Edgar Filing: MOBIVITY HOLDINGS CORP.

mfon10q09302012.htm

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to __________

Commission file number 000-53851

Mobivity Holdings Corp.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Nevada		26-3439095
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)		Identification No.)

58 W. Buffalo St. #200

Chandler, AZ 85225

(Address of Principal Executive Offices & Zip Code)

(866) 622-4261

(Registrant’s Telephone Number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	[ ]		Accelerated filer	[ ]
Non-accelerated filer	[ ]		Smaller reporting company	[X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of November 13, 2012, the registrant had 23,218,117 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

MOBIVITY HOLDINGS CORP

INDEX

			Page

Part I	Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements		1
		Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
		Consolidated Statements of Operations	2
		Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	3
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	4
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		29
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		36
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		36

Part II	Other Information

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		38
Item 6.	Exhibits		38
Signatures

-i-

Table of Contents

Part I - Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

Mobivity Holdings Corp.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	September 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
Current assets
Cash	$	166,391		$	396
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $43,875 and $18,050, respectively		348,260			243,846
Other current assets		248,259			15,924
Total current assets		762,910			260,166

Equipment, net		14,187			25,316
Goodwill		3,002,070			3,002,070
Intangible assets, net		704,842			1,116,506
Other assets		46,577			197,046
TOTAL ASSETS	$	4,530,586		$	4,601,104

Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	399,858		$	842,777
Accounts payable - related party		10,226			-
Accrued interest		188,002			130,426
Accrued and deferred personnel compensation		212,379			237,691
Deferred revenue - related party		42,462			200,000
Deferred revenue and customer deposits		139,509			126,525
Convertible notes payable, net of discount		4,098,216			1,002,730
Notes payable, net of discount		172,446			736,270
Cash payment obligation, net of discount		-			86,714
Derivative liabilities		2,810,001			1,573,859
Other current liabilities		287,821			245,227
Earn-out payable		2,739,399			-
Total current liabilities		11,100,319			5,182,219

Non-current liabilities
Long term accounts payable		-			125,846
Earn-out payable		-			2,658,238
Total non-current liabilities		-			2,784,084
Total liabilities		11,100,319			7,966,303

Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 11)
Stockholders' equity (deficit)
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 23,218,117 and 22,754,308 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively		23,218			22,754
Additional paid-in capital		22,934,474			21,099,289
Accumulated deficit		(29,527,425	)		(24,487,242	)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(6,569,733	)		(3,365,199	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	4,530,586		$	4,601,104

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

-1-

Table of Contents

Mobivity Holdings Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

		Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
		2012			2011			2012			2011
					(Restated)						(Restated)
Revenues
Revenues	$	1,006,262		$	842,885		$	3,028,866		$	1,536,630
Cost of revenues		307,061			311,717			1,007,288			570,605
Gross margin		699,201			531,168			2,021,578			966,025

Operating expenses
General & administrative		637,113			961,136			2,354,369			2,152,977
Sales & marketing		406,815			240,722			1,135,934			514,185
Engineering, research, & development		155,365			174,802			448,446			499,120
Depreciation & amortization		130,579			191,783			431,962			318,560
Total operating expenses		1,329,872			1,568,443			4,370,711			3,484,842

Loss from operations		(630,671	)		(1,037,275	)		(2,349,133	)		(2,518,817	)

Other income/(expense)
Interest income		252			-			2,821			-
Interest expense, net		(1,781,125	)		(133,055	)		(3,019,625	)		(376,548	)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		213,089			(401,710	)		407,079			(986,216	)
Loss on sale of asset		-			-			(164	)		-
Loss on adjustment in contingent consideration		(157,943	)		-			(81,161	)		-
Total other income/(expense)		(1,725,727	)		(534,765	)		(2,691,050	)		(1,362,764	)

Loss before income taxes		(2,356,398	)		(1,572,040	)		(5,040,183	)		(3,881,581	)

Income tax expense		-			(1,600	)		-			(1,562	)

Net loss	$	(2,356,398	)	$	(1,573,640	)	$	(5,040,183	)	$	(3,883,143	)

Net loss per share - basic and diluted	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.19	)

Weighted average number of shares during the period - basic and diluted		23,215,481			22,048,802			23,019,643			20,381,533

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

-2-

Table of Contents

Mobivity Holdings Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)

(Unaudited)

										Total
	Common Stock				Additional					Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Equity (Deficit)
Balance, December 31, 2011		22,754,308	$	22,754	$	21,099,289	$	(24,487,242	)	$	(3,365,199	)

Issuance of common stock for services		225,000		225		269,775		-			270,000
Issuance of common stock for late payment		235,441		235		160,233		-			160,468
Stock-based compensation		-		-		314,990		-			314,990
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt repayment		3,368		4		69,328		-			69,332
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt conversion		-		-		1,020,859		-			1,020,859
Net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2012		-		-				(5,040,183	)		(5,040,183	)
Balance, September 30, 2012		23,218,117	$	23,218	$	22,934,474	$	(29,527,425	)	$	(6,569,733	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

-3-

Table of Contents

Mobivity Holdings Corp.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011
				(Restated)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(5,040,183	)	$	(3,883,143	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Bad debt expense		104,484			-
Common stock for services		270,000			-
Stock-based compensation		314,990			1,154,724
Stock issued for late payment		160,468			-
Depreciation and amortization expense		431,962			318,560
Loss on adjustment in contingent consideration		81,161			-
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		(407,079	)		986,216
Amortization of deferred financing costs		239,943			30,000
Amortization of note discounts		2,551,161			248,412
Loss on sale of assets		164			-
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in:
Accounts receivable		(208,898	)		(269,704	)
Other current assets		(200,915	)		28,525
Other assets		1,540			(33,333	)
Accounts payable		(442,920	)		314,920
Accounts payable - related party		10,226			-
Accrued interest		195,225			83,022
Accrued and deferred personnel compensation		(25,312	)		41,122
Deferred revenue - related party		(157,538	)		-
Deferred revenue and customer deposits		12,984			112,639
Other liabilities		42,594			74,580
Net cash used in operating activities		(2,065,943	)		(793,460	)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of equipment		(9,732	)		(12,189	)
Acquisition of intangible assets		-			(77,000	)
Cash paid for acquisitions		-			(209,833	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(9,732	)		(299,022	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable,
net of finance offering costs		3,148,470			10,000
Payments on notes payable		(819,300	)		(201,008	)
Payments on cash payment obligation		(87,500	)		(100,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock and warrants,
net of equity offering costs		-			1,011,203
Net cash provided by financing activities		2,241,670			720,195

Net change in cash		165,995			(372,287	)
Cash at beginning of period		396			373,439
Cash at end of period	$	166,391		$	1,152

Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid during period for :
Interest	$	33,108		$	11,048
Income taxes	$	-		$	1,562
Non cash investing and financing activities:
Common stock issued for patents and trademarks	$	-		$	50,000
Debt discount	$	2,733,412		$	-
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt repayment	$	69,332		$	-
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt conversion	$	1,020,859		$	-
Conversion of accrued interest into debt	$	137,649		$	-

Fair value of assets acquired in acquisitions	$	-		$	44,414
Customer contracts		-			1,026,000
Customer relationships		-			1,406,000
Trade name		-			140,000
Technology / IP		-			458,000
Non-compete		-			16,000
Goodwill		-			9,777,820
Assumed liabilities - deferred revenue		-			(134,849	)
Subordinated secured note payable		-			(781,064	)
Subordinated note payable					(182,460	)
Cash payment obligation		-			(241,960	)
Common stock issued for acquisitions		-			(11,318,068	)
Cash paid for acquisitions	$	-		$	209,833

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

-4-

Table of Contents

Mobivity Holdings Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Reverse Merger Transaction and Accounting

Reverse Merger Transaction

Mobivity Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) was incorporated as Ares Ventures Corporation in Nevada in 2008. On November 2, 2010, the Company acquired CommerceTel, Inc., which was wholly-owned by CommerceTel Canada Corporation (“CTel Canada” or “our former parent”), in a reverse merger, or the “Merger”. Pursuant to the Merger, all of the issued and outstanding shares of CommerceTel, Inc. common stock were converted, at an exchange ratio of 0.7268-for-1, into an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and CommerceTel, Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In connection with the Merger, the Company changed its corporate name to CommerceTel Corporation on October 5, 2010. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, common share and weighted average common share basic and diluted information has been retroactively adjusted to reflect the exchange ratio in the Merger. In connection with the Company’s acquisition of assets from Mobivity, LLC (See note 3 below), and the Company changed its corporate name to Mobivity Holdings Corp. and its operating company (CommerceTel, Inc) to Mobivity, Inc, on August 23, 2012.

Reverse Merger Accounting

Immediately following the consummation of the Merger, the: (i) former security holders of Mobivity, Inc. common stock had an approximate 56% voting interest in the Company and the Company stockholders retained an approximate 44% voting interest, (ii) former executive management team of Mobivity, Inc. remained as the only continuing executive management team for the Company, and (iii) Company’s ongoing operations consist solely of the ongoing operations of Mobivity, Inc. Based primarily on these factors, the Merger was accounted for as a reverse merger and a recapitalization in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or “GAAP”. As a result, these condensed financial statements reflect the: (i) historical results of Mobivity, Inc. prior to the Merger, (ii) combined results of the Company following the Merger, and (iii) acquired assets and liabilities at their historical cost. In connection with the Merger, the Company received net assets of $16,496.

On December 7, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company resolved to change the Company’s fiscal year end from September 30 to December 31, effective immediately, to coincide with the fiscal year end of its wholly owned subsidiary Mobivity, Inc.

2. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

The Company is a provider of mobile marketing technology that enables major brands and enterprises to engage consumers via their mobile phones and other smart devices. Interactive electronic communications with consumers is a complex process involving communication networks and software. The Company removes this complexity through its suite of services and technologies thereby enabling brands, marketers, and content owners to communicate with their customers and consumers in general.

Principles of Accounting and Consolidation

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

-5-

Table of Contents

Going Concern

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern. Such assumption contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, we have incurred continued losses, have a net working capital deficiency, and have an accumulated deficit of approximately ($29.5) million as of September 30, 2012. These factors among others create a substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is dependent upon sufficient future revenues, additional sales of our securities or obtaining debt financing in order to meet its operating cash requirements. Barring the Company’s generation of revenues in excess of its costs and expenses or its obtaining additional funds from equity or debt financing, or receipt of significant licensing prepayments, the Company will not have sufficient cash to continue to fund the operations of the Company through March 31, 2013. These unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

In response to our Company’s cash needs, we raised additional bridge financing totaling $3,396,350 between January and September, 2012. Longer term, we anticipate that we will raise additional equity financing through the sale of shares of the Company’s common stock in order to finance our future investing and operating cash flow needs. However, there can be no assurance that such financings will be available on acceptable terms, or at all.

We anticipate, based on currently proposed plans and assumptions relating to our ability to market and sell our products, that our cash on hand will not satisfy, our operational and capital requirements for the next 6 months. Further, the operation of our business and our efforts to grow our business further both through acquisitions and organically will require significant cash outlays and commitments. The timing and amount of our cash needs may vary significantly depending on numerous factors. Our existing working capital is not sufficient to meet our cash requirements and we will need to seek additional capital, potentially through debt, or equity financings, to fund our growth.

Although we are actively pursuing financing opportunities, we may not be able to raise cash on terms acceptable to us or at all. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining additional funding. Financings, if available, may be on terms that are dilutive to our shareholders, and the prices at which new investors would be willing to purchase our securities may be lower than the current price of our ordinary shares. The holders of new securities may also receive rights, preferences or privileges that are senior to those of existing holders of our ordinary shares. If additional financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our operations in the short term.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates used are those related to stock-based compensation, the valuation of the derivative liabilities, asset impairments, the valuation and useful lives of depreciable tangible and certain intangible assets, the fair value of common stock used in acquisitions of businesses, the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in acquisitions of businesses, and the valuation allowance of deferred tax assets. Management believes that these estimates are reasonable; however, actual results may differ from these estimates.

Purchase Accounting

The Company accounts for acquisitions pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 805, Business Combinations. The Company records all acquired tangible and intangible assets and all assumed liabilities based upon their estimated fair values.

Cash

The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses on such accounts.

-6-

Table of Contents

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework for using fair value to measure financial assets and liabilities on a recurring basis, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Beginning on January 1, 2011, the Company also applied the guidance to non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, which includes goodwill and intangible assets. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows:

Level 1 - Valuation is based upon unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access.

Level 2 -Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets; or valuations based on models where the significant inputs are observable in the market.

Level 3 - Valuation is based on models where significant inputs are not observable. The unobservable inputs reflect the Company's own assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use.

The following table presents assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value as of September 30, 2012 on a recurring and non-recurring basis:

Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Gains (Losses)
Intangibles, net (non-recurring)	$	-	$	-	$	704,842	$	-
Goodwill (non-recurring)	$	-	$	-	$	3,002,070	$	-
Derivatives (recurring)	$	-	$	-	$	2,810,001	$	407,079

The following table presents assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value as of December 31, 2011 on a recurring and non-recurring basis:

Description	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Gains (Losses)
Intangibles, net (non-recurring)	$	-	$	-	$	1,116,506	$	(1,325,134	)
Goodwill (non-recurring)	$	-	$	-	$	3,002,070	$	(10,435,170	)
Derivatives (recurring)	$	-	$	-	$	1,573,859	$	(1,234,145	)

The Company has goodwill and intangible assets as a result of the business combinations that were completed during 2011 and that are discussed throughout this 10-Q. These assets were valued with the assistance of a valuation consultant and consisted of Level 3 valuation techniques

The Company has derivative liabilities as a result of 2011 and 2012 convertible promissory notes and common stock and warrants with exercise price reset provisions that include embedded derivatives. These liabilities were valued with the assistance of a valuation consultant and consisted of Level 3 valuation techniques.

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and long-term debt. The estimated fair value of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The carrying value of long-term debt also approximates fair value since their terms are similar to those in the lending market for comparable loans with comparable risks. None of these instruments are held for trading purposes.

-7-

Table of Contents

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts. The Company grants unsecured credit to substantially all of its customers. Ongoing credit evaluations are performed and potential credit losses are charged to operations at the time the account receivable is estimated to be uncollectible. Since the Company cannot necessarily predict future changes in the financial stability of its customers, the Company cannot guarantee that its reserves will continue to be adequate.

From time to time, the Company may have a limited number of customers with individually large amounts due. Any unanticipated change in one of the customer’s credit worthiness could have a material effect on the results of operations in the period in which such changes or events occurred. The Company recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts of $43,875 and $18,050 as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. As of September 30, 2012, the Company had one customer whose balance represented 41% of total accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2011, there were no single customers with balances greater than 10%.

Equipment

Equipment, which is recorded at cost, consists primarily of computer equipment and is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets (generally five years or less). Costs incurred for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred and expenditures for major replacements and improvements are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated remaining useful lives. Depreciation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $6,913 and $6,154, respectively. Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $20,297 and $13,314, respectively. Accumulated depreciation for the Company’s equipment equaled $154,317 at September 30, 2012 and $134,810 at December 31, 2011.

Net property and equipment were as follows:

	September 30, 2012			December 31, 2011
Equipment	$	153,935		$	146,872
Furniture and Fixtures		14,569			13,254
Subtotal		168,504			160,126

Less accumulated depreciation		(154,317	)		(134,810	)
Total	$	14,187		$	25,316

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The Company periodically reviews the carrying value of intangible assets not subject to amortization, including goodwill, to determine whether impairment may exist. Goodwill and certain intangible assets are assessed annually, or when certain triggering events occur, for impairment using fair value measurement techniques. These events could include a significant change in the business climate, legal factors, a decline in operating performance, competition, sale or disposition of a significant portion of the business, or other factors. Specifically, goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company uses Level 3 inputs and a discounted cash flow methodology to estimate the fair value of a reporting unit. A discounted cash flow analysis requires one to make various judgmental assumptions including assumptions about future cash flows, growth rates, and discount rates. The assumptions about future cash flows and growth rates are based on the Company’s budget and long-term plans. Discount rate assumptions are based on an assessment of the risk inherent in the respective reporting units. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the goodwill impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. That is, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the purchase price paid to acquire the reporting unit.

-8-

Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2012, amortizable intangible assets consist of patents and trademarks, customer contracts, customer relationships, trade name, acquired technology, and non-compete agreements. These intangibles are being amortized on a straight line basis over their estimated useful lives of one to five years. The Company recorded amortization of our intangible assets of $123,666 and $185,629 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company also recorded amortization of our intangible assets of $411,664 and $305,246 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 360-10, Property, Plant and Equipment ("ASC 360-10"). ASC 360-10 requires that long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles held and used by the Company be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for impairment annually or more often if events and circumstances warrant. Events relating to recoverability may include significant unfavorable changes in business conditions, recurring losses or a forecasted inability to achieve break-even operating results over an extended period. The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets based upon forecasted undiscounted cash flows. Should impairment in value be indicated, the carrying value of intangible assets will be adjusted, based on estimates of future discounted cash flows resulting from the use and ultimate disposition of the asset. ASC 360-10 also requires that those assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value less costs to sell.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks.

The Company reviews the terms of the common stock, warrants and convertible debt it issues to determine whether there are embedded derivative instruments, including embedded conversion options, which are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as derivative financial instruments. In circumstances where the host instrument contains more than one embedded derivative instrument, including the conversion option, that is required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.

Bifurcated embedded derivatives are initially recorded at fair value and are then revalued at each reporting date with changes in the fair value reported as non-operating income or expense. When the equity or convertible debt instruments contain embedded derivative instruments that are to be bifurcated and accounted for as liabilities, the total proceeds received are first allocated to the fair value of all the bifurcated derivative instruments. The remaining proceeds, if any, are then allocated to the host instruments themselves, usually resulting in those instruments being recorded at a discount from their face value.

The discount from the face value of the convertible debt, together with the stated interest on the instrument, is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to interest expense, using the effective interest method.

The fair value of the derivatives is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The model utilizes a series of inputs and assumptions to arrive at a fair value at the date of inception and each reporting period. Some of the key assumptions include the likelihood of future financing, stock price volatility, and discount rates.

Revenue Recognition

The Company’s “C4” Mobile Marketing and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform is a hosted solution, as is the newly acquired Txtstation Control Center platform. The Company generates revenue from licensing its software to clients in its software as a service (Saas) model, per-message and per-minute transactional fees, and customized professional services. The Company recognizes license fees over the period of the contract, service fees as the services are performed, and per-message or per-minute transaction revenue when the transaction takes place. The Company recognizes revenue at the time that the services are rendered, the selling price is fixed, and collection is reasonably assured, provided no significant obligations remain. The Company considers authoritative guidance on multiple deliverables in determining whether each deliverable represents a separate unit of accounting. As for the newly acquired Mobivity and Boomtext platforms, which are both hosted solutions, revenue is principally derived from subscription fees from customers. The subscription fee is billed on a month to month basis with no contractual term and is collected by credit card for Mobivity and collected by cash and credit card for Boomtext. Revenue is recognized at the time that the services are rendered and the selling price is fixed with a set range of plans. Cash received in advance of the performance of services is recorded as deferred revenue. Deferred revenues to related parties totaled $42,462 at September 30, 2012 and $200,000 at December 31, 2011. Deferred revenues to third parties totaled $122,366 at September 30, 2012 and $109,063 at December 31, 2011.

-9-

Table of Contents

Stock-based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC Topic 718 Stock Compensation, which establishes accounting for equity instruments exchanged for employee services. Under such provisions, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense, under the straight-line method, over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity grant). In accordance with ASC 718, the Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revises the estimates if necessary, if actual forfeiture rates differ from those estimates. Stock options issued to employees are accounted for at their estimated fair value determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company recorded employee stock based compensation of $314,990 and $303,913 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Long Term Accounts Payable

The company had recorded amounts pertaining to payments made prior to the acquisitions of Boomtext as well as amounts due to it from the sellers of Boomtext in accounts that are included in Other Assets and Long Term Accounts Payable as of the year ended December 31, 2011. The amount recorded as a receivable from the sellers of Boomtext totaled $248,930, and the amount due to these sellers totaled $125,846 at December 31, 2011. As of September 30, 2012 these amounts have been reclassified to Other Current Assets and Other Current Liabilities, since these balances will be settled in March of 2013 when the Earn-out payable to Boomtext is paid. The amount recorded as a receivable from the sellers of Boomtext totaled $153,317 and the amount due to these sellers totaled $136,617 at September 30, 2012.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Company is required to record all components of comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated financial statements in the period in which they are recognized. Net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss), including foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on investments, are reported, net of their related tax effect, to arrive at comprehensive income (loss). For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the comprehensive loss was equal to the net loss.

Net Loss Per Common Share

Net loss per share is presented as both basic and diluted net loss per share. Basic net loss per share excludes any dilutive effects of options, shares subject to repurchase and warrants. Diluted net loss per share includes the impact of potentially dilutive securities. During 2012 and 2011, the Company had securities outstanding which could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future, but were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share, as their effect would have been anti-dilutive. These outstanding securities consist of 1,973,748 outstanding employee options, 930,000 outstanding non-employee warrants and 842,142 outstanding warrants attached to the private placement offering. In addition, see potential issuances associated with warrants and convertible debt in Notes 5 and 6.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting standards promulgated by the FASB are subject to change. Changes in such standards may have an impact on the Company’s future financial statements. The following are a summary of recent accounting developments.

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. This update clarifies the application of certain existing fair value measurement guidance and expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This update is effective on a prospective basis for annual and interim reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011, which for the Company is January 1, 2012. The Company does not expect that adopting this update will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

-10-

Table of Contents

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-08, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other” (ASU 2011-08). ASU 2011-08 allows a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step goodwill impairment test. If it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then the two-step impairment test would be performed. ASU 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011, and early adoption is permitted. This update is expected to change the process the Company uses to test goodwill for impairment, but is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2011, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-11, Balance Sheet - Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” to enhance disclosure requirements relating to the offsetting of assets and liabilities on an entity's balance sheet. The update requires enhanced disclosures regarding assets and liabilities that are presented net or gross in the statement of financial position when the right of offset exists, or that are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement. The new disclosure requirements relating to this update are retrospective and effective for annual and interim periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The update only requires additional disclosures, as such; we do not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

3. Acquisitions

Txtstation Acquisition

On April 1, 2011, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of the Txtstation interactive mobile marketing platform and services business from Adsparq Limited (“Adsparq”). The purchase price for the acquisition was 2,125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, $26,184 in cash at closing and $250,000 of scheduled cash payments. The $250,000 of scheduled cash payments is due as follows: $25,000 payable on the 60th day following closing and the balance is payable in $25,000 installments at the end of each of the next nine 30-day periods thereafter.

The Company also issued 300,000 shares of its common stock to the controlling stockholder of Adsparq in consideration of certain indemnification obligations and other agreements.

The acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination and the Company valued all assets and liabilities acquired at their fair values on the date of acquisition. An independent valuation expert (Vantage Point Advisors) was hired to assist the Company in determining these fair values. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the acquired entity were recorded at their estimated fair values at the date of the acquisition.

Mobivity Acquisition

Effective April 1, 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of Mobivity, LLC’s and Mobile Visions, Inc.’s Mobivity interactive mobile marketing platform and services business.

The purchase price for the acquisition consisted of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, $64,969 in cash paid at closing and a secured subordinated promissory note of Mobivity, Inc. in the principal amount of $606,064. The promissory note earns interest at 6.25% per annum; is payable in six quarterly installments of $105,526 (inclusive of interest) starting May 1, 2011; matures on August 1, 2012 and was repaid in full as discussed in Note 6; is secured by the acquired assets of the Mobivity business; and is subordinated to the Company’s obligations under its outstanding 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Notes due October 15, 2012 (see Note 6). Mobivity, LLC was granted a security interest in the acquired assets, subordinated only to the Company's senior debt (Bridge Loan), and a majority of the Bridge Lenders consented to the junior security interest.

-11-

Table of Contents

BoomText Acquisition

Effective August 1, 2011, the Company completed the purchase from with Digimark, LLC (“Digimark”) of substantially all of the assets of its BoomText interactive mobile marketing services business. The purchase price for the acquisition consisted of the following components: (i) 519,540 shares of the Company’s common stock issued at closing; (ii) $120,514 in cash paid at closing; (iii) a secured subordinated promissory note of Mobivity, Inc. in the principal amount of $175,000. This note bears interest at 6.25% per annum; is payable in full on May 25th, 2012 (original maturity March 31, 2012 was extended) and was repaid in full as discussed in Note 6; was secured by all of the assets of Mobivity, Inc. and is subordinated to the Company’s obligations under its outstanding 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Notes due October 15, 2012 (see Note 6); (i7v) an unsecured subordinated promissory note in the principal amount of $194,658 issued by Mobivity, Inc. This note does not bear interest; is payable in installments (varying in amount) from August 2011 through October 2012; and is subordinated to the Company’s obligations under its outstanding 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Notes due October 15, 2012 (see Note 6); (v) an earn-out payment (payable 20 months after closing of the transaction) of a number of shares of common stock of the Company equal to (a) 1.5, multiplied by the Company’s net revenue from acquired customers and customer prospects for the twelve-month period beginning six months after the closing date, divided by (b) the average of the volume-weighted average trading prices of the Company’s common stock for the 25 trading days immediately preceding the earn-out payment (subject to a collar of $1.49 and $2.01 per share). As of September 30, 2012 the dollar value of the earn-out payable is $2,739,399, which is recorded as a current liability on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The estimated number of common shares to be issued to settle the earn-out payable is 1,826,266 as of September 30, 2012. The purchase price also included the assumption of an office lease obligation and certain of Digimark’s accounts payable.

For one year following the closing of the transaction, 50% of the shares of common stock issued to Digimark at closing will be held in escrow as security for its indemnification obligations in the transaction.

The Company completed the acquisition in furtherance of its strategy to acquire small, privately owned enterprises in the mobile marketing sector through an asset purchase structure. This acquisition was consistent with the Company's purchase price model in which equity will represent most of the purchase price plus a small cash component and, in some cases, the assumption of specific liabilities.

4. Goodwill and Purchased Intangibles

As required under ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, goodwill is separately disclosed from other intangible assets on the consolidated balance sheet and not amortized, and is tested for impairment on at least an annual basis.

The following table presents details of the Company’s total purchased intangible assets as of September 30, 2012:

	Balance at							Balance at
	December 31, 2011		Additions		Amortization			September 30, 2012

Patents and trademarks	$	120,016	$	-	$	(6,297	)	$	113,719
Customer contracts		103,000		-		(18,176	)		84,824
Customer relationships		496,999		-		(261,820	)		235,179
Trade name		70,750		-		(37,809	)		32,941
Technology / IP		322,116		-		(85,187	)		236,929
Non-compete		3,625		-		(2,375	)		1,250

	$	1,116,506	$	-	$	(411,664	)	$	704,842

-12-

Table of Contents

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recorded amortization expense related to purchased intangibles of $123,666 and $411,664, respectively, which is included in Depreciation & amortization in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible assets as of September 30, 2012 is as follows:

Year ending December 31,	Amount

2012	$	115,500
2013		258,102
2014		109,737
2015		109,737
2016		33,732
Thereafter		78,034
Total	$	704,842

Beginning in 2011, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test outlined under ASC 350 which requires the assessment of goodwill for impairment on an annual basis. The assessment of goodwill impairment will be conducted by determining and comparing the fair value of our reporting units, as defined in ASC 350, to the reporting unit’s carrying value as of that date. The fair value will be determined using an income approach under which the fair value of the asset is based on the value of the cash flows that the asset can be expected to generate in the future. These estimated future cash flows will be discounted to arrive at their respective fair values.

Beginning in 2011, the Company evaluated its purchased intangibles for possible impairment on an ongoing basis. When impairment indicators exist, the Company will perform an assessment to determine if the intangible asset has been impaired and to what extent. The assessment of purchased intangibles impairment is conducted by first estimating the undiscounted future cash flows to be generated from the use and eventual disposition of the purchased intangibles and comparing this amount with the carrying value of these assets. If the undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amounts, impairment exists and future cash flows are discounted at an appropriate rate and compared to the carrying amounts of the purchased intangibles to determine the amount of the impairment.

5. Derivative Liabilities

As discussed in Note 6 under Bridge Financing, the Company issued convertible notes payable that provide for the issuance of warrants to purchase its common stock at a future date. The conversion term for the convertible notes is variable based on certain factors. The number of warrants to be issued is based on the future price of the Company’s common stock. As of September 30, 2012, the number of warrants to be issued remains indeterminate. Due to the fact that the number of warrants issuable is indeterminate, the equity environment is tainted and all additional warrants and convertible debt are included in the value of the derivative. Pursuant to ASC 815-15 Embedded Derivatives, the fair values of the variable conversion option and warrants / shares to be issued were recorded as derivative liabilities on the issuance date.

In March 2011, the Company commenced a private placement. The private placement structure consists of a series of identical subscription agreements for the sale of units comprised of shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $1.50 per share and an equivalent number of warrants at an exercise price of $2.00. Both the common shares and the warrants contain anti-dilutive, or down round, price protection. The common shares down round price protection expired on August 15, 2012; resulting in a gain of $512,345, during 2012, due their removal from the derivative liability. The down round protection for the warrant terminates when the warrant expires or is exercised. Pursuant to ASC 815-15 Embedded Derivatives and ASC 815-40 Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity, the Company recorded a derivative liability for the warrants issued in the transactions.

The fair values of the Company’s derivative liabilities were estimated at the issuance date and are revalued at each subsequent reporting date, using a Monte Carlo simulation. At September 30, 2012, the Company recorded current derivative liabilities of $2,810,001. The change in fair value of the derivative liabilities for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was a gain of $213,089, and a loss of ($401,710), respectively, which were reported as other income/(expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. The change in fair value of the derivative liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was a gain of $407,079, and a loss of ($986,216), respectively, which were also reported as other income/(expense) in the consolidated statements of operations.

Derivative Value by Intrument Type	September 30, 2012		December 31, 2011

Convertible Bridge Notes	$	2,582,774	$	747,424
Common Stock and Warrants		135,507		826,435
Non-employee Warrants		91,720		-
	$	2,810,001	$	1,573,859

-13-

Table of Contents

	Total
Beginning balance January 1, 2010	$	-
Issuances in derivative value due to new security issuances of notes		319,617
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		14,861
Beginning balance January 1, 2011	$	334,478
Issuances in derivative value due to new security issuances of notes		149,197
Issuances in derivative value due to new security issuances of common stock and warrants		1,185,150
Conversion of bridge notes into common stock and warrants		(143,961	)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		48,995
Beginning balance January 1, 2012	$	1,573,859
Issuances in derivative value due to new security issuances of notes		2,852,045
Issuances in derivative value due to vesting of non-employee warrants		475,018
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt repayment		(69,332	)
Adjustment to derivative liability due to debt conversion		(1,020,859	)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		(1,000,730	)
Ending balance September 30, 2012	$	2,810,001

Key inputs and assumptions:

For issuances of notes, common stock and warrants:

s Stock prices on all measurement dates were based on the fair market value

s Down round protection is based on the subsequent issuance of common stock at prices less than $1.50 per share and warrants less than $2.00 per share

s The probability of future financing was estimated at 100%

s Computed volatility of 65%

s Risk free rates ranging from 0.03% to 0.78%

For issuances of non-employee warrants:

s Computed volatility of 61% to 73%

s Risk free rates ranging from 0.28% to 1.04%

s Expected life (years) from 3.00 to 6.00

See Note 9, discussing fair value measurements.

6. Bridge Financing, Notes Payable, Accrued Interest and Cash Payment Obligation

Bridge Financing

From November 2010 through March 2011, the Company issued to a number of accredited investors a series of its 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Note (the “Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of $1,010,000 (the “Financing”). The Notes accrue interest at the rate of 10% per annum. The entire principal amount evidenced by the Notes (the “Principal Amount”) plus all accrued and unpaid interest is due on the earlier of (i) the date the Company completes a financing transaction for the offer and sale of shares of common stock (including securities convertible into or exercisable for its common stock), in an aggregate amount of no less than 125% of the principal amounts evidenced by the Notes (a “Qualifying Financing”), and (ii) November 2, 2011. If the Notes are held to maturity, the Company pays, at the option of the holder: i) cash or ii) in securities to be issued by the Company in the Qualifying Financing at the same price paid by other investors. The Notes are secured by a first priority lien and security interest in all of the Company’s assets.

-14-

Table of Contents

In November 2011, the Company entered into agreements with all holders of the then outstanding Notes. Under the terms of the agreements, holders of Notes totaling $800,000 agreed to extend the maturity due date of the Notes to February 2, 2012. For these note holders, no change occurred in their rights. Holders of the balance of the Notes totaling $210,000 agreed to convert the entire principal amount plus all accrued and unpaid interest of $20,271 into units (each, a “Unit”), each of which consists of one share of common stock of the Company and a four-year warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at $2.00 per share. The conversion took place at a price of $1.50 per Unit. Accordingly, the Company issued an aggregate of 153,515 shares of common stock and 153,515 warrants. As a result of the conversion, the holders of the converted Notes forfeited all rights there under, including the right to acquire warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock.

Also in November 2011, the Company issued additional Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $262,500. These Notes were due February 2, 2012 and contain the same rights and privileges as the previously issued Notes. In January, 2012, the Company issued additional Notes in the principal amount of $520,000. As of April 11, 2012, all note holders with maturity dates of February 2, 2012 extended the maturity through May 2, 2012. As consideration to the note holders for the extension of the maturity date to May 2, 2012, the Company provided Allonges which consisted of the accrued interest as of January 31, 2012 for each note, which is convertible into common shares at the latest financing price. The Allonges were valued using a Monte Carlo Simulation; the fair value of the Allonges were estimated at the January 31, 2012 creating an additional share issuance derivative liability totaling $118,633. The Allonge derivative liability is revalued at each subsequent reporting date and as of September 30, 2012 totaled $114,873. The subsequent decrease in the derivative liability during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 of $3,760 was recorded as a decrease to the derivative liability and an increase to change in fair market value of derivative liabilities in the statement of operations.

In March 2012, one note holder was repaid a partial principal balance of $65,000.

In March and April 2012, the Company issued additional 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $220,100 due May 2, 2012. In May 2012 theses notes were cancelled and converted into the New Notes below.

In May and June 2012, (the “Company”) issued to a number of accredited investors its 10% Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes in the principal amount of $4,347,419 (the “New Notes”), consisting of (i) $2,656,250 of new funds and (ii) $1,691,168 principal amount plus accrued but unpaid interest outstanding under previously issued 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Notes (the “Old Notes”) that were cancelled and converted into the New Notes. The New Notes accrue interest at the rate of 10% per annum. The entire principal amount under the New Notes (the “Principal Amount”) plus all accrued and unpaid interest is due on the earlier of (i) the date the Company completes a financing transaction for the offer and sale of shares of common stock (including securities convertible into or exercisable for its common stock), in an aggregate amount of no less than 125% of the principal amounts evidenced by the Notes (a “Qualifying Financing”), and (ii) October 15, 2012, which date, as described below, was later extended to April 15, 2013. Payments may be made in cash, or, at the option of the holder of the New Notes in securities to be issued by the Company in the Qualifying Financing at the same price paid for such securities by other investors. The New Notes are secured by a first priority lien and security interest in all of the Company’s assets.

The Company will also issue to the holders of the New Notes on the date that is the earlier of the repayment of the New Notes or the completion of the Qualifying Financing, at their option:

five year warrants (the “Warrants”) to purchase that number of shares of Common Stock equal to the Principal Amount plus all accrued and unpaid interest divided by the per share purchase price of the Common stock offered and sold in the Qualifying Financing (the “Offering Price”) which Warrants shall be exercisable at the Offering Price and shall include cashless exercise provisions commencing 18 months from the date of issuance of the Warrants if there is not at that time an effective registration statement covering the shares of Common Stock exercisable upon exercise of the Warrants, or

·	that number of shares of Common Stock equal to the product arrived at by multiplying (x) the Principal Amount plus all accrued and unpaid interest divided by the Offering Price and (y) 0.33

The Company has granted piggy-back registration rights with respect to the securities to be issued in connection with the New Notes.

-15-

Table of Contents

The New Notes contain embedded derivatives that on their inception date were valued with a Monte Carlo simulation as discussed in Note 6. The embedded derivatives, as they represent additional consideration given to the New Notes holders, were treated as a discount on the debt that is being amortized over the life of the New Notes which ends on October 15, 2012. The debt discounts booked as reductions to the New Notes during May 2012 were $478,544 and $1,852,713 for the variable maturity conversion option and the additional security issuance derivative. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, $1,528,438 was amortized from the debt discount into interest expense. The remaining debt discount amounts as of September 30, 2012, for the variable maturity conversion option and additional security issuance derivatives are $51,150 and $198,053, respectively, and will be amortized during the subsequent life ending on October 15, 2012.

The New Notes further provide that in the event of a change of control transaction, the proceeds from such transaction must be used by the Company to pay to the holders of the New Notes, pro rata based on the amount of New Notes owned by each holder, an amount equal to 1.5 times the amount of the aggregate principal amount outstanding under the New Notes, plus all accrued and unpaid interest due there under, plus all other fees, costs or other charges due there under.

The holders of the New Notes were also granted the right to appoint two designees to serve as members of the Company’s board of directors, which members will also serve as members of the Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee of the Company’s board of directors.

The Company used $201,322 from the proceeds of the sale of the New Notes to pay off existing balances under the Old Notes that were not cancelled and converted into the New Notes.

Commencing on October 12, 2012 and continuing thereafter, Mobivity Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) has entered into amendments with the holders the New Notes. Under the terms of the amendments, the holders of New Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $4,209,720 have agreed to extend the maturity date of the New Notes to April 15, 2013. In consideration of the New Note holders’ agreement to extend the maturity date, the amendment provides that the holder shall have the option to convert the principal and interest under the New Note into the securities offered by the Company in a qualifying equity financing at the lower of (a) the same price paid for such securities by other investors investing in the financing or (b) $.50 per share (subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, reclassification or the like). Prior to the amendment, the conversion option under the New Note entitled the holder to convert the principal and interest under the Note into the securities offered by the Company in a qualifying equity financing at the same price paid for such securities by other investors investing in the financing.

On November 2, 2012 one new Note holder was repaid $5,000 in principal.

As of November 9, 2012, the Company is pursuing the execution of similar amendments by the holders of the remaining Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $132,699. While these Notes are considered past due as of October 15, 2012, no notice of default has been issued by the Note holders as of November 9, 2012.

The Company’s obligations under the New Notes are secured by all of the assets of the Company, including all shares of Mobivity, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary.

The Company paid $200,630 in placement agent fees in connection with the sale and issuance of the New Notes. WFG Investments, Inc. and Emerging Growth Equities, Ltd., both registered broker dealers, cumulatively have been paid placement agent fees related to the Notes in the amount of $40,000 and $252,737, respectively, which were capitalized as deferred financing costs, and are being amortized over the term of the Notes using the effective interest method. The Company recorded deferred financing amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, totaling $65,703 and $20,000, respectively. The Company also recorded deferred financing amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, totaling $100,857 and $20,000, respectively

The following table summarizes information relative to all of the outstanding Notes at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	September 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011
Bridge notes payable	$	4,347,419		$	1,062,500
Less unamortized discounts:
Variable maturity discount		(51,150	)		(12,031	)
Warrant discount		(198,053	)		(47,739	)
Bridge notes payable, net of discounts	$	4,098,216		$	1,002,730

-16-

Table of Contents

In accordance with ASC 470-20 Debt with Conversion and Other Options, the Company recorded a discount of $560,662 for the variable conversion feature and a discount of $2,172,750 for the warrants / shares to be issued. The discounts will be amortized to interest expense over the term of the Notes using the effective interest method. The Company recorded $2,543,979 of interest expense for the amortization of the note discounts associated with derivative liabilities during the year ended September 30, 2012.

In accordance with ASC 815-15, the Company determined that the variable conversion feature and the warrants / shares to be issued represented embedded derivative features, and these are shown as derivative liabilities on the balance sheet. See Note 5.

The Company calculated the fair value of the compound embedded derivatives associated with the convertible notes payable utilizing a complex, customized Monte Carlo simulation model suitable to value path dependant American options. The model uses the risk neutral methodology adapted to value corporate securities. This model utilized subjective and theoretical assumptions that can materially affect fair values from period to period.

Mobivity Note

As partial consideration for the acquisition of Mobivity, the Company issued a secured subordinated promissory note in the principal amount of $606,000. The promissory note accrued interest at 6.25% per annum; was payable in six quarterly installments of $105,526 (inclusive of interest) starting May 1, 2011; matured on August 1, 2012; is secured by the acquired assets of the Mobivity business; and is subordinated to the Company’s obligations under its Notes discussed above. Mobivity, LLC was granted a security interest in the acquired assets, subordinated only to the Company's Notes, and a majority of the Bridge Financing lenders consented to the junior security interest. On May 18, 2012 and May 25, 2012, late payment penalties were paid in the amount of 235,441 common shares valued at $160,468 based on the closing market price on the date granted; which were expensed through share based compensation.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company made principal and interest payments totaling $316,579 on the promissory note, and the note was paid in full on May 31, 2012.

Digimark, LLC Notes

As partial consideration for the acquisition of Boomtext, the Company issued a secured subordinated promissory note in the principal amount of $175,000. The promissory note accrues interest at 6.25% per annum; is payable in full on May 25, 2012 (original maturity March 31, 2012 was extended); is secured by all of the assets of Mobivity, Inc. and is subordinated to the Company’s obligations under its Notes discussed above.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company made principal and interest payments totaling $184,266 on the promissory note, and the note was paid in full on May 31, 2012.

As partial consideration for the acquisition of Boomtext, the Company also issued an unsecured subordinated promissory note in the principal amount of $195,000. The promissory note does not bear interest; is payable in installments (varying in amount) from August 2011 through October 2012; and is subordinated to the Company’s obligations under its Notes discussed above. The $195,000 unsecured subordinated promissory note does not bear interest; accordingly, the Company recorded the promissory note at the present value of the $195,000 payments over the subsequent periods. The Company used a discount rate of 6.25% in calculating the net present value of the unsecured promissory note. The discount rate was based on the Company’s estimated cost of debt capital. Under the effective interest method, the Company accretes the debt discount to the face amount of the promissory note. Accretion of the debt discount totaled $4,422 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Accretion of the debt discount was charged to interest expense in accordance with ASC 480.

-17-

Table of Contents

Summary of Notes Payable and Accrued Interest

The following table summarizes the Company’s notes payable and accrued interest as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011:

	Notes Payable				Accrued Interest
	9/30/2012		12/31/2011		9/30/2012		12/31/2011
Bridge notes, net, as discussed above	$	4,098,216	$	1,002,730	$	151,995	$	95,823

Mobivity note, as discussed above		-		310,135		-		-

Unsecured (as amended) note payable due to our Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, interest accrues at the rate of 9% compounded annually, all amounts due and payable December 31, 2008, See Note 12		20,000		20,000		13,020		10,871

Note payable due to a trust, interest accrues at the rate of 10% per annum, all amounts due and payable December 31, 2006. The Company is negotiating the terms of this note.		51,984		51,984		22,987		19,084

Digimark, LLC secured subordinated promissory note, as discussed above		-		175,000		-		4,648

Digimark, LLC subordinated promissory note, net, as discussed above		100,462		179,151		-		-
	$	4,270,662	$	1,739,000	$	188,002	$	130,426

Interest expense, including amortization of note discounts, totaled $1,781,125 and $133,055 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Interest expense, including amortization of note discounts, totaled $3,019,625 and $376,548 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Cash Payment Obligation

As partial consideration for the acquisition of Txtstation, the Company agreed to a $250,000 of scheduled cash payments. The $250,000 of scheduled cash payments is due as follows: $25,000 payable on the 60th day following closing and the balance is payable in $25,000 installments at the end of each of the next nine 30-day periods thereafter. The $250,000 cash payment obligation does not bear interest; accordingly, the Company recorded the cash payment obligation at the present value of the $250,000 payments over the subsequent periods. The Company used a discount rate of 6.25% in calculating the net present value of the cash payment obligation. The discount rate was based on the Company’s estimated cost of debt capital. Under the effective interest method, the Company accretes the debt discount to the face amount of the promissory note. Accretion of the debt discount totaled $786 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Accretion of the debt discount was charged to interest expense in accordance with FASB ASC 480.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company made payments totaling $87,500 on the cash payment obligation, and the obligation was paid in full on April 11, 2012

7. Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Common Stock

On March 2, 2012, the Company issued 150,000 common stock shares at a price of $1.22 per share totaling $183,000 for consulting services. The shares were valued based on the closing stock price for the date granted.

On February 1, 2012, the Company authorized 75,000 common stock shares at a price of $1.16 per share totaling $87,000 for investor relations consulting services. In May 2012 the Company issued the common stock shares which were valued based on the closing stock price for the date granted.

-18-

Table of Contents

On May 18, 2012, the Company issued 86,812 common stock shares at a price of $0.65 per share totaling $56,428 in share based compensation. The issuance was pursuant to the Mobivity Acquisition Agreement Amendment #1 to the Secured Subordinated Promissory Note and due to the default on the Mobivity Note for the May 18th, 2012 extended quarterly payment. The shares were valued based on the closing stock price for the date granted and constituted a late penalty payment to the note holder; not a principal or interest repayment.

On May 25, 2012, the Company issued 148,629 common stock shares at a price of $0.70 per share totaling $104,040 in share based compensation. The issuance was pursuant to the Mobivity Acquisition Agreement Amendment #1 to the Secured Subordinated Promissory Note and due to the default on the Mobivity Note for the May 25th, 2012 penalty for failure to prepay final payment. The shares were valued based on the closing stock price for the date granted and constituted a late penalty payment to the note holder; not a principal or interest repayment.

On September 10, 2012, the Company issued 3,368 shares of its common stock at a deemed value of $0.40 per share realizing $6,644 in additional security issuance derivative liability. These shares were consideration owed to one old Note holder for the additional securities due under the original 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge note, and additional shares issued under the terms of the Allonge signed January 31, 2012 as consideration for the extension of the maturity date of the Note from February 2, 2012, to May 2, 2012. The share consideration was valued based on the Monte Carlo simulation for both the Allonge granted on February 2, 2012 plus the Monte Carlo simulation for the additional shares issuance derivative liability, on September 10, 2012. For more details concerning the inputs and background of the derivatives please see Note 6.

As of September 30, 2012, the Company has 23,218,117 common shares outstanding.

Stock-based Compensation

2010 Incentive Stock Option Plan

On December 24, 2010, the Company adopted the 2010 Incentive Stock Option Plan (“the 2010 Plan”), subject to shareholder approval within one year. Shareholder approval was not obtained within one year, therefore incentive stock options granted under the 2010 Plan converted to non-qualified stock options. The 2010 Plan permits the Company to grant up to 3,124,000 shares of common stock and options to purchase shares of common stock. The 2010 Plan is designed to retain directors, executives and selected employees and consultants and reward them for making major contributions to the success of the Company. These objectives are accomplished by making long-term incentive awards under the 2010 Plan thereby providing participants with a proprietary interest in the growth and performance of the Company.

The Company believes that such awards better align the interests of its employees with those of its shareholders. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price that equals the fair market value of the Company's stock at the date of grant. These option awards generally vest based on four years of continuous service and have five-year or 10-year contractual terms.

A summary of option activity under the 2010 Plan as of September 30, 2012 and changes during the nine months then ended is presented below:

				Weighted -		Weighted -
				Average		Average
	Number			Exercise Price		Remaining Contractual
	Outstanding			Per Share		Life (Years)
Outstanding at January 1, 2012		1,610,000		$	0.82		4.37
Granted		682,500			0.56		4.78
Exercised		-			-		-
Canceled/forfeited/expired		(318,752	)		0.52		3.36
Outstanding at September 30, 2012		1,973,748		$	0.78		4.68

Options vested and exercisable at September 30, 2012		554,368		$	0.79		4.44

-19-

Table of Contents

Expense Information

The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors based upon estimated fair values. The Company recorded stock-based compensation in operating expenses for employees and directors totaling $104,561 and $100,551 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company also recorded stock-based compensation in operating expenses for employees and directors totaling $314,990 and $303,913 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Company vesting term for employees is a 4 year term and vest as follows; the first installment equaling 25% of the grant, shall become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of the Option, and additional installments shall become exercisable monthly at the rate of 1/36 of the 75% grant balance over the ensuing 36 months. As of September 30, 2012, the company had recorded $249,945 of employee stock based compensation and expects to expense approximately $760,000 of additional employee stock based compensation over the next 5 years.

The Company vesting term for directors is a 3 year term and vest as follows; in (3) equal annual installments of 33 1/3% of the Shares covered by this Option, the first installment to be exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of the Option, with an additional 33 1/3% of such Shares becoming exercisable on each of the 2 successive anniversary dates. As of September 30, 2012, the company had recorded $65,045 of director stock based compensation and expects to expense approximately $113,000 of additional director stock based compensation over the next 9 years.

Valuation Assumptions

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model in determining its option expense. The weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $0.56 per share. There were 682,500 options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The ranges of assumptions used during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 are as follows:

	Employee
	Options
Expected volatility	65% to 73.4%
Risk-free interest rate	0.39% to 0.51%
Forfeiture rate		0.0	%
Expected dividend rate		0.0	%
Expected life(yrs)	3.00 to 4.00

The expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the historical volatility of publicly traded surrogates in the Company’s peer group.

The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon published interest rates appropriate for the expected life of the Company’s employee stock options.

The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history of not paying dividends and no future expectations of dividend payouts.

The expected life of the stock options represents the weighted-average period that the stock options are expected to remain outstanding and was determined based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms of the stock-based awards, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee behavior as influenced by changes to the terms of its stock-based awards.

-20-

Table of Contents

Warrants

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company issued warrants totaling 25,000 to non-employee consultants that include graded vesting terms. As of September 30, 2012, 583,118 warrants were vested pursuant to four non-employee warrant agreements; three of which were granted during the prior year. These warrants were valued using a Monte Carlo Simulation; the fair values of the warrants were estimated at the vesting date and are revalued at each subsequent reporting date. At September 30, 2012, the Company recorded current derivative liabilities for the non-employee warrants totaling $91,720. The change in fair value of the derivative liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was a gain of $331,018, which was reported as other income/(expense) in the consolidated statements of operations.

On December 24, 2010 the company issued 700,000 warrants for consulting services. The warrants vest over a 4 year term and vest as follows; the first installment equaling 25% of the grant, shall become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of the Option, and additional installments shall become exercisable monthly at the rate of 1/36 of the 75% grant balance over the ensuing 36 months.

On January 10, 2011 the company issued 200,000 warrants for consulting services. The warrants vest over a 4 year term and vest as follows; the first installment equaling 25% of the grant, shall become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of the Option, and additional installments shall become exercisable monthly at the rate of 1/36 of the 75% grant balance over the ensuing 36 months.

On July 8, 2011 the company issued 5,000 warrants for consulting services. The warrants vest over a 4 year term and vest as follows; the first installment equaling 25% of the grant, shall become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of the Option, and additional installments shall become exercisable monthly at the rate of 1/36 of the 75% grant balance over the ensuing 36 months.

On February 1, 2012 the company issued 25,000 warrants for consulting services. The warrants vest over a 1 year term and vest as follows; the warrants vest monthly commencing on the 1st monthly anniversary of the grant.

Valuation Assumptions

The Company uses a Monte Carlo simulation in determining the fair values of the warrants. There were 25,000 warrants granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Company periodically revalues these warrants as they vest. The ranges of assumptions used during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 are as follows:

	Non-Employee
	Warrants
Expected volatility	61% to 73.4%
Risk-free interest rate	0.28% to 0.57%
Forfeiture rate		0.0	%
Expected dividend rate		0.0	%
Expected life (yrs)		5.00

-21-

Table of Contents

A summary of non-employee warrant activity during the nine months ended and as of September 30, 2012 is presented below:

			Weighted -		Weighted -
			Average		Average
	Number		Exercise Price		Remaining Contractual
	Outstanding		Per Share		Life (Years)
Outstanding at January 1, 2012		905,000	$	0.33		4.35
Granted		25,000		1.16		4.34
Exercised		-		-		-
Canceled/forfeited/expired		-		-		-
Outstanding at September 30, 2012		930,000	$	0.35		4.35

Warrants vested and exercisable at September 30, 2012		583,118	$	0.35		3.99

As discussed in Note 6, the Company is obligated to issue warrants or shares pursuant to its Bridge Financing. The number of warrants / shares issuable pursuant to the agreements is not known as of September 30, 2012.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued warrants for the purchase of 688,669 shares of common stock at $2.00 per share in connection with its private placement discussed above under Common Stock. The warrants are exercisable for four years from the date of issuance, and contain anti-dilution, or down round, price protection as long as the warrant remains outstanding. In addition, the Company issued warrants for the purchase of 153,515 shares of common stock at $2.00 per share in connection with the conversion of its outstanding Notes with a principal amount of $210,000 discussed above in Note 6 under Bridge Financing. The warrants are exercisable for four years from the date of issuance. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company did not issue any additional warrants. These warrants are shown below. These warrants are included in the “Common Stock and Warrants” derivative value (see Note 5) as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Beginning balance January 1, 2012			842,184
Warrants issued			-
Warrants exercised			-
Warrants expired			-
Ending balance September 30, 2012			842,184

8. Income Taxes

The Company maintains deferred tax assets that reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. These deferred tax assets include net operating loss carryforwards, deferred revenue and stock-based compensation. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company considers projected future taxable income and planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on the level of historical operating results and projections for the taxable income for the future, the Company has determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets to zero. There can be no assurance that the Company will ever be able to realize the benefit of some or all of the federal and state loss carryforwards, either due to ongoing operating losses or due to ownership changes, which limit the usefulness of the loss carryforwards.

The Company has determined that during 2010 it experienced a “change of ownership” as defined by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. As such, utilization of net operating loss carryforwards and credits generated before the 2010 change in ownership will be limited to approximately $207,000 per year until such carryforwards are fully utilized. The pre-change net operating loss carryforward was approximately $7,000,000.

-22-

Table of Contents

9. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the authoritative guidance establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the Company to develop its own assumptions. This hierarchy requires companies to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value. On a recurring basis, the Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, including its derivative liabilities.

At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company recorded a liability related to the variable maturity feature and the future issuance of warrants / shares in connection with its Bridge Notes (See Note 6), and the common stock and warrants issued in the current year (See Note 5) at the aggregate fair market value of $2,810,001 and $1,573,859, respectively, utilizing unobservable inputs. The change in fair market value of these liabilities is included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations. The assumptions used in the Monte-Carlo simulation used to value the derivative liabilities involve expected volatility in the Company’s common stock, estimated probabilities related to the occurrence of a future financing, and interest rates. As all the assumptions employed to measure this liability are based on management’s judgment using internal and external data, this fair value determination is classified in Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

See Note 5 for a table that provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the derivative liabilities as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

10. Concentrations

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, one customer accounted for 10% of revenues. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, one customer accounted for 12% of revenues. At September 30, 2012, the previously mentioned customer accounted for 41% of accounts receivable totaling $154,444 and as of November 13, 2012 the outstanding accounts receivable balance decreased to $82,390. At December 31, 2011, no customers were greater than 10% of receivables.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Earn-Out Contingency

The Company has an earn-out commitment associated with the acquisition of Boomtext from Digimark, LLC. An earn-out payment (payable 20 months after closing of the transaction) of a number of shares of common stock of the Company equal to (a) 1.5, multiplied by the Company’s net revenue from acquired customers and customer prospects for the twelve-month period beginning six months after the closing date, divided by (b) the average of the volume-weighted average trading prices of the Company’s common stock for the 25 trading days immediately preceding the earn-out payment (subject to a collar of $1.49 and $2.01 per share). As of September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, the estimated dollar value of the earn-out payable is $2,739,399, and $2,658,238, respectively. As of September 30, 2012 this was recorded as a current liability and was recorded as a non-current liability as of December 31, 2011 on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.

Litigation

On September 23, 2012, the Company initiated litigation against a former client (the “Defendant”) for failure to pay the Company’s invoices for services rendered under its Master License and Services Agreement. The complaint was filed in Superior Court of California, San Diego County. The litigation seeks to recover $67,795 in services and interest penalties. As of November 9, 2012 the Company is in negotiation with the Defendant's counsel to settle the debt.

Operating Lease

On February 28, 2012, the Company signed an amendment to its existing lease for the facility in Chandler, Arizona to expand by adding 2,519 square feet in an adjacent suite. The amended lease agreement remains in force through December 2015.

-23-

Table of Contents

The minimum lease payments required over the next five years is shown below as of September 30, 2012.

Minimum Lease Payments

2012	$	32,550
2013		138,678
2014		143,492
2015		148,281
2016		-
	$	463,001

Lease Exit Obligation

The Company had a lease agreement for its office facilities in San Diego, California through September 2012. Upon signing a lease agreement for the facility in Chandler, the Company determined it no longer needed the San Diego facility. The property was vacated in November 2011 and returned to the owner. As of September 30, 2012, the Company has a Lease Exit Obligation totaling $65,993 for the period December 2011 through September 2012, made up of, $38,088 in remaining rent obligation, $27,905 in remaining deferred rent. The Company expects no further charges in relation to this lease exit obligation, aside from actual common area maintenance charges reconciled against the estimate.

Rent expense for both the San Diego, California, and Chandler, Arizona facilities was $135,827 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, and $59,771 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

12.	Employee Benefit Plan

The Company has an employee savings plan (the “Plan”) pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), covering all of its employees. Participants in the Plan may contribute a percentage of compensation, but not in excess of the maximum allowed under the Code. The Company may make contributions at the discretion of its Board of Directors. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company made no contributions to the Plan.

13.	Related Party Transactions

Prior to the reverse merger on November 2, 2010, Optimal Payments Corporation converted $570,534 of debt into $370,534 worth of Mobivity Inc common stock and $200,000 of prepaid services to be rendered by Mobivity. These services remain owed to Optimal Payments Corporation at December 31, 2011. A member of the Company's Board of Directors is currently President of Sterling Card Solutions, which has a minority ownership position in Optimal Payments Corporation. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company began work on two projects for Optimal Payments Corporation and recognized revenue of $124,538.

Hidden River Ventures I, LLC is an existing shareholder in the Company as a result of converting $229,000 of payables in exchange for 415,937 shares of the Company's common stock. On October 26, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a related company under common control, Hidden River, LLC, pursuant to which Hidden River, LLC would lead the Company’s acquisition strategy. The consulting agreement calls for monthly payments of $11,000, along with periodic bonus payments associated with the success of the acquisition strategy, as well as options to purchase 700,000 shares granted on December 24, 2010 priced at $.32 per share. Of the options granted, 481,245 options were vested as of September 24, 2012. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, Hidden River earned $99,000 in regards to the previously mentioned consulting services.

On July 16, 2012, the Company entered into a verbal agreement with Hidden River, LLC (the “Consultant”) to provide additional consulting services, at a rate of $10,000 per month, as a Vice President of Operations. In this role the Consultant would lead and manage the execution of day-to-day operations of the Company, including Sales, Marketing, Client Services and Administration in pursuit of its short and long term performance objectives.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the company entered into an employment agreement with the primary owner and shareholder of Digimark LLC, holder of 519,540 common shares, to serve as Executive Vice President of Business Development. He was paid $90,000 as of September 30, 2012.

-24-

Table of Contents

14. Subsequent Events

Commencing on October 12, 2012 and continuing thereafter, the Company has entered into amendments to its New Notes, as described in Note 6 above.

15. Restatement

On or about March 26, 2012, the Company's management concluded that the Company should restate goodwill related charges in connection with its three acquisitions that were completed during the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company’s method of valuing the restricted common stock issued in the acquisitions at the price paid by investors for Company shares in a number of private offerings around the time of the acquisitions was incorrect, and a revised discounted restricted common stock valuation be used, as required under FAS 157/ASC 820. This change in valuation method of securities also affected share based compensation expense and certain derivative liabilities and related expenses.

Under ASC 820 Fair Value Measurements & Disclosures, a quoted stock price in an active market is considered primary (Type I) indicator of fair value of restricted stock issued in consideration for the acquisitions completed in 2011. The Company believed that the infrequent and low volume of initial trading of its common stock did not constitute an active market. Alternatively, throughout the year the company conducted a private placement in which units comprised of shares of restricted common stock and attached warrants were sold at $1.50 per share. This price per share was bifurcated for the value of the common stock, the warrant, an embedded derivative related to down round protection on common stock, and an embedded derivative related to down round protection on the warrant. The price per common share that was determined by this valuation equaled $110 for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The use of this method resulted in understated asset value for certain intangible assets, understated stock based compensation expense, an understatement of certain derivative liabilities and an understatement of the related expense related to the Company’s derivative liability, as reflected in its financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

The cumulative effect of this change through September 30, 2011 is an increase of $8,316,527 in goodwill, an increase of $32,143 in intangible assets, a decrease of ($1,834) in other current assets, an increase of $739,606 in current liabilities, an increase of $993,119 in earn-out payable, an increase of $8,177,272 in additional paid-in capital, and a decrease of ($1,913,161) in the Company’s net income; however, this had no effect on the Company’s reported cash flows. Unaudited Tables detailing the effect of the error on the Company’s previously filed financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 are included below.

-25-

Table of Contents

NOTE 15 - RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STAEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Balance Sheet
	September 30, 2011
	As Filed			Adjustments				Restated
Current Assets
Cash	$	1,152		$	-			$	1,152
Accounts Receivable		318,919			-				318,919
Other Current Assets		52,689			(1,834	)	(a)		50,855
Total Current Assets		372,760			(1,834	)			370,926

Equipment, Net		31,714			-				31,714
Goodwill		5,120,712			8,316,527		(a)		13,437,239
Intangible Assets, Net		2,835,611			32,143		(a)		2,867,754
Other Assets		49,650			125,846		(c)		175,496
TOTAL ASSETS	$	8,410,447		$	8,472,682			$	16,883,129


Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable	$	581,392		$	-			$	581,392
Accrued Interest		120,923			-				120,923
Accrued and Deferred Personnel Compensation		160,763			-				160,763
Deferred Revenue - related party		200,000			-				200,000
Deferred Revenue and Customer Deposits		166,277			-				166,277
Notes Payable, net of discount		837,245			-				837,245
Convertible notes payable, net of discount		980,030			(2,944	)	(a)		977,086
Cash payment obligation, net of discount		147,414			-				147,414
Derivative Liabilities		582,443			742,550		(a)		1,324,993
Other Current Liabilities		143,722			-				143,722
Total Current Liabilities		3,920,209			739,606				4,659,815

Non-Current Liabilities
Long term note payable		-			125,846		(c)		125,846
Earn-out payable		2,664,466			993,119		(a)		3,657,585
Total Non-Current Liabilities		2,664,466			1,118,965				3,783,431
Total Liabilities		6,584,675			1,858,571				8,443,246

Stockholders' Deficit
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 22,360,793 and 17,700,000 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively		22,361			-				22,361
Common Stock Liability		-			350,000		(b)		350,000
Additional Paid-in Capital		11,947,645			8,177,272		(a)		20,124,917
Accumulated Deficit		(10,144,234	)		(1,913,161	)	(a)		(12,057,395	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit		1,825,772			6,614,111				8,439,883
TOTAL LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	8,410,447		$	8,472,682			$	16,883,129

(a) To reflect change due to the change in fair market value of restricted stock in underlyging calculations
(b) To reflect shares owed at Sept 30, 2011 not issued until Q4 2011
(c) To reflect net working capital of Boomtext obligation payout

-26-

Table of Contents

NOTE 15 - RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STAEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Statement of Operations

	Three months ended September 30, 2011
	As Filed			Adjustments				Restated
Revenues

Revenues	$	842,885		$	-			$	842,885
Cost of revenues		311,717			-				311,717
Gross Margin		531,168			-				531,168

Operating Expenses
General & administrative		523,513			437,623		(a,b)		961,136
Sales & marketing expense		245,810			(5,088	)	(a)		240,722
Engineering, research, & development expense		156,851			17,951		(a)		174,802
Depreciation & amortization		191,783			-				191,783
Total Operating Expenses		1,117,957			450,486				1,568,443

Loss From Operations		(586,789	)		(450,486	)			(1,037,275	)

Other Income/(Expense)
Interest expense		(133,055	)		-				(133,055	)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		(54,134	)		(347,576	)	(a)		(401,710	)
Total Other Income/(Expense)		(187,189	)		(347,576	)			(534,765	)

Loss before income taxes		(773,978	)		(798,062	)			(1,572,040	)

Income tax benefit/(expense)		(1,600	)		-				(1,600	)

Net Loss	$	(775,578	)	$	(798,062	)		$	(1,573,640	)

Net Loss Per Share - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.04	)	(a)	$	(0.07	)

Weighted average number of shares
during the period - basic and diluted		22,048,802			22,048,802				22,048,802

(a) To reflect change due to the change in fair market value of restricted stock in underlying calculations
(b) To reflect shares owed at Sept 30, 2011 not issued until Q4 2011

-27-

Table of Contents

NOTE 15 - RESTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL STAEMENTS (CONTINUED)

Statement of Operations

	Nine months ended September 30, 2011
	As Filed			Adjustments				Restated
Revenues

Revenues	$	1,536,630		$	-			$	1,536,630
Cost of revenues		570,605			-				570,605
Gross Margin		966,025			-				966,025

Operating Expenses
General & administrative		1,448,955			704,022		(a,b)		2,152,977
Sales & marketing expense		497,936			16,249		(a)		514,185
Engineering, research, & development expense		445,267			53,853		(a)		499,120
Depreciation & amortization		318,560			-				318,560
Total Operating Expenses		2,710,718			774,124				3,484,842

Loss From Operations		(1,744,693	)		(774,124	)			(2,518,817	)

Other Income/(Expense)
Interest expense		(376,548	)		-				(376,548	)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities		152,822			(1,139,038	)	(a)		(986,216	)
Total Other Income/(Expense)		(223,726	)		(1,139,038	)			(1,362,764	)

Loss before income taxes		(1,968,419	)		(1,913,162	)			(3,881,581	)

Income tax benefit/(expense)		(1,562	)		-				(1,562	)

Net Loss	$	(1,969,981	)	$	(1,913,162	)		$	(3,883,143	)

Net Loss Per Share - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.09	)	(a)	$	(0.19	)

Weighted average number of shares
during the period - basic and diluted		20,381,533			20,381,533				20,381,533

(a) To reflect change due to the change in fair market value of restricted stock in underlying calculations
(b) To reflect shares owed at Sept 30, 2011 not issued until Q4 2011

-28-

Table of Contents

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, in connection with the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially and adversely from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements Such forward-looking statements include statements about our expectations, beliefs or intentions regarding our potential product offerings, business, financial condition, results of operations, strategies or prospects. You can identify forward-looking statements by the fact that these statements do not relate strictly to historical or current matters. Rather, forward-looking statements relate to anticipated or expected events, activities, trends or results as of the date they are made and are often identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” or “will,” and similar expressions or variations. Because forward-looking statements relate to matters that have not yet occurred, these statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any future results expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Many factors could cause our actual activities or results to differ materially from the activities and results anticipated in forward-looking statements. These factors include those risks disclosed in this report, under the caption “Risk Factors” included in our 2011 annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, on April 16, 2012 and in our subsequent filings with the SEC. Furthermore, such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements.

Overview

We are a provider of technology that enables major brands and enterprises to engage consumers via their mobile phone. Interactive electronic communications with consumers is a complex process involving communication networks and software. We remove this complexity through our suite of services and technologies thereby enabling brands, marketers, and content owners to communicate with their customers and consumers in general. From Presidential elections to major broadcast events, we are pioneers in the deployment of the mobile channel as the ultimate direct connection to the consumer.

Mobile phone users represent a large and captive audience. While televisions, radios, and even PCs are often shared by multiple consumers, mobile phones are personal devices representing a truly unique and individual address to the end user. The future of digital media will be driven by mobile phones where a direct, personal conversation can be had with the world’s largest audience. The future of mobile includes banking, commerce, advertising, video, games and just about every other aspect of both on and offline life. Over 4 million consumers have been engaged via their mobile device thanks to our technology.

We believe that our mobile marketing and advertising campaign platform is among the most advanced in the industry as it allows real time interactive communications with consumers. We generate revenue from licensing our software to clients in our software as a service (Saas) model, per-message and per-minute transactional fees, and customized professional services.

Our “C4” Mobile Marketing and Customer Relationship Management (CRM) platform is a hosted solution enabling our clients to develop, execute, and manage a variety of engagements to a consumer’s mobile phone. Short Messaging Service (SMS), Multi-Media Messaging (MMS), and Interactive Voice Response (IVR) interactions can all be facilitated via a set of Graphical User Interfaces (GUIs). Reporting and analytics capabilities are also available to our users through the C4 solution.

Mobile devices are emerging as the principal interactive channel for brands to reach consumers since it is the only media platform that has access to the consumer virtually anytime and anywhere. Brands and advertising agencies are recognizing the unique benefits of the mobile channel and they are increasingly integrating mobile media within their overall advertising and marketing campaigns. Our objective is to become the industry leader in connecting brands and enterprises to consumers’ mobile phones.

Recent Events

Share Exchange Agreement

On November 2, 2010, we completed the Share Exchange Agreement and acquired Mobivity, Inc., in exchange for 10,000,000 shares of our common stock. Please refer to Note 1 in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

-29-

Table of Contents

Bridge Financing

To date in 2012, we have issued additional 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Notes in the aggregate of $3,533,999. (See discussion of Bridge Notes in Liquidity and Capital Resources, and Note 6 to Consolidated Financial Statements). As of November 9, 2012 there is $4,342,419 in principal amount of outstanding notes, which were due October 15, 2012. All notes have been extended to April 15, 2012 except two in the principal amount of $132,699, which we are currently working with to extend or repay. In consideration of the Note holders’ agreement to extend the maturity date, the amendment provides that the holder shall have the option to convert the principal and interest under the Note into the securities offered by the Company in a qualifying equity financing at the lower of (a) the same price paid for such securities by other investors investing in the financing or (b) $.50 per share (subject to adjustment in the event of a stock split, reclassification or the like). Prior to the amendment, the conversion option under the Note entitled the Holder to convert the principal and interest under the Note into the securities offered by the Company in a qualifying equity financing at the same price paid for such securities by other investors investing in the financing.

As of November 9, 2012, nine note holders were repaid $254,080 in principal.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Our management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made, including those related to share based compensation and valuation of the derivative liability. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Revenue recognition

Share-based compensation expense

Share-based compensation cost is measured at the date of grant, based on the calculated fair value of the stock-based award, and is recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the award). The Company estimates the fair value of employee stock options granted using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model. Key assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the exercise price of the award, the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, the expected option term, the risk free interest rate at the date of grant, the expected volatility and the expected annual dividend yield on the Company’s common stock. We use comparable public company data among other information to estimate the expected price volatility and the expected forfeiture rate. The Company recorded employee stock based compensation of $314,990 and $303,913 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

-30-

Table of Contents

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks.

The Company reviews the terms of convertible debt and equity instruments it issues to determine whether there are embedded derivative instruments, including the embedded conversion option, that are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. In circumstances where the convertible instrument contains more than one embedded derivative instrument, including the conversion option, that is required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument. Also, in connection with the sale of convertible debt and equity instruments, the Company may issue freestanding warrants that may, depending on their terms, be accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities, rather than as equity.

Bifurcated embedded derivatives are initially recorded at fair value and are then revalued at each reporting date with changes in the fair value reported as non-operating income or expense. When the convertible debt or equity instruments contain embedded derivative instruments that are to be bifurcated and accounted for as liabilities, the total proceeds allocated to the convertible host instruments are first allocated to the fair value of all the bifurcated derivative instruments. The remaining proceeds, if any, are then allocated to the convertible instruments themselves, usually resulting in those instruments being recorded at a discount from their face value.

Results of Operations

The following describes certain line items set forth in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

Revenues

Revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $1,006,262, an increase of $163,377, or 19% compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011. The increase is primarily attributed to the acquisition of Boomtext on August 1, 2011. The revenues attributable to the Boomtext operations increased $290,064, resulting from one additional month of revenue in the 3rd quarter of 2012 as compared to the 3rd quarter of 2011, and an increase in average monthly income derived from this unit of approximately $55,000 per month. Average monthly revenue from the Boomtext operations for the months of August and September 2011 was approximately $124,000, while the average monthly revenue from the Boomtext operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was approximately $179,000 per month. This increase was offset by reductions in revenue from the Mobivity and Txtstation operations during the third quarter of 2012 compared to the prior year period of $69,785, and $58,060, respectively.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $307,061, a decrease of $4,656, or 1.5% compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011. This decrease is primarily due to ongoing reductions in costs related to message transmission through the consolidation of acquired vendors and negotiated volume discounts.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $699,201, an increase of $168,033, or 32%, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased to 69.5% compared to 63% for the three months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in gross profit is primarily due to ongoing reductions in costs related to message transmission through the consolidation of acquired vendors and negotiated volume discounts.

-31-

Table of Contents

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were $637,113 and $961,136, respectively. Such expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel related expenses, stock-based compensation expense, consulting costs and other expenses. The decrease of $324,023 or 33.7% was primarily due to decreases in share based compensation of $429,297, and accounting and legal expenses of $22,435. These decreases were partially offset by increases in personnel expenses of $62,430 resulting from our acquisition of Boomtext, bad debt expense of $31,597, and facilities and office supply expense of $18,008 due to expansion of office space in Chandler, Arizona.

Sales and Marketing Expense

Sales & Marketing expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were $406,815 and $240,722, respectively. Such expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel related expenses, stock-based compensation expense, sales travel, consulting costs and other expenses. The increase of $166,093 or 69% was primarily due to an increase in personnel expenses of $124,330 and share based compensation of $20,338, both resulting from increased headcount from our acquisition of Boomtext, an increase in sales and marketing related travel of $4,061, and an increase in marketing expenses of $17,101.

Engineering, Research, and Development Expense

Engineering, research, and development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were $155,365 and $174,802, respectively. Such expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel related expenses, stock-based compensation expense, consulting costs and other expenses. The decrease of $19,437 or 11% was primarily due to a decrease of $19,870 in share based compensation.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were $130,579 and $191,783, respectively. The decrease of $61,204 or 32% was primarily due to the completed amortization of certain intangible assets resulting from the acquisitions in 2011 of Mobivity and Txtstation businesses.

Loss from Operations

Loss from operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $630,671, a decrease of $406,604, or 39%, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in Loss from Operations is primarily attributed to an increase in gross profit of $168,033 and a decrease in share based compensation expense of $428,827, which was partially offset by increases in personnel and consulting expenses of $188,968.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $1,781,125 an increase of $1,648,070 or 1,239% compared to the three months ended September 30, 2011. The increase is primarily due to an increase in amortization of bridge note financing totaling $1,528,438 resulting from the bridge notes issued in May and June 2012 with a maturity date of October 15, 2012.

Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities

The gain on fair value of derivative liabilities for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $213,089; whereas during the three months ended September 30, 2011, there was a loss of $401,710. The increase of $614,799 is primarily due to a lower share price as of September 30, 2012, as compared to the prior year’s September 30, 2011 share price.

Net Loss

Net Losses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 were $2,356,398 and $1,573,640 respectively. The increase of $782,758 or 50% can primarily be attributed to an increase in interest expense of $1,648,070 resulting from the bridge notes issued in May and June 2012, and loss on adjustment in contingent liabilities of $157,943, partially offset by an increase in gross profit of $168,033, reduced operating expenses of $238,571, and a change in fair market value of derivative liabilities of $614,799.

-32-

Table of Contents

Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011

Revenues

Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $3,028,866, an increase of $1,492,236, or 97% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase is primarily attributed to the acquisitions of Mobivity and Txtstation on April 1, 2011 and Boomtext on August 1, 2011

Cost of Revenues

Cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $1,007,288, an increase of $436,683, or 77% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. This increase is mostly due to the Mobivity, Txtstation and Boomtext acquisitions and the increased costs for SMS transmission, short code fees, marketing materials, sales commissions, co-location costs, and merchant fees resulting from the acquisitions.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $2,021,578, an increase of $1,055,553, or 109%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Gross profit as a percentage of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased to 66.7% compared to 62.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase is primarily due to the acquisitions of Mobivity, Txtstation, and Boomtext in 2011, and reduced costs related to message transmission through the consolidation of acquired vendors and negotiated volume discounts.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were $2,354,369 and $2,152,977, respectively. Such expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel related expenses, stock-based compensation expense, consulting costs and other expenses. The increase of $201,392 or 9.4% was primarily due to increases in personnel expense of $377,767 resulting from our acquisition of Txtstation and Boomtext, bad debt expense of $104,484, rent expense of $69,183, general and administrative expense of $53,043 and investor relations expense of $43,087. This was offset by decreases for share based compensation of $373,954 and legal expense of $72,218.

Sales and Marketing Expense

Sales & Marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were $1,135,934 and $514,185, respectively. Such expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel related expenses, stock-based compensation expense, sales travel, consulting costs and other expenses. The increase of $621,749 or 121% was due to an increase in personnel expense of $519,404 and share based compensation of $38,601, both resulting from the acquisition of Boomtext and Txtstation, travel expenses of $19,065, and an increase in marketing and trade show expenses of $29,531 as compared to 2011.

Engineering, Research, and Development Expense

Engineering, research, and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were $448,446 and $499,120, respectively. Such expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel related expenses, stock-based compensation expense, consulting costs and other expenses. The decrease of $50,674 or 10% was primarily due to a decrease in personnel expenses of $14,297 and share based compensation of $48,913 partially offset by an increase of $10,567 in software expense.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were $431,962 and $318,560, respectively. The increase of $113,402 or 36% was primarily due to the amortization expense related to the amortization of intangibles assets acquired in the Mobivity, Txtstation and Boomtext acquisitions.

Loss from Operations

Loss from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $2,349,133, a decrease of $169,684, or 7%, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in Loss from Operations is primarily attributed to an increase in gross profit of $1,055,553, offset by an increase in operating expense of $885,869.

-33-

Table of Contents

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $3,019,625, an increase of $2,643,077 or 702% compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase is primarily due to an increase in amortization of bridge note financing totaling $2,303,766. It is also attributed to an increase in amortization of deferred financing costs totaling $209,943.

Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities

The gain on fair value of derivative liabilities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $407,079; whereas during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, there was a loss of $986,216. The increase of $1,393,295 is primarily due a lower share price as of September 30, 2012, as compared to the prior year’s September 30, 2011 share price.

Net Loss

Net Losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 were $5,040,183 and $3,883,143, respectively. The increase of $1,157,040 or 30% is primarily attributed to an increase in gross profit of $1,055,553which was offset by an increase in operating expense of $885,869 and an increase in other expense of $1,328,286.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2012 we had current assets of $762,910, including $166,391 in cash, and current liabilities of $11,100,319, resulting in negative working capital of $10,337,409. Since that date, our current assets have decreased and our negative working capital position has increased as a result of continuing losses from operations. As of the date of this report, and assuming revenue projections for the 4th quarter 2012 and 1st quarter of 2013 are attained, we believe we have working capital on hand and projected cash equivalents sufficient to fund our current level of operations through March 2013.

We believe that we require approximately $500,000 of additional working capital in order to fund our current level of operations over the next 12 months. This estimate assumes that we can convince the holders of our investment notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $4,347,419, to convert the principal and accrued interest into shares of our equity securities. If we are unsuccessful in doing so, our working capital requirements will increase commensurately. While our priority is on generating additional working capital from operations through the sale of our services, we are also seeking to raise additional working capital through various financing sources, including the sale of our equity and debt securities and, subject to our commencement of profitable operations, the procurement of commercial debt financing. However, there can be no guarantees that such funds will be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If such financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we will be unable to continue our business as desired and operating results will be adversely affected. In addition, any financing arrangement may have potentially adverse effects on us or our stockholders. Debt financing (if available and undertaken) will increase expenses, must be repaid regardless of operating results and may involve restrictions limiting our operating flexibility. If we issue equity securities to raise additional funds, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders will be reduced and the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of our common stock.

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, included in our 2011 annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2012, states that due to our recurring operating losses from operations, negative cash flows from operations and dependence on additional financing to fund operations, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

In addition, all of our assets are currently subject to a first priority lien in favor of the holders of our outstanding investment notes in the current aggregate principal amount of $4,347,419. The notes are due on April 15, 2013, if we are unable to repay or refinance our obligations under those notes by April 15, 2013, the holders of the notes will have the right to foreclose on their security interests and seize our assets. To avoid such an event, we may be forced to seek bankruptcy protection, however a bankruptcy filing would, in all likelihood, materially adversely affect our ability to continue our current level of operations. In the event we are not able to refinance or repay the notes, but negotiate for a further extension of the maturity date of the notes, we may be required to pay significant extension fees in cash of shares of our equity securities or otherwise make other forms of concessions that may adversely impact the interests of our common stockholders.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Our operating activities resulted in net cash used for operations of $2,065,943 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to net cash used in operations of $793,460 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

-34-

Table of Contents

The net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 reflects a net loss of $5,040,183, which was increased by bad debt expense $104,484, common stock for services of $270,000, stock-based compensation of $314,990, stock issued for late payment of $160,468, depreciation and amortization of $431,962, loss on adjustment in contingent consideration $81,161, amortization of deferred financing costs of $239,943, and amortization of note discounts of $2,551,161, and other minor factors, which was partially offset by a change in fair market value of derivative liabilities of ($407,079). For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 the non-cash charges totaled $3,747,253. Changes in operating assets and liabilities included decreases in accounts receivable of ($208,898), other current assets of ($200,915), accounts payable of ($442,919), accrued compensation of ($25,312) and deferred revenue – related party of ($157,538), offset by increases in other assets of $1,540, accounts payable – related party of $10,226, deferred revenue and customer deposits of $12,984, accrued interest of $195,225 and other liabilities of $42,594.

The net cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 reflects a net loss of $3,883,143, which was increased by stock-based compensation of $1,154,724, depreciation and amortization of $318,560, change in fair market value of derivative liabilities of $986,216, amortization of deferred financing costs of $30,000 and amortization of note discounts of $248,412. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 the non-cash charges totaled $2,737,912. Changes in operating assets and liabilities included increases in other current assets $28,525, accounts payable of $314,920, accrued interest of $83,022, accrued compensation of $41,122, deferred revenues and customer deposits of $112,639, and other liabilities of $74,580, offset by a decrease in accounts receivable ($269,704) and other assets ($33,333).

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $9,732 and $299,022, respectively. In 2012 and 2011 we acquired equipment totaling $9,732 and $12,189, respectively. In 2011, we acquired intangible assets (patents and trademarks) totaling $77,000 and also paid $209,833 in cash for the acquisition of Txtstation, Mobivity and Boomtext.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $2,241,670 and $720,195, respectively. In 2012, we received proceeds of $3,396,350 from the issuance of 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Notes, offset by payments of $247,880 in deferred financing costs. In 2012, we paid $249,080 against eight $10% Senior Secured Bridge Notes, payments of $570,220 against the principal balance of the notes issued in the Mobivity and Boomtext acquisitions, and payments of $87,500 against the cash payment obligation resulting from the Txtstation acquisition. In 2011, we received proceeds of $1,033,003 from the sale of 688,669 shares of common stock and the issuance of warrants to purchase 688,669 shares at $2.00 per share, offset by equity offering costs of $21,800. We received $10,000 from the issuance of a 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Note. In 2011, we paid $201,008 against the principal balance of the note issued in the Mobivity acquisition as well as $100,000 against the cash payment obligation from the Txtstation acquisition

Bridge Note Financing

We have completed the following bridge note financing:

·	From November 2010 through March 2011, the Company issued to a number of accredited investors a series of its 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Note (the “Notes”) in the aggregate principal amount of $1,010,000. The Notes accrue interest at the rate of 10% per annum.

·	Also in November 2011, the Company issued additional Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $262,500. These Notes were due February 2, 2012 and contain the same rights and privileges as the previously issued Notes.

·	In January, 2012, the Company issued additional Notes in the principal amount of $520,000. All note holders with maturity dates of February 2, 2012 extended the maturity through May 2, 2012.

·	In March and April 2012, the Company issued additional Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $220,100 due May 2, 2012. In March 2012, one note holder was repaid a partial principal balance of $65,000.

-35-

Table of Contents

In May and June 2012, the Company issued to a number of accredited investors its 10% Senior Secured Convertible Promissory Notes in the principal amount of $4,347,419 (the “New Notes”), consisting of (i) $2,656,250 of new funds and (ii) $1,691,168 principal amount plus accrued but unpaid interest outstanding under previously issued 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Notes (the “Old Notes”) that were cancelled and converted into the New Notes. The New Notes accrue interest at the rate of 10% per annum. The entire principal amount under the New Notes (the “Principal Amount”) plus all accrued and unpaid interest is due on the earlier of (i) the date the Company completes a financing transaction for the offer and sale of shares of common stock (including securities convertible into or exercisable for its common stock), in an aggregate amount of no less than 125% of the principal amounts evidenced by the Notes (a “Qualifying Financing”), and (ii) October 15, 2012.

·	The Company used $201,322 from the proceeds of the sale of the New Notes to pay off existing balances under the Old Notes that were not cancelled and converted into the New Notes.

·	The Company’s obligations under the New Notes are secured by all of the assets of the Company, including all shares of our wholly owned subsidiary.

2011 Private Placement

We commenced a private placement in late March 2011, which continued until November 2011, raising gross proceeds of approximately $1,033,000. The private placement structure consists of a series of identical subscription agreements offering subscribers an opportunity to invest in units comprised of shares of our common stock at a price of $1.50 per share and an equivalent number of warrants at an exercise price of $2.00.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Polices,” in the accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

As a smaller reporting company, as defined by section 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide the information set forth in this item.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that as of September 30, 2012 our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to existing material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as described below.

-36-

Table of Contents

In connection with our evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, and included in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2012, we determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses which are indicative of many small companies with small staff, including:

	(1)	Inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment;
	(2)	Insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and guidelines of the SEC; and
	(3)	Inadequate closing processes to ensure all material misstatements are corrected in the financial statements, as evidenced by the fact that there were audit adjustments and restatements of our financial statements.

Changes in Internal Control

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

-37-

Table of Contents

Part II - Other Information

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Company issued 3,368 shares of its common stock to one holder of the original 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Notes. These shares were consideration owed to the old Note holder for the additional securities due under the old Note, and additional shares issued under the terms of the Allonge signed January 31, 2012 as consideration for the extension of the maturity date of the Note from February 2, 2012, to May 2, 2012.

Item 6.

Exhibits.

Exhibit No.	Description	Method of Filing
3.1	Articles of Merger	Filed as Exhibit 3.01 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on dated August 10, 2012
10.1	Employment Agreement entered into August 1, 2012 by and between the Registrant and Timothy Schatz	Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on dated August 7, 2012
10.2	Form of Amendment to 10% Senior Secured Convertible Bridge Notes due October 15, 2012	Filed as Exhibit 99.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on dated October 19, 2012

31.1	Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002	Filed electronically herewith
31.2	Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002	Filed electronically herewith
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350	Filed electronically herewith
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350	Filed electronically herewith

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document*	Filed electronically herewith
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Schema Document*	Filed electronically herewith
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document*	Filed electronically herewith
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase Document*	Filed electronically herewith
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document*	Filed electronically herewith
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document*	Filed electronically herewith

* In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

-38-

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized

		Mobivity Holdings Corp

Date: November 14, 2012	By:	/s/ Dennis Becker
		Dennis Becker
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 14, 2012	By:	/s/ Timothy Schatz
		Timothy Schatz
		Chief Financial Officer