e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended July 3, 2005
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _______ to ________
Commission File Number: 1-10317
LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of Incorporation)
|
|
94-2712976
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
1621 Barber Lane
Milpitas, California 95035
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip code)
(408) 433-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act) YES þ NO o
As of August 5, 2005, there were 390,718,991 shares of the registrants Common Stock, $.01 par
value, outstanding.
LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2005
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands, except per-share amounts) |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
211,456 |
|
|
$ |
218,723 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
570,563 |
|
|
|
595,862 |
|
Accounts receivable, less allowances of $10,445 and $12,545 |
|
|
284,897 |
|
|
|
272,065 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
185,740 |
|
|
|
218,900 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
5,649 |
|
|
|
5,661 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
55,316 |
|
|
|
54,076 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,313,621 |
|
|
|
1,365,287 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
288,513 |
|
|
|
311,916 |
|
Intangibles, net |
|
|
73,232 |
|
|
|
108,457 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
965,468 |
|
|
|
973,130 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
5,002 |
|
|
|
5,044 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
101,673 |
|
|
|
110,167 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,747,509 |
|
|
$ |
2,874,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
121,285 |
|
|
$ |
122,422 |
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
65,161 |
|
|
|
58,516 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
125,644 |
|
|
|
142,278 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
82,408 |
|
|
|
72,935 |
|
Current portion of long-term obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
394,498 |
|
|
|
396,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
625,956 |
|
|
|
781,846 |
|
Tax related liabilities and other |
|
|
75,280 |
|
|
|
77,570 |
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations and other liabilities |
|
|
701,236 |
|
|
|
859,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 10 and 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in subsidiary |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares; $.01 par value; 2,000 shares authorized, none outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock; $.01 par value; 1,300,000 shares authorized; 390,306 and
387,490 shares outstanding |
|
|
3,903 |
|
|
|
3,875 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,986,207 |
|
|
|
2,969,478 |
|
Deferred stock compensation |
|
|
(10,594 |
) |
|
|
(8,936 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(1,354,340 |
) |
|
|
(1,384,321 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
26,352 |
|
|
|
37,950 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,651,528 |
|
|
|
1,618,046 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,747,509 |
|
|
$ |
2,874,001 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
3
LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
481,292 |
|
|
$ |
447,897 |
|
|
$ |
931,299 |
|
|
$ |
900,254 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
269,531 |
|
|
|
239,081 |
|
|
|
529,271 |
|
|
|
490,006 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
211,761 |
|
|
|
208,816 |
|
|
|
402,028 |
|
|
|
410,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
|
|
99,659 |
|
|
|
110,098 |
|
|
|
198,896 |
|
|
|
219,039 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
59,872 |
|
|
|
63,757 |
|
|
|
118,012 |
|
|
|
124,915 |
|
Restructuring of operations and other items, net |
|
|
7,156 |
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
8,689 |
|
|
|
2,431 |
|
Amortization of non-cash deferred stock
compensation (*) |
|
|
1,172 |
|
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
3,829 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
17,613 |
|
|
|
19,398 |
|
|
|
35,226 |
|
|
|
37,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
26,289 |
|
|
|
10,531 |
|
|
|
38,578 |
|
|
|
22,362 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(6,320 |
) |
|
|
(6,067 |
) |
|
|
(13,030 |
) |
|
|
(11,979 |
) |
Interest income and other, net |
|
|
11,543 |
|
|
|
8,778 |
|
|
|
16,933 |
|
|
|
17,944 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
31,512 |
|
|
|
13,242 |
|
|
|
42,481 |
|
|
|
28,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
6,250 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25,262 |
|
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
|
$ |
29,981 |
|
|
$ |
16,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
389,088 |
|
|
|
383,522 |
|
|
|
388,371 |
|
|
|
382,571 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
393,427 |
|
|
|
388,586 |
|
|
|
391,954 |
|
|
|
389,102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Amortization of non-cash deferred stock compensation, if not shown separately, would
have been included in cost of revenues, research and development and selling, general and
administrative expenses as shown below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Cost of revenues |
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
96 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
2,711 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,172 |
|
|
$ |
2,003 |
|
|
$ |
2,627 |
|
|
$ |
3,829 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
4
LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
29,981 |
|
|
$ |
16,327 |
|
Adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
82,293 |
|
|
|
92,441 |
|
Amortization of non-cash deferred stock compensation |
|
|
2,627 |
|
|
|
3,829 |
|
Non-cash restructuring and other items |
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
6,385 |
|
Gain on sale and exchange of equity securities |
|
|
(2,311 |
) |
|
|
(8,104 |
) |
Gain on repurchase of Convertible Subordinated Notes |
|
|
(4,123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of property and equipment |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3,937 |
) |
Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in business combinations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(12,853 |
) |
|
|
(56,980 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
33,160 |
|
|
|
(11,701 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(8,160 |
) |
|
|
(5,777 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(2,378 |
) |
|
|
10,263 |
|
Accrued and other liabilities |
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(5,178 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
119,144 |
|
|
|
38,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of debt securities available-for-sale |
|
|
(262,532 |
) |
|
|
(454,756 |
) |
Maturities and sales of debt securities available-for-sale |
|
|
283,183 |
|
|
|
339,458 |
|
Purchases of equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,250 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of equity securities |
|
|
3,871 |
|
|
|
10,518 |
|
Purchases of property, equipment and software |
|
|
(19,420 |
) |
|
|
(25,218 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
3,215 |
|
|
|
5,836 |
|
Adjustment to goodwill acquired in a prior year for resolution of
a pre-acquisition income tax contingency |
|
|
7,662 |
|
|
|
4,462 |
|
Increase in non-current assets and deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
Decrease in non-current assets and deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,633 |
|
Acquisition of companies, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,487 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities |
|
|
15,979 |
|
|
|
(118,844 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of Convertible Subordinated Notes |
|
|
(148,126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
17,810 |
|
Purchase of minority interest in subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,453 |
) |
Repayment of debt obligations |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities |
|
|
(135,429 |
) |
|
|
10,141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(6,961 |
) |
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(7,267 |
) |
|
|
(71,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
218,723 |
|
|
|
269,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
211,456 |
|
|
$ |
198,403 |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.
5
LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
In the opinion of LSI Logic Corporation (the Company or LSI), the accompanying unaudited
consolidated condensed financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments and restructuring and other items, net as discussed in Note 3 to the
Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, hereafter referred to as the Notes),
necessary to state fairly the financial information included herein. While the Company believes
that the disclosures are adequate to make the information not misleading, it is suggested that
these financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004.
For financial reporting purposes, the Company reports on a 13 or 14-week quarter with a year
ending December 31. The current quarter ended July 3, 2005. For presentation purposes, the
consolidated condensed financial statements refer to the calendar quarters for convenience. The
results of operations for the quarter ended July 3, 2005, are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year. The first six months of 2005 ended on July 3, 2005, and
consisted of approximately 26 weeks, while the first six months of 2004 ended on July 4, 2004, and
consisted of approximately 27 weeks. The second quarter of 2005 and 2004 both consisted of 13
weeks.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated condensed financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ significantly
from these estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R).
This statement eliminates the alternative to use the intrinsic value method of accounting for stock
options issued to employees. This statement requires entities to recognize the cost of employee
services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value
of those awards. This statement applies to all awards granted, modified, repurchased or cancelled
after the effective date. In addition, compensation cost will be recognized on or after the
effective date for the portion of outstanding awards for which the requisite service has not been
rendered, based on the grant date fair value of those awards calculated under SFAS No. 123 for pro
forma disclosures. This statement also requires additional disclosures in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements. On April 14, 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) announced the adoption of a rule that defers the required effective date of SFAS No. 123R
until the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company expects to
apply this statement beginning in the first fiscal quarter of 2006. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of adopting this statement; however, the Company expects that it will have a
significant impact on our consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations. The exact impact
on the Companys financial statements will be dependent on a number of factors including the
transition method, the option-pricing model used to compute fair value and the inputs to that model
such as volatility and expected life. The pro forma disclosures of the impact of SFAS No. 123
provided in Note 2 may not be representative of the impact of adopting this statement.
6
On March 29, 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 107, Share-Based
Payment. This statement expresses views of the staff regarding the interaction between SFAS No.
123R and certain SEC rules and regulations and provides the staffs views regarding the valuation
of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. In particular, SAB No. 107 provides
guidance related to share-based payment transactions with non-employees, the transition from
nonpublic to public entity status, valuation methods (including assumptions such as expected
volatility and expected term), the accounting for certain redeemable financial instruments issued
under share-based payment arrangements, the classification of compensation expense, non-GAAP
financial measures, first-time adoption of SFAS No. 123R in an interim period, capitalization of
compensation cost related to share-based payment arrangements, the accounting for income tax
effects of share-based payment arrangements upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R, the modification of
employee share options prior to adoption of SFAS No. 123R and disclosures in Managements
Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) subsequent to adoption of SFAS No. 123R. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of adopting this statement; however, the Company expects that the adoption of
SFAS No. 123R and the related interpretations in SAB No. 107 will have a significant impact on the
Companys consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations.
In June 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on Issue No. 05-2,
The Meaning of Conventional Convertible Debt Instrument in EITF Issue 00-19, Accounting for
Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock.
This statement clarifies three issues surrounding the application of Issue 00-19 as it relates to
conventional convertible debt. The first issue resolved to retain the conventional convertible
debt exception in Issue No. 00-19, which was originally included to avoid a conflict with existing
guidance in APB 14. The second issue clarifies and expands the definition of conventional in the
context of the Issue No. 00-19 exception to include instruments for which conversion into a fixed
number of shares is contingent on a future event. The third issue clarifies that preferred stock
with a mandatory redemption date could qualify for the conventional convertible debt exception,
with qualification depending on the facts and circumstances. The consensuses in this Issue should
be applied prospectively to new instruments entered into or modified in periods beginning after
June 29, 2005. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated balance sheet or statement of operations.
In June 2005, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 05-6, Determining the Amortization
Period for Leasehold Improvements. This statement clarifies that the amortization period for
leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination or acquired subsequent to lease inception
should be based on the lesser of the useful life of the leasehold improvements or the period of the
lease, including all renewal periods that are reasonably assured of exercise at the time of the
acquisition. The consensus is to be applied prospectively to leasehold improvements purchased or
acquired in reporting periods beginning after June 29, 2005. The adoption of this standard is not
expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated balance sheet or statement of
operations.
In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections. This
statement replaces APB Opinion No. 20 and SFAS No. 3. This statement applies to all voluntary
changes in accounting principle and applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement if
transition provisions are not provided. This statement requires retrospective application to prior
periods financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to
determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. This
statement is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated balance sheet or statement of operations.
In March 2005, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 47 (FIN No. 47), Accounting for
Conditional Retirement Obligations-an interpretation of SFAS No. 143. This interpretation
clarifies the timing of when a liability should be recognized for legal obligations associated with
the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset. In addition, the interpretation clarifies the
treatment when there is insufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset
retirement obligation. FIN No. 47 is effective no later than December 31, 2005. Retrospective
application for interim financial information is permitted but is not required. The adoption of
this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated balance sheet
or statement of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets-an amendment
of APB Opinion No. 29. This statement amends APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for
nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for
exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has
commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as
a result of the exchange. This statement is effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in
7
fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this standard is not expected
have a material impact on the Companys consolidated balance sheet or statement of operations.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs-an amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4. This statement clarifies the accounting for abnormal amounts of facility expense,
freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) to require them to be recognized as
current-period charges. This statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal
years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a
material impact on the Companys consolidated balance sheet or statement of operations.
On October 22, 2004, the President signed the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act).
The Act introduced a special one-time dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain
foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer (repatriation provision), provided certain criteria are met.
The Company has yet to complete its evaluation of the foreign earnings repatriation provision
within the Act. At this time the Company has not been able to reasonably estimate the income tax
effect of the foreign earnings repatriation provision. The Company plans to complete its evaluation
in the second half of 2005.
In March 2004, the EITF reached a consensus on Issue No. 03-01, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. EITF No. 03-01
provides guidance on recording other-than-temporary impairments of cost-method investments and
requires additional disclosures for those investments. In September 2004, a FASB Staff Position
was issued that delays the recognition and measurement guidance in EITF No. 03-01 until the final
issuance of FASB Staff Position Issue 03-01. The adoption of the recognition and measurement
provisions is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated balance sheet or
statement of operations.
NOTE 2 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The following table provides pro forma disclosures as if the Company had
recorded compensation costs based on the estimated grant date fair value, as defined by SFAS No.
123, for awards granted under its stock option and stock purchase plans. The estimated
weighted-average grant date fair value, as defined by SFAS No. 123, was calculated using the
Black-Scholes model. The Black-Scholes model was developed to estimate the fair value of freely
tradable, fully transferable options without vesting restrictions, which significantly differ from
the Companys stock option awards. These models also require highly subjective assumptions,
including future stock price volatility and expected time until exercise, which greatly affect the
calculated grant date fair value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
25,262 |
|
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
|
$ |
29,981 |
|
|
$ |
16,327 |
|
Add: Amortization of
non-cash deferred stock
compensation determined
under the intrinsic
value method as
reported in net income,
net of related tax
effects * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
2,022 |
|
Deduct: Total
stock-based employee
compensation expense
determined under fair
value method for all
awards, net of related
tax effects |
|
|
(25,475 |
) |
|
|
(32,756 |
) |
|
|
(43,514 |
) |
|
|
(70,597 |
) |
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss |
|
$ |
(213 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,766 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,237 |
) |
|
$ |
(52,248 |
) |
|
|
|
Income/(loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic-as reported |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Basic-pro forma |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted-as reported |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
Diluted-pro forma |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
|
* |
|
This amount excludes amortization of non-cash deferred stock compensation on restricted stock
awards. |
The pro forma disclosure provided above may not be representative of the effect of applying
SFAS No. 123R. See further discussion in Recent Accounting Pronouncements in Note 1.
8
NOTE 3 RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER ITEMS
The
Company recorded charges of $7 million and $9 million in restructuring of operations and
other items for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, primarily in the
Semiconductor segment. The Company recorded charges of $3.0 million and $2.4 million in
restructuring of operations and other items for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004,
respectively. For a complete discussion of the 2004 restructuring actions, please refer
to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year 2004.
Restructuring and impairment of long-lived assets:
First quarter of 2005:
The Company recorded an expense of $0.8 million for the write-down of purchased software that
will not be used. An expense of $0.3 million was recorded to reflect the change in time value of
accruals for facility lease termination costs, net of adjustments for changes in sublease
assumptions for certain previously accrued facility lease termination costs. Additional
non-manufacturing facilities were consolidated during the first quarter of 2005 and an expense of
$0.4 million was recorded as the leased facilities ceased being used.
Second quarter of 2005:
The Company recorded restructuring charges of approximately $1.7 million, which included the
following items. An expense of $0.4 million for the write-down of equipment held for sale to
reflect a decline in fair market values. An expense of $0.4 million was recorded to reflect the
change in time value of accruals for facility lease termination costs. An additional
non-manufacturing facility was consolidated during the second quarter of 2005 and an expense of
$0.3 million was recorded as the leased facility ceased being used. An expense of $0.2 million was
recorded for severance and termination benefits for 10 employees. An expense of $0.4 million was
recorded for facility closure costs related to the Colorado fabrication facility as the expenses
were incurred.
Assets held for sale of $7 million and $11 million were included as a component of prepaid
expenses and other current assets as of June 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, respectively. Assets
classified as held for sale are not depreciated. The fair values of impaired equipment and
facilities were researched and estimated by management. Given that current market conditions for
the sale of older fabrication facilities and related equipment may fluctuate, there can be no
assurance that the Company will realize the current net carrying value of the assets held for sale.
The Company reassesses the realizability of the carrying value of these assets at the end of each
quarter until the assets are sold or otherwise disposed of and additional adjustments may be
necessary.
The following table sets forth the Companys restructuring reserves as of June 30, 2005, which
are included in other accrued liabilities on the balance sheet:
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance at |
|
Restructuring |
|
during |
|
Balance at |
|
Restructuring |
|
Utilized |
|
at |
|
|
December |
|
Expense |
|
Q1, |
|
March 31, |
|
Expense |
|
during |
|
June 30, |
|
|
31, 2004 |
|
Q1, 2005 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
Q2, 2005 |
|
Q2, 2005 |
|
2005 |
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of
excess assets and
decommissioning costs
(a) |
|
$ |
1,207 |
|
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
(1,271 |
) |
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
(451 |
) |
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease terminations (b) |
|
|
20,065 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
(2,691 |
) |
|
|
18,112 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
(2,674 |
) |
|
|
16,165 |
|
Facility closure and
other exit costs (c) |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(476 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Payments to employees
for severance (d) |
|
|
7,408 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4,250 |
) |
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
29,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
|
$ |
(8,688 |
) |
|
$ |
22,068 |
|
|
$ |
1,720 |
|
|
$ |
(5,437 |
) |
|
$ |
18,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The amounts utilized in 2005 reflect $1.2 million of non-cash write-downs of long-lived
assets in the U.S. due to impairment and $0.5 million in cash payments to decommission and
sell assets. The write-downs of long-lived assets were accounted for as a reduction of the
assets and did not result in a liability. The $0.7 million balance as of June 30, 2005,
relates to machinery and equipment decommissioning costs in the U.S. and estimates for selling
costs for assets held for sale and is expected to be utilized during 2005. |
|
(b) |
|
Amounts utilized represent cash payments. The balance remaining for real estate lease
terminations will be paid during the remaining terms of these contracts, which extend through
2011. |
|
(c) |
|
Amounts utilized represent cash payments. The balance remaining for facility closure and
other exit costs will be paid during 2005. |
|
(d) |
|
Amounts utilized represent cash severance payments to 123 employees during the six months
ended June 30, 2005. The balance remaining for severance is expected to be paid by the end of
2005. |
Other Items:
On May 23, 2005, Wilfred J. Corrigans status as an employee ceased and in connection with
this event, the Company recorded a charge of $5.3 million. The amount was paid to Mr. Corrigan in
the second quarter of 2005 and was made in accordance with Mr. Corrigans employment agreement
dated September 20, 2001.
NOTE 4
INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset and mortgage-backed securities |
|
$ |
264,945 |
|
|
$ |
292,898 |
|
U.S. government and agency securities |
|
|
225,959 |
|
|
|
234,787 |
|
Corporate and municipal debt securities |
|
|
79,659 |
|
|
|
68,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments |
|
$ |
570,563 |
|
|
$ |
595,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments in equity securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities |
|
$ |
20,649 |
|
|
$ |
28,372 |
|
Non-marketable equity securities |
|
|
9,307 |
|
|
|
9,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term investments in equity securities |
|
$ |
29,956 |
|
|
$ |
37,679 |
|
|
|
|
10
Accumulated other comprehensive income included unrealized gains on investments in
available-for-sale debt and equity securities of $7 million, net of the related tax effect of $4
million, and $12 million, net of the related tax effect of $6 million, as of June 30, 2005, and
December 31, 2004, respectively.
Net realized losses on sales of investments in available-for-sale debt securities were $0.4
million and $0.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively. Net
realized losses on the sale of investments in available-for-sale debt securities were $0.3 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2004. Net realized gains on sales of investments in
available-for-sale debt securities were $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
The Company realized pre-tax gains of $2 million related to the following for the six months
ended June 30, 2005:
A $1 million pre-tax gain related to the sale of certain marketable available-for-sale equity
securities in the second quarter of 2005; and |
|
A $1 million pre-tax gain associated with marketable available-for-sale equity securities of a
certain technology company that was acquired by another technology company in the second quarter of
2005. |
|
The Company realized pre-tax gains of $8 million related to the following for the six months
ended June 30, 2004: |
|
A $5 million pre-tax gain related to the sales of certain marketable available-for-sale equity
securities in the second quarter of 2004; and |
|
A $3 million pre-tax gain associated with marketable available-for-sale equity securities of a
certain technology company that was acquired by another technology company in the first quarter of
2004. |
The following table includes the details of pre-tax losses related to investments in equity
securities that the Company has recorded during the first six months of 2005 and 2004. Management
believed that the declines in value were other than temporary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-marketable |
|
Marketable |
|
|
equity |
|
equity |
|
|
investments |
|
investments |
|
|
(in millions) |
Pre-tax loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2004 |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2004 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying value of impaired investments as
of June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
NOTE 5 BALANCE SHEET DETAIL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash in financial institutions |
|
$ |
31,252 |
|
|
$ |
51,172 |
|
Cash equivalents |
|
|
180,204 |
|
|
|
167,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
211,456 |
|
|
$ |
218,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
17,602 |
|
|
$ |
20,022 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
83,241 |
|
|
|
106,818 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
84,897 |
|
|
|
92,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
185,740 |
|
|
$ |
218,900 |
|
|
|
|
11
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2005 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductor |
|
Storage Systems |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
segment |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
892,497 |
|
|
$ |
80,633 |
|
|
$ |
973,130 |
|
Adjustment to goodwill acquired in
a prior year
for cash received from the
resolution of a pre-acquisition
income tax contingency |
|
|
(7,662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,662 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
884,835 |
|
|
$ |
80,633 |
|
|
$ |
965,468 |
|
|
|
|
The Company monitors the recoverability of goodwill recorded in connection with acquisitions
annually, or sooner if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not
be recoverable. An impairment, if any, would be determined in accordance with SFAS No. 142, which
uses a fair value model for determining the carrying value of goodwill. See the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.
NOTE 6 DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
Maturity |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Price |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
2003 Convertible Subordinated Notes |
|
May 2010 |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
13.4200 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
$ |
350,000 |
|
|
2001 Convertible Subordinated Notes |
|
November 2006 |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
26.3390 |
|
|
|
271,848 |
|
|
|
421,500 |
|
Deferred gain on terminated swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,108 |
|
|
|
10,346 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
625,956 |
|
|
|
781,975 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
625,956 |
|
|
$ |
781,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2005, the Company repurchased approximately $150
million of the 2001 Convertible Notes. A net pre-tax gain of approximately $4 million was
recognized in interest income and other, net for the repurchase. The pre-tax gain is net of the
write-off of debt issuance costs and a portion of the deferred gain on the terminated Swaps.
NOTE 7 RECONCILIATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED INCOME PER SHARE
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted income per share
computations are as follows:
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
Income* |
|
Shares+ |
|
Amount |
|
Income* |
|
Shares+ |
|
Amount |
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts) |
Basic EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
25,262 |
|
|
|
389,088 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
|
|
383,522 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
25,262 |
|
|
|
393,427 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
|
|
388,586 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per-Share |
|
|
Income* |
|
Shares+ |
|
Amount |
|
Income* |
|
Shares+ |
|
Amount |
|
|
(In thousands except per share amounts) |
Basic EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
29,981 |
|
|
|
388,371 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
16,327 |
|
|
|
382,571 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
29,981 |
|
|
|
391,954 |
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
16,327 |
|
|
|
389,102 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Numerator |
|
+ |
|
Denominator |
Options to purchase 47,747,107 and 49,602,295 shares were outstanding during the three
and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, but were not included in the computation of
diluted shares because the exercise prices of these options were greater than the average market
price of common shares for the above periods. The exercise price of these options ranged from $6.59
to $72.25 and from $6.30 to $72.25 as of June 30, 2005, respectively. Options to purchase
53,566,120 and 50,709,797 shares were outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30,
2004, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted shares because the exercise
prices of these options were greater than the average market price of common shares for the periods
presented. The exercise price of these options ranged from $8.24 to $72.25 and from $9.12 to $72.25
as of June 30, 2004, respectively.
Weighted average restricted common shares of 1,054,642 and 924,872 for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted shares
because of their antidilutive effect on net income per share. Weighted average restricted common
shares of 301,847 and 153,102 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively, were
excluded from the computation of diluted shares because of their antidilutive effect on net income
per share.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, weighted average potentially dilutive shares
of 38,656,318 and 40,388,457, respectively, associated with the 2003 and 2001 Convertible Notes
were excluded from the calculation of diluted shares because of their antidilutive effect on net
income per share. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, weighted average potentially
dilutive shares of 44,684,052 shares associated with the 2003 and 2001 Convertible Notes were
excluded from the calculation of diluted shares because of their antidilutive effect on net income
per share.
NOTE 8 COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)
Comprehensive income/(loss) is defined as a change in equity of a company during a period from
transactions and other events and circumstances, excluding transactions resulting from investments
by owners and distributions to owners. Comprehensive income/(loss), net of taxes for the current
reporting period and comparable period in the prior year is as follows:
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Net income |
|
$ |
25,262 |
|
|
$ |
7,242 |
|
|
$ |
29,981 |
|
|
$ |
16,327 |
|
Change in unrealized gain/loss on derivative
instruments
designated as and qualifying as cash-flow hedges |
|
|
(369 |
) |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
1,470 |
|
Change in unrealized gain/loss on available-for-sale
securities |
|
|
(1,450 |
) |
|
|
(10,716 |
) |
|
|
(4,273 |
) |
|
|
(11,412 |
) |
Change in foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(3,341 |
) |
|
|
(9,653 |
) |
|
|
(6,790 |
) |
|
|
(4,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income/(loss) |
|
$ |
20,102 |
|
|
$ |
(10,754 |
) |
|
$ |
18,383 |
|
|
$ |
1,905 |
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9 SEGMENT REPORTING
The Company operates in two reportable segments: the Semiconductor segment and the Storage
Systems segment. The Storage Systems segment may also be referred to as Engenio. In the
Semiconductor segment, the Company uses advanced deep sub-micron process technology and
comprehensive design methodologies to design, develop, manufacture and market highly complex
integrated circuits. These system-on-a-chip solutions include application specific integrated
circuits, commonly referred to as ASICs, RapidChip® Platform ASICs and application specific
standard products in silicon, or ASSPs. Semiconductor segment product offerings also include host
bus adapters, RAID adapters and related products, and services. In the Storage Systems segment,
the Company designs, manufactures and sells high-performance, highly scalable open storage area
network systems and storage solutions to original equipment manufacturers and a specialized network
of resellers. The Storage Systems products are sold as complete storage systems or sub-assemblies
configured from modular components, including our disk array controller boards and related
enclosures, disk drive enclosures and related management software.
The following is a summary of operations by segment for the three and six months ended June
30, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductor |
|
$ |
362,422 |
|
|
$ |
335,626 |
|
|
$ |
706,004 |
|
|
$ |
672,524 |
|
Storage Systems |
|
|
118,870 |
|
|
|
112,271 |
|
|
|
225,295 |
|
|
|
227,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
481,292 |
|
|
$ |
447,897 |
|
|
$ |
931,299 |
|
|
$ |
900,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductor |
|
$ |
23,807 |
|
|
$ |
3,992 |
|
|
$ |
38,006 |
|
|
$ |
5,166 |
|
Storage Systems |
|
|
2,482 |
|
|
|
6,539 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
17,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
26,289 |
|
|
$ |
10,531 |
|
|
$ |
38,578 |
|
|
$ |
22,362 |
|
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues for the periods presented above were not significant. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005, restructuring of operations and other items, net of $7 million and
$9 million, respectively, were primarily included in the Semiconductor segment. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2004, restructuring of operations and other items, net of $3 million and
$2 million, respectively, were primarily included in the Semiconductor segment.
14
Significant Customers. The following table summarizes the number of our significant
customers, each of whom accounted for 10% or more of the Companys revenues, along with the
percentage of revenues they individually represent on a consolidated basis and by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Semiconductor segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of significant customers |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Storage Systems segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of significant customers |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
57%, 13%, 12 |
% |
|
|
55%, 14 |
% |
|
|
55%, 15%, 13 |
% |
|
|
53%, 14%, 11 |
% |
Consolidated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of significant customers |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Percentage of consolidated revenues |
|
|
15%, 12 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
14%, 11 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
The following is a summary of total assets by segment as of June 30, 2005, and December
31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Total assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semiconductor |
|
$ |
2,439,260 |
|
|
$ |
2,549,016 |
|
Storage Systems |
|
|
308,249 |
|
|
|
324,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,747,509 |
|
|
$ |
2,874,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from domestic operations were $228 million, representing 47% of consolidated revenues
for the second quarter of 2005 compared to $227 million, representing 51% of consolidated revenues
for the same period of 2004.
Revenues from domestic operations were $436 million, representing 47% of consolidated
revenues, for the first six months of 2005 compared to $459 million, representing 51% of
consolidated revenues, for the same period of 2004.
NOTE
10 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is a party to a variety of agreements pursuant to which it may be
obligated to indemnify the other party with respect to certain matters. Typically, these
obligations arise in connection with contracts and license agreements or the sale of assets, under
which the Company customarily agrees to hold the other party harmless against losses arising from a
breach of warranties, representations and covenants related to such matters as title to assets
sold, validity of certain intellectual property rights, non-infringement of third-party rights, and
certain income tax-related matters. In each of these circumstances, payment by the Company is
typically subject to the other party making a claim to and cooperating with the Company pursuant to
the procedures specified in the particular contract. This usually allows the Company to challenge
the other partys claims or, in case of breach of intellectual property representations or
covenants, to control the defense or settlement of any third-party claims brought against the other
party. Further, the Companys obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of
activity (typically to replace or correct the products or terminate agreement with a refund to the
other party), duration and/or amounts. In some instances, the Company may have recourse against
third parties and/or insurance covering certain payments made by the Company.
15
NOTE 11 LEGAL MATTERS
In February 1999, a lawsuit alleging patent infringement was filed in the United States
District Court for the District of Arizona by the Lemelson Medical, Education & Research
Foundation, Limited Partnership (Lemelson) against 88 electronics industry companies, including
LSI. The case number is CIV990377PHXRGS. The patents involved in this lawsuit are alleged to
relate to semiconductor manufacturing and computer imaging, including the use of bar coding for
automatic identification of articles. The plaintiff has sought a judgment of infringement, an
injunction, treble damages, attorneys fees and further relief as the court may provide. In
September 1999, the Company filed an answer denying infringement and raising affirmative defenses.
In addition, the Company asserted a counterclaim for declaratory judgment of non-infringement,
invalidity and unenforceability of Lemelsons patents. A claim construction hearing was held and
completed in December 2004; a ruling on the claim construction is pending. No trial date has been
set. While the Company can give no assurances regarding the final outcome of this lawsuit, the
Company believes the allegations made by Lemelson are without merit and is defending the action
vigorously.
On May 4, 2001, Ning Frank Hui caused a lawsuit to be filed against C-Cube Microsystems Inc.
in the Superior Court of California for the County of Santa Clara. Hui caused the lawsuit to be
filed on his behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, approximately 600 employees of
C-Cube Microsystems who were employed by C-Cube Microsystems in May 2000 at the time of the
acquisition of certain C-Cube Microsystems assets by Harmonic, Inc. Subsequent to the filing of
the lawsuit, the Superior Court granted Huis motion for class certification. In the Complaint,
Hui alleged that C-Cube Microsystems management improperly reduced the conversion factor for
unvested employee stock options when such options were converted at the time of the Harmonic
transaction. The Company, without admitting liability, entered into a settlement agreement with
Hui and all class members, which was preliminarily approved by the Superior Court on or about April
26, 2005; final approval of the settlement was granted on July 26, 2005, at which time the Superior
Court ordered the lawsuit dismissed, with prejudice. The settlement agreement, as approved by the
Superior Court, will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations
or financial condition of the Company.
The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to other litigation matters and claims that are
normal in the course of its operations. The Company aggressively defends all legal matters and
does not believe, based on currently available facts and circumstances, that the final outcome of
these matters, taken individually or as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys consolidated results of operations and financial condition. However, the pending
unsettled lawsuits may involve complex questions of fact and law and will likely require the
expenditure of significant funds and the diversion of other resources to defend. From time to time
the Company may enter into confidential discussions regarding the potential settlement of such
lawsuits; however, there can be no assurance that any such discussions will occur or will result in
a settlement. Moreover, the settlement of any pending litigation could require the Company to
incur substantial settlement payments and costs and, in the case of the settlement of any
intellectual property proceeding against the Company, may require the Company to obtain a license
under a third partys intellectual property rights that could require royalty payments in the
future and the Company to grant a license to certain of its intellectual property rights to a third
party under a cross-license agreement. The results of litigation are inherently uncertain, and
material adverse outcomes are possible.
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. In many cases you can identify
forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, should, expect, plan,
anticipate, believe, estimate, predict, potential, intend or continue, or the
negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. In addition, forward-looking statements
in this document include, but are not limited to, the following: projected net income per diluted
share in the third quarter of 2005, projected revenues in the third quarter of 2005, projections of
gross profit margins in the third quarter of 2005 and projected capital expenditures in 2005. We
assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements, and these statements involve
risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the
forward-looking statements. For a summary of such risks and uncertainties, please see the
paragraphs located at the end of this Item 2 entitled Factors that May Affect Future Operating
Results and please also see the risk factors located in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.
OVERVIEW
We design, develop, manufacture and market complex, high-performance integrated circuits and
storage systems. We operate in two segments-the Semiconductor segment and the Storage Systems
segment. Within the Semiconductor segment, we offer three enabling system-on-a-chip
technologies-standard-cell ASICs, Platform ASICs and application specific standard products that
are focused on the consumer, communication and storage component markets. Within the Storage
Systems segment, we focus on high-performance modular disk storage systems, sub-assemblies and
storage management software. Our products are marketed primarily to original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs) that sell products targeted for applications in these markets.
Our business is characterized by rapid technological change, competitive pricing pressures and
cyclical market patterns. Our financial results are affected by a wide variety of factors,
including general economic conditions worldwide, economic conditions specific to the semiconductor
and storage systems industries, the timely implementation of new technologies and the ability to
safeguard inventions and other intellectual property in a rapidly evolving market. In addition, the
semiconductor and storage systems markets have historically been cyclical and subject to
significant economic downturns at various times.
On May 23, 2005, Abhijit Y. Talwalkar joined LSI as President and Chief Executive Officer and
Wilfred J. Corrigans status as an employee of LSI ceased. Since joining LSI, Mr. Talwalkar has
been in the process of assessing the strategic foundation and operational effectiveness of our
overall business.
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2005 was $25.3 million or $0.06 per diluted
share compared to $4.7 million or $0.01 per diluted share for the three months ended March 31, 2005
and $7.2 million or $0.02 per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2004.
Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 was $30.0 million or $0.08 per diluted share
compared to $16.3 million or $0.04 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Revenues on a consolidated basis for the three months ended June 30, 2005 were $481.3 million,
representing a 7.0% increase from revenues of $450.0 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and a 7.5% increase from revenues of $447.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004.
The increases are attributable to increased revenues in our Semiconductor and Storage Systems
segments. Revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2005 were $931.3 million
representing a 3.4% increase over revenues of $900.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2004. The increase is attributable to increased revenues in our Semiconductor segment, offset in
part by a decline in revenues for our Storage Systems segment.
In the third quarter of 2005, we expect our consolidated revenues to be in the range of
$470 million to $500 million and net income per diluted share to be in the range of $0.05 to $0.07.
In the third quarter of 2005 and forward, we will be driving synergies between our existing
storage system building blocks within our Storage Systems segment and semiconductors such as our
line of MegaRAID and internal RAID hosted products within the Semiconductor segment. In addition,
within the Semiconductor segment, we will be enhancing our ASIC strategy and focus as well as our
Domino and video media processor technologies that is enabling us to be successful in consumer
product applications such as DVD products.
17
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $782.0 million as of June 30, 2005,
$865.9 million as of March 31, 2005 and $814.6 million as of December 31, 2004. In the second
quarter of 2005, we generated approximately $59.8 million in cash from operations and repurchased
approximately $150 million of the 2001 Convertible Notes. (See Note 6 of the Notes.) For the six
months ended June 30, 2005, we generated approximately $119.1 million in cash from operations
compared to $38.2 million for the same period of the prior year.
Net inventories were $185.7 million as of June 30, 2005, compared to $203.4 million as of
March 31, 2005 and $218.9 million as of December 31, 2004. The decline in inventory levels
reflects our continued focus on supply chain management.
Where more than one significant factor contributed to changes in results from year to year, we
have quantified such factors throughout Managements Discussion & Analysis, where practicable.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
(in millions) |
Semiconductor segment |
|
$ |
362.4 |
|
|
$ |
343.6 |
|
|
$ |
335.6 |
|
|
$ |
706.0 |
|
|
$ |
672.5 |
|
Storage Systems segment |
|
|
118.9 |
|
|
|
106.4 |
|
|
|
112.3 |
|
|
|
225.3 |
|
|
|
227.8 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
481.3 |
|
|
$ |
450.0 |
|
|
$ |
447.9 |
|
|
$ |
931.3 |
|
|
$ |
900.3 |
|
|
|
|
There were no significant intersegment revenues during the periods presented.
Second quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2005
Total consolidated revenues for the second quarter of 2005 increased $31.3 million or 7% from
the first quarter of 2005.
Semiconductor segment:
Revenues for the Semiconductor segment increased $18.8 million or 5% in the second quarter of
2005 as compared to the previous quarter. The increase in semiconductor revenues is attributable
to the following:
|
|
|
Revenues increased for semiconductors used in storage product applications primarily
due to higher demand for ASICs used in hard disk drives and Host Bus Adapters (HBA)
along with storage standard products, including our Fibre Channel, Serial Attached SCSI
(SAS) controller product and Ultra320 SCSI products; and |
|
|
|
|
Revenues increased for semiconductors used in communications product applications
primarily due to an increase in demand for enterprise and wireless products. |
The above noted increases were offset in part by decreases in revenues for semiconductors used
in video game consumer product applications as a result of lower demand.
Storage Systems segment:
Revenues for the Storage Systems segment increased $12.5 million or 12% from the first quarter
of 2005. The increase in revenues is primarily attributable to the introduction of our new
high-end controller product during the second quarter of 2005 and normal seasonality, as the first
quarter of the fiscal year is typically the lowest quarter for revenues in the Storage Systems
segment.
18
Three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period of 2004
Total consolidated revenues for the second quarter of 2005 increased $33.4 million or 7% as
compared to the second quarter of 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, revenues
increased $31.0 million or 3% as compared to the same period of the prior year.
Semiconductor segment:
Revenues for the Semiconductor segment increased $26.8 million or 8% for the second quarter of
2005 as compared to the same period of the previous year. The increase in revenues for the
three-month period is attributable to:
|
|
|
An increase in revenues for semiconductors used in storage product applications
primarily due to higher demand for ASICs used in hard disk drives and
HBAs; and |
|
|
|
|
An increase in revenues for semiconductors used in consumer product applications
primarily a result of increased demand for digital audio players, video games, cable
and set-top box solutions. These increases were offset in part by decreases in demand
for semiconductors used in DVD products. |
The above noted increases in revenues were offset in part by decreased demand for
semiconductors used in communications product applications such as office automation solutions,
switch and wide area network (WAN) products.
Revenues for the Semiconductor segment increased $33.5 million or 5% for the first six months
of 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. The increase in revenues is attributable to:
|
|
|
An increase in revenues for semiconductors used in storage product applications
primarily due to higher demand for ASICs used in hard disk drives. This increase was
partially offset by decreased demand for semiconductors used in HBAs, server products
and for storage standard products as excess inventory in the supply chain from the
prior year was depleted; and |
|
|
|
|
An increase in revenues for semiconductors used in consumer product applications
primarily a result of increased demand for video games, digital audio players, cable
and set-top box solutions. These increases were offset in part by decreases in demand
for semiconductors used in DVD products. |
The above noted increases in revenues were offset in part by decreased demand for
semiconductors used in communications product applications such as office automation solutions,
switch and WAN products.
Storage Systems segment:
Revenues for the Storage Systems segment increased $6.6 million or 6% for the second quarter
of 2005 and decreased $2.5 million or 1% for the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same
periods of 2004. The increase in revenues for the second quarter of 2005 as compared to the same
period of 2004 was primarily driven by the introduction of our new high-end controller product
during the second quarter of 2005 and increased volumes across other product lines. Partially
offsetting these improvements in our revenues were price reductions instituted on certain older
products.
The decrease in revenues for the first half of 2005 compared to the same period of 2004 was
primarily driven by lower sales at two of our larger OEM customers as well as declines in our
direct/reseller business. We expect to see a further decline in our direct/reseller business as we
focus on being the OEM partner of choice.
Significant Customers. The following table summarizes the number of our significant
customers, each of whom accounted for 10% or more of our revenues, along with the percentage of
revenues they individually represent on a consolidated basis and by segment:
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Semiconductor segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of significant customers |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Storage Systems segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of significant customers |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
57%, 13%,12 |
% |
|
|
55%, 14 |
% |
|
|
55%, 15%, 13 |
% |
|
|
53%, 14%, 11 |
% |
Consolidated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of significant customers |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Percentage of consolidated revenues |
|
|
15%,12 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
14%,11 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Revenues by geography. The following table summarizes our revenues by geography:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
(in millions) |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America * |
|
$ |
228.1 |
|
|
$ |
207.5 |
|
|
$ |
226.8 |
|
|
$ |
435.6 |
|
|
$ |
459.1 |
|
Asia, including Japan |
|
|
195.4 |
|
|
|
195.3 |
|
|
|
164.9 |
|
|
|
390.7 |
|
|
|
329.6 |
|
Europe * |
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
|
|
|
56.2 |
|
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
111.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
481.3 |
|
|
$ |
450.0 |
|
|
$ |
447.9 |
|
|
$ |
931.3 |
|
|
$ |
900.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Revenues by geography are accumulated based on the revenues generated by our
subsidiaries located within the three geographic areas noted in the above table. In the
second half of 2004, Engenio formed new subsidiaries within Europe. As a result, the amounts
in the table above have been restated. All revenues generated by Engenio Europe were
previously reported in North America. |
Second quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2005
In the second quarter of 2005, revenues increased in North America, Asia, including Japan, and
Europe compared to the first quarter of 2005. The increase in North America is primarily
attributable to higher demand for semiconductors used in storage component, consumer and
communications product applications and higher revenues in the Storage Systems segment. The slight
increase in Asia, including Japan, is primarily the result of increases in semiconductors used in
storage component and communications applications, offset in part by a decrease in revenues for
semiconductors used in consumer product applications. The increase in Europe is primarily
attributable to increases in semiconductors used in consumer product applications and increases in
revenues in the Storage Systems segment. These increases were offset in part by decreases in
semiconductors used in storage component and communications applications.
Three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods of 2004
In the second quarter of 2005, revenues increased in North America, Asia, including Japan, and
Europe as compared to the second quarter of 2004. The increase in North America is attributable to
increases for semiconductors used in consumer product applications, offset in part by decreases in
demand for semiconductors used in storage components and communications product applications and
decreases in revenues in the storage systems segment. The increase in Asia, including Japan, is
attributable to increased demand for semiconductors used in storage component applications. These
increases were offset in part by decreased demand for semiconductors used in communications product
applications. The increase in Europe is primarily attributable to increases in semiconductors used
in consumer product applications in the semiconductor segment and increased revenues in the Storage
Systems segment. These increases were offset in part by
20
decreases for semiconductors used in storage component and communications product applications
in the semiconductor segment.
In the first half of 2005, revenues decreased in North America and Europe and increased in
Asia, including Japan, as compared to the same period of 2004. The decrease in North America is
primarily attributable to a decrease in demand for semiconductors used in storage component and
communications product applications in the semiconductor segment and decreased revenues in the
Storage Systems segment. These decreases were offset in part by increases in semiconductors used
in consumer product applications in the semiconductor segment. The increase in Asia, including
Japan, is a result of a higher demand for semiconductors used in consumer and storage component
applications in the semiconductor segment, offset in part by decreased demand for semiconductors
used in communications product applications. The decrease in Europe is primarily a result of a
decline in revenues in both the Semiconductor and Storage Systems segments.
Operating costs and expenses. Key elements of the consolidated statements of operations for
the respective segments are as follows:
Gross profit margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
(in millions) |
Semiconductor segment |
|
$ |
172.9 |
|
|
$ |
158.4 |
|
|
$ |
166.5 |
|
|
$ |
331.3 |
|
|
$ |
322.7 |
|
Percentage of
revenues |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
Storage Systems segment |
|
$ |
38.8 |
|
|
$ |
31.9 |
|
|
$ |
42.3 |
|
|
$ |
70.7 |
|
|
$ |
87.5 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
211.7 |
|
|
$ |
190.3 |
|
|
$ |
208.8 |
|
|
$ |
402.0 |
|
|
$ |
410.2 |
|
|
|
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
46 |
% |
Second quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2005
The consolidated gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues increased to 44% in the
second quarter of 2005 from 42% in the first quarter of 2005. The improvement in gross profit
margin was primarily attributable to lower manufacturing variances and inventory charges as
compared to the first quarter of 2005.
Semiconductor segment:
The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Semiconductor segment increased to
48% in the second quarter of 2005 from 46% in the first quarter of 2005. The improvement in gross
profit margin for the semiconductor segment was primarily attributable to lower manufacturing
variances for the Gresham manufacturing facility associated with yield improvements and improved
factory utilization. In addition, inventory charges were lower on certain consumer product
applications such as DVD products. These improvements in gross profit margins were offset in part
by a shift in product mix from higher to lower margin semiconductors used primarily in consumer
product applications.
Storage Systems segment:
The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Storage Systems segment increased
to 33% in the second quarter of 2005 from 30% in the first quarter of 2005. The increase in gross
profit margin reflects a favorable shift in product mix during the second quarter of 2005 as
compared to the first quarter of 2005. The improvement in product mix is attributable to the
introduction in the second quarter of our new high-end controller product and an increase in sales
of controller board products, which have higher margins.
We expect our consolidated gross profit margin to be in the range of 43% to 44% in the third
quarter of 2005.
21
Three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods of 2004
The consolidated gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues decreased to 44% in the
second quarter of 2005 from 47% in the second quarter of 2004. The consolidated gross profit margin
as a percentage of revenues decreased to 43% in the first six months of 2005 as compared to 46% in
the same period of 2004.
Semiconductor segment:
The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Semiconductor segment decreased to
48% in the second quarter of 2005 from 50% in the second quarter of 2004. The decrease in gross
profit margin for the Semiconductor segment was primarily attributable to:
|
|
|
Lower average selling prices for semiconductors used in consumer product
applications and in storage component applications such as hard disk drives and RAID
storage adapters; and |
|
|
|
|
Higher inventory charges in 2005 for consumer product applications such as DVD
products. |
The declines in gross profit margins noted above were offset in part by improved operating
efficiencies and lower operating costs at the Gresham manufacturing facility as a result of the
restructuring actions taken in the second half of 2004.
The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Semiconductor segment decreased to
47% in the first six months of 2005 as compared to 48% in the same period of 2004. The decrease in
gross profit margin for the Semiconductor segment was primarily attributable to:
|
|
|
Lower average selling prices for semiconductors used in consumer product applications
and in Storage Component applications such as hard disk drives and RAID storage
adapters; and |
|
|
|
|
Higher inventory charges in 2005 for consumer product applications such as DVD
products. |
The declines in gross profit margins noted above were offset in part by the following:
|
|
|
Improved operating efficiencies and lower operating costs at the Gresham
manufacturing facility as a result of the restructuring actions taken in the second
half of 2004; and |
|
|
|
|
A favorable shift in product mix for semiconductors used in consumer product
applications. |
Storage Systems segment:
The gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues for the Storage Systems segment decreased
to 33% in the second quarter of 2005 from 38% in the second quarter of 2004. The gross profit
margin as a percentage of revenues for the Storage Systems segment decreased to 31% in the first
six months of 2005 from 38% in the first six months of 2004. The decline in gross profit margin in
the Storage Systems segment for both periods is mainly due to changes in product mix reflecting
lower sales volumes for some of our higher-end storage system products and lower selling prices for
some of our older products. These declines were only partially offset by second quarter 2005 margin
improvements from the introduction of our new high-end controller product and increased sales of
controller board products.
Factors that may affect gross profit margins
We have advanced wafer-manufacturing operations in Gresham, Oregon, which is our primary
manufacturing site in our Semiconductor segment. We also own our Storage Systems segment
manufacturing facility in Wichita, Kansas. In addition, we acquire wafers from foundries in
Taiwan, Japan and China and outsource a portion of our Storage Systems segment
22
manufacturing to a facility in Ireland. Utilizing diverse manufacturing locations allows us to
better manage potential disruption in the manufacturing process due to economic and geographic
risks associated with each location.
Our operating environment, combined with the resources required to operate in the
Semiconductor and Storage Systems industries, requires that we manage a variety of factors. These
factors include, among other things:
|
|
Competitive pricing pressures; |
|
|
|
Product mix; |
|
|
|
Factory capacity and utilization; |
|
|
|
Geographic location of manufacturing; |
|
|
|
Manufacturing yields; |
|
|
|
Availability of certain raw materials; |
|
|
|
Implementation of new process technologies; |
|
|
|
Adoption of new industry standards; |
|
|
|
Terms negotiated with third-party subcontractors; and |
|
|
|
Foreign currency fluctuations. |
These and other factors could have a significant effect on our gross profit margin in future
periods.
Research and development:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
(in millions) |
Semiconductor segment |
|
$ |
82.7 |
|
|
$ |
84.1 |
|
|
$ |
96.1 |
|
|
$ |
166.8 |
|
|
$ |
190.9 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
Storage Systems segment |
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
|
$ |
15.1 |
|
|
$ |
14.0 |
|
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
99.7 |
|
|
$ |
99.2 |
|
|
$ |
110.1 |
|
|
$ |
198.9 |
|
|
$ |
219.0 |
|
|
|
|
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
Second quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2005
Research and development (R&D) expenses remained relatively flat in the second quarter of
2005 as compared to the first quarter of 2005 on a consolidated basis. As a percentage of
consolidated revenues, R&D expenses declined to 21% from 22% in the first quarter of 2005.
Semiconductor segment:
R&D expenses in the Semiconductor segment decreased by $1.4 million or 2% in the second
quarter of 2005 as compared to the first quarter of 2005. The decrease in R&D is primarily
attributable to lower R&D spending for our internal process technology development. As a
percentage of semiconductor segment revenues, R&D expenses decreased to 23% in the second quarter
of 2005 from 24% in the first quarter of 2005.
23
We develop advanced sub-micron product technologies. We continued the build-out of the
RapidChip Platform ASIC infrastructure in the second quarter of 2005. Products utilizing RapidChip
technology combine the high-density, high-performance and proven intellectual property benefits of
cell-based ASICs with the advantages of lower development costs and faster time to market. Our
customer base for RapidChip technology encompasses a range from small start-up companies to major
system OEMs throughout all of our geographic markets. Design wins and product shipments for
RapidChip platform products continued to increase in the second quarter of 2005.
Storage Systems segment:
R&D expenses in the Storage Systems segment increased $1.9 million or 13% in the second
quarter of 2005 as compared to the first quarter of 2005. The increase is primarily due to
additional spending for OEM product development and the development of products in the low to
medium pricing bands. As a percentage of Storage Systems revenues, R&D expenses were flat at 14%
between the first and second quarters of 2005.
Three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods of 2004
R&D expenses, on a consolidated basis, decreased $10.4 million or 9% during the second quarter
of 2005 as compared to the second quarter of 2004. R&D expenses for the first six months of 2005
decreased by $20.1 million or 9% as compared to the same period of 2004.
Semiconductor segment:
R&D expenses for the Semiconductor segment decreased $13.4 million or 14% in the second
quarter of 2005 and $24.1 million or 13% for the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same
periods of 2004. The decrease in R&D expenses for the Semiconductor segment is primarily a result
of cost-cutting measures implemented as part of the restructuring actions taken during 2004,
including lower compensation-related expenses as well as lower equipment and software expenses. In
addition, we spent less on design engineering programs during the first half of 2005 as compared to
the same period of 2004.
Storage Systems segment:
R&D expenses for the Storage Systems segment increased by $3.0 million or 21% in the second
quarter of 2005 and $4.0 million or 14% in the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same
periods of 2004. R&D expenses as a percentage of Storage Systems segment revenues for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2005 increased to 14% from 12% for the same periods in 2004. As
noted above, these increases are primarily due to additional spending in 2005 for OEM product
development and the development of products in the low to medium pricing bands.
Selling, general and administrative:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Six months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
June 30, 2004 |
|
|
(in millions) |
Semiconductor segment |
|
$ |
42.9 |
|
|
$ |
41.8 |
|
|
$ |
45.2 |
|
|
$ |
84.7 |
|
|
$ |
89.1 |
|
Percentage of revenue |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
Storage Systems segment |
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
|
$ |
16.3 |
|
|
$ |
18.6 |
|
|
$ |
33.3 |
|
|
$ |
35.9 |
|
Percentage of revenue |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
59.9 |
|
|
$ |
58.1 |
|
|
$ |
63.8 |
|
|
$ |
118.0 |
|
|
$ |
125.0 |
|
|
|
|
Percentage of revenue |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
Second quarter of 2005 compared to the first quarter of 2005
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased $1.8 million or 3% during
the second quarter of 2005 from the first quarter of 2005 on a consolidated basis.
24
Semiconductor segment:
SG&A expenses for the Semiconductor segment increased $1.1 million or 3% in the second quarter
of 2005 as compared to the first quarter of 2005. The increase is due to higher
compensation-related expenditures that are based upon performance metrics.
Storage Systems segment:
SG&A expenses for the Storage Systems segment increased $0.7 million or 4% in the second
quarter of 2005 as compared to the first quarter of 2005. The increase is primarily a result of an
increase in headcount related expenses, including sales commissions that increased as a result of
higher revenues in the second quarter as compared to the first
quarter of 2005 and an increase in sales and
marketing expenses associated with the introduction of our new high-end controller product in the
second quarter of 2005.
Three and six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same periods of 2004
Consolidated SG&A expenses decreased $3.9 million or 6% during the second quarter of 2005 and
$7.0 million or 6% during the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same periods of 2004.
Semiconductor segment:
SG&A expenses for the Semiconductor segment decreased $2.3 million or 5% for the second
quarter of 2005 and $4.4 million or 5% for the first six months of 2005, as compared to the same
periods of 2004. The decrease in the Semiconductor segment was primarily attributable to benefits
from the cost-cutting measures implemented as part of the restructuring actions taken during 2004,
including lower compensation-related expenses and benefits from the consolidation of our
non-manufacturing facilities. These decreases were offset in part by higher expenses from
commissions for sales representatives.
Storage Systems segment:
SG&A expenses for the Storage Systems segment decreased by $1.6 million or 9% in the second
quarter of 2005 and $2.6 million or 7% in the first six months of 2005 as compared to the same
periods of 2004. The decrease in SG&A expenses from the second quarter of 2005 as compared to
the second quarter of 2004 is primarily related to spending in 2004 for Engenios proposed initial
public offering and separation that was not present in 2005.
The decrease in SG&A expenses from the first six months of 2005 to the first six months of
2004 is primarily the result of spending in 2004 related to Engenios proposed initial public
offering, separation from LSI and the set-up of experience centers that were not present in 2005.
The decrease was also related to lower compensation-related expenses that are based upon
performance metrics for selling and marketing personnel.
Restructuring of operations and other items: We recorded charges of $7.2 million and $8.7
million in restructuring of operations and other items for the three and six months ended June 30,
2005, respectively, primarily in the Semiconductor segment. We recorded charges of $3.0 million
and $2.4 million in restructuring of operations and other items for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2004, respectively. For a complete discussion of the 2004 restructuring
actions, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2004.
Restructuring and impairment of long-lived assets:
First quarter of 2005:
We recorded an expense of $0.8 million for the write-down of purchased software that will not
be used. An expense of $0.3 million was recorded to reflect the change in time value of accruals
for facility lease termination costs, net of adjustments for changes in sublease assumptions for
certain previously accrued facility lease termination costs. Additional non-manufacturing
facilities were consolidated during the first quarter of 2005 and an expense of $0.4 million was
recorded as the leased facilities ceased being used.
25
Second quarter of 2005:
We recorded restructuring expenses of approximately $1.7 million including the following
items. An expense of $0.4 million for the write-down of equipment held for sale to reflect a
decline in fair market values. An expense of $0.4 million was recorded to reflect the change in
time value of accruals for facility lease termination costs. An additional non-manufacturing
facility was consolidated during the second quarter of 2005 and an expense of $0.3 million was
recorded as the leased facility ceased being used. An expense of $0.2 million was recorded for
severance and termination benefits for 10 employees. An expense of $0.4 million was recorded for
facility closure costs related to the Colorado fabrication facility as the expenses were incurred.
Assets held for sale of $7 million and $11 million were included as a component of prepaid
expenses and other current assets as of June 30, 2005, and December 31, 2004, respectively. Assets
classified as held for sale are not depreciated. The fair values of impaired equipment and
facilities were researched and estimated by management. Given that current market conditions for
the sale of older fabrication facilities and related equipment may fluctuate, there can be no
assurance that we will realize the current net carrying value of the assets held for sale. We
reassess the realizability of the carrying value of these assets at the end of each quarter until
the assets are sold or otherwise disposed of and additional adjustments may be necessary. We are
making appropriate efforts to sell assets held for sale within the next twelve months.
The following table sets forth our restructuring reserves as of and June 30, 2005, which are
included in other accrued liabilities on the balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Balance at |
|
Restructuring |
|
during |
|
Balance at |
|
Restructuring |
|
Utilized |
|
at |
|
|
December |
|
Expense |
|
Q1, |
|
March 31, |
|
Expense |
|
during |
|
June 30, |
(In thousands) |
|
31, 2004 |
|
Q1, 2005 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
Q2, 2005 |
|
Q2, 2005 |
|
2005 |
Write-down of excess
assets and
decommissioning costs
(a) |
|
$ |
1,207 |
|
|
$ |
796 |
|
|
$ |
(1,271 |
) |
|
$ |
732 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
|
$ |
(451 |
) |
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease terminations (b) |
|
|
20,065 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
(2,691 |
) |
|
|
18,112 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
(2,674 |
) |
|
|
16,165 |
|
Facility closure and
other exit costs (c) |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(476 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Payments to employees
for severance (d) |
|
|
7,408 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4,250 |
) |
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
29,223 |
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
|
$ |
(8,688 |
) |
|
$ |
22,068 |
|
|
$ |
1,720 |
|
|
$ |
(5,437 |
) |
|
$ |
18,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The amounts utilized in 2005 reflect $1.2 million of non-cash write-downs of long-lived
assets in the U.S. due to impairment and $0.5 million in cash payments to decommission and
sell assets. The write-downs of long-lived assets were accounted for as a reduction of the
assets and did not result in a liability. The $0.7 million balance as of June 30, 2005,
relates to machinery and equipment decommissioning costs in the U.S. and estimates for selling
costs for assets held for sale that is expected to be utilized during 2005. |
|
(b) |
|
Amounts utilized represent cash payments. The balance remaining for real estate lease
terminations will be paid during the remaining terms of these contracts, which extend through
2011. |
|
(c) |
|
Amounts utilized represent cash payments. The balance remaining for facility closure and
other exit costs will be paid during 2005. |
|
(d) |
|
Amounts utilized represent cash severance payments to 123 employees during the six months
ended June 30, 2005. The balance remaining for severance is expected to be paid by the end of
2005. |
26
Other Items:
On May 23, 2005, Wilfred J. Corrigans status as an employee of LSI ceased and in connection
with this event, we recorded a charge of $5.3 million. The amount was paid to Mr. Corrigan in the
second quarter of 2005 and was made in accordance with Mr. Corrigans employment agreement dated
September 20, 2001.
Amortization of non-cash deferred stock compensation: Amortization of non-cash deferred stock
compensation was $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005, $1.5 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 and $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004. For the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the amortization of non-cash deferred stock compensation was
$2.7 million and $3.8 million, respectively. The acquisitions for which deferred stock
compensation and related amortization were recorded consisted primarily of the Accerant transaction
in the second quarter of 2004, the Velio transaction in the first quarter of 2004, an acquisition
in the fourth quarter of 2002, the acquisition of C-Cube and the RAID business from AMI in 2001 and
the acquisition of DataPath in 2000. We have also recorded non-cash deferred stock compensation
for restricted common shares issued to our employees, Engenio employees and the non-employee
directors of Engenio. We amortize deferred stock compensation ratably over the related vesting
periods. Deferred stock compensation is adjusted to reflect forfeitures prior to vesting. At June
30, 2005, the deferred stock compensation that remained was $10.6 million, and is expected to be
amortized over the next four years.
Amortization of intangibles: Amortization of intangible assets was $17.6 million in both the
first and second quarters of 2005.
Amortization of intangible assets for the second quarter of 2005 decreased by $1.8 million
from $19.4 million for the same period in 2004. For the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004,
amortization of intangible assets was $35.2 million and $37.7 million, respectively. Amortization
decreased as a result of the write-down during the fourth quarter of 2004 and certain intangible
assets becoming fully amortized, offset by amortization of intangible assets acquired during the
first and second quarters of 2004. As of June 30, 2005, we had approximately $73.2 million of
intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization that will continue to amortize.
Interest expense: Interest expense decreased slightly to $6.3 million in the second quarter
of 2005 from $6.7 million in the first quarter of 2005 due to the repurchase of $149.7 million of
the 2001 Convertible Notes during the second quarter of 2005. Interest expense increased slightly
in the second quarter of 2005 from $6.1 million during the same period in 2004. Interest expense
increased by $1.0 million to $13.0 million in the first six months of 2005 from $12.0 million in
the same period of 2004. The increase is due to the amortization of the deferred gain on the
previously terminated interest rate swaps using the effective interest
method, offset in part by a decrease in interest expense due to
the repurchase of $68.5 million of Convertible Notes during the third quarter of 2004 and the
additional repurchase during the second quarter of 2005 discussed above.
Interest income and other, net: Interest income and other, net, was $11.5 million in the
second quarter of 2005 as compared to $5.4 million in the first quarter of 2005. Interest income
decreased to $5.5 million in the second quarter of 2005 from $6.1 million in the first quarter of
2005. The decrease in interest income is mainly due to lower average cash balances during the
second quarter. Other income, net of $6.0 million in the second quarter of 2005 included a pre-tax
gain of $4.1 million on the repurchase of the 2001 Convertible Notes (see Note 6 of the Notes), a
pre-tax gain of $2.4 million on certain marketable available-for-sale equity securities (see Note 4
of the Notes) and other miscellaneous items that net to an expense of $0.5 million.
Interest income and other, net was higher in the second quarter of 2005 by $2.7 million
compared to $8.8 million in the second quarter of 2004. Interest income was higher in the second
quarter of 2005 by $2.0 million compared to $3.5 million in the second quarter of 2004 due to
higher returns on our short-term investments. Other income, net of $5.3 million in the second
quarter of 2004 included a pre-tax gain of $5.1 million on sales of certain marketable
available-for-sale equity securities for the three months ended June 30, 2004, and other
miscellaneous items.
Interest income and other, net decreased to $16.9 million during the first six months of 2005
from $17.9 million in the same period of 2004. Interest income increased by $2.7 million to $11.6
million during the first six months of 2005 from $8.9 million in the same period of 2004. The
increase in interest income is mainly due to higher returns on our short-term investments. Other
income, net of $5.3 million in the first six months of 2005 included a pre-tax gain of $4.1 million
on the repurchase of the 2001 Convertible Notes, a pre-tax gain of $2.9 million on sales of certain
marketable available-for-sale equity securities in the second quarter of 2005 and other
miscellaneous expense items. Other income, net of $9.0 million in
27
the first six months of 2004 included a pre-tax gain of $3.0 million associated with our investment
in marketable available-for-sale equity securities of a certain technology company that was
acquired by another publicly traded technology company during the first quarter of 2004, a pre-tax
gain of $5.1 million on sales of certain marketable available-for-sale equity securities in the
second quarter of 2004 and other miscellaneous items.
Provision for income taxes: During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 we recorded
an income tax expense of $6.25 million and $12.5 million respectively. For the three and six
months ended June 30, 2004, we recorded an income tax expense of $6 million and $12 million,
respectively. The expense primarily relates to foreign income taxes. Excluding certain foreign
jurisdictions, the future benefit of temporary differences, including operating losses, is not
being recognized.
FINANCIAL CONDITION, CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased to $782.0 million at June 30,
2005, from $814.6 million at December 31, 2004. As described below, the decrease is mainly due to
net cash inflows from operating and investing activities and net cash outflows from financing
activities.
Working capital. Working capital decreased by $49.9 million to $919.1 million at June 30,
2005, from $969.0 million at December 31, 2004. Working capital for the six months ended June 30,
2005 was impacted by the following activities:
|
|
|
Inventories decreased by $33.2 million to $185.7 million as of June 30, 2005, from $218.9
million as of December 31, 2004. The decline in inventory levels reflects our continued
focus on supply chain management. |
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased by $32.6 million. |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable increased by $9.5 million due to the timing of tax payments made and
the income tax provision recorded in the first six months of 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits increased by $6.6 million primarily due to the
timing differences in payment of salaries, benefits and performance based compensation. |
|
|
The decrease in working capital was offset, in part, by the following: |
|
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities decreased by $16.6 million primarily due to a decrease of $10.9
million in restructuring reserves mainly for payments for severance and previously exited
leases and a consumption tax payment of approximately $7.8 million in the first quarter of
2005. |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable increased by $12.8 million. The increase is mainly attributable to
higher revenues in the second quarter of 2005 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2004 and
the timing of sales in the last month of the second quarter of 2005 as compared to the last
month of the fourth quarter of 2004. |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased by $1.2 million primary attributable
to $4.7 million increase in prepaid software maintenance and other miscellaneous items,
offset in part by $3.5 million decrease in assets held for sale due to sales and retirements
(see note 3 of the Notes). |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable decreased by $1.1 million primarily due to the timing of invoice receipt
and payments. |
28
Cash and cash equivalents generated from operating activities. During the six months ended
June 30, 2005, we generated $119.1 million of net cash and cash equivalents from operating
activities compared to $38.2 million generated in the same period of 2004. Cash and cash
equivalents generated by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005, were the
result of the following:
|
|
|
Income (before depreciation and amortization, non-cash restructuring and other items,
amortization of non-cash deferred stock compensation, gain on sale and exchange of equity
securities, and gain on repurchase of convertible
subordinated notes). The non-cash items and other non-operating adjustments are quantified in
our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows included in this Form 10-Q; and |
|
|
|
|
A net increase from assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in business combinations including changes in working capital components from
December 31, 2004 to June 30, 2005, as discussed above. |
Cash and cash equivalents provided by/(used in) investing activities. Cash and cash
equivalents provided by investing activities were $16.0 million for the six months ended June 30,
2005, compared to $118.8 million used in investing activities in the same period in 2004. The
investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
Purchases of debt and equity securities available for sale, net of sales and maturities; |
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, equipment and software; |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of property and equipment; and |
|
|
|
|
Receipt of an income tax refund for pre-acquisition tax matters associated with C-Cube
Microsystems Inc. (we acquired C-Cube Microsystems in May 2001). |
We expect capital expenditures to be approximately $60 million in 2005. In recent years we
have reduced our level of capital expenditures as a result of our focus on establishing strategic
supplier alliances with foundry semiconductor manufacturers, which enables us to have access to
advanced manufacturing capacity, and reduces our capital spending requirements.
Cash and cash equivalents (used in)/provided by financing activities. Cash and cash
equivalents used in financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2005, were $135.4
million as compared to $10.1 million provided by financing activities in the same period in 2004.
The primary financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
The repurchase of a portion of the Convertible Notes due in 2006; |
|
|
|
|
The issuance of common stock under our employee stock option and purchase plans; and |
|
|
|
|
The repayment of debt obligations. |
We may seek additional equity or debt financing from time to time. We believe that our
existing liquid resources and funds generated from operations, combined with funds from such
financing and our ability to borrow funds, will be adequate to meet our operating and capital
requirements and obligations for the foreseeable future. However, we cannot be certain that
additional financing will be available on favorable terms. Moreover, any future equity or
convertible debt financing will decrease the percentage of equity ownership of existing
stockholders and may result in dilution, depending on the price at which the equity is sold or the
debt is converted.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at June 30, 2005, and the effect
these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods.
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After 5 |
|
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Less than 1 year |
|
1 3 years |
|
4 5 years |
|
years |
|
Total |
|
|
(in millions) |
Convertible Subordinated
Notes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
271.8 |
|
|
$ |
350.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
621.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
|
62.4 |
|
|
|
61.5 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
189.1 |
|
Purchase commitments |
|
|
278.3 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
340.7 |
|
|
$ |
344.9 |
|
|
$ |
388.2 |
|
|
$ |
28.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,102.3 |
|
|
|
|
Convertible Subordinated Notes
As of June 30, 2005, we had $272 million of Convertible Subordinated Notes due in November
2006 (2001 Convertible Notes) and $350 million of Convertible Subordinated Notes due in May 2010
(2003 Convertible Notes). All of the Convertible Notes are subordinated to all existing and
future senior debt and are convertible at the holders option, at any time prior to the maturity
date of the Convertible Notes, into shares of our common stock. The 2001 and 2003 Convertible Notes
have conversion prices of approximately $26.34 per share and $13.42 per share, respectively. The
2001 Convertible Notes are redeemable at our option, in whole or in part, on at least 30 days
notice at any time on or after the call date, which is two years before the due date. We cannot
elect to redeem the 2003 Convertible Notes prior to maturity. Each holder of the 2001 and 2003
Convertible Notes has the right to cause us to repurchase all of such holders convertible notes at
100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest upon the occurrence of any fundamental change
to us, which includes a transaction or event such as an exchange offer, liquidation, tender offer,
consolidation, merger or combination. Interest is payable semiannually.
Fluctuations in our stock price impact the prices of our outstanding convertible securities
and the likelihood of the convertible securities being converted into cash or equity. If we are
required to redeem any of the Convertible Notes for cash, it may affect our liquidity position. In
the event they do not convert to equity, we believe that our current cash position and expected
future operating cash flows will be adequate to meet these obligations as they mature. From time
to time, we redeem or repurchase Convertible Notes.
Operating Lease Obligations
We lease real estate, certain non-manufacturing equipment and software under non-cancelable
operating leases.
Purchase Commitments
We maintain certain purchase commitments, primarily for raw materials, with suppliers and for
some non-production items. Purchase commitments for inventory materials are generally restricted
to a forecasted time-horizon as mutually agreed upon between the parties. This forecasted
time-horizon can vary among our different suppliers.
Critical Accounting Policies
The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on
the consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements
requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures. For a
detailed discussion of our critical accounting policies, please see the Critical Accounting
Policies contained in Part II, Item 7 of the Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004.
We monitor the recoverability of goodwill recorded in connection with acquisitions annually,
or sooner if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable. Impairment, if any, would be determined in accordance with SFAS No. 142, which uses a
fair value model for determining the carrying value of goodwill. We plan to perform our next
annual impairment review in the fourth quarter of 2005.
30
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The information contained in Item 1 in Note 1 of the Notes under the heading Recent
Accounting Pronouncements is hereby incorporated by reference into this Item 2.
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS
You are advised to keep the following risk factors, as well as other risk factors mentioned in
this report, in mind when you read forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q and in
the documents incorporated herein by reference. These are statements that relate to our
expectations for future events and time periods. Generally, the words, anticipate, expect,
intend and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements
involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those anticipated
in the forward-looking statements.
We believe that our future operating results will continue to be subject to quarterly
variations based upon a wide variety of factors. Our actual results in future periods may be
significantly different from any future performance suggested in this report. Although we believe
that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot
guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. While management
believes that the discussion and analysis in this report is adequate for a fair presentation of the
information, we recommend that you read this discussion and analysis in conjunction with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K. Risks and uncertainties that may affect our results include, among others:
A general economic weakness may reduce our revenues. The semiconductor industry is cyclical
in nature and is characterized by wide fluctuations in product supply and demand. In addition, our
results of operations are dependent on the global economy. Any geopolitical factors such as
terrorist activities, armed conflict or global health conditions, which adversely affect the global
economy, may adversely impact our operating results and financial condition. In addition, goodwill
and other long-lived assets could be impacted by a further decline in revenues because impairment
is measured based upon estimates of future cash flows. These estimates include assumptions about
future conditions within our company and industry.
We operate in highly competitive markets. The Semiconductor and Storage Systems segments in
which we conduct business are characterized by rapid technological change, short product cycles and
evolving industry standards. We believe our future success depends, in part, on our ability to
improve on existing technologies and to develop and implement new ones in order to continue to
reduce semiconductor chip size and improve product performance and manufacturing yields. We must
also be able to adopt and implement emerging industry standards in a timely manner and to adapt
products and processes to technological changes. If we are not able to implement new process
technologies successfully or to achieve volume production of new products at acceptable yields, our
operating results and financial condition may be adversely impacted.
Our competitors include many large domestic and foreign companies that have substantially
greater financial, technical and management resources than we do. Several major diversified
electronics companies offer ASIC products and/or other standard products that are competitive with
our product lines. Other competitors are specialized, rapidly growing companies that sell products
into the same markets that we target. Some of our large customers may develop internal design and
production capabilities to manufacture their own products, thereby displacing our products. There
is no assurance that the price and performance of our products will be superior relative to the
products of our competitors. As a result, we may experience a loss of competitive position that
could result in lower prices, fewer customer orders, reduced revenues, reduced gross profit margins
and loss of market share.
We are dependent on a limited number of customers. Our concentrated customer base accounts
for a substantial portion of our revenues. For the six months ended June 30, 2005, IBM and Seagate
represented 14% and 11% of our total consolidated revenues, respectively.
31
Our operating results and financial condition could be significantly affected if:
we do not win new product designs from major existing customers;
major customers reduce or cancel their existing business with us;
major customers make significant changes in scheduled deliveries; or
there are declines in the prices of products that we sell to these customers.
Our new products may not achieve market acceptance. We introduce many new products each year.
We must continue to develop and introduce new products that compete effectively on the basis of
price and performance and that satisfy customer requirements. We continue to emphasize engineering
development and acquisition of CoreWare building blocks and integration of our CoreWare libraries
into our design capabilities. Our cores and standard products are intended to be based upon
industry standard functions, interfaces, and protocols so that they are useful in a wide variety of
systems applications. Development of new products and cores often requires long-term forecasting
of market trends, development and implementation of new or changing technologies and a substantial
capital commitment. We cannot provide assurance that the cores or standard products that we select
for investment of our financial and engineering resources will be developed or acquired in a timely
manner or will enjoy market acceptance.
The manufacturing facilities we operate are highly complex and require high fixed costs. Our
wafer fabrication site is located in Gresham, Oregon. In addition, we own our Storage Systems
segment manufacturing facility in Wichita, Kansas. The manufacture and introduction of our
products is a complicated process. We continually strive to implement the latest process
technologies and manufacture products in a clean and tightly controlled environment. We confront
challenges in the manufacturing process that require us to:
maintain a competitive manufacturing cost structure;
implement the latest process technologies required to manufacture new products;
exercise stringent quality control measures to ensure high yields;
effectively manage the subcontractors engaged in the wafer fabrication, test and assembly of
products; and
update equipment and facilities as required for leading edge production capabilities.
We outsource a substantial portion of wafers manufactured. We have consolidated our internal
semiconductor manufacturing in Gresham, Oregon. We have developed outsourcing arrangements for the
manufacture of some of our products based on process technology that is unique to the supplier.
There is no assurance that the third party manufacturer will be able to produce and deliver wafers
that meet our specifications or that our supplier will be able to successfully provide the process
technology. If the third party is not able to deliver products and process technology on a timely
and reliable basis, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
We have capital requirements to maintain and grow our business. We continue to
make investments in our facilities and capital equipment, and, as a result, our fixed
costs for manufacturing are high. We also seek to obtain access to advanced manufacturing
capacities through strategic supplier alliances with wafer foundries. In general, we seek to
optimally allocate the manufacture of our products between our facilities and those of our foundry
suppliers. Nonetheless, a high level of capital expenditures in our facilities results in
relatively high fixed costs. If demand for our products does not absorb the available capacity,
the fixed costs and operating expenses related to our production capacity could have a material
adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition.
We finance our capital expenditure needs from operating cash flows, bank financing and capital
market financing. As of June 30, 2005, we had convertible notes outstanding of approximately $622
million. We may need to seek additional equity or debt financing from time to time and cannot be
certain that additional financing will be available on favorable terms. Moreover, any future
equity or equity-linked financing may dilute the equity ownership of existing stockholders.
We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We have some exposure to
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. We have international subsidiaries and
distributors that operate and sell our products globally. We routinely hedge these exposures in an
effort to minimize the impact of currency fluctuations. However, we may still be adversely
affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates or declining economic conditions in these
countries.
32
We procure parts and raw materials from limited domestic and foreign sources. We do not
maintain an extensive inventory of parts and materials for manufacturing. We purchase a portion of
our requirements for parts and raw materials from a limited number of sources, primarily from
suppliers in Japan and their U.S. subsidiaries, and we obtain other material inputs on a local
basis. There is no assurance that, if we have difficulty in obtaining parts or materials in the
future, alternative suppliers will be available, or that these suppliers will provide parts and
materials in a timely manner or on favorable terms. As a result, we may be adversely affected by
delays in product shipments. If we cannot obtain adequate materials for manufacture of our
products or if such materials are not available at reasonable prices, there could be a material
adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition.
We utilize indirect channels of distribution over which we have limited control. Our
financial results could be adversely affected if our relationship with resellers or distributors
were to deteriorate or if the financial condition of these resellers or distributors were to
decline. In addition, as our business grows, we may have an increased reliance on indirect
channels of distribution. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in maintaining or
expanding these indirect channels of distribution. This could result in the loss of certain sales
opportunities. Furthermore, the partial reliance on indirect channels of distribution may reduce
our visibility with respect to future business, thereby making it more difficult to accurately
forecast orders.
Our operations are affected by cyclical fluctuations. The Semiconductor and Storage Systems
segments in which we compete are subject to cyclical fluctuations in demand. The Semiconductor
industry has in the past experienced periods of rapid expansion of production capacity followed by
periods of significant downturn. Even when the demand for our products remains constant, the
availability of additional excess production capacity in the industry creates competitive pressure
that can degrade pricing levels, which can reduce revenues. Furthermore, customers who benefit
from shorter lead times may defer some purchases to future periods, which could adversely affect
revenues in the short term. As a result, we may experience downturns or fluctuations in demand for
our products and experience adverse effects on our operating results and financial condition.
We engage in acquisitions and alliances giving rise to economic and technological risks. We
are continually exploring strategic acquisitions that build upon our existing library of
intellectual property, human capital and engineering talent, and increase our leadership position
in the markets where we operate. We did not complete any material acquisitions or alliances in the
first half of 2005. We completed two acquisitions in 2004. Mergers and acquisitions of high-technology
companies bear inherent risks. No assurance can be given that our previous or future acquisitions
will be successful and will not materially adversely affect our business, operating results or
financial condition. We must manage any growth effectively. Failure to manage growth effectively
and to integrate acquisitions could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
In addition, we intend to continue to make investments in companies, products and technologies
through strategic alliances. Investment activities often involve risks, including the need to
acquire timely access to needed capital for investments related to alliances and to invest in
companies and technologies that contribute to the growth of our business.
The price of our securities may be subject to wide fluctuations. Our stock has experienced
substantial price volatility, particularly as a result of quarterly variations in results, the
published expectations of analysts and announcements by our competitors and us. In addition, the
stock market has experienced price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market price of
many technology companies and that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of such
companies. The price of our securities may also be affected by general global, economic and market
conditions. While we cannot predict the individual effect that these and other factors may have on
the price of our securities, these factors, either individually or in the aggregate, could result
in significant variations in price during any given period of time. These fluctuations in our
stock price also impact the price of our outstanding convertible securities and the likelihood of
the convertible securities being converted into cash or equity. If our stock price is below the
conversion price of our convertible bonds on the date of maturity, they may not convert into equity
and we may be required to redeem the convertible securities for cash. However, in the event they
do not convert to equity, we believe that our current cash position and expected future operating
cash flows will be adequate to meet these obligations as they mature.
We may rely on capital and bank markets to provide liquidity. In order to finance strategic
acquisitions, capital assets needed in our manufacturing facilities and other general corporate
needs, we may rely on capital and bank markets to provide liquidity. Historically, we have been
able to access capital and bank markets, but this does not necessarily guarantee that we will be
able to access these markets in the future or at terms that are acceptable to us. The availability
of capital in these
33
markets is affected by several factors, including geopolitical risk, the interest rate
environment and the condition of the economy as a whole. In addition, our own operating
performance, capital structure and expected future performance impact our ability to raise capital.
We believe that our current cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and future cash
provided by operations will be sufficient to fund our needs in the foreseeable future. This
includes repaying our existing convertible debt when due. However, if our operating performance
falls below expectations, we may need additional funds.
We design and develop highly complex cell-based ASICs. As technology advances to 0.13 micron
and smaller geometries, there are increases in the complexity, time and expense associated with the
design, development and manufacture of ASICs. We must incur substantial research and development
costs to confirm the technical feasibility and commercial viability of any ASIC products that in
the end may not be successful. Therefore, we cannot guarantee that any new ASIC products will
result in market acceptance.
Our global operations expose us to numerous international business risks. We have substantial
business activities in Asia and Europe. Both manufacturing and sales of our products may be
adversely impacted by changes in political and economic conditions abroad. A change in the current
tax laws, tariff structures, export laws, regulatory requirements or trade policies in either the
United States or foreign countries could adversely impact our ability to manufacture or sell our
products in foreign markets. Moreover, a significant decrease in sales by our customers to end
users in either Asia or Europe could result in a decline in orders.
We subcontract wafer manufacturing, test and assembly functions to independent companies
located in Asia. A reduction in the number or capacity of qualified subcontractors or a
substantial increase in pricing could cause longer lead times, delays in the delivery of products
to customers or increased costs.
The high technology industry in which we operate is prone to intellectual property litigation.
Our success is dependent in part on our technology and other proprietary rights, and we believe
that there is value in the protection afforded by our patents, copyright rights and trademarks. We
have a program whereby we actively protect our intellectual property by acquiring patent and other
intellectual property rights. However, the industry is characterized by rapidly changing
technology and our future success depends primarily on the technical competence and creative skills
of our personnel.
As is typical in the high technology industry, from time to time we have received
communications from other parties asserting that certain of our products, processes, technologies
or information infringe upon their patent rights, copyrights, trademark rights or other
intellectual property rights. We regularly evaluate such assertions. In light of industry
practice, we believe, with respect to existing or future claims that any licenses or other rights
that may be necessary may generally be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. Nevertheless,
there is no assurance that licenses will be obtainable on acceptable terms or that a claim will not
result in litigation or other administrative proceedings. Resolution of whether our product or
intellectual property has infringed on valid rights held by others could have a material adverse
effect on our financial position or results of operations and may require material changes in
production processes and products.
See Legal Matters in Note 11 (Legal Matters) of the Notes regarding current patent
litigation.
Our manufacturing facilities are subject to disruption. Operations at any of our primary
manufacturing facilities may be disrupted for reasons beyond our control, including work stoppages,
fire, earthquake, tornado, floods or other natural disasters, which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial position or results of operation.
We depend on independent foundry subcontractors to manufacture a portion of our current
products, and any failure to secure and maintain sufficient foundry capacity could materially and
adversely affect our business. Outside foundry subcontractors, located in Asia, manufacture a
portion of our semiconductor devices in current production. Availability of foundry capacity has
in the recent past been reduced due to strong demand. In addition, the occurrence of a public
health emergency could further affect the production capabilities of our manufacturers by resulting
in quarantines or closures. If we are unable to secure sufficient capacity at our existing
foundries, or in the event of a quarantine or closure at any of these foundries, our revenues, cost
of revenues and results of operations would be negatively impacted. If any of our foundries
experiences a shortage in capacity, or suffers any damage to its facilities due to earthquakes or
other natural disasters, experiences power outages, encounters financial difficulties or any other
disruption of foundry capacity, we may need to qualify an alternative foundry in a timely manner.
Even our current foundries need to have new manufacturing processes qualified if there is a
disruption in an existing process. We typically require several months to qualify a new foundry or
34
process before we can begin shipping products from it. If we cannot accomplish this
qualification in a timely manner, we may experience a significant interruption in supply of the
affected products.
Because we rely on outside foundries with limited capacity, we face several significant risks,
including:
|
|
|
a lack of guaranteed wafer supply and potential wafer shortages and higher wafer prices; |
|
|
|
|
limited control over delivery schedules, quality assurance, manufacturing yields and production costs; and |
|
|
|
|
the unavailability of, or potential delays in obtaining access to, key process technologies. |
In addition, the manufacture of integrated circuits is a highly complex and technologically
demanding process. Although we work closely with our foundries to minimize the likelihood of
reduced manufacturing yields, our foundries have from time to time experienced lower than
anticipated manufacturing yields. This often occurs during the production of new products or the
installation and start-up of new process technologies. Poor yields from our foundries could result
in product shortages or delays in product shipments, which could seriously harm our relationships
with our customers and materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
The ability of each foundry to provide us with semiconductor devices is limited by its
available capacity and existing obligations. Although we have entered into contractual commitments
to supply specified levels of products to some of our customers, we do not have a long-term volume
purchase agreement or a significant guaranteed level of production capacity with any of our
foundries. Foundry capacity may not be available when we need it or at reasonable prices.
Availability of foundry capacity has in the recent past been reduced from time to time due to
strong demand. We place our orders on the basis of our customers purchase orders or our forecast
of customer demand, and the foundries can allocate capacity to the production of other companies
products and reduce deliveries to us on short notice. It is possible that foundry customers that
are larger and better financed than we are, or that have long-term agreements with our main
foundries, may induce our foundries to reallocate capacity to them. This reallocation could impair
our ability to secure the supply of components that we need. Although we use a number of
independent foundries to manufacture our semiconductor products, most of our components are not
manufactured at more than one foundry at any given time, and our products typically are designed to
be manufactured in a specific process at only one of these foundries. Accordingly, if one of our
foundries is unable to provide us with components as needed, we could experience significant delays
in securing sufficient supplies of those components. Also, our third party foundries typically
migrate capacity to newer, state-of-the-art manufacturing processes on a regular basis, which may
create capacity shortages for our products designed to be manufactured on an older process. We
cannot assure you that any of our existing or new foundries will be able to produce integrated
circuits with acceptable manufacturing yields, or that our foundries will be able to deliver enough
semiconductor devices to us on a timely basis, or at reasonable prices. These and other related
factors could impair our ability to meet our customers needs and have a material and adverse
effect on our operating results.
Although we may utilize new foundries for other products in the future, in using new foundries
we will be subject to all of the risks described in the foregoing paragraphs with respect to our
current foundries.
We depend on third-party subcontractors to assemble, obtain packaging materials for, and test
substantially all of our current products. If we lose the services of any of our subcontractors or
if these subcontractors are unable to attain sufficient packaging materials, shipments of our
products may be disrupted, which could harm our customer relationships and adversely affect our net
sales. Third-party subcontractors located in Asia assemble, obtain packaging materials for, and
test substantially all of our current products. Because we rely on third-party subcontractors to
perform these functions, we cannot directly control our product delivery schedules and quality
assurance. This lack of control has in the past resulted, and could in the future result, in
product shortages or quality assurance problems that could delay shipments of our products or
increase our manufacturing, assembly or testing costs.
If our third-party subcontractors are unable to obtain sufficient packaging materials for our
products in a timely manner, we may experience a significant product shortage or delay in product
shipments, which could seriously harm our customer relationships and materially and adversely
affect our net sales. If any of these subcontractors experiences capacity constraints or financial
difficulties, suffers any damage to its facilities, experiences power outages or any other
disruption of assembly or testing capacity, we may not be able to obtain alternative assembly and
testing services in a timely manner. Due to the amount of time that it usually takes us to qualify
assemblers and testers, we could experience significant delays in product shipments if we are
required to find alternative assemblers or testers for our components. Any problems that we may
encounter with the delivery, quality or cost of our products could damage our customer
relationships and materially and
35
adversely affect our results of operations. We are continuing to develop relationships with
additional third-party subcontractors to assemble and test our products. However, even if we use
these new subcontractors, we will continue to be subject to all of the risks described above.
We are increasingly exposed to various legal, business, political and economic risks
associated with our international operations. We currently obtain a substantial portion all of our
manufacturing, and all of our assembly and testing services from suppliers located outside the
United States. We also frequently ship products to our domestic customers international
manufacturing divisions and subcontractors. We also undertake design and development activities in
Canada, China, India, Taiwan and the United Kingdom. We intend to continue to expand our
international business activities and to open other design and operational centers abroad. The
recent war in Iraq and the lingering effects of terrorist attacks in the United States and abroad,
the resulting heightened security and the increasing risk of extended international military
conflicts may adversely impact our international sales and could make our international operations
more expensive. International operations are subject to many other inherent risks, including but
not limited to:
|
|
|
political, social and economic instability; |
|
|
|
|
exposure to different legal standards, particularly with respect to intellectual property; |
|
|
|
|
natural disasters and public health emergencies; |
|
|
|
|
nationalization of business and blocking of cash flows; |
|
|
|
|
trade and travel restrictions; |
|
|
|
|
the imposition of governmental controls and restrictions; |
|
|
|
|
burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws; |
|
|
|
|
import and export license requirements and restrictions of the United States and each
other country in which we operate; |
|
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; |
|
|
|
|
foreign technical standards; |
|
|
|
|
changes in tariffs; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing international operations; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties in collecting receivables from foreign entities or delayed revenue recognition; and |
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences. |
Any of the factors described above may have a material adverse effect on our ability to
increase or maintain our foreign sales.
Additionally, public health emergencies may impact our operations, including, but not limited
to, disruptions at our third-party manufacturers that are primarily located in Asia, reduced sales
and increased supply chain costs. For example, if SARS recurs, or other similar public health
emergencies arise, our international sales and operations could be harmed.
We must attract and retain key employees in a highly competitive environment. Our employees
are vital to our success and our key management, engineering and other employees are difficult to
replace. We do not generally have employment contracts with our key employees. Despite the
economic slowdown of the last few years, competition for certain key technical and engineering
personnel remains intense. Our continued growth and future operating results will depend upon our
ability to attract, hire and retain significant numbers of qualified employees.
Engenio Information Technologies, Inc. represents a significant portion of our business, and
an initial public offering, sale or spin-off of the Storage Systems segment, may cause our
operating results to suffer and may cause net revenues and income to decline. Engenio Information
Technologies, Inc. represents a significant portion of our business, and it is currently reported
as a separate segment in our consolidated financial statements. For the six months ended June 30,
2005, the Storage Systems segment represented 24% of our revenues. For the fiscal year ended 2004,
the Storage Systems segment represented 27% of our revenues.
If we engage in a transaction that results in Engenio no longer being our subsidiary, the
Storage Systems segments financial results, including its net revenues and net income, will no
longer be included in our consolidated financial statements.
36
Accordingly, our historical
consolidated financial results may not necessarily reflect our future financial position, results
of operations and cash flows if Engenio ceases to be a subsidiary. In addition, as a result of a spin-off or sale of the storage systems segment, our stock price may fluctuate.
The separation and possible initial public offering, sale or spin-off of Engenio Information
Technologies, Inc. from us is a substantial undertaking that may disrupt our ongoing business and
may increase expenses, which may affect our results of operations or financial condition. The
separation of Engenio, and the possible initial public offering of the subsidiarys common stock to
the public and the potential spin-off of the subsidiary to our stockholders continue to require the
substantial dedication of management resources. Furthermore, we expect to incur significant
expenses in future periods related to the separation. We have not yet made any adjustments to our
historical financial information to reflect the significant changes that may occur in our cost
structure, funding and operations as a result of the separation. In addition, the efforts required
to complete the separation of Engenio from us may disrupt our ongoing business activities, may
result in employee distraction and may harm Engenios and our ability to attract, retain and
motivate key employees. If any of the foregoing occurs, our results of operations or financial
condition may suffer.
Future changes in financial accounting standards or practices or existing taxation rules or
practices may cause adverse unexpected fluctuations and affect our reported results of operations.
Financial accounting standards in the United States are constantly under review and may be changed
from time to time. We would be required to apply these changes when adopted. Once implemented,
these changes could result in material fluctuations in our financial results of operations and/or
the way in which such results of operations are reported. Similarly, we are subject to taxation in
the United States and a number of foreign jurisdictions. Rates of taxation, definitions of income,
exclusions from income, and other tax policies are subject to change over time. Changes in tax
laws in a jurisdiction in which we have reporting obligations could have a material impact on our
results of operations.
We expect that the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123
(revised 2004) (SFAS No. 123R), entitled Share-Based Payment, effective for the beginning in the first quarter of
2006, will have a significant impact on our reported results as described under Recent Accounting
Pronouncements. Because the factors that will affect compensation expense we incur due to the
adoption of SFAS No. 123R are unknown, the impact on our operating results at the
point of adoption, or in the future, cannot be determined. Changes in these or other rules, or
modifications to our current practices, may have a significant adverse effect on our reported
operating results or in the way in which we conduct our business in the future.
We face uncertainties related to the effectiveness of internal controls. Public companies in
the United States are required to review their internal controls over financial reporting under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed
and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the
system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations
of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will achieve its stated goal under
all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
Internal control deficiencies or weaknesses that are not yet identified could emerge. Over
time we may identify and correct deficiencies or weaknesses in our internal controls and, where and
when appropriate, report on the identification and correction of these deficiencies or weaknesses.
However, the internal control procedures can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance
that deficiencies or weaknesses are identified. Deficiencies or weaknesses that are not yet
identified could emerge and the identification and corrections of these deficiencies or weaknesses
could have a material impact on the results of operations for the Company.
Internal control issues that appear minor now may later become reportable conditions. We are
required to publicly report on deficiencies or weaknesses in our internal controls that meet a
materiality standard as required by law. While the Company meets its statutory obligations,
management may, at a point in time, accurately categorize a deficiency or weakness as immaterial or
minor and therefore not be required to publicly report such deficiency or weakness. Such
determination, however, does not preclude a change in circumstances such that the deficiency or
weakness could, at a later time, become a reportable condition that could have a material impact on
our results of operations.
37
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
There have been no significant changes in the market risk disclosures during the six months
ended June 30, 2005, as compared to the discussion in Part II, Item 7a of our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our chief executive officer and our chief
financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule
13a-15 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of June 30, 2005. Based on this
evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to
disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms.
In May of 2005, we completed the upgrade of the information systems that we use to accumulate
financial data used in financial reporting for our majority owned subsidiary, Engenio. We utilized
this new system upgrade to generate financial statements for our fiscal quarter ended June 30,
2005. This system upgrade served to enhance our system of internal controls and was not made in response to any weakness in our system of internal controls. We believe there was
no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered
by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. We are aware that any system of
control, however well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable, and not absolute,
assurance that the objectives of this system are met, and that maintenance of disclosure controls
and procedures is an ongoing process that may change over time.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
This information is included in Note 11 (Legal Matters) of the Notes to the Unaudited
Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements, which information is incorporated herein by reference
from Item 1 of Part I hereof.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On July 28, 2000, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a new stock repurchase program
in which up to 5 million shares of the Companys common stock may be repurchased in the open market
from time to time. There is no expiration date for the plan. No shares were repurchased under this
plan during the first six months of 2005. There are 3.5 million shares available for repurchase
under this plan as of June 30, 2005.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) |
|
(d) |
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
Total Number |
|
Average Price |
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Approximate Dollar Value) of |
|
|
of Shares (or |
|
Paid per |
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
Shares (or Units) that May Yet |
|
|
Units) |
|
Share (or |
|
Publicly Announced |
|
Be Purchased Under the Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Unit) |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
or Programs |
|
May 2005
|
|
149,652 units
|
|
|
0.98980 |
|
|
n/a
|
|
n/a |
* During the three months ended June 30, 2005, the Company repurchased approximately $150
million of the 2001 Convertible Subordinated Notes (the 2001 Convertible Notes) in open-market
purchase transactions. The purchases were opportunistic buy backs of convertible subordinated
notes. A net pre-tax gain of approximately $4 million was recognized, in interest income and
other, net, on the repurchases of the 2001 Convertible Notes. The pre-tax gain is net of the
write-off of debt issuance costs and a portion of the deferred gain on the related terminated
interest rate swap (see Note 6 of the Notes).
38
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holder
Our Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on May 12, 2005 in San Jose, California. At the
meeting, our stockholders voted on and approved the following proposals. The results of voting
were as follows:
|
|
|
Proposal 1.
|
|
To elect eight directors to serve for the ensuing year and until their
successors are elected. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Withheld |
T.Z. Chu |
|
|
313,488,144 |
|
|
|
11,669,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wilfred J. Corrigan |
|
|
313,470,221 |
|
|
|
11,686,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malcolm R. Currie |
|
|
313,420,563 |
|
|
|
11,736,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
James H. Keyes |
|
|
313,499,561 |
|
|
|
11,657,659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Douglas Norby |
|
|
291,988,464 |
|
|
|
33,168,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew J. ORourke |
|
|
314,659,070 |
|
|
|
10,498,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregorio Reyes |
|
|
314,949,813 |
|
|
|
10,207,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Larry W. Sonsini |
|
|
259,842,214 |
|
|
|
65,315,006 |
|
|
|
|
Proposal 2.
|
|
To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent
registered public accounting firm of the Company for its 2005 fiscal year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstentions |
317,549,045 |
|
|
4,884,100 |
|
|
|
2,724,075 |
|
Item 5. Other Information
A clerical error was made in the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 8, 2005,
which identified the effective date of the performance share grant to Abhijit Y. Talwalkar. The
error cited the effective grant date to Mr. Talwalkar as June 2, 2005, rather than the correct
effective date of June 1, 2005.
39
Item 6. Exhibits
10.40 |
|
Summary Description of LSI Logic Corporation 2005 Semiconductor
Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with
the Current Report on Form 8-K on April 7, 2005.* |
|
10.41 |
|
Summary Description of 2005 Engenio Information Technologies, Inc.
Incentive Plan. Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with
the Current Report on Form 8-K on April 7, 2005.* |
|
10.42 |
|
Form of LSI Logic Corporation Annual Director Option Agreement.
Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Current Report
on Form 8-K on April 7, 2005.* |
|
10.43 |
|
Form of Notice of Grant under LSI Logic Corporation Annual Director
Option Agreement. Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with
the Current Report on Form 8-K on April 7, 2005.* |
|
10.44 |
|
Employment Agreement with Abhijit Y. Talwalkar, effective as of May
23, 2005. Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the
Current Report on Form 8-K on May 24, 2005.* |
|
10.45 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the LSI Logic Corporation 1991 Equity Incentive
Plan Stock Option Agreement dated August 15, 1997 with Wilfred J.
Corrigan. Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the
Current Report on Form 8-K on June 17, 2005.* |
|
10.46 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the LSI Logic Corporation 1991 Equity Incentive
Stock Option Agreement dated November 20, 1998 with Wilfred J.
Corrigan. Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the
Current Report on Form 8-K on June 17, 2005.* |
|
10.47 |
|
Form of LSI Logic Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement.* |
|
10.48 |
|
Form of Notice of Grant under LSI Logic Corporation 2003 Equity
Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement.* |
|
10.49 |
|
Abhijit Y. Talwalkar LSI Logic Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive
Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, effective as of June 1,
2005.* |
|
10.50 |
|
Abhijit Y. Talwalkar Notice of Grant under LSI Logic Corporation
2003 Equity Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement,
effective as of June 1 2005.*+ |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-1(e), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbarnes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-1(e), as adopted pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** |
* Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
+ Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain portions of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
**
Furnished not filed.
40
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSI LOGIC CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 11, 2005 |
By |
|
/s/ Bryon Look
|
|
|
|
|
Bryon Look |
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer |
|
41
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
10.40 |
|
Summary Description of LSI Logic Corporation 2005 Semiconductor Incentive Plan. Incorporated
by reference to exhibits filed with the Current Report on Form 8-K on April 7, 2005.* |
|
10.41 |
|
Summary Description of 2005 Engenio Information Technologies, Inc. Incentive Plan.
Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Current Report on Form 8-K on April 7,
2005.* |
|
10.42 |
|
Form of LSI Logic Corporation Annual Director Option Agreement. Incorporated by reference to
exhibits filed with the Current Report on Form 8-K on April 7, 2005.* |
|
10.43 |
|
Form of Notice of Grant under LSI Logic Corporation Annual Director Option Agreement.
Incorporated by reference to exhibits filed with the Current Report on Form 8-K on April 7,
2005.* |
|
10.44 |
|
Employment Agreement with Abhijit Y. Talwalkar, effective as of May 23, 2005. Incorporated
by reference to exhibits filed with the Current Report on Form 8-K on May 24, 2005.* |
|
10.45 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the LSI Logic Corporation 1991 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Option
Agreement dated August 15, 1997 with Wilfred J. Corrigan. Incorporated by reference to
exhibits filed with the Current Report on Form 8-K on June 17, 2005.* |
|
10.46 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to the LSI Logic Corporation 1991 Equity Incentive Stock Option Agreement
dated November 20, 1998 with Wilfred J. Corrigan. Incorporated by reference to exhibits
filed with the Current Report on Form 8-K on June 17, 2005.* |
|
10.47 |
|
Form of LSI Logic Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement.* |
|
10.48 |
|
Form of Notice of Grant under LSI Logic Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan Nonqualified
Stock Option Agreement.* |
|
10.49 |
|
Abhijit Y. Talwalkar LSI Logic Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan Nonqualified Stock
Option Agreement, effective as of June 1, 2005.* |
|
10.50 |
|
Abhijit Y. Talwalkar Notice of Grant under LSI Logic Corporation 2003 Equity Incentive Plan
Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement, effective as of June 1 2005.*+ |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-1(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities and Exchange Act Rules
13-15(e) and 15d-1(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.** |
* Denotes management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
+ Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain portions of this exhibit. Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
**
Furnished not filed.
42