UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
INFORMATION
REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE
14A INFORMATION
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by
Registrant [X]
Filed by
a Party other than the
Registrant [ ]
Check the
appropriate box:
[ ] Preliminary
Proxy Statement
[ ] Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
[X] Definitive
Proxy Statement
[ ] Definitive
Additional Materials
[ ] Soliciting
Material Pursuant to ss.240.14a-12
ARC WIRELESS SOLUTIONS,
INC.
(Name of
Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of
Person Filing Proxy Statement, if other than Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] No
fee required.
[ ] Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i) and 0-11.
|
(1)
|
Title
of each class of securities to which the transaction
applies:
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
(3)
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of the
transaction:
|
Total
proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:
[ ] Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
andidentify the filing for which
the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filingby registration statement number, or
the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
|
(1)
|
Amount
Previously Paid:
|
|
(2)
|
Form
Schedule or Registration No.:
|
ARC
WIRELESS SOLUTIONS, INC.
10601
West 48th Avenue
I-70
Frontage Road North
Wheat
Ridge, Colorado 80033-2660
(303)
421-4063
NOTICE
OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
to
be held December 16, 2009.
The
Annual Meeting of the shareholders of ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc. (the
“Company”) will be held on December 16, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard
time) at the offices of Carret Asset Management, LLC, 40 West 57th Street, 20th
Floor, New York, NY, 10019 for the following purposes:
|
1.
|
To
elect a Board of Directors consisting of five
directors;
|
|
2.
|
To
consider and vote upon a proposal recommended by the Board of Directors to
ratifythe selection of Hein & Associates LLP to serve as our certified
independentaccountants for the year ending December 31, 2009;
and
|
|
3.
|
To
transact any other business that properly may come before the Annual
Meeting.
|
Only the
shareholders of record as shown on the transfer books at the close of business
on November 24, 2009 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual
Meeting.
IMPORTANT
NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING
TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 16, 2009:
Our
notice of annual meeting and proxy statement and our annual report are available
on the Internet at http://www.arcwireless.net.
All
shareholders, regardless of whether they expect to attend the meeting in person,
are requested to complete, date, sign and return promptly the enclosed form of
proxy in the accompanying envelope. The person executing the proxy may revoke it
by filing with the Secretary of the Company an instrument of revocation or a
duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by electing to vote in person at
the Annual Meeting.
ALL
SHAREHOLDERS ARE EXTENDED A CORDIAL INVITATION TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL
MEETING
By Order
of the Board of Directors:
Wheat
Ridge, Colorado
Jason T.
Young
Chief
Executive Officer
November
24, 2009
PROXY
STATEMENT
ARC
WIRELESS SOLUTIONS, INC.
10601
West 48th Avenue
I-70
Frontage Road North
Wheat
Ridge, Colorado 80033-2660
(303)
421-4063
ANNUAL
MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS to be held
December
16, 2009
SOLICITATION
AND REVOCABILITY OF PROXIES
This
Proxy Statement is provided in connection with the solicitation of proxies by
the Board of Directors of ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc., a Utah corporation (the
“Company”), to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on
December 16, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard time) at the offices of Carret
Asset Management, LLC, 40 West 57th Street, 20th Floor, New York, NY, 10019 or
at any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. We anticipate that this Proxy
Statement and the accompanying form of proxy will be first mailed or given to
shareholders on or about December 3, 2009.
The
shares represented by all proxies that are properly executed and submitted will
be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions indicated on
the proxies. Unless otherwise directed, the shares represented by proxies will
be voted: (i) FOR each of the five nominees for director whose names are set
forth on the proxy card; (ii) FOR the ratification of the selection of Hein
& Associates LLP as our independent certified accountants for the year
ending December 31, 2009; and (iii) FOR any other business that properly may
come before the Annual Meeting.
A
shareholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is exercised by
delivering written notice of revocation to our Secretary, by substituting a new
proxy executed at a later date, or by requesting, in person at the Annual
Meeting, that the proxy be returned. Shareholders do not have dissenters' rights
of appraisal for any action proposed to be taken at the Annual
Meeting.
The
solicitation of proxies by the Company is to be made principally by mail;
however, following the initial solicitation, further solicitations may be made
by telephone or oral communication with shareholders. Our officers, directors
and employees may solicit proxies, but these persons will not receive
compensation for that solicitation other than their regular compensation.
Arrangements also will be made with brokerage houses and other custodians,
nominees and fiduciaries to forward solicitation materials to beneficial owners
of the shares held of record by those persons. We may reimburse those persons
for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by them in so doing. We will pay
all expenses involved in preparing, assembling and mailing this Proxy Statement
and the enclosed material.
THE
ANNUAL MEETING OF ARC WIRELESS SOLUTIONS, INC.
Time,
Place and Date
The
Annual Meeting will be held on December 16, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard
time) at the offices of Carret Asset Management, LLC, 40 West 57th Street, 20th
Floor, New York, NY, 10019.
Purpose
At the
Annual Meeting, the shareholders of the Company will be asked to consider and
vote upon a proposal (i) to elect a Board of Directors consisting of five
directors; (ii) to ratify the selection of Hein & Associates LLP to serve as
the Company's certified independent accountants for the year ending December 31,
2009; and (iii) to transact any other business that properly may come before the
Annual Meeting.
VOTING
SECURITIES
The close
of business on November 24, 2009 has been fixed as the record date for the
determination of holders of record of the Company's common stock, $.0005 par
value per share (the “Common Stock”), entitled to notice of and to vote at the
Annual Meeting. On the record date, 3,091,350 shares of Common Stock were
outstanding and eligible to be voted at the Annual Meeting. Each share, unless
otherwise set forth herein, is entitled to one vote. A majority of the issued
and outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote, represented either in
person or by proxy, constitutes a quorum at any meeting of the shareholders. If
sufficient votes for approval of the matters to be considered at the Annual
Meeting have not been received prior to the meeting date, we intend to postpone
or adjourn the Annual Meeting in order to solicit additional votes. The form of
proxy we are soliciting requests authority for the proxies, in their discretion,
to vote the shareholders' shares with respect to a postponement or adjournment
of the Annual Meeting. At any postponed or adjourned meeting, we will vote any
proxies received in the same manner described in this Proxy Statement with
respect to the original meeting.
VOTING
PROCEDURES
Votes at
the Annual Meeting are counted by an inspector of election. Shares of stock
present in person or represented by proxy, including abstentions (shares that do
not vote with respect to one or more of the matters presented for shareholder
approval), and broker “non-votes,” are counted as present and entitled to vote
for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the Annual Meeting. A
broker “non-vote” occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner
does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have
discretionary voting power with respect to that item and has not received voting
instructions from the beneficial owner. If your shares are held in the name of a
bank, broker or other nominee, you must obtain a proxy, executed in your favor,
from the holder of record, to be able to vote at the Annual Meeting. At any
postponed or adjourned meeting, we will vote any proxies received in the same
manner described in this Proxy Statement with respect to the original Annual
Meeting.
In the
election of directors (the “Election of Directors Proposal”), the five director
candidates having the highest number of votes cast in favor of their election
will be elected to the Board of Directors. In addition, a plurality of the votes
present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required for
the ratification of the appointment of the Company's independent auditors (the
“Independent Auditor Proposal”).
Only
votes “FOR” or “AGAINST” the Election of Directors Proposal and the Independent
Auditor Proposal will affect the outcome. Abstentions are not counted for
purposes of the Election of Directors Proposal or the Independent Auditor
Proposal.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The
number of shares beneficially owned includes shares of Common Stock with respect
to which the persons named below have either investment or voting power. A
person is also deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if that person
has the right to acquire beneficial ownership of that security within 60 days
through the exercise of an option or through the conversion of another security.
Except as noted, each beneficial owner has sole investment and voting power with
respect to the Common Stock.
Common
Stock not outstanding that is subject to options or other convertible securities
or rights is deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage of Common Stock beneficially owned by the person holding such options
or other convertible securities or rights, but is not deemed to be outstanding
for the purpose of computing the percentage of Common Stock beneficially owned
by any other person.
The
following table summarizes certain information as of November 23, 2009, except
as noted below, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by
each director, by all executive officers and directors as a group, and by each
other person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than five percent of
our common stock. As of November 23, 2009, 3,091,350 shares of our Common Stock
were issued and outstanding.
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Number
of Shares
Beneficially
Owned (1)
|
Percent
of Class
|
Randall
P. Marx
ARC
Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601
West 48th
Ave.
Wheat
Ridge, CO 80033
|
167,165(5)
|
5.4%
|
|
|
|
Steven
C. Olson
ARC
Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601
West 48th
Ave.
Wheat
Ridge, CO 80033
|
17,751(3)
|
*
|
|
|
|
Paul
J. Rini
7376
Johnnycake Rd
Mentor,
Ohio 44060
|
438,132(6)
|
14.17%
|
|
|
|
Jason
Young
ARC
Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601
West 48th Ave.
Wheat
Ridge, CO 80033
|
575,763(2)(7)
|
18.63%
|
Brean
Murray Carret Group, Inc.
40
West 57th Street, 20th Floor
New
York, NY 10019
|
575,763(4)(7)
|
18.63%
|
|
|
|
Viktor
Nemeth
ARC
Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601
West 48th Ave.
Wheat
Ridge, CO 80033
|
0
|
*
|
|
|
|
Marco
Vega
ARC
Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601
West 48th Ave.
Wheat
Ridge, CO 80033
|
0
|
*
|
|
|
|
Javier
Baz
ARC
Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601
West 48th Ave.
Wheat
Ridge, CO 80033
|
0
|
*
|
|
|
|
Amit
Chatwani
ARC
Wireless Solutions, Inc.
10601
West 48th Ave.
Wheat
Ridge, CO 80033
|
0
|
*
|
|
|
|
All
officers and directors as a group (6 persons)
|
593,514(2)(3)(7)
|
19.20%
|
* Less
than one percent.
|
(1)
|
“Beneficial
ownership” is defined in the regulations promulgated by the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission as having or sharing, directly or
indirectly (1) voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct
the voting, or (2) investment power, which includes the power to dispose
or to direct the disposition, of shares of the common stock of an issuer.
The definition of beneficial ownership includes shares underlying options
or warrants to purchase common stock, or other securities convertible into
common stock, that currently are exercisable or convertible or that will
become exercisable or convertible within 60 days. Unless otherwise
indicated, the beneficial owner has sole voting and investment
power.
|
|
(2)
|
Consists
of 575,763 shares beneficially owned by the Brean Murray Carret Group,
Inc. Mr. Young is deemed to share voting and investment power over the
shares beneficially owned by the Brean Murray Carret Group,
Inc.
|
|
(3)
|
Consists
of 1,751 shares in Mr. Olson's ARC Wireless 401(k) account and options to
purchase 16,000 shares at $5.41 per share until September 21, 2017,
granted under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan which are currently
exercisable.
|
|
(4)
|
Consists
of 575,763 shares beneficially owned by Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc.
Mr. Young, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board, serves as a representative of Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc. and
he holds voting and investment power over these shares.
|
|
(5)
|
Includes
163,816 shares directly held by Randall Marx, the Company's former Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, 1,980 shares in his ARC
Wireless 401(k) account, 800 shares held by his spouse's IRA and 570
shares owned beneficially through a 50% ownership of an LLC. This does not
include 2,170 shares owned by the Harold and Theora Marx Living Trust, of
which Mr. Marx's father is the trustee, as Mr. Marx disclaims beneficial
ownership of these shares. This also does not include 3,100 shares owned
by Warren E. Spencer Living Trust, of which Mr. Marx's mother-in-law is
trustee, as Mr. Marx disclaims beneficial ownership of these
shares.
|
|
(6)
|
Consists
of shares owned by Mr. Paul J. Rini as reported on April 30,
2009.
|
|
(7)
|
The
shares owned by Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc. are included three times
in the table in accordance with the rules governing disclosure of
beneficial ownership. In addition to being shown as owned by Brean Murray
Carret Group, Inc., these same shares are included as being beneficially
owned by Jason Young and by all officers and directors as a
group.
|
PROPOSAL
1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
At the
Annual Meeting, the shareholders will elect five directors to serve as our Board
of Directors. Each director will be elected to hold office until the next annual
meeting of shareholders. The affirmative vote of a plurality of the shares
represented at the meeting is required to elect each director. Cumulative voting
is not permitted in the election of directors. Each record holder of stock shall
be entitled to vote in the election of directors and shall have as many votes
for each of the shares owned by him or her as there are directors to be elected
and for whose election he or she has the right to vote. As a result, a
shareholder may vote all of his or her shares for each nominee, but may not
cumulate the votes to vote more than the total number of shares owned for any
one nominee. In the absence of instructions to the contrary, the person named in
the accompanying proxy shall vote the shares represented by that proxy for the
persons named below as the Board's nominees for directors. Each of the nominees
currently is a director of the Company.
Each of
the nominees has consented to be named in this Proxy Statement and to serve on
the Board of Directors if elected. It is not anticipated that any of the
nominees will become unable or unwilling to accept his nomination or election,
but, if that should occur, the persons named in the proxy intend to vote for the
election of such other person as the Board of Directors may
recommend.
The
following table sets forth, with respect to each nominee for director, the
nominee's age, his position(s) and office(s) with the Company, the expiration of
his term as a director, and the year in which he first became a director.
Individual background information concerning each of the nominees follows the
table. For additional information concerning the nominees, including stock
ownership and compensation, see “Executive Compensation,” “Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” and “Certain Transactions with
Management and Principal Shareholders.”
Name
|
Age
|
Position
with the Company
|
Expiration
of Term as Director
|
Initial
Date as Director
|
Jason
T.
Young
|
31
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|
Next
Annual Meeting
|
Appointed
to the Board October 2008
|
Viktor
Nemeth
|
34
|
Director
Chairman
of the Audit Committee Chairman of the Compensation
Committee
|
Next
Annual Meeting
|
Appointed
to the Board: November 2008
|
Marco
Vega
|
40
|
Director
|
Next
Annual Meeting
|
Appointed
to the Board: November 2008
|
Javier
Baz
|
56
|
Director
Audit
Committee Member Compensation Committee Member
|
Next
Annual Meeting
|
Appointed
to the Board: January 2009
|
Amit
Chatwani
|
27
|
Director
Audit
Committee Member Compensation Committee Member
|
Next
Annual Meeting
|
Appointed
to the Board: January 2009
|
Jason Young. Mr. Young became
a Director in October 2008, and he became Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company in November 2008. Since 2005, Mr. Young has
been a Managing Director at Quadrant Management, Inc., where he is responsible
for making investments in US and emerging market companies, where he frequently
serves in active Management or Director level roles. He has been an Investment
Committee Member of the Carret Global India Fund of Hedge Funds since 2005. In
2008 Mr. Young became a member of the Investment Committee of the Vanterra
Advantage Fund. From 2000 to 2005, Mr. Young worked for Merrill Lynch in the
Investment Banking Group and later in the Global Principal Investment Group. In
1999, he was an Analyst at Helicon Capital Management, a hedge fund and private
equity investment firm. He holds a BA in International Economics from UCLA.
Because of his employment with Quadrant Management, Inc., which is under common
control with the Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc., Mr. Young is deemed to be
under control of the Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc.
Viktor Nemeth. Mr. Nemeth
became a Director in November 2008, and he currently serves on the Company's
Audit Committee and the Company's Compensation Committee. Between January 2008
and October 2008, Mr. Nemeth served as the Chief Revenue Officer of
Bid4Spots.com, Inc., an entity that hosts weekly online auctions of radio
airtime to allow advertisers and broadcasters to transact unsold airtime. From
March 2000 through December 2007, Mr. Nemeth worked for Yahoo Inc. and
predecessor companies Overture Services and GoTo.com in a variety of corporate
development, business development, and sales & marketing roles. Mr. Nemeth
holds a BA in Business-Economics with a Minor in Accounting from
UCLA.
Marco Vega. Mr. Vega became a
Director in November 2008. Since March 2003, Mr. Vega has been the Chief
Operating Officer of Carret Asset Management, LLC, where he is responsible for
the accounting, operations and compliance functions of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission registered investment advisor. Mr. Vega formerly served as
the President of Carret Securities LLC, and he now serves on the Board of
Advisors to Brean Murray Carret & Co., LLC, a boutique investment bank. Mr.
Vega frequently serves in active management-or director-level roles. Because of
his employment by Carret Asset Management, LLC, which is under common control
with the Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc., Mr. Vega is deemed to be under control
of the Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc. Mr. Vega holds a BS in accounting and an
MBA from St. John's University.
Javier Baz. Mr. Baz
became a Director in January of 2009. Mr. Baz is currently a private
investor. From 2005 to 2006, he was a Director and later Chairman of
Lifeline Therapeutics. From January of 1994 through March 2004, Mr. Baz
was responsible for several business areas at Trust Company of the West, a Los
Angeles, California based investment management firm. Among his responsibilities
he was chief investment officer and group head of the firm’s Private Client
Services Group, a unit with $7 billion in clients’ assets under management. He
also was the chief investment officer for Trust Company of the West’s publicly
traded fixed income and equity strategies investing outside of the United States
in Europe, Japan, Asia Pacific and Latin America. From 1995 through 2001 Mr. Baz
chaired the Trust Company of the West’s committee responsible for overseeing
regional allocation of emerging markets and international equity strategies.
Before joining Trust Company of the West in 1994, Mr. Baz established Condor
Asset Management in Greenwich, Connecticut as a broker-dealer and asset
management firm, and worked with Merrill Lynch, First Boston International,
McKinsey & Co., and the Mexico City branch of Citibank N.A. Mr. Baz has a
bachelor of science degree in economics from the Wharton School of the
University of Pennsylvania (which he received in 1976) and a masters of business
administration from the Kellogg School at Northwestern University (which he
received in 1981).
Amit Chatwani. Mr.
Chatwani became a Director in January of 2009. Since October 2007, Mr.
Chatwani has served as Chief Executive Officer of One Part Beverages, LLC, an
entity he founded that bottles and markets a unique brand of spirits.
Between January 2006 and December 2008, he served as Chief Executive Officer of
Aural New York, LLC, a consumer electronics company he founded, which sold its
products both online and in specialty retailers across the country. Mr.
Chatwani is the founder and Creative Director of Leveraged Sellout, LLC, an
entertainment property involved in the online, print, and film spaces. He
is also a published author. From 2004-2006, Mr. Chatwani was an internal
strategy consultant for the I.B.M. Corporation. He graduated with honors
in Computer Science from Princeton University.
Required
Vote
The five
director candidates having the highest number of votes cast in favor of their
election will be elected to the Board of Directors.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS
VOTE FOR
THE ELECTION OF THE FIVE NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.
INFORMATION
REGARDING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AND
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Information
regarding Mr. Jason Young as an officer and director of the Company is set forth
in the table above pertaining to the nominees for election of
directors.
Other
Executive Officers
Name
|
Age
|
Position
with the Company
|
Initial
Date as Officer
|
Steven
C. Olson
|
52
|
Chief
Technology Officer
|
2001
|
Steven C. Olson. Mr. Olson
serves as our Chief Technology Officer. Prior to joining the Company in August
2001, Mr. Olson was employed at Ball Aerospace for 14 years, including the last
five years as Director of Engineering for Ball's Wireless Communications
Solutions Division. In this capacity Mr. Olson led the development of new
technologies, resulting in industry leading antenna solutions for the wireless
communications market. Before the Ball Wireless Communications unit was formed,
Mr. Olson developed Ball's high performance, low cost AirBASE(R) antenna
technology, specifically for use in its future commercial wireless business. He
received his Bachelors and Masters of Science degrees in Electrical Engineering
from the University of Utah in 1984 and 1985, respectively.
Each of
our officers serves at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. There are no
family relationships among our officers and directors.
Board
Meetings
The Board
of Directors met five times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and
each director participated in at least 75% of the meetings. The Board of
Directors does not maintain a formal policy regarding the manner in which
shareholders may communicate with the Board. The Board intends to
adopt such a formal policy during the first quarter of 2010.
The
Company encourages each member of the Board of Directors to attend the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders, but does not require any member to do so. None of the
directors attended the Company’s last Annual Meeting of Shareholders, held on
December 16, 2008.
Board
Independence
We are
currently subject to corporate governance standards defining the independence of
our directors imposed by the NASDAQ Capital Market's requirements for
independent directors (Rule 5605(a)(2) of the Marketplace Rules of The NASDAQ
Stock Market LLC). Under this definition, we have determined that prior to their
resignation in November 2008, Sigmund A. Balaban, Robert E. Wade and Dr. Donald
A. Huebner qualified as independent directors. On November 12, 2008, the
Company's Board elected Viktor Nemeth and Marco Vega to serve on the Board of
Directors and on January 21, 2009 Mr. Javier Baz and Amit Chatwani were elected
to serve on the Board of Directors. Mr. Nemeth, Mr. Baz and Mr. Chatwani qualify
as independent directors in accordance with the standards imposed by the NASDAQ
Capital Market's requirements for independent directors (Rule 5605(a)(2) of the
Marketplace Rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC).
Audit
Committee of the Board of Directors
Until
their resignations in November 2008, the audit committee consisted of three
independent directors, Mr. Sigmund A. Balaban, who was chairman of the
committee, Mr. Robert E. Wade and Dr. Donald A. Huebner. On January 21, 2009 Mr.
Viktor Nemeth was designated to serve as the Chairman of the Audit Committee. On
January 21, 2009 Mr. Javier Baz and Mr. Amit Chatwani were elected to the Board
of Directors and were appointed to serve on the Audit Committee. The
responsibilities of the audit committee include overseeing our financial
reporting process, reporting the results of the Committee’s activities to the
board, retaining and ensuring the independence of our auditors, approving
services to be provided by our auditors, reviewing our periodic filings with the
independent auditors prior to filing, and reviewing and responding to any
matters raised by the independent auditors in their management letter. The Audit
Committee met two times during fiscal 2008, which was attended by all committee
members.
Audit
Committee Financial Expert
Prior to
their resignations on November 12, 2008, the former board of directors had
determined that at least one member of the audit committee, who was also
independent, Mr. Sigmund A. Balaban, was an audit committee financial expert
prior to his resignation in November 2008. Mr. Javier Baz has been designated to
be the new audit committee financial expert.
Audit
Committee Charter
Our Board
of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee will review and assess the adequacy of the Audit Committee charter
annually.
Audit
Committee Report
Management
is responsible for the Company's internal controls and financial reporting
process. The independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent
audit of the Company's financial statements in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States of America and to issue a
report thereon. The Audit Committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee
these processes and to engage and discharge the Company's auditors. It is not
our duty or our responsibility to conduct auditing or accounting reviews or
procedures. We may not be, and we may not represent ourselves to be or to serve
as, accountants or auditors by profession or experts in the fields of accounting
or auditing. Therefore, we have relied, without independent verification, on
management's representation that the financial statements have been prepared
with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, and on the representations
of the independent auditors included in the report on the Company's financial
statements. Our oversight does not provide us with an independent basis to
determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial
reporting principles or policies, or appropriate internal controls and
procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and
applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, our considerations and discussions
with management and the independent auditors do not assure that the Company's
financial statements are presented in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, that the audit of the Company's financial statements has
been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, or
that the Company's independent accountants are in fact
“independent.”
In this
context, the Audit Committee has met and held discussions separately with
management and the independent accountants. Management represented to the Audit
Committee that the Company's financial statements were prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
and the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the financial statements with
management and the independent accountants. The Audit Committee discussed with
the independent accountants matters required to be discussed by the Statement on
Auditing Standards No. 61, Communications with Audit Committees, as currently in
effect.
The
Company's independent accountants also provided to the Audit Committee the
written disclosure required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1,
Independence Discussions with Audit Committees. The Committee discussed with the
independent accountants that firm's independence and considered whether the
non-audit services provided by the independent accountants are compatible with
maintaining its independence.
Based on
the Audit Committee's discussion with management and the independent
accountants, and the Audit Committee's review of the representations of
management and the report of the independent accounts to the Audit Committee,
the Audit Committee recommended that the Board of Directors include the audited
financial statements in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Submitted
by the Audit Committee of the Company's Board of Directors:
Viktor
Nemeth, Chairman
Javier
Baz
Amit
Chatwani
Compensation
Committee
The Board
of Directors currently has a Compensation Committee. Until their
resignations in November 2008, this committee consisted of Mr. Robert E. Wade,
the chairman of the Compensation Committee, Dr. Donald A. Huebner and Mr.
Sigmund A. Balaban. On January 21, 2009 Mr. Viktor Nemeth was designated to
serve as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. On January 21, 2009 Mr.
Javier Baz and Mr. Amit Chatwani were elected to the Board of Directors and were
appointed to serve on the Compensation Committee. The Compensation
Committee has a charter which is located on the Company’s website at
www.arcwireless.net. The Compensation Committee held one formal meeting during
fiscal 2008, which was attended by all committee members.
Nominating
Committee: Nominating Policies and Procedures
The
Company does not currently have a standing nominating committee of the Board of
Directors because it believes that the nominating functions should be conducted
by the full Board of Directors.
On June
30, 2008 the Board of Directors amended and restated its Policies and Procedures
for Nominations of Director Candidates (the “Nomination Policies”), which are
attached hereto as Appendix A, that have been in effect since January 1, 2009.
Director nominations are made to the Board of Directors by independent
directors, constituting a majority of the Board of Directors’ independent
directors, in a vote in which only independent directors vote. It is the policy
of the Board of Directors that each candidate recommended for nomination and
election to the Board (each, a “Nominee”), regardless of whether such Nominee is
recommended by a shareholder of the Company, the Board or any other person,
shall be approved by a majority of the independent directors of the
Board.
In
general, the Board believes that certain minimum qualifications must be met by
each Nominee for the Board, as well as meeting the applicable independence
standards required by the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and federal
securities laws. The Board believes that Nominees must reflect a Board that is
comprised of directors (i) a majority of whom are independent (as determined
under the aforementioned SEC director qualification standards); (ii) who are of
high integrity; (iii) who have qualifications that will increase the overall
effectiveness of the Board; and (iv) who meet other requirements as may be
required by applicable rules, such as financial literacy or financial expertise
with respect to Audit Committee members. In evaluating the qualifications of the
Nominees, the Board considers many factors, including issues of leadership
ability, career success, character, judgment, independence, background, age,
expertise, diversity and breadth of experience, length of service, other
commitments and the like. The Board evaluates such factors, among others, and
does not assign any particular weight or priority to any of these factors. Also,
the Board considers the suitability of each Nominee, including the current
members of the Board, in light of the current size and composition of the
Board.
Unless
and until otherwise subsequently determined by the Board, the number of
directors of the Company at any time shall be the number of directors that the
Board nominated for election at the most recently-held annual meeting of
shareholders, increased by the number of directors, if any, that the Board
appointed subsequent to the most recently-held annual meeting of shareholders
and also increased by the number of directors, if any, whose term as a director
did not expire at the most recently-held annual meeting of
shareholders.
The Board
shall consider recommendations for Nominees to the Board from shareholders (an
“Eligible Shareholder”) holding a minimum of $2,000 in market value, or 1%, of
the Company's voting common stock, which stock is held through the date of the
meeting electing directors, and which Eligible Shareholder complies with the
nomination notice procedures set forth in the Nomination Policies. Nominees
recommended by Eligible Shareholders (hereinafter referred to as “Shareholder
Candidates”) will be evaluated by the Board on the same basis as Nominees that
may be identified by the Board, management or, if the Board permits, a search
firm.
For a
Shareholder Candidate to be considered by the Board, the Eligible Shareholder
and the Shareholder Candidate must comply with the procedures set forth in the
Nomination Policies. Recommendations for Shareholder Candidate(s) to the Board
of Directors from an Eligible Shareholder must be directed in writing to ARC
Wireless Solutions, Inc., Attn: Executive Vice-President, at the Company's
principal offices at 10601 West 48th Avenue, I-70 Frontage Road North, Wheat
Ridge, Colorado 80033-2660. The specific recommendations should include the
information set forth in the Nomination Policies, which are attached hereto as
Appendix A and incorporated herein by reference.
For a
recommendation of a Shareholder Candidate to be properly brought before the
Board by an Eligible Shareholder, the Eligible Shareholder must have given
timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of the Corporation. To be
timely, an Eligible Shareholder’s notice must be delivered to the Corporate
Secretary not less than one hundred and twenty (120) days prior to the first
(1st) anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. In the event that the
date of the annual meeting is advanced by more than thirty (30) days or delayed
by more than sixty (60) days from the anniversary date of the preceding year’s
annual meeting, the notice by the Eligible Shareholder must be delivered not
later than the close of business on the later of the sixtieth (60th) day prior
to such annual meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public
announcement of the date of such annual meeting is first
made.
The
Secretary of the Corporation will provide a copy of the Nominating Policies and
Procedures upon a request in writing from the Eligible Shareholder.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) requires
our directors, executive officers and holders of more than 10% of our common
stock to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of
ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity
securities of ours. We believe that during the year ended December 31, 2008, our
officers, directors and holders of more than 10% of our common stock complied
with all Section 16(a) filing requirements. In making these statements, we have
relied upon the written representation of our directors and officers and our
review of the monthly statements of changes filed with us by our officers and
directors.
Code
of Ethics
The
Company endeavors to adhere to provide assurances to outside investors and
interested parties that the Company's officers, directors, and employees adhere
to a reasonably responsible code of ethics and as such, we have adopted a Code
of Ethics, which was amended on November 7, 2006, that applies to all officers,
directors and employees of the Company. The Code is posted on the Company’s
website at www.arcwireless.net/investor_relations.
Corporate
Governance Documents
On the
Company’s Corporate Governance Web site at
www.arcwireless.net/investor_relations, shareholders can access the Company’s
Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, and Code of Ethics for
members of the Board of Directors and officers. Copies of these documents are
available to shareholders without charge upon request to the Corporate Secretary
at the Company’s principal address.
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
This
Compensation Discussion and Analysis addresses the aspects of our compensation
programs and explains our compensation philosophy, policies, and practices, with
respect to our named executive officers, including our chief executive officer,
chief financial officer, executive vice-president, and chief technology officer,
which we collectively refer to as our named executive officers, or
NEOs.
Oversight
of Executive Compensation Program
The
Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors oversees our executive
compensation programs. Each member of the Compensation Committee is an
“independent director” as defined by the federal securities laws and in Rule
5605(a)(2) of the Marketplace Rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC. The Compensation Committee met 3 times during 2008, and works
closely with executive management, primarily our chief executive officer
(“CEO”), in assessing compensation levels. The Compensation Committee is
empowered to advise management and make recommendations to the Board of
Directors with respect to the compensation and other employment benefits of
executive officers and key employees of the Company. The Compensation Committee
also administers the Company's compensation plans for executive officers and
employees.
The
Compensation Committee regularly reviews the Company’s compensation programs to
ensure that remuneration levels and incentive opportunities are competitive and
reflect performance. Factors taken into account in assessing the compensation of
individual officers include the officer’s performance and contribution to the
Company, experience, strategic impact, external equity or market value, internal
equity or fairness, and retention priority. The various components of
the compensation programs for executive officers are discussed below in Elements
of Executive Compensation Program.
Objectives
of Executive Compensation and What the Programs are Designed to
Reward
The
Company’s executive compensation program is designed to integrate compensation
with the achievement of our short-term and long-term business objectives and to
assist us in attracting, motivating and retaining the highest quality executive
officers and rewarding them for superior performance. Different programs are
geared to short-term and longer-term performance with the goal of increasing
stockholder value over the long term.
We
believe that the compensation of our executive officers should reflect their
success in attaining key operating objectives, such as growth or maintenance of
market position, development of new products and marketplaces, meeting
established goals for operating earnings and earnings per share, maintenance and
development of customer relationships and long-term competitive advantage. We
also believe that executive compensation should reflect achievement of
individual goals established for specific executive officers, as well as
specific achievements by such individuals over the course of the year such as
development of specific products or customer relationships or agreements or
executing or integrating acquisitions and strategic arrangements. We believe
that the performance of the executives in managing our Company, considered in
light of general economic and specific Company, industry and competitive
conditions, should be the basis for determining their overall compensation. We
also believe that their compensation should not generally be based on the
short-term performance of our stock, whether favorable or unfavorable, but
rather that the price of our stock will, in the long-term, reflect our operating
performance, and ultimately, the management of the Company by our
executives.
Compensation
Consultants
In
determining competitive levels of compensation, the Compensation Committee
considers publicly available information regarding the compensation of executive
officers of other comparable U.S. investor-owned companies. The Compensation
Committee also considers recommendations made by the CEO regarding compensation
for other NEOs and key employees.
Elements
of Executive Compensation Program
Compensation
elements include:
|
·
|
base
salary;
|
|
·
|
annual
cash or equity incentive awards;
|
|
·
|
long-term
equity incentive compensation; and
|
|
·
|
other
health, welfare and pension
benefits.
|
Base
Salary
Base
salary is designed to provide competitive levels of base compensation to our
executives based on their experience, duties and scope of
responsibilities. We pay base salaries because it provides a base
compensation that is required to recruit and retain executives of the quality
that we must employ to ensure the success of our Company. Our
executive base salaries are typically adjusted in accordance with the NEO’s
employment agreement on an annual basis.
Annual Cash or Equity
Incentive Awards
Annual
incentive compensation is designed to provide competitive levels of compensation
based on experience, duties and scope of responsibilities. Incentive
awards are influenced by the Company’s profitability and achievement of planned
profitability, as well as other factors. The Compensation Committee uses the
annual incentive compensation to motivate and reward the NEOs for the
achievement and over-performance of our critical financial and strategic
goals.
Long-Term Equity Incentive
Compensation
Long-term
equity awards were granted to our executives from our 1997 Stock Option and
Compensation Plan, (“1997 Plan”) until September 2007, when the shareholders of
the Company approved the new 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The
Compensation Committee granted awards under the 1997 Plan and the 2007 Plan in
order to align the interests of the NEOs with our stockholders, and to motivate
and reward the NEOs to increase the stockholder value of the Company over the
long term. The Compensation Committee does not have a regular schedule for
awarding equity-based compensation and the timing of such awards is subject to
the discretion of the Compensation Committee but generally is awarded as part of
entering into employment agreements. We do not backdate options or grant
options retroactively or stock options with a so-called “reload” feature. In
addition, we do not plan to coordinate grants of options so that they are made
before the announcement of favorable information, or after the announcement of
unfavorable information.
Compensation
paid to each executive officer, including a stock bonus, was based on the
Compensation Committee’s review and consideration of aggregate levels of
compensation paid to executives of comparable companies and the individual
qualitative contributions and performance of each executive officer. In 2007,
the Compensation Committee issued a stock option award of 40,000 shares to Steve
C. Olson, our Chief Technology Officer under the 2007 Plan. No stock
options were issued in 2008.
Other Health, Welfare and
Retirement Benefits
Health
and Welfare Benefits
All
full-time employees, including our NEOs, may participate in our health and
welfare benefit programs, including medical, dental and vision care coverage,
disability insurance, and life insurance. We provide these benefits to meet the
health and welfare needs of employees and their families.
Retirement
Benefits
Our
employees, including the NEO’s, are eligible to participate in our 401(k)
contributory defined contribution plan (“401(k) Plan”). Each employee may
make before-tax contributions of up to 25% of their base salary up to current
Internal Revenue Service limits. We provide this plan to help our employees save
some amount of their cash compensation for retirement in a tax efficient manner.
The Company may make discretionary matching contributions, however in 2006 the
Company did not provide participants with a matching contribution. Commencing
January 1, 2007, the Company amended its 401(k) Plan to make a Safe Harbor
Contribution of 3% of a participant’s cash compensation.
Pension
Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
We do not
currently provide pension arrangements or post-retirement health coverage for
our executives or employees, although we may consider such benefits in the
future. In addition, we do not provide any nonqualified defined contribution or
other deferred compensation plans, although we may consider such benefits in the
future.
Employment
Agreements and Other Post-Employment Payments
All of
our NEOs were parties to employment agreements until their resignations in
November 2008, which provided for salaries and certain bonus payments as well as
rights to certain payments upon termination for cause. These employment
agreements also had change of control provisions that would require payments in
the event of termination of employment, which are described in greater detail
below. Only one NEO, Mr. Steve Olson, is still party to an agreement which
provides for salaries and certain bonus payments as well as rights to certain
payments upon termination for cause. Mr. Jason T. Young, is not party to an
employment agreement and has no current compensation arrangement with the
Company
These
employment agreements also have change of control provisions that would require
payments in the event of termination of employment, which are described in
greater detail below.
Tax
Implications of Executive Compensation
We do not
currently intend to award compensation that would result in a limitation on the
deductibility of a portion of such compensation pursuant to Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, other than awards that may be
exercised under the 1997 Plan or be made under the 2007 Plan; however, we may in
the future decide to authorize other compensation in excess of the limits of
Section 162(m) if it determines that such compensation is in the best interests
of the Company.
Although
deductibility of compensation is preferred, tax deductibility is not a primary
objective of our compensation programs. We believe that achieving our
compensation objectives set forth above is more important than the benefit of
tax deductibility and we reserve the right to maintain flexibility in how we
compensate our executive officers that may result in limiting the deductibility
of amounts of compensation from time to time.
Compensation
Committee Report
The
Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion
and Analysis with management and, based on the review and discussions, the
Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the
Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included herein and in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Viktor
Nemeth
Javier
Baz
Amit
Chatwani
Summary
Compensation Table for 2008
Name
and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
($)
|
Bonus
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)(3)
|
Option
Awards
($)(3)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
|
Change
in
Pension
Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
|
All
Other Compensation
($)(4)
|
Total
($)
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
(j)
|
Jason
T. Young, Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary (1)
|
2008
|
6,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randall
P. Marx, former Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
|
2008
2007
2006
|
287,000
250,000
245,000
|
-
25,000
-
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
|
328,000
8,250
-
|
615,000
283,250
245,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monty
R. Lamirato, former Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
|
2008
2007
2006
|
154,000
160,000
155,000
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
|
115,000
4,800
-
|
269,000
164,800
155,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
C. Olson, Chief Technology Officer
|
2008
2007
2006
|
215,000
200,000
175,000
|
-
7,500
-
|
-
-
-
|
-
6,000
-
|
-
-
-
|
-
-
-
|
-
6,225
-
|
215,000
219,725
175,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard
A. Anderson, former Executive Vice President
|
2008
2007
|
110,000
120,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
120,000
3,750
|
230,000
123,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory
E. Raskin, former President (2)
|
2006
|
321,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
108,000
|
-
|
-
|
429,000
|
|
(1)
|
Mr.
Young was appointed as a director in October 2008 and was appointed as the
Company’s Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer in November 2008.
Mr. Young received no compensation as an employee during 2008; he received
$6,000 for his services as a director during 2008. The Company
may compensate Mr. Young in the future.
|
|
(2)
|
Mr.
Gregory E. Raskin resigned effective October 31, 2006, in connection with
the sale of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Winncom Technologies Inc. Under
Mr. Raskin’s employment agreement, he was eligible to receive a cash bonus
based upon certain pre-determined net-income objectives. As a
result of meeting these objectives, Mr. Raskin earned $108,000 as a cash
bonus during fiscal year 2006.
|
|
(3)
|
The
amounts in columns (e) and (f) reflect the dollar amounts
recognized in each of 2007 and 2006 for financial statement reporting
purposes in accordance with FAS 123R with respect to stock awards and
stock options granted in each such year, and the dollar amount required to
be recognized in each such year in accordance with FAS 123R. These options
were granted pursuant to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan described
above.
|
|
(4)
|
The
amounts in the column titled “All Other Compensation” for 2008 include
accrued severance obligations for Randall P. Marx, Monty R. Lamirato, and
Richard A. Anderson, who resigned in November
2008.
|
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards
Name
and Principal Position
|
Grant
Date
|
Estimated
Future Payouts Under
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
|
All
Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares
of
Stock
or
Units4
(#)
|
All
Other
Option
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
|
Exercise
or Base Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
|
Grant
Date
Fair
Value
of
Awards
($)
|
Threshold
$
|
Target
$
|
Maximum
$
|
Jason
T. Young, Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Randall
P. Marx, Former Chair, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monty
R. Lamirato, Former Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
C. Olson, Chief Technology Officer
|
9/21/07
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
40,000(1)
|
$5.40
|
$134,000
|
(1) These
options we granted pursuant to the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan.
There
were no stock Equity Incentive Plan awards granted to the executive officers
with respect to the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 other than those
noted above. In addition, no options were exercised by the executive
officers during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The
following table sets forth information on outstanding option and stock awards
held by the named executive officers as of December 31, 2008, including the
number of shares underlying both exercisable and unexercisable portions of each
stock option as well as the exercise price and the expiration date of each
outstanding option.
|
Option
Awards
|
Stock
Awards
|
Name
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
(1)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
|
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Number
of
Shares
or
Units
of
Stock
That
Have
Not
Vested
(2)(3)
|
Market
Value
of
Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
($)
|
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights
That Have Not Vested
(#)
|
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have
Not
Vested
($)
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
(i)
|
(j)
|
Jason
T. Young
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Steven
C. Olson
|
16,000
(a)
|
24,000(a)
|
-
|
$5.40
|
9/21/2017
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
(a)
|
These
options were granted pursuant to the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. The
options vests at a rate of 20% per year with vesting dates of 12/31/07,
12/31/08, 12/31/09, 12/31/10, 12/31/11. These total 40,000 options are
reported in the Summary Compensation and the Grant of Plan Based Awards
Table.
|
No
options were exercised and no stock vested in 2006.
Director
Compensation for the Year Ended December 31, 2008
The table
below summarizes the compensation paid by the Company to directors for the year
ended December 31, 2008:
Director
Compensation for the Year Ended December 31, 2008
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
(f)
|
(g)
|
(h)
|
Name(1)
|
Fees
Earned or
Paid
in Cash
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
(2)
|
Option
Awards
($)(3)
|
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
|
Change
in
Pension
Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
|
All
Other
Compensation
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Randall
P. Marx (1)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Sigmund
A. Balaban (4)
|
26,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
26,000
|
Robert
E. Wade(4)
|
24,000
|
2,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
26,000
|
Donald
A. Huebner (4)
|
11,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
11,000
|
Jason
T. Young (5)
|
6,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
6,000
|
Viktor
Nemeth(6)
|
5,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
5,000
|
Marco
Vega (6)
|
3,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3,000
|
(1)
|
Randall
P. Marx was the Company’s Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer
and thus received no compensation for his services as a director. Mr. Marx
resigned on November 18, 2008. The compensation received by Mr. Marx as an
employee of the Company is shown in the Summary Compensation
Table.
|
(2)
|
Reflects
the dollar amount recognized and expensed for financial statement
reporting purposes for the year ended December 31, 2008 in accordance
with FAS 123R, and thus may include amounts from awards granted in and
prior to 2008. For Mr. Wade, the amount represents the Director fees
earned that were paid by issuance of common stock at fair market value
rather than cash.
|
(3)
|
Reflects
the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes
for the year ended December 31, 2008 in accordance with FAS 123R, and
thus includes amounts from options granted in and prior to
2008.
|
(4)
|
Mr.
Marx, Mr. Balaban, Mr. Wade and Mr. Huebner resigned as directors in
November 2008.
|
(5)
|
Mr.
Young was appointed as a director in October 2008 and was appointed as the
Company’s Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer in November 2008.
Mr. Young receives no compensation as an employee.
|
(6)
|
Mr.
Nemeth and Mr. Vega were appointed as directors in November
2008.
|
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
No member
of the Compensation Committee was an officer or former officer of the Company or
had any material relationship or transactions with the Company and no officer of
the Company sits on the compensation committee or other body that has the power
to establish the compensation of any member of the Compensation
Committee.
2007
Stock Incentive Plan
The
following paragraphs provide a summary of the principal features of the 2007
Plan and its operation.
Shares Available for
Issuance
The 2007
Plan provides that no more than 300,000 shares of our common stock may be issued
for awards. If there is any change in the Company’s common stock by reason of
any stock exchange, merger, consolidation, reorganization, recapitalization,
stock dividend, reclassification, split-up, combination of shares or otherwise,
then the Board, or any Option Committee, shall make proportionate adjustments to
the maximum number and kind of securities (i) available for issuance under the
2007 Plan; (ii) available for issuance as incentive stock options or
non-qualified stock options; (iii) that may be subject to awards received by any
participant; (iv) that may be subject to different types of awards; (v) that are
subject to any outstanding award; and (vi) the price of each
security.
The 2007
Plan provides that shares covered by an award will not count against the shares
available for issuance under the 2007 Plan until they are actually issued and
delivered to a participant. If an award granted under the 2007 Plan
lapses, expires, terminates or is forfeited, surrendered or canceled without
having been fully exercised or without the issuance of all the shares subject to
the award, the shares covered by such award will again be available for use
under the 2007 Plan.
Eligibility
Awards
may be made to any employee, officer, director of the Company and its related
companies or other persons who provide services to the Company and its related
companies.
Administration
The 2007
Plan is administered by the Option Committee, which shall consist of the Board
or a committee of the Board as the Board may from time to time
designate.
Types of
Awards
Stock Options. The Option
Committee may grant, either incentive stock options, which comply with Section
422 of the Internal Revenue Code, or nonqualified stock options. The Option
Committee sets option exercise prices and terms, except that the exercise price
of an incentive stock option may be no less than 100% of the fair market value
of the shares on the date of grant. At the time of grant, the Option Committee
in its sole discretion will determine when stock options are exercisable and
when they expire, except that the term of a stock option cannot exceed ten
years.
Restricted Stock Awards. The
Option Committee may grant awards of restricted stock under the 2007 Plan. These
shares may be subject to restrictions on transferability, risk of forfeiture and
other restrictions as determined by the Option Committee. As a condition to a
grant of an award of restricted stock, the Option Committee may require or
permit a participant to elect that any cash dividends paid on a share of
Restricted Stock be automatically reinvested in additional shares of restricted
stock or applied to the purchase of additional awards under the 2007 Plan.
Unless otherwise determined by the Option Committee, stock distributed in
connection with a stock split or stock dividend, and other property distributed
as a dividend, shall be subject to restrictions and a risk of forfeiture to the
same extent as restricted stock with respect to which such stock or other
property has been distributed.
Restricted Stock Unit Awards.
The Option Committee may grant awards of Restricted Stock Units under the 2007
Plan. A “Restricted Stock Unit” is a grant valued in terms of common stock, but
common stock is not issued at the time of grant. After participants who receive
awards of Restricted Stock Units satisfy applicable vesting requirements, the
Company will distribute shares or the cash equivalent of the number of shares
used to value the Unit. If the participant does not meet the requirements prior
to the end of the vesting period, the Units will be forfeited to the Company.
Vesting requirements may be met by the passage of time or by either Company or
individual performance. Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to such
restrictions (which may include a risk of forfeiture) as determined by the
Option Committee, which restrictions may lapse at the expiration of the deferral
period or at other times determined by the Option Committee.
Amendment and Termination of
the 2007 Plan
The Board
of Directors or the Option Committee may amend, alter or discontinue the 2007
Plan, except that if any applicable statute, rule or regulation requires
shareholder approval with respect to any amendment of the 2007 Plan, then to the
extent so required, shareholder approval will be obtained. No amendment may
impair the right of a participant under an outstanding agreement. The 2007 Plan
will terminate on August 2, 2017.
Federal Income Tax
Consequences
The
following is a summary of the material United States federal income tax
consequences to us and to recipients of certain awards under the 2007 Plan. The
summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code and the U.S. Treasury regulations
promulgated thereunder in effect as of the date of this Proxy Statement, all of
which may change with retroactive effect. The summary is not intended to be a
complete analysis or discussion of all potential tax consequences that may be
important to recipients of awards under the 2007 Plan.
Nonqualified Stock Options. A
recipient will not have any income at the time a nonqualified stock option is
granted, nor will the Company be entitled to a deduction at that
time. When a nonqualified stock option is exercised, the recipient
generally will recognize ordinary income (whether the option price is paid in
cash or by surrender of shares of Company stock), in an amount equal to the
excess of the fair market value of the shares to which the option exercise
pertains over the option price.
Incentive Stock
Options. A recipient will not have any income at the time an
incentive stock option (“ISO”) is granted. Furthermore, a recipient
will not have regular taxable income at the time the ISO is exercised. However,
the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise over
the option price will be a preference item that could create an alternative
minimum tax liability for the recipient. If a recipient disposes of the shares
acquired on exercise of an ISO after the later of two years after the grant of
the ISO or one year after exercise of the ISO, the gain recognized by the
recipient (i.e., the excess of the proceeds received over the option price), if
any, will be long-term capital gain eligible for favorable tax rates under the
Internal Revenue Code. Conversely, if the recipient disposes of the shares
within two years of the grant of the ISO or within one year of exercise of the
ISO, the disposition will generally be a “disqualifying disposition”, and the
recipient will recognize ordinary income in the year of the disqualifying
disposition equal to the lesser of (i) the excess of the fair market value of
the stock on the date of exercise over the option price and (ii) the excess of
the amount received for the shares over the option price. The balance of the
gain or loss, if any, will be long-term or short-term capital gain, depending on
how long the shares were held.
Restricted Stock and Restricted
Stock Units. With respect to a grant of restricted stock or Restricted
Stock Units, the participant will recognize ordinary income at the time of
vesting or payout equal to the fair market value (on the vesting or payout date)
of the shares or cash received minus any amount paid. For restricted stock only,
a participant instead may elect to be taxed at the time of grant.
The
Company generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with an
award under the 2007 Plan in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by
a participant at the time the participant recognizes such income, provided that
the deduction is not disallowed by Section 162(m) or otherwise limited by the
Internal Revenue Code.
In 2007,
options to purchase a total of 40,000 shares were granted to an officer at an
exercise price of $5.40. No options were granted to directors in 2007 from the
2007 Plan and no options were granted in 2008 under the 2007 Plan.
1997 Stock Option and
Compensation Plan
In
November 1997, the Board of Directors approved our 1997 Stock Option and
Compensation Plan (the “1997 Plan”). Pursuant to the 1997 Plan, options were
authorized to be granted to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of our
common stock to key employees, directors, and other persons who have or are
contributing to our success. On November 9, 2004, the shareholders approved
amendments to the 1997 Stock Option and Compensation Plan to allow for an
aggregate of 200,000 options to be granted under the 1997 Plan. The options
granted pursuant to the 1997 Plan could have been incentive options qualifying
for beneficial tax treatment for the recipient or they could have been
non-qualified options. The 1997 Plan was administered by an option committee
that determined the terms of the options subject to the requirements of the 1997
Plan, except that the option committee did not administer the 1997 Plan with
respect to automatic grants of options to our directors who were not our
employees. The option committee could have been the entire Board or a
committee of the Board. The 1997 Stock Option and Compensation Plan expired in
November 2007.
Through
May 24, 2000, directors who were not also our employees (“Outside Directors”)
automatically received options to purchase 5,000 shares pursuant to the 1997
Plan at the time of their election as an Outside Director. These Outside
Directors options were not exercisable at the time of grant. Options to purchase
1,000 shares became exercisable for each meeting of the Board of Directors
attended by each Outside Director on or after the date of grant of the options
to that Outside Director, but in no event earlier than six months following the
date of grant. The exercise price for options granted to Outside Directors was
equal to the closing price per share of our common stock on the date of grant.
All options granted to Outside Directors expired five years after the date of
grant. On the date that all of an Outside Director’s options became exercisable,
options to purchase an additional 5,000 shares, which were exercisable no
earlier than six months from the date of grant, were automatically granted to
that Outside Director. On May 24, 2000, the Board of Directors voted to (1)
decrease the amount of options automatically granted to Outside Directors from
5,000 to 500 options, and (2) decrease the amount of exercisable options from
1,000 to 100 per meeting. The term of the Outside Director option granted in the
future was lowered from five years to two years. The other terms of the Outside
Director options did not change. On July 5, 2002, the Board of Directors voted
to (1) increase the amount of options automatically granted to Outside
Directors from 500 to 2,500 options, and (2) increase the amount of
exercisable options from 100 to 500 per meeting. The other terms of the Outside
Director options did not change.
The
Company granted a total of 7,500 options to Outside Directors under the 1997
Plan during 2007 at exercise prices ranging from $4.80 to $5.47 per share. The
Company granted a total of 5,000 options to Outside Directors under the 1997
Plan during 2006 at an exercise price of $6.50 per share. The Company granted a
total of 5,000 options to Outside Directors under the 1997 Plan during 2005 at
exercise prices ranging from $5.50 to $7.50 per share.
As of
December 31, 2008, there were 6,000 exercisable options outstanding related to
the grants to former Outside Directors. These options expired February 12,
2009.
In
addition to Outside Directors grants, the Board of Directors may grant incentive
options to our key employees pursuant to the 1997 Plan. In 2007 and 2006, the
Board did not grant any options to employees under the 1997 Plan. In 2005, the
Board granted a total of 2,000 options under the Plan to employees with an
exercise price of $7.50. These options expired in 2008.
Employment Contracts and
Termination of Employment and Change-In-Control Arrangements
Effective
February 1, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an employment
agreement between the Company and Randall P. Marx, the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer (CEO), effective as of January 31, 2008. The employment agreement was
recommended to the Board by the Compensation Committee. The agreement provided
for annual compensation of $250,000 in 2007, $275,000 in 2008, and $300,000 in
2009. On November 18, 2008 Mr. Marx resigned his position as CEO. In connection
with Mr. Marx’s resignation, on November 18, 2008, the Company and Mr. Marx
reached an agreement for compensation of Mr. Marx that would replace the
compensation and other benefits to which Mr. Marx could be entitled under his
January 31, 2008 employment agreement with the Company. Pursuant to this new
agreement, Mr. Marx will be compensated $327,500 through December 31, 2009 as
payment in full for his salary and accrued vacation, and he will receive health
benefits from the Company through December 31, 2009. Under the terms of this
agreement, Mr. Marx is not entitled to receive any other compensation or
benefits to which he otherwise would have been entitled under his January 31,
2008 employment agreement. Mr. Marx also agreed to provide telephonic consulting
services to the Company.
Effective
November 1, 2007, the Company entered into a two year employment agreement with
Mr. Monty R. Lamirato as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, which position
he had served in since June 2001. The agreement provided for annual compensation
of $165,000 in the first year and $175,000 in the second year. On November 26,
2008, Monty R. Lamirato, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
resigned from his positions with the Company. In connection with Mr. Lamirato’s
resignation, Mr. Lamirato and the Company executed a separation agreement
pursuant to which Mr. Lamirato was paid $115,000 through May 26, 2009 for all
compensation and other benefits to which he otherwise would have been entitled
under his November 7, 2007 employment agreement. Under the terms of this
agreement, Mr. Lamirato agreed to provide consulting services to the Company
through October 31, 2009.
Effective
November 1, 2007, the Company entered into a three year employment agreement
with Mr. Richard A. Anderson, as the Company’s Executive Vice President. The
agreement provided for annual compensation of $125,000. On November 26, 2008,
Richard L. Anderson, the Company’s Executive Vice President, resigned from his
position with the Company. In connection with his resignation, Mr. Anderson and
the Company executed a separation agreement pursuant to which Mr. Anderson was
paid $120,000 through May 26, 2009, and received health benefits from the
Company through June 30, 2009, both as payment for all compensation and other
benefits to which he otherwise would have been entitled under his November 7,
2007 employment agreement. Mr. Anderson also agreed to provide consulting
services to the Company through December 31, 2009.
Effective
November 1, 2007, the Company entered into a five year employment agreement with
Mr. Steven C. Olson, as President and Chief Technology Officer of the Company’s
Wireless Communications Solutions Division. Mr. Olson has been with the Company
since 2001. The agreement provides for annual base compensation of $200,000 in
2007, increasing annually to $245,000 in 2011. Mr. Olson shall also be entitled
to bonuses ranging from $5,000 to $100,000 annually contingent upon the Wireless
Communications Solutions Division achieving certain net income targets. Mr.
Olson earned a bonus of $7,500 for 2007. We previously entered into a written
employment agreement with Mr. Olson, effective August 22, 2004. The employment
agreement was for the period August 22, 2004 through August 22, 2007 at an
annual base salary of $175,000. Mr. Olson also was eligible to earn bonuses,
upon achieving certain gross margin objectives, over the term of the agreement.
Mr. Olson did not receive a bonus in 2006. Mr. Olson also received options to
purchase 10,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $6.00 per share from
August 22, 2004 through August 22, 2007. Mr. Olson also received options to
purchase 40,000 shares of our common stock on August 21, 2007. These options
vest at a rate of 20% per year with vesting dates of 12/31/07, 12/31/08,
12/31/09, 12/31/10, and 12/31/11.
The
following tables show the potential payments upon termination or a change of
control of the Company for each of the named executive officers.
Scenario
|
Mr.
Olson
|
If
early retirement occurred at December 31, 2009
|
-
|
If
termination for cause occurred at December 31, 2009
|
-
|
If
termination without cause occurred at December 31, 2009
|
$225,000
|
If
“termination for Good Reason” occurred at December 31, 2009
(1)
|
$225,000
|
If
death or disability occurred as of December 31, 2009
|
-
|
(1) The
provisions governing “Good Reason” are described in Mr. Olson’s Employment
Agreement, which has been filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
as Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2007. Such Form 8-K,
and the Exhibits thereto, are incorporated herein by reference thereto.
Such Form 8-K and Mr. Olson’s Employment Agreement are publicly available at the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s website www.sec.gov.
We have
no compensatory plan or arrangement that results or will result from the
resignation, retirement, or any other termination of an executive officer’s
employment with us or from a change-in-control or a change in an executive
officer’s responsibilities following a change-in-control, except that the 2007
Stock Incentive Plan and 1997 Stock Option and Compensation Plan provides
for vesting of all outstanding options in the event of the occurrence of a
change-in-control.
Certain
Transactions with Management and Principal Shareholders
We do not
employ specific written procedures for the review, approval or ratification of
related party transactions involving our directors, officers and employees or
their family members, but we consider such transactions on a case-by-case
basis.
On
January 23, 2009 we entered into a financial advisory engagement (the
“Agreement”) with Quadrant Management, Inc. (the “Advisor”). Quadrant
Management, Inc. is under common control with Brean Murray Carret Group, Inc.,
an entity that beneficially owns 575,763, or 18.63%, of the Company's common
stock. Mr. Young, the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer, has been a
Managing Director at Quadrant Management, Inc. since 2005, where he is
responsible for making investments in US and emerging market companies, and
where he frequently serves in active management- or director-level
roles.
Pursuant
to the Agreement, the Advisor will provide to ARC financial advisory and
business consulting services, including restructuring services.
In
consideration for the restructuring services provided by the Advisor since
November 2008 and for the ongoing services to be provided, ARC will pay the
following: 1) an initial cash fee of $250,000 upon signing the Agreement; 2) an
annual fee of the greater of (i) $250,000, or (ii) 20% of any increase in
reported earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization after
adjusting for one-time and non-recurring items (“EBITDA”) for the current
financial year over preceding year, or (iii) 20% of reported EBITDA for the
current financial year; and 3) all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by
Advisor in performing services under the Agreement.
The
Agreement will expire on December 31, 2013.
Except as
set forth herein, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and during the
interim period since the end of fiscal year 2008, there were no transactions
between the Company and its directors, executive officers or known holders of
greater than five percent of the Company's Common Stock in which the amount
involved exceeded $120,000 and in which any of the foregoing persons had or will
have a direct or indirect material interest.
PROPOSAL
NO. 2: TO RATIFY THE SELECTION OF HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP AS
HE
COMPANY'S CERTIFIED INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
The Board
of Directors and its Audit Committee recommends that the shareholders vote in
favor of ratifying the selection of the certified public accounting firm of Hein
& Associates LLP of Denver, Colorado as the auditors who will continue to
audit financial statements, review tax returns, and perform other accounting and
consulting services for the year ending December 31, 2009 or until the Board of
Directors, in its discretion, replaces them. Hein & Associates LLP also
audited our financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001,
2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008.
An
affirmative vote of the plurality of shares represented at the meeting is
necessary to ratify the selection of auditors. There is no legal requirement for
submitting this proposal to the shareholders; however, the Board of Directors
believes it is of sufficient importance to seek ratification. Whether the
proposal is ratified or defeated, the Board of Directors may reconsider, at its
discretion, its selection of Hein & Associates LLP. Representatives of Hein
& Associates LLP will not be present at the Annual Meeting.
Audit
Fees
The Audit
Committee reviews and determines whether specific projects or expenditures with
our independent registered public accounting firm (auditor), Hein &
Associates LLP potentially affect their independence. The Audit Committee’s
policy requires that all services the Company's independent registered public
accounting firm (auditor) may provide to the Company, including audit services
and permitted audit-related services, be pre-approved in advance by the Audit
Committee. In the event that an audit or non-audit service requires approval
prior to the next scheduled meeting of the Audit Committee, the auditor must
contact the Chairman of the Audit Committee to obtain such approval. Any
approval will be reported to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled
meeting.
Audit
Fees
The
following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to us by Hein &
Associates LLP for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Audit
fees
|
|
|
$99,420 |
(1) |
|
|
$78,000 |
(1) |
|
|
$140,000 |
(1) |
Audit-related
fees
|
|
|
-- |
(2) |
|
|
-- |
(2) |
|
|
-- |
(2) |
Tax
fees
|
|
|
18,000 |
(3) |
|
|
22,000 |
(3) |
|
|
14,000 |
(3) |
All
other fees
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Total
audit and non-audit fees
|
|
|
$117,420 |
|
|
|
$100,000 |
|
|
|
$154,000 |
|
(1)
|
Includes
fees for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual
financial statements and review of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year 2008, 2007 and 2006 and for reviews of the financial statements
included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the first three
quarters of fiscal 2008, 2007 and 2006 and related U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission registration
statements.
|
(2)
|
Includes
fees billed for professional services rendered in fiscal 2008, 2007 and
2006, in connection with acquisition planning and due
diligence.
|
(3)
|
Includes
fees billed for professional services rendered in fiscal 2008, 2007 and
2006, in connection with tax compliance (including U.S. federal and state
returns) and tax consulting.
|
Financial
Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees
During
fiscal year 2008, Hein & Associates LLP did not bill any fees for the
professional services described in paragraph (c)(4)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of
Regulation S-X.
All Other
Fees
During
fiscal year 2008, there were no other fees billed for services rendered by Hein
& Associates LLP other than the services described above.
The Board
of Directors has considered whether the provision of the services covered in
this section is compatible with maintaining Hein & Associates LLP’s
independence and believes that it is.
Required
Vote
Ratification
of the appointment of the independent registered public accounting firm requires
the affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of the
shares of common stock voting in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. If
the shareholders should not ratify the appointment of Hein & Associates LLP,
the Board will reconsider the appointment.
Recommendation
of the Board of Directors
THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS
VOTE FOR
THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP AS
THE
COMPANY'S
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING
DECEMBER
31, 2009.
PROPOSAL
3: OTHER BUSINESS
The Board
of Directors of the Company is not aware of any other matters that are to be
presented at the Annual Meeting, and it has not been advised that any other
person will present any other matters for consideration at the meeting.
Nevertheless, if other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting,
the shareholders present, or the persons, if any, authorized by a valid proxy to
vote on their behalf, shall vote on such matters in accordance with their
judgment.
RESOLUTIONS
PROPOSED BY INDIVIDUAL SHAREHOLDERS;
DISCRETIONARY
AUTHORITY TO VOTE PROXIES
In order
to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating
to our next annual meeting of shareholders following the end of our 2009 fiscal
year, proposals by individual shareholders must be received by us no later than
August 18, 2010.
In
addition, the proxy solicited by the Board of Directors for the next annual
meeting of shareholders will confer discretionary authority on any shareholder
proposal presented at that meeting unless we are provided with notice of that
proposal no later than September 30, 2010.
AVAILABILITY
OF REPORTS ON FORM 10-K
A copy of
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 is
being sent to each shareholder with this Proxy Statement. Upon written request,
we will provide, without charge, a copy of our 2008 Form 10-K or other SEC
filings to any shareholder of record, or to any shareholder who owns Common
Stock listed in the name of a bank or broker as nominee, at the close of
business on November 24, 2009. Any request for a copy of our 2008 Form 10-K or
other SEC filings should be mailed to ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc., 10601 West
48th Avenue, I-70 Frontage Road North, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-2660,
Attention: Investor Relations.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
This
proxy statement and materials delivered with this proxy statement include
“forward-looking” statements. All statements other than statements of historical
facts included in this proxy statement and materials delivered with this proxy
statement, including without limitation statements regarding our financial
position, business strategy, and plans and objectives of management for future
operations and capital expenditures, are forward-looking statements. Although we
believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements and
the assumptions upon which the forward-looking statements are based are
reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations and assumptions will
prove to have been correct. Additional statements concerning important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations
(“Cautionary Statements”) are disclosed in the “Forward-Looking Statements-
Cautionary Statements” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008. All written and oral forward-looking statements
attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf subsequent to the date of
this proxy statement are expressly qualified in their entirety by the Cautionary
Statements.
This
notice and proxy statement are sent by order of the Board of
Directors.
Dated: November
24, 2009
|
Jason
T. Young
|
Chief
Executive Officer
* * * *
*
APPENDIX
A
ARC
WIRELESS SOLUTIONS, INC.
POLICIES
AND PROCEDURES FOR NOMINATIONS
OF
DIRECTOR CANDIDATES
Effective
January 1, 2009
I. All
Nominations
It is the
policy of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of ARC Wireless Solutions, Inc.
(the “Corporation”) that each candidate recommended for nomination and election
to the Board (each, a “Nominee”), regardless of whether such Nominee is
recommended by a shareholder of the Corporation, the Board or any other person,
shall be approved by a majority of the independent directors of the
Board.
The Board
believes that certain minimum qualifications must be met by each Nominee for the
Board, as well as meeting the applicable independence standards required by the
Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and federal securities laws. The
Board believes that Nominees must reflect a Board that is comprised of directors
(i) a majority of whom are independent (as determined under the aforementioned
SEC director qualification standards); (ii) who are of high integrity; (iii) who
have qualifications that will increase the overall effectiveness of the Board;
and (iv) who meet other requirements as may be required by applicable rules,
such as financial literacy or financial expertise with respect to audit Board
members. In evaluating the qualifications of the Nominees, the Board considers
many factors, including issues of leadership ability, career success, character,
judgment, independence, background, age, expertise, diversity and breadth of
experience, length of service, other commitments and the like. The Board
evaluates such factors, among others, and does not assign any particular weight
or priority to any of these factors. Also, the Board considers the suitability
of each Nominee, including the current members of the Board, in light of the
current size and composition of the Board.
Unless
and until otherwise subsequently determined by the Board, the number of
directors of the Corporation at any time shall be the number of directors that
the Board nominated for election at the most recently-held annual meeting of
shareholders, increased by the number of directors, if any, that the Board
appointed subsequent to the most recently-held annual meeting of shareholders
and also increased by the number of directors, if any, whose term as a director
did not expire at the most recently-held annual meeting of
shareholders.
II. Shareholder
Nominations
The Board
shall consider recommendations for Nominees to the Board from shareholders (an
“Eligible Shareholder”) holding a minimum of $2,000 in market value, or 1%, of
the Corporation's voting common stock, which stock is held through the date of
the meeting electing directors, and which Eligible Shareholder complies with the
nomination notice procedures set forth in these policies and the Corporation's
Bylaws.
Nominees
recommended by Eligible Shareholders (hereinafter referred to as “Shareholder
Candidates”) will be evaluated by the Board on the same basis as Nominees that
may be identified by the Board, management or, if the Board permits, a search
firm. Such evaluation may, in the Board's discretion, include a review solely of
information and documentation provided to the Board or may also include
discussions with persons familiar with the Shareholder Candidate, an interview
with the Shareholder Candidate or other actions that the Board deems proper. In
evaluating and identifying Nominees, the Board has the authority to retain and
terminate any third party search firm that is used to identify director Nominees
and has the authority to approve the fees and retention terms of any such search
firm.
Shareholder
Candidates who are recommended by an Eligible Shareholder at a time when there
are no open positions on the Board and are considered qualified Nominees by the
Board may be placed on the rolling list of Nominees for open Board positions
maintained by the Board, generally for a period of up to 24 months from the date
that the recommendation was received by the Secretary of the
Corporation.
III. Procedures
for Shareholders Regarding Nomination of Director Candidates
For the
Shareholder Candidate to be considered by the Board, regardless of whether the
Eligible Shareholder (i) is seeking to have the Shareholder Candidate included
in the Corporation's proxy statement, (ii) intends to prepare and distribute its
own proxy statement, or (iii) intends to nominate the Shareholder Candidate at a
meeting, the Eligible Shareholder and the Shareholder Candidate must comply with
the procedures set forth herein.
A.
Recommendations for Shareholder Candidate(s) to the Board of Directors from an
Eligible Shareholder must be directed in writing to ARC Wireless Solutions,
Inc., Attn: Corporate Secretary, at the Corporation's principal offices at 10601
West 48th Avenue, I-70 Frontage Road North, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-2660.
Each such recommendation from an Eligible Shareholder shall include and set
forth the following information regarding the Shareholder Candidate whom the
Eligible Shareholder proposes to nominate for election as a
director:
|
1.
|
the
name, age, business address and residence address of such Shareholder
Candidate;
|
|
2.
|
the
principal occupation or employment of the Shareholder Candidate;
|
|
3.
|
the
class and number of shares of the Corporation's securities beneficially
owned by such Shareholder Candidate, if
any;
|
|
4.
|
detailed
biographical data and qualifications and information regarding
any relationships between the Shareholder Candidate and the
Corporation within the last three
years;
|
|
5.
|
a
statement signed by the Shareholder Candidate acknowledging that:
|
(a) the
Shareholder Candidate consents to being named in the Corporation's proxy
materials, and, if elected, will serve as a director of the Corporation and will
represent all shareholders of the Corporation in accordance with applicable laws
and the Corporation's articles of incorporation and by-laws, as may be amended
from time to time; and
(b) the
Shareholder Candidate, if elected, will comply with the Corporation's Amended
and Restated Code of Ethics, any corporate governance guidelines, and any other
applicable rule, regulation, policy or standard of conduct applicable to the
Board of Directors and its individual members.
|
6.
|
a
fully completed and signed Questionnaire for Directors and Officers on the
Corporation's standard form and provide any additional information
requested by the Board or the Corporation, including any information that
would be required to be included in a proxy statement in which the
Shareholder Candidate is named as a nominee for election as a director and
information showing that the Shareholder Candidate meets the Board's
qualifications for nomination as a director and for service on the
Committees of the Board; and
|
|
7.
|
any
other information relating to such Shareholder Candidate required to be
disclosed in solicitations for proxies for election of directors pursuant
to Regulation 14A under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “1934 Act”), and the rules
thereunder.
|
B. The
Eligible Shareholder submitting the recommendation must provide:
1. the
name and record address of the Eligible Shareholder and the class and number of
shares of the Corporation's securities beneficially owned by the Eligible
Shareholder;
2. any
material interest of the Eligible Shareholder in such nomination;
3. a
description of all arrangements or understandings between the Eligible
Shareholder making such nomination and the Shareholder Candidate and any other
person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the
nomination is made by the Eligible Shareholder;
4. a
statement from the recommending Eligible Shareholder in support of the
Shareholder Candidate and providing references for the Shareholder
Candidate;
5. a
representation that such Eligible Shareholder intends to appear in person or by
proxy at the annual meeting to nominate the Shareholder Candidate named in its
recommendation; and
6. any
other information that is required to be provided by the shareholder pursuant to
Regulation 14A under the 1934 Act, in his/her capacity as a proponent to a
shareholder proposal.
In
addition to the required information detailed above, a Shareholder Candidate
must be available for interviews with members of the Board.
IV. Timing
of Shareholder Candidate Recommendations
An
Eligible Shareholder who wishes to recommend a Shareholder Candidate for
election as a director, regardless of whether the Eligible Shareholder (i) is
seeking to have the Shareholder Candidate included in the Corporation's proxy
statement, (ii) intends to prepare and distribute its own proxy statement, or
(iii) intends to nominate the Shareholder Candidate at a meeting, must submit
the information and documentation described above for receipt by the Secretary
of the Corporation in a timely manner, with “timely” determined as set forth in
the next succeeding sentence herein. To be timely, an Eligible Shareholder's
notice must be received at the Corporation's principal office not less than 120
calendar days before the date that the Corporation's proxy statement or notice
thereof was first mailed to shareholders in connection with the previous year's
annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event (i) the Corporation did not
hold an annual meeting in the previous year, (ii) the date of the annual meeting
has been changed by more than 30 days from the date of the previous year's
meeting, or (iii) the meeting is a special meeting called in the manner set
forth in the Corporation's bylaws, then notice by the Eligible Shareholder, to
be timely, must be delivered to the Corporation not later than the 10th day
following the day on which a Public Announcement (defined in Article II Section
5 of the bylaws) of the date of such meeting is first made. The Secretary of the
Corporation will provide a copy of the Bylaws and/or the Policies and Procedures
for Shareholder Nominations of Director Candidates upon a request in writing
from the Eligible Shareholder.
V. Decisions
by the Independent Directors
The
majority of the independent directors shall have final authority on determining
the selection of director Nominees for nomination to the Board.
VI. Modification
of Policies and Procedures
The
policies and procedures set forth herein may be modified at any time as may be
determined by the Board and a majority of the independent
directors.
32