sec document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(RULE 14A-101)
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(x) Filed by the Registrant
( ) Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
Check the appropriate box:
(x) Preliminary proxy statement
( ) Confidential, for Use of the SEC Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
( ) Definitive proxy statement
( ) Definitive Additional Materials
( ) Soliciting Material Pursuant to ss.240.14a-12
LYNCH INTERACTIVE CORPORATION
-----------------------------
(NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
------------------------------------------------------------
(NAME OF PERSON(S) FILING PROXY STATEMENT, IF OTHER THAN THE REGISTRANT)
PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (CHECK THE APPROPRIATE BOX):
(X) NO FEE REQUIRED.
( ) FEE COMPUTED ON TABLE BELOW PER EXCHANGE ACT RULES 14A-6(I)(1) AND 0-11.
TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF SECURITIES TO WHICH TRANSACTION APPLIES:
(1) AGGREGATE NUMBER OF SECURITIES TO WHICH TRANSACTION APPLIES:
(2) PER UNIT PRICE OR OTHER UNDERLYING VALUE OF TRANSACTION COMPUTED
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE (2) 0-11 (SET FORTH THE AMOUNT ON
WHICH THE FILING FEE IS CALCULATED AND STATE HOW IT WAS
DETERMINED):
(3) PROPOSED MAXIMUM AGGREGATE VALUE OF TRANSACTION:
(4) TOTAL FEE PAID:
(5) FEE PAID PREVIOUSLY WITH PRELIMINARY MATERIALS.
( ) CHECK BOX IF ANY PART OF THE FEE IS OFFSET AS PROVIDED BY EXCHANGE ACT
RULE 0-11(A)(2) AND IDENTIFY THE FILING FOR WHICH THE OFFSETTING FEE
WAS PAID PREVIOUSLY. IDENTIFY THE PREVIOUS FILING BY REGISTRATION
STATEMENT NUMBER, OR THE FORM OR SCHEDULE AND THE DATE OF ITS FILING.
(1) AMOUNT PREVIOUSLY PAID:
(2) FORM, SCHEDULE OR REGISTRATION STATEMENT NO.:
(3) FILING PARTY:
(4) DATE FILED:
LYNCH INTERACTIVE CORPORATION
401 THEODORE FREMD AVENUE
RYE, NEW YORK 10580
--------------------
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD JUNE 2, 2005
--------------------
April 29, 2005
To Stockholders of
Lynch Interactive Corporation:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN to the holders of Common Stock, par value
$0.0001 per share ("Common Stock"), of Lynch Interactive Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the
"Annual Meeting") of the Corporation, will be held at the Greenwich Library, 101
West Putnam Avenue, Greenwich, Connecticut, on Thursday, June 2, 2005, at 8:30
a.m. Eastern time, for the following purposes:
1. To approve, subject to final action by the Board of Directors of
the Corporation (the "Board of Directors"), an amendment to the
Corporation's Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a
1-for-100 reverse stock split of the Common Stock with the result
that (i) holdings prior to such split of fewer than 100 shares of
Common Stock will be converted to a fractional share, which will
be immediately cancelled and converted into a right to receive the
cash consideration described in the attached proxy statement, and
(ii) the Corporation will have fewer than 300 holders of record,
allowing it to delist the Common Stock from the American Stock
Exchange (the "AMEX") and to deregister the Common Stock under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"),
and to avoid many of the costs associated with being a public
reporting company.
2. To re-approve the Principal Executive Bonus Plan.
3. To elect members of the Board of Directors to serve until the next
Annual Meeting and until their successors are duly elected and
qualify.
4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the
Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.
Information relating to the above matters is set forth in the attached
proxy statement. The Board of Directors and management of the Corporation are
not aware of any other matters that will come before the Annual Meeting. As
determined by the Board of Directors, only stockholders of record at the close
of business on April 29, 2005 are entitled to receive notice of, and to vote at,
the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ENCOURAGES ALL STOCKHOLDERS TO PERSONALLY ATTEND
THE ANNUAL MEETING. YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF
SHARES YOU OWN. WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU ARE
REQUESTED TO PROMPTLY DATE, COMPLETE, SIGN AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD IN
THE ENCLOSED ACCOMPANYING POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE IN ORDER THAT YOUR SHARES OF OUR
COMMON STOCK MAY BE REPRESENTED. YOUR COOPERATION IS GREATLY APPRECIATED.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
/s/ John A. Cole
John A. Cole
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
SUMMARY TERM SHEET
This summary term sheet, including the "Questions and Answers About the
Meeting and Transaction" section that follows, highlights selected information
from the attached proxy statement for the 2005 Annual Meeting of our
stockholders and addresses the material terms of the reverse stock split
described below. For a complete description of the reverse stock split, you
should carefully read the proxy statement and all of its exhibits. This summary
is qualified in its entirety by reference to the more detailed information
appearing elsewhere in, or accompanying, the proxy statement, including the
financial statements in our annual report, which accompanies and is incorporated
by reference into the proxy statement. References to the "Corporation," "us,"
"we," "our" or "Lynch Interactive" refers to Lynch Interactive Corporation, a
Delaware corporation.
REVERSE STOCK SPLIT; "GOING DARK"; "PINK SHEET" QUOTATION
Our Board of Directors has authorized, subject to stockholder approval
and subsequent final action by our Board of Directors, a 1-for-100 reverse stock
split of our Common Stock. Stockholders who own fewer than 100 shares at the
effective time of the reverse stock split will receive a cash payment equal to
the fair market value of the shares they hold, as described in more detail in
the proxy statement. Stockholders who own 100 or more shares of our Common Stock
at the effective time of the reverse stock split will remain stockholders, will
continue to hold whole and fractional shares, and will not be entitled to
receive any cash for their fractional share interests resulting from the reverse
stock split. Our shares may then be quoted in the "pink sheets," but initially
at a price approximately 100 times their current price on the AMEX. In addition,
the spread between the bid and asked prices of our Common Stock may be wider
than on the AMEX and the liquidity of our shares may be less. In order to
facilitate future quotation of our Common Stock in the pink sheets and to
eliminate any then existing fractional shares at some time after the reverse
stock is completed, we may effect a forward stock split.
If consummated, the reverse stock split would be part of a "going dark"
plan. Following the reverse stock split, we would have fewer than 300 holders of
record and would be eligible to terminate the registration of our Common Stock
under the Exchange Act. We would then "go dark," i.e., become a non-reporting
company for purposes of the Exchange Act. This will eliminate the significant
expense required to comply with public reporting and related requirements
including, but not limited to, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our Board of
Directors has concluded that the cost associated with being a reporting company
is not justified by its benefits in view of the limited trading activity in our
Common Stock, and has determined that the reverse stock split is fair to and in
the best interests of our stockholders. See also the information in the sections
"Recommendation of Our Board of Directors" and "Fairness of the Reverse Stock
Split."
If we "go dark," we intend voluntarily to disseminate press releases,
quarterly financial statements and audited annual financial statements to our
stockholders and the investment community generally to facilitate quotation of
our shares in the pink sheets.
The amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation that would
effect the 1-for-100 reverse split would also include a standing option for us
to repurchase any shares of Common Stock proposed to be transferred by a
remaining stockholder if such proposed transfer would cause the number of
holders of record of our Common Stock to equal or exceed 300. The price to be
paid for the shares pursuant to this option would be equal to (i) the mean
between the bid and asked prices (as published in the pink sheets) averaged over
the 20 trading days on which the shares of Common Stock were actually quoted
immediately preceding the date of exercise of the option or, (ii) if the Common
Stock is not then quoted in the pink sheets, or if such determination cannot
otherwise be made, the fair market value of such shares as determined by our
Board of Directors in good faith.
-1-
The members of our Board of Directors, including Mario J. Gabelli (who
may be deemed to be a controlling stockholder of ours), have indicated that they
intend to vote, or cause to be voted, the shares of our Common Stock that they
directly or indirectly control in favor of the reverse stock split. The shares
of our Common Stock beneficially owned by directors represent approximately 26%
of our outstanding voting securities. This percentage will not materially change
as a result of the reverse stock split. See also the information in the section
"Special Interests of Affiliated Persons in the Transaction."
The reverse stock split is not expected to affect our current business
plan or operations, except for the anticipated cost and management time savings
associated with termination of our public reporting company obligations. See
also the information in the section "Structure of Proposal."
Our Board of Directors has retained the authority to determine whether
and when to file the amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation with
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to effect the reverse stock
split, notwithstanding the authorization of the reverse stock split by our
stockholders. Our Board of Directors may abandon the proposal at any time
without further action by our stockholders, or may file the amendment effecting
the proposal at any time without further notice to or action on the part of our
stockholders. The date on which the amendment to our Restated Certificate of
Incorporation is filed with the Office of the Secretary of State of Delaware is
referred to herein as the Effective Date. Please see the section of the proxy
statement entitled "Structure of the Proposal," for a more detailed discussion
of the procedures to effect the reverse stock split.
Our Board of Directors has retained Caymus Partners LLC to provide an
opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the reverse stock
split to our stockholders. Our Board of Directors has set the cash consideration
to be paid for fractional shares held by holders of less than one whole share
resulting from the reverse stock split to be the greater of (i) $29.00 per share
or (ii) 120% of the average of the closing prices per share of our Common Stock
on the AMEX over the last 20 days immediately preceding the Effective Date on
which the shares of Common Stock were actually traded, which amount the Board of
Directors believes to represent, and is referred to hereinafter as the "fair
market value" per share of our Common Stock. Our Board of Directors made this
determination in good faith, based upon the fairness opinion and other factors
it deemed relevant, as described in more detail in the section "Fairness of the
Reverse Stock Split." As our Board of Directors has retained the authority to
determine when, and if, to consummate the reverse stock split, the exact amount
of cash consideration to be received by our stockholders will depend on the
selected Effective Date. For example, if the Effective Date had been April 11,
2005, the fair market value to be paid as cash compensation to the stockholders
would have been $29.66 per share of Common Stock.
Our stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights under either our
Restated Certificate of Incorporation or our Bylaws, as amended, or under the
Delaware General Corporation Law, even if they dissent on approval of the
reverse stock split. See also the information in the section "Appraisal and
Dissenters' Rights."
-2-
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETING AND THE PROPOSALS
Q: WHAT IS THE TIME AND PLACE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING?
A: The Annual Meeting will be held at the Greenwich Library, 101 West Putnam
Avenue, Greenwich, Connecticut, on Thursday, June 2, 2005, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern
time.
Q: WHAT PROPOSALS WILL BE VOTED ON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING?
A: You are being asked to vote on the approval of a proposed amendment to our
Restated Certificate of Incorporation that will provide for a 1-for-100 reverse
stock split. You are also being asked to re-approve the Principal Executive
Bonus Plan, which was first approved in 2000, to elect seven directors and to
transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
Q: WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO "GO DARK" AND WHAT ARE ITS BENEFITS?
A: If the reverse stock split is consummated, we would have fewer than 300
holders of record, and we would be eligible to delist from the AMEX and to
terminate the registration of our Common Stock under the Exchange Act, so that,
among other things, we would not have to comply with the requirements of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Additionally, the shares of our Common Stock would
trade, if at all, only in the pink sheets or in privately negotiated sales. If
we delist and deregister our Common Stock, we currently intend voluntarily to
disseminate press releases, quarterly financial statements and audited annual
financial statements to our stockholders and the investment community generally.
The benefits of delisting and deregistering include:
o Eliminating the costs associated with filing documents under the
Exchange Act with the SEC, including but not limited to reporting
transactions of our executive officers, directors, and 10%
stockholders relating to our Common Stock;
o Eliminating the costs of compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley and related
regulations;
o Reducing the direct and indirect costs of administering our
stockholder accounts and responding to stockholder requests;
o Affording our stockholders who hold fewer than 100 shares immediately
before the reverse stock split the opportunity to receive cash for
their shares without having to pay brokerage commissions and other
transaction costs; and
o Permitting our management to focus its time and resources on our
long-term business goals and objectives.
Q: WHAT ARE THE DISADVANTAGES TO "GOING DARK"?
A. Some of the disadvantages include:
o Stockholders owning fewer than 100 shares of our Common Stock before
the reverse stock split will not have an opportunity to liquidate
their shares after the reverse stock split at a time and for a price
of their own choosing; instead, they will be cashed out and will no
longer be our stockholders and will not have the opportunity to
participate in or benefit from any future potential appreciation in
our value.
o Stockholders who will continue to be our stockholders following the
reverse stock split will no longer have available all of the
information regarding our operations and results that is currently
available in our filings with the SEC, although, as indicated above,
we currently intend to continue voluntarily to disseminate press
releases, quarterly and audited annual financial statements; we will
no longer be subject to the liability provisions of the Exchange Act;
we will no longer be subject to the provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley; and
our officers will no longer be required to certify the accuracy of
our financial statements;
o Our stockholders following the reverse stock split will no longer be
able to trade our securities on the AMEX but only in the pink sheets
or in privately negotiated transactions, the effect of which may be a
significant reduction in liquidity;
-3-
o We may have less flexibility in attracting and retaining executives
and other employees because equity-based incentives (such as stock
options, if we ever choose to use them) tend not to be viewed as
having the same value in a non-reporting company; and
o We will be less likely to be able to use shares of our Common Stock
to acquire other companies.
See "Fairness of the Reverse Stock Split."
Q. IS THERE A METHOD TO PREVENT THE NUMBER OF HOLDERS OF RECORD FROM REACHING
300, THEREBY MAKING US A REPORTING COMPANY AGAIN? A. We need to be able to keep
the number of holders of record of our Common Stock below 300 in order to avoid
re-registering under the Exchange Act, filing public reports and complying with
Sarbanes-Oxley. The amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation that
would effect the 1-for-100 reverse stock split would also include a standing
option for us to repurchase any shares of Common Stock proposed to be
transferred by a remaining stockholder if such proposed transfer would cause the
number of holders of record of our Common Stock to equal or exceed 300. The
price to be paid for the shares pursuant to this option would be equal to (i)
the mean between the bid and asked prices (as published in the pink sheets)
averaged over the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date of exercise of
the option on which the shares of Common Stock were actually traded or (ii) if
the Common Stock is not then traded in the pink sheets, the fair market value
for such shares as determined by our Board of Directors in good faith.
Q: LYNCH INTERACTIVE HAS BEEN PUBLICLY HELD SINCE 1999; WHAT ARE SOME OF THE
REASONS FOR DELISTING AND DEREGISTERING NOW?
A: Our Board of Directors believes that we currently derive no material benefit
from our status as a public reporting company. In addition to the direct
financial burden of being a public reporting company, the low trading volume in
our Common Stock has not provided significant liquidity to our stockholders. Our
Board of Directors does not expect that we will use our shares of Common Stock
as consideration for acquisitions or other transactions in the foreseeable
future. Finally, the low trading volume results in substantial spikes in the
trading price when actual trades are made on the AMEX. See information in the
section "Background of the Proposal."
Q: AS A STOCKHOLDER, WHAT WILL I RECEIVE IN THE TRANSACTION?
A: If the reverse stock split is consummated and if you own fewer than 100
shares of our Common Stock immediately before the effective time of the reverse
stock split, you will receive cash equal to the fair market value, without
interest, for the shares of Common Stock that you own and you will cease to be
our stockholder. The fair market value to be received for fractional shares
shall be equal to the greater of (i) $29.00 per share or (ii) 120% of the
average of the closing price per share of our Common Stock on the AMEX over the
20 trading days immediately preceding the Effective Date on which the shares of
Common Stock were actually traded. As our Board of Directors has retained the
authority to determine when, and if, to consummate the transaction, the exact
amount of cash you would receive will depend on the selected Effective Date. If
you own 100 or more shares of our Common Stock immediately prior to the
effective time of the reverse stock split you will continue to be our
stockholder and you will not receive any cash payment for your shares in
connection with the transaction.
Q: IF I OWN FEWER THAN 100 SHARES, IS THERE ANY WAY I CAN CONTINUE TO BE A
STOCKHOLDER AFTER THE TRANSACTION?
A: If you currently own fewer than 100 shares of our Common Stock, you can
continue to be our stockholder after the effective time of the reverse stock
split by purchasing in the open market or privately sufficient additional shares
to cause you to own a minimum of 100 shares in a single account immediately
prior to the effective time of the reverse stock split. However, we cannot
assure you that any shares will be available for Purchase.
-4-
Q: IS THERE ANYTHING I CAN DO TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE OPPORTUNITY TO RECEIVE
CASH FOR MY SHARES AS A RESULT OF THE TRANSACTION IF I CURRENTLY OWN MORE THAN
100 SHARES? A: If you currently own 100 or more shares, you can receive cash for
shares you own as of the effective time of the reverse stock split if you reduce
your ownership of our Common Stock to fewer than 100 shares by selling such
shares in the open market or otherwise transferring them. However, we cannot
assure you that any purchaser for your shares will be available.
Q: WHAT HAPPENS IF I OWN A TOTAL OF 100 OR MORE SHARES BENEFICIALLY, BUT I HOLD
FEWER THAN 100 SHARES OF RECORD IN MY NAME AND FEWER THAN 100 SHARES WITH MY
BROKER IN "STREET NAME"? A: An example of this would be that you have 40 shares
registered in your own name with our transfer agent and you have 60 shares
registered with your broker in "street name." Accordingly, you are the
beneficial owner of a total of 100 shares, but you do not own 100 shares of
record or beneficially in the same name. If this is the case, as a result of the
transaction, you would receive cash for the 40 shares you hold of record. You
will also receive cash for the 60 shares held in street name if your broker or
other nominee accepts our offer for beneficial owners of fewer than 100 shares
of our Common Stock held in the broker's or nominee's name to receive cash for
fractional shares. You can avoid this result by consolidating your holdings of
100 or more shares in a single account.
Q: WHAT ARE THE FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE TRANSACTION TO ME?
A: Stockholders who do not receive any cash as a result of the reverse stock
split should not recognize any gain or loss as a result of the reverse stock
split. For stockholders who will continue to be our stockholders after the
transaction, their tax basis and holding period in the shares of our Common
Stock should remain unchanged after the reverse stock split. Stockholders who
will be paid cash for their shares of our Common Stock as a result of this
transaction will generally recognize capital gain or loss for federal income tax
purposes. Such gain or loss will be measured by the difference between the cash
received by such stockholder and the aggregate adjusted tax basis of the shares
of Common Stock held. To review the material tax consequences of the reverse
stock split in greater detail, please read the discussion under the section
"Material Federal Income Tax Consequences".
Q: AM I ENTITLED TO DISSENTERS' RIGHTS?
A: Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, our stockholders are not
entitled to dissenter's rights in connection with the reverse stock split.
Q: WHAT IS THE VOTING RECOMMENDATION OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS?
A: Our Board of Directors has determined that the reverse stock split is
advisable and in the best interests of our stockholders. Our Board of Directors
has therefore unanimously approved the reverse stock split and recommends that
you vote "FOR" approval of this matter at the Annual Meeting. See the
information in the section "Recommendation of our Board of Directors."
Our Board of Directors also recommends that you vote "FOR" the re-approval of
the Principal Executive Bonus Plan and "FOR" the election to the Board of
Directors of each nominee named in the proxy statement.
Q: WERE THERE ADDITIONAL FACTORS SUPPORTING OUR BOARD'S DETERMINATION TO
RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT?
A: In addition to considering the advantages and disadvantages of the reverse
stock split discussed above, our Board of Directors based its recommendation to
approve such transaction on the following:
o The financial presentations and analyses of management and the opinion
of Caymus Partners LLC, the financial advisor retained in connection
with the reverse stock split, and our Board of Directors' discussions
and conclusions about the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the proposed fair market value to be paid to our stockholders who own
fewer than 100 shares of our Common Stock immediately before the
effective time of the reverse stock split; and
-5-
o Attempts of our stockholders to achieve liquidity through the AMEX would
likely be frustrated due to the low average daily trading volume of
shares of our Common Stock, where only a small number of shares could be
purchased or sold without the risk of significantly increasing or
decreasing the trading price.
Q: WHAT IS THE TOTAL COST TO US OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT?
A: We estimate that the total cash outlay of the reverse stock split will be
approximately $477,000, of which we will pay approximately $340,000 to cash out
fractional shares, based on recent trading prices of shares of our Common Stock,
and approximately $137,000 in legal, financial advisor and other costs to effect
the proposed transaction. This total amount could be larger or smaller if the
number of fractional shares that will be outstanding upon the reverse stock
split changes as a result of purchases or sales of shares of our Common Stock.
Q: WHAT SHARES CAN I VOTE?
A: You may vote all shares of our Common Stock that you own as of the close of
business on the record date, which is April 29, 2005. These shares include (1)
shares held directly in your name as the "holder of record," and (2) shares held
for you in "street name" as the "beneficial owner" through a nominee (such as a
broker or bank). Nominees may have different procedures and, if you own shares
in street name, you should contact them prior to voting.
Q: SHOULD I SEND IN MY STOCK CERTIFICATES NOW?
A: No. Once the reverse stock split is consummated, we will send instructions
on where to send your stock certificates and how you will receive any cash
payments you may be entitled to receive.
Q: CAN I VOTE MY SHARES WITHOUT ATTENDING THE ANNUAL MEETING?
A: Whether you hold your shares directly as the stockholder of record or
beneficially in "street name," you may direct your vote without attending the
Annual Meeting. You may vote by signing your proxy card or, for shares held in
"street name," by signing the voting instruction card included by your broker or
nominee and mailing it in the enclosed, preaddressed envelope. If you provide
specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted as you instruct. If you
sign but do not provide instructions, your shares will be voted as described
below in "How are votes counted?"
Q: CAN I CHANGE MY VOTE?
A: You may change your proxy instructions at any time prior to the vote at the
Annual Meeting. For shares held directly in your name, you may change your vote
by signing a new proxy card bearing a later date (which automatically revokes
the earlier dated proxy card) or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in
person. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not cause your previously signed
proxy card to be revoked unless you specifically so request. For shares held
beneficially by you in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new
voting instructions to your broker or nominee.
Q: WHAT ARE THE VOTING REQUIREMENTS TO APPROVE THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT,
RE-APPROVE THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN AND ELECT DIRECTORS?
A: Approval of the reverse stock split will require the affirmative vote of a
majority of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock. Re-approval of the
Principal Executive Bonus Plan will require the affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast on such proposal at the Annual Meeting. The election of
nominees to our Board of Directors will be determined by a plurality of the
votes of the shares of our Common Stock present in person or represented by
proxy at the Annual Meeting.
Q: HOW ARE VOTES COUNTED?
A: You may vote "FOR," "AGAINST" or "ABSTAIN" on the reverse stock split and
re-approval of the Principal Executive Bonus Plan. If you "ABSTAIN" on the
proposal to approve the reverse stock split, it has the same effect as a vote
"AGAINST." If you "ABSTAIN" on the proposal to re-approve the Principal
Executive Bonus Plan, it will have no effect on the votes cast. If you sign and
-6-
date your proxy card with no further instructions, your shares will be voted
"FOR" the approval of the transaction, "FOR" the re-approval of the Principal
Executive Bonus Plan and "FOR" the election of each nominee for our Board of
Directors named in the proxy statement, all in accordance with the
recommendations of our Board of Directors.
Q: WHERE CAN I FIND THE VOTING RESULTS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING?
A: We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and publish
final results in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC or by amending
the Schedule 13E-3 filed in connection with the reverse stock split.
Q: IF THE TRANSACTION IS APPROVED BY OUR STOCKHOLDERS, MUST IT BE CONSUMMATED
BY OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS?
A: No. Our Board of Directors may abandon the reverse stock split at any time
or may proceed with it at any time without further notice to or action on the
part of our stockholders.
Q: HOW WILL WE OPERATE AFTER THE TRANSACTION?
A: If the reverse stock split is consummated, and assuming that we have fewer
than 300 holders of record after the transaction, we would delist, deregister
and no longer be subject to the reporting and related requirements under the
federal securities laws that are applicable to reporting companies. We do not
anticipate that the reverse stock split will have an effect in the conduct of
our business. We expect our business and operations to continue as they are
currently being conducted.
-7-
LYNCH INTERACTIVE CORPORATION
401 THEODORE FREMD AVENUE
RYE, NEW YORK 10580
--------------------
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement is furnished by our Board of Directors in
connection with the solicitation of proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of
stockholders to be held at Greenwich Library, 101 West Putnam Avenue, Greenwich,
Connecticut, on Thursday, June 2, 2005, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern time, and at any
adjournments thereof. This proxy statement and the accompanying proxy is first
being mailed to holders of our shares of Common Stock on or about April 29,
2005.
You are being asked to vote on the following proposals:
1. To approve, subject to final action by our Board of Directors, an
amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect a
1-for-100 reverse stock split of our Common Stock with the result
that (i) holdings prior to such split of fewer than 100 shares of
Common Stock will be converted to a fractional share, which will be
immediately cancelled and converted into a right to receive the
cash consideration described in this proxy statement, and (ii) we
will have fewer than 300 holders of record, allowing us to delist
the Common Stock from the AMEX and to deregister the Common Stock
under the Exchange Act, and to avoid many of the costs associated
with being a public reporting company. The filing of the amendment
to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Office of the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, and the subsequent
delisting of our shares of Common Stock from the AMEX and the
deregistration of the Common Stock under the Exchange Act are
sometimes collectively referred to in this proxy statement as the
"transaction."
2. To re-approve the Principal Executive Bonus Plan.
3. To elect members of our Board of Directors to serve until the next
Annual Meeting of our stockholders and until their successors are
duly elected and qualify.
4. To transact such other business as may properly come before the
Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof.
THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION, AND NEITHER THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION HAS
PASSED UPON THE FAIRNESS OR MERITS OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT OR UPON THE
ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. ANY
REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.
PROXIES AND VOTING PROCEDURES
Only stockholders of record at the close of business on April 29, 2005,
the record date, are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting
of our stockholders. As of the close of business on such date, 2,752,251 shares
of our Common Stock were outstanding and eligible to be voted. Each share of our
Common Stock is entitled to one vote on each matter submitted to our
stockholders. Where a specific instruction is given in the proxy, the proxy will
be voted in accordance with such instruction. If no such instruction is given,
the proxy will be voted FOR the reverse stock split described below, FOR the
nominees to the Board of Directors named below, and FOR re-approval of the
Principal Executive Bonus Plan, and in the discretion of the proxies with
respect to any other matter that is properly brought before the Annual Meeting.
-8-
Any stockholder giving a proxy may revoke it at any time before it is voted at
the Annual Meeting by delivering a written notice of revocation or a duly
executed proxy bearing a later date to our Corporate Secretary or by appearing
at the Annual Meeting and revoking his or her proxy and voting in person.
In order to be approved by our stockholders, the reverse stock split
must receive the votes of a majority of the shares of our Common Stock issued
and outstanding, so abstaining has the effect of a negative vote. In order to
re-approve the Principal Executive Bonus Plan, the proposal has to receive the
votes of a majority of the votes cast, so abstaining will have no effect. The
candidates for election to our Board of Directors who receive the highest number
of affirmative votes will be elected. Shares held by brokers who do not have
discretionary authority to vote on a particular matter and who have not received
voting instructions from their customers, referred to as "broker non-votes," are
not counted or deemed to be present or represented for purposes of determining
whether that matter has been approved by stockholders, but they are counted as
present for purposes of determining the existence of a quorum at the Annual
Meeting.
An automated system administered by our transfer agent tabulates the
votes.
COST OF PROXY SOLICITATION
This solicitation of proxies is made on behalf of our Board of
Directors, and the cost thereof will be borne by us. We have employed the firm
of Morrow & Co. Inc., 445 Park Avenue, 5th Floor, New York, New York, 10022, to
assist in this solicitation at a cost of $5,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses. We
will also reimburse brokerage firms and nominees for their expenses in
forwarding proxy material to beneficial owners of our Common Stock. In addition,
our officers and employees, none of whom will receive any compensation therefor
in addition to their regular compensation, may solicit proxies. The solicitation
will be made by mail and, in addition, may be made by telegrams, personal
interviews and by telephone.
-9-
PROPOSAL NO. 1
AMENDMENT TO
RESTATED CERTIFICATE ON INCORPORATION
TO EFFECT A REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
We are seeking approval of the reverse stock split described below. If
approved by our stockholders, and upon subsequent final action of our Board of
Directors, we will file an amendment to our Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to effect a 1-for-100 reverse stock split of our Common Stock. Our
stockholders who own fewer than 100 shares of our Common Stock immediately prior
to the effective time of the reverse stock split will receive a cash payment
equal to the fair market value of their shares and will cease to be our
stockholders. For purposes of calculating cash payments for fractional shares,
the "fair market value" shall equal such fraction multiplied by the greater of
(i) $29.00 per share or (ii) 120% of the average of the closing price per share
of our Common Stock on the AMEX over the 20 trading days on which the shares of
Common Stock were actually traded immediately preceding the Effective Date. Our
stockholders who own 100 or more shares of our Common Stock immediately prior to
the effective time of the reverse stock split will continue to be our
stockholders and will not be entitled to receive any cash for their fractional
share interests resulting from the transaction. In order to facilitate future
quotation of our shares of Common Stock in the pink sheets and to eliminate
fractional shares, at some time after the reverse stock split is effectuated, we
may effect a forward stock split.
The amendment to our Restated Certificate of Incorporation would also
include a standing option for us to repurchase any shares of Common Stock
proposed to be transferred if the proposed transfer would cause the number of
holders of record of our Common Stock to equal or exceed 300. The price to be
paid for the shares pursuant to this option would be equal to (i) the mean
between the bid and asked prices (as published in the pink sheets) averaged over
the 20 trading days immediately preceding the date of exercise of the option on
which the shares of Common Stock were actually quoted or (ii) if the Common
Stock is not then quoted in the pink sheets, or if such determination cannot
otherwise be made, the fair market value for such shares as determined by our
Board of Directors in good faith.
The following discussion describes in more detail the reverse stock
split and its advantages and disadvantages.
SPECIAL FACTORS
BACKGROUND OF THE PROPOSAL
In recent years, our Common Stock has attracted only limited market
research attention. There has been low trading volume on the AMEX, resulting in
an inefficient market for our shares. The low trading volume and market
capitalization have limited our ability to use our Common Stock as a significant
part of our employee compensation and incentives strategy or as consideration
for acquisitions. Our Board of Directors does not presently intend to raise
capital through sales of equity securities in a public offering. Also, our Board
of Directors has determined that given our size and the absence of sustained
interest by securities research analysts and other factors, we have not enjoyed
an appreciable enhancement in our company image, which usually results from
having reporting company status.
We incur substantial direct and indirect costs associated with
compliance with the Exchange Act's filing and reporting requirements imposed on
reporting companies. The cost of this compliance has increased significantly
with the implementation of the provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley, including but not
limited to, significant costs and burdens of compliance with the forthcoming
internal control audit requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, more
commonly referred to in this proxy statement as Section 404. While the SEC has
deferred for one year the application of Section 404 to non-accelerated filers
like us, the cost of implementing Section 404's internal control procedures is
expected to be unduly burdensome and costly, considering our size and our
decentralized control environment. We have already incurred, and would continue
to incur, substantial costs to implement these procedures unless and until we
delist and deregister. In addition, we incur direct and indirect expenses
associated with listing the shares of our Common Stock on the AMEX. We have also
incurred substantial indirect costs as a result of, among other things, the
executive time expended to prepare and review our public filings.
In light of these circumstances, our Board of Directors believes that
it is in our best interest to undertake the reverse stock split, enabling us to
deregister our Common Stock under the Exchange Act. Deregistering will relieve
us of the administrative burden, cost and competitive disadvantages associated
with filing reports and otherwise complying with the requirements imposed under
the Exchange Act and Sarbanes-Oxley.
Our Board of Directors began considering the issues that led to this
proposal during 2004. At that time, officers and directors began to evaluate
whether we were achieving the benefits of being a publicly traded company when
weighed against the costs of maintaining our public reporting obligations,
coupled with the limited liquidity and trading volatility associated with the
limited trading volume of our Common Stock on the AMEX. They also consulted with
counsel about alternatives and procedures for delisting and deregistering our
shares. Also during 2004, our management met several times with Deloitte &
Touche LLP, our independent auditors, to discuss a comprehensive program to
document, evaluate and test our systems of internal controls for Section 404
readiness and ultimate compliance. Our management also retained consultants to
assist us in preparing to comply with the requirements of Section 404, including
preparing a preliminary project and cost plan.
On January 12, 2005, at a meeting of the Audit Committee of our Board
of Directors, Deloitte & Touche LLP discussed new accounting pronouncements
regarding the SEC's final rules for implementing Section 404.
Finally, on March 9, 2005, our Board of Directors discussed the
increasing costs of operating as a reporting company and evaluated the merits of
delisting and deregistering our shares of Common Stock. In addition to the
reverse stock split, our Board of Directors considered numerous alternatives to
achieve this result. After a full discussion, our Board of Directors concluded
that the most viable alternative was a reverse stock split. Our Board of
Directors authorized our management to retain Caymus Partners LLC as its
financial advisor.
On April 17, 2005, our Board of Directors, received the report and
opinion of and approved the opinion of the financial advisor regarding the
fairness from a financial point of view of the proposed cash consideration to be
paid to our stockholders for fractional shares. Thereafter on April 19, 2005,
the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, acting pursuant to authority
delegated to it by the Board of Directors, met again with the financial advisor
and approved the report and opinion.
PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSAL
The primary purpose of the reverse stock split is to enable us to
reduce the number of our holders of record to fewer than 300. This will allow:
o termination of the registration of our Common Stock under
Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act and suspend our duties to
file periodic reports with the SEC and comply with
Sarbanes-Oxley;
o termination of the listing of our shares on the AMEX and the
expenses associated with listing thereon;
o elimination of the administrative burden and expense of
maintaining small stockholders' accounts; and
o small stockholders to liquidate their shares of our Common
Stock at a fair price, without having to pay brokerage
commissions, as we will pay all related transaction costs.
-11-
STRUCTURE OF THE PROPOSAL
Our Board of Directors has approved the submission of the reverse stock
split to a vote of our stockholders and recommends the transaction for your
approval. Our Board of Directors has, however, retained the final authority to
determine if and when to file the amendment to our Restated Certificate of
Incorporation with the Office of the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware
in order to effectuate the reverse stock split. Notwithstanding authorization of
the proposed transaction by our current stockholders, our Board of Directors may
abandon the reverse stock split at any time without further action by our
stockholders, or may file the amendment at any time without further notice to or
action by our stockholders.
As of April 19, there were approximately 2,752,251 shares of our Common
Stock outstanding and approximately 889 holders of record. As of such date,
approximately 690 holders of record held fewer than 100 shares of our Common
Stock. As a result, we believe that the reverse stock split will reduce the
number of our holders of record to approximately 200, while only reducing the
number of outstanding shares to approximately 274,100 (2,741,000 on a
pre-reverse stock split basis).
EFFECTS ON STOCKHOLDERS WITH FEWER THAN 100 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
If the reverse stock split is implemented, stockholders holding fewer
than 100 shares of our Common Stock immediately before the reverse stock split,
sometimes referred to as Cashed Out Stockholders, will:
o not receive a fractional share of Common Stock as a result of the
reverse stock split;
o receive cash equal to the fair market value of the shares of our
Common Stock they held immediately before the reverse stock split
in accordance with the procedures described in this proxy
statement;
o not be required to pay any service charges or brokerage
commissions in connection with the reverse stock split;
o not receive any interest on the cash payments made as a result of
the reverse stock split; and
o have no further ownership interest in our Corporation and no
further voting rights.
Cash payments to Cashed Out Stockholders as a result of the reverse
stock split will be subject to income taxation. For a discussion of the federal
income tax consequences of the reverse stock split, please see the section of
this proxy statement entitled "Material Federal Income Tax Consequences."
If you do not currently hold at least 100 shares of Common Stock in a
single account and you want to continue to hold shares of our Common Stock after
the reverse stock split, you may do so by taking either of the following
actions:
1. Purchase a sufficient number of additional shares of our Common
Stock in the open market or privately and have them registered in
your name and consolidated with your current record account, if
you are a record holder, or have them entered in your account
with a nominee (such as your broker or bank) in which you hold
your current shares so that you hold at least 100 shares of our
Common Stock in your account immediately before the effective
time of the reverse stock split; or
2. If you hold an aggregate of 100 or more shares in two or more
accounts, consolidate your accounts so that you hold at least 100
shares of our Common Stock in one account immediately before the
effective time of the reverse stock split.
-12-
You will have to act far enough in advance so that the purchase of any
shares of our Common Stock and/or consolidation of your accounts containing
shares of our Common Stock is completed by the close of business prior to the
effective time of the reverse stock split.
EFFECTS ON STOCKHOLDERS WITH 100 OR MORE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
If the reverse stock split is consummated, stockholders holding 100 or
more shares of our Common Stock immediately before the reverse stock split,
otherwise referred to as Continuing Stockholders, will:
o continue to be our stockholders and will be the only persons
entitled to vote as stockholders after the consummation of the
reverse stock split;
o not receive cash for any of their shares of our Common Stock,
including fractional shares; and
o likely experience a reduction in liquidity (which may be
significant) with respect to their shares of our Common Stock,
because if our Common Stock continues to be quoted, it will be
quoted in the pink sheets, and there may be no trading market at
all in our Common Stock. In order for our Common Stock to be
quoted in the pink sheets, one or more broker-dealers must act as
a market maker and sponsor our shares. However, because we will
not file reports with the SEC, there can be no assurance that any
broker-dealer will be willing to act as a market maker for our
shares of Common Stock, even if we voluntarily disseminate press
releases, quarterly financial statements and audited annual
financial statements to our stockholders and the investment
community generally.
EFFECTS ON LYNCH INTERACTIVE
If consummated, the reverse stock split will affect the registration of
our Common Stock under the Exchange Act, as we intend to apply for termination
of such registration as soon as practicable after the consummation of the
reverse stock split. We also intend to delist our Common Stock from the AMEX.
We have no current plans to issue additional shares of our Common Stock
after the reverse stock split, but we reserve the right to do so at any time and
from time to time at such prices and on such terms as our Board of Directors
determines to be in our best interests. Continuing Stockholders will not have
any preemptive or other preferential rights to purchase any shares of our Common
Stock that we may issue in the future, unless such rights are specifically
granted to the stockholders.
After the reverse stock split has been consummated, we intend, from
time to time, to repurchase shares of our Common Stock pursuant to our share
repurchase program, in privately negotiated sales or in other transactions. The
timing of when we seek to repurchase shares in the future will depend on a
number of factors, including our financial condition, operating results and
available capital at the time. In addition, we may be required at various times
in the future to exercise our option to repurchase shares of our Common Stock in
order to prevent the number of our holders of record from equaling or exceeding
300. We cannot predict the likelihood, timing or prices of such purchases and
they may well occur without regard to our financial condition or available cash
at the time.
We expect that upon the completion of the reverse stock split, the
shares of our Common Stock beneficially owned by our directors and executive
offices will comprise approximately 26% of the then issued and outstanding
shares of our Common Stock, which is approximately the same percentage they
comprised prior to the effective time of the reverse stock split.
The par value of the shares of our Common Stock will be $0.01 per share
following consummation of the reverse stock split.
-13-
SCHEDULE 13E-3 FILING
The reverse stock split is considered a "going private" transaction as
defined in Rule 13e-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, because, if
consummated, it is intended to terminate the registration of our Common Stock
under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act and suspend our duty to file periodic
reports with the SEC. Consequently, we have filed a Rule 13e-3 Transaction
Statement on Schedule 13E-3 with the SEC.
ADVANTAGES OF THE PROPOSAL
COST SAVINGS
As a result of recent corporate governance scandals and the
legislative and litigation environment resulting from those scandals, the costs
of being a public reporting company in general, and the costs of our remaining a
public reporting company in particular, are expected to continue to increase in
the near future. Newly-enacted legislation, such as Sarbanes-Oxley, will likely
continue to have the effect of increasing the compliance burdens and potential
liabilities of being a public reporting company as well as increase audit fees
and other costs of compliance, such as securities counsel fees, increase outside
director fees and increase potential liability faced by our officers and
directors. We also incur substantial indirect costs as a result of, among other
things, our management's time expended to prepare and review our public filings.
As we have relatively few executive personnel, these indirect costs have been
substantial.
Our Board of Directors believes that by deregistering our shares of
Common Stock and suspending our periodic reporting obligations, we will realize
annual cost savings of approximately $1.7 million.
Estimated Ongoing Estimated Ongoing
Annual Costs of Annual Cost Savings
Normal Fees: of Remaining Listed from Delising
------------ ------------------- -------------------
AMEX listing fees $ 15,000 $ 15,000
Printing, mailing and filing costs 9,000 5,000
Audit fees 1,310,000 400,000
Other fees 15,000 10,000
----------- ----------
Subtotal $ 1,349,000 $ 430,000
----------- ----------
Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Fees:
-------------------------------
Attestation fees $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Consultants fees 270,000 270,000
---------- ----------
Subtotal $1,270,000 $1,270,000
---------- ----------
TOTAL $2,619,000 $1,700,000
========== ==========
These estimated annual cost savings reflect, among other things: (i) a
reduction in audit and related fees, (ii) the elimination of costs associated
with filing periodic reports with the SEC, (iii) the elimination of costs
associated with the listing of shares of our Common Stock on the AMEX and (iv)
the reduction in direct miscellaneous clerical and other expenses, including
printing, stock transfer and proxy solicitation expenses.
Preparing our compliance with Section 404 would require significant
expenditures during the initial fiscal year of compliance, including costs
related to computer software and hardware and fees to third parties for
compliance planning, assessment, documentation and testing. Management estimates
the increased fees to third parties during the initial year of compliance at
approximately $500,000. In addition, the estimated annual costs and cost savings
do not include other costs that management and the Board of Directors believe
are substantial, though difficult or impossible to quantify, such as internal
-14-
and outside legal expenses related to being a public reporting company,
management and internal clerical support time devoted to these issues, and the
increased risk of liability associated with being a reporting company.
The cost savings figures set forth above are only estimates. The actual
savings we realize from the transaction may be higher or lower than such
estimates, depending, among other things, on how promptly we consummate the
reverse stock split. Estimates of the annual savings to be realized are based
upon (i) the actual costs to us of the services and disbursements in each of the
categories listed above that are reflected in our financial records and (ii) the
allocation to each category of management's estimates of the portion of the
expenses and disbursements in such category believed to be solely or primarily
attributable to our public reporting company status. In some instances,
management's cost saving expectations were based on information provided or upon
verifiable assumptions. For example, our auditors, Deloitte & Touche, LLP, have
informed us, informally, that there will be a reduction in auditing fees if we
no longer continue as a public reporting company, though the estimated annual
savings were developed by management.
OPPORTUNITY FOR CASHED OUT STOCKHOLDERS TO SELL THEIR HOLDINGS AT OR
ABOVE THE THEN CURRENT MARKET TRADING PRICE, WITHOUT BROKERAGE FEES OR
COMMISSIONS
In connection with the reverse stock split, our Board of Directors
determined that a fair price for this transaction to Cashed Out Stockholders is
the fair market value as set forth in the section "Background of the Proposal"
of this proxy statement, because it provides them an opportunity to liquidate
their holdings at a fair price without brokerage commissions.
ABILITY TO CONTROL DECISION WHETHER TO REMAIN AS A STOCKHOLDER
Another factor considered by our Board of Directors in determining the
fairness of the transaction to our stockholders is that current holders of fewer
than 100 shares of our Common Stock can remain as our stockholders, even if the
reverse stock split is consummated, by acquiring additional shares so that they
own at least 100 shares of our Common Stock immediately before the effective
time of the reverse stock split. Conversely, stockholders that own 100 or more
shares of our Common Stock can reduce their holdings to fewer than 100 shares by
selling shares prior to the transaction. Our Board of Directors considered the
structure of the transaction to be fair to our stockholders because it allows
them a measure of control over the decision of whether to remain stockholders
after the transaction, or to receive the cash consideration offered in
connection with the reverse stock split, if the transaction is consummated.
OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY
Another advantage of effectuating the reverse stock split relates to
operational flexibility. Our Board of Directors believes that consummating the
reverse stock split and ending our status as a public reporting company would
enable management to concentrate its efforts on our long-term growth, free from
the constraints of public ownership. Our Board of Directors believes that we
will benefit more if their business decisions can be made with a view toward
long-term growth and with less emphasis on the effect of decisions upon the
short-term earnings and the consequent short-term effect of such earnings on the
market value of our Common Stock.
NO MATERIAL CHANGE IN PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP OF CONTINUING STOCKHOLDERS
Because only an estimated 11,000 out of 2,752,251 shares of our Common
Stock would be eliminated as a result of the reverse stock split, the percentage
ownership of Continuing Stockholders would be approximately the same as it was
prior to the reverse stock split. For example, our officers and directors
currently beneficially own approximately 26% of the outstanding shares of our
Common Stock and will beneficially own approximately 26% of our Common Stock
following completion of the reverse stock split. We believe that structuring the
transaction in a manner that preserves the approximate percentage ownership of
the Continuing Stockholders, whether affiliated or unaffiliated, supports the
fairness of the transaction to all the stockholders.
-15-
DISADVANTAGES OF THE PROPOSAL
SUBSTANTIAL OR COMPLETE REDUCTION OF PUBLIC SALE OPPORTUNITIES FOR OUR
STOCKHOLDERS
Following the transaction, we anticipate that the market for shares of
our Common Stock will be reduced and may be eliminated altogether. Our
stockholders may no longer have the option of selling their shares of our Common
Stock in a public market. While shares may be quoted in the pink sheets, any
such market for our Common Stock may be highly illiquid after the suspension of
our periodic reporting obligations, even though we currently intend voluntarily
to disseminate press releases, quarterly financial statements and audited annual
financial statements to our stockholders and the investment community generally.
LOSS OF CERTAIN PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Upon terminating the registration of our Common Stock under the
Exchange Act, our duty to file periodic reports with the SEC would be suspended.
Some of the information regarding our operations and financial results that is
currently available to the general public and our investors may not be available
after we have terminated our registration. Upon the suspension of our duty to
file reports with the SEC, investors seeking information about us may have to
contact us directly to receive such information. We cannot assure you that we
will provide the requested information to an investor. While our Board of
Directors acknowledges the circumstances in which such termination of publicly
available information may be disadvantageous to some of our stockholders, our
Board of Directors believes that the overall benefit to us of no longer being a
public reporting company substantially outweighs the disadvantages thereof.
POSSIBLE SIGNIFICANT DECLINE IN THE VALUE OF OUR SHARES
Because of the limited liquidity for the shares of our Common Stock
following the consummation of transaction and the diminished opportunity for our
stockholders to monitor actions of our management due to the lack of certain
public information, Continuing Stockholders may experience a significant
decrease in the value of their shares of our Common Stock.
INABILITY TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY FUTURE INCREASES IN VALUE OF OUR COMMON
STOCK
Cashed Out Stockholders will have no further financial interest in the
Corporation and thus will not have the opportunity to participate in any
potential appreciation in the value of our shares, including without limitation
if we were to become a public reporting company again in the future. Our Board
of Directors determined that this factor does not make the transaction unfair to
stockholders, because those stockholders who wish to remain stockholders after
the reverse stock split can do so by acquiring additional shares so that they
own at least 100 shares of our Common Stock before the reverse stock split.
OPINION OF FINANCIAL ADVISOR
Our Board of Directors retained Caymus Partners LLC to act as the
financial advisor to it and requested that it evaluate the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the reverse stock split. On April 17, 2005, the
financial advisor delivered its report and opinion to the effect that, as of the
date of the opinion and based upon and subject to the matters stated in the
opinion, the fractional share consideration equal to the fair market value
described in this proxy statement, would be fair, from a financial point of
view, to the holders of the our Common Stock. Thereafter on April 19, 2005, the
Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, acting pursuant to authority
delegated to it by the Board of Directors, met again with the financial advisor
and approved the report and option.
Under the terms of our agreement with Caymus Partners LLC, it will
receive a fee of $30,000, plus reimbursement of its reasonable out-of-pocket and
incidental expenses and it will issue to the Board of Directors an opinion both
at (or about) the date of this proxy statement and at (or about) the effective
time, if any, of the transaction, as to the fairness, from a financial point of
view, of the cash consideration to be paid to Cashed Out Stockholders in
-16-
exchange for their fractional shares. In connection with the engagement, we are
required to furnish the financial advisor with all information it reasonably
requests and we are responsible for the truth and accuracy, in all material
respects, of such information. We have agreed to indemnify the financial advisor
and its directors, officers, controlling persons (within the meaning of the
Exchange Act), other affiliates, agents and employees from any claims arising
from or related to the engagement, except where such claims are found to have
resulted primarily from the financial advisor's or its agent's, employee's or
affiliates' gross negligence or willful misconduct.
In April, 2003, an entity controlled by our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer made a $100,000 investment in five-year callable preferred
return securities issued by Caymus Partners LLC. The investment constituted
approximately 25% of the outside (non-member) capital raised by the firm and is
intended to yield 10% per annum (plus a 5% profits interest under certain
circumstances). Our Chairman also serves on Caymus Partners' Board of Advisors,
which is an advisory body without management or control functions. In addition,
we retained Caymus Securities LLC, an affiliate of the financial advisor, in
March 2005 to assist us in locating and negotiating a new line of credit to
replace our existing line with First National Bank of Omaha. If successful, the
financial advisor will receive a maximum fee of approximately $100,000 in
connection with this engagement. The Board of Directors does not believe that
any of these relationships is material or compromises the independence of the
financial advisor.
In arriving at its opinion, the financial advisor:
o Reviewed a draft of our proxy statement;
o Reviewed and analyzed certain publicly available financial and
other data with respect to Lynch Interactive and certain other
relevant historical operating data relating to us from published
sources;
o Conducted discussions with members of our senior management with
respect to our business prospects and financial outlook;
o Reviewed current and historical market prices and trading activity
of our Common Stock;
o Compared certain of our financial information with similar
information of certain other publicly traded companies; and
o Reviewed the financial terms, to the extent publicly available, of
selected precedent transactions which the financial advisor deemed
generally comparable to the reverse stock split.
In rendering its opinion, the financial advisor considered such other
information and conducted such other financial studies, analyses and
investigations as it deemed appropriate under the circumstances. In connection
with the review, the financial advisor relied upon and assumed the accuracy and
completeness of the financial and other information publicly available or
furnished to it by us or otherwise reviewed by it. The financial advisor did not
independently verify the accuracy or completeness of such information. Nor did
the financial advisor make or obtain any independent evaluations or appraisals
of any of our properties, assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise). In
addition, neither we nor our Board of Directors authorized the financial advisor
to solicit any indications of interest from any third party with respect to the
purchase of all or a part of our business. With respect to our financial
projections, the financial advisor assumed that they were reasonably prepared on
a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of our
management as to our future financial performance, and the financial advisor
expressed no opinion with respect to such forecasts or the assumptions on which
they were based. The opinion was necessarily based upon financial, economic,
market and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated on the date
of the opinion.
The financial advisor expressed no view as to, and its opinion did not
address, the relative merits of the reverse stock split as compared to any
alternative business strategies that might exist for us or the effect of any
transaction in which we might engage. The financial advisor did not express any
opinion as to the prices or price ranges at which our Common Stock has traded or
may trade in the future. Although the financial advisor evaluated the fractional
share consideration from a financial point of view, it was not asked to and did
-17-
not recommend the specific consideration payable in the reverse stock split. The
fractional share consideration was determined by our Board of Directors. No
limitations were imposed by us on the financial advisor with respect to the
investigations made or procedures followed by it in rendering its opinion.
THE FULL TEXT OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S WRITTEN OPINION IS ATTACHED AS
EXHIBIT B AND SHOULD BE READ CAREFULLY IN ITS ENTIRETY. THE FINANCIAL ADVISOR'S
OPINION IS DIRECTED TO OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND RELATES ONLY TO THE FAIRNESS
OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT FROM A FINANCIAL POINT OF VIEW, DOES NOT ADDRESS ANY
OTHER ASPECT OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT OR ANY RELATED TRANSACTION AND DOES NOT
CONSTITUTE A RECOMMENDATION TO ANY STOCKHOLDER WITH RESPECT TO THE REVERSE STOCK
SPLIT OR ANY OTHER MATTER BEING VOTED UPON BY OUR STOCKHOLDERS.
In preparing its opinion, the financial advisor performed a variety of
financial and comparative analyses. The summary of these analyses is not a
complete description of them. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex
analytical process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate
and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods
to the particular circumstances and, therefore, a fairness opinion is difficult
to summarize. Accordingly, the financial advisor believes that its analyses must
be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors
or focusing on information presented in tabular format, without considering all
analyses and factors or the narrative description of the analyses, could create
a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying its analyses and
opinion.
In its analyses, the financial advisor considered industry performance,
general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters
existing as of the date of its opinion. Many of these factors are beyond our
control. No company, transaction or business used in those analyses as a
comparison is identical to us or the reverse stock split, nor is an evaluation
of those analyses entirely mathematical; rather, the analyses involve complex
considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics
and other factors that could affect the acquisition, public trading or other
values of the companies, business segments or transactions being analyzed.
The estimates contained in the financial advisor's analyses and the
valuation ranges resulting from any particular analysis do not reflect actual
values or future results or values. Those values may be significantly more or
less favorable than those suggested by the analyses. In addition, analyses
relating to the value of businesses or securities do not purport to be
appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually
may be sold. Accordingly, these analyses and estimates are inherently subject to
substantial uncertainty.
The financial advisor's opinion and analyses were only one of several
factors considered by our Board of Directors in their evaluation of the reverse
stock split and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of our Board
of Directors or management with respect to the fractional share consideration to
be paid if the reverse stock split is consummated, or with respect to the
reverse stock split generally.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses that the
financial advisor performed in connection with the rendering of its opinion.
In connection with the rendering of its opinion, the financial advisor
took into account its assessment of general economic, market and financial
conditions as well as its experience in connection with similar transactions and
securities valuations generally and among other things:
o Reviewed and analyzed transaction documents provided by the
Corporation;
-18-
o Reviewed publicly available financial information and other data
including the Corporation's most recent audited financial
statements (Form 10-K);
o Reviewed and analyzed certain financial characteristics of
companies that were deemed to have characteristics comparable to
the Corporation;
o Reviewed and analyzed certain financial terms of acquisitions
involving target companies deemed to have characteristics
comparable to the Corporation;
o Reviewed and analyzed certain financial terms of reverse stock
splits in conjunction with going private transactions;
o Reviewed and discussed with representatives or management of the
Corporation certain financial and operating information furnished
by them, including assumptions with respect to the business,
operations and prospects of the Corporation;
o Reviewed and analyzed the projected cash flows of the Corporation;
o Considered the historical financial results and present financial
condition of Interactive;
o Reviewed the reported prices and trading activity for the shares
of the Corporation;
o Reviewed the prices for historical periods of companies having
characteristics comparable to the Corporation; and
o Performed such other analyses and examinations as Caymus Partners
deemed appropriate.
COMPARABLE COMPANY ANALYSIS
Caymus Partners' comparable company analysis was based on application
of valuation multiples from a selected group of comparable public companies (the
"Company Comparables" and the "Core LEC Comparables", as more fully described
below).
In selecting the Company Comparables, Caymus Partners searched
comprehensive lists and directories of public comparable companies. The
Comparable Company approach is based upon the theory that the stock price of
publicly-traded companies reflects all readily available information. In other
words, the market continuously evaluates each company and determines a current
value as reflected by the bids and offers for the company's stock.
Using this technique, publicly-traded companies are reviewed in order
to identify a peer group similar to the subject company. When selecting the
Company Comparables, certain determinant factors included: (i) participation in
the local exchange carrier ("LEC") industry with emphasis on the rural,
incumbent and competitive LEC markets; (ii) publicly available financial
information; and (iii) an active trading market. The Company Comparables
selected were:
- Alaska Comm. Systems Group Inc. (Nasdaq:ALSK)
- Commonwealth Telephone Enterprises Inc. (Nasdaq:CTCO)
- CT Communications Inc. (Nasdaq:CTCI)
- D&E Communications Inc. (Nasdaq:DECC)
- Fairpoint Communications Inc. (NYSE:FRP)
- Hector Communications Corp. (AMEX:HCT)
- Iowa Telecommunications Services Inc. (NYSE: IWA)
-19-
- Hickory Tech Corp. (Nasdaq:HTCO)
- North Pittsburgh Systems Inc. (Nasdaq:NPSI)
- Otelco, Inc. (AMEX: OTT)
- Shenandoah Telecommunications Co. (Nasdaq:SHEN)
- SureWest Communications (Nasdaq:SURW)
- Valor Communications Group Inc. (NYSE: VCG)
- Warwick Valley Telephone Co. (Nasdaq:WWVYE)
Caymus Partners then selected four companies of the 14 Company
Comparables to represent a more defined grouping of comparable companies ("Core
LEC Comparables").
The four Core LEC Comparables selected were:
- CT Communications Inc. (Nasdaq:CTCI)
- D&E Communications Inc. (Nasdaq:DECC)
- Hickory Tech Corp. (Nasdaq:HTCO)
- North Pittsburgh Systems Inc. (Nasdaq:NPSI)
No company included in the selected Company Comparables or Core LEC
Comparables is identical to the Corporation. In selecting and evaluating the
Company Comparables and Core LEC Comparables, Caymus Partners made subjective
judgments and assumptions with regard to industry performance, general business,
economical, market and financial conditions, and other matters. Because of the
inherent differences between business, operations, financial conditions and
prospects of the Corporation and those of the selected Company Comparables and
Core LEC Comparables, Caymus Partners believed it was inappropriate to, and
therefore did not, rely solely on the quantitative results of the Comparable
Company analysis.
For both the Company Comparables and the Core LEC Comparables, Caymus
Partners then compared market values, of, among other things, current enterprise
value (equity value plus total debt, minority interest, preferred stock, less
cash and cash equivalents) as multiples of the latest 12-month ("LTM") earnings
from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization, or EBITDA.
Caymus Partners applied a range of these multiples to the LTM EBITDA of
the Corporation to obtain an enterprise valuation range for the Corporation.
EBITDA was chosen because it is a more reliable indicator of value than other
factors such as revenue. Caymus Partners then calculated an equity value for the
Corporation by subtracting net debt, minority interest and preferred stock from
the enterprise value. The implied equity value per share for the Corporation
ranged from $24.53 to $31.36 (mean value of $27.95 per share) using multiples
derived from Company Comparables. The implied equity value per share for the
Corporation ranged from $19.07 to $27.26 (mean value of $23.17) using multiples
derived from the Core LEC Companies.
COMPARABLE TRANSACTIONS ANALYSIS
Caymus Partners' comparable transaction analysis was based on
application of valuation multiples from a select group of transactions deemed
relevant based on similar business operations and publicly available information
(the "Transaction Comparables").
Information is typically not disclosed for transactions involving a
private seller, even when the buyer is a public company, unless the acquisition
is deemed to be "material" for the acquirer. In addition to the lack of
information on comparable acquisitions, available information on public
companies may be outdated or incomplete. As a result, the selected Comparable
Transactions Analysis is typically limited to transactions involving the
acquisition of a public company, or substantially all of its assets, or the
acquisition of a large private company, or substantially all of its assets, by
the public company. Accordingly, an analysis of comparable business combinations
is not mathematical; rather it involves complex considerations and judgments
concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the
comparable transactions.
-20-
In the Comparable Transactions Analysis, Caymus Partners reviewed
acquisitions of companies involving 100% control. Transactions involving partial
control, including minority control positions, buybacks of stock, etc., were not
reviewed due to the inability to gather such appropriate data. No acquired
company involved in the selected Comparable Transactions Analysis is identical
to the Corporation. In selecting and evaluating the Transaction Comparables,
Caymus Partners made subjective judgments and assumptions with regard to
industry performance, general business, economical, market and financial
conditions, and other matters. Because of the inherent differences between the
business, operations, financial conditions and prospects of the Corporation and
those of the acquired companies included in the Comparable Transactions
Analysis, Caymus Partners believed it was inappropriate to, and therefore did
not, rely solely on the quantitative results of the Comparable Transactions
Analysis.
Caymus Partners identified six (6) Transaction Comparables announced
and closed in the last three and one-half years involving target companies in
the local exchange carrier industry. Based on the information disclosed with
respect to the target in each of the Comparable Transactions, Caymus Partners
calculated and compared the total enterprise value as a multiple of LTM EBITDA.
EBITDA was chosen because it is a more reliable indicator of value than other
factors such as revenue. Caymus Partners adjusted the mean and median EBITDA
multiples of comparable transactions to account for an already implied control
premium of 20% since the acquisitions were for 100% control. After discounting
the EBITDA multiples, Caymus Partners applied a range of these multiples to the
LTM EBITDA of the Corporation to obtain an implied enterprise value for the
Corporation, assuming less than 100% control. Caymus Partners then calculated an
equity value for the Corporation by subtracting net debt, minority interest and
preferred stock from the enterprise value.
The implied equity per share value for the Corporation ranged from
$21.80 to $30.00 (mean value of $25.90 per share).
DISCOUNTED CASH FLOW ANALYSIS
Caymus Partners performed a discounted cash flow analysis ("DCF") on
the Corporation. The fundamental premise of the DCF approach is to estimate the
available cash flows a prudent investor would expect a company to generate over
its remaining life. To determine this amount, Caymus Partner relied on cash flow
projections for the fiscal years ending 2005 through 2009, as provided by the
Corporation's management. Caymus Partners estimated the Corporation's discount
rate by analyzing the Corporation's current capitalization, Corporation tax
rate, risk free rate and estimates of market premia with respect to certain
qualitative factors associated with the Corporation's operations and financial
measurements and its marketability of shares.
The discounted cash flow analysis incorporates estimates provided by
the Corporation's management of cash flows during 2005 and for the next four
succeeding years. These estimates, in turn, are based on assumptions,
projections and forecasts, including without limitation business conditions,
financial markets and regulatory actions and initiatives. As a result, there is
no assurance that any such estimates will be met and such estimates are subject
to uncertainties, risks and inaccuracies, any or all of which could be
substantial. Caymus Partners performed the discounted cash flow analysis on the
preliminary cash flow of the Corporation. To arrive at a present value of the
free cash flow, Caymus Partners utilized discount rates ranging from 11.0% to
13.0%. A range of terminal year EBITDA multiples between and including 5.50x and
6.00x, which range is in line with EBITDA multiples for Interactive's Core LEC
Comparables, were utilized in this analysis. Caymus Partners discounted the free
cash flows and terminal year EBITDA valuation to derive a range of enterprise
values. These enterprise values were reduced by net debt to arrive at an equity
value. The Corporation's net debt is estimated to be approximately $147 million
(as of December 31, 2004). Caymus Partners determined that the implied equity
per share value for the Corporation ranged from $24.05 to $33.96 (mean value of
$29.00).
-21-
FRACTIONAL SHARE CASH-OUT VALUES OF SELECT REVERSE STOCK SPLITS
Caymus Partners performed an analysis of other "going dark"
transactions associated with reverse stock splits to determine the premiums paid
for fractional shares. An analysis of selected other reverse stock splits
associated with "going dark" transactions is heavily dependent on a small number
of companies that may or may not be related to Interactive and that have varying
transactional circumstances, market capitalizations, profitability and future
growth opportunities.
Caymus Partners aggregated selected reverse stock split transactions in
conjunction with pending "going dark" transactions to determine the cash
premiums paid, if any, of fractional shares. Caymus Partners concluded that,
based on the difficulty in obtaining "going dark" transactions, the lack of data
provided for those transactions and the lack of data related to companies paying
fractional share premiums, an analysis of reverse stock split data is not useful
for purposes of opining on the value to be paid by Interactive in this
Transaction.
HISTORICAL STOCK TRADING ANALYSIS
Caymus Partners reviewed the historical performance of the
Corporation's common stock based on historical analysis of closing prices for
the 20-day period prior to the date of its analysis. Caymus Partners noted that
the closing prices for the Corporation's common stock over this period ranged
from $19.25 to $29.28. The following chart summarizes the average closing prices
of the Corporation's stock over the last 20 days.
Price as of April 11, 2005 $29.28
5-Day Trailing Average $26.41
10-Day Trailing Average $25.36
20-Day Trailing Average $24.72
ALTERNATIVE TRANSACTIONS CONSIDERED
In making the determination to submit the reverse stock split for
approval by our stockholders, our Board of Directors considered the feasibility
of certain other alternative transactions, as described below, each of which was
ultimately rejected because of its disadvantages:
o ISSUER TENDER OFFER. Our Board of Directors considered the
feasibility of an issuer tender offer to repurchase the shares of
our Common Stock held by our unaffiliated stockholders. A
principal disadvantage of this type of transaction relates to our
ability to secure the debt financing needed to effect a tender
offer in which there is full participation by unaffiliated
stockholders. In addition, due to the voluntary nature of such a
transaction, we would have no assurance that the transaction
would result in a sufficient number of shares being tendered.
Moreover, the going private rules regarding the treatment of our
stockholders in a tender offer, including pro-rata acceptance of
offers from our stockholders, make it difficult to ensure that we
would be able to significantly reduce the number of holders of
record to a level below 300.
o TRADITIONAL STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM. Our Board of Directors also
considered increasing the number of shares subject to our current
stock repurchase plan, whereby we periodically repurchase shares
of our Common Stock on the open market at the then current market
price. Although we intend to resume making purchases under our
existing stock repurchase program after the reverse stock split,
repurchasing enough shares in this manner to enable us to
deregister under the Exchange Act would likely take an extended
period of time, would have no assurance of success and would be
of indeterminate cost.
o ODD-LOT REPURCHASE PROGRAM. Our Board of Directors also
considered the feasibility of a transaction in which we would
announce to our stockholders that we would repurchase, at a
designated price per share, the shares of our Common Stock held
by any stockholder who holds fewer than a specified number of
shares and who offers such shares for sale pursuant to the terms
of the program. A principal disadvantage of such an approach,
however, results from the voluntary nature of the program.
-22-
Because our stockholders would not be required to participate in
the program, we could not be certain at the outset whether a
sufficient number of odd-lot stockholders would participate and
thereby result in the number of holders of record being reduced
to below 300. In terms of timing, such a program, especially
after giving effect to any extensions of deadlines for tendering
into the program, would likely necessitate a longer time frame
than that of the reverse stock split.
o MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO. Our Board of Directors also
considered maintaining the status quo. In that case, we would
continue to incur the expenses of being a public reporting
company without enjoying the benefits traditionally associated
with public reporting company status.
FAIRNESS OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
Our Board of Directors has fully reviewed and considered the terms,
purpose, alternatives and effects of the reverse stock split and has determined
that the transaction is in our best interests and is substantively and
procedurally fair to the all of our stockholders.
The reverse stock split is not structured in such a way so as to
require the approval of at least a majority of our unaffiliated stockholders,
because our affiliated stockholders only own approximately 26% of our voting
securities. In assessing the reverse stock split, our Board of Directors
understood that (i) they and our officers who hold shares of our Common Stock
have indicated that they will vote in favor of the reverse stock split at the
Annual Meeting and (ii) our stockholders who dissent on voting on the reverse
stock split will have no appraisal or dissenters' rights available under the
Delaware General Corporation Law. Despite the foregoing, our Board of Directors
believes that the reverse stock split is procedurally fair to the unaffiliated
stockholders due to the existence of certain safeguards described herein.
In evaluating the fairness of the reverse stock split with respect to
the unaffiliated stockholders in particular, our Board of Directors noted that
the transaction would not differentiate among stockholders on the basis of
affiliate status. The sole determining factor in whether a stockholder will
become a Cashed Out Stockholder or a Continuing Stockholder as a result of the
reverse stock split is the number of shares held by such stockholder as of the
effective time of the reverse stock split. Our Board of Directors also noted
that the percentage ownership of each Continuing Stockholder, whether affiliated
or unaffiliated, will be approximately the same as it was prior to the reverse
stock split.
Our Board of Directors considered the advantages and disadvantages of
the reverse stock split discussed in the sections "Advantages of the Proposal"
and "Disadvantages of the Proposal" in reaching its conclusion as to the
substantive fairness of the reverse stock split to our unaffiliated
stockholders. Our Board of Directors did not assign specific weight to each
advantage and disadvantage in a formulaic fashion, but did place special
emphasis on the opportunity for Cashed Out Stockholders to sell their holdings
without brokerage fees or commissions, as well as the significant cost and time
savings for us.
We have not made any special provision in connection with the reverse
stock split to grant stockholders access to our corporate files or to obtain
counsel or appraisal services at our expense. Our Board of Directors did not
consider these steps necessary to ensure the fairness of the reverse stock
split. Our Board of Directors determined that such steps would be costly, time
consuming and would not provide any meaningful additional benefits. Our Board of
Directors determined that this proxy statement, together with our other filings
with the SEC, provide adequate information for our stockholders to make an
informed decision with respect to the transaction.
-23-
OTHER MATTERS
SPECIAL INTERESTS OF AFFILIATED PERSONS IN THE TRANSACTION
In considering the recommendation of our Board of Directors with
respect to the reverse stock split, our stockholders should be aware that our
executive officers and directors have interests in the transaction, which are in
addition to, or may be different from, our stockholders generally. These
interests may create potential conflicts of interest including, but not limited
to, the significant increase in legal exposure for members of boards of
directors of public reporting companies, especially in the aftermath of recent
legislation and related regulations. While there are still significant controls,
regulations and liabilities for directors and executives officers of
unregistered companies, the legal exposure for the members of our Board of
Directors and our executive officers will be reduced after the reverse stock
split.
Each of the affiliated stockholders has indicated to us that it will
vote its shares of our Common Stock in favor of authorizing the reverse stock
split.
COSTS/SOURCE OF FUNDS AND EXPENSES
Based on estimates of the record ownership of shares of our Common
Stock, the number of shares outstanding and other information as of March 31,
2005, and assuming that 10,000 shares are cashed out, we estimate that the total
funds required to consummate the reverse stock split will be approximately
$477,000, of which approximately $340,000 will be used to pay the consideration
to stockholders entitled to receive cash for their shares of our Common Stock
and $137,000 will be used to pay the costs of the reverse stock split, as
follows:
Legal fees and expenses $100,000
Financial consulting 30,000
Proxy solicitation and
transfer agent fees 7,000
--------
$137,000
========
These expenses do not include the normal costs of conducting the annual
meeting of stockholders, because those costs would be incurred in the normal
course of business of a public reporting company.
We intend to fund these costs using cash on hand and, if necessary, by
accessing our credit line.
FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES
Summarized below are material federal income tax consequences to us and
to our stockholders resulting from the reverse stock split, if it is
consummated. This summary is based on the provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, more commonly referred to as the Code, the Treasury
Regulations, issued pursuant thereto, and published rulings and court decisions
in effect as of the date hereof, all of which are subject to change. This
summary does not take into account possible changes in such laws or
interpretations, including amendments to the Code, other applicable statutes,
Treasury Regulations and proposed Treasury Regulations or changes in judicial or
administrative rulings; some of which may have retroactive effect. No assurance
can be given that any such changes will not adversely affect the federal income
tax consequences of the reverse stock split.
This summary does not address all aspects of the possible federal
income tax consequences of the reverse stock split and is not intended as tax
advice to any person or entity. In particular, and without limiting the
foregoing, this summary does not consider the federal income tax consequences to
our stockholders in light of their individual investment circumstances nor to
our stockholders subject to special treatment under the federal income tax laws
(for example, tax exempt entities, life insurance companies, regulated
investment companies and foreign taxpayers), or who hold, have held, or will
hold our Common Stock as part of a straddle, hedging, or conversion transaction
-24
for federal income tax purposes. In addition, this summary does not address any
consequences of the reverse stock split under any state, local or foreign tax
laws.
We will not obtain a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service or an
opinion of counsel regarding the federal income tax consequences to our
stockholders as a result of the reverse stock split. Accordingly, you are
encouraged to consult your own tax advisor regarding the specific tax
consequences of the proposed transaction, including the application and effect
of state, local and foreign income and other tax laws.
This summary assumes that you are one of the following: (i) a citizen
or resident of the United States, (ii) a domestic corporation, (iii) an estate
the income of which is subject to United States federal income tax regardless of
its source, or (iv) a trust if a United States court can exercise primary
supervision over the trust's administration and one or more United States
persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust. This
summary also assumes that you have held and will continue to hold your shares as
capital assets for federal income tax purposes.
You should consult your tax advisor as to the particular federal,
state, local, foreign, and other tax consequences, applicable to your specific
circumstances.
We believe that the reverse stock split will be treated as a tax-free
"recapitalization" for federal income tax purposes. This should result in no
material federal income tax consequences to Lynch Interactive or to our
stockholders who do not receive cash in the transaction. However, if you are
receiving cash in the transaction, you may not qualify for tax-free
"recapitalization" treatment for federal income tax purposes.
STOCKHOLDERS WHO DO NOT RECEIVE CASH IN CONNECTION WITH THE REVERSE
STOCK SPLIT
If you (1) continue to hold Common Stock directly immediately after the
reverse stock split, and (2) you receive no cash as a result of the reverse
stock split, you should not recognize any gain or loss in the reverse stock
split for federal income tax purposes. Your aggregate adjusted tax basis in your
shares of our Common Stock held immediately after the reverse stock split will
be equal to your aggregate adjusted tax basis in such shares held immediately
prior to the reverse stock split and you will have the same holding period or
periods in your Common Stock as you had in such Common Stock immediately prior
to the reverse stock split.
STOCKHOLDERS WHO RECEIVE CASH IN CONNECTION WITH THE REVERSE STOCK
SPLIT
If you (1) receive cash in exchange for fractional shares as a result
of the reverse stock split, (2) you do not continue to hold any Common Stock
directly immediately after the reverse stock split, and (3) you are not related
to any person or entity that holds Common Stock immediately after the reverse
stock split, you will recognize capital gain or loss on the reverse stock split
for federal income tax purposes, with such gain measured by the difference
between the cash you received for your cashed-out shares and your aggregate
adjusted tax basis in such Common Stock.
If you receive cash in exchange for fractional shares of our Common
Stock as a result of the reverse stock split, but either continue to directly
own stock immediately after the reverse stock split, or are related to a person
or entity who continues to hold stock immediately after the reverse stock split,
you will recognize capital gain or loss in the same manner as set forth in the
previous paragraph, provided that your receipt of cash either is "not
essentially equivalent to a dividend," or constitutes a "substantially
disproportionate redemption of stock," as described below.
o "Not Essentially Equivalent to a Dividend." You will satisfy
the "not essentially equivalent to a dividend" test if the
reduction in your proportionate interest in Lynch Interactive
resulting from the reverse stock split (taking into account
for this purpose the Common Stock owned by persons related to
you) is considered a "meaningful reduction" given your
particular facts and circumstances. The Internal Revenue
Service has ruled that a small reduction by a minority
-25-
stockholder whose relative stock interest is minimal and who
exercises no control over the affairs of a corporation will
satisfy this test.
o "Substantially Disproportionate Redemption of Stock." The
receipt of cash in the reverse stock split will be a
"substantially disproportionate redemption of stock" for you
if the percentage of the outstanding shares of our Common
Stock owned by you (and by persons related to you)
immediately after the reverse stock split is (a) less than
50% of all outstanding shares and (b) less than 80% of the
percentage of shares of our Common Stock owned by you
immediately before the reverse stock split.
In applying these tests, you will be treated as owning shares of our
Common Stock actually or constructively owned by certain individuals and
entities related to you. If your receipt of cash in exchange for Common Stock is
not treated as capital gain or loss under any of the tests, it will be treated
first as ordinary dividend income to the extent of your ratable share of Lynch
Interactive's current and accumulated earnings and profits, then as a tax-free
return of capital to the extent of your aggregate adjusted tax basis in your
shares, and any remaining amount will be treated as capital gain. See "Capital
Gain and Loss" and "Special Rate for Certain Dividends," below.
CAPITAL GAIN AND LOSS
For individuals, net capital gain (defined generally as your total
capital gains in excess of capital losses for the year) recognized upon the sale
of capital assets that have been held for more than 12 months generally will be
subject to tax at a rate not to exceed 15%. Net capital gain recognized from the
sale of capital assets that have been held for 12 months or less will continue
to be subject to tax at ordinary income tax rates. Capital gain recognized by a
corporate taxpayer will continue to be subject to tax at the ordinary income tax
rates applicable to corporations. There are limitations on the deductibility of
capital losses.
SPECIAL RATE FOR CERTAIN DIVIDENDS
In general, dividends are taxed at ordinary income rates. However, you
may qualify for a 15% rate of tax on any cash received in the reverse stock
split that is treated as a dividend as described above, if (i) you are an
individual or other non-corporate Stockholder, (ii) you have held the shares of
our Common Stock with respect to which the dividend was received for more than
60 days during the 120-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date,
as determined under the Code, and (iii) you were not obligated during such
period (pursuant to a short sale or otherwise) to make related payments with
respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. You are urged
to consult with your tax advisor regarding your applicability for, and the
appropriate federal, state, local, foreign or other tax treatment of, any such
dividend income.
BACKUP WITHHOLDING
Stockholders will be required to provide their social security or other
taxpayer identification numbers (or, in some instances, additional information)
to the Transfer Agent in connection with the reverse stock split to avoid backup
withholding requirements that might otherwise apply. The letter of transmittal
will require each Stockholder to deliver such information when the Common Stock
certificates are surrendered following the effective time of the reverse stock
split. Failure to provide such information may result in backup withholding at a
rate of 28%.
As explained above, the amounts paid to you as a result of the reverse
stock split may result in dividend income, capital gain income, or some
combination of dividend and capital gain income to you depending on your
individual circumstances. You should consult your tax advisor as to the
particular federal, state, local, foreign, and other tax consequences of the
transaction, in light of your specific circumstances.
-26-
THE PRECEDING DISCUSSION OF THE MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX
CONSEQUENCES OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT IS GENERAL AND DOES NOT INCLUDE ALL
CONSEQUENCES TO EVERY STOCKHOLDER UNDER FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, OR FOREIGN TAX
LAWS. ACCORDINGLY, EACH STOCKHOLDER SHOULD CONSULT ITS OWN TAX ADVISOR AS TO THE
PARTICULAR TAX CONSEQUENCES TO IT OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT, INCLUDING THE
APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR FOREIGN TAX LAWS, AND OF ANY
PROPOSED CHANGES IN APPLICABLE LAW.
APPRAISAL AND DISSENTERS' RIGHTS
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, our Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and our Bylaws, our stockholders are not entitled to appraisal or
dissenter's rights.
VOTES REQUIRED
In order to approve the reverse stock split, stockholders holding a
majority of the shares of our Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at
the Annual Meeting of stockholders, voting together as a single class, must
approve the filing of the certificate of amendment to our Restated Certificate
of Incorporation to effect the reverse stock split. Following this stockholder
approval, our Board of Directors will determine when, and if, to file the
amendment with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. Mr. Gabelli has
indicated that he intends to vote shares beneficially owned by him in favor of
the proposal.
RECOMMENDATION OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Our Board of Directors has unanimously determined that the reverse
stock split is fair to, and in the best interests of, us and our stockholders.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE "FOR" THE
APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO LYNCH INTERACTIVE'S
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO EFFECT THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT.
Please note that voting "FOR" the proposal does not mean that the
reverse stock split will be consummated. By voting "FOR" the proposal, you are
giving our Board of Directors the discretion to reject (and not implement) the
reverse stock split (even after the amendment is approved by the stockholders).
If for any reason the reverse stock split is not approved, or, if approved, not
implemented, the shares of our Common Stock will not be deregistered under the
Exchange Act or delisted from the AMEX, unless and until such time as we are
eligible to do so and our Board of Directors decides to do so.
PROPOSAL NO. 2
RE-APPROVAL OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN
In 2000, our Board of Directors and stockholders approved the Principal
Executive Bonus Plan, to provide our chief executive officer and, if so
designated, certain other key employees with a performance-based annual bonus
for calendar years beginning January 1, 2000.
The Principal Executive Bonus Plan is designed to satisfy Section
162(m) of the Code. Section 162(m) of the Code denies a deduction by an employer
for certain compensation in excess of $1 million per year paid by a publicly
held corporation to the chief executive officer and the four other most highly
compensated executive officers who are employed at the end of the fiscal year.
Certain compensation, including compensation paid based on the achievement of
pre-established performance goals, is excluded from this deduction limit. In
-27-
general, the performance goals must be disclosed to, and approved by, the
stockholders in a separate vote every five years. Accordingly, the Principal
Executive Bonus Plan is being resubmitted to stockholders so that payments
thereunder will not fail to be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code.
The following description of the Principal Executive Bonus Plan is a
summary of its key provisions and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the Principal Executive Bonus Plan, a copy of which was previously filed with
the 2000 annual proxy statement and a copy of which may be obtained upon request
by contacting our Secretary.
ADMINISTRATION
The Principal Executive Bonus Plan is administered by a subcommittee of
the Executive Compensation and Benefits Committee, consisting of Messrs.
Berkowitz and Moats, who qualify as "outside directors" under Section 162(m) of
the Code. The subcommittee has the authority to designate the key employees
eligible to participate in the Principal Executive Bonus Plan (other than the
chief executive officer), establish individual bonus pool percentages, determine
performance criteria, certify attainment of performance goals and other material
terms, to construe and interpret the Principal Executive Bonus Plan and make all
other determinations it deems necessary or advisable for the administration of
the Principal Executive Bonus Plan.
ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION
Our chief executive officer participates in the Principal Executive
Bonus Plan during each calendar year automatically. In addition, the
subcommittee may, in its sole discretion, select other key executive officers or
key employees of ours (including our subsidiaries) to be eligible to participate
in the Principal Executive Bonus Plan for any calendar year. However, no other
executive currently participates in the Principal Executive Bonus Plan.
DETERMINATION OF ANNUAL BONUS
Each participant's annual bonus under the Principal Executive Bonus
Plan for each calendar year will be equal to the participant's individual bonus
pool percentage multiplied by the achieved annual bonus pool for the respective
calendar year. The annual bonus pool is determined pursuant to an objective
formula or standard based on the attainment of pre-established performance goals
specified by the subcommittee. The individual bonus pool percentage is
determined by the subcommittee and is expressed as a percentage of the annual
bonus pool for each calendar year. In no event may the total of all
participants' individual bonus pool percentages exceed 100% of the annual bonus
pool for any calendar year. Unless otherwise reduced by the subcommittee,
payment of a participant's annual bonus shall be made only if and to the extent
performance goals for the relevant calendar year are attained.
PERFORMANCE GOALS
The subcommittee generally has the authority to determine the
performance goals that will be in effect for each calendar year. The performance
goals with respect to the annual bonus pool are based on the attainment of
certain target levels of, or a percentage increase in, pre-tax profits (as
defined below) in excess of certain target levels or percentages of
stockholders' equity (as defined below). In addition, the subcommittee has the
authority to incorporate provisions in the performance goals allowing for
adjustments in recognition of unusual or non-recurring events affecting us or
our financial statements, or in response to changes in applicable laws,
regulations or accounting principles, to the extent permitted by Section 162(m)
of the Code.
LIMITS ON ANNUAL BONUS
Notwithstanding the attainment of performance goals, the subcommittee
has the discretion to reduce (but not increase) a participant's annual bonus
under the Principal Executive Bonus Plan for any calendar year, regardless of
-28-
the degree of attainment of the performance goals. In any event, the maximum
annual bonus permitted under the Principal Executive Bonus Plan with respect to
any calendar year may not exceed, in the case of any participant, 80% of an
amount equal to 20% of the excess of (a) pre-tax profits (as defined below) for
such calendar year less (b) 25% of stockholders' equity (as defined below).
Pre-tax profits means income before income taxes (excluding any
provision for annual bonuses under the Principal Executive Bonus Plan and under
the bonus plan applicable to other corporate employees), minority interest (if
any), extraordinary items (if any), cumulative changes in accounting (if any)
and discontinued operations (if any) in our Statement of Consolidated Income
reported in our annual financial statements adjusted by (i) minority interest
effects on such pre-tax profits; and (ii) pre-tax effect of income or loss
associated with discontinued operation net of minority interest effects.
Stockholders' equity means the average of stockholders' equity at the beginning
of the plan year (i.e., the calendar year) and at the beginning of the two
preceding plan years, in each case as reported in our consolidated balance sheet
in our annual financial statements.
FORM AND PAYMENT OF ANNUAL BONUS
With respect to each participant, payment under the Principal Executive
Bonus Plan will be made in cash in an amount equal to the achieved annual bonus
and may be made only after attainment of the performance goals has been
certified in writing by the subcommittee. Unless otherwise determined by the
subcommittee in its sole discretion, each participant shall, to the extent the
applicable performance goals with respect to the annual bonus pool are attained
at the end of each calendar year, have the right to receive payment of a
prorated portion of such participant's annual bonus under the Principal
Executive Bonus Plan for any calendar year during which the participant's
employment with us is terminated for any reason other than for "cause" (as
determined by the subcommittee in its sole discretion).
AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN
The subcommittee may at any time and from time to time alter, amend,
suspend or terminate the Principal Executive Bonus Plan in whole or in part;
provided, that no amendment shall, without the prior approval of our
stockholders to the extent required under Code Section 162(m): (i) materially
alter the performance goals, (ii) increase the maximum annual bonus for any
calendar year, (iii) change the class of persons eligible to participate in the
Principal Executive Bonus Plan, or (iv) implement any change to a provision of
the Principal Executive Bonus Plan requiring stockholder approval in order for
the Principal Executive Bonus Plan to continue to comply with the requirements
of Section 162(m) of the Code. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no amendment shall
affect adversely any of the rights of any participant, without such
participant's consent, under an award theretofore granted under the Principal
Executive Bonus Plan.
PERFORMANCE AWARDS
Mr. Gabelli, the only participant in the Principal Executive Bonus
Plan, did not receive a bonus in respect of 2004. For a description of awards
made over the last five years under the Principal Executive Bonus Plan, see
"Executive Compensation and Benefits Committee Report on Executive Compensation
- Executive Officer Compensation Program," and " - Chief Executive Officer
Compensation."
VOTES REQUIRED
Approval of this Proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority
of the shares of our Common Stock voting on the proposition, excluding any
abstentions. Mr. Gabelli has indicated he intends to vote the shares
beneficially owned by him in favor of the proposal.
-29-
RECOMMENDATION OF OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS (OTHER THAN MR. GABELLI, WHO IS MAKING NO
RECOMMENDATION) RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE RE-APPROVAL OF THE PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN.
MARKET RELATED INFORMATION
MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK
Our Common Stock currently trades on the AMEX under the symbol "LIC".
On March 17, 2005, the most recent practicable date prior to the printing of
this proxy statement, the closing price for our Common Stock was $25.75 per
share, and there were 889 stockholders of record. The following table lists the
high and low sales prices of our Common Stock for the periods indicated below.
PERIOD HIGH LOW
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2003
1st Quarter $28.00 $21.50
2nd Quarter 24.80 19.50
3rd Quarter 27.75 23.95
4th Quarter 27.41 21.80
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004
1st Quarter $37.90 $23.50
2nd Quarter 37.95 28.00
3rd Quarter 36.50 29.50
4th Quarter 24.75 30.45
Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2005
1st Quarter (through March 17, $32.00 $19.25
2005)
DIVIDEND POLICY
We have not paid cash dividends on our Common Stock since our inception
and intend to continue to retain earnings for operations.
-30-
PROPOSAL NO. 3
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Upon the recommendation of our nominating committee, our Board of
Directors has nominated Morris Berkowitz, Paul J. Evanson, John C. Ferrara,
Mario J. Gabelli, Daniel R. Lee, Lawrence R. Moats and Salvatore Muoio to be
elected at the 2005 Annual Meeting as members of our Board of Directors, to
serve until the next Annual Meeting and until their respective successors are
elected. If for any reason any nominee does not stand for election, the proxies
solicited by this proxy statement will be voted in favor of the remainder of
those named and may be voted for a substitute nominee in place of such nominee.
Our management, however, has no reason to expect that any of the nominees will
not stand for election.
Our Bylaws provide that our Board of Directors shall consist of no less
than two and no more than nine members and that any vacancies on our Board of
Directors, from whatever cause arising, including newly-created directorships,
may be filled by the remaining directors until the next meeting of our
stockholders.
Biographical summaries and ages of the nominees as of March 31, 2005,
are set forth below. Data with respect to the number of shares of our Common
Stock beneficially owned by each of them appears elsewhere in this proxy
statement. All such information has been furnished to us by the nominees.
DIRECTOR
NOMINEE AGE PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND
------- --- -----------------------
Morris 82 Mr. Berkowitz has served as a director of
Berkowitz Lynch Interactive since 2004. He has
acted as a consultant and an advisor to
Lynch Interactive and its predecessor,
Lynch Corporation, since 1998. He has
also served as an advisor to GGCP, Inc.,
a private investment company, since 1998.
Mr. Berkowitz is currently retired.
Paul J. 63 Mr. Evanson has served as a director of
Evanson Lynch Interactive since 1999. He has
served as Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Allegheny Energy,
Inc. since June 2003. Prior to that, he
served as President of Florida Power &
Light Company from 1995 to May 2003. He
also served as President and Chief
Operating Officer of Lynch Corporation
prior to 1995.
John C. 53 Mr. Ferrara has served as a director of
Ferrara Lynch Interactive since 1999. He has
served as President and Chief Executive
Officer of Lynch Corporation, a holding
company with diversified manufacturing
operations, since October 2004. He was a
private investor from 2002 to 2004. Prior
to that, he served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Space Holding
Corporation, a private multimedia company
dedicated to space, science and
technology, from 2001 to March 2002 and
as Chief Financial Officer from 1999 to
2000. Mr. Ferrara is a Director of
Gabelli Asset Management Inc.
Mario J. 62 Mr. Gabelli has served as a director and
Gabelli Chief Executive Officer of Lynch
Interactive since 1999. He has served as
our Chairman since December 2004 (and
-31-
also from September 1999 to December
2002) and as our Vice Chairman from
December 2002 to December 2004. Mr.
Gabelli has also served as the Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer and a
director of Gabelli Asset Management Inc.
and its predecessors since November 1976
(and in connection with those
responsibilities, he serves as director
or trustee and/or an officer of
registered investment companies managed
by subsidiaries of Gabelli Asset
Management). Mr. Gabelli also serves as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
GGCP, Inc., a private investment company.
Mr. Gabelli serves on the Board of
Advisors of Healthpoint and Caymus
Partners LLC. Mr. Gabelli (i) is a former
Governor of the AMEX; and (ii) serves as
an Overseer of Columbia University
Graduate School of Business; Trustee of
Fairfield University, Roger Williams
University, the Winston Churchill
Foundation and the E.L. Wiegand
Foundation; as a Director of the National
Italian American Foundation and the
American-Italian Cancer Foundation; and
as the Chairman of the Patron's Committee
of Immaculate Conception School.
Daniel R. 48 Mr. Lee has served as a director of Lynch
Lee Interactive since 2000. He has served as
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc., a public
company operating resorts and casinos
since 2002. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Lee
was a private investor. Prior to that, he
served as Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President of HomeGrocer.com,
Inc. from 1999 to 2000. From 1992 to
1999, Mr. Lee served as the Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior
Vice President, Development of Mirage
Resort, Incorporated.
Lawrence R. 57 Mr. Moats has served as a director of
Moats Lynch Interactive since January 2005. He
has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Arlington Electrical
Construction Company Inc. since 1970. He
also serves as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Moats Office
Properties, Inc., a private real estate
company, since 1992. Mr. Moats served for
15 years as a Trustee of Harper College.
Since 1991, Mr. Moats has also been a
Director and Chairman of the Audit
Committee of Royal American Bank, a
private banking institution.
Salvatore 45 Mr. Muoio has served as a director of
Muoio Lynch Interactive since 1999. He has
served as Principal and Chief Investment
Officer of S. Muoio & Co. LLC, a
securities advisory firm, since 1996.
From 1995 to 1996, Mr. Muoio served as a
Securities Analyst and Vice President of
Lazard Freres & Co., L.L.C., an
investment banking firm. From 1985 to
1995, Mr. Muoio served as a Securities
Analyst at Gabelli & Company, Inc.
VOTE REQUIRED
Except where authority to vote for nominees has been withheld, it is
intended that the proxies received pursuant to this solicitation will be voted
"FOR" the nominees named below. Nominees receiving the greatest number of votes
duly cast for the election of directors will be elected to our Board of
Directors. Abstentions and broker "non-votes" are not counted as votes cast for
purpose of electing directors.
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION OF EACH OF
OUR NOMINEES TO OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS.
-32-
GOVERNANCE OF LYNCH INTERACTIVE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Our Board of Directors currently has seven members, five of whom meet
the AMEX standard for independence. Only independent directors serve on our
audit committee, nominating committee and the executive compensation and
benefits committee. During 2004, our Board of Directors held four meetings and
the committees held a total of 10 meetings. All of our directors attended at
least 75% of the meetings of our Board of Directors and the committees of which
they are members.
COMMITTEES OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS
In 2004, our Board of Directors had four ongoing committees: the
executive committee, the audit committee, the executive compensation and
benefits committee, and the nominating committee. In 2004, the executive
committee did not meet, the audit committee met nine times, the executive
compensation and benefits committee met one time; and the nominating committee
did not meet. These committees are described below.
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
In 2004, Mario Gabelli (Chairman) and Paul Evanson were the members of
our executive committee. Our executive committee is vested with all the power
and authority of our Board of Directors, except as otherwise provided by
Delaware law or by our Bylaws, during intervals between meetings of our Board of
Directors.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
In 2004, John Ferrara (Chairman), Morris Berkowitz and Salvatore Muoio
were the members of our audit committee. In January 2005, Lawrence Moats was
also appointed to our audit committee. In March 2005, Mr. Ferrara announced his
resignation both as chairman and as a member of that committee. Mr. Moats was
thereupon appointed chairman. Our Board of Directors has determined that the
audit committee members meet the AMEX standard for independence. In addition,
our Board of Directors has determined that at least one member of our audit
committee meets the AMEX standard of having accounting or related financial
management expertise. Our Board of Directors has also determined that Morris
Berkowitz meets the SEC criteria of an "audit committee financial expert." Mr.
Berkowitz's extensive background and experience includes professional training
and experience as a CPA and an attorney; service as the chief financial officer
and general counsel of two publicly-traded corporations; and experience as a tax
and legal advisor as well as a consultant.
Our audit committee operates pursuant to a charter, which can be viewed
on our web site at www.lynchinteractivecorp.com. The charter gives our audit
committee the authority and responsibility for the appointment, retention,
compensation and oversight of our independent auditors, including pre-approval
of all audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditors.
Our audit committee charter gives this committee broad authority to fulfill its
obligations under SEC and AMEX rules and regulations. The audit committee report
is set forth elsewhere herein.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE
In 2004, Paul Evanson, John Ferrara and Morris Berkowitz were members
of our executive compensation and benefits committee. In March 2005, Mr. Ferrara
resigned his membership on this committee and Lawrence R. Moats was appointed in
his place. Our Board of Directors has determined that the committee members meet
the AMEX standard for independence. Our executive compensation and benefits
committee develops and makes recommendations to our Board of Directors with
respect to our executive compensation policies; recommends to our Board of
Directors the compensation to be paid to executive officers; administers the
Lynch Interactive Corporation Bonus Plan and 401(k) Savings Plan; and performs
-33-
such other duties as may be assigned to it by our Board of Directors. In 2004, a
subcommittee consisting of Messrs. Berkowitz and Ferrara addressed matters
relating to the Principal Executive Benefits Plan. Mr. Moats replaced Mr.
Ferrara on this subcommittee in March 2005.
NOMINATING COMMITTEE
In 2004, Paul Evanson, John Ferrara, Salvatore Muoio and Morris
Berkowitz were all members of our nominating committee. In March 2005, Mr.
Ferrara resigned from the committee and Lawrence R. Moats was appointed in his
place. Our nominating committee is responsible for recommending to our Board of
Directors nominees for election as our directors. The committee believes
candidates for our Board of Directors should have the ability to exercise
objectivity and independence in making informed business decisions; extensive
knowledge, experience and judgment; the highest integrity; loyalty to our
interests and to our stockholders; a willingness to devote the extensive time
necessary to fulfill a director's duties; the ability to contribute to the
diversity of perspectives present in our Board of Directors' deliberations; and
an appreciation of the Corporation's role in society. Our nominating committee
considers candidates meeting these criteria who are suggested by directors,
management or stockholders. Stockholders may submit recommendations in writing
by letter addressed to our Corporate Secretary. Our nominating committee
operates pursuant to a charter setting out the functions and responsibilities of
this committee. Its charter can be viewed on our web site at
www.lynchinteractivecorp.com.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS
Directors, other than the Chairman and directors considered to be our
employees, receive a monthly cash retainer of $1,500, a fee of $2,000 for each
in person Board of Directors meeting attended and a fee of $1,000 for each
telephonic meeting of the Board of Directors (which lasts for at least one hour)
attended and each committee meeting the director attended.
In addition, each non-employee director (other than the Chairman)
serving as a committee chairman receives an additional $2,000 annual cash
retainer. We also purchase accident and dismemberment insurance coverage of
$100,000 for each member of our Board of Directors and maintain a liability
insurance policy that provides for indemnification of each director (and
officer) against certain liabilities that he may incur in his capacity as such.
EMPLOYEE CODE OF ETHICS AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST POLICY
Since our spin-off from Lynch Corporation in 1999, we have had a code
of conduct and conflicts of interest policy. In December 2003, we adopted a code
of ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors,
including our principal executive officer and our senior financial officers. We
require all of our employees to adhere to our code of ethics in addressing legal
and ethical issues encountered in conducting their work. Our code of ethics
requires that our employees avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all laws
and other legal requirements, conduct business in an honest and ethical manner
and otherwise act with integrity and in our best interest. All of our employees
are required to certify that they have reviewed and understood our code of
ethics.
In addition, all employees who because of their responsibilities are
thought to be in sensitive positions and who may, therefore, be placed in
conflicts of interest situations, are required to certify as to their compliance
with our conflicts of interest policy. Copies of our code of ethics and
conflicts of interest policy were filed with the SEC as exhibits to our December
31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K and are posted on our website at
www.lynchinteractivecorp.com.
-34-
POLICY REGARDING REPORTS OF ACTIONS THAT MAY BE VIOLATIONS OF LAW
In December 2003, our Board of Directors adopted a Policy Regarding
Reports Of Actions That May Be Violations Of Law, more commonly called our
Violations Policy. Our Violations Policy reaffirms our policy to comply with all
applicable laws that protect employees against unlawful discrimination or
retaliation by their employer as a result of their lawfully reporting
information regarding, or their participating in, investigations involving
alleged corporate fraud or other alleged violations by us or our agents of
federal or state law. Our Violations Policy further establishes a procedure by
which our employees may file anonymous complaints regarding our business
practices including, but not limited to, fraud, violations of law or accounting,
internal accounting controls or auditing matters.
Our Violations Policy also provides that we will offer a reward of
$10,000 (also made on an anonymous basis) to any employee who reports
information regarding corporate fraud or other alleged violations by us or our
agents of federal or state law and such information leads to a finding of
wrongdoing by either our Board of Directors or a competent state or federal
adjudicatory body. A copy of our Violations Policy is posted on our website at
www.lynchinteractivecorp.com.
STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS
Our stockholders may send communications by letter addressed to our
Board of Directors at Lynch Interactive Corporation, 401 Theodore Fremd Avenue,
Rye, New York 10580. All communications will be received and reviewed by our
Corporate Secretary. The receipt of concerns about our accounting, internal
controls, auditing matters or business practices will be reported to the audit
committee. The receipt of other concerns will be reported to our Board of
Directors or an appropriate committee of our Board of Directors.
-35-
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The following tables set forth compensation received by our Chief
Executive Officer and each of our executive officers for the last three fiscal
years:
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
ANNUAL COMPENSATION
-------------------
ALL OTHER
NAME AND PRINCIPAL POSITION YEAR SALARY($) BONUS($)(1) COMPENSATION
--------------------------- ---- --------- ----------- ------------
Mario J. Gabelli 2004 350,000 --- -
Chairman and 2003 250,000 850,000 -
Chief Executive Officer 2002 350,000 195,000 -
Robert E. Dolan 2004 285,146 125,000 -
Chief Financial Officer 2003 260,000 300,000 -
2002 250,000 85,000 -
Evelyn C. Jerden 2004 244,467 6,928 24,269(2)
Senior Vice President-- 2003 191,659 7,228 24,469(2)
Operations 2002 148,674 6,083 23,080(2)
John A. Cole(3) 2004 17,692 10,000 -
Vice President, Corporate
Development, General Counsel
and Secretary
---------------------------
(1) Bonuses earned in any fiscal year are generally paid during the following
fiscal year.
(2) Represents Western New Mexico Telephone Company's contribution to Ms.
Jerden's account with Western New Mexico's Employee Profit Sharing Plan.
(3) Mr. Cole's employment commenced on December 1, 2004.
We have no outstanding stock options or stock appreciation rights and
we have not made any long-term incentive plan awards to our executive officers.
-36-
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE
REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
OVERVIEW AND PHILOSOPHY
The Executive Compensation and Benefits Committee, or the compensation
committee, of our Board of Directors is responsible for developing and making
recommendations to our Board of Directors with respect to our executive
compensation policies and administering the various executive compensation
plans. In addition, this committee recommends to our Board of Directors the
annual compensation to be paid to our Chief Executive Officer and each of our
other executive officers, as well as to other key employees. The committee
comprises three independent, non-employee directors.
The objectives of our executive compensation program are to:
o Support the achievement of our desired performance;
o Provide compensation that will attract and retain superior talent
and reward performance;
o Ensure that there is appropriate linkage between executive
compensation and the enhancement of stockholder value; and
o Evaluate the effectiveness of our incentives for key executives.
The executive compensation program is designed to provide an overall
level of compensation opportunity that is competitive with companies of
comparable size, capitalization and complexity. Actual compensation levels,
however, may be greater or less than average competitive levels based upon our
annual and long-term performance, as well as individual performance. The
compensation committee uses its discretion to recommend executive compensation
at levels warranted in its judgment by such performance.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION PROGRAM
Our executive officer compensation program is comprised of base salary,
cash bonus compensation, our 401(k) Savings Plan, and other benefits generally
available to our employees.
BASE SALARY
Base salary levels for our executive officers are intended to be
competitive. In recommending salaries, the compensation committee takes into
account an individual's experience and performance, as well as specific issues
relating to us. The adjustments made to salaries for 2004 were based upon a
variety of judgmental factors, including the individual performances of the
officers in 2003 and their anticipated contributions to us in 2004, the
prevailing industry conditions and our general financial and strategic
performance.
BONUS PLAN
We have in place a bonus plan that is based on an objective measure of
corporate performance and on subjective evaluation of individual performance for
our executive officers, other than Mr. Gabelli our principal executive officer,
and other key personnel. In general, this plan provides for an annual bonus pool
equal to (i) 20% of the excess of our consolidated pre-tax profits for a
calendar year less (ii) 25% of our average stockholders equity at the beginning
of such year. Stockholders' equity is the average of stockholders equity at the
beginning of the period and at the beginning of the two preceding years. The
bonus pool will also be reduced by amounts paid pursuant to the Principal
Executive Bonus Plan, as described below. The compensation committee, in its
discretion, may take into consideration other factors and circumstances in
determining the amount of the bonus pool and awarding bonuses, such as progress
toward achievement of strategic goals and qualitative aspects of management
performance. The allocation of the bonus pool among the executives is not based
upon a formula but upon judgmental factors. In 2004, the annual bonus pool was
-37-
equal to approximately $265,000, which was paid to executive officers (other
than Mr. Gabelli) and other personnel, taking into consideration the factors
discussed above.
Mr. Gabelli is the sole participant in the Principal Executive Bonus
Plan that was adopted by our Board of Directors and approved by stockholders in
2000. The Principal Executive Bonus Plan is described under Proposal No. 2 and
is similar to the regular bonus plan, except that it (i) specifies a maximum
annual bonus (as defined in the Principal Executive Bonus Plan) which is based
on a maximum percentage (80%) of a specified bonus pool and (ii) removes the
discretion of the committee to award annual bonuses above the established
maximum annual bonus. The Principal Executive Bonus Plan is designed to satisfy
an exemption from Section 162(m) of the Code, which denies a deduction by an
employer for certain compensation in excess of $1,000,000 per year. In 2002,
from the annual bonus pool of $310,000, Mr. Gabelli was awarded a bonus of
$195,000. In 2003, from the annual bonus pool of $1,600,000 Mr. Gabelli was paid
a bonus of $850,000. In 2004, from an annual bonus pool of $205,000, Mr. Gabelli
was paid no bonus.
LYNCH INTERACTIVE CORPORATION 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN
All our employees are eligible to participate in our 401(k) Savings
Plan, after having completed one year of service and having reached the age of
18.
Our 401(k) Savings Plan permits employees to make contributions by
deferring a portion of their compensation. We may make discretionary
contributions to our 401(k) Savings Plan accounts of participating employees. A
participant's interest in both employee and employer contributions and earnings
thereupon are fully vested at all times.
Employee and employer contributions are invested in certain mutual
funds or our Common Stock, as determined by the participants. With respect to
the individuals listed in the Summary Compensation Table, each of Messrs.
Gabelli and Dolan deferred $12,000 under the 401(k) Savings Plan during 2004,
which amounts have been included for each individual in the Summary Compensation
Table.
BENEFITS
We provide medical, life insurance and disability benefits to the
executive officers that are generally available to all of our employees. The
amount of perquisites, as determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC
relating to executive compensation, did not exceed 10% of salary and bonus for
2004.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth compensation received by Mr. Gabelli for
the last five years, for serving as our Chief Executive Officer:
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Salary 350,000 350,000 350,000 250,000 350,000
Bonus 0 0 195,000 850,000 0
Mr. Gabelli performs the usual functions of a chief executive officer
and is particularly involved in the development of acquisition, investment and
financial strategies. The compensation committee considers a number of factors
in determining the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, including our
size and scope, the role of leadership, particularly that of Mr. Gabelli, in
developing existing businesses and in making strategic acquisitions, our
financial performance as reflected by the increase in our internally estimated
private market value as well as our public market value, and return on
stockholders' equity. Effective in 2000, Mr. Gabelli's prior $500,000 salary was
reduced to $350,000, in connection with our spin off from Lynch Corporation,
with no raise until 2004. Following Mr. Gabelli's resignation as Chairman and
-38-
his appointment as Vice Chairman, effective January 1, 2003, Mr. Gabelli's
salary was reduced to $250,000. In 2003, based on the formula set forth in the
Principal Executive Bonus Plan, the annual bonus pool was $1,600,000, with the
maximum bonus payable to Mr. Gabelli not to exceed 80% of the annual bonus pool.
The compensation committee, which has the discretion to reduce the bonus payable
to Mr. Gabelli, approved a bonus of $850,000, representing approximately 53.1%
of the annual bonus pool, to be paid to Mr. Gabelli. In 2004, Mr. Gabelli's
salary was increased to $350,000 following his resumption of his Chief Executive
Officer duties, but he was awarded no bonus in respect of 2004.
Morris Berkowitz (Member)
Paul J. Evanson (Member)
Lawrence R. Moats (Member)
John C. Ferrara (Retired Member)
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of the record date, certain
information with respect to all persons known to us to each beneficially own
more than 5% of our shares of Common Stock, which is our only class of voting
stock outstanding. The table also sets forth information with respect to our
Common Stock beneficially owned by the directors, by each nominee for director,
by each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, and
by all directors, nominees for director and executive officers as a group. The
number of shares beneficially owned is determined under rules of the SEC, and
the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any
other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to
which a person has the sole or shared voting or investment power or any shares
that the person can acquire within 60 days, such as through exercise of stock
options or conversions of securities. Except as otherwise indicated, our
stockholders listed in the table have sole voting and investment powers with
respect to the Common Stock set forth in the table. The following information is
either reflected in filings with the SEC or has otherwise been furnished to us
by persons named in the table. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each
entity listed in the table is c/o 401 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Rye, New York
10580.
NAME OF AMOUNT AND NATURE PERCENT
BENEFICIAL OWNER OF BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF CLASS
---------------- ----------------------- --------
Kinetics Asset Management, Inc.
470 Park Avenue South
New York, New York 10016 ....................... 209,000(1) 7.6%
MJG-IV Limited Partnership...................... 620,000(2) 22.5%
Mario J. Gabelli................................ 658,583(2)(3) 23.9%
Morris Berkowitz................................ 504 *
Paul J. Evanson................................. 11,304 *
John C. Ferrara................................. 2,828 *
Daniel R. Lee................................... 0 0
Lawrence R. Moats............................... 27,700(4) 1.0%
Salvatore Muoio................................. 16,004(5) *
Robert E. Dolan................................. 960(6) *
Evelyn C. Jerden................................ 105 *
John A. Cole.................................... 0 0
All directors and named executive officers
as a group (10 persons)......................... 717,988 26.1%
---------------------------------------------
* Represents holdings of less than one percent.
-39-
(1) Because of its investment and/or voting power over shares of our Common
Stock held in the accounts of its investment advisory clients, Kinetics
Asset Management, Inc., an investment adviser, is deemed to be the
beneficial owner of 209,000 shares. Kinetics disclaims beneficial
ownership of all such shares.
(2) MJG-IV Limited Partnership, a limited partnership of which Mr. Gabelli
is the general partner, has the right to receive and the power to
direct the receipt of dividends from, or the proceeds from the sale of,
620,000 shares. Mr. Gabelli has approximately a 5% interest in the
partnership, except in respect of 480,000 shares of our Common Stock
sold by Mr. Gabelli to the partnership in January 2004 in which Mr.
Gabelli has no interest. Mr. Gabelli holds an irrevocable proxy to vote
such 480,000 shares until January 16, 2007.
(3) Represents 620,000 shares owned by a limited partnership in which Mr.
Gabelli is the general partner (see footnote 2 above), 6,008 shares
owned directly by Mr. Gabelli, 11,075 shares owned by Mr. Gabelli
through our 401(k) Savings Plan, and 21,500 shares owned by GGCP, Inc.,
in which Mr. Gabelli is the majority stockholder. Mr. Gabelli disclaims
beneficial ownership of the shares owned by MJG-IV and GGCP, Inc.
except to the extent of his interest therein.
(4) Includes 600 shares owned directly by Mr. Moats, 100 shares held as
custodian for a child, 100 shares held by a family member and 26,800
shares held by a foundation of which Mr. Moats is the president. With
respect to all such shares except the 600 shares held by him directly,
Mr. Moats disclaims beneficial ownership.
(5) Consists of (i) 1,704 shares owned directly by Mr. Muoio; (ii) 14,100
shares owned by investment funds of which S. Muoio & Co. LLC is the
general partner or investment manager and (iii) 200 shares owned by S.
Muoio & Co. LLC Profit Sharing Plan. Mr. Muoio is the managing member
of S. Muoio & Co. LLC. Mr. Muoio disclaims beneficial ownership of the
shares owned by such investment funds, except for his interest therein.
(6) Includes 70 shares registered in the name of Mr. Dolan's children with
respect to which Mr. Dolan has voting and investment power and 238
shares owned by Mr. Dolan through our 401(k) Savings Plan.
-40-
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our
Common Stock for the period January 1, 2000 through December 31, 2004, with the
cumulative total return over the same period on the broad market, as measured by
the American Stock Exchange Market Value Index, and on a peer group. The peer
group index is based on the total returns earned on the stock of the
publicly-traded companies included in the Media General Financial Services
database under SIC Code 4813, Telephone Communications, except Radio Telephone
(135 companies). The data presented in the graph assumes that $100 was invested
in our Common Stock and in each of the indexes on January 1, 2000 and that all
dividends were reinvested. The stock price performance shown on the following
graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.
[OBJECT OMITTED]
-41-
TRANSACTIONS WITH CERTAIN AFFILIATED PERSONS
Mario Gabelli is affiliated with various entities that he directly
or indirectly controls and that are engaged in various aspects of the securities
business, such as an investment adviser to various institutional and individual
clients, including registered investment companies and pension plans, as a
broker-dealer, and as managing general partner of various private investment
partnerships. During 2004, Lynch Interactive and its subsidiaries engaged in
various transactions and arrangements with certain of these entities. The amount
of commissions, fees, and other remuneration paid to such entities, excluding
reimbursement of certain expenses related to Mr. Gabelli's employment with us
(including approximately $40,000 reimbursement in connection with an airplane in
part owned by a subsidiary of GGCP, Inc.), was approximately $63,000, primarily
for administrative and staff support functions.
In 1998, Lynch Corporation, our predecessor, entered into a lease
for approximately 5,000 square feet in a building in Rye, New York, owned by an
affiliate of Mr. Gabelli. Following the spin-off, we became the lessee of such
lease and in May 2001 the parties agreed to reduce the leased space to
approximately 3,300 square feet. The lease was renewed in December 2002 and
provides for rent at approximately $28 per square foot per annum plus a minimum
of $3 per square foot per annum for utilities, subject to adjustment for
increases in taxes and other operating expenses. The total amount paid for rent
and utilities in 2004 under this lease was $112,000. An unaffiliated entity also
leasing space in the same building pays rent on substantially the same basis.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive
officers and holders of more than 10% of our Common Stock to file with the SEC
and AMEX initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in the ownership of
our Common Stock and other equity securities. Such persons are required to
furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) filings. Based solely on our review
of the copies of such filings we have received and written representations of
directors and officers, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004, our officers, directors, and 10% stockholders were in compliance with
all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them.
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
On January 12, 2005, our audit committee appointed Deloitte & Touche
LLP to serve as our independent auditor to audit our and our subsidiaries'
consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31,
2004. Deloitte & Touche LLP also audited our 2003 consolidated financial
statements. Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be
available at the Annual Meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if they
desire to do so and to answer appropriate questions.
The audit committee has not yet selected a principal auditor for fiscal
year 2005. Consistent with the past practice, the audit committee begins the
selection process for our principal auditor following completion of the prior
year's audit.
RESIGNATION OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Following the completion of its review of our condensed consolidated
financial statements for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, on November 14,
2003, Ernst & Young LLP notified us of its resignation as our independent
auditor. Ernst & Young's decision was based, in part, on the existence of
pending litigation against it initiated by Morgan Group Holding Co., an entity
that was created through a spin-off from us. Morgan Group Holding Co. brought an
action against Ernst & Young in its capacity as the independent auditor of The
Morgan Group, Inc., a public company in which Morgan Group Holding Co. had a
majority interest.
-42-
The reports of Ernst & Young, as our principal auditor, on our
consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001
and 2002 (which reports were based on the work of Siepert & Co., L.L.P. insofar
as it relates to the amounts included in the consolidated financial statements
for our following subsidiaries: Cuba City Telephone Exchange Corporation and
Belmont Telephone Corporation in 2002 and 2001, Upper Peninsula Telephone
Corporation in 2002 and Lynch Michigan Telephone Holding Corporation in 2001)
did not contain any adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they
qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.
In connection with the audits of our financial statements for each of
2002 and 2001 and in the subsequent interim periods through November 14, 2003,
there were no disagreements with Ernst & Young on any matters of accounting
principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or
procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst &
Young, would have caused Ernst & Young to make reference to the subject matter
of the disagreements in connection with its reports. There were no reportable
events as described in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
A copy of the disclosure under this subheading has been furnished to
Ernst & Young and Deloitte & Touche in order to give each such auditor the
opportunity to present its views in this proxy statement if it believes that the
statements made are incorrect or incomplete.
AUDIT FEES
The aggregate fees billed or to be billed by Deloitte & Touche for
professional services rendered for the audit of our 2003 and 2004 financial
statements is $1.2 million and $1.1 million, respectively The aggregate fees
billed by Deloitte & Touche for professional services rendered for the reviews
of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q for
2004 was approximately $215,000. The aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young for
the audit of our 2002 financial statements and review of financial statements
included in our Form 10-Q's for that year was $615,000. In addition, Ernst &
Young billed us $263,000 for review of the financial statements included in our
Form 10-Q for 2003 and $50,000 for audit-related work in 2004.
AUDIT-RELATED FEES
No fees were billed by Deloitte & Touche for assurance and related
services for 2004 that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit of
our 2004 financial statements and/or performance of a review of our financial
statements during 2004 that are not reported as audit fees above. The aggregate
fees billed by Ernst & Young for assurance and related services for 2003 that
are reasonably related to the performance of the review of our financial
statements and not reported as audit fees above was $7,500.
TAX FEES
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte & Touche for professional
services rendered to us in 2004 for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning
was approximately $15,000. These services included miscellaneous tax-related
research. The aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young for professional services
rendered to us in 2003 for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning was
$5,000.
ALL OTHER FEES
No fees were billed by Deloitte & Touche or by Ernst & Young for 2004
or 2003, respectively, for services other than as set forth above.
-43-
AUDIT COMMITTEE'S PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
In December 2002, our audit committee adopted policies and procedures
that require that any non-audit services to be provided by our independent
auditor that are not otherwise proscribed by Sarbanes-Oxley must be pre-approved
by a member of our audit committee and that any such pre-approval must then be
ratified by our audit committee at its next meeting.
The revised audit committee charter also provides that our audit
committee shall pre-approve all auditing provided to us by the independent
auditors.
Prior to December 2002, our audit committee did not have an established
pre-approval procedure with respect to the provision of services other than the
audit by its independent auditor. For the year ended 2002, our audit committee
considered that the provisions of all non-audit services were compatible with
maintaining the independence of our independent auditor. For the years ended
2003 and 2004, our audit committee pre-approved all the fees incurred by our
independent auditors.
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The audit committee of our Board of Directors comprises directors who
meet the AMEX standards for independence. The audit committee operates under a
written charter adopted by our Board of Directors.
The audit committee met with management periodically during the year to
consider the adequacy of our internal controls and the objectivity of our
financial reporting. The audit committee discussed these matters with Deloitte &
Touche LLP, our independent auditors, and with our chief financial officer. The
audit committee also discussed with our senior management and independent
auditors our compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley.
The audit committee met privately with the independent auditors, as
well as with the chief financial officer, on a number of occasions.
The audit committee also held meetings to deliberate the selection of
independent auditors for 2004.
The audit committee has reviewed and discussed our audited 2004
financial statements with both management and our independent auditors for 2004.
The audit committee has also discussed with our independent auditors any matters
required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61
(Communications with Audit Committees). The audit committee has received the
written disclosures and the letter from our independent auditors required by
Independent Standards Board No. 1, Independent Discussions with Audit Committees
and has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP their independence.
Management has primary responsibility for our financial statements and
the overall reporting process, including our systems of internal controls.
Management has represented to the audit committee that the 2004 financial
statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Based on the foregoing reviews and discussions, the audit committee
recommended to our Board of Directors that our 2004 audited financial statements
be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004.
Morris Berkowitz (Member)
Lawrence R. Moats (Chairman)
Salvatore Muoio (Member)
John C. Ferrara (Retired Chairman and Member)
-44-
PROPOSALS OF STOCKHOLDERS
If our Exchange Act registration is not terminated in connection with
the reverse stock split, proposals of stockholders intended to be presented at
our 2006 Annual Meeting must be received by the Corporate Secretary, Lynch
Interactive Corporation, 401 Theodore Fremd Avenue, Rye, NY 10580, no later than
December 15, 2005, for inclusion in our proxy statement and form of proxy
relating to the that meeting.
MISCELLANEOUS
Our Board of Directors knows of no other matters that are likely to
come before the Annual Meeting. If any other matters should properly come before
the Annual Meeting, it is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying
form of proxy to vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment.
ANNUAL REPORT
Our Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2004, and our Annual Report on Form 10-K, are being sent herewith to each
stockholder. The Form 10-K is incorporated herein by reference.
-45-
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
OF THE
RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
LYNCH INTERACTIVE CORPORATION
================================================================================
It is hereby certified that:
1. The name of the corporation is LYNCH INTERACTIVE CORPORATION (the
"Corporation").
2. The Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is
hereby amended to reflect a 1-for-100 reverse stock split of the
Corporation's common stock and to provide the Corporation with an
option to buy back shares of its common stock proposed to be
transferred after the reverse stock split is effective.
3. To accomplish the foregoing amendment, the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by revising
Article FOURTH in its entirety to read as follows:
"FOURTH: The Corporation shall have the authority to issue
10,000,000 shares of common stock, $.01 per share (the
"Common Stock").
Simultaneously with the effective time of the filing of this
amendment to the Corporation's Restated Certificate of
Incorporation (the "Effective Time"), each share of common
stock, par value $.0001 per share, of the Corporation issued
and outstanding or held as treasury shares immediately prior
to the Effective Time (the "Old Common Stock") shall
automatically be reclassified as and reduced to (the "Reverse
Split"), without any action on the part of the holder
thereof, 1/100 of one share of Common Stock (the "New Common
Stock"). Each holder of a certificate of Old Common Stock
shall be entitled to receive, upon surrender of such
certificate to the Corporation's transfer agent for
cancellation, a certificate of New Common Stock that will
equal the number of shares of Old Common Stock divided by one
hundred. Holders of Old Common Stock who are entitled to an
aggregate of less than one share on account of the Reverse
Split shall not receive fractional shares, but rather shall
receive, upon surrender of the stock certificates formerly
representing shares of the Old Common Stock, in lieu of such
fractional share, an amount in cash equal to the fractional
share that a holder would otherwise be entitled to,
multiplied by ___________ ($______.00).
Subject to the fractional share treatment described above,
certificates for Old Common Stock will be deemed for all
purposes to represent the appropriately reduced number of
shares of New Common Stock; provided, however, that the
holder of unexchanged certificates will not be entitled to
receive any distributions payable by the Corporation after
the Effective Time, until the certificates for Old Common
Stock have been surrendered for exchange. Such distributions,
if any, will be accumulated and, at the time of surrender of
the Old Common Stock certificate, all such unpaid
distributions will be paid without interest.
After the Effective Time, the Corporation shall have the
right to buy back shares of Common Stock proposed to be
transferred by any stockholder if such transfer would cause
the number of holders of record of the Corporation's Common
Stock to equal or exceed 300. The price to be paid for the
shares pursuant to this option is equal to (i) the mean
between the bid and asked prices (as published in the pink
sheets) averaged over the 20 trading days immediately
preceding the date of exercise of the option, on which the
shares of Common Stock were quoted or, (ii) if the Common
Stock is not then quoted in the pink sheets (or if such
determination cannot otherwise be made), the fair market
value for such shares as determined by the Corporation's
Board of Directors in good faith.
4. The Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation effected by this Certificate was duly authorized and
declared advisable by the Board of Directors of the Corporation in
accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, and approved by the
affirmative vote of a majority of the stockholders entitled to vote
thereon in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Lynch Interactive
Corporation on this ______ day of _______________.
-----------------------------------
Robert E. Dolan
Chief Financial Officer
3
EXHIBIT B
CAYMUS PARTNERS LLC
April 17, 2005
CONFIDENTIAL
Board of Directors
Lynch Interactive Corporation
401 Theodore Fremd Avenue
Rye, New York 10580
RE: FAIRNESS OPINION
Gentlemen:
Lynch Interactive Corporation ("Interactive" or the "Company") proposes a
1-for-100 reverse stock split ("Stock Split") of the Company's common stock
("Common Stock") with the result that (i) holdings prior to such Stock Split of
fewer than 100 shares of Common Stock will be converted to a fractional share,
which will be immediately cancelled and converted into a right to receive the
cash consideration described in the attached proxy statement ("Transaction"),
and (ii) the Corporation will have fewer than 300 holders of record, allowing it
to delist the Common Stock from the American Stock Exchange (the "AMEX") and to
deregister its Common Stock. As part of the Transaction, holders of record of
less than 100 shares prior to the Stock Split would receive cash compensation
equal to 120% of the average of the Company's stock price for the 20 trading
days, on which the Company's shares were traded, immediately preceding the date
of when the Company's restated certificate of incorporation is filed with the
Office of the Secretary of the State of Delaware.
You have asked Caymus Partners LLC ("Caymus Partners," "we" or "us") whether or
not, in our opinion, the Transaction is fair to the public shareholders of the
Company from a financial point of view (the "Opinion").
In arriving at the Opinion set forth below, we have, among other things:
1) Reviewed and analyzed the March 31, 2005 draft of the proxy
statement (Schedule 14A) ("Proxy Statement") in connection with the
Transaction that was provided by the Company;
2) Reviewed publicly available historical financial information and
other data concerning the Company, including Interactive's Annual
Report and audited financial statements on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "SEC");
3) Reviewed and analyzed certain financial characteristics of companies
we deemed to have characteristics comparable to the Company;
4) Reviewed and analyzed certain financial terms of transactions
involving target companies we deemed to have characteristics
comparable to the Company;
5) Reviewed certain internal financial analyses and forecasts of the
Company related to the business, earnings, cash flow, assets and
prospects of Interactive, which were provided to us by management of
Interactive;
6) Had discussions with representatives or members of management of the
Company concerning its businesses, operations, assets, present
condition and future prospects;
7) Considered the historical financial results and present financial
condition of the Company;
8) Reviewed the stock prices and trading history of the Company's
common stock;
9) Reviewed such other financial studies and analyses and performed
such other investigations and took into account such other matters
as we deemed necessary, including our assessment of general
economic, market and monetary conditions; and
10) Presented our preliminary findings to the Board of Directors of the
Company and answered and discussed a variety of questions posed by
the Board of Directors.
In preparing our Opinion, we have relied on the accuracy and completeness of all
information publicly available, supplied or otherwise communicated to us by the
Company, and we have not assumed any responsibility to independently verify such
information. With respect to the financial forecasts provided to us by the
Company, we have assumed that such forecasts have been reasonably and accurately
prepared and represent management's best currently available judgments and
estimates as to the future financial performance of Interactive, and we express
no opinion with respect to such forecasts or the assumptions upon which they are
based. We have also relied upon assurances of the management of the Company that
they are unaware of any facts that would make the information provided to us
incomplete or misleading. We have not made any independent evaluation or
appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of the Company
nor have we been furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. We also have
assumed that, in all material respects to our analysis, the representations and
warranties contained in the Proxy Statement are true and correct, each of the
parties to the Proxy Statement will perform all of the covenants and agreements
to be performed by it under the Proxy Statement and that the Transaction will be
consummated in all material respects in accordance with the terms and conditions
described in the Proxy Statement without any waiver or modification thereof. We
have also assumed that the final Proxy Statement will be substantially the same
as the March 31, 2004 draft of the Proxy Statement reviewed by us.
This Opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder of
Interactive. This Opinion does not address the relative merits of the
Transaction and any other transactions or business strategies discussed by the
Board of Directors of the Company as alternatives to the Stock Split or the
decision of the Board of Directors of the Company to proceed with the Stock
Split. Our Opinion is based on economic, monetary and market conditions existing
on the date hereof.
Caymus Partners is currently acting as financial advisor to the Company and will
be receiving a fee in connection with the rendering of this Opinion. No portion
of Caymus Partners' fee is contingent upon the conclusions reached in our
Opinion.
On the basis of, and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the
proposed Transaction is fair to the public shareholders of Interactive from a
financial point of view.
This Opinion has been prepared for the information of the Board of Directors of
the Company in connection with the Transaction and shall not be reproduced,
summarized, described or referred to, provided to any person or otherwise made
public or used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of Caymus
Partners, except that the Company may include this opinion in its entirety in
any disclosure document to be sent to the Company's stockholders or filed with
the SEC relating to the Transaction.
Very truly yours,
/s/ CAYMUS PARTNERS LLC
CAYMUS PARTNERS LLC
LYNCH INTERACTIVE CORPORATION
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Robert E. Dolan and John A. Cole, and
each of them, with full power of substitution, to vote as indicated below, and
act with respect to all shares of Common Stock of Lynch Interactive
Corporation., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), standing in the name
of the undersigned, at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 8:30
a.m., Eastern time, on Thursday, June 2, 2005, at Greenwich Library, 101 West
Putnam Avenue, Greenwich, Connecticut, or at any adjournment thereof, with all
the power the undersigned would possess if personally present:
1. Amendment of Lynch Interactive Corporation's Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to effect the reverse stock split.
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
2. To re-approve the Principal Executive Bonus Plan.
[ ] FOR [ ] AGAINST [ ] ABSTAIN
3. Election of the following nominees as directors of the Corporation: Morris
Berkowitz, Paul J. Evanson, John C. Ferrara, Mario J. Gabelli, Daniel R. Lee,
Lawrence R. Moats and Salvatore Muoio.
[ ] FOR all the nominees (except as [ ] WITHHOLD AUTHORITY to vote
otherwise marked above) for all nominees.
INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any particular nominee,
strike through such person's name in the above list.
4. In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other
business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof.
THIS PROXY WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED ABOVE. IF
NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THE PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR PROPOSALS 1, 2 AND 3.
IMPORTANT: To ensure a quorum and to avoid the expense and delay of sending
follow-up letters, please mark, sign, date and mail this proxy in the
accompanying envelope.
Date:__________________________, 2005
__________________________
__________________________
Please sign exactly as name appears
hereon. For a joint account, each owner
should sign. Persons signing as
attorney, executor, administrator,
trustee or guardian or in any other
representative capacity should indicate
their full title. If a corporation,
please sign in full corporate name by
president or other authorized officer.
If a partnership, please sign in
partnership name by authorized person.