SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [_]
Check the appropriate box:
[X] Preliminary Proxy Statement [_]Confidential, for Use of the
[_] Definitive Proxy Statement Commission Only
(as permitted by Rule 14a-
[_] Definitive Additional Materials 6(e)(2))
[_] Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11(c) or Section 240.14a-12
USX CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
(Name of Persons Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)
Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box).
[_] No Fee Required
[_] Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and how it was calculated):
(4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5) Total fee paid:
[X]Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:
[_]Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule
0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number,
or the form or schedule and the date of its filing.
(1) Amount Previously Paid:
(2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3) Filing Party:
(4) Date Filed:
Revised Preliminary Proxy Materials
[LOGO OF USX]
USX Corporation Thomas J. Usher
600 Grant Street Chairman, Board of
Pittsburgh, PA 15219-4776 Directors &
Chief Executive Officer
, 2001
Dear USX Stockholder:
A special meeting of stockholders of USX Corporation will be held on October
16, 2001, at 9:00 a.m., local time, at the Hotel DuPont, 11th and Market
Streets, Wilmington, Delaware.
At this special meeting, you will be asked to approve the separation of the
Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group into two independent companies. If the
separation is completed, the business of the U. S. Steel Group will be owned
and operated by United States Steel Corporation, which will be a publicly
traded company, wholly owned by the holders of the then outstanding USX--U. S.
Steel Group Common Stock, and the business of the Marathon Group will be owned
and operated by Marathon Oil Corporation, which will be a separate publicly
traded company, wholly owned by the holders of the then outstanding USX--
Marathon Group Common Stock. At this special meeting, we will also be asking
you to approve the United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock Plan and the
United States Steel Corporation Senior Executive Officer Annual Incentive
Compensation Plan. These plans would not go into effect unless and until the
separation is completed.
The separation is intended to be tax-free to USX and our stockholders. We
have submitted a request to the Internal Revenue Service for a private letter
ruling as to the tax-free status of the separation, and completion of the
separation is conditioned upon receipt of a favorable private letter ruling.
Your board of directors has unanimously approved the separation and
recommends that you vote FOR approval of the separation and adoption of the
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, which is the legal document governing the
separation. The board believes that the separation will create two strong,
independent companies prepared to grow and prosper in each of their rapidly
changing industries. In reaching this conclusion, the board considered many
factors, including the opinions of Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation and
Salomon Smith Barney that the financial effects, taken as a whole, of the
transactions contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization, are fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of USX--U. S. Steel Group Common Stock
and the holders of the USX--Marathon Group Common Stock.
Your vote is very important. We cannot complete the separation without the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding USX--Marathon
Group Common Stock, voting as a separate class, the holders of a majority of
the outstanding USX--U. S. Steel Group Common Stock, voting as a separate
class, and the holders of a majority of the outstanding USX--Marathon Group
Common Stock and USX--U. S. Steel Group Common Stock, voting together as a
single class. In the combined class vote, holders of USX-Marathon Group Common
Stock will be entitled to one vote per share and holders of USX-U. S. Steel
Group Common Stock will be entitled to votes per share, which was calculated
in accordance with the formula required by the USX Restated Certificate of
Incorporation. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting in person,
please take the time to vote by signing and returning your proxy card in the
enclosed postage-paid envelope or you may take advantage of our telephone or
Internet voting procedures. If you do not return your proxy card or vote by
telephone or Internet or vote in person at the special meeting, it will have
the same effect as a vote against the separation.
This proxy statement/prospectus provides you with detailed information about
the separation. We encourage you to read the entire document carefully. In
particular, you should carefully consider the discussion in the section
entitled "Risk Factors" beginning on page 13.
Very truly yours,
Thomas J. Usher
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved the shares of United States Steel
Corporation to be issued in the separation or passed upon the accuracy or
adequacy of this proxy statement/prospectus. Any representation to the contrary
is a criminal offense.
This proxy statement/prospectus is dated , 2001 and is first being
mailed to USX stockholders on or about , 2001.
[LOGO OF USX CORPORATION]
USX Corporation
600 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15219-4776
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER 16, 2001
Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of the stockholders of USX
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, will be held on October 16, 2001 at 9:00
a.m. local time, at the Hotel DuPont, 11th and Market Streets, Wilmington,
Delaware to consider and vote upon the following proposals:
1. To approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization,
dated as of July 31, 2001, between USX Corporation and United
States Steel LLC, providing for the separation of the U. S. Steel
Group and the Marathon Group into two independent companies,
pursuant to which (1) a wholly owned subsidiary of USX will be
merged with and into USX, with USX continuing as the surviving
corporation, (2) each outstanding share of USX--U. S. Steel Group
Common Stock will be converted into the right to receive one share
of common stock of United States Steel Corporation, which will own
and operate the business of the U. S. Steel Group, and (3) the
USX--Marathon Group Common Stock will remain outstanding,
unaffected by the separation and will be the sole outstanding
shares of common stock of USX, which will change its name to
Marathon Oil Corporation and will own and operate the business of
the Marathon Group.
2. To approve the United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock Plan.
3. To approve the United States Steel Corporation Senior Executive
Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.
4. To adjourn the special meeting, if necessary.
Only holders of USX--Marathon Group Common Stock and USX--U. S. Steel Group
Common Stock at the close of business on August 31, 2001 are entitled to notice
of, and to vote at, the special meeting.
Your board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR approval
and adoption of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, and FOR approval of
the other proposals listed above. Your vote is very important. Adoption of the
Plan of Reorganization requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of the outstanding USX--Marathon Group Common Stock, voting as a
separate class, the holders of a majority of the outstanding USX--U. S. Steel
Group Common Stock, voting as a separate class, and the holders of a majority
of the outstanding USX--Marathon Group Common Stock and USX--U. S. Steel Group
Common Stock, voting together as a single class.
The Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and the separation are explained in
the accompanying proxy statement/prospectus, which you are urged to read
carefully. A copy of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization is attached as
Annex A to this proxy statement/prospectus.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Dan D. Sandman
Secretary
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
, 2001
Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting, please complete,
sign, date and return the accompanying proxy in the enclosed self-addressed
stamped envelope or vote by telephone or Internet.
Additional Information
This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates by reference important business
and financial information about USX Corporation that is not included in or
delivered with this proxy statement/prospectus. This information is available
to you without charge upon your written or oral request. You can obtain the
documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus by
requesting them in writing or by telephone from USX Corporation at the
following address and telephone number:
USX Corporation
Shareholder Services
600 Grant Street, Room 611
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-4776
(412)433-4801
(866) 433-4801 (toll free)
(412) 433-4818 (fax)
Any request for documents should be made by October 8, 2001 to ensure timely
delivery of the documents prior to the special meeting.
See the section entitled "Where You Can Find More Information" on page 131.
Table of Contents
Questions and Answers About the Separation................................ 1
Summary................................................................... 3
Selected Historical Financial Information for USX Corporation ............ 8
Selected Historical Financial Information for the U. S. Steel Group....... 9
Selected Historical Financial Information for the Marathon Group.......... 10
Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Information for United States Steel
Corporation.............................................................. 11
Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Information for Marathon Oil Corporation..... 12
Risk Factors.............................................................. 13
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements......................... 25
Recent Developments....................................................... 26
Market Price and Dividend Information of Marathon Group Shares and U. S.
Steel Group Shares....................................................... 30
Proposal One: The Separation.............................................. 32
Structure of the Separation............................................. 32
Background of the Separation............................................ 33
Reasons for the Separation.............................................. 36
Factors Considered by the Board of Directors in Approving the
Separation............................................................. 36
Recommendation of the USX Board of Directors............................ 38
Opinions of Financial Advisors.......................................... 38
Financing Arrangements Relating to the Separation....................... 44
Treatment of Employee Stock Options in the Separation................... 49
Treatment of USX Corporate Employees in the Separation.................. 49
Assignment of Other USX Corporate Assets and Certain Liabilities in the
Separation............................................................. 50
Federal Securities Law Consequences..................................... 50
Accounting Treatment.................................................... 50
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences........................... 51
Stock Exchange Listing.................................................. 53
No Appraisal Rights..................................................... 53
Interests of Officers and Directors in the Separation................... 53
The Special Meeting....................................................... 56
Date, Time and Place of the Special Meeting............................. 56
Proposals to be Considered at the Special Meeting....................... 56
Record Date............................................................. 56
Quorum.................................................................. 57
Vote Required........................................................... 57
Voting Rights........................................................... 57
Voting and Revocation of Proxies........................................ 58
Revocation.............................................................. 58
Solicitation of Proxies................................................. 59
Adjournments............................................................ 59
The Plan of Reorganization................................................ 60
Transactions............................................................ 60
No Exchange of Marathon Group Stock Certificates........................ 62
Redemption of Shares of Trust Preferred in Connection with the
Separation............................................................. 62
Listing of New U. S. Steel Shares and Marathon Shares.................... 62
Conditions to the Completion of the Separation........................... 62
Stockholders' Meeting and Board Recommendation........................... 63
Indemnification.......................................................... 64
Expenses................................................................. 64
Amendment................................................................ 64
Termination.............................................................. 64
Information About United States Steel...................................... 65
Description of the Business of United States Steel....................... 65
Properties of United States Steel........................................ 76
United States Steel Legal Proceedings.................................... 76
Management of United States Steel Corporation Following the Separation... 81
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations........................................................... 92
Information About Marathon................................................. 108
Management of Marathon Oil Corporation Following the Separation.......... 108
Liquidity of Marathon Oil Corporation Following the Separation........... 112
Relationship Between United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil
Corporation Following the Separation...................................... 114
Tax Sharing Agreement.................................................... 114
Transition Services Agreement............................................ 115
Financial Matters Agreement.............................................. 116
License Agreement........................................................ 116
Insurance Assistance Agreement........................................... 116
Description of Capital Stock of Marathon Oil Corporation Following the
Separation................................................................ 117
Authorized Share Capital................................................. 117
Marathon Shares.......................................................... 117
Marathon Oil Corporation Preferred Stock................................. 117
Marathon Oil Corporation Rights Agreement................................ 117
Description of Capital Stock of United States Steel Corporation Following
the Separation............................................................ 119
Authorized Share Capital................................................. 119
New U. S. Steel Shares................................................... 119
United States Steel Corporation Preferred Stock.......................... 119
United States Steel Corporation Rights Agreement......................... 119
Comparison of the Rights of Stockholders................................... 121
Voting Rights............................................................ 121
Dividends................................................................ 121
Liquidation.............................................................. 121
Rights on Disposition.................................................... 122
Separation of Groups and Exchange of Stock............................... 122
Certain Anti-takeover Considerations..................................... 122
Proposal Two: Approval of the United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock
Plan...................................................................... 124
Recommendation of the USX Board of Directors............................. 124
Summary of the Plan...................................................... 124
Proposal Three: Approval of the United States Steel Corporation Senior
Executive Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan...................... 127
Recommendation of the USX Board of Directors............................. 128
Summary of the Plan...................................................... 128
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners......................... 129
Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers.................. 129
Other Matters........................................................... 130
Legal Matters......................................................... 130
Experts............................................................... 130
Where You Can Find More Information..................................... 131
ANNEX A: Agreement and Plan of Reorganization...........................
ANNEX B: Opinions of Financial Advisors.................................
Opinion of Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation..................... B-1-1
Opinion of Salomon Smith Barney....................................... B-2-1
ANNEX C: Unaudited Condensed Pro Forma Financial Statements............. C-1
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements for United
States Steel Corporation............................................. C-1
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Statements for Marathon Oil
Corporation.......................................................... C-9
ANNEX D: Historical Financial Information for United States Steel....... D-1
Report of Independent Accountants..................................... D-2
Audited Combined Financial Statements................................. D-3
Unaudited Combined Financial Information.............................. D-32
Unaudited Interim Combined Financial Information...................... D-36
ANNEX E: Historical Financial Information for USX Corporation........... E-1
Management's Report................................................... E-2
Report of Independent Accountants..................................... E-3
Audited Financial Statements.......................................... E-4
Unaudited Financial Information....................................... E-43
Management's Discussion and Analysis.................................. E-56
Unaudited Interim Financial Statements................................ E-82
Management's Discussion and Analysis.................................. E-102
ANNEX F: United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock Plan................
ANNEX G: United States Steel Corporation Senior Executive Officer Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan............................................
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SEPARATION
Q: What is the proposed transaction?
A: USX is being separated into two independent companies, United States Steel
Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation. The separation is being effected
by a merger of USX with a newly formed subsidiary of USX. As a result of the
separation, the business of the U. S. Steel Group will be owned and operated
by United States Steel Corporation, which will be wholly owned by the
holders of the then outstanding USX--U. S. Steel Group Common Stock, and the
business of the Marathon Group will be owned and operated by Marathon Oil
Corporation, which will be wholly owned by the holders of the then
outstanding USX--Marathon Group Common Stock. The separation includes a $900
million value transfer from the Marathon Group to the U. S. Steel Group.
Q: What will I receive in the separation?
A: In the separation, each outstanding share of USX--U. S. Steel Group Common
Stock will be converted into one share of United States Steel Corporation
common stock ("New U. S. Steel Shares"), and the outstanding USX--Marathon
Group Common Stock will remain outstanding, unaffected by the separation and
will be the sole outstanding shares of common stock of USX ("Marathon
Shares"), and USX will change its name to Marathon Oil Corporation and will
own and operate the business of the Marathon Group.
Q: Will my shares of stock continue to be traded on the New York Stock
Exchange, Pacific Stock Exchange and Chicago Stock Exchange?
A. Yes. Following the separation, both the Marathon Shares and the New U. S.
Steel Shares will be traded on the NYSE, PSE and CSE under their current
symbols. We have applied to the NYSE, the PSE and the CSE for approval of
the listing of the New U. S. Steel Shares to be issued in the Separation
under the symbol "X", and the closing of the Separation is conditioned upon
the approval of such listing.
Q: What am I being asked to vote upon?
A: You are being asked to approve and adopt the Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization, which is the legal document governing the separation.
Q: What does our board of directors recommend?
A: Your board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR approval
and adoption of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization.
Your board has carefully reviewed the terms of the Separation, and has
received opinions of two independent financial advisors, that the financial
effects, taken as a whole, of the transactions contemplated by the Plan of
Reorganization, are fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of
USX--Marathon Group Common Stock and the holders of USX--U. S. Steel Group
Common Stock.
Your board has determined that the Separation is advisable and in the best
interests of USX and the holders of the USX--Marathon Group Common Stock
and the USX--U. S. Steel Group Common Stock.
Q: Your board has unanimously approved the Separation and adopted the Plan of
Reorganization.
A: In considering the recommendation of the USX board of directors to vote in
favor of the Separation, you should be aware that some of our directors and
executive officers have interests in the Separation that are in addition to
or different from the interests of stockholders generally. These interests
include disproportionate ownership of USX--Marathon Group Common Stock and
USX--U. S. Steel Group Common Stock, ownership of options, stock
appreciation rights and restricted shares, contractual rights to severance
payments in connection with a change in control and certain other
contractual rights and payments (including a completion and retention
agreement with the chairman of the board of directors of USX that, among
other things, includes a $6 million bonus). As of June 30, 2001, USX
directors beneficially owned 2.6 million shares of USX--Marathon Group
Common Stock (0.83% of USX--Marathon Group Common Stock) and 1.4 million
shares of USX--U. S. Steel Group Common Stock (1.55% of USX--U. S. Steel
Group Common Stock). The USX board of directors was aware of these interests
and considered them, among other factors, in approving the Separation. See
"THE SEPARATION--Interest of Officers and Directors in the Separation" on
page 53.
Q: What vote is required to approve the separation?
A: The Agreement and Plan of Reorganization must be approved by both the
holders of a
majority of the outstanding USX--Marathon Group Common Stock and USX--U. S.
Steel Group Common Stock, voting together as a single class, and by the
holders of a majority of the outstanding USX--Marathon Group Common Stock
and the holders of a majority of the outstanding USX--U. S. Steel Group
Common Stock, each voting as a separate class.
Q: Who is entitled to vote?
A: You are entitled to vote if you were a holder of either USX--Marathon Group
Common Stock or USX--U. S. Steel Group Common Stock at the close of
business on August 31, 2001.
Q: How do I vote?
A: You may vote by telephone or over the Internet by following the
instructions on the enclosed proxy card (or, if you own your shares through
a broker or other intermediary, on the enclosed voting instruction card).
You may also vote by marking, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card or
voting instruction card, and returning it in the enclosed prepaid envelope.
The proxy committee will vote your shares in accordance with your
directions. If you sign and return a proxy card but do not mark the boxes
showing how you wish to vote, the proxy committee will vote your shares FOR
the adoption of the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization. Unsigned proxy
cards will not be voted at all and will have the same effect as a vote
against the separation. If you are a stockholder of record (that is, if you
are registered on our books), you may also vote in person by attending the
meeting.
Q: Can I change my vote?
A: Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke
your proxy at any time before your shares are voted at the special meeting
by:
. voting again by telephone or over the Internet;
. sending us a proxy card dated later than your last vote;
. notifying the Secretary of USX in writing; or
. voting at the special meeting.
Q: If my shares are held in "street name" by my broker, will my broker vote my
shares for me?
A: Your broker will vote your shares only if you provide instructions to your
broker on how to vote. You should follow the directions provided by your
broker regarding how to instruct your broker to vote your shares. Without
instructions to your broker, your shares will not be voted on the
separation and will have the same effect as a vote against the separation.
Q: Is the separation taxable?
A: The separation generally will be tax-free to both USX and our stockholders.
We have requested a private letter ruling from the IRS that the separation
will be tax-free, and completion of the separation is conditioned upon
receipt of such private letter ruling. In the event that this condition is
waived, we will distribute supplemental proxy materials and resolicit
proxies from our stockholders. The material U. S. federal income tax
consequences of the separation are described in more detail on page 51. The
tax consequences to you will depend on the facts of your own situation. We
urge you to consult your tax advisor for a full understanding of the tax
consequences to you of the separation.
Q: Am I entitled to appraisal rights?
A: No. You will not be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the
separation.
Q: When do you expect to complete the separation?
A: Completion of the separation is subject to a number of conditions, which
are described on page 62, including the receipt of a private letter ruling
from the IRS that the separation will be tax-free. Although we cannot
predict the timing of receipt of such private letter ruling or satisfaction
of such other conditions, we presently expect to complete the separation on
or about December 31, 2001.
Q: Should I send my stock certificates now?
A: No. After we complete the separation, we will send instructions explaining
how to exchange your certificates representing shares of USX--U. S. Steel
Group Common Stock. Certificates representing shares of USX--Marathon Group
Common Stock will not be exchanged in the separation and will represent
Marathon Shares after the separation.
Q: Whom can I call with questions?
A: If you have any questions about the separation or would like copies of any
of the documents we refer to in this proxy statement/prospectus, you should
call Innisfree M&A at ( ) .
2
SUMMARY
This summary highlights selected material information from this proxy
statement/prospectus and may not contain all of the information that is
important to you. To better understand the separation, and for a more complete
description of the legal terms of these transactions, you should read this
entire document carefully, as well as those additional documents to which we
refer you. See "Where You Can Find More Information" on page 131. In this proxy
statement/prospectus, the term "United States Steel," refers to the U. S. Steel
Group for all periods prior to completion of the separation and to United
States Steel Corporation and its direct and indirect subsidiaries for all
periods following completion of the separation, in each case, unless the
context otherwise requires. In addition, in this proxy statement/prospectus,
the term "Marathon" refers to the Marathon Group for all periods prior to
completion of the separation and to Marathon Oil Corporation and its direct and
indirect subsidiaries for all periods following completion of the separation,
in each case, unless the context otherwise requires.
The Businesses
The U. S. Steel Group
The U. S. Steel Group, through its domestic steel segment, is engaged in the
production, sale and transportation of steel mill products, coke, taconite
pellets and coal; the management of mineral resources; real estate development;
and engineering and consulting services and, through its U. S. Steel Kosice
segment, primarily located in the Slovak Republic, in the production and sale
of steel mill products and coke. Certain business activities are conducted
through joint ventures and partially owned companies. Following the Separation,
the business of the U. S. Steel Group will be owned and operated by United
States Steel Corporation, which will have its principal executive offices at
600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15219-4776, and its telephone number will be
(412) 433-1121. For a description of the business of United States Steel, see
"INFORMATION ABOUT UNITED STATES STEEL" on page 65.
The Marathon Group
The Marathon Group includes Marathon Oil Company and certain other
subsidiaries of USX, which are engaged in worldwide exploration and production
of crude oil and natural gas; domestic refining, marketing and transportation
of petroleum products primarily through Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC ("MAP"),
owned 62 percent by Marathon; and other energy-related businesses. Following
the Separation, the business of the Marathon Group will be owned and operated
by Marathon Oil Corporation. Marathon's principal executive offices will be at
5555 San Felipe Road, Houston, TX 77056-2723, and its telephone number will be
713-629-6600.
The Holding Company Reorganization (see page 26)
On July 2, 2001, we completed a corporate reorganization to implement a new
holding company structure. As a result, USX became a holding company that owns
all of the outstanding equity of Marathon Oil Company, an Ohio corporation
which, directly and indirectly, owns and operates the business of the Marathon
Group, and of United States Steel LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
which, directly and indirectly, owns and operates the business of the U. S.
Steel Group. This reorganization is referred to as the "HoldCo Merger."
No action is or was required to be taken by any stockholder in connection
with the HoldCo Merger. Your stock certificates continue to represent shares of
USX--Marathon Group Common Stock ("Marathon Group Shares") or USX--U. S. Steel
Group Common Stock ("U. S. Steel Group Shares"), as applicable. No changes were
made to the rights of any stockholder.
The Separation (see page 32)
USX will be separated into two independent, publicly traded companies:
United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation. This transaction
is called the "Separation." As a result of the Separation:
. the business of the U. S. Steel Group will be owned and operated by
United States Steel Corporation, which will be an independent, publicly
traded company, wholly owned by the holders of the then outstanding U.
S. Steel Group Shares; and
. the business of the Marathon Group will be owned and operated by
Marathon Oil Corporation, which will be an
3
independent, publicly traded company, wholly owned by the holders of the
then outstanding Marathon Group Shares.
Structure of the Separation (see page 32)
The Separation will be implemented by merging a newly formed corporate
subsidiary of USX with and into USX, with USX continuing as the surviving
corporation. USX will change its name to Marathon Oil Corporation, and will
continue to own its subsidiary, Marathon Oil Company, which, together with its
subsidiaries, presently owns and operates the business of the Marathon Group.
At the effective time of the Separation, United States Steel LLC, which,
together with its subsidiaries, presently owns and operates the business of
the U. S. Steel Group, will be converted into a Delaware corporation named
United States Steel Corporation.
Conversion of Securities in the Separation (see page 61)
At the effective time of the Separation:
. each issued and outstanding U. S. Steel Group Share will be converted
into one New U. S. Steel Share;
. Marathon Group Shares will remain outstanding and will be the sole
outstanding shares of common stock of USX, and USX will change its name
to Marathon Oil Corporation;
. each outstanding share of USX 6.50% Cumulative Convertible Preferred
Stock will be converted into the right to receive, in cash, $50.00 plus
accrued but unpaid dividends thereon;
. each option to purchase U. S. Steel Group Shares, each stock
appreciation right with respect to U. S. Steel Group Shares, and each
restricted U. S. Steel Group Share, which has been granted and is
outstanding, will be converted into an option to purchase New U. S.
Steel Shares, a stock appreciation right of United States Steel
Corporation with respect to New U. S. Steel Shares or a restricted New
U. S. Steel Share, respectively, subject to the same terms and
conditions as were applicable to such options, stock appreciation rights
or restricted shares, respectively, prior to the Separation.
. each option to purchase Marathon Group Shares, each stock appreciation
right with respect to Marathon Group Shares and each restricted Marathon
Group Share, which has
been granted and is outstanding, will remain outstanding and represent
an option to purchase Marathon Shares, a stock appreciation right of
Marathon Oil Corporation with respect to Marathon Shares or a restricted
Marathon Share, respectively, subject to the same terms and conditions
as were applicable to such options, stock appreciation rights or
restricted shares, respectively, prior to the Separation.
The Value Transfer (see pages 32 to 37)
Following the Separation, USX, which will be renamed Marathon Oil
Corporation, will remain responsible for substantially all of our
indebtedness. In connection with the Separation, a portion of the indebtedness
and other obligations of USX will be repaid or retired and United States Steel
Corporation will incur indebtedness and other obligations and agree to repay a
portion of the indebtedness and other obligations of USX, such that the amount
of indebtedness and other obligations for which United States Steel
Corporation will be responsible is $900 million less than the net amounts
attributed to the U. S. Steel Group immediately prior to the Separation.
Conversely, the amount of indebtedness and other obligations for which
Marathon Oil Corporation will be responsible is $900 million more than the net
amounts attributed to the Marathon Group immediately prior to the separation.
We refer to this series of transactions as the "Value Transfer."
If the Separation had occurred on June 30, 2001, after giving effect to the
Value Transfer, Marathon Oil Corporation's total outstanding debt would have
been $3.5 billion and United States Steel Corporation's total outstanding debt
would have been $1.8 billion.
Redemption of Shares in Connection With the Separation (see page 62)
In connection with the Separation, each outstanding share of 6.75%
Convertible Quarterly Income Preferred Security of USX Capital Trust I, a
subsidiary of USX, will be redeemed for $50.00, plus accrued but unpaid
dividends thereon, in cash.
4
Reasons for the Separation (see page 36)
The USX board of directors believes that the Separation will, among other
things, allow Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel Corporation to
focus on their core businesses and make critical acquisitions and investments
needed to grow their respective businesses and will enhance stockholder value
for all of our stockholders through the creation of two strong, independent
companies.
Opinions of Financial Advisors (see page 38)
The USX board of directors received written opinions of two independent
investment banking firms, Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation ("CSFB") and
Salomon Smith Barney Inc. ("SSB"), as to the fairness of the financial effects,
taken as a whole, of the transactions contemplated by the Plan of
Reorganization from a financial point of view, to the holders of Marathon Group
Shares and to the holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares. The full text of these
investment banking opinions are included in Annexes B-1 and B-2 to this proxy
statement/prospectus. You are urged to read these opinions carefully in their
entirety for a description of the procedures followed, assumptions made,
matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken and the opinions
given.
Accounting Treatment (see page 50)
Marathon Oil Corporation, as successor to USX, will account for the
Separation as a discontinuance of the businesses comprising United States
Steel. If the historical carrying value of USX's investment in United States
Steel exceeds its fair value, a non-recurring non-cash charge on the Separation
will be recognized by Marathon Oil Corporation. Following the Separation,
United States Steel Corporation will account for its assets and liabilities
based on historical values at which they were carried by USX immediately prior
to the Separation.
The Compensation Plans Being Voted Upon (see pages 124 to 128).
You are being asked to approve two compensation plans for United States
Steel Corporation:
. The United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock Plan is an equity
compensation plan providing for stock options, restored options, stock
appreciation rights and restricted stock
which may be granted to executive officers and other persons in
responsible positions with United States Steel Corporation. This plan is
intended to provide United States Steel Corporation employees with
benefits comparable to those provided under the USX Corporation 1990
Stock Plan and is described on page 124.
. The United States Steel Corporation Senior Executive Officer Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan provides for cash bonus awards to senior
executive officers of United States Steel Corporation based on pre-
established performance measures. This plan is intended to provide
United States Steel Corporation senior executive officers with benefits
comparable to those provided under the USX Corporation Senior Executive
Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and is described on page 127.
The proposals to approve the United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock Plan
and the United States Steel Corporation Senior Executive Officer Annual
Incentive Stock Plan will require (i) the affirmative vote of a majority of the
votes cast at the special meeting by holders of Marathon Group Shares and U. S.
Steel Group Shares, voting together as a single class, and (ii) the affirmative
vote of a majority of the votes cast at the special meeting by holders of U. S.
Steel Group Shares, voting as a separate class. Notwithstanding such approvals,
these plans will not be implemented unless the Plan of Reorganization is
adopted by our stockholders and the Separation is completed.
Your board unanimously recommends that holders of Marathon Group Shares and
U. S. Steel Group Shares vote FOR the proposal to approve the United States
Steel Corporation 2002 Stock Plan and the proposal to approve the United States
Steel Corporation Senior Executive Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.
Following the Separation, the USX compensation plans referred to above will
be amended to eliminate references to U. S. Steel Group Shares and will remain
in effect with respect to directors, officers and employees of Marathon.
5
The Special Meeting (see page 56)
The special meeting of USX stockholders will be held on October 16, 2001 at
9:00 a.m., local time, at the Hotel DuPont, 11th and Market Streets,
Wilmington, Delaware. At the special meeting, you will be asked to:
. adopt the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization providing for the
Separation;
. approve the United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock Plan; and
. approve the United States Steel Corporation Senior Executive Officer
Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.
Record Date (see page 56)
Only holders of Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares at the
close of business on August 31, 2001 are entitled to vote at the special
meeting.
Voting Rights (see page 57)
In the separate class votes described above, each holder of Marathon Group
Shares or U. S. Steel Group Shares is entitled to one vote per share at the
special meeting. In the combined votes described above of Marathon Group Shares
and U. S. Steel Group Shares, voting together as a single class, holders of
Marathon Group Shares are entitled to one vote per share and holders of U. S.
Steel Group Shares are entitled to votes per share. We calculated the
number of votes to which each U. S. Steel Group Share is entitled by using the
formula required by USX's Restated Certificate of Incorporation. It is based on
the ratio of the market value of one U. S. Steel Group Share to one Marathon
Group Share over the 20 business-day period ending on August 31, 2001.
Conditions to Completion of the Separation (see page 62)
USX will not complete the Separation unless conditions to completion of the
Separation are satisfied or waived, to the extent permitted by law, in the sole
discretion of the USX board of directors. These conditions include:
. Adoption of the Plan of Reorganization by the required votes of USX
stockholders;
. Receipt of a private letter ruling from the IRS, in form and substance
satisfactory to the USX board of directors, that the Separation will
qualify as a tax-free transaction;
. Receipt of financing by or for United States Steel Corporation in
amount, form and substance satisfactory to the USX board of directors,
and completion of the $900 million Value Transfer;
. Approval of the New U. S. Steel Shares to be issued in the Separation
for listing on the NYSE, the PSE and the CSE, subject to official notice
of issuance; and
. The absence of any injunction or legal restraint blocking the
Separation.
On July 2, 2001, we filed with the IRS a request for such private letter
ruling. Receipt of the private letter ruling is the only remaining material
federal or state regulatory requirement in connection with the Separation.
Termination (see page 64)
The Separation may be terminated and abandoned at any time prior to the
effective date of the Separation, whether prior to or following the special
meeting, by and in the sole discretion of the USX board of directors.
Effects of the Separation on the Rights of Stockholders (see page 121)
Because the Marathon Shares and the New U. S. Steel Shares will not be
"targeted" shares as are Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares,
there will be differences in the rights of holders of the Marathon Shares and
New U. S. Steel Shares from their rights as holders of Marathon Group Shares
and U. S. Steel Group Shares, respectively. See "COMPARISON OF THE RIGHTS OF
STOCKHOLDERS" on page 121.
6
The organization of USX before and after the Separation is illustrated
below:
[GRAPH]
BEFORE THE SEPARATION
U.S. Steel Group Marathon Group
Stockholders Stockholders
USX
Corporation
United States Marathon Oil
Steel LLC Company
THE SEPARATION
--U.S. Steel Group Marathon Group
Stockholders-- Stockholders
USX
##Corporation
--United States USX MERGER Marathon Oil
Steel LLC ##Corporation Company
**
AFTER THE SEPARATION
United States Marathon Oil
Steel Corporation Corporation
Stockholders Stockholders
(formerly U.S. Steel (formerly Marathon
Group Stockholders Group Stockholders
United States Steel Marathon Oil
Corporation Corporation
(formerly (formerly
United States Steel LLC) USX Corporation)
Marathon Oil
Company
--------------------------------
**United States Steel LLC is converted into United states Steel Corporation
--U.S. Steel Group shares are converted into shares of United States Steel
Corporation common stock
##USX Merger Corporation, a newly formed corporate subsidiary of USX, is merged
with and into USX Corporation
7
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR USX CORPORATION
The following table sets forth selected historical financial information for
USX Corporation. This information should be read in conjunction with USX
Corporation's consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto,
which are in Annex E. This information does not give effect to the transactions
contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization. For such information, see "MARATHON
OIL CORPORATION UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET" and "MARATHON OIL
CORPORATION UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS" on pages C-
10 and C-15 in Annex C.
Six Months
Ended
June 30
----------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Dollars in millions (except per share data)
Statement of Operations
Data:
Revenues and other
income(a)(b)........... $21,188 $19,779 $39,914 $29,119 $28,077 $22,824 $22,938
Income from
operations(b).......... 2,039 1,588 1,752 1,863 1,517 1,705 1,779
Includes:
Inventory market
valuation credits
(charges)............. -- -- -- 551 (267) (284) 209
Gain (loss) on
ownership change in
MAP................... (6) 8 12 17 245 -- --
Income from continuing
operations............. $1,069 $ 720 $ 411 $ 705 $ 674 $ 908 $ 946
Income from discontinued
operations............. -- -- -- -- -- 80 6
Extraordinary losses.... -- -- -- (7) -- -- (9)
Cumulative effect of
change in accounting
principle.............. (8) -- -- -- -- -- --
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income.............. $ 1,061 $ 720 $ 411 $ 698 $ 674 $ 988 $ 943
Noncash credit from
exchange of preferred
stock.................. -- -- -- -- -- 10 --
Dividends on preferred
stock.................. (4) (4) (8) (9) (9) (13) (22)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income applicable to
common stocks.......... $ 1,057 $ 716 $ 403 $ 689 $ 665 $ 985 $ 921
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Common Share Data:
Marathon Stock:
Income before
extraordinary losses
and cumulative effect
of change in accounting
principle.............. $ 1,090 $ 621 $ 432 $ 654 $ 310 $ 456 $ 671
Per share--basic....... 3.53 1.99 1.39 2.11 1.06 1.59 2.33
--diluted........... 3.52 1.99 1.39 2.11 1.05 1.58 2.31
Net income.............. 1,082 621 432 654 310 456 664
Per share--basic....... 3.50 1.99 1.39 2.11 1.06 1.59 2.31
--diluted........... 3.50 1.99 1.39 2.11 1.05 1.58 2.29
Dividends paid per
share.................. .46 .42 .88 .84 .84 .76 .70
Common Stockholders'
Equity per share....... 18.89 16.92 15.70 15.38 13.95 12.53 11.62
Steel Stock:
Income (loss) before
extraordinary losses... $ (25) $ 95 $ (29) $ 42 $ 355 $ 449 $ 253
Per share--basic....... (.28) 1.08 (.33) .48 4.05 5.24 3.00
--diluted........... (.28) 1.07 (.33) .48 3.92 4.88 2.97
Net income (loss)....... (25) 95 (29) 35 355 449 251
Per share--basic....... (.28) 1.08 (.33) .40 4.05 5.24 2.98
--diluted........... (.28) 1.07 (.33) .40 3.92 4.88 2.95
Dividends paid per
share.................. .35 .50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Common Stockholders'
Equity per share....... 20.83 23.59 21.58 23.23 23.66 20.56 18.37
Balance Sheet Data--at
period end:
Capital expenditures.... $ 769 $ 1,669 $ 1,665 $ 1,580 $ 1,373 $ 1,168
Total assets............ 24,514 23,401 22,931 21,133 17,284 16,980
Capitalization:
Notes payable.......... $ 250 $ 150 $ -- $ 145 $ 121 $ 81
Total long-term debt... 4,109 4,460 4,283 3,991 3,403 4,212
Preferred stock of
subsidiary............ 250 250 250 250 250 250
Trust preferred
securities............ 183 183 183 182 182 --
Minority interest in
MAP................... 2,010 1,840 1,753 1,590 -- --
Redeemable Delhi
Stock(c).............. -- -- -- -- 195 --
Preferred stock........ 2 2 3 3 3 7
Common stockholders'
equity................ 7,692 6,762 6,853 6,402 5,397 5,015
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total
capitalization...... $14,496 $13,647 $13,325 $12,563 $ 9,551 $ 9,565
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
-------
(a) Consists of revenues, dividend and investee income (loss), gain (loss) on
ownership change in Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC ("MAP"), net gains
(losses) on disposal of assets, gain on investee stock offering and other
income.
(b) Excludes amounts for the Delhi Group (sold in 1997), which have been
reclassified as discontinued operations.
(c) On January 26, 1998, USX redeemed all of the outstanding shares of USX--
Delhi Group Common Stock.
8
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE U. S. STEEL GROUP
The following table sets forth selected historical information for the U. S.
Steel Group. This information does not present the financial information for
United States Steel Corporation as if it were a separate entity for the periods
presented. For financial information for United States Steel Corporation which
gives effect to the transactions contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization,
see "UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
BALANCE SHEET" and "UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS" on pages C-2 and C-6 in Annex C.
This information should be read in conjunction with USX Corporation's
consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, which are in
Annex E.
Six Months
Ended June 30
-------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Dollars in millions
Statement of Operations
Data:
Revenues and other
income(a).............. $3,301 $3,244 $6,132 $5,470 $6,477 $7,156 $6,872
Income (loss) from
operations............. (128) 203 104 150 579 773 483
Income (loss) before
extraordinary losses... (21) 99 (21) 51 364 452 275
Net income (loss)....... (21) 99 (21) 44 364 452 273
Noncash credit from
exchange of preferred
stock.................. -- -- -- -- -- 10 --
Dividends on preferred
stock.................. (4) (4) (8) (9) (9) (13) (22)
Net income (loss)
applicable to Steel
Stock.................. (25) 95 (29) 35 355 449 251
Balance Sheet Data--at
period end:
Capital expenditures.... $ 141 $ 244 $ 287 $ 310 $ 261 $ 337
Total assets............ 8,954 8,711 7,525 6,749 6,694 6,580
Capitalization:
Notes payable......... $ 123 $ 70 $ -- $ 13 $ 13 $ 18
Total long-term debt.. 2,309 2,375 915 476 510 1,087
Preferred stock of
subsidiary........... 66 66 66 66 66 64
Trust Preferred
Securities........... 183 183 183 182 182 --
Preferred stock....... 2 2 3 3 3 7
Common stockholders'
equity............... 1,858 1,917 2,053 2,090 1,779 1,559
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total
capitalization..... $4,541 $4,613 $3,220 $2,830 $2,553 $2,735
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
--------
(a) Consists of revenues, dividends and investee income (loss), net gains
(losses) on disposal of assets, gain on investee stock offering and other
income (loss).
9
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION FOR THE MARATHON GROUP
The following table sets forth selected historical information for the
Marathon Group. This information does not present the financial information for
Marathon Oil Corporation as if it were a separate entity for the periods
presented. For financial information for Marathon Oil Corporation which gives
effect to the transactions contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization, see
"MARATHON OIL CORPORATION UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET" and
"MARATHON OIL CORPORATION UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS" on pages C-10 and C-15 in Annex C. This information should be read
in conjunction with USX Corporation's consolidated financial statements,
including the notes thereto, which are in Annex E.
Six Months
Ended June 30
----------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Dollars in millions
Statement of Operations
Data:
Revenues and other
income(a).............. $17,911 $16,565 $33,859 $23,707 $21,623 $15,775 $16,153
Income from operations.. 2,167 1,385 1,648 1,713 938 932 1,296
Includes:
Inventory market
valuation credits
(charges)............ -- -- -- 551 (267) (284) 209
Gain (loss) on
ownership change in
MAP.................. (6) 8 12 17 245 -- --
Income before
extraordinary losses
and cumulative effect
of change in accounting
principle.............. 1,090 621 432 654 310 456 671
Net income.............. 1,082 621 432 654 310 456 664
Balance Sheet Data--at
period end:
Capital expenditures.... $ 628 $ 1,425 $ 1,378 $ 1,270 $ 1,038 $ 751
Total assets............ 16,004 15,232 15,674 14,544 10,565 10,151
Capitalization:
Notes payable......... $ 127 $ 80 $ -- $ 132 $ 108 $ 59
Total long-term debt.. 1,800 2,085 3,368 3,515 2,893 2,906
Preferred stock of
subsidiary........... 184 184 184 184 184 182
Minority interest in
MAP.................. 2,010 1,840 1,753 1,590 -- --
Common stockholders'
equity............... 5,834 4,845 4,800 4,312 3,618 3,340
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total
capitalization..... $ 9,955 $ 9,034 $10,105 $ 9,733 $ 6,803 $ 6,487
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
--------
(a) Consists of revenues, dividends and investee income (loss), gain (loss) on
ownership change in MAP, net gains (losses) on disposal of assets and
other income.
10
SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA INFORMATION FOR UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
The following selected unaudited pro forma financial information of United
States Steel Corporation gives effect to the $900 million Value Transfer, new
financing arrangements, the assignment of certain USX corporate assets and
liabilities and the payment of certain costs and expenses in connection with
the Separation. The selected unaudited pro forma financial information has been
derived from, or prepared on a basis consistent with, the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial statements of United States Steel Corporation,
including the notes thereto, included in Annex C of this proxy
statement/prospectus. This information is presented for illustrative purposes
only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations or
financial position that would have occurred at the beginning of each period
presented or on the dates indicated, nor is it necessarily indicative of the
future operating results or financial position of United States Steel
Corporation. This information should also be read in conjunction with the
unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements of United States
Steel, including the notes thereto, included in Annex C of this proxy
statement/prospectus.
Six Months Ended Year Ended
or as of or as of
June 30, 2001 December 31, 2000
---------------- -----------------
(Dollars in millions except per
share amounts)
Statement of Operations Information:
Revenues and other income.................... $3,301 $6,132
Income (loss) from operations................ (128) 104
Net income (loss)............................ (9) 23
Per Common Share Data:
Net income (loss)
--basic.................................... $ (.10) $ 0.26
--diluted.................................. (.10) 0.26
Balance Sheet Data:
Total Assets................................. $8,821
Capitalization:
Debt....................................... $1,791
Equity..................................... 2,680
------
Total capitalization..................... $4,471
======
11
SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA INFORMATION FOR MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
The following selected unaudited pro forma financial information of Marathon
Oil Corporation gives effect to the discontinuance of the businesses of United
States Steel, the $900 million Value Transfer, the assignment of certain USX
corporate assets and liabilities to United States Steel Corporation, the
payment of certain costs and expenses in connection with the Separation, and
the distribution of New U. S. Steel Shares to the holders of U. S. Steel Group
Shares. The selected unaudited pro forma financial information has been derived
from, or prepared on a basis consistent with, the unaudited pro forma condensed
financial statements of Marathon Oil Corporation, including the notes thereto,
included in Annex C of this proxy statement/prospectus. This information is
presented for illustrative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of
the results of operations or financial position that would have occurred at the
beginning of each period presented or on the dates indicated, nor is it
necessarily indicative of the future operating results or financial position of
Marathon Oil Corporation. This information should also be read in conjunction
with the unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements of Marathon Oil
Corporation, including the notes thereto, included in Annex C of this proxy
statement/prospectus.
Six Months Ended Year Ended
or as of or as of
June 30, 2001 December 31, 2000
---------------- -----------------
(Dollars in millions except per
share amounts)
Statement of Operations Information:
Revenues and other income.................... $17,911 $33,859
Income from operations....................... 2,153 1,630
Net income................................... 1,047 364
Per Common Share Data:
Net income
--basic.................................... $ 3.38 $1.17
--diluted.................................. 3.38 1.17
Balance Sheet Data:
Total Assets................................. $16,662
Capitalization:
Debt....................................... $ 3,538
Preferred stock of subsidiary.............. 250
Minority interest in MAP................... 2,010
Equity..................................... 4,853
-------
Total capitalization..................... $10,651
=======
12
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information included and incorporated by reference
in this proxy statement/prospectus, you should consider the following matters
in deciding whether to vote in favor of the Separation.
Risks Related to Separation
United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation Will Be Subject to
Continuing Contingent Liabilities of the Other Company Following the Separation
After the Separation, there will be several significant areas where the
liabilities of Marathon or United States Steel may become an obligation of the
other company following the Separation.
Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder (the "Code"), each corporation that was a
member of the USX consolidated group during any taxable period or portion
thereof ending on or before the effective time of the Separation is jointly and
severally liable for the federal income tax liability of the entire USX
consolidated group for such taxable period. See "RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NEW
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION AND MARATHON OIL CORPORATION FOLLOWING THE
SEPARATION--Tax Sharing Agreement" on page 114. Other provisions of federal law
establish similar liability for other matters, including laws governing tax
qualified pension plans as well as other contingent liabilities.
In addition, following the Separation, United States Steel Corporation will
remain contingently liable for debt, available revolving credit and other
obligations of Marathon Oil Corporation in the amount of approximately $2.8
billion as of June 30, 2001, of which approximately $1 billion was outstanding.
Pursuant to the Financial Matters Agreement, Marathon Oil Corporation will
indemnify United States Steel Corporation for any payments it would be required
to make in respect of these obligations. Similarly, Marathon Oil Corporation
will remain contingently liable for debt and certain guarantee and lease
obligations of United States Steel Corporation in the amount of approximately
$702 million as of June 30, 2001. Pursuant to the Financial Matters Agreement,
United States Steel Corporation will indemnify Marathon Oil Corporation for any
payments it would be required to make in respect of such obligations.
The Separation May Be Challenged by Creditors as a Fraudulent Transfer or
Conveyance
If a court in a suit by an unpaid creditor or representative of creditors of
either United States Steel Corporation or Marathon Oil Corporation, such as a
trustee in bankruptcy, or United States Steel Corporation or Marathon Oil
Corporation, as debtor-in-possession, in a reorganization case under title 11
of the United States Code, were to find that:
. the Separation and the related transactions were undertaken for the
purpose of hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors, or
. Marathon Oil Corporation or United States Steel Corporation received
less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration in
connection with the Separation and the transactions related thereto and
(i) USX was insolvent immediately prior to, or Marathon Oil Corporation
or United States Steel Corporation was insolvent at the effective time
of the Separation and after giving effect thereto, (ii) USX immediately
prior to, or Marathon Oil Corporation or United States Steel Corporation
as of the effective time of the Separation and after giving effect
thereto, intended or believed that it would be unable to pay its debts
as they became due, or (iii) the capital of USX immediately prior to, or
Marathon Oil Corporation or United States Steel Corporation, at the
effective time of the Separation and after giving effect thereto, was
inadequate to conduct its business,
13
then such court could determine that the Separation and the related
transactions violated applicable provisions of the United States Bankruptcy
Code and/or applicable state fraudulent transfer or conveyance laws. Such a
determination would permit the bankruptcy trustee or debtor-in-possession or
unpaid creditors to rescind the Separation.
The measure of insolvency for purposes of the foregoing considerations will
vary depending upon the law of the jurisdiction that is being applied.
Generally, however, an entity would be considered insolvent if, either:
. the sum of its liabilities, including contingent liabilities, is greater
than its assets, at a fair valuation; or
. the present fair saleable value of its assets is less than the amount
required to pay the probable liability on its total existing debts and
liabilities, including contingent liabilities, as they become absolute
and matured.
United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation May Be Unable to
Achieve All of the Benefits Sought by the Separation
We believe that Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel Corporation
will realize strategic and financial benefits as a result of the Separation.
However, we cannot guarantee when these benefits will be achieved, the extent
to which they will be achieved, or whether they will occur at all. The
following are factors that may prevent Marathon Oil Corporation and United
States Steel Corporation from realizing these benefits:
. competitors in the steel industry and the oil and gas industry may have
greater financial resources to make such investments or participate in
such consolidation on more attractive terms;
. substantial indebtedness of Marathon Oil Corporation and United States
Steel Corporation may impede either Marathon Oil Corporation or United
States Steel Corporation or both of them from participating in certain
investment or consolidation transactions; and/or
. domestic and international economic conditions may make such investments
and consolidation more costly.
Additionally, many factors may affect future results of Marathon Oil
Corporation and United States Steel Corporation. See "SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS" on page 25.
Following the Separation, Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel
Corporation Will Not Be Consolidated for Tax Purposes and United States Steel
Corporation's Recognition of the Benefits of Its Tax Losses May Be Delayed
Prior to the Separation, USX filed consolidated, combined and unitary tax
returns for federal and many states' income taxes, which included the results
of operations of the U. S. Steel Group and the Marathon Group. As a result of
the Separation, United States Steel Corporation will not be able to join with
Marathon Oil Corporation in any consolidated, combined, or unitary tax returns
for taxable periods ending after the effective time of the Separation.
Consequently, for federal and state income tax purposes, taxable income or
losses, and other tax attributes of United States Steel Corporation for taxable
periods ending after the effective time of the Separation generally cannot
offset, or be offset by, taxable income or losses and other tax attributes of
Marathon Oil Corporation.
Additionally, the present USX tax allocation policy requires the Marathon
Group and the U. S. Steel Group to pay the other for tax benefits resulting
from tax attributes which cannot be utilized currently by the group to which
such attributes are attributable on a stand-alone basis but which can be
utilized on a consolidated, combined, or unitary basis. The net amount of cash
payments paid by Marathon to United States Steel under the tax allocation
policy for prior tax years, subject to adjustment, was $21 million, $(2)
million, $91 million and $379 million during the years 1998, 1999, 2000 and the
first six months of 2001, respectively.
14
Such payments allow the group generating the tax attributes to currently
realize the tax benefits. After the Separation, if United States Steel
Corporation generates losses or other tax attributes, it would generally
benefit from those losses or other tax attributes only if and when it generated
sufficient taxable income in future years to utilize those losses or other tax
attributes on a stand-alone basis. Such a delay will affect cash flows, which
may require reduction or postponement of capital expenditures or acquisitions.
The Separation May Become Taxable Under Section 355(e) of the Code if 50% or
More of the Marathon Shares or New U. S. Steel Shares Are Acquired as Part of a
Plan
The Separation may become taxable to USX pursuant to Section 355(e) of the
Code if 50% or more of either the Marathon Shares or New U. S. Steel Shares are
acquired, directly or indirectly, as part of a plan or series of related
transactions that include the Separation. See "THE SEPARATION--Material U.S.
Federal Income Tax Consequences" on page 51. If Section 355(e) applies, USX
would be required to pay a corporate tax based on the excess of the fair market
value of the shares distributed over USX's tax basis for such shares. The
amount of such tax would be materially greater if the Separation were deemed to
be a distribution of Marathon Shares. If an acquisition occurs which results in
the Separation being taxable under Section 355(e), the Tax Sharing Agreement
provides that the resulting corporate tax liability will be borne by the
entity, either United States Steel Corporation or Marathon Oil Corporation,
with respect to which the acquisition has occurred. See the discussion in
"RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION AND MARATHON OIL
CORPORATION FOLLOWING THE SEPARATION--Tax Sharing Agreement" on page 114.
Anti-takeover Provisions Could Deter Takeover Attempts of Marathon Oil
Corporation and United States Steel Corporation and Limit Appreciation of Stock
Market Prices for Marathon Shares and New U. S. Steel Shares
The certificate of incorporation and by-laws of United States Steel
Corporation and of USX, which will be renamed Marathon Oil Corporation, contain
provisions that may have the impact of delaying or precluding an acquisition of
United States Steel Corporation or Marathon Oil Corporation without the
approval of the board of directors of such company. Such provisions may limit
the price that investors might be otherwise willing to pay in the future for
New U. S. Steel Shares and Marathon Shares. Such provisions include a
classified board of directors, a provision prohibiting stockholder action by
written consent, and a provision prohibiting stockholders from calling special
meetings. The foregoing provisions are identical to the provisions that are
currently included in the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of USX and the
By-Laws of USX. In addition, under the stockholder rights plan of each of
Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel Corporation, disinterested
stockholders may acquire additional Marathon Shares or New U. S. Steel Shares,
respectively, or of an acquiring company at a substantial discount in the event
of certain described changes of control. The foregoing plans are substantially
identical to the stockholder rights plans of USX. In addition, there are
provisions of Delaware law that may also have the effect of precluding an
acquisition of United States Steel Corporation or Marathon Oil Corporation
without the approval of the board of directors of such company. See "COMPARISON
OF THE RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS--Certain Anti-takeover Considerations" on
page 122.
Marathon Oil Corporation Will Continue to Have Financial Exposure to United
States Steel Corporation
Pursuant to the financial matters agreement to be entered into by Marathon
Oil Corporation and United States Steel Corporation in connection with the
Separation (the "Financial Matters Agreement"), if the Separation had occurred
on June 30, 2001, United States Steel Corporation would have assumed $702
million of financial obligations of Marathon in connection with the Separation,
including, $479 million of industrial revenue bonds, $90 million of capitalized
leases and $133 million of certain guarantee and lease obligations, which
guarantee and lease obligations are not reflected in the financial statements
of Marathon. Marathon (as the successor to USX) will remain contingently
responsible for repayment of these obligations. The Financial Matters Agreement
does not contain any financial covenants and United States Steel Corporation
will remain
15
free to incur additional debt and grant mortgages or security interests. United
States Steel Corporation will be more highly leveraged than USX, will have a
non-investment grade credit rating and has granted or likely will be granting
security interests in certain assets. If United States Steel Corporation were
to default under these assumed obligations, Marathon will be responsible for
them. See "THE SEPARATION--Financing Arrangements Relating to the Separation"
on page 44.
Certain Obligations to Be Assumed by United States Steel Corporation in the
Separation May Be Accelerated in the Event of the Bankruptcy of Marathon Oil
Corporation
Pursuant to the Financial Matters Agreement, upon the Separation, United
States Steel Corporation will become responsible for certain industrial revenue
bonds and certain guarantee and lease obligations (which on June 30, 2001
totaled approximately $702 million). Additionally, United States Steel
Corporation is contingently liable for debt, available revolving credit and
other obligations of Marathon Oil Corporation in the amount of approximately
$2.8 billion as of June 30, 2001, of which approximately $1 billion was
outstanding. Marathon Oil Corporation is not limited by agreement with United
States Steel as to the amount of indebtedness that it may incur and, in the
event of the bankruptcy of Marathon Oil Corporation, the holders of the
industrial revenue bonds and such other obligations may declare them
immediately due and payable. If such event occurs, United States Steel
Corporation may not be able to satisfy such obligations. See "RISK FACTORS--
Following the Separation, United States Steel Corporation Will Not Have Access
to the Financial and Other Resources of USX Corporation" on page 20.
Risks Related to the Business of United States Steel
Overcapacity in the Steel Industry May Negatively Affect United States Steel's
Results of Operations
On a global basis, there is an excess of steel-making capacity over global
consumption of steel products, including sheet, plate, tin mill and tubular
products. Under these conditions, shipment and production levels for United
States Steel's domestic operations have varied from year to year and quarter to
quarter, affecting United States Steel's results of operations and cash flows.
Many factors influence these results, including demand in the domestic market,
international currency conversion rates, and government actions, both domestic
and international. In addition, in many applications, steel competes with many
materials, including aluminum, cement, composites, glass, plastic and wood. The
emergence of additional substitutes for steel products could adversely affect
future market prices and demand for steel products. See "INFORMATION ABOUT
UNITED STATES STEEL--Management's Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations" on page 92.
Imports of Steel Could Negatively Affect United States Steel's Results of
Operations
Imports of steel into the United States constituted 23%, 27%, 26% and 30% of
the domestic steel market demand for the first five months of 2001, and the
years 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. See "INFORMATION ABOUT UNITED STATES
STEEL --Management's Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations" on page 92. We believe that steel imports into the United States
involve widespread dumping and subsidy abuses, and that the remedies provided
by United States law to private litigants are insufficient to correct these
problems. Imports of steel involving dumping and subsidy abuses depress
domestic price levels, which has an adverse effect upon United States Steel's
revenue and income. See "INFORMATION ABOUT UNITED STATES STEEL--United States
Steel Legal Proceedings" on page 76.
Many of United States Steel's International Competitors Are Larger and Have
Higher Credit Ratings
Based on International Iron and Steel Institute statistics, United States
Steel ranks as the largest domestic integrated steel producer and the eleventh
largest steel producer in the world, assuming full-year production of U. S.
Steel Kosice, s.r.o. ("USSK"). Many of its larger competitors have investment
grade credit ratings and, due to their superior size and credit ratings, United
States Steel may be at a disadvantage in participating in consolidations. In
addition, terms of United States Steel's indebtedness contain covenants that
may limit United States Steel's ability to participate in certain
consolidations.
16
Competition From Mini-Mill Producers Could Result in Reduced Selling Prices and
Shipment Levels for United States Steel
Domestic integrated producers, such as United States Steel, have lost market
share in recent years to domestic mini-mill producers. Mini-mills generally
produce a narrower range of steel products than integrated producers, but
typically enjoy certain competitive advantages such as lower capital
expenditures for construction of facilities and non-unionized work forces with
lower employment costs and more flexible work rules. An increasing number of
mini-mills utilize thin slab casting technology to produce flat-rolled
products. Through the use of thin slab casting, mini-mill competitors are
increasingly able to compete directly with integrated producers of flat-rolled
products, especially hot-rolled and plate products. Depending on market
conditions, the additional production generated by flat-rolled mini-mills could
have an adverse effect on United States Steel's selling prices and shipment
levels. See "INFORMATION ABOUT UNITED STATES STEEL--Description of the Business
of United States Steel" on page 65.
High Energy Costs Can Adversely Impact United States Steel's Results of
Operations
United States Steel's operations consume large amounts of energy, a
significant amount of which is natural gas. Domestic natural gas prices have
significantly increased from an average of $2.27 per million BTUs in 1999 to an
average of $5.88 per million BTUs in the first half of 2001. At current
consumption levels, a $1.00 change in domestic natural gas prices would result
in an estimated $50 million change in United States Steel's annual domestic
pretax operating costs.
United States Steel's Operations Are Subject to Business Interruptions and
Casualty Losses
Steel making and raw material operations are subject to unplanned events
such as explosions, fires, inclement weather, accidents and transportation
interruptions. To the extent not covered by insurance, United States Steel's
costs, revenues and cash flows may be adversely impacted.
Environmental Compliance and Remediation Could Result in Substantially
Increased Capital Requirements and Operating Costs
The domestic businesses of United States Steel are subject to numerous
federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the
environment. These environmental laws and regulations include the Clean Air Act
("CAA") with respect to air emissions; the Clean Water Act ("CWA") with respect
to water discharges; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") with
respect to solid and hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal; and the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA")
with respect to releases and remediation of hazardous substances. In addition,
all states where United States Steel operates have similar laws dealing with
the same matters. These laws are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly
stringent. The ultimate impact of complying with existing laws and regulations
is not always clearly known or determinable due in part to the fact that
certain implementing regulations for laws such as RCRA and the CAA have not yet
been promulgated or in certain instances are undergoing revision. These
environmental laws and regulations, particularly the CAA, could result in
substantially increased capital, operating and compliance costs. See
"INFORMATION ABOUT UNITED STATES STEEL--Description of the Business of United
States Steel: Environmental Matters" on page 73. In addition, United States
Steel is involved in a number of environmental remediation projects relating to
the remediation of former and present operating locations and is involved in a
number of other remedial actions under federal and state law. See "INFORMATION
ABOUT UNITED STATES STEEL--Description of the Business of United States Steel:
Environmental Matters" on page 73. United States Steel's environmental
expenditures were $230 million in 2000, $253 million in 1999 and $266 million
in 1998.
We believe that all of our domestic steel competitors are subject to similar
environmental laws and regulations. However, the specific impact on each
competitor may vary depending upon a number of factors, including the age and
location of operating facilities, production processes (such as mini-mill or
integrated producer) and the specific products and services it provides. To the
extent that competitors, particularly foreign
17
steel producers and manufacturers of competitive products, are not required to
undertake equivalent costs, the competitive position of United States Steel
could be adversely impacted.
USSK is subject to the national laws of the Slovak Republic. The
environmental laws of the Slovak Republic generally follow the requirements of
the European Union, which are comparable to domestic standards. In addition,
USSK has entered into agreements with the government to bring its facilities
into European Union environmental compliance. See "INFORMATION ABOUT UNITED
STATES STEEL--Description of the Business of United States Steel" on page 65.
United States Steel's Retiree Employee Health Care and Retiree Life Insurance
Costs Are Higher Than Those of Many of its Competitors
United States Steel maintains defined benefit retiree health care and life
insurance plans covering most domestic employees upon their retirement. Health
care benefits are provided through comprehensive hospital, surgical and major
medical benefit provisions or through health maintenance organizations, both
subject to various cost sharing features. Life insurance benefits are provided
to nonunion retiree beneficiaries primarily based on employees' annual base
salary at retirement. For domestic union retirees, benefits are provided for
the most part based on fixed amounts negotiated in labor contracts with the
appropriate unions. As of December 31, 2000, United States Steel reported an
unfunded obligation for such matters in the amount of $1,307 million. Mini-
mills, foreign competitors and many producers of products that compete with
steel are obligated to provide lesser benefits to their employees and retirees
and this difference in costs could adversely impact United States Steel's
competitive position.
Bankruptcies of Domestic Competitors Have Resulted in Lowered Operating Costs
of Such Competitors
Since 1998, approximately eighteen domestic steel companies have sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Many of these
companies have continued to operate and have enjoyed significant cost
advantages over United States Steel. In some cases, they have even expanded and
modernized while in bankruptcy. Upon emergence from bankruptcy, these
companies, or new entities that purchase their facilities through the
bankruptcy process, have been relieved of certain environmental, retiree and
other obligations. As a result, they are able to operate with lower costs than
United States Steel.
Many Lawsuits Have Been Filed Against United States Steel Involving Asbestos-
Related Injuries
United States Steel has been and is a defendant in a large number of cases
in which plaintiffs allege injury resulting from exposure to asbestos. Many of
these cases involve multiple plaintiffs and most have multiple defendants.
These cases fall into three major groups: (1) claims made under federal and
general maritime law by employees of the Great Lakes or Intercoastal Fleets,
former operations of United States Steel; (2) claims by persons who did work at
United States Steel facilities; and (3) claims made by industrial workers
allegedly exposed to an electrical cable product formerly manufactured by
United States Steel. It is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome
of these matters. If adversely determined, these lawsuits could have a material
adverse effect on United States Steel's financial position. See "INFORMATION
ABOUT UNITED STATES STEEL--United States Steel Legal Proceedings" on page 76.
United States Steel's International Operations Expose United States Steel to
Uncertainties and Risks From Abroad Which Could Negatively Affect Its Results
of Operations
USSK, located in the Slovak Republic, constitutes 28% of United States
Steel's total raw steel capability and also accounted for 16% of revenues for
the first half of 2001. USSK exports more than 80% of its product, with the
majority of its sales to other European countries. USSK is subject to economic
conditions in the European Union and global markets it serves. It is also
subject to political factors, including taxation, nationalization, inflation,
currency fluctuations, increased regulation and protectionist measures. In
addition, USSK is subject to foreign currency exchange risks in that its
revenues are primarily in euro-denominated currencies and its costs are
primarily in Slovak crowns and United States dollars.
18
Following the Separation, United States Steel Corporation Will Have a
Substantial Amount of Indebtedness and Other Obligations, Which Could Limit Its
Operating Flexibility and Otherwise Adversely Affect Its Financial Condition
If the Separation had occurred on June 30, 2001, United States Steel
Corporation would be liable for indebtedness in a total amount equal to
approximately $1.8 billion. United States Steel Corporation will also agree to
be responsible for certain guarantee and lease obligations of Marathon Oil
Corporation not reflected in its financial statements. As of June 30, 2001,
these obligations were estimated to be $133 million. In addition, United States
Steel Corporation may incur other obligations for working capital, refinancing
of a portion of the $1.8 billion referred to above or for other purposes. See
"THE SEPARATION--Financing Arrangements Relating to the Separation" on page 44.
This substantial amount of indebtedness could limit United States Steel's
operating flexibility and could otherwise adversely affect United States
Steel's financial condition.
United States Steel's high degree of leverage could have important
consequences, including the following:
. its ability to satisfy its debt obligations may be impaired in the
future;
. its ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital
expenditures, debt service requirements, acquisitions or general
corporate or other purposes may be impaired in the future;
. a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations must be dedicated
to the payment of principal and interest on its indebtedness, thereby
reducing the funds available to it for other purposes;
. some of its borrowings are and are expected to be at variable rates of
interest (including borrowings under its expected inventory and accounts
receivable credit facilities), which will expose it to the risk of
increased interest rates;
. its substantial leverage may limit its flexibility to adjust to changing
economic or market conditions, reduce its ability to withstand
competitive pressures and make it more vulnerable to a downturn in
general economic conditions; and
. its ability to pay dividends may be limited.
We cannot predict the amount or terms of additional indebtedness that United
States Steel may incur in the future. Such indebtedness may exacerbate the
consequences described above and could have other important consequences.
United States Steel's Business Requires Substantial Debt Service, Capital
Investment and Maintenance Expenditures Which United States Steel May Be Unable
to Meet
Based on United States Steel's pro forma debt levels, United States Steel
anticipates that its scheduled interest payments for the twelve months
immediately following the Separation will be approximately $148 million,
assuming an annual weighted average interest rate of 8.25%. The amortization
and maturities of the anticipated accounts receivable facility and inventory
revolving credit facility have not yet been negotiated with lenders.
Additionally, United States Steel's operations are capital intensive. For the
five-year period ended December 31, 2000, total capital expenditures were
$1,439 million and United States Steel plans capital expenditures of $325
million in 2001. United States Steel's business also requires substantial
expenditures for routine maintenance. There can be no assurance that United
States Steel will be able to raise such amounts through internally generated
cash or from external sources. See "RISK FACTORS--Following the Separation,
United States Steel Corporation Will Not Have Access to the Financial and Other
Resources of USX Corporation" on page 20 and "--United States Steel has
Incurred Operating and Cash Losses and Will Have Fewer Sources of Cash" on page
19.
United States Steel Has Incurred Operating and Cash Losses and Will Have Fewer
Sources of Cash
For the six months ended June 30, 2001 and the year ended December 31, 2000,
United States Steel had segment income (loss) from operations of $(138) million
and $25 million, respectively. Additionally, for the
19
year ended December 31, 2000, United States Steel generated negative cash from
operations of $494 million after investing activities and dividends, excluding
the $500 million elective VEBA funding. There can be no assurance that United
States Steel will realize positive operating income or cash flows from
continuing operations in the foreseeable future.
Historically, United States Steel funded its negative operating cash flow
with cash supplied by USX, a portion of which was reflected as a payment from
Marathon under the tax allocation policy and the remainder of which was
represented by increased amounts of debt attributed by USX. As a stand-alone
company, United States Steel Corporation will need to fund any of its negative
operating cash flow from external sources and there is no assurance that
adequate sources will be available or that the cost of such funding will not
adversely impact United States Steel.
Following the Separation, United States Steel Corporation Will Not Have Access
to the Financial and Other Resources of USX Corporation
Prior to the Separation, the U.S. Steel Group has been and will continue to
be operated under the control of USX. Following the Separation, United States
Steel Corporation will not be able to rely on USX for financial support or
benefit from a relationship with USX to obtain credit. Immediately following
the Separation, United States Steel Corporation's credit ratings will be lower
than USX's current ratings. See "THE SEPARATION--Background of the Separation"
beginning on page 33. This will result in higher interest rates and make
obtaining necessary capital more difficult. Following the Separation, the
annual weighted average interest rate of United States Steel Corporation's debt
and other obligations is estimated to be approximately 8.25%. During the six
months ended June 30, 2001, the annual weighted average interest rate of USX's
debt and other obligations was 7.11%. See "THE SEPARATION--Financing
Arrangements Relating to the Separation" on page 44.
The Terms of Indebtedness Entered Into and to Be Entered Into by United States
Steel Corporation in Connection With the Separation Will Contain Restrictive
Covenants that May Limit United States Steel Corporation's Operating
Flexibility
If the Separation had occurred on June 30, 2001, the amount of financing
that United States Steel Corporation would have incurred in connection with the
Separation, not including assumption of existing obligations, is $897 million.
This includes the $385 million of indebtedness (reduced by a $5 million
discount) evidenced by the 10.75% Senior Notes due August 1, 2008, recently
issued by United States Steel (the "Senior Notes"). The Senior Notes impose
significant restrictions on United States Steel Corporation compared to the
terms of the current financial obligations of USX. These restrictions, among
other things may:
. impose restrictions on payment of dividends;
. limit additional borrowings by United States Steel Corporation,
including limiting the amount of borrowings secured by inventories or
accounts receivable;
. limit asset sales and sale of the stock of subsidiaries; and
. restrict the ability to make capital expenditures or certain
acquisitions.
It is also expected that the anticipated secured inventory facility and
secured accounts receivable facility will require United States Steel to
maintain certain financial ratios and net assets.
If these covenants are breached, creditors would be able to declare their
obligations immediately due and payable and foreclose on any collateral.
Additional indebtedness that United States Steel may incur in the future may
also contain similar covenants, as well as other restrictive provisions.
See "THE SEPARATION--Financing Arrangements Relating to the Separation" and
"INFORMATION ABOUT UNITED STATES STEEL--Management's Discussion & Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations" on pages 44 and 92,
respectively.
20
Unionized Workforce
Currently, substantially all domestic hourly employees of United States
Steel's steel, coke and taconite pellet facilities are covered by a collective
bargaining agreement with the United Steelworkers of America which expires in
August 2004 and includes a no-strike provision. Other hourly employees (for
example, those engaged in coal mining and transportation activities) are
represented by the United Mine Workers of America, the United Steelworkers of
America and other unions. In addition, the majority of USSK employees are
represented by a union under a collective bargaining agreement expiring
February 2004, which is subject to annual wage negotiations. Strikes or work
stoppages and the resultant adverse impact on its relationship with its
customers could have a material adverse effect on United States Steel's
business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, mini-mill
producers and certain foreign competitors and producers of comparable products
do not have unionized work forces. This may place United States Steel at a
competitive disadvantage.
United States Steel's Business Is Cyclical
Demand for most of United States Steel's products is cyclical in nature and
sensitive to general economic conditions. The financial condition and results
of operations of United States Steel are significantly affected by fluctuations
in the U.S. and global economies. Because integrated steel makers have high
fixed costs, reduced volumes result in operating inefficiencies, such as those
experienced in the first half of 2001. Over the past five years, United States
Steel's net income has varied from a high of $452 million in 1997 to a loss of
$21 million in 2000. Future economic downturns, a stagnant economy or currency
fluctuations may adversely affect United States Steel's business, results of
operations and financial condition.
Risks Related to the Business of Marathon
A Substantial or Extended Decline in Oil or Gas Prices Would Have a Material
Adverse Effect on Marathon
Prices for oil and gas fluctuate widely. Marathon's revenues, operating
results and future rate of growth are highly dependent on the prices it
receives for its oil, gas and refined products. Historically, the markets for
oil, gas and refined products have been volatile and may continue to be
volatile in the future. Many of the factors influencing prices of oil, gas and
refined products are beyond the control of Marathon. These factors include:
. worldwide and domestic supplies of oil and gas,
. weather conditions,
. the ability of the members of OPEC to agree to and maintain oil price
and production controls,
. political instability or armed conflict in oil-producing regions,
. the price and level of foreign imports,
. the level of consumer demand,
. the price and availability of alternative fuels,
. the availability of pipeline capacity, and
. domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes.
Marathon is unable to predict the long-term effects of these and other
conditions on the prices of oil and gas. For example, oil prices declined
significantly in 1998 and, for an extended period of time, remained
substantially below prices obtained in previous years. In late 1999, oil and
natural gas prices increased significantly and have remained at higher levels.
21
Lower oil and gas prices may reduce the amount of oil and gas that Marathon
produces, which may adversely affect its revenues and operating income.
Significant reductions in oil and gas prices may require Marathon to reduce its
capital expenditures.
Oil and Gas Reserve Data and Future Net Revenue Estimates of Marathon Are
Uncertain
Estimates of reserves by necessity are projections based on engineering
data, the projection of future rates of production and the timing of future
expenditures. Estimates of Marathon's proved oil and gas reserves and projected
future net revenues are based on reserve reports which it prepares. The process
of estimating oil and gas reserves requires substantial judgment on the part of
the petroleum engineers, resulting in imprecise determinations, particularly
with respect to new discoveries. Different reserve engineers may make different
estimates of reserve quantities and revenues attributable thereto based on the
same data. Future performance that deviates significantly from the reserve
reports could have a material adverse effect on the business and prospects of
Marathon.
Fluctuations in the price of oil and natural gas have the effect of
significantly altering reserve estimates as the economic projections inherent
in the estimates may reduce or increase the quantities of recoverable reserves.
There can be no assurance, however, that such prices will be realized or that
the estimated production volumes will be produced during the periods indicated.
Actual future production, oil and natural gas prices, revenues, taxes,
development expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of recoverable oil
and natural gas reserves most likely will vary from our estimates.
If Marathon Fails to Acquire or Find Additional Reserves, Its Reserves and
Production Will Decline Materially From Their Current Levels
The rate of production from oil and gas properties generally declines as
reserves are depleted. Except to the extent that Marathon acquires additional
properties containing proved reserves, conducts successful exploration and
development activities or, through engineering studies, identifies additional
behind-pipe zones or secondary recovery reserves, its proved reserves will
decline materially as reserves are produced. Future oil and gas production is,
therefore, highly dependent upon our level of success in acquiring or finding
additional reserves. Because Marathon is smaller than many of its competitors,
it has fewer reserves and will be at an even greater disadvantage to its
competitors if it fails to acquire or find additional reserves.
Marathon's Refined Product Margins Can Be Adversely Affected by Rising Crude
Oil Prices and Environmental Regulations
Marathon conducts domestic refining, marketing and transportation operations
primarily through its 62% owned consolidated subsidiary, Marathon Ashland
Petroleum LLC ("MAP"). MAP's operations are conducted mainly in the Midwest,
Southeast, Ohio River Valley and the upper Great Plains. The profitability of
these operations depends largely on the margin between the cost of crude oil
and other feedstocks refined and the selling prices of refined products. MAP is
a purchaser of crude oil in order to satisfy its refinery throughput
requirements. As a result, its overall profitability could be adversely
affected by availability of supply and rising crude oil and other feedstock
prices which are not recovered in the marketplace. Refined product margins have
been historically volatile and vary with the level of economic activity in the
various marketing areas, the regulatory climate, logistical capabilities and
the available supply of refined products.
In addition, environmental regulations, particularly the 1990 Amendments to
the CAA, have imposed, and are expected to continue to impose, increasingly
stringent and costly requirements on refining and marketing operations which
may have an adverse effect on margins.
The Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Industry Is Very Competitive
There is strong competition relating to all aspects of the oil and natural
gas industry, and in particular in the exploration and development of new oil
and natural gas reserves. Marathon competes with major integrated
22
and independent oil and gas companies for the acquisition of oil and gas
properties and leases, for the equipment and labor required to develop and
operate these properties, and in the marketing of natural gas to end-users.
Many of these competitors have financial and other resources substantially
greater than that available to Marathon. In addition, many of Marathon's larger
competitors may be better able to respond to factors that affect the demand for
oil and natural gas production, such as changes in worldwide oil and natural
gas prices and levels of production, the cost and availability of alternative
fuels and the application of government regulations. Marathon also competes in
attracting and retaining personnel, including geologists, geophysicists and
other specialists and generalists. There can be no assurance Marathon will be
able to attract or retain technical personnel in the future.
Many of Marathon's Competitors in Exploration and Production Have Greater
Resources Than Marathon
The oil and gas industry is characterized by a large number of companies,
none of which is dominant within the industry, but a number of which have
greater resources than Marathon. As a consequence, Marathon may find itself at
a competitive disadvantage in bidding for drilling rights and in completing
projects.
Environmental Compliance and Remediation Could Result in Increased Capital
Requirements and Operating Costs
The businesses of Marathon are subject to numerous federal, state and local
laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. These
environmental laws and regulations include: the CAA, with respect to air
emissions; CWA, with respect to water discharges; RCRA, with respect to solid
and hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal; CERCLA, with respect to
releases and remediation of hazardous substances; and the Oil Pollution Act of
1990, with respect to oil pollution and response. In addition, many states
where Marathon operates have similar laws dealing with the same matters. These
laws and their associated regulations are constantly evolving and many of them
have become more stringent. The ultimate impact of complying with existing laws
and regulations is not always clearly known or determinable due in part to the
fact that certain implementing regulations for laws such as RCRA and the CAA
have not yet been finalized or in certain instances are undergoing revision.
These environmental laws and regulations, particularly the 1990 Amendments to
the CAA, new water quality standards and stricter fuel regulations could result
in increased capital, operating and compliance costs.
Marathon has incurred and will continue to incur substantial capital,
operating and maintenance, and remediation expenditures as a result of
environmental laws and regulations. To the extent these expenditures, as with
all costs, are not ultimately reflected in the prices of Marathon's products
and services, operating results will be adversely affected. Marathon believes
that substantially all of its competitors are subject to similar environmental
laws and regulations. However, the specific impact on each competitor may vary
depending on a number of factors, including the age and location of its
operating facilities, marketing areas, production processes and whether or not
it is engaged in the petrochemical business or the marine transportation of
crude oil or refined products.
Of particular significance to MAP are the new Tier II Fuels regulations
proposed in late 1999. The gasoline rules, which were finalized by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") in February 2000, and the diesel fuel
rule which was finalized in January 2001, require substantially reduced sulfur
levels. The combined capital cost to achieve compliance with the gasoline and
diesel regulations could amount to approximately $700 million between 2003 and
2005. This is a forward-looking statement and can be only a broad-based
estimate due to the ongoing evolution of regulatory requirements. Some factors
(among others) that could potentially affect gasoline and diesel fuel
compliance costs include obtaining the necessary construction and environmental
permits, operating considerations, and unforeseen hazards such as weather
conditions. To the extent these expenditures, as with all costs, are not
ultimately reflected in the prices of Marathon's products and services,
operating results will be adversely affected.
23
Marathon's Reliance on Foreign Production of Oil and Gas Exposes Marathon to
Risks From Abroad Which Could Negatively Affect Its Results of Operations
Marathon's oil and gas producing activities rely heavily upon production
outside of the United States. For the years 2000, 1999 and 1998, international
production accounted for 48%, 33% and 34%, respectively. Development of new
production properties in countries outside the United States may require
protracted negotiations with host governments, national oil companies and third
parties and are frequently subject to economic and political considerations,
such as taxation, nationalization, inflation, currency fluctuations, increased
regulation and approval requirements and governmental regulation, which could
adversely affect the economics of projects.
Marathon's Exploration and Production Operations Are Subject to Business
Interruptions and Casualty Losses
Exploration and production operations are subject to unplanned occurrences,
including, without limitation, blowouts, explosions, fires, loss of well
control and spills, adverse weather, labor disputes, and maritime accidents. To
the extent not covered by insurance, Marathon's costs, revenues and cash flows
could be adversely impacted.
Marathon's Refining, Marketing and Transportation Operations Are Subject to
Business Interruptions and Casualty Losses
Refining, marketing and transportation operations are subject to business
interruptions due to unplanned events such as explosions, fires, pipeline
interruptions, crude oil or refined product spills, inclement weather or labor
disputes. They are also subject to the additional hazards of marine operations,
such as capsizing, collision and damage or loss from severe weather conditions.
To the extent not covered by insurance, Marathon's costs, revenues and cash
flows could be adversely impacted.
Marathon Does Not Insure Against All Potential Losses and Could Be Seriously
Harmed by Unexpected Liabilities
As discussed above, both the exploration and production and the refining,
marketing and transportation operations of Marathon are subject to business
interruptions and casualty losses. Marathon maintains insurance against many,
but not all, potential losses or liabilities arising from its operations in
accordance with customary industry practices and in amounts that it believes to
be prudent. Losses and liabilities arising from such events could reduce
Marathon's revenues and increase its costs to the extent not covered by
insurance. The occurrence of any of the aforementioned events and any payments
made as a result of such events and the liabilities related thereto, would
reduce the funds available for exploration, drilling and production and could
have a material adverse effect on Marathon's financial position or results of
operations.
24
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This proxy statement/prospectus includes "forward-looking statements" within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements are identified by
the use of forward-looking words or phrases including, but not limited to,
"intended," "expects," "expected," "anticipates," and "anticipated." These
forward-looking statements are based on (1) a number of assumptions made by
management concerning future events and (2) information currently available to
management. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such forward-
looking statements, which are not a guarantee of performance and are subject to
a number of uncertainties and other facts, many of which are outside USX's
control, that could cause actual events to differ materially from such
statements. All statements other than statements of historical factors included
in this proxy statement/prospectus, including those regarding the financial
position, results of operations, cash flows, business strategy, projected
costs, growth opportunities, strategic and other benefits of the Separation,
and plans regarding financing in connection with the Separation, are forward-
looking statements. Although we believe that our expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such
expectations will prove to have been correct. Important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations ("Cautionary
Statements") include prices of oil and natural gas; refined product margins;
prices and volumes of sale of steel products; levels of imports of steel
products into the United States; prevailing interest rates; and general
economic and financial market conditions, as well as those factors disclosed
under "RISK FACTORS" on page 13 and elsewhere in this proxy
statement/prospectus and in our SEC filings listed under "WHERE YOU CAN FIND
MORE INFORMATION" on page 131. These forward-looking statements represent our
judgment as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus. All subsequent
written and oral forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their
entirety by the Cautionary Statements. Unless otherwise required by law, we
disclaim any intent or obligation to update the respective forward-looking
statements.
25
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
The Holding Company Reorganization
On July 2, 2001, we completed a corporate reorganization to implement a new
holding company structure. As a result, USX became a holding company that owns
all of the outstanding equity of Marathon Oil Company, an Ohio corporation
which, directly and indirectly, owns and operates the business of the Marathon
Group, and of United States Steel LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
which, directly and indirectly, owns and operates the business of the U. S.
Steel Group.
No action is or was required to be taken by any stockholder in connection
with the HoldCo Merger. Your stock certificates continue to represent Marathon
Group Shares or U. S. Steel Group Shares, as applicable. No changes were made
to the rights of any stockholder. References in this proxy statement/prospectus
to "Old USX" refer to USX Corporation, as it existed prior to the HoldCo
Merger.
The organization of USX before and after the HoldCo Merger is illustrated
below:
[GRAPH]
BEFORE THE
U.S. Steel Group HOLDCO MERGER Marathon Group
Stockholders Stockholders
USX Corporation
(owns the assets of the U.S. Steel Group)
Marathon Oil Company
THE HOLDCO
U.S. Steel Group MERGER Marathon Group
Stockholders Stockholders
USX Corporation
USX HoldCo, Inc.
United States Steel LLC Marathon Oil Company
AFTER THE
U.S. Steel Group HOLDCO MERGER Marathon Group
Stockholders Stockholders
USX Corporation
(formerly USX HoldCo, Inc.)
United States Steel LLC Marathon Oil Company
26
Fairless Works Shutdown
On August 14, 2001, United States Steel announced its intention to
permanently close the cold rolling and tin mill operations at Fairless Works,
with a combined annual finishing capability of 1.5 million tons, on or after
November 12, 2001. Under its labor agreement, United States Steel is required
to discuss the proposed shutdown with the United Steel Workers of America
before making a final decision. United States Steel also announced that,
subject to market conditions, it currently intends to continue operating the
hot dip galvanizing line at Fairless Works. The anticipated financial impact of
the shutdown, which is predominately non-cash, will be recorded in the second
half of 2001 and is estimated to be a pretax charge of $35 to $45 million.
Voluntary Early Retirement Program
[TO COME]
Outlook of United States Steel
Over the last few months, domestic orders for steel have strengthened and
prices have stabilized. In the third quarter, we expect Domestic Steel
shipments to be somewhat higher and realized prices to be flat or modestly
higher. On the cost side, there has been a declining trend in natural gas
prices compared to the same period last year. Continuation of this trend could
provide a significant positive impact on our costs over the balance of the
year.
On May 31, 2001 a major fire damaged the cold-rolling mill at USS-POSCO,
which is fifty percent owned by United States Steel. Damage was predominantly
limited to the cold-rolling mill area of the plant. USS-POSCO maintains
insurance coverage against such losses, including coverage for business
interruption. The mill is expected to resume production in the first quarter of
2002, although full-production may not be achieved until mid-2002. Until such
time, the plant will continue customer shipments using cold-rolled coils from
United States Steel and POSCO as substitute feedstock.
For USSK, United States Steel expects third quarter shipments to be slightly
lower than the second quarter and third quarter average realized prices to be
flat compared to the second quarter. Based on continued improvement in
production performance since acquisition, USSK raw steel production capability
for the second half of 2001 will be increased to 2.5 million net tons, for an
annualized rate of 5.0 million net tons.
For the full year 2001, total shipments are expected to be approximately
14.0 to 14.5 million net tons with Domestic Steel shipments of approximately
10.5 to 11 million net tons and USSK shipments of approximately 3.5 million net
tons.
United States Steel owns a 16% equity method investment in Republic
Technologies International, LLC ("Republic") through USX's ownership in
Republic Technologies International Holdings, LLC, which is the sole owner of
Republic. Republic is a major purchaser of raw materials from United States
Steel and the primary supplier of rounds for Lorain Tubular. On April 2, 2001,
Republic filed to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
Republic has continued to supply the Lorain mill since filing for bankruptcy
and no supply interruptions are anticipated. United States Steel's carrying
value of this investment in Republic has been reduced to zero. Upon Republic's
filing for bankruptcy, United States Steel accrued a charge for a substantial
portion of the receivables due from Republic. At June 30, 2001, United States
Steel's remaining pre-petition financial exposure to Republic, after recording
various losses and reserves, totaled approximately $30 million.
The above discussion includes forward-looking statements concerning
shipments, pricing, and equity investee performance. These statements are based
on assumptions as to future product demand, prices and mix, and production.
Steel shipments and prices can be affected by imports and actions of the U.S.
Government and its agencies pertaining to trade, domestic and international
economies, domestic production capacity, and customer demand. Factors which may
affect USSK results are similar to domestic factors, including excess world
supply and foreign currency fluctuations, and also can be influenced by matters
peculiar to international marketing such as tariffs. In the event these
assumptions prove to be inaccurate, actual results may differ significantly
from those presently anticipated.
27
Outlook of Marathon
The outlook regarding the Marathon Group's upstream revenues and income is
largely dependent upon future prices and volumes of liquid hydrocarbons and
natural gas. Prices have historically been volatile and have frequently been
affected by unpredictable changes in supply and demand resulting from
fluctuations in worldwide economic activity and political developments in the
world's major oil and gas producing and consuming areas. Any significant
decline in prices could have a material adverse effect on the Marathon Group's
results of operations. A prolonged decline in such prices could also adversely
affect the quantity of crude oil and natural gas reserves that can be
economically produced and the amount of capital available for exploration and
development.
Marathon's third quarter and full year 2001 production is expected to be
approximately 392 and 420 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day,
respectively. The full year estimate reflects reduced heavy oil investment in
Canada, a higher than expected level of asset sales and delays in new project
start-ups.
Marathon's high impact drilling program in the Gulf of Mexico will be
delayed due to the cancellation of the contract for the Cajun Express rig. With
the Cajun Express rig, Marathon expected to drill two deepwater Gulf of Mexico
wells before year-end 2001. Marathon has contracted the Max Smith rig, which is
on location, to drill the Deep Ozona prospect with the Paris Carver prospect
expected to follow in the fourth quarter of 2001.
For the longer term Marathon has targeted a 3% annual production growth rate
at a time when we see worldwide production growth rates of 1% to 2%. We plan to
continue our program of exploration and business development to meet our
target. Our exploration program is targeted on high impact projects and our
business development team is pursuing growth opportunities through purchases,
exchanges and joint ventures. We also anticipate that at some points we will
exceed the 3% annual growth rate which could present us with the opportunity of
selling less attractive reserves and productions thereby improving the
production profile.
The above discussion includes forward-looking statements with respect to the
expected levels of Marathon's worldwide liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas
production and the drilling program. Some factors that could potentially affect
worldwide liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas production include pricing, supply
and demand for petroleum products, amount of capital available for exploration
and development, regulatory constraints, timing of commencing production from
new wells, and other geological, operating and economic considerations. Some
factors that affect the drilling program include the timing and results of
future development drilling and drilling rig availability.
Downstream income of the Marathon Group is largely dependent upon the
refining and wholesale marketing margin for refined products and the retail
gross margin for gasoline and distillates. The refining and wholesale marketing
margin reflects the difference between the wholesale selling prices of refined
products and the cost of raw materials refined, purchased product costs and
manufacturing expenses. Refining and wholesale marketing margins have been
historically volatile and vary with the level of economic activity in the
various marketing areas, the regulatory climate, the seasonal pattern of
certain product sales, crude oil costs, manufacturing costs, the available
supply of crude oil and refined products, and logistical constraints. The
retail gross margin for gasoline and distillates reflects the difference
between the retail selling prices of these products and their wholesale cost.
Retail gasoline and distillate margins have also been historically volatile,
but tend to be counter cyclical to the refining and wholesale marketing margin.
Factors affecting the retail gasoline and distillate margin include seasonal
demand fluctuations, the available wholesale supply, the level of economic
activity in the marketing areas and weather situations which impact driving
conditions.
In June 2001, MAP acquired an interest in approximately 50 convenience
stores located in Indiana and Michigan from Welsh, Inc. The acquisition of
these retail outlets increases MAP's presence in these markets and should
provide more than 80 million gallons of new annual gasoline sales.
MAP is targeting a third quarter closing on a combination to create the
largest nationwide travel center network, which includes the travel center
operations of MAP's wholly owned subsidiary Speedway SuperAmerica LLC ("SSA")
and those of Pilot Corporation. MAP will have a 50 percent interest in the new
company, Pilot Travel Centers LLC.
28
MAP is also working to improve its logistics network and has been designated
operator of the Centennial Pipeline, owned jointly by Panhandle Eastern Pipe
Line Company, a subsidiary of CMS Energy Corporation, MAP, and TE Products Pipe
Line Company, Limited Partnership. All of the permits and rights-of-way have
been obtained for the new pipeline, which will connect the Gulf Coast refiners
with the Midwest market. The Centennial Pipeline system is expected to be
operational in first quarter 2002.
A MAP subsidiary, Ohio River Pipe Line LLC ("ORPL"), plans to build a
pipeline from Kenova, West Virginia to Columbus, Ohio. ORPL is a common carrier
pipeline company and the pipeline will be an interstate common carrier
pipeline. The pipeline will be named Cardinal Pipeline and is expected to
initially move about 50,000 barrels per day of refined petroleum into the
central Ohio region. MAP has secured over 95 percent of the rights-of-way
required to build the pipeline and negotiations are continuing with most of the
remaining landowners. Eminent domain proceedings are in progress in several
cases as well. Permitting issues have been encountered which could delay the
start-up of this pipeline until the first quarter of 2003. MAP continues to
vigorously pursue the permits and remaining rights-of-way required to complete
this project.
The Garyville, Louisiana coker project is nearing completion and is
anticipated to be at full production during the fourth quarter of this year.
The total cost of this major improvement program is approximately $280 million.
In connection with the proposed Separation, described beginning on page 32,
Standard & Poor's reported that they had assigned a BBB+ corporate credit
rating, which is investment grade, to Marathon Oil Corporation with a stable
outlook assuming the proposed Separation is completed.
The above discussion includes forward-looking statements with respect to the
expected successful completion and timing of the Pilot Travel Center
transaction, the expected completion of the Centennial Pipeline system, the
expected completion of the Cardinal Pipeline, the coker project and the
Proposed Separation. Some factors which could affect the successful completion
of the Pilot Travel Center transaction are the closing of definitive
agreements, obtaining the necessary financing and the receipt of third party
approvals. Some factors which could impact the Centennial Pipeline system
include delivery of equipment and materials, contractor performance and
unforeseen hazards such as weather conditions. Some factors which could impact
the Cardinal Pipeline include obtaining the necessary permits and remaining
rights-of-way, and completion of construction. Some factors which could impact
the coker project include unforeseen hazards such as weather conditions, and
unanticipated commissioning and start-up issues. Some factors that could affect
the Proposed Separation include approval of a majority of the outstanding
shares of each class of the current USX common stock, receipt of a favorable
tax ruling from the IRS on the tax-free nature of the transaction, completion
of necessary financing arrangements, receipt of necessary regulatory and third
party consents, any materially adverse changes in business conditions for the
energy and/or steel businesses or other unfavorable circumstances. These
factors (among others) could cause actual results to differ materially from
those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
29
MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION OF
MARATHON GROUP SHARES AND U. S. STEEL GROUP SHARES
The principal trading market for the Marathon Group Shares and the U. S.
Steel Group Shares is the NYSE. Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group
Shares are also listed on the Pacific Stock Exchange ("PSE") and the Chicago
Stock Exchange ("CSE"). The following tables set forth, for the periods
indicated, the high and low closing sale price per share on the NYSE, based on
published financial sources.
U. S. Steel
Marathon Group Shares Group Shares
--------------------- --------------
High Low High Low
--------------------- ------- ------
1999:
First Quarter........................... $ 31.38 $ 19.63 $ 29.13 $22.25
Second Quarter.......................... 32.75 25.81 34.25 23.50
Third Quarter........................... 33.88 28.50 30.06 24.56
Fourth Quarter.......................... 30.63 23.63 33.00 21.75
2000:
First Quarter........................... $ 27.50 $ 20.69 $ 32.94 $20.63
Second Quarter.......................... 29.19 22.81 26.88 18.25
Third Quarter........................... 29.63 23.50 19.69 14.88
Fourth Quarter.......................... 30.38 25.25 18.31 12.69
2001:
First Quarter........................... $ 29.99 $ 25.85 $ 18.00 $14.00
Second Quarter.......................... 33.73 26.23 22.00 13.72
Third Quarter (through )............
On November 29, 2000, the last full trading day prior to the announcement
that our board of directors authorized an in-depth study of our targeted stock
structure, the last reported sales prices of U. S. Steel Group Shares and
Marathon Group Shares on the NYSE Composite Tape were $13.81 per share and
$27.50 per share, respectively. On April 23, 2001, the last full trading day
prior to the announcement that our board of directors authorized management to
take steps necessary to implement the Separation, the last reported sales
prices of U. S. Steel Group Shares and Marathon Group Shares on the NYSE
Composite Tape were $15.89 per share and $31.37 per share, respectively. On
July 30, 2001, the last full trading day prior to the announcement that our
board of directors approved the Plan of Reorganization, the last reported sales
of U. S. Steel Group Shares and Marathon Group Shares on the NYSE Composite
Tape were $19.61 per share and $29.76 per share, respectively. On , 2001,
the last full trading day prior to the printing of this proxy
statement/prospectus, the last reported sales prices of U. S. Steel Group
Shares and Marathon Group Shares on the NYSE Composite Tape were $ per share
and $ per share, respectively. Stockholders are urged to obtain a current
market quotation for the U. S. Steel Group Shares and the Marathon Group
Shares.
In recent years, USX paid a quarterly dividend on the U. S. Steel Group
Shares of $0.25 per share. On April 24, 2001 and July 31, 2001, the USX board
of directors declared reduced dividends on U. S. Steel Group Shares of $0.10
per share.
For the periods indicated above through June 10, 2000, USX paid a quarterly
dividend on the Marathon Group Shares of $0.21 per share. Since September 9,
2000, USX has paid a quarterly dividend on the Marathon Group Shares of $0.23
per share.
Current Dividend Policy. The USX board of directors declares and pays
dividends on Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares based on the
financial condition and results of operations of the Marathon Group and the U.
S. Steel Group, long-term earnings and cash flow capabilities of the Marathon
Group and the U. S. Steel Group as well as the dividend policies of similar
publicly traded oil and gas and steel companies.
30
In determining its dividend policy with respect to Marathon Group Shares and U.
S. Steel Group Shares, the USX board of directors has relied on the separate
financial statements of the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group.
As set forth in the USX Restated Certificate of Incorporation, dividends on
Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares are limited to legally
available funds of USX, which are determined on the basis of the entire
corporation. Dividends on U. S. Steel Group Shares are further limited to the
"Available Steel Dividend Amount," an amount similar to the amount that would
be legally available for the payment of dividends on the U. S. Steel Group
Shares under Delaware law if the U. S. Steel Group were a separate company.
Post-Separation Dividend Policy. Following the Separation, the declaration
of dividends on New U. S. Steel Shares and Marathon Shares will be at the
discretion of the boards of directors of United States Steel Corporation and
Marathon Oil Corporation, respectively, and will be determined after
consideration of various factors, including, without limitation, in each case
the earnings and financial condition of United States Steel Corporation and
Marathon Oil Corporation and their subsidiaries. The boards of directors of
United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation will have the
right to change the amount of dividends at any time. The terms of indebtedness
entered into and to be entered into in connection with the Separation will
limit the ability of United States Steel Corporation to pay dividends following
the Separation. See "THE SEPARATION--Financing Arrangements Relating to the
Separation" on page 44.
31
PROPOSAL ONE: THE SEPARATION
Structure of the Separation
Under the Plan of Reorganization, the Separation will be implemented by
merging a newly formed corporate subsidiary of USX ("Merger Sub") with and into
USX, with USX continuing as the surviving corporation (the "Separation
Merger").
As a result of the Separation Merger:
. the business of the U. S. Steel Group will be owned and operated by
United States Steel Corporation, which will be an independent, publicly
traded company, wholly owned by the holders of the then outstanding U.
S. Steel Group Shares;
. the business of the Marathon Group will be owned and operated by
Marathon Oil Corporation, which will be an independent, publicly traded
company, wholly owned by the holders of the then outstanding Marathon
Group Shares;
. each issued and outstanding U. S. Steel Group Share will be converted
into the right to receive one share of common stock, par value $1.00 per
share, of United States Steel Corporation ("New U. S. Steel Shares");
. Marathon Group Shares will remain outstanding and will be the sole
outstanding shares of USX common stock ("Marathon Shares"), and USX will
change its name to Marathon Oil Corporation; and
. each outstanding share of 6.50% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock,
no par value, of USX ("6.50% Preferred Stock") will be converted into
the right to receive, in cash, $50.00 plus accrued but unpaid dividends
thereon.
For information regarding the material differences between the New U. S. Steel
Shares and the U. S. Steel Group Shares and between the Marathon Shares and the
Marathon Group Shares, see "COMPARISON OF THE RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS" beginning
on page 121.
In connection with the Separation, certain indebtedness and other
obligations of USX will be repaid or retired and United States Steel
Corporation will incur indebtedness and other obligations and agree to repay
certain indebtedness and other obligations of USX, such that the amount of
indebtedness and other obligations for which United States Steel Corporation is
responsible immediately following the Separation is $900 million less than the
net amounts attributed to the U. S. Steel Group immediately prior to the
Separation. Conversely, the amount of indebtedness and other obligations for
which Marathon Oil Corporation will be responsible immediately following the
Separation is $900 million more than the net amounts attributed to the Marathon
Group immediately prior to the Separation. For a more detailed description of
the financial arrangements affected by the Value Transfer, see "THE
SEPARATION--Financing Arrangements Relating to the Separation" on page 44.
In connection with the Separation, each outstanding share of the 6.75%
Convertible Quarterly Income Preferred Security of USX Capital Trust I, a
subsidiary of USX, will be redeemed for the right to receive, in cash, $50.00
plus accrued but unpaid dividends thereon.
The Separation will become effective at such time after the satisfaction or
waiver, to the extent permitted by law, of all of the conditions to the
Separation set forth in the Plan of Reorganization, as determined by the USX
board of directors, upon the filing of a certificate of merger with the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware or such later time as specified in
the certificate of merger (the "Separation Effective Time"). Completion of the
Separation is subject to a number of conditions including the receipt of a
private letter ruling from the IRS. For a description of such conditions, see
"THE PLAN OF REORGANIZATION--Conditions to the Completion of the Separation" on
page 62. Although we cannot predict the timing of receipt of such ruling or
satisfaction of such other conditions, we presently expect to complete the
Separation on or about December 31, 2001. The date upon which the Separation
actually occurs is referred to in this proxy statement/prospectus as the
"Separation Date."
32
Your board may terminate the Plan of Reorganization and determine not to
proceed with the Separation at any time prior to its completion, even if it is
approved by our stockholders and all of the other conditions to the Separation
are satisfied. In the event that any of the conditions to the Separation are
not satisfied, such as failure to receive the IRS private letter ruling,
inability to complete the financing in amount, form and substance satisfactory
to the board or failure to receive stockholder approval of the Separation, or
if the board decides not to proceed with the Separation, USX will continue to
exist in its present form with two classes of common stock outstanding
representing the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group.
Background of the Separation
In May 1991, stockholders of Old USX approved an amendment to the
certificate of incorporation of Old USX to provide for the issuance of two
classes of common stock--sometimes referred to as targeted stock-- intended to
separately reflect the performance of our steel and energy businesses without
diminishing the benefits of remaining a single corporation or restricting our
future restructuring options. Our targeted stock structure was designed to give
stockholders an opportunity to separately evaluate and invest in our steel and
energy businesses while allowing Old USX to finance its extensive capital
requirements on a consolidated basis.
Since that time, Old USX enjoyed lower capital and operating costs than it
believes would have been incurred by the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel
Group had they been held by two separate corporations. Although our board of
directors believes that the existing structure has benefitted both classes of
our common stockholders over the past ten years, the board has, from time to
time, reviewed our capital structure and the performance of our targeted stock
and has considered alternative structures to enhance stockholder value for all
of our stockholders. On November 30, 2000, we announced that our board of
directors authorized management to retain financial, tax and legal advisors to
perform an in-depth study of our targeted stock structure and all alternative
structures which may be in the best interest of all of our stockholders.
In December 2000, we engaged CSFB and SSB as our financial advisors in
connection with our review of the targeted stock structure and available
alternative structures. Immediately thereafter, CSFB and SSB began their due
diligence investigation of our business and capital structure and commenced
their review of available alternatives. Since that time, your board has met
five times with CSFB, SSB and other advisors to consider a number of matters
impacting the Separation.
On February 27, 2001, at a meeting of the board of directors, CSFB and SSB
reported to the board their preliminary findings with respect to their review
of our targeted stock structure and its impact on stockholder value, as well as
industry and business conditions facing the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel
Group. At that meeting, CSFB and SSB reviewed for the board potential
restructuring alternatives available to USX. Such alternatives included a spin-
off of Marathon or of United States Steel; a sale of Marathon or United States
Steel to a third party for stock and/or cash; creation of a single class of USX
stock for both Marathon and United States Steel; strategic acquisitions by
Marathon or United States Steel; and a restructuring of Marathon. CSFB and SSB
discussed the potential advantages and disadvantages of such alternatives.
Management, together with legal counsel, then reviewed for the board issues to
be considered in connection with any contemplated separation of the Marathon
Group and the U. S. Steel Group, including tax implications and structural
considerations.
On April 3, 2001, our board of directors again met with its financial, legal
and tax advisors to discuss the proposed Separation. At this meeting, CSFB and
SSB updated the board as to their preliminary advice that a separation of the
Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group would establish two strong,
independent companies and would create stockholder value for both classes of
our stockholders, assuming an appropriate value transfer from the Marathon
Group to the U. S. Steel Group. CSFB and SSB also advised the board that a
value transfer of $900 million would establish United States Steel as a
financially independent company. CSFB and SSB described for the board the
proposed capital structure of Marathon and United States Steel following the
Separation. Legal counsel then reviewed with the board alternative separation
structures and described for the board the considerations in selecting a
separation structure, including the tax implications of the Separation,
required stockholder approvals and corporate governance considerations.
33
Based upon all of the above, the board believes that the businesses of the
Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group will improve, and stockholder value
will therefore increase, if both businesses grow and are positioned to
participate in consolidation opportunities in their respective industries and
markets. Over the past two years, the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group
have engaged in major growth transactions. Marathon acquired Pennaco Energy
Inc. and acquired interests in producing properties from Shell U.K. Limited in
exchange for its 37.5% interest in Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Ltd. MAP
is participating in Centennial Pipeline, has acquired Midwest convenience
stores from Welsh Inc. and is forming a joint venture with Pilot Corporation to
expand its nationwide participation in the travel center market. The U. S.
Steel Group acquired an integrated steel facility in Kosice, Slovakia, tin mill
operations of LTV Steel and the remaining 50% interest in Lorain Tubular
Company, LLC. Each of the U. S. Steel Group and the Marathon Group has
identified a need to participate in industry consolidation, but has found that
our targeted stock structure has been an impediment to such participation, as
many potential acquisition candidates are reluctant to accept a targeted stock
as consideration.
On April 23, 2001, at a meeting of our board of directors, its financial,
legal and tax advisors, together with our management team, presented the board
of directors with the conclusions drawn from their studies undertaken to review
our targeted stock structure. Management presented the board with updated
business plans for both businesses and revenue trends in the two businesses
including, for the Marathon Group, an annual 3% production growth rate in
exploration and production operations and a 1% growth in volume in refining and
marketing operations and for U. S. Steel a continuation of the current weak
commercial environment through mid-2002 with strengthening prices and volumes
from mid-2002 through 2003. At that meeting, CSFB and SSB outlined the business
reasons for a separation. CSFB and SSB also confirmed that a value transfer of
approximately $900 million would be appropriate to establish United States
Steel as a strong, independent company. CSFB and SSB each advised the board
that, based on the information available as of the date thereof, it would be
prepared to render a fairness opinion to the board of directors to the effect
that the financial effects of the transactions, taken as a whole, contemplated
by the Plan of Reorganization are fair to the holders of Marathon Group Shares
and U. S. Steel Group Shares from a financial point of view, subject to the
approval of its investment banking fairness committee and subject to completion
and review of the definitive documents to effect the Separation.
Legal counsel then reviewed with the board the proposed structure of the
Separation. CSFB and SSB then briefly outlined the proposed refinancing of a
portion of our indebtedness and presented a proposed timetable to complete the
Separation. After full discussion, the board of directors unanimously
determined to authorize management to proceed with the necessary steps to
implement the Separation, subject to the later approval by the board of the
Separation. We issued a press release on April 24, 2001 announcing that our
board had authorized management to take such steps.
On May 29, 2001, the board of directors met with its legal, tax and
financial advisors. Legal counsel reviewed for the board the structure of the
Separation and the terms of the draft Plan of Reorganization, and discussed the
preliminary proxy statement/prospectus and the anticipated IRS private letter
ruling request. After full discussion, the board of directors unanimously
determined to approve the filing of the preliminary proxy statement/prospectus
with the SEC and the private letter ruling request with the IRS.
On July 31, 2001, our board of directors again met with its legal, tax and
financial advisors to review the terms of the Separation. Legal counsel
reviewed for the board the structure of the Separation and the terms of the
Plan of Reorganization. CSFB and SSB reviewed for the board their financial
analysis of the Separation and delivered their opinions to the board that the
financial effects, taken as a whole, of the transactions contemplated by the
Plan of Reorganization, are fair, from a financial point of view, to the
holders of Marathon Group Shares and the holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares.
Management updated the board on the steel and energy businesses including the
latest financial outlook for the two businesses. After full discussion, the
board of directors unanimously approved the Separation, adopted the Plan of
Reorganization and determined to recommend that our stockholders vote to adopt
the Plan of Reorganization and approve the transactions contemplated thereby.
Our financial advisors confirmed that, in their experience, in transactions
involving equity securities as a substantial part of the overall consideration,
many parties, particularly international persons and corporations,
34
strongly prefer a so-called "asset based" stock of an issuer that has a single
class of common stock, as compared to a targeted stock. Among the reasons
expressed by such parties are concerns about the impact of actual and
contingent liabilities of the other business, concerns over whether one
business is favored or disfavored by executive management and directors and the
combination of different credit profiles into a single borrower. The board
strongly believes that the businesses of both the Marathon Group and the U. S.
Steel Group will be benefited if they each have a single class, asset-based
common stock available for future consolidation activities.
In considering the Separation, the board was aware that the capital
structure of each company and the availability and cost of borrowings would be
a key factor for both companies. USX manages most financial activity on a
centralized consolidated basis, including issuance, repayment and repurchase of
debt. The financial impact of these centralized financial activities are then
attributed to the two groups based upon their respective cash flows. Both
businesses, but particularly the U. S. Steel Group, have benefited from the
borrowing power of USX.
The board believes that it is imperative that both companies going forward
be strong and competitive in their respective industries. This, in turn,
requires that each have adequate access to the capital markets. The board and
management consulted with its financial advisors and credit rating agencies
concerning the likely credit ratings of the two companies going forward and
their ability to raise necessary capital on appropriate terms and rates. Based
upon these discussions, the board concluded that if the U. S. Steel Group were
separated into an independent company with the debt level currently attributed
to it, it may be unable to raise necessary capital at competitive rates to
allow it to accomplish its business objectives. The board also concluded that
if the Marathon Group were separated with more debt than is currently
attributed to it, it would not adversely impact its ability to raise necessary
capital at competitive rates to allow it to accomplish its business objectives.
The board concluded, therefore, to adjust the amount of debt that will be
assumed by each company from amounts attributed to the two groups immediately
prior to the Separation.
The board and its advisors considered a range of possible adjustments and
evaluated each in the context of impact on business plans, possible business
conditions and credit ratings, following consultations with Moody's and
Standard & Poor's. Based upon these factors, the board determined that a value
transfer of $900 million is appropriate. To accomplish this, certain
indebtedness and other obligations of USX will be repaid or retired and United
States Steel Corporation will incur indebtedness and other obligations and
agree to repay certain indebtedness and other obligations of USX, such that the
amount of indebtedness and other obligations for which United States Steel
Corporation is responsible immediately following the Separation is $900 million
less than the net amounts attributed to the U. S. Steel Group immediately prior
to the Separation. Conversely, the amount of indebtedness and other obligations
for which Marathon Oil Corporation will be responsible immediately following
the Separation will be $900 million more than the net amounts attributed to the
Marathon Group immediately prior to the Separation. The board believes that the
Value Transfer will help establish United States Steel Corporation as a strong,
independent entity. After giving effect to this Value Transfer, United States
Steel Corporation will have less debt and more stockholders' equity than U. S.
Steel Group's current balance sheet and Marathon Oil Corporation will have more
debt and less stockholders' equity than Marathon Group's current balance sheet.
Based upon our discussions with the two rating agencies, it was anticipated
that the credit ratings of Marathon Oil Corporation would remain investment
grade and United States Steel Corporation would have non-investment grade
credit ratings following the Separation, which would be expected to reduce
United States Steel's ability to access the credit markets, as compared to the
access available to it currently as part of USX.
In considering the recommendation of the USX board to vote in favor of the
Separation, you should be aware that directors and executive officers of USX
have interests in the Separation that are in addition to or different from the
interests of stockholders generally, including disproportionate ownership of
Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares, ownership of options, stock
appreciation rights and restricted shares, and contractual rights to severance
payments in connection with a change in control and certain other contractual
rights and payments. Additionally, certain directors will be directors of both
Marathon Oil Corporation
35
and United States Steel Corporation after the Separation and be entitled to
receive directors' allowances and attendance fees from both companies, in the
amounts set forth on pages 82 and 109. The USX board of directors was aware of
these interests and considered them, among other things, in approving the
Separation. See "THE SEPARATION--Interest of Officers and Directors in the
Separation" on page 53.
Reasons for the Separation
Our board of directors believes that the Separation is in the best interest
of all of USX's stockholders and will create two strong, independent companies.
We believe that the Separation will:
. allow Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel Corporation to
focus on their core businesses;
. allow Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel Corporation to
make critical acquisitions and investments needed to grow their
respective businesses;
. provide each of Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel
Corporation with an appropriate capital structure for its business and
independent access to financial markets;
. remove impediments to participation in industry consolidation by
providing Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel Corporation
more flexibility in making stock-based acquisitions;
. align the liabilities and risks of each business with the company that
owns such business; and
. facilitate broader equity research coverage of each company, thereby
expanding the range of prospective investors in both the Marathon Shares
and the New U. S. Steel Shares.
Factors Considered by the Board of Directors in Approving the Separation
In recommending that USX stockholders approve the Separation and adopt the
Plan of Reorganization, our board of directors considered a number of factors
which they believe support their recommendation, including:
. the information and presentations regarding the historical and projected
industry and business conditions facing each of Marathon and United
States Steel.
. the historical results of operations, financial condition, assets,
liabilities, and cash flows of each of Marathon and United States Steel.
. the internally generated business plans for Marathon and United States
Steel prepared by our management, the assumptions underlying those
business plans and downside business condition scenarios for both groups
prepared by our management.
. the likelihood that the Separation will result in United States Steel
Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation, as independent companies,
being more focused on their respective businesses.
. the perceived impact of our targeted stock structure on the historical
and projected trading prices of Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel
Group Shares.
. the likelihood that the Separation would create stockholder value for
all of our stockholders and the opportunities to create similar value
for all of our stockholders under the current or alternative structures.
. the likelihood that the Separation would enable Marathon and United
States Steel to participate in industry consolidation, thereby enhancing
stockholder value.
. the opinions of CSFB and SSB that as of July 31, 2001, the financial
effects, taken as a whole, of the transactions contemplated by the Plan
of Reorganization, were fair, from a financial point of view, to the
holders of the Marathon Group Shares and to the holders of the U. S.
Steel Group Shares.
36
. the effect that the Value Transfer of $900 million would have on the
financial condition of United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil
Corporation.
. the opinion of American Appraisal Associates, Inc. (with respect to USX
prior to the Separation and with respect to each of Marathon Oil
Corporation and United States Steel Corporation after the Separation)
that the present fair saleable value of its assets would exceed its
probable liabilities; that its cash flows would be adequate to pay its
debts as they come due; and that it has, and would have, adequate
capital to conduct its business operations.
. The terms of the Plan of Reorganization which provide that our board of
directors has the right to terminate the Plan of Reorganization at any
time prior to completion of the Separation, whether before or after
stockholder approval.
. The terms of the Plan of Reorganization which require the approval of
the holders of a majority of the outstanding Marathon Group Shares and
the holders of a majority of the outstanding U. S. Steel Group Shares,
each voting as a separate class.
In its consideration of the proposed Separation, the board also considered
the following potentially negative factors:
. The continuation of contingent liability of each of Marathon and United
States Steel for certain liabilities of the other company following the
Separation.
. The possibility that some or all of the desired benefits of the
Separation may not be achieved.
. Loss of potential benefits flowing from consolidation of Marathon and
United States Steel for federal income and certain other tax purposes.
. Loss of access by United States Steel to USX's borrowing capabilities
and investment grade credit ratings.
. Risk of potential tax liabilities relating to the Separation under
Section 355(e) of the Code.
The board of directors also considered many of the other risks described
under the caption "RISK FACTORS", beginning on page 13, as potentially negative
factors in its evaluation of the proposed Separation. The board considered both
the positive and the potentially negative factors described above as they
relate to both the holders of Marathon Group Shares and the holders of U. S.
Steel Group Shares. In particular, the effect of the $900 million Value
Transfer was considered by the board to be a positive factor for the U. S.
Steel Group and important to provide for two strong, financially independent
companies. Although the Value Transfer might be viewed as negative by some
Marathon Group stockholders because Marathon's allocated debt will be increased
by $900 million, the board of directors believes that this potentially negative
factor is outweighed by the potential advantages of the Separation,
particularly in light of the fact that both groups are currently burdened by
all of the debt of USX.
Our targeted stock structure was implemented to provide our stockholders
with separate securities reflecting the performance of USX's steel and energy
businesses, while retaining the benefits of a single corporation. While the
interests of the holders of each targeted class of USX common stock may, under
some circumstances, diverge or appear to diverge, under Delaware law, the USX
board of directors must act with due care and in the best interest of all its
common stockholders, including the holders of the shares of each class of USX
common stock. The same standard applies to the discharge of the board's
fiduciary duties in the context of matters having disparate impacts upon
holders of Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares. Accordingly, in
approving the Separation, the board of directors considered the interests of
all its stockholders.
The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the
board of directors includes all of the material factors considered by the board
in reaching its conclusions and recommendations but is not meant to be
exhaustive. In view of the variety of factors considered in reaching its
determination, the board of directors did not find it practicable to, and did
not, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors
considered in reaching its conclusions and recommendations. In addition,
individual members of the board of directors may have given different weights
to different factors.
37
Recommendation of the USX Board of Directors
The USX board of directors has determined that the Separation is advisable
and in the best interests of USX and the holders of Marathon Group Shares and
U. S. Steel Group Shares. Our board has unanimously approved the Separation and
approved and declared the advisability of the Plan of Reorganization, and
recommends that holders of Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares
vote FOR adoption of the Plan of Reorganization.
In considering the recommendation of the USX board to vote in favor of the
Separation, you should be aware that directors and executive officers of USX
have interests in the Separation that are in addition to or different from the
interests of stockholders generally, including disproportionate ownership of
Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares, ownership of options, stock
appreciation rights and restricted shares, and contractual rights to severance
payments in connection with a change in control and certain other contractual
rights and payments. Additionally, certain directors will become directors of
both Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel after the Separation and
become entitled to receive directors' allowances and attendance fees from both
companies, in the amounts set forth on pages 82 and 109. The USX board of
directors was aware of these interests and considered them, among other things,
in approving the Separation. See "THE SEPARATION--Interest of Officers and
Directors in the Separation" on page 53.
Opinions of Financial Advisors
CSFB and SSB (the "Financial Advisors") have acted as USX's financial
advisors in connection with the Separation. USX selected the Financial Advisors
based on their experience, expertise, reputation and familiarity with USX's
businesses. Each of CSFB and SSB is an internationally recognized investment
banking firm that is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, complex strategic
transactions, negotiated underwritings, private placements and other purposes.
USX requested that the Financial Advisors evaluate the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the financial effects, taken as a whole, of the
transactions contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization to the holders of
Marathon Group Shares and to the holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares. On July
31, 2001, at a meeting of the USX Board of Directors held to consider the
Separation, each of CSFB and SSB delivered to the USX Board of Directors a
written opinion to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to
the matters described therein, the financial effects, taken as a whole, of the
transactions contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization are fair, from a
financial point of view, to the holders of Marathon Group Shares and to the
holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares. The opinions of the Financial Advisors do
not address any other aspect of the transaction or any related transaction and
do not constitute a recommendation to any stockholders with respect to any
matters relating to the proposed transaction.
The full text of the written opinions of the Financial Advisors dated July
31, 2001, to the USX board of directors, which set forth the procedures
followed, assumptions made, matters considered and limitations on the review
undertaken, are attached hereto as Annexes B-1 and B-2 and are incorporated
into this proxy statement/prospectus by reference. Holders of Marathon Group
Shares and holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares are urged to read the opinions
carefully in their entirety. This summary of opinions of the Financial Advisors
in this proxy statement/prospectus, which describe the material provisions of
the opinions, is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of
each opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, each of the Financial Advisors reviewed, among
other things, (1) historical financial statements of USX, including the
separate financial statements for the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group,
and certain other historical financial and operating data of USX, including the
Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, (2) certain publicly available
information with respect to USX, including the Marathon Group and the U. S.
Steel Group, (3) certain projected financial data with respect to USX,
including the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, without giving effect
to the Separation, and with respect to United States Steel Corporation and
Marathon Oil Corporation, giving effect to the Separation, in each case as
38
prepared by the management of USX, including the management of the Marathon
Group and the management of the U. S. Steel Group (collectively, "Management"),
(4) reported prices and trading activity for the Marathon Group Shares and the
U. S. Steel Group Shares, (5) drafts of the Plan of Reorganization, the
Financial Matters Agreement and the Tax Sharing Agreement, (6) the preliminary
proxy materials filed by USX with the Securities and Exchange Commission in
connection with the Separation, (7) the letter dated July 2, 2001 from USX to
the Internal Revenue Service requesting a private letter ruling that the
Separation will qualify as a tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the
Internal Revenue Code and (8) the terms of the Marathon Group Shares and the U.
S. Steel Group Shares as set forth in USX's certificate of incorporation as
currently in effect.
In addition, the Financial Advisors held discussions with Management with
respect to, among other things (1) the operations and financial condition of
USX, including the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, and the plans of
Management with respect to the business and affairs of USX, including the
Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, prior to the Separation, and of
United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation after the
Separation, (2) certain projected financial data with respect to USX, including
the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, without giving effect to the
Separation, and with respect to United States Steel Corporation and Marathon
Oil Corporation, giving effect to the Separation, in each case as prepared by
Management, (3) the benefits and detriments to USX of continued ownership of
both the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, (4) the expected impact of
the Separation and related transactions, including the $900 million reduction
in the net amounts of indebtedness and other obligations attributed to the U.
S. Steel Group and the corresponding increase on the Marathon Group immediately
prior to the Separation (collectively referred to as the "Transactions") on the
operations and the financial and strategic flexibility of United States Steel
Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation after the Separation, (5) certain
terms of the proposed Plan of Reorganization and (6) the effect of the
Separation on the business, results of operations and financial condition of
each of United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation.
In addition, each of the Financial Advisors undertook such other studies,
analyses and investigations as it deemed appropriate for the purpose of
rendering its opinion.
In arriving at its opinion, each of the Financial Advisors has assumed and
relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all of the financial and other
information used by it without assuming any responsibility for independent
verification of such information and has further relied upon the assurances of
Management that they are not aware of any facts that would make such
information inaccurate or misleading. Each of the Financial Advisors has
assumed that the Transactions will be consummated in accordance with the terms
of the Plan of Reorganization, without waiver, amendment or modification of any
material term, condition or agreement set forth therein. Each of the Financial
Advisors has also assumed that the Plan of Reorganization, the Financial
Matters Agreement and the Tax Sharing Agreement, when executed, will conform to
the drafts reviewed by the Financial Advisors in all respects material to the
analyses. With respect to the projected financial data of USX, including the
Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, and of United States Steel
Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation after the Separation prepared by
Management, upon the advice of Management and with Management's consent each of
the Financial Advisors has assumed that such projections have been reasonably
prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and
judgments of Management as to the expected future prospects and financial
performance of USX, including the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, and
of United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation after the
Separation, and each of the Financial Advisors has relied on such projections
in rendering its opinion. With respect to the estimates prepared by Management
of the value of certain benefits and detriments of the Separation to each of
United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation, with Management's
consent, each of the Financial Advisors has relied on such estimates and
assumed that they were reasonably prepared and reflected the best currently
available judgments of Management as to such benefits and detriments.
39
***
The following paragraphs contain a summary of certain financial and
comparative analyses performed by the Financial Advisors in connection with the
preparation of the fairness opinions. The summary does not purport to be a
complete description of the analyses conducted by the Financial Advisors in
arriving at the opinions. In addition, the Financial Advisors believe that the
analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the
analyses and of the factors considered, without considering all such factors
and analyses, could create an incomplete view of the processes underlying the
opinions. The Financial Advisors did not assign relative weights to any of the
analyses in preparing the opinions. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a
complex process, and a summary description does not capture the full analysis.
In performing the analyses, the Financial Advisors made numerous assumptions
with respect to industry performance, general business and economic conditions
and other matters, many of which are beyond the control of USX, the Marathon
Group, the U. S. Steel Group, United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil
Corporation. In addition, certain elements of the Separation are not
susceptible to precise quantification and, in preparing the opinions, the
Financial Advisors made judgments and estimates that they considered reasonable
and appropriate under the circumstances. Any estimates incorporated in the
analyses performed by the Financial Advisors are not necessarily indicative of
actual past or future values or results, which may be significantly more or
less favorable than suggested by such estimates or analyses. Because such
estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty, none of the Financial
Advisors, USX Management, Marathon, United States Steel or any other person
assumes responsibility for their accuracy. In addition, analyses relating to
the value of businesses do not purport to be appraisals and do not necessarily
reflect the prices at which businesses may be sold in the future or at which
their shares of capital stock may trade in the future.
The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in
tabular format. In order to fully understand the following financial analyses,
the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables
alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses.
Considering the data in the tables below without considering the full narrative
description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and
assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete
view of the financial analyses of the Financial Advisors.
Marathon Group Stock Performance
The Financial Advisors reviewed data regarding the stock price performance
of the Marathon Group Shares relative to a group of selected companies the
Financial Advisors deemed comparable to the Marathon Group or relevant to their
analyses (the "Marathon Peer Group") from April 20, 2001, two trading days
prior to the April 24 public announcement that the USX board of directors had
authorized management to pursue the Separation, to July 25, 2001. The Marathon
Peer Group included Conoco Inc., Phillips Petroleum Company and Amerada Hess
Corporation. The Financial Advisors noted that, during that period, the
Marathon Group had performed consistently with the Marathon Peer Group.
Separation Impact on the Marathon Group--Comparable Company Trading Analysis
The Financial Advisors reviewed data regarding the following ratios, for the
Marathon Group compared to the same ratios of the Marathon Peer Group for the
20 trading days ended July 25, 2001, using estimated earnings for 2001 and
2002:
. adjusted market value (equity market value plus total debt, preferred
stock and minority interest minus cash) to EBITDAX (earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and exploration expense)
ratio,
. equity market value to after-tax cash flow (earnings plus depreciation
and amortization) ratio and
. equity market value to net income.
40
For the 20 trading days ended July 25, 2001, the ratios obtained for the
Marathon Group and the mean ratios obtained for the Marathon Peer Group were as
follows:
Ratio Marathon Group Marathon Peer Group Mean
----- -------------- ------------------------
Adjusted Market Value/2001E EBITDAX... 3.2x 4.1x
Adjusted Market Value/2002E EBITDAX... 3.7x 4.5x
Market Value/2001E After-Tax Cash
Flow................................. 3.0x 3.9x
Market Value/2002E After-Tax Cash
Flow................................. 3.4x 4.2x
Market Value/2001E Net Income......... 6.0x 7.6x
Market Value/2002E Net Income......... 8.8x 10.2x
The Financial Advisors then selected ranges of multiples of estimated 2001
and 2002 EBITDAX, after-tax cash flow and net income derived from the Marathon
Peer Group and applied these multiple ranges to the corresponding financial
data of the Marathon Group. This analysis indicated an implied potential value
benefit reference range of $1,200,000,000 to $2,700,000,000. The Financial
Advisors noted that this potential value benefit range did not reflect the
change in value already realized in the market price of the Marathon Group
Shares.
Separation Impact on the Marathon Group--Precedent Premium Analysis
The Financial Advisors analyzed the implied transaction premiums paid in the
following selected merger and acquisition transactions involving major
integrated petroleum companies announced since 1998 (acquiror/target):
Chevron/Texaco, TOTAL Fina/Elf Aquitaine, Repsol/YPF, BP Amoco/Atlantic
Richfield, Exxon/Mobil, TOTAL/PetroFina and British Petroleum/Amoco. The
Financial Advisors then selected a range of premiums derived from these
transactions based on the closing stock prices of the target company one day
and thirty days prior to the public announcement of the transaction and applied
this premium range to:
. the average equity market value of the Marathon Group for the 20 trading
days ended July 25, 2001 and
. an adjusted equity market value of the Marathon Group, computed by
adding the mean implied potential benefit range from the Comparable
Companies Trading Analysis to the average equity market value of the
Marathon Group for the 20 trading days ended July 25, 2001.
In applying the premium range to the adjusted equity market value of the
Marathon Group, the Financial Advisors discounted the resulting implied equity
value by 10% per year over a one-year and a two-year period. This analysis
indicated an implied potential value benefit reference range of $1,600,000,000
to $3,000,000,000. The Financial Advisors noted that this potential value
benefit range did not reflect the change in value already realized in the
market price of the Marathon Group Shares.
Separation Impact on the Marathon Group--Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Using discounted cash flow analysis, the Financial Advisors calculated a
range of value of the Marathon Group based on the implied total net present
value of the estimated future unlevered free cash flows (EBITDAX minus
unlevered cash taxes minus capital expenditures and changes in working capital)
that the Marathon Group could produce. The Financial Advisors performed the
analysis based on two scenarios, a pre-Separation case and a post-Separation
case. The pre-Separation case was based on internal estimates provided by and
discussed with the Marathon Group's management to reflect the reasonable long-
term growth prospect for the Marathon Group under the existing USX corporate
structure. The pre-Separation case reflected a 3% annual production growth rate
in the Marathon Group's exploration and production business. In developing the
post-Separation case, the Financial Advisors used a 6% annual production growth
rate in the Marathon Group's exploration and production business, a growth rate
consistent with the publicly available production growth rate targets of the
Marathon Group's peers. The Financial Advisors also increased capital spending
to fund this
41
increased production growth rate. The post-Separation case also assumed
incremental debt for the Value Transfer and reflected the financial effects of
the arrangements contained in the Separation Agreements. The Financial Advisors
determined an implied total net present value reference range for each case
based on the sum of the following:
. the discounted value (using discount rates ranging from 9.0% to 10.0%
for the pre-Separation case and discount rates ranging from 8.5% to 9.5%
for the post-Separation case) of the estimated free cash flows of the
Marathon Group for the 10 year period of 2001 through 2010 and
. the net present value of the estimated free cash flows of the Marathon
Group after 2010 (using a terminal value multiple range of 3.5x to 4.5x
TV/EBITDAX for both the pre-Separation and the post-Separation case).
This analysis resulted in an implied potential value benefit reference range
of $700,000,000 to $1,200,000,000.
Separation Impact on the Marathon Group--Peer Credit Statistics Analysis
The Financial Advisors reviewed data regarding the debt to book
capitalization ratio and the debt to LTM (last twelve months) EBITDAX ratio of
the Marathon Group and its peers. Pro forma for the Separation and inclusive of
the Value Transfer, the Marathon Group's debt to book capitalization ratio was
41% and debt to LTM EBITDAX ratio was 1.2x. The Financial Advisors noted that
these ratios were consistent with those of the Marathon Group's peers.
U. S. Steel Group Stock Performance
The Financial Advisors reviewed data regarding the stock price performance
of the U. S. Steel Group Shares relative to a group of selected companies the
Financial Advisors deemed comparable to the U. S. Steel Group or relevant to
their analyses (the "U. S. Steel Peer Group") from April 20, 2001 to July 25,
2001. The U. S. Steel Peer Group included AK Steel Corporation, Bethlehem Steel
Corporation, Dofasco Inc. and National Steel Corporation. The Financial
Advisors noted that, during that period, the U. S. Steel Group had outperformed
the U. S. Steel Peer Group by approximately 23 percentage points.
Separation Impact on the U. S. Steel Group--Comparable Company Trading
Analysis
The Financial Advisors reviewed data regarding the following ratios, in each
case for the U. S. Steel Group compared to the same ratios of the U. S. Steel
Peer Group for the 20 trading days ended July 25, 2001, using estimated
earnings for 2001and 2002:
. the adjusted market value to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization) ratio and
. the adjusted market value to EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes)
ratio.
For the 20 trading days ended July 25, 2001, the ratios obtained for the U.
S. Steel Group and the mean ratios obtained for the U. S. Steel Peer Group were
as follows:
Ratio U. S. Steel Group U. S. Steel Peer Group Mean
----- ----------------- ---------------------------
Adjusted Market Value/2001E
EBITDA......................... 22.8x 6.5x
Adjusted Market Value/2002E
EBITDA......................... 4.5x 4.0x
Adjusted Market Value/2001E
EBIT........................... NM 18.1x
Adjusted Market Value/2002E
EBIT........................... 9.8x 9.0x
42
The Financial Advisors then selected a range of multiples of estimated 2002
EBITDA derived from the U. S. Steel Peer Group and applied this multiple range
to the corresponding financial data of the U. S. Steel
Group. This analysis indicated an implied potential value (detriment)/benefit
reference range of ($300,000,000) to $300,000,000. The Financial Advisors noted
that this potential value benefit range did not reflect the change in value
already realized in the market price of the U. S. Steel Group Shares.
Separation Impact on the U. S. Steel Group--Precedent Transaction Analysis
. The Financial Advisors analyzed the implied transaction multiples paid
in the following selected merger and acquisition transactions involving
major steel companies announced since 1995 (acquiror/target):
Usinor/Aceralia, Usinor/Arbed, USX/steel assets of VSZ, British
Steel/Hoogevens, Usinor/Cockerill, Sambre Usinor/CST, Ispat
International/Inland Steel, Bethlehem Steel/Lukens Steel, Grupo
Amazonia/Sidor, Thyssen/Krupp, Arbed/Aceralia, Renco Group/WCI Steel,
Acesita/CST, Watermill Ventures/Gulf States Steel. The Financial
Advisors compared adjusted market values in the selected transactions as
multiples of EBITDA and EBIT for the twelve-month period preceding the
announcement of the transaction. Adjusted market values were calculated
by multiplying the announced transaction price per share for the
relevant transaction by the diluted number of target company shares
outstanding, after taking into account option proceeds, plus total debt,
preferred stock and minority interest, minus cash.
The Financial Advisors then selected ranges of multiples of LTM EBITDA and
EBIT derived from these transactions and applied these multiple ranges to:
. the LTM EBITDA of the U. S. Steel Group, adjusted to include an
annualized twelve months of EBITDA of the U. S. Steel Group's Kosice
business segment, acquired in November 2000 and
. the average annual EBITDA and EBIT of the U. S. Steel Group for the
calendar years 1994 to 2000, adjusted to include an annualized twelve
months of EBITDA and EBIT, respectively, of the U. S. Steel Group's
Kosice business segment.
This analysis indicated an implied potential value benefit reference range
of $700,000,000 to $1,400,000,000. The Financial Advisors noted that this
potential value benefit range did not reflect the change in value already
realized in the market price of the U. S. Steel Group Shares.
Separation Impact on the U. S. Steel Group--Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
Using a discounted cash flow analysis, the Financial Advisors calculated a
range of value of the U. S. Steel Group based on the implied total net present
value of the estimated future unlevered free cash flows that the U. S. Steel
Group could produce. The Financial Advisors performed the analysis based on two
scenarios, a pre-Separation case and a post-Separation case. The pre-Separation
case and the post-Separation case were based on identical internal estimates
provided by and discussed with the U. S. Steel Group's Management and
reflecting the reasonable long-term prospect for the U. S. Steel Group under
the existing USX corporate structure and for United States Steel Corporation
assuming completion of the Separation. The post-Separation case also assumed a
reduction of debt from the Value Transfer and reflected the financial effects
of the arrangements contained in the Separation Agreements. The Financial
Advisors noted that post-Separation the U. S. Steel Group's weighted average
cost of capital may increase by approximately 2.5 percentage points. The
Financial Advisors determined an implied total net present value reference
range for each case based on the sum of the following:
. the discounted value (using discount rates ranging from 7.25% to 7.75%
for the pre-Separation case and discount rates ranging from 9.50% to
10.50% for the post-Separation case) of the estimated free cash flows of
the U. S. Steel Group for the 10 year period of 2001 through 2010 and
43
. the net present value of the estimated free cash flows of the U. S.
Steel Group after 2010 (using a terminal value multiple range of 4.0x to
5.0x TV/EBITDA for both the pre-Separation case and the post-Separation
case).
This analysis resulted in an implied potential value benefit reference range
of $400,000,000 to $450,000,000.
Separation Impact on the U. S. Steel Group- Peer Credit Statistics Analysis
The Financial Advisors reviewed data regarding the debt to book
capitalization ratio and the debt to 2002 estimated EBITDA ratio of the U. S.
Steel Group and its peers. Pro forma for the Separation and inclusive of the
Value Transfer, the U. S. Steel Group's debt to book capitalization ratio was
37.3% and debt to 2002 estimated EBITDA ratio was 2.4x. The Financial Advisors
noted that these ratios were lower than with those of the U. S. Steel Group's
peers.
***
USX has agreed to pay a fee to each of the Financial Advisors for its
services in connection with the Transactions, a significant portion of which,
in the case of each of the Financial Advisors, is contingent on consummation of
the Separation. USX has also agreed to reimburse each of the Financial Advisors
for its reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, including fees and expenses of legal
counsel and any other advisor retained by each of the Financial Advisors, and
to indemnify each of the Financial Advisors and related parties against
liabilities, including liabilities under the U.S. federal securities law,
arising out of its engagement.
Each of the Financial Advisors and its affiliates has performed and may
perform other investment banking financial advisory services for USX, Marathon
Oil Corporation, United States Steel Corporation and their respective
affiliates, including in connection with the offering by United States Steel of
the Senior Notes, for which each Financial Advisor has received and will
receive customary compensation. In the ordinary course of business, each of the
Financial Advisors and its affiliates may actively trade the debt and equity
securities of the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group for its own accounts
and for the accounts of customers, and, accordingly, may at any time hold long
or short positions in those securities.
Financing Arrangements Relating to the Separation
Current USX Financial Arrangements
USX manages most of its financial activities on a centralized, consolidated
basis. Such financial activities include the investment of surplus cash; the
issuance, repayment and repurchase of short-term and long-term debt; the
issuance, repurchase and redemption of preferred stock; and the issuance and
repurchase of common stock. Transactions that relate primarily to invested
cash, short-term and long-term debt (including convertible debt), related net
interest and other financial costs, and preferred stock and related dividends
are attributed to the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group based upon the
cash flows of each group for the periods presented and the initial capital
structure of each group. However, transactions such as leases, certain
collaterized financings, certain indexed debt instruments, financial activities
of consolidated entities which are less than wholly owned by USX and
transactions related to securities convertible solely into Marathon Group
Shares or the U. S. Steel Group Shares are specifically attributed to and
reflected in their entirety in the financial statements of the group to which
they relate.
These are attributions for accounting purposes and do not reflect legal
ownership of cash or legal obligation to pay and discharge such obligations.
USX is the issuer of the 6.50% Preferred Stock, although it is attributed
solely to the U. S. Steel Group, and subsidiaries of USX are the issuers of
other Preferred Obligations. Subject to a limited number of exceptions, USX is
the legal obligor of long-term debt and other financial instruments, including
many--such as leases--that are not reflected as liabilities on the consolidated
or group balance sheets.
After the Separation, United States Steel Corporation will own and operate
the business of the U. S. Steel Group and United States Steel Corporation or
its subsidiaries will incur indebtedness and other obligations in an
44
amount approximately equal to all of the liabilities of or attributed to the U.
S. Steel Group immediately prior to the Separation, both absolute and
contingent, less the amount of the $900 million Value Transfer. Upon
consummation of the Separation, the name of USX Corporation will be changed to
Marathon Oil Corporation, and Marathon Oil Corporation and its subsidiary
Marathon Oil Company will own and operate the business of the Marathon Group
and will remain responsible for all of the liabilities of or attributed to the
Marathon Group immediately prior to the Separation, both absolute and
contingent, plus $900 million.
USX is presently the legal obligor for most of the obligations attributed to
both groups, and, therefore, Marathon Oil Corporation will remain legally
obligated for these obligations after the Separation. Accordingly, United
States Steel Corporation will be required to incur new indebtedness to repay or
otherwise discharge a substantial amount of USX obligations. The indebtedness
and other obligations to be incurred by United States Steel in connection with
the Separation are referred to herein as the "Financing." In addition to the
Financing necessary to effect the Value Transfer, the indenture governing the
Senior Notes requires United States Steel to have at least $400 million of
availability through cash and undrawn credit facilities at the time of the
Separation.
After giving effect to the Financing required to complete the Separation,
and assuming the Separation had occurred on June 30, 2001, United States Steel
Corporation and its subsidiaries
. would be the direct obligor of the $325 million USSK Loan Facility;
. would assume $569 million of debt and capital leases of USX and $133
million of certain guarantee and lease obligations (which guarantee and
lease obligations are not reflected in the financial statements of
Marathon Oil Corporation);
. would incur new indebtedness in the amount of approximately $897
million, including the Senior Notes, and would pay $868 million of the
net proceeds thereof to Marathon Oil Corporation to be used to repay a
portion of the indebtedness attributed to United States Steel by USX
prior to the Separation.
In addition, United States Steel expects to enter into new credit
facilities, including a secured accounts receivable facility and a secured
inventory facility. Undrawn amounts under these facilities will provide
liquidity to United States Steel following the Separation.
Assuming the Separation had occurred on June 30, 2001, and that United
States Steel had completed all the financing required to complete the
Separation, United States Steel's sources and uses would have been:
(Dollars in
Sources: millions)
-------- -----------
Assumed industrial revenue
bonds...................... $ 479
Assumed capital leases...... 90
USSK Loan Facility.......... 325
Senior Notes(/1/)........... 380
Additional financing(/2/)... 517
Value Transfer.............. 900
Invested cash(/3/).......... 189
------
Total Sources............... $2,880
======
(Dollars in
Uses: millions)
----- -----------
Debt attributed to United
States Steel.............. $ 2,432
Preferred securities of
subsidiaries.............. 249
6.5% Preferred Stock....... 121
Separation costs........... 29
Other...................... 49
-------
Total Uses................. $ 2,880
=======
--------
(1) On July 27, 2001 United States Steel completed a private placement of $385
million principal amount (reduced by a $5 million discount) of 10 3/4%
Senior Notes due August 1, 2008.
(2) We currently anticipate that United States Steel will satisfy the need for
the $517 million in additional financing using the preliminary tax
settlement from Marathon, which is expected to be at least $300 million and
will be received on or before the Separation Effective Time, and a
combination of financings which may include additional senior notes, lease
financings and new preferred or other security offerings (including an
exchange of existing securities for new securities). In addition, United
States Steel expects to enter into new credit facilities, including a
secured accounts receivable facility and a secured inventory facility.
Undrawn amounts under these facilities are expected to be at least $300
million in order to
45
provide necessary liquidity. The amount of additional financing at
Separation may vary as a result of a number of factors including the
operating performance of United States Steel, its working capital position
and the amount of the tax settlement with Marathon.
(3) Invested cash represents amounts attributed to United States Steel by USX.
This cash will be retained by Marathon and be used to reduce debt
attributed to United States Steel.
Following the Separation, the annual weighted average interest rate of
these obligations is estimated to be approximately 8.25%. A one one-eighth (
1/8) percent change in that rate is expected to have an annual impact of about
$2 million of interest expense. Completion of this Financing in amount, form
and substance satisfactory to our board of directors is a condition to
completion of the Separation.
Obligations for Which United States Steel Corporation Will Be the Direct
Obligor
The following obligations of the U. S. Steel Group will continue as
obligations of United States Steel Corporation following the Separation, and
United States Steel will continue to be the obligor:
Senior Notes. On July 27, 2001, United States Steel completed the sale of
$385 million principal amount of Senior Notes. The Senior Notes, which mature
on August 1, 2008 and pay interest at an annual rate of 10.75%, represent an
unsecured senior obligation of United States Steel. Interest on the Senior
Notes is payable in cash on a semiannual basis, beginning on February 1, 2002.
The Senior Notes rank equally in right of payment with all existing and future
unsecured indebtedness of United States Steel and will rank senior in right of
payment to all of its existing and future subordinated indebtedness. USX has
initially guaranteed the Senior Notes, however USX will be released from the
guarantee if the Separation occurs on or before December 31, 2002.
The indenture governing the Senior Notes (the "Senior Note Indenture")
contains covenants which, among other things, limit or prevent United States
Steel and its subsidiaries from collateralizing assets to secure indebtedness,
borrowing additional funds, issuing or selling capital stock of its
subsidiaries, making certain payments and distributions, paying dividends,
transferring or selling assets and engaging in certain transactions, including
mergers or sales of substantially all of its assets. After the Separation, if
the Senior Notes receive and maintain an investment grade rating from both
Standard & Poor's and Moody's, United States Steel will no longer be subject
to certain of the covenants referred to above. The Senior Note Indenture also
contains several conditions to the completion of the Separation, including,
among others, a requirement that immediately following the Separation, United
States Steel shall have at least $400 million available in undrawn credit
facilities and cash, of which at least $300 million shall be available under
facilities with terms extending at least three years after the date such
facilities are put in place.
If the board of directors of USX decides not to proceed with the Separation
or the Separation does not occur on or before December 31, 2002, the Senior
Notes may be redeemed in whole or part at 101% of the principal amount plus
accrued but unpaid interest. Up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of
the Senior Notes may be redeemed at any time prior to August 1, 2004, at a
price of 110.75% of the principal amount plus accrued interest with the
proceeds of public equity offerings.
USSK Loan Facility. On November 24, 2000, USX acquired USSK which has a
loan facility with a group of financial institutions aggregating $325 million.
The facility, which is non-recourse to USX, bears interest at a fixed rate of
8.5% per year. The loan is subject to annual repayments of $20 million
beginning in 2003, with the balance due in 2010. Additional mandatory
prepayments of the loan may be required based upon a cash flow formula or a
change in control of USX. USSK also has a short-term $50 million credit
facility that expires in November 2001. The facility, which is non-recourse to
USX, bears interest at prevailing short-term market rates plus 1%. USSK is
obligated to pay a .25% commitment fee on undrawn amounts. At June 30, 2001,
there were no borrowings against this facility.
Operating Lease Obligations. United States Steel is the lessee under
several equipment leases and office building leases which, for accounting
purposes, are treated as operating leases. Total future lease payments under
these leases as of June 30, 2001 were approximately $250 million, with varying
maturities.
46
USX Obligations to Be Assumed by United States Steel Corporation
The following obligations of USX will continue as direct obligations of
Marathon Oil Corporation, although United States Steel Corporation will agree
in the Financial Matters Agreement to assume and pay all liabilities for these
obligations following the Separation:
Industrial Revenue Bonds. As of June 30, 2001, USX had outstanding $479
million of obligations under industrial revenue bonds related to environmental
projects for current and former U. S. Steel Group facilities, $9 million of
which will be repaid on or prior to December 31, 2001. Pursuant to the
Financial Matters Agreement, United States Steel Corporation will assume all
obligations under these instruments. Only $1.8 million of the industrial
revenue bonds mature from 2002 to 2012. Pursuant to the Financial Matters
Agreement, United States Steel must provide for the discharge of Marathon Oil
Corporation from the remaining liability under the assumed industrial revenue
bonds on or before the tenth anniversary of the Separation. Such discharge may
be accomplished by refinancing, paying to Marathon Oil Corporation the then
remaining principal amount of the obligations or a combination of the
foregoing.
Fairfield Caster Lease. United States Steel Corporation is the lessee of a
slab caster at the Fairfield Works facility in Alabama with a term through
2012. This lease is treated as a capitalized lease and, as of June 30, 2001,
the amount of such obligation was $84 million. USX is the obligor under this
lease. Under the Financial Matters Agreement, United States Steel will assume
and discharge all obligations under this lease. This lease is an amortizing
financing with a final maturity of 2012, subject to additional extensions.
Operating Lease Obligations and Guarantees. In connection with past sales of
various plants and operations, United States Steel assigned and the purchasers
assumed certain leases of major equipment used in the divested plants and
operations. In the event of a default by any of the purchasers, United States
Steel remains contingently liable for payments under these leases. In addition,
United States Steel is assuming certain other obligations and guarantees of USX
related to the business of United States Steel. As of June 30, 2001, the total
exposure for all of these matters totaled $133 million.
New Financing Arrangements of United States Steel Corporation
United States Steel Corporation will incur additional indebtedness in
connection with the Separation. Assuming the Separation occurred on June 30,
2001, United States Steel Corporation would have to incur new indebtedness in
the amount of $517 million (in addition to the indebtedness relating to the
Senior Notes) and enter into new agreements to provide the liquidity required
by the Senior Note Indenture. Such financings may include a combination of
additional senior notes, lease financings and new preferred or other security
offerings (including an exchange of existing securities for new securities)
with terms and conditions consistent with United States Steel Corporation's
credit rating. Approximately $868 million of the proceeds from these financings
and from the Senior Notes financing would have been paid to Marathon Oil
Corporation upon the Separation, assuming the Separation had occurred on June
30, 2001. It is also expected that United States Steel Corporation will enter
into new credit facilities, including a secured accounts receivable facility
and a secured inventory facility. Undrawn amounts under these facilities are
expected to be at least $300 million in order to provide necessary liquidity.
The Separation is conditioned upon the successful implementation of this
financing.
USX Obligations to Be Repaid or Retired
6.50% Preferred Stock Obligations. USX is the issuer of 2,404,487 shares of
the 6.50% Preferred Stock, which is presently convertible into U. S. Steel
Group Shares at a price of $46.125 per share and is attributed entirely to the
U. S. Steel Group. At the Separation Effective Time, each issued and
outstanding share of 6.50% Preferred Stock will be converted in the Separation
Merger into the right to receive, in cash, $50.00 plus accrued but unpaid
dividends thereon, or an aggregate of $120,224,350 (assuming there are no
unpaid dividends).
Redeemable Convertible Stock of a Subsidiary Trust. USX Capital Trust I, a
Delaware business trust and a subsidiary of USX, has outstanding 3,937,163
shares of 6.75% Convertible Quarterly Income Preferred
47
Securities(TM) (the "Trust Preferred"). The Trust Preferred has an initial
liquidation amount of $50.00 per share and is convertible into U. S. Steel
Group Shares at a price of $46.25 per share. In connection with the Separation,
each issued and outstanding share of Trust Preferred will be redeemed for
$50.00, in cash, plus accrued but unpaid dividends thereon, or an aggregate of
$196,858,150 (assuming there are no unpaid dividends).
General Terms of the Financial Matters Agreement
The Financial Matters Agreement governs the assumption by United States
Steel Corporation of the industrial revenue bonds and other financial
obligations of USX specified above. The agreement provides that United States
Steel Corporation will assume and discharge all principal, interest and other
duties of USX under these assumed obligations, including any amounts due upon
any defaults or accelerations of any of the obligations, other than defaults or
accelerations caused by any action of Marathon Oil Corporation. The agreement
also provides that on or before the tenth anniversary of the Separation, United
States Steel Corporation will provide for the discharge of Marathon Oil
Corporation from any remaining liability under any of the assumed industrial
revenue bonds. Such discharge may be accomplished by refinancing, paying to
Marathon Oil Corporation the then remaining principal amount of the obligations
or a combination of the foregoing.
The Financial Matters Agreement prohibits Marathon Oil Corporation from
taking any action that would create a default under the assumed obligations or
otherwise accelerate the payment obligations thereunder. The agreement also
obligates Marathon Oil Corporation to provide any letters of credit required
under any of these obligations provided that United States Steel Corporation
shall reimburse Marathon Oil Corporation in advance for the costs of such
letters of credit and shall indemnify and hold Marathon Oil Corporation
harmless against any draws under the letters of credit.
The Financial Matters Agreement provides for a general unsecured obligation
of United States Steel Corporation to Marathon Oil Corporation and ranks equal
to accounts payable and other obligations. The Financial Matters Agreement does
not contain any financial covenants and United States Steel Corporation and
Marathon Oil Corporation will remain free to incur additional debt, grant
mortgages or security interests in its property and sell or transfer assets
without the consent of Marathon Oil Corporation. The Financial Matters
Agreement also provides that Marathon Oil Corporation will indemnify United
States Steel Corporation against any claims arising out of USX financings not
assumed by United States Steel Corporation.
The Financial Matters Agreement is a contract between United States Steel
Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation. It does not grant any rights to the
holders of the industrial revenue bonds or of any other obligation. Among other
things, United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation may amend
or modify the Financial Matters Agreement upon mutual agreement, and payments
by United States Steel Corporation to Marathon Oil Corporation do not create an
obligation on the part of Marathon Oil Corporation to redeem or repurchase any
of these instruments.
Financing Arrangements of USX to Be Continued by Marathon Oil Corporation
Revolving Credit Facility. In November 2000, USX entered into a $1,354
million 5-year revolving credit agreement, expiring in November 2005, with a
group of financial institutions. Interest on the facility is based on defined
short-term market rates. During the term of the credit agreement, USX is
obligated to pay a variable facility fee on total commitments, which at June
30, 2001 was 0.125%. On June 30, 2001, there were no borrowings against this
facility. This facility will remain outstanding as an obligation of Marathon
Oil Corporation following the Separation. USX also has a similar $451 million
short-term credit facility expiring on November 29, 2001 with the same
financial institutions as the 5-year revolving credit agreement. On June 30,
2001, there were no borrowings under this facility. We expect that we will
renew this facility in 2001.
USX has from time to time issued commercial paper which it has classified as
long-term debt because it is supported by the unused and available credit on
the $1,354 million facility. On June 30, 2001, no commercial
48
paper was outstanding. We anticipate that Marathon Oil Corporation may issue
commercial paper in the future under similar circumstances.
Long and Short-Term USX Obligations to Be Continued. Marathon Oil
Corporation will continue to be the obligor on the obligations of USX. The
principal components of these obligations are:
Amount
Interest Rates Maturity (in millions) as of
Obligations % Range June 30, 2001
----------- -------------- --------- -------------------
Obligations relating to
Industrial Revenue Bonds (1)... 3.30 to 6.875% 2009-2033 $ 508
Fairfield Caster Lease(2)....... 8.04% 2012 $ 84
Bank Term Loan.................. 6.57% 2006 $ 29
Guaranteed Notes and Loans of
Subsidiaries................... 7.00 to 9.05% 2002-2006 $ 320
Preferred Obligations of a
Subsidiary..................... 8.75% 2044 $ 250
Operating Leases and
Guarantees..................... 5.00 to 11.75% 2002-2017 $ 747
Other long and short term
obligations.................... 6.65 to 9.80% 2001-2023 $2,505
--------
(1) The rights and obligations pertaining to $479 million of the industrial
revenue bonds are being assigned to and assumed by United States Steel
Corporation pursuant to the Financial Matters Agreement.
(2) Fairfield Caster will be subleased to United States Steel Corporation under
the Financial Matters Agreement.
Treatment of Employee Stock Options in the Separation
In the Separation, all outstanding and unexercised options to purchase U. S.
Steel Group Shares will be converted into options to purchase New U. S. Steel
Shares, subject to the same terms and conditions as the options to purchase U.
S. Steel Group Shares immediately before the Separation Effective Time. All
outstanding and unexercised options to purchase Marathon Group Shares will
remain outstanding and represent an option to purchase Marathon Shares, subject
to the same terms and conditions as the options to purchase Marathon Group
Shares immediately before the Separation Effective Time. The options to
purchase New U. S. Steel Shares and Marathon Shares will have the same
expiration dates and will be subject to the same vesting requirements as the
options to purchase U. S. Steel Group Shares and options to purchase Marathon
Group Shares, respectively, and will cover the same number of shares as the
options to purchase U. S. Steel Group Shares and Marathon Group Shares,
respectively, provided that the number of shares and/or the exercise prices
will be adjusted, if necessary, so that (i) the aggregate intrinsic value of
the options to purchase New U. S. Steel Shares and options to purchase Marathon
Shares immediately after the Separation Effective Time is not greater than the
aggregate intrinsic value of the options being converted immediately before the
Separation Effective Time, and (ii) the ratio of the exercise prices per share
to the market values per share is not reduced. Any such adjustments will be
based on the last closing price per share reported on the NYSE Composite Tape
of U. S. Steel Group Shares or Marathon Group Shares immediately prior to the
Separation Effective Time relative to the first opening price per share
reported on the NYSE Composite Tape of New U. S. Steel Shares or Marathon
Shares, respectively, immediately following the Separation Effective Time.
Treatment of USX Corporate Employees in the Separation
Currently, USX personnel employed at the Pittsburgh corporate headquarters
provide accounting, audit, corporate finance, government affairs, investor
relations, public affairs, strategic planning, legal, stock transfer and tax
services that primarily relate to corporate-wide matters and for which the
costs are allocated between the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group based
upon USX's present allocation policy, which takes into account employment,
investments and revenues. Effective upon the Separation, Marathon Oil
Corporation and United States Steel Corporation will be responsible for their
own needs in these areas, and USX corporate personnel will be assigned to, and
will be employed by, either Marathon Oil Corporation or United States Steel
Corporation. All such USX employees currently participate in the Steel Pension
Plan as well as health and
49
other insurance benefit programs. Following the Separation Effective Time, such
USX corporate employees will participate in the pension plans, health and other
insurance benefit programs of the corporation by which they are employed.
Assignment of Other USX Corporate Assets and Certain Liabilities in the
Separation
There are certain assets and liabilities of USX (which include such items as
headquarters property, plant, and equipment; pension, health and life insurance
and other employee benefit matters relating to employees of USX headquarters)
which were used to support the businesses of both groups, as well as assets and
liabilities relating to pension, insurance and other employee benefit matters
for employees and retirees of one group who have prior service under plans
that, after the Separation, will be maintained by the other company. However,
for administrative and operational reasons, it is impractical to divide many of
these assets and liabilities. Therefore, certain of these assets and
liabilities as well as the ongoing requirement to maintain such assets have
been designated by our board of directors for assignment to United States Steel
Corporation and the remainder of which will be retained by Marathon Oil
Corporation. The board believes that this division of these assets and
liabilities is fair in the aggregate to both groups of stockholders. The impact
of this assignment is reflected in the Unaudited Condensed Pro Forma Balance
Sheets for United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation,
included on pages C-2 and C-10 in Annex C.
Federal Securities Law Consequences
The issuance of the New U. S. Steel Shares in the Separation Merger to
holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares has been registered under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended. Upon issuance, these New U. S. Steel Shares may be
traded freely and without restriction, except that New U. S. Steel Shares
received by persons who are deemed to be "affiliates" (as such term is defined
under the Securities Act) of USX prior to the Separation may be resold by them
only in transactions permitted by the resale provisions of Rule 145 promulgated
under the Securities Act (or Rule 144, in the case of such persons who become
affiliates of United States Steel Corporation) or as otherwise permitted under
the Securities Act. Persons who may be deemed to be affiliates of USX or United
States Steel Corporation are generally defined as individuals or entities that
control, are controlled by, or are under common control with, USX or United
States Steel Corporation and may include certain executive officers and
directors of USX or United States Steel Corporation.
Accounting Treatment
Marathon Oil Corporation will account for the Separation as a discontinuance
of the businesses comprising United States Steel. The measurement date for
discontinued operations accounting purposes will be on or about the date when
all conditions of the Separation have been satisfied. If the historical
carrying value of USX's investment in United States Steel exceeds its fair
value, as measured by the aggregate market value of the U. S. Steel Group
Shares at the Separation Effective Time, a non-recurring, non-cash charge on
the Separation will be recognized by Marathon Oil Corporation. Total costs
relating to the Separation, including financing costs, lease termination costs,
severance costs and fees and other expenses (collectively, "Separation Costs")
are estimated at $100 million, of which $67 million will be paid by Marathon
Oil Corporation and $33 million will be paid by United States Steel
Corporation. USX has paid $11 million of these costs through June 30, 2001. Of
the remaining $89 million, the pro forma financial statements reflect that $60
million will be paid by Marathon and $29 million will be paid by United States
Steel.
Annex C of this proxy statement/prospectus includes unaudited pro forma
condensed financial information for Marathon Oil Corporation which gives effect
to the discontinuance of the businesses of United States Steel, the $900
million Value Transfer, the assignment of certain USX corporate assets and
liabilities to United States Steel Corporation, the payment of Separation
Costs, and the distribution of New U. S. Steel Shares to the holders of U. S.
Steel Group Shares.
Following the Separation, United States Steel Corporation will account for
its assets and liabilities based on the historical values at which they were
carried by USX immediately prior to the Separation. Annex D of this proxy
statement/prospectus includes historical combined financial information for
United States Steel.
50
In addition, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
information for United States Steel Corporation included on pages C-1 to C-8 in
Annex C of this proxy statement/prospectus gives effect to the $900 million
Value Transfer, new financing arrangements, the assignment of certain USX
corporate assets and liabilities, and the payment of Separation Costs.
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences
The following discussion prepared by Miller & Chevalier, Chartered, special
tax counsel to USX, summarizes the material U. S. federal income tax
consequences of the Separation which will be set forth in the requested IRS
ruling. It does not purport to cover all income tax consequences to USX and its
stockholders and may not apply to stockholders who acquired their Marathon
Group Shares or U. S. Steel Group Shares in connection with a grant of such
shares as compensation, who are not citizens or residents of the United States,
or who are otherwise subject to special treatment under the Code. In addition,
this discussion does not address the tax consequences to stockholders who do
not hold their Marathon Group Shares or U. S. Steel Group Shares as a capital
asset. This discussion assumes that the U. S. Steel Group Shares and the
Marathon Group Shares are treated as stock of USX for federal income tax
purposes. This discussion is based on provisions of the Code and the
regulations promulgated thereunder, and on current administrative rulings and
court decisions, in effect as of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus,
all of which are subject to change.
We urge each USX stockholder to consult his or her own tax advisor as to the
particular tax consequences of the Separation to such stockholder, including
the application of state, local, and foreign tax laws, and the effect of
possible changes in the tax law that may affect the tax consequences described
below.
USX has requested a private letter ruling from the IRS that the exchange of
U. S. Steel Group Shares for New U. S. Steel Shares in the Separation will
qualify as a tax-free distribution of the New U. S. Steel Shares under Section
355 of the Code. The receipt of a private letter ruling to that effect, or the
receipt of a private letter ruling and an opinion of outside tax counsel which
together indicate that the exchange is treated for tax purposes as a tax-free
distribution of New U. S. Steel Shares, with both ruling and opinion in form
and substance satisfactory to the board, is a condition to completion of the
Separation.
It is expected that the private letter ruling, if issued, will provide, in
part, that for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
. No gain or loss will be recognized by (and no amount will be included in
the income of) a holder of U. S. Steel Group Shares as a result of the
Separation;
. The basis of New U. S. Steel Shares in the hands of a holder of U. S.
Steel Group Shares will equal the basis of the holder's U. S. Steel
Group Shares immediately before the Separation;
. The holding period of the New U. S. Steel Shares in the hands of a
holder of U. S. Steel Group Shares will include the holding period of
the U. S. Steel Group Shares that are exchanged in the Separation;
. Holders of Marathon Group Shares will have no tax consequences resulting
from the Separation with respect to the Marathon Shares; and
. No gain or loss will be recognized by USX on the distribution of New U.
S. Steel Shares to the holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares.
Holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares who have blocks of U. S. Steel Group
Shares with different per share tax bases are urged to consult their tax
advisors regarding the possible tax basis consequences of the Separation to
them.
The IRS private letter ruling, if issued, will be based on the facts
presented and representations made by USX in the ruling request. Generally, an
IRS private letter ruling will not be revoked or modified retroactively unless
there has been an omission or misstatement of a material fact or a breach of a
material representation. USX intends to present all relevant facts and is not
aware of any facts or circumstances that would cause those
51
representations to be incorrect or incomplete in a material respect. In
addition, Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel Corporation will
agree in the Tax Sharing Agreement not to take actions, or to fail to take
actions, that are inconsistent with the representations upon which the IRS
private letter ruling is based. If, however, those facts or representations are
found to be incorrect or incomplete in a material respect or if the facts at
the time of the Separation are materially different from the facts upon which
the IRS private letter ruling was based, USX could not rely on the IRS private
letter ruling and the Separation might not qualify as a tax-free distribution
under Section 355 of the Code.
If the IRS private letter ruling were determined to be inapplicable and the
Separation were found to be a taxable distribution of New U. S. Steel Shares or
Marathon Shares, the tax consequences to the USX stockholders would depend on
which shares were deemed to be distributed for federal income tax purposes. The
stockholders deemed to receive the distribution, either the holders of U. S.
Steel Group Shares or the holders of Marathon Group Shares, as the case may be,
would be treated as receiving a taxable distribution in an amount equal to the
fair market value of the shares deemed to be received. The difference between
the amount of the distribution and the stockholder's basis in the shares deemed
to be exchanged would be treated as a capital gain or loss to such stockholder.
The tax consequences to stockholders who hold both U. S. Steel Group Shares and
Marathon Group Shares, however, may differ from those described above. Such
stockholders may have dividend, return of capital, or capital gain/loss
treatment and are urged to consult their tax advisors. Neither Marathon nor
United States Steel Corporation will indemnify any USX stockholders with
respect to taxes that may be incurred as a result of the Separation.
If the IRS private letter ruling were determined to be inapplicable and the
Separation were found to be a taxable distribution of New U. S. Steel Shares or
Marathon Shares, a corporate-level tax would be payable by USX. Such tax would
be based on the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the shares deemed
to be distributed over USX's tax basis for such shares. The amount of USX's tax
liability would be materially greater if the Separation were deemed to be a
distribution of Marathon Shares. The party which would bear the burden of the
corporate tax would be determined under the Tax Sharing Agreement. See the
discussion below in "RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION AND
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION FOLLOWING THE SEPARATION--Tax Sharing Agreement" on
page 114.
Even if the Separation otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment under
Section 355 of the Code, the Separation may become taxable to USX pursuant to
Section 355(e) of the Code if 50% or more of either the Marathon Shares or New
U. S. Steel Shares are acquired, directly or indirectly, as part of a plan or
series of related transactions that include the Separation. For this purpose,
acquisitions (including acquisitions which are neither planned nor accepted or
recommended by the management of the company whose stock is acquired) of
Marathon Shares or New U. S. Steel Shares within the two years before or after
the Separation are presumed to be part of such a plan. Marathon Oil Corporation
or United States Steel Corporation may be able to rebut that presumption,
however, by establishing that the Separation and any preceding or subsequent
acquisition were not part of a plan or series of related transactions. If an
acquisition occurs pursuant to a plan or series of related transactions that
includes the Separation, USX would have to pay a corporate tax based on the
excess of the fair market value of the shares deemed to be distributed, either
New U. S. Steel Shares or Marathon Shares, over USX's tax basis for such
shares. The amount of such tax would be materially greater if the Separation
were deemed to be a distribution of Marathon Shares. The party who would bear
the burden of the corporate tax would be determined under the Tax Sharing
Agreement. See the discussion below in "RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UNITED STATES
STEEL CORPORATION AND MARATHON OIL CORPORATION FOLLOWING THE SEPARATION--Tax
Sharing Agreement" on page 114. Even if Section 355(e) were to apply to cause
the Separation to be taxable to USX, it would remain tax-free to the USX
stockholders.
United States Treasury regulations require each holder of U. S. Steel Group
Shares that receives New U. S. Steel Shares in the Separation to attach to the
stockholder's U.S. federal income tax return for the year in which such stock
is received a detailed statement setting forth such data as may be appropriate
to show the applicability of Section 355 of the Code to the Separation.
Subsequent to the Separation, United States Steel
52
Corporation will provide its stockholders who received New U. S. Steel Shares
pursuant to the Separation with the information necessary to comply with such
requirement.
Stock Exchange Listing
We have applied to the NYSE, the PSE and the CSE for approval of the listing
of the New U. S. Steel Shares to be issued in the Separation under the symbol
"X" on the NYSE, the PSE and the CSE, and completion of the Separation is
conditioned upon the approval of such listing. The Marathon Shares will
continue to be listed and traded on the NYSE, the PSE and the CSE after the
Separation under the symbol "MRO."
No Appraisal Rights
Stockholders of USX will not be entitled to exercise dissenter's or
appraisal rights under Delaware law or to demand payment for their shares in
connection with the Separation.
Interests of Officers and Directors in the Separation
In considering the recommendation of the USX board to vote in favor of the
Separation, stockholders of USX should be aware that directors and executive
officers of USX have interests in the Separation that are in addition to or
different from the interests of stockholders generally. The USX board of
directors was aware of these interests and considered them, among other
factors, in approving the Separation.
Stock Ownership
All of our directors and executive officers currently own U. S. Steel Group
Shares and/or Marathon Group Shares and will receive New U. S. Steel Shares
and/or Marathon Shares in the Separation. Some of these individuals currently
own a greater number of U. S. Steel Group Shares or Marathon Group Shares, as
the case may be. Accordingly, these directors and executive officers will have
a larger proportionate interest in United States Steel Corporation or Marathon
Oil Corporation, as the case may be, after the Separation. See "SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS" on page 129.
Treatment of Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and Restricted Shares
Some of our officers and directors hold options to purchase Marathon Group
Shares and/or U. S. Steel Group Shares and/or own restricted Marathon Group
Shares and/or U. S. Steel Group Shares issued under the USX Corporation 1990
Stock Plan. As of June 30, 2001, our executive officers and directors
beneficially owned an aggregate of 3,871,179 Marathon Group Shares and
3,089,472 U. S. Steel Group Shares, including options to purchase Marathon
Group Shares or U. S. Steel Group Shares. See "SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS
AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS" on page 129. Under the Plan of Reorganization, each
unexercised and unexpired option to purchase U. S. Steel Group Shares will be
converted into an option to purchase New U. S. Steel Shares and each
unexercised and unexpired option to purchase Marathon Group Shares will remain
outstanding and represent an option to purchase Marathon Shares. Each option to
purchase New U. S. Steel Shares and Marathon Shares, will be subject to the
same terms and conditions (including vesting) as the option to purchase U. S.
Steel Group Shares and Marathon Group Shares, respectively.
In addition, some of our directors and executive officers hold stock
appreciation rights ("SARs") with respect to Marathon Group Shares and U. S.
Steel Group Shares. Such SARs will become SARs with respect to Marathon Shares
and New U. S. Steel Shares, respectively, on the same terms and conditions as
were applicable to the SARs immediately prior to the Separation.
In the Separation, each restricted U. S. Steel Group Share will be converted
into a restricted New U. S. Steel Share and each restricted Marathon Group
Share will remain outstanding and represent a restricted Marathon Share. After
the Separation Effective Time, such restricted New U. S. Steel Shares and
Marathon Shares will be subject to the same terms and conditions (including
with respect to vesting) as were applicable to the restricted U. S. Steel Group
Shares or restricted Marathon Group Shares, respectively, immediately prior to
the Separation.
53
Change in Control Agreements
United States Steel has entered into change in control agreements with its
executive officers and with executive officers of USX who, in connection with
the Separation, will become executive officers of United States Steel
Corporation. At the Separation Effective Time, these agreements will become
obligations of United States Steel Corporation. The terms of these agreements
are substantially the same as those set forth in the change in control
agreements entered into by USX with its executive officers who, at the
Separation Effective Time, will be executive officers of Marathon Oil
Corporation. For a description of such arrangements, see "INFORMATION ABOUT
UNITED STATES STEEL--Management of United States Steel Corporation Following
the Separation: Change in Control Agreements" on page 86.
Completion and Retention Agreement With Thomas J. Usher
In connection with the Separation, USX entered into a Completion and
Retention Agreement with Thomas J. Usher, its current Chairman & Chief
Executive Officer. To facilitate the Separation and to maintain continuity in
both businesses, the board of directors asked Mr. Usher to serve as the
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer and President of United States Steel
Corporation, the Chairman of the board of directors of Marathon Oil Corporation
and Chairman of the board of managers of MAP. In deciding to ask Mr. Usher to
serve in these three roles, the board of directors determined that Mr. Usher's
unique experience and talents will bring value to both groups of stockholders.
Mr. Usher has over 35 years experience in the steel industry, and with the
recent death of Paul Wilhelm, the former President of United States Steel, the
board of directors believes that the stockholders will be best served if Mr.
Usher becomes the full time Chief Executive Officer of United States Steel
Corporation. The board of directors also believes that since Clarence Cazalot,
Philip G. Behrman, and Steven Lowden all joined Marathon in 2000, there is a
need to provide them, and the board of directors of Marathon Oil Corporation,
with Mr. Usher's knowledge of past activities, decisions and developments
concerning the business of Marathon Oil Company and the Marathon Group. As non-
employee Chairman of the board of directors of Marathon Oil Corporation, Mr.
Usher will be able to draw upon his experience as Chairman & Chief Executive
Officer of USX and as a member of the board of directors of Marathon Oil
Company to provide these insights. Similarly in his role as Chairman of the
Management Committee of MAP, Mr. Usher brings a familiarity with MAP. Among
other things, Mr. Usher is the only Marathon appointed member to have served on
the board of managers of MAP since its formation. He also has a working
relationship with the members appointed by Ashland, the owner of 38% of MAP,
and this relationship will benefit Marathon Oil Corporation and its
stockholders after the Separation.
The Completion and Retention Agreement provides that Mr. Usher will receive,
or has received:
. A salary from USX of $1,400,000 for 2001 and if the Separation occurs, a
salary of $1,100,000 annually from United States Steel Corporation for
2002-2004, subject to adjustment by the board of directors and the
Compensation and Organization Committee of United States Steel
Corporation. This $300,000 reduction reflects the lower levels of
salaries in the steel and metal industries as compared to the energy
industry.
. If the Separation occurs, a $25,000 annual fee from Marathon Oil
Corporation for serving as Chairman of the board of directors of Marathon
Oil Corporation and of the board of managers of MAP. This fee is in
addition to regular fees paid by Marathon Oil Corporation to non-employee
directors.
. A grant of 90,000 restricted shares of USX--Marathon Group Common Stock
on August 8, 2001 with 30,000 shares vesting on August 8, 2002, May 1,
2003, and May 1, 2004, based upon the achievement of performance
objectives for 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively.
. If the Separation occurs, a grant of stock appreciation rights for
500,000 shares of Marathon Oil Corporation common stock. The exercise
price of 150,000 shares are based on the average of the high and low
market price of USX--Marathon Group Common Stock on the last trading day
before the Separation Effective Time and the exercise price of 350,000
shares are based on the average of the
54
high and low market price of Marathon Oil Corporation common stock on the
first trading day after the Separation Effective Time. The effective date
of each grant is the same date as the determination of the exercise
price. These stock appreciation rights vest on the effective date of the
grant and expire on the earlier of ten years from the effective date of
grant, nine years following retirement or three years following death
while employed.
. A separation completion bonus, if the Separation occurs, of $6,000,000
will be payable by Marathon Oil Corporation on the first business day
after the Separation Effective Time and a retention bonus, of up to
$3,000,000, that is subject to a number of performance measures, will be
paid by United States Steel Corporation on the third anniversary of the
Separation.
. If the Separation occurs, and if Mr. Usher elects to receive his non-
qualified pension as a lump sum, the lump sum will be calculated using
the interest rates and mortality tables in effect for retirements on
December 31, 2001, instead of the rates and mortality tables in effect
at Mr. Usher's retirement, which could result in a greater or lesser
pension.
The Completion and Retention Agreement was negotiated on behalf of USX by
the Compensation Committee of the board of directors which is composed solely
of non-employee directors and is intended to provide an incentive to Mr. Usher
to serve in his three roles. Among the factors considered by the Compensation
Committee were the unique background Mr. Usher brings to each role, his past
performance in guiding both the steel and energy businesses, compensation
levels and practices at other steel and energy companies as well as other
companies of similar size and complexity as USX, Marathon and United States
Steel and the fact that as a non-employee director Mr. Usher will not be
eligible to receive compensation (salary, bonuses, options or other stock
based compensation) from Marathon Oil Corporation or MAP even though it is
expected that he will make major contributions to the future success of
Marathon Oil Corporation and MAP in his roles as chairman of the governing
bodies of each.
Dual Directorships
Upon completion of the Separation, Shirley Ann Jackson, Charles Lee, Seth
Schofield and Douglas Yearley, each of whom is currently a director of USX,
are expected to become directors of both United States Steel Corporation and
Marathon Oil Corporation. As such, they will be entitled to receive directors'
allowances and attendance fees from both United States Steel Corporation and
Marathon Oil Corporation in the amount that each company provides to its other
non-employee directors. For a description of such amounts to be paid by United
States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation, see "INFORMATION ABOUT
UNITED STATES STEEL--Management of United States Steel Corporation Following
the Separation" on page 81 and "INFORMATION ABOUT MARATHON--Management of
Marathon Oil Corporation Following the Separation" on page 108.
Also, upon completion of the Separation, Thomas J. Usher, the present
Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of USX, will be
Chairman of the board of directors, Chief Executive Officer and President of
United States Steel Corporation and will also serve as Chairman of the board
of directors of Marathon Oil Corporation.
55
THE SPECIAL MEETING
This proxy statement/prospectus is being furnished in connection with the
solicitation of proxies by our board of directors for use at a special meeting
of USX stockholders in connection with the proposed Separation. This proxy
statement/prospectus is first being mailed to USX stockholders on or about
, 2001.
Date, Time and Place of the Special Meeting
The special meeting of USX stockholders will be held on October 16, 2001 at
9:00 a.m., local time, at the Hotel DuPont, 11th and Market Streets,
Wilmington, Delaware.
Proposals to be Considered at the Special Meeting
At the special meeting, USX stockholders will be asked to consider and vote
upon the following proposals:
. A proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, which
provides for the Separation of the U. S. Steel Group and the Marathon
Group into two independent companies. The Separation will be effected by
the merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of USX with and into USX, with
USX continuing as the surviving corporation. Upon the effective time of
the Separation:
- the business of the U. S. Steel Group will be owned and operated by
United States Steel Corporation, which will be wholly owned by the
holders of the then outstanding U. S. Steel Group Shares;
- the business of the Marathon Group will be owned and operated by
USX, which will change its name to Marathon Oil Corporation and will
be wholly owned by the holders of the then outstanding Marathon
Group Shares;
- each outstanding U. S. Steel Group Share will be converted into the
right to receive one New U. S. Steel Share;
- the Marathon Group Shares will remain outstanding, unaffected by the
Separation, and will be the sole outstanding shares of common stock
of USX, which will change its name to Marathon Oil Corporation; and
. each outstanding share of 6.50% Preferred Stock will be converted
into the right to receive, in cash, $50.00 plus accrued but unpaid
dividends thereon.
. A proposal to approve the United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock
Plan.
. A proposal to approve the United States Steel Corporation Senior
Executive Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan.
. A proposal to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary.
The proposals to approve the United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock Plan
and the United States Steel Corporation Senior Executive Officer Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan are conditioned upon the adoption of the Plan of
Reorganization by USX stockholders and the consummation of the Separation. If
the Separation is not approved and consummated, the proposals to approve the
United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock Plan and the United States Steel
Senior Executive Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan will not be
implemented.
Record Date
Our board of directors has established the close of business on August 31,
2001 as the record date for determination of USX stockholders entitled to
notice of and to vote at the special meeting. As of the record
56
date, there were Marathon Group Shares outstanding, held by approximately
holders of record, and U. S. Steel Group Shares outstanding, held by
approximately holders of record.
Quorum
One-third of the voting power of the outstanding Marathon Group Shares and
U. S. Steel Group Shares entitled to vote at the special meeting must be
represented, either in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum at the
special meeting. Abstentions and "broker non-votes" will be counted for
purposes of determining whether a quorum is present. Broker non-votes are
shares held by brokers or nominees in "street name" that are represented at the
meeting, but with respect to which the broker or nominee has not been
instructed how to vote.
Vote Required
Adoption of the Plan of Reorganization will require:
. the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares as of the record
date, voting together as a single class,
. the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding
Marathon Group Shares as of the record date, voting as a separate class,
and
. the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding U.
S. Steel Group Shares as of the record date, voting as a separate class.
The proposals to approve the United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock Plan
and the United States Steel Corporation Senior Executive Officer Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan will each require the affirmative vote of a
majority of votes cast at the special meeting by holders of Marathon Group
Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares, voting together as a single class, and the
affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the special meeting by
holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares, voting as a separate class.
The proposal to approve an adjournment of the special meeting will require
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by holders of Marathon
Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares at the special meeting, voting
together as a single class.
See "SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS" on page 129 for
information concerning stock ownership of the current USX officers and
directors.
Voting Rights
Only holders of Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares at the
close of business on August 31, 2001 are entitled to vote at the special
meeting. In the separate class votes described above, each holder of Marathon
Group Shares or U. S. Steel Group Shares is entitled to one vote per share at
the special meeting. In the combined votes described above of Marathon Group
Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares, voting together as a single class, holders
of Marathon Group Shares are entitled to one vote per share and holders of U.
S. Steel Group Shares are entitled to votes per share. We calculated the
number of votes to which each U. S. Steel Group Share is entitled by using the
formula required by the USX Restated Certificate. It is based on the ratio of
the market value of one U. S. Steel Group Share to one Marathon Group Share
over the 20 business-day period ending on August 31, 2001.
Under the rules of the NYSE, brokers who hold shares in "street name" for
customers are precluded from exercising their voting discretion with respect to
the approval of non-routine matters, such as the Separation, and, therefore,
absent specific instructions from the beneficial owner of such shares, brokers
may not vote such shares at the special meeting. Your broker will vote your
shares only if you provide instructions on how to vote by following the
instructions provided to you by your broker.
57
Because the required vote for the adoption of the Plan of Reorganization is
based on a percentage of the shares outstanding, abstentions and broker non-
votes will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal to adopt the
Plan of Reorganization.
Voting and Revocation of Proxies
There are three ways to vote your proxy:
. Vote by telephone--toll free--1-888- -
Use any touch-tone telephone to vote your proxy 24 hours a day, 7 days
a week. You will be prompted to enter your control number, which
appears on the enclosed proxy card. Follow the simple instructions the
voice provides you.
. Vote by Internet--https://www. .com/usx
Access the above Internet site to vote your proxy 24 hours a day, 7
days a week. You will be prompted to enter your control number, which
appears on the enclosed proxy card, and your complete address, exactly
as it appears on the enclosed proxy card, to create an electronic
ballot.
. Vote by mail
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope. If you vote by telephone or Internet, please do
not return your proxy card.
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the proxies to vote your shares in
the same manner as if you had marked, signed and returned your proxy card.
All shares represented by properly executed proxies received before or at
the special meeting will, unless the proxies are revoked, be voted in
accordance with the instructions indicated thereon. If no instructions are
indicated on a properly executed proxy card, the shares will be voted FOR
adoption of the Plan of Reorganization, approval of the United States Steel
Corporation 2002 Stock Plan, approval of the United States Steel Corporation
Senior Executive Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and approval of the
proposal to adjourn the special meeting. You are urged to mark the box on the
proxy to indicate how to vote your shares.
If your shares are held in "street name" by your broker, do not follow the
above instructions. Rather, follow the separate instructions provided by your
broker.
Revocation
If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy or change your
vote at any time before it is voted at the special meeting by:
. voting again by telephone or the Internet;
. completing and mailing us a proxy card dated later than your last vote;
. submitting a written revocation to the Secretary of USX at 600 Grant
Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-4776; or
. appearing in person and voting at the special meeting.
If your shares are held in "street name" by your broker, you may only revoke
your proxy or change your vote by following the separate instructions provided
by your broker.
In order to vote in person at the special meeting, stockholders of record
must attend the meeting and cast their votes in accordance with the voting
provisions established for the special meeting. Attendance at the
58
special meeting without voting in accordance with the voting procedures will
not in and of itself revoke a proxy.
Solicitation of Proxies
All expenses incurred in connection with solicitation of the enclosed proxy
will be paid by USX. Officers and employees of USX may solicit proxies by
telephone or in person, but they will not be paid for soliciting proxies. We
also will request that brokerage houses and other nominees holding shares in
their names or in the names of their nominees that are beneficially owned by
others send proxy materials to and obtain proxies from those beneficial owners,
and we will reimburse those brokerage houses and nominees for their reasonable
expenses in performing those services. We have retained Innisfree M&A to assist
us in the solicitation of proxies, at an anticipated cost of $ , plus
reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses.
Adjournments
Although it is not expected, the special meeting may be adjourned for the
purpose of soliciting additional proxies. Any adjournment of the special
meeting may be made without notice, other than by an announcement made at the
special meeting, by approval of the holders of a majority of the votes cast by
holders of Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares at the special
meeting (voting together as a single class). Any proxies received by USX will
be voted in favor of an adjournment of the special meeting if the purpose of
the adjournment is to provide additional time to solicit votes to approve the
Plan of Reorganization, unless the stockholder directs otherwise by voting
against or abstaining from voting on the adjournment proposal included in the
enclosed proxy card or by voting against the adoption of the Plan of
Reorganization. Any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting for the
purpose of soliciting additional proxies will allow USX stockholders who have
already sent in their proxies to revoke them at any time prior to their use.
59
THE PLAN OF REORGANIZATION
The following summary describes the material terms of the Plan of
Reorganization, but does not purport to describe all terms of the Plan of
Reorganization. Because the Plan of Reorganization is the legal document that
governs the Separation, we recommend that you read carefully the complete text
of the Plan of Reorganization for its precise legal terms and other information
that may be important to you. The Plan of Reorganization is included as Annex A
to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated by reference in this
document.
Transactions
The Plan of Reorganization provides for the conversion of United States
Steel LLC from a Delaware limited liability company into a Delaware corporation
and provides for the Separation. The conversion of United States Steel LLC into
a Delaware corporation does not require stockholder approval.
Conversion of United States Steel LLC into United States Steel Corporation
Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, at the Separation Effective Time,
United States Steel LLC will convert from a Delaware limited liability company
into a Delaware corporation named "United States Steel Corporation."
The United States Steel Corporation Certificate and the United States Steel
Corporation By-Laws, which will be the certificate of incorporation and by-laws
of United States Steel Corporation from and after the Separation Effective
Time, are substantially the same as the USX Restated Certificate and the USX
By-Laws. The only differences between the United States Steel Corporation
Certificate and the USX Restated Certificate are that the United States Steel
Corporation Certificate provides for the authorization of two hundred million
shares of common stock and fourteen million shares of preferred stock and does
not provide for classes of targeted common stock, as currently provided for in
the USX Restated Certificate. The directors and officers of United States Steel
Corporation immediately following the Separation Effective Time are expected to
consist of the individuals named under "INFORMATION ABOUT UNITED STATES STEEL--
Management of United States Steel Corporation Following the Separation" on page
81.
The Separation Merger
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan of Reorganization, Merger
Sub will merge with and into USX at the Separation Effective Time. The separate
corporate existence of Merger Sub will cease. USX will be the surviving
corporation in the Separation Merger and will change its name to "Marathon Oil
Corporation" and continue to be governed by the laws of the State of Delaware.
Effective Time. Merger Sub and USX will complete the Separation Merger by
filing a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware at such time as is determined by the USX board of directors following
the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the Separation Merger. The
Separation Merger will become effective on the date and time the certificate of
merger is filed or such later time as specified in the certificate of merger.
Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws. At the Separation Effective Time,
the USX Restated Certificate will continue to be the restated certificate of
incorporation of the surviving corporation, but will be amended to change the
name of USX to Marathon Oil Corporation, to provide for the authorization of
five hundred and fifty million shares of common stock and twenty-six million
shares of preferred stock, and to delete the references to the classes of
targeted common stock, currently provided for in the USX Restated Certificate.
The by-laws of USX will be the by-laws of the surviving corporation.
Directors and Officers. The directors of USX immediately prior to the
Separation Effective Time (who are expected to consist of the individuals
listed on page 108) will be the initial directors of the surviving
60
corporation, and the officers of Merger Sub immediately prior to the Separation
Effective Time will be the initial officers of the surviving corporation.
Conversion of Securities. The Plan of Reorganization provides that, at the
Separation Effective Time, and without any action on the part of any holders of
any of the securities listed below:
. Each U. S. Steel Group Share issued and outstanding or held in the
treasury of USX or by any subsidiary of USX immediately prior to the
Separation Effective Time will be converted into one duly issued, fully
paid and nonassessable New U. S. Steel Share;
. Each Marathon Group Share issued and outstanding or held in the treasury
of USX or by any subsidiary of USX immediately prior to the Separation
Effective Time will remain outstanding, unaffected by the Separation
Merger and will be the sole outstanding shares of common stock of USX,
which will change its name to Marathon Oil Corporation;
. Each outstanding share of 6.50% Preferred Stock will be converted into
the right to receive, in cash, $50.00, plus accrued but unpaid dividends
thereon;
. Each share of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of Merger Sub
issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Separation Effective
Time will automatically be cancelled and retired and shall cease to
exist, without payment of any consideration therefor;
. Each option to purchase U. S. Steel Group Shares, each stock
appreciation right with respect to U. S. Steel Group Shares and each
restricted U. S. Steel Group Share, which has been granted by USX and is
outstanding immediately prior to the Separation Effective Time, will be
converted as of the Separation Effective Time into an option to purchase
New U. S. Steel Shares, a stock appreciation right of United States
Steel Corporation with respect to New U. S. Steel Shares, or a
restricted New U. S. Steel Share, respectively, subject to the same
terms and conditions as were applicable to such options, stock
appreciation rights or restricted shares being converted. With respect
to options to purchase New U. S. Steel Shares, each new option will have
the same expiration date and be subject to the same vesting requirements
as the option being converted, and will cover the same number of shares
and have the same exercise price as the option being converted, provided
that the number of shares and/or the exercise price will be adjusted, if
necessary, so that (i) the aggregate intrinsic value of the new option
immediately after the Separation Effective Time is not greater than the
aggregate intrinsic value of the option being converted immediately
before the Separation Effective Time, and (ii) the ratio of the exercise
price per share to the market value per share is not reduced. Any such
adjustments will be based on the closing price per share of U. S. Steel
Group Shares immediately prior to the Separation Effective Time relative
to the first opening price per share of New U. S. Steel Shares
immediately following the Separation Effective Time; and
. Each option to purchase Marathon Group Shares, each stock appreciation
right with respect to Marathon Group Shares and each restricted Marathon
Group Share which has been granted by USX and is outstanding immediately
prior to the Separation Effective Time will remain outstanding as of the
Separation Effective Time and represent an option to purchase Marathon
Shares, a stock appreciation right of Marathon Oil Corporation with
respect to Marathon Shares or a restricted Marathon Share, respectively,
subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable to such
options, stock appreciation rights or restricted shares, respectively,
prior to the Separation Merger. The number of shares and/or the exercise
price of the options to purchase Marathon Shares will be adjusted, if
necessary, so that (i) the aggregate intrinsic value of the option
immediately after the Separation Effective Time is not greater than the
aggregate intrinsic value of the option immediately before the
Separation Effective Time, and (ii) the ratio of the exercise price per
share to the market value per share is not reduced. Any such adjustments
will be based on the closing price per share of Marathon Group Shares
immediately prior to the Separation Effective Time relative to the first
opening price per share of Marathon Shares immediately following the
Separation Effective Time.
61
Exchange of U. S. Steel Group Stock Certificates. USX will appoint an
exchange agent in connection with the Plan of Reorganization. Promptly after
the Separation Effective Time, the exchange agent will mail a letter of
transmittal and instructions for use in effecting the surrender of certificates
and exchange of stock certificates to each registered holder of physical stock
certificates representing U. S. Steel Group Shares. Only holders of U. S. Steel
Group Shares holding physical stock certificates will receive such letter of
transmittal from the exchange agent and be required to surrender their stock
certificates in exchange for New U. S. Steel Shares. We request that you not
surrender your certificates for exchange until you receive the letter of
transmittal and instructions. No dividends or other distributions declared or
made after the Separation Effective Time with respect to New U. S. Steel Shares
will be paid to the holder of any unsurrendered certificates. However, the
holder will be paid, without interest, upon surrender of such certificate, any
dividends or distributions with a record date after the Separation Effective
Time but a payment date between the Separation Effective Time and the time of
surrender. No transfers of U. S. Steel Group Shares will be made after the
Separation Effective Time.
No Exchange of Marathon Group Stock Certificates
Certificates representing shares of Marathon Group Shares will not be
exchanged in connection with the Separation and will represent Marathon Shares
for all corporate purposes following the Separation.
Redemption of Shares of Trust Preferred in Connection with the Separation
In connection with the Separation, each outstanding share of Trust Preferred
will be redeemed for the right to receive, in cash, $50.00 plus accrued but
unpaid dividends thereon.
Listing of New U. S. Steel Shares and Marathon Shares
United States Steel LLC and USX have agreed to use their reasonable efforts
to cause the New U. S. Steel Shares to be issued in the Separation Merger to be
approved for listing, under the symbol "X", on the NYSE, PSE and CSE, subject
to official notice of issuance. The listing of the New U. S. Steel Shares on
the NYSE, PSE and CSE is a condition to the consummation of the Separation
Merger.
Marathon Shares will continue to be listed on the NYSE, PSE and CSE under
the symbol "MRO", and USX has agreed to amend its listing applications with the
NYSE, PSE and CSE to provide for its name change to Marathon Oil Corporation.
Conditions to the Completion of the Separation
The consummation of the Separation is subject to the satisfaction or waiver
(to the extent permitted by law) of each of the following conditions:
. Adoption of the Plan of Reorganization by the required votes of USX
stockholders;
. Receipt of a private letter ruling from the IRS that the Separation will
qualify as a tax-free transaction within the meaning of Section 355 of
the Code, in a form and substance satisfactory to the USX board of
directors;
. United States Steel LLC and USX having completed the Financing (in
amount, form and substance satisfactory to the USX board) and the Value
Transfer;
. Approval of the New U. S. Steel Shares to be issued in the Separation
for listing on the NYSE, the PSE and the CSE, subject to official notice
of issuance;
. This document having been declared effective by the SEC and not being
the subject of any stop order or proceedings seeking a stop order;
62
. USX and United States Steel LLC having entered into the Separation
Documents, including the Tax Sharing Agreement, Financial Matters
Agreement, and Transition Services Agreement (in form and substance
satisfactory to the USX board of directors);
. All of the actions and transactions required by the Plan of
Reorganization to be performed or consummated prior to the Separation
Effective Time having been performed or consummated (in form and
substance satisfactory to the USX board of directors);
. Receipt of all material consents, authorizations and approvals required
in connection with the Separation (in form and substance satisfactory to
the USX board of directors); and
. No order, injunction or decree having been issued and remaining in
effect which prohibits or prevents the consummation of the Separation;
All determinations as to satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to
consummation of the Separation are to be made by the USX board, in its sole and
absolute discretion. In addition, the Senior Note Indenture requires, as a
condition to the Separation, that United States Steel must have at least $400
million available in undrawn credit facilities and cash, of which at least $300
million must be available under facilities with terms extending at least three
years after the date such facilities are put in place.
On July 2, 2001, USX filed a request with the IRS for a private letter
ruling as to the tax free status of the Separation. As of the date of this
proxy statement/prospectus, none of the conditions to the Separation has been
satisfied except that this proxy statement/prospectus has been declared
effective by the SEC.
Stockholders' Meeting and Board Recommendation
USX has agreed to take all actions necessary to call, give notice of,
convene and hold a special meeting of its stockholders (the "Stockholders'
Meeting") as promptly as practicable to:
. obtain the approval and adoption of the Plan of Reorganization by the
stockholders of USX;
. obtain the approval of the United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock
Plan by the stockholders of USX;
. obtain the approval of the United States Steel Corporation Senior
Executive Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan by the stockholders
of USX; and
. vote to adjourn the Stockholders' Meeting, if necessary.
USX has agreed to include in the proxy statement/prospectus the
recommendation of the USX board of directors that stockholders of USX vote in
favor of the adoption of the Plan of Reorganization.
In considering the recommendation of the USX board of directors to vote in
favor of the Separation, you should be aware that directors and executive
officers of USX have interests in the Separation that are in addition to or
different from the interests of stockholders generally, including
disproportionate ownership of Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group
Shares, ownership of options, stock appreciation rights and restricted shares,
contractual rights to severance payments in connection with a change in control
and certain other contractual rights and payments. Additionally, certain
directors will become directors of both Marathon Oil Corporation and United
States Steel Corporation after the Separation and become entitled to receive
directors' allowances and attendance fees from both companies, in the amounts
set forth on pages 82 and 109. The USX board of directors was aware of these
interests and considered them, among other things, in approving the Separation.
See "THE SEPARATION--Interest of Officers and Directors in the Separation" on
page 53.
USX has agreed to use its reasonable efforts to solicit from USX
stockholders proxies in favor of the adoption of the Plan of Reorganization and
to take all other actions necessary or advisable to secure, at the
Stockholders' Meeting, the vote required to approve and adopt the Plan of
Reorganization.
63
Indemnification
Marathon Oil Corporation has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold harmless
United States Steel Corporation, and its directors, officers, employees,
representatives, advisors, agents and affiliates from, against and in respect
of any and all losses arising out of, relating to or resulting from, directly
or indirectly:
. except as otherwise provided in the Tax Sharing Agreement or the
Financial Matters Agreement (or any other Separation Document), any and
all liabilities to the extent arising out of or relating to the
business, assets or liabilities of the Marathon Group;
. Marathon Oil Corporation's failure to observe its obligations under the
Plan of Reorganization or any of the Separation Documents; and
. except as otherwise provided in the Tax Sharing Agreement or the
Financial Matters Agreement (or any other Separation Document), sixty-
five percent (65%) of any and all (i) joint liabilities relating to USX
corporate assets, liabilities or businesses not related to the
businesses of the Marathon Group or the U. S. Steel Group and
(ii) liabilities arising from or related to the Separation or the
related transactions or agreements, including, but not limited to, the
filing of this proxy statement/prospectus with the SEC (together, (i)
and (ii) are referred to as "Joint Liabilities").
United States Steel Corporation has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold
harmless Marathon Oil Corporation, and its directors, officers, employees,
representatives, advisors, agents and affiliates, from, against and in respect
of any and all losses arising out of, relating to or resulting from, directly
or indirectly:
. except as otherwise provided in the Tax Sharing Agreement or the
Financial Matters Agreement (or any other Separation Document), any and
all liabilities to the extent arising out of or relating to the
business, assets or liabilities of the U. S. Steel Group, which includes
any businesses owned or previously owned by USX that do not fall within
the definition of the Marathon Group (as determined pursuant to the USX
Restated Certificate);
. United States Steel Corporation's failure to observe its obligations
under the Plan of Reorganization or any of the Separation Documents; and
. except as otherwise provided in the Tax Sharing Agreement or the
Financial Matters Agreement (or any other Separation Document), thirty-
five percent (35%) of any and all Joint Liabilities.
Expenses
Except to the extent otherwise provided in the Separation Documents, all
Separation Costs incurred in connection with the transactions contemplated by
the Plan of Reorganization, including, without limitation the Financing, (i)
incurred prior to the Separation Effective Time are to be borne thirty-five
percent (35%) by United States Steel Corporation and sixty-five percent (65%)
by Marathon Oil Corporation and (ii) incurred following the Separation
Effective Time shall be borne by the party incurring such expenses. The
Separation Costs are expected to total approximately $100 million.
Amendment
The terms of the Separation may be amended, modified or supplemented at any
time as determined by the USX board of directors, and will be evidenced by a
written agreement signed by all of the parties to the Plan of Reorganization.
In the event that the board determines that any such amendments, modifications
or supplements are material to the stockholders of USX, we will distribute
supplemental proxy materials and resolicit proxies from our stockholders.
Termination
The Separation may be terminated and abandoned for any reason at any time
prior to the Separation, whether prior to or following the Stockholders'
Meeting, by and in the sole discretion of the USX board of directors. In the
event of such termination, none of the parties to the Separation shall have any
liability by reason of the Plan of Reorganization.
64
INFORMATION ABOUT UNITED STATES STEEL
DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS OF UNITED STATES STEEL
United States Steel, through its Domestic Steel segment, is engaged in the
production, sale and transportation of steel mill products, coke, taconite
pellets and coal; the management of mineral resources; real estate development;
and engineering and consulting services and, through its U. S. Steel Kosice
segment, primarily located in the Slovak Republic, in the production and sale
of steel mill products and coke for the central European market. Certain
business activities are conducted through joint ventures and partially owned
companies, such as USS-POSCO Industries ("USS-POSCO"), PRO-TEC Coating Company
("PRO-TEC"), Clairton 1314B Partnership, Republic Technologies International,
LLC ("Republic") and Rannila Kosice, s.r.o.
A three-year summary of financial highlights for United States Steel is
provided below.
Assets
Revenues and Income from Net at Capital
Other Income(a) Operations(b) Income (Loss) Year-End Expenditures
--------------- ------------- ------------- -------- ------------
(Millions)
United States Steel
2000.................. $6,132 $104 $(21) $8,711 $244
1999.................. 5,470 150 44 7,525 287
1998.................. 6,477 579 364 6,749 310
The following table sets forth the total revenues of United States Steel for
each of the last three years.
Revenues and Other Income
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(Millions)
Revenues by product:
Sheet and semi-finished steel products................ $3,288 $3,433 $3,598
Tubular, plate, and tin mill products................. 1,731 1,140 1,546
Raw materials (coal, coke and iron ore)............... 626 549 744
Other(a).............................................. 445 414 490
Income (loss) from affiliates........................... (8) (89) 46
Gain on disposal of assets.............................. 46 21 54
Other income (loss)..................................... 4 2 (1)
------ ------ ------
Total revenues and other income......................... $6,132 $5,470 $6,477
====== ====== ======
--------
(a) Includes revenue from the sale of steel production by-products, real estate
development, resource management, and engineering and consulting services.
Steel Industry Background and Competition
The steel industry is cyclical and highly competitive and is affected by
excess world capacity, which has restricted price increases during periods of
economic growth and led to price decreases during economic contraction. In
addition, the domestic and international steel industries face competition from
producers of materials such as aluminum, cement, composites, glass, plastics
and wood in many markets.
United States Steel is the largest integrated steel producer in North
America and, through its subsidiary USSK, the largest integrated flat-rolled
producer in Central Europe. United States Steel competes with many domestic and
foreign steel producers. Competitors include integrated producers which, like
United States Steel, use iron ore and coke as primary raw materials for steel
production, and mini-mills which primarily use steel scrap and, increasingly,
iron bearing feedstocks as raw materials. Mini-mills generally produce a
narrower range of steel products than integrated producers, but typically enjoy
certain competitive advantages such as
65
lower capital expenditures for construction of facilities and non-unionized
work forces with lower employment costs and more flexible work rules. An
increasing number of mini-mills utilize thin slab casting technology to produce
flat-rolled products. Through the use of thin slab casting, mini-mill
competitors are increasingly able to compete directly with integrated producers
of flat-rolled products. Depending on market conditions, the additional
production generated by flat-rolled mini-mills could have an adverse effect on
United States Steel's selling prices and shipment levels.
Steel imports to the United States accounted for an estimated 23%, 27%, 26%
and 30% of the domestic steel market demand for the first five months of 2001,
and for the years 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. Steel imports of pipe
increased 37% and hot-rolled steel increased 19% in 2000, compared to 1999.
Foreign competitors typically have lower labor costs and are often owned,
controlled or subsidized by their governments, allowing their production and
pricing decisions to be influenced by political and economic policy
considerations as well as prevailing market conditions. High levels of imported
steel are expected to continue to have an adverse effect on future market
prices and demand levels for domestic steel.
On November 13, 2000, United States Steel joined with eight other producers
and the Independent Steelworkers Union to file trade cases against hot-rolled
carbon steel flat products from 11 countries (Argentina, India, Indonesia,
Kazakhstan, the Netherlands, the People's Republic of China, Romania, South
Africa, Taiwan, Thailand and Ukraine). Three days later the USWA also entered
the cases as a petitioner. Antidumping ("AD") cases were filed against all the
countries and countervailing duty ("CVD") cases were filed against Argentina,
India, Indonesia, South Africa and Thailand. On December 28, 2000, the ITC made
a preliminary determination that there is a reasonable indication that the
domestic industry is materially injured by the imports in question. As a
result, both the ITC and Commerce will continue their investigations in these
cases.
United States Steel believes that the remedies provided by U.S. law to
private litigants are insufficient to correct the widespread dumping and
subsidy abuses that currently characterize steel imports into our country.
United States Steel, nevertheless, intends to file additional AD and CVD
petitions against unfairly traded imports that adversely impact, or threaten to
adversely impact, the results of United States Steel and is urging the U.S.
government to take additional steps.
On July 3, 2000, Commerce and the ITC initiated mandatory five-year "sunset"
reviews of AD orders issued in 1995 against seamless pipe from Argentina,
Brazil, Germany and Italy and oil country tubular goods ("OCTG") from
Argentina, Italy, Japan, Mexico and South Korea. The reviews also encompass the
1995 CVD orders against the same two products from Italy. The "sunset" review
procedures require that an order must be revoked after five years unless
Commerce and the ITC determine that, if the orders would be discontinued,
dumping or countervailing subsidies would be likely to continue or recur. In
all of the cases, Commerce determined that dumping or countervailing subsidies
would be likely to continue or recur if the orders are discontinued. In the
seamless pipe cases, the ITC voted on June 7, 2001 to continue the orders as to
Argentina, Brazil and Germany and to discontinue the orders pertaining to
Italy. The ITC voted on June 15, 2001 to continue the orders against all five
countries pertaining to OCTG other than drill pipe. The ITC's votes on drill
pipe will continue the order in effect against Japan and discontinue the orders
against Argentina and Mexico.
United States Steel's domestic businesses are subject to numerous federal,
state and local laws and regulations relating to the storage, handling,
emission and discharge of environmentally sensitive materials. United States
Steel believes that its major domestic integrated steel competitors are
confronted by substantially similar conditions and thus does not believe that
its relative position with regard to such other competitors is materially
affected by the impact of environmental laws and regulations. However, the
costs and operating restrictions necessary for compliance with environmental
laws and regulations may have an adverse effect on United States Steel's
competitive position with regard to domestic mini-mills and some foreign steel
producers and producers of materials which compete with steel, which may not be
required to undertake equivalent costs in their operations. For further
information, see "United States Steel Legal Proceedings" on page 76, and
INFORMATION ABOUT UNITED STATES STEEL--Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations on page 92.
66
On June 5, 2001, President Bush announced a three-part program to address
the excessive imports of steel that have been depressing markets in the United
States. The program involves (1) negotiations with foreign governments seeking
near-term elimination of inefficient excess steel production capacity
throughout the world; (2) negotiations with foreign governments to establish
rules that will govern steel trade in the future and eliminate subsidies; and
(3) an investigation by the ITC under section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974 to
determine whether steel is being imported into the United States in such
quantities as to be a substantial cause of serious injury to the United States
steel industry. The timing of and parties to the negotiations remain to be
determined.
On June 22, 2001, the Bush Administration requested that the ITC initiate
investigations under section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974. Products included in
the request are in the following categories, subject to exclusion of certain
products:
(1) Carbon and alloy flat products;
(2) Carbon and alloy long products;
(3) Carbon and alloy pipe and tube; and
(4) Stainless steel and alloy tool steel products.
USSK does business primarily in Central Europe and is subject to market
conditions in this area which are similar to domestic factors, including excess
world supply, and also can be influenced by matters peculiar to international
marketing such as tariffs.
Business Overview
United States Steel produces raw steel at Gary Works in Indiana, Mon Valley
Works in Pennsylvania, Fairfield Works in Alabama, and, through USSK, in
Kosice, Slovak Republic.
United States Steel has responded to competition resulting from excess steel
industry capability by eliminating less efficient facilities, modernizing those
that remain and entering into joint ventures, all with the objective of
focusing production on higher value-added products, where superior quality and
special characteristics are of critical importance. These products include bake
hardenable steels and coated sheets for the automobile and appliance
industries, laminated sheets for the manufacture of motors and electrical
equipment, higher strength plate products, improved tin mill products for the
container industry and oil country tubular goods. Several recent modernization
projects support United States Steel's objectives of providing value-added
products and services to customers. These projects include, for the automotive
industry--the degasser facility at Mon Valley Works, the second hot-dip
galvanizing line at PRO-TEC, the Fairless Works galvanizing line upgrade and
the cold reduction mill upgrades at Gary Works and Mon Valley Works; for the
construction industry--the dual coating lines at Fairfield Works and Mon Valley
Works; for the tubular market--the Fairfield Works pipemill upgrade and
acquiring full ownership of Lorain Tubular Company LLC; and for the plate
market--the heat treat facility at the Gary Works plate mill. Also, a new
pickle line was built at the Mon Valley Works which replaced three older and
less efficient facilities located at Fairless Works and Mon Valley Works.
Through its November 2001 purchase of USSK, which owns the steel producing
operations and related assets formerly held by VSZ a.s. in the Slovak Republic,
United States Steel took a major strategic step by expanding offshore and
following many of its customers into the European market. The objective is to
advance USSK to become a leader among European steel producers and the prime
supplier of flat-rolled steel to the growing central European market. This
globalization strategy is also being pursued through our Acero Prime joint
venture in Mexico. The location of this joint venture allows for easy servicing
and just-in-time delivery to customers throughout Mexico.
67
Effective March 1, 2001, United States Steel acquired from LTV Corporation
("LTV") the tin mill products business of LTV for the assumption of $66 million
of employee-related liabilities. United States Steel is leasing the land and
acquired title to the buildings, facilities and inventory at LTV's former tin
mill operation in Indiana which we are operating as East Chicago Tin. United
States Steel intends to operate these facilities as an ongoing business and
East Chicago Tin employees became United States Steel employees. United States
Steel and LTV also entered into 5-year agreements for LTV to supply United
States Steel with pickled hot bands and for United States Steel to provide LTV
with processing of cold-rolled steel.
In addition to the modernization of its production facilities, United States
Steel has entered into a number of joint ventures with domestic and foreign
partners to take advantage of market or manufacturing opportunities in the
sheet, tin mill, tubular, bar and plate consuming industries.
The following table lists products and services by facility or business
unit:
Domestic Steel
Gary.................... Sheets; Tin Mill; Plates; Coke
Fairfield............... Sheets; Tubular
Mon Valley/Fairless..... Sheets
USS-POSCO(a)............ Sheets; Tin Mill
East Chicago Tin........ Tin Mill
Lorain Tubular Company
LLC.................... Tubular
Republic Technologies
International, LLC(a).. Bar
PRO-TEC(a).............. Galvanized Sheet
Clairton................ Coke
Clairton 1314B
Partnership(a)......... Coke
Transtar................ Transportation
Minntac................. Taconite Pellets
U. S. Steel Mining...... Coal
Resource Management..... Administration of Mineral, Coal and
Timber Properties
Realty Development...... Real estate sales, leasing and management
Engineers and
Consultants............ Engineering and Consulting Services
USSK
U. S. Steel Kosice...... Sheets; Tin Mill; Plates; Coke
Walzwerke Finow......... Precision steel tubes; specialty shaped sections
Rannila Kosice (a)...... Color coated profile and construction products
--------
(a) Equity investee
Domestic Operations
United States Steel domestic operations includes plants which produce steel
products in a variety of forms and grades. Raw steel production was 11.4
million tons in 2000, compared with 12.0 million tons in 1999 and 11.2 million
tons in 1998. Raw steel produced was nearly 100% continuous cast in 2000, 1999
and 1998. Raw steel production averaged 89% of capability in 2000, compared
with 94% of capability in 1999 and 88% of capability in 1998. United States
Steel's stated annual domestic raw steel production capability was 12.8
millions tons for 2000 (7.5 million at Gary Works, 2.9 million at Mon Valley
Works, and 2.4 million at Fairfield Works).
68
Steel shipments were 10.8 million tons in 2000, 10.6 million tons in 1999
and 10.7 million tons in 1998. United States Steel shipments comprised
approximately 9.8% of domestic steel shipments in 2000. Exports accounted for
approximately 5% of United States Steel shipments in 2000, 3% in 1999 and 4% in
1998.
The following tables set forth significant United States Steel domestic
operations shipment data by major markets and products for each of the last
three years. Such data does not include shipments by joint ventures and other
affiliates of United States Steel accounted for by the equity method.
Steel Shipments By Market and Product (United States Production Only)
Sheets & Tubular,
Semi-finished Plate & Tin
Steel Mill Products Total
------------- ------------- ------
(Thousands of Net Tons)
Major Market--2000
Steel Service Centers....................... 1,636 679 2,315
Further Conversion:
Trade Customers........................... 742 432 1,174
Joint Ventures............................ 1,771 -- 1,771
Transportation (Including Automotive)....... 1,206 260 1,466
Containers.................................. 182 520 702
Construction and Construction Products...... 778 158 936
Oil, Gas and Petrochemicals................. -- 973 973
Export...................................... 346 198 544
All Other................................... 748 127 875
----- ----- ------
Total................................... 7,409 3,347 10,756
===== ===== ======
Major Market--1999
Steel Service Centers....................... 1,867 589 2,456
Further Conversion:
Trade Customers........................... 1,257 376 1,633
Joint Ventures............................ 1,818 -- 1,818
Transportation (Including Automotive)....... 1,280 225 1,505
Containers.................................. 167 571 738
Construction and Construction Products...... 660 184 844
Oil, Gas and Petrochemicals................. -- 363 363
Export...................................... 246 75 321
All Other................................... 819 132 951
----- ----- ------
Total................................... 8,114 2,515 10,629
===== ===== ======
Major Market--1998
Steel Service Centers....................... 1,867 696 2,563
Further Conversion:
Trade Customers........................... 706 434 1,140
Joint Ventures............................ 1,473 -- 1,473
Transportation (Including Automotive)....... 1,438 347 1,785
Containers.................................. 222 572 794
Construction and Construction Products...... 809 178 987
Oil, Gas and Petrochemicals................. -- 509 509
Export...................................... 226 156 382
All Other................................... 867 186 1,053
----- ----- ------
Total................................... 7,608 3,078 10,686
===== ===== ======
69
United States Steel's sheet business produces hot-rolled, cold-rolled and
galvanized products. We are committed to increasing our value-added shipments
of cold-rolled, galvanized and other products processed from hot-rolled band.
Value-added products comprised 78% of domestic shipments in 2000, including
finishing performed by joint ventures. United States Steel's sheet customer
base includes automotive, appliance, service center, industrial and
construction customers. United States Steel has a long-standing relationship
with many of them, as do the USS-POSCO, PRO-TEC and Acero Prime joint ventures.
In the last three years, United States Steel has made a number of key
investments directed toward the automotive industry, including upgrades to our
steel-making facilities to increase our capacity for both high strength and
highly formable steels, upgrades to United States Steel's Fairless galvanizing
line to produce automotive quality product and constructing an automotive
technical center in Michigan. In addition, a number of United States Steel's
joint ventures expanded their automotive capacity, most notably PRO-TEC, which
added 400,000 tons of annual hot-dipped galvanized capacity to bring its total
capacity to 1.0 million tons per year.
The tubular, tin mill products and plate businesses complement the larger
steel sheet business by producing specialized products for specific markets.
United States Steel's tubular operations are located at Fairfield, Alabama,
Lorain, Ohio, and McKeesport, Pennsylvania and produce both seamless and
electric resistance weld ("ERW") tubular products. United States Steel enjoys
over a 50% share of the domestic market for seamless standard and line pipe and
a 25% share of the domestic market for oil country tubular goods ("OCTG"). With
the successful conversion in 2000 of the Fairfield piercing mill to process
rounds plus the acquisition of the remaining 50% interest in Lorain Tubular,
United States Steel has the capability to produce 1.6 million tons of tubular
products in the 5 million ton market for the tubular products it produces. With
the continued high demand for energy, United States Steel believes it is well
positioned to supply the oil and gas industry with OCTG.
With the recent acquisition of East Chicago Tin operations, United States
Steel is one of the two largest tin mill products producers in North America.
United States Steel supplies a full line of tin plate and tin-free steel
("TFS") products, primarily used in the container industry. United States Steel
believes its reputation in the marketplace is enhanced through its attention to
quality and customer service reliability and expects its acquisition of East
Chicago Tin will provide significant operating synergies while providing it the
opportunity to better serve its existing and newly acquired customers. United
States Steel currently supplies over 25% of the domestic market, and coupled
with USSK's tin capability, it anticipates being in a prime position to service
customers who have a global presence.
United States Steel's plate business is located within the Gary Works
complex and is a major supplier to the transportation market, and to the
industrial, agricultural, and construction equipment market. United States
Steel's modern plate heat-treating facilities allow it to offer its customers
specialized plates for critical applications.
United States Steel and its wholly owned entity, U. S. Steel Mining LLC,
have domestic coal properties with bituminous coal reserves of approximately
787 million net tons at year-end 2000 and at year-end 1999. The reserves are of
metallurgical and steam quality in approximately equal proportions. They are
located in Alabama, Illinois, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and West
Virginia. Approximately 93% of the reserves are owned, and the rest are leased.
The leased properties are covered by leases which expire in 2005 and 2012.
During 2000, United States Steel recorded $71 million of impairments relating
to coal assets located in West Virginia and Alabama. The impairment was
recorded as a result of a reassessment of long-term prospects after adverse
geological conditions were encountered. U. S. Steel Mining's coal production
was 5.5 million tons in 2000, compared with 6.2 million tons in 1999 and 7.3
million tons in 1998.
70
United States Steel controls domestic iron ore properties having iron ore
reserves in grades subject to beneficiation processes in commercial use by
United States Steel domestic operations of approximately 710 million tons at
year-end 2000, substantially all of which are iron ore concentrate equivalents
available from low-grade iron-bearing materials. All reserves are located in
Minnesota. Approximately 31% of these reserves are owned and the remaining 69%
are leased. Most of the leased reserves are covered by a lease expiring in 2058
and the remaining leases have expiration dates ranging from 2021 to 2026.
United States Steel's iron ore operations at Mt. Iron, Minnesota ("Minntac")
produced 16.3 million net tons of taconite pellets in 2000, 14.3 million net
tons in 1999 and 15.8 million net tons in 1998. Taconite pellet shipments were
15.0 million tons in 2000, compared with 15.0 million tons in 1999 and 15.4
million tons in 1998.
On March 23, 2001, Transtar, Inc. ("Transtar") completed its previously
announced reorganization with its two voting shareholders, USX and Transtar
Holdings, L.P. (Holdings), an affiliate of Blackstone Capital Partners L. P. As
a result of this transaction, United States Steel became the sole owner of
Transtar and certain of its subsidiaries, namely, the Birmingham Southern
Railroad Company; the Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company; the Lake
Terminal Railroad Company; the McKeesport Connecting Railroad Company; the
Mobile River Terminal Company, Inc.; the Union Railroad Company; the Warrior &
Gulf Navigation Company; and Tracks Traffic Management Services, Inc. and their
subsidiaries. Holdings became the owner of the other subsidiaries.
A subsidiary of United States Steel sells technical services worldwide to
the steel, mining, chemical and related industries. Together with its
subsidiary companies, it provides engineering and consulting services for
facility expansions and modernizations, operating improvement projects,
integrated computer systems, coal and lubrication testing and environmental
projects.
United States Steel develops real estate for sale or lease and manages
retail and office space, business and industrial parks and residential and
recreational properties. United States Steel also administers the remaining
mineral lands and timber lands of United States Steel domestic operations and
is responsible for the lease or sale of these lands and their associated
resources, which encompass approximately 270,000 acres of surface rights and
1,500,000 acres of mineral rights in 13 states.
United States Steel participates directly and through subsidiaries in a
number of joint ventures included in the Domestic Steel segment. All of the
joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method. Certain of the joint
ventures and other investments are described below, all of which are at least
50% owned except Republic, Acero Prime and the Clairton 1314B Partnership.
United States Steel and Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. ("POSCO") of South
Korea participate in a joint venture, USS-POSCO, which owns and operates the
former U. S. Steel Pittsburg, California plant. The joint venture markets high
quality sheet and tin products, principally in the western United States. USS-
POSCO produces cold-rolled sheets, galvanized sheets, tin plate and tin-free
steel, with hot bands principally provided by United States Steel and POSCO.
Total shipments by USS-POSCO were approximately 1.5 million tons in 2000. On
May 31, 2001, a fire damaged USS-POSCO's facilities. Damage was predominantly
limited to the cold-rolling mill. USS-POSCO maintains insurance coverage
against such losses, including coverage for business interruption. The mill is
expected to resume production in the first quarter of 2002, although full
production may not be achieved until mid-2002. Until such time, the plant will
continue customer shipments using cold-rolled coils from United States Steel
and POSCO as substitute feedstock.
United States Steel has a 16% investment in Republic Technologies
International LLC (Republic) which was accounted for under the equity method of
accounting. During the first quarter of 2001, United States Steel discontinued
applying the equity method since investments in and advances to Republic had
been reduced to zero. Also, United States Steel has recognized certain debt
obligations of $14 million previously assumed by Republic. On April 2, 2001,
Republic filed a voluntary petition with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to
reorganize its operations under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In the
first quarter of 2001, as a result of
71
Republic's actions, United States Steel recorded a pretax charge of $74 million
for the potentially uncollectible receivables from Republic.
United States Steel and Kobe Steel, Ltd. ("Kobe") participate in a joint
venture, PRO-TEC, which owns and operates two hot-dip galvanizing lines in
Leipsic, Ohio. The first galvanizing line commenced operations in early 1993.
In November 1998, operations commenced on a second hot-dip galvanized sheet
line which expanded PRO-TEC's capacity nearly 400,000 tons a year to 1.0
million tons annually. Total shipments by PRO-TEC were approximately 1.0
million tons in 2000.
United States Steel and Worthington Industries Inc. participate in a joint
venture known as Worthington Specialty Processing which operates a steel
processing facility in Jackson, Michigan. The plant is operated by Worthington
Industries, Inc. The facility contains state-of-the-art technology capable of
processing master steel coils into both slit coils and sheared first operation
blanks including rectangles, trapezoids, parallelograms and chevrons. It is
designed to meet specifications for the automotive, appliance, furniture and
metal door industries. In 2000, Worthington Specialty Processing shipments were
approximately 300 thousand tons.
United States Steel and Rouge Steel Company participate in Double Eagle
Steel Coating Company ("DESCO"), a joint venture which operates an
electrogalvanizing facility located in Dearborn, Michigan. This facility
enables United States Steel to supply the automotive demand for steel with
corrosion resistant properties. The facility can coat both sides of sheet steel
with zinc or alloy coatings and has the capability to coat one side with zinc
and the other side with alloy. Availability of the facility is shared equally
by the partners. In 2000, DESCO produced approximately 800 thousand tons of
electrogalvanized steel.
United States Steel and Olympic Steel, Inc. participate in a 50-50 joint
venture to process laser welded- sheet steel blanks at a facility in Van Buren,
Michigan. The joint venture conducts business as Olympic Laser Processing.
Startup began in 1998. In February 2000 an expansion project was announced
adding two manually operated welding lines. The expansion will create the
needed flexibility and capacity to service current and growing requirements for
automotive laser weld applications. Laser welded blanks are used in the
automotive industry for an increasing number of body fabrication applications.
United States Steel is the venture's primary customer and is responsible for
marketing the laser-welded blanks. In 2000, Olympic Laser Processing shipments
were approximately 676 thousand parts.
United States Steel, through its subsidiary, United States Steel Export
Company de Mexico, along with Feralloy Mexico, S.R.L. de C.V. and Intacero de
Mexico, S.A. de C.V., participate in a joint venture, Acero Prime, for a
slitting and warehousing facility in San Luis Potosi, Mexico. In May 2000, an
expansion project was announced for the joint venture. The expansion project
involved the construction of a 60,000 square-foot addition that doubled the
current facility's size and total warehousing capacity. A second slitting line
and an automatic packaging system were installed as part of the project. Also,
a new 70,000 square-foot, in-bond warehouse facility was built in Coahuilla
state in Ramos Arizpe. The warehouse stores and manages coil inventories.
Startup began in the first quarter of 2001. In 2000, the joint venture
processed approximately 95 thousand tons.
United States Steel's purchases from equity investees, including
transportation services from Transtar and its subsidiaries and semi-finished
steel from Republic, totaled $566 million, $361 million and $331 million in
2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, U. S. Steel's
payables to these investees totaled $66 million and $60 million, respectively.
United States Steel's revenues for steel and raw material sales to equity
investees, primarily PRO-TEC, USS-POSCO and Republic, totaled $958 million,
$831 million and $725 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. At December
31, 2000 and 1999, United States Steel's receivables from these investees were
$177 million. These transactions were conducted under long-term, market-based
contractual arrangements.
72
U. S. Steel Kosice
In November 2000, United States Steel acquired U. S. Steel Kosice, s.r.o.
("USSK"), headquartered in Kosice in the Slovak Republic, which owns the steel-
making operations and related assets formerly held by VSZ, a.s., making United
States Steel the largest flat-rolled producer in Central Europe. Currently,
USSK has annual raw steel-making capability of 5.0 million tons and produces
and sells sheet, tin, tubular, precision tube and specialty products, as well
as coke. United States Steel's strategy is to serve its existing customers in
Central Europe and to grow its customer base in this region.
USSK produces steel products in a variety of forms and grades. In the first
half of 2001, USSK raw steel production was 2.1 million tons. USSK has three
blast furnaces, two steel shops with two vessels each, a dual strand caster
attached to each steel shop, a hot strip mill, cold rolling mill, pickling
lines, galvanizing line, tin coating line and two coke batteries.
USSK shipped 1.8 million tons for the first half of 2001. These shipments
included sheet products, galvanized sheet products and tin mill products. In
addition, USSK owns Walzwerke Finow GmbH, located in eastern Germany, which
produces about 90,000 tons per year of welded precision steel tubes from both
cold rolled and hot rolled product as well as cold rolled specialty shaped
sections. USSK also has facilities for manufacturing heating radiators and
spiral weld pipe.
A majority of product sales by USSK are denominated in euros while only a
small percent of expenditures are in euros. In addition, most interest and debt
payments are in U.S. dollars and the majority of other spending is in U.S.
dollars and Slovak crowns. This results in exposure to currency fluctuations.
Employees
On December 31, 2000, the total number of active United States Steel
domestic employees was 18,784, and the total number of active USSK employees
was 16,244. Currently, substantially all domestic hourly employees of United
States Steel's steel, coke and taconite pellet facilities are covered by a
collective bargaining agreement with the United Steelworkers of America which
expires in August 2004 and includes a no-strike provision. Other hourly
employees (for example, those engaged in coal mining and transportation
activities) are represented by the United Mine Workers of America, United
Steelworkers of America and other unions. In addition, hourly employees of USSK
are represented by the union OZ Metalurg under a collective bargaining
agreement expiring February 2004, which is subject to annual wage negotiations.
Environmental Matters
United States Steel maintains a comprehensive environmental policy overseen
by the Public Policy Committee of the USX Board of Directors. The Environmental
Affairs organization has the responsibility to ensure that United States
Steel's operating organizations maintain environmental compliance systems that
are in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. The Executive
Environmental Committee, which is comprised of officers of United States Steel,
is charged with reviewing its overall performance with various environmental
compliance programs. Also, United States Steel, largely through the American
Iron and Steel Institute, continues its involvement in the negotiation of
various air, water, and waste regulations with federal, state and local
governments concerning the implementation of cost effective pollution reduction
strategies.
The businesses of United States Steel are subject to numerous federal, state
and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment.
These environmental laws and regulations include the Clean Air Act ("CAA") with
respect to air emissions; the Clean Water Act ("CWA") with respect to water
discharges; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") with respect to
solid and hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal; and the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA")
with respect to releases and remediation of hazardous substances. In addition,
all states where
73
United States Steel operates have similar laws dealing with the same matters.
These laws are constantly evolving and becoming increasingly stringent. The
ultimate impact of complying with existing laws and regulations is not always
clearly known or determinable due in part to the fact that certain implementing
regulations for laws such as RCRA and the CAA have not yet been promulgated or
in certain instances are undergoing revision. These environmental laws and
regulations, particularly the CAA, could result in substantially increased
capital, operating and compliance costs.
For a discussion of environmental capital expenditures and the cost of
compliance for air, water, solid waste and remediation, see "--United States
Steel Legal Proceedings" on page 76 and "Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" on page 92.
United States Steel has incurred and will continue to incur substantial
capital, operating and maintenance, and remediation expenditures as a result of
environmental laws and regulations. In recent years, these expenditures have
been mainly for process changes in order to meet CAA obligations, although
ongoing compliance costs have also been significant. To the extent these
expenditures, as with all costs, are not ultimately reflected in the prices of
United States Steel's products and services, operating results will be
adversely affected. United States Steel believes that its major domestic
integrated steel competitors are confronted by substantially similar conditions
and thus does not believe that its relative position with regard to such
competitors is materially affected by the impact of environmental laws and
regulations. However, the costs and operating restrictions necessary for
compliance with environmental laws and regulations may have an adverse effect
on United States Steel's competitive position with regard to domestic mini-
mills and some foreign steel producers and producers of materials which compete
with steel, which may not be required to undertake equivalent costs in their
operations. In addition, the specific impact on each competitor may vary
depending on a number of factors, including the age and location of its
operating facilities and its production methods. For further information, see
"--United States Steel Legal Proceedings" on page 76, and "--Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" on
page 92.
The 1997 Kyoto Global Climate Change Agreement ("Kyoto Protocol") produced
by the United Nations convention on climate change, if ratified by the U. S.
Senate, would require restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions in the United
States. Options that could be considered by federal regulators to force the
reductions necessary to meet these restrictions could escalate energy costs and
thereby increase steel production costs. Until action is taken by the U. S.
Senate to ratify or reject the Kyoto Protocol, it is not possible to estimate
the effect of regulations that may be considered for implementation of
emissions restrictions in the United States.
Air
The CAA imposed more stringent limits on air emissions, established a
federally mandated operating permit program and allowed for enhanced civil and
criminal enforcement sanctions. The principal impact of the CAA on United
States Steel is on the coke-making and primary steel-making operations of
United States Steel, as described in this section. The coal mining operations
and sales of U. S. Steel Mining may also be affected.
The CAA requires the regulation of hazardous air pollutants and development
and promulgation of Maximum Achievable Control Technology ("MACT") Standards.
The amendment to the Chrome Electroplating MACT to include the chrome processes
at Gary and Fairless is expected sometime in the next couple years. The EPA is
also promulgating MACT standards for integrated iron and steel plants and
taconite iron ore processing which are expected to be finalized in 2002. The
impact of these new standards could be significant to United States Steel, but
the cost cannot be reasonably estimated until the rules are finalized.
The CAA specifically addressed the regulation and control of coke oven
batteries. The National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for coke
oven batteries was finalized in October 1993, setting forth the MACT standard
and, as an alternative, a Lowest Achievable Emission Rate ("LAER") standard.
Effective
74
January 1998, United States Steel elected to comply with the LAER standards.
United States Steel believes it will be able to meet the current LAER
standards. The LAER standards will be further revised in 2010 and additional
health risk-based standards are expected to be adopted in 2020. EPA is in the
process of developing the Phase II Coke MACT for pushing, quenching and battery
stacks which is scheduled to be finalized in 2002. This MACT will impact United
States Steel, but the cost cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.
The CAA also mandates the nationwide reduction of emissions of acid rain
precursors (sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides) from fossil fuel-fired
electrical utility plants. United States Steel, like all other electricity
consumers, will be impacted by increased electrical energy costs that are
expected as electric utilities seek rate increases to comply with the acid rain
requirements.
In September 1997, the EPA adopted revisions to the National Ambient Air
Quality Standards for ozone and particulate matter which are significantly more
stringent than prior standards. EPA has issued a Nitrogen Oxide ("NOx") State
Implementation Plan ("SIP") call to require certain states to develop plans to
reduce NOx emissions focusing on large utility and industrial boilers. The
impact of these revised standards could be significant to United States Steel,
but the cost cannot be reasonably estimated until the final revised standards
and the NOx SIP call are issued and, more importantly, the states implement
their SIPs covering their standards.
In 2000, all of the coal production of U. S. Steel Mining was metallurgical
coal, which is primarily used in coke production. While USX believes that the
new environmental requirements for coke ovens will not have an immediate effect
on U. S. Steel Mining, the requirements may encourage development of
steelmaking processes that reduce the usage of coke. The new ozone and
particulate matter standards could be significant to U. S. Steel Mining, but
the cost is not capable of being reasonably estimated until rules are proposed
or finalized.
Water
United States Steel maintains the necessary discharge permits as required
under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") program of
the CWA, and it is in compliance with such permits. In 1998, USX entered into a
consent decree with the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") which resolved
alleged violations of the Clean Water Act NPDES permit at Gary Works and
provides for a sediment remediation project for a section of the Grand Calumet
River that runs through Gary Works. Contemporaneously, USX entered into a
consent decree with the public trustees which resolves potential liability for
natural resource damages on the same section of the Grand Calumet River. In
1999, USX paid civil penalties of $2.9 million for the alleged water act
violations and $0.5 million in natural resource damages assessment costs. In
addition, United States Steel will pay the public trustees $1 million at the
end of the remediation project for future monitoring costs and United States
Steel is obligated to purchase and restore several parcels of property that
have been or will be conveyed to the trustees. During the negotiations leading
up to the settlement with the EPA, capital improvements were made to upgrade
plant systems to comply with the NPDES requirements. The sediment remediation
project is an approved final interim measure under the corrective action
program for Gary Works and is expected to cost approximately $36.4 million over
the next five years. Estimated remediation and monitoring costs for this
project have been accrued.
Solid Waste
United States Steel continues to seek methods to minimize the generation of
hazardous wastes in its operations. RCRA establishes standards for the
management of solid and hazardous wastes. Besides affecting current waste
disposal practices, RCRA also addresses the environmental effects of certain
past waste disposal operations, the recycling of wastes and the regulation of
storage tanks. Corrective action under RCRA related to past waste disposal
activities is discussed below under "Remediation."
Remediation
A significant portion of United States Steel's currently identified
environmental remediation projects relate to the remediation of former and
present operating locations. These projects include the remediation of the
75
Grand Calumet River (discussed above), and the closure and remediation of
permitted hazardous and non-hazardous waste landfills.
United States Steel is also involved in a number of remedial actions under
CERCLA, RCRA and other federal and state statutes, and it is possible that
additional matters may come to its attention which may require remediation. For
a discussion of remedial actions related to United States Steel, see "--United
States Steel Legal Proceedings".
PROPERTIES OF UNITED STATES STEEL
United States Steel or its predecessor USX has owned the vast majority of
the domestic properties in excess of thirty years with no material adverse
claim asserted. In the case of the real property and buildings of USSK,
certified copies of the property registrations were obtained and examined by
local counsel prior to the acquisition.
Several steel production facilities are leased. The caster facility at
Fairfield, Alabama is subject to a lease expiring in 2012 with an option to
purchase or to extend the lease. A coke battery at Clairton, Pennsylvania,
which is subleased to the Clairton 1314B Partnership, is subject to a lease
through 2004 with an option to purchase. The office space in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania used by USX and United States Steel is leased through 2007.
For property, plant and equipment additions, including capital leases, see
"--Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" on page 92.
UNITED STATES STEEL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
After the Separation, United States Steel will be a party to the following
litigation:
Inland Steel Patent Litigation. In July 1991, Inland Steel Company
("Inland") filed an action against United States Steel and another domestic
steel producer in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, Eastern Division, alleging defendants had infringed two of Inland's
steel-related patents. Inland seeks monetary damages of up to approximately $50
million and an injunction against future infringement. United States Steel, in
its answer and counterclaim, alleges the patents are invalid and not infringed
and seeks a declaratory judgment to such effect. In May 1993, a jury found
United States Steel to have infringed the patents. The District Court has yet
to rule on the validity of the patents. In July 1993, the U.S. Patent Office
rejected the claims of the two Inland patents upon a reexamination at the
request of United States Steel and the other steel producer. A further request
was submitted by United States Steel to the Patent Office in October 1993,
presenting additional questions as to patentability which was granted and
consolidated for consideration with the original request. In 1994, the Patent
Office issued a decision rejecting all claims of the Inland patents. On
September 21, 1999, the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirmed the decision of
the Patent Office. Inland filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit on November 17, 1999. A hearing was held before the
court on January 10, 2001, and the decision is pending.
Asbestos Litigation. United States Steel has been and is a defendant in a
large number of cases in which plaintiffs allege injury resulting from exposure
to asbestos. Many of these cases involve multiple plaintiffs and most have
multiple defendants. These claims fall into three major groups: (1) claims made
under certain federal and general maritime law by employees of the Great Lakes
or Intercoastal Fleets, former operations of United States Steel; (2) claims
made by persons who did work at United States Steel facilities; and (3) claims
made by industrial workers allegedly exposed to an electrical cable product
formerly manufactured by United States Steel. To date, all actions resolved
have been either dismissed or settled for immaterial amounts. It is not
possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these matters; however, based
upon present knowledge, management believes that it is unlikely that the
resolution of the remaining actions will have a material adverse effect on its
financial condition. This statement of belief is a forward-looking statement.
Predictions as to the
76
outcome of pending litigation are subject to substantial uncertainties with
respect to (among other things) factual and judicial determinations, and
actual results could differ materially from those expressed in this forward-
looking statement.
Environmental Proceedings. The following is a summary of the proceedings of
United States Steel that were pending or contemplated as of June 30, 2001,
under federal and state environmental laws. Except as described herein, it is
not possible to accurately predict the ultimate outcome of these matters.
Claims under CERCLA and related state acts have been raised with respect to
the cleanup of various waste disposal and other sites. CERCLA is intended to
expedite the cleanup of hazardous substances without regard to fault. Primary
Responsible Parties ("PRPs") for each site include present and former owners
and operators of, transporters to and generators of the substances at the
site. Liability is strict and can be joint and several. Because of various
factors including the ambiguity of the regulations, the difficulty of
identifying the responsible parties for any particular site, the complexity of
determining the relative liability among them, the uncertainty as to the most
desirable remediation techniques and the amount of damages and cleanup costs
and the time period during which such costs may be incurred, it is impossible
to reasonably estimate its ultimate cost of compliance with CERCLA.
Projections, provided in the following paragraphs, of spending for and/or
timing of completion of specific projects are forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions, including,
but not limited to, the factors provided in the preceding paragraph. To the
extent that these assumptions prove to be inaccurate, future spending for, or
timing of completion of, environmental projects may differ materially from
those stated in forward-looking statements.
At June 30, 2001, United States Steel had been identified as a PRP at a
total of 22 CERCLA sites. Based on currently available information, which is
in many cases preliminary and incomplete, management believes that United
States Steel liability for cleanup and remediation costs in connection with
eight of these sites will be between $100,000 and $1 million per site and
eight will be under $100,000.
At the remaining 6 sites, management expects that United States Steel share
in the remaining cleanup costs at any single site will not exceed $5 million,
although it is not possible to accurately predict the amount of sharing in any
final allocation of such costs. The following is a summary of the status of
these sites:
. At the former Duluth, Minn. Works, United States Steel spent a total of
approximately $11.2 million through 2000. The Duluth Works was listed by
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under the Minnesota Environmental
Response and Liability Act on its Permanent List of Priorities. The
Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") has consolidated and included
the Duluth Works site with the St. Louis River and Interlake sites on
the EPA's National Priorities List. The Duluth Works cleanup has
proceeded since 1989. United States Steel is conducting an engineering
study of the estuary sediments and the construction of a breakwater in
the estuary. Depending upon the method and extent of remediation at this
site, future costs are presently unknown and indeterminable.
. The Buckeye Reclamation Landfill, near St. Clairsville, Ohio, has been
used at various times as a disposal site for coal mine refuse and
municipal and industrial waste. United States Steel was one of 15 PRPs
that have entered into an agreed order with the EPA to perform a
remediation of the site. Implementation of the remedial design plan,
resulting in a long-term cleanup of the site, is estimated to cost
approximately $28.5 million.
One of the PRPs filed suit against the EPA, the Ohio Environmental
Protection Agency, and 13 PRPs including United States Steel. The EPA,
in turn, filed suit against the PRPs to recover $1.5 million in
oversight costs. In May 1996, United States Steel entered into a final
settlement agreement to resolve this litigation and the overall
allocation. United States Steel agreed to pay 4.8% of the estimated
costs which would result in United States Steel paying an additional
amount of approximately $1.1 million over a two- to three-year period.
Through June 30, 2001, United States Steel has spent $941,000 at the
site. Remediation commenced in 1999 and should be substantially
completed in 2001.
77
. The D'Imperio and Ewan sites in New Jersey are waste disposal sites
where a former subsidiary allegedly disposed of used paint and solvent
wastes. USX has entered into a settlement agreement with the major PRPs
at the sites which fixes USX's share of liability at approximately $1.2
million, $598,000 of which United States Steel has already paid. The
balance, which is expected to be paid over the next several years, has
been accrued.
. The Berks Associates/Douglassville Site ("Berks Site") is situated on a
50-acre parcel located on the Schuylkill River in Berks County, Pa. Used
oil and solvent reprocessing operations were conducted on the Berks Site
between 1941 and 1986. In September 1997, United States Steel signed a
consent decree to conduct a feasibility study at the site relating to
the alternative remedy. In 1999, a new Record of Decision was approved
by EPA and the DOJ. On January 19, 2001, United States Steel signed a
consent decree with the EPA to remediate this site. On April 6, 2001,
United States Steel paid its share of the consent decree obligation,
which was $0.4 million. The only remaining outstanding claim is the
natural resource damages claim filed by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania.
. In 1988, United States Steel and three other PRPs agreed to the issuance
of an administrative order by the EPA to undertake emergency removal
work at the Municipal & Industrial Disposal Co. site in Elizabeth, Pa.
The cost of such removal, which has been completed, was approximately
$4.2 million, of which United States Steel paid $3.4 million. The EPA
has indicated that further remediation of this site may be required in
the future, but it has not conducted any assessment or investigation to
support what remediation would be required. In October 1991, the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources ("PaDER") placed the
site on the Pennsylvania State Superfund list and began a Remedial
Investigation ("RI") which was issued in 1997. It is not possible to
estimate accurately the cost of any remediation or the shares in any
final allocation formula; however, based on presently available
information, USX may have been responsible for as much as 70% of the
waste material deposited at the site. On October 10, 1995, the DOJ filed
a complaint in the U.S. District Court for Western Pennsylvania against
United States Steel and other Municipal & Industrial Disposal Co.
defendants to recover alleged costs incurred at the site. In June 1996,
United States Steel agreed to pay $245,000 to settle the government's
claims for costs against it, American Recovery, and Carnegie Natural
Gas. In 1996, United States Steel filed a cost recovery action against
parties who did not contribute to the cost of the removal activity at
the site. United States Steel reached a settlement in principle with all
of the parties except the site owner. The PRPs are awaiting issuance of
the State's Feasibility Study ("FS").
In addition, there are 16 sites related to United States Steel where
information requests have been received or there are other indications that
United States Steel may be a PRP under CERCLA but where sufficient information
is not presently available to confirm the existence of liability.
There are also 29 additional sites related to United States Steel where
remediation is being sought under other environmental statutes, both federal
and state, or where private parties are seeking remediation through
discussions or litigation. Based on currently available information, which is
in many cases preliminary and incomplete, management believes that liability
for cleanup and remediation costs in connection with 4 of these sites will be
under $100,000 per site, another 3 sites have potential costs between $100,000
and $1 million per site, and 7 sites may involve remediation costs between $1
million and $5 million. Another 3 sites, including the Grand Calumet River
remediation at Gary Works, the Peters Creek Lagoon remediation at Clairton,
and the potential claim for investigation, restoration and compensation of
injuries to sediments in the East Branch of the Grand Calumet River near Gary
Works, have or are expected to have costs for remediation, investigation,
restoration or compensation in excess of $5 million. Potential costs
associated with remediation at the remaining 12 sites are not presently
determinable.
The following is a discussion of remediation activities at the major
domestic United States Steel facilities:
Gary Works. In 1998, United States Steel entered into a consent decree with
the EPA which resolved alleged violations of the Clean Water Act National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES")
78
permit at Gary Works and provides for a sediment remediation project for a
section of the Grand Calumet River that runs through Gary Works.
Contemporaneously, United States Steel entered into a consent decree with the
public trustees which resolves potential liability for natural resource damages
on the same section of the Grand Calumet River. United States Steel will pay
the public trustees $1 million at the end of the remediation project for future
monitoring costs and United States Steel is obligated to purchase and restore
several parcels of property that have been or will be conveyed to the trustees.
During the negotiations leading up to the settlement with the EPA, capital
improvements were made to upgrade plant systems to comply with the NPDES
requirements. In 1999, United States Steel paid civil penalties of $2.9 million
for the alleged water act violations and $0.5 million in natural resource
damages assessment costs. In addition, United States Steel purchased properties
which were conveyed to the trustees. The sediment remediation project is an
approved final interim measure under the corrective action program for Gary
Works and is expected to cost approximately $36.4 million over the next five
years. Estimated remediation and monitoring costs for this project have been
accrued.
In October 1996, United States Steel was notified by the Indiana Department
of Environmental Management ("IDEM") acting as lead trustee, that IDEM and the
U.S. Department of the Interior had concluded a preliminary investigation of
potential injuries to natural resources related to releases of hazardous
substances from various municipal and industrial sources along the east branch
of the Grand Calumet River and Indiana Harbor Canal. The public trustees
completed a preassessment screen pursuant to federal regulations and have
determined to perform a Natural Resource Damages Assessment. United States
Steel was identified as a PRP along with 15 other companies owning property
along the river and harbor canal. United States Steel and eight other PRPs have
formed a joint defense group. In 2000, the trustees concluded their assessment
of sediment injuries, which included a technical review of environmental
conditions. The PRP joint defense group has proposed terms for the settlement
of this claim which have been endorsed by representatives of the trustees and
the EPA, to be included in a consent decree that United States Steel expects
will resolve this claim. A reserve has been established for United States
Steel's share of the anticipated settlement.
On October 23, 1998, a final Administrative Order on Consent was issued by
EPA addressing Corrective Action for Solid Waste Management Units throughout
Gary Works. This order requires United States Steel to perform a RCRA Facility
Investigation ("RFI") and a Corrective Measure Study ("CMS") at Gary Works. The
Current Conditions Report, United States Steel's first deliverable, was
submitted to EPA in January 1997 and was approved by EPA in 1998. The Phase I
RFI work plan was submitted to the EPA in July 1999.
IDEM issued notices of violations ("NOVs") relating to Gary Works in 1994
alleging various violations of air pollution requirements. In early 1996,
United States Steel paid a $6 million penalty and agreed to install additional
pollution control equipment and programs and implement programs costing over
$100 million over a period of several years. In 1999, United States Steel
entered into an Agreed Order with IDEM to resolve outstanding air issues.
United States Steel paid a penalty of $207,400 and installed equipment at the
No. 8 Blast Furnace and the No. 1 BOP to reduce air emissions. In November
1999, IDEM issued an NOV alleging various air violations at Gary Works. An
agreed order is being negotiated.
In February 1999, the DOJ and EPA issued a letter demanding a cash payment
of approximately $4 million to resolve a Finding of Violation issued in 1997
alleging improper sampling of benzene waste streams at Gary Coke. On September
18, 2000, a Consent Decree was entered which required United States Steel to
pay a civil penalty of $587,000 and to replace PCB transformers as a
Supplemental Environmental Program ("SEP") at a cost of approximately $2.2
million. Payment of the civil penalty was made on October 13, 2000.
Clairton. In 1987, USX and the PaDER entered into a Consent Order to resolve
an incident in January 1985 involving the alleged unauthorized discharge of
benzene and other organic pollutants from Clairton Works in Clairton, Pa. That
Consent Order required USX to pay a penalty of $50,000 and a monthly payment of
$2,500 for five years. In 1990, USX and the PaDER reached agreement to amend
the Consent Order. Under the amended Order, USX agreed to remediate the Peters
Creek Lagoon (a former coke plant waste disposal
79
site); to pay a penalty of $300,000; and to pay a monthly penalty of up to
$1,500 each month until the former disposal site is closed. As of June 30,
2001, remediation costs have amounted to $9.2 million with another $208,000
projected to complete the project.
Fairless Works. In January 1992, United States Steel commenced negotiations
with the EPA regarding the terms of an Administrative Order on consent,
pursuant to the RCRA, under which United States Steel would perform a RFI and a
CMS at Fairless Works. A Phase I RFI report was submitted during the third
quarter of 1997. A Phase II/III RFI will be submitted following EPA approval.
The RFI/CMS will determine whether there is a need for, and the scope of, any
remedial activities at Fairless Works.
Fairfield Works. In December 1995, United States Steel reached an agreement
in principle with the EPA and the DOJ with respect to alleged RCRA violations
at Fairfield Works. A consent decree was signed by United States Steel and the
United States and filed with the court on December 11, 1997, under which United
States Steel will pay a civil penalty of $1 million, implement two SEPs costing
a total of $1.75 million and implement a RCRA corrective action at the
facility. One SEP was completed during 1998 at a cost of $250,000. The second
SEP is under way. The first RFI work plan for the site will be submitted for
agency approval in the first quarter of 2001.
Mon Valley Works/Edgar Thomson Plant. In September 1997, USX received a
draft consent decree addressing issues raised in an NOV issued by the EPA in
January 1997. The NOV alleged air quality violations at United States Steel's
Edgar Thomson Plant, which is part of Mon Valley Works. The draft consent
decree addressed these issues, including various operational requirements,
which EPA believed were necessary to bring the plant into compliance. USX has
completed implementing the compliance requirements identified by EPA. USX has
paid a cash penalty of $550,000 and implemented five SEPs valued at
approximately $1.5 million in settlement of the government's allegations. On
February 1, 2000, the U.S. District Court for Western Pennsylvania entered the
consent decree.
In November 2000, an NOV was issued by the Jefferson County Health
Department ("JCHD") alleging violation of the Halogenated Solvent National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and the JCHD volatile organic
compound ("VOC") regulations at the sheet mill stretch leveler at Fairfield
Works. United States Steel proposed a civil penalty of $100,000 and a VOC
emission limit, which have been agreed to by JHCD. A consent order was executed
and approved by the court in May 2001. The penalty was paid by United States
Steel in June 2001.
80
MANAGEMENT OF UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION FOLLOWING THE SEPARATION
Directors of United States Steel Corporation Following the Separation
Under Delaware law, the business and affairs of United States Steel
Corporation will be managed under the direction of its board of directors. The
certificate of incorporation and by-laws of United States Steel Corporation
provide that the number of directors may be fixed by the board from time to
time provided that there are always at least three directors. Upon the
Separation, the board of directors of United States Steel Corporation is
expected to consist of the individuals listed below (ages as of June 30, 2001).
The present principal occupation or employment and five-year employment history
of each individual follows the list below. Each of the individuals listed below
is a citizen of the United States.
Name Age Position
---- --- --------
J. Gary Cooper(1)........... 64 Director
Robert J. Darnall........... 63 Director
Roy G. Dorrance............. 55 Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer
Dr. Shirley Ann 54 Director
Jackson(1)(2)..............
Charles R. Lee(1)(2)........ 61 Director
Paul E. Lego(1)............. 71 Director
John F. McGillicuddy(1)..... 70 Director
Dan D. Sandman.............. 53 Vice Chairman and Chief Legal &
Administrative Officer
Seth E. Schofield(1)(2)..... 61 Director
John W. Snow(1)............. 61 Director
John P. Surma, Jr........... 47 Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Thomas J. Usher(1)(2)....... 58 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President
Douglas C. Yearley(1)(2).... 65 Director
--------
(1) Current director of USX
(2) Is also expected to be a director of Marathon Oil Corporation following the
Separation
J. Gary Cooper is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Commonwealth
National Bank. He was the United States Ambassador to Jamaica from 1994 to
1997. Ambassador Cooper is a director of Gen Corp Inc. and Protective Life
Corporation.
Robert J. Darnall is Chairman of Prime Advantage Corporation. In 1998, he
retired from the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at Inland
Steel (concluding a thirty-six year career with Inland) and joined Ispat
International N.V. as head of their North American operations. Mr. Darnall is a
member of the board of directors of Household International, Inc., Cummins,
Inc., Pactiv Corp., Sunoco, Inc., and the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago,
where he currently serves as Deputy Chairman.
Roy G. Dorrance is Executive Vice President of United States Steel. In
January, 2001 he was named to this position. From 1997 to January 2001, he
served as United States Steel's Executive Vice President with responsibility
for production, sales and marketing of United States Steel's sheet product
business.
Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson is President of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
She was appointed President in 1999 and was Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission from 1995 to 1999. Dr. Jackson is a director of Federal
Express Corporation, Newport News Shipbuilding, Sealed Air Corporation and
UtiliCorp United, Inc. She is a member of the National Academy of Engineering,
a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and a Fellow of the
American Physical Society.
81
Charles R. Lee is Chairman of the Board and Co-CEO, Verizon Communications
since his election on June 30, 2000. Mr. Lee was elected Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer of GTE, a predecessor of Verizon, in May 1992. Mr.
Lee is a director of The Procter & Gamble Company, United Technologies
Corporation, the Stamford Hospital Foundation, and the New American Schools
Development Corporation.
Paul E. Lego is Retired Chairman and CEO Westinghouse Electric Corporation.
Mr. Lego retired as Chairman and CEO of Westinghouse Electric Corporation in
January 1993 after serving in that position since 1990. He is also Chairman of
the Board of Commonwealth Industries, Inc. and a director of Dominion Resources
Inc., Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. and Orlimar Golf Company.
John F. McGillicuddy is Retired Chairman Chemical Banking Corporation. Mr.
McGillicuddy retired as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Chemical
Banking Corporation in 1994, having served as Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Chemical Banking Corporation and its predecessor Manufacturer's
Hanover Corporation since 1979. He is a director of Empire HealthChoice, Inc.,
Southern Peru Copper Corporation, and UAL Corporation.
Dan D. Sandman is General Counsel, Secretary, and Senior Vice President--
Human Resources & Public Affairs of USX Corporation. Mr. Sandman was elected to
this post in 1998. In 1996, Mr. Sandman's duties, as General Counsel and
Secretary, were expanded to include overall responsibility for human resources
corporate wide, as well as direct responsibility for executive compensation as
Senior Vice President--Human Resources for USX. Mr. Sandman is a director of
Roppe Corporation.
Seth E. Schofield is Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer--USAir
Group. Mr. Schofield retired as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 1996
after having served in such position since 1992. He is a director of Calgon
Carbon Corp.
John W. Snow is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, CSX
Corporation, since 1991. He is a director of Circuit Cities Stores Inc.,
Verizon Communications and Johnson & Johnson.
John P. Surma, Jr. is Assistant to the Chairman of USX Corporation effective
September 1, 2001 and has been the President of Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC
(MAP) since January 2001. Prior to that Mr. Surma served as the Senior Vice
President, Supply & Transportation for MAP, the President of Speedway
SuperAmerica LLC, and was named Senior Vice President, Finance & Accounting for
Marathon Oil Company in 1997. Immediately prior to joining Marathon Oil
Company, he was the Pittsburgh PriceWaterhouse office leader for Audit and
Business Advisory Services. He is a director of Calgon Carbon Corp.
Thomas J. Usher is Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer of USX
Corporation. Mr. Usher was elected to his current posts in July 1995 after
being elected President and Chief Operating Officer of USX Corporation in 1994.
In addition, he is on the board of directors of H. J. Heinz Company, PPG
Industries, and PNC Financial Services Group.
Douglas C. Yearley is Chairman Emeritus of Phelps Dodge Corporation. Mr.
Yearley retired in May, 2000 from Phelps Dodge Corporation after being elected
President in 1991 and Chief Executive Officer in 1989. He is a director of
Lockheed Martin Corporation.
The by-laws of United States Steel Corporation require that each non-
employee director be paid allowances and attendance fees as the board may from
time to time determine. Directors who are employees of United States Steel
Corporation receive no compensation for their service on the board. It is
expected that United States Steel Corporation will pay its non-employee
directors as follows:
Annual Retainer................... $ 60,000
Committee Membership Fee.......... $ 5,000 ($6,000 for Committee Chairman)
Meeting Fee (for each board or
committee meeting)............... $ 2,000
82
Committees of United States Steel Corporation's Board of Directors Following
the Separation
United States Steel Corporation is expected to have four standing
committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation and Organization Committee, a
Financial Policy Committee and a Corporate Governance and Public Policy
Committee. Each of these committees will consist of three or more directors who
meet all requirements imposed by SEC rules and regulations or rules and
regulations of any exchange or trading system on which United States Steel
Corporation securities are listed.
The Audit Committee
All the members of the Audit Committee will be independent (as independence
is defined in Sections 303.01(B)(2)(a) and (3) of the NYSE's listing standards,
as may be modified or supplemented).
The Audit Committee is, among other things, responsible for:
. ensuring the integrity of United States Steel Corporation's financial
reports,
. recommending to the board the independent accountants to be nominated
for election by the stockholders,
. reviewing the independence of the independent accountants,
. reviewing the scope of the audit activities of the independent
accountants and our internal auditors,
. providing direction to the internal audit staff and the independent
accountants,
. approving the independent accountants' fees,
. reviewing audit results,
. reviewing and approving the annual financial statements, the annual
report to stockholders, and the Annual Report on Form 10-K to be filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
. determining that appropriate controls are in place to ensure that United
States Steel operates in accordance with its procedures and codes of
conduct,
. reviewing compliance with business conduct policies,
. reviewing significant accounting, auditing and SEC pronouncements,
. reviewing, on an annual basis, a report outlining the activities
undertaken by the committee over the past year to meet the requirements
of the committee's charter, and
. assessing, and reporting annually to the United States Steel board on
the activities of the committee and on the adequacy of the committee's
charter.
The Compensation and Organization Committee
The Compensation and Organization Committee will be composed solely of
directors who satisfy all criteria for independence under applicable rules of
the New York Stock Exchange and who, in the opinion of the United States Steel
Corporation board, are free of any relationship that would interfere with their
exercise of independent judgment as members of the committee.
The Compensation and Organization Committee will be responsible for:
. making recommendations to the United States Steel Corporation board and
to the boards of subsidiaries on all matters of policy and procedures
relating to executive compensation,
. approving the salaries of officers (other than the officer-directors,
whose salaries are approved by the United States Steel Corporation
board),
. administering the Annual Incentive Compensation Plan and the Senior
Executive Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan,
83
. administering the plans under which long-term incentives are granted and
approving grants of options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock
and other incentives under those plans,
. the timely certification as to the meeting of applicable performance
levels under the foregoing plans,
. approving the annual report on executive compensation for the proxy
statement, and
. such other duties and responsibilities as may be assigned to the
committee by the United States Steel board or as designated in plans
approved by the shareholders.
The Compensation and Organization Committee will also be authorized to:
. adopt and amend employee benefit plans,
. review the activities of the United States Steel Corporation Pension
Fund as administrator of certain benefit plans,
. make recommendations to the United States Steel Corporation board
concerning policy matters relating to employee benefits,
. make recommendations to the United States Steel Corporation board
concerning the appropriate size and composition of the United States
Steel board, including
--candidates for election as directors,
--the composition and functions of United States Steel board
committees,
--the compensation of non-employee directors, and
--all matters relating to the development and effective functioning of
the United States Steel board,
. confer with management concerning plans for succession to executive
management positions, and
. consider nominees recommended by stockholders for election as directors.
In recommending candidates for election as directors, the committee, among
other considerations, will study the composition of the United States Steel
Corporation board and try to identify candidates with broad knowledge and
experience in business and society in general. Recommendations of candidates by
stockholders of record must be sent, together with the nominee's qualifications
and consent to be considered as a nominee, to the Secretary of United States
Steel Corporation for presentation to the committee.
The Financial Policy Committee
The Financial Policy Committee will provide oversight with respect to the
appropriate capital structure and financial policies of United States Steel.
Its key responsibility in that role will be to make recommendations to the
board concerning dividends. The board will also delegate to the committee the
authority to:
. approve financings by United States Steel Corporation (except financings
which involve the issuance of common stock), including the
recommendation of action to subsidiaries, partnerships and joint
ventures,
. authorize loans to outside entities, guarantees by United States Steel
Corporation of the credit of others, and other uses of United States
Steel Corporation credit, and
. approve United States Steel Corporation's funding policy for its pension
and other post-employment benefit plans.
In addition, the committee is responsible for reviewing the performance of
the United States Steel Pension Fund as investment manager and/or trustee of
our employee benefit plans. It also receives reports and makes recommendations
to the board on various financial matters.
84
The Corporate Governance and Public Policy Committee
The Corporate Governance and Public Policy Committee will concentrate on the
following areas of emphasis: ownership of United States Steel Corporation,
stockholder attitudes toward United States Steel Corporation, political-
legislative developments affecting United States Steel Corporation, United
States Steel Corporation policies on major public issues and corporate
governance matters.
The committee will review the following matters and report to the board such
observations and information thereon as the committee deems appropriate:
. matters bearing on the relationship between management and present or
potential stockholders with emphasis on policy and major programs
affecting ownership of United States Steel Corporation,
. communications to and from the investment community, particularly United
States Steel Corporation's stockholders,
. legislative and regulatory issues affecting United States Steel
Corporation's businesses and operations,
. public issues identified by United States Steel Corporation as likely to
generate expectations of United States Steel Corporation by its
constituencies, including stockholders, employees, customers, vendors,
governments and the public, and United States Steel Corporation's
position regarding identified public issues including, but not limited
to, employee health and safety, environmental, energy and trade matters,
. United States Steel Corporation's efforts to affect identified public
issues through research, analysis, lobbying efforts and participation in
business and government programs, and
. codes of conduct applicable to employees of United States Steel
Corporation and its principal operating units.
The committee also will assess and make recommendations concerning overall
corporate governance to the extent specific matters are not the assigned
responsibility of other board committees.
The board may establish other committees from time to time to facilitate the
management of the business and affairs of United States Steel Corporation.
Officers of United States Steel Corporation Following the Separation
Upon completion of the Separation, the individuals listed below, with their
ages (as of June 30, 2001) are expected to be officers of United States Steel
Corporation. Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each of the
individuals listed below is: 600 Grant Street, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-
4776. Each of the individuals listed below is a citizen of the United States.
Name Age Position
---- --- --------
Charles G. Carson, III........... 59 Vice President--Environmental Affairs
John J. Connelly................. 54 Vice President--Strategic Planning
Roy G. Dorrance.................. 55 Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer
Albert E. Ferrara, Jr............ 52 Senior Vice President and Treasurer
James D. Garraux................. 48 Vice President--Employee Relations
Charles C. Gedeon................ 60 Executive Vice President--Raw Materials &
Diversified Business
Gretchen R. Haggerty............. 45 Senior Vice President and Controller
Bruce A. Haines.................. 56 Vice President--Technology & Management
Services
J. Paul Kadlic................... 59 Executive Vice President--Sheet Products
Dan D. Sandman................... 53 Vice Chairman and Chief Legal &
Adminstrative Officer
Larry G. Schultz................. 51 Vice President--Investor Relations and
Financial Analysis
Terrance D. Straub............... 55 Vice President--Governmental Affairs
John P. Surma, Jr................ 47 Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
Stephan K. Todd.................. 55 General Counsel
Thomas J. Usher.................. 58 Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President
85
For biographical information regarding Messrs. Dorrance, Sandman, Surma and
Usher, see "Directors of United States Steel Corporation Following the
Separation" on page 81.
Charles G. Carson, III, current United States Steel Vice President--
Environmental Affairs, was appointed to this position in January 1993.
John J. Connelly, current United States Steel Vice President--Business
Development and Long Range Planning. From 1999 until January of 2001, Mr.
Connelly served as United States Steel's Vice President-- Long Range Planning
and International Business. In 1994, he was named Vice President--International
Business for the U. S. Steel Group and served as President of USX Engineers and
Consultants, Inc. from October 1994 to September 1996.
Albert E. Ferrara, Jr., current USX Vice President--Strategic Planning since
1997.
James D. Garraux, current United States Steel Vice President--Employee
Relations, assumed his position on August 1, 2000. He was appointed General
Manager--Employee Relations in 1996.
Charles C. Gedeon, current United States Steel Executive Vice President--Raw
Materials and Diversified Businesses, has served in this position since 1992.
Gretchen R. Haggerty, current United States Steel Vice President--Accounting
and Finance, was named to this position in 1998 after serving as Vice President
& Treasurer of USX Corporation from 1991 to 1998.
Bruce A. Haines, current United States Steel Vice President--Technology &
Management Services, was named to his current position in 1995.
J. Paul Kadlic, current United States Steel Executive Vice President--Sheet
Products, assumed this position on January 1, 2001. He was named Vice
President--Sales for sheet products in 1996.
Larry G. Schultz, current USX Vice President--Accounting since 2000, after
serving as Comptroller of U. S. Steel Group from 1992.
Terrance D. Straub, current USX Vice President--Governmental Affairs since
1991.
Stephan K. Todd, current United States Steel General Counsel, was elected to
his current post in June 1998. He was named Assistant General Counsel in 1995.
Change in Control Agreements
United States Steel has entered into change in control agreements with its
officers and with officers of USX who, in connection with the Separation, will
become officers of United States Steel Corporation. At the Separation Effective
Time, these agreements will be obligations of United States Steel Corporation.
These agreements provide that, if an officer's employment is terminated
under certain circumstances following a change in control, or after certain
events associated with a change in control, the officer will be entitled to the
following severance benefits:
. a cash payment of up to three times the sum of the officer's salary plus
bonus,
. life and health insurance benefits for up to 3 years after termination,
. up to 3 years of additional credit for purposes of retiree medical and
life insurance plans,
. a cash payment equal to the difference between amounts receivable by the
officer under our pension plans and those which would be payable if the
officer had worked for 3 more years at current pay rates,
86
. a cash payment equal to the difference between amounts receivable under
our savings and thrift plans and amounts which would have been received
if the officer's savings had been fully vested, and
. additional payments sufficient to compensate the officer for certain
federal taxes.
The severance benefits are payable if the officer's employment is terminated
by the officer for good reason or is terminated by United States Steel
Corporation for other than cause or disability. Severance benefits are not
payable if termination is due to the officer's death or occurs after the
officer reaches age 65.
In addition, the agreements provide that upon a change in control all
outstanding options, restored options, and stock appreciation rights previously
granted to the officers will be fully vested and exercisable, and all
restricted stock held by the officers will be fully vested.
Each agreement is automatically extended each year unless the officer is
notified that United States Steel Corporation does not wish it extended. In any
event, however, each agreement continues for two years after a change in
control.
The definition of a change in control for purposes of these agreements is
complex but is summarized as follows. It includes any change in control
required to be reported in response to Item 6 (e) of Schedule 14A under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and provides that a change in control will have
occurred if:
. any person not affiliated with United States Steel Corporation acquires
20 percent or more of the voting power of its outstanding securities,
. the United States Steel Corporation board of directors no longer has a
majority made up of (1) individuals who were directors on the date of
the agreements and (2) new directors (other than directors who join the
board in connection with an election contest) approved by two-thirds of
the directors then in office who (a) were directors on the date of the
agreements or (b) were themselves previously approved by the board in
this manner,
. United States Steel Corporation merges with another company and United
States Steel Corporation's stockholders end up with less than 50 percent
of the voting power of the new entity,
. stockholders approve a plan of complete liquidation of United States
Steel Corporation, or
. there is a sale of all or substantially all of United States Steel
Corporation's assets.
Neither the approval and adoption of the Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization, nor the completion of the Separation will constitute a change
in control for purposes of these agreements.
87
Compensation of United States Steel Corporation Executive Officers
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the
compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the chief executive officer and
the other four most highly compensated individuals who are expected to serve as
executive officers of United States Steel Corporation following the Separation
for services rendered to USX or its subsidiaries in all capacities during 2000.
Summary Compensation Table
Restricted
Salary Stock Options All Other
and Bonus Other Annual Award(s) SARs Compensation
Name & Position Salary ($) Bonus ($) Total ($) Compensation ($) ($)(1) (#)(2) ($)(3)
--------------- ---------- --------- --------- ---------------- ---------- ------- ------------
T. J. Usher............. 1,325,000 2,500,000 3,825,000 7,729 4,925,000 400,000 112,406
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer
and President
D. D. Sandman .......... 459,167 650,000 1,109,167 4,597 923,438 80,000 47,693
Vice Chairman and Chief
Legal and
Administrative Officer
J. P. Surma, Jr. ...... 350,000 650,000 1,000,000 1,781 0 30,000 41,375
Vice Chairman and Chief
Financial Officer
R. G. Dorrance.......... 328,333 340,000 668,333 1,677 345,000 50,000 32,115
Vice Chairman and
Chief Operating Officer
C. C. Gedeon............ 336,000 340,000 676,000 1,677 345,000 50,000 28,195
Executive Vice
President-Raw Materials
& Diversified
Businesses
--------
(1) Grants of restricted stock under the USX Corporation 1990 Stock Plan,
valued as of the date of grant. Grants are subject to conditions including
continued employment and achievement of business performance standards.
Dividends are paid on restricted stock. Shown below is the vesting schedule
for restricted stock scheduled to vest less than three years from the date
of grant, together with the number and value, as of December 31, 2000, of
the aggregate holdings of restricted stock for each of the executive
officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. Vesting shown assumes
achievement of business performance at peer-group standard.
(2) All option shares listed except those granted to Mr. Surma were granted
with tandem stock appreciation rights ("SARs").
(3) This column includes amounts contributed by USX under the USX Savings Fund
Plan or the Marathon Thrift Plan and the related supplemental savings
plans. Such amounts for 2000 are $79,500, $27,550, $39,375, $19,700 and
$18,480 for Messrs. Usher, Sandman, Surma, Dorrance and Gedeon,
respectively. Also included are amounts attributable to split-dollar life
insurance provided by USX. (Marathon Oil Company does not provide split-
dollar life insurance.) For 2000, these amounts are $30,906, $18,143,
$10,415 and $7,715 for Messrs. Usher, Sandman, Dorrance and Gedeon,
respectively. Also included are amounts attributable to a mandatory tax
compliance program. For 2000, these amounts were $2,000 each for Messrs.
Usher, Sandman, Surma, Dorrance and Gedeon.
88
Options/SARs and Restricted Stock Granted in 2000
The following table sets forth certain information concerning restricted
stock, stock options and stock appreciation rights ("SARs") granted during 2000
to each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table under the USX
1990 Stock Plan:
Restricted Stock Stock Options
------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of % of Restricted Number of % of Stock Exercise
Class of Shares Stock Shares Option Shares Price per Expiration Assumed 5% Assumed
Name Stock Granted Shares Granted Granted Granted Share Date Gain 10% Gain
---- -------- --------- --------------- --------- ------------- --------- ------------ ---------- -----------
T.J. Usher...... Marathon 130,000 31.7% 260,000* 14.4% $25.5000 May 30, 2010 $4,169,568 $10,566,504
Steel
70,000 22.9% 140,000* 15.3% $23.0000 May 30, 2010 $2,025,044 $ 5,131,854
D.D. Sandman.... Marathon 24,375 5.9% 52,000* 2.9% $25.5000 May 30, 2010 $ 833,914 $ 2,113,301
Steel
13,125 4.3% 28,000* 3.1% $23.0000 May 30, 2010 $ 405,009 $ 1,026,371
J.P. Surma, Marathon 0 0 30,000 1.7% $25.5000 May 30, 2010 $ 481,104 $ 1,219,212
Jr............. Steel
0 0 0 0 -- -- -- --
R.G. Dorrance... Marathon 0 0 0 0 -- -- -- --
Steel
15,000 4.9% 50,000* 5.5% $23.0000 May 30, 2010 $ 723,230 $ 1,832,805
C.C. Gedeon..... Marathon 0 0 0 0 -- -- -- --
Steel
15,000 4.9% 50,000* 5.5% $23.0000 May 30, 2010 $ 723,230 $ 1,832,805
--------
* These options were granted with tandem SARs, which have the same exercise
date as the underlying options. Upon the exercise of an SAR, an optionee
receives an amount, in cash and/or shares, equal to the excess, for a
specified number of shares, of (a) the fair market value of a share on the
date the SAR is exercised (except that for any SAR exercised during the 10-
business-day period beginning on the third business day following the release
of quarterly earnings, the Compensation Committee may, in its sole
discretion, establish a uniform fair market value of a share for such period
which shall not be more than the highest daily fair market value and shall
not be less than the lowest daily fair market value during such 10-business-
day period) over (b) the exercise price per share.
Unvested Restricted Shares
Vesting Schedule for Restricted Stock Aggregate Holdings
--------------------------------------- --------------------------
Value as
of
December
Class of May 2002 May 2003 Class of 31, 2000
Date Granted Stock (Shares) (Shares) Stock Shares ($)
------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- ------- ---------
T.J. Usher.............. May 30, 2000 Marathon 26,000 26,000 Marathon 130,000 3,684,694
Steel Steel
May 30, 2000 14,000 14,000 70,000 1,255,625
------- ---------
200,000 4,940,319
D.D. Sandman............ May 30, 2000 Marathon 4,875 4,875 Marathon 24,375 690,880
Steel Steel
May 30, 2000 2,625 2,625 13,125 235,430
------- ---------
37,500 926,310
R.G. Dorrance........... May 30, 2000 Steel 3,000 3,000 Steel 15,000 269,063
C.C. Gedeon............. May 30, 2000 Steel 3,000 3,000 Steel 15,000 269,063
--------
Options/SARs Exercised in 2000
Total Value
No. of Realized No. of
Shares for Both Unexercised Value of Unexercised In-
Underlying Classes of Options/SARs at The-Money Options/SARs
Options/SARs Stock December 31, at December 31, 2000
Name Exercised(1) ($)(1) 2000(1) for all Classes of Stock ($)(1)
---- ------------ ----------- --------------- -------------------------------
T.J. Usher.............. 0 -- 1,499,000 1,421,472
D.D. Sandman............ 0 -- 260,725 147,878
J.P. Surma, Jr.......... 0 -- 120,000 85,314
C.C. Gedeon............. 0 -- 162,500 0
R.G. Dorrance........... 0 -- 150,300 0
--------
Note: All options listed above are currently exercisable. Except for 50,000
shares held by Mr. Surma, the listed options were granted with SARs.
89
(1) Figures by class of stock are as follows:
No. of
Shares No. of
Underlying Unexercised
Class of Options/SARs Value Options/SARs at
Stock Exercised Realized ($) December 31, 2000
-------- ------------ ------------ -----------------
T.J. Usher................. Marathon 0 0 892,600
Steel 0 0 606,400
D.D. Sandman............... Marathon 0 0 153,400
Steel 0 0 107,325
J.P. Surma, Jr............. Marathon 0 0 120,000
Steel 0 0 0
C.C. Gedeon................ Marathon 0 0 0
Steel 0 0 162,500
R.G. Dorrance.............. Marathon 0 0 0
Steel 0 0 150,300
Pension Benefits
The United States Steel Plan for Non-Union Employee Pension Benefits ("Steel
Pension Plan") is comprised of two defined benefits. One is based on final
earnings and the other on career earnings. Directors who have not been
employees of United States Steel do not receive any benefits under the plan.
The following table shows the annual final earnings pension benefits for
retirement at age 65 (or earlier under certain circumstances) for various
levels of eligible earnings which would be payable to employees retiring with
the years of service shown. The benefits are based on a formula of a specified
percentage (dependent on years of service) of average annual eligible earnings
in the five consecutive years of the ten years prior to retirement in which
such earnings were highest. As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus
Messrs. Usher, Sandman, Dorrance and Gedeon have 35, 8, 30 and 15 years of
service, respectively. As of June 30, 2001, Mr. Surma had not accrued a benefit
under any pension plan or program sponsored by United States Steel. If Mr.
Gedeon retires with at least 16 credited years of service, he will receive from
United States Steel Corporation an amount equivalent to a final earnings and a
supplemental pension calculated as though he had an additional 14 years of
service. In connection with the Separation and in order to induce Dan D.
Sandman to serve as Vice Chairman and Chief Legal & Administrative Officer of
United States Steel Corporation, USX and Mr. Sandman have entered into an
agreement that provides if Mr. Sandman is employed by United States Steel
Corporation for five years after the Separation, upon his retirement, Mr.
Sandman will be offered the same enhanced retirement benefits as are being
offered to USX employees under the Voluntary Early Retirement Benefits Package
described on page 27 hereof.
15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Final Earnings Years Years Years Years Years Years Years
-------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
$ 100,000 17,325 23,100 28,875 34,650 40,950 47,250 53,550
$ 300,000 51,975 69,300 86,625 103,950 122,850 141,750 160,650
$ 500,000 86,625 115,500 144,375 173,250 204,750 236,250 267,750
$ 700,000 121,275 161,700 202,125 242,550 286,650 330,750 374,850
$ 900,000 155,925 207,900 259,875 311,850 368,550 425,250 481,950
$1,100,000 190,575 254,100 317,625 381,150 450,450 519,750 589,050
$1,300,000 225,225 300,300 375,375 450,450 532,350 614,250 696,150
$1,500,000 259,875 346,500 433,125 519,750 614,250 708,750 803,250
Annual career earning benefits are equal to 1% of total career earnings plus
a 30 percent supplement. The estimated annual career earnings benefits payable
at normal retirement age 65, assuming no increase in annual earnings, will be
$233,400 for Mr. Usher, $114,420 for Mr. Sandman, $80,902 for Mr. Dorrance and
$69,562 for Mr. Gedeon. Earnings for the purpose of calculating both the final
earnings and career earnings pensions are limited to base salary as reflected
in the Summary Compensation table. They do not include any awards under any
bonus programs.
90
As of June 30, 2001 Mr. Surma had 4.5 years of service with Marathon Oil
Company, MAP and its subsidiaries and no service with USX or its other
subsidiaries. In connection with his employment by Marathon in 1997, Marathon
agreed to credit Mr. Surma with 15 years of continuous service under all
Marathon pension plans. As a result of this provision, if Mr. Surma retires at
age 65, his total pension benefits from Marathon and its subsidiaries will be
$19,631 monthly.
As of June 30, 2001 Mr. Sandman had 19 years of service under Marathon's
pension plans. If Mr. Sandman retires at age 65, his total pension benefits
from Marathon and its subsidiaries will be $25,181 monthly.
In addition to the pension benefit described above, Messrs. Usher, Sandman,
Surma, Dorrance and Gedeon participate in the United States Steel Corporation
Executive Management Supplemental Pension Plan and are entitled, upon
retirement after age 60, or before age 60 with United States Steel's consent,
to the benefits shown in the table below based on bonuses paid under applicable
United States Steel plans. These bonuses are reported in the bonus column of
the Summary Compensation Table.
Annual
Bonus 15 Years 20 Years 25 Years 30 Years 35 Years 40 Years 45 Years
------ -------- -------- -------- -------- --------- --------- ---------
$ 100,000 $ 23,100 $ 30,800 $ 38,500 $ 46,200 $ 53,900 $ 61,600 $ 69,300
300,000 69,300 92,400 115,500 138,600 161,700 184,800 207,900
500,000 115,500 154,000 192,500 231,000 269,500 308,000 346,500
700,000 161,700 215,600 269,500 323,400 377,300 431,200 485,100
900,000 207,900 277,200 346,500 415,800 485,100 554,400 623,700
1,100,000 254,100 338,800 423,500 508,200 592,900 677,600 762,300
1,300,000 300,000 400,400 500,500 600,600 700,700 800,800 900,900
1,500,000 346,500 462,200 577,500 693,000 808,500 924,000 1,039,500
1,700,000 392,700 523,600 654,500 785,400 916,300 1,047,200 1,178,100
1,900,000 438,900 585,200 731,500 877,800 1,024,100 1,170,400 1,316,700
For information regarding compensation to be paid to Mr. Usher following the
Separation, see "THE SEPARATION--Completion and Retention Agreement with Thomas
J. Usher" on page 54.
91
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
United States Steel, through its Domestic Steel segment, is engaged in the
production, sale and transportation of steel mill products, coke, taconite
pellets and coal; the management of mineral resources; real estate development;
and engineering and consulting services and, through its U. S. Steel Kosice
("USSK") segment, primarily located in the Slovak Republic, in the production
and sale of steel mill products and coke for the central European market.
Certain business activities are conducted through joint ventures and partially
owned companies, such as USS-POSCO Industries ("USS-POSCO"), PRO-TEC Coating
Company ("PRO-TEC"), Clairton 1314B Partnership, Republic Technologies
International, LLC ("Republic") and Rannila Kosice, s.r.o. Management's
Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with United States
Steel's Combined Financial Statements and Notes to Combined Financial
Statements.
Certain sections of Management's Discussion and Analysis include forward-
looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting the
businesses of United States Steel. These statements typically contain words
such as "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "expects", "intends" or similar
words indicating that future outcomes are not known with certainty and subject
to risk factors that could cause these outcomes to differ significantly from
those projected. In accordance with "safe harbor" provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, these statements are accompanied by
cautionary language identifying important factors, though not necessarily all
such factors that could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those
set forth in forward-looking statements. For additional risk factors affecting
the businesses of United States Steel, see "RISK FACTORS" on page 13.
Results of Operations
Revenues and other income for the first six months of 2001 and 2000 and the
years 2000, 1999 and 1998 are set forth in the following table:
Six Months
Ended June 30
-------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
(Dollars in Millions)
Revenues by product:
Sheet and semi-finished steel
products............................. $1,601 $1,790 $3,288 $3,433 $3,598
Tubular, plate, and tin mill
products............................. 1,096 884 1,731 1,140 1,546
Raw materials (coal, coke and iron
ore)................................. 254 268 626 549 744
Other(a).............................. 292 269 445 414 490
Income (loss) from affiliates........... 40 7 (8) (89) 46
Gain on disposal of assets.............. 16 28 46 21 54
Other income (loss)..................... 2 (2) 4 2 (1)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total revenues and other income......... $3,301 $3,244 $6,132 $5,470 $6,477
====== ====== ====== ====== ======
--------
(a) Includes revenue from the sale of steel production by-products, real estate
development, resource management, and engineering and consulting services.
Revenues and other income increased by $57 million in the first six months
of 2001 compared with the first six months of 2000. The increase primarily
reflected the inclusion of USSK revenues, partially offset by lower domestic
shipment volumes (domestic steel shipments decreased 841,000 tons) and lower
average domestic steel product prices (average prices decreased $11 per ton).
Revenues and other income increased by $662 million in 2000 from 1999
primarily due to the consolidation of Lorain Tubular Company LLC, ("Lorain
Tubular") effective January 1, 2000, higher average
92
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
realized prices, particularly tubular product prices, and lower losses from
investees, which, in 1999, included a $47 million charge for the impairment of
United States Steel's previous investment in USS/Kobe Steel Company and costs
related to the formation of Republic. Total revenues and other income in 1999
decreased by $1,007 million from 1998 primarily due to lower average realized
prices and lower income from investees.
Income (loss) from operations for the first six months of 2001 and 2000 and
the years 2000, 1999 and 1998 are set forth in the following table:
Six Months
Ended June
30
------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998
----- ----- ---- ---- -----
(Dollars in millions)
Segment income (loss) for Domestic
Steel(a)(b).................................. $(220) $ 122 $ 23 $ 91 $ 517
Segment income for U. S. Steel Kosice(c)...... 82 -- 2 -- --
----- ----- ---- ---- -----
Income (loss) for reportable segments..... $(138) $ 122 $ 25 $ 91 $ 517
Items not allocated to segments:
Net pension credits......................... 72 132 266 228 186
Administrative expenses..................... (15) (11) (25) (17) (24)
Costs related to former business
activities(d).............................. (38) (40) (91) (83) (100)
Costs related to the Separation............. (9) -- -- -- --
Asset impairments--Coal..................... -- -- (71) -- --
Impairment of United States Steel's
investment in USS/Kobe and costs related to
formation of Republic...................... -- -- -- (47) --
Loss on investment in RTI stock used to
satisfy indexed debt obligation............ -- -- -- (22) --
----- ----- ---- ---- -----
Total income (loss) from operations....... $(128) $ 203 $104 $150 $ 579
===== ===== ==== ==== =====
--------
(a) The first six months of 2001 include a favorable $68 million for United
States Steel's share of gain on the Transtar reorganization and a $74
million charge for a substantial portion of accounts receivable from
Republic. The first six months of 2000 include charges totaling $15 million
for certain environmental and legal accruals.
(b) Includes income from the sale, domestic production and transportation of
steel products, coke, taconite pellets and coal; the management of mineral
resources; real estate development; engineering and consulting services;
and equity income from joint ventures and partially owned companies.
(c) Includes the sale and production of steel products and coke from facilities
primarily located in the Slovak Republic.
(d) Primarily represents postretirement costs other than pension (OPEB costs)
related to all retirees prior to January 1, 1987, and related to former
employees and retirees from the businesses sold or closed after January 1,
1987. Also includes certain other expenses (primarily litigation and
environmental remediation costs) associated to lines of business in which
USX is no longer engaged as a result of sale or closure.
Segment income for Domestic Steel
Segment income for Domestic Steel operations decreased $342 million in the
first six months of 2001, compared with the first six months of 2000, primarily
due to lower average steel prices, higher costs from operating inefficiencies
primarily due to lower throughput for sheet products, higher energy costs,
lower shipment volumes and lower results at iron ore and coal operations.
93
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
Domestic Steel operations recorded segment income of $23 million in 2000
versus segment income of $91 million in 1999, a decrease of $68 million. The
2000 segment income included $36 million for certain environmental and legal
accruals, a $34 million charge to establish reserves against notes and
receivables from financially distressed steel companies and a $10 million
charge for United States Steel's share of Republic special charges. Results in
1999 included $17 million in charges for certain environmental and legal
accruals and $7 million in various non-recurring investee charges. Excluding
these items, the decrease in segment income for Domestic Steel was primarily
due to higher costs related to energy and inefficient operating levels due to
lower throughput, lower income from raw materials operations, particularly coal
operations, and lower sheet shipments resulting from high levels of imports
that continued in 2000.
Segment income for Domestic Steel operations in 1999 decreased $426 million
from 1998. Results in 1998 included a net favorable $30 million for an
insurance litigation settlement and charges of $10 million related to a
voluntary workforce reduction plan. Excluding these items, the decrease in
segment income for Domestic Steel was primarily due to lower average steel
prices, lower income from raw materials operations, a less favorable product
mix and lower income from investees.
Segment income for U. S. Steel Kosice
Segment income for USSK was $82 million for the first six months of 2001 and
$2 million for the period following the November 24, 2000 acquisition through
year-end 2000.
Items not allocated to segments
Net pension credits associated with all of United States Steel's domestic
pension plans are not included in segment income for domestic operations. These
net pension credits, which are primarily noncash, totaled $72 million in first
six months of 2001, compared to $132 million in first six months of 2000. The
$60 million decrease in net pension credits in the first six months 2001 is
primarily due to the transition asset being fully amortized at the end of 2000.
In addition, these net pension credits totaled $266 million in 2000, $228
million in 1999 and $186 million in 1998. Net pension credits in 1999 included
$35 million for a one-time favorable pension settlement primarily related to
the voluntary early retirement program for salaried employees. Currently, the
net pension credit for 2001 is expected to be approximately $145 million,
excluding any potential impacts from the Proposed Separation. Future net
pension credits will no longer benefit from the transition asset, which was
fully amortized in 2000, and can vary depending upon the market performance of
plan assets, changes in actuarial assumptions regarding such factors as a
selection of a discount rate and rate of return on assets, changes in the
amortization levels of prior period service costs, plan amendments affecting
benefit payout levels, business combinations and profile changes in the
beneficiary populations being valued. To the extent net pension credits decline
in the future, income from operations would be adversely affected.
Asset impairments--Coal were for asset impairments at U. S. Steel Mining's
coal mines in Alabama and West Virginia in 2000 following a reassessment of
long-term prospects after adverse geological conditions were encountered.
Administrative expenses are corporate general and administrative costs
allocated to United States Steel by USX based upon utilization or other methods
management believes to be reasonable and which consider certain measures of
business activities, such as employment, investments and revenues. The costs
allocated to United States Steel were $15 million and $11 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, respectively, and $25 million in 2000, $17
million in 1999 and $24 million in 1998, which primarily consist of employment
costs including pension effects, professional services, facilities and other
related costs associated with corporate
94
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
activities. The increase from 1999 to 2000 primarily resulted from the
nonrecurrence of favorable 1999 franchise tax settlements and employee
compensation costs. The decrease from 1998 to 1999 was largely the result of
lower franchise taxes, primarily due to settlements of prior years' taxes.
Costs related to former business activities increased $8 million in 2000
from 1999 primarily due to higher litigation expenses. Costs related to former
business activities decreased $17 million in 1999 from 1998 primarily due to
lower litigation expenses and lower payments to a multiemployer health care
benefit plan created by the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992.
Costs related to the Separation include professional fees and expenses and
certain other costs.
In 1999, an impairment of USX's investment in USS/Kobe and costs related to
the formation of Republic totaled $47 million.
Income from operations in 1999 also included a loss on investment in RTI
stock used to satisfy indexed debt obligations of $22 million from the
termination of ownership in RTI International Metals, Inc.
Net interest and other financial costs for the first six months of 2001 and
2000 and the years 2000, 1999 and 1998 are set forth in the following table:
Six Month
Ended
June 30
----------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(Dollars in millions)
Net interest and other financial costs (income).... $ 36 $48 $105 $74 $42
Less:
Favorable adjustment to carrying value of indexed
debt(a)......................................... -- -- -- (13) (44)
Favorable adjustment to interest related to prior
years' taxes(b)................................. (67) -- -- -- --
---- --- ---- --- ---
Net interest and other financial costs adjusted to
exclude above items............................... $103 $48 $105 $87 $86
==== === ==== === ===
--------
(a) In December 1996, USX issued $117 million of 6 3/4% Exchangeable Notes Due
February 1, 2000 ("Indexed Debt") indexed to the price of RTI common stock.
The carrying value of Indexed Debt was adjusted quarterly to settlement
value, based on changes in the value of RTI common stock. Any resulting
adjustment was credited to income and included in interest and other
financial costs.
(b) Reversal of interest accrued on prior year contested tax liabilities
resolved in the first quarter of 2001.
Adjusted net interest and other financial costs increased by $55 million in
the first six months of 2001 as compared with the same period in 2000. This
increase was largely due to a higher average debt level, which primarily
resulted from the elective funding for employee benefits and the acquisition of
USSK, both of which occurred in the fourth quarter of 2000.
Adjusted net interest and other financial costs increased $18 million in
2000 as compared with 1999, primarily due to higher average debt levels.
Adjusted net interest and other financial costs were $87 million in 1999 as
compared with $86 million in 1998.
The credit for income taxes in the first six months of 2001 was $143
million. The credit contained a $33 million tax benefit associated with the
Transtar reorganization and an unfavorable adjustment of $15 million related to
the settlement of prior years' taxes. In addition, as a result of tax credit
provisions of laws of the Slovak Republic and certain tax planning strategies,
virtually no income tax provision is recorded for income related to USSK.
95
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
The provision for income taxes in 2000 decreased compared to 1999 primarily
due to a decline in income from operations, partially offset by higher state
income taxes as certain previously recorded state tax benefits will not be
utilized. The provision for income taxes in 1999 decreased compared to 1998 due
to a decline in income from operations.
The extraordinary loss on extinguishment of debt of $7 million, net of
income tax benefit, in 1999 included a $5 million loss resulting from the
satisfaction of the indexed debt and a $2 million loss for United States
Steel's share of Republic's extraordinary loss related to the early
extinguishment of debt.
Net loss in the first six months of 2001 was $21 million, compared with net
income of $99 million in the first six months of 2000, a decrease of $120
million. United States Steel recorded a 2000 net loss of $21 million, compared
with net income of $44 million in 1999 and $364 million in 1998. Net income
decreased $65 million in 2000 from 1999 and decreased $320 million in 1999 from
1998. These decreases in net income primarily reflect the factors discussed
above.
Operating Statistics
First six months 2001 United States Steel shipments were 6.9 million net
tons. Domestic Steel shipments of 5.0 million tons and raw steel production of
5.2 million tons decreased 14% and 15%, respectively, from the same period in
2000. Domestic raw steel capability utilization in the first six months of 2001
averaged 83%, compared to 97% in the same period in 2000. At USSK, first six
month 2001 shipments were 1.8 million net tons, raw steel production was 2.1
million net tons and raw steel capability utilization was 93% based on annual
raw steel production capability which had been 4.5 million net tons.
Total steel shipments were 11.1 million tons in 2000, 10.6 million tons in
1999, and 10.7 million tons in 1998. Domestic Steel shipments comprised
approximately 9.8% of the domestic steel market in 2000. Domestic Steel
shipments were negatively affected by high import levels in 2000, 1999 and 1998
and by weak tubular markets in 1999 and 1998. Exports accounted for
approximately 5% of Domestic Steel shipments in 2000, 3% in 1999 and 4% in
1998.
Domestic raw steel production was 11.4 million tons in 2000, compared with
12.0 million tons in 1999 and 11.2 million tons in 1998. Domestic raw steel
production averaged 89% of capability in 2000, compared with 94% of capability
in 1999 and 88% of capability in 1998. In 2000, domestic raw steel production
was negatively impacted by a planned reline at Gary Works No. 4 blast furnace
in July 2000. Because of market conditions, United States Steel limited its
domestic production by keeping the Gary Works No. 4 blast furnace out of
service until February 2001. In 1998, domestic raw steel production was
negatively affected by a planned reline at Gary Works No. 6 blast furnace, an
unplanned blast furnace outage at the Gary Works No. 13 blast furnace, and the
idling of certain facilities as a result of the increase in imports. Because of
market conditions, United States Steel curtailed its domestic production by
keeping the Gary Works No. 6 blast furnace out of service until February 1999,
after a scheduled reline was completed in mid-August 1998. In addition,
domestic raw steel production was cut back at Mon Valley Works and Fairfield
Works during 1998.
Financial Condition and Cash Flows
Current assets at June 30, 2001 decreased $41 million from year-end 2000
primarily due to decreases in inventories, deferred income tax benefits and
income taxes receivable, partially offset by increases in cash and cash
equivalents and accounts receivable. Current assets at year-end 2000 increased
$736 million from year-end 1999 primarily due to an increase in cash and cash
equivalents, a larger income tax receivable from Marathon, and increased trade
receivables and inventories resulting from the acquisition of USSK.
96
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
Net property, plant and equipment at June 30, 2001 increased $359 million
from year-end 2000 primarily due to the consolidation of Transtar and the
acquisition of East Chicago Tin. Net property, plant and equipment at year-end
2000 increased $223 million from year-end 1999 primarily due to the acquisition
of USSK.
Current liabilities at June 30, 2001 increased $269 million from year-end
2000 primarily due to increases in notes payable, debt due within one year and
accrued taxes. Current liabilities in 2000 increased $107 million from 1999
primarily due to increased notes payable and increased debt due within one
year, partially offset by a decrease in payroll and benefits payable.
Total long-term debt and notes payable was $2,432 million at June 30, 2001,
$13 million lower than year-end 2000. Total long-term debt and notes payable at
December 31, 2000 of $2,445 million was $1,530 million higher than year-end
1999. USX debt attributed to United States Steel increased partially due to a
$500 million elective contribution to a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association
("VEBA"), a trust established by contract in 1994 covering United Steelworkers
of America retirees' health care and life insurance benefits, and the
acquisition of USSK. Excluding the impact of these items, the increase in debt
was primarily due to lower cash flow provided from operating activities
partially offset by reduced capital expenditures. Most of the debt is a direct
obligation of, or is guaranteed by, USX.
Employee benefits at June 30, 2001 increased $149 million from year-end 2000
primarily due to additional liabilities resulting from the Transtar
consolidation and the acquisition of the tin mill products business of LTV
Corporation. Employee benefits at December 31, 2000 decreased $478 million from
December 31, 1999 primarily due to the $500 million elective contribution to a
VEBA.
Net cash provided from operating activities increased $126 million in the
first six months of 2001, compared with the first six months of 2000. The
increase was due primarily to favorable working capital changes, which included
a favorable income tax settlement of $379 million with Marathon in the first
six months of 2001 compared to a favorable settlement of $97 million in the
first six months of 2000, partially offset by decreased net income (excluding
noncash items).
Net cash used in operating activities in 2000 was $627 million and reflected
the $500 million elective contribution to a VEBA and a $30 million elective
contribution to a non-union retiree life insurance trust, partially offset by
an income tax settlement with Marathon in accordance with the group tax
allocation policy. The $500 million VEBA contribution has provided United
States Steel with the flexibility to fund the ongoing costs of providing USWA
retiree health care and life insurance benefits from the VEBA instead of from
corporate cash flow for at least the next several years. It is estimated that
approximately $110 million of such obligations will be paid from the VEBA
instead of from corporate cash in 2001. Net cash used in operating activities
was $80 million in 1999 including a net payment of $320 million upon the
expiration of the accounts receivable program. Excluding these non-recurring
items in both years, net cash provided from operating activities decreased $434
million in 2000 due mainly to decreased profitability and an increase in
working capital.
Net cash provided from operating activities was $380 million in 1998 and
included proceeds of $38 million for the insurance litigation settlement
pertaining to the 1995 Gary Works No. 8 blast furnace explosion and the payment
of $30 million for the repurchase of sold accounts receivable, partially offset
by an income tax settlement with Marathon in accordance with the group tax
allocation policy. Excluding these non-recurring items in both years, net cash
provided from operating activities decreased $110 million in 1999 due mainly to
decreased profitability.
Capital expenditures in the first six months of 2001 were $141 million,
compared with $97 million in the same period in 2000. The increase of $44
million is primarily due to exercising a buyout option of a lease for the
balance of the Gary Works No. 2 Slab Caster.
97
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
Capital expenditures of $244 million in 2000 included exercising an early
buyout option of a lease for approximately half of the Gary Works No. 2 Slab
Caster; the continued replacement of coke battery thruwalls at Gary Works;
installation of the remaining two coilers at Gary's hot strip mill; a blast
furnace stove replacement at Gary Works; and the continuation of an upgrade to
the Mon Valley cold reduction mill.
Capital expenditures of $287 million in 1999 included the completion of the
new 64" pickle line at Mon Valley Works; the replacement of one coiler at the
Gary hot strip mill; an upgrade to the Mon Valley cold reduction mill;
replacement of coke battery thruwalls at Gary Works; several projects at Gary
Works allowing for production of specialized high strength steels, primarily
for the automotive market; and completion of the conversion of the Fairfield
pipemill to use rounds instead of square blooms.
Capital expenditures of $310 million in 1998 included a reline of the Gary
Works No. 6 blast furnace; an upgrade to the galvanizing line at Fairless
Works; replacement of coke battery thruwalls at Gary Works; conversion of the
Fairfield pipemill to use round instead of square blooms; and additional
environmental expenditures primarily at Fairfield Works and Gary Works.
Contract commitments for capital expenditures at June 30, 2001 totaled $109
million compared with $206 million at year-end 2000 and $83 million at year-end
1999. In addition, USSK has a commitment to the Slovak government for a capital
improvements program of $700 million, subject to certain conditions, over a
period commencing with the acquisition date and ending on December 31, 2010.
Capital expenditures for 2001, which include expenditures related to the
recently acquired facilities of USSK, Transtar and East Chicago Tin, are
expected to be approximately $325 million, a reduction of over $100 million
from the amount originally expected, primarily due to the substitution of
leases for purchases and the delay or deferral of certain capital projects.
Major expenditures include exercising an early buyout option of a lease for the
balance of the Gary Works No. 2 Slab Caster; work on the No. 3 blast furnace at
Mon Valley Works; work on the No. 2 stove at the No. 6 blast furnace at Gary
Works; the completion of the replacement of coke battery thruwalls at Gary
Works; the completion of an upgrade to the Mon Valley cold reduction mill;
systems development projects; and projects at USSK, including the completion of
the tin mill upgrade.
The preceding statement concerning expected 2001 capital expenditures is a
forward-looking statement. This forward-looking statement is based on
assumptions, which can be affected by, among other things, levels of cash flow
from operations, general economic conditions, whether or not assets are
purchased or financed by operating leases, unforeseen hazards such as weather
conditions, explosions or fires, which could delay the timing of completion of
particular capital projects. Accordingly, actual expenditures may differ
materially from current expectations in the forward-looking statement.
Investments in investees in 2000 of $35 million largely reflected an
investment in stock of VSZ in which United States Steel now holds a 25 percent
interest. Investments in investees in 1999 of $15 million was an investment in
Republic. Investments in investees in 1998 of $73 million mainly reflects
funding for entry into a joint venture in the Slovak Republic with VSZ.
The acquisition of U. S. Steel Kosice, s.r.o. totaled $10 million in 2000,
which reflected a $69 million purchase price net of cash acquired in the
transaction of $59 million. The first quarter 2001 acquisition of East Chicago
Tin and consolidation of Transtar were noncash transactions.
Net cash changes related to financial obligations decreased by $32 million
in the first six months of 2001, reflecting favorable cash from operations,
partially offset by capital expenditures and dividend payments. Financial
obligations consist of United States Steel's portion of USX debt and preferred
stock of a subsidiary attributed to both groups, as well as debt and financing
agreements specifically attributed to United States Steel.
98
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
Net cash changes related to financial obligations increased by $1,202
million, $486 million and $9 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The
increase in 2000 primarily reflected the net effects of cash used in operating
activities, including a VEBA contribution, cash used in investing activities,
dividend payments and preferred stock repurchases. The increase in 1999
primarily reflected the net effects of cash used in operating and investing
activities and dividend payments.
Dividends paid decreased $13 million in the first six months of 2001 from
the same period in 2000, due to a decrease in the dividend rate paid to U. S.
Steel Group common stockholders.
Liquidity
Prior to Separation
As a matter of policy, USX has managed most financial activities on a
centralized, consolidated basis, and will continue to do so until the
Separation. Such financial activities include the investment of surplus cash;
the issuance, repayment and repurchase of short-term and long-term debt; the
issuance, repurchase and redemption of preferred stock; and the issuance and
repurchase of common stock. Transactions related primarily to invested cash,
short-term and long-term debt (including convertible debt), related net
interest and other financial costs and preferred stock and related dividends
are attributed to United States Steel based upon its cash flows for the periods
presented and its initial capital structure. However, a portion of most
financing transactions are attributed to and reflected in the combined
financial statements of United States Steel. Transactions such as leases,
certain collateralized financings, financial activities of consolidated
entities that are less than wholly owned by USX and transactions related to
securities convertible solely into USX-U. S. Steel Group Common Stock are or
will be specifically attributed to and reflected in their entirety in the
combined financial statements of United States Steel.
The cash requirements for United States Steel have been funded as part of
USX's program of managing financial activities on a centralized consolidated
basis. In December 2000, USX entered into a $1,354 million five-year revolving
credit agreement, terminating in November 2005, and a $451 million 364-day
facility, which together replaced the prior $2,350 million facility. At June
30, 2001, USX had no borrowings against its $1,354 million long-term revolving
credit agreement, no borrowings against its $451 million 364-day facility and
no commercial paper borrowings. There were no borrowings against USX's short-
term lines of credit totaling $115 million at June 30, 2001. At June 30, 2001,
there were no borrowings against the USSK $50 million revolving credit
agreement.
On April 24, 2001, USX announced that the Board had authorized management to
proceed with the necessary steps to implement a plan of reorganization of the
corporation in order to separate the energy and steel businesses. Until the
plan of reorganization is implemented or abandoned, USX management believes
that it will be more difficult to access traditional debt and equity markets.
Capital expenditures in the first half of 2001 were $141 million and are
expected to be approximately $325 million for the full year, including
expenditures related to the recently acquired facilities of USSK, Transtar, and
East Chicago Tin. Contract commitments for capital expenditures at June 30,
2001 totaled $109 million. Based upon preliminary assumptions, capital
expenditures are expected to be at least $260 million for the full year in
2002.
After Separation
Following the Separation, United States Steel will be an independent company
and will no longer have access to the financial resources of USX Corporation.
It is a condition to the Separation that United States Steel will have in
place, at time of Separation, cash and undrawn credit facilities of at least
$400 million.
99
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
Assuming the Separation had occurred on June 30, 2001, United States Steel
Corporation and its subsidiaries would have had total outstanding debt of
$1,791 million including:
--a USSK loan facility of $325 million
--assumed USX debt and capital leases of $569 million
--new financing arrangements of $897 million.
On July 27, 2001, in partial satisfaction of the $897 million in new
financings, United States Steel completed a private placement of $385 million
(reduced by a $5 million discount) of 10 3/4% Senior Notes which mature on
August 1, 2008. For the remaining pro forma new financing arrangements of $517
million, United States Steel intends to enter, on or before the Separation,
into various financing arrangements in order to, among other things, replace a
portion of the indebtedness attributed to United States Steel by USX prior to
the Separation and to provide necessary liquidity. The terms of such
financings, including maturities and amortization schedules for payments of
principal, interest rates, covenants or security, have not yet been determined
and no commitments for any additional financing facilities are in place. This
additional financing is expected to be partially satisfied by receipt of a
preliminary tax settlement of at least $300 million from Marathon immediately
prior to the Separation as described below. The financings will be subject to
market conditions and we cannot assure you that such financings will be
available on commercially reasonable terms.
Based on United States Steel's pro forma debt levels as of June 30, 2001,
United States Steel anticipates that its scheduled interest payments for the
twelve months immediately following the Separation will be approximately $148
million, assuming an annual weighted average interest rate of 8.25 percent.
United States Steel management believes that its liquidity will be adequate
to satisfy its obligations after Separation for the foreseeable future,
including its obligations under the Financial Matters Agreement with Marathon
Oil Corporation and any other financing transactions related to the Separation,
and to complete currently authorized capital spending programs. Future
requirements for United States Steel's business needs, including the funding of
capital expenditures, debt service for the financing to be incurred in relation
to the Separation, and any amounts that may ultimately be paid in connection
with contingencies, are expected to be financed by a combination of internally
generated funds, proceeds from the sale of stock, borrowings and other external
financing sources.
USX has elected to file a consolidated United States federal income tax
return. Accordingly, the provision for federal income taxes and the related
payments or refunds of tax are determined on a consolidated basis. The
consolidated provision and the related tax payments or refunds have been
reflected in the United States Steel financial statements in accordance with
USX's Tax Allocation Policy.
For tax provision and settlement purposes, consolidated tax benefits or
detriments resulting from attributes generated by United States Steel,
principally net operating losses and minimum tax credits, which could not be
utilized on a separate return basis for United States Steel, but which were
utilized on the USX consolidated tax return were allocated to United States
Steel. As a result, a tax receivable or payable was recorded reflecting the
benefits or detriments accruing to United States Steel for the use of these
attributes by USX. The tax receivable from USX established at December 31, 2000
was settled in the first quarter 2001 by a $364 million reduction to
outstanding debt balances of United States Steel. Settlements were $379 million
in the first six months of 2001, $91 million in 2000, $(2) million in 1999, and
$21 million in 1998. For pre-separation tax years which have not been settled
with the IRS, the Tax Sharing Agreement replaces the USX Tax Allocation Policy
and generally provides for resettlement of these tax years on a basis similar
to the USX Tax Allocation Policy. Following the Separation, United States Steel
will no longer be a member of the USX consolidated group for tax purposes and,
therefore, generally there is no provision for settlements under the Tax
Sharing Agreement for these years.
100
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
A preliminary settlement for the calendar year 2001 federal income taxes,
which would be made in March 2002 under USX's current tax allocation policy,
will be made immediately prior to the Separation at a discounted amount to
reflect the time value of money. Under the preliminary settlement for calendar
year 2001, it is expected that United States Steel will receive at least $300
million from Marathon immediately prior to Separation arising from USX's
current Tax Allocation Policy.
United States Steel management's opinion concerning liquidity and United
States Steel's ability to avail itself in the future of the financing options
mentioned in the above forward-looking statements are based on currently
available information. To the extent that this information proves to be
inaccurate, future availability of financing may be adversely affected. Factors
that could affect the availability of financing include the performance of
United States Steel (as measured by various factors including cash provided
from operating activities), the state of worldwide debt and equity markets,
investor perceptions and expectations of past and future performance, the
overall U.S. financial climate, and, in particular, with respect to borrowings,
by levels of United States Steel's outstanding debt and credit ratings by
rating agencies.
Debt Rating
Standard and Poor's has assigned a BB corporate credit rating, which is non-
investment grade, to United States Steel Corporation with a negative outlook,
assuming the Plan of Reorganization is completed. Moody's has assigned a Ba1
senior implied rating, which is non-investment grade, to United States Steel
with a stable outlook. Additionally, Standard & Poor's and Moody's have
assigned BB and Ba2 credit ratings, respectively, to United States Steel's $385
million Senior Notes. Both of these ratings are non-investment grade.
Environmental Matters, Litigation and Contingencies
United States Steel has incurred and will continue to incur substantial
capital, operating and maintenance, and remediation expenditures as a result of
environmental laws and regulations. In recent years, these expenditures have
been mainly for process changes in order to meet Clean Air Act obligations,
although ongoing compliance costs have also been significant. To the extent
these expenditures, as with all costs, are not ultimately reflected in the
prices of United States Steel's products and services, operating results will
be adversely affected. United States Steel believes that all of its domestic
competitors are subject to similar environmental laws and regulations. However,
the specific impact on each competitor may vary depending on a number of
factors, including the age and location of its operating facilities, marketing
areas, production processes and the specific products and services it provides.
To the extent that competitors are not required to undertake equivalent costs
in their operations, the competitive position of United States Steel could be
adversely affected.
In addition, United States Steel expects to incur capital expenditures for
its USSK operation to meet environmental standards under the Slovak Republic's
environmental laws.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") establishes standards
for the management of solid and hazardous wastes. Besides affecting current
waste disposal practices, RCRA also addresses the environmental effects of
certain past waste disposal operations, the recycling of wastes and the
regulation of storage tanks.
United States Steel is in the study phase of RCRA corrective action programs
at its Fairless Works and its former Geneva Works. A RCRA corrective action
program has been initiated at its Gary Works and at its Fairfield Works. Until
the studies are completed at these facilities, United States Steel is unable to
estimate the total cost of remediation activities that will be required.
United States Steel has been notified that it is a potential responsible
party ("PRP") at 22 waste sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA") as of June 30, 2001. In addition,
there are 16 sites where United States Steel has received information requests
or
101
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
other indications that United States Steel may be a PRP under CERCLA but where
sufficient information is not presently available to confirm the existence of
liability or to make any judgment as to the amount thereof. There are also 29
additional sites related to United States Steel where remediation is being
sought under other environmental statutes, both federal and state, or where
private parties are seeking remediation through discussions or litigation. At
many of these sites, United States Steel is one of a number of parties involved
and the total cost of remediation, as well as United States Steel's share
thereof, is frequently dependent upon the outcome of investigations and
remedial studies. United States Steel accrues for environmental remediation
activities when the responsibility to remediate is probable and the amount of
associated costs is reasonably determinable. As environmental remediation
matters proceed toward ultimate resolution or as additional remediation
obligations arise, charges in excess of those previously accrued may be
required.
In October 1996, United States Steel was notified by the Indiana Department
of Environmental Management ("IDEM"), acting as lead trustee, that IDEM and the
U.S. Department of the Interior had concluded a preliminary investigation of
potential injuries to natural resources related to the releases of hazardous
substances from various municipal and industrial sources along the east branch
of the Grand Calumet River and Indiana Harbor Canal. The public trustees
completed a pre-assessment screen pursuant to federal regulations and have
determined to perform a Natural Resource Damages Assessment. United States
Steel was identified as a PRP along with 15 other companies owning property
along the river and harbor canal. United States Steel and eight other PRPs have
formed a joint defense group. In 2000, the trustees concluded their assessment
of sediment injuries, which included a technical review of environmental
conditions. The PRP joint defense group has proposed terms for the settlement
of this claim which have been endorsed by representatives of the trustees and
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") to be included in a consent
decree that United States Steel expects will resolve this claim. A reserve has
been established for United States Steel's share of this anticipated
settlement.
In 1997, USS/Kobe Steel Company ("USS/Kobe"), a joint venture between United
States Steel and Kobe Steel, Ltd. ("Kobe"), was the subject of a multi-media
audit by the EPA that included an air, water and hazardous waste compliance
review. USS/Kobe and the EPA entered into a tolling agreement pending issuance
of the final audit and commenced settlement negotiations in July 1999. In
August 1999, the steelmaking and bar producing operations of USS/Kobe were
combined with companies controlled by Blackstone Capital Partners II to form
Republic. The tubular operations of USS/Kobe were transferred to a newly formed
entity, Lorain Tubular Company LLC ("Lorain Tubular"), which operated as a
joint venture between USX and Kobe until December 31, 1999 when USX purchased
all of Kobe's interest in Lorain Tubular. Republic and Lorain Tubular are
continuing negotiations with the EPA. Most of the matters raised by the EPA
relate to Republic's facilities, however, air discharge from Lorain Tubular's
#3 seamless pipe mill have also been cited. Lorain Tubular will be responsible
for matters relating to its facilities. The final report and citations from the
EPA have not been issued.
In 1998, United States Steel entered into a consent decree with the EPA
which resolved alleged violations of the Clean Water Act National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permit at Gary Works and provides for a
sediment remediation project for a section of the Grand Calumet River that runs
through Gary Works. Contemporaneously, United States Steel entered into a
consent decree with the public trustees which resolves potential liability for
natural resource damages on the same section of the Grand Calumet River. In
1999, United States Steel paid civil penalties of $2.9 million for the alleged
water act violations and $0.5 million in natural resource damages assessment
costs. In addition, United States Steel will pay the public trustees $1 million
at the end of the remediation project for future monitoring costs and United
States Steel is obligated to purchase and restore several parcels of property
that have been or will be conveyed to the trustees. During the negotiations
leading up to the settlement with the EPA, capital improvements were made to
upgrade plant systems to comply with the NPDES requirements. The sediment
remediation project is an approved final interim measure under the corrective
action program for Gary Works and is expected to cost approximately $36.4
million over the next five years. Estimated remediation and monitoring costs
for this project have been accrued.
102
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
The Berks Associates/Douglassville Site ("Berks Site") is situated on a 50-
acre parcel located on the Schuylkill River in Berks County, Pa. Used oil and
solvent reprocessing operations were conducted on the Berks Site between 1941
and 1986. In September 1997, United States Steel signed a consent decree to
conduct a feasibility study at the site relating to the alternative remedy. In
1999, a new Record of Decision was approved by the EPA and the U.S. Department
of Justice. On January 19, 2001, United States Steel signed a consent decree
with the EPA to remediate this site. On April 6, 2001, United States Steel paid
$0.4 million for costs associated with this site. The only remaining
outstanding claim is the natural resource damages claim filed by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
In 1987, the California Department of Health Services ("DHS") issued a
remedial action order for the GBF/Pittsburg landfill near Pittsburg,
California. DHS alleged that from 1972 through 1974, Pittsburg Works arranged
for the disposal of approximately 2.6 million gallons of waste oil, sludge,
caustic mud and acid, which were eventually taken to this landfill for
disposal. In 2000, the parties reached a buyout arrangement with a third party
remediation firm, whereby the firm agreed to take title to and remediate the
site and also indemnify the PRPs. This commitment was backed by pollution
insurance. United States Steel's share to participate in the buyout was
approximately $1.1 million. Payment of the USX buyout amount was made December
2000. Title to the site was transferred to the remediation firm on January 31,
2001.
In November 2000, a NOV was issued by the Jefferson County Health Department
("JCHD") alleging violation of the Halogenated Solvent National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and the JCHD Volatile Organic Compound
("VOC") regulations at the sheet mill stretch leveler at Fairfield Works. U.S.
Steel Group proposed a civil penalty of $100,000 and a VOC emission limit,
which have been agreed to by JCHD. A consent order was executed and approved by
the court in May 2001. The penalty was paid by United States Steel in June
2001.
New or expanded environmental requirements, which could increase United
States Steel's environmental costs, may arise in the future. United States
Steel intends to comply with all legal requirements regarding the environment,
but since many of them are not fixed or presently determinable (even under
existing legislation) and may be affected by future legislation, it is not
possible to predict accurately the ultimate cost of compliance, including
remediation costs which may be incurred and penalties which may be imposed.
However, based on presently available information, and existing laws and
regulations as currently implemented, United States Steel does not anticipate
that environmental compliance expenditures (including operating and maintenance
and remediation) will materially increase in 2001. United States Steel's
capital expenditures for environmental are expected to be approximately $20
million in 2001 and are expected to be spent on projects primarily at Gary
Works and USSK. Predictions beyond 2001 can only be broad-based estimates which
have varied, and will continue to vary, due to the ongoing evolution of
specific regulatory requirements, the possible imposition of more stringent
requirements and the availability of new technologies to remediate sites, among
other matters. Based upon currently identified projects, United States Steel
anticipates that environmental capital expenditures will be approximately $51
million in 2002; however, actual expenditures may vary as the number and scope
of environmental projects are revised as a result of improved technology or
changes in regulatory requirements and could increase if additional projects
are identified or additional requirements are imposed.
United States Steel is the subject of, or a party to, a number of pending or
threatened legal actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of
matters, including laws and regulations relating to the environment. The
ultimate resolution of these contingencies could, individually or in the
aggregate, be material to United States Steel Combined Financial Statements.
However, management believes that United States Steel will remain a viable and
competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies
could be resolved unfavorably to United States Steel.
Imports and Trade Issues
Steel imports to the United States accounted for an estimated 23%, 27%, 26%
and 30% of the domestic steel market demand in the first five months of 2001,
and for the years 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
103
UNITED STATES STEEL
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
On November 13, 2000, United States Steel joined with eight other producers
and the Independent Steelworkers Union to file trade cases against hot-rolled
carbon steel flat products from 11 countries (Argentina, India, Indonesia,
Kazakhstan, the Netherlands, the People's Republic of China, Romania, South
Africa, Taiwan, Thailand and Ukraine). Three days later, the USWA also entered
the cases as a petitioner. Antidumping ("AD") cases were filed against all the
countries and countervailing duty ("CVD") cases were filed against Argentina,
India, Indonesia, South Africa, and Thailand. The ITC made a preliminary
determination that there is a reasonable indication that the domestic industry
is being materially injured by the imports in question. The U.S. Department of
Commerce ("Commerce") made preliminary findings of margins in all of the cases.
Commerce has also found final margins in the AD cases against Argentina and
South Africa and in the CVD case against Argentina, while final determinations
in the other cases will be made at a later date. Both the ITC and Commerce are
continuing their investigations in all the cases in which final determinations
have not yet been made.
On June 5, 2001, President Bush announced a three-part program to address
the excessive imports of steel that have been depressing markets in the United
States. The program involves (1) negotiations with foreign governments seeking
near-term elimination of inefficient excess steel production capacity
throughout the world, (2) negotiations with foreign governments to establish
rules that will govern steel trade in the future and eliminate subsidies, and
(3) an investigation by the ITC under section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974 to
determine whether steel is being imported into the United States in such
quantities as to be a substantial cause of serious injury to the United States
steel industry.
On June 22, 2001, the Bush Administration requested that the ITC initiate
investigations under section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974. Products included in
the request are in the following categories, subject to exclusion of certain
products:
(1) Carbon and alloy flat products;
(2) Carbon and alloy long products;
(3) Carbon and alloy pipe and tube; and
(4) Stainless steel and alloy tool steel products.
United States Steel believes that the remedies provided by AD and CVD are
insufficient to correct the widespread dumping and subsidy abuses that
currently characterize steel imports into our country and has, therefore, urged
the government to take actions such as those described above. United States
Steel, nevertheless, intends to file additional AD and CVD petitions against
unfairly traded imports that adversely impact, or threaten to adversely impact,
the results of United States Steel and is urging the U.S. government to take
additional steps.
On July 3, 2000, Commerce and the ITC initiated mandatory five-year "sunset"
reviews of AD orders issued in 1995 against seamless pipe from Argentina,
Brazil, Germany and Italy and oil country tubular goods ("OCTG") from
Argentina, Italy, Japan, Mexico and South Korea. The reviews also encompass the
1995 CVD orders against the same two products from Italy. The "sunset" review
procedures require that an order must be revoked after five years unless
Commerce and the ITC determine that, if the orders would be discontinued,
dumping or a countervailing subsidy would be likely to continue or recur. In
all of the cases, Commerce determined that dumping or countervailing subsidies
would be likely to continue or recur if the orders are discontinued. In the
seamless pipe cases, the ITC voted on June 7, 2001 to continue the orders as to
Argentina, Brazil and Germany and to discontinue the orders pertaining to
Italy. The ITC voted on June 15, 2001 to continue the orders against all five
countries pertaining to OCTG other than drill pipe. The ITC's votes on drill
pipe will continue the order in effect against Japan and discontinue the orders
against Argentina and Mexico.
On June 29, 2001, various domestic producers of coke and the United
Steelworkers of America filed antidumping cases against blast furnace coke
producers from China and Japan. United States Steel produces coke and also
imports coke from both China and Japan. United States Steel is not a petitioner
in these cases.
104
UNITED STATES STEEL
Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Commodity Price Risk and Related Risks
Sensitivity analysis of the incremental effects on pretax income of
hypothetical 10% and 25% changes in commodity prices for commodity-based
derivative instruments as of June 30, 2001 are provided in the following
table(a):
Incremental
Decrease in
Income Before
Income Taxes
Assuming a
Hypothetical
Price Change
of:
-------------
10% 25%
------ ------
(Dollars in
millions)
Commodity-Based Derivative Instruments
Natural Gas..................................................... 0.9(b) 2.2(b)
Zinc............................................................ 1.8(b) 4.6(b)
Tin............................................................. 0.1(b) 0.3(b)
--------
(a) With the adoption of SFAS No. 133, the definition of a derivative
instrument has been expanded to include certain fixed price physical
commodity contracts. Such instruments are included in the above table.
Amounts reflect the estimated incremental effect on pretax income of a
hypothetical 10% and 25% changes in closing commodity prices at June 30,
2001. Management evaluates the portfolios of commodity-based derivative
instruments on an ongoing basis and adjusts strategies to reflect
anticipated market conditions, changes in risk profiles and overall
business objectives. Changes to the portfolios subsequent to June 30, 2001,
may cause future pretax income effects to differ from those presented in
the table.
(b) Price decrease.
105
UNITED STATES STEEL
Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk--(Continued)
Interest Rate Risk
USX is subject to the effects of interest rate fluctuations on certain of
its non-derivative financial instruments. A sensitivity analysis of the
projected incremental effect of a hypothetical 10% decrease in year-end 2000
and 1999 interest rates on the fair value of United States Steel's specifically
attributed non-derivative financial instruments and the United States Steel's
portion of USX's non-derivative financial instruments is provided in the
following table:
As of December 31,
As of June 30, -----------------------------------------
2001 2000 1999
------------------ -------------------- --------------------
Incremental Incremental Incremental
Increase in Increase in Increase in
Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair Fair
Value Value(b) Value(c) Value(b) Value(c) Value(b)
------ ----------- -------- ----------- -------- -----------
(Dollars in millions)
Non-Derivative Financial
Instruments(a)
Financial assets:
Investments and long-
term receivables(d)... $ 86 $-- $ 137 $-- $ 122 $--
Financial liabilities:
Long-term debt (e)(f).. $2,415 $ 75 $2,375 $ 80 $ 835 $ 20
Preferred stock of
subsidiary............ 66 5 63 5 63 5
USX obligated
mandatorily redeemable
convertible preferred
securities of a
subsidiary trust...... 182 13 119 10 169 15
------ ---- ------ ---- ------ ----
Total liabilities..... $2,663 $ 93 $2,557 $ 95 $1,067 $ 40
====== ==== ====== ==== ====== ====
--------
(a) Fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, notes payable,
accounts payable and accrued interest approximate carrying value and are
relatively insensitive to changes in interest rates due to the short-term
maturity of the instruments. Accordingly, these instruments are excluded
from the table.
(b) Reflects, by class of financial instrument, the estimated incremental
effect of a hypothetical 10% decrease in interest rates at June 30, 2001,
December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999, on the fair value of USX's non-
derivative financial instruments. For financial liabilities, this assumes a
10% decrease in the weighted average yield to maturity of USX's long-term
debt at June 30, 2001, December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999.
(c) See Note 23 to the United States Steel Combined Financial Statements for
the year ended December 31, 2000 for carrying value of instruments.
(d) For additional information, see Note 16 to the United States Steel Combined
Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2000.
(e) Includes amounts due within one year.
(f) Fair value was based on market prices where available, or current borrowing
rates for financings with similar terms and maturities. For additional
information, see Note 11 to the United States Steel Combined Financial
Statements for the year ended December 31, 2000.
At June 30, 2001, USX's portfolio of long-term debt was comprised primarily
of fixed-rate instruments. Therefore, the fair value of the portfolio is
relatively sensitive to effects of interest rate fluctuations. This sensitivity
is illustrated by the $75 million increase in the fair value of long-term debt
assuming a hypothetical 10% decrease in interest rates. However, USX's
sensitivity to interest rate declines and corresponding increases in the fair
value of its debt portfolio would unfavorably affect USX's results and cash
flows only to the extent that USX elected to repurchase or otherwise retire all
or a portion of its fixed-rate debt portfolio at prices above carrying value.
106
UNITED STATES STEEL
Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk--(Continued)
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
United States Steel is subject to the risk of price fluctuations related to
anticipated revenues and operating costs, firm commitments for capital
expenditures and existing assets or liabilities denominated in currencies other
than U.S. dollars. United States Steel has not generally used derivative
instruments to manage this risk. However, United States Steel has made limited
use of forward currency contracts to manage exposure to certain currency price
fluctuations. At June 30, 2001, United States Steel had open euro forward sale
contracts for Slovak crowns with a total carrying value of approximately $20
million. A 10% increase in the June 30, 2001 euro forward rates would result in
a $2 million charge to income.
Equity Price Risk
United States Steel is subject to equity price risk and liquidity risk
related to its investment in VSZ. These risks are not readily quantifiable.
Safe Harbor
United States Steel's quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market
risk include forward-looking statements with respect to management's opinion
about risks associated with United States Steel's use of derivative
instruments. These statements are based on certain assumptions with respect to
market prices and industry supply and demand for steel products and certain raw
materials. To the extent that these assumptions prove to be inaccurate, future
outcomes with respect to United States Steel's hedging programs may differ
materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.
107
INFORMATION ABOUT MARATHON
MANAGEMENT OF MARATHON OIL CORPORATION FOLLOWING THE SEPARATION
Directors of Marathon Oil Corporation Following the Separation
Under Delaware law, the business and affairs of Marathon Oil Corporation
will be managed under the direction of its board of directors. The Marathon Oil
Corporation certificate of incorporation and by-laws provide that the number of
directors may be fixed by the board from time to time, provided that there are
always at least three directors. Upon the Separation, the board of directors of
Marathon Oil Corporation is expected to consist of the individuals listed below
(ages as of June 30, 2001). The present principal occupation or employment and
five-year employment history of each individual follows the list below. Each of
the individuals listed below is a citizen of the United States.
Name Age Position
---- --- --------
Neil A. Armstrong(1)................. 70 Director
Clarence P. Cazalot, Jr.(1).......... 50 President and Chief Executive Officer
Charles A. Corry(1).................. 69 Director
David A. Daberko..................... 56 Director
Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson(1)(2)........ 54 Director
Charles R. Lee(1)(2)................. 61 Director
Dennis H. Reilley.................... 48 Director
Seth E. Schofield(1)(2).............. 61 Director
Thomas J. Usher(1)(2)................ 58 Chairman of the Board
Douglas C. Yearley(1)(2)............. 65 Director
--------
(1) Current director of USX
(2) Is also expected to be a director of United States Steel Corporation
following the Separation.
Neil A. Armstrong is Chairman, EDO Corporation, an electronic and electro-
mechanical systems company. He was appointed in 2000. Mr. Armstrong was
Chairman of AIL Systems Inc. from 1989 to 2000. He is a director of RTI
International Metals, Inc.
Clarence P. Cazalot, Jr. is current Vice Chairman--USX Corporation and
President--Marathon Oil Company. He was appointed to both positions on March 3,
2000. Prior to his employment by Marathon, he was employed by Texaco, Inc. Mr.
Cazalot was named President--Worldwide Production Operations of Texaco, Inc. in
1999. In 1998, he was named President--International Production and Chairman of
London-based Texaco Ltd. after serving as Texaco Exploration and Production
Inc.'s President of International Marketing and Manufacturing for one year.
Charles A. Corry is Retired Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of USX Corporation. Mr. Corry retired in 1995 after serving as USX's
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since his election in 1989.
Mr. Corry is a director of Mellon Financial Corp. and OMNOVA Solutions, Inc.
David A. Daberko is Chief Executive Officer, National City Corporation. Mr.
Daberko assumed this role in 1995. Mr. Daberko is a director of OMNOVA
Solutions, Inc.
Dr. Shirley Ann Jackson is President, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. She
was appointed President in 1999 and was Chairman of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission from 1995 to 1999. Dr. Jackson is a director of Federal Express
Corporation, Newport News Shipbuilding, Sealed Air Corporation and UtiliCorp
United, Inc. She is a member of the National Academy of Engineering, a Fellow
of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and a Fellow of the American
Physical Society.
Charles R. Lee is Chairman of the Board and Co-CEO, Verizon Communications
since June 30, 2000. Mr. Lee was elected Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of GTE Corporation, a predecessor of Verizon in 1992. Mr. Lee
is a director of The Procter & Gamble Company, United Technologies Corporation,
the Stamford Hospital Foundation, and the New American Schools Development
Corporation.
108
Dennis H. Reilley is Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of
Praxair, Inc. He was appointed to these roles in March of 2000. Prior to his
appointment at Praxair, and beginning in 1989, Mr. Reilley held a series of
senior management positions including Vice President and General Manager in
DuPont Chemical's Specialty Chemicals business. Mr. Reilley is a director of
Entergy Corporation.
Seth E. Schofield is Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer--US Air
Group, Inc. Mr. Schofield retired as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of US
Air Group in 1996 having served in such position since 1992. He is a director
of Calgon Carbon Corp.
Thomas J. Usher is Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer of USX
Corporation. Mr. Usher was elected to his current posts in July 1995 after
being elected President and Chief Operating Officer of USX Corporation in 1994.
In addition, he is on the board of directors of H. J. Heinz Company, PPG
Industries, and PNC Financial Services Group.
Douglas C. Yearley is Chairman Emeritus, Phelps Dodge Corporation. Mr.
Yearley retired in May, 2000 from Phelps Dodge Corporation after being elected
President in 1991 and Chief Executive Officer in 1989. He is a director of
Lockheed Martin Corporation.
The by-laws of Marathon Oil Corporation require that each non-employee
director be paid allowances and attendance fees as the board may from time to
time determine. Directors who are employees of Marathon receive no compensation
for their service on the board. Marathon Oil Corporation pays its non-employee
directors as follows:
Annual Retainer...................... $ 60,000
Committee Membership Fee............. $ 5,000 ($6,000 for Committee Chairman)
Meeting Fee (for each board or
committee meeting).................. $ 2,000
Officers of Marathon Oil Corporation Following the Separation
Upon the Separation, the individuals listed below, (ages as of June 30,
2001), are expected to be officers of Marathon Oil Corporation. The business
address of each of the individuals listed below is 5555 San Felipe Road,
Houston, Texas 77056-2723. Unless otherwise indicated below, each of the
individuals listed below is a citizen of the United States.
Name Age Position
---- --- --------
Albert G. Adkins............. 53 Vice President--Accounting and Controller
Philip G. Behrman............ 50 Senior Vice President--Worldwide Exploration
Eileen M. Campbell........... 43 Vice President--Human Resources
Clarence P. Cazalot, Jr...... 50 President and Chief Executive Officer
G. David Golder.............. 53 Senior Vice President--Commercialization &
Development
Steven B. Hinchman........... 42 Senior Vice President--Production Operations
Jerry Howard................. 52 Senior Vice President--Corporate Affairs
A. Robert Kukla.............. 58 Vice President--Global Procurement
Patrick J. Kuntz............. 51 Vice President--Natural Gas & Crude Oil Sales
Steven J. Lowden............. 42 Senior Vice President--Business Development
Kenneth L. Matheny........... 53 Vice President--Investor Relations
James F. Meara............... 48 Vice President--Taxes
John T. Mills................ 53 Chief Financial Officer
L. Michael Mueller........... 48 Vice President--Drilling & Development
Kenneth J. Orlowski.......... 51 Vice President--Information Technology
Paul C. Reinbolt............. 45 Vice President--Finance and Treasurer
William F. Schwind, Jr....... 56 Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
Daniel J. Sullenbarger....... 50 Vice President--Health, Environment & Safety
Timothy N. Tipton............ 45 Vice President--Technology
For biographical information regarding Mr. Cazalot, see "Directors of
Marathon Oil Corporation Following the Separation" on page 108.
109
Albert G. Adkins is the Comptroller for USX Corporation. Mr. Adkins was
elected to this position in 2000. He was named Assistant Comptroller for USX at
the Pittsburgh headquarters in 1997 after serving as Vice President--Finance
and Accounting for Delhi Gas Pipeline Corporation, a USX subsidiary, from 1996.
Eileen M. Campbell is a Vice President--Human Resources of Marathon Oil
Corporation. She was appointed to her current post in September, 2000. Ms.
Campbell served as Director--Government Affairs for USX Corporation since 1998.
Prior to that, from her appointment in 1991, she was the Manager--Government
Affairs.
Philip G. Behrman is Senior Vice President--Worldwide Exploration, for
Marathon. Mr. Behrman was elected to this post in October 2000. Prior to
accepting this position, he was the Exploration Manager and Acting Vice
President--Exploration and Land, at Vastar Resources, Inc., an independent oil
and gas exploration and production company, from March 2000 to October 2000;
Exploration Manager, Deepwater Gulf of Mexico, of Vastar from June 1996 to
March 2000; Exploration Manager, Special Projects, of BP Exploration, an oil
and gas exploration company, from January 1995 until June 1996.
G. David Golder is Senior Vice President--Commercialization and Development
for Marathon. Mr. Golder had been Vice President--International Production with
Marathon since 1999 and from 1996 to 1999 was Executive Vice President of
Sakhalin Energy, which was partially owned by Marathon.
Steven B. Hinchman is Senior Vice President, Production Operations, of
Marathon. Mr. Hinchman was elected to this post in October 2000. Prior to
accepting this position, he served as Marathon's Regional Manager, Mid-
Continent Region, from November 1999 to October 2000; Production Manager, Mid-
Continent Region, from November 1996 to November 1999; and Engineering Manager,
International Production, from August 1994 to November 1996.
Jerry Howard is Vice President--Taxes for USX Corporation. Mr. Howard was
elected to his current position in 1998. In 1997, he was named Marathon's Vice
President--Human Resources and Environment.
A. Robert Kukla is Vice President--Global Procurement of Marathon Oil
Corporation. Mr. Kukla was appointed to his current post in October, 1997.
Prior to that, he served as Vice President--Domestic Production and Manager--
Alaska Production.
Patrick J. Kuntz is Vice President--Natural Gas & Crude Oil Sales for
Marathon Oil Corporation. He was appointed in January 2000. Mr. Kuntz served as
Controller since July 1998. He joined Marathon in 1972 as a Financial Analyst
and served in various staff supervisory and managerial capacities in
international funds, industry and corporate affairs, real estate, financial
planning, finance and administration and auditing.
Stephen J. Lowden is Senior Vice President--Business Development, for
Marathon. Mr. Lowden was elected to this post in December 2000 and is a citizen
of the United Kingdom. Prior to accepting this position, he was Director of
Commercial and Business Development for Premier Oil PLC, a London oil and gas
exploration, development, and production company, from 1996 to December 2000
and General Manager for International Exploration and Production of Premier Oil
from 1994 to 1996.
Kenneth L. Matheny is Vice President--Investor Relations for USX. Mr.
Matheny was appointed in 2000. He was Vice President and Comptroller for USX
from 1997 through 2000.
James F. Meara is the Controller for Marathon Oil Company and was named to
this position in 2000. He was appointed as Tax Manager in 1997.
John T. Mills is Senior Vice President--Finance and Administration of
Marathon Oil Company. Mr. Mills was elected to this post in 1998. He was
appointed Vice President--Taxes for USX in 1987.
110
L. Michael Mueller is Vice President--Drilling & Development for Marathon
Oil Corporation. He was appointed to his current post in 2000. He had served as
Vice President--Domestic Production, Gulf of Mexico & Worldwide Deepwater
Development since September 1999. Mr. Mueller joined Marathon in 1977 as a
reservoir engineer and has held a wide range of engineering, supervisory and
management positions.
Kenneth J. Orlowski is Vice President--Information Technology for Marathon
Oil Corporation. He was appointed to this position in 1999. Mr. Orlowski was
named Assistant General Counsel, USX Corporation, in 1997. From 1992 to 1997,
he was Senior Vice President--Administration, General Counsel and Secretary of
Delhi Gas Pipeline Company.
Paul C. Reinbolt is the Comptroller for U. S. Steel Group and was named to
his post in 2000. In 1998, Mr. Reinbolt was appointed Manager--Finance and
Administration, Production, United Kingdom, for Marathon after serving for four
years as USX's Assistant Treasurer--Corporate Finance.
William F. Schwind, Jr. is General Counsel and Secretary of Marathon Oil
Company. Mr. Schwind was named to this post in 1992.
Daniel J. Sullenbarger is Vice President--Health, Environment & Safety for
Marathon Oil Corporation. Mr. Sullenbarger was appointed to this position in
September of 2000. In September of 1988, he was appointed Vice President--Human
Resources and Environment. From 1994 to 1998, Mr. Sullenbarger served as Group
Counsel--Worldwide Exploration & Production.
Timothy N. Tipton is Vice President--Technology for Marathon. Mr. Tipton was
appointed to his current post in September 2000. Prior to accepting this
position, he served as Manager--Engineering & Technology, Reservoir Technology
since September of 1999. Mr. Tipton became Production Manager--Rocky Mountain
Region in 1996.
111
LIQUIDITY OF MARATHON OIL CORPORATION FOLLOWING THE SEPARATION
Prior to Separation
As a matter of policy, USX has managed most financial activities on a
centralized, consolidated basis, and will continue to do so until the
Separation. Such financial activities include the investment of surplus cash;
the issuance, repayment and repurchase of short-term and long-term debt; the
issuance, repurchase and redemption of preferred stock; and the issuance and
repurchase of common stock. Transactions related primarily to invested cash,
short-term and long-term debt (including convertible debt), related net
interest and other financial costs and preferred stock and related dividends
are attributed to Marathon based upon its cash flows for the periods presented
and its initial capital structure. However, a portion of most financing
transactions are attributed to and reflected in the financial statements of
Marathon. Transactions such as leases, certain collateralized financings,
financial activities of consolidated entities that are less than wholly owned
by USX and transactions related to securities convertible solely into USX-
Marathon Group Common Stock are or will be specifically attributed to and
reflected in their entirety in the financial statements of Marathon.
In December 2000, USX entered into a $1,354 million five-year revolving
credit agreement, terminating in November 2005, and a $451 million 364-day
facility, which together replaced the prior $2,350 million facility. At June
30, 2001, USX had no borrowings against its $1,354 million long-term revolving
credit agreement, no borrowings against its $451 million 364-day facility and
no commercial paper borrowings. There were no borrowings against USX's short-
term lines of credit totaling $115 million at June 30, 2001. At June 30, 2001,
there were no borrowings against MAP's revolving credit agreement.
On April 24, 2001, USX announced that the Board had authorized management to
proceed with the necessary steps to implement a plan of reorganization of the
corporation in order to separate the energy and steel businesses. Until the
plan of reorganization is implemented or abandoned, USX management believes
that it will be more difficult to access traditional debt and equity markets.
After Separation
Upon Separation, Marathon will assume the financial resources of USX
Corporation. Marathon will have access to a $1,354 million 5-year revolving
credit agreement, expiring in November 2005. At June 30, 2001, there were no
borrowings under this facility. Marathon also will have a short-term credit
facility against which there were no borrowings as of June 30, 2001. In
addition, Marathon will have the ability to issue commercial paper supported by
the unused and available credit line on the $1,354 million facility. At June
30, 2001, no commercial paper was outstanding. Also, at June 30, 2001, there
were no borrowings against MAP revolving credit agreements.
Capital and exploration expenditures for 2001 are expected to be
approximately $1.8 billion, excluding the $0.5 billion acquisition of Pennaco.
Marathon management believes that its short-term and long-term liquidity
will be adequate to satisfy its obligations after Separation, and to complete
currently authorized capital spending programs. Future requirements for
Marathon's business needs, including the funding of capital expenditures, debt
service for the balance of 2001 and years 2002 and 2003, and any amounts that
may ultimately be paid in connection with contingencies, are expected to be
financed by a combination of internally generated funds, proceeds from the sale
of stock, borrowings and other external financing sources.
Marathon management's opinion concerning liquidity and Marathon's ability to
avail itself in the future of the financing options mentioned in the above
forward-looking statements are based on currently available information. To the
extent that this information proves to be inaccurate, future availability of
financing may be
adversely affected. Factors that could affect the availability of financing
include the performance of Marathon (as measured by various factors including
cash provided from operating activities), the state of worldwide debt
112
and equity markets, investor perceptions and expectations of past and future
performance, the overall U.S. financial climate, and, in particular, with
respect to borrowings, by levels of Marathon's outstanding debt and credit
ratings by rating agencies.
Debt Rating
Standard and Poor's has assigned an investment grade corporate credit rating
to Marathon Oil Corporation with a stable outlook, assuming the Plan of
Reorganization is completed.
113
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION AND MARATHON OIL
CORPORATION AFTER THE SEPARATION
Following consummation of the Separation, United States Steel Corporation
and Marathon Oil Corporation will be independent companies and neither will
have any ownership interest in the other, although some of the Marathon Oil
Corporation directors will also serve as directors of United States Steel
Corporation. See "Interests of Officers and Directors in the Separation" on
page 53. In connection with the Separation and pursuant to the Plan of
Reorganization, United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation
and their respective subsidiaries will enter into a series of agreements
("Separation Documents") governing their relationship subsequent to the
Separation and providing for the allocation of tax and certain other
liabilities and obligations arising from periods prior to the Separation.
Copies of the forms of such Separation Documents are filed as exhibits to this
proxy statement/prospectus. Set forth below is a description of the material
terms of such Separation Documents.
Tax Sharing Agreement
United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation will enter into
a Tax Sharing Agreement on behalf of themselves and their respective
consolidated groups, that reflects each party's rights and obligations relating
to payments and refunds of income, sales, transfer, and other taxes that are
attributable to periods beginning prior to and including the Separation Date
and taxes resulting from transactions effected in connection with the
Separation.
The Tax Sharing Agreement will incorporate the general tax sharing
principles of USX's current tax allocation policy. In general, United States
Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation, will make payments between them
such that, with respect to any USX consolidated, combined, or unitary tax
returns for any taxable period or portion thereof ending on or before the
Separation Date, the amount of taxes to be paid by each of United States Steel
Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation will be determined, subject to certain
adjustments, as if the U. S. Steel Group and the Marathon Group each filed its
own consolidated, combined, or unitary tax return. The Tax Sharing Agreement
also will provide for payments between United States Steel Corporation and
Marathon Oil Corporation for certain tax adjustments which may be made after
the Separation. Other provisions will address, but will not be limited to, the
handling of tax audits, settlements, and return filing in cases where both
United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation have an interest
in the results of these activities.
A preliminary settlement for the calendar year 2001 federal income taxes,
which would be made in March 2002 under USX's current tax allocation policy,
will be made immediately prior to the Separation at a discounted amount to
reflect the time value of money. Under the preliminary settlement for calendar
year 2001, it is expected that United States Steel will receive at least $300
million from Marathon immediately prior to Separation arising from USX's
current tax allocation policy. This policy provides that United States Steel
receives the benefit of tax attributes (principally net operating losses, and
various tax credits) that arise out of its business and which are used by USX
on a consolidated basis.
Additionally, pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement, United States Steel
Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation will agree to protect the tax-free
status of the Separation. United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil
Corporation each will covenant that during the two-year period following the
Separation, it will not cease to be engaged in an active trade or business.
Each party also will represent that there is no plan or intention to liquidate
such party, take any other actions inconsistent with the information and
representations set forth in the ruling request filed with the IRS or sell or
otherwise dispose of its assets (other than in the ordinary course of business)
and will covenant that during the two-year period following the Separation, it
will not do so. To the extent that a breach of a representation or covenant
results in corporate tax being imposed on USX, the breaching party, either
United States Steel Corporation or Marathon Oil Corporation, will be
responsible for the payment of the corporate tax. In the event that the
Separation fails to qualify as a tax-free transaction through no fault of
either United States Steel Corporation or Marathon Oil Corporation, the Tax
Sharing Agreement will provide that the resulting corporate tax liability will
be allocated to the party whose shares were deemed to be distributed for
federal income tax purposes.
114
The provisions of the Tax Sharing Agreement will only benefit Marathon Oil
Corporation and United States Steel Corporation and will not confer any rights
on USX stockholders or any other parties. The Tax Sharing Agreement may be
amended or modified by Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel
Corporation without the consent of any stockholder.
Even if the Separation otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment under
Section 355 of the Code, the Separation may become taxable to USX pursuant to
Section 355(e) of the Code if 50% or more of either the Marathon Shares or New
U. S. Steel Shares are acquired, directly or indirectly, as part of a plan or
series of related transactions that include the Separation. See "THE
SEPARATION--Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences" discussion above on
page 51. To minimize this risk, both United States Steel Corporation and
Marathon Oil Corporation will covenant in the Tax Sharing Agreement that they
will not enter into any transactions or make any change in their equity
structures that could cause the Separation to be treated as part of a plan or
series of related transactions to which Section 355(e) may apply. If an
acquisition occurs which results in the Separation being taxable under Section
355(e), the Tax Sharing Agreement provides that the resulting corporate tax
liability will be borne by the entity, either United States Steel Corporation
or Marathon Oil Corporation, with respect to which the acquisition has
occurred.
As discussed above in the section, "RISK FACTORS--Risks Related to
Separation--United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation Will
Be Subject to Continuing Contingent Liabilities of the Other Company Following
the Separation" on page 13, although the Tax Sharing Agreement will allocate
tax liabilities relating to taxable periods ending on or prior to the
Separation Date, as between United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil
Corporation, each corporation that was a member of the USX consolidated group
during any portion of a taxable period ending on or prior to the Separation
Date is jointly and severally liable under the Code for the federal income tax
liability of the entire USX consolidated group for that year. Thus, even though
the Tax Sharing Agreement will provide that one party (United States Steel
Corporation or Marathon Oil Corporation) will be responsible for the payment of
a tax, the taxing authorities may seek to collect the tax from the other party
and consequently, that other party would be entitled to seek indemnification
under the Tax Sharing Agreement. There can be no assurance that, in such
circumstance, Marathon Oil Corporation or United States Steel Corporation would
be able to satisfy its indemnification obligations under the Tax Sharing
Agreement.
Transition Services Agreement
Currently, USX personnel at our Pittsburgh corporate headquarters provide
accounting, audit, corporate finance, government affairs, investor relations,
legal, stock transfer, strategic planning, public affairs and tax services that
primarily relate to corporate-wide matters and for which the costs are
allocated between the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group. Effective upon
the Separation, Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel Corporation
will be responsible for their own needs in these areas, and USX corporate
personnel will be assigned to, and will be employed by, either Marathon Oil
Corporation or United States Steel Corporation. To the extent that one company
or the other is not able to immediately service its own needs, United States
Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation will enter into a transition
services agreement whereby one company will provide such services to the other
(to the extent requested) if the providing company is able to do so. Such
agreement will be for a term of up to twelve months and will be on a cost-
reimbursement basis. In addition, the company receiving such service shall
release the other from any and all claims that may arise concerning the
adequacy, timeliness or quality of the service provided.
Although both the Marathon Group and U. S. Steel Group maintain independent
information technology and computer systems, USX headquarters relies on the two
groups for many of its computer applications. The Transition Services Agreement
provides that, to the extent that either group has been supplying computer or
information services to USX headquarters or the other group, for a period of up
to twelve months, Marathon Oil Corporation or United States Steel Corporation
will continue to provide services to the other (to the extent requested) on the
same basis that it is currently provided on a cost-reimbursement basis. In
addition, the
115
company receiving services shall release the other from any and all claims that
may arise concerning the adequacy, timeliness or other quality of the services
provided.
The Transition Services Agreement also provides that Marathon Oil
Corporation, as successor to USX, will grant to United States Steel Corporation
a fully paid, worldwide, nonexclusive license, without right to sublicense or
assign, in all computer programs, software, source code, and know-how (whether
patented, trademarked, copyrighted or not) owned or licensed (to the extent
permitted by the terms of such license) by USX in providing services used by
USX on a corporate basis or provided by USX to the U. S. Steel Group. Such
license will be granted without any representation or warranty whatsoever,
including suitability, ownership, usefulness, non-infringement or existence. A
similar grant of licenses will be made by United States Steel Corporation for
the benefit of Marathon Oil Corporation.
The Transition Services Agreement further provides that if, at any time in
the future, either Marathon Oil Corporation or United States Steel Corporation
requires any records, documents or other information in the possession of the
other relating to activities prior to the Separation, the party having
possession of such records, documents or other information shall make it or
copies available to the other party without charge.
Financial Matters Agreement
United States Steel Corporation and Marathon Oil Corporation will enter into
the Financial Matters Agreement whereby United States Steel Corporation or its
subsidiaries will agree to incur or assume indebtedness and other obligations
of USX in connection with the Separation. The terms of the Financial Matters
Agreement are described in "THE SEPARATION--Financing Arrangements Relating to
the Separation" on page 44.
License Agreement
Upon consummation of the Separation, the License Agreement will provide that
Marathon Oil Corporation will grant to United States Steel Corporation a fully-
paid, worldwide, non-exclusive license to use the USX name rights and certain
intellectual property with the right to sublicense the same.
Insurance Assistance Agreement
Prior to the time of the HoldCo Merger, the Marathon Group and the U. S.
Steel Group maintained independent property and business interruption insurance
policies. Other types of insurance, such as general liability, employer's
liability, automobile liability, workers' compensation, boiler and machinery
and executive risk, were purchased and held by Old USX, for the benefit of Old
USX and all of its subsidiaries. Following the HoldCo Merger, separate policies
of insurance for certain general liability, employer's liability, automobile
liability, workers' compensation and aircraft were issued to cover: (1) USX,
and Marathon and its subsidiaries; and (2) United States Steel LLC and its
subsidiaries. The remaining policies of insurance were maintained for the
benefit of USX and its subsidiaries.
At the Separation Effective Time, the insurance policies held for the
benefit of USX and its subsidiaries will be truncated and separate policies of
insurance will be purchased for Marathon Oil Corporation and its subsidiaries
and for United States Steel Corporation and its subsidiaries. Marathon Oil
Corporation and United States Steel Corporation will also enter into the
Insurance Assistance Agreement. This agreement will provide for the division of
responsibility for joint insurance arrangements and the associated payment of
insurance claims and deductibles following the Separation for claims associated
with pre-Separation periods. Under this agreement, Marathon Oil Corporation
will be solely liable for pre-Separation claims associated with the business of
the Marathon Group, and United States Steel Corporation will be solely liable
for pre-Separation claims associated with the business of the U. S. Steel
Group. Liability for pre-Separation claims associated with USX assets,
directors and employees will be allocated 65% to Marathon Oil Corporation and
35% to United States Steel Corporation. The cost of extended reporting
insurance for these pre-Separation periods will also be split between Marathon
Oil Corporation and United States Steel Corporation on a 65%-35% basis,
respectively. Finally, the agreement will address the sharing of policy limits
for extended reporting insurances maintained jointly by Marathon and United
States Steel prior to the Separation.
116
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF MARATHON OIL
CORPORATION FOLLOWING THE SEPARATION
The following is a summary of the material terms of the capital stock of
Marathon Oil Corporation upon the Separation. This summary does not purport to
be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text
of such capital stock set forth in the Marathon Oil Corporation Restated
Certificate of Incorporation (the "Marathon Certificate"). A copy of the full
text of the Marathon Certificate is included as exhibit to this proxy
statement/prospectus.
Authorized Share Capital
Marathon Oil Corporation will be authorized by the Marathon Certificate to
issue (i) five hundred and fifty million (550,000,000) shares of Marathon Oil
Corporation Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, and (ii) twenty six
million (26,000,000) shares of preferred stock, no par value, issuable in
series. If the Separation had occurred as of July 31, 2001, there would be
308,913,392 Marathon Shares issued and outstanding (based on the number of
Marathon Group Shares issued and outstanding as of such date) and no shares of
preferred stock issued and outstanding.
Marathon Shares
The holders of Marathon Shares will be entitled to receive dividends when,
as and if declared by the Marathon Oil Corporation board of directors out of
funds legally available therefor, subject to the rights of any shares of
Marathon Oil Corporation preferred stock at the time outstanding. The holders
of Marathon Shares will be entitled to one vote for each share on all matters
voted on generally by stockholders under the Marathon Certificate, including
the election of directors. The holders of Marathon Shares will not have any
cumulative voting, conversion, redemption or preemptive rights. In the event of
dissolution, liquidation or winding up of Marathon Oil Corporation, holders of
Marathon Shares will be entitled to share ratably in any assets remaining after
the satisfaction in full of the prior rights of creditors, including holders of
Marathon Oil Corporation's then outstanding indebtedness, and subject to the
aggregate liquidation preference and participation rights of any Marathon Oil
Corporation preferred stock then outstanding. The additional shares of
authorized stock available for issuance by Marathon Oil Corporation may be
issued at such times and under such circumstances as to have a dilutive effect
on earnings per share and on the equity ownership of the holders of Marathon
Shares.
Marathon Oil Corporation Preferred Stock
The Marathon Oil Corporation board of directors will be authorized to issue
shares of Marathon Oil Corporation preferred stock, in one or more series, and
to fix for each such series voting powers, preferences and relative,
participating, optional or other special rights and such qualifications,
limitations or restrictions thereof as are permitted by the Delaware General
Corporation Law ("DGCL"). Although the Marathon Oil Corporation board of
directors has no current plans to issue Marathon Oil Corporation preferred
stock, the issuance of such shares could be used to discourage an unsolicited
acquisition proposal. See "COMPARISON OF THE RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS--Certain
Anti-takeover Considerations" on page 122.
Marathon Oil Corporation Rights Agreement
USX is a party to a Rights Agreement, dated as of September 28, 1999 (the
"USX Rights Agreement"), with ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C, as
Rights Agent. Pursuant to the USX Rights Agreement, a U. S. Steel Group Right
is attached to each outstanding U. S. Steel Group Share and a Marathon Group
Right is attached to each outstanding Marathon Group Share. In connection with
the Separation, the USX Rights Agreement will be amended and restated (as so
amended and restated, the "Marathon Oil Corporation Rights Agreement") to
provide (i) that the U. S. Steel Group Rights and the Marathon Group Rights
will not become exercisable, distributed or unredeemable as a result of the
consummation of the Separation, and (ii) that the
117
U. S. Steel Group Rights will expire at the Separation Effective Time.
Following the Separation, the Marathon Group Rights will be referred to as a
Marathon Right. The following description of the terms of the Marathon Oil
Corporation Rights Agreement does not purport to be complete and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the Marathon Oil Corporation Rights Agreement,
the form of which is filed as an exhibit to this proxy statement/prospectus,
and is incorporated herein by reference.
Each Marathon Right becomes exercisable, at a price of $110, after any
person or group has acquired, obtained the right to acquire or made a tender or
exchange offer for 15% or more of the outstanding voting power represented by
the outstanding Marathon Shares, except pursuant to a qualifying all-cash
tender offer for all outstanding Marathon Shares which results in the offeror
owning Marathon Shares, representing a majority of the voting power (other than
Marathon Shares beneficially owned by the offeror immediately prior to the
offer). Each Marathon Right entitles the holder, other than the acquiring
person or group, to purchase one one- hundredth of a share of Series A Junior
Preferred Stock or, upon the acquisition by any person of 15% or more of the
outstanding voting power represented by the outstanding Marathon Shares (or, in
certain circumstances, other property) having a market value of twice the
exercise price. After a person or group acquires 15% or more of the outstanding
voting power, if Marathon Oil Corporation engages in a merger or other business
combination where it is not the surviving corporation or where it is the
surviving corporation and the Marathon Shares are changed or exchanged, or if
50% or more of Marathon Oil Corporation's assets, earnings power or cash flow
are sold or transferred, each Marathon Right entitles the holder to purchase
common stock of the acquiring entity having a market value of twice the
exercise price. The Marathon Rights and the exercise price are subject to
adjustment. The Marathon Rights will expire on October 9, 2009, unless such
date is extended or the Marathon Rights are earlier redeemed by Marathon Oil
Corporation for one cent per Marathon Right at any time prior to the point they
become exercisable. Under certain circumstances, the Board of Directors of
Marathon Oil Corporation has the option to exchange one Marathon Share for each
exercisable Marathon Right.
118
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF UNITED STATES STEEL
CORPORATION FOLLOWING THE SEPARATION
The following is a summary of the material terms of the capital stock of
United States Steel Corporation upon the Separation. This summary does not
purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the
complete text of such capital stock set forth in the United States Steel
Corporation Certificate of Incorporation (the "United States Steel Corporation
Certificate"). A copy of the full text of the United States Steel Corporation
Certificate is included as exhibit to this proxy statement/prospectus.
Authorized Share Capital
United States Steel Corporation is authorized by the United States Steel
Corporation Certificate to issue (i) two hundred million (200,000,000) shares
of United States Steel Corporation Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share, and
(ii) fourteen million (14,000,000) shares of preferred stock, no par value,
issuable in series. If the Separation had occurred as of July 31, 2001, there
would be 89,141,345 New U. S. Steel Shares outstanding (based on the number of
U. S. Steel Group Shares issued and outstanding as of such date) and no shares
of preferred stock issued and outstanding.
New U. S. Steel Shares
The holders of New U. S. Steel Shares will be entitled to receive dividends
when, as and if declared by the United States Steel Corporation board of
directors out of funds legally available therefor, subject to the rights of any
shares of United States Steel Corporation preferred stock at the time
outstanding. The holders of New U. S. Steel Shares will be entitled to one vote
for each share on all matters voted on generally by stockholders under the
United States Steel Corporation Certificate, including the election of
directors. The holders of New U. S. Steel Shares do not have any cumulative
voting, conversion, redemption or preemptive rights. In the event of
dissolution, liquidation or winding up of United States Steel Corporation,
holders of the New U. S. Steel Shares will be entitled to share ratably in any
assets remaining after the satisfaction in full of the prior rights of
creditors, including holders of United States Steel Corporation's then
outstanding indebtedness, and subject to the aggregate liquidation preference
and participation rights of any United States Steel Corporation preferred stock
then outstanding. The additional shares of authorized stock available for
issuance by United States Steel Corporation may be issued at such times and
under such circumstances as to have a dilutive effect on earnings per share and
on the equity ownership of the holders of New U. S. Steel Shares.
United States Steel Corporation Preferred Stock
The United States Steel Corporation board of directors will be authorized to
issue shares of United States Steel Corporation preferred stock, in one or more
series, and to fix for each such series voting powers, preferences and
relative, participating, optional or other special rights and such
qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof as are permitted by the
DGCL. The issuance of shares of United States Steel Corporation preferred stock
could be used to discourage an unsolicited acquisition proposal. See
"COMPARISON OF THE RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS--Certain Anti-takeover
Considerations" on page 122.
United States Steel Corporation Rights Agreement
Upon the Separation Effective Time, United States Steel Corporation will
enter into a Rights Agreement (the "United States Steel Corporation Rights
Agreement") with as Rights Agent. The following is a description of the
terms of the United States Steel Corporation Rights Agreement. A copy of the
United States Steel Corporation Rights Agreement has been filed as an exhibit
to this proxy statement/prospectus. The following description of the terms of
the United States Steel Corporation Rights Agreement does not purport to be
complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the United States
Steel Corporation Rights Agreement, the form of which is filed as an exhibit to
this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated in this summary description
herein by reference.
119
Pursuant to the United States Steel Corporation Rights Agreement, one
preferred stock purchase right (a "United States Steel Corporation Right") will
be distributed with each New U. S. Steel Share issued in connection with the
Separation. Each United States Steel Corporation Right becomes exercisable, at
a price of $ , after any person or group has acquired, obtained the right to
acquire or made a tender or exchange offer for 15% or more of the outstanding
voting power represented by the outstanding New U. S. Steel Shares, except
pursuant to a qualifying all-cash tender offer for all outstanding New U. S.
Steel Shares which results in the offeror owning New U. S. Steel Shares,
representing a majority of the voting power (other than New U. S. Steel Shares
beneficially owned by the offeror immediately prior to the offer). Each United
States Steel Corporation Right entitles the holder, other than the acquiring
person or group, to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior
Preferred Stock or, upon the acquisition by any person of 15% or more of the
outstanding voting power represented by the outstanding New U. S. Steel Shares
(or, in certain circumstances, other property) having a market value of twice
the exercise price. After a person or group acquires 15% or more of the
outstanding voting power, if United States Steel Corporation engages in a
merger or other business combination where it is not the surviving corporation
or where it is the surviving corporation and the New U. S. Steel Shares are
changed or exchanged, or if 50% or more of U. S. Steel's assets, earnings power
or cash flow are sold or transferred, each United States Steel Corporation
Right entitles the holder to purchase common stock of the acquiring entity
having a market value of twice the exercise price. The United States Steel
Corporation Rights and the exercise price are subject to adjustment. The United
States Steel Corporation Rights will expire on , unless such date is
extended or the United States Steel Corporation Rights are earlier redeemed by
United States Steel Corporation for one cent per United States Steel
Corporation Right at any time prior to the point they become exercisable. Under
certain circumstances, the Board of Directors of United States Steel
Corporation has the option to exchange one New U. S. Steel Share for each
exercisable U. S. Steel Right.
120
COMPARISON OF THE RIGHTS OF STOCKHOLDERS
USX is a Delaware corporation and, following consummation of the Separation,
Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel Corporation will be Delaware
corporations. The rights of holders of Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel
Group Shares are currently governed by the DGCL, the USX Restated Certificate
and USX By-laws. Following consummation of the Separation, the rights of
holders of Marathon Shares will be governed by the DGCL, the Marathon
Certificate and the Marathon Oil Corporation By-laws, and the rights of holders
of New U. S. Steel Shares will be governed by the DGCL, the United States Steel
Corporation Certificate and the United States Steel Corporation By-laws. The
terms of the Marathon Certificate and the United States Steel Corporation
Certificate will be identical to the terms of the USX Restated Certificate
(other than with respect to capitalization, since the Marathon Certificate and
the United States Steel Corporation Certificate will each provide for only one
class of common stock, and will not have the provisions contained in the USX
Restated Certificate relating to the USX targeted stocks). The terms of the
Marathon Oil Corporation By-laws and the United States Steel Corporation By-
laws will be identical to the terms of the USX By-laws, except for the matters
described below.
Voting Rights
Under the USX Restated Certificate, with respect to matters to be voted upon
by both the holders of Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares as a
single class, the holder of each Marathon Group Share is entitled to one vote
per share and the holder of each U. S. Steel Group Share is entitled to a
number of votes per share (which may be greater than or less than one), as
determined pursuant to the terms of the USX Restated Certificate, based on the
ratio of the market value of one U. S. Steel Group Share to the market value of
one Marathon Group Share, calculated over the 20-business day period ending on
the record date for determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to
vote at, any meeting of stockholders. Under the Marathon Certificate, each
Marathon Share will be entitled to one vote on all matters. Under the United
States Steel Corporation Certificate, each New U. S. Steel Share will be
entitled to one vote on all matters.
Dividends
Under the USX Restated Certificate, (i) dividends on the Marathon Group
Shares are payable out of the funds of USX legally available for the payment of
dividends and (ii) dividends on the U. S. Steel Group Shares are payable out of
the lesser of (a) the funds of USX legally available for the payment of
dividends and (b) the "Available Group Dividend Amount" (an amount similar to
the amount that would be legally available for the payment of dividends on the
U. S. Steel Group Shares under Delaware law if the U. S. Steel Group were a
separate company). Holders of Marathon Shares and New U. S. Steel Shares will
be entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by the respective
boards of directors of Marathon Oil Corporation and United States Steel
Corporation out of funds legally available therefor, subject to the terms of
any preferred stock then outstanding and the terms of any covenants in
indentures or other evidences of indebtedness.
Liquidation
Pursuant to the USX Restated Certificate, in the event of the liquidation of
USX, holders of Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares will be
entitled to a portion of the assets remaining for distribution based on the
average of their proportionate market values, using the market prices for the
five business days prior to the date the liquidation is announced and the five
business days after the liquidation is announced. Pursuant to the Marathon
Certificate, in the event of a liquidation of Marathon Oil Corporation, holders
of Marathon Shares will be entitled to share ratably in the assets of Marathon
Oil Corporation remaining for distribution to holders of Marathon Shares.
Pursuant to the United States Steel Corporation Restated Certificate, in the
event of a liquidation of United States Steel Corporation, holders of New U. S.
Steel Shares will be entitled to share ratably in the assets of United States
Steel Corporation remaining for distribution to holders of New U. S.
Steel Shares.
121
Rights on Disposition
Pursuant to the USX Restated Certificate, subject to certain exceptions, if
USX disposes of all or substantially all of the properties and assets
attributed to the U. S. Steel Group, USX is required to either (i) distribute
to holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares an amount in cash and/or securities or
other property equal to the fair value of the net proceeds of such disposition
by special dividend, (ii) redeem a number of whole U. S. Steel Group Shares
with an average value equal to the proceeds of the disposition, calculated over
the ten-trading day period beginning on the first trading day after
consummation of the disposition transaction, (iii) convert each U. S. Steel
Group Share into a number of Marathon Group Shares equal to 110% of the ratio
of the average market value of one U. S. Steel Group Share to the average
market value of one Marathon Group Share, calculated over the ten-trading day
period beginning on the first trading day after consummation of the disposition
transaction. As a result of the Separation, the United States Steel Corporation
Certificate will not provide for such rights upon the disposition of assets.
Separation of Groups and Exchange of Stock
Pursuant to the USX Restated Certificate, if USX were to transfer all of the
assets and liabilities of the Marathon Group (and only such assets and
liabilities) to a wholly owned subsidiary of USX, the USX board of directors
has discretion, without the vote of any of the USX stockholders, to exchange
the outstanding Marathon Group Shares for shares of the new subsidiary holding
the Marathon Group assets and liabilities. The result of such an exchange would
be the spinoff of the Marathon Group to the holders of Marathon Group Shares.
Following the Separation, the Marathon Certificate will not provide the
directors of Marathon Oil Corporation with such discretion, as Marathon Oil
Corporation generally will hold only the assets and liabilities currently held
by the Marathon Group.
Pursuant to the USX Restated Certificate, if USX were to transfer all of the
assets and liabilities of the U. S. Steel Group (and only such assets and
liabilities) to a wholly owned subsidiary of USX, the USX board of directors
has discretion, without the vote of any of the USX stockholders, to exchange
the outstanding U. S. Steel Group Shares for shares of the new subsidiary
holding the U. S. Steel Group assets and liabilities. The result of such an
exchange would be the spinoff of the U. S. Steel Group to the holders of U. S.
Steel Group Shares. Following the Separation, the United States Steel
Certificate will not provide the directors of United States Steel Corporation
with such discretion, as United States Steel Corporation generally will hold
only the assets and liabilities currently held by the U. S. Steel Group.
Certain Anti-takeover Considerations
The DGCL, the Marathon Certificate and the Marathon Oil Corporation By-laws,
and the United States Steel Corporation Certificate and the United States Steel
Corporation By-laws, contain provisions that could serve to discourage or make
more difficult a change in control of Marathon Oil Corporation or United States
Steel Corporation without the support of the Marathon Oil Corporation board of
directors or the United States Steel Corporation board of directors, as the
case may be, or without meeting various other conditions. All of these
provisions are currently in effect with respect to USX, pursuant to the USX
Restated Certificate, USX By-Laws and the DGCL. A summary of these provisions
is set forth below.
The Marathon Certificate and the United States Steel Corporation Certificate
each will provide for the issuance of preferred stock, at the discretion of the
Marathon Oil Corporation board of directors or the United States Steel
Corporation board of directors, as the case may be, from time to time, in one
or more series, without further action by the stockholders of Marathon Oil
Corporation or United States Steel Corporation, unless approval of the
stockholders is deemed advisable by the Marathon Oil Corporation board of
directors or the United States Steel Corporation board of directors or required
by applicable law, regulation or stock exchange listing requirements. In
addition, the authorized but unissued Marathon Shares will be available for
issuance from time to time at the discretion of the Marathon Oil Corporation
board of directors without the approval of the stockholders of Marathon Oil
Corporation, and the authorized but unissued New U. S. Steel
122
Shares will be available for issuance from time to time at the discretion of
the United States Steel Corporation board of directors without the approval of
the stockholders of United States Steel Corporation, in each case, unless such
approval is deemed advisable by the Marathon Oil Corporation board of directors
or United States Steel Corporation board of directors, as the case may be, or
required by applicable law, regulation or stock exchange listing requirements.
One of the effects of the existence of authorized, unissued and unreserved
Marathon Shares and New U. S. Steel Shares and preferred stock could be to
enable the Marathon Oil Corporation board of directors or the United States
Steel Corporation board of directors to issue shares to persons friendly to
current management that could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to
obtain control of Marathon Oil Corporation or United States Steel Corporation
by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise, and thereby
protect the continuity of Marathon Oil Corporation's or United States Steel
Corporation's management. Such additional shares also could be used to dilute
the stock ownership of persons seeking to obtain control of Marathon Oil
Corporation or United States Steel Corporation.
The Marathon Oil Corporation Certificate and the United States Steel
Corporation Certificate each provide for a classified board of directors under
which one-third of the total number of directors are elected each year and will
prohibit the removal of directors, unless such removal is for cause. Pursuant
to the Marathon Oil Corporation Certificate and the United States Steel
Corporation Certificate, stockholders will not be permitted to act by written
consent. In addition, pursuant to the Marathon Oil Corporation Certificate and
the United States Steel Corporation Certificate, only the board of directors,
and not the stockholders, will be permitted to call a special meeting of
stockholders.
The Marathon Oil Corporation By-laws and United States Steel Corporation By-
laws each establish an advance notice procedure for stockholders to bring
business before an annual or special meeting of stockholders. The Marathon Oil
Corporation By-laws and United States Steel Corporation By-laws each will
provide that a stockholder may present a proposal for action at an annual
meeting of stockholders only if such stockholder delivers a written notice of
the proposal, together with certain specified information relating to such
stockholder's stock ownership and identity, to the Secretary of Marathon Oil
Corporation or United States Steel Corporation, as applicable, at least 45
days, and, in certain situations, 90 days, before the meeting or within 10 days
following the announcement of the date of the special meeting. In addition, the
Marathon Oil Corporation By-laws and United States Steel Corporation By-laws
each will provide that a stockholder may nominate individuals for election to
the board of directors at any annual meeting or special meeting of stockholders
at which directors are to be elected only if such stockholder delivers written
notice, containing certain specified information with respect to the nominee
and nominating stockholder, to the Secretary of Marathon Oil Corporation or
United States Steel Corporation, as applicable, at least 45 days, and, in
certain situations, 90 days, before the annual meeting or within 10 days
following the announcement of the date of the special meeting.
The Marathon Oil Corporation Rights and the United States Steel Corporation
Rights will permit disinterested stockholders to acquire additional shares of
Marathon Oil Corporation or United States Steel Corporation, respectively, or
of an acquiring company, at a substantial discount in the event of certain
described changes in control. See "DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF MARATHON OIL
CORPORATION FOLLOWING THE SEPARATION--Marathon Oil Corporation Rights
Agreement" on page 117 and "DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK OF UNITED STATES STEEL
CORPORATION FOLLOWING THE SEPARATION--United States Steel Corporation Rights
Agreement" on page 119.
Certain provisions described above may have the effect of delaying
stockholder actions with respect to certain business combinations. As such, the
provisions could have the effect of discouraging open market purchases of the
Marathon Shares or the New U. S. Steel Shares because such provisions may be
considered disadvantageous by a stockholder who desires to participate in a
business combination.
123
PROPOSAL TWO: APPROVAL OF THE UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION 2002 STOCK PLAN
Subject to the approval of stockholders, the USX board of directors has
approved the United States Steel Corporation 2002 Stock Plan (the "Steel Stock
Plan") effective as of the Separation Effective Time. The Steel Stock Plan is
intended to provide United States Steel Corporation employees with benefits
comparable to those provided under the USX Corporation 1990 Stock Plan (the
"USX Stock Plan"). Principal differences between the two plans are summarized
below under the caption "Differences Between the Steel Stock Plan and the
Applicable Portions of the USX Stock Plan" on page 127. The USX Stock Plan was
approved by USX stockholders on May 7, 1990, and, with stockholder approval,
was amended and restated on April 28, 1998. As of the Separation Effective
Time, the USX Stock Plan will be renamed the Marathon Oil Corporation 2002
Stock Plan, and, at that time, United States Steel employees will no longer be
eligible to participate.
The Steel Stock Plan has the same objectives as the USX Stock Plan. The
Steel Stock Plan is designed (a) to promote the long-term financial interests
and growth of the United States Steel Corporation and its subsidiaries by
attracting and retaining management personnel with the training, experience and
ability to enable them to make a substantial contribution to the success of
Unites States Steel Corporation's business, (b) to motivate management
personnel by means of growth-related incentives to achieve long-range growth
goals, and (c) to further the identity of interests of participants with those
of the stockholders of United States Steel Corporation through opportunities
for increased stock ownership.
Recommendation of the USX Board of Directors
Although USX has already approved the Steel Stock Plan as the sole member of
United States Steel LLC, under the organizational documents of United States
Steel LLC, any matter requiring approval of the members of United States Steel
LLC also requires stockholder approval of USX. Thus, the Steel Stock Plan must
be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the
special meeting by holders of Marathon Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group
Shares, voting together as a single class. Because the Steel Stock Plan will
only relate to United States Steel Corporation, we are also seeking approval of
the plan by a majority of the votes cast at the special meeting by holders of
U. S. Steel Group Shares, voting as a separate class, since they will hold all
of the common stock of United States Steel Corporation.
The USX board of directors unanimously recommends that holders of Marathon
Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares vote FOR the approval of the Steel
Stock Plan.
Summary of the Plan
Following is a summary of the material features of the Steel Stock Plan, the
full text of which is set forth as Annex F to this proxy statement/prospectus.
General
The Steel Stock Plan would permit the grant of any or all of the following
types of awards in any combination or sequence: (a) stock options, (b) restored
options, (c) stock appreciation rights and (d) restricted stock, in each case,
in relation to New U. S. Steel Shares ("Grants"). Up to 10,000,000 New U. S.
Steel Shares will be available for Grants during the period the Steel Stock
Plan is in effect, of which up to 1,400,000 New U. S. Steel Shares may be
granted as restricted shares. Shares related to Grants that are forfeited,
terminated, cancelled, expired, unexercised, settled in cash in lieu of shares
or in such manner that all or some of the shares covered by the Grant are not
issued to a participant, shall immediately become available under the Steel
Stock Plan.
The employees of United States Steel Corporation who are eligible for
participation under the Steel Stock Plan are all executive officers and others
in responsible positions whose performance in the judgment of the Compensation
and Organization Committee affects United States Steel Corporation's success.
It is expected that approximately 175 employees will be eligible for
participation under the Steel Stock Plan in 2002. Over the term of the Steel
Stock Plan, it is anticipated that other employees will become eligible for
participation in the Steel Stock Plan.
124
The Compensation and Organization Committee of the United States Steel
Corporation board of directors shall administer the Steel Stock Plan. It shall
determine the type or types of Grants to be made under the Steel Stock Plan and
shall set forth in each such Grant the terms, conditions and limitations
applicable to it. The Compensation and Organization Committee shall have full
and exclusive power to interpret the Steel Stock Plan, to adopt rules,
regulations and guidelines relating to the Steel Stock Plan and to make all of
the determinations necessary for its administration.
Types of Grants
Options. The Compensation and Organization Committee may grant options to
purchase a specified number of New U. S. Steel Shares at not less than the fair
market value on the date of the Grant. All options will be non-qualified
options. Payment of the purchase price shall be made in cash or in such other
form as approved by the Compensation and Organization Committee, including New
U. S. Steel Shares valued at their fair market value on the date of the option
exercise. No option will have a term exceeding eight years from the date of
grant or be exercisable prior to the expiration of one year from the date of
grant, and no option will be repriced except in the event of any change in the
outstanding common stock of United States Steel Corporation by reason of a
stock split, stock dividend, stock combination or reclassification,
recapitalization or merger, or similar event. In the case of a change in
control of United States Steel Corporation, all restrictions will terminate.
An employee receiving an option does not realize income under the Code upon
the grant of the option. The employee will generally realize income at the time
of exercise of the option in the amount of the difference between the option
price and the fair market value of the New U. S. Steel Shares on the date of
exercise. United States Steel Corporation will then be entitled to a tax
deduction in an amount equal to the amount of income realized by the employee.
Restored Options. An employee may exercise an option by paying the purchase
price in previously owned New U. S. Steel Shares. Upon such an exercise, a
restored option will be granted equal to the number of shares presented plus
any shares withheld for the payment of taxes. A restored option will have an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the New U. S. Steel Shares on
the date of exercise, as well as the same expiration date as the original
exercised option. No restored option will be exercisable prior to the
expiration of one year from the date of grant.
Stock Appreciation Rights. The Compensation and Organization Committee may
grant a participant the right to receive a payment in cash and/or New U. S.
Steel Shares equal to the excess of the fair market value of a New U. S. Steel
Share on the date the right is exercised over the fair market value of such
share on the date the right is granted for a specified number of shares. No
stock appreciation right will be exercisable prior to the expiration of one
year from the date of grant.
An employee receiving a stock appreciation right does not realize income
under the Code at the time of receipt of the right. The employee will realize
income upon the exercise of the right in the amount of the cash received and
the fair market value on the date of exercise of the New U. S. Steel Shares
received. United States Steel Corporation will then be entitled to a tax
deduction in the amount of such income realized by the employee.
Restricted Stock. The Compensation and Organization Committee may award New
U. S. Steel Shares for no cash consideration or for such other consideration as
may be determined by the Compensation and Organization Committee. Each award
shall be subject to conditions including, but not limited to, continuous
service with United States Steel Corporation of at least one year following the
date of such award and vesting restrictions based on achievement of target
levels under specified performance measures, and also subject to provisions for
forfeiture and non-transfer. No shares of restricted stock will be vested prior
to one year from the date of grant. In the case of a change in control of
United States Steel Corporation, all restrictions will terminate. During the
period from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2006, the number of shares of
restricted stock granted will not exceed 1,400,000.
125
Each award of restricted stock will remain unvested for a minimum of one
year and until the Compensation and Organization Committee vests the shares.
The Compensation and Organization Committee will base its vesting decisions on
the achievement of target levels under the following performance measures:
Performance Measures for the Vesting of Restricted Stock
--------------------------------------------------------
. Income from operations as a percent of capital employed
. Income from operations per ton shipped
. Operating cash flow as a percent of capital employed
. Safety performance
An employee normally will not realize income under the Code upon the grant
of restricted stock. Upon the termination of the restrictions applicable to
such stock, the employee will realize taxable income equal to the fair market
value of the shares of common stock at that time. United States Steel
Corporation will be entitled to a deduction in the same amount and at the same
time as the employee realizes income. Dividends paid to the employee with
respect to restricted stock constitute compensation and are taxable to the
employee and deductible by United States Steel Corporation.
Conversion of Options, Restored Options, Stock Appreciation Rights and
Restricted Stock
Options and restored options to purchase U. S. Steel Group Shares, and
stock appreciation rights with respect to U. S. Steel Group Shares that were
granted under the USX Stock Plan and that remain unexercised at the Separation
Effective Time, shall be converted into options and restored options to
purchase, and stock appreciation rights with respect to New U. S. Steel
Shares. Also, at the Separation Effective Time, all restricted U. S. Steel
Group Shares awarded under the USX Stock Plan shall be converted into an equal
number of New U. S. Steel Shares. These options, restored options, and stock
appreciation rights relating to New U. S. Steel Shares, and the restricted New
U. S. Steel Shares shall be subject to the same terms and conditions,
including vesting requirements, as the options, restored options, stock
appreciation rights and restricted stock being converted. With regard to
options and restored options, each option or restored option to purchase New
U. S. Steel Shares will cover the same number of shares and have the same
exercise price as the option or restored option being converted, provided that
the number of shares and/or the exercise price will be adjusted, if necessary,
so that (i) the aggregate intrinsic value of the option to purchase New U. S.
Steel Shares immediately after the Separation Effective Time is not greater
than the aggregate intrinsic value of the option being converted immediately
before the Separation Effective Time, and (ii) the ratio of the exercise price
per share to the market value per share is not reduced. Any such adjustments
will be based on the closing price per share of U. S. Steel Group Shares on
the last trading day before the Separation Effective Time relative to the
opening price per share of New U. S. Steel Shares on the first trading day
following the Separation Effective Time.
As of June 30, 2001, options respecting 4,544,125 U. S. Steel Group Shares
remained unexercised and outstanding. Such options had a weighted average
exercise price of $28.1725, and a weighted average term to expiration of 7.5
years. As of that date, 243,580 U. S. Steel Group Shares represented
restricted stock. There will be no further grants respecting U. S. Steel Group
Shares under the USX Stock Plan.
During any calendar year, no participant will be awarded Grants with
respect to more than 800,000 New U. S. Steel Shares.
It is not practical to predict the number of shares that will be awarded
under Grants made to participants in the future because such numbers are, and
will continue to be, within the discretion of the Compensation and
Organization Committee under the terms of the United States Steel 2002 Stock
Plan.
The Steel Stock Plan will terminate on December 31, 2006, subject to
earlier termination by the Board.
126
Amendments
The board of directors of United States Steel Corporation may amend, suspend
or terminate the Steel Stock Plan provided that no such action may, without
stockholder approval, increase the aggregate number of shares available for
Grants under the Steel Stock Plan, decrease the price of options, restored
options or stock appreciation rights, change the requirements relating to the
Compensation and Organization Committee or extend the term of the Steel Stock
Plan. The Compensation and Organization Committee may amend the terms and
conditions applicable to outstanding Grants consistent with the Steel Stock
Plan, provided that no such action may modify the Grant in a manner adverse to
the participant without the participant's consent.
This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the copy of the
Steel Stock Plan attached as Annex F.
Differences Between the Steel Stock Plan and the Applicable Portions of the USX
Stock Plan
The principal differences between the Steel Stock Plan and the USX Stock
Plan, which are due in part to the fact that Marathon Shares will not be
available for grants under the Steel Stock Plan are as follows: 1) the original
term of the USX Stock Plan was for ten years and was extended with stockholder
approval to expire in 2005; the term of the Steel Stock Plan is 5 years and
expires in 2007; 2) the maximum term of options that can be granted under the
USX Stock Plan is 10 years; the maximum term of options under the Steel Stock
Plan is 8 years; 3) under the USX Stock Plan, up to 0.5% of outstanding
Marathon Group Shares and up to 0.8% of outstanding U. S. Steel Group Shares
are available for grants each year; under the Steel Stock Plan, up to
10,000,000 New U. S. Steel Shares are available for grants during the full term
of the Steel Stock Plan; 4) grants of restricted stock are limited to 1,200,000
Marathon Group Shares and 800,000 U. S. Steel Group Shares during the term of
the USX Stock Plan; grants of restricted stock are limited to 1,400,000 New U.
S. Steel Shares during the term of the Steel Stock Plan; and 5) under the USX
Stock Plan, individual per annum grants are limited to 500,000 Marathon Group
and 500,000 U. S. Steel Group Common Shares; under the Steel Stock Plan,
individual per annum grants are limited to 800,000 New U. S. Steel Shares.
The USX board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR approval
of Proposal Two.
PROPOSAL THREE: APPROVAL OF THE UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
SENIOR EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANNUAL INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
Subject to the approval of stockholders, the USX board of directors has
adopted the United States Steel Corporation Senior Executive Officer Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Steel Incentive Plan") effective as of the
Separation Effective Time. The material terms of the Steel Incentive Plan are
substantially the same as the material terms of the USX Corporation Senior
Executive Officer Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (the "USX Incentive Plan")
applicable to employees of the U. S. Steel Group. The USX Incentive Plan was
approved by USX stockholders on May 2, 1994, and, with stockholder approval,
was amended and restated on April 28, 1998. The USX Incentive Plan will be
renamed the Marathon Oil Corporation Senior Executive Officer Annual Incentive
Compensation Plan effective as of the Separation Effective Time, and, at that
time, United States Steel employees will no longer be eligible to participate.
Like the USX Incentive Plan, the Steel Incentive Plan provides for the
payment of cash bonus awards to senior executive officers of United States
Steel Corporation based on pre-established performance measures. The Steel
Incentive Plan's objectives are to advance the interests of the United States
Steel Corporation by providing participants with annual incentive opportunities
linked directly to specific business results. It is intended to (a) reinforce
United States Steel Corporation's goal-setting and strategic planning process,
(b) recognize the efforts of senior executive officers in achieving designated
objectives, and (c) aid in attracting and retaining competent senior executive
officers, thus ensuring the long-range success of United States Steel
Corporation. The Steel Incentive Plan is designed to preserve the tax
deductibility, under Section 162(m) of the Code, of the annual incentive
compensation paid to senior executive officers.
127
Recommendation of the USX Board of Directors
Although USX has already approved the Steel Incentive Plan as the sole
member of United States Steel LLC, under the organizational documents of
United States Steel LLC, any matter requiring approval of the members of
United States Steel LLC also requires stockholder approval of USX. Thus, the
Steel Incentive Plan must be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of
the votes cast at the special meeting by holders of Marathon Group Shares and
U. S. Steel Group Shares, voting together as a single class. Because the Steel
Incentive Plan will only relate to United States Steel Corporation, we are
also seeking approval of the plan by a majority of the votes cast at the
special meeting by holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares, voting as a separate
class, since they will hold all of the common stock of United States Steel
Corporation.
The USX board of directors unanimously recommends that holders of Marathon
Group Shares and U. S. Steel Group Shares, vote FOR the approval of the Steel
Incentive Plan.
Summary of the Plan
Following is a summary of the material features of the Steel Incentive
Plan. The full text of the Steel Incentive Plan is set forth as Annex G to
this proxy statement/prospectus.
The Steel Incentive Plan would authorize the Compensation and Organization
Committee of the United States Steel Corporation board of directors to adopt,
in accordance with regulations promulgated under the Code, applicable target
levels under the performance measures described below, and the amounts to be
awarded for attaining such target levels. The Committee will have the right to
reduce the amount of an award or eliminate an award that would otherwise be
payable to a participant, i.e. exercise "negative discretion". In no event
will the amount of an award payable to a participant for a given year exceed
$3,000,000.
Awards may be paid only after the Compensation and Organization Committee
certifies that the applicable performance measures have been satisfied. It is
impossible to determine the amounts that will be paid under the Steel
Incentive Plan in the future since awards, and payment with respect thereto,
are, and will continue to be, within the discretion of the Compensation and
Organization Committee under the terms of the plan.
Individuals serving in one of the positions listed below for at least a
portion of a calendar year will be eligible to participate in the Steel
Incentive Plan:
United States Steel Corporation Chairman
United States Steel Corporation Chief Executive Officer
United States Steel Corporation President
United States Steel Corporation Vice Chairmen
United States Steel Corporation Chief Operating Officer
United States Steel Corporation Chief Financial Officer
United States Steel Corporation Chief Legal Officer
United States Steel Corporation Executive Vice Presidents
United States Steel Corporation Senior Vice Presidents
Set forth below are the performance measures under the Steel Incentive
Plan:
Income from Operations
Steel Shipments
Worker Safety
Toxic Emissions Improvements
Work Force Diversity
Common Stock Performance
The USX board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote FOR
approval of Proposal Three.
128
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The following table furnishes information concerning all persons known to
USX to beneficially own five percent or more of any class of the voting stock
of USX:
Name and Address of Beneficial Amount and Nature of Percent of
Class Owner Beneficial Ownership Class
----- ------------------------------ -------------------- ----------
Marathon
Group
Shares Wellington Management Company, LLP 15,562,200(1) 5.05(1)
75 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
--------
(1) Based on Schedule 13G dated February 14, 2001 which indicates that
Wellington Management Company, LLP had sole voting power over no shares,
shared voting power over 762,600 shares, sole dispositive power over no
shares and shared dispositive power over 15,562,200 shares.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the number of shares of each class of USX
common stock beneficially owned as of June 30, 2001 by each director, by each
executive officer and by all directors and executive officers as a group. No
director or executive officer beneficially owned, as of June 30, 2001, any
equity securities of USX other than those shown.
U. S.
Marathon Steel
Group Group
Name Shares Shares
---- --------- ---------
Neil A. Armstrong(1)...................................... 14,112 4,811
Clarence P. Cazalot, Jr.(2)(3)............................ 576,217 69,054
J. Gary Cooper(1)(2)...................................... 3,410 1,816
Charles A. Corry(1)(2)(3)................................. 3,923 81,337
Robert M. Hernandez(2)(3)(4).............................. 643,098 315,010
Shirley Ann Jackson(1)(2)................................. 2,806 1,771
Charles R. Lee(1)......................................... 13,781 5,388
Paul E. Lego(1)(2)........................................ 11,083 3,727
John F. McGillicuddy(1)................................... 13,349 4,482
Dan D. Sandman(2)(3)...................................... 275,498 166,217
Seth E. Schofield(1)(2)................................... 8,810 3,780
John W. Snow(1)........................................... 7,007 3,010
Thomas J. Usher(2)(3)..................................... 1,273,154 879,595
Douglas C. Yearley(1)..................................... 8,269 3,596
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (35
persons)(1)(2)(3)(5)..................................... 3,871,179 3,089,472
--------
(1) Includes Common Stock Units credited under the USX Corporation Deferred
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors as follows:
Marathon Group U. S. Steel Group
Common Stock Units Common Stock Units
------------------ ------------------
Neil A. Armstrong...................... 12,612 4,511
J. Gary Cooper......................... 2,378 770
Charles A. Corry....................... 3,923 1,377
Shirley Ann Jackson.................... 1,790 746
Charles R. Lee......................... 11,781 4,188
Paul E. Lego........................... 9,481 3,401
John F. McGillicuddy................... 11,349 4,082
Seth E. Schofield...................... 7,690 2,636
John W. Snow........................... 6,007 2,010
Douglas C. Yearley..................... 7,269 2,596
(2) Includes shares held under the USX Savings Fund Plan, the Marathon Thrift
Plan, the USX Dividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plans and
the 1990 Stock Plan.
129
(3) Includes shares which may be acquired upon exercise of outstanding
options as follows (all options other than those granted on May 29, 2001
are currently exercisable): Mr. Usher: Marathon Group Shares 1,101,100,
U. S. Steel Group Shares 781,400; Mr. Sandman: Marathon Group Shares
218,400, U. S. Steel Group Shares 142,325; Mr. Cazalot: Marathon Group
Shares 520,000, U. S. Steel Group Shares 55,000; Mr. Hernandez: Marathon
Group Shares 562,625, U. S. Steel Group Shares 282,625; Mr. Corry: U. S.
Steel Group Shares 80,000; and all directors and executive officers as a
group: Marathon Group Shares 3,179,220, U. S. Steel Group Shares
2,688,705.
(4) As of January 31, 2001 the United States Steel and Carnegie Pension Fund,
trustee of the United States Steel Corporation Plan for Employee Pension
Benefits and the United States Steel Corporation Plan for Non-Union
Employee Pension Benefits, owned 587,680 shares of the Marathon Group
Shares. This stock was received in exchange for common stock of Texas Oil
& Gas Corp. Mr. Hernandez is chairman and one of seven members of the
Investment Committee of the trustee. The board of directors of the
trustee has by formal resolution delegated sole power to vote and dispose
of such stock to a subcommittee of the Investment Committee which is
composed of members who are not officers or employees of USX. Mr.
Hernandez disclaims beneficial ownership of such stock.
(5) Total shares beneficially owned in each case constitute less than one
percent of the outstanding shares of each class except that all directors
and executive officers as a group own 1.25 percent of the Marathon Group
Shares and 3.47 percent of the U. S. Steel Group Shares.
OTHER MATTERS
Legal Matters
The validity of the United States Steel Corporation common stock to be
issued in connection with the Separation will be passed upon by Skadden, Arps,
Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP.
Experts
The combined financial statements of United States Steel as of December 31,
2000 and December 31, 1999 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000 included in this proxy statement/prospectus have been so
included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent
accountants, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and
accounting.
The consolidated financial statements of USX Corporation as of December 31,
2000 and December 31, 1999 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2000 included in this proxy statement/prospectus have been so
included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent
accountants, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and
accounting.
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
FOR THE 2002 ANNUAL MEETING
If the Separation does not occur, any USX stockholder who wishes to present
a proposal at the USX Corporation 2002 annual meeting of stockholders, and who
wishes to have such proposal included in the USX Corporation proxy statement
for that meeting, must deliver a copy of such proposal to USX's Corporate
Secretary no later than 5:00 P.M. Eastern Time on November 12, 2001. If a USX
stockholder intends to present a proposal at the USX Corporation 2002 annual
meeting of stockholders that is not included in USX Corporation's proxy
statement for that meeting, and the USX stockholder fails to promptly notify
USX of such proposal in writing on or after December 27, 2001 and no later than
January 26, 2002, then such proposals shall be considered untimely. Article I
of USX's bylaws governs submission of matters for presentation at USX
stockholder meetings.
If the Separation does occur, any stockholder of Marathon Oil Corporation
who wishes to present a proposal at the Marathon Oil Corporation 2002 annual
meeting of stockholders, and who wishes to have such
130
proposal included in the Marathon Oil Corporation proxy statement for that
meeting, must deliver a copy of such proposal to Marathon's Corporate Secretary
no later than 5:00 P.M. Eastern Time on November 12, 2001. If a Marathon
stockholder intends to present a proposal at the Marathon Oil Corporation 2002
annual meeting of stockholders that is not included in Marathon's proxy
statement for that meeting, and the Marathon stockholder fails to promptly
notify Marathon of such proposal in writing on or after December 27, 2001 and
no later than January 26, 2002, then such proposals shall be considered
untimely. Article I of Marathon's bylaws governs submission of matters for
presentation at Marathon stockholder meetings.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates documents by reference which
are not presented in or delivered with this proxy statement/prospectus.
The following documents, which were filed by USX with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, are incorporated by reference:
SEC Filings Period
----------- ------
Annual Report on Year ended December 31, 2000, as filed on March
Form 10-K................ 12, 2001
Quarterly Reports on Quarter ended March 31, 2001, as filed on May
Form 10-Q................ 11, 2001 Quarter ended June 30, 2001, as filed
on August 6, 2001
Current Reports on Form 8- Dated February 27, 2001, April 24, 2001, June
K........................ 15, 2001, July 2, 2001, July 31, 2001, August 1,
2001, August 2, 2001 and August 6, 2001
Proxy Statement on Filed on March 12, 2001
Schedule 14A.............
USX incorporates by reference additional documents that it may file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission between the date of this proxy
statement/prospectus and the date of the special meeting of stockholders of
USX. These documents include periodic reports, such as Annual Reports on Form
10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, as well
as proxy statements.
Any statement contained in a document incorporated or deemed to be
incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus will be deemed
to be modified or superseded for purposes of this proxy statement/prospectus to
the extent that a statement contained in this proxy statement/prospectus or any
other subsequently filed document that is deemed to be incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/prospectus modifies or supersedes the
statement. Any statement so modified or superseded will not be deemed, except
as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this proxy
statement/prospectus.
The documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus
are available from us upon request. We will provide a copy of any and all of
the information that is incorporated by reference in this proxy
statement/prospectus to any person, without charge, upon written or oral
request. Any request for documents should be made by October 8, 2001 to ensure
timely delivery of the documents prior to the special meeting.
Requests for documents should be directed to:
USX Corporation
Shareholder Services
600 Grant Street, Room 611
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-4776
(412) 433-4801
(866) 433-4801 (toll free)
(412) 433-4818 (fax)
131
USX Corporation files annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy
statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You may read and copy this
information at the following location of the Securities and Exchange
Commission:
Public Reference Room
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Room 1024
Washington, D.C. 20549
You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
You can also inspect reports, proxy statements and other information about
USX Corporation at the offices of the National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc., 9513 Key West Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20850.
The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains an Internet worldwide
web site that contains reports, proxy statements and other information about
issuers, like USX Corporation, who file electronically with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.
United States Steel LLC has filed a registration statement on Form S-4 under
the Securities Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to
New U. S. Steel Shares to be issued to holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares in
the Separation. This proxy statement/prospectus constitutes the prospectus of
United States Steel Corporation filed as part of that registration statement.
This proxy statement/prospectus does not contain all of the information set
forth in the registration statement because certain parts of the registration
statement are omitted in accordance with the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The registration statement and its exhibits
are available for inspection and copying as set forth above.
If you have any questions about the merger, please call Innisfree M&A at
[ ].
You should rely only on the information contained in this document or that
we have referred you to. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
information that is different.
This proxy statement/prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell, or a
solicitation of an offer to purchase, the securities offered by this proxy
statement/prospectus, or the solicitation of a proxy, in any jurisdiction to or
from any person to whom or from whom it is unlawful to make such offer,
solicitation of an offer or proxy solicitation in such jurisdiction. Neither
the delivery of this proxy statement/ prospectus nor any distribution of
securities pursuant to this proxy statement/prospectus shall, under any
circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the
information set forth or incorporated into this proxy statement/prospectus by
reference or in our affairs since the date of this proxy statement/prospectus.
132
ANNEX B-1
[Letterhead of Credit Suisse First Boston]
July 31, 2001
Board of Directors
USX Corporation
600 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-4776
Members of the Board:
We understand that the Board of Directors (the "Board") of USX Corporation
("USX") is considering the separation of its U. S. Steel Group and its Marathon
Group into two independent companies (the "Separation"). The Separation will be
accomplished through a merger of USX with a newly formed subsidiary of USX
pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, to be dated as of the
date hereof (the "Plan of Reorganization"), by and between USX and United
States Steel LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of USX that will be converted into
a Delaware corporation named United States Steel Corporation ("United States
Steel") in accordance with the Plan of Reorganization. As a result of the
Separation, United States Steel will become an independent, publicly held
company, wholly owned by the holders of the then outstanding shares of USX-
U. S. Steel Group Common Stock ("U. S. Steel Group Shares"), which are
currently traded under ticker symbol "X" and U. S. Steel Group Shares will
cease to exist. Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, USX will change its
name to Marathon Oil Corporation ("MOC") and will be wholly owned by the
holders of the then outstanding shares of USX-Marathon Group Common Stock
(which are currently traded under ticker symbol "MRO") ("Marathon Group
Shares"). As a result of the Separation, the business of the U. S. Steel Group
of USX (the "U. S. Steel Group") will be owned and operated by United States
Steel and the business of the Marathon Group of USX (the "Marathon Group") will
be owned and operated by MOC.
Immediately prior to and as a condition of the consummation of the
Separation, a portion of the indebtedness and other obligations of USX will be
repaid or retired and United States Steel will incur indebtedness and other
obligations and agree to repay a portion of the indebtedness and other
obligations of USX, such that the amount of indebtedness and other obligations
for which United States Steel is responsible is $900 million less than the net
amounts attributed to the U. S. Steel Group immediately prior to the Separation
(the "Value Transfer"). In addition to the Plan of Reorganization, USX and
United States Steel will enter into certain related agreements, including a
Financial Matters Agreement and a Tax Sharing Agreement (collectively, together
with the Plan of Reorganization, the "Separation Agreement"), establishing
certain arrangements between USX and United States Steel deemed necessary by
USX and United States Steel in order to address various business, legal and
regulatory issues resulting from the Separation. The Separation and the related
transactions, including the Value Transfer, are collectively referred to as the
"Transactions".
We have been requested to render to the Board our opinion with respect to
the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the financial effects, taken
as a whole, of the Transactions to the holders of the Marathon Group Shares and
to the holders of the U. S. Steel Group Shares. We have not been requested to
opine as to, and our opinion does not in any manner address, USX's underlying
business decision to proceed with or effect the proposed Transactions.
In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed, among other things, (1) historical
financial statements of USX, including the separate financial statements for
the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, and certain other historical
financial and operating data of USX, including the Marathon Group and the U. S.
Steel Group, (2) certain publicly available information with respect to USX,
including the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, (3) certain projected
financial data with respect to USX, including the Marathon Group and the U. S.
Steel Group, without giving effect to the Separation, and with respect to
United States Steel and MOC,
B-1-1
giving effect to the Separation, in each case as prepared by the management of
USX, including the management of the Marathon Group and the management of the
U. S. Steel Group (collectively, "Management"), (4) reported prices and trading
activity for the Marathon Group Shares and the U. S. Steel Group Shares, (5)
drafts of the Plan of Reorganization, the Financial Matters Agreement and the
Tax Sharing Agreement, (6) the preliminary proxy materials filed by USX with
the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the Separation, (7)
the letter dated July 2, 2001 from USX to the Internal Revenue Service
requesting a private letter ruling that the Separation will qualify as a tax-
free distribution under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code and (8) the
terms of the Marathon Group Shares and the U. S. Steel Group Shares as set
forth in USX's certificate of incorporation as currently in effect. In
addition, we have held discussions with Management with respect to, among other
things, (1) the operations and financial condition of USX, including the
Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, and the plans of Management with
respect to the business and affairs of USX, including the Marathon Group and
the U. S. Steel Group, prior to the Separation and of United States Steel and
MOC after the Separation, (2) certain projected financial data with respect to
USX, including the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, without giving
effect to the Separation, and with respect to United States Steel and MOC,
giving effect to the Separation, in each case as prepared by Management, (3)
the benefits and detriments to USX of continued ownership of both the Marathon
Group and the U. S. Steel Group, (4) the expected impact of the Transactions on
the operations and the financial and strategic flexibility of United States
Steel and MOC after the Separation, (5) certain terms of the proposed Plan of
Reorganization and (6) the effect of the Separation Agreement on the business,
results of operations and financial condition of each of United States Steel
and MOC. In addition, we undertook such other studies, analyses and
investigations as we deemed appropriate for purposes of rendering our opinion.
In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon the accuracy and
completeness of all of the financial and other information used by us without
assuming any responsibility for independent verification of such information
and have further relied upon the assurances of Management that they are not
aware of any facts that would make such information inaccurate or misleading.
With respect to the projected financial data of USX, including the Marathon
Group and the U. S. Steel Group, and of United States Steel and MOC after the
Separation prepared by Management, upon the advice of Management and with your
consent we have assumed that such projections have been reasonably prepared on
a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of
Management as to the expected future prospects and financial performance of
USX, including the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, and of United
States Steel and MOC after the Separation, and we have relied on such
projections in rendering our opinion. With respect to the estimates prepared by
Management of the value of certain benefits and detriments of the Separation to
each of United States Steel and MOC, with your consent, we have relied on such
estimates and assumed that they were reasonably prepared and reflected the best
currently available judgments of Management as to such benefits and detriments.
In arriving at our opinion, we have not conducted a physical inspection of
the properties and facilities of USX, including the properties and facilities
constituting the Marathon Group or the U. S. Steel Group, and have not made or
obtained any evaluations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities of USX,
including the assets or liabilities allocated or attributed to the Marathon
Group or the U. S. Steel Group. We have not been requested to opine as to, and
our opinion does not in any manner address, the solvency of United States Steel
or MOC (including the impact of any contingent liabilities of United States
Steel or MOC) after giving effect to the Transactions, which is the subject of
a written opinion, dated as of the date of this opinion, of American Appraisal
Associates, Inc. You also have advised us, and we have assumed, that the
Transactions will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the Plan of
Reorganization, without waiver, amendment or modification of any material term,
condition or agreement set forth therein. We have also assumed that the Plan of
Reorganization, the Financial Matters Agreement and the Tax Sharing Agreement,
when executed, will conform to the drafts reviewed by us in all respects
material to our analyses. In addition, you have not authorized us to solicit,
and we have not solicited, any indications of interest from any third party
with respect to a business combination or other extraordinary transaction
involving USX or any of its assets or subsidiaries, including the assets or
subsidiaries constituting the Marathon Group or the U. S. Steel Group.
Similarly, we
B-1-2
have not been engaged by you to participate, nor have we participated in, the
negotiation of any terms of the Separation Agreement or the Transactions. Our
opinion does not address whether the financial effects of the Transactions to
the holders of Marathon Group Shares or U. S. Steel Group Shares are the most
favorable that could have been obtained by either group of such holders.
We have not been asked to, and we do not, express an opinion as to the
prices at which the common stock of United States Steel or MOC will actually
trade following the Separation, and we can provide no assurance that the
trading price of (A) a share of common stock of MOC following the Separation
will be equal to or in excess of the trading price of a Marathon Group Share
prior to the Separation or (B) a share of common stock of United States Steel
following the Separation will be equal to or in excess of the trading price of
a U. S. Steel Group Share prior to the Separation.
Our opinion necessarily is based upon market, economic and other conditions
as they exist on, and can be evaluated as of, the date of this letter.
Furthermore, we wish to advise you that certain elements of the Transactions
are not susceptible to precise quantification and that, in connection with the
preparation of this opinion, we have made judgments and estimates that we
consider reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Board in connection with the
Transactions and will receive a fee for our services. A significant portion of
our fee is contingent on consummation of the Separation. We have performed in
the past and may perform in the future other investment banking financial
advisory services for USX, MOC, United States Steel and their respective
affiliates, including in connection with the offering by the U. S. Steel Group
of its 7 year, 10.75% senior unsecured notes, for which we have received and
will receive customary compensation.
In the ordinary course of our business, we actively trade in the debt and
equity securities of USX for our own account and for the accounts of our
customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
such securities.
This opinion is for the use and benefit of the Board and is rendered to the
Board in connection with its consideration of the Transactions. This opinion is
not intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of
Marathon Group Shares or U. S. Steel Group Shares as to whether such
stockholder should consent to the Transactions.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion as of the
date hereof that the financial effects, taken as a whole, of the Transactions
are fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the Marathon Group
Shares and to the holders of the U. S. Steel Group Shares.
Very truly yours,
Credit Suisse First Boston
Corporation
B-1-3
ANNEX B-2
[Letterhead of Salomon Smith Barney]
July 31, 2001
Board of Directors
USX Corporation
600 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-4776
Members of the Board:
We understand that the Board of Directors (the "Board") of USX Corporation
("USX") is considering the separation of its U. S. Steel Group and its Marathon
Group into two independent companies (the "Separation"). The Separation will be
accomplished through a merger of USX with a newly formed subsidiary of USX
pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, to be dated as of the
date hereof (the "Plan of Reorganization"), by and between USX and United
States Steel LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of USX that will be converted into
a Delaware corporation named United States Steel Corporation ("United States
Steel") in accordance with the Plan of Reorganization. As a result of the
Separation, United States Steel will become an independent, publicly held
company, wholly owned by the holders of the then outstanding shares of USX-U.
S. Steel Group Common Stock ("U. S. Steel Group Shares"), which are currently
traded under ticker symbol "X" and U. S. Steel Group Shares will cease to
exist. Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, USX will change its name to
Marathon Oil Corporation ("MOC") and will be wholly owned by the holders of the
then outstanding shares of USX-Marathon Group Common Stock (which are currently
traded under ticker symbol "MRO") ("Marathon Group Shares"). As a result of the
Separation, the business of the U. S. Steel Group of USX (the "U. S. Steel
Group") will be owned and operated by United States Steel and the business of
the Marathon Group of USX (the "Marathon Group") will be owned and operated by
MOC.
Immediately prior to and as a condition of the consummation of the
Separation, a portion of the indebtedness and other obligations of USX will be
repaid or retired and United States Steel will incur indebtedness and other
obligations and agree to repay a portion of the indebtedness and other
obligations of USX, such that the amount of indebtedness and other obligations
for which United States Steel is responsible is $900 million less than the net
amounts attributed to the U. S. Steel Group immediately prior to the Separation
(the "Value Transfer"). In addition to the Plan of Reorganization, USX and
United States Steel will enter into certain related agreements, including a
Financial Matters Agreement and a Tax Sharing Agreement (collectively, together
with the Plan of Reorganization, the "Separation Agreement"), establishing
certain arrangements between USX and United States Steel deemed necessary by
USX and United States Steel in order to address various business, legal and
regulatory issues resulting from the Separation. The Separation and the related
transactions, including the Value Transfer, are collectively referred to as the
"Transactions".
We have been requested to render to the Board our opinion with respect to
the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the financial effects, taken
as a whole, of the Transactions to the holders of the Marathon Group Shares and
to the holders of the U. S. Steel Group Shares. We have not been requested to
opine as to, and our opinion does not in any manner address, USX's underlying
business decision to proceed with or effect the proposed Transactions.
In arriving at our opinion, we reviewed, among other things, (1) historical
financial statements of USX, including the separate financial statements for
the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, and certain other historical
financial and operating data of USX, including the Marathon Group and the U. S.
Steel Group, (2) certain publicly available information with respect to USX,
including the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, (3) certain projected
financial data with respect to USX, including the Marathon Group and the U. S.
B-2-1
Steel Group, without giving effect to the Separation, and with respect to
United States Steel and MOC, giving effect to the Separation, in each case as
prepared by the management of USX, including the management of the Marathon
Group and the management of the U. S. Steel Group (collectively, "Management"),
(4) reported prices and trading activity for the Marathon Group Shares and the
U. S. Steel Group Shares, (5) drafts of the Plan of Reorganization, the
Financial Matters Agreement and the Tax Sharing Agreement, (6) the preliminary
proxy materials filed by USX with the Securities and Exchange Commission in
connection with the Separation, (7) the letter dated July 2, 2001 from USX to
the Internal Revenue Service requesting a private letter ruling that the
Separation will qualify as a tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the
Internal Revenue Code and (8) the terms of the Marathon Group Shares and the U.
S. Steel Group Shares as set forth in USX's certificate of incorporation as
currently in effect. In addition, we have held discussions with Management with
respect to, among other things, (1) the operations and financial condition of
USX, including the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, and the plans of
Management with respect to the business and affairs of USX, including the
Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, prior to the Separation and of United
States Steel and MOC after the Separation, (2) certain projected financial data
with respect to USX, including the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group,
without giving effect to the Separation, and with respect to United States
Steel and MOC, giving effect to the Separation, in each case as prepared by
Management, (3) the benefits and detriments to USX of continued ownership of
both the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, (4) the expected impact of
the Transactions on the operations and the financial and strategic flexibility
of United States Steel and MOC after the Separation, (5) certain terms of the
proposed Plan of Reorganization and (6) the effect of the Separation Agreement
on the business, results of operations and financial condition of each of
United States Steel and MOC. In addition, we undertook such other studies,
analyses and investigations as we deemed appropriate for purposes of rendering
our opinion.
In arriving at our opinion, we have assumed and relied upon the accuracy and
completeness of all of the financial and other information used by us without
assuming any responsibility for independent verification of such information
and have further relied upon the assurances of Management that they are not
aware of any facts that would make such information inaccurate or misleading.
With respect to the projected financial data of USX, including the Marathon
Group and the U. S. Steel Group, and of United States Steel and MOC after the
Separation prepared by Management, upon the advice of Management and with your
consent we have assumed that such projections have been reasonably prepared on
a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of
Management as to the expected future prospects and financial performance of
USX, including the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, and of United
States Steel and MOC after the Separation, and we have relied on such
projections in rendering our opinion. With respect to the estimates prepared by
Management of the value of certain benefits and detriments of the Separation to
each of United States Steel and MOC, with your consent, we have relied on such
estimates and assumed that they were reasonably prepared and reflected the best
currently available judgments of Management as to such benefits and detriments.
In arriving at our opinion, we have not conducted a physical inspection of
the properties and facilities of USX, including the properties and facilities
constituting the Marathon Group or the U. S. Steel Group, and have not made or
obtained any evaluations or appraisals of the assets or liabilities of USX,
including the assets or liabilities allocated or attributed to the Marathon
Group or the U. S. Steel Group. We have not been requested to opine as to, and
our opinion does not in any manner address, the solvency of United States Steel
or MOC (including the impact of any contingent liabilities of United States
Steel or MOC) after giving effect to the Transactions, which is the subject of
a written opinion, dated as of the date of this opinion, of American Appraisal
Associates, Inc. You also have advised us, and we have assumed, that the
Transactions will be consummated in accordance with the terms of the Plan of
Reorganization, without waiver, amendment or modification of any material term,
condition or agreement set forth therein. We have also assumed that the Plan of
Reorganization, the Financial Matters Agreement and the Tax Sharing Agreement,
when executed, will conform to the drafts reviewed by us in all respects
material to our analyses. In addition, you have not authorized us to solicit,
and we have not solicited, any indications of interest from any third party
with respect to a business combination or other extraordinary transaction
involving USX or any of its assets or subsidiaries, including the assets or
subsidiaries constituting the Marathon Group or the U. S. Steel Group.
Similarly, we
B-2-2
have not been engaged by you to participate, nor have we participated in, the
negotiation of any terms of the Separation Agreement or the Transactions. Our
opinion does not address whether the financial effects of the Transactions to
the holders of Marathon Group Shares or U. S. Steel Group Shares are the most
favorable that could have been obtained by either group of such holders.
We have not been asked to, and we do not, express an opinion as to the
prices at which the common stock of United States Steel or MOC will actually
trade following the Separation, and we can provide no assurance that the
trading price of (A) a share of common stock of MOC following the Separation
will be equal to or in excess of the trading price of a Marathon Group Share
prior to the Separation or (B) a share of common stock of United States Steel
following the Separation will be equal to or in excess of the trading price of
a U. S. Steel Group Share prior to the Separation.
Our opinion necessarily is based upon market, economic and other conditions
as they exist on, and can be evaluated as of, the date of this letter.
Furthermore, we wish to advise you that certain elements of the Transactions
are not susceptible to precise quantification and that, in connection with the
preparation of this opinion, we have made judgments and estimates that we
consider reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances.
We have acted as financial advisor to the Board in connection with the
Transactions and will receive a fee for our services. A significant portion of
our fee is contingent on consummation of the Separation. We have performed in
the past and may perform in the future other investment banking financial
advisory services for USX, MOC, United States Steel and their respective
affiliates, including in connection with the offering by the U. S. Steel Group
of its 7 year, 10.75% senior unsecured notes, for which we have received and
will receive customary compensation.
In the ordinary course of our business, we actively trade in the debt and
equity securities of USX for our own account and for the accounts of our
customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in
such securities.
This opinion is for the use and benefit of the Board and is rendered to the
Board in connection with its consideration of the Transactions. This opinion is
not intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of
Marathon Group Shares or U. S. Steel Group Shares as to whether such
stockholder should consent to the Transactions.
Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion as of the
date hereof that the financial effects, taken as a whole, of the Transactions
are fair, from a financial point of view, to the holders of the Marathon Group
Shares and to the holders of the U. S. Steel Group Shares.
Very truly yours,
SALOMON SMITH BARNEY INC.
B-2-3
ANNEX C
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of
June 30, 2001 gives effect to the $900 million Value Transfer, new financing
arrangements, the assignment of certain USX corporate assets and liabilities
and the payment of Separation Costs as if such transactions had been
consummated as of June 30, 2001. The following unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2001, and
the year ended December 31, 2000, give effect to changes in net interest and
other financial costs as a result of the Value Transfer and new financing
arrangements, as if such transactions had been consummated at the beginning of
the periods presented.
No pro forma adjustments were made for changes in the future level of
corporate administrative costs to be incurred by United States Steel
Corporation as compared with the historical level of such costs allocated to
United States Steel. These costs are expected to continue at approximately the
same level as previously allocated, except for insurance costs which are
estimated to be higher by $9 million annually.
No pro forma adjustments have been made in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of operations for nonrecurring charges associated with the
Separation. Such adjustments are reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined balance sheet.
Following the Separation, United States Steel Corporation will account for
its assets and liabilities based on the historical values at which they were
carried by USX immediately prior to the Separation.
The pro forma adjustments included herein are based on available information
and certain assumptions that management believes are reasonable and are
described in the accompanying notes. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements do not necessarily represent United States Steel
Corporation's financial position or results of operations had the transactions
occurred at such dates or project United States Steel Corporation's financial
position or results of operations for any future date or period. A number of
factors may affect United States Steel Corporation's results. See "SPECIAL NOTE
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS" on page 25. In the opinion of management,
all adjustments necessary to present fairly the unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements have been made. The unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements should be read in conjunction with the historical
combined financial statements of United States Steel, including the notes
thereto, included in Annex D.
C-1
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
June 30, 2001
Dollars in millions
United United States
States Steel
Steel Separation Value Corporation
Historical Adjustments Transfer Pro Forma
---------- ----------- -------- -------------
ASSETS
Cash........................ $ 254 $(189)(A) $ $ 65
Other current assets........ 2,422 2,422
Property, plant and
equipment--net............. 3,098 20 (B) 3,118
Prepaid pensions............ 2,711 2,711
Other assets................ 469 31 (A) 505
5 (B)
------ ----- ----- ------
Total assets................ $8,954 $(133) $ $8,821
====== ===== ===== ======
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities other
than debt.................. $1,313 $ (43)(A) $ $1,268
(2)(B)
Notes payable and long-term
debt due within one year... 347 (329)(A) 18
Long-term debt.............. 2,085 588 (A) (900)(C) 1,773
Other long-term
liabilities................ 3,100 (2)(A) 3,082
(16)(B)
Preferred securities of
subsidiaries............... 249 (249)(A) --
Equity...................... 1,860 (123)(A) 900 (C) 2,680
43 (B)
------ ----- ----- ------
Total liabilities and
equity..................... $8,954 $(133) $ -- $8,821
====== ===== ===== ======
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet
C-2
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
(A) Reflects the effects of the following:
(1) Reversal of the attribution to United States Steel of the financial
activities of USX, including invested cash, deferred financing costs,
accrued interest payable, debt, and preferred securities of
subsidiaries.
(2) Recognition of existing USX debt for which United States Steel
Corporation will be responsible under the Financial Matters Agreement.
(3) New financing arrangements of United States Steel Corporation, the
proceeds of which will be used to pay Marathon Oil Corporation in
connection with the Separation and to pay United States Steel
Corporation's portion of the Separation Costs.
For a more detailed description, see "THE SEPARATION--Financing
Arrangements Relating to the Separation" on page 44.
The decrease in cash of $189 million reflects the reversal of the portion
of USX invested cash historically attributed to United States Steel which
will be included in the accounts of Marathon Oil Corporation.
The increase in other assets of $31 million primarily reflects estimated
deferred financing costs to be incurred related to the new financing
arrangements.
The decrease in current liabilities other than debt of $43 million
primarily reflects the reversal of the portion of USX's accrued interest
payable historically attributed to United States Steel which will be
included in the accounts of Marathon Oil Corporation.
The net increase in debt of $259 million (the sum of a decrease in notes
payable and long-term debt due within one year of $329 million and an
increase in long-term debt of $588 million) primarily reflects the
refinancing of other obligations not classified as debt (Preferred
securities of subsidiaries and 6.50% Preferred Stock), net of invested
cash, and Separation Costs. The following table reconciles the amount of
debt attributed to United States Steel to the pro forma balance of United
States Steel Corporation debt.
Dollars
in millions
-----------
Debt attributed to United States Steel................. $2,432
Other obligations, net of invested cash, attributed to
United States Steel which will be refinanced as debt:
Preferred securities of subsidiaries................. 249
6.50% Preferred Stock................................ 121
Invested cash........................................ (189)
Other financial activities........................... 35
Excess of redemption value over carrying value of
Trust Preferred..................................... 14
Separation Costs..................................... 29
----
Net refinancing of other obligations................... 259
------
Debt before the Value Transfer......................... 2,691
Value Transfer......................................... (900)
------
Pro forma balance of United States Steel Corporation
debt.................................................. $1,791
======
The net decrease in other long-term liabilities of $2 million reflects
expected tax benefits related to Separation Costs.
C-3
The net decrease in equity of $123 million consists of the following:
Dollars in millions
-------------------
6.50% Preferred Stock, which will be repaid by
Marathon Oil Corporation........................... $121
Excess of redemption value of the Trust Preferred
over carrying value................................ 14
Other adjustments, net.............................. (12)
----
Net decrease in equity.............................. $123
====
The following illustrates the pro forma balance of United States Steel
Corporation's debt at June 30, 2001:
Dollars
in millions
-----------
USX debt that will be the responsibility of United
States Steel Corporation:
USSK Loan Facility.................................. $ 325
Industrial revenue bonds (for which Marathon Oil
Corporation remains obligated)..................... 479
Fairfield caster sublease........................... 84
Capital lease obligations and other................. 6
New financing arrangements:
To pay Marathon Oil Corporation..................... $868
To pay Separation Costs............................. 29
-----
Total new financing arrangements.................. 897
------
Total debt............................................ 1,791
Less notes payable and long-term debt within one
year............................................... 18
------
Total long-term debt.................................. $1,773
======
The new financing arrangements include the July 27, 2001 sale of $385
million of Senior Notes at an annual interest rate of 10.75%. The Senior
Notes were issued at a discount that resulted in proceeds of $380 million
for an effective yield of 11%. At least $300 million of these financing
requirements will be funded through the preliminary tax settlement with
Marathon Oil Corporation which will occur immediately prior to the
Separation. For more information regarding this tax settlement, see
"RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION AND MARATHON OIL
CORPORATION AFTER THE SEPARATION--Tax Sharing Agreement" on page 114. The
remaining $217 million of new financing arrangements may include a
combination of additional senior notes, lease financings, new preferred or
other security offerings, including an exchange of existing securities for
new securities, and amounts drawn under new credit facilities, including a
secured accounts receivable facility and a secured inventory facility.
C-4
(B) Reflects the assignment of certain USX corporate assets and liabilities to
United States Steel Corporation. For a more detailed description, see "THE
SEPARATION--Assignment of Other USX Corporate Assets and Certain
Liabilities in the Separation" on page 50. The effects can be summarized as
follows:
Dollars in millions
---------------------------------------------------
Property,
Plant and Other Current Other
Equipment Assets Liabilities Liabilities Total
--------- ------- ----------- ----------- -------
Property, plant and
equipment.............. $ 20 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 20
Assets and liabilities
associated with
employee benefits...... -- 5 2 66 73
Income tax assets and
liabilities, including
tax effect of above
adjustments............ -- -- -- (50) (50)
----- ------- ------- ------- -------
Increase in equity...... $ 20 $ 5 $ 2 $ 16 $ 43
===== ======= ======= ======= =======
(C) Reflects adjustments related to the $900 million Value Transfer. In
connection with the Separation, a portion of USX indebtedness and other
obligations will be repaid or retired and United States Steel Corporation
will incur indebtedness and other obligations and agree to repay a portion
of the indebtedness and other obligations of USX, such that the amount of
indebtedness and other obligations for which United States Steel
Corporation is responsible is $900 million less than the net amounts
attributed to United States Steel immediately prior to the Separation. For
a more detailed description of the Value Transfer, see "THE SEPARATION--
Financing Arrangements Relating to the Separation" on page 44.
C-5
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended June 30, 2001
Dollars in millions (except per share amounts)
United States
United States Steel
Steel Separation Corporation
Historical Adjustments Pro forma
------------- ----------- -------------
Revenues and other income.............. $3,301 $ $3,301
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues (excludes items
shown below)........................ 3,148 3,148
Selling, general and administrative
expenses ........................... 3 3
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization........................ 152 152
Taxes other than income taxes........ 126 126
------ ---- ------
Total costs and expenses........... 3,429 3,429
------ ---- ------
Income (loss) from operations.......... (128) (128)
Net interest and other financial costs
...................................... 36 (18)(A) 18
------ ---- ------
Income (loss) before income taxes...... (164) 18 (146)
Provision (credit) for income taxes.... (143) 6 (B) (137)
------ ---- ------
Net income (loss)...................... (21) 12 (9)
Dividends on preferred stock........... 4 (4)(C) --
------ ---- ------
Net income (loss) applicable to common
stock................................. $ (25) $ 16 $ (9)
====== ==== ======
Net income (loss) per common share: (D)
Basic and diluted.................... $ (.10)
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
C-6
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 2000
Dollars in millions (except per share amounts)
United States
United Steel
States Steel Separation Corporation
Historical Adjustments Pro forma
------------- ----------- -------------
Revenues and other income.............. $6,132 $ $6,132
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues (excludes items
shown below)........................ 5,656 5,656
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (credits).................. (223) (223)
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization........................ 360 360
Taxes other than income taxes........ 235 235
------ ---- ------
Total costs and expenses........... 6,028 6,028
------ ---- ------
Income from operations................. 104 104
Net interest and other financial
costs................................. 105 (68)(A) 37
------ ---- ------
Income (loss) before income taxes...... (1) 68 67
Provision for income taxes............. 20 24 (B) 44
------ ---- ------
Net income (loss)...................... (21) 44 23
Dividends on preferred stock........... 8 (8)(C) --
------ ---- ------
Net income (loss) applicable to common
stock................................. $ (29) $ 52 $ 23
====== ==== ======
Net income (loss) per common share: (D)
Basic and diluted.................... $ 0.26
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
C-7
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(A) Reflects a decrease in net interest and other financial costs as a result
of a decrease in the amount of indebtedness of United States Steel
Corporation following the Separation, as compared to the amount of USX debt
attributed to United States Steel. The decrease primarily reflects the $900
million Value Transfer. Pro forma interest costs have been calculated based
on pro forma average levels of debt for the six months ended June 30, 2001,
and for the year ended December 31, 2000. Pro forma debt reflects new
financing arrangements, the proceeds of which will be used to pay Marathon
Oil Corporation in connection with the Separation and to pay United States
Steel Corporation's portion of the Separation Costs.
The assumed interest rate for new financing arrangements was 10% based upon
expected market conditions and the expected credit rating of United States
Steel Corporation. The pro forma average interest rate for the six months
ended June 30, 2001 for existing USX debt and other obligations for which
United States Steel Corporation will be responsible was approximately 6
3/4%. The weighted average interest rate for the six months ended June 30,
2001 for all United States Steel Corporation pro forma debt and other
obligations was approximately 8 1/4%. A 1/8 percentage point change in the
assumed interest rate for new financing arrangements would have changed
annual interest costs by approximately $1 million.
(B) Reflects the income tax effects of adjustment (A).
(C) Reflects the elimination of preferred stock dividends on the 6.50%
Preferred Stock, which will be repaid by Marathon Oil Corporation.
(D) Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding (basic and diluted) for
United States Steel Corporation, on a pro forma basis, were 88,906,000 for
the six months ended June 30, 2001, and 88,613,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2000.
C-8
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
The following unaudited pro forma condensed balance sheet as of June 30,
2001 gives effect to the discontinuance of the businesses of United States
Steel Corporation, the $900 million Value Transfer, the assignment of certain
USX corporate assets and liabilities to United States Steel Corporation, the
payment of Separation Costs and the distribution of New U. S. Steel Shares to
the holders of U. S. Steel Group Shares as if such transactions had been
consummated as of June 30, 2001. The following unaudited pro forma condensed
statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and the year
ended December 31, 2000 give effect to the discontinuance of the businesses of
United States Steel Corporation and interest changes as a result of the Value
Transfer and the repayment of the 6.5% Preferred Stock as if such transactions
had been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented. The unaudited
pro forma condensed statements of operations of Marathon Oil Corporation for
the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 give effect to the discontinuance of
the businesses of United States Steel Corporation but do not give effect to any
adjustments associated with the Separation.
No pro forma adjustments were made for changes in the future level of
corporate administrative costs to be incurred by Marathon Oil Corporation as
compared with the historical level of such costs allocated to Marathon. These
costs are expected to continue at approximately the same level as previously
allocated, except for insurance costs which are estimated to be higher by $2
million annually.
No pro forma adjustments have been made in the unaudited pro forma condensed
statements of operations for nonrecurring charges including the Separation
Costs and the loss on the Separation. Such adjustments are reflected in the
unaudited pro forma condensed balance sheet.
The pro forma adjustments included herein are based on available information
and certain assumptions that management believes are reasonable and are
described in the accompanying notes. The unaudited pro forma condensed
financial statements do not necessarily represent Marathon Oil Corporation's
financial position or results of operations had the transactions occurred at
such dates or project Marathon Oil Corporation's financial position or results
of operations for any future date or period. A number of factors may affect
Marathon Oil Corporation's results. See "SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS" on page 25. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary
to present fairly the unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements have
been made. The unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements should be
read in conjunction with the historical financial statements of USX
Corporation, including the notes thereto, included in Annex E.
C-9
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
June 30, 2001
Dollars in millions
Marathon
Oil
Corporation
Pro Forma Marathon
Discontinued Before Oil
USX Operations Separation Separation Value Corporation
Historical Adjustments Adjustments Adjustments Transfer Pro Forma
---------- ------------ ----------- ----------- -------- -----------
ASSETS
Cash.................... $ 723 $ (254) (A) $ 469 $ 189 (C) $ $ 658
Other current assets.... 6,465 (2,422) (A) 4,366 20 (C) 4,386
323 (B)
Net investment in
discontinued
operations............. 1,860 (A) 1,860 (123) (C) 900 (F) --
43 (D)
(2,680) (E)
Property, plant and
equipment--net......... 12,977 (3,098) (A) 9,879 (20) (D) 9,859
Prepaid pensions........ 2,928 (2,711) (A) 217 217
Other assets............ 1,421 (469) (A) 1,073 551 (C) 1,542
121 (B) (82) (D)
------- ------- ------- ------- ---- -------
Total assets............ $24,514 $(6,650) $17,864 $(2,102) $900 $16,662
======= ======= ======= ======= ==== =======
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
other than debt........ $ 4,655 $(1,313) (A) $ 3,665 $ 25 (C) $ $ 3,692
323 (B) 2 (D)
Notes payable and long-
term debt due within
one year............... 686 (347) (A) 339 344 (C) 683
Long-term debt.......... 3,673 (2,085) (A) 1,588 367 (C) 900 (F) 2,855
Other long-term
liabilities............ 5,363 (3,100) (A) 2,384 (4) (C) 2,319
121 (B) (61) (D)
Preferred securities of
subsidiaries........... 433 (249) (A) 184 66 (C) 250
Minority interest in
Marathon Ashland
Petroleum LLC.......... 2,010 2,010 2,010
Equity.................. 7,694 7,694 (150) (C) 4,853
(11) (C)
(1,797) (E)
(883) (E)
------- ------- ------- ------- ---- -------
Total liabilities and
equity................. $24,514 $(6,650) $17,864 $(2,102) $900 $16,662
======= ======= ======= ======= ==== =======
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Balance Sheet
C-10
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
(A) Reflects the reclassification of all assets and liabilities of the
businesses of United States Steel Corporation to discontinued operations.
The measurement date for discontinued operations purposes will be on or
about the Separation Effective Time.
(B) Reflects the establishment of payables to United States Steel previously
eliminated in consolidation, primarily related to income taxes under USX's
tax allocation policy.
(C) Reflects the effects of the following:
(1) Recognition of the financial activities of USX formerly attributed to
United States Steel, including invested cash, deferred financing costs,
accrued interest payable, debt, and preferred securities of
subsidiaries.
(2) Reversal of existing USX debt for which United States Steel Corporation
will be responsible under the Financial Matters Agreement.
(3) Establishment of receivables from United States Steel Corporation under
the Financial Matters Agreement for obligations relating to industrial
revenue bonds and a sublease of the Fairfield caster.
(4) Payment from United States Steel Corporation, the proceeds of which
will be used to redeem the Trust Preferred, to repay the 6.5% Preferred
Stock, to repay the Receivables Facility and to fund a portion of the
Separation Costs.
(5) New financing arrangements of Marathon Oil Corporation, the proceeds of
which will be used to fund the remaining portion of the Separation
Costs.
For a more detailed description, see "THE SEPARATION--Financing
Arrangements Relating to the Separation" on page 44.
The increase in cash of $189 million reflects the recognition of the
portion of USX invested cash historically attributed to United States Steel
which will be included in the accounts of Marathon Oil Corporation.
The increase in other current assets of $20 million reflects the principal
and accrued interest on industrial revenue bonds and the Fairfield caster
lease for which Marathon Oil Corporation remains obligated but United
States Steel Corporation assumes responsibility for repayment.
The increase in other assets of $551 million primarily reflects receivables
from United States Steel Corporation of $470 million related to industrial
revenue bonds for which Marathon Oil Corporation remains obligated but
United States Steel Corporation assumes responsibility for repayment and
$78 million related to a sublease of the Fairfield caster to United States
Steel Corporation.
The increase in current liabilities other than debt of $25 million
primarily reflects the recognition of the portion of USX's accrued interest
payable historically attributed to United States Steel which will be
included in the accounts of Marathon Oil Corporation.
C-11
The net increase in debt of $711 million (the sum of an increase in notes
payable and long-term debt due within one year of $344 million and an
increase in long-term debt of $367 million) primarily reflects the
refinancing of other obligations (Preferred securities of subsidiaries and
6.50% Preferred Stock), net of invested cash, by United States Steel
Corporation, the refinancing of other obligations and Separation Costs by
Marathon Oil Corporation, and certain obligations assumed by United States
Steel Corporation but reflected as both an asset and liability by Marathon
Oil Corporation. The following table reconciles the amount of total USX
debt to the pro forma balance of Marathon Oil Corporation debt.
Dollars
in millions
-----------
Total USX debt......................................... $4,359
Less debt attributed to discontinued operations........ 2,432
------
Debt of Marathon Oil Corporation before separation
adjustments........................................... 1,927
Other obligations, net of invested cash, which will be
refinanced by United States Steel Corporation:
Preferred securities of subsidiaries................. (249)
6.50% Preferred Stock................................ (121)
Invested cash........................................ 189
Other financial activities........................... (35)
Excess of redemption value over carrying value of
Trust Preferred..................................... (14)
Other obligations which will be refinanced by Marathon
Oil Corporation:
Separation Costs..................................... 60
Redemption of the Trust Preferred.................... 197
Repayment of the 6.50% Preferred Stock............... 121
Obligations assumed by United States Steel Corporation,
reflected as both an asset and liability by Marathon
Oil Corporation:
Industrial revenue bonds............................. 479
Fairfield caster lease............................... 84
----
Net refinancing of other obligations and obligations
assumed by United States Steel Corporation............ 711
------
Debt before the Value Transfer......................... 2,638
Value Transfer......................................... 900
------
Pro forma balance of Marathon Oil Corporation debt..... $3,538
======
The decrease in other long-term liabilities of $4 million reflects expected
tax benefits related to the Separation Costs.
C-12
The increase in preferred securities of subsidiaries of $66 million
reflects the recognition of the portion of such obligations historically
attributed to United States Steel which will be included in the accounts of
Marathon Oil Corporation.
The decrease in equity of $150 million consists of the following:
Dollars
in millions
-----------
Repayment of 6.50% Preferred Stock............................. $121
Adjustments related to Separation Costs........................ 29
----
Net decrease in equity......................................... $150
====
The extraordinary loss of $11 million on the redemption of the Trust
Preferred, net of the income tax benefit, included in pro forma equity is
calculated below:
Dollars
in millions
-----------
Redemption cost (3,937,163 shares redeemed at $50 per
share)..................................................... $ 197
Carrying value.............................................. (183)
Writeoff of deferred financing costs........................ 4
-----
Extraordinary loss before income tax benefit................ 18
Income tax benefit.......................................... (7)
-----
Extraordinary loss, net of income tax benefit............... $ 11
=====
The extraordinary loss is reflected on the unaudited pro forma condensed
balance sheet but not in the unaudited pro forma condensed statements of
operations.
The decrease in net investment in discontinued operations of $123 million
reflects the offsetting impact of these adjustments on United States Steel
Corporation. For a detailed description, see "UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION" on pages
C-1 to C-8.
The pro forma sources and uses of funds received from United States Steel
Corporation and from new financing arrangements were as follows:
Dollars
in millions
-----------
Payment from United States Steel Corporation................... $868
====
Repayment of the Receivables Facility.......................... $350
Redemption of the Trust Preferred.............................. 197
Repayment of the 6.50% Preferred Stock......................... 121
Repayment of other debt obligations............................ 140
Payment of Separation Costs.................................... 60
----
Total........................................................ $868
====
The payment from United States Steel Corporation will be reduced by the
amount paid by Marathon to United States Steel in the preliminary tax
settlement. This amount is expected to be at least $300 million. For more
information regarding this tax settlement, see "RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UNITED
STATES STEEL CORPORATION AND MARATHON OIL CORPORATION AFTER THE
SEPARATION--Tax Sharing Agreement" on page 114.
The decrease in other long-term liabilities of $4 million reflects expected
tax benefits related to the Separation Costs.
C-13
(D) Reflects the assignment of certain USX corporate assets and liabilities to
United States Steel Corporation. For a more detailed description, see "THE
SEPARATION--Assignment of Other USX Corporate Assets and Certain
Liabilities in the Separation" on page 50. The effects can be summarized as
follows:
Dollars in millions
---------------------------------------------------
Property,
Plant and Other Current Other
Equipment Assets Liabilities Liabilities Total
--------- ------- ----------- ----------- -------
Property, plant and
equipment.............. $(20) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ (20)
Assets and liabilities
associated with
employee benefits...... -- (5) (2) (66) (73)
Reclassification of
intercompany balances.. -- (77) -- 77 --
Income tax assets and
liabilities, including
the tax effect of above
adjustments............ -- -- -- 50 50
---- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net effect on net
investment in
discontinued
operations............. $(20) $ (82) $ (2) $ 61 $ (43)
==== ======= ======= ======= =======
(E) Reflects the removal of the net investment in discontinued operations. Also
reflects the distribution of New U. S. Steel Shares to the holders of
U. S. Steel Group Shares as a dividend. Because the net investment in
discontinued operations exceeded the fair value, as measured by the
aggregate market value of the U. S. Steel Group Shares at June 30, 2001, a
nonrecurring non-cash charge would have been recognized as follows:
Dollars
in millions
-----------
Market value of the U. S. Steel Group Shares (89,156,721
shares of stock issued and outstanding at $20.15 per
share)...................................................... $1,797
Less net investment in discontinued operations............... 2,680
------
Loss on separation........................................... $ (883)
======
(F) Reflects adjustments related to the $900 million Value Transfer. In
connection with the Separation, a portion of USX indebtedness will be
repaid or retired and United States Steel Corporation will incur
indebtedness and agree to repay a portion of the indebtedness and other
obligations of USX, such that the amount of indebtedness and other
obligations for which United States Steel Corporation is responsible is
$900 million less than the net amounts attributed to United States Steel
immediately prior to the Separation. For a more detailed description of the
Value Transfer, see "THE SEPARATION--Financing Arrangements Relating to the
Separation" on page 44.
C-14
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended June 30, 2001
Dollars in millions (except per share amounts)
Marathon Oil
Corporation
Pro Forma
Discontinued Before Marathon Oil
USX Operations Separation Separation Corporation
Historical Adjustments Adjustments Adjustments Pro Forma
---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------
Revenues and other income........................ $21,188 $(3,301)(A) $17,911 $ $17,911
24 (B)
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues (excludes items shown below).. 15,560 (3,148)(A) 12,436 12,436
24 (B)
Selling, general and administrative expenses... 329 (3)(A) 340 340
14 (C)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization....... 761 (152)(A) 609 609
Taxes other than income taxes.................. 2,450 (126)(A) 2,324 2,324
Exploration expenses........................... 49 -- 49 49
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Total costs and expenses..................... 19,149 (3,391) 15,758 15,758
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income from operations........................... 2,039 114 2,153 2,153
Net interest and other financial costs........... 109 (36)(A) 83 30 (F) 113
10 (D)
Minority interest in Marathon Ashland
Petroleum LLC................................... 427 -- 427 427
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income before income taxes....................... 1,503 140 1,643 (30) 1,613
Provision for income taxes....................... 434 143 (A) 569 (11)(G) 558
(8)(E)
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income from continuing operations................ 1,069 5 1,074 (19) 1,055
Discontinued operations:
Results of operations, net of tax............... -- (5)(A) (5) 5 (H) --
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle............................ 1,069 -- 1,069 (14) 1,055
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle....................................... (8) -- (8) (8)
------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income....................................... $ 1,061 $ -- $ 1,061 $ (14) $ 1,047
======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Applicable to Marathon Stock: (I)
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle............................ $ 1,090
Per share--basic............................... 3.53
--diluted........................................ 3.52
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle....................................... $ (8)
Per share--basic............................... (0.03)
--diluted........................................ (0.02)
Net income....................................... $ 1,082
Per share--basic and diluted................... 3.50
Applicable to Steel Stock: (I)
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle......................... $ (25)
Per share--basic and diluted................... (0.28)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle....................................... $ --
Per share--basic and diluted................... --
Net income (loss)................................ $ (25)
Per share--basic and diluted................... (0.28)
Applicable to Marathon Oil Corporation Stock: (I)
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle............................ $ 1,055
Per share--basic............................... 3.41
--diluted........................................ 3.40
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle....................................... $ (8)
Per share--basic............................... (0.03)
--diluted........................................ (0.02)
Net income....................................... $ 1,047
Per share--basic and diluted................... 3.38
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statement of Operations.
C-15
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 2000
Dollars in millions (except per share amounts)
Marathon Oil
Corporation
Pro Forma
Discontinued Before Marathon Oil
USX Operations Separation Separation Corporation
Historical Adjustments Adjustments Adjustments Pro Forma
---------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------
Revenues and other
income................. $39,914 $(6,132)(A) $33,859 $ $33,859
77 (B)
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues
(excludes items shown
below)............... 31,056 (5,656)(A) 25,477 25,477
77 (B)
Selling, general and
administrative
expenses............. 402 223 (A) 643 643
18 (C)
Depreciation,
depletion and
amortization......... 1,605 (360)(A) 1,245 1,245
Taxes other than
income taxes......... 4,861 (235)(A) 4,626 4,626
Exploration expenses.. 238 -- 238 238
------- ------- ------- ---- -------
Total costs and
expenses........... 38,162 (5,933) 32,229 32,229
------- ------- ------- ---- -------
Income from operations.. 1,752 (122) 1,630 1,630
Net interest and other
financial costs........ 341 (105)(A) 236 89 (F) 325
Minority interest in
Marathon Ashland
Petroleum LLC.......... 498 -- 498 498
------- ------- ------- ---- -------
Income before income
taxes.................. 913 (17) 896 (89) 807
Provision for income
taxes.................. 502 (20)(A) 476 (33)(G) 443
(6)(E)
------- ------- ------- ---- -------
Income from continuing
operations............. 411 9 420 (56) 364
Discontinued operations:
Results of operations,
net of tax............ -- (9)(A) (9) 9 (H) --
------- ------- ------- ---- -------
$
Net income.............. $ 411 -- $ 411 $(47) $ 364
======= ======= ======= ==== =======
Applicable to Marathon
Stock: (I)
Per share--basic and
diluted
Net income............ $ 1.39
Applicable to Steel
Stock: (I)
Per share--basic and
diluted
Net income............ $ (0.33)
Applicable to Marathon
Oil Corporation Stock:
(I)
Per share--basic and
diluted
Net income............ $ 1.17
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statement of Operations
C-16
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 1999
Dollars in millions
Marathon
Oil Corporation
Pro Forma
Discontinued Before
USX Operations Separation
Historical Adjustments Adjustments
---------- ------------ ---------------
Revenues and other income........... $29,119 $(5,470)(A) $23,707
58 (B)
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues (excludes items
shown below)..................... 21,679 (5,084)(A) 16,653
58 (B)
Selling, general and
administrative expenses.......... 203 283 (A) 498
12 (C)
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization..................... 1,254 (304)(A) 950
Taxes other than income taxes..... 4,433 (215)(A) 4,218
Exploration expenses.............. 238 238
Inventory market valuation
credits.......................... (551) (551)
------- ------- -------
Total costs and expenses........ 27,256 (5,250) 22,006
------- ------- -------
Income from operations.............. 1,863 (162) 1,701
Net interest and other financial
costs.............................. 362 (74)(A) 288
Minority interest in Marathon
Ashland Petroleum LLC.............. 447 447
------- ------- -------
Income before income taxes.......... 1,054 (88) 966
Provision for income taxes.......... 349 (25)(A) 320
(4)(E)
------- ------- -------
Income from continuing operations... 705 (59) 646
Discontinued operations:
Results of operations, net of tax.. 59 (A) 59
Extraordinary losses................ 7 7
------- ------- -------
Net income.......................... $ 698 $ -- $ 698
======= ======= =======
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statement of Operations
C-17
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 1998
Dollars in millions
Marathon
Oil Corporation
Pro Forma
Discontinued Before
USX Operations Separation
Historical Adjustments Adjustments
---------- ------------ ---------------
Revenues and other income........... $28,077 $(6,477)(A) $21,623
23 (B)
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues (excludes items
shown below)..................... 20,211 (5,604)(A) 14,630
23 (B)
Selling, general and
administrative expenses.......... 304 201 (A) 514
9 (C)
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization..................... 1,224 (283)(A) 941
Taxes other than income taxes..... 4,241 (212)(A) 4,029
Exploration expenses.............. 313 313
Inventory market valuation
charges.......................... 267 267
------- ------- -------
Total costs and expenses........ 26,560 (5,866) 20,694
------- ------- -------
Income from operations.............. 1,517 (588) 929
Net interest and other financial
costs.............................. 279 (42)(A) 237
Minority interest in Marathon
Ashland Petroleum LLC.............. 249 249
------- ------- -------
Income before income taxes.......... 989 (546) 443
Provision for income taxes.......... 315 (173)(A) 139
(3)(E)
------- ------- -------
Income from continuing operations... 674 (370) 304
Discontinued operations:
Results of operations, net of
tax.............................. 370 (A) 370
------- ------- -------
Net income.......................... $ 674 $ -- $ 674
======= ======= =======
See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Statement of Operations
C-18
MARATHON OIL CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(A) Reflects the reclassification of all revenues and expenses of the
businesses of United States Steel to discontinued operations. The
measurement date for discontinued operations purposes will be on or about
the Separation Effective Time.
(B) Reflects the establishment of revenues and the related cost of revenues for
intercompany sales previously eliminated in consolidation.
(C) Reflects the reversal of general corporate overhead expenses allocated to
United States Steel that are not permitted to be reflected in discontinued
operations.
(D) Reflects the reversal of a portion of the interest expense allocated to
United States Steel that is not permitted to be reflected in discontinued
operations. The only period in which allocated interest exceeded the
permitted amount was the six months ended June 30, 2001.
(E) Reflects the income tax effects of adjustments (C) and (D).
(F) Reflects an increase in net interest and other financial costs as a result
of an increase in the amount of indebtedness of Marathon Oil Corporation
following the Separation, as compared to the amount of USX debt attributed
to Marathon. The increase primarily reflects the $900 million Value
Transfer and the repayment of the 6.50% Preferred Stock. Pro forma interest
costs have been calculated based on pro forma average levels of debt for
the six months ended June 30, 2001, and for the year ended December 31,
2000. Pro forma debt reflects the redemption of the Trust Preferred
Securities and 6.50% Preferred Stock, repayment of the Receivables
Facility, and payments from United States Steel Corporation for debt
attributed to United States Steel prior to the Separation that will remain
with Marathon Oil Corporation. In 2001, pro forma debt also includes the
effects of additional drawings on existing lines of credit to fund
Marathon's portion of the Separation Costs and to fund a portion of the
repayment of the Receivables Facility. For the majority of the year 2000,
the amount of debt that would have remained with Marathon Oil Corporation
was less than the net debt levels of USX attributed to Marathon, adjusted
for the $900 million Value Transfer. As a result, pro forma debt for 2000
reflects additional drawings on existing lines of credit to fund the
redemption of the Trust Preferred Securities and 6.5% Preferred Stock, to
repay the Receivables Facility, and to pay Marathon's share of the
Separation Costs.
The assumed interest rate for new financings was 6% in 2001 and 7% in 2000,
which was based on the average borrowing rates on available lines of
credit. A 1/8 percentage point change in the assumed financing rate would
have changed annualized interest costs in 2000 by approximately $1 million.
(G) Reflects the income tax effects of adjustments (F).
(H) Reflects the elimination of discontinued operations as a result of the
Separation. Also includes amounts related to corporate administrative costs
and interest costs allocated to United States Steel but not classified as
discontinued operations.
(I) Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding were 308,928,000
(basic) and 309,338,000 (diluted) for both Marathon Group and, on a pro
forma basis, Marathon Oil Corporation for the six month period ended June
30, 2001. Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding were
311,531,000 (basic) and 311,761,000 (diluted) for both Marathon Group and,
on a pro forma basis, Marathon Oil Corporation for year ended December 31,
2000. Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding (basic and
diluted) for the U. S. Steel Group were 88,906,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2001, and 88,613,000 for the year ended December 31, 2000.
Preferred stock dividends of $4 million and $8 million reduced net income
applicable to U. S. Steel Group Shares for the six months ended June 30,
2001, and for the year ended December 31, 2000, respectively.
C-19
ANNEX D
Index For Annex D
Historical Financial Information for United States Steel
Page
----
Report of Independent Accountants......................................... D-2
Audited Combined Financial Statements:
Combined Statement of Operations--Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999
and 1998............................................................... D-3
Combined Balance Sheet--at December 31, 2000 and 1999................... D-4
Combined Statement of Cash Flows--Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999
and 1998............................................................... D-5
Notes to Combined Financial Statements.................................. D-6
Unaudited Combined Financial Information:
Selected Quarterly Financial Data....................................... D-32
Supplementary Information on Mineral Reserves........................... D-32
Principal Unconsolidated Investees...................................... D-35
Unaudited Interim Combined Financial Information:
Combined Statement of Operations--Second Quarter and Six Months Ended
June 30, 2001 and 2000................................................. D-36
Combined Balance Sheet--at June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000.......... D-37
Combined Statement of Cash Flows--Six Months Ended June 30, 2001 and
2000................................................................... D-38
Selected Notes to Combined Financial Statements......................... D-39
D-1
Report of Independent Accountants
To the Stockholders of USX Corporation
In our opinion, the accompanying combined balance sheets and the related
combined statements of operations and of cash flows present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of United States Steel at December
31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
These financial statements are the responsibility of USX Corporation's
management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in
accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
February 7, 2001
D-2
UNITED STATES STEEL
COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(Dollars in
millions)
Revenues and other income:
Revenues............................................. $6,090 $5,536 $6,378
Income (loss) from investees......................... (8) (89) 46
Net gains on disposal of assets...................... 46 21 54
Other income (loss).................................. 4 2 (1)
------ ------ ------
Total revenues and other income.................... 6,132 5,470 6,477
------ ------ ------
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues (excludes items shown below)........ 5,656 5,084 5,604
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(credits) (Note 12)................................. (223) (283) (201)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization............. 360 304 283
Taxes other than income taxes........................ 235 215 212
------ ------ ------
Total costs and expenses........................... 6,028 5,320 5,898
------ ------ ------
Income from operations................................. 104 150 579
Net interest and other financial costs (Note 7)........ 105 74 42
------ ------ ------
Income (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary
losses................................................ (1) 76 537
Provision for income taxes (Note 15)................... 20 25 173
------ ------ ------
Income (loss) before extraordinary losses.............. (21) 51 364
Extraordinary losses (Note 6).......................... -- 7 --
------ ------ ------
Net income (loss)...................................... (21) 44 364
Dividends on preferred stock........................... 8 9 9
------ ------ ------
Net income (loss) available to USX's net investment.... $ (29) $ 35 $ 355
====== ====== ======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial
statements.
D-3
UNITED STATES STEEL
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
December 31
----------------------
2000 1999
---------- ----------
(Dollars in millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents............................ $ 219 $ 22
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$57 and $10......................................... 625 486
Receivables subject to a security interest (Note
11)................................................. 350 350
Receivables from related parties (Note 13)........... 366 99
Inventories (Note 14)................................ 946 743
Deferred income tax benefits (Note 15)............... 201 281
Other current assets................................. 10 --
---------- ----------
Total current assets............................... 2,717 1,981
Investments and long-term receivables, less reserves of
$38 and $3 (Note 16).................................. 439 475
Long-term receivables from related parties (Note 13)... 97 97
Property, plant and equipment--net (Note 21)........... 2,739 2,516
Prepaid pensions (Note 12)............................. 2,672 2,404
Other noncurrent assets................................ 47 52
---------- ----------
Total assets....................................... $ 8,711 $ 7,525
========== ==========
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Notes payable........................................ $ 70 $ --
Accounts payable..................................... 755 751
Accounts payable to related parties (Note 13)........ 5 6
Payroll and benefits payable......................... 202 322
Accrued taxes........................................ 173 177
Accrued interest..................................... 47 15
Long-term debt due within one year (Note 11)......... 139 13
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities.......................... 1,391 1,284
Long-term debt (Note 11)............................... 2,236 902
Deferred income taxes (Note 15)........................ 666 348
Employee benefits (Note 12)............................ 1,767 2,245
Deferred credits and other liabilities................. 483 441
Preferred stock of subsidiary (Note 10)................ 66 66
Mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred securities
of a subsidiary trust holding solely junior
subordinated convertible debentures of USX (Note 18).. 183 183
EQUITY (Note 19)
Preferred stock........................................ 2 3
USX's net investment................................... 1,950 2,073
Deferred compensation.................................. (3) --
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).......... (30) (20)
---------- ----------
Total equity....................................... 1,919 2,056
---------- ----------
Total liabilities and equity....................... $ 8,711 $ 7,525
========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial
statements.
D-4
UNITED STATES STEEL
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
2000 1999 1998
------ ----- -----
(Dollars in
millions)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)....................................... $ (21) $ 44 $ 364
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided from (used
in) operating activities:
Extraordinary losses.................................. -- 7 --
Depreciation, depletion and amortization.............. 360 304 283
Pensions and other postretirement benefits............ (847) (256) (215)
Deferred income taxes................................. 389 107 158
Net gains on disposal of assets....................... (46) (21) (54)
Changes in:
Current receivables--sold........................... -- (320) (30)
--operating turnover.................................... (263) (242) 232
Inventories......................................... (63) (14) 7
Current accounts payable and accrued expenses....... (262) 239 (285)
All other--net........................................ 126 72 (80)
------ ----- -----
Net cash provided from (used in) operating
activities......................................... (627) (80) 380
------ ----- -----
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures.................................. (244) (287) (310)
Acquisition of U. S. Steel Kosice s.r.o., net of cash
acquired of $59...................................... (10) -- --
Disposal of assets.................................... 21 10 21
Restricted cash--withdrawals.......................... 2 15 35
--deposits............................................ (2) (17) (35)
Investees--investments................................ (35) (15) (73)
--loans and advances.................................. (10) -- (1)
All other--net........................................ 8 -- 14
------ ----- -----
Net cash used in investing activities............... (270) (294) (349)
------ ----- -----
Financing activities (Note 10):
Increase in attributed portion of USX consolidated
debt................................................. 1,208 147 13
Specifically attributed debt:
Borrowings.......................................... -- 350 --
Repayments.......................................... (6) (11) (4)
Steel Stock issued.................................... -- -- 55
Preferred stock repurchased........................... (12) (2) (8)
Dividends paid........................................ (97) (97) (96)
------ ----- -----
Net cash provided from (used in) financing
activities......................................... 1,093 387 (40)
------ ----- -----
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash................. 1 -- --
------ ----- -----
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents.... 197 13 (9)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year.......... 22 9 18
------ ----- -----
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year................ $ 219 $ 22 $ 9
====== ===== =====
See Note 9, for supplemental cash flow information.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial
statements.
D-5
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying combined financial statements represent a carve-out
financial statement presentation of the businesses comprising United States
Steel, and are not intended to be a complete presentation of the financial
position, the results of operations and cash flows of United States Steel on a
stand-alone basis. These combined financial statements are presented as if
United States Steel existed as an entity separate from the remaining businesses
of USX Corporation (USX) during the periods presented. The allocations and
estimates included in these combined financial statements are determined using
the methodologies described in Note 4.
United States Steel through its Domestic Steel segment, is engaged in the
production, sale and transportation of steel mill products, coke, taconite
pellets and coal; the management of mineral resources; real estate development;
engineering and consulting services and, through its U.S. Steel Kosice segment,
primarily located in the Slovak Republic, in the production and sale of steel
mill products and coke for the central European market. Most businesses within
the Domestic Steel segment are divisions of USX. Certain business activities
are conducted through joint ventures and partially owned companies, such as
USS-POSCO Industries, PRO-TEC Coating Company, Clairton 1314B Partnership,
Republic Technologies International LLC and Rannila Kosice s.r.o.
The accompanying combined financial statements include the historical
operations of certain divisions of USX and certain subsidiaries of USX. In this
context, no direct ownership existed among all the various units comprising
United States Steel; accordingly, USX's net investment in United States Steel
(USX's net investment) is shown in lieu of Common Stockholder's Equity in the
combined financial statements. The combined financial statements included
herein have been prepared from USX's historical accounting records.
2. Summary of Principal Accounting Policies
Principles applied in consolidation--Investments in entities over which
United States Steel has significant influence are accounted for using the
equity method of accounting and are carried at United States Steel's share of
net assets plus loans and advances.
Investments in companies whose stock is publicly traded are carried
generally at market value. The difference between the cost of these investments
and market value is recorded in other comprehensive income (net of tax).
Investments in companies whose stock has no readily determinable fair value are
carried at cost.
Income from investees includes United States Steel's proportionate share of
income from equity method investments. Also, gains or losses from a change in
ownership of an unconsolidated investee are recognized in the period of change.
Use of estimates--Generally accepted accounting principles require
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at year-end and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year.
Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the
carrying value of long-lived assets; valuation allowances for receivables,
inventories and deferred income tax assets; environmental liabilities;
liabilities for potential tax deficiencies and potential litigation claims and
settlements; and assets and obligations related to employee benefits.
Additionally, certain estimated liabilities are recorded when management
commits to a plan to close an operating facility or to exit a business
activity. Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used.
Revenue recognition--Revenues are recognized generally when products are
shipped or services are provided to customers, the sales price is fixed and
determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Costs associated with
revenues, including shipping and other transportation costs, are recorded in
cost of revenues.
D-6
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Cash and cash equivalents--Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand
and on deposit and investments in highly liquid debt instruments with
maturities generally of three months or less.
Inventories--Inventories are carried at lower of cost or market. Cost of
inventories is determined primarily under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method.
Derivative instruments--United States Steel uses commodity-based derivative
instruments to manage its exposure to price risk. Management is authorized to
use futures, forwards, swaps and options related to the purchase of natural
gas, refined products and nonferrous metals used in steel operations. Recorded
deferred gains or losses are reflected within other current and noncurrent
assets or accounts payable and deferred credits and other liabilities, as
appropriate.
Long-lived assets--Depreciation is generally computed using a modified
straight-line method based upon estimated lives of assets and production
levels. The modification factors for domestic steel producing assets range from
a minimum of 85% at a production level below 81% of capability, to a maximum of
105% for a 100% production level. No modification is made at the 95% production
level, considered the normal long-range level.
Depletion of mineral properties is based on rates which are expected to
amortize cost over the estimated tonnage of minerals to be removed.
United States Steel evaluates impairment of its long-lived assets on an
individual asset basis or by logical groupings of assets. Assets deemed to be
impaired are written down to their fair value, including any related goodwill,
using discounted future cash flows and, if available, comparable market values.
When long-lived assets depreciated on an individual basis are sold or
otherwise disposed of, any gains or losses are reflected in income. Gains on
disposal of long-lived assets are recognized when earned, which is generally at
the time of closing. If a loss on disposal is expected, such losses are
recognized when long-lived assets are reclassified as assets held for sale.
Proceeds from disposal of long-lived assets depreciated on a group basis are
credited to accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization with no
immediate effect on income.
Major maintenance activities--United States Steel incurs planned major
maintenance costs primarily for blast furnace relines. Such costs are
separately capitalized in property, plant and equipment and are amortized over
their estimated useful life, which is generally the period until the next
scheduled reline.
Environmental remediation--United States Steel provides for remediation
costs and penalties when the responsibility to remediate is probable and the
amount of associated costs is reasonably determinable. Generally, the timing of
remediation accruals coincides with completion of a feasibility study or the
commitment to a formal plan of action. Remediation liabilities are accrued
based on estimates of known environmental exposure and are discounted in
certain instances.
Postemployment benefits--United States Steel recognizes an obligation to
provide postemployment benefits, primarily for disability-related claims
covering indemnity and medical payments to certain employees. The obligation
for these claims and the related periodic costs are measured using actuarial
techniques and assumptions, including an appropriate discount rate, analogous
to the required methodology for measuring pension and other postretirement
benefit obligations. Actuarial gains and losses are deferred and amortized over
future periods.
Insurance--United States Steel is insured for catastrophic casualty and
certain property and business interruption exposures, as well as those risks
required to be insured by law or contract. Costs resulting from noninsured
losses are charged against income upon occurrence.
D-7
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
3. New Accounting Standards
In the fourth quarter of 2000, United States Steel adopted the following
accounting pronouncements primarily related to the classification of items in
the financial statements. The adoption of these new pronouncements had no net
effect on the financial position or results of operations of United States
Steel, although they required reclassifications of certain amounts in the
financial statements, including all prior periods presented.
. In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101) "Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements," which summarizes the SEC staff's interpretations
of generally accepted accounting principles related to revenue
recognition and classification.
. In 2000, the Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (EITF) issued EITF Consensus No. 99-19 "Reporting
Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent," which addresses
whether certain items should be reported as a reduction of revenue or as
a component of both revenues and cost of revenues, and EITF Consensus
No. 00-10 "Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs," which
addresses the classification of costs incurred for shipping goods to
customers.
. In September 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, "Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities" (SFAS 140). SFAS 140 revises the standards for accounting
for securitizations and other transfers of financial assets and
collateral and requires certain disclosures. United States Steel adopted
certain recognition and reclassification provisions of SFAS 140, which
were effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2000. The
remaining provisions of SFAS 140 are effective after March 31, 2001.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities" (SFAS No. 133), which later was amended by SFAS Nos.
137 and 138. This Standard requires recognition of all derivatives as either
assets or liabilities at fair value. Changes in fair value will be reflected in
either current period net income or other comprehensive income, depending on
the designation of the derivative instrument. United States Steel may elect not
to designate a derivative instrument as a hedge even if the strategy would be
expected to qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The adoption of SFAS No.
133 will change the timing of recognition for derivative gains and losses as
compared to previous accounting standards.
United States Steel will adopt the Standard effective January 1, 2001. The
transition adjustment resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 133 will be
reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The
transition adjustment for United States Steel is expected to be immaterial. The
amounts reported as other comprehensive income will be reflected in net income
when the anticipated physical transactions are consummated. It is not possible
to estimate the effect that this Standard will have on future results of
operations.
4. Corporate Activities
Financial activities--As a matter of policy, USX manages most financial
activities on a centralized, consolidated basis. Such financial activities
include the investment of surplus cash; the issuance, repayment and repurchase
of short-term and long-term debt; the issuance, repurchase and redemption of
preferred stock; and the issuance and repurchase of common stock. Transactions
related primarily to invested cash, short-term and
D-8
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
long-term debt (including convertible debt), related net interest and other
financial costs, and preferred stock and related dividends are attributed to
United States Steel based upon its cash flows for the periods presented and its
initial capital structure. Most financing transactions are not specifically
attributed to United States Steel but represent attributed amounts of USX's
financial activities. See Note 10, for United States Steel's attributed portion
of USX's financial activities. However, transactions such as leases, certain
collateralized financings, certain indexed debt instruments, financial
activities of consolidated entities which are less than wholly owned by USX and
transactions related to securities convertible solely into USX-U. S. Steel
Group Common Stock are or will be specifically attributed to and reflected in
their entirety in the financial statements of United States Steel.
Corporate general and administrative costs--Corporate general and
administrative costs are allocated to United States Steel by USX based upon
utilization or other methods management believes to be reasonable and which
consider certain measures of business activities, such as employment,
investments and revenues. The costs allocated to United States Steel were $25
million in 2000, $17 million in 1999 and $24 million in 1998, and primarily
consist of employment costs including pension effects, professional services,
facilities and other related costs associated with corporate activities.
Income taxes--All members of the USX affiliated group are included in the
consolidated United States federal income tax return filed by USX. Accordingly,
the provision for federal income taxes and the related payments or refunds of
tax are determined on a consolidated basis. The consolidated provision and the
related tax payments or refunds have been reflected in the United States Steel
financial statements in accordance with USX's tax allocation policy. In
general, such policy provides that the consolidated tax provision and related
tax payments or refunds are allocated to United States Steel for financial
statement purposes, based upon its financial income, taxable income, credits,
preferences, and other directly related amounts.
For tax provision and settlement purposes, tax benefits resulting from
attributes (principally net operating losses and various tax credits), which
cannot be utilized by United States Steel on a separate return basis but which
can be utilized on a consolidated basis in that year or in a carryback year,
are allocated to United States Steel if it generated the attributes. To the
extent that United States Steel is allocated a consolidated tax attribute
which, as a result of expiration or otherwise, is not ultimately utilized on
the consolidated tax return, the prior years' allocation of such attribute is
adjusted such that the effect of the expiration is borne by United States Steel
if it generated the attribute. Also, if a tax attribute cannot be utilized on a
consolidated basis in the year generated or in a carryback year, the prior
years' allocation of such consolidated tax effects is adjusted in a subsequent
year to the extent necessary to allocate the tax benefits to United States
Steel if it would have realized the tax benefits on a separate return basis. As
a result, the allocated amounts of taxes payable or refundable are not
necessarily comparable to those that would have resulted if United States Steel
had filed its own separate tax returns.
5. Business Combination
On November 24, 2000, United States Steel acquired U. S. Steel Kosice s.r.o.
(USSK), which is located in the Slovak Republic. USSK was formed in June 2000
to hold the steel operations and related assets of VSZ a.s. (VSZ), a
diversified Slovak corporation. The cash purchase price was $69 million.
Additional payments to VSZ of not less than $25 million and up to $75 million
are contingent upon the future performance of USSK. Additionally, $325 million
of debt was included with the acquisition. The acquisition was accounted for
under the purchase method of accounting. The 2000 results of operations include
the operations of USSK from the date of acquisition.
D-9
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Prior to this transaction, United States Steel and VSZ were equal partners
in VSZ U. S. Steel s.r.o. (VSZUSS), a tin mill products manufacturer. The
assets of USSK included VSZ's interest in VSZUSS. The acquisition of the
remaining interest in VSZUSS was accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting. Previously, United States Steel had accounted for its investment in
VSZUSS under the equity method of accounting.
The following unaudited pro forma data for United States Steel includes the
results of operations of USSK for 2000 and 1999, giving effect to the
acquisition as if it had been consummated at the beginning of the years
presented. The pro forma data is based on historical information and does not
necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred nor is it
necessarily indicative of future results of operations. In addition, VSZ did
not historically provide carve-out financial information for its steel
operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. Therefore, United States Steel made certain estimates and
assumptions regarding revenue and costs in the preparation of the following
unaudited pro forma data.
Year Ended
December 31
-------------
2000 1999
------ ------
(In millions)
Revenues and other income..................................... $7,094 $6,472
Income before extraordinary loss.............................. 57 36
Net income.................................................... 57 29
6. Extraordinary Losses
In 1999, United States Steel irrevocably deposited with a trustee the entire
5.5 million common shares it owned in RTI International Metals, Inc. (RTI). The
deposit of the shares resulted in the satisfaction of United States Steel's
obligation under its 6 3/4% Exchangeable Notes (indexed debt) due February 1,
2000. Under the terms of the indenture, the trustee exchanged one RTI share for
each note at maturity. All shares were required for satisfaction of the indexed
debt; therefore, none reverted back to United States Steel.
As a result of the above transaction, United States Steel recorded in 1999
an extraordinary loss of $5 million, net of a $3 million income tax benefit,
representing prepaid interest expense and the write-off of unamortized debt
issue costs, and a pretax charge of $22 million, representing the difference
between the carrying value of the investment in RTI and the carrying value of
the indexed debt, which is included in net gains on disposal of assets.
In 1999, Republic Technologies International, LLC, an equity investee of
United States Steel, recorded an extraordinary loss related to the early
extinguishment of debt. As a result, United States Steel recorded an
extraordinary loss of $2 million, net of a $1 million income tax benefit,
representing its share of the extraordinary loss.
D-10
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
7. Other Items
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Net interest and other financial costs
Interest and other financial income:
Interest income.............................................. $ 3 $ 1 $ 5
Other........................................................ 7 -- --
---- ---- ----
Total...................................................... 10 1 5
---- ---- ----
Interest and other financial costs:
Interest incurred............................................ 88 45 40
Less interest capitalized.................................... 3 6 6
---- ---- ----
Net interest............................................... 85 39 34
Interest on tax issues....................................... 11 15 16
Financial costs on trust preferred securities................ 13 13 13
Financial costs on preferred stock of subsidiary............. 5 5 5
Amortization of discounts.................................... 1 1 2
Expenses on sales of accounts receivable..................... -- 15 21
Adjustment to settlement value of indexed debt............... -- (13) (44)
---- ---- ----
Total...................................................... 115 75 47
---- ---- ----
Net interest and other financial costs......................... $105 $ 74 $ 42
==== ==== ====
Foreign currency transactions
For 2000, the aggregate foreign currency transaction gain included in
determining net income was $7 million. There were no foreign currency
transaction gains or losses in 1999 and 1998.
8. Segment Information
United States Steel consists of two reportable operating segments: 1)
Domestic Steel and 2) U. S. Steel Kosice (USSK). Domestic Steel includes the
United States operations of United States Steel, while USSK includes the United
States Steel operations in the Slovak Republic. Domestic Steel is engaged in
the domestic production and sale of steel mill products, coke and taconite
pellets; the management of mineral resources; coal mining; engineering and
consulting services; and real estate development and management. USSK is
engaged in the production and sale of steel mill products and coke and
primarily serves European markets.
Segment income represents income from operations allocable to both operating
segments and does not include net interest and other financial costs and
provisions for income taxes. Additionally, the following items are not
allocated to operating segments:
. Net pension credits associated with pension plan assets and liabilities
. Certain costs related to former United States Steel business activities
. Allocated USX corporate general and administrative costs. These costs
primarily consist of employment costs including pension effects,
professional services, facilities and other related costs associated
with corporate activities.
. Certain other items not allocated to operating segments for business
performance reporting purposes (see reconcilement schedule on page D-13)
Information on assets by segment is not provided as it is not reviewed by
the chief operating decision maker.
D-11
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The following represents the operations of United States Steel:
Domestic
Steel USSK Total
-------- ---- ------
(In millions)
2000
Revenues and other income:
Customer.............................................. $5,981 $ 92 $6,073
Other subsidiaries of USX(a).......................... 17 -- 17
Equity in losses of unconsolidated investees.......... (8) -- (8)
Other................................................. 50 -- 50
------ ---- ------
Total revenues and other income..................... $6,040 $ 92 $6,132
====== ==== ======
Segment income.......................................... $ 23 $ 2 $ 25
Significant noncash items included in segment income -
depreciation, depletion and amortization(b)............ 285 4 289
Capital expenditures.................................... 239 5 244
1999
Revenues and other income:
Customer.............................................. $5,519 $-- $5,519
Other subsidiaries of USX(a).......................... 17 -- 17
Equity in losses of unconsolidated investees.......... (43) -- (43)
Other................................................. 46 -- 46
------ ---- ------
Total revenues and other income..................... $5,539 $-- $5,539
====== ==== ======
Segment income.......................................... $ 91 $-- $ 91
Significant noncash items included in segment income -
depreciation, depletion and amortization............... 304 -- 304
Capital expenditures(c)................................. 286 -- 286
1998
Revenues and other income:
Customer.............................................. $6,374 $-- $6,374
Other subsidiaries of USX(a).......................... 2 -- 2
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investees........ 46 -- 46
Other................................................. 55 -- 55
------ ---- ------
Total revenues and other income..................... $6,477 $-- $6,477
====== ==== ======
Segment income.......................................... $ 517 $-- $ 517
Significant noncash items included in segment income -
depreciation, depletion and amortization............... 283 -- 283
Capital expenditures(c)................................. 305 -- 305
--------
(a) Revenues and transfers with other subsidiaries of USX were conducted under
terms comparable to those with unrelated parties.
(b) Difference between segment total and United States Steel total represents
amounts for impairment of coal assets.
(c) Differences between segment total and United States Steel total represent
amounts related to corporate administrative activities.
D-12
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The following schedules reconcile segment amounts to amounts reported in
United States Steel's combined financial statements:
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(In millions)
Revenues and Other Income:
Revenues and other income of reportable segments..... $6,132 $5,539 $6,477
Items not allocated to segments:
Impairment and other costs related to an investment
in an equity investee............................. -- (47) --
Loss on investment in RTI stock used to satisfy
indexed debt obligations.......................... -- (22) --
------ ------ ------
Total revenues and other income.................. $6,132 $5,470 $6,477
====== ====== ======
Income:
Income for reportable segments....................... $ 25 $ 91 $ 517
Items not allocated to segments:
Impairment of coal assets.......................... (71) -- --
Impairment and other costs related to an investment
in an equity investee............................. -- (47) --
Loss on investment in RTI stock used to satisfy
indexed debt obligations.......................... -- (22) --
Administrative expenses............................ (25) (17) (24)
Net pension credits................................ 266 228 186
Costs related to former businesses activities...... (91) (83) (100)
------ ------ ------
Total income from operations..................... $ 104 $ 150 $ 579
====== ====== ======
Revenues by Product:
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(In millions)
Sheet and semi-finished steel products................. $3,288 $3,433 $3,598
Tubular, plate and tin mill products................... 1,731 1,140 1,546
Raw materials (coal, coke and iron ore)................ 626 549 744
Other(a)............................................... 445 414 490
--------
(a) Includes revenue from the sale of steel production by-products,
engineering and consulting services, real estate development and resource
management.
D-13
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Geographic Area:
The information below summarizes the operations in different geographic
areas.
Revenues and Other Income
----------------------------
Within Between
Geographic Geographic
Year Areas Areas Total Assets(a)
---- ---------- ---------- ------ ---------
(In millions)
United States....................... 2000 $6,027 $-- $6,027 $2,745
1999 5,452 -- 5,452 2,889
1998 6,460 -- 6,460 3,043
Slovak Republic..................... 2000 95 -- 95 376
1999 3 -- 3 60
1998 6 -- 6 66
Other Foreign Countries............. 2000 10 -- 10 10
1999 15 -- 15 3
1998 11 -- 11 3
Total............................. 2000 $6,132 $-- $6,132 $3,131
1999 5,470 -- 5,470 2,952
1998 6,477 -- 6,477 3,112
--------
(a) Includes property, plant and equipment and investments.
D-14
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
9. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- --------
(In millions)
Cash provided from (used in) operating activities
included:
Interest and other financial costs paid (net of
amount capitalized)............................. $ (71) $ (77) $ (76)
Income taxes refunded (paid), including
settlements with USX under the tax allocation
policy.......................................... 81 3 (29)
Consolidated USX debt:
Commercial paper:
Issued......................................... $ 3,362 $ 6,282 $ --
Repayments..................................... (3,450) (6,117) --
Credit agreements:
Borrowings..................................... 437 5,529 17,486
Repayments..................................... (437) (5,980) (16,817)
Other credit arrangements--net................... 150 (95) 55
Other debt:
Borrowings..................................... -- 319 671
Repayments..................................... (54) (87) (1,053)
------- ------- --------
Total...................................... $ 8 $ (149) $ 342
======= ======= ========
Activity attributed to United States Steel....... $ 1,208 $ 147 $ 13
Activity attributed to other subsidiaries of
USX............................................. (1,200) (296) 329
------- ------- --------
Total...................................... $ 8 $ (149) $ 342
======= ======= ========
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Stock issued for dividend reinvestment and
employee stock plans............................ $ 5 $ 2 $ 2
Disposal of assets:
Deposit of RTI common shares in satisfaction of
indexed debt.................................. -- 56 --
Interest in USS/Kobe contributed to Republic... -- 40 --
Other disposals of assets--notes or common
stock received................................ 14 1 2
Business combinations:
Acquisition of USSK:
Liabilities assumed.......................... 568 -- --
Contingent consideration payable at present
value....................................... 21 -- --
Investee liabilities consolidated in step
acquisition................................. 3 -- --
Other acquisitions:
Liabilities assumed.......................... -- 26 --
Investee liabilities consolidated in step
acquisition................................. -- 26 --
D-15
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
10. Financial Activities Attributed to United States Steel
The following is the portion of USX financial activities attributed to
United States Steel. These amounts exclude amounts specifically attributed to
United States Steel.
United
States Consolidated
Steel USX
----------- -------------
December 31
-------------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
------ ---- ------ ------
(In millions)
Cash and cash equivalents............................ $ 171 $ 1 $ 364 $ 9
Other noncurrent assets.............................. 3 1 7 8
------ ---- ------ ------
Total assets....................................... $ 174 $ 2 $ 371 $ 17
====== ==== ====== ======
Notes payable........................................ $ 70 $-- $ 150 $ --
Accrued interest..................................... 45 13 95 95
Long-term debt due within one year (Note 11)......... 130 7 277 54
Long-term debt (Note 11)............................. 1,804 466 3,734 3,771
Preferred stock of subsidiary........................ 66 66 250 250
------ ---- ------ ------
Total liabilities.................................. $2,115 $552 $4,506 $4,170
====== ==== ====== ======
United States Consolidated
Steel(a) USX
-------------- --------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Net interest and other financial costs (Note
7)............................................. $59 $39 $29 $309 $334 $324
--------
(a) United States Steel's net interest and other financial costs reflect
weighted average effects of all financial activities attributed by USX.
D-16
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
11. Long-Term Debt
United States Steel's portion of USX's consolidated long-term debt is as
follows:
United
States Consolidated
Steel USX
----------- -------------
December 31
-------------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
------ ---- ------ ------
(In millions)
Specifically attributed debt(a):
Receivables facility............................... $ 350 $350 $ 350 $ 350
Sale-leaseback financing and capital leases........ 88 92 95 107
Other.............................................. 3 -- 4 1
------ ---- ------ ------
Total............................................ 441 442 449 458
Less amount due within one year.................... 9 6 10 7
------ ---- ------ ------
Total specifically attributed long-term debt..... $ 432 $436 $ 439 $ 451
====== ==== ====== ======
USX debt attributed to United States Steel(b)........ $1,946 $477 $4,036 $3,852
Less unamortized discount.......................... 12 4 25 27
Less amount due within one year.................... 130 7 277 54
------ ---- ------ ------
Total long-term debt not specifically
attributed...................................... $1,804 $466 $3,734 $3,771
====== ==== ====== ======
Total long-term debt due within one year............. $ 139 $ 13 $ 287 $ 61
Total long-term debt due after one year.............. 2,236 902 4,173 4,222
--------
(a) As described in Note 4, certain financial activities are specifically
attributed to and reflected in their entirety in the financial statements
of United States Steel.
(b) Long-term debt activities of USX Corporation, not specifically attributed,
are attributed to United States Steel based on its cash flows.
12. Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
United States Steel has noncontributory defined benefit pension plans
covering substantially all U.S. employees. Benefits under these plans are based
upon years of service and final average pensionable earnings, or a minimum
benefit based upon years of service, whichever is greater. In addition, pension
benefits are also provided to most U.S. salaried employees based upon a percent
of total career pensionable earnings. United States Steel also participates in
multiemployer plans, most of which are defined benefit plans associated with
coal operations.
United States Steel also has defined benefit retiree health care and life
insurance plans (other benefits) covering most U.S. employees upon their
retirement. Health care benefits are provided through comprehensive hospital,
surgical and major medical benefit provisions or through health maintenance
organizations, both subject to various cost sharing features. Life insurance
benefits are provided to nonunion retiree beneficiaries primarily based on
employees' annual base salary at retirement. For U.S. union retirees, benefits
are provided for the most part based on fixed amounts negotiated in labor
contracts with the appropriate unions.
D-17
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Pension
Benefits Other Benefits
----------------- ------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
------ ------- ------- -------
(In millions)
Change in benefit obligations
Benefit obligations at January 1..... $6,716 $ 7,549 $ 1,896 $ 2,113
Service cost......................... 76 87 12 15
Interest cost........................ 505 473 147 133
Plan amendments...................... -- 381(a) -- 14
Actuarial (gains) losses............. 430 (822) 260 (225)
Plan merger and acquisition.......... -- 42 -- 7
Settlements, curtailments and
termination benefits................ -- (207) -- --
Benefits paid........................ (806) (787) (166) (161)
------ ------- ------- -------
Benefit obligations at December 31... $6,921 $ 6,716 $ 2,149 $ 1,896
====== ======= ======= =======
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at January
1................................... $9,995 $10,243 $ 281 $ 265
Actual return on plan assets......... 139 729 26 20
Acquisition.......................... (1) 26 -- 1
Employer contributions............... -- -- 576(b) 34
Trustee distributions(c)............. (16) (14) -- --
Settlements paid..................... -- (207) -- --
Benefits paid from plan assets....... (805) (782) (41) (39)
------ ------- ------- -------
Fair value of plan assets at December
31.................................. $9,312 $ 9,995 $ 842 $ 281
====== ======= ======= =======
Funded status of plans at December
31.................................. $2,391(d) $ 3,279(d) $(1,307) $(1,615)
Unrecognized net gain from
transition.......................... (2) (69) -- --
Unrecognized prior service cost...... 719 817 12 19
Unrecognized actuarial gains......... (462) (1,639) (241) (526)
Additional minimum liability......... (19) (16) -- --
------ ------- ------- -------
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost....... $2,627 $ 2,372 $(1,536) $(2,122)
====== ======= ======= =======
--------
(a) Results primarily from a five-year labor contract with the United
Steelworkers of America ratified in August 1999.
(b) Includes contributions of $530 million to a Voluntary Employee Benefit
Association trust, comprised of $30 million in contractual requirements
and an elective contribution of $500 million. Also includes a $30 million
elective contribution to the non-union retiree life insurance trust.
(c) Represents transfers of excess pension assets to fund retiree health care
benefits accounts under Section 420 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(d) Includes a plan that has accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan
assets:
2000 1999
---- ----
Aggregate accumulated benefit
obligations.............................. $(40) $(29)
Aggregate projected benefit obligations... (49) (39)
Aggregate plan assets..................... -- --
D-18
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
---------------------- --------------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Components of net periodic
benefit cost (credit)
Service cost................ $ 76 $ 87 $ 71 $ 12 $ 15 $ 15
Interest cost............... 505 473 487 147 133 141
Expected return on plan
assets..................... (841) (781) (769) (24) (21) (21)
Amortization--net transition
gain....................... (67) (67) (69) -- -- --
--prior service costs....... 98 83 72 4 4 4
--actuarial (gains) losses.. (44) 6 6 (29) (12) (16)
Multiemployer and other
plans...................... -- -- 1 9(a) 7(a) 13(a)
Settlement and termination
(gains) losses............. -- (35)(b) 10(b) -- -- --
----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----
Net periodic benefit cost
(credit)................... $(273) $(234) $(191) $119 $126 $136
===== ===== ===== ==== ==== ====
--------
(a) Represents payments to a multiemployer health care benefit plan created by
the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992 based on assigned
beneficiaries receiving benefits. The present value of this unrecognized
obligation is broadly estimated to be $84 million, including the effects
of future medical inflation, and this amount could increase if additional
beneficiaries are assigned.
(b) Relates primarily to the 1998 voluntary early retirement program.
Pension Other
Benefits Benefits
---------- ----------
2000 1999 2000 1999
---- ---- ---- ----
Weighted average actuarial assumptions at December 31
Discount rate.......................................... 7.5% 8.0% 7.5% 8.0%
Expected annual return on plan assets.................. 8.9% 8.5% 8.5% 8.5%
Increase in compensation rate.......................... 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 4.0%
For measurement purposes, a 7.5% annual rate of increase in the per capita
cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2001. The rate was assumed
to decrease gradually to 5% for 2006 and remain at that level thereafter.
A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would
have the following effects:
1-Percentage- 1-Percentage-
Point Increase Point Decrease
-------------- --------------
(In millions)
Effect on total of service and interest cost
components..................................... $ 16 $ (14)
Effect on other postretirement benefit
obligations.................................... 177 (151)
13. Transactions with Related Parties
Revenues and purchases--United States Steel revenues for sales to other
subsidiaries of USX totaled $17 million in both 2000 and 1999 and $2 million in
1998. United States Steel purchases from other subsidiaries of USX totaled $60
million, $41 million and $21 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. At
December 31, 2000 and 1999, United States Steel receivables from related
parties totaled $366 million and $99 million, respectively, related to
transactions with other subsidiaries of USX. At December 31, 2000 and 1999,
United States Steel accounts payable to related parties totaled $5 million and
$6 million, respectively, related to transactions with other subsidiaries of
USX. These transactions were conducted under terms comparable to those with
unrelated parties.
D-19
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Income taxes receivable from/payable to USX--At December 31, 2000 and 1999,
amounts receivable or payable for income taxes were included in the balance
sheet as follows:
December
31
---------
2000 1999
---- ----
(In
millions)
Current:
Receivables........................................................ $364 $ 97
Accounts payable................................................... 4 1
Noncurrent:
Receivables........................................................ 97 97
These amounts have been determined in accordance with the tax allocation
policy described in Note 4. Amounts classified as current are settled in cash
in the year succeeding that in which such amounts are accrued. Noncurrent
amounts represent estimates of tax effects of certain issues for years that are
still under various stages of audit and administrative review. Such tax effects
are not settled until the audit of those respective tax years is closed. The
amounts ultimately settled for open tax years will be different than recorded
noncurrent amounts based on the final resolution of all of the audit issues for
those years.
14. Inventories
December
31
---------
2000 1999
---- ----
(In
millions)
Raw materials........................................................ $214 $101
Semi-finished products............................................... 429 392
Finished products.................................................... 210 193
Supplies and sundry items............................................ 93 57
---- ----
Total.............................................................. $946 $743
==== ====
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively, the LIFO method accounted for
91% and 93% of total inventory value. Current acquisition costs were estimated
to exceed the above inventory values at December 31 by approximately $380
million and $370 million in 2000 and 1999, respectively. Cost of revenues was
reduced and income from operations was increased by $3 million in 2000 as a
result of liquidations of LIFO inventories.
15. Income Taxes
Income tax provisions and related assets and liabilities attributed to
United States Steel are determined in accordance with the USX tax allocation
policy (Note 4).
Provisions (credits) for income taxes were:
2000 1999 1998
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
(In millions)
Current Deferred Total Current Deferred Total Current Deferred Total
------- -------- ----- ------- -------- ----- ------- -------- -----
Federal................. $(357) $340 $(17) $(84) $ 99 $15 $19 $149 $168
State and local......... (12) 49 37 1 8 9 3 9 12
Foreign................. -- -- -- 1 -- 1 (7) -- (7)
----- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- --- ---- ----
Total................. $(369) $389 $ 20 $(82) $107 $25 $15 $158 $173
===== ==== ==== ==== ==== === === ==== ====
D-20
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
A reconciliation of federal statutory tax rate (35%) to total provisions
follows:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Statutory rate applied to income before income taxes........ $-- $27 $188
Excess percentage depletion................................. (3) (7) (11)
Effects of foreign operations, including foreign tax
credits.................................................... (5) (2) (11)
State and local income taxes after federal income tax
effects.................................................... 24 6 8
Credits other than foreign tax credits...................... (3) (3) (3)
Adjustments of prior years' federal income taxes............ 5 -- --
Other....................................................... 2 4 2
---- --- ----
Total provisions........................................ $ 20 $25 $173
==== === ====
Deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted from the following:
December 31
--------------
2000 1999
------ ------
(In millions)
Deferred tax assets:
Minimum tax credit carryforwards............................. $ 39 $ 131
State tax loss carryforwards (expiring in 2001 through
2020)....................................................... 55 65
Employee benefits............................................ 782 998
Receivables, payables and debt............................... 52 68
Expected federal benefit for deducting state deferred income
taxes....................................................... 16 --
Contingency and other accruals............................... 71 52
Other........................................................ 2 11
Valuation allowances--state.................................. (34) (41)
------ ------
Total deferred tax assets(a)............................... 983 1,284
------ ------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property, plant and equipment................................ 248 274
Prepaid pensions............................................. 1,046 921
Inventory.................................................... 15 16
Investments in subsidiaries and equity investees............. 82 96
Other........................................................ 61 44
------ ------
Total deferred tax liabilities............................. 1,452 1,351
------ ------
Net deferred tax liabilities............................. $ 469 $ 67
====== ======
--------
(a) USX expects to generate sufficient future taxable income to realize the
benefit of United States Steel's deferred tax assets.
The consolidated tax returns of USX for the years 1990 through 1997 are
under various stages of audit and administrative review by the IRS. United
States Steel believes it has made adequate provision for income taxes and
interest which may become payable for years not yet settled.
Pretax income in 2000 included $8 million attributable to foreign sources.
Undistributed earnings of certain consolidated foreign subsidiaries at
December 31, 2000, amounted to $18 million. No provision for deferred U.S.
income taxes has been made for these subsidiaries because United States Steel
intends to permanently reinvest such earnings in those foreign operations. If
such earnings were not permanently reinvested, a deferred tax liability of $6
million would have been required.
D-21
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
16. Investments and Long-Term Receivables
December 31
-----------
2000 1999
----- -----
(In
millions)
Equity method investments.......................................... $ 325 $ 397
Other investments.................................................. 67 39
Receivables due after one year..................................... 5 11
Deposits of restricted cash........................................ 3 2
Other.............................................................. 39 26
----- -----
Total............................................................ $ 439 $ 475
===== =====
Summarized financial information of investees accounted for by the equity
method of accounting follows:
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(In millions)
Income data--year:
Revenues and other income............................. $3,484 $3,027 $3,163
Operating income (loss)............................... 112 (57) 193
Net income (loss)..................................... (166) (193) 97
Balance sheet data--December 31:
Current assets........................................ $ 911 $ 995
Noncurrent assets..................................... 2,196 2,402
Current liabilities................................... 1,171 1,181
Noncurrent liabilities................................ 1,307 1,251
United States Steel acquired a 25% interest in VSZ during 2000. VSZ does
not provide its shareholders with financial statements prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (USGAAP).
Although shares of VSZ are traded on the Bratislava Stock Exchange, those
securities do not have a readily determinable fair value as defined under
USGAAP. Accordingly, United States Steel accounts for its investment in VSZ
under the cost method of accounting.
In 1999, United States Steel and Kobe Steel, Ltd. (Kobe Steel) completed a
transaction that combined the steelmaking and bar producing assets of USS/Kobe
Steel Company (USS/Kobe) with companies controlled by Blackstone Capital
Partners II. The combined entity was named Republic Technologies
International, LLC and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Republic Technologies
International Holdings, LLC (Republic). As a result of this transaction,
United States Steel recorded $47 million in charges related to the impairment
of the carrying value of its investment in USS/Kobe and costs related to the
formation of Republic. These charges were included in income (loss) from
investees in 1999. In addition, United States Steel made a $15 million equity
investment in Republic. United States Steel owned 50% of USS/Kobe and now owns
16% of Republic. United States Steel accounts for its investment in Republic
under the equity method of accounting. The seamless pipe business of USS/Kobe
was excluded from this transaction. That business, now known as Lorain Tubular
Company, LLC, became a wholly owned subsidiary of United States Steel at the
close of business on December 31, 1999.
Dividends and partnership distributions received from equity investees were
$10 million in 2000, $2 million in 1999 and $19 million in 1998.
D-22
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
United States Steel's purchases of transportation services and semi-finished
steel from equity investees totaled $566 million, $361 million and $331 million
in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, U. S.
Steel's payables to these investees totaled $66 million and $60 million,
respectively. United States Steel's revenues for steel and raw material sales
to equity investees totaled $958 million, $831 million and $725 million in
2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, United States
Steel's receivables from these investees were $177 million. Generally, these
transactions were conducted under long-term, market-based contractual
arrangements.
17. Leases
Future minimum commitments for capital leases (including sale-leasebacks
accounted for as financings) and for operating leases having remaining
noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows:
Capital Operating
Leases Leases
------- ---------
(In millions)
2001......................................................... $ 11 $ 79
2002......................................................... 11 56
2003......................................................... 11 40
2004......................................................... 11 37
2005......................................................... 11 29
Later years.................................................. 84 64
Sublease rentals............................................. -- (62)
---- ----
Total minimum lease payments............................... 139 $243
====
Less imputed interest costs.................................. 51
----
Present value of net minimum lease payments included in
long-term debt............................................ $ 88
====
Operating lease rental expense:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Minimum rental................................................ $132 $124 $131
Contingent rental............................................. 17 18 19
Sublease rentals.............................................. (6) (6) (7)
---- ---- ----
Net rental expense.......................................... $143 $136 $143
==== ==== ====
United States Steel leases a wide variety of facilities and equipment under
operating leases, including land and building space, office equipment,
production facilities and transportation equipment. Most long-term leases
include renewal options and, in certain leases, purchase options.
18. Trust Preferred Securities
In 1997, USX exchanged approximately 3.9 million 6.75% Convertible Quarterly
Income Preferred Securities (Trust Preferred Securities) of USX Capital Trust
I, a Delaware statutory business trust (Trust), for an equivalent number of
shares of its 6.50% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (6.50% Preferred
Stock) (Exchange). The Exchange resulted in the recording of Trust Preferred
Securities at a fair value of $182 million.
D-23
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
USX owns all of the common securities of the Trust, which was formed for the
purpose of the Exchange. (The Trust Common Securities and the Trust Preferred
Securities are together referred to as the Trust Securities.) The Trust
Securities represent undivided beneficial ownership interests in the assets of
the Trust, which consist solely of USX 6.75% Convertible Junior Subordinated
Debentures maturing March 31, 2037 (Debentures), having an aggregate principal
amount equal to the aggregate initial liquidation amount ($50.00 per security
and $203 million in total) of the Trust Securities issued by the Trust.
Interest and principal payments on the Debentures will be used to make
quarterly distributions and to pay redemption and liquidation amounts on the
Trust Preferred Securities. The quarterly distributions, which accumulate at
the rate of 6.75% per annum on the Trust Preferred Securities and the accretion
from fair value to the initial liquidation amount, are charged to income and
included in net interest and other financial costs.
Under the terms of the Debentures, USX has the right to defer payment of
interest for up to 20 consecutive quarters and, as a consequence, monthly
distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities will be deferred during such
period. If USX exercises this right, then, subject to limited exceptions, it
may not pay any dividend or make any distribution with respect to any shares of
its capital stock.
The Trust Preferred Securities are convertible at any time prior to the
close of business on March 31, 2037 (unless such right is terminated earlier
under certain circumstances) at the option of the holder, into shares of USX-
U.S. Steel Group Common Stock at a conversion price of $46.25 per share
(equivalent to a conversion ratio of 1.081 shares for each Trust Preferred
Security), subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.
The Trust Preferred Securities may be redeemed at any time at the option of
USX, at a premium of 101.95% of the initial liquidation amount through March
31, 2001, and thereafter, declining annually to the initial liquidation amount
on April 1, 2003, and thereafter. They are mandatorily redeemable at March 31,
2037, or earlier under certain circumstances.
Payments related to quarterly distributions and to the payment of redemption
and liquidation amounts on the Trust Preferred Securities by the Trust are
guaranteed by USX on a subordinated basis. In addition, USX unconditionally
guarantees the Trust's Debentures. The obligations of USX under the Debentures,
and the related indenture, trust agreement and guarantee constitute a full and
unconditional guarantee by USX of the Trust's obligations under the Trust
Preferred Securities.
D-24
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
19. Equity
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(In millions,
except per share
data)
Preferred stock:
Balance at beginning of year......................... $ 3 $ 3 $ 3
Repurchased.......................................... (1) -- --
------ ------ ------
Balance at end of year............................... 2 3 3
------ ------ ------
USX's net investment:
Balance at beginning of year......................... 2,073 2,126 1,808
Net income (loss).................................... (21) 44 364
Repurchase of 6.50% preferred stock.................. (11) (2) (8)
Common stock issued.................................. 6 2 59
Dividends on preferred stock......................... (8) (9) (9)
Dividends on common stock (per share $1.00).......... (89) (88) (88)
------ ------ ------
Balance at end of year............................... 1,950 2,073 2,126
------ ------ ------
Deferred compensation:
Balance at beginning of year......................... -- (1) (1)
Changes during year, net of taxes.................... (3) 1 --
------ ------ ------
Balance at end of year............................... (3) -- (1)
------ ------ ------
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Minimum pension liability adjustments (Note 12):
Balance at beginning of year....................... (7) (27) (25)
Changes during year, net of taxes (b).............. 3 20 (2)
------ ------ ------
Balance at end of year............................. (4) (7) (27)
------ ------ ------
Foreign currency translation adjustment:
Balance at beginning of year....................... (13) (8) (3)
Changes during year, net of taxes (b).............. (13) (5) (5)
------ ------ ------
Balance at end of year............................. (26) (13) (8)
------ ------ ------
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss)(a)........................................... (30) (20) (35)
------ ------ ------
Total equity........................................... $1,919 $2,056 $2,093
====== ====== ======
--------
(a) Total comprehensive income (loss) for United States Steel for the years
2000, 1999 and 1998 was $(31) million, $59 million and $357 million,
respectively.
(b) Related income tax provision (credit):
Minimum pension liability adjustment......................... $(1) $(11) $ 1
Foreign currency translation adjustments..................... (5) 3 2
20. Stock-Based Compensation Plans
The 1990 Stock Plan of USX, as amended and restated, authorizes the
Compensation Committee of the board of directors of USX to grant restricted
stock, stock options and stock appreciation rights of USX-U. S. Steel Group
Common Stock to key management employees. Up to 0.8 percent of the outstanding
stock, as determined on December 31 of the preceding year, are available for
grants during each calendar year the 1990 Plan is in effect. In addition,
awarded shares that do not result in shares being issued are available for
subsequent grant, and any ungranted shares from prior years' annual allocations
are available for subsequent grant during the years the 1990 Plan is in effect.
As of December 31, 2000, 2,108,128 shares were available for grants in 2001.
D-25
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Restricted stock represents stock granted for such consideration, if any, as
determined by the Compensation Committee, subject to provisions for forfeiture
and restricting transfer. Those restrictions may be removed as conditions such
as performance, continuous service and other criteria are met. Restricted stock
is issued at the market price per share at the date of grant and vests over
service periods that range from one to five years.
Deferred compensation is charged to equity when the restricted stock is
granted and subsequently adjusted for changes in the market value of the
underlying stock. The deferred compensation is expensed over the balance of the
vesting period and adjusted if conditions of the restricted stock grant are not
met.
The following table presents information on restricted stock grants:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------ ------
Number of shares granted................................. 305,725 18,272 17,742
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share......... $ 23.00 $28.22 $37.28
Stock options represent the right to purchase shares of stock at the market
value of the stock at date of grant. Certain options contain the right to
receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of the fair market value
of shares of common stock, as determined in accordance with the plan, over the
option price of shares. Most stock options vest after one-year service period
and all expire 10 years from the date they are granted.
The following is a summary of stock option activity:
Shares Price(a)
--------- --------
Balance December 31, 1997................................... 1,633,100 $34.35
Granted................................................... 611,515 37.28
Exercised................................................. (230,805) 32.00
Canceled.................................................. (21,240) 35.89
---------
Balance December 31, 1998................................... 1,992,570 35.50
Granted................................................... 656,400 28.22
Exercised................................................. (2,580) 24.92
Canceled.................................................. (20,005) 38.51
---------
Balance December 31, 1999................................... 2,626,385 33.67
Granted................................................... 915,470 23.00
Exercised................................................. (400) 24.30
Canceled.................................................. (62,955) 38.19
---------
Balance December 31, 2000................................... 3,478,500 30.78
=========
--------
(a) Weighted-average exercise price
The weighted-average grant-date fair value per option was $6.63 in 2000,
$6.95 in 1999 and $8.29 in 1998.
D-26
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The following table represents stock options at December 31, 2000:
Outstanding Exercisable
-------------------------------------- ------------------------
Weighted-
Average Weight- Weight-
Range of Number Remaining Average Number Average
Exercise of Shares Contractual Exercise of Shares Exercise
Prices Under Option Life Price Under Option Price
-------- ------------ ----------- -------- ------------ --------
$23.00-28.22 1,592,305 8.8 years $25.17 678,135 $28.10
31.69-34.44 1,050,920 5.2 32.53 1,050,920 32.53
37.28-44.19 835,275 6.0 39.26 835,275 39.26
--------- ---------
Total 3,478,500 2,564,330
========= =========
Actual stock-based compensation expense was $1 million in 2000 and 1999 and
there was no amount in 1998. Incremental compensation expense, as determined
under a fair value model, was not material. Therefore, pro forma net income has
been omitted.
USX has a deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors of its Board
of Directors. The plan permits participants to defer some or all of their
annual retainers in the form of common stock units or cash and it requires new
directors to defer at least half of their annual retainer in the form of common
stock units. Common stock units are book entry units equal in value to a share
of stock. Deferred stock benefits are distributed in shares of common stock
within five business days after a participant leaves the Board of Directors.
During 2000, 4,872 shares of stock were issued and during 1999, 3,798 shares of
stock were issued. During 1998, no shares of common stock were issued.
21. Property, Plant and Equipment
December 31
-------------
2000 1999
------ ------
(In millions)
Land and depletable property..................................... $ 161 $ 152
Buildings........................................................ 602 484
Machinery and equipment.......................................... 8,409 8,007
Leased assets.................................................... 98 105
------ ------
Total.......................................................... 9,270 8,748
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization........ 6,531 6,232
------ ------
Net............................................................ $2,739 $2,516
====== ======
Amounts in accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization for assets
acquired under capital leases (including sale-leasebacks accounted for as
financings) were $79 million and $81 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999,
respectively.
During 2000, United States Steel recorded $71 million of impairments
relating to coal assets located in West Virginia and Alabama. The impairment
was recorded as a result of a reassessment of long-term prospects after adverse
geological conditions were encountered. The charge is included in depreciation,
depletion and amortization.
22. Derivative Instruments
United States Steel remains at risk for possible changes in the market value
of derivative instruments; however, such risk should be mitigated by price
changes in the underlying hedged item. United States Steel is
D-27
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
also exposed to credit risk in the event of nonperformance by counterparties.
The credit-worthiness of counterparties is subject to continuing review,
including the use of master netting agreements to the extent practical, and
full performance is anticipated.
The following table sets forth quantitative information by class of
derivative instrument:
Fair Carrying Recorded
Value Amount Deferred Aggregate
Assets Assets Gain or Contract
(Liabilities)(a) (Liabilities) (Loss) Values(b)
---------------- ------------- -------- ---------
(In millions)
December 31, 2000:
OTC commodity swaps--other
than trading(c)........... $-- $-- $-- $18
==== ==== ==== ===
December 31, 1999:
OTC commodity swaps--other
than trading.............. $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $37
==== ==== ==== ===
--------
(a) The fair value amounts are based on exchange-traded index prices and
dealer quotes.
(b) Contract or notional amounts do not quantify risk exposure, but are used
in the calculation of cash settlements under the contracts.
(c) The OTC swap arrangements vary in duration with certain contracts
extending into 2001.
23. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value of the financial instruments disclosed herein is not necessarily
representative of the amount that could be realized or settled, nor does the
fair value amount consider the tax consequences of realization or settlement.
The following table summarizes financial instruments, excluding derivative
financial instruments disclosed in Note 22, by individual balance sheet
account. As described in Note 4, United States Steel's specifically attributed
financial instruments and the portion of USX's financial instruments attributed
to United States Steel are as follows:
December 31
-------------------------------
2000 1999
--------------- ---------------
Fair Carrying Fair Carrying
Value Amount Value Amount
------ -------- ------ --------
(In millions)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.................... $ 219 $ 219 $ 22 $ 22
Receivables (including related parties'
receivables)................................ 1,341 1,341 935 935
Investments and long-term receivables........ 137 137 122 122
------ ------ ------ ------
Total financial assets..................... $1,697 $1,697 $1,079 $1,079
====== ====== ====== ======
Financial liabilities:
Notes payable................................ $ 70 $ 70 $ -- $ --
Accounts payable............................. 760 760 739 739
Accrued interest............................. 47 47 15 15
Long-term debt (including amounts due within
one year)................................... 2,375 2,287 835 823
Preferred stock of subsidiary and trust
preferred securities........................ 182 249 232 249
------ ------ ------ ------
Total financial liabilities................ $3,434 $3,413 $1,821 $1,826
====== ====== ====== ======
D-28
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Fair value of financial instruments classified as current assets or
liabilities approximates carrying value due to the short-term maturity of the
instruments. Fair value of investments and long-term receivables was based on
discounted cash flows or other specific instrument analysis. Certain foreign
cost method investments are excluded from investments and long-term receivables
because the fair value is not readily determinable. United States Steel is
subject to market risk and liquidity risk related to its investments; however,
these risks are not readily quantifiable. Fair value of preferred stock of
subsidiary and trust preferred securities was based on market prices. Fair
value of long-term debt instruments was based on market prices where available
or current borrowing rates available for financings with similar terms and
maturities.
Financial guarantees are United States Steel's only unrecognized financial
instrument. It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of this form of
financial instrument obligation because there are no quoted market prices for
transactions which are similar in nature. For details relating to financial
guarantees, see Note 24.
24. Contingencies and Commitments
United States Steel is the subject of, or party to, a number of pending or
threatened legal actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of
matters, including laws and regulations relating to the environment. Certain of
these matters are discussed below. The ultimate resolution of these
contingencies could, individually or in the aggregate, be material to United
States Steel's combined financial statements.
Environmental matters--
United States Steel is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and
regulations relating to the environment. These laws generally provide for
control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible
parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites. Penalties
may be imposed for noncompliance. Accrued liabilities for remediation totaled
$137 million and $101 million at December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. It
is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation
costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed.
For a number of years, United States Steel has made substantial capital
expenditures to bring existing facilities into compliance with various laws
relating to the environment. In 2000 and 1999, such capital expenditures
totaled $18 million and $32 million, respectively. United States Steel
anticipates making additional such expenditures in the future; however, the
exact amounts and timing of such expenditures are uncertain because of the
continuing evolution of specific regulatory requirements.
Guarantees--
Guarantees of the liabilities of unconsolidated entities of United States
Steel totaled $82 million at December 31, 2000, and $88 million at December 31,
1999. In the event that any defaults of guaranteed liabilities occur, United
States Steel has access to its interest in the assets of the investees to
reduce potential losses resulting from these guarantees. As of December 31,
2000, the largest guarantee for a single such entity was $59 million.
Commitments--
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, United States Steel's contract commitments to
acquire property, plant and equipment totaled $206 million and $83 million,
respectively.
USSK has a commitment to the Slovak government for a capital improvements
program of $700 million, subject to certain conditions, over a period
commencing with the acquisition date and ending on
D-29
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
December 31, 2010. USSK is required to report periodically to the Slovak
government on its status toward meeting this commitment. The first reporting
period ends on December 31, 2003.
United States Steel entered into a 15-year take-or-pay arrangement in 1993,
which requires United States Steel to accept pulverized coal each month or pay
a minimum monthly charge of approximately $1 million. Charges for deliveries of
pulverized coal totaled $23 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998. If United States
Steel elects to terminate the contract early, a maximum termination payment of
$96 million, which declines over the duration of the agreement, may be
required.
25. Events Occurring After the Opinion Date (Unaudited)
On March 1, 2001, USX completed the purchase of the tin mill products
business of LTV Corporation (LTV), which is now operated as East Chicago Tin.
In this noncash transaction, USX assumed approximately $66 million of certain
employee related obligations from LTV. The acquisition was accounted for using
the purchase method of accounting. Results of operations for the six months of
2001 include the operations of East Chicago Tin from the date of acquisition.
On March 23, 2001, Transtar, Inc. (Transtar) completed its previously
announced reorganization with its two voting shareholders, USX and Transtar
Holdings, L.P. (Holdings), an affiliate of Blackstone Capital Partners L. P. As
a result of this transaction, United States Steel became the sole owner of
Transtar and certain of its subsidiaries. Holdings became owner of the other
subsidiaries of Transtar. United States Steel accounted for this change in its
ownership interest using the purchase method of accounting. United States Steel
recognized in the first quarter of 2001, a pretax gain of $70 million (included
in income (loss) from investees) and a favorable deferred tax adjustment of $33
million related to this transaction. United States Steel previously accounted
for its investment in Transtar under the equity method of accounting.
During the first quarter of 2001, USX reached an agreement with the IRS
regarding its review of USX's consolidated tax returns for the years 1990 and
1991. In the first quarter of 2001, United States Steel recorded a favorable
adjustment of $67 million to net interest and financial costs and an
unfavorable adjustment of $15 million to provision for income taxes, both of
which were related to prior years' taxes.
United States Steel has a 16% investment in Republic Technologies
International LLC (Republic) which was accounted for under the equity method of
accounting. During the first quarter of 2001, United States Steel discontinued
applying the equity method since investments in and advances to Republic had
been reduced to zero. Also, United States Steel has recognized certain debt
obligations of $14 million previously assumed by Republic. On April 2, 2001,
Republic filed a voluntary petition with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to
reorganize its operations under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In the
first quarter of 2001, as a result of Republic's action, United States Steel
recorded a pretax charge of $74 million for the potentially uncollectible
receivables from Republic.
On July 2, 2001, a corporate reorganization was implemented to create a new
holding company structure. USX became a holding company that owns all of the
outstanding equity of Marathon Oil Company, an Ohio Corporation which, directly
and indirectly, owns and operates the businesses of the USX-Marathon Group, and
United States Steel LLC, a Delaware limited liability company which owns and
operates the businesses of the USX-U. S. Steel Group.
This reorganization in corporate form is independent of the Proposed
Separation of the energy and steel businesses of USX Corporation.
D-30
UNITED STATES STEEL
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
On July 31, 2001, USX announced that its board of directors approved the
definitive plan of reorganization to separate the energy and steel businesses
of USX (Proposed Separation). The Proposed Separation envisions a tax-free
spin-off of the steel business of USX into a freestanding, publicly traded
company to be known as United States Steel Corporation. Holders of current USX-
U. S. Steel Group Common Stock will become holders of United States Steel
Corporation Common Stock. Holders of current USX-Marathon Group Common Stock
will continue to hold their shares in USX which will be renamed Marathon Oil
Corporation. The Proposed Separation does not contemplate a cash distribution
to stockholders. The Proposed Separation is subject to the approval of the
holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of each class of current USX
common stock, receipt of a favorable private letter ruling from the Internal
Revenue Service ("IRS") on the tax-free nature of the transaction, completion
of necessary financing arrangements and receipt of necessary regulatory and
third party consents. The transaction is expected to occur on or about December
31, 2001.
On May 31, 2001 a major fire damaged the cold-rolling mill at USS-POSCO,
which is fifty percent owned by United States Steel. Damage was predominantly
limited to the cold-rolling mill area of the plant. USS-POSCO maintains
insurance coverage against such losses, including coverage for business
interruption. The mill is expected to resume production in the first quarter of
2002, although full-production may not be achieved until mid-2002. Until such
time, the plant will continue customer shipments using cold-rolled coils from
United States Steel and POSCO as substitute feedstock.
On August 14, 2001, United States Steel announced its intention to
permanently close the cold rolling and tin mill operations at Fairless Works,
with an annual finishing capability of 1.5 million tons, on or after November
12, 2001. Under its labor agreement, United States Steel is required to discuss
the proposed shutdown with the United Steel Workers of America before making a
final decision. United States Steel also announced that, subject to market
conditions, it currently intends to continue operating the hot dip galvanizing
line at Fairless Works. The anticipated financial impact of the shutdown, which
is predominately noncash, will be recorded in the second half of 2001 and is
estimated to be a pretax charge of $35 to $45 million.
D-31
UNITED STATES STEEL
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
2000 1999
---------------------------- ----------------------------
4th 3rd 2nd 1st 4th 3rd 2nd 1st
Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. Qtr. Qtr.
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
(In millions, except per share data)
Revenues and other
income:
Revenues(a)........... $1,417 $1,462 $1,629 $1,582 $1,492 $1,415 $1,344 $1,285
Other income (loss)... (4) 13 27 6 8 (40) 1 (35)
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total............... 1,413 1,475 1,656 1,588 1,500 1,375 1,345 1,250
Income (loss) from
operations............. (159) 60 112 91 75 (26) 103 (2)
Income (loss) before
extraordinary losses... (139) 19 56 43 34 (29) 55 (9)
Net income (loss)....... (139) 19 56 43 34 (31) 55 (14)
--------
(a) Certain items have been reclassified between revenues and cost of
revenues, primarily to give effect to new accounting standards as
disclosed in Note 3 of the Notes to Combined Financial Statements. Amounts
reclassified in the first, second and third quarters of 2000 were $41
million, $45 million and $45 million, respectively, and for the first,
second, third and fourth quarters of 1999 were $39 million, $41 million,
$38 million and $38 million, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON MINERAL RESERVES (UNAUDITED)
United States Steel operates two underground coal mining complexes, the #50
Mine and Pinnacle Preparation Plant in West Virginia, and the Oak Grove Mine
and Concord Preparation Plant in Alabama. United States Steel also operates one
iron ore surface mining complex consisting of the open pit Minntac Mine and
Pellet Plant in Minnesota.
Production History
The following table provides a summary, by mining complex, of our minerals
production in millions of tons for each of the last three years:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Coal:
#50 Mine/Pinnacle Preparation Plant.............................. 3.3 4.1 4.5
Oak Grove Mine/Concord Preparation Plant......................... 2.2 2.1 2.8
---- ---- ----
Total coal production.......................................... 5.5 6.2 7.3
==== ==== ====
Iron Ore Pellets:
Minntac Mine and Pellet Plant.................................... 16.3 14.3 15.8
Adverse mining conditions in the form of unforeseen geologic conditions
occurred at both coal mining operations in the year 2000. Coal production was
diminished and mining costs were elevated. Force majeure conditions were
declared with respect to contracted coal deliveries with certain contracts
fulfilled by purchased substitutes and other contracts fulfilled by extension
of delivery time into 2001. These adverse mining conditions did not affect
reserves reported as of December 31, 2000.
No recent adverse events affected iron ore pellet production other than
fluctuations in market demand.
D-32
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON MINERAL RESERVES (UNAUDITED)--(Continued)
Coal Reserves
United States Steel had 786.6 million short tons of recoverable coal
reserves classified as proven and probable at December 31, 2000. Proven and
probable reserves are defined by sites for inspection, sampling, and
measurement generally less than 1 mile apart, such that continuity between
points and subsequent economic evaluation can be assured.
Independent outside entities have reviewed United States Steel's coal
reserve estimates on properties comprising approximately 70% of the stated coal
reserves.
The following table summarizes our proven and probable coal reserves as of
December 31, 2000, the status of the reserves as assigned or unassigned, our
property interest in the reserves, and certain characteristics of the reserves:
Proven and Reserve Control Coal Characteristics As Received(4)
Probable ----------------- ------------------------------- BTU Per As Received(4)
Location Reserves(1)(5) Owned Leased Grade Volatility Pound % Sulfur
-------- -------------- -------- -------- ------------------- ----------- -------------- --------------
Assigned Reserves(2):
Oak Grove Mine, AL...... 52.1 52.1 -- Metallurgical Low >12,000 <1.0%
#50 Mine, WV............ 88.2 76.0 12.2 Metallurgical Low >12,000 <1.0%
----- -------- -------
Sub-total Assigned..... 140.3 128.1 12.2
Unassigned Reserves(3):
Alabama................. 123.4 123.4 -- Metallurgical Low to High >12,000 <1.0%
Alabama(5).............. 47.6 47.6 -- Steam Low to High >12,000 0.7%-2.5%
Alabama................. 31.9 -- 31.9 Metallurgical Medium >12,000 <1.0%
Illinois................ 374.8 374.8 -- Steam High 11,600 2.3%
Indiana, Pennsylvania,
Tennessee, West
Virginia............... 68.6 68.6 -- Metallurgical/Steam Low to High 11,600-13,000 1.0%-3.0%
----- -------- -------
Sub-total Unassigned... 646.3 614.4 31.9
Total Proven and
Probable............... 786.6 742.5 44.1
===== ======== =======
--------
(1) The amounts in this column reflect recoverable tons. Recoverable tons
represent the amount of product that could be used internally or delivered
to a customer after considering mining and preparation losses. Neither
inferred reserves nor resources which exist in addition to proven and
probable reserves were included in these figures.
(2) Assigned Reserves means recoverable coal reserves which have been committed
by United States Steel to our operating mines and plant facilities.
(3) Unassigned Reserves represent coal which has not been committed, and which
would require new mines and or plant facilities before operations could
begin on the property.
(4) "As received" means the quality parameters stated are with the expected
product moisture content and quality values that a customer can reasonably
expect to receive upon delivery.
(5) All of United States Steel's recoverable reserves would be recovered
utilizing underground mining methods, with the exception of 17.2 million
short tons of owned, unassigned, recoverable, steam grade reserves in
Alabama which would be recovered utilizing surface mining methods.
Iron Ore Reserves
United States Steel had 709.8 million short tons of recoverable iron ore
reserves classified as proven and probable at December 31, 2000. Proven and
probable reserves are defined by sites for inspection, sampling, and
measurement generally less than 1,000 feet apart, such that continuity between
points and subsequent economic
D-33
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON MINERAL RESERVES (UNAUDITED)--(Continued)
evaluation can be assured. Recoverable tons mean the tons of product that can
be used internally or delivered to a customer after considering mining and
benefication or preparation losses. Neither inferred reserves nor resources
which exist in addition to proven and probable reserves were included in these
figures.
All 709.8 million tons of proven and probable reserves are assigned, which
means that they have been committed by United States Steel to its one operating
mine, and are of blast furnace pellet grade. United States Steel owns 219.2
million of these tons and leases the remaining 490.6 million tons. United
States Steel does not own, or control by lease, any unassigned iron ore
reserves.
Independent outside entities, including lessors, have reviewed United States
Steel's estimates on approximately 75% of the stated iron ore reserves.
D-34
UNITED STATES STEEL
PRINCIPAL UNCONSOLIDATED INVESTEES (UNAUDITED)
December 31, 2000
-----------------
Company Country Ownership Activity
------- ------------- --------- -----------------------
Clairton 1314B Partnership, L.P. United States 10% Coke & Coke By-Products
Double Eagle Steel Coating Company United States 50% Steel Processing
PRO-TEC Coating Company United States 50% Steel Processing
Republic Technologies International,
LLC United States 16% Steel Products
Transtar, Inc. United States 46% Transportation
USS-POSCO Industries United States 50% Steel Processing
Worthington Specialty Processing United States 50% Steel Processing
D-35
UNITED STATES STEEL
COMBINED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
Second Quarter Six Months
Ended June 30 Ended June 30
---------------- --------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
------- ------- ------ ------
(In millions)
Revenues and other income:
Revenues................................... $ 1,733 $ 1,629 $3,243 $3,211
Income (loss) from investees............... (7) 14 40 7
Net gains on disposal of assets............ 10 13 16 28
Other income (loss)........................ 1 -- 2 (2)
------- ------- ------ ------
Total revenues and other income.......... 1,737 1,656 3,301 3,244
------- ------- ------ ------
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues (excludes items shown
below).................................... 1,599 1,462 3,148 2,890
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (credits)........................ 19 (57) 3 (120)
Depreciation, depletion and amortization... 79 78 152 153
Taxes other than income taxes.............. 67 61 126 118
------- ------- ------ ------
Total costs and expenses................. 1,764 1,544 3,429 3,041
------- ------- ------ ------
Income (loss) from operations................ (27) 112 (128) 203
Net interest and other financial costs....... 48 24 36 48
------- ------- ------ ------
Income (loss) before income taxes............ (75) 88 (164) 155
Provision (credit) for income taxes.......... (45) 32 (143) 56
------- ------- ------ ------
Net income (loss)............................ (30) 56 (21) 99
Dividends on preferred stock................. 2 2 4 4
------- ------- ------ ------
Net income (loss) available to USX's net
investment.................................. $ (32) $ 54 $ (25) $ 95
======= ======= ====== ======
Selected notes to combined financial statements appear on pages D-39 to D-44.
D-36
UNITED STATES STEEL
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
June
30 December 31
2001 2000
------ -----------
(In millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................ $ 254 $ 219
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $128
and $57................................................. 649 625
Receivables subject to a security interest............... 350 350
Receivables from related parties......................... 323 366
Inventories.............................................. 916 946
Deferred income tax benefits............................. 171 201
Other current assets..................................... 13 10
------ ------
Total current assets................................... 2,676 2,717
Investments and long-term receivables, less reserves of $39
and $38................................................... 332 439
Long-term receivable from related parties.................. 43 97
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated
depreciation, depletion and amortization of $6,708 and
$6,531.................................................... 3,098 2,739
Prepaid pensions........................................... 2,711 2,672
Other noncurrent assets.................................... 94 47
------ ------
Total assets........................................... $8,954 $8,711
====== ======
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Notes payable............................................ $ 123 $ 70
Accounts payable......................................... 778 755
Accounts payable to related parties...................... -- 5
Payroll and benefits payable............................. 242 202
Accrued taxes............................................ 242 173
Accrued interest......................................... 51 47
Long-term debt due within one year....................... 224 139
------ ------
Total current liabilities.............................. 1,660 1,391
Long-term debt, less unamortized discount.................. 2,085 2,236
Deferred income taxes...................................... 709 666
Employee benefits.......................................... 1,916 1,767
Deferred credits and other liabilities..................... 475 483
Preferred stock of subsidiary.............................. 66 66
Mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred securities of
a subsidiary trust holding solely junior subordinated
convertible debentures of USX............................. 183 183
EQUITY
Preferred stock............................................ 2 2
USX's net investment....................................... 1,902 1,950
Deferred compensation...................................... (10) (3)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss....................... (34) (30)
------ ------
Total equity........................................... 1,860 1,919
------ ------
Total liabilities and equity........................... $8,954 $8,711
====== ======
Selected notes to combined financial statements appear on pages D-39 to D-44.
D-37
UNITED STATES STEEL
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended
June 30
------------------
2001 2000
-------- --------
(In millions)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)......................................... $ (21) $ 99
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided from
operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization................ 152 153
Pensions and other postretirement benefits.............. (51) (163)
Deferred income taxes................................... 56 146
Net gains on disposal of assets......................... (16) (28)
Changes in:
Current receivables................................... 64 13
Inventories........................................... 57 (29)
Current accounts payable and accrued expenses......... 61 (90)
All other -- net........................................ (77) (2)
-------- --------
Net cash provided from operating activities........... 225 99
-------- --------
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures.................................... (141) (97)
Disposal of assets...................................... 9 16
Restricted cash--withdrawals............................ 3 3
--deposits........................................ (2) (1)
Investees -- investments................................ (1) (11)
All other -- net........................................ 10 3
-------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities................. (122) (87)
-------- --------
Financing activities:
Increase (decrease) in attributed portion of USX
consolidated debt...................................... (26) 37
Specifically attributed debt repayments................. (6) (6)
Preferred stock repurchased............................. -- (12)
Dividends paid.......................................... (35) (48)
-------- --------
Net cash used in financing activities................. (67) (29)
-------- --------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash................... (1) --
-------- --------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents...... 35 (17)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year............ 219 22
-------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period................ $ 254 $ 5
======== ========
Cash provided from (used in) operating activities
included:
Interest and other financial costs paid (net of amount
capitalized)........................................... $ (93) $ (41)
Income taxes refunded, including settlements with USX... 387 85
Selected notes to combined financial statements appear on pages D-39 to D-44.
D-38
UNITED STATES STEEL
SELECTED NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. The accompanying combined financial statements represent a carve-out
financial statement presentation of the businesses comprising United States
Steel and are not intended to be a complete presentation of the financial
position, the results of operations and cash flows of United States Steel on a
stand-alone basis. These combined financial statements are presented as if
United States Steel existed as an entity separate from the remaining businesses
of USX Corporation (USX) during the periods presented.
The accompanying combined financial statements include the historical
operations of certain divisions of USX and certain subsidiaries of USX. In this
context, no direct ownership existed among all the various units comprising
United States Steel; accordingly, USX's net investment in United States Steel
(USX's net investment) is shown in lieu of Common Stockholder's Equity in the
combined financial statements. The combined financial statements included
herein have been prepared from USX's historical accounting records.
The information furnished in these financial statements is unaudited but, in
the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of the results for the periods covered. All such adjustments are
of a normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. These combined
financial statements, including selected notes, have been prepared in
accordance with the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
and do not include all of the information and disclosures required by generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.
2. Effective January 1, 2001, United States Steel adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities" (SFAS No. 133), as amended by SFAS Nos. 137 and 138.
This Standard, as amended, requires recognition of all derivatives at fair
value as either assets or liabilities. United States Steel uses commodity-based
and foreign currency derivative instruments to manage its exposure to price
risk. Management has authorized the use of futures, forwards, swaps and options
to reduce the effects of fluctuations related to the purchase of natural gas
and nonferrous metals and also certain business transactions denominated in
foreign currencies. United States Steel has not elected to designate derivative
instruments as qualifying for hedge accounting treatment. As a result, the
changes in fair value of all derivatives are recognized immediately in
earnings. A cumulative effect adjustment relating to the adoption of SFAS No.
133 was recognized in other comprehensive income. The cumulative effect
adjustment relates only to deferred gains or losses existing as of the close of
business on December 31, 2000, for hedge transactions under prior accounting
rules. The effect of adoption of SFAS No. 133 was less than $1 million, net of
tax.
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board approved Statements
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 "Business Combinations" (SFAS 141),
No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" (SFAS 142) and No. 143
"Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" (SFAS 143).
SFAS 141 requires all business combinations completed after June 30, 2001,
be accounted for under the purchase method. This standard also establishes for
all business combinations made after June 30, 2001, specific criteria for the
recognition of intangible assets separately from goodwill. SFAS 141 also
requires that the excess of fair value of acquired assets over cost (negative
goodwill) be recognized immediately as an extraordinary gain, rather than
deferred and amortized. United States Steel will account for all future
business combinations under SFAS 141.
SFAS 142 addresses the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets
after an acquisition. The most significant changes made by SFAS 142 are: 1)
goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives will no longer be
amortized; 2) goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives must be
tested for impairment at least annually; and 3) the amortization period for the
intangible assets with finite lives will no longer be limited to forty years.
United States Steel will adopt SFAS 142 effective January 1, 2002, as required.
At that time,
D-39
UNITED STATES STEEL
SELECTED NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
amortization of existing goodwill will cease on the unamortized portion
associated with previous acquisitions and certain investments accounted for
under the equity method. This provision of SFAS 142 is not expected to have a
material impact on the results of operations for United States Steel.
Additionally, SFAS 142 requires that unamortized negative goodwill associated
with investments accounted for under the equity method and acquired before July
1, 2001, be recognized in income as a cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle. United States Steel expects to recognize a favorable cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle of approximately $20 million, net of
tax, upon adoption. United States Steel continues to evaluate the financial
effects of the provisions of SFAS 142 pertaining to intangible assets other
than goodwill.
SFAS 143 provides accounting requirements for retirement obligations
associated with tangible long-lived assets, including: 1) the timing of
liability recognition; 2) initial measurement of the liability; 3) allocation
of asset retirement cost to expense; 4) subsequent measurement of the
liability; and 5) financial statement disclosures. SFAS 143 requires that an
asset retirement cost should be capitalized as part of the cost of the related
long-lived asset and subsequently allocated to expense using a systematic and
rational method. United States Steel will adopt the Statement effective January
1, 2003. The transition adjustment resulting from the adoption of SFAS 143 will
be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. At this
time, United States Steel cannot reasonably estimate the effect of the adoption
of this Statement on either its financial position or results of operations.
3. The financial statement provision for income taxes and related tax
payments or refunds have been reflected in United States Steel's financial
statements in accordance with USX's tax allocation policy. In general, such
policy provides that the consolidated tax provision and related tax payments or
refunds are allocated to United States Steel principally upon its financial
income, taxable income, credits, preferences and other directly related
amounts.
The provision for income taxes for United States Steel is based on tax rates
and amounts which recognize management's best estimate of current and deferred
tax assets and liabilities.
4. On November 24, 2000, United States Steel acquired U. S. Steel Kosice,
s.r.o. (USSK), which is primarily located in the Slovak Republic. USSK was
formed in June 2000 to hold the steel operations and related assets of VSZ a.s.
(VSZ), a diversified Slovak corporation. The acquisition was accounted for
under the purchase method of accounting.
On March 1, 2001, United States Steel completed the purchase of the tin mill
products business of LTV Corporation (LTV), which is now operated as East
Chicago Tin. In this noncash transaction, United States Steel assumed
approximately $66 million of certain employee related obligations from LTV. The
acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Results
of operations for the six months of 2001 include the operations of East Chicago
Tin from the date of acquisition.
On March 23, 2001, Transtar, Inc. (Transtar) completed its previously
announced reorganization with its two voting shareholders, USX and Transtar
Holdings, L.P. (Holdings), an affiliate of Blackstone Capital Partners L.P. As
a result of this transaction, United States Steel became sole owner of Transtar
and certain of its subsidiaries. Holdings became owner of the other
subsidiaries of Transtar. United States Steel accounted for the change in its
ownership interest in Transtar using the purchase method of accounting. United
States Steel recognized in the six months of 2001 a pretax gain of $68 million
(included in income (loss) from investees) and a favorable deferred tax
adjustment of $33 million related to this transaction. United States Steel
previously accounted for its investment in Transtar under the equity method of
accounting.
D-40
UNITED STATES STEEL
SELECTED NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
The following unaudited pro forma data for United States Steel includes the
results of operations of the above acquisitions giving effect to them as if
they had been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented. The six
months 2001 pro forma results exclude the $68 million gain and $33 million tax
benefit recorded as a result of the Transtar transaction. In addition, VSZ did
not historically provide historical carve-out financial information for its
steel activities prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States. Therefore, United States Steel made certain
estimates and assumptions regarding revenues and costs used in the preparation
of the unaudited pro forma data relating to USSK for the six months of 2000.
The following pro forma data is based on historical information and does not
necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred nor is it
necessarily indicative of future results of operations.
Six Months
Ended June 30
--------------
2001 2000
------ ------
(In millions)
Revenues and other income...................................... $3,279 $3,850
Net income (loss).............................................. (123) 137
5. United States Steel consists of two reportable operating segments: 1)
Domestic Steel and 2) U. S. Steel Kosice (USSK). Domestic Steel includes the
United States operations of United States Steel while USSK includes the United
States Steel operations primarily located in the Slovak Republic. Domestic
Steel is engaged in the domestic production, sale and transportation of steel
mill products, coke, taconite pellets and coal; the management of mineral
resources; real estate development; and engineering and consulting services.
USSK is engaged in the production and sale of steel mill products and coke and
primarily serves central European markets. The results of segment operations
are as follows:
Domestic Total
Steel USSK Segments
-------- ---- --------
(In millions)
Second Quarter 2001
Revenues and other income:
Customer.............................................. $1,447 $284 $1,731
Intersegment(a)....................................... 2 -- 2
Other subsidiaries of USX(a).......................... 2 -- 2
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated
investees............................................ (8) 1 (7)
Other................................................. 11 -- 11
------ ---- ------
Total revenues and other income..................... $1,454 $285 $1,739
====== ==== ======
Segment income (loss)................................... $ (69) $ 41 $ (28)
====== ==== ======
Second Quarter 2000
Revenues and other income:
Customer.............................................. $1,625 $-- $1,625
Other subsidiaries of USX(a).......................... 4 -- 4
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investees........ 14 -- 14
Other................................................. 13 -- 13
------ ---- ------
Total revenues and other income..................... $1,656 $-- $1,656
====== ==== ======
Segment income.......................................... $ 68 $-- $ 68
====== ==== ======
--------
(a) Revenues and transfers between segments and with other subsidiaries of USX
were conducted under terms comparable to those with unrelated parties.
D-41
UNITED STATES STEEL
SELECTED NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
Domestic Total
Steel USSK Segments
-------- ---- --------
(In millions)
Six Months 2001
Revenues and other income:
Customer............................................... $2,709 $530 $3,239
Intersegment(a)........................................ 3 -- 3
Other subsidiaries of USX(a)........................... 4 -- 4
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investees......... 39 1 40
Other.................................................. 17 1 18
------ ---- ------
Total revenues and other income...................... $2,772 $532 $3,304
====== ==== ======
Segment income (loss).................................... $ (220) $ 82 $ (138)
====== ==== ======
Six Months 2000
Revenues and other income:
Customer............................................... $3,203 $-- $3,203
Other subsidiaries of USX(a)........................... 8 -- 8
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investees......... 7 -- 7
Other.................................................. 26 -- 26
------ ---- ------
Total revenues and other income...................... $3,244 $-- $3,244
====== ==== ======
Segment income........................................... $ 122 $-- $ 122
====== ==== ======
--------
(a) Revenues and transfers between segments and with other subsidiaries of USX
were conducted under terms comparable to those with unrelated parties.
The following schedule reconciles segment revenues and income to amounts
reported in United States Steel's combined financial statements:
Second Quarter Ended Six Months
June 30 Ended June 30
---------------------- --------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
---------- ---------- ------ ------
(In millions)
Revenues and other income:
Revenues and other income of
reportable segments................. $ 1,739 $ 1,656 $3,304 $3,244
Elimination of intersegment
revenues............................ (2) -- (3) --
---------- ---------- ------ ------
Total revenues and other income.. $ 1,737 $ 1,656 $3,301 $3,244
========== ========== ====== ======
Income:
Income (loss) for reportable
segments............................ $ (28) $ 68 $ (138) $ 122
Items not allocated to segments:
Administrative expenses............ (8) (5) (15) (11)
Net pension credits................ 31 67 72 132
Costs related to former business
activities........................ (14) (18) (38) (40)
Costs related to Proposed
Separation........................ (8) -- (9) --
---------- ---------- ------ ------
Total income (loss) from
operations...................... $ (27) $ 112 $ (128) $ 203
========== ========== ====== ======
D-42
UNITED STATES STEEL
SELECTED NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
6. United States Steel's total comprehensive income (loss) was $(31) million
for the second quarter of 2001, $54 million for the second quarter of 2000,
$(24) million for the six months of 2001 and $98 million for the six months of
2000.
7. United States Steel has a 16% investment in Republic Technologies
International LLC (Republic) which was accounted for under the equity method of
accounting. During the first quarter of 2001, United States Steel discontinued
applying the equity method since investments in and advances to Republic had
been reduced to zero. Also, United States Steel has recognized certain debt
obligations of $14 million previously assumed by Republic. On April 2, 2001,
Republic filed a voluntary petition with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to
reorganize its operations under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In the
first quarter of 2001, as a result of Republic's action, United States Steel
recorded a pretax charge of $74 million for potentially uncollectible
receivables from Republic.
8. Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market. Cost of
inventories is determined primarily under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method.
June 30 December 31
2001 2000
------- -----------
(In millions)
Raw materials............................................... $170 $214
Semi-finished products...................................... 378 429
Finished products........................................... 259 210
Supplies and sundry items................................... 109 93
---- ----
Total..................................................... $916 $946
==== ====
9. At June 30, 2001, and December 31, 2000, estimated income tax receivables
from USX included in receivables from related parties were $320 million and
$364 million, respectively. In addition, long-term receivables from related
parties at June 30, 2001, and December 31, 2000, were $43 million and $97
million, respectively, of income taxes receivable from USX. These amounts have
been determined in accordance with the tax allocation policy discussed in Note
3.
10. Interest and other financial costs in the six months of 2001 included a
favorable adjustment of $67 million and provision for income taxes included an
unfavorable adjustment of $15 million, both of which are related to prior
years' taxes.
11. United States Steel is the subject of, or a party to, a number of
pending or threatened legal actions, contingencies and commitments relating to
United States Steel involving a variety of matters including laws and
regulations relating to the environment. Certain of these matters are discussed
below. The ultimate resolution of these contingencies could, individually or in
the aggregate, be material to the United States Steel combined financial
statements.
United States Steel is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and
regulations relating to the environment. These laws generally provide for
control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible
parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites. Penalties
may be imposed for noncompliance. At June 30, 2001, and December 31, 2000,
accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $138 million and $137 million,
respectively. It is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of
all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be
imposed.
D-43
UNITED STATES STEEL
SELECTED NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
For a number of years, United States Steel has made substantial capital
expenditures to bring existing facilities into compliance with various laws
relating to the environment. In the second quarter of 2001 and for the years
2000 and 1999, such capital expenditures totaled $6 million, $18 million and
$32 million, respectively. United States Steel anticipates making additional
such expenditures in the future; however, the exact amounts and timing of such
expenditures are uncertain because of the continuing evolution of specific
regulatory requirements.
Guarantees by United States Steel of the liabilities of affiliated entities
of United States Steel totaled $58 million at June 30, 2001. In the event that
any defaults of guaranteed liabilities occur, United States Steel has access
to its interest in the assets of the affiliates to reduce losses resulting
from these guarantees. As of June 30, 2001, the largest guarantee for a single
affiliate was $48 million.
United States Steel's contract commitments to acquire property, plant and
equipment at June 30, 2001, totaled $109 million compared with $206 million at
December 31, 2000.
12. On July 31, 2001, USX announced that its board of directors approved
the definitive plan of reorganization to separate the energy and steel
businesses of USX (Proposed Separation). The Proposed Separation envisions a
tax-free spin-off of the steel business of USX into a freestanding, publicly
traded company to be known as United States Steel Corporation. Holders of
current USX-U. S. Steel Group Common Stock will become holders of United
States Steel Corporation Common Stock. Holders of current USX-Marathon Group
Common Stock will continue to hold their shares in USX which will be renamed
Marathon Oil Corporation. The Proposed Separation does not contemplate a cash
distribution to stockholders. The Proposed Separation is subject to the
approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of each class
of current USX common stock, receipt of a favorable private letter ruling from
the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") on the tax-free nature of the
transaction, completion of necessary financing arrangements and receipt of
necessary regulatory and third party consents. The transaction is expected to
occur on or about December 31, 2001. Costs related to the Proposed Separation
include professional fees and other expenses and are included in selling,
general and administrative expenses (credits). These costs in the second
quarter and six months of 2001 were $8 million and $9 million, respectively.
13. On July 2, 2001, a corporate reorganization was implemented to create a
new holding company structure. USX became a holding company that owns all of
the outstanding equity of Marathon Oil Company, an Ohio Corporation which,
directly and indirectly, owns and operates the businesses of the USX-Marathon
Group, and United States Steel LLC, a Delaware limited liability company which
owns and operates the businesses of the USX-U. S. Steel Group.
This reorganization in corporate form is independent of the Proposed
Separation of the energy and steel businesses of USX Corporation.
14. On August 14, 2001, United States Steel announced its intention to
permanently close the cold rolling and tin mill operations at Fairless Works,
with an annual finishing capability of 1.5 million tons, on or after November
12, 2001. Under its labor agreement, United States Steel is required to
discuss the proposed shutdown with the United Steel Workers of America before
making a final decision. United States Steel also announced that, subject to
market conditions, it currently intends to continue operating the hot dip
galvanizing line at Fairless Works. The anticipated financial impact of the
shutdown, which is predominately noncash, will be recorded in the second half
of 2001 and is estimated to be a pretax charge of $35 to $45 million.
D-44
ANNEX E
Index For Annex E
Historical Financial Information for USX Corporation
Page
-----
Management's Report...................................................... E-2
Report of Independent Accountants........................................ E-3
Audited Financial Statements:
Consolidated Statement of Operations--Years Ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998......................................................... E-4
Consolidated Balance Sheet--at December 31, 2000 and 1999.............. E-6
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows--Years Ended December 31, 2000,
1999, 1998............................................................ E-7
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity......................... E-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements............................. E-10
Unaudited Financial Information:
Selected Quarterly Financial Data...................................... E-43
Principal Unconsolidated Investees..................................... E-44
Supplementary Information on Mineral Reserves Other than Oil and Gas... E-44
Supplementary Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities.......... E-47
Management's Discussion and Analysis..................................... E-56
Unaudited Interim Financial Information:
Consolidated Statement of Operations--Second Quarter and Six Months
Ended June 30, 2001 and 2000.......................................... E-82
Consolidated Balance Sheet--at June 30, 2001 and December 31, 2000..... E-84
Statement of Cash Flows--Six Months Ended June 30, 2001 and 2000....... E-86
Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................... E-87
Management's Discussion and Analysis..................................... E-102
E-1
MANAGEMENT'S REPORT
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of USX Corporation and
Subsidiary Companies (USX) are the responsibility of and have been prepared by
USX in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States. They necessarily include some amounts that are based on best judgments
and estimates. The consolidated financial information displayed in other
sections of this report is consistent with these consolidated financial
statements.
USX seeks to assure the objectivity and integrity of its financial records
by careful selection of its managers, by organizational arrangements that
provide an appropriate division of responsibility and by communications
programs aimed at assuring that its policies and methods are understood
throughout the organization.
USX has a comprehensive formalized system of internal accounting controls
designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and that
financial records are reliable. Appropriate management monitors the system for
compliance, and the internal auditors independently measure its effectiveness
and recommend possible improvements thereto. In addition, as part of their
audit of the consolidated financial statements, USX's independent accountants,
who are elected by the stockholders, review and test the internal accounting
controls selectively to establish a basis of reliance thereon in determining
the nature, extent and timing of audit tests to be applied.
The Board of Directors pursues its oversight role in the area of financial
reporting and internal accounting control through its Audit Committee. This
Committee, composed solely of nonmanagement directors, regularly meets (jointly
and separately) with the independent accountants, management and internal
auditors to monitor the proper discharge by each of its responsibilities
relative to internal accounting controls and the consolidated financial
statements.
Thomas J. Usher Robert M. Hernandez Larry G. Schultz
Chairman, Board of Directors & Vice Chairman & Vice President-
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Accounting
E-2
USX CORPORATION
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Stockholders of USX Corporation:
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements appearing
on pages E-4 through E-42 present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of USX Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2000
and 1999, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These
financial statements are the responsibility of USX's management; our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
600 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-2794
February 7, 2001
E-3
USX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(Dollars in millions)
Revenues and other income:
Revenues (Note 6)................................. $40,500 $29,068 $27,629
Dividend and investee income (loss)............... 94 (20) 96
Net gains (losses) on disposal of assets (Note
27).............................................. (739) 21 82
Gain on ownership change in Marathon Ashland
Petroleum LLC (Note 3)........................... 12 17 245
Other income...................................... 47 33 25
------- ------- -------
Total revenues and other income............... 39,914 29,119 28,077
------- ------- -------
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues (excludes items shown below)..... 31,056 21,679 20,211
Selling, general and administrative expenses...... 402 203 304
Depreciation, depletion and amortization.......... 1,605 1,254 1,224
Taxes other than income taxes..................... 4,861 4,433 4,241
Exploration expenses.............................. 238 238 313
Inventory market valuation charges (credits) (Note
15).............................................. -- (551) 267
------- ------- -------
Total costs and expenses...................... 38,162 27,256 26,560
------- ------- -------
Income from operations.............................. 1,752 1,863 1,517
Net interest and other financial costs (Note 6)..... 341 362 279
Minority interest in income of Marathon Ashland
Petroleum LLC (Note 3)............................. 498 447 249
------- ------- -------
Income before income taxes and extraordinary
losses............................................. 913 1,054 989
Provision for income taxes (Note 11)................ 502 349 315
------- ------- -------
Income before extraordinary losses.................. 411 705 674
Extraordinary losses (Note 7)....................... -- 7 --
------- ------- -------
Net income.......................................... 411 698 674
Dividends on preferred stock........................ 8 9 9
------- ------- -------
Net income applicable to common stocks.............. $ 403 $ 689 $ 665
======= ======= =======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
E-4
USX CORPORATION
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
2000 1999 1998
----- ---- -----
(Dollars in
millions,
except per share
data)
Applicable to Marathon Stock:
Net income................................................. $ 432 $654 $ 310
Per Share Data:
Basic..................................................... 1.39 2.11 1.06
Diluted................................................... 1.39 2.11 1.05
Applicable to Steel Stock:
Income (loss) before extraordinary losses.................. $ (29) $ 42 $ 355
Extraordinary losses....................................... -- 7 --
----- ---- -----
Net income (loss).......................................... $ (29) $ 35 $ 355
===== ==== =====
Per Share Data
Basic:
Income (loss) before extraordinary losses................ $(.33) $.48 $4.05
Extraordinary losses..................................... -- .08 --
----- ---- -----
Net income (loss)........................................ $(.33) $.40 $4.05
===== ==== =====
Diluted:
Income (loss) before extraordinary losses................ $(.33) $.48 $3.92
Extraordinary losses..................................... -- .08 --
----- ---- -----
Net income (loss)........................................ $(.33) $.40 $3.92
===== ==== =====
See Note 20, for a description and computation of income per common share.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
E-5
USX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
December 31
----------------------
2000 1999
---------- ----------
(Dollars in millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents........................... $ 559 $ 133
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$60 and $12........................................ 2,888 2,367
Receivables subject to a security interest (Note
14)................................................ 350 350
Inventories (Note 15)............................... 2,813 2,627
Deferred income tax benefits (Note 11).............. 261 303
Assets held for sale (Note 27)...................... 330 84
Other current assets................................ 131 92
---------- ----------
Total current assets............................ 7,332 5,956
Investments and long-term receivables, less reserves
of $38 and $3 (Note 12).............................. 801 1,237
Property, plant and equipment--net (Note 21).......... 12,114 12,809
Prepaid pensions (Note 9)............................. 2,879 2,629
Other noncurrent assets............................... 275 300
---------- ----------
Total assets.................................... $ 23,401 $ 22,931
========== ==========
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Notes payable (Note 13)............................. $ 150 $ --
Accounts payable.................................... 3,774 3,409
Payroll and benefits payable........................ 432 468
Accrued taxes....................................... 281 283
Accrued interest.................................... 108 107
Long-term debt due within one year (Note 14)........ 287 61
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities....................... 5,032 4,328
Long-term debt (Note 14).............................. 4,173 4,222
Deferred income taxes (Note 11)....................... 2,020 1,839
Employee benefits (Note 9)............................ 2,415 2,809
Deferred credits and other liabilities................ 724 691
Preferred stock of subsidiary (Note 22)............... 250 250
USX obligated mandatorily redeemable convertible
preferred securities of a subsidiary trust holding
solely junior subordinated convertible debentures of
USX (Note 22)........................................ 183 183
Minority interest in Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC
(Note 3)............................................. 1,840 1,753
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Details on pages E-8 and E-9)
Preferred stock (Note 23) - 6.50% Cumulative
Convertible issued--2,413,487 shares and 2,715,287
shares ($121 and $136 liquidation preference,
respectively)........................................ 2 3
Common stocks:
Marathon Stock issued--312,165,978 shares and
311,767,181 shares (par value $1 per share,
authorized 550,000,000 shares)..................... 312 312
Steel Stock issued--88,767,395 shares and 88,397,714
shares (par value $1 per share,
authorized 200,000,000 shares)..................... 89 88
Securities exchangeable solely into Marathon Stock
issued--281,148 shares and 288,621 shares (Note
3)................................................. -- --
Treasury common stock, at cost--Marathon Stock--
3,899,714 shares and -0- shares...................... (104) --
Additional paid-in capital............................ 4,676 4,673
Deferred compensation................................. (8) --
Retained earnings..................................... 1,847 1,807
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)......... (50) (27)
---------- ----------
Total stockholders' equity...................... 6,764 6,856
---------- ----------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity...... $ 23,401 $ 22,931
========== ==========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
E-6
USX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(Dollars in millions)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Operating activities:
Net income......................................... $ 411 $ 698 $ 674
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided from
operating activities:
Extraordinary losses............................. -- 7 --
Minority interest in income of Marathon Ashland
Petroleum LLC................................... 498 447 249
Depreciation, depletion and amortization......... 1,605 1,254 1,224
Exploratory dry well costs....................... 86 109 186
Inventory market valuation charges (credits)..... -- (551) 267
Pensions and other postretirement benefits....... (778) (220) (181)
Deferred income taxes............................ 149 212 184
Gain on ownership change in Marathon Ashland
Petroleum LLC................................... (12) (17) (245)
Net (gains) losses on disposal of assets......... 739 (21) (82)
Changes in: Current receivables--sold............ -- (320) (30)
--operating turnover............................... (375) (988) 451
Inventories................................. (46) (77) (6)
Current accounts payable and accrued
expenses................................... 182 1,251 (497)
All other--net................................... 72 152 (172)
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided from operating activities... 2,531 1,936 2,022
------- ------- -------
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures............................... (1,669) (1,665) (1,580)
Acquisitions--U. S. Steel Kosice s.r.o., net of
cash acquired of $59.............................. (10) -- --
--Tarragon Oil and Gas Limited..................... -- -- (686)
Disposal of assets................................. 560 366 86
Restricted cash--withdrawals....................... 273 60 241
--deposits......................................... (270) (61) (67)
Investees--investments............................. (100) (74) (115)
--loans and advances............................... (16) (70) (104)
--returns and repayments........................... 10 1 71
All other--net..................................... 29 (25) (4)
------- ------- -------
Net cash used in investing activities......... (1,193) (1,468) (2,158)
------- ------- -------
Financing activities:
Commercial paper and revolving credit
arrangements--net................................. 62 (381) 724
Other debt--borrowings............................. 273 810 1,036
--repayments....................................... (339) (242) (1,445)
Common stock--issued............................... -- 89 668
--repurchased...................................... (105) -- (195)
Treasury common stock reissued..................... 1 -- --
Preferred stock repurchased........................ (12) (2) (8)
Dividends paid..................................... (371) (354) (342)
Distributions to minority shareholder of Marathon
Ashland Petroleum LLC............................. (420) (400) (211)
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided from (used in) financing
activities................................... (911) (480) 227
------- ------- -------
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash............ (1) (1) 1
------- ------- -------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents....................................... 426 (13) 92
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year..... 133 146 54
------- ------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year........... $ 559 $ 133 $ 146
======= ======= =======
See Note 16, for supplemental cash flow information.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
E-7
USX CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
USX has two classes of common stock: USX--Marathon Group Common Stock
(Marathon Stock) and USX--U. S. Steel Group Common Stock (Steel Stock), which
are intended to reflect the performance of the Marathon and U. S. Steel Groups,
respectively. (See Note 8, for a description of the two Groups.) During 1998,
USX issued 878,074 Exchangeable Shares (exchangeable solely into Marathon
Stock) related to the purchase of Tarragon Oil and Gas Limited. (See Note 3.)
On all matters where the holders of Marathon Stock and Steel Stock vote
together as a single class, Marathon Stock has one vote per share and Steel
Stock has a fluctuating vote per share based on the relative market value of a
share of Steel Stock to the market value of a share of Marathon Stock. In the
event of a disposition of all or substantially all the properties and assets of
the U. S. Steel Group, USX must either distribute the net proceeds to the
holders of the Steel Stock as a special dividend or in redemption of the stock,
or exchange the Steel Stock for the Marathon Stock. In the event of liquidation
of USX, the holders of the Marathon Stock and Steel Stock will share in the
funds remaining for common stockholders based on the relative market
capitalization of the respective Marathon Stock and Steel Stock to the
aggregate market capitalization of both classes of common stock.
Dollars in
millions Shares in thousands
----------------- -------------------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
----- ---- ---- ------- ------- -------
Preferred stock (Note 23):
6.50% Cumulative Convertible:
Balance at beginning of year... $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 2,715 2,768 2,962
Repurchased.................... (1) -- -- (302) (53) (194)
----- ---- ---- ------- ------- -------
Balance at end of year......... $ 2 $ 3 $ 3 2,413 2,715 2,768
===== ==== ==== ======= ======= =======
Common stocks:
Marathon Stock:
Balance at beginning of year... $ 312 $308 $289 311,767 308,459 288,786
Issued in public offering...... -- -- 17 -- 67 17,000
Issued for:
Employee stock plans.......... -- 3 2 391 2,903 2,236
Dividend Reinvestment and
Direct Stock Purchase Plan... -- -- -- -- 120 66
Exchangeable Shares........... -- 1 -- 8 218 371
----- ---- ---- ------- ------- -------
Balance at end of year......... $ 312 $312 $308 312,166 311,767 308,459
===== ==== ==== ======= ======= =======
Steel Stock:
Balance at beginning of year... $ 88 $ 88 $ 86 88,398 88,336 86,578
Issued for:
Employee stock plans.......... 1 -- 2 369 62 1,733
Dividend Reinvestment and
Direct Stock Purchase Plan... -- -- -- -- -- 25
----- ---- ---- ------- ------- -------
Balance at end of year......... $ 89 $ 88 $ 88 88,767 88,398 88,336
===== ==== ==== ======= ======= =======
Securities exchangeable solely
into Marathon Stock:
Balance at beginning of year... $ -- $ 1 $-- 289 507 --
Issued to acquire Tarragon
stock......................... -- -- 1 -- -- 878
Exchanged for Marathon Stock... -- (1) -- (8) (218) (371)
----- ---- ---- ------- ------- -------
Balance at end of year......... $ -- $-- $ 1 281 289 507
===== ==== ==== ======= ======= =======
Treasury common stock, at cost:
Marathon Stock:
Balance at beginning of year... $ -- $-- $-- -- -- --
Repurchased.................... (105) -- -- (3,957) -- --
Reissued for:
Employee stock plans.......... 1 -- -- 43 -- --
Non-employee Board of
Directors deferred
compensation plan ........... -- -- -- 14 -- --
----- ---- ---- ------- ------- -------
Balance at end of year......... $(104) $-- $-- (3,900) -- --
===== ==== ==== ======= ======= =======
(Table continued on next page)
E-8
Comprehensive
Stockholders' Equity Income
---------------------- ----------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------ ---- ---- ----
(Dollars in millions)
Additional paid-in capital:
Balance at beginning of year....... $4,673 $4,587 $3,924
Marathon Stock issued.............. 9 92 598
Steel Stock issued................. 5 2 57
Exchangeable Shares:
Issued............................ -- -- 28
Exchanged for Marathon Stock...... -- (6) (12)
Repurchase of 6.50% preferred
stock............................. (11) (2) (8)
------ ------ ------
Balance at end of year............. $4,676 $4,673 $4,587
====== ====== ======
Deferred compensation (Note 17)...... $ (8) $ -- $(1)
====== ====== ======
Retained earnings:
Balance at beginning of year....... $1,807 $1,467 $1,138
Net income......................... 411 698 674 $411 $698 $674
Dividends on preferred stock....... (8) (9) (9)
Dividends on Marathon Stock (per
share: $.88 in 2000 and $.84 in
1999 and 1998).................... (274) (261) (248)
Dividends on Steel Stock (per share
$1.00)............................ (89) (88) (88)
------ ------ ------
Balance at end of year............. $1,847 $1,807 $1,467
====== ====== ======
Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss):
Minimum pension liability
adjustments:
Balance at beginning of year...... $ (10) $ (37) $ (32)
Changes during year, net of
taxes(a)......................... (11) 27 (5) (11) 27 (5)
------ ------ ------
Balance at end of year............ (21) (10) (37)
------ ------ ------
Foreign currency translation
adjustments:
Balance at beginning of year...... $ (17) $ (11) $ (8)
Changes during year, net of
taxes(a)......................... (12) (6) (3) (12) (6) (3)
------ ------ ------
Balance at end of year............ (29) (17) (11)
------ ------ ------
Unrealized holding losses on
investments:
Balance at beginning of year...... $ -- $ -- $ 3
Changes during year, net of
taxes(a)......................... -- (1) 2 -- (1) 2
Reclassification adjustment
included in net income........... -- 1 (5) -- 1 (5)
------ ------ ------
Balance at end of year............ -- -- --
------ ------ ------
Total balances at end of year..... $ (50) $ (27) $ (48)
====== ====== ====== ---- ---- ----
Total comprehensive income(b)... $388 $719 $663
==== ==== ====
Total stockholders' equity........... $6,764 $6,856 $6,405
====== ====== ======
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(a)Related income tax provision
(credit):
Minimum pension liability
adjustments...................... $ 4 $ (13) $ 3
Foreign currency translation
adjustments...................... (4) 3 4
Unrealized holding gains on
investments...................... -- -- 2
(b)Total comprehensive income (loss)
by Group:
Marathon Group.................... $ 419 $ 660 $ 306
U. S. Steel Group................. (31) 59 357
------ ------ ------
Total........................... $ 388 $ 719 $ 663
====== ====== ======
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
E-9
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Principal Accounting Policies
Principles applied in consolidation--The consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of USX Corporation and the majority-owned subsidiaries
which it controls (USX).
Investments in unincorporated oil and gas joint ventures, undivided interest
pipelines and jointly owned gas processing plants are consolidated on a pro
rata basis.
Investments in entities over which USX has significant influence are
accounted for using the equity method of accounting and are carried at USX's
share of net assets plus loans and advances.
Investments in companies whose stock is publicly traded are carried
generally at market value. The difference between the cost of these investments
and market value is recorded in other comprehensive income (net of tax).
Investments in companies whose stock has no readily determinable fair value are
carried at cost.
Dividend and investee income includes USX's proportionate share of income
from equity method investments and dividend income from other investments.
Dividend income is recognized when dividend payments are received.
Gains or losses from a change in ownership of a consolidated subsidiary or
an unconsolidated investee are recognized in the period of change.
Use of estimates--Generally accepted accounting principles require
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at year-end and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year.
Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the
carrying value of long-lived assets; valuation allowances for receivables,
inventories and deferred income tax assets; environmental liabilities;
liabilities for potential tax deficiencies and potential litigation claims and
settlements; and assets and obligations related to employee benefits.
Additionally, certain estimated liabilities are recorded when management
commits to a plan to close an operating facility or to exit a business
activity. Actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used.
Revenue recognition--Revenues are recognized generally when products are
shipped or services are provided to customers, the sales price is fixed and
determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Costs associated with
revenues, including shipping and other transportation costs, are recorded in
cost of revenues. Matching buy/sell transactions settled in cash are recorded
in both revenues and cost of revenues as separate sales and purchase
transactions, with no net effect on income. USX follows the sales method of
accounting for gas production imbalances and would recognize a liability if the
existing proved reserves were not adequate to cover the current imbalance
situation.
Cash and cash equivalents--Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand
and on deposit and investments in highly liquid debt instruments with
maturities generally of three months or less.
Inventories--Inventories are carried at lower of cost or market. Cost of
inventories is determined primarily under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method.
Derivative instruments--USX uses commodity-based and foreign currency
derivative instruments to manage its exposure to price risk. Management is
authorized to use futures, forwards, swaps and options related to the purchase,
production or sale of crude oil, natural gas, refined products, nonferrous
metals and electricity. While USX's risk management activities generally reduce
market risk exposure due to unfavorable commodity price changes for raw
material purchases and products sold, such activities can also encompass
strategies which assume price risk.
E-10
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Commodity-Based Hedging Transactions--For transactions that qualify for
hedge accounting, the resulting gains or losses are deferred and subsequently
recognized in income from operations, as a component of revenues or cost of
revenues, in the same period as the underlying physical transaction. To qualify
for hedge accounting, derivative positions cannot remain open if the underlying
physical market risk has been removed. If such derivative positions remain in
place, they would be marked-to- market and accounted for as trading or other
activities. Recorded deferred gains or losses are reflected within other
current and noncurrent assets or accounts payable and deferred credits and
other liabilities, as appropriate.
Commodity-Based Trading and Other Activities--Derivative instruments used
for trading and other activities are marked-to-market and the resulting gains
or losses are recognized in the current period within income from operations.
This category also includes the use of derivative instruments that have no
offsetting underlying physical market risk.
Foreign Currency Transactions--USX uses forward exchange contracts to manage
currency risks. Gains or losses related to firm commitments are deferred and
recognized concurrent with the underlying transaction. All other gains or
losses are recognized in income in the current period as revenues, cost of
revenues, interest income or expense, or other income, as appropriate. Forward
exchange contracts are recorded as receivables or payables, as appropriate.
Property, plant and equipment--USX uses the successful efforts method of
accounting for oil and gas producing activities. Costs to acquire mineral
interests in oil and gas properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells that
find proved reserves, and to drill and equip development wells are capitalized.
Costs to drill exploratory wells that do not find proved reserves, geological
and geophysical costs, and costs of carrying and retaining unproved properties
are expensed.
Capitalized costs of producing oil and gas properties are depreciated and
depleted by the unit-of-production method. Support equipment and other
property, plant and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful
lives.
USX evaluates its oil and gas producing properties for impairment of value
on a field-by-field basis or, in certain instances, by logical grouping of
assets if there is significant shared infrastructure, using undiscounted future
cash flows based on total proved reserves. Oil and gas producing properties
deemed to be impaired are written down to their fair value, as determined by
discounted future cash flows based on total proved and risk-adjusted probable
and possible reserves or, if available, comparable market values. Unproved oil
and gas properties that are individually significant are periodically assessed
for impairment of value, and a loss is recognized at the time of impairment.
Other unproved properties are amortized over their remaining holding period.
For property, plant and equipment unrelated to oil and gas producing
activities, depreciation is generally computed on the straight-line method over
their estimated useful lives. USX's method of computing depreciation for
domestic steel producing assets modifies straight-line depreciation based on
the level of production. The modification factors range from a minimum of 85%
at a production level below 81% of capability to a maximum of 105% for a 100%
production level. No modification is made at the 95% production level, which is
considered to be the normal long-range level.
Depletion of mineral properties, other than oil and gas, is based on rates
that are expected to amortize capitalized costs over the estimated tonnage of
minerals to be removed.
E-11
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Assets unrelated to oil and gas producing activities are evaluated for
impairment of value on an individual asset basis or by logical groupings of
assets. Assets deemed to be impaired are written down to their fair value, as
determined by discounted future cash flows or, if available, comparable market
values.
When property, plant and equipment depreciated on an individual basis are
sold or otherwise disposed of, any gains or losses are reflected in income.
Gains on disposal of property, plant and equipment are recognized when earned,
which is generally at the time of closing. If a loss on disposal is expected,
such losses are recognized when the assets are reclassified as held for sale.
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment depreciated on a group
basis are credited to accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization with
no immediate effect on income.
Major maintenance activities--USX incurs planned major maintenance costs
primarily for refinery turnarounds in the Marathon Group and blast furnace
relines in the U. S. Steel Group. Costs associated with refinery turnarounds
are expensed in the same annual period as incurred; however, estimated annual
turnaround costs are recognized in income throughout the year on a pro rata
basis. Costs associated with blast furnace
relines are separately capitalized in property, plant and equipment. Such costs
are amortized over their estimated useful life, which is generally the period
until the next scheduled reline.
Environmental liabilities--USX provides for remediation costs and penalties
when the responsibility to remediate is probable and the amount of associated
costs is reasonably determinable. Generally, the timing of remediation accruals
coincides with completion of a feasibility study or the commitment to a formal
plan of action. Remediation liabilities are accrued based on estimates of known
environmental exposure and are discounted in certain instances. If recoveries
of remediation costs from third parties are probable, a receivable is recorded.
Estimated abandonment and dismantlement costs of offshore production platforms
are accrued based on production of estimated proved oil and gas reserves.
Postemployment benefits--USX recognizes an obligation to provide
postemployment benefits, primarily for disability-related claims covering
indemnity and medical payments. The obligation for these claims and the related
periodic costs are measured using actuarial techniques and assumptions,
including an appropriate discount rate, analogous to the required methodology
for measuring pension and other postretirement benefit obligations. Actuarial
gains and losses are deferred and amortized over future periods.
Insurance--USX is insured for catastrophic casualty and certain property and
business interruption exposures, as well as those risks required to be insured
by law or contract. Costs resulting from noninsured losses are charged against
income upon occurrence.
Reclassifications--Certain reclassifications of prior years' data have been
made to conform to 2000 classifications.
2. New Accounting Standards
In the fourth quarter of 2000, USX adopted the following accounting
pronouncements primarily related to the classification of items in the
financial statements. The adoption of these new pronouncements had no net
effect on the financial position or results of operations of USX, although they
required reclassifications of certain amounts in the financial statements,
including all prior periods presented.
. In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 (SAB 101) "Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements," which summarizes the SEC staff's interpretations
of generally accepted accounting principles related to revenue
recognition and classification.
E-12
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
. In 2000, the Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (EITF) issued EITF Consensus No. 99-19 "Reporting
Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent," which addresses
whether certain items should be reported as a reduction of revenue or as
a component of both revenues and cost of revenues, and EITF Consensus
No. 00-10 "Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs," which
addresses the classification of costs incurred for shipping goods to
customers.
. In September 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, "Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities" (SFAS 140). SFAS 140 revises the standards for accounting
for securitizations and other transfers of financial assets and
collateral and requires certain disclosures. USX adopted certain
recognition and reclassification provisions of SFAS 140, which were
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2000. The remaining
provisions of SFAS 140 are effective after March 31, 2001.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities" (SFAS No. 133), which later was amended by SFAS Nos.
137 and 138. This Standard requires recognition of all derivatives as either
assets or liabilities at fair value. Changes in fair value will be reflected in
either current period net income or other comprehensive income, depending on
the designation of the derivative instrument. USX may elect not to designate a
derivative instrument as a hedge even if the strategy would be expected to
qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The adoption of SFAS No. 133 will
change the timing of recognition for derivative gains and losses as compared to
previous accounting standards.
USX will adopt the Standard effective January 1, 2001. The transition
adjustment resulting from the adoption of SFAS No. 133 will be reported as a
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The unfavorable
cumulative effect on net income, net of tax, is expected to approximate $9
million. The unfavorable cumulative effect on other comprehensive income, net
of tax, will approximate $7 million. The amounts reported as other
comprehensive income will be reflected in net income when the anticipated
physical transactions are consummated. It is not possible to estimate the
effect that this Standard will have on future results of operations.
3. Business Combinations
On November 24, 2000, USX acquired U. S. Steel Kosice s.r.o. (USSK), which
is located in the Slovak Republic. USSK was formed in June 2000 to hold the
steel operations and related assets of VSZ a.s. (VSZ), a diversified Slovak
corporation. The cash purchase price was $69 million. Additional payments to
VSZ of not less than $25 million and up to $75 million are contingent upon the
future performance of USSK. Additionally, $325 million of debt was included
with the acquisition. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase
method of accounting. The 2000 results of operations include the operations of
USSK from the date of acquisition.
Prior to this transaction, USX and VSZ were equal partners in VSZ U. S.
Steel s.r.o. (VSZUSS), a tin mill products manufacturer. The assets of USSK
included VSZ's interest in VSZUSS. The acquisition of the remaining interest in
VSZUSS was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. Previously,
USX had accounted for its investment in VSZUSS under the equity method of
accounting.
The following unaudited pro forma data for USX includes the results of
operations of USSK for 2000 and 1999, giving effect to the acquisition as if it
had been consummated at the beginning of the years presented. The pro forma
data is based on historical information and does not necessarily reflect the
actual results that would have occurred nor is it necessarily indicative of
future results of operations. In addition, VSZ did not historically provide
carve-out financial information for its steel operations in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Therefore, USX
made certain estimates and assumptions regarding revenues and costs in the
preparation of the following unaudited pro forma data.
E-13
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Year Ended December 31
-----------------------
2000 1999
----------- -----------
(In millions, except
per share amounts)
Revenues and other income............................... $40,876 $30,121
Net income.............................................. 489 683
Applicable to Steel Stock:
Income before extraordinary losses(a)................... 49 27
--Per share--basic and diluted........................ .55 .31
Net income(a)........................................... 49 20
--Per share--basic and diluted........................ .55 .23
--------
(a) Amounts are net of dividends on preferred stock of $8 million and $9
million in 2000 and 1999, respectively.
In August 1998, Marathon Oil Company (Marathon) acquired Tarragon Oil and
Gas Limited (Tarragon), a Canadian oil and gas exploration and production
company. Securityholders of Tarragon received, at their election, Cdn$14.25 for
each Tarragon share, or the economic equivalent in Exchangeable Shares of an
indirect Canadian subsidiary of Marathon, which are exchangeable solely on a
one-for-one basis into Marathon Stock. The purchase price included cash
payments of $686 million, issuance of 878,074 Exchangeable Shares valued at $29
million and the assumption of $345 million in debt.
The Exchangeable Shares are exchangeable at the option of the holder at any
time and automatically redeemable on August 11, 2003 (and, in certain
circumstances, as early as August 11, 2001). The holders of
Exchangeable Shares are entitled to receive declared dividends equivalent to
dividends declared from time to time by USX on Marathon Stock.
USX accounted for the acquisition using the purchase method of accounting.
The 1998 results of operations include the operations of Marathon Canada
Limited, formerly known as Tarragon, commencing August 12, 1998.
During 1997, Marathon and Ashland Inc. (Ashland) agreed to combine the major
elements of their refining, marketing and transportation (RM&T) operations. On
January 1, 1998, Marathon transferred certain RM&T net assets to Marathon
Ashland Petroleum LLC (MAP), a new consolidated subsidiary. Also on January 1,
1998, Marathon acquired certain RM&T net assets from Ashland in exchange for a
38% interest in MAP. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase
method of accounting. The purchase price was determined to be $1.9 billion,
based upon an external valuation. The change in Marathon's ownership interest
in MAP resulted in a gain of $245 million in 1998. In accordance with MAP
closing agreements, Marathon and Ashland have made capital contributions to MAP
for environmental improvements. The closing agreements stipulate that ownership
interests in MAP will not be adjusted as a result of such contributions.
Accordingly, Marathon recognized a gain on ownership change of $12 million in
2000 and $17 million in 1999.
In connection with the formation of MAP, Marathon and Ashland entered into a
Limited Liability Company Agreement dated January 1, 1998 (the LLC Agreement).
The LLC Agreement provides for an initial term of MAP expiring on December 31,
2022 (25 years from its formation). The term will automatically be extended for
ten-year periods, unless a termination notice is given by either party.
Also in connection with the formation of MAP, the parties entered into a
Put/Call, Registration Rights and Standstill Agreement (the Put/Call
Agreement). The Put/Call Agreement provides that at any time after December 31,
2004, Ashland will have the right to sell to Marathon all of Ashland's
ownership interest in MAP, for an amount in cash and/or Marathon or USX debt or
equity securities equal to the product of 85% (90% if equity securities are
used) of the fair market value of MAP at that time, multiplied by Ashland's
percentage interest in MAP. Payment could be made at closing, or at Marathon's
option, in three equal annual installments, the first of which would be payable
at closing. At any time after December 31, 2004, Marathon will have the right
to purchase all of Ashland's ownership interests in MAP, for an amount in cash
equal to the product of 115% of the fair market value of MAP at that time,
multiplied by Ashland's percentage interest in MAP.
E-14
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
4. Transactions Between MAP and Ashland
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, MAP had current receivables from Ashland of
$35 million and $26 million, respectively, and current payables to Ashland of
$2 million.
MAP has a $190 million revolving credit agreement with Ashland. Interest on
borrowings is based on defined short-term market rates. At December 31, 2000
and 1999, there were no borrowings against this facility.
During 2000, 1999 and 1998, MAP's sales to Ashland, consisting primarily of
petroleum products, were $285 million, $198 million and $190 million,
respectively, and MAP's purchases of products and services from Ashland were
$26 million, $22 million and $47 million, respectively. These transactions were
conducted under terms comparable to those with unrelated parties.
5. Discontinued Operations
Effective October 31, 1997, USX sold its stock in Delhi Gas Pipeline
Corporation and other subsidiaries of USX that comprised all of the Delhi
Group. USX elected to use the net proceeds of $195 million, or $20.60
per share, to redeem all shares of Delhi Stock. The net proceeds were
distributed to the Delhi shareholders on January 26, 1998. After the
redemption, 50,000,000 shares of Delhi Stock remain authorized but unissued.
6. Other Items
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Net interest and other financial costs
Interest and other financial income:
Interest income............................................ $ 29 $ 16 $ 35
Other...................................................... 5 (13) 4
---- ---- ----
Total.................................................... 34 3 39
---- ---- ----
Interest and other financial costs:
Interest incurred.......................................... 328 326 325
Less interest capitalized.................................. 19 26 46
---- ---- ----
Net interest............................................. 309 300 279
Interest on tax issues..................................... 17 20 21
Financial costs on trust preferred securities.............. 13 13 13
Financial costs on preferred stock of subsidiary........... 22 22 22
Amortization of discounts.................................. 3 3 6
Expenses on sales of accounts receivable................... -- 15 21
Adjustment to settlement value of indexed debt............. -- (13) (44)
Other...................................................... 11 5 --
---- ---- ----
Total.................................................... 375 365 318
---- ---- ----
Net interest and other financial costs....................... $341 $362 $279
==== ==== ====
E-15
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Foreign currency transactions
For 2000, 1999 and 1998, the aggregate foreign currency transaction gains
(losses) included in determining net income were $37 million, $(12) million and
$13 million, respectively.
Consumer excise taxes
Included in revenues and costs and expenses for 2000, 1999 and 1998 were
$4,344 million, $3,973 million and $3,824 million, respectively, representing
consumer excise taxes on petroleum products and merchandise.
7. Extraordinary Losses
In 1999, USX irrevocably deposited with a trustee the entire 5.5 million
common shares it owned in RTI International Metals, Inc. (RTI). The deposit of
the shares resulted in the satisfaction of USX's obligation under its 6 3/4%
Exchangeable Notes (indexed debt) due February 1, 2000. Under the terms of the
indenture, the trustee exchanged one RTI share for each note at maturity. All
shares were required for satisfaction of the indexed debt; therefore, none
reverted back to USX.
As a result of the above transaction, USX recorded in 1999 an extraordinary
loss of $5 million, net of a $3 million income tax benefit, representing
prepaid interest expense and the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs, and
a pretax charge of $22 million, representing the difference between the
carrying value of the investment in RTI and the carrying value of the indexed
debt, which is included in net gains (losses) on
disposal of assets. Since USX's investment in RTI was attributed to the U. S.
Steel Group, the indexed debt was also attributed to the U. S. Steel Group.
In 1999, Republic Technologies International, LLC, an equity investee of
USX, recorded an extraordinary loss related to the early extinguishment of
debt. As a result, USX recorded an extraordinary loss of $2 million, net of a
$1 million income tax benefit, representing its share of the extraordinary
loss.
8. Group and Segment Information
USX has two classes of common stock: Marathon Stock and Steel Stock, which
are intended to reflect the performance of the Marathon Group and the U. S.
Steel Group, respectively. A description of each group and its products and
services is as follows:
Marathon Group--The Marathon Group includes Marathon Oil Company and certain
other subsidiaries of USX. Marathon Group revenues as a percentage of total
consolidated USX revenues were 85% in 2000, 81% in 1999 and 77% in 1998.
U. S. Steel Group--The U. S. Steel Group consists of U. S. Steel, the
largest domestic integrated steel producer and U. S. Steel operations in the
Slovak Republic. U. S. Steel Group revenues as a percentage of total
consolidated USX revenues were 15% in 2000, 19% in 1999 and 23% in 1998.
E-16
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Group Operations:
Income Net
From Income Capital
Year Revenues Operations (Loss) Expenditures Assets
---- -------- ---------- ------ ------------ -------
(In millions)
Marathon Group............ 2000 $34,487 $1,648 $432 $1,425 $15,232
1999 23,590 1,713 654 1,378 15,674
1998 21,274 938 310 1,270 14,544
U. S. Steel Group......... 2000 6,090 104 (21) 244 8,711
1999 5,536 150 44 287 7,525
1998 6,378 579 364 310 6,749
Eliminations.............. 2000 (77) -- -- -- (542)
1999 (58) -- -- -- (268)
1998 (23) -- -- -- (160)
Total USX Corporation..... 2000 $40,500 $1,752 $411 $1,669 $23,401
1999 29,068 1,863 698 1,665 22,931
1998 27,629 1,517 674 1,580 21,133
Revenues by Product:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(In millions)
Marathon Group
Refined products..................................... $22,514 $15,181 $12,852
Merchandise.......................................... 2,441 2,194 1,941
Liquid hydrocarbons.................................. 6,856 4,587 5,023
Natural gas.......................................... 2,518 1,429 1,187
Transportation and other products.................... 158 199 271
U. S. Steel Group
Sheet and semi-finished steel products............... $ 3,288 $ 3,433 $ 3,598
Tubular, plate and tin mill products................. 1,731 1,140 1,546
Raw materials (coal, coke and iron ore).............. 626 549 744
Other(a)............................................. 445 414 490
--------
(a) Includes revenue from the sale of steel production by-products,
engineering and consulting services, real estate development and resource
management.
E-17
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Operating Segments:
USX's reportable operating segments are business units within the Marathon
and U. S. Steel Groups, each providing their own unique products and services.
Each operating segment is independently managed and requires different
technology and marketing strategies. Segment income represents income from
operations allocable to operating segments. The following items included in
income from operations are not allocated to operating segments:
. Gain on ownership change in MAP
. Net pension credits associated with the U. S. Steel Group's pension plan
assets and liabilities
. Certain costs related to former U. S. Steel Group business activities
. Certain general and administrative costs related to all Marathon Group
operating segments in excess of amounts billed to MAP under service
contracts and amounts charged out to operating segments under Marathon's
shared services procedures
. USX corporate general and administrative costs. These costs primarily
consist of employment costs including pension effects, professional
services, facilities and other related costs associated with corporate
activities.
. Inventory market valuation adjustments
. Certain other items not allocated to operating segments for business
performance reporting purposes (see (a) in reconcilement table on page
E-20.)
E-18
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The Marathon Group's operations consist of three reportable operating
segments: 1) Exploration and Production (E&P)--explores for and produces crude
oil and natural gas on a worldwide basis; 2) Refining, Marketing and
Transportation (RM&T)--refines, markets and transports crude oil and petroleum
products, primarily in the Midwest and southeastern United States through MAP;
and 3) Other Energy Related Businesses (OERB). Other Energy Related Businesses
is an aggregation of two segments which fall below the quantitative reporting
thresholds: 1) Natural Gas and Crude Oil Marketing and Transportation--markets
and transports its own and third-party natural gas and crude oil in the United
States; and 2) Power Generation--develops, constructs and operates independent
electric power projects worldwide. The U. S. Steel Group consists of two
reportable operating segments: 1) Domestic Steel and 2) U. S. Steel Kosice
(USSK). Domestic Steel includes the United States operations of U. S. Steel,
while USSK includes the U. S. Steel Kosice operations in the Slovak Republic.
Domestic Steel is engaged in the domestic production and sale of steel mill
products, coke and taconite pellets; the management of mineral resources; coal
mining; engineering and consulting services; and real estate development and
management. USSK is engaged in the production and sale of steel mill products
and coke and primarily serves European markets.
Information on assets by segment is not provided as it is not reviewed by
the chief operating decision maker.
Total Total
Marathon Domestic U. S. Steel
E&P RM&T OERB Segments Steel USSK Segments Total
------ ------- ------ -------- -------- ---- ----------- -------
(In millions)
2000
Revenues and other
income:
Customer............... $4,184 $28,693 $1,550 $34,427 $5,981 $ 92 $6,073 $40,500
Intersegment(a)........ 412 83 78 573 -- -- -- 573
Intergroup(a).......... 30 1 29 60 17 -- 17 77
Equity in earnings
(losses) of
unconsolidated
investees............. 47 22 15 84 (8) -- (8) 76
Other.................. 21 50 12 83 50 -- 50 133
------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ---- ------ -------
Total revenues and
other income.......... $4,694 $28,849 $1,684 $35,227 $6,040 $ 92 $6,132 $41,359
====== ======= ====== ======= ====== ==== ====== =======
Segment income.......... $1,535 $ 1,273 $ 38 $ 2,846 $ 23 $ 2 $ 25 $ 2,871
Significant noncash
items included in
segment income--
depreciation, depletion
and amortization(b).... 723 315 3 1,041 285 4 289 1,330
Capital
expenditures(c)........ 742 656 2 1,400 239 5 244 1,644
1999
Revenues and other
income:
Customer............... $2,856 $19,962 $ 731 $23,549 $5,519 $-- $5,519 $29,068
Intersegment(a)........ 202 47 40 289 -- -- -- 289
Intergroup(a).......... 19 -- 22 41 17 -- 17 58
Equity in earnings
(losses) of
unconsolidated
investees............. (2) 17 26 41 (43) -- (43) (2)
Other.................. 30 50 15 95 46 -- 46 141
------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ---- ------ -------
Total revenues and
other income.......... $3,105 $20,076 $ 834 $24,015 $5,539 $-- $5,539 $29,554
====== ======= ====== ======= ====== ==== ====== =======
Segment income.......... $ 618 $ 611 $ 61 $ 1,290 $ 91 $-- $ 91 $ 1,381
Significant noncash
items included in
segment income--
depreciation, depletion
and amortization(b).... 638 280 5 923 304 -- 304 1,227
Capital
expenditures(c)........ 744 612 4 1,360 286 -- 286 1,646
1998
Revenues and other
income:
Customer............... $1,905 $19,018 $ 306 $21,229 $6,374 $-- $6,374 $27,603
Intersegment(a)........ 144 10 17 171 -- -- -- 171
Intergroup(a).......... 13 -- 7 20 2 -- 2 22
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated
investees............. 2 12 14 28 46 -- 46 74
Other.................. 26 40 11 77 55 -- 55 132
------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ---- ------ -------
Total revenues and
other income.......... $2,090 $19,080 $ 355 $21,525 $6,477 $-- $6,477 $28,002
====== ======= ====== ======= ====== ==== ====== =======
Segment income.......... $ 278 $ 896 $ 33 $ 1,207 $ 517 $-- $ 517 $ 1,724
Significant noncash
items included in
segment income--
depreciation, depletion
and amortization(b).... 581 272 6 859 283 -- 283 1,142
Capital
expenditures(c)........ 839 410 8 1,257 305 -- 305 1,562
--------
(a) Intersegment and intergroup revenues and transfers were conducted under
terms comparable to those with unrelated parties.
(b) Differences between segment totals and consolidated totals represent
amounts included in administrative expenses, international and domestic
oil and gas property impairments and impairment of coal assets.
(c) Differences between segment totals and consolidated totals represent
amounts related to corporate administrative activities.
E-19
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The following schedules reconcile segment amounts to amounts reported in the
Groups' financial statements:
Marathon Group U. S. Steel Group
------------------------- ----------------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
------- ------- ------- ------ ------ ------
(In millions)
Revenues and Other Income:
Revenues and other income
of reportable segments... $35,227 $24,015 $21,525 $6,132 $5,539 $6,477
Items not allocated to
segments:
Joint venture formation
charges................ (931) -- -- -- -- --
Gain on ownership change
in MAP................. 12 17 245 -- -- --
Losses on certain equity
investments............ -- -- -- -- (69) --
Other................... 124 (36) 24 -- -- --
Elimination of
intersegment revenues.... (573) (289) (171) -- -- --
------- ------- ------- ------ ------ ------
Total Group revenues
and other income...... $33,859 $23,707 $21,623 $6,132 $5,470 $6,477
======= ======= ======= ====== ====== ======
Income:
Income for reportable
segments................. $ 2,846 $ 1,290 $ 1,207 $ 25 $ 91 $ 517
Items not allocated to
segments:
Joint venture formation
charges................ (931) -- -- -- -- --
Gain on ownership change
in MAP................. 12 17 245 -- -- --
Administrative
expenses............... (136) (108) (106) (25) (17) (24)
Net pension credits..... -- -- -- 266 228 186
Costs related to former
business activities.... -- -- -- (91) (83) (100)
Inventory market
valuation adjustments.. -- 551 (267) -- -- --
Other(a)................ (143) (37) (141) (71) (69) --
------- ------- ------- ------ ------ ------
Total Group income from
operations............ $ 1,648 $ 1,713 $ 938 $ 104 $ 150 $ 579
======= ======= ======= ====== ====== ======
--------
(a) Represents in 2000, for the Marathon Group, certain oil and gas property
impairments, net gains on certain asset sales and reorganization charges
and for the U. S. Steel Group, impairment of coal assets. Represents in
1999, for the Marathon Group, primarily certain oil and gas property
impairments, costs of a voluntary early retirement program and net losses
on certain asset sales and, for the U. S. Steel Group, certain losses
related to investments in equity investees. Represents in 1998, certain
international oil and gas property impairments, certain suspended
exploration well write-offs, a gas contract settlement and MAP transition
charges.
E-20
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Geographic Area:
The information below summarizes the operations in different geographic
areas. Transfers between geographic areas are at prices which approximate
market.
Revenues and Other Income
-----------------------------------------
Within Between
Year Geographic Areas Geographic Areas Total Assets(a)
---- ---------------- ---------------- ------- ---------------
(In millions)
Marathon Group:
United States......... 2000 $32,239 $ -- $32,239 $ 6,711
1999 22,716 -- 22,716 7,555
1998 20,837 -- 20,837 7,659
Canada................ 2000 856 899 1,755 940
1999 426 521 947 1,112
1998 209 368 577 1,094
United Kingdom........ 2000 567 -- 567 1,698
1999 459 -- 459 1,581
1998 462 -- 462 1,739
Other Foreign
Countries............ 2000 197 188 385 310
1999 106 88 194 735
1998 115 52 167 468
Eliminations.......... 2000 -- (1,087) (1,087) --
1999 -- (609) (609) --
1998 -- (420) (420) --
Total Marathon
Group.............. 2000 $33,859 $ -- $33,859 $ 9,659
1999 23,707 -- 23,707 10,983
1998 21,623 -- 21,623 10,960
U. S. Steel Group:
United States......... 2000 $ 6,027 $ -- $ 6,027 $ 2,745
1999 5,452 -- 5,452 2,889
1998 6,460 -- 6,460 3,043
Foreign Countries..... 2000 105 -- 105 386
1999 18 -- 18 63
1998 17 -- 17 69
Total U. S. Steel
Group.............. 2000 $ 6,132 $ -- $ 6,132 $ 3,131
1999 5,470 -- 5,470 2,952
1998 6,477 -- 6,477 3,112
Eliminations............ 2000 $ (77) $ -- $ (77) $ --
1999 (58) -- (58) --
1998 (23) -- (23) --
Total USX Corporation... 2000 $39,914 $ -- $39,914 $12,790
1999 29,119 -- 29,119 13,935
1998 28,077 -- 28,077 14,072
--------
(a) Includes property, plant and equipment and investments.
E-21
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
9. Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits
USX has noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering substantially
all U.S. employees. Benefits under these plans are primarily based upon years
of service and final average pensionable earnings, or a minimum benefit based
upon years of service, whichever is greater. In addition, pension benefits
based upon a percent of total career pensionable earnings cover certain
participating salaried employees.
USX also has defined benefit retiree health care and life insurance plans
(other benefits) covering most U.S. employees upon their retirement. Health
care benefits are provided through comprehensive hospital, surgical and major
medical benefit provisions or through health maintenance organizations, both
subject to various cost sharing features. Life insurance benefits are provided
to certain nonunion and union represented retiree beneficiaries primarily based
on employees' annual base salary at retirement. For most U.S. union retirees,
benefits are provided for the most part based on fixed amounts negotiated in
labor contracts with the appropriate unions.
Pension
Benefits Other Benefits
------------------ ------------------
2000 1999 2000 1999
------- ------- ------- -------
(In millions)
Change in benefit obligations
Benefit obligations at January 1.... $ 7,584 $ 8,629 $ 2,374 $ 2,710
Service cost........................ 128 152 26 32
Interest cost....................... 572 540 184 169
Plan amendments..................... 6 399(a) 1 (30)
Actuarial (gains) losses............ 551 (1,019) 306 (333)
Plan mergers and acquisitions....... -- 56 -- 11
Settlements, curtailments and
termination benefits............... (99) (329) 22 --
Benefits paid....................... (883) (844) (189) (185)
------- ------- ------- -------
Benefit obligations at December 31.. $ 7,859 $ 7,584 $ 2,724 $ 2,374
======= ======= ======= =======
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at January
1.................................. $11,305 $11,574 $ 281 $ 265
Actual return on plan assets........ 131 865 26 20
Plan merger and acquisitions........ (1) 38 -- 1
Employer contributions.............. 1 2 576(b) 34
Trustee distributions(c)............ (34) (30) -- --
Settlements paid.................... (134) (306) -- --
Benefits paid from plan assets...... (877) (838) (41) (39)
------- ------- ------- -------
Fair value of plan assets at
December 31........................ $10,391 $11,305 $ 842 $ 281
======= ======= ======= =======
Funded status of plans at December
31................................. $ 2,532(d) $ 3,721(d) $(1,882) $(2,093)
Unrecognized net gain from
transition......................... (20) (95) -- --
Unrecognized prior service costs
(credits).......................... 778 880 (47) (53)
Unrecognized net actuarial gains.... (499) (1,945) (126) (458)
Additional minimum liability(e)..... (38) (24) -- --
------- ------- ------- -------
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost...... $ 2,753 $ 2,537 $(2,055) $(2,604)
======= ======= ======= =======
--------
(a) Results primarily from a five-year labor contract with the United
Steelworkers of America ratified in August 1999.
(b) Includes for the U. S. Steel Group, contributions of $530 million to a
Voluntary Employee Benefit Association trust, comprised of $30 million in
contractual requirements and an elective contribution of $500 million.
Also includes for the U. S. Steel Group, a $30 million elective
contribution to the non-union retiree life insurance trust.
E-22
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(c) Represents transfers of excess pension assets to fund retiree health care
benefits accounts under Section 420 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(d) Includes several plans that have accumulated benefit obligations in excess
of plan assets:
2000 1999
---- ----
Aggregate accumulated benefit obligations...................... $(74) $(53)
Aggregate projected benefit obligations........................ (92) (76)
Aggregate plan assets.......................................... -- --
(e) Additional minimum liability recorded was offset by the following:
Intangible asset............................................... $ 6 $ 9
Accumulated other comprehensive income (losses):
Beginning of year.............................................. $(10) $(37)
Change during year (net of tax)................................ (11) 27
---- ----
Balance at end of year......................................... $(21) $(10)
==== ====
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
------------------------ --------------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Components of net periodic
benefit cost (credit)
Service cost.............. $ 128 $ 152 $ 119 $ 26 $ 32 $ 27
Interest cost............. 572 540 544 184 169 172
Expected return on plan
assets................... (958) (895) (876) (24) (21) (21)
Amortization
--net transition gain... (71) (72) (74) -- -- --
--prior service costs
(credits).............. 102 87 75 (6) (4) 1
--actuarial (gains)
losses................. (53) 7 6 (26) (5) (13)
Multiemployer and other
USX plans................ 5 5 6 9(a) 7(a) 13(a)
Settlement and termination
(gains) losses........... 32(b) (42)(b) 10(b) 21(b) -- --
----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----
Net periodic benefit cost
(credit)................. $(243) $(218) $(190) $184 $178 $179
===== ===== ===== ==== ==== ====
--------
(a) Represents payments to a multiemployer health care benefit plan created by
the Coal Industry Retiree Health Benefit Act of 1992 based on assigned
beneficiaries receiving benefits. The present value of this unrecognized
obligation is broadly estimated to be $84 million, including the effects of
future medical inflation, and this amount could increase if additional
beneficiaries are assigned.
(b) Relates primarily to voluntary early retirement programs.
Other
Pension Benefits Benefits
----------------- ---------
2000 1999 2000 1999
-------- -------- ---- ----
Weighted average actuarial assumptions at December
31
Discount rate..................................... 7.5% 8.0% 7.5% 8.0%
Expected annual return on plan assets............. 9.0% 8.6% 8.5% 8.5%
Increase in compensation rate..................... 4.1% 4.1% 4.1% 4.1%
For measurement purposes, a 7.6% annual rate of increase in the per capita
cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2001. The rate was assumed
to decrease gradually to 5% in 2006 for the U. S. Steel Group and in 2007 for
the Marathon Group and remain at that level thereafter.
E-23
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would
have the following effects:
1-Percentage- 1-Percentage-
Point Point
Increase Decrease
------------- -------------
(In millions)
Effect on total of service and interest cost
components....................................... $ 25 $ (21)
Effect on other postretirement benefit
obligations...................................... 248 (209)
10. Leases
Future minimum commitments for capital leases (including sale-leasebacks
accounted for as financings) and for operating leases having remaining
noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year are as follows:
Capital Operating
Leases Leases
------- ---------
(In millions)
2001......................................................... $ 12 $173
2002......................................................... 12 139
2003......................................................... 12 98
2004......................................................... 12 87
2005......................................................... 12 141
Later years.................................................. 89 173
Sublease rentals............................................. -- (80)
---- ----
Total minimum lease payments............................. 149 $731
====
Less imputed interest costs.................................. 54
----
Present value of net minimum lease payments included in
long-term debt.......................................... $ 95
====
Operating lease rental expense:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Minimum rental................................................ $288 $273 $288
Contingent rental............................................. 30 29 29
Sublease rentals.............................................. (19) (19) (14)
---- ---- ----
Net rental expense.......................................... $299 $283 $303
==== ==== ====
USX leases a wide variety of facilities and equipment under operating
leases, including land and building space, office equipment, production
facilities and transportation equipment. Most long-term leases include renewal
options and, in certain leases, purchase options. In the event of a change in
control of USX, as defined in the agreements, or certain other circumstances,
operating lease obligations totaling $104 million may be declared immediately
due and payable.
E-24
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
11. Income Taxes
Provisions (credits) for income taxes were:
2000 1999 1998
---------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------
Current Deferred Total Current Deferred Total Current Deferred Total
------- -------- ----- ------- -------- ----- ------- -------- -----
(In millions)
Federal................. $257 $196 $453 $107 $257 $364 $102 $168 $270
State and local......... 41 3 44 4 1 5 33 18 51
Foreign................. 55 (50) 5 26 (46) (20) (4) (2) (6)
---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Total................. $353 $149 $502 $137 $212 $349 $131 $184 $315
==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ====
A reconciliation of federal statutory tax rate (35%) to total provisions
follows:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(In millions)
Statutory rate applied to income before income taxes........ $320 $369 $346
Effects of foreign operations:
Impairment of deferred tax benefits....................... 235 -- --
Adjustments to foreign valuation allowances............... (30) -- --
All other, including foreign tax credits.................. (35) (20) (37)
State and local income taxes after federal income tax
effects.................................................... 29 3 33
Credits other than foreign tax credits...................... (10) (10) (12)
Excess percentage depletion................................. (3) (7) (11)
Effects of partially owned companies........................ (5) (5) (4)
Dispositions of subsidiary investments...................... -- 7 --
Adjustment of prior years' federal income taxes............. (6) 4 (5)
Other....................................................... 7 8 5
---- ---- ----
Total provisions.......................................... $502 $349 $315
==== ==== ====
E-25
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted from the following:
December 31
--------------
2000 1999
------ ------
(In millions)
Deferred tax assets:
Minimum tax credit carryforwards............................. $ 39 $ 131
State tax loss carryforwards (expiring in 2001 through
2020)....................................................... 125 122
Foreign tax loss carryforwards (portion of which expire in
2001 through 2015).......................................... 269 408
Employee benefits............................................ 1,028 1,204
Expected federal benefit for:
Crediting certain foreign deferred income taxes............ 315 530
Deducting state deferred income taxes...................... 36 36
Receivables, payables and debt............................... 93 82
Contingency and other accruals............................... 226 202
Investments in foreign subsidiaries.......................... 39 52
Other........................................................ 62 45
Valuation allowances:
Federal.................................................... -- (30)
State...................................................... (50) (52)
Foreign.................................................... (252) (282)
------ ------
Total deferred tax assets(a)............................. 1,930 2,448
------ ------
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property, plant and equipment................................ 1,890 2,365
Prepaid pensions............................................. 1,165 1,048
Inventory.................................................... 335 340
Investments in subsidiaries and equity investees............. 52 76
Other........................................................ 221 155
------ ------
Total deferred tax liabilities........................... 3,663 3,984
------ ------
Net deferred tax liabilities........................... $1,733 $1,536
====== ======
--------
(a) USX expects to generate sufficient future taxable income to realize the
benefit of its deferred tax assets. In addition, the ability to realize the
benefit of foreign tax credits is based upon certain assumptions concerning
future operating conditions (particularly as related to prevailing oil
prices), income generated from foreign sources and USX's tax profile in the
years that such credits may be claimed. During 2000, the amount of net
deferred tax assets expected to be realized was reduced as a result of the
change in the amount and timing of future foreign source income due to the
exchange of Marathon's interest in Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Ltd.
(Sakhalin Energy) for other oil and gas producing interests. Additionally,
gross deferred tax assets and the associated valuation allowance were
reduced by a change in management's intent regarding the permanent
reinvestment of the earnings from certain foreign subsidiaries.
The consolidated tax returns of USX for the years 1990 through 1997 are
under various stages of audit and administrative review by the IRS. USX
believes it has made adequate provision for income taxes and interest which may
become payable for years not yet settled.
Pretax income (loss) included $245 million, $63 million and $(75) million
attributable to foreign sources in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
E-26
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Undistributed earnings of certain consolidated foreign subsidiaries at
December 31, 2000, amounted to $223 million. No provision for deferred U.S.
income taxes has been made for these subsidiaries because USX intends to
permanently reinvest such earnings in those foreign operations. If such
earnings were not permanently reinvested, a deferred tax liability of $78
million would have been required.
12. Investments and Long-Term Receivables
December 31
-----------
2000 1999
---- ------
(In
millions)
Equity method investments.......................................... $575 $1,055
Other investments.................................................. 101 71
Receivables due after one year..................................... 59 57
Deposits of restricted cash........................................ 19 22
Other.............................................................. 47 32
---- ------
Total............................................................ $801 $1,237
==== ======
Summarized financial information of investees accounted for by the equity
method of accounting follows:
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(In millions)
Income data--year:
Revenues and other income............................. $3,901 $3,449 $3,510
Operating income...................................... 286 95 324
Net income (loss)..................................... (43) (74) 176
Balance sheet data--December 31:
Current assets........................................ $1,239 $1,382
Noncurrent assets..................................... 3,443 5,008
Current liabilities................................... 1,427 1,481
Noncurrent liabilities................................ 1,957 2,317
In 2000, Marathon exchanged its investment in Sakhalin Energy for a working
interest in the Foinaven field located in the Atlantic Margin offshore the
United Kingdom and an overriding royalty interest in an eight block area in the
Gulf of Mexico, which includes the Ursa field. Additionally, Marathon received
reimbursement for amounts advanced to Sakhalin Energy in 2000 and a cash
settlement for certain other activities in 2000. The transaction was recorded
at fair value and resulted in a pretax gain on disposal of assets of $58
million.
USX acquired a 25% interest in VSZ during 2000. VSZ does not provide its
shareholders with financial statements prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States (USGAAP). Although shares
of VSZ are traded on the Bratislava Stock Exchange, those securities do not
have a readily determinable fair value as defined under USGAAP. Accordingly,
USX accounts for its investment in VSZ under the cost method of accounting.
In 1999, USX and Kobe Steel, Ltd. (Kobe Steel) completed a transaction that
combined the steelmaking and bar producing assets of USS/Kobe Steel Company
(USS/Kobe) with companies controlled by Blackstone Capital Partners II. The
combined entity was named Republic Technologies International, LLC and is a
wholly owned subsidiary of Republic Technologies International Holdings, LLC
(Republic). As a result of this transaction, USX recorded $47 million in
charges related to the impairment of the carrying value of its
E-27
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
investment in USS/Kobe and costs related to the formation of Republic. These
charges were included in dividend and investee income (loss) in 1999. In
addition, USX made a $15 million equity investment in Republic. USX owned 50%
of USS/Kobe and now owns 16% of Republic. USX accounts for its investment in
Republic under the equity method of accounting. The seamless pipe business of
USS/Kobe was excluded from this transaction. That business, now known as Lorain
Tubular Company, LLC, became a wholly owned subsidiary of USX at the close of
business on December 31, 1999.
Dividends and partnership distributions received from equity investees were
$56 million in 2000, $46 million in 1999 and $42 million in 1998.
USX purchases from equity investees totaled $627 million, $411 million and
$395 million in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. USX sales to equity
investees totaled $986 million, $853 million and $747 million in 2000, 1999 and
1998, respectively.
13. Short-Term Debt
In November 2000, USX entered into a $451 million 364-day revolving credit
agreement, which terminates in November 2001. Interest is based on defined
short-term market rates. During the term of the agreement, USX is obligated to
pay a variable facility fee on total commitments, which at December 31, 2000
was .10%. At December 31, 2000, there were no borrowings against this facility.
USX has a short-term line of credit totaling $150 million, bearing interest at
a defined short-term market rate, which at December 31, 2000 was 7.10%. At
December 31, 2000, USX had borrowed $150 million against this facility. Certain
other banks provide short-term lines of credit totaling $150 million which
require a .125% fee or maintenance of compensating balances of 3%. At December
31, 2000, there were no borrowings against these facilities.
MAP has a $100 million short-term revolving credit facility that terminates
in July 2001. Interest is based on defined short-term market rates. During the
term of the agreement, MAP is required to pay a variable facility fee on total
commitments, which at December 31, 2000 was .11%. At December 31, 2000, there
were no borrowings against this facility.
USSK has a short-term $50 million credit facility that expires in November
2001. The facility, which is non-recourse to USX, bears interest on prevailing
short-term market rates plus 1%. USSK is obligated to pay a .25% commitment fee
on undrawn amounts. At December 31, 2000, there were no borrowings against this
facility.
E-28
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
14. Long-Term Debt
December 31
Interest -------------
Rates -- % Maturity 2000 1999
--------------- ----------- ------ ------
(In millions)
USX Corporation:
Revolving credit facility(a)....... 2005 $ 300 $ 300
Commercial paper(a)................ 7.68 77 165
Notes payable...................... 6 13/20 - 9 4/5 2001 - 2023 2,505 2,525
Obligations relating to Industrial
Development and Environmental
Improvement Bonds and Notes(b).... 4 1/4 - 6 7/8 2009 - 2033 494 494
Receivables facility(c)............ 2004 350 350
All other obligations, including
sale-leaseback financing and
capital leases.................... 2001 - 2012 88 92
Consolidated subsidiaries:
Revolving credit facilities(d)..... 2001 - 2003 -- --
USSK loan facility(e).............. 8 1/2 2010 325 --
Guaranteed Notes................... 7 2002 135 135
Guaranteed Loan(f)................. 9 1/20 2001 - 2006 199 223
Notes payable...................... 8 1/2 2001 1 1
All other obligations, including
capital leases.................... 2001 - 2011 11 26
------ ------
Total(g)(h)...................... 4,485 4,311
Less unamortized discount............ 25 28
Less amount due within one year...... 287 61
------ ------
Long-term debt due after one
year............................ $4,173 $4,222
====== ======
--------
(a) In November 2000, USX entered into a $1,354 million 5-year revolving credit
agreement, terminating in November 2005, which in conjunction with a $451
million 364-day revolving credit agreement, terminating in December 2001,
replaced the prior $2,350 million facility. Interest on the facility is
based on defined short-term market rates. During the term of the agreement,
USX is obligated to pay a variable facility fee on total commitments, which
at December 31, 2000 was .125%. At December 31, 2000, $300 million had been
borrowed against this facility. The commercial paper is supported by the
unused and available credit on the 5-year facility and, accordingly, is
classified as long-term debt.
(b) At December 31, 2000, USX had outstanding obligations relating to
Environmental Improvement Bonds in the amount of $141 million, which were
supported by letter of credit arrangements that could become short-term
obligations under certain circumstances.
(c) In December 1999, USX entered into an agreement under which the U. S. Steel
Group participates in a program to sell an undivided interest in certain
accounts receivable. A previous program expired in October 1999 and was
accounted for as a transfer of receivables. The new program is accounted
for as a secured borrowing. Payments are collected from sold accounts
receivable and invested in new accounts receivable for the purchaser and a
yield, based on short-term market rates, is transferred to the purchaser.
If the U. S. Steel Group does not have sufficient eligible receivables to
reinvest for the purchaser, the size of the program is reduced accordingly.
The purchaser has a security interest in a pool of receivables to secure
USX's obligations under the program. If the receivables facility is not
renewed annually, the balance outstanding of such facility could be
refinanced by the 5-year facility discussed in (a), or another long-term
debt source; and therefore, is classified as long-term debt. The amounts
sold under the previous receivables programs averaged $291 million and $347
million for the years 1999 and 1998, respectively.
(d) MAP has a $400 million revolving credit facility that terminates in July
2003. Interest is based on defined short-term market rates. During the term
of the agreement, MAP is required to pay a variable facility fee
E-29
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
on total commitments, which at December 31, 2000 was .125%. At December 31,
2000, the unused and available credit was $352 million, which reflects
reductions for outstanding letters of credit. In the event that MAP
defaults on indebtedness (as defined in the agreement) in excess of $100
million, USX has guaranteed the payment of any outstanding obligations.
(e) USSK has a loan facility with a group of financial institutions
aggregating $325 million. The loan, which is non-recourse to USX, bears
interest at a fixed rate of 8.5% per annum. The loan is subject to annual
repayments of $20 million beginning in 2003, with the balance due in 2010.
Mandatory prepayments of the loan may be required based upon a cash flow
formula or a change in control of USX.
(f) The Guaranteed Loan was used to fund a portion of the costs in connection
with the development of the East Brae Field and the SAGE pipeline in the
North Sea. A portion of proceeds from a long-term gas sales contract is
dedicated to loan service under certain circumstances. Prepayment of the
loan may be required under certain situations, including events impairing
the security interest.
(g) Required payments of long-term debt for the years 2002-2005 are $209
million, $207 million, $710 million and $440 million, respectively.
(h) In the event of a change in control of USX, as defined in the related
agreements, debt obligations totaling $3,614 million may be declared
immediately due and payable. The principal obligations subject to such a
provision are Notes payable--$2,505 million; USSK loan facility--$325
million; and Guaranteed Loan--$199 million. In such event, USX may also be
required to either repurchase the leased Fairfield slab caster for $100
million or provide a letter of credit to secure the remaining obligation.
15. Inventories
December 31
-------------
2000 1999
------ ------
(In millions)
Raw materials.................................................... $ 915 $ 830
Semi-finished products........................................... 429 392
Finished products................................................ 1,279 1,239
Supplies and sundry items........................................ 190 166
------ ------
Total (at cost)................................................ 2,813 2,627
Less inventory market valuation reserve.......................... -- --
------ ------
Net inventory carrying value................................... $2,813 $2,627
====== ======
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, the LIFO method accounted for 92% and 91%,
respectively, of total inventory value. Current acquisition costs were
estimated to exceed the above inventory values at December 31 by approximately
$880 million and $570 million in 2000 and 1999, respectively. Cost of revenues
was reduced and income from operations was increased by $17 million in 2000 as
a result of liquidations of LIFO inventories.
The inventory market valuation reserve reflects the extent that the
recorded LIFO cost basis of crude oil and refined products inventories exceeds
net realizable value. The reserve is decreased to reflect increases in market
prices and inventory turnover and increased to reflect decreases in market
prices. Changes in the inventory market valuation reserve result in noncash
charges or credits to costs and expenses. During 2000, there were no charges
or credits to costs and expenses.
E-30
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
16. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- --------
(In millions)
Cash used in operating activities included:
Interest and other financial costs paid (net of
amount capitalized)............................. $ (341) $ (366) $ (336)
Income taxes paid................................ (387) (98) (183)
Commercial paper and revolving credit
arrangements--net:
Commercial paper
--issued....................................... $ 3,362 $ 6,282 $ --
--repayments................................... (3,450) (6,117) --
Credit agreements
--borrowings................................... 437 5,529 17,486
--repayments................................... (437) (5,980) (16,817)
Other credit arrangements--net................... 150 (95) 55
------- ------- --------
Total........................................ $ 62 $ (381) $ 724
======= ======= ========
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Common stock issued for dividend reinvestment and
employee stock plans............................ $ 15 $ 6 $ 5
Marathon Stock issued for Exchangeable Shares.... -- 7 11
Investee preferred stock received in conversion
of investee loan................................ -- 142 --
Disposal of assets:
Exchange of Sakhalin Energy investment......... 410 -- --
Deposit of RTI common shares in satisfaction of
indexed debt.................................. -- 56 --
Interest in USS/Kobe contributed to Republic... -- 40 --
Other--notes or common stock received.......... 20 20 2
Business combinations:
Acquisition of USSK:
Liabilities assumed.......................... 568 -- --
Contingent consideration payable at present
value....................................... 21 -- --
Investee liabilities consolidated in step
acquisition................................. 3 -- --
Acquisition of Tarragon:
Exchangeable Shares issued................... -- -- 29
Liabilities assumed.......................... -- -- 433
Acquisition of Ashland RM&T net assets:
38% interest in MAP.......................... -- -- 1,900
Liabilities assumed.......................... -- -- 1,038
Other acquisitions:
Liabilities assumed.......................... -- 42 --
Investee liabilities consolidated in step
acquisition................................. -- 26 --
17. Stock-Based Compensation Plans
The 1990 Stock Plan, as amended and restated, authorizes the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors to grant restricted stock, stock options
and stock appreciation rights to key management employees. Such employees are
generally granted awards of the class of common stock intended to reflect the
performance of the group(s) to which their work relates. Up to 0.5 percent of
the outstanding Marathon Stock and 0.8 percent of the outstanding Steel Stock,
as determined on December 31 of the preceding year, are available for grants
during each calendar year the 1990 Plan is in effect. In addition, awarded
shares that do not result in shares
E-31
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
being issued are available for subsequent grant, and any ungranted shares from
prior years' annual allocations are available for subsequent grant during the
years the 1990 Plan is in effect. As of December 31, 2000, 8,519,302 Marathon
Stock shares and 2,108,128 Steel Stock shares were available for grants in
2001.
Restricted stock represents stock granted for such consideration, if any, as
determined by the Compensation Committee, subject to provisions for forfeiture
and restricting transfer. Those restrictions may be removed as conditions such
as performance, continuous service and other criteria are met. Restricted stock
is issued at the market price per share at the date of grant and vests over
service periods that range from one to five years.
Deferred compensation is charged to stockholders' equity when the restricted
stock is granted and subsequently adjusted for changes in the market value of
the underlying stock. The deferred compensation is expensed over the balance of
the vesting period and adjusted if conditions of the restricted stock grant are
not met.
The following table presents information on restricted stock grants:
Marathon Stock Steel Stock
--------------------- ---------------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
------- ------ ------ ------- ------ ------
Number of shares granted.......... 410,025 28,798 25,378 305,725 18,272 17,742
Weighted-average grant-date fair
value per share.................. $25.50 $29.38 $34.00 $23.00 $28.22 $37.28
Stock options represent the right to purchase shares of Marathon Stock or
Steel Stock at the market value of the stock at date of grant. Certain options
contain the right to receive cash and/or common stock equal to the excess of
the fair market value of shares of common stock, as determined in accordance
with the plan, over the option price of shares. Most stock options vest after a
one-year service period and all expire 10 years from the date they are granted.
The following is a summary of stock option activity:
Marathon Stock Steel Stock
------------------- -------------------
Shares Price(a) Shares Price(a)
--------- -------- --------- --------
Balance December 31, 1997............... 3,694,865 $24.81 1,633,100 $34.35
Granted................................. 987,535 34.00 611,515 37.28
Exercised............................... (594,260) 27.61 (230,805) 32.00
Canceled................................ (13,200) 27.22 (21,240) 35.89
--------- ---------
Balance December 31, 1998............... 4,074,940 26.62 1,992,570 35.50
Granted................................. 1,005,000 29.38 656,400 28.22
Exercised............................... (176,160) 27.27 (2,580) 24.92
Canceled................................ (121,055) 30.19 (20,005) 38.51
--------- ---------
Balance December 31, 1999............... 4,782,725 27.08 2,626,385 33.67
Granted................................. 1,799,880 25.18 915,470 23.00
Exercised............................... (58,870) 23.11 (400) 24.30
Canceled................................ (410,115) 28.06 (62,955) 38.19
--------- ---------
Balance December 31, 2000............... 6,113,620 26.50 3,478,500 30.78
========= =========
--------
(a) Weighted-average exercise price
E-32
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The weighted-average grant-date fair value per option for the Marathon Stock
was $7.51 in 2000, $8.89 in 1999 and $10.43 in 1998. For the Steel Stock such
amounts were $6.63 in 2000, $6.95 in 1999 and $8.29 in 1998.
The following table represents stock options at December 31, 2000:
Outstanding Exercisable
-------------------------------------------- ---------------------------
Weighted-
Range of Number of Average Weighted- Number of Weighted-
Exercise Shares Under Remaining Average Shares Under Average
Prices Option Contractual Life Exercise Price Option Exercise Price
------------ ------------ ---------------- -------------- ------------ --------------
Marathon Stock.......... $17.00-23.44 1,947,290 4.5 years $21.03 1,647,290 $20.60
25.38-26.47 1,512,905 8.6 25.53 135,225 25.38
29.38-34.00 2,653,425 7.5 31.06 2,653,425 31.06
--------- ---------
Total...... 6,113,620 4,435,940
========= =========
Steel Stock............. $23.00-28.22 1,592,305 8.8 years $25.17 678,135 $28.10
31.69-34.44 1,050,920 5.2 32.53 1,050,920 32.53
37.28-44.19 835,275 6.0 39.26 835,275 39.26
--------- ---------
Total...... 3,478,500 2,564,330
========= =========
Actual stock-based compensation expense (credit) was $6 million in 2000 and
$(3) million in 1999 and 1998. Incremental compensation expense, as determined
under a fair value model, was not material ($.02 or less per share for all
years presented). Therefore, pro forma net income and earnings per share data
have been omitted.
USX has a deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors of its Board
of Directors. The plan permits participants to defer some or all of their
annual retainers in the form of common stock units or cash and it requires new
directors to defer at least half of their annual retainer in the form of common
stock units. Common stock units are book entry units equal in value to a share
of Marathon Stock or Steel Stock. Deferred stock benefits are distributed in
shares of common stock within five business days after a participant leaves the
Board of Directors. During 2000, 14,242 shares of Marathon Stock and 4,872
shares of Steel Stock were issued and during 1999, 10,541 shares of Marathon
Stock and 3,798 shares of Steel Stock were issued. During 1998, no shares of
common stock were issued.
18. Dividends
In accordance with the USX Certificate, dividends on the Marathon Stock and
Steel Stock are limited to the legally available funds of USX. Net losses of
any Group, as well as dividends and distributions on any class of USX Common
Stock or series of preferred stock and repurchases of any class of USX Common
Stock or series of preferred stock at prices in excess of par or stated value,
will reduce the funds of USX legally available for payment of dividends on all
classes of Common Stock. Subject to this limitation, the Board of Directors
intends to declare and pay dividends on the Marathon Stock and Steel Stock
based on the financial condition and results of operations of the related
group, although it has no obligation under Delaware law to do so. In making its
dividend decisions with respect to each of the Marathon Stock and Steel Stock,
the Board of Directors considers, among other things, the long-term earnings
and cash flow capabilities of the related group as well as the dividend
policies of similar publicly traded companies.
E-33
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Dividends on the Steel Stock are further limited to the Available Steel
Dividend Amount. At December 31, 2000, the Available Steel Dividend Amount was
at least $3,161 million. The Available Steel Dividend Amount will be increased
or decreased, as appropriate, to reflect U. S. Steel Group net income,
dividends, repurchases or issuances with respect to the Steel Stock and
preferred stock attributed to the U. S. Steel Group and certain other items.
19. Stockholder Rights Plan
On September 28, 1999, USX's Board of Directors adopted a new Stockholder
Rights Plan and declared a dividend distribution of one right for each
outstanding share of Marathon Stock and Steel Stock (referred to together as
"Voting Stock") to stockholders of record on October 9, 1999. Each right
becomes exercisable, at a price of $110, after any person or group has
acquired, obtained the right to acquire or made a tender or exchange offer for
15% or more of the outstanding voting power represented by the outstanding
Voting Stock, except pursuant to a qualifying all-cash tender offer for all
outstanding shares of Voting Stock which results in the offeror owning shares
of Voting Stock representing a majority of the voting power (other than Voting
Stock beneficially owned by the offeror immediately prior to the offer). Each
right entitles the holder, other than the acquiring person or group, to
purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A Junior Preferred Stock or,
upon the acquisition by any person of 15% or more of the outstanding voting
power represented by the outstanding Voting Stock, Marathon Stock or Steel
Stock (or, in certain circumstances, other property) having a market value of
twice the exercise price. After a person or group acquires 15% or more of the
outstanding voting power, if USX engages in a merger or other business
combination where it is not the surviving corporation or where it is the
surviving corporation and the Voting Stock is changed or exchanged, or if 50%
or more of USX's assets, earnings power or cash flow are sold or transferred,
each right entitles the holder to purchase common stock of the acquiring entity
having a market value of twice the exercise price. The rights and the exercise
price are subject to adjustment. The rights will expire on October 9, 2009,
unless such date is extended or the rights are earlier redeemed by USX for one
cent per right at any time prior to the point they become exercisable. Under
certain circumstances, the Board of Directors has the option to exchange one
share of the respective class of Voting Stock for each exercisable right.
20. Income Per Common Share
The method of calculating net income (loss) per share for the Marathon Stock
and the Steel Stock reflects the USX Board of Directors' intent that the
separately reported earnings and surplus of the Marathon Group and the U. S.
Steel Group, as determined consistent with the USX Certificate, are available
for payment of dividends on the respective classes of stock, although legally
available funds and liquidation preferences of these classes of stock do not
necessarily correspond with these amounts. The financial statements of the
Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, taken together, include all accounts
which comprise the corresponding consolidated financial statements of USX.
Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated by adjusting net income for
dividend requirements of preferred stock and is based on the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted net income (loss) per share assumes conversion of convertible
securities for the applicable periods outstanding and assumes exercise of stock
options, provided in each case, the effect is not antidilutive.
E-34
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
2000 1999 1998
---------------- --------------- ---------------
Basic Diluted Basic Diluted Basic Diluted
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
COMPUTATION OF INCOME PER
SHARE
Marathon Group
Net income (millions)...... $ 432 $ 432 $ 654 $ 654 $ 310 $ 310
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Shares of common stock
outstanding (thousands):
Average number of common
shares outstanding....... 311,531 311,531 309,696 309,696 292,876 292,876
Effect of dilutive
securities--stock
options.................. -- 230 -- 314 -- 559
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Average common shares
and dilutive effect.... 311,531 311,761 309,696 310,010 292,876 293,435
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Net income per share....... $ 1.39 $ 1.39 $ 2.11 $ 2.11 $ 1.06 $ 1.05
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
U. S. Steel Group
Net income (loss)
(millions):
Income (loss) before
extraordinary losses..... $ (21) $ (21) $ 51 $ 51 $ 364 $ 364
Dividends on preferred
stock.................... 8 8 9 9 9 --
Extraordinary losses...... -- -- 7 7 -- --
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income (loss)
applicable to Steel
Stock.................... (29) (29) 35 35 355 364
Effect of dilutive
securities--trust
preferred securities..... -- -- -- -- -- 8
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income (loss)
assuming conversions... $ (29) $ (29) $ 35 $ 35 $ 355 $ 372
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Shares of common stock
outstanding (thousands):
Average number of common
shares outstanding....... 88,613 88,613 88,392 88,392 87,508 87,508
Effect of dilutive
securities:
Trust preferred
securities............... -- -- -- -- -- 4,256
Preferred stock........... -- -- -- -- -- 3,143
Stock options............. -- -- -- 4 -- 36
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Average common shares
and dilutive effect.... 88,613 88,613 88,392 88,396 87,508 94,943
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
Per share:
Income (loss) before
extraordinary losses..... $ (.33) $ (.33) $ .48 $ .48 $ 4.05 $ 3.92
Extraordinary losses...... -- -- .08 .08 -- --
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Net income (loss)......... $ (.33) $ (.33) $ .40 $ .40 $ 4.05 $ 3.92
======= ======= ======= ======= ======= =======
E-35
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
21. Property, Plant and Equipment
December 31
---------------
2000 1999
------- -------
(In millions)
Marathon Group:
Production..................................................... $12,266 $14,568
Refining....................................................... 2,800 2,439
Marketing...................................................... 2,286 2,197
Transportation................................................. 1,402 1,374
Other.......................................................... 312 282
------- -------
Total........................................................ 19,066 20,860
------- -------
U. S. Steel Group:
Land and depletable property................................... 161 152
Buildings...................................................... 602 484
Machinery and equipment........................................ 8,409 8,007
Leased assets.................................................. 98 105
------- -------
Total........................................................ 9,270 8,748
------- -------
USX Corporation:
Total property, plant and equipment............................ 28,336 29,608
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization:
Marathon Group............................................... 9,691 10,567
U. S. Steel Group............................................ 6,531 6,232
------- -------
Net property, plant and equipment.............................. $12,114 $12,809
======= =======
Property, plant and equipment includes gross assets acquired under capital
leases (including sale-leasebacks accounted for as financings) of $106 million
at December 31, 2000, and $125 million at December 31, 1999; related amounts in
accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization were $79 million and $81
million, respectively.
During 2000, the U. S. Steel Group recorded $71 million of impairments
relating to coal assets located in West Virginia and Alabama. The impairment
was recorded as a result of a reassessment of long-term prospects after adverse
geological conditions were encountered.
During 2000, the Marathon Group recorded $193 million of impairments of
certain E&P segment oil and gas properties, primarily located in Canada. The
impairments were recorded due to reserve revisions as a result of production
performance and disappointing drilling results. The fair value of the
properties was determined using a discounted cash flow model, unless an
indicative offer to purchase was available. The Marathon Group used pricing
assumptions based on forecasted prices applicable for the remaining life of the
assets derived from current market conditions and long-term forecasts. The
discounted cash flow calculation included risk-adjusted probable and possible
reserve quantities.
In 1998, the Marathon Group recorded a $60 million impairment charge on its
oil and gas properties in Libya. The deterioration of U.S. relations with Libya
at the time created an unstable environment that caused the Marathon Group to
reevaluate its stance with its investment in Libya. The Marathon Group impaired
the value of these assets because it could not reasonably predict with a high
degree of certainty if government sanctions which prevented the Marathon Group
from operating these assets would ever be lifted.
All impairment charges were included in depreciation, depletion and
amortization.
E-36
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
22. Preferred Stock of Subsidiary and Trust Preferred Securities
USX Capital LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of USX, sold 10,000,000 shares
(carrying value of $250 million) of 8 3/4% Cumulative Monthly Income Preferred
Shares (MIPS) (liquidation preference of $25 per share) in 1994. Proceeds of
the issue were loaned to USX. USX has the right under the loan agreement to
extend interest payment periods for up to 18 months, and as a consequence,
monthly dividend payments on the MIPS can be deferred by USX Capital LLC during
any such interest payment period. In the event that USX exercises this right,
USX may not declare dividends on any share of its preferred or common stocks.
The MIPS are redeemable at the option of USX Capital LLC and subject to the
prior consent of USX, in whole or in part from time to time, for $25 per share,
and will be redeemed from the proceeds of any repayment of the loan by USX. In
addition, upon final maturity of the loan, USX Capital LLC is required to
redeem the MIPS. The financial costs are included in net interest and other
financial costs.
In 1997, USX exchanged approximately 3.9 million 6.75% Convertible Quarterly
Income Preferred Securities (Trust Preferred Securities) of USX Capital Trust
I, a Delaware statutory business trust (Trust), for an equivalent number of
shares of its 6.50% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (6.50% Preferred
Stock) (Exchange). The Exchange resulted in the recording of Trust Preferred
Securities at a fair value of $182 million.
USX owns all of the common securities of the Trust, which was formed for the
purpose of the Exchange. (The Trust Common Securities and the Trust Preferred
Securities are together referred to as the Trust Securities.) The Trust
Securities represent undivided beneficial ownership interests in the assets of
the Trust, which consist solely of USX 6.75% Convertible Junior Subordinated
Debentures maturing March 31, 2037 (Debentures), having an aggregate principal
amount equal to the aggregate initial liquidation amount ($50.00 per security
and $203 million in total) of the Trust Securities issued by the Trust.
Interest and principal payments on the Debentures will be used to make
quarterly distributions and to pay redemption and liquidation amounts on the
Trust Preferred Securities. The quarterly distributions, which accumulate at
the rate of 6.75% per annum on the Trust Preferred Securities and the accretion
from fair value to the initial liquidation amount, are charged to income and
included in net interest and other financial costs.
Under the terms of the Debentures, USX has the right to defer payment of
interest for up to 20 consecutive quarters and, as a consequence, monthly
distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities will be deferred during such
period. If USX exercises this right, then, subject to limited exceptions, it
may not pay any dividend or make any distribution with respect to any shares of
its capital stock.
The Trust Preferred Securities are convertible at any time prior to the
close of business on March 31, 2037 (unless such right is terminated earlier
under certain circumstances) at the option of the holder, into shares of Steel
Stock at a conversion price of $46.25 per share of Steel Stock (equivalent to a
conversion ratio of 1.081 shares of Steel Stock for each Trust Preferred
Security), subject to adjustment in certain circumstances.
The Trust Preferred Securities may be redeemed at any time at the option of
USX, at a premium of 101.95% of the initial liquidation amount through March
31, 2001, and thereafter, declining annually to the initial liquidation amount
on April 1, 2003, and thereafter. They are mandatorily redeemable at March 31,
2037, or earlier under certain circumstances.
Payments related to quarterly distributions and to the payment of redemption
and liquidation amounts on the Trust Preferred Securities by the Trust are
guaranteed by USX on a subordinated basis. In addition, USX unconditionally
guarantees the Trust's Debentures. The obligations of USX under the Debentures,
and the
E-37
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
related indenture, trust agreement and guarantee constitute a full and
unconditional guarantee by USX of the Trust's obligations under the Trust
Preferred Securities.
23. Preferred Stock
USX is authorized to issue 40,000,000 shares of preferred stock, without par
value -
6.50% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (6.50% Preferred Stock)--As of
December 31, 2000, 2,413,487 shares (stated value of $1.00 per share;
liquidation preference of $50.00 per share) were outstanding. The 6.50%
Preferred Stock is convertible at any time, at the option of the holder, into
shares of Steel Stock at a conversion price of $46.125 per share of Steel
Stock, subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. This stock is redeemable
at USX's sole option, at a price of $50.975 per share beginning April 1, 2000,
and thereafter at prices declining annually on each April 1 to an amount equal
to $50.00 per share on and after April 1, 2003.
24. Derivative Instruments
USX remains at risk for possible changes in the market value of derivative
instruments; however, such risk should be mitigated by price changes in the
underlying hedged item. USX is also exposed to credit risk in the event of
nonperformance by counterparties. The credit-worthiness of counterparties is
subject to continuing review, including the use of master netting agreements to
the extent practical, and full performance is anticipated.
E-38
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
The following table sets forth quantitative information by class of
derivative instrument for derivative instruments categorized as trading or
other than trading:
Recognized
Fair Value Carrying Trading Recorded Aggregate
Assets Amount Assets Gain or (Loss) Deferred Contract
(Liabilities)(a)(b) (Liabilities) for the Year Gain or (Loss) Values(c)
------------------- ------------- -------------- -------------- ---------
(In millions)
December 31, 2000:
Exchange-traded
commodity futures:
Trading................ $-- $-- $(19) $-- $ --
Other than trading..... -- -- -- 7 897
Exchange-traded
commodity options:
Trading................ -- -- -- -- --
Other than trading..... (6)(d) (6) -- (1) 971
OTC commodity swaps(e):
Trading................ -- -- -- -- --
Other than trading..... 35 (f) 35 -- 25 426
OTC commodity options:
Trading................ -- -- -- -- --
Other than trading..... (52)(g) (52) -- (40) 94
---- ---- ---- ---- ------
Total commodities...... $(23) $(23) $(19) $ (9) $2,388
==== ==== ==== ==== ======
Forward exchange
contracts(h):
--receivable........... $ 14 $ 14 $-- $-- $ 14
==== ==== ==== ==== ======
December 31, 1999:
Exchange-traded
commodity futures:
Trading................ $-- $-- $ 4 $-- $ 8
Other than trading..... -- -- -- 28 344
Exchange-traded
commodity options:
Trading................ -- -- 4 -- 179
Other than trading..... (6)(d) (6) -- (10) 1,262
OTC commodity swaps:
Trading................ -- -- -- -- --
Other than trading..... 6 (f) 6 -- 5 193
OTC commodity options:
Trading................ -- -- -- -- --
Other than trading..... 4 (g) 4 -- 5 238
---- ---- ---- ---- ------
Total commodities...... $ 4 $ 4 $ 8 $ 28 $2,224
==== ==== ==== ==== ======
Forward exchange
contracts:
--receivable........... $ 52 $ 52 $-- $-- $ 51
==== ==== ==== ==== ======
--------
(a) The fair value amounts for OTC positions are based on various indices or
dealer quotes. The fair value amounts for currency contracts are based on
dealer quotes of forward prices covering the remaining duration of the
forward exchange contract. The exchange-traded futures contracts and
certain option contracts do not have a corresponding fair value since
changes in the market prices are settled on a daily basis.
(b) The aggregate average fair value of all trading activities for 2000 and
1999 was $(5) million and $3 million, respectively. Detail by class of
instrument was not available.
(c) Contract or notional amounts do not quantify risk exposure, but are used in
the calculation of cash settlements under the contracts. The contract or
notional amounts do not reflect the extent to which positions may offset
one another.
(d) Includes fair values as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, for assets of $10
million and $11 million and for liabilities of $(16) million and $(17)
million, respectively.
(e) The OTC swap arrangements vary in duration with certain contracts extending
into 2008.
(f) Includes fair values as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, for assets of $84
million and $11 million and for liabilities of $(49) million and $(5)
million, respectively.
(g) Includes fair values as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, for assets of $1
million and $5 million and for liabilities of $(53) million and $(1)
million, respectively.
(h) The forward exchange contracts relating to USX's foreign operations have
various maturities ending in March 2001.
E-39
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
25. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Fair value of the financial instruments disclosed herein is not necessarily
representative of the amount that could be realized or settled, nor does the
fair value amount consider the tax consequences of realization or settlement.
The following table summarizes financial instruments, excluding derivative
financial instruments disclosed in Note 24, by individual balance sheet
account:
December 31
-------------------------------
2000 1999
--------------- ---------------
Fair Carrying Fair Carrying
Value Amount Value Amount
------ -------- ------ --------
(In millions)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents..................... $ 559 $ 559 $ 133 $ 133
Receivables................................... 3,238 3,238 2,717 2,717
Investments and long-term receivables......... 211 147 190 134
------ ------ ------ ------
Total financial assets....................... $4,008 $3,944 $3,040 $2,984
====== ====== ====== ======
Financial liabilities:
Notes payable................................. $ 150 $ 150 $ -- $ --
Accounts payable.............................. 3,774 3,774 3,409 3,409
Accrued interest.............................. 108 108 107 107
Long-term debt (including amounts due within
one year).................................... 4,549 4,365 4,278 4,176
Preferred stock of subsidiary and trust
preferred securities......................... 357 433 408 433
------ ------ ------ ------
Total financial liabilities.................. $8,938 $8,830 $8,202 $8,125
====== ====== ====== ======
Fair value of financial instruments classified as current assets or
liabilities approximates carrying value due to the short-term maturity of the
instruments. Fair value of investments and long-term receivables was based on
discounted cash flows or other specific instrument analysis. Certain foreign
cost method investments are excluded from investments and long-term receivables
because the fair value is not readily determinable. USX is subject to market
risk and liquidity risk related to its investments; however, these risks are
not readily quantifiable. Fair value of preferred stock of subsidiary and trust
preferred securities was based on market prices. Fair value of long-term debt
instruments was based on market prices where available or current borrowing
rates available for financings with similar terms and maturities.
USX's only unrecognized financial instruments are financial guarantees and
commitments to extend credit. It is not practicable to estimate the fair value
of these forms of financial instrument obligations because there are no quoted
market prices for transactions which are similar in nature. For details
relating to financial guarantees, see Note 26.
26. Contingencies and Commitments
USX is the subject of, or party to, a number of pending or threatened legal
actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters,
including laws and regulations relating to the environment. Certain of these
matters are discussed below. The ultimate resolution of these contingencies
could, individually or in the aggregate, be material to the consolidated
financial statements. However, management believes that USX will remain a
viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these
contingencies could be resolved unfavorably.
E-40
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
Environmental matters--
USX is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations
relating to the environment. These laws generally provide for control of
pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to
undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites. Penalties may be
imposed for noncompliance. At December 31, 2000 and 1999, accrued liabilities
for remediation totaled $212 million and $170 million, respectively. It is not
presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs
that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed. Receivables for
recoverable costs from certain states, under programs to assist companies in
cleanup efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing
outlets, were $57 million at December 31, 2000, and $52 million at December 31,
1999.
For a number of years, USX has made substantial capital expenditures to
bring existing facilities into compliance with various laws relating to the
environment. In 2000 and 1999, such capital expenditures totaled $91 million
and $78 million, respectively. USX anticipates making additional such
expenditures in the future; however, the exact amounts and timing of such
expenditures are uncertain because of the continuing evolution of specific
regulatory requirements.
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, accrued liabilities for platform abandonment
and dismantlement totaled $162 million and $152 million, respectively.
Guarantees--
Guarantees of the liabilities of unconsolidated entities by USX and its
consolidated subsidiaries totaled $82 million at December 31, 2000, and $219
million at December 31, 1999. In the event that any defaults of guaranteed
liabilities occur, USX has access to its interest in the assets of most of the
investees to reduce potential losses resulting from these guarantees. As of
December 31, 2000, the largest guarantee for a single such entity was $59
million.
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, USX's pro rata share of obligations of LOOP
LLC and various pipeline investees secured by throughput and deficiency
agreements totaled $119 million and $146 million, respectively. Under the
agreements, USX is required to advance funds if the investees are unable to
service debt. Any such advances are prepayments of future transportation
charges.
Commitments--
At December 31, 2000 and 1999, contract commitments to acquire property,
plant and equipment and long-term investments totaled $663 million and $568
million, respectively.
USSK has a commitment to the Slovak government for a capital improvements
program of $700 million, subject to certain conditions, over a period
commencing with the acquisition date and ending on December 31, 2010. USSK is
required to report periodically to the Slovak government on its status toward
meeting this commitment. The first reporting period ends on December 31, 2003.
USX entered into a 15-year take-or-pay arrangement in 1993, which requires
USX to accept pulverized coal each month or pay a minimum monthly charge of
approximately $1 million. Charges for deliveries of pulverized coal totaled $23
million in 2000, 1999 and 1998. If USX elects to terminate the contract early,
a maximum termination payment of $96 million, which declines over the duration
of the agreement, may be required.
USX is a party to a 15-year transportation services agreement with a natural
gas transmission company. The contract requires USX to pay minimum annual
demand charges of approximately $5 million starting in
E-41
USX CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
December 2000 and concluding in 2015. The payments are required even if the
transportation facility is not utilized. Demand charges paid in 2000 were less
than $1 million.
27. Joint Venture Formation
In December 2000, Marathon and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. signed a
definitive agreement to form a joint venture combining certain of their oil and
gas producing activities in the U.S. Permian Basin, including Marathon's
interest in the Yates Field. This transaction will allow Marathon to expand its
interests in the Permian Basin and will improve access to materials for use in
enhanced recovery techniques in the Yates Field. The joint venture named MKM
Partners L.P., commenced operations in January 2001 and will be accounted for
under the equity method of accounting.
As a result of the agreement to form this joint venture, Marathon recognized
a pretax charge of $931 million in the fourth quarter 2000, which is included
in net gains (losses) on disposal of assets, and reclassified the remaining
book value associated with the Yates Field from property, plant and equipment
to assets held for sale. Upon completion of this transaction in January 2001,
the book value will be transferred from assets held for sale to investments and
long-term receivables.
28. Subsequent Event--Business Combination
In the first quarter 2001, Marathon Oil Company (Marathon) acquired Pennaco
Energy, Inc. (Pennaco), a natural gas producer. Marathon acquired 87% of the
outstanding stock of Pennaco through a tender offer completed on February 7,
2001 at $19 a share. On March 26, 2001, Pennaco was merged with a wholly owned
subsidiary of Marathon. Under the terms of the merger, each share not held by
Marathon was converted into the right to receive $19 in cash. The total
purchase price of Pennaco was $506 million. The acquisition was accounted for
under the purchase method of accounting.
E-42
USX CORPORATION
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
2000 1999
-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------
4th Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 1st Qtr. 4th Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 1st Qtr.
-------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------
(In millions, except per share data)
Revenues and other
income:
Revenues(a)............. $10,293 $10,607 $10,293 $9,307 $8,725 $7,713 $6,649 $5,981
Other income (loss)..... (837) 72 57 122 53 (13) 35 (24)
------- ------- ------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Total................... 9,456 10,679 10,350 9,429 8,778 7,700 6,684 5,957
Income (loss) from
operations.............. (625) 789 972 616 425 535 502 401
Includes:
Joint venture formation
charges................ (931) -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Inventory market
valuation credits...... -- -- -- -- -- 136 66 349
Income (loss) before
extraordinary losses.... (449) 140 423 297 205 201 189 110
Net income (loss)........ (449) 140 423 297 205 199 189 105
Marathon Stock data:
Net income (loss)........ $ (310) $ 121 $ 367 $ 254 $ 171 $ 230 $ 134 $ 119
Per share--basic and
diluted................ (1.00) .38 1.18 .81 .55 .74 .43 .38
Dividends paid per
share................... .23 .23 .21 .21 .21 .21 .21 .21
Price range of Marathon
Stock(b):
--Low................... 25 1/4 23 1/2 22 13/16 20 11/16 23 5/8 28 1/2 25 13/16 19 5/8
--High.................. 30 3/8 29 5/8 29 3/16 27 1/2 30 5/8 33 7/8 32 3/4 31 3/8
Steel Stock data:
Income (loss) before
extraordinary losses
applicable to Steel
Stock................... $ (141) $ 17 $ 54 $ 41 $ 32 $ (31) $ 52 $ (11)
Per share:
--basic................. (1.59) .19 .62 .45 .35 (.35) .60 (.13)
--diluted............... (1.59) .19 .62 .45 .35 (.35) .59 (.13)
Dividends paid per
share................... .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25 .25
Price range of Steel
Stock(b):
--Low................... 12 11/16 14 7/8 18 1/4 20 5/8 21 3/4 24 9/16 23 1/2 22 1/4
--High.................. 18 5/16 19 11/16 26 7/8 32 15/16 33 30 1/16 34 1/4 29 1/8
--------
(a) Certain items have been reclassified between revenues and cost of
revenues, primarily to give effect to new accounting standards as
disclosed in Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Amounts reclassified in the first, second and third quarters of 2000 were
$(65) million, $(138) million and $(14) million, respectively, and for the
first, second, third and fourth quarters of 1999 were $(97) million, $(82)
million, $(113) million and $(172) million, respectively.
(b) Composite tape.
E-43
USX CORPORATION
PRINCIPAL UNCONSOLIDATED INVESTEES (UNAUDITED)
December 31, 2000
-----------------
Company Country Ownership Activity
------- ------------- --------- --------
Clairton 1314B Partnership, United States 10% Coke & Coke By-Products
L.P.........................
CLAM Petroleum B.V........... Netherlands 50% Oil & Gas Production
Double Eagle Steel Coating United States 50% Steel Processing
Company.....................
Kenai LNG Corporation........ United States 30% Natural Gas
Liquification
LOCAP, Inc. ................. United States 50%(a) Pipeline & Storage
Facilities
LOOP LLC..................... United States 47%(a) Offshore Oil Port
Manta Ray Offshore Gathering United States 24% Natural Gas Transmission
Company, LLC................
Minnesota Pipe Line Company.. United States 33%(a) Pipeline Facility
Nautilus Pipeline Company, United States 24% Natural Gas Transmission
LLC.........................
Odyssey Pipeline LLC......... United States 29% Pipeline Facility
Poseidon Oil Pipeline United States 28% Crude Oil Transportation
Company, LLC................
PRO-TEC Coating Company...... United States 50% Steel Processing
Republic Technologies United States 16% Steel Products
International, LLC..........
Transtar, Inc. .............. United States 46% Transportation
USS-POSCO Industries......... United States 50% Steel Processing
Worthington Specialty United States 50% Steel Processing
Processing..................
--------
(a) Represents the ownership of MAP.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON MINERAL RESERVES OTHER THAN OIL AND GAS
(UNAUDITED)
USX operates two underground coal mining complexes, the #50 Mine and
Pinnacle Preparation Plant in West Virginia, and the Oak Grove Mine and Concord
Preparation Plant in Alabama. USX also operates one iron ore surface mining
complex consisting of the open pit Minntac Mine and Pellet Plant in Minnesota.
Production History
The following table provides a summary, by mining complex, of our minerals
production in millions of tons for each of the last three years:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
Coal:
#50 Mine/Pinnacle Preparation Plant.............................. 3.3 4.1 4.5
Oak Grove Mine/Concord Preparation Plant......................... 2.2 2.1 2.8
---- ---- ----
Total coal production.......................................... 5.5 6.2 7.3
==== ==== ====
Iron Ore Pellets:
Minntac Mine and Pellet Plant.................................... 16.3 14.3 15.8
Adverse mining conditions in the form of unforeseen geologic conditions
occurred at both coal mining operations in the year 2000. Coal production was
diminished and mining costs were elevated. Force majeure conditions were
declared with respect to contracted coal deliveries with certain contracts
fulfilled by purchased substitutes and other contracts fulfilled by extension
of delivery time into 2001. These adverse mining conditions did not affect
reserves reported as of December 31, 2000.
No recent adverse events affected iron ore pellet production other than
fluctuations in market demand.
E-44
USX CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON MINERAL RESERVES OTHER THAN OIL AND GAS
(UNAUDITED)--(Continued)
Coal Reserves
USX had 786.6 million short tons of recoverable coal reserves classified as
proven and probable at December 31, 2000. Proven and probable reserves are
defined by sites for inspection, sampling, and measurement generally less than
1 mile apart, such that continuity between points and subsequent economic
evaluation can be assured.
Independent outside entities have reviewed USX's coal reserve estimates on
properties comprising approximately 70% of the stated coal reserves.
The following table summarizes our proven and probable coal reserves as of
December 31, 2000, the status of the reserves as assigned or unassigned, our
property interest in the reserves, and certain characteristics of the reserves:
Proven and Reserve Control Coal Characteristics As Received(4)
Probable ----------------- ------------------------------- BTU Per As Received(4)
Location Reserves(1)(5) Owned Leased Grade Volatility Pound % Sulfur
-------- -------------- -------- -------- ------------------- ----------- -------------- --------------
Assigned Reserves(2):
Oak Grove Mine, AL...... 52.1 52.1 -- Metallurgical Low >12,000 <1.0%
#50 Mine, WV............ 88.2 76.0 12.2 Metallurgical Low >12,000 <1.0%
----- -------- -------
Sub-total Assigned..... 140.3 128.1 12.2
Unassigned Reserves(3):
Alabama................. 123.4 123.4 -- Metallurgical Low to High >12,000 <1.0%
Alabama(5).............. 47.6 47.6 -- Steam Low to High >12,000 0.7%-2.5%
Alabama................. 31.9 -- 31.9 Metallurgical Medium >12,000 <1.0%
Illinois................ 374.8 374.8 -- Steam High 11,600 2.3%
Indiana, Pennsylvania,
Tennessee, West
Virginia............... 68.6 68.6 -- Metallurgical/Steam Low to High 11,600-13,000 1.0%-3.0%
----- -------- -------
Sub-total Unassigned... 646.3 614.4 31.9
Total Proven and
Probable............... 786.6 742.5 44.1
===== ======== =======
--------
(1) The amounts in this column reflect recoverable tons. Recoverable tons
represent the amount of product that could be used internally or delivered
to a customer after considering mining and preparation losses. Neither
inferred reserves nor resources which exist in addition to proven and
probable reserves were included in these figures.
(2) Assigned Reserves means recoverable coal reserves which have been committed
by USX to our operating mines and plant facilities.
(3) Unassigned Reserves represent coal which has not been committed, and which
would require new mines and or plant facilities before operations could
begin on the property.
(4) "As received" means the quality parameters stated are with the expected
product moisture content and quality values that a customer can reasonably
expect to receive upon delivery.
(5) All of USX's recoverable reserves would be recovered utilizing underground
mining methods, with the exception of 17.2 million short tons of owned,
unassigned, recoverable, steam grade reserves in Alabama which would be
recovered utilizing surface mining methods.
E-45
USX CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON MINERAL RESERVES OTHER THAN OIL AND GAS
(UNAUDITED)--(Continued)
Iron Ore Reserves
USX had 709.8 million short tons of recoverable iron ore reserves classified
as proven and probable at December 31, 2000. Proven and probable reserves are
defined by sites for inspection, sampling, and measurement generally less than
1,000 feet apart, such that continuity between points and subsequent economic
evaluation can be assured. Recoverable tons mean the tons of product that can
be used internally or delivered to a customer after considering mining and
benefication or preparation losses. Neither inferred reserves nor resources
which exist in addition to proven and probable reserves were included in these
figures.
All 709.8 million tons of proven and probable reserves are assigned, which
means that they have been committed by USX to its one operating mine, and are
of blast furnace pellet grade. USX owns 219.2 million of these tons and leases
the remaining 490.6 million tons. USX does not own, or control by lease, any
unassigned iron ore reserves.
Independent outside entities, including lessors, have reviewed USX's
estimates on approximately 75% of the stated iron ore reserves.
E-46
USX CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING
ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
Capitalized Costs and Accumulated Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
December 31
---------------------------------------------------
United Other Equity
States Europe Intl. Consolidated Investees Total
------ ------ ------ ------------ --------- -------
(In millions)
2000
Capitalized costs:
Proved properties......... $5,752 $4,739 $1,373 $11,864 $226 $12,090
Unproved properties....... 343 124 180 647 2 649
------ ------ ------ ------- ---- -------
Total..................... 6,095 4,863 1,553 12,511 228 12,739
------ ------ ------ ------- ---- -------
Accumulated depreciation,
depletion and
amortization:
Proved properties......... 3,435 3,074 420 6,929 170 7,099
Unproved properties....... 107 -- 13 120 1 121
------ ------ ------ ------- ---- -------
Total..................... 3,542 3,074 433 7,049 171 7,220
------ ------ ------ ------- ---- -------
Net capitalized costs...... $2,553 $1,789 $1,120 $ 5,462 $ 57 $ 5,519
====== ====== ====== ======= ==== =======
1999
Capitalized costs:
Proved properties......... $8,270 $4,465 $1,270 $14,005 $612 $14,617
Unproved properties....... 349 55 187 591 123 714
------ ------ ------ ------- ---- -------
Total..................... 8,619 4,520 1,457 14,596 735 15,331
------ ------ ------ ------- ---- -------
Accumulated depreciation,
depletion and
amortization:
Proved properties......... 5,019 2,859 136 8,014 169 8,183
Unproved properties....... 78 -- 6 84 -- 84
------ ------ ------ ------- ---- -------
Total..................... 5,097 2,859 142 8,098 169 8,267
------ ------ ------ ------- ---- -------
Net capitalized costs...... $3,522 $1,661 $1,315 $ 6,498 $566 $ 7,064
====== ====== ====== ======= ==== =======
E-47
USX CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING
ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)--(Continued)
Results of Operations for Oil and Gas Producing Activities, Excluding Corporate
Overhead and Interest Costs(a)
United Other Equity
States Europe Intl. Consolidated Investees Total
------- ------ ----- ------------ --------- -------
(In millions)
2000:
Revenues:
Sales.................. $ 783 $ 579 $ 310 $ 1,672 $145 $ 1,817
Transfers.............. 1,337 -- 188 1,525 -- 1,525
Other revenues(b)...... (875) 10 55 (810) -- (810)
------- ----- ----- ------- ---- -------
Total revenues......... 1,245 589 553 2,387 145 2,532
Expenses:
Production costs....... (371) (111) (133) (615) (34) (649)
Shipping and handling
costs(c).............. (72) -- -- (72) -- (72)
Exploration expenses... (125) (37) (74) (236) (6) (242)
Reorganization costs... (45) (12) (10) (67) -- (67)
Depreciation, depletion
and amortization...... (380) (175) (122) (677) (27) (704)
Impairments............ (5) -- (188) (193) -- (193)
Other expenses......... (33) (3) (15) (51) -- (51)
------- ----- ----- ------- ---- -------
Total expenses......... (1,031) (338) (542) (1,911) (67) (1,978)
Other production-related
earnings (losses)(d)... 4 (21) 4 (13) 1 (12)
------- ----- ----- ------- ---- -------
Results before income
taxes.................. 218 230 15 463 79 542
Income taxes
(credits)(e)........... 70 62 (1) 131 27 158
------- ----- ----- ------- ---- -------
Results of operations... $ 148 $ 168 $ 16 $ 332 $ 52 $ 384
======= ===== ===== ======= ==== =======
1999:
Revenues:
Sales.................. $ 547 $ 431 $ 200 $ 1,178 $ 33 $ 1,211
Transfers.............. 882 -- 88 970 -- 970
Other revenues(b)...... 4 -- (2) 2 -- 2
------- ----- ----- ------- ---- -------
Total revenues......... 1,433 431 286 2,150 33 2,183
Expenses:
Production costs....... (322) (137) (99) (558) (25) (583)
Shipping and handling
costs(c).............. (77) -- -- (77) -- (77)
Exploration expenses... (134) (42) (51) (227) (4) (231)
Depreciation, depletion
and amortization...... (362) (143) (99) (604) (13) (617)
Impairments............ (16) -- -- (16) -- (16)
Other expenses......... (28) (7) (15) (50) -- (50)
------- ----- ----- ------- ---- -------
Total expenses......... (939) (329) (264) (1,532) (42) (1,574)
Other production-related
earnings (losses)(d)... 1 4 4 9 1 10
------- ----- ----- ------- ---- -------
Results before income
taxes.................. 495 106 26 627 (8) 619
Income taxes (credits).. 168 33 (7) 194 (3) 191
------- ----- ----- ------- ---- -------
Results of operations... $ 327 $ 73 $ 33 $ 433 $ (5) $ 428
======= ===== ===== ======= ==== =======
--------
(a) Includes the results of using derivative instruments to manage commodity
and foreign currency risks.
(b) Includes net gains (losses) on asset dispositions and contract
settlements.
(c) Represents a reclassification of shipping and handling costs previously
reported as a reduction from oil and gas revenues.
(d) Includes revenues, net of associated costs, from third-party activities
that are an integral part of USX's production operations which may include
the processing and/or transportation of third-party production, and the
purchase and subsequent resale of gas utilized in reservoir management.
(e) Excludes net valuation allowance tax charges of $205 million.
E-48
USX CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING
ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)--(Continued)
Results of Operations for Oil and Gas Producing Activities, Excluding Corporate
Overhead and Interest Costs(a)
United Other Equity
States Europe Intl. Consolidated Investees Total
------ ------ ----- ------------ --------- -------
(In millions)
1998:
Revenues:
Sales................... $ 542 $ 454 $ 71 $ 1,067 $ 28 $ 1,095
Transfers............... 536 -- 51 587 -- 587
Other revenues(b)....... 43 -- -- 43 -- 43
------ ----- ----- ------- ---- -------
Total revenues.......... 1,121 454 122 1,697 28 1,725
Expenses:
Production costs........ (295) (153) (57) (505) (8) (513)
Shipping and handling
costs(c)............... (67) -- -- (67) -- (67)
Exploration expenses.... (165) (23) (49) (237) (5) (242)
Depreciation, depletion
and amortization....... (339) (150) (58) (547) (8) (555)
Impairments(d).......... (14) (22) (47) (83) -- (83)
Other expenses.......... (37) (3) (11) (51) -- (51)
------ ----- ----- ------- ---- -------
Total expenses.......... (917) (351) (222) (1,490) (21) (1,511)
Other production-related
earnings (losses)(e).... 1 15 3 19 1 20
------ ----- ----- ------- ---- -------
Results before income
taxes................... 205 118 (97) 226 8 234
Income taxes (credits)... 61 22 (28) 55 3 58
------ ----- ----- ------- ---- -------
Results of operations.... $ 144 $ 96 $ (69) $ 171 $ 5 $ 176
====== ===== ===== ======= ==== =======
--------
(a) Includes the results of using derivative instruments to manage commodity
and foreign currency risks.
(b) Includes net gains (losses) on asset dispositions and contract
settlements.
(c) Represents a reclassification of shipping and handling costs previously
reported as a reduction from oil and gas revenues.
(d) Includes suspended exploration well write-offs.
(e) Includes revenues, net of associated costs, from third-party activities
that are an integral part of USX's production operations which may include
the processing and/or transportation of third-party production, and the
purchase and subsequent resale of gas utilized in reservoir management.
E-49
USX CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING
ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)--(Continued)
Average Production Costs(a)
2000 1999 1998
----- ----- -----
(Dollars per BOE)
United States................................................. $4.01 $3.26 $3.12
International--Europe......................................... 3.82 4.62 4.29
--Other International......................................... 6.09 4.66 4.73
Total Consolidated............................................ 4.29 3.73 3.55
--Equity Investees(b)......................................... 6.00 10.02 3.99
Worldwide..................................................... 4.35 3.83 3.56
--------
(a) Production costs are as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission
and include property taxes, severance taxes and other costs, but exclude
depreciation, depletion and amortization of capitalized acquisition,
exploration and development costs and certain administrative costs. Natural
gas volumes were converted to BOE using a conversion factor of six mcf of
natural gas to one barrel of oil.
(b) Represents CLAM and Sakhalin Energy for 2000 and 1999, and CLAM for 1998.
Average Sales Prices
Average Sales Prices Crude Oil and
(excluding results of Condensate Natural Gas Liquids Natural Gas
hedging) -------------------- -------------------- -----------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- ----- -----
(Dollars per Barrel) (Dollars per
Thousand Cubic
Feet)
United States........... $25.96 $15.78 $10.60 $19.20 $12.30 $ 8.64 $3.30 $1.90 $1.79
International--Europe... 27.90 17.59 12.87 24.98 13.84 11.49 2.56 2.03 2.07
--Other International... 25.77 16.77 11.31 23.48 13.49 8.38 3.20 1.64 1.34
Total Consolidated...... 26.22 16.21 11.14 20.35 12.67 9.32 3.08 1.90 1.85
--Equity Investee(a).... 29.64 23.43 -- 28.74 13.22 12.65 2.75 1.87 2.37
Worldwide............... 26.42 16.25 11.14 20.37 12.67 9.33 3.08 1.90 1.86
Average Sales Prices Crude Oil and
(including results of Condensate Natural Gas Liquids Natural Gas
hedging) -------------------- -------------------- -----------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ----- ----- -----
(Dollars per Barrel) (Dollars per
Thousand Cubic
Feet)
United States........... $25.49 $15.68 $10.60 $19.20 $12.30 $ 8.64 $3.21 $1.92 $1.79
International--Europe... 27.90 17.59 12.87 24.98 13.84 11.49 2.56 2.03 2.07
--Other International... 25.77 16.63 11.31 23.48 13.49 8.38 3.14 1.66 1.34
Total Consolidated...... 25.91 16.12 11.14 20.35 12.67 9.32 3.02 1.91 1.85
--Equity Investee(a).... 29.64 23.43 -- 28.74 13.22 12.65 2.75 1.87 2.37
Worldwide............... 26.13 16.16 11.14 20.37 12.67 9.33 3.02 1.91 1.86
--------
(a) Represents CLAM and Sakhalin Energy for 2000 and 1999, and CLAM for 1998.
E-50
USX CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING
ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)--(Continued)
Costs Incurred for Property Acquisition, Exploration and Development--Including
Capital Expenditures
United Other Equity
States Europe Intl. Consolidated Investees Total
------ ------ ------ ------------ --------- ------
(In millions)
2000:
Property acquisition:
Proved................. $128 $-- $ 12 $ 140 $-- $ 140
Unproved............... (5)(a) -- 10 5 -- 5
Exploration.............. 161 33 93 287 2 289
Development.............. 288 42 103 433 77 510
1999:
Property acquisition:
Proved................. $ 20 $-- $ 10 $ 30 $-- $ 30
Unproved............... 26 12 107 145 -- 145
Exploration.............. 141 47 64 252 8 260
Development.............. 232 34 117 383 84 467
1998:
Property acquisition:
Proved................. $ 3 $ 3 $1,051 $1,057 $-- $1,057
Unproved............... 82 -- 57 139 -- 139
Exploration.............. 217 39 75 331 11 342
Development.............. 431 39 46 516 165 681
--------
(a) Includes proceeds of $25 million realized from the reduction of mineral
interests.
E-51
USX CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING
ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)--(Continued)
Estimated Quantities of Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
The following estimates of net reserves have been determined by deducting
royalties of various kinds from USX's gross reserves. The reserve estimates are
believed to be reasonable and consistent with presently known physical data
concerning size and character of the reservoirs and are subject to change as
additional knowledge concerning the reservoirs becomes available. The estimates
include only such reserves as can reasonably be classified as proved; they do
not include reserves which may be found by extension of proved areas or
reserves recoverable by secondary or tertiary recovery methods unless these
methods are in operation and are showing successful results. Undeveloped
reserves consist of reserves to be recovered from future wells on undrilled
acreage or from existing wells where relatively major expenditures will be
required to realize production. USX did not have any quantities of oil and gas
reserves subject to long-term supply agreements with foreign governments or
authorities in which USX acts as producer.
United Other Equity
States Europe Intl. Consolidated Investees Total
------ ------ ----- ------------ --------- -----
(Millions of barrels)
Liquid Hydrocarbons
Proved developed and
undeveloped reserves:
Beginning of year--1998..... 590 161 26 777 82 859
Purchase of reserves in
place...................... 1 -- 156 157 -- 157
Revisions of previous
estimates.................. (1) (28) 1 (28) (2) (30)
Improved recovery........... 3 -- -- 3 -- 3
Extensions, discoveries and
other additions............ 10 4 18 32 -- 32
Production.................. (49) (15) (7) (71) -- (71)
Sales of reserves in place.. (5) -- -- (5) -- (5)
--- --- --- --- --- ---
End of year--1998........... 549 122 194 865 80 945
Purchase of reserves in
place...................... 14 -- 7 21 -- 21
Revisions of previous
estimates.................. 2 (20) -- (18) (3) (21)
Improved recovery........... 11 -- 1 12 -- 12
Extensions, discoveries and
other additions............ 9 -- 5 14 -- 14
Production.................. (53) (12) (11) (76) -- (76)
Sales of reserves in place.. (12) -- (9) (21) -- (21)
--- --- --- --- --- ---
End of year--1999........... 520 90 187 797 77 874
Purchase of reserves in
place...................... 27 -- -- 27 -- 27
Exchange of interest(a)..... 6 60 -- 66 (73) (7)
Revisions of previous
estimates.................. (4) (35) (21) (60) -- (60)
Improved recovery........... 7 -- -- 7 -- 7
Extensions, discoveries and
other additions............ 15 3 1 19 -- 19
Production.................. (48) (10) (13) (71) (4) (75)
Sales of reserves in place.. (65) -- (3) (68) -- (68)
--- --- --- --- --- ---
End of year--2000........... 458 108 151 717 -- 717
=== === === === === ===
Proved developed reserves:
Beginning of year--1998..... 486 161 12 659 -- 659
End of year--1998........... 489 119 67 675 -- 675
End of year--1999........... 476 90 72 638 69 707
End of year--2000........... 414 74 57 545 -- 545
--------
(a) Reserves represent the exchange of an equity interest in Sakhalin Energy
Investment Company Ltd. for certain interests in the UK Atlantic Margin
area and the Gulf of Mexico.
E-52
USX CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING
ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)--(Continued)
United Other Equity
States Europe Intl. Consolidated Investees Total
------ ------ ----- ------------ --------- -----
(Billions of cubic feet)
Natural Gas
Proved developed and
undeveloped reserves:
Beginning of year--
1998................... 2,232 1,048 23 3,303 111 3,414
Purchase of reserves in
place.................. 10 -- 782 792 -- 792
Revisions of previous
estimates.............. (16) 10 (1) (7) 5 (2)
Improved recovery....... -- -- -- -- -- --
Extensions, discoveries
and other additions.... 238 32 55 325 5 330
Production.............. (272) (124) (29) (425) (11) (436)
Sales of reserves in
place.................. (29) -- -- (29) -- (29)
----- ----- ---- ----- --- -----
End of year--1998....... 2,163 966 830 3,959 110 4,069
Purchase of reserves in
place.................. 5 -- 11 16 -- 16
Revisions of previous
estimates.............. (83) (81) (3) (167) 13 (154)
Improved recovery....... 8 -- 2 10 -- 10
Extensions, discoveries
and other additions.... 281 -- 94 375 13 388
Production.............. (275) (111) (59) (445) (13) (458)
Sales of reserves in
place.................. (42) -- (42) (84) -- (84)
----- ----- ---- ----- --- -----
End of year--1999....... 2,057 774 833 3,664 123 3,787
Purchase of reserves in
place.................. 114 -- 15 129 -- 129
Exchange of
interest(a)............ 14 31 -- 45 -- 45
Revisions of previous
estimates.............. (154) (114) (347) (615) (26) (641)
Improved recovery....... -- -- -- -- -- --
Extensions, discoveries
and other additions.... 217 35 38 290 2 292
Production.............. (268) (112) (52) (432) (10) (442)
Sales of reserves in
place.................. (66) -- (10) (76) -- (76)
----- ----- ---- ----- --- -----
End of year--2000....... 1,914 614 477 3,005 89 3,094
===== ===== ==== ===== === =====
Proved developed
reserves:
Beginning of year--
1998................... 1,702 1,024 19 2,745 78 2,823
End of year--1998....... 1,678 909 534 3,121 76 3,197
End of year--1999....... 1,550 741 497 2,788 65 2,853
End of year--2000....... 1,421 563 381 2,365 52 2,417
--------
(a) Reserves represent the exchange of an equity interest in Sakhalin Energy
Investment Company Ltd. for certain interests in the UK Atlantic Margin
area and the Gulf of Mexico.
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows and Changes Therein
Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
Estimated discounted future net cash flows and changes therein were
determined in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
69. Certain information concerning the assumptions used in computing the
valuation of proved reserves and their inherent limitations are discussed
below. USX believes such information is essential for a proper understanding
and assessment of the data presented.
Future cash inflows are computed by applying year-end prices of oil and gas
relating to USX's proved reserves to the year-end quantities of those reserves.
Future price changes are considered only to the extent provided by contractual
arrangements in existence at year-end.
The assumptions used to compute the proved reserve valuation do not
necessarily reflect USX's expectations of actual revenues to be derived from
those reserves nor their present worth. Assigning monetary values to the
estimated quantities of reserves, described on the preceding page, does not
reduce the subjective and ever-changing nature of such reserve estimates.
E-53
USX CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING
ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)--(Continued)
Additional subjectivity occurs when determining present values because the
rate of producing the reserves must be estimated. In addition to uncertainties
inherent in predicting the future, variations from the expected production rate
also could result directly or indirectly from factors outside of USX's control,
such as unintentional delays in development, environmental concerns, changes in
prices or regulatory controls.
The reserve valuation assumes that all reserves will be disposed of by
production. However, if reserves are sold in place or subjected to
participation by foreign governments, additional economic considerations also
could affect the amount of cash eventually realized.
Future development and production costs, including abandonment and
dismantlement costs, are computed by estimating the expenditures to be incurred
in developing and producing the proved oil and gas reserves at the end of the
year, based on year-end costs and assuming continuation of existing economic
conditions.
Future income tax expenses are computed by applying the appropriate year-end
statutory tax rates, with consideration of future tax rates already legislated,
to the future pretax net cash flows relating to USX's proved oil and gas
reserves. Permanent differences in oil and gas related tax credits and
allowances are recognized.
Discount was derived by using a discount rate of 10 percent a year to
reflect the timing of the future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas
reserves.
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil
and Gas Reserves
United Other Equity
States Europe Intl. Consolidated Investees Total
------- ------- ------- ------------ --------- -------
(In millions)
December 31, 2000:
Future cash inflows.... $25,052 $ 4,571 $ 6,704 $36,327 $ 313 $36,640
Future production
costs................. (5,689) (1,662) (1,156) (8,507) (125) (8,632)
Future development
costs................. (638) (185) (309) (1,132) (26) (1,158)
Future income tax
expenses.............. (6,290) (677) (2,102) (9,069) (76) (9,145)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------ -------
Future net cash flows.. 12,435 2,047 3,137 17,619 86 17,705
10% annual discount for
estimated timing of
cash flows............ (5,403) (486) (1,524) (7,413) (19) (7,432)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------ -------
Standardized measure of
discounted future net
cash flows relating to
proved oil and gas
reserves.............. $ 7,032 $ 1,561 $ 1,613 $10,206 $ 67 $10,273
======= ======= ======= ======= ====== =======
December 31, 1999:
Future cash inflows.... $15,393 $ 4,426 $ 5,242 $25,061 $2,154 $27,215
Future production
costs................. (4,646) (1,864) (1,107) (7,617) (850) (8,467)
Future development
costs................. (445) (86) (315) (846) (88) (934)
Future income tax
expenses.............. (3,102) (987) (1,581) (5,670) (328) (5,998)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------ -------
Future net cash flows.. 7,200 1,489 2,239 10,928 888 11,816
10% annual discount for
estimated timing of
cash flows............ (3,371) (374) (862) (4,607) (372) (4,979)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------ -------
Standardized measure of
discounted future net
cash flows relating to
proved oil and gas
reserves.............. $ 3,829 $ 1,115 $ 1,377 $ 6,321 $ 516 $ 6,837
======= ======= ======= ======= ====== =======
December 31, 1998:
Future cash inflows.... $ 8,442 $ 3,850 $ 2,686 $14,978 $1,036 $16,014
Future production
costs................. (3,731) (2,240) (950) (6,921) (586) (7,507)
Future development
costs................. (559) (130) (323) (1,012) (124) (1,136)
Future income tax
expenses.............. (816) (630) (542) (1,988) (45) (2,033)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------ -------
Future net cash flows.. 3,336 850 871 5,057 281 5,338
10% annual discount for
estimated timing of
cash flows............ (1,462) (256) (392) (2,110) (136) (2,246)
------- ------- ------- ------- ------ -------
Standardized measure of
discounted future net
cash flows relating to
proved oil and gas
reserves.............. $ 1,874 $ 594 $ 479 $ 2,947 $ 145 $ 3,092
======= ======= ======= ======= ====== =======
E-54
USX CORPORATION
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCING
ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)--(Continued)
Summary of Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
Consolidated Equity Investees Total
------------------------- ------------------- -------------------------
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
------- ------- ------- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------- -------
(In millions)
Sales and transfers of
oil and gas produced,
net of production
costs.................. $(2,508) $(1,516) $(1,125) $(111) $ (8) $ (20) $(2,619) $(1,524) $(1,145)
Net changes in prices
and production costs
related to future
production............. 6,820 5,891 (3,579) 12 484 (372) 6,832 6,375 (3,951)
Extensions, discoveries
and improved recovery,
less related costs..... 1,472 566 284 3 9 4 1,475 575 288
Development costs
incurred during the
period................. 433 383 516 77 84 165 510 467 681
Changes in estimated
future development
costs.................. (273) (69) (285) (22) (52) (100) (295) (121) (385)
Revisions of previous
quantity estimates..... (1,899) (346) (110) (43) (8) (2) (1,942) (354) (112)
Net changes in purchases
and sales of minerals
in place............... 380 68 637 -- -- -- 380 68 637
Net change in exchanges
of reserves in place... 755 -- -- (547) -- -- 208 -- --
Accretion of discount... 843 382 623 62 18 39 905 400 662
Net change in income
taxes.................. (1,969) (1,995) 825 90 (117) 57 (1,879) (2,112) 882
Other................... (169) 10 401 30 (39) 102 (139) (29) 503
------- ------- ------- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------- -------
Net change for the
year................... 3,885 3,374 (1,813) (449) 371 (127) 3,436 3,745 (1,940)
Beginning of year....... 6,321 2,947 4,760 516 145 272 6,837 3,092 5,032
------- ------- ------- ----- ----- ----- ------- ------- -------
End of year............. $10,206 $ 6,321 $ 2,947 $ 67 $ 516 $ 145 $10,273 $ 6,837 $ 3,092
======= ======= ======= ===== ===== ===== ======= ======= =======
E-55
USX CORPORATION
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
USX Corporation ("USX") is a diversified company engaged primarily in the
energy business through its Marathon Group, and in the steel business through
its U. S. Steel Group.
Effective October 31, 1997, USX sold Delhi Gas Pipeline Corporation and
other subsidiaries of USX that comprised all of the USX--Delhi Group ("Delhi
Companies"). On January 26, 1998, USX used the $195 million net proceeds from
the sale to redeem all of the 9.45 million outstanding shares of USX--Delhi
Group Common Stock. For additional information, see Note 5 to the USX
Consolidated Financial Statements.
On January 1, 1998, Marathon Oil Company ("Marathon") transferred certain
refining, marketing and transportation ("RM&T") net assets to Marathon Ashland
Petroleum LLC ("MAP"), a new consolidated subsidiary. Also on January 1, 1998,
Marathon acquired certain RM&T net assets from Ashland Inc. ("Ashland") in
exchange for a 38 percent interest in MAP. Financial measures such as revenues,
income from operations and capital expenditures in 2000, 1999 and 1998 include
100 percent of MAP and are not comparable to prior period amounts. Net income
and related per share amounts for 2000, 1999 and 1998 are net of minority
interest. For further discussion of MAP, see Note 3 to the USX Consolidated
Financial Statements.
On August 11, 1998, Marathon acquired Tarragon Oil and Gas Limited
("Tarragon"), a Canadian oil and gas exploration and production company. The
purchase price included $686 million in cash payments, the assumption of $345
million in debt and the issuance of Exchangeable Shares of an indirect Canadian
subsidiary of Marathon valued at $29 million. The Exchangeable Shares are
exchangeable at any time on a one-for-one basis for shares of USX -Marathon
Group Common Stock ("Marathon Stock"). On November 4, 1998, USX sold 17 million
shares of Marathon Stock. The proceeds to USX of $528 million were used to
reduce indebtedness incurred to fund the Tarragon acquisition. Financial
measures such as revenues, income from operations and capital expenditures
include operations of Marathon Canada Limited, formerly known as Tarragon,
commencing August 12, 1998. For further discussion of Tarragon, see Note 3 to
the USX Consolidated Financial Statements.
On November 24, 2000, USX acquired U. S. Steel Kosice s.r.o. ("USSK"), which
held the steel operations and related assets of VSZ a.s. ("VSZ"), located in
the Slovak Republic. The 2000 results include USSK operations after the
acquisition date. For further discussion of USSK, see Note 3 to the USX
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of USX Consolidated Financial
Statements provides certain information about the Marathon and U. S. Steel
Groups, particularly in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Operations by
Group. More expansive Group information, primarily on Group reportable segments
and changes in Group financial statements, is provided in Management's
Discussion and Analysis of the Marathon Group and U. S. Steel Group, which are
included in the USX 2000 Form 10-K. Management's Discussion and Analysis should
be read in conjunction with the USX Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
to the USX Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain sections of Management's Discussion and Analysis include forward-
looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting USX. These
statements typically contain words such as "anticipates", "believes",
"estimates", "expects" or similar words indicating that future outcomes are
uncertain. In accordance with "safe harbor" provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, these statements are accompanied by
cautionary language identifying important factors, though not necessarily all
such factors, that could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those
set forth in the forward-looking statements. For additional risk factors
affecting the businesses of USX, see Supplementary Data--Disclosures About
Forward-Looking Statements in the USX 2000 Form 10-K.
E-56
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Income
Revenues and Other Income for each of the last three years are summarized in
the following table:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(Dollars in millions)
Revenues and other income(a)
Marathon Group................................. $33,859 $23,707 $21,623
U. S. Steel Group.............................. 6,132 5,470 6,477
Eliminations................................... (77) (58) (23)
------- ------- -------
Total USX Corporation revenues and other
income...................................... 39,914 29,119 28,077
Less:
Consumer excise taxes on petroleum products and
merchandise(b)................................ 4,344 3,973 3,824
------- ------- -------
Revenues and other income adjusted to exclude
above item.................................. $35,570 $25,146 $24,253
======= ======= =======
--------
(a) Consists of revenues, dividend and investee income (loss), gain on
ownership change in MAP, net gains (losses) on disposal of assets and
other income.
(b) Included in both revenues and costs and expenses for the Marathon Group
and USX Consolidated, resulting in no effect on income.
Adjusted revenues and other income increased by $10,424 million in 2000
compared with 1999, reflecting a 43 percent increase for the Marathon Group and
a 12 percent increase for the U. S. Steel Group. Adjusted revenues and other
income increased by $893 million in 1999 compared with 1998, reflecting a 10
percent increase for the Marathon Group, partially offset by a 16 percent
decrease for the U. S. Steel Group. For further discussion, see Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Operations by Group, herein.
Income from operations for each of the last three years are summarized in
the following table:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------ ------
(Dollars in millions)
Reportable segments
Marathon Group
Exploration & production.......................... $ 1,535 $ 618 $ 278
Refining, marketing & transportation.............. 1,273 611 896
Other energy related businesses................... 38 61 33
------- ------ ------
Income for reportable segments--Marathon Group.. 2,846 1,290 1,207
U. S. Steel Group
Domestic Steel.................................... 23 91 517
U. S. Steel Kosice................................ 2 -- --
------- ------ ------
Income for reportable segments--U. S. Steel
Group.......................................... 25 91 517
------- ------ ------
Income for reportable segments--USX
Corporation.................................... 2,871 1,381 1,724
Items not allocated to reportable segments:
Marathon Group..................................... (1,198) 423 (269)
U. S. Steel Group.................................. 79 59 62
------- ------ ------
Total income from operations--USX Corporation... $ 1,752 $1,863 $1,517
======= ====== ======
Income from operations decreased $111 million in 2000 compared with 1999 and
increased $346 million in 1999 compared with 1998. The decrease in 2000,
despite higher income from reportable segments for the Marathon Group, was
primarily due to special charges at Marathon, in particular a noncash
adjustment related to the formation of a joint venture with Kinder Morgan
Energy Partners, L.P. In addition, income from operations for the U. S. Steel
Group declined in 2000 due primarily to higher costs related to energy and
E-57
inefficient operating levels, lower income from raw materials operations,
particularly coal operations, and lower sheet shipments resulting from high
levels of imports that continued in 2000. For further discussion, see
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Operations by Group, herein.
Net interest and other financial costs for each of the last three years are
summarized in the following table:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(Dollars in
millions)
Interest and other financial income....................... $ 34 $ 3 $ 39
Interest and other financial costs........................ 375 365 318
---- ---- ----
Net interest and other financial costs................ 341 362 279
Less:
Favorable adjustment to carrying value of indexed
debt/(a)/.............................................. -- (13) (44)
---- ---- ----
Net interest and other financial costs adjusted to exclude
above item............................................... $341 $375 $323
==== ==== ====
--------
(a) In December 1996, USX issued $117 million in aggregate principal amount
of 6-3/4% Notes Due February 1, 2000 ("indexed debt"), mandatorily
exchangeable at maturity for common stock of RTI International Metals,
Inc. ("RTI") or for the equivalent amount of cash, at USX's option. The
carrying value of indexed debt was adjusted quarterly to settlement value
based on changes in the value of RTI common stock. Any resulting
adjustment was charged or credited to income and included in interest and
other financial costs. In 1999, USX irrevocably deposited with a trustee
the RTI common stock resulting in satisfaction of USX's obligation. For
further information see Note 7 to the USX Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Excluding the effect of the adjustment to the carrying value of indexed
debt, net interest and other financial costs decreased by $34 million in 2000
as compared with 1999, and increased by $52 million in 1999 as compared with
1998. The decrease in 2000 was primarily due to higher interest income. The
increase in 1999 was primarily due to lower interest income and increased
financial costs as a result of higher average debt levels. For additional
information, see Note 6 to the USX Consolidated Financial Statements.
The minority interest in income of MAP, which represents Ashland's 38%
ownership interest, was $498 million in 2000, $447 million in 1999, and $249
million in 1998. The increase of $51 million from 1999 to 2000 was primarily
due to much higher RM&T segment income, largely offset by the absence of the
favorable 1999 inventory market valuation ("IMV") reserve adjustment. The
increase of $198 million from 1998 to 1999 was primarily due to the favorable
effect of the IMV reserve adjustment, partially offset by lower RM&T segment
income.
The provision for income taxes was $502 million in 2000, compared with $349
million in 1999 and $315 million in 1998. The 2000 provision included a $235
million one-time, noncash deferred tax charge for the Marathon Group as a
result of the change in the amount and timing of future foreign source income
due to the exchange of its interest in Sakhalin Energy Investment Company Ltd.
for oil and gas producing interests. The 1999 provision included a $23 million
favorable adjustment to deferred taxes for the Marathon Group related to the
outcome of a United States Tax Court case. The 1998 income tax provision
included $33 million of favorable income tax accrual adjustments relating to
foreign operations. For reconciliation of the federal statutory rate to total
provisions on income from continuing operations, see Note 11 to the USX
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Extraordinary loss of $7 million, net of income tax benefit, in 1999
included a $5 million loss resulting from the satisfaction of the indexed debt
and a $2 million loss for USX's share of Republic Technologies International,
LLC's extraordinary loss related to the early extinguishment of debt. For
additional information, see Note 7 to the USX Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Net income was $411 million in 2000, $698 million in 1999 and $674 million
in 1998. Excluding the gain on change of ownership in MAP in 2000, 1999 and
1998 and adjustments to the inventory market valuation reserve in 1999 and
1998, net income decreased by $69 million in 2000 compared with 1999, and
decreased by $152 million in 1999 compared with 1998.
E-58
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition, Cash Flows and
Liquidity
Current assets increased by $1,376 million from year-end 1999, primarily
reflecting increased cash and cash equivalents, receivables, inventories and
assets held for sale. Receivables primarily increased as a result of higher
commodity prices. Cash and cash equivalents increased primarily due to an
increase in cash held by certain foreign subsidiaries. Inventories increased by
$186 million largely due to increases at the U. S. Steel Group, in particular
the acquisition of USSK. Assets held for sale increased mainly due to the
reclassification of the Yates field from property, plant and equipment.
Current liabilities increased by $704 million from year-end 1999, primarily
due to an increase in accounts payable reflecting higher year-end commodity
prices for the Marathon Group and the acquisition of USSK for the U. S. Steel
Group. In addition, notes payable increased and, because of the
reclassification of long- term debt to short-term, short-term debt also
increased.
Investments and long-term receivables decreased by $436 million from year-
end 1999, primarily due to the exchange of Marathon's interest in Sakhalin
Energy Investment Company Ltd.
Net property, plant and equipment decreased by $695 million from year-end
1999, primarily due to depreciation, asset impairments and sales, and
reclassifications to assets held for sale, partially offset by property
additions, including USSK.
Total long-term debt and notes payable increased by $327 million from year-
end 1999, primarily due to $325 million of debt related to the acquisition of
USSK, which is nonrecourse to USX. Debt attributed to the U. S. Steel Group
increased, while debt attributed to the Marathon Group decreased.
Stockholders' equity decreased by $92 million from year-end 1999 mainly
reflecting net income of $411 million offset by dividends declared and Marathon
Stock repurchases of $105 million. In July 2000, the USX Board of Directors
authorized spending up to $450 million to repurchase shares of Marathon Stock.
This repurchase program will continue from time to time as the Corporation's
financial condition and market conditions warrant.
Net cash provided from operating activities was $2,531 million in 2000,
$1,936 million in 1999 and $2,022 million in 1998. Cash provided from operating
activities in 2000 included a $500 million elective contribution to a Voluntary
Employee Benefit Association Trust ("VEBA"), a trust established by contract in
1994 covering United Steelworkers of America retirees' health care and life
insurance benefits and a $30 million elective contribution to a non-union
retiree life insurance trust. Cash provided from operating activities in 1999
included a payment of $320 million resulting from the expiration of a program
to sell U. S. Steel Group's accounts receivable. Excluding the effects of these
items, cash provided from operating activities increased $805 million in 2000
compared with 1999 primarily due to increased cash provided from operations at
the Marathon Group partially offset by increased income tax payments. Cash
provided from operating activities in 1998 included proceeds of $38 million for
the insurance litigation settlement pertaining to the 1995 Gary Works #8 blast
furnace explosion and the payment of $30 million for the repurchase of sold
accounts receivable. Excluding the effects of these adjustments, cash provided
from operating activities increased by $242 million in 1999 compared with 1998
primarily due to favorable working capital changes.
Capital expenditures for each of the last three years are summarized in the
following table:
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(Dollars in
millions)
Marathon Group
Exploration & production
Domestic............................................. $ 516 $ 356 $ 652
International........................................ 226 388 187
Refining, marketing & transportation................... 656 612 410
Other.................................................. 27 22 21
------ ------ ------
Subtotal Marathon Group............................ 1,425 1,378 1,270
U. S. Steel Group...................................... 244 287 310
------ ------ ------
Total USX Corporation capital expenditures......... $1,669 $1,665 $1,580
====== ====== ======
E-59
Domestic exploration and production capital expenditures for the Marathon
Group in 2000 mainly included the completion of the Viosca Knoll Block 786
(Petronius) development in the Gulf of Mexico, various producing property
acquisitions, and natural gas developments in East Texas and other gas basins
throughout the western United States. International exploration and production
projects included the completion of the Tchatamba West development, located
offshore Gabon, and continued oil and natural gas developments in Canada.
Refining, marketing and transportation capital expenditures by MAP primarily
consisted of refinery modifications, including the initiation of the delayed
coker unit project at the Garyville refinery, and upgrades and expansions of
retail marketing outlets.
Capital expenditures for the U. S. Steel Group in 2000 included exercising
an early buyout option of a lease for approximately half of the Gary Works No.
2 Slab Caster, the continued replacement of coke battery thruwalls at Gary
Works, installation of the remaining two coilers at Gary's hot strip mill, a
blast furnace stove replacement at Gary Works and the continuation of an
upgrade to the Mon Valley cold reduction mill.
Capital expenditures in 2001 are expected to be approximately $1.9 billion.
Expenditures for the Marathon Group are expected to be approximately $1.5
billion. Domestic exploration and production projects planned for 2001 will
focus on gas projects and include various producing property acquisitions.
Planned capital expenditures in 2001 do not include the capital requirements
related to the acquisition of Pennaco Energy, Inc. ("Pennaco"). International
exploration and production projects include the continued development of the
Foinaven area in the U.K. Atlantic Margin and continued oil and natural gas
developments in Canada. Refining, marketing and transportation spending by MAP
will primarily consist of refinery improvements, including the completion of
the delayed coker unit project at the Garyville refinery, upgrades and
expansions of retail marketing outlets, and expansion and enhancement of
logistics systems. Other Marathon spending will include funds for development
and installation of SAP software, which is an enterprise resource planning
system that will allow the integration of processes among business units and
with outside enterprises.
Capital expenditures for the U. S. Steel Group in 2001 are expected to be
approximately $425 million. Planned projects include exercising an early buyout
option of a lease for the balance of the Gary Works No. 2 Slab Caster, work on
the No. 3 blast furnace at Mon Valley Works, work on the No. 2 stove at the No.
6 blast furnace at Gary Works, the completion of the replacement of coke
battery thruwalls at Gary Works, the completion of an upgrade to the Mon Valley
cold reduction mill, mobile equipment purchases, systems development projects,
and projects at USSK, including the completion of the tin mill upgrade.
Contract commitments to acquire property, plant and equipment and long-term
investments at December 31, 2000, totaled $663 million compared with $568
million at December 31, 1999.
Investments in investees of $100 million in 2000 mainly reflected Marathon
Group development spending for the Sakhalin II project in Russia and U. S.
Steel Group investment in stock of VSZ in which USX now holds a 25 percent
interest.
The above statements with respect to capital expenditures are forward-
looking statements reflecting management's best estimates based on information
currently available. To the extent this information proves to be inaccurate,
the timing and levels of future expenditures could differ materially from those
included in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause future
capital expenditures to differ materially include changes in industry supply
and demand, general economic conditions, the availability of business
opportunities and levels of cash flow from operations for each of the Groups.
The timing of completion or cost of particular capital projects could be
affected by unforeseen hazards such as weather conditions, explosions or fires.
Proceeds from disposal of assets were $560 million in 2000, compared with
$366 million in 1999 and $86 million in 1998. Proceeds in 2000 primarily
reflected Marathon's Sakhalin exchange, sales of interest in the
Angus/Stellaria development in the Gulf of Mexico, the sale of non-core
Speedway SuperAmerica stores and other domestic production properties. Proceeds
in 1999 primarily reflected the sales of Scurlock Permian LLC,
E-60
over 150 non-strategic domestic and international production properties and
Carnegie Natural Gas Company and affiliated subsidiaries, all of which were
attributed to the Marathon Group.
The net change in restricted cash was a net withdrawal of $3 million in
2000, compared with a net deposit of $1 million in 1999 and a net withdrawal of
$174 million in 1998. The $174 million net withdrawal in 1998 was primarily the
result of redeeming all of the outstanding shares of USX--Delhi Group Common
Stock with the $195 million of net proceeds from the sale of the Delhi
Companies.
Repayments of loans and advances to investees were $10 million in 2000
compared with $1 million in 1999 and $71 million in 1998. In 1998, Sakhalin
Energy Investment Company Ltd. repaid advances made by Marathon in connection
with the Sakhalin II project.
Net cash changes related to financial obligations (the net of commercial
paper and revolving credit arrangements, debt borrowings and repayments on the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows) decreased $4 million in 2000, compared
with an increase of $187 million in 1999 and an increase of $315 million in
1998. The decrease in 2000 reflects the net effects of net cash provided from
operating activities, net cash used in investing activities, distributions to
minority shareholder of MAP, dividends paid and a stock repurchase program for
Marathon Group. The increase in 1999 reflects the net effects of net cash
provided from operating activities, net cash used in investing activities,
distributions to minority shareholder of MAP and dividends paid. The increase
in 1998 was primarily the result of borrowings against revolving credit
agreements to fund the acquisition of Tarragon.
Significant additions to long-term debt for each of the last three years are
summarized in the following table:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(Dollars in
millions)
Aggregate principal amounts of:
6.65% Notes due 2006....................................... $-- $300 $--
6.85% Notes due 2008....................................... -- -- 400
U. S. Steel receivables facility........................... -- 350 --
USSK loan facility(a)...................................... 325 -- --
Environmental bonds and capital leases(b).................. -- 37 280
---- ---- ----
Total.................................................... $325 $687 $680
==== ==== ====
--------
(a) The USSK loan facility is nonrecourse to USX.
(b) Issued to refinance an equivalent amount of environmental improvement
refunding bonds.
In the event of a change in control of USX, debt and lease obligations
totaling $3,818 million at year-end 2000 may be declared immediately due and
payable or required to be collateralized. See Notes 10 and 14 to the USX
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Marathon Stock repurchased was $105 million in 2000. In July 2000, the USX
Board of Directors authorized spending up to $450 million to repurchase shares
of Marathon Stock. This repurchase program will continue from time to time as
the Corporation's financial condition and market conditions warrant.
Dividends paid increased $17 million in 2000 compared with 1999 and
increased $12 million in 1999 compared with 1998. The increase in 2000 was due
primarily to a two-cents-per-share increase in the quarterly Marathon Stock
dividend effective with dividends paid in the third quarter 2000.
Benefit Plan Activity
In 2000, USX contributed $530 million to a VEBA, including a $500 million
elective contribution, and $30 million to a non- union retiree life insurance
trust. In 1999, USX contributed $20 million to a VEBA.
E-61
Debt and Preferred Stock Ratings
In May 2000, Standard & Poor's Corp. upgraded USX's and Marathon's senior
debt to BBB, which continues the investment grade rating. At the same time,
USX's subordinated debt was upgraded to BBB- and preferred stock was upgraded
to BB+. Also in May 2000, Moody's Investors Services, Inc., upgraded USX's and
Marathon's senior debt to the investment grade rating of Baa1, USX's
subordinated debt to Baa2 and USX's preferred stock to baa3. Fitch IBCA Duff &
Phelps currently rates USX's senior notes as investment grade at BBB and USX's
subordinated debt as BBB-. In December 2000, Standard & Poor's Corp. advised
that they had put USX on "Credit Watch Developing" status and Fitch IBCA, Duff
& Phelps advised that they had put USX on "Rating Watch-Evolving" status. Both
moves were in response to USX's announced structure study.
Derivative Instruments
See Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for
discussion of derivative instruments and associated market risk.
Liquidity
In December 2000, USX entered into a $1,354 million five- year revolving
credit agreement, terminating in November 2005, and a $451 million 364-day
facility, which together replaced the prior $2,350 million facility. At
December 31, 2000, USX had $300 million of borrowings against its $1,354
million long-term revolving credit agreements and commercial paper borrowings
of $77 million. Also, USX had a short-term line of credit totaling $150 million
which was fully drawn at December 31, 2000. There were no borrowings against
MAP or USSK revolving credit agreements at December 31, 2000.
USX had a total of $1,678 million available at December 31, 2000 under
existing shelf registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. These allow USX to offer and issue unsecured debt securities,
common and preferred stock and warrants in one or more separate offerings on
terms to be determined at the time of sale.
USX management believes that its short-term and long-term liquidity is
adequate to satisfy its obligations as of December 31, 2000, and to complete
currently authorized capital spending programs. Future requirements for USX's
business needs, including the funding of capital expenditures, debt maturities
for the years 2001, 2002 and 2003, and any amounts that may ultimately be paid
in connection with contingencies (which are discussed in Note 26 to the USX
Consolidated Financial Statements), are expected to be financed by a
combination of internally generated funds, proceeds from the sale of stock,
borrowings or other external financing sources. However, on November 30, 2000,
USX announced that the USX Board of Directors had authorized management to
retain financial, tax and legal advisors to perform an in-depth study of the
corporation's targeted stock structure. Until the study is complete, USX
management believes it will be more difficult to access traditional debt and
equity markets. Although USX management believes that it will not be necessary
to access financial markets during this time frame, nontraditional sources
should be available to provide adequate liquidity, if necessary.
USX management's opinion concerning liquidity and USX's ability to avail
itself in the future of the financing options mentioned in the above forward-
looking statements are based on currently available information. To the extent
that this information proves to be inaccurate, future availability of financing
may be adversely affected. Factors that affect the availability of financing
include the performance of each Group (as indicated by levels of cash provided
from operating activities and other measures), the results of the announced
structure study, the state of the debt and equity markets, investor perceptions
of past performance and expectations regarding future actions and performance,
the overall U.S. financial climate, and, in particular, with respect to
borrowings, levels of USX's outstanding debt and credit ratings by rating
agencies. For a summary of short-term and long-term debt, see Notes 13 and 14
to the USX Consolidated Financial Statements.
E-62
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Environmental Matters, Litigation and
Contingencies
USX has incurred and will continue to incur substantial capital, operating
and maintenance, and remediation expenditures as a result of environmental
laws and regulations. To the extent these expenditures, as with all costs, are
not ultimately reflected in the prices of USX's products and services,
operating results will be adversely affected. USX believes that domestic
competitors of the U. S. Steel Group and substantially all the competitors of
the Marathon Group are subject to similar environmental laws and regulations.
However, the specific impact on each competitor may vary depending on a number
of factors, including the age and location of its operating facilities,
marketing areas, production processes and the specific products and services
it provides.
In addition, USX expects to incur capital expenditures to meet
environmental standards under the Slovak Republic's environmental laws for the
U. S. Steel Group's USSK operation.
The following table summarizes USX's environmental expenditures for each of
the last three years(a):
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- ----
(Dollars in
millions)
Capital
Marathon Group............................................. $ 73 $ 46 $ 83
U. S. Steel Group.......................................... 18 32 49
---- ---- ----
Total capital............................................ $ 91 $ 78 $132
==== ==== ====
Compliance
Operating & maintenance
Marathon Group............................................. $139 $117 $126
U. S. Steel Group.......................................... 194 199 198
---- ---- ----
Total operating & maintenance............................ 333 316 324
---- ---- ----
Remediation(b)
Marathon Group............................................. 30 25 10
U. S. Steel Group.......................................... 18 22 19
---- ---- ----
Total remediation........................................ 48 47 29
---- ---- ----
Total compliance......................................... $381 $363 $353
==== ==== ====
--------
(a) Amounts for the Marathon Group are calculated based on American Petroleum
Institute survey guidelines and include 100% of MAP. Amounts for the U. S.
Steel Group are based on previously established U.S. Department of
Commerce survey guidelines.
(b) Amounts do not include noncash provisions recorded for environmental
remediation, but include spending charged against remediation reserves,
net of recoveries where permissible.
USX's environmental capital expenditures accounted for 5%, 5% and 8% of
total consolidated capital expenditures in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
USX's environmental compliance expenditures averaged 1% of total
consolidated costs in each of 2000, 1999 and 1998. Remediation spending
primarily reflected ongoing clean-up costs for soil and groundwater
contamination associated with underground storage tanks and piping at retail
gasoline stations, and remediation activities at former and present operating
locations.
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA") establishes standards
for the management of solid and hazardous wastes. Besides affecting current
waste disposal practices, RCRA also addresses the environmental effects of
certain past waste disposal operations, the recycling of wastes and the
regulation of storage tanks.
E-63
A significant portion of USX's currently identified environmental
remediation projects relate to the remediation of former and present operating
locations. These projects include remediation of contaminated sediments in a
river that receives discharges from the Gary Works and the closure of permitted
hazardous and non-hazardous waste landfills.
USX has been notified that it is a potentially responsible party ("PRP") at
38 waste sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act ("CERCLA") as of December 31, 2000. In addition, there are 23
sites where USX has received information requests or other indications that USX
may be a PRP under CERCLA but where sufficient information is not presently
available to confirm the existence of liability. There are also 144 additional
sites, excluding retail gasoline stations, where remediation is being sought
under other environmental statutes, both federal and state, or where private
parties are seeking remediation through discussions or litigation. Of these
sites, 15 were associated with properties conveyed to MAP by Ashland for which
Ashland has retained liability for all costs associated with remediation. At
many of these sites, USX is one of a number of parties involved and the total
cost of remediation, as well as USX's share thereof, is frequently dependent
upon the outcome of investigations and remedial studies. USX accrues for
environmental remediation activities when the responsibility to remediate is
probable and the amount of associated costs is reasonably determinable. As
environmental remediation matters proceed toward ultimate resolution or as
additional remediation obligations arise, charges in excess of those previously
accrued may be required. See Note 26 to the USX Consolidated Financial
Statements.
New Tier II Fuels regulations were proposed in late 1999. The gasoline
rules, which were finalized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA")
in February 2000, and the diesel fuel rule, which was finalized in January
2001, require substantially reduced sulfur levels. The combined capital cost to
achieve compliance with the gasoline and diesel regulations could amount to
approximately $700 million between 2003 and 2005. This is a forward-looking
statement and can only be a broad-based estimate due to the ongoing evolution
of regulatory requirements. Some factors (among others) that could potentially
affect gasoline and diesel fuel compliance costs include obtaining the
necessary construction and environmental permits, operating considerations, and
unforeseen hazards such as weather conditions.
In October 1998, the National Enforcement Investigations Center and Region V
of the EPA conducted a multi-media inspection of MAP's Detroit refinery.
Subsequently, in November 1998, Region V conducted a multi-media inspection of
MAP's Robinson refinery. These inspections covered compliance with the Clean
Air Act (New Source Performance Standards, Prevention of Significant
Deterioration, and the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Benzene), the Clean Water Act (permit exceedances for the Waste Water
Treatment Plant), reporting obligations under the Emergency Planning and
Community Right to Know Act and the handling of process waste. MAP has been
advised, in ongoing discussions with the EPA, as to certain compliance issues
regarding MAP's Detroit and Robinson refineries. Thus far, MAP has been served
with two Notices of Violation ("NOV") and three Findings of Violation in
connection with the multi-media inspection at its Detroit refinery. The Detroit
notices allege violations of the Michigan State Air Pollution Regulations, the
EPA New Source Performance Standards and National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants for Benzene. On March 6, 2000, MAP received its first
NOV arising out of the multi-media inspection of the Robinson refinery
conducted in November 1998. The NOV is for alleged Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (hazardous waste) violations.
MAP has responded to information requests from the EPA regarding New Source
Review ("NSR") compliance at its Garyville and Texas City refineries. In
addition, the scope of the EPA's 1998 multi-media inspections of the Detroit
and Robinson refineries included NSR compliance. NSR requires new major
stationary sources and major modifications at existing major stationary sources
to obtain permits, perform air quality analysis and install stringent air
pollution control equipment at affected facilities. The current EPA initiative
appears to target many items that the industry has historically considered
routine repair, replacement and maintenance or other activity exempted from the
NSR requirements. MAP is engaged in ongoing discussions with the EPA on these
issues concerning all of MAP's refineries.
E-64
While MAP has not been notified of any formal findings or violations
resulting from either the information requests or inspections regarding NSR
compliance, MAP has been informed during discussions with the EPA of potential
non-compliance concerns of the EPA based on these inspections and other
information identified by the EPA. Recently, discussions with the EPA have
included commitment to some specific control technologies and implementation
schedules, but not penalties. In addition, MAP anticipates that some or all of
the non-NSR related issues arising from the multi-media inspections may also be
resolved as part of the current discussions with the EPA. A negotiated
resolution with the EPA could result in increased environmental capital
expenditures in future years, in addition to as yet, undetermined penalties.
During 1999 an EPA advisory panel on oxygenate use in gasoline issued
recommendations to the EPA, calling for the improved protection of drinking
water from methyl tertiary butyl ether ("MTBE") impacts, a substantial
reduction in the use of MTBE, and action by Congress to remove the oxygenate
requirements for reformulated gasoline under the Clean Air Act. The panel
reviewed public health and environmental issues that have been raised by the
use of MTBE in gasoline, and specifically by the discovery of MTBE in water
supplies. State and federal environmental regulatory agencies could implement
the majority of the recommendations, while some would require Congressional
legislative action. California has acted to ban MTBE use by December 31, 2002
and has requested a waiver from the EPA of California state oxygenate
requirements. In addition, a number of states have passed laws which limit or
require the phase out of MTBE in gasoline, including states in MAP's marketing
area such as Michigan and Minnesota. Many other states are considering bills
which require similar limitations or the phase out of MTBE.
MAP has a non-material investment in MTBE units at its Robinson,
Catlettsburg and Detroit refineries. Approximately seven percent of MAP's
refinery gasoline production includes MTBE. Potential phase-outs or
restrictions on the use of MTBE would not be expected to have a material impact
on MAP and its operations, although it is not possible to reach any conclusions
until further federal or state actions, if any, are taken.
In October 1996, USX was notified by the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management ("IDEM") acting as lead trustee, that IDEM and the U. S. Department
of the Interior had concluded a preliminary investigation of potential injuries
to natural resources related to releases of hazardous substances from various
municipal and industrial sources along the east branch of the Grand Calumet
River and Indiana Harbor Canal. The public trustees completed a pre-assessment
screen pursuant to federal regulations and have determined to perform an NRD
Assessment. USX was identified as a PRP along with 15 other companies owning
property along the river and harbor canal. USX and eight other PRPs have formed
a joint defense group. The trustees notified the public of their plan for
assessment and later adopted the plan. In 2000, the trustees concluded their
assessment of sediment injuries, which includes a technical review of
environmental conditions. The PRP joint defense group is discussing settlement
opportunities with the trustees and the EPA.
In 1997, USS/Kobe Steel Company ("USS/Kobe"), a joint venture between USX
and Kobe Steel, Ltd. ("Kobe"), was the subject of a multi-media audit by the
EPA that included an air, water and hazardous waste compliance review. USS/Kobe
and the EPA entered into a tolling agreement pending issuance of the final
audit and commenced settlement negotiations in July 1999. In August 1999, the
steelmaking and bar producing operations of USS/Kobe were combined with
companies controlled by Blackstone Capital Partners II to form Republic
Technologies International, LLC ("Republic"). The tubular operations of
USS/Kobe were transferred to a newly formed entity, Lorain Tubular Company, LLC
("Lorain Tubular"), which operated as a joint venture between USX and Kobe
until December 31, 1999 when USX purchased all of Kobe's interest in Lorain
Tubular. Republic and Lorain Tubular are continuing negotiations with the EPA.
Most of the matters raised by the EPA relate to Republic's facilities; however,
air discharges from Lorain Tubular's #3 seamless pipe mill have also been
cited. Lorain Tubular will be responsible for matters relating to its
facilities. The final report and citations from the EPA have not been issued.
In 1998, USX entered into a consent decree with the EPA which resolved
alleged violations of the Clean Water Act National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System ("NPDES") permit at Gary Works and provides for a sediment
remediation project for a section of the Grand Calumet River that runs through
Gary Works.
E-65
Contemporaneously, USX entered into a consent decree with the public trustees
which resolves potential liability for natural resource damages on the same
section of the Grand Calumet River. In 1999, USX paid civil penalties of $2.9
million for the alleged water act violations and $0.5 million in natural
resource damages assessment costs. In addition, USX will pay the public
trustees $1 million at the end of the remediation project for future monitoring
costs and USX is obligated to purchase and restore several parcels of property
that have been or will be conveyed to the trustees. During the negotiations
leading up to the settlement with EPA, capital improvements were made to
upgrade plant systems to comply with the NPDES requirements. The sediment
remediation project is an approved final interim measure under the corrective
action program for Gary Works and is expected to cost approximately $36.4
million over the next five years. Estimated remediation and monitoring costs
for this project have been accrued.
In February 1999, the U.S. Department of Justice and EPA issued a letter
demanding a cash payment of approximately $4 million to resolve a Finding of
Violation issued in 1997 alleging improper sampling of benzene waste streams at
Gary Coke. On September 18, 2000, a Consent Decree was entered which required
USX to pay a civil penalty of $587,000 and to replace PCB transformers as a
Supplemental Environmental Program at a cost of approximately $2.2 million.
Payment of the civil penalty was made on October 13, 2000.
New or expanded environmental requirements, which could increase USX's
environmental costs, may arise in the future. USX intends to comply with all
legal requirements regarding the environment, but since many of them are not
fixed or presently determinable (even under existing legislation) and may be
affected by future legislation, it is not possible to predict accurately the
ultimate cost of compliance, including remediation costs which may be incurred
and penalties which may be imposed. However, based on presently available
information, and existing laws and regulations as currently implemented, USX
does not anticipate that environmental compliance expenditures (including
operating and maintenance and remediation) will materially increase in 2001.
USX expects environmental capital expenditures in 2001 to be approximately $120
million, or approximately 5% of total estimated consolidated capital
expenditures. Predictions beyond 2001 can only be broad-based estimates which
have varied, and will continue to vary, due to the ongoing evolution of
specific regulatory requirements, the possible imposition of more stringent
requirements and the availability of new technologies, among other matters.
Based upon currently identified projects, USX anticipates that environmental
capital expenditures in 2002 will total approximately $143 million; however,
actual expenditures may vary as the number and scope of environmental projects
are revised as a result of improved technology or changes in regulatory
requirements, and could increase if additional projects are identified or
additional requirements are imposed.
USX is the subject of, or party to, a number of pending or threatened legal
actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters. The
ultimate resolution of these contingencies could, individually or in the
aggregate, be material to the consolidated financial statements. However,
management believes that USX will remain a viable and competitive enterprise
even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved
unfavorably.
Outlook
For Outlook, see Management's Discussion and Analysis for the Marathon Group
and the U. S. Steel Group, herein.
Accounting Standards
In the fourth quarter of 2000, USX adopted the following accounting
pronouncements primarily related to the classification of items in the
financial statements. The adoption of these new pronouncements had no net
effect on the financial position or results of operations of USX, although they
required reclassifications of certain amounts in the financial statements,
including all prior periods presented.
. In December 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") issued
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 ("SAB 101") "Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements," which summarizes the SEC
E-66
staff's interpretations of generally accepted accounting principles
related to revenue recognition and classification.
. In 2000, the Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting
Standards Board ("EITF") issued EITF consensus No. 99-19 "Reporting
Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent," which addresses
whether certain items should be reported as a reduction of revenue or as
a component of both revenues and cost of revenues, and EITF Consensus No.
00-10 "Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs," which
addresses the classification of costs incurred for shipping goods to
customers.
. In September 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, "Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities" ("SFAS 140"). SFAS 140 revises the standards for accounting
for securitizations and other transfers of financial assets and
collateral and requires certain disclosures. USX adopted certain
recognition and reclassification provisions of SFAS 140, which were
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2000. The remaining
provisions of SFAS 140 are effective after March 31, 2001.
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS No. 133"), which later was amended by SFAS Nos.
137 and 138. This Standard requires recognition of all derivatives as either
assets or liabilities at fair value. Changes in fair value will be reflected in
either current period net income or other comprehensive income, depending on
the designation of the derivative instrument. USX may elect not to designate a
derivative instrument as a hedge even if the strategy would be expected to
qualify for hedge accounting treatment. The adoption of SFAS No. 133 will
change the timing of recognition for derivative gains and losses as compared to
previous accounting standards.
USX will adopt the Standard effective January 1, 2001. The transition
adjustment resulting from adoption of SFAS No. 133 will be reported as a
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. The unfavorable
cumulative effect on net income, net of tax, is expected to approximate $9
million. The unfavorable cumulative effect on other comprehensive income, net
of tax, will approximate $7 million. The amounts reported as other
comprehensive income will be reflected in net income when the anticipated
physical transactions are consummated. It is not possible to estimate the
effect that this Standard will have on future results of operations.
Management's Discussion and Analysis by Group
The Marathon Group
The Marathon Group includes Marathon Oil Company ("Marathon") and certain
other subsidiaries of USX Corporation ("USX"), which are engaged in worldwide
exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas; domestic refining,
marketing and transportation of petroleum products primarily through Marathon
Ashland Petroleum LLC ("MAP"), owned 62 percent by Marathon; and other energy
related businesses. The Management's Discussion and Analysis should be read in
conjunction with the Marathon Group's Financial Statements and Notes to
Financial Statements.
The Marathon Group's 2000 financial performance was primarily affected by
the strong recovery in worldwide liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas prices and
stronger refining margins. During 2000, Marathon focused on the acquisition of
assets with a strong strategic fit, the disposal of non-core properties, and
workforce reductions through a voluntary early retirement program.
E-67
Revenues and Other Income for each of the last three years are summarized in
the following table:
2000 1999 1998
------- ------- -------
(Dollars in millions)
Exploration & production ("E&P")................ $ 4,694 $ 3,105 $ 2,090
Refining, marketing & transportation
("RM&T")(a).................................... 28,849 20,076 19,080
Other energy related businesses(b).............. 1,684 834 355
------- ------- -------
Revenues and other income of reportable
segments..................................... 35,227 24,015 21,525
Revenues and other income not allocated to
segments:
Joint venture formation charges(c)............ (931) -- --
Gain on ownership change in MAP............... 12 17 245
Other(d)...................................... 124 (36) 24
Elimination of intersegment revenues............ (573) (289) (171)
------- ------- -------
Total Group revenues and other income....... $33,859 $23,707 $21,623
======= ======= =======
Items included in both revenues and costs and
expenses, resulting in no effect on income:
Consumer excise taxes on petroleum products and
merchandise.................................... $ 4,344 $ 3,973 $ 3,824
======= ======= =======
--------
(a) Amounts include 100 percent of MAP.
(b) Includes domestic natural gas and crude oil marketing and transportation,
and power generation.
(c) Represents a pretax charge related to the joint venture formation between
Marathon and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
(d) Represents net gains/(losses) on certain asset sales.
E&P segment revenues increased by $1,589 million in 2000 from 1999 following
an increase of $1,015 million in 1999 from 1998. The increase in 2000 was
primarily due to higher worldwide liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas prices,
partially offset by lower domestic liquid hydrocarbon and worldwide natural gas
production. The increase in 1999 was primarily due to higher worldwide liquid
hydrocarbon prices, increased domestic liquid hydrocarbon production and higher
E&P crude oil buy/sell volumes.
RM&T segment revenues increased by $8,773 million in 2000 from 1999
following an increase of $996 million in 1999 from 1998. The increase in 2000
primarily reflected higher refined product prices and increased refined product
sales volumes. The increase in 1999 was mainly due to higher refined product
prices, increased volumes of refined product sales and higher merchandise
sales, partially offset by reduced crude oil sales revenues following the sale
of Scurlock Permian LLC.
Other energy related businesses segment revenues increased by $850 million
in 2000 from 1999 following an increase of $479 million in 1999 from 1998. The
increase in 2000 reflected higher natural gas and crude oil resale activity
accompanied by higher crude oil and natural gas prices. The increase in 1999
was primarily due to increased crude oil and natural gas purchase and resale
activity.
For additional discussion of revenues, see Note 10 to the Marathon Group
Financial Statements.
E-68
Income from operations for each of the last three years is summarized in the
following table:
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ -----
(Dollars in
millions)
E&P
Domestic.......................................... $1,115 $ 494 $ 190
International..................................... 420 124 88
------ ------ -----
Income of E&P reportable segment.................. 1,535 618 278
RM&T(a)............................................. 1,273 611 896
Other energy related businesses..................... 38 61 33
------ ------ -----
Income for reportable segments.................... 2,846 1,290 1,207
Items not allocated to reportable segments:
Joint venture formation charges(b)................ (931) -- --
Administrative expenses(c)........................ (136) (108) (106)
IMV reserve adjustment(d)......................... -- 551 (267)
Gain on ownership change & transition charges--
MAP(e)........................................... 12 17 223
Impairment of oil and gas properties, assets held
for sale, and gas contract settlement(f)......... (197) (16) (119)
Gain/(loss) on disposal of assets(g).............. 124 (36) --
Reorganization charges including pension settlement
(loss)/gain & benefit accruals(h).................. (70) 15 --
------ ------ -----
Total income from operations.................... $1,648 $1,713 $ 938
====== ====== =====
--------
(a) Amounts include 100 percent of MAP.
(b) Represents a pretax charge related to the joint venture formation between
Marathon and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.
(c) Includes the portion of the Marathon Group's administrative costs not
charged to the operating segments and the portion of USX corporate general
and administrative costs allocated to the Marathon Group.
(d) The inventory market valuation ("IMV") reserve reflects the extent to which
the recorded LIFO cost basis of crude oil and refined products inventories
exceeds net realizable value. For additional discussion of the IMV, see
Note 20 to the Marathon Group Financial Statements.
(e) The gain on ownership change and one-time transition charges in 1998 relate
to the formation of MAP. For additional discussion of the gain on ownership
change in MAP, see Note 5 to the Marathon Group Financial Statements.
(f) Represents in 2000, an impairment of certain oil and gas properties,
primarily in Canada, and assets held for sale. Represents in 1999, an
impairment of certain domestic properties. Represents in 1998, a write-off
of certain non-revenue producing international investments and several
exploratory wells which had encountered hydrocarbons but had been suspended
pending further evaluation. It also includes in 1998 a gain from the
resolution of a contract dispute with a purchaser of Marathon's natural gas
production from certain domestic properties.
(g) The net gain in 2000 represents a gain on the disposition of
Angus/Stellaria, a gain on the Sakhalin exchange, a gain on the sale of
Speedway SuperAmerica LLC ("SSA") non-core stores, and a loss on the sale
of the Howard Glasscock field. The net loss in 1999 represents a loss on
the sale of Scurlock Permian LLC, certain domestic production properties,
Carnegie Natural Gas Company and affiliated subsidiaries and a gain on
certain Egyptian properties.
(h) Amounts in 2000 and 1999 represent pension settlement gains/(losses) and
various benefit accruals resulting from retirement plan settlements, the
voluntary early retirement program, and reorganization charges.
Income for reportable segments increased by $1,556 million in 2000 from
1999, mainly due to higher worldwide liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas prices,
and higher refined product margins, partially offset by
E-69
decreased natural gas volumes. Income for reportable segments increased by $83
million in 1999 from 1998, mainly due to higher worldwide liquid hydrocarbon
prices, partially offset by lower refined product margins. Income from
operations includes 100 percent of MAP beginning in 1998, and results from
Marathon Canada Limited (formerly known as Tarragon) commencing August 12,
1998.
Average Volumes and Selling Prices
2000 1999 1998
---------- ---------- ----------
(thousands of barrels per day)
Net liquids
production(a).......... -- U.S. 131 145 135
-- International(b) 65 62 61
---------- ---------- ----------
-- Total consolidated 196 207 196
-- Equity investees(c) 11 1 --
---------- ---------- ----------
-- Worldwide 207 208 196
(millions of cubic feet per day)
Net natural gas
production............. -- U.S. 731 755 744
-- International--equity 470 489 441
-- International--other(d) 11 16 23
---------- ---------- ----------
-- Total consolidated 1,212 1,260 1,208
-- Equity investee(e) 29 36 33
---------- ---------- ----------
-- Worldwide 1,241 1,296 1,241
========== ========== ==========
(dollars per barrel)
Liquid
hydrocarbons(a)(f)..... -- U.S. $ 25.11 $ 15.44 $ 10.42
-- International 26.54 16.90 12.24
(dollars per mcf)
Natural gas(f).......... -- U.S. $ 3.30 $ 1.90 $ 1.79
-- International--equity 2.76 1.90 1.94
(thousands of barrels per day)
Refined products
sold(g)................ 1,306 1,251 1,198
Matching buy/sell
volumes included in
above................ 52 45 39
========== ========== ==========
--------
(a) Includes crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids.
(b) Represents equity tanker liftings, truck deliveries and direct deliveries.
(c) Represents Marathon's equity interest in Sakhalin Energy Investment Company
Ltd. ("Sakhalin Energy") and CLAM Petroleum B.V. ("CLAM") for 2000 and
1999.
(d) Represents gas acquired for injection and subsequent resale.
(e) Represents Marathon's equity interest in CLAM.
(f) Prices exclude gains/losses from hedging activities, equity investees and
purchase/resale gas.
(g) Refined products sold and matching buy/sell volumes include 100 percent of
MAP.
Domestic E&P income increased by $621 million in 2000 from 1999 following an
increase of $304 million in 1999 from 1998. The increase in 2000 was primarily
due to higher liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas prices, partially offset by
lower liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas volumes due to natural field declines
and asset sales, and derivative losses from other than trading activities.
The increase in 1999 was primarily due to higher liquid hydrocarbon and
natural gas prices, increased liquid hydrocarbon volumes resulting from new
production in the Gulf of Mexico and lower exploration expense.
International E&P income increased by $296 million in 2000 from 1999
following an increase of $36 million in 1999 from 1998. The increase in 2000
was mainly due to higher liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas prices, higher
liquid hydrocarbon liftings, primarily in Russia and Gabon, and lower dry well
expense, partially offset by lower natural gas volumes.
E-70
The increase in 1999 was primarily due to higher liquid hydrocarbon prices,
partially offset by lower liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas production in
Europe and higher exploration expense.
RM&T segment income increased by $662 million in 2000 from 1999 following a
decrease of $285 million in 1999 from 1998. The increase in 2000 was primarily
due to higher refined product margins, partially offset by higher operating
expenses for SSA, higher administrative expenses including increased variable
pay plan costs, and higher transportation costs.
The decrease in 1999 was primarily due to lower refined product margins,
partially offset by recognized mark-to-market derivative gains, increased
refined product sales volumes, higher merchandise sales at SSA and the
realization of additional operating efficiencies as a result of forming MAP.
Other energy related businesses segment income decreased by $23 million in
2000 from 1999 following an increase of $28 million in 1999 from 1998. The
decrease in 2000 was primarily a result of derivative losses from other than
trading activities and lower equity earnings as a result of decreased pipeline
throughput. The increase in 1999 was primarily due to higher equity earnings as
a result of increased pipeline throughput and a reversal of abandonment
accruals of $10 million in 1999.
Items not allocated to reportable segments: IMV reserve adjustment--When U.
S. Steel Corporation acquired Marathon Oil Company in March 1982, crude oil and
refined product prices were at historically high levels. In applying the
purchase method of accounting, the Marathon Group's crude oil and refined
product inventories were revalued by reference to current prices at the time of
acquisition, and this became the new LIFO cost basis of the inventories.
Generally accepted accounting principles require that inventories be carried at
lower of cost or market. Accordingly, the Marathon Group has established an IMV
reserve to reduce the cost basis of its inventories to net realizable value.
Quarterly adjustments to the IMV reserve result in noncash charges or credits
to income from operations.
When Marathon acquired the crude oil and refined product inventories
associated with Ashland's RM&T operations on January 1, 1998, the Marathon
Group established a new LIFO cost basis for those inventories. The acquisition
cost of these inventories lowered the overall average cost of the Marathon
Group's combined RM&T inventories. As a result, the price threshold at which an
IMV reserve will be recorded was also lowered.
These adjustments affect the comparability of financial results from period
to period as well as comparisons with other energy companies, many of which do
not have such adjustments. Therefore, the Marathon Group reports separately the
effects of the IMV reserve adjustments on financial results. In management's
opinion, the effects of such adjustments should be considered separately when
evaluating operating performance.
In 1999, the IMV reserve adjustment resulted in a credit to income from
operations of $551 million compared to a charge of $267 million in 1998, or a
change of $818 million. The favorable 1999 IMV reserve adjustment, which is
almost entirely recorded by MAP, was primarily due to the significant increase
in refined product prices experienced during 1999. For additional discussion of
the IMV reserve, see Note 20 to the Marathon Group Financial Statements.
Joint venture formation charges represent a pretax charge of $931 million in
2000 related to the joint venture formation between Marathon and Kinder Morgan
Energy Partners, L.P. The formation of the joint venture included contribution
of interests in the Yates and SACROC assets. Marathon holds an 85 percent
economic interest in the combined entity which commenced operations in January
2001.
Impairment of oil and gas properties, assets held for sale, and gas contract
settlement includes in 2000, the impairments of certain oil and gas properties
primarily in Canada and assets held for sale totaling $197 million. In 1999,
the $16 million charge relates to the impairment of certain domestic
properties. In 1998, the $119 million charge relates to a write-off of certain
non- revenue producing international investments and several
E-71
exploratory wells, partially offset by a gain from the resolution of a contract
dispute with a purchaser of Marathon's natural gas production from certain
domestic properties.
Gain/(loss) on disposal of assets represents in 2000 a net gain on the sale
of Marathon's interest in the Angus/Stellaria development in the Gulf of
Mexico, a gain on the Sakhalin exchange, a loss on the sale of the Howard
Glasscock Field, and a gain on the sale of non-core SSA stores. In 1999, the
net loss represents losses on the sale of Scurlock Permian LLC, certain
domestic production properties, Carnegie Natural Gas Company and affiliated
subsidiaries and a gain on certain Egyptian properties.
Reorganization charges including pension settlement (loss)/gain and benefit
accruals represent charges related to a reorganization program initiated by
Marathon for its upstream business during 2000.
Outlook of Marathon Group
For a recent outlook pertaining to the Marathon Group, see "RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS--Outlook of Marathon" on pages 28 and 29.
The outlook regarding the results of operations for Marathon's upstream
segment is largely dependent upon future prices and volumes of liquid
hydrocarbons and natural gas. Prices have historically been volatile and have
frequently been affected by unpredictable changes in supply and demand
resulting from fluctuations in worldwide economic activity and political
developments in the world's major oil and gas producing and consuming areas.
Any significant decline in prices could have a material adverse effect on
Marathon's results of operations. A prolonged decline in such prices could also
adversely affect the quantity of crude oil and natural gas reserves that can be
economically produced and the amount of capital available for exploration and
development.
At year-end 2000, Marathon revised its estimate of proved developed and
undeveloped oil and gas reserves downward by 167 million barrels of oil
equivalent ("BOE"). These revisions were principally in Canada, the North Sea
and United States and are the result of production performance and
disappointing drilling results.
BOE is a combined measure of worldwide liquid hydrocarbon and natural gas
production, measured in barrels per day and cubic feet per day, respectively.
For purposes of determining BOE, natural gas volumes are converted to
approximate liquid hydrocarbon barrels by dividing the natural gas volumes
expressed in thousands of cubic feet ("mcf") by 6. The liquid hydrocarbon
volume is added to the barrel equivalent of gas volume to obtain BOE. Marathon
intends to disclose total production estimates on a BOE basis from this point
forward.
In 2001, worldwide production is expected to average 430,000 BOE per day,
split evenly between liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas, including production
from Marathon's share of equity investees and future acquisitions.
On December 28, 2000, Marathon signed a definitive agreement to form a joint
venture with Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., which commenced operations in
January 2001. The formation of the joint venture included contribution of
interests in the Yates and SACROC assets. This transaction will allow Marathon
to expand its interests in the Permian Basin and will improve access to
materials for use in enhanced recovery techniques in the Yates Field. Marathon
holds an 85 percent economic interest in the combined entity, which will be
accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
In the first quarter 2001, Marathon Oil Company (Marathon) acquired Pennaco
Energy, Inc. (Pennaco), a natural gas producer. Marathon acquired 87% of the
outstanding stock of Pennaco through a tender offer completed on February 7,
2001 at $19 a share. On March 26, 2001, Pennaco was merged with a wholly owned
subsidiary of Marathon. Under the terms of the merger, each share not held by
Marathon was converted into
E-72
the right to receive $19 in cash. The total purchase price of Pennaco was $506
million. The acquisition was accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting.
Marathon plans to drill six deepwater Gulf of Mexico exploratory wells in
2001. To support this increased drilling activity, Marathon has contracted two
new deepwater rigs, capable of drilling in water depths beyond 6,500 feet.
Other major upstream projects, which are currently underway or under
evaluation and are expected to improve future income streams, include the
Mississippi Canyon Block 348 in the Gulf of Mexico and various North American
natural gas fields. Also, Marathon expects continued development in the
Foinaven area in the U.K. Atlantic Margin. Marathon acquired an interest in
this location through the exchange of its Sakhalin interests with Shell Oil in
the fourth quarter of 2000.
Marathon E&P is currently on target for achieving $150 million in annual
repeatable pre-tax operating efficiencies by year-end 2001. Marathon initiated
a reorganization program for its upstream business units which will contribute
to an overall workforce reduction of 24% compared to 1999 levels. In addition,
regional production offices in Lafayette, Louisiana and Tyler, Texas have been
closed along with the Petroleum Technology Center in Littleton, Colorado.
The above discussion includes forward-looking statements with respect to
2001 worldwide liquid hydrocarbon production and natural gas volumes, the
acquisition of Pennaco, commencement of upstream projects, and the Gulf of
Mexico drilling program. Some factors that could potentially affect worldwide
liquid hydrocarbon production/gas volumes, upstream projects, and the drilling
program include: pricing, worldwide supply and demand for petroleum products,
amount of capital available for exploration and development, regulatory
constraints, reserve estimates, reserve replacement rates, production decline
rates of mature fields, timing of commencing production from new wells, timing
and results of future development drilling, drilling rig availability, the
completion of the merger with Pennaco, future acquisitions of producing
properties, and other geological, operating and economic considerations. In
addition, development of new production properties in countries outside the
United States may require protracted negotiations with host governments and is
frequently subject to political considerations, such as tax regulations, which
could adversely affect the timing and economics of projects. A factor that
could affect the Pennaco acquisition is successful completion of the merger.
These factors (among others) could cause actual results to differ materially
from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
Downstream income of the Marathon Group is largely dependent upon refined
product margins, which reflect the difference between the selling prices of
refined products and the cost of raw materials refined and manufacturing costs.
Refined product margins have been historically volatile and vary with the level
of economic activity in the various marketing areas, the regulatory climate,
crude oil costs, manufacturing costs, logistical limitations and the available
supply of crude oil and refined products.
In 2000, MAP, CMS Energy Corporation, and TEPPCO Partners, L.P. formed a
limited liability company with equal ownership to operate an interstate refined
petroleum products pipeline extending from the U.S. Gulf of Mexico to the
Midwest. The new company plans to build a 74-mile, 24-inch diameter pipeline
connecting TEPPCO's facility in Beaumont, Texas, with an existing 720-mile, 26-
inch diameter pipeline extending from Longville, Louisiana to Bourbon,
Illinois. In addition, a two million barrel terminal storage facility will be
constructed. The system will be called Centennial Pipeline and will connect
with existing MAP transportation assets and other common carrier lines.
Construction is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2001.
A MAP subsidiary, Ohio River Pipe Line LLC ("ORPL"), plans to build a
pipeline from Kenova, West Virginia to Columbus, Ohio. ORPL is a common carrier
pipeline company and the pipeline will be an interstate common carrier
pipeline. The pipeline is expected to initially move about 50,000 bpd of
refined petroleum into the central Ohio region. The pipeline is currently
expected to be operational in mid-2002. The startup of this pipeline is largely
dependent on obtaining the final regulatory approvals, obtaining the necessary
rights-of-way,
E-73
of which approximately 95 percent have been obtained to date, and completion of
construction. ORPL is still negotiating with a few landowners to obtain the
remaining rights-of-way. Where necessary, ORPL has filed condemnation actions
to acquire some rights-of-way. These actions are at various stages of
litigation and appeal with several recent decisions supporting ORPL's use of
eminent domain.
MAP is constructing a delayed coker unit at its Garyville, Louisiana
refinery. This unit will allow for the use of heavier, lower cost crude and
reduce the production of heavy fuel oil. To supply this new unit, MAP reached
an agreement with P.M.I. Comercio Internacional, S.A. de C.V., (PMI), an
affiliate of Petroleos Mexicanos, (PEMEX), to purchase approximately 90,000 bpd
of heavy Mayan crude oil. This is a multi-year contract, which will begin upon
completion of the delayed coker unit which is scheduled in the fall of 2001. In
addition, a project to increase light product output is underway at MAP's
Robinson, Illinois refinery and is expected to be completed in the second
quarter of 2001.
MAP initiated a program for 2000 to dispose of approximately 270 non-core
SSA retail outlets in the Midwest and Southeast. At the end of this program
through December 31, 2000, 159 stores, which comprise about 7 percent of MAP's
owned and operated SSA retail network, had been sold. MAP will continue to sell
additional SSA stores as part of its ongoing store development process.
The above discussion includes forward-looking statements with respect to
pipeline and refinery improvement projects. Some factors that could potentially
cause actual results to differ materially from present expectations include the
price of petroleum products, levels of cash flow from operations, obtaining the
necessary construction and environmental permits, unforeseen hazards such as
weather conditions, obtaining the necessary rights-of-way, outcome of pending
litigation, and regulatory approval constraints. These factors (among others)
could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the
forward-looking statements.
The U. S. Steel Group
The U. S. Steel Group is engaged in the production and sale of steel mill
products, coke, and taconite pellets; the management of mineral resources; coal
mining; real estate development; and engineering and consulting services.
Certain business activities are conducted through joint ventures and partially
owned companies, such as USS-POSCO Industries ("USS-POSCO"), PRO-TEC Coating
Company ("PRO-TEC"), Transtar, Inc. ("Transtar"), Clairton 1314B Partnership,
and Republic Technologies International, LLC ("Republic"). On November 24,
2000, USX acquired U. S. Steel Kosice s.r.o. ("USSK"), which held the steel and
related assets of VSZ a.s. ("VSZ"), headquartered in the Slovak Republic.
Management's Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the U.
S. Steel Group's Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements.
Revenues and Other Income for each of the last three years are summarized in
the following table:
2000 1999 1998
------ ------ ------
(Dollars in
millions)
Revenues by product:
Sheet and semi-finished steel products............. $3,288 $3,433 $3,598
Tubular, plate, and tin mill products.............. 1,731 1,140 1,546
Raw materials (coal, coke and iron ore)............ 626 549 744
Other(a)........................................... 445 414 490
Income (loss) from investees......................... (8) (89) 46
Net gains on disposal of assets...................... 46 21 54
Other income (loss).................................. 4 2 (1)
------ ------ ------
Total revenues and other income.................. $6,132 $5,470 $6,477
====== ====== ======
--------
(a) Includes revenue from the sale of steel production by-products, real
estate development, resource management, and engineering and consulting
services.
E-74
Total revenues and other income increased by $662 million in 2000 from 1999
primarily due to the consolidation of Lorain Tubular Company, LLC, ("Lorain
Tubular") effective January 1, 2000, higher average realized prices,
particularly tubular product prices, and lower losses from investees, which, in
1999, included a $47 million charge for the impairment of U. S. Steel's
investment in USS/Kobe Steel Company. Total revenues and other income in 1999
decreased by $1,007 million from 1998 primarily due to lower average realized
prices and lower income from investees.
Income from operations for the U. S. Steel Group for the last three years
was:
2000 1999 1998
---- ---- -----
(Dollars in
millions)
Segment income for Domestic Steel(a).................... $ 23 $ 91 $ 517
Segment income for U. S. Steel Kosice(b)................ 2 -- --
---- ---- -----
Income for reportable segments...................... 25 91 517
Items not allocated to segments:
Net pension credits................................... 266 228 186
Administrative expenses............................... (25) (17) (24)
Costs related to former business activities(c)........ (91) (83) (100)
Asset impairments--Coal............................... (71) -- --
Impairment of USX's investment in USS/Kobe and costs
related to formation of Republic..................... -- (47) --
Loss on investment in RTI stock used to satisfy
indexed debt obligations(d).......................... -- (22) --
---- ---- -----
Total income from operations........................ $104 $150 $ 579
==== ==== =====
--------
(a) Includes income from the sale and domestic production of steel mill
products, coke and taconite pellets; the management of mineral resources;
coal mining; real estate development and management; and engineering and
consulting services.
(b) Includes the sale and production of steel products from facilities
primarily located in the Slovak Republic commencing November 24, 2000. For
further details, see Note 5 to the U. S. Steel Group Financial Statements.
(c) Includes the portion of postretirement benefit costs and certain other
expenses principally attributable to former business units of the U. S.
Steel Group.
(d) For further details, see Note 6 to the U. S. Steel Group Financial
Statements.
Segment income for Domestic Steel
Domestic Steel operations recorded segment income of $23 million in 2000
versus segment income of $91 million in 1999, a decrease of $68 million. The
2000 segment income included $36 million for certain environmental and legal
accruals, a $34 million charge to establish reserves against notes and
receivables from financially distressed steel companies and a $10 million
charge for USX's share of Republic special charges. Results in 1999 included
$17 million in charges for certain environmental and legal accruals and $7
million in various non-recurring equity investee charges. Excluding these
items, the decrease in segment income for Domestic Steel was primarily due to
higher costs related to energy and inefficient operating levels due to lower
throughput, lower income from raw materials operations, particularly coal
operations and lower sheet shipments resulting from high levels of imports that
continued in 2000.
Segment income for Domestic Steel operations in 1999 decreased $426 million
from 1998. Results in 1998 included a net favorable $30 million for an
insurance litigation settlement and charges of $10 million related to a
voluntary workforce reduction plan. Excluding these items, the decrease in
segment income for Domestic Steel was primarily due to lower average steel
prices, lower income from raw materials operations, a less favorable product
mix and lower income from investees.
E-75
Segment income for U. S. Steel Kosice
USSK segment income for the period following the November 24, 2000
acquisition was $2 million.
Items not allocated to segments: Net pension credits, which are primarily
noncash, totaled $266 million in 2000, $228 million in 1999 and $186 million in
1998. Net pension credits in 1999 included $35 million for a one-time favorable
pension settlement primarily related to the voluntary early retirement program
for salaried employees. For additional information on pensions, see Note 12 to
the U. S. Steel Group Financial Statements.
Asset impairments--Coal, were for asset impairments at U. S. Steel Mining's
coal mines in Alabama and West Virginia in 2000 following a reassessment of
long-term prospects after adverse geological conditions were encountered.
In 1999, an impairment of USX's investment in USS/Kobe and costs related to
the formation of Republic totaled $47 million.
Income from operations in 1999 also included a loss on investment in RTI
stock used to satisfy indexed debt obligations of $22 million from the
termination of ownership in RTI International Metals, Inc. For further
discussion, see Note 6 to the U. S. Steel Group Financial Statements.
Outlook--U. S. Steel Group
For a recent outlook pertaining to the U. S. Steel Group, see "RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS--Outlook of United States Steel" on page 27.
Over the last few months, the Domestic Steel order book has strengthened and
prices have stabilized. In the third quarter, we expect Domestic Steel volumes
to be somewhat higher and realized prices to be at or modestly higher. On the
cost side, there has been a declining trend in natural gas prices, and we have
reduced our natural gas usage by approximately twenty five percent in the
second quarter of 2001 compared to the same period last year. Continuation of
this trend could provide a significant positive impact on our costs over the
balance of the year.
On May 31, 2001 a major fire damaged the cold-rolling mill at USS-POSCO,
which is fifty percent owned by United States Steel. Damage was predominantly
limited to the cold-rolling mill area of the plant. USS-POSCO maintains
insurance coverage against such losses, including coverage for business
interruption. The mill is expected to resume production in the first quarter of
2002. Until such time, the plant will continue customer shipments using cold-
rolled coils from United States Steel and POSCO as substitute feedstock.
For USSK, United States Steel expects third quarter shipments to be slightly
lower than the second quarter and third quarter average realized prices to be
flat compared to the second quarter.
High natural gas prices adversely affected our results in 2000 and are
expected to persist for some time. The blast furnace idled at Gary Works in
July 2000 for a planned 10-day outage remained down until late February 2001
due to business conditions. The U. S. Steel Group has continued its cost
reduction efforts, and has recently requested from its current suppliers an
immediate, temporary eight percent price reduction from existing levels to help
weather this difficult period.
Several domestic competitors recently have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection. This provides them with certain competitive advantages and further
demonstrates the very difficult economic circumstances faced by the domestic
industry.
U. S. Steel Group's income from operations includes net pension credits,
which are primarily noncash, associated with all of U. S. Steel's pension
plans. Net pension credits were $266 million in 2000. At the end of
E-76
2000, U. S. Steel's main pension plans' transition asset was fully amortized,
decreasing the pension credit by $69 million annually in future years for this
component. In addition, for the year 2001, low marketplace returns on trust
assets in the year 2000 and pending business combinations in the current year
are expected to further reduce net pension credits to approximately $160
million. The above includes forward-looking statements concerning net pension
credits which can vary depending upon the market performance of plan assets,
changes in actuarial assumptions regarding such factors as the selection of a
discount rate and rate of return on plan assets, changes in the amortization
levels of transition amounts or prior period service costs, plan amendments
affecting benefit payout levels, business combinations and profile changes in
the beneficiary populations being valued. Changes in any of these factors could
cause net pension credits to change. To the extent net pension credits decline
in the future, income from operations would be adversely affected.
The U. S. Steel Group includes a 16 percent equity method investment in
Republic (through an ownership interest in Republic Technologies International
Holdings, LLC ("Republic Holdings"), which is the sole owner of Republic). In
the third quarter of 2000, Republic announced that it had completed a financial
restructuring to improve its liquidity position. Republic raised approximately
$30 million in loans from certain of its direct and indirect equity partners in
exchange for notes of Republic and warrants to purchase Class D common stock of
Republic Technologies International, Inc., Republic's majority owner. The U. S.
Steel Group's portion was approximately $6 million and the U. S. Steel Group
also agreed to certain deferred payment terms into the year 2002, up to a
maximum of $30 million, with regard to Republic's obligations relating to iron
ore pellets supplied to Republic. In its Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2000, which was filed with the SEC on October 31, 2000, Republic
Holdings stated that "Notwithstanding these efforts, [Republic Holdings] may
need to obtain additional financing to meet its cash flow requirements,
including financing from the sale of additional debt or equity securities."
Republic Holdings also stated "As a result of the factors mentioned above,
[Republic Holdings] is highly leveraged and could be considered a risky
investment."
At December 31, 2000, the U. S. Steel Group's financial exposure to Republic
totaled approximately $131 million, consisting of amounts owed by Republic to
the U. S. Steel Group and debt obligations assumed by Republic.
In early October 2000, the U. S. Steel Group announced an agreement with LTV
Corporation ("LTV") to purchase LTV's tin mill products business, including its
Indiana Harbor, Indiana tin operations. This acquisition recently closed and
was effective March 1, 2001. Terms of this noncash transaction call for the
U. S. Steel Group to assume certain employee-related obligations of LTV. The U.
S. Steel Group intends to operate these facilities as an ongoing business and
tin mill employees at Indiana Harbor became U. S. Steel Group employees. The U.
S. Steel Group and LTV also entered into 5-year agreements for LTV to supply
the U. S. Steel Group with pickled hot bands and for the U. S. Steel Group to
provide LTV with processing of cold rolled steel.
In October 2000, Transtar announced it had entered into a Reorganization and
Exchange Agreement with its two voting shareholders. Upon closing, Transtar and
certain of its subsidiaries, namely, the Birmingham Southern Railroad Company;
the Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Company; the Lake Terminal Railroad
Company; the McKeesport Connecting Railroad Company; the Mobile River Terminal
Company, Inc.; the Union Railroad Company; the Warrior & Gulf Navigation
Company; and Tracks Traffic and Management Services, Inc. will become
subsidiaries within the U. S. Steel Group. The other shareholder, Transtar
Holdings, L.P., an affiliate of Blackstone Capital Partners L.P., will become
the owner of the other subsidiaries.
The preceding statements concerning anticipated steel demand, steel pricing,
and shipment levels are forward-looking and are based upon assumptions as to
future product prices and mix, and levels of steel production capability,
production and shipments. These forward-looking statements can be affected by
imports, domestic and international economies, domestic production capacity,
the completion of the LTV and Transtar transactions, and customer demand. In
the event these assumptions prove to be inaccurate, actual results may differ
significantly from those presently anticipated.
E-77
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Management Opinion Concerning Derivative Instruments
USX uses commodity-based and foreign currency derivative instruments to
manage its price risk. Management has authorized the use of futures, forwards,
swaps and options to manage exposure to price fluctuations related to the
purchase, production or sale of crude oil, natural gas, refined products, and
nonferrous metals. For transactions that qualify for hedge accounting, the
resulting gains or losses are deferred and subsequently recognized in income
from operations, in the same period as the underlying physical transaction.
Derivative instruments used for trading and other activities are marked-to-
market and the resulting gains or losses are recognized in the current period
in income from operations. While USX's risk management activities generally
reduce market risk exposure due to unfavorable commodity price changes for raw
material purchases and products sold, such activities can also encompass
strategies that assume price risk.
Management believes that use of derivative instruments along with risk
assessment procedures and internal controls does not expose USX to material
risk. The use of derivative instruments could materially affect USX's results
of operations in particular quarterly or annual periods. However, management
believes that use of these instruments will not have a material adverse effect
on financial position or liquidity. For a summary of accounting policies
related to derivative instruments, see Note 1 to the USX Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Commodity Price Risk and Related Risks
In the normal course of its business, USX is exposed to market risk or price
fluctuations related to the purchase, production or sale of crude oil, natural
gas, refined products and steel products. To a lesser extent, USX is exposed to
the risk of price fluctuations on coal, coke, natural gas liquids, petroleum
feedstocks and certain nonferrous metals used as raw materials.
USX's market risk strategy has generally been to obtain competitive prices
for its products and services and allow operating results to reflect market
price movements dictated by supply and demand. However, USX uses fixed-price
contracts and derivative commodity instruments to manage a relatively small
portion of its commodity price risk. USX uses fixed-price contracts for
portions of its natural gas production to manage exposure to fluctuations in
natural gas prices. Certain derivative commodity instruments have the effect of
restoring the equity portion of fixed-price sales of natural gas to variable
market-based pricing. These instruments are used as part of USX's overall risk
management programs.
Sensitivity analyses of the incremental effects on pretax income of
hypothetical 10% and 25% changes in commodity prices for open derivative
commodity instruments as of December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999, are
provided for the Marathon Group in the following table. While the U. S. Steel
Group uses derivative commodity instruments, its usage is immaterial to the
results of operations.
Incremental Decrease
in
Pretax Income
Assuming a
Hypothetical Price
Change of(a)
------------------------
2000 1999
--------- -----------
Derivative Commodity Instruments 10% 25% 10% 25%
-------------------------------- ---- ---- ----- -----
(Dollars in millions)
Marathon Group(b)(c):
Crude oil(d)
Trading.......................................... $-- $-- (e) $ 1.3 $ 7.7(e)
Other than trading............................... 9.1 27.2(e) 16.5 54.0(e)
Natural gas(d)
Trading.......................................... -- -- (e) -- -- (f)
Other than trading............................... 20.2 50.6(e) 4.7 16.8(f)
Refined products(d)
Trading.......................................... -- -- (e) -- -- (e)
Other than trading............................... 6.1 16.5(e) 8.4 23.8(e)
--------
(a) Gains and losses on derivative commodity instruments are generally offset
by price changes in the underlying commodity. Effects of these offsets are
not reflected in the sensitivity analyses. Amounts reflect
E-78
the estimated incremental effect on pretax income of hypothetical 10% and
25% changes in closing commodity prices for each open contract position at
December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999. Marathon Group management evaluates
their portfolio of derivative commodity instruments on an ongoing basis and
adds or revises strategies to reflect anticipated market conditions and
changes in risk profiles. Changes to the portfolio subsequent to December
31, 2000, would cause future pretax income effects to differ from those
presented in the table.
(b) The number of net open contracts varied throughout 2000, from a low of
12,252 contracts at July 5, to a high of 34,554 contracts at October 25,
and averaged 21,875 for the year. The derivative commodity instruments used
and hedging positions taken also varied throughout 2000, and will continue
to vary in the future. Because of these variations in the composition of
the portfolio over time, the number of open contracts, by itself, cannot be
used to predict future income effects.
(c) The calculation of sensitivity amounts for basis swaps assumes that the
physical and paper indices are perfectly correlated. Gains and losses on
options are based on changes in intrinsic value only.
(d) The direction of the price change used in calculating the sensitivity
amount for each commodity reflects that which would result in the largest
incremental decrease in pretax income when applied to the derivative
commodity instruments used to hedge that commodity.
(e) Price increase.
(f) Price decrease.
In total, Marathon's exploration and production operations recorded net
pretax other than trading activity losses of approximately $34 million in 2000,
gains of $3 million in 1999 and losses of $3 million in 1998.
Marathon's refining, marketing and transportation operations generally use
derivative commodity instruments to lock-in costs of certain crude oil and
other feedstocks, to protect carrying values of inventories and to protect
margins on fixed-price sales of refined products. Marathon's refining,
marketing and transportation operations recorded net pretax other than trading
activity losses, net of the 38% minority interest in MAP, of approximately $116
million in 2000, and net pretax other than trading activity gains, net of the
38% minority interest in MAP, of $8 million in 1999 and $28 million in 1998.
Marathon's refining, marketing and transportation operations used derivative
instruments for trading activities and recorded net pretax trading activity
losses, net of the 38% minority interest in MAP, of $11 million in 2000 and net
pretax trading activity gains, net of the 38% minority interest in MAP, of $5
million in 1999.
The U. S. Steel Group uses OTC commodity swaps to manage exposure to market
risk related to the purchase of natural gas, heating oil and certain nonferrous
metals. The U. S. Steel Group recorded net pretax other than trading activity
gains of $2 million in 2000, losses of $4 million in 1999 and losses of $6
million in 1998. These gains and losses were offset by changes in the realized
prices of the underlying hedged commodities.
For additional quantitative information relating to derivative commodity
instruments, including aggregate contract values and fair values, where
appropriate, see Note 24 to the USX Consolidated Financial Statements.
USX is subject to basis risk, caused by factors that affect the relationship
between commodity futures prices reflected in derivative commodity instruments
and the cash market price of the underlying commodity. Natural gas transaction
prices are frequently based on industry reference prices that may vary from
prices experienced in local markets. For example, New York Mercantile Exchange
("NYMEX") contracts for natural gas are priced at Louisiana's Henry Hub, while
the underlying quantities of natural gas may be produced and sold in the
Western United States at prices that do not move in strict correlation with
NYMEX prices. To the extent that commodity price changes in one region are not
reflected in other regions, derivative commodity instruments may no longer
provide the expected hedge, resulting in increased exposure to basis risk.
These regional price differences could yield favorable or unfavorable results.
OTC transactions are being used to manage exposure to a portion of basis risk.
E-79
USX is subject to liquidity risk, caused by timing delays in liquidating
contract positions due to a potential inability to identify a counterparty
willing to accept an offsetting position. Due to the large number of active
participants, liquidity risk exposure is relatively low for exchange-traded
transactions.
Interest Rate Risk
USX is subject to the effects of interest rate fluctuations on certain of
its non-derivative financial instruments. A sensitivity analysis of the
projected incremental effect of a hypothetical 10% decrease in year-end 2000
and 1999 interest rates on the fair value of USX's non-derivative financial
instruments, is provided in the following table:
As of December 31,
-----------------------------------------
2000 1999
Incremental Incremental
Increase in Increase in
Non-Derivative Financial Fair Fair Fair Fair
Instruments(a) Value(b) Value(c) Value(b) Value(c)
------------------------ -------- ----------- -------- -----------
(Dollars in millions)
Financial assets:
Investments and long-term
receivables(d).................... $ 211 $-- $ 190 $--
Financial liabilities:
Long-term debt(e)(f)............... $4,549 $166 $4,278 $164
Preferred stock of subsidiary(g)... 238 20 239 21
USX obligated mandatorily
redeemable convertible preferred
securities of a subsidiary
trust(g).......................... 119 10 169 15
------ ---- ------ ----
Total liabilities................ $4,906 $196 $4,686 $200
====== ==== ====== ====
--------
(a) Fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, notes payable,
accounts payable and accrued interest, approximate carrying value and are
relatively insensitive to changes in interest rates due to the short-term
maturity of the instruments. Accordingly, these instruments are excluded
from the table.
(b) See Note 25 to the USX Consolidated Financial Statements for carrying
value of instruments.
(c) Reflects, by class of financial instrument, the estimated incremental
effect of a hypothetical 10% decrease in interest rates at December 31,
2000 and December 31, 1999, on the fair value of USX's non-derivative
financial instruments. For financial liabilities, this assumes a 10%
decrease in the weighted average yield to maturity of USX's long-term debt
at December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999.
(d) For additional information, see Note 12 to the USX Consolidated Financial
Statements.
(e) Includes amounts due within one year.
(f) Fair value was based on market prices where available, or current
borrowing rates for financings with similar terms and maturities. For
additional information, see Note 14 to the USX Consolidated Financial
Statements.
(g) See Note 22 to the USX Consolidated Financial Statements.
At December 31, 2000, USX's portfolio of long-term debt was comprised
primarily of fixed-rate instruments. Therefore, the fair value of the portfolio
is relatively sensitive to effects of interest rate fluctuations. This
sensitivity is illustrated by the $166 million increase in the fair value of
long-term debt assuming a hypothetical 10% decrease in interest rates. However,
USX's sensitivity to interest rate declines and corresponding increases in the
fair value of its debt portfolio would unfavorably affect USX's results and
cash flows only to the extent that USX elected to repurchase or otherwise
retire all or a portion of its fixed-rate debt portfolio at prices above
carrying value.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
USX is subject to the risk of price fluctuations related to anticipated
revenues and operating costs, firm commitments for capital expenditures and
existing assets or liabilities denominated in currencies other than
E-80
U.S. dollars, such as the Euro, the Slovak koruna and the Canadian dollar. USX
has not generally used derivative instruments to manage this risk. However, USX
has made limited use of forward currency contracts to manage exposure to
certain currency price fluctuations. At December 31, 2000, USX had open
Canadian dollar forward purchase contracts with a total carrying value of
approximately $14 million compared to $52 million at December 31, 1999. A 10%
increase in the December 31, 2000, Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar forward rate,
would result in a charge to income of approximately $1 million. Last year, a
10% increase in the December 31, 1999, Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar forward
rate, would have resulted in a charge to income of $5 million.
Equity Price Risk
USX is subject to equity price risk and liquidity risk related to its
investment in VSZ, which is attributed to the U. S. Steel Group. These risks
are not readily quantifiable.
Safe Harbor
USX's quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk include
forward-looking statements with respect to management's opinion about risks
associated with USX's use of derivative instruments. These statements are based
on certain assumptions with respect to market prices and industry supply of and
demand for crude oil, natural gas, refined products, steel products and certain
raw materials. To the extent that these assumptions prove to be inaccurate,
future outcomes with respect to USX's hedging programs may differ materially
from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.
E-81
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Second Quarter Six Months
Ended June 30 Ended June 30
---------------- ----------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
------- ------- ------- -------
(In millions)
Revenues and other income:
Revenues.................................. $10,844 $10,293 $20,960 $19,600
Dividend and investee income.............. 32 31 112 35
Net gains on disposal of assets........... 24 15 44 122
Gain (loss) on ownership change in
Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC........... (7) 4 (6) 8
Other income.............................. 10 7 78 14
------- ------- ------- -------
Total revenues and other income......... 10,903 10,350 21,188 19,779
------- ------- ------- -------
Costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues (excludes items shown
below)................................... 7,791 7,710 15,560 14,923
Selling, general and administrative
expenses................................. 204 67 329 138
Depreciation, depletion and amortization.. 385 318 761 639
Taxes other than income taxes............. 1,269 1,237 2,450 2,400
Exploration expenses...................... 26 46 49 91
------- ------- ------- -------
Total costs and expenses................ 9,675 9,378 19,149 18,191
------- ------- ------- -------
Income from operations...................... 1,228 972 2,039 1,588
Net interest and other financial costs...... 86 92 109 187
Minority interest in income of Marathon
Ashland Petroleum LLC...................... 320 203 427 258
------- ------- ------- -------
Income before income taxes and cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle... 822 677 1,503 1,143
Provision for income taxes.................. 270 254 434 423
------- ------- ------- -------
Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle....................... 552 423 1,069 720
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle.................................. -- -- (8) --
------- ------- ------- -------
Net income.................................. 552 423 1,061 720
Dividends on preferred stock................ 2 2 4 4
------- ------- ------- -------
Net income applicable to common stocks...... $ 550 $ 421 $ 1,057 $ 716
======= ======= ======= =======
Selected notes to financial statements appear on pages E-87 to E-100.
E-82
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
(Unaudited)
Six Months
Second Quarter Ended
Ended June 30 June 30
---------------- ----------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
------- ------- ------- -------
(Dollars in millions, except
per share amounts)
Applicable to Marathon Stock:
Income before cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle................... $ 582 $ 367 $ 1,090 $ 621
--Per share--basic....................... 1.88 1.18 3.53 1.99
--diluted.................................... 1.88 1.18 3.52 1.99
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle................................. -- -- (8) --
--Per share--basic....................... -- -- (.03) --
--diluted.................................... -- -- (.02) --
Net income................................. $ 582 $ 367 $ 1,082 $ 621
--Per share--basic and diluted........... 1.88 1.18 3.50 1.99
Dividends paid per share................... .23 .21 .46 .42
Weighted average shares, in thousands......
--Basic.................................. 309,101 312,233 308,928 312,180
--Diluted................................ 309,627 312,431 309,338 312,359
Applicable to Steel Stock:
Net income (loss).......................... $ (32) $ 54 $ (25) $ 95
--Per share--basic....................... (.36) .62 (.28) 1.08
--diluted.................................... (.36) .62 (.28) 1.07
Dividends paid per share................... .10 .25 .35 .50
Weighted average shares, in thousands......
--Basic.................................. 89,005 88,499 88,906 88,461
--Diluted................................ 89,005 92,755 88,906 92,721
Selected notes to financial statements appear on pages E-87 to E-100.
E-83
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (Unaudited)
June 30 December 31
2001 2000
------- -----------
(In millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................ $ 723 $ 559
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $131
and $60................................................. 2,836 2,888
Receivables subject to a security interest............... 350 350
Inventories.............................................. 2,926 2,813
Deferred income tax benefits............................. 234 261
Assets held for sale..................................... -- 330
Other current assets..................................... 119 131
------- -------
Total current assets................................... 7,188 7,332
Investments and long-term receivables, less reserves of $39
and $38................................................... 1,041 801
Property, plant and equipment, less accumulated
depreciation, depletion and amortization of $16,810 and
$16,222................................................... 12,977 12,114
Prepaid pensions........................................... 2,928 2,879
Other noncurrent assets.................................... 380 275
------- -------
Total assets........................................... $24,514 $23,401
======= =======
Selected notes to financial statements appear on pages E-87 to E-100.
E-84
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
June 30 December 31
2001 2000
------- -----------
(In millions)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Notes payable........................................... $ 250 $ 150
Accounts payable........................................ 3,547 3,774
Payroll and benefits payable............................ 418 432
Accrued taxes........................................... 576 281
Accrued interest........................................ 114 108
Long-term debt due within one year...................... 436 287
------- -------
Total current liabilities............................. 5,341 5,032
Long-term debt, less unamortized discount................. 3,673 4,173
Deferred income taxes..................................... 2,070 2,020
Employee benefits......................................... 2,578 2,415
Deferred credits and other liabilities.................... 715 724
Preferred stock of subsidiary............................. 250 250
USX obligated mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred
securities of a subsidiary trust holding solely junior
subordinated convertible debentures of USX............... 183 183
Minority interest in Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC....... 2,010 1,840
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock--
6.50% Cumulative Convertible issued--2,404,487 shares
and 2,413,487 shares ($120 and $121 liquidation
preference, respectively).............................. 2 2
Common stocks:
Marathon Stock issued--312,165,978 shares and
312,165,978 shares..................................... 312 312
Steel Stock issued--89,156,721 shares and 88,767,395
shares................................................. 89 89
Securities exchangeable solely into Marathon Stock
issued--264,441 shares and 281,148 shares.............. -- --
Treasury common stock, at cost--Marathon Stock--3,256,789
shares and 3,899,714 shares.............................. (87) (104)
Additional paid-in capital................................ 4,686 4,676
Deferred compensation..................................... (30) (8)
Retained earnings......................................... 2,731 1,847
Accumulated other comprehensive loss...................... (9) (50)
------- -------
Total stockholders' equity............................ 7,694 6,764
------- -------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity............ $24,514 $23,401
======= =======
Selected notes to financial statements appear on pages E-87 to E-100.
E-85
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six Months
Ended June 30
--------------
2001 2000
------- -----
(In millions)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Operating activities:
Net income.................................................... $ 1,061 $ 720
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided from operating
activities:
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle......... 8 --
Minority interest in income of Marathon Ashland Petroleum
LLC........................................................ 427 258
Depreciation, depletion and amortization.................... 761 639
Exploratory dry well costs.................................. 6 32
Pensions and other postretirement benefits.................. (42) (157)
Deferred income taxes....................................... (179) 162
Gain (loss) on ownership change in Marathon Ashland
Petroleum LLC.............................................. 6 (8)
Net gains on disposal of assets............................. (44) (122)
Changes in:
Current receivables....................................... 150 (320)
Inventories............................................... (83) (265)
Current accounts payable and accrued expenses............. (99) 213
All other--net.............................................. 51 (44)
------- -----
Net cash provided from operating activities............... 2,023 1,108
------- -----
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures.......................................... (769) (673)
Acquisition of Pennaco Energy, Inc............................ (506) --
Disposal of assets............................................ 115 230
Restricted cash--withdrawals.................................. 26 161
--deposits............................................ (15) (194)
Investees--investments (2) (67)
--loans and advances...................................... (5) --
--returns and payments.................................... 10 2
All other--net (19) 23
------- -----
Net cash used in investing activities.................... (1,165) (518)
------- -----
Financing activities:
Commercial paper and revolving credit arrangements--net....... (277) (253)
Other debt--borrowings........................................ 139 273
--repayments............................................ (132) (309)
Common stock repurchased...................................... (1) --
Treasury stock reissued....................................... 3 --
Preferred stock repurchased................................... -- (12)
Dividends paid................................................ (177) (179)
Distributions to minority shareholder of Marathon Ashland
Petroleum LLC................................................ (244) (73)
------- -----
Net cash used in financing activities.................... (689) (553)
------- -----
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash....................... (5) (3)
------- -----
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents..................... 164 34
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year................ 559 133
------- -----
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period.................... $ 723 $ 167
======= =====
Cash provided from operating activities included:
Interest and other financial costs paid (net of amount
capitalized)............................................... $ (178) $(179)
Income taxes paid........................................... (218) (141)
Selected notes to financial statements appear on pages E-87 to E-100.
E-86
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. The information furnished in these financial statements is unaudited but,
in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair
presentation of the results for the periods covered. All such adjustments are
of a normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. These financial
statements, including selected notes, have been prepared in accordance with the
applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include
all of the information and disclosures required by generally accepted
accounting principles for complete financial statements. Certain
reclassifications of prior year data have been made to conform to 2001
classifications. Additional information is contained in the USX Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.
2. Effective January 1, 2001, USX adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities" (SFAS No. 133), as amended by SFAS Nos. 137 and 138. This Standard,
as amended, requires recognition of all derivatives at fair value as either
assets or liabilities. Changes in the fair value of all derivatives are
recognized immediately in earnings, unless the derivative qualifies as a hedge
of future cash flows or certain foreign currency exposures. For derivatives
qualifying as hedges of future cash flows or certain foreign currency
exposures, the effective portion of any changes in fair value is recognized in
a component of stockholders' equity called other comprehensive income (OCI) and
then reclassified to earnings when the underlying anticipated transaction is
consummated. Any ineffective portion of such hedges is recognized in earnings
as it occurs. For derivatives designated as hedges of the fair value of
recognized assets, liabilities or firm commitments, changes in the fair value
of the hedged item are recognized immediately in earnings. Since changes in
fair value of the related derivative are also recognized immediately in
earnings, the net effect of that accounting is to reflect in earnings the
extent to which the hedge is not effective in achieving offsetting changes in
fair value.
USX uses commodity-based and foreign currency derivative instruments to
manage its exposure to price risk. Management has authorized the use of
futures, forwards, swaps and options to reduce the effects of fluctuations
related to the purchase, production or sale of crude oil, natural gas, refined
products and nonferrous metals and also certain business transactions
denominated in foreign currencies.
In order to apply hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, USX is required to
establish at the inception of the hedge the method it will use for assessing
the effectiveness of the hedging derivative and the measurement approach for
determining the ineffective portion of the hedge. Generally, USX has not
elected to designate derivative instruments as qualifying for hedge accounting
treatment. As a result, the changes in fair value of most derivatives are
recognized immediately in earnings, while the changes in the fair value of the
underlying items generally are not recognized until the transaction is
consummated. At the date of adoption, USX had one strategy that qualified as a
hedge of the fair value of a firm commitment. This strategy continues to
qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Additional strategies, which are hedges
of future cash flows, were qualified as hedges on June 1, 2001.
A portion of the cumulative effect adjustment relating to the adoption of
SFAS No. 133 was recognized in OCI. The cumulative effect adjustment relates
only to deferred gains or losses existing as of the close of business on
December 31, 2000, for hedge transactions under prior accounting rules. A
reconciliation of the changes in OCI relating to derivative instruments is as
follows:
Second Quarter Six Months
Ended Ended
Deferred gain (loss), net of tax June 30, 2001 June 30, 2001
-------------------------------- -------------- -------------
Beginning balance................................ $34 $--
Cumulative effect adjustment..................... -- (8)
Reclassification of the cumulative effect
adjustment into earnings........................ (7) 35
Changes in fair value............................ 15 15
Reclassification to earnings..................... -- --
--- ---
Balance at June 30, 2001......................... $42 $42
=== ===
E-87
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
Of the $42 million recorded in OCI as of June 30, 2001, $18 million, net of
income taxes, is expected to be reclassified to earnings over the 12-month
period ending June 30, 2002. The actual amounts that will be reclassified to
earnings over the next twelve months will vary as a result of continual changes
in fair value.
The ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of hedges of future
cash flows recognized during the second quarter and six months of 2001 was a
favorable $4 million before income taxes. This amount was included in revenues.
The futures contracts used in cash flow hedge strategies vary in duration
with certain contracts extending into 2002.
USX employs one strategy qualifying as a hedge of the fair value of a firm
commitment. There is no ineffectiveness associated with this hedge. The hedging
instrument and the existing firm commitment contract are priced on the same
underlying index. The over-the-counter swap agreement extends into 2008.
USX did not have any foreign currency contracts that qualified for hedge
accounting. The changes in fair value of the forward currency contracts are
recognized immediately in earnings. These forward currency contracts have
various maturities extending into 2001.
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board approved Statements
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 "Business Combinations" (SFAS 141),
No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" (SFAS 142) and No. 143
"Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations" (SFAS 143).
SFAS 141 requires all business combinations completed after June 30, 2001,
be accounted for under the purchase method. This standard also establishes for
all business combinations made after June 30, 2001, specific criteria for the
recognition of intangible assets separately from goodwill. SFAS 141 also
requires that the excess of fair value of acquired assets over cost (negative
goodwill) be recognized immediately as an extraordinary gain, rather than
deferred and amortized. USX will account for all future business combinations
under SFAS 141.
SFAS 142 addresses the accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets
after an acquisition. The most significant changes made by SFAS 142 are: 1)
goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives will no longer be
amortized; 2) goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives must be
tested for impairment at least annually; and 3) the amortization period for the
intangible assets with finite lives will no longer be limited to forty years.
USX will adopt SFAS 142 effective January 1, 2002, as required. At that time,
amortization of existing goodwill will cease on the unamortized portion
associated with previous acquisitions and certain investments accounted for
under the equity method. This will have a favorable impact on the results of
operations of approximately $5 million, net of tax, annually beginning in 2002.
Additionally, SFAS 142 requires that unamortized negative goodwill associated
with investments accounted for under the equity method and acquired before July
1, 2001, be recognized in income as a cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle. USX expects to recognize a favorable cumulative effect of a change
in accounting principle of approximately $35 million, net of tax, upon
adoption. USX continues to evaluate the financial effects of the provisions of
SFAS 142 pertaining to intangible assets other than goodwill.
SFAS 143 provides accounting requirements for retirement obligations
associated with tangible long-lived assets, including: 1) the timing of
liability recognition; 2) initial measurement of the liability; 3) allocation
of asset retirement cost to expense; 4) subsequent measurement of the
liability; and 5) financial statement disclosures. SFAS 143 requires that an
asset retirement cost should be capitalized as part of the cost of the
E-88
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
related long-lived asset and subsequently allocated to expense using a
systematic and rational method. USX will adopt the Statement effective January
1, 2003. The transition adjustment resulting from the adoption of SFAS 143 will
be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. At this
time, USX cannot reasonably estimate the effect of the adoption of this
Statement on either its financial position or results of operations.
3. The Marathon Group's operations consist of three reportable operating
segments: 1) Exploration and Production (E&P)--explores for and produces crude
oil and natural gas on a worldwide basis; 2) Refining, Marketing and
Transportation (RM&T)--refines, markets and transports crude oil and petroleum
products, primarily in the Midwest and southeastern United States through
Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC (MAP); and 3) Other Energy Related Businesses
(OERB). OERB is an aggregation of two segments which fall below the
quantitative reporting thresholds: 1) Natural Gas and Crude Oil Marketing and
Transportation--markets and transports its own and third-party natural gas and
crude oil in the United States; and 2) Power Generation--develops, constructs
and operates independent electric power projects worldwide.
The U. S. Steel Group consists of two reportable operating segments: 1)
Domestic Steel and 2) U. S. Steel Kosice (USSK). Domestic Steel includes the
United States operations of U. S. Steel while USSK includes the U. S. Steel
Kosice operations primarily located in the Slovak Republic. Domestic Steel is
engaged in the domestic production, sale and transportation of steel mill
products, coke, taconite pellets and coal; the management of mineral resources;
real estate development; and engineering and consulting services. USSK is
engaged in the production and sale of steel mill products and coke and
primarily serves central European markets.
The results of segment operations for USX are as follows:
Total
Marathon
E&P RM&T OERB Segments
------ ------ ---- --------
(In millions)
Second Quarter 2001
Revenues and other income:
Customer........................................ $1,140 $7,536 $437 $9,113
Intersegment(a)................................. 136 7 19 162
Intergroup(a)................................... 5 -- 3 8
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated investees.. 16 8 7 31
Other........................................... 9 17 5 31
------ ------ ---- ------
Total revenues and other income............... $1,306 $7,568 $471 $9,345
====== ====== ==== ======
Segment income.................................... $ 459 $ 842 $ 10 $1,311
====== ====== ==== ======
Second Quarter 2000
Revenues and other income:
Customer........................................ $ 957 $7,406 $305 $8,668
Intersegment(a)................................. 119 35 13 167
Intergroup(a)................................... 6 -- 6 12
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated
investees...................................... (3) 6 4 7
Other........................................... 7 10 2 19
------ ------ ---- ------
Total revenues and other income............... $1,086 $7,457 $330 $8,873
====== ====== ==== ======
Segment income.................................... $ 356 $ 529 $-- $ 885
====== ====== ==== ======
--------
(a) Intersegment and intergroup sales and transfers were conducted under terms
comparable to those with unrelated parties.
E-89
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
Total Total
Domestic U. S. Steel Marathon
Steel USSK Segments Segments Total
-------- ---- ----------- -------- -------
(In millions)
Second Quarter 2001
Revenues and other income:
Customer.......................... $1,447 $284 $1,731 $9,113 $10,844
Intersegment(a)................... 2 -- 2 162 164
Intergroup(a)..................... 2 -- 2 8 10
Equity in earnings (losses) of
unconsolidated investees......... (8) 1 (7) 31 24
Other............................. 11 -- 11 31 42
------ ---- ------ ------ -------
Total revenues and other
income......................... $1,454 $285 $1,739 $9,345 $11,084
====== ==== ====== ====== =======
Segment income (loss)............... $ (69) $ 41 $ (28) $1,311 $ 1,283
====== ==== ====== ====== =======
Second Quarter 2000
Revenues and other income:
Customer.......................... $1,625 $-- $1,625 $8,668 $10,293
Intersegment(a)................... -- -- -- 167 167
Intergroup(a)..................... 4 -- 4 12 16
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated investees......... 14 -- 14 7 21
Other............................. 13 -- 13 19 32
------ ---- ------ ------ -------
Total revenues and other
income......................... $1,656 $-- $1,656 $8,873 $10,529
====== ==== ====== ====== =======
Segment income...................... $ 68 $-- $ 68 $ 885 $ 953
====== ==== ====== ====== =======
--------
(a) Intersegment and intergroup sales and transfers were conducted under terms
comparable to those with unrelated parties.
E-90
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
Total
Marathon
E&P RM&T OERB Segments
------ ------- ------ --------
(In millions)
Six Months 2001
Revenues and other income:
Customer..................................... $2,378 $14,278 $1,065 $17,721
Intersegment(a).............................. 270 13 44 327
Intergroup(a)................................ 15 -- 5 20
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated
investees................................... 36 14 11 61
Other........................................ 17 32 7 56
------ ------- ------ -------
Total revenues and other income............ $2,716 $14,337 $1,132 $18,185
====== ======= ====== =======
Segment income................................. $1,059 $ 1,118 $ 18 $ 2,195
====== ======= ====== =======
Six Months 2000
Revenues and other income:
Customer..................................... $1,909 $13,833 $ 655 $16,397
Intersegment(a).............................. 188 55 32 275
Intergroup(a)................................ 11 -- 11 22
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated
investees................................... (4) 10 8 14
Other........................................ 10 21 6 37
------ ------- ------ -------
Total revenues and other income............ $2,114 $13,919 $ 712 $16,745
====== ======= ====== =======
Segment income................................. $ 665 $ 669 $ 13 $ 1,347
====== ======= ====== =======
--------
(a) Intersegment and intergroup sales and transfers were conducted under terms
comparable to those with unrelated parties.
E-91
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
Total Total
Domestic U. S. Steel Marathon
Steel USSK Segments Segments Total
-------- ---- ----------- -------- -------
(In millions)
Six Months 2001
Revenues and other income:
Customer.......................... $2,709 $530 $3,239 $17,721 $20,960
Intersegment(a)................... 3 -- 3 327 330
Intergroup(a)..................... 4 -- 4 20 24
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated investees......... 39 1 40 61 101
Other............................. 17 1 18 56 74
------ ---- ------ ------- -------
Total revenues and other
income......................... $2,772 $532 $3,304 $18,185 $21,489
====== ==== ====== ======= =======
Segment income (loss)............... $ (220) $ 82 $ (138) $ 2,195 $ 2,057
====== ==== ====== ======= =======
Six Months 2000.....................
Revenues and other income:
Customer.......................... $3,203 $-- $3,203 $16,397 $19,600
Intersegment(a)................... -- -- -- 275 275
Intergroup(a)..................... 8 -- 8 22 30
Equity in earnings of
unconsolidated investees......... 7 -- 7 14 21
Other............................. 26 -- 26 37 63
------ ---- ------ ------- -------
Total revenues and other
income......................... $3,244 $-- $3,244 $16,745 $19,989
====== ==== ====== ======= =======
Segment income...................... $ 122 $-- $ 122 $ 1,347 $ 1,469
====== ==== ====== ======= =======
--------
(a) Intersegment and intergroup sales and transfers were conducted under terms
comparable to those with unrelated parties.
The following schedules reconcile segment revenues and income to amounts
reported in the Marathon and U. S. Steel Groups' financial statements:
Marathon U. S. Steel
Group Second Group Second
Quarter Ended Quarter Ended
June 30 June 30
-------------- --------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
------ ------ ------ ------
(In millions)
Revenues and other income:
Revenues and other income of reportable
segments.................................... $9,345 $8,873 $1,739 $1,656
Items not allocated to segments--
Gain (loss) on ownership change in MAP..... (7) 4 -- --
Elimination of intersegment revenues......... (162) (167) (2) --
------ ------ ------ ------
Total Group revenues and other income.... $9,176 $8,710 $1,737 $1,656
====== ====== ====== ======
Income:
Income (loss) for reportable segments........ $1,311 $ 885 $ (28) $ 68
Items not allocated to segments:
Gain (loss) on ownership change in MAP..... (7) 4 -- --
Administrative expenses.................... (34) (29) (8) (5)
Net pension credits........................ -- -- 31 67
Costs related to former business
activities................................ -- -- (14) (18)
Costs related to Proposed Separation....... (15) -- (8) --
------ ------ ------ ------
Total Group income (loss) from
operations.............................. $1,255 $ 860 $ (27) $ 112
====== ====== ====== ======
E-92
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
U. S. Steel
Marathon Group Group
Six Months Six Months
Ended June 30 Ended June 30
---------------- --------------
2001 2000 2001 2000
------- ------- ------ ------
(In millions)
Revenues and other income:
Revenues and other income of reportable
segments.................................. $18,185 $16,745 $3,304 $3,244
Items not allocated to segments:
Gain (loss) on ownership change in MAP... (6) 8 -- --
Other (a)................................ 59 87 -- --
Elimination of intersegment revenues....... (327) (275) (3) --
------- ------- ------ ------
Total Group revenues and other income.. $17,911 $16,565 $3,301 $3,244
======= ======= ====== ======
Income:
Income (loss) for reportable segments...... $ 2,195 $ 1,347 $ (138) $ 122
Items not allocated to segments:
Gain (loss) on ownership change in MAP... (6) 8 -- --
Administrative expenses.................. (65) (57) (15) (11)
Net pension credits...................... -- -- 72 132
Costs related to former business
activities.............................. -- -- (38) (40)
Costs related to Proposed Separation..... (16) -- (9) --
Other (a)................................ 59 87 -- --
------- ------- ------ ------
Total Group income (loss) from
operations............................ $ 2,167 $ 1,385 $ (128) $ 203
======= ======= ====== ======
--------
(a) Represents in 2001 for the Marathon Group, gain on offshore lease
resolution with the U.S. Government and in 2000, gain on disposition of
Angus/Stellaria.
4. On November 24, 2000, USX acquired U. S. Steel Kosice, s.r.o. (USSK),
which is primarily located in the Slovak Republic. USSK was formed in June 2000
to hold the steel operations and related assets of VSZ a.s. (VSZ), a
diversified Slovak corporation. The acquisition was accounted for under the
purchase method of accounting.
In the first quarter 2001, Marathon Oil Company (Marathon) acquired Pennaco
Energy, Inc. (Pennaco), a natural gas producer. Marathon acquired 87% of the
outstanding stock of Pennaco through a tender offer completed on February 7,
2001 at $19 a share. On March 26, 2001, Pennaco was merged with a wholly owned
subsidiary of Marathon. Under the terms of the merger, each share not held by
Marathon was converted into the right to receive $19 in cash. The total cash
purchase price of Pennaco was $506 million. The acquisition was accounted for
under the purchase method of accounting. The excess of the purchase price over
the preliminary fair value of net assets acquired (goodwill) was $64 million
and was orginally to be amortized over 17 years. However, with the adoption of
SFAS No. 142, effective January 1, 2002, USX will cease the amortization of
goodwill and will test the unamortized balance for impairment on an annual
basis. Results of operations for the six months of 2001 include the results of
Pennaco from February 7, 2001.
On March 1, 2001, USX completed the purchase of the tin mill products
business of LTV Corporation (LTV), which is now operated as East Chicago Tin.
In this noncash transaction, USX assumed approximately $66 million of certain
employee related obligations from LTV. The acquisition was accounted for using
the purchase method of accounting. Results of operations for the six months of
2001 include the operations of East Chicago Tin from the date of acquisition.
E-93
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
On March 23, 2001, Transtar, Inc. (Transtar) completed its previously
announced reorganization with its two voting shareholders, USX and Transtar
Holdings, L.P. (Holdings), an affiliate of Blackstone Capital Partners L.P. As
a result of this transaction, USX became sole owner of Transtar and certain of
its subsidiaries. Holdings became owner of the other subsidiaries of Transtar.
USX accounted for the change in its ownership interest in Transtar using the
purchase method of accounting. USX recognized in the six months of 2001 a
pretax gain of $68 million (included in dividend and investee income) and a
favorable deferred tax adjustment of $33 million related to this transaction.
USX previously accounted for its investment in Transtar under the equity method
of accounting.
The following unaudited pro forma data for USX includes the results of
operations of the above acquisitions giving effect to them as if they had been
consummated at the beginning of the periods presented. The six months 2001 pro
forma results exclude the $68 million gain and $33 million tax benefit recorded
as a result of the Transtar transaction. In addition, VSZ did not historically
provide historical carve-out financial information for its steel activities
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. Therefore, USX made certain estimates and assumptions regarding
revenues and costs used in the preparation of the unaudited pro forma data
relating to USSK for the six months of 2000.
The following pro forma data is based on historical information and does not
necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred nor is it
necessarily indicative of future results of operations.
Six Months
Ended June 30
----------------
2001 2000
------- -------
(In millions,
except per
share amounts)
Revenues and other income..................................... $21,174 $20,402
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle.................................................... 964 740
Net income.................................................... 956 740
Applicable to Marathon Stock:
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle.................................................... 1,087 603
--Per share--basic and diluted.............................. 3.52 1.93
Net income.................................................... 1,079 603
--Per share--basic and diluted.............................. 3.49 1.93
Applicable to Steel Stock:
Net income (loss)(a).......................................... (127) 133
--Per share--basic.......................................... (1.43) 1.51
--diluted............................................... (1.43) 1.48
--------
(a) Amounts are net of dividends on preferred stock of $4 million.
5. In December 2000, Marathon and Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. signed
a definitive agreement to form a joint venture combining certain of their oil
and gas producing activities in the U.S. Permian Basin, including Marathon's
interest in the Yates Field. This transaction has allowed Marathon to expand
its interests in the Permian Basin and improve access to materials for use in
enhanced recovery techniques in the Yates Field. The joint venture, named MKM
Partners L.P., commenced operations in January 2001 and is accounted for under
the equity method of accounting.
6. Inventories are carried at lower of cost or market. Cost of inventories
is determined primarily under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method.
E-94
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
June
30 December 31
2001 2000
------ -----------
(In millions)
Raw materials................................................ $ 933 $ 915
Semi-finished products....................................... 378 429
Finished products............................................ 1,411 1,279
Supplies and sundry items.................................... 204 190
------ ------
Total...................................................... $2,926 $2,813
====== ======
7. Total comprehensive income was $562 million for the second quarter of
2001, $420 million for the second quarter of 2000, $1,103 million for the six
months of 2001 and $716 million for the six months of 2000.
8. The method of calculating net income (loss) per share for the Marathon
Stock and Steel Stock reflects the USX Board of Directors' intent that the
separately reported earnings and surplus of the Marathon Group and the U. S.
Steel Group, as determined consistent with the USX Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, are available for payment of dividends on the respective classes
of stock, although legally available funds and liquidation preferences of these
classes of stock do not necessarily correspond with these amounts. The
financial statements of the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group, taken
together, include all accounts which comprise the corresponding consolidated
financial statements of USX.
Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated by adjusting net income
(loss) for dividend requirements of preferred stock and is based on the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
Diluted net income (loss) per share assumes conversion of convertible
securities for the applicable periods outstanding and assumes exercise of stock
options, provided in each case, the effect is not antidilutive.
E-95
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
Computation of Income Per Share
Second Quarter Ended June 30
-------------------------------------
2001 2000
------------------ -----------------
Basic Diluted Basic Diluted
-------- -------- -------- --------
Marathon Group
Net income (millions).................... $ 582 $ 582 $ 367 $ 367
======== ======== ======== ========
Shares of common stock outstanding
(thousands):
Average number of common shares
outstanding........................... 309,101 309,101 312,233 312,233
Effect of dilutive securities--stock
options............................... -- 526 -- 198
-------- -------- -------- --------
Average common shares and dilutive
effect.............................. 309,101 309,627 312,233 312,431
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income per share..................... $ 1.88 $ 1.88 $ 1.18 $ 1.18
======== ======== ======== ========
U. S. Steel Group
Net income (loss) (millions):
Net income (loss)...................... $ (30) $ (30) $ 56 $ 56
Dividends on preferred stock........... 2 2 2 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) applicable to Steel
Stock................................. (32) (32) 54 54
Effect of dilutive trust preferred
securities............................ -- -- -- 2
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) assuming
conversions......................... $ (32) $ (32) $ 54 $ 56
======== ======== ======== ========
Shares of common stock outstanding
(thousands):
Average number of common shares
outstanding........................... 89,005 89,005 88,499 88,499
Effect of dilutive securities--trust
preferred securities.................. -- -- -- 4,256
-------- -------- -------- --------
Average common shares and dilutive
effect.............................. 89,005 89,005 88,499 92,755
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income (loss) per share.............. $ (.36) $ (.36) $ .62 $ .62
======== ======== ======== ========
E-96
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
Computation of Income Per Share
Six Months Ended June 30
-------------------------------------
2001 2000
------------------ -----------------
Basic Diluted Basic Diluted
-------- -------- -------- --------
Marathon Group
Net income (millions):
Income before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle........ $ 1,090 $ 1,090 $ 621 $ 621
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle.................. (8) (8) -- --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income............................. $ 1,082 $ 1,082 $ 621 $ 621
======== ======== ======== ========
Shares of common stock outstanding
(thousands):
Average number of common shares
outstanding........................... 308,928 308,928 312,180 312,180
Effect of dilutive securities--stock
options............................... -- 410 -- 179
-------- -------- -------- --------
Average common shares and dilutive
effect.............................. 308,928 309,338 312,180 312,359
======== ======== ======== ========
Per share:
Income before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle........ $ 3.53 $ 3.52 $ 1.99 $ 1.99
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle.................. (.03) (.02) -- --
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income............................. $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 1.99 $ 1.99
======== ======== ======== ========
U. S. Steel Group
Net income (loss) (millions):
Net income (loss)...................... $ (21) $ (21) $ 99 $ 99
Dividends on preferred stock........... 4 4 4 4
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) applicable to Steel
Stock................................. (25) (25) 95 95
Effect of dilutive trust preferred
securities............................ -- -- -- 4
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (loss) assuming
conversions........................... $ (25) $ (25) $ 95 $ 99
======== ======== ======== ========
Shares of common stock outstanding
(thousands):
Average number of common shares
outstanding........................... 88,906 88,906 88,461 88,461
Effect of dilutive securities:
Trust preferred securities........... -- -- -- 4,256
Stock options........................ -- -- -- 4
-------- -------- -------- --------
Average common shares and dilutive
effect.............................. 88,906 88,906 88,461 92,721
======== ======== ======== ========
Net income (loss) per share.............. $ (.28) $ (.28) $ 1.08 $ 1.07
======== ======== ======== ========
9. Included in revenues and costs and expenses for the second quarter of
2001 and 2000 were $1,132 million and $1,108 million, respectively,
representing excise taxes on petroleum products and merchandise. Similar
amounts for the six months of 2001 and 2000 were $2,170 million and $2,147
million, respectively.
10. The provision for income taxes for the periods reported is based on tax
rates and amounts which recognize management's best estimate of current and
deferred tax assets and liabilities.
E-97
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
Interest and other financial costs in the six months of 2001 included a
favorable adjustment of $76 million and provision for income taxes included an
unfavorable adjustment of $20 million, both of which are related to certain
prior years' taxes.
In the second quarter of 2001, the income tax provision included a foreign
deferred tax benefit of $9 million related to a reduction in the statutory rate
enacted in the Canadian province of Alberta.
11. At June 30, 2001, USX had no borrowings against its $1,354 million long-
term revolving credit facility and no borrowings against its $451 million
short-term revolving credit facility.
Certain banks provide USX with short-term lines of credit totaling $115
million which require a .125% fee or maintenance of compensating balances of
3%. At June 30, 2001, there were no borrowings against these facilities.
At June 30, 2001, MAP had no borrowings against its $500 million revolving
credit agreements with banks and had no amounts outstanding against its $190
million revolving credit agreement with Ashland, which was amended and extended
for one year to March 15, 2002.
At June 30, 2001, USSK had no borrowings against its $50 million short-term
credit facility.
At June 30, 2001, in the event of a change in control of USX, debt
obligations totaling $3,330 million and operating lease obligations of $101
million may be declared immediately due and payable. In such event, USX may
also be required to either repurchase the leased Fairfield slab caster for $100
million or provide a letter of credit to secure the remaining obligation.
12. On February 16, 2001, USX borrowed $250 million under a six-month term
loan facility agreement. The loan is unsecured and any borrowings bear interest
at defined short-term market rates. At June 30, 2001, $250 million remained
outstanding on this facility.
On March 30, 2001, USX borrowed $30 million under a five-year promissory
note agreement. The amount borrowed is unsecured and requires quarterly
principal payments and interest at a rate of 6.57%. At June 30, 2001, $29
million was outstanding under the agreement.
13. USX has a 16% investment in Republic Technologies International LLC
(Republic) which was accounted for under the equity method of accounting.
During the first quarter of 2001, USX discontinued applying the equity method
since investments in and advances to Republic had been reduced to zero. Also,
USX has recognized certain debt obligations of $14 million previously assumed
by Republic. On April 2, 2001, Republic filed a voluntary petition with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court to reorganize its operations under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code. In the first quarter of 2001, as a result of Republic's
action, USX recorded a pretax charge of $74 million for potentially
uncollectible receivables from Republic.
14. In 1998, USX redeemed all shares of USX-Delhi Group Common Stock. After
the redemption, 50,000,000 shares of this stock remain authorized but unissued.
15. USX is the subject of, or a party to, a number of pending or threatened
legal actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters,
including laws and regulations relating to the environment. Certain of these
matters are discussed below. The ultimate resolution of these contingencies
could, individually or in the aggregate, be material to the consolidated
financial statements. However, management believes that USX will remain a
viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these
contingencies could
E-98
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
be resolved unfavorably. See discussion of Liquidity in USX Consolidated
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
USX is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations
relating to the environment. These laws generally provide for control of
pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to
undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites. Penalties may be
imposed for noncompliance. At June 30, 2001, and December 31, 2000, accrued
liabilities for remediation totaled $216 million and $212 million,
respectively. It is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of
all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be
imposed. Receivables for recoverable costs from certain states, under programs
to assist companies in cleanup efforts related to underground storage tanks at
retail marketing outlets, were $60 million at June 30, 2001, and $57 million at
December 31, 2000.
For a number of years, USX has made substantial capital expenditures to
bring existing facilities into compliance with various laws relating to the
environment. In the six months of 2001 and for the years 2000 and 1999, such
capital expenditures totaled $23 million, $91 million and $78 million,
respectively. USX anticipates making additional such expenditures in the
future; however, the exact amounts and timing of such expenditures are
uncertain because of the continuing evolution of specific regulatory
requirements.
On May 11, 2001, MAP entered into a consent decree with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency which commits it to complete certain agreed
upon environmental capital projects over the next eight years primarily aimed
at reducing air emissions at its seven refineries. The current estimated cost
to complete these projects is approximately $270 million. In addition, MAP is
required to complete certain agreed upon supplemental environmental projects as
part of an enforcement action for alleged Clean Air Act violations, at a
current estimated cost of $8 million. The consent decree is currently awaiting
court approval.
At June 30, 2001, and December 31, 2000, accrued liabilities for platform
abandonment and dismantlement totaled $178 million and $162 million,
respectively.
Guarantees by USX of the liabilities of affiliated entities totaled $80
million at June 30, 2001. In the event that any defaults of guaranteed
liabilities occur, USX has access to its interest in the assets of most of the
affiliates to reduce losses resulting from these guarantees. As of June 30,
2001, the largest guarantee for a single affiliate was $48 million.
At June 30, 2001, USX's pro rata share of obligations of LOOP LLC and
various pipeline affiliates secured by throughput and deficiency agreements
totaled $119 million. Under the agreements, USX is required to advance funds if
the affiliates are unable to service debt. Any such advances are prepayments of
future transportation charges.
Contract commitments to acquire property, plant and equipment and long-term
investments at June 30, 2001, totaled $568 million compared with $663 million
at December 31, 2000.
16. On July 31, 2001, USX announced that its board of directors approved the
definitive plan of reorganization to separate the energy and steel business of
USX (Proposed Separation). The Proposed Separation envisions a tax-free spin-
off of the steel business of USX into a freestanding, publicly traded company
to be known as United States Steel Corporation. Holders of current USX-U. S.
Steel Group Common Stock will become holders of United States Steel Corporation
Common Stock. Holders of current USX-Marathon Group Common Stock will become
holders of Marathon Oil Corporation Common Stock. The Proposed Separation does
not contemplate a cash distribution to stockholders. Each new company will
carry
E-99
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(Continued)
(Unaudited)
approximately the same assets and liabilities now associated with its existing
businesses, except for a value transfer of approximately $900 million from
Marathon Oil Corporation to United States Steel Corporation, intended to
maintain United States Steel Corporation as a strong, independent company. The
form of the value transfer will be a reattribution of USX corporate debt
between the USX-Marathon Group and the USX-U. S. Steel Group. The Proposed
Separation is subject to the approval of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of each class of current USX common stock, receipt of a
favorable private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") on
the tax-free nature of the transaction, completion of necessary financing
arrangements and receipt of necessary regulatory and third party consents. The
transaction is expected to occur on or about December 31, 2001. Costs related
to the Proposed Separation include professional fees and other expenses and are
included in selling, general and administrative expenses. These costs in the
second quarter and six months of 2001 were $23 million and $25 million,
respectively.
17. On July 2, 2001, a corporate reorganization was implemented to create a
new holding company structure. USX became a holding company that owns all of
the outstanding equity of Marathon Oil Company, an Ohio Corporation which,
directly and indirectly, owns and operates the businesses of the USX-Marathon
Group, and United States Steel LLC, a Delaware limited liability company which
owns and operates the businesses of the USX-U. S. Steel Group. The
reorganization will not have any impact on the results of operations or
financial position of USX Corporation, the Marathon Group or the U. S. Steel
Group.
This reorganization in corporate form is independent of the Proposed
Separation of the energy and steel businesses of USX Corporation.
18. On July 27, 2001, United States Steel LLC and United States Steel LLC's
wholly owned subsidiary, United States Steel Financing Corp., issued $385
million of Senior Notes due August 1, 2008 (Notes), at an interest rate of
10.75 percent. The Notes were issued to meet, in part, the conditions of the
Proposed Separation related to the completion of necessary financing
arrangements. These notes are guaranteed by USX Corporation until completion of
the Proposed Separation, at which time they will be solely the obligation of
United States Steel Corporation. The notes may be redeemed if the Proposed
Separation does not occur.
The Notes contain certain restrictive covenants that became effective on the
date of issue. These convenants impose restrictions on certain activities of
United States Steel. Most of these covenants apply only when the Notes are not
rated investment grade.
E-100
USX CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
TOTAL ENTERPRISE BASIS--(Unaudited)
CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended
June 30 Year Ended December 31
------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------ ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
11.18 6.58 3.79 4.20 3.45 3.63 3.41
====== ===== ==== ==== ==== ==== ====
USX CORPORATION
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
TOTAL ENTERPRISE BASIS--(Unaudited)
CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Six Months Ended
June 30 Year Ended December 31
------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 2000 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
------ ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----
11.56 6.74 3.89 4.32 3.56 3.79 3.65
====== ===== ==== ==== ==== ==== ====
E-101
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
USX Corporation ("USX") is a diversified company that is principally engaged
in the energy business through its Marathon Group and in the steel business
through its U. S. Steel Group. The following discussion should be read in
conjunction with the second quarter 2001 USX Consolidated Financial Statements
and Selected Notes to Financial Statements. For income per common share amounts
applicable to USX's two classes of common stock, USX-Marathon Group Common
Stock ("Marathon Stock") and USX-U. S. Steel Group Common Stock ("Steel
Stock"), see Consolidated Statement of Operations--Income per Common Share. For
individual Group results, see Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel
Group. For operating statistics, see Supplemental Statistics following
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for each of the respective Groups.
On July 31, 2001, USX announced that its board of directors approved the
definitive plan of reorganization to separate the energy and steel businesses
of USX ("Proposed Separation"). The Proposed Separation envisions a tax-free
spin-off of the steel business of USX into a freestanding, publicly traded
company to be known as United States Steel Corporation. Holders of current
Steel Stock would become holders of United States Steel Corporation Common
Stock. Holders of current Marathon Stock would become holders of Marathon Oil
Corporation Common Stock. The Proposed Separation does not contemplate a cash
distribution to stockholders. Each new company will carry approximately the
same assets and liabilities now associated with its existing business, except
for a value transfer of approximately $900 million from Marathon Oil
Corporation to United States Steel Corporation, intended to maintain United
States Steel Corporation as a strong, independent company. The form of the
value transfer will be a reattribution of USX corporate debt between the USX-
Marathon Group and the USX-U. S. Steel Group. The Proposed Separation is
subject to the approval of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares
of each class of current USX common stock, receipt of a favorable private
letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") on the tax-free nature
of the transaction, completion of necessary financing arrangements, and receipt
of necessary regulatory and third party consents. The transaction is expected
to occur on or about December 31, 2001.
On July 2, 2001, a corporate reorganization was implemented to create a new
holding company structure. USX became a holding company that owns all of the
outstanding equity of Marathon Oil Company, a Ohio Corporation which, directly
and indirectly, owns and operates the businesses of the USX-Marathon Group, and
United States Steel LLC, a Delaware limited liability company which owns and
operates the businesses of the USX-U. S. Steel Group. The reorganization will
not have any impact on the results of operations or financial position of USX
Corporation, the Marathon Group or the U. S. Steel Group. This reorganization
in corporate form is independent of the Proposed Separation of the energy and
steel businesses of USX Corporation.
Certain sections of Management's Discussion and Analysis include forward-
looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting USX. These
statements typically contain words such as "anticipates", "believes",
"estimates", "expects" or similar words indicating that future outcomes are
uncertain. In accordance with "safe harbor" provisions of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, these statements are accompanied by
cautionary language identifying important factors, though not necessarily all
such factors, which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those
set forth in the forward-looking statements. For additional risk factors
affecting the businesses of USX, see Supplementary Data--Disclosures About
Forward-Looking Statements in the USX Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000 and subsequent filings.
E-102
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
Results of Operations
Revenues and other income for the first six months of 2001 and 2000 are set
forth in the following table:
Six Months
Ended June 30
----------------
2001 2000
------- -------
(Dollars in
millions)
Revenues and other income Marathon Group...................... $17,911 $16,565
U. S. Steel Group............................................ 3,301 3,244
Eliminations................................................. (24) (30)
------- -------
Total revenues and other income............................ $21,188 $19,779
Less:
Excise taxes(a).............................................. 2,170 2,147
Matching buy/sell transactions(a)............................ 2,130 2,295
------- -------
Revenues and other income excluding above items............ $16,888 $15,337
======= =======
--------
(a) Consumer excise taxes on petroleum products and merchandise and matching
crude oil and refined products buy/sell transactions settled in cash are
included in both revenues and costs and expenses for the Marathon Group
and USX consolidated.
Revenues and other income (excluding excise taxes and matching buy/sell
transactions) for the first six months of 2001 increased $1,551 million as
compared with the same period of 2000, reflecting increases of $1,488 million
for the Marathon Group and $57 million for the U. S. Steel Group.
For discussion of revenues and other income by Group, see Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for
the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group.
Income from operations for the the first six months of 2001 and 2000 are
set forth in the following table:
Six Months
Ended June 30
----------------
2001 2000
------- -------
(Dollars in
millions)
Reportable segments
Marathon Group
Exploration & production.................................... $ 1,059 $ 665
Refining, marketing & transportation........................ 1,118 669
Other energy related businesses............................. 18 13
------- -------
Income for reportable segments--Marathon Group............. $ 2,195 $ 1,347
U. S. Steel Group
Domestic Steel.............................................. $ (220) $ 122
U. S. Steel Kosice.......................................... 82 --
------- -------
Income (loss) for reportable segments--U. S. Steel Group... $ (138) $ 122
Income for reportable segments--USX Corporation............ 2,057 1,469
Items not allocated to segments:
Marathon Group.............................................. (28) 38
U. S. Steel Group........................................... 10 81
------- -------
Total income from operations--USX Corporation.............. $ 2,039 $ 1,588
E-103
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
Income for reportable segments in the first six months of 2001 increased by
$588 million compared with the first six months of 2000, reflecting an increase
of $848 million for the Marathon Group reportable segments and a decrease of
$260 million for the U. S. Steel Group reportable segments.
For discussion of income from operations by segment, see Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for
the Marathon Group and the U. S. Steel Group.
Net interest and other financial costs for the first six months of 2001
included a favorable adjustment of $76 million related to prior years' taxes.
Excluding this adjustment, net interest and other financial costs for the first
six months of 2001 decreased $2 million compared to the same period in 2000.
The minority interest in income of MAP, which represents Ashland's 38
percent ownership interest, increased $169 million in the first six months of
2001 due to higher MAP income. For further discussion, see Management
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for
the Marathon Group.
Provisions for income taxes of $434 million for the first six months of 2001
was based on tax rates and amounts that recognize management's best estimate of
current and deferred tax assets and liabilities. In the first six months of
2001, the provision included a $33 million tax benefit associated with the
Transtar reorganization, a foreign deferred tax benefit of $9 million related
to a reduction in the statutory rate enacted in the Canadian province of
Alberta and an unfavorable adjustment of $20 million primarily related to the
settlement of prior years' taxes.
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $8 million, net of a
tax benefit of $5 million, in the first six months of 2001 was an unfavorable
transition adjustment related to adopting SFAS No. 133. For further discussion,
see Note 2 to the USX Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net income was $1,061 million for the first six months of 2001, an increase
of $341 million compared with the first six months of 2000, reflecting an
increase of $461 million for the Marathon Group and a $120 million decrease for
the U. S. Steel Group.
Dividends to Stockholders
On July 31, 2001, the USX Board of Directors (the "Board") declared
dividends of 23 cents per share on Marathon Stock and 10 cents per share on
Steel Stock, payable September 10, 2001, to stockholders of record at the close
of business on August 16, 2001. The Board also declared a dividend of $0.8125
per share on USX's 6.50% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, payable
September 28, 2001, to stockholders of record at the close of business on
August 31, 2001.
On August 13, 2001, Marathon Oil Canada Limited, an indirect subsidiary of
Marathon Oil Company, will redeem its non-voting Exchangeable Shares through an
exchange for shares of Marathon Stock on a one-for-one basis.
Balance Sheet
Current assets at June 30, 2001 decreased $144 million from year-end 2000
primarily due to decreases in assets held for sale, accounts receivable and
deferred income tax benefits, partially offset by increases in cash and cash
equivalents and inventories. The decrease in assets held for sale resulted from
the reclassification of the Yates field assets to investments and long-term
receivables.
E-104
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
Investments and long-term receivables increased $240 million from year-end
2000, primarily due to the reclassification of the Yates field assets from
assets held for sale to an investment in MKM Partners L.P.
Net property, plant and equipment at June 30, 2001 increased $863 million
from year-end 2000 primarily due to the acquisitions of Pennaco Energy, Inc.
("Pennaco") and East Chicago Tin and the consolidation of Transtar.
Current liabilities at June 30, 2001 increased $309 million compared to
year-end 2000 primarily due to an increase in accrued taxes, debt due within
one year and notes payable, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable.
The increase in accrued taxes was primarily related to the settlement of prior
years' taxes.
Total long-term debt and notes payable was $4,359 million at June 30, 2001,
$251 million lower than year-end 2000. Debt decreased due to increased cash
available for debt reduction. As a result, revolving credit agreements and
outstanding commercial paper were reduced, partially offset by increased
borrowings from a six-month term loan facility agreement and a new five-year
promissory note agreement. Most of the debt is a direct obligation of, or is
guaranteed by, USX.
Employee benefits at June 30, 2001 increased $163 million compared to year-
end 2000 primarily due to the addition of employees with the Transtar
consolidation and the acquisition of the tin mill products business of LTV
Corporation.
Minority interest in Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC increased by $170
million from year-end 2000 due to Ashland's share of recorded MAP income
exceeding cash distributions to Ashland.
Total stockholders' equity increased $930 million from year-end 2000
primarily due to increased net income, partially offset by dividends paid.
Cash Flows
Net cash provided from operating activities totaled $2,023 million in the
first six months of 2001, a $915 million increase from the first six months of
2000, reflecting increases of $789 million for the Marathon Group and $126
million for the U. S. Steel Group. The increases primarily reflect higher net
income and lower use of working capital. For details, see Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation for
each Group.
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment in the first six
months of 2001 were $769 million compared with $673 million for the first six
months of 2000. For further details, see Management's Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for each of the respective
Groups.
Contract commitments to acquire property, plant and equipment and long-term
investments at June 30, 2001, totaled $568 million compared with $663 million
at December 31, 2000. In addition, MAP has a commitment to spend approximately
$270 million over the next eight years for future environmental projects.
The acquisition of Pennaco Energy, Inc. included cash payments of $506
million. For further discussion of Pennaco, see Note 4 to the USX Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Cash from disposal of assets was $115 million in the first six months of
2001, compared with $230 million in the first six months of 2000. Proceeds in
2001 were for the disposition of various Canadian oil fields, SSA stores, and
various domestic production properties. Proceeds in 2000 were mainly from the
disposition of Marathon's 33.34 percent interest in the Angus/Stellaria
development in the Gulf of Mexico.
E-105
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
The net change in restricted cash was a net withdrawal of $11 million in the
first six months of 2001, compared with a net deposit of $33 million in the
first six months of 2000. Restricted cash in both periods primarily reflected
the net effects of cash deposited and withdrawn from domestic production
property dispositions and acquisitions.
Financial obligations (the net of commercial paper and revolving credit
agreements and other debt borrowings and repayments on the Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows) decreased $270 million in the first six months of 2001
compared with a decrease of $289 million in the first six months of 2000. The
decrease in 2001 reflects net cash provided from operating activities and asset
sales in excess of cash used for capital expenditures, acquisitions, dividend
payments and minority interest distributions.
Distributions to minority shareholder of MAP were $244 million in the first
six months of 2001, compared with $73 million in the first six months of 2000.
For further details, see Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for the Marathon Group.
Debt and Preferred Stock Ratings
Standard & Poor's Corp. rates USX's and Marathon's senior debt BBB, USX's
subordinated debt BBB- and preferred stock BB+. Moody's Investor Services, Inc.
rates USX's and Marathon's senior debt Baa1, USX's subordinated debt Baa2 and
preferred stock Baa3. Fitch IBCA Duff & Phelps rates USX's senior notes BBB and
USX's subordinated debt as BBB-. All senior debt of USX holds an investment
grade rating. In connection with the Proposed Separation, Standard & Poor's
reported that they had assigned a corporate credit rating of BBB+ for Marathon
Oil Corporation with a stable outlook and a corporate credit rating of BB to
United States Steel Corporation with a negative outlook, assuming the Proposed
Separation is completed. Moody's has assigned a Ba1 senior implied rating to
United States Steel Corporation with a stable outlook. Additionally, Standard &
Poor's and Moody's have assigned BB and Ba2 ratings, respectively, to United
States Steel LLC's $385 million senior unsecured note offering.
Liquidity
At June 30, 2001, USX had no borrowings against its $1,354 million long-term
revolving credit agreement, no borrowings against its $451 million 364-day
facility and no commercial paper borrowings. There were no borrowings against
USX's short-term lines of credit totaling $115 million at June 30, 2001. At
June 30, 2001, there were no borrowings against the USSK short-term credit
facility. At June 30, 2001, MAP had no borrowings against its revolving credit
agreements with banks and no amounts outstanding against its revolving credit
agreement with Ashland, which was amended and extended for one year to March
15, 2002.
At June 30, 2001, USX had $250 million outstanding under a six-month term
loan facility expiring August 16, 2001 and $29 million outstanding under a
five-year promissory note agreement expiring in 2006.
On July 27, 2001, United States Steel LLC and United States Steel LLC's
wholly owned subsidiary, United States Steel Financing Corp., issued $385
million of Senior Notes due August 1, 2008 ("Notes"), at an interest rate of
10.75 percent. The Notes were issued to meet, in part, the conditions of the
Proposed Separation related to the completion of necessary financing
arrangements. These Notes are guaranteed by USX Corporation until completion of
the Proposed Separation, at which time they will be solely the obligation of
United States Steel Corporation. The Notes allow their redemption if the
Proposed Separation does not occur. In accordance with USX's policy of managing
most financial activity on a centralized, consolidated basis, the proceeds from
the issuance of these Notes will be attributed to and reflected in the
financial statements of both
E-106
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
groups. The Notes contain covenants that impose significant restrictions on
certain activities of United States Steel Corporation. For a description of
these covenants see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation for the U. S. Steel Group--Liquidity" on
page 99.
Capital expenditures in the first six months of 2001 were $769 million and
are expected to be approximately $2.1 billion for the full year, including
expenditures by recently acquired businesses. Contract commitments for capital
expenditures at June 30, 2001 totaled $568 million.
USX management believes that its short-term and long-term liquidity is
adequate to satisfy its obligations as of June 30, 2001, to complete currently
authorized capital spending programs and to complete the Proposed Separation.
Future requirements for USX's business needs, including the funding of capital
expenditures, debt maturities for the balance of 2001 and years 2002 and 2003,
and any amounts that may ultimately be paid in connection with contingencies
(which are discussed in Note 15 to the USX Consolidated Financial Statements),
are expected to be financed by a combination of internally generated funds,
proceeds from the sale of stock, borrowings and other external financing
sources. Until the Proposed Separation is implemented or abandoned, USX
management believes that it will be more difficult to access traditional debt
and equity markets.
USX management's opinion concerning liquidity and USX's ability to avail
itself in the future of the financing options mentioned in the above forward-
looking statements are based on currently available information. To the extent
that this information proves to be inaccurate, future availability of financing
may be adversely affected. Factors that could affect the availability of
financing include the performance of each Group (as measured by various factors
including cash provided from operating activities), the state of worldwide debt
and equity markets, investor perceptions and expectations of past and future
performance, the overall U.S. financial climate, and, in particular, with
respect to borrowings, by levels of USX's outstanding debt and credit ratings
by rating agencies.
Environmental Matters, Contingencies and Commitments
USX has incurred and will continue to incur substantial capital, operating
and maintenance, and remediation expenditures as a result of environmental laws
and regulations. To the extent these expenditures, as with all costs, are not
ultimately reflected in the prices of USX's products and services, operating
results will be adversely affected. USX believes that domestic competitors of
the U. S. Steel Group and substantially all the competitors of the Marathon
Group are subject to similar environmental laws and regulations. However, the
specific impact on each competitor may vary depending on a number of factors,
including the age and location of its operating facilities, marketing areas,
production processes and the specific products and services it provides.
USX has been notified that it is a potentially responsible party ("PRP") at
33 waste sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act ("CERCLA") as of June 30, 2001. In addition, there are 20 sites
where USX has received information requests or other indications that USX may
be a PRP under CERCLA but where sufficient information is not presently
available to confirm the existence of liability. There are also 145 additional
sites, excluding retail gasoline stations, where remediation is being sought
under other environmental statutes, both federal and state, or where private
parties are seeking remediation through discussions or litigation. Of these
sites, 14 were associated with properties conveyed to MAP by Ashland for which
Ashland has retained liability for substantially all costs associated with
remediation. At many of these sites, USX is one of a number of parties involved
and the total cost of remediation, as well as USX's share thereof, is
frequently dependent upon the outcome of investigations and remedial studies.
USX accrues for environmental remediation activities when the responsibility to
remediate is
E-107
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
probable and the amount of associated costs is reasonably determinable. As
environmental remediation matters proceed toward ultimate resolution or as
additional remediation obligations arise, charges in excess of those previously
accrued may be required.
New Tier II gasoline rules, which were finalized by the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency ("EPA") in February 2000, and the diesel fuel rules, which
were finalized in January 2001, require substantially reduced sulfur levels.
The combined capital cost to achieve compliance with the gasoline and diesel
regulations could amount to approximately $700 million between 2003 and 2005.
This is a forward-looking statement and can only be a broad-based estimate due
to the ongoing evolution of regulatory requirements. Some factors (among
others) that could potentially affect gasoline and diesel fuel compliance costs
include obtaining the necessary construction and environmental permits,
operating and logistical considerations, and unforeseen hazards such as weather
conditions.
In October 1996, EPA Region V issued a Finding of Violation against the
Robinson refinery alleging that it does not qualify for an exemption under the
National Emission Standards for Benzene Waste Operations pursuant to the CAA,
because the refinery's Total Annual Benzene releases exceed the limitation of
10 megagrams per year, and as a result, the refinery is in violation of the
emission control, record keeping, and reports requirements. The Marathon Group
contends that it does qualify for the exemption. However, in February 1999, the
U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") in Chicago, Illinois, filed a civil
complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
alleging six counts of violations of the CAA with respect to the benzene
releases. The case has been settled in concept with Marathon and MAP agreeing
to pay a combined $1.6 million civil penalty and the performance of $125,000 in
supplemental environmental projects as part of an enforcement action for
alleged Clean Air Act violations. A negotiated consent decree was filed with
the Court May 11, 2001 and approval by the Court is anticipated in the third
quarter 2001.
In 1998, the EPA conducted multi-media inspections of MAP's Detroit and
Robinson refineries covering compliance with the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water
Act, reporting obligations under the Emergency Planning and Community Right to
Know Act, and CERCLA and the handling of process waste. The EPA served a total
of six Notices of Violation ("NOV") and Findings of Violation as a result of
these inspections. On May 11, 2001, a consent decree was lodged with a federal
court in Detroit, Michigan, where MAP settled with the EPA certain New Source
Review ("NSR") and other air compliance issues as well as issues related to the
EPA's 1998 multi-media inspections of the Detroit and Robinson refineries.
MAP's settlement with the EPA includes all of MAP's refineries and commits MAP
to specific control technologies and implementation schedules for approximately
$270 million in environmental capital expenditures and improvements to MAP's
refineries over approximately an eight year period that are consistent with
MAP's current capital spending plans. It also commits MAP to payment of an
aggregate civil penalty in the amount of $3.8 million and the performance of
about $8 million in supplemental environmental projects as part of an
enforcement action for alleged Clean Air Act violations. MAP believes that the
settlement will provide MAP with increased permitting and operating flexibility
while achieving significant emission reductions. Approval of the consent decree
by the court is expected in the third quarter of 2001.
In 2000, the Kentucky Natural Resources and Environmental Cabinet sent
Marathon Ashland Pipe Line LLC a NOV seeking a civil penalty associated with a
pipeline spill earlier that year in Winchester, Kentucky. MAP has settled this
NOV in concept for a $170,000 penalty and reimbursement of response costs up to
$131,000. A final consent decree is expected in the third quarter 2001.
In October 1996, USX was notified by the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management ("IDEM") acting as lead trustee, that IDEM and the U.S. Department
of the Interior had concluded a preliminary investigation of potential injuries
to natural resources related to the releases of hazardous substances from
E-108
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS--(Continued)
various municipal and industrial sources along the east branch of the Grand
Calumet River and Indiana Harbor Canal. The public trustees completed a pre-
assessment screen pursuant to federal regulations and have determined to
perform a Natural Resource Damages Assessment. USX was identified as a PRP
along with 15 other companies owning property along the river and harbor canal.
USX and eight other PRPs have formed a joint defense group. In 2000, the
trustees concluded their assessment of sediment injuries, which includes a
technical review of environmental conditions. The PRP joint defense group has
proposed terms for the settlement of this claim which have been endorsed by
representatives of the trustees and the EPA to be included in a consent decree
that USX expects will resolve this claim. A reserve has been established for
the USX share of this anticipated settlement.
The Berks Associates/Douglassville Site ("Berks Site") is situated on a 50-
acre parcel located on the Schuylkill River in Berks County, Pa. Used oil and
solvent reprocessing operations were conducted on the Berks Site between 1941
and 1986. In September 1997, USX signed a consent decree to conduct a
feasibility study at the site relating to the alternative remedy. In 1999, a
new Record of Decision was approved by the EPA and the U.S. Department of
Justice. On January 19, 2001, USX signed a consent decree with the EPA to
remediate this site. On April 6, 2001, USX paid $.4 million for costs
associated with this site. The only remaining outstanding claim is the natural
resource damages claim filed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
In 1987, the California Department of Health Services ("DHS") issued a
remedial action order for the GBF/Pittsburg landfill near Pittsburg,
California. DHS alleged that from 1972 through 1974, Pittsburg Works arranged
for the disposal of approximately 2.6 million gallons of waste oil, sludge,
caustic mud and acid, which were eventually taken to this landfill for
disposal. In 2000, the parties reached a buyout arrangement with a third party
remediation firm, whereby the firm agreed to take title to and remediate the
site and also indemnify the PRPs. This commitment was backed by pollution
insurance. USX's share to participate in the buyout was approximately $1.1
million. Payment of the USX buyout amount was made December 2000. Title to the
site was transferred to the remediation firm on January 31, 2001.
In November 2000, a NOV was issued by the Jefferson County Health Department
("JCHD") alleging violation of the Halogenated Solvent National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and the JCHD Volatile Organic Compound
("VOC") regulations at the sheet mill stretch leveler at Fairfield Works. U. S.
Steel Group proposed a civil penalty of $100,000 and a VOC emission limit,
which have been agreed to by JCHD. A consent order was executed and approved by
the court in May 2001. The penalty was paid by U. S. Steel Group in June 2001.
USX is the subject of, or a party to, a number of pending or threatened
legal actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters,
including laws and regulations relating to the environment (see Note 15 to the
USX Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of certain of these
matters). The ultimate resolution of these contingencies could, individually or
in the aggregate, be material to the USX Consolidated Financial Statements.
However, management believes that USX will remain a viable and competitive
enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be
resolved unfavorably. See discussion of Liquidity herein.
Outlook--U. S. Steel Group
For a recent outlook pertaining to the U. S. Steel Group, see "RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS--Outlook of United States Steel" on page 27.
Outlook--Marathon Group
For a recent outlook pertaining to the Marathon Group, see "RECENT
DEVELOPMENTS--Outlook of Marathon" on pages 28 and 29.
E-109
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Commodity Price Risk and Related Risks
Sensitivity analysis of the incremental effects on pretax income of
hypothetical 10% and 25% changes in commodity prices for commodity-based
derivative instruments are provided in the following table(a):
Incremental Decrease in
Income Before Income
Taxes Assuming a
Hypothetical Price
Change of:
--------------------------
10% 25%
------------ -----------
(Dollars in millions)
Commodity-Based Derivative Instruments
Marathon Group(b)(c)
Crude oil(f)(g)................................ $ 8.0(d) $ 22.6(d)
Natural gas(f)(g).............................. 10.4(d) 25.3(d)
Refined products(f)(g)......................... 0.3(d) 1.8(d)
U. S. Steel Group
Natural Gas.................................... 0.9(e) 2.2(e)
Zinc........................................... 1.8(e) 4.6(e)
Tin............................................ 0.1(e) 0.3(e)
(a) With the adoption of SFAS No. 133, the definition of a derivative
instrument has been expanded to include certain fixed price physical
commodity contracts. Such instruments are included in the above table.
Amounts reflect the estimated incremental effects on pretax income of
hypothetical 10% and 25% changes in closing commodity prices at June 30,
2001. Management evaluates the portfolios of commodity-based derivative
instruments on an ongoing basis and adjusts strategies to reflect
anticipated market conditions, changes in risk profiles and overall
business objectives. Changes to the portfolios subsequent to June 30, 2001,
may cause future pretax income effects to differ from those presented in
the table.
(b) The number of net open contracts varied throughout second quarter 2001,
from a low of 19,657 contracts at June 30, to a high of 30,633 contracts at
May 30, and averaged 24,710 for the quarter. The type of derivative
instruments and number of positions entered into will vary which changes
the composition of the portfolio. Because of these variations, the number
of open contracts, by itself, cannot be used to predict future income
effects.
(c) The calculation of sensitivity amounts for basis swaps assumes that the
physical and paper indices are perfectly correlated. Gains and losses on
options are based on changes in intrinsic value only.
(d) Price increase.
(e) Price decrease.
(f) The direction of the price change used in calculating the sensitivity
amount for each commodity reflects that which would result in the largest
incremental decrease in pretax income.
(g) Adjusted to reflect Marathon's 62 percent ownership of MAP.
E-110
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Risk
USX is subject to the effects of interest rate fluctuations on certain of
its non-derivative financial instruments. A sensitivity analysis of the
projected incremental effect of a hypothetical 10% decrease in June 30, 2001
interest rates on the fair value of USX's non-derivative financial instrument
is provided in the following table:
(Dollars in millions)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As of June 30, 2001
Incremental
Increase in
Non-Derivative Fair Fair
Financial Instruments(a) Value Value(b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial assets:
Investments and long-term receivables...................... $ 272 $ --
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial liabilities:
Long-term debt(c)(d)....................................... $4,396 $146
Preferred stock of subsidiary.............................. 250 19
USX obligated mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred
securities of a subsidiary trust............................ 182 13
------ ----
Total liabilities............................................ $4,828 $178
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(a) Fair values of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, notes payable,
accounts payable and accrued interest approximate carrying value and are
relatively insensitive to changes in interest rates due to the short-term
maturity of the instruments. Accordingly, these instruments are excluded
from the table.
(b) Reflects, by class of financial instrument, the estimated incremental
effect of a hypothetical 10% decrease in interest rates at June 30, 2001 on
the fair value of USX's non-derivative financial instruments. For financial
liabilities, this assumes a 10% decrease in the weighted average yield to
maturity of USX's long-term debt at June 30, 2001.
(c) Includes amounts due within one year.
(d) Fair value was based on market prices where available, or current borrowing
rates for financings with similar terms and maturities.
E-111
USX CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
USX is subject to the risk of price fluctuations related to anticipated
revenues and operating costs, firm commitments for capital expenditures and
existing assets or liabilities denominated in currencies other than U.S.
dollars. USX has not generally used derivative instruments to manage this risk.
However, USX has made limited use of forward currency contracts to manage
exposure to certain currency price fluctuations.
At June 30, 2001, USX had open Euro forward sale contracts for Slovak Koruna
with a total carrying value of approximately $20 million. A 10% increase in the
June 30, 2001 Euro forward rates would result in a $2 million charge to income.
The entire amount of these contracts is attributed to the U. S. Steel Group.
At June 30, 2001, USX had open Canadian dollar forward purchase contracts
with a total carrying value of approximately $9 million. A 10% increase in the
Canadian dollar to U.S. dollar forward rate would result in a charge to income
of approximately $1 million. The entire amount of these contracts is attributed
to the Marathon Group.
Equity Price Risk
As of June 30, 2001, USX was subject to equity price risk and liquidity risk
related to its investment in VSZ a.s., the former parent of U. S. Steel Kosice,
s.r.o., which is attributed to the U. S. Steel Group. These risks are not
readily quantifiable.
Safe Harbor
USX's quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk include
forward-looking statements with respect to management's opinion about risks
associated with USX's use of derivative instruments. These statements are based
on certain assumptions with respect to market prices and industry supply and
demand for crude oil, natural gas, refined products, steel products and certain
raw materials. To the extent that these assumptions prove to be inaccurate,
future outcomes with respect to USX's hedging programs may differ materially
from those discussed in the forward-looking statements.
E-112
[USX CORPORATION LOGO]
ATTENDANCE CARD
SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON OCTOBER 16, 2001
You are cordially invited to attend the Special Meeting of Stockholders on
October 16, 2001. The Meeting will be held at The Hotel DuPont, 11th and Market
Streets, Wilmington, Delaware, at 9:00 A.M. Eastern Time.
Use of this attendance card is for our mutual convenience. Your right to
attend the meeting without this attendance card is not affected, upon
presentation of identification.
Attached below is your Proxy Card for the Special Meeting.
Dan D. Sandman
Secretary
For the personal use of the named stockholder(s)--not transferable. Please
present this card upon arrival.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
YOU MAY VOTE
(A) BY COMPLETING THE PROXY CARD ATTACHED BELOW AND RETURNING IT IN
THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE, OR
(B) BY TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE CALL, OR
(C) ON THE INTERNET
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET
USE THE CONTROL NUMBER IN THE BOX BELOW
YOUR CONTROL NUMBER
[ ]
BY TELEPHONE BY INTERNET
Toll-free [1-888- - ] [https://www. .com/usx]
Have your control number available when you call or visit the Internet
site and follow the prompts. If voting on the Internet, be certain to
enter the complete address as shown above.
Voting is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Do NOT return the proxy card if you have voted by telephone or
Internet.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The undersigned appoint(s) Thomas J. Usher, Clarence P. Cazalot, Jr. and
Robert M. Hernandez, or any of them, proxies to vote as herein stated on behalf
of the undersigned at the Special Meeting of Stockholders of USX Corporation on
October 16, 2001, and any adjournment or postponement thereof, upon each of the
proposals set forth below, as set forth in the Proxy Statement for such Special
Meeting, with respect to which the proxies are instructed to vote as follows:
PROPOSALS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
TO HOLDERS OF USX-U.S. STEEL GROUP COMMON STOCK (VOTING AS A SEPARATE CLASS
AND/OR VOTING WITH ALL CLASSES OF USX COMMON STOCK)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" EACH OF THE ITEMS
BELOW.
FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN [_]
1. Approval and adoption of the
Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization, dated as of
July 31, 2001, between USX
Corporation and United States
Steel LLC, providing for the
separation of the U. S. Steel
Group and the Marathon Group into
two independent companies, by way
of a merger of a wholly owned
subsidiary of USX Corporation
with and into USX Corporation
pursuant to which each share of
USX-U. S. Steel Group Common
Stock shall be converted into one
share of common stock of United
States Steel Corporation and
shares of USX-Marathon Group
Common Stock shall remain
outstanding as the sole
outstanding shares of common
stock of USX.
2. Approval of the United States FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN [_]
Steel Corporation 2002 Stock
Plan.
3. Approval of the United States FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN [_]
Steel Corporation Senior
Executive Officer Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan.
4.To adjourn the special meeting, if FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN [_]
necessary.
SIGNATURE(S) ________________________________
_________________________________
Dated: ____________________, 2001
Please sign exactly as your name appears
hereon, including representative capacity where
applicable. If more than one named owner, all
owners should sign.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIREC-
TORS AND REPRESENTS YOUR HOLDINGS OF USX-U.S.
STEEL GROUP COMMON STOCK. UNLESS OTHERWISE
MARKED, PROXIES ARE TO VOTE "FOR" PROPOSALS 1,
2, 3 AND 4.
2
The undersigned appoint(s) Thomas J. Usher, Clarence P. Cazalot, Jr. and
Robert M. Hernandez, or any of them, proxies to vote as herein stated on behalf
of the undersigned at the Special Meeting of Stockholders of USX Corporation on
October 16, 2001, and any adjournment or postponement thereof, upon each of the
proposals set forth below, as set forth in the Proxy Statement for such Special
Meeting, with respect to which the proxies are instructed to vote as follows:
PROPOSALS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
TO HOLDERS OF USX-MARATHON GROUP COMMON STOCK (VOTING AS A SEPARATE CLASS
AND/OR VOTING WITH ALL CLASSES OF USX COMMON STOCK)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" EACH OF THE ITEMS
BELOW.
FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN [_]
1. Approval and adoption of the
Agreement and Plan of
Reorganization, dated as of
July 31, 2001, between USX
Corporation and United States
Steel LLC, providing for the
separation of the U. S. Steel
Group and the Marathon Group into
two independent companies, by way
of a merger of a wholly owned
subsidiary of USX Corporation
with and into USX Corporation
pursuant to which each share of
USX-U. S. Steel Group Common
Stock shall be converted into one
share of common stock of United
States Steel Corporation and
shares of USX-Marathon Group
Common Stock shall remain
outstanding as the sole
outstanding shares of common
stock of USX.
2. Approval of the United States FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN [_]
Steel Corporation 2002 Stock
Plan.
3. Approval of the United States FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN [_]
Steel Corporation Senior
Executive Officer Annual
Incentive Compensation Plan.
4.To adjourn the special meeting, if FOR [_] AGAINST [_] ABSTAIN [_]
necessary.
SIGNATURE(S) ________________________________
_________________________________
Dated: ____________________, 2001
Please sign exactly as your name appears
hereon, including representative capacity where
applicable. If more than one named owner, all
owners should sign.
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIREC-
TORS AND REPRESENTS YOUR HOLDINGS OF USX-MARA-
THON GROUP COMMON STOCK. UNLESS OTHERWISE
MARKED, PROXIES ARE TO VOTE "FOR" PROPOSALS 1,
2, 3 AND 4.
3