchase or sell commodities.

PROPOSAL 4G

INVESTMENT RESTRICTION REGARDING MAKING SHORT SALES

The fundamental investment restriction regarding making short sales
currently reads as follows:

"[The Company may not] make any short sale of securities except in
conformity with applicable laws, rules and regulations and unless, in
giving effect to the sale, the market value of all securities sold short
does not exceed 25%, except short sales "against the box" which are not
subject to the limitation, of the value of our total assets and our
aggregate short sales of a particular class of securities does not exceed
25% of the then-outstanding securities of that class."

If Proposal 4G is adopted, the Company would have the authority to effect
short sales. A short sale is a transaction in which a company sells a security
it does not own by borrowing it from a broker, and consequently becomes
obligated to replace that security. Making short sales would increase our risk
of loss if the price of the security sold short increases between the time of
the short sale and the time we replace the borrowed security. The amount of loss
is theoretically unlimited. In addition, we would be obligated to replace the
borrowed security at any time upon demand and might not be able to reborrow the
security from other sources, in which case we would have to purchase the
security in order to return the borrowed security at a time that might cause us
to realize a loss.

The Board of Directors proposes that shareholders remove the
above-referenced investment restriction regarding short sales, because such an
investment restriction is not required for a business development company,
although we have no present intention to make short sales.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THIS PROPOSAL.

Other Business

The Board of Directors does not intend to bring any other matters before
the Annual Meeting and, at the date of mailing of this proxy statement, has not
been informed of any matter that others may bring before the Annual Meeting.
However, if any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, it is the
intention of the persons named in the accompanying proxy to vote such proxy in
accordance with their judgment on such matters.

Annual Reports on Form 10-K

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC, is being delivered
with this proxy statement.

We undertake to provide, without charge, to each shareholder as of March
14, 2005, upon the written request of such shareholder, a copy of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, including the financial statements and the financial
statement schedules, required to be filed with the SEC for our most recent
fiscal year. Any shareholder who would like to request a copy of our most recent
Annual Report on Form 10-K may do so by submitting a written request, which
shall contain a representation in good faith that such shareholder was a
beneficial owner as of March 14, 2005, of our securities entitled to vote, to
the following address:

Investor Relations
Harris & Harris Group, Inc.
111 West 57th Street, Suite 1100
New York, NY 10019

Submission of Shareholder Proposals

Any shareholder proposals intended to be presented for inclusion in our
proxy statement and form of proxy for the next annual meeting of shareholders to
be held in 2006 must be received in writing by the Secretary of the Company at
Harris & Harris Group, Inc., 111 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019, no
later than November 30, 2005, in order for such proposals to be considered for
inclusion in the proxy statement and proxy relating to the 2006 annual meeting
of shareholders. Submission of a proposal does not guarantee inclusion in the
proxy statement, as the requirements of certain federal laws and regulations
must be met by such proposals.

Under our Bylaws, nominations for director may be made only by the Board
or the Nominating Committee, or by a shareholder entitled to vote who has
delivered written notice to our Secretary (containing certain information
specified in the Bylaws) not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to
the anniversary of the date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of
shareholders; provided, however, that in the event that the annual meeting is
called for a date that is not within 30 days before or after such anniversary
date, notice by the shareholder in order to be timely must be so received not
later than the close of business on the 10th day following the day on which
notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed or such public disclosure of
the date of the annual meeting was made, whichever first occurs. The Bylaws also
provide that no business may be brought before an annual meeting of the
shareholders except as specified in the notice of the meeting or as otherwise
properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board or by a
shareholder entitled to vote who has delivered written notice to our Secretary
(containing certain information specified in the Bylaws) not less than 90 days
nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the date of the immediately
preceding annual meeting of shareholders; provided, however, that in the event
that the annual meeting is called for a date that is not within 30 days before
or after such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder in order to be timely
must be so received not later than the close of business on the 10th day
following the day on which notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed
or such public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting was made, whichever
first occurs.

Rule 14a-4 of the Securities and Exchange Commission's proxy rules allows
us to use discretionary voting authority to vote on matters coming before an
annual meeting of shareholders, if we do not have notice of the matter at least
45 days before the anniversary of the date on which we first mailed our proxy
materials for the prior year's annual meeting of shareholders or the date
specified by the advance notice provision in our Bylaws. Our Bylaws contain such
an advance notice provision as described above. For our Annual Meeting of
Shareholders expected to be held on May 5, 2005, shareholders must submit such
written notice to our Secretary in accordance with our advance notice provision,
as described above.

A copy of the full text of the Bylaw provisions discussed above may be
obtained by writing to our Secretary.

By Order of the Board of Directors

New York, New York /s/ Susan T. Harris
-----------------------------------
April 5, 2005 Susan T. Harris
Secretary

DETACH PROXY CARD HERE
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sign, Date and Return the [X]
Proxy Card Promptly Using Votes must be indicated
the Enclosed Envelope. (x) in Black or Blue ink.

1. Election of Directors

FOR all nominees [ ] WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote [ ] *EXCEPTIONS [ ]
listed below for all nominees listed
below

Nominees: DR. C. WAYNE BARDIN, DR. PHILLIP A. BAUMAN, G. MORGAN BROWNE, DUGALD A. FLETCHER,
CHARLES E. HARRIS, DR. KELLY S. KIRKPATRICK, MARK A. PARSELLS, LORI D. PRESSMAN,
CHARLES E. RAMSEY, JAMES E. ROBERTS.

(INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee,
mark the "Exceptions" box and write that nominee's name in the space
provided below.)

*Exceptions________________________________________________________________

FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN

2 [ ] [ ] [ ]

3 [ ] [ ] [ ]

4A [ ] [ ] [ ]

4B [ ] [ ] [ ]

4C [ ] [ ] [ ]

4D [ ] [ ] [ ]

4E [ ] [ ] [ ]

4F [ ] [ ] [ ]

4G [ ] [ ] [ ]

SCAN LINE (FPO)

Please sign exactly as name appears to the left. When shares are held by
joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor,
administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a
corporation, please sign in full corporation name by President or other
authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by
authorized person.

------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------
Date Share Owner sign here Co-Owner sign here

2. To approve a proposal to authorize the Company to offer long-term rights to
purchase shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price that, at
the time such rights are issued, will not be less than the greater of the
market value of the Company's common stock or the net asset value of the
Company's common stock. Such rights may be part of or accompanied by other
securities of the Company (such as convertible preferred stock or
convertible debt);

3. To amend our Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of common stock from 25,000,000 to 30,000,000;

4. To remove certain investment restrictions that date back to before we
became a business development company that are not applicable to business
development companies:

4A. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding concentration;

4B. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding borrowing and the
issuance of senior securities;

4C. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding lending;

4D. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding underwriting
securities;

4E. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding the purchase or sale
of real estate;

4F. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding the purchase or sale
of commodities;and

4G. To eliminate the investment restriction regarding making short sales.

5. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or
any postponement or adjournments thereof.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HARRIS & HARRIS GROUP,INC.
111 West 57th Street
New York,NY 10019

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
-----------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby appoints CHARLES E.HARRIS and HELENE B.SHAVIN and each of
them, with full power of substitution, proxies to vote at the annual meeting of
shareholders to be held on May 5, 2005 or an adjournment thereof, to represent
and to vote all the shares of common stock of Harris & Harris Group, Inc. that
the undersigned is entitled to vote with all powers the undersigned would have
if personally present, on the following matters as designated on the reverse
side and in their discretion with respect to such other business as may properly
come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote "FOR" all the nominees listed in item 1
and "FOR"items 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, 4F and 4G.

When properly executed,this proxy will be voted as specified and in accordance
with the accompanying proxy statement.If no instruction is indicated, this proxy
will be voted "FOR"items 1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 4C, 4D, 4E, 4F and 4G.

To change your address, please mark this box. [ ] (Continued and to be dated and signed on the reverse side.)

To include any comments, please mark this box. [ ] HARRIS & HARRIS GROUP, INC.
P.O. BOX 11469
NEW YORK, N.Y. 10203-0469