UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(AMENDMENT NO. )
Filed by the Registrant [X]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the appropriate box:
[ ] | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
[ ] | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
[X] | Definitive Proxy Statement |
[ ] | Definitive Additional Materials |
[ ] | Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12 |
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[X] | No fee required. | |
[ ] | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | |
|
||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | |
|
||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | |
|
||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | |
|
||
(5) | Total fee paid: | |
|
||
[ ] | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |
[ ] | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: | |
|
||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | |
|
||
(3) | Filing Party: | |
|
||
(4) | Date Filed: | |
|
| If you have Internet access, we encourage you to vote over the Internet at http://www.proxyvote.com. It is convenient for you and saves your company significant postage and processing costs; |
| If you vote using the telephone, have your proxy card available before dialing the toll-free number 1-800-690-6903; and |
| If you use the enclosed proxy card, it should be signed, dated and returned in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. |
1. | To elect six directors. |
2. | To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent accountants for the Companys fiscal year ending September 30, 2007. |
3. | To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. |
| Vote by Internet, by going to the web address http://www.proxyvote.com and following the instructions for Internet voting shown on the enclosed proxy card. |
| Vote by Telephone, by dialing 1-800-690-6903 and following the instructions for telephone voting shown on the enclosed proxy card. |
| Vote by Proxy Card, by completing, signing, dating and mailing the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. If you vote by Internet or telephone, please do not mail your proxy card. |
| E-mail delivery of the proxy statement, annual report and related materials; | |
| Stockholder voting on-line; | |
| Reduction of the amount of bulky documents stockholders receive; and | |
| Reduction of the Companys printing and mailing costs associated with more traditional delivery methods. |
Page
|
||||
1 | ||||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
8 | ||||
9 | ||||
11 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
16 | ||||
19 | ||||
20 | ||||
29 | ||||
31 | ||||
32 | ||||
Appendix 1 |
2
Director |
||||||||||
Name
|
Position With QUALCOMM | Age | Since | |||||||
Directors nominated for
election at the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:
|
||||||||||
Barbara T. Alexander
|
Director | 58 | 2006 | |||||||
Raymond V. Dittamore
|
Director | 63 | 2002 | |||||||
Irwin Mark Jacobs
|
Chairman of the Board | 73 | 1985 | |||||||
Sherry Lansing
|
Director | 62 | 2006 | |||||||
Peter M. Sacerdote
|
Director | 69 | 1989 | |||||||
Marc I. Stern
|
Director | 62 | 1994 | |||||||
Directors whose terms expire at
the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders:
|
||||||||||
Donald G. Cruickshank
|
Director | 64 | 2005 | |||||||
Paul E. Jacobs
|
Chief Executive Officer | 44 | 2005 | |||||||
Robert E. Kahn
|
Director | 68 | 1997 | |||||||
Duane A. Nelles
|
Director | 63 | 1988 | |||||||
Brent Scowcroft
|
Director | 81 | 1994 |
3
4
5
6
| the appropriate size of the Board; | |
| the needs of the Company with respect to the particular talents and experience of its directors; | |
| the knowledge, skills and experience of nominees, including experience in technology, business, finance, administration or public service, in light of prevailing business conditions and the knowledge, skills and experience already possessed by other members of the Board; | |
| familiarity with national and international business matters; |
7
| experience in political affairs; | |
| experience with accounting rules and practices; | |
| appreciation of the relationship of the Companys business to the changing needs of society; | |
| the nominees other commitments, including the other boards on which a nominee serves; and | |
| the desire to balance the considerable benefit of continuity with the periodic injection of the fresh perspective provided by new members. |
8
9
Fiscal 2006 | Fiscal 2005 | |||||||
Audit Fees(1)
|
$ | 4,204,000 | $ | 3,513,000 | ||||
Audit-Related Fees(2)
|
1,539,000 | 1,209,000 | ||||||
Tax Fees
|
| | ||||||
All Other Fees(3)
|
6,000 | 6,000 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 5,749,000 | $ | 4,728,000 | ||||
(1) | Audit Fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the Companys consolidated annual financial statements and review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Audit fees also include fees for professional services rendered for the audits of (i) managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and (ii) the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. | |
(2) | Audit-Related Fees consist of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Companys consolidated financial statements and are not reported under Audit Fees. This category includes fees principally related to licensee contract compliance. | |
(3) | All Other Fees consist of fees for products and services other than the services reported above. These services include fees related to technical publications purchased from the independent accountant. |
10
Amount and Nature of |
||||||||
Beneficial Ownership(1) | ||||||||
Number of |
Percent of |
|||||||
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Shares | Class | ||||||
Paul E. Jacobs(2)
|
4,100,963 | * | ||||||
Steven R. Altman(3)
|
1,941,787 | * | ||||||
Sanjay K. Jha(4)
|
1,682,407 | * | ||||||
William E. Keitel(5)
|
1,011,210 | * | ||||||
Roberto Padovani(6)
|
1,530,333 | * | ||||||
Barbara T. Alexander(7)
|
5,000 | * | ||||||
Richard C. Atkinson(8)
|
700,788 | * | ||||||
Adelia A. Coffman(9)
|
484,366 | * | ||||||
Donald G. Cruickshank(10)
|
16,633 | * | ||||||
Raymond V. Dittamore(11)
|
62,599 | * | ||||||
Diana Lady Dougan(12)
|
483,866 | * | ||||||
Irwin Mark Jacobs(13)
|
35,763,807 | 2.15 | % | |||||
Robert E. Kahn(14)
|
561,866 | * | ||||||
Sherry Lansing
|
0 | * | ||||||
Duane A. Nelles(15)
|
369,206 | * | ||||||
Peter M. Sacerdote(16)
|
1,412,466 | * | ||||||
Brent Scowcroft(17)
|
566,450 | * | ||||||
Marc I. Stern(18)
|
1,049,106 | * | ||||||
Richard Sulpizio(19)
|
595,546 | * | ||||||
All Executive Officers and
Directors as a Group (24 persons)(20)
|
57,121,341 | 3.40 | % |
* | Less than 1%. | |
(1) | This table is based upon information supplied by officers and directors. Unless otherwise indicated in the footnotes to this table and subject to community property laws where applicable, the Company believes that each of the stockholders named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned. Applicable percentages are based on 1,653,606,046 shares outstanding on December 15, 2006, adjusted as required by rules promulgated by the SEC. | |
(2) | Includes 1,044,040 shares held in family trusts, 106,941 shares held for the benefit of Dr. Paul E. Jacobs children, 8,634 shares held jointly with his spouse and 400,000 shares held in a Grantor Retained Annuity Trust for the benefit of Dr. Paul E. Jacobs and his spouse. Dr. Paul E. Jacobs disclaims all beneficial ownership for the shares held in trust for the benefit of his children. Also includes 2,541,348 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of which 756,000 shares are held in trusts for the benefit of Dr. Paul E. Jacobs and/or his spouse and 1,041 are held by Dr. Paul E. Jacobs spouse. | |
(3) | Includes 179,288 shares held in family trusts and 1,762,499 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(4) | Includes 23,891 shares held in family trusts and 1,658,516 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. |
11
(5) | Includes 1,005,416 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(6) | Consists of 1,530,333 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(7) | Includes 5,000 shares held in family trusts. | |
(8) | Includes 264,542 shares held in a Grantor Retained Annuity Trust for the benefit of Dr. Richard C. Atkinson and his spouse, and 65,280 shares held in trust for the benefit of relatives. Also includes 370,966 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(9) | Includes 210,500 shares held in family trusts. Also includes 273,866 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(10) | Consists of 16,633 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(11) | Includes 7,400 shares held in family trusts. Also includes 55,199 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(12) | Consists of 483,866 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(13) | Includes 9,114,303 shares held in family trusts and 17,789,798 shares held in a Grantor Retained Annuity Trust for the benefit of Dr. Irwin Mark Jacobs and his spouse. Dr. Irwin Mark Jacobs shares voting power with his spouse for shares owned through these trusts. Also includes 8,859,706 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days, of which 1,458,622 shares are held in trusts for the benefit of Dr. Irwin Mark Jacobs and/or his spouse and 1,623,378 shares are held by Dr. Irwin Mark Jacobs spouse. | |
(14) | Includes 489,866 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(15) | Includes 111,340 shares held in family trusts. Also includes 257,866 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(16) | Includes 114,600 shares held by The Peter M. Sacerdote Investment Partners, L.P., a family partnership, with Peter M. Sacerdote as General Partner and 480,000 shares owned by the Peter M. Sacerdote Foundation. Mr. Sacerdote disclaims all beneficial ownership for the shares owned by the Foundation. Also includes 97,866 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(17) | Includes 417,866 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(18) | Includes 704,500 shares held by the Beatrice B. Corporation of which Mr. Stern is the president and sole owner, and 162,576 shares owned through a grantor trust, of which Mr. Stern is the trustee. Also includes 182,030 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days. | |
(19) | Includes 846 shares held in family trusts and 16,800 shares held for the benefit of Mr. Sulpizios children. Also includes 577,900 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days of which 1,368 shares are held in trusts for the benefit of Mr. Sulpizios children for which Mr. Sulpizios spouse is the trustee. | |
(20) | Includes 24,416,788 shares issuable upon exercise of options exercisable within 60 days for all directors and executive officers as a group. |
12
| An annual retainer of $50,000, paid quarterly (and pro rated for partial years of service); | |
| A Board meeting fee of $2,000 for each Board meeting attended ($1,000 for attendance by telephone); | |
| A Board committee meeting fee of $1,500 for each Board committee meeting attended (including attendance by telephone); and | |
| The Chair of each Board committee received a fee of $7,500 per year, except the Audit Committee Chair received a fee of $15,000 per year. |
Annual |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash |
Board/Committee |
Committee |
Stock Underlying |
|||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Retainer | Meeting Fees | Chair Fees | Total | Options Granted | |||||||||||||||
Barbara T. Alexander
|
$ | 8,423 | $ | 4,000 | $ | | $ | 12,423 | 40,000 | |||||||||||
Richard C. Atkinson
|
50,000 | 29,500 | | 79,500 | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||
Adelia A. Coffman
|
50,000 | 19,000 | | 69,000 | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||
Donald G. Cruickshank
|
50,000 | 23,500 | | 73,500 | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||
Raymond V. Dittamore
|
50,000 | 29,500 | 7,500 | 87,000 | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||
Diana Lady Dougan
|
50,000 | 29,500 | | 79,500 | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||
Robert E. Kahn
|
50,000 | 23,500 | | 73,500 | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||
Sherry Lansing
|
1,222 | | | 1,222 | 40,000 | |||||||||||||||
Duane A. Nelles
|
50,000 | 31,000 | 15,000 | 96,000 | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||
Peter M. Sacerdote
|
50,000 | 31,500 | 7,500 | 89,000 | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||
Brent Scowcroft
|
50,000 | 25,000 | | 75,000 | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||
Marc I. Stern
|
50,000 | 30,000 | 7,500 | 87,500 | 18,000 | |||||||||||||||
Richard Sulpizio
|
37,500 | 20,500 | | 58,000 | 18,000 |
13
14
Component
|
2006 Program | 2007 Program | ||||||
Board Service
|
||||||||
Annual Retainer(1)
|
$ | 50,000 | $ | 100,000 | ||||
Meeting Fee(2)
|
$ | 2,000 | $ | 2,000 | ||||
Committee Service
|
||||||||
Chair Retainer
|
||||||||
Audit Committee
|
$ | 15,000 | $ | 17,500 | ||||
Other Committees
|
$ | 7,500 | $ | 10,000 | ||||
Meeting Fee
|
$ | 1,500 | $ | 1,500 | ||||
Equity Compensation
|
||||||||
Stock Options at
election (underlying shares)
|
40,000 | 0 | ||||||
Annual Stock Option Grant
(underlying shares)(3)
|
18,000 | 14,000 | ||||||
Charitable Gifts Matching Program
(Annual Maximum)(4)
|
$ | 50,000 | $ | 50,000 |
(1) | May elect to receive retainer in cash and/or tax deferred stock units. Retainer and other cash compensation may be deferred under the Executive Retirement Contribution Plan. | |
(2) | $1,000 for telephonic attendance. | |
(3) | See discussion above for changes to the vesting schedule and new holding requirements. | |
(4) | The Company will match, up to $50,000 annually, a directors contribution to a qualified, eligible IRS recognized nonprofit organization. |
15
Long-Term |
||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation | ||||||||||||||||||||
Securities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Compensation(1) |
Underlying |
All Other |
||||||||||||||||||
Name and Principal Position
|
Year | Salary | Bonus | Options (#) | Compensation(2) | |||||||||||||||
Paul E. Jacobs
|
2006 | $ | 1,007,699 | $ | 1,650,000 | 900,000 | $ | 141,106 | ||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer
|
2005 | 650,016 | 500,000 | 1,400,000 | 154,645 | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 531,743 | 984,525 | 400,000 | 105,606 | ||||||||||||||||
Steven R. Altman
|
2006 | 749,236 | 1,130,000 | 620,000 | 115,820 | |||||||||||||||
President
|
2005 | 604,243 | 450,000 | 1,150,000 | 151,183 | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 510,624 | 975,000 | 400,000 | 100,436 | ||||||||||||||||
Sanjay K. Jha
|
2006 | 688,464 | 1,000,000 | 565,000 | 107,173 | |||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and
|
2005 | 575,011 | 425,000 | 1,100,000 | 149,909 | |||||||||||||||
Group President, QUALCOMM CDMA
Technologies(3)
|
2004 | 488,280 | 976,500 | 400,000 | 100,466 | |||||||||||||||
William E. Keitel
|
2006 | 576,939 | 710,000 | 475,000 | 83,714 | |||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and
|
2005 | 482,702 | 350,000 | 400,000 | 116,518 | |||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer
|
2004 | 455,679 | 750,000 | 280,000 | 148,048 | |||||||||||||||
Roberto Padovani
|
2006 | 459,235 | 325,000 | 300,000 | 61,049 | |||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and
|
2005 | 421,542 | 200,000 | 300,000 | 86,581 | |||||||||||||||
Chief Technology Officer
|
2004 | 367,928 | 550,000 | 280,000 | 151,280 |
(1) | As permitted by rules established by the SEC, no amounts are shown with respect to certain perquisites where such amounts do not exceed in the aggregate the lesser of 10% of salary plus bonus or $50,000. | |
(2) | Includes the other compensation as indicated in the table below. | |
(3) | Dr. Sanjay K. Jha assumed additional responsibilities as Chief Operating Officer effective December 11, 2006. |
Company |
Executive |
|||||||||||||||
Matching |
Retirement |
|||||||||||||||
401(k) |
Stock |
Total Other |
||||||||||||||
Name
|
Year | Contributions | Matching(1) | Compensation | ||||||||||||
Paul E. Jacobs
|
2006 | $ | 5,175 | $ | 135,931 | $ | 141,106 | |||||||||
2005 | 5,075 | 149,570 | 154,645 | |||||||||||||
2004 | 4,975 | 100,631 | 105,606 | |||||||||||||
Steven R. Altman
|
2006 | 5,175 | 110,645 | 115,820 | ||||||||||||
2005 | 5,075 | 146,108 | 151,183 | |||||||||||||
2004 | 4,975 | 95,461 | 100,436 | |||||||||||||
Sanjay K. Jha
|
2006 | 5,175 | 101,998 | 107,173 | ||||||||||||
2005 | 5,075 | 144,834 | 149,909 | |||||||||||||
2004 | 4,975 | 95,491 | 100,466 | |||||||||||||
William E. Keitel
|
2006 | 5,675 | 78,039 | 83,714 | ||||||||||||
2005 | 5,506 | 111,012 | 116,518 | |||||||||||||
2004 | 5,550 | 142,498 | 148,048 | |||||||||||||
Roberto Padovani
|
2006 | 5,675 | 55,374 | 61,049 | ||||||||||||
2005 | 5,475 | 81,106 | 86,581 | |||||||||||||
2004 | 5,475 | 145,805 | 151,280 |
(1) | The Company has a voluntary deferred compensation plan that allows eligible executives to defer up to 100% of their income on a pre-tax basis. The Company will match in stock, subject to vesting, up to 10% of eligible |
16
income. The values stated above are the values of the Companys quarterly contributions on their respective dates of contribution. Company contributions begin vesting based on certain minimum participation or service requirements, and are fully vested at age 65. After the end of a full years contribution, that contribution will then vest over a four-year period in equal installments of 25% per year. Executive and Company contributions are unsecured and subject to the general creditors of the Company. |
Individual Grants |
Potential Realized |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of |
% of Total |
Value at Assumed Annual |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities |
Options |
Rates of Stock Price |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying |
Granted to |
Appreciation for |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Options |
Employees in |
Exercise Price |
Expiration |
Option Term(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Granted(1) | Fiscal Year | per Share | Date | 5% | 10% | ||||||||||||||||||
Paul E. Jacobs
|
900,000 | 2.4 | % | $ | 44.02 | 11/03/15 | $ | 24,906,922 | $ | 63,114,060 | ||||||||||||||
Steven R. Altman
|
620,000 | 1.7 | % | 44.02 | 11/03/15 | 17,158,102 | 43,478,574 | |||||||||||||||||
Sanjay K. Jha
|
565,000 | 1.5 | % | 44.02 | 11/03/15 | 15,636,012 | 39,621,604 | |||||||||||||||||
William E. Keitel
|
475,000 | 1.3 | % | 44.02 | 11/03/15 | 13,145,320 | 33,310,198 | |||||||||||||||||
Roberto Padovani
|
300,000 | 0.8 | % | 44.02 | 11/03/15 | 8,302,307 | 21,038,020 |
(1) | Options were granted under the 2001 Stock Option Plan and have a grant price that is equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. Such options vest according to the following schedule: 10% of the shares subject to the option will vest on the six-month anniversary of the date of grant, with ratable monthly vesting thereafter. Generally, vesting is contingent upon continued service with the Company. Options granted under the Companys stock option plans generally have a maximum term of 10 years. | |
(2) | Potential gains are net of exercise price, but before taxes associated with exercise. These theoretical amounts represent certain assumed rates of appreciation only, in accordance with the SECs rules. Actual gains, if any, on stock option exercises are dependent on the future performance of the common stock, overall market conditions and the option holders continued employment through the vesting period. The amounts reflected in this table may not necessarily be achieved. |
Number of Securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Underlying Unexercised |
Value of Unexercised |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired |
Options Held at |
In-the-Money
Options at |
||||||||||||||||||||||
on |
Value |
September 24, 2006 | September 24, 2006(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Exercise | Realized | Exercisable | Unexercisable | Exercisable | Unexercisable | ||||||||||||||||||
Paul E. Jacobs
|
602,000 | $ | 15,763,571 | 2,232,265 | 2,075,335 | $ | 12,619,886 | $ | 8,148,322 | |||||||||||||||
Steven R. Altman
|
475,000 | 10,824,428 | 1,517,165 | 1,632,835 | 5,057,448 | 7,053,787 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sanjay K. Jha
|
246,000 | 8,376,964 | 1,443,431 | 1,601,169 | 13,408,514 | 8,269,186 | ||||||||||||||||||
William E. Keitel
|
187,000 | 6,450,790 | 866,665 | 871,335 | 6,697,599 | 3,627,371 | ||||||||||||||||||
Roberto Padovani
|
340,000 | 9,279,414 | 1,400,332 | 669,668 | 7,405,091 | 3,607,983 |
(1) | Represents the closing price per share of the underlying shares on the last day of the fiscal year less the option exercise price multiplied by the number of shares. The closing price per share was $37.86 on the last trading day of the fiscal year as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. |
17
2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
Total shares underlying options
granted
|
35 | 35 | 31 | 34 | ||||||||||||
Less shares underlying cancelled
options
|
(3 | ) | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||
Net shares underlying granted
options
|
32 | 29 | 27 | 25 | ||||||||||||
Total shares underlying options
granted to Named Executive Officers
|
3 | 5 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Net shares underlying grants
during the period as % of outstanding shares(1)
|
1.9 | % | 1.8 | % | 1.7 | % | 1.6 | % | ||||||||
Grants to Named Executive Officers
as % of total shares underlying options granted(2)
|
8.2 | % | 13.9 | % | 7.0 | % | 6.7 | % | ||||||||
Grants to Named Executive Officers
as % of outstanding shares(1)(2)
|
0.2 | % | 0.3 | % | 0.1 | % | 0.1 | % | ||||||||
Cumulative shares underlying
options held by Named Executive Officers as % of total options
outstanding(1)
|
7.1 | % | 12.0 | % | 10.8 | % | 10.5 | % |
(1) | Calculated based on outstanding shares or options, as applicable, as of the beginning of each period. | |
(2) | Includes the one-time grants to Drs. Paul E. Jacobs and Sanjay K. Jha and Mr. Steven R. Altman for their promotions in 2005. Excluding this event, the grants to Named Executive Officers as a percent of total shares underlying options granted and as a percent of total outstanding shares for 2005 would have been 8.6% and 0.2%, respectively. |
Number of Shares to |
||||||||||||
be Issued Upon |
Weighted Average |
Number of Shares |
||||||||||
Exercise of |
Exercise Price of |
Remaining Available |
||||||||||
Plan Category
|
Outstanding Options | Outstanding Options | for Future Issuance | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved
by stockholders(1)
|
198,601 | $ | 29.31 | 78,450 | (2) | |||||||
Equity compensation plans not
approved by stockholders
|
| | 64 | (3) | ||||||||
Total(4)
|
198,601 | $ | 29.31 | 78,514 |
(1) | Consists of seven plans: the Companys 1991 Stock Option Plan, 2001 Stock Option Plan, 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, 1998 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, 2001 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, and the Executive Retirement Matching Contribution Plan. | |
(2) | Includes 13,161,839 shares reserved for issuance under the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 65,287,777 shares reserved for issuance under the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan. | |
(3) | Consists solely of shares issuable under the Companys 1996 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which allows eligible employees to purchase shares of common stock at 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last day of each six-month offering period. Employees may authorize the Company to withhold up to 15% of their compensation during any offering period, subject to certain limitations. | |
(4) | Excludes options assumed in connection with mergers and acquisitions. Approximately 3,530,000 shares of the Companys common stock were issuable upon exercise of these assumed options. These options have a weighted average exercise price of $21.15 per share. No additional options may be granted under these assumed arrangements. |
18
19
I. | Overview of the Compensation Committee |
A. | Purpose. The Compensation Committee of the Board (the Committee) assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for administering the Companys Total Rewards Program offered to the Companys officers and non-employee directors. |
B. | Member Independence. Four independent, non-employee directors serve on the Committee. Each member of the Committee meets the independence requirements specified by the NASDAQ and by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Tax Code). | |
C. | Charter. The Committees charter is to work with executive management in developing a compensation philosophy; to evaluate and approve compensation for the Chief Executive Officer, other officers, key executives, and non-employee directors; and to oversee the general employee benefit programs, including the Companys employee equity compensation plan and employee stock purchase plan. The Committees charter is available on the Companys website at http://investor.qualcomm.com/documentdisplay.cfm?DocumentID=462. |
D. | Oversight of compensation related disclosures. The Committee is responsible for overseeing the Companys executive compensation related disclosures. The Securities and Exchange Commission issued new rules August 2006 for executive compensation and related person disclosure. The Companys fiscal year 2006 ended on September 24, 2006, preceding the effective date for complying with the new disclosure requirements (i.e., registrants with fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2006.) Accordingly, the Company will comply with the new regulations in its proxy statement for fiscal year 2007. |
E. | Outside consultants and advisors. The Committee has the authority to retain and terminate any independent, third-party compensation consultant and to obtain independent advice and assistance from internal and external legal, accounting and other advisors. During fiscal year 2006, the Committee engaged consultants from Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. to advise it on compensation matters. The consultants (Mr. George Paulin, Chairman and CEO of Frederic W. Cook, and Mr. Michael Reznick, a Principal at the firm) report directly to the Committee. During fiscal year 2006, the Company did not engage Frederic W. Cook for any additional services beyond their support to the Committee. The Committee also seeks and receives advice from the Companys outside legal counsel, DLA Piper. Mr. Cameron Jay Rains, a Partner at DLA Piper and a Co-Chair of DLA Pipers Corporate and Securities Practices group, attends Committee meetings and serves as the Committees Secretary. |
F. | Internal advisors. The Total Rewards Management department within QUALCOMMs Human Resources organization supports the Committee in its work, collaborates with the Committees compensation consultants and the outside legal counsel and manages the Total Rewards Program. |
G. | Committee governance. At its March 2006 meeting, the Committee reviewed and reassessed the adequacy of its Charter. The Committee also reviewed and discussed its own performance for the prior fiscal year in order to benefit from self-evaluation and to encourage continuous improvement. For the self-evaluation, the Committee referred to materials provided by the Governance Committee, materials on compensation committee governance published by WorldatWork, and suggestions from the Committees compensation consultants. The Committee conducts these reviews at least annually. | |
H. | Committee meetings. Each year, the Committee develops a calendar-year annual schedule and agenda plan for the coming year. The meeting dates for the year are established and the Committee Chair and management identify agenda topics for each meeting. The Chair reports the Committees actions and recommendations to the full Board following each Committee meeting. The Committee held five formal meetings during fiscal year 2006; each meeting included an executive session during which only the independent directors and their advisors were present. |
20
A. | Since 1997, the Committee has regularly reviewed, discussed and articulated its objectives and philosophy regarding the Total Rewards Program for the executive officers and for all other employees. During these discussions, the Committee and management reviewed the Companys objectives, strategy, growth, employee demographics, anticipated needs, competitive practices, culture and values. Over this time, the overarching objective and philosophy has endured resulting in compensation programs that align with stockholders interests, the business objectives, reward performance, and are externally competitive and internally equitable. Management and the Committee believe it is a good governance practice to review the Companys Total Rewards Program objectives and philosophy on a regular basis, and did so again at the Committees April 2006 meeting. |
B. | Guiding principles. The principles that guide the design of QUALCOMMs Total Rewards Program include: |
1. | Provide total direct compensation and rewards programs that are externally competitive and internally equitable. | |
2. | Use a total direct compensation perspective in designing programs and conducting competitive analyses. |
a. | In characterizing the externally competitive market, estimate the total direct compensation levels (salary plus target bonus plus equity) of a peer group of companies and then target aggregate total direct compensation between the 50th and 75th percentiles, allowing for individual compensation levels to vary outside the 50th to 75th percentile range to reflect role, scope and contributions. The term aggregate refers to the sum for all executive officers, or for the employee population as a whole. |
3. | The primary goals of the Total Rewards Program are to: |
a. | Successfully attract and retain the employees QUALCOMM needs to execute its business strategy and achieve its long-term objectives; | |
b. | Motivate, engage and reward employees who contribute to QUALCOMMs strategic and operational goals (i.e., pay-for-performance); and, | |
c. | Allow all employees to participate in QUALCOMMs success through stock ownership. |
C. | Rewards objectives. The Company designed the Total Rewards Program to reward individual and company performance with both cash and equity. |
1. | The total cash component of QUALCOMMs Total Rewards Program includes both fixed (annual salary) and variable (cash bonus) elements: |
a. | Merit increases to base salary reward and recognize employees for successfully fulfilling their role and responsibilities and the incremental value of the experience, knowledge, expertise and skills acquired and developed during employment with QUALCOMM. | |
b. | Cash bonuses reward and recognize employees for their individual contributions to business goals and objectives during the fiscal year, within the context of overall Company performance. |
2. | The equity component of QUALCOMMs Total Rewards Program uses stock option grants to reward and recognize employees for their individual contributions to business goals and objectives. These grants also serve as incentive for future performance by motivating and encouraging employees to contribute in ways that positively affect the business strategy and goals, ultimately providing a positive influence on the Companys stock price. The Company grants stock options with a five-year vesting schedule, longer than the typical three-or four-year schedule among high technology companies. This time-based vesting provision provides a retention component to the option awards. |
21
III. | The Elements of the Total Rewards Program. |
A. | Total Direct Compensation (TDC). The TDC is the sum of annual salary plus bonus plus the estimated fair value of equity-based compensation. QUALCOMM uses this framework to gauge the appropriate total value of cash and equity in making external comparisons and assessing internal fairness. The Actual TDC is the sum of a persons annual salary plus actual bonus awarded plus the estimated fair value of equity compensation at the time of award. The Target TDC is the sum of a persons annual salary plus target bonus plus the estimated fair value of planned equity compensation. |
B. | Peer Groups. To characterize external competitive practices relevant to the CEO and other executive officers, the Committees consultants used data from peer group companies and from the Radford Executive Compensation survey. To identify appropriate peer group companies, management, the Committee and the Committees consultants first mutually developed the following selection criteria: |
1. | Labor market and capital market competitors; and, | |
2. | High technology companies with market capitalization above $10B; and, | |
3. | Similar pay models and growth experiences (i.e., equity compensation orientation without defined benefit pension plan or significant dividends); and, | |
4. | Exclude financially unhealthy companies and companies in multi-year turnaround situations. |
Advanced Micro Devices
|
Comcast | Linear Technology | ||
Agilent
|
Dell | Lucent | ||
Amazon
|
eBay | Marvell Technologies | ||
Analog Devices
|
EMC | Motorola | ||
Apple
|
Freescale Semiconductors | Oracle | ||
Applied Materials
|
Sprint Nextel | |||
Broadcom
|
Intel | Texas Instruments | ||
Cisco
|
L-3 Communications | Yahoo! |
C. | The Mix of TDC. The mix of cash and equity varies by role and responsibility. Variable pay, including cash and equity, increases as a proportion of total pay commensurate with the executives role and responsibility. For the CEO, annual target cash comprises 14% of Dr. Paul Jacobs Target TDC; the remaining 86% is equity-based. The Mix of Total Direct Compensation Elements table summarizes the cash and equity mix for the Companys executive officers. |
Estimated Fair |
||||||||||||
Value of Equity |
||||||||||||
Fixed Cash as a % |
Variable Cash as a |
Compensation as a % |
||||||||||
Executive
|
of Target TDC | % of Target TDC | of Target TDC | |||||||||
CEO
|
7% | 7% | 86% | |||||||||
Other Named Executive Officers
|
7% 10% | 5% 7% | 83% 86% |
D. | Annual Salary. The Company pays an annual salary to its employees, including the CEO and other executive officers, as consideration for fulfillment of certain roles and responsibilities. Changes in annual salaries for executive officers are generally effective as of the beginning of the calendar year. |
22
E. | Variable Cash. The Company awards variable cash bonuses to employees, including the CEO and other executive officers, as a reward and recognition for contributing to the Companys achievement of specific annual financial goals (revenue and EBT). All employees are eligible for a form of variable cash bonuses (the broad-based cash bonus program or the sales incentive plan), though not all employees actually receive a cash bonus during any given fiscal year. |
F. | Equity-Based Compensation. The Company grants equity-based compensation to employees, including the CEO and other executive officers, to attract, motivate, engage and retain highly qualified and highly sought-after employees. The Company grants stock options on a broad basis to encourage all employees to work with a long-term view and think like stockholders. Stock options are inherently performance-based because they deliver value to the option holder only if the value of QUALCOMM stock increases. Thus, stock options are a potential reward for long-term value creation and serve as an incentive for employees who remain with the Company to contribute to the overall long-term success of the business. |
1. | Equity-based compensation strategy. Management, the Committee, and the Committees compensation consultants reviewed and discussed the evolution among high technology companies from options-only practices to a mix of options and restricted stock units (RSUs). The inherent performance-based nature of options supports the Companys pay-for-performance principle. Appreciation-type equity awards (stock options and stock appreciation rights) align the interests among employees and stockholders. Many of QUALCOMMs highly talented employees are the targets for competitor companies recruiting efforts, and RSUs are an increasingly larger component of the packages offered to QUALCOMMs employees by competitor companies. QUALCOMMs voluntary turnover rate remains significantly lower compared to the high technology industry. During fiscal year 2006, voluntary turnover was only 4.9%, a full 7 percentage points below the 11.9% rate for the period from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006 reported by Radford Surveys + Consulting, a leading high technology compensation survey company. Management and the Committee continuously monitor competitive practices and the Company is positioned to refine the stock-based compensation strategy should it be in the interests of stockholders relative to attracting and retaining the highly skilled talent required to execute the business strategy. | |
2. | Determining the amount of equity-based awards. The annual stock option award for the CEO and the other executive officers is determined in conjunction with setting the TDC. The Committee and management also consider the competitive market for long-term incentives and maintain the CEOs stock option award, and the other Named Executive Officers stock option awards, above the competitive median to provide the equity-based compensation leverage the Company desires consistent with the Companys Total Rewards Program. |
23
3. | Determining to the timing and exercise price of equity-based awards. QUALCOMM has a long-standing practice, since November 1999, of making annual stock option awards to the Companys officers during the first quarter of each fiscal year. The option awards are in conjunction with the Committees approval of officers annual salary for the coming calendar year and cash bonus awards for prior fiscal year performance. From time-to-time, the Company may assign an officer an expanded role and/or formally promote an officer to a position of greater scope and responsibility. The Committee may consider an equity award, in addition to the annual award, to recognize the expanded scope and role. The Committee has a long-standing practice for establishing the grant date for all stock option awards to the officers that grant date is the Friday of the week during which the Committee met to consider and approve the awards. Since March 2001, the Company has defined the exercise price as the most recent closing price available on the grant date (i.e., the closing price on the most recently completed trading day prior to the grant). Nominally, this is the closing price on Thursday, the day immediately before grant date. | |
4. | Option grant date coordination with the release of material non-public information. The option grant date for awards to officers is traditionally the Friday of the week during which the Committee meets and approves the options awards. The Company engages in a consistent practice and predetermined process for granting annual option awards to executive officers. The Committee establishes the meeting and grant dates in accordance with the Companys policy, and does not determine these dates based on knowledge of material non-public information or in response to the Companys stock price. | |
5. | Stock Ownership Guidelines. During fiscal year 2006, the Committee recommended, and the Board approved, stock ownership requirements for the Companys officers and non-employee directors. Please see the earlier section Majority Voting, Stock Ownership Guidelines and Other Matters for a discussion of the guidelines. |
G. | Employee Stock Purchase Program (the ESPP). QUALCOMM offers its ESPP to eligible employees in order to allow them the opportunity to share in the success of the Company. The ESPP enables employees to purchase QUALCOMM common stock at a discount from the market price. The program includes two offering periods during a calendar year. The purchase price is 85% of the lower of: (1) the fair market value (FMV) on the first day of the offering period, or, (2) the FMV on the last day of the offering period. In a survey of QUALCOMM employees, more than 50% reported the ESPP as important in employees decisions to join and remain with the Company. Over the last three completed offering periods, an average of 65% of eligible employees participated in the ESPP and employees have held their ESPP shares for an average of 25 months. | |
H. | Certain Benefit and Perquisite Programs. QUALCOMM promotes an egalitarian culture the Company does not provide its officers or other senior-level executives with preferential parking, separate dining facilities, or other personal benefits. The Companys officers, non-officer executives, and other senior-level employees are eligible for certain additional benefit programs, including: |
1. | Voluntary Executive Retirement Contribution and Matching Plans. QUALCOMM provides this benefit so that highly compensated employees with significant responsibilities (i.e., Vice Presidents and above) may defer additional income beyond the limits imposed by the Companys qualified 401(k) plan. The Executive Retirement Contribution Plan (the ERC Plan) is a voluntary, non-qualified plan that enables executives to defer up to 100% of their salary and variable cash bonus on a pre-tax basis. The Executive Retirement Matching Contribution Plan (the Matching Plan) is a non-qualified plan under which participants who contribute to the ERC Plan receive a Company contribution in the form of Company stock of up to 10% of pay, less any 401(k) contribution. The Company stock contributions under the Matching Plan are subject to a four-year vesting schedule. The investment options under the ERC Plan are the same as those made available to all employees participating in the Companys 401(k) plan. |
24
2. | Supplemental Health. QUALCOMM provides a health plan to all employees and eligible dependents; the plan is self-funded and the Company pays 100% of the premium. The Company and employees share in the cost of health care through deductibles and co-payments. QUALCOMM provides a supplemental health care plan for the officers, non-officer executives, and other senior-level employees. The maximum annual limit is $10,000 for officers and lower limits for other eligible employees. The program covers the employee and all eligible dependents of the employee, and provides coverage for most medical expenses not covered by the Companys base health plan. The Company provides this benefit because it has strong retention value, can be a key attractor for experienced, senior-level talent, and is a motivator for employees to advance to the eligibility level. | |
3. | Financial and Retirement Planning Services. QUALCOMM provides this perquisite to its officers and senior-level employees to encourage and assist them in effectively managing their financial affairs. The Company will reimburse officers up to a maximum of $12,500 per fiscal year for expenses incurred for financial, estate and/or tax planning. |
IV. | Employment agreements, Severance and Change-in-Control provisions |
A. | Employment Agreements. All QUALCOMM employees, including the executive officers, are employed at will and do not have employment agreements. |
B. | Severance and Change-in-Control Provisions. QUALCOMM does not have a pre-defined involuntary termination severance plan or policy for employees, including executives. The Companys practices in such situations may include: (1) salary continuation dependent on the business reason for the termination; (2) lump sum payment based on job level and service with the Company; (3) paid health care coverage and COBRA payments for a limited time; and (4) outplacement services. The Companys 2001 Stock Option Plan and 2006 LTIP stock option agreements provide for accelerating 10% of unvested options under certain, not for cause involuntary terminations. |
V. | Compensation for the CEO and other Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 2006 |
A. | Determining TDC. The Committee and management reviewed (at its July and September 2005 meetings) competitive market data from peer group companies and from independent, third party compensation surveys in which the Company participated at that time (i.e., the Radford Executive survey and the Clark Consulting CHiPS Executive and Senior Management survey). The Committee met in November 2005 to review and approve the total rewards packages for the CEO and the other officers. At this meeting, the Committee reviewed tally sheets for the CEO, the Chairman, and the other four Named Executive Officers. The tally sheets summarized cash and equity-based compensation, compensation deferred in the Companys 401(k) plan, ERC Plan and Matching Plan, and benefits and perquisites. The tally sheets also included summaries of the in-the-money value of stock options and the value of directly held shares, and hypothetical stock option gains. |
B. | Determining Annual Salary. QUALCOMM pays the annual salary rate for the CEO and the other officers on a calendar year basis. In developing the salary recommendations, management and the Committee considered the competitive market data, internal relationships among certain officer roles, and each officers contributions, role, experience and skills. In consideration of their successful transitions to the CEO and President roles during 2005 and consistent with the Companys compensation philosophy, the Committee approved Dr. Paul Jacobs and Steven Altmans calendar year 2006 annual salaries of $1,025,000 and $750,000, respectively. For their continuing leadership as QUALCOMMs Chief Financial Officer and Chief Technology Officer and consistent with the Companys compensation philosophy, the Committee approved William Keitels and Dr. Roberto Padovanis annual salaries of $600,000 and $465,000, respectively. Management and the Committee recognize the unique value and contributions Dr. Sanjay Jha brings to QUALCOMM, and his significant responsibility for QUALCOMMs revenue and earnings. (Please see section VI(A)(3)(a) on fiscal year 2007 compensation for a more complete |
25
discussion). Accordingly, the Committee and management agreed to position Dr. Jhas annual salary above the competitive market 75th percentile, and approved his annual salary of $700,000. |
C. | Determining Cash Bonus Targets. The Committee approved the fiscal year 2006 Executive Bonus Program (the Bonus Program) at its November 2005 meeting, including the individual officers threshold, target and maximum bonus levels (expressed as a percent of fiscal year end annual salary) and the formula for funding the officer bonus pool. The bonus formula nominally uses a baseline target. For fiscal year 2006 the Committee established a stretch bonus level (also expressed as a percent of fiscal year end annual salary) that is used if pro forma EPS exceeds a pre-determined threshold. |
D. | Fiscal Year 2006 Bonus Awards. In fiscal year 2006, the Company exceeded the pre-determined pro forma revenue and EBT targets. QUALCOMM also exceeded the pre-determined pro forma EPS threshold and thus used the stretch targets to determine the Pool. The Overall Funding Rate was 1.31X of the Stretch Target Bonus. At its November 6, 2006 meeting, the CEO and the Committee assessed the CEOs performance during the fiscal year. The Committee also discussed the CEOs assessment of the other officers and his recommendations for bonus awards for fiscal year 2006 performance. The Summary Compensation Table includes the fiscal year 2006 bonus awards for the Named Executive Officers approved by the Committee. In determining Dr. Paul Jacobs bonus award, the Committee considered QUALCOMMs outstanding financial performance, exceeding plan revenue and plan net income in the face of unprecedented attacks on the Companys business model. During fiscal year 2006, Dr. Paul Jacobs demonstrated distinguished leadership in developing new opportunities for growth and strengthening QUALCOMMs strategic partnerships. He also championed strong internal controls for financial and operational results reporting transparency. |
E. | Determining Equity-based Awards. In the fiscal year 2005 Proxy Statement, the Committee reported it awarded Dr. Paul Jacobs a stock option grant to purchase 900,000 shares of the Companys common stock at an exercise price of $44.02 per share. The Committee approved this award at its November 2, 2005 meeting. The grant date was Friday, November 4, 2005, consistent with the Companys long-standing practice for establishing the grant date described earlier in this report. The exercise price was the closing price on Thursday, November 3, 2005 again, consistent with the Companys long-standing practice for determining the exercise price described earlier. This stock option award was in consideration of his leadership of the QW&I group comprised of the QWI and QTL Business Segments during the first three quarters of fiscal year 2005, his leadership during the succession plan transition and the final quarter of fiscal year 2005, and was consistent with the Companys compensation philosophy. The Committee also approved the stock option awards to the other Named Executive Officers reported in the Summary Compensation Table at the same November 2, 2005 meeting. The grants to Steven Altman, William Keitel and Dr. Roberto Padovani were consistent with the Companys compensation philosophy. The grant to Dr. Sanjay Jha is consistent with the decision, discussed earlier, to compensate Dr. Jha above the competitive market in order to recognize appropriately his valuable role and contributions. |
VI. | Compensation Planning for the CEO and other Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 2007 |
A. | Determining TDC. To establish the appropriate 2007 TDC for the CEO and other executive officers, management and the Committee followed a 3-Phase process during fiscal year 2006. |
1. | In the first phase, the Committees compensation consultants prepared a competitive analysis that informed management and the Committee of the competitive market 50th and 75th percentiles for TDC and separately for salary, target and actual bonus awards, and long-term incentives. | |
2. | In the second phase, the Committee, management, and the Committees compensation consultants discussed in more detail various strategies for the mix of target cash vs. equity and different forms of equity. The result is a leveraged compensation program that supports QUALCOMMs long-term strategy for increasing market share, investing in R&D, developing new sources of future revenue, strengthening strategic partnerships, and long-term earnings and cash flow growth, balanced with the Companys shorter-term goals of achieving the annual operating plan and appropriately deploying resources. | |
3. | In the third phase, management and the Committee determined appropriate TDC targets (calendar year 2007 salary plus fiscal year 2007 target bonus plus November 2006 stock option award) for each |
26
officer, based on the incumbents role and responsibilities, contributions to the business, and longer-term considerations such as the Companys management succession plans. With the Target TDC established, management and the Committee then determined individual annual salary levels and stock option awards within the context of the targeted TDC for each officer, adjusting the stock option awards to reflect management and the Committees assessment of internal relationships and the relative value the Company places on the incumbents holding these positions. |
Estimated Fair |
||||||||||||||||
Calendar Year 2007 |
Target Bonus for |
Value of November |
Target Total Direct |
|||||||||||||
Salary |
FY07 Performance |
2006 Stock Award |
Compensation |
|||||||||||||
Executive
|
($000s) | ($000s) | ($000s) | ($000s) | ||||||||||||
Paul E. Jacobs
|
$ | 1,075 | $ | 1,344 | $ | 10,670 | $ | 13,089 | ||||||||
Steven R. Altman
|
790 | 938 | 7,900 | 9,628 | ||||||||||||
Sanjay K. Jha
|
735 | 689 | 7,500 | 8,924 | ||||||||||||
William E. Keitel
|
630 | 591 | 5,100 | 6,321 | ||||||||||||
Roberto Padovani
|
485 | 303 | 2,700 | 3,488 |
B. | The competitive analysis prepared by the Committees compensation consultants included a Carried-Interest Ownership analysis of the CEO and five other potential Named Executive Officers. The carried-interest analysis is a measure of a companys historical practice in granting equity awards and compares the sum of stock options plus owned shares plus three years of sales as a percent of shares outstanding. The carried-interest ownership of the CEO and these five other officers is between the median and 75th percentile. This is consistent with the Companys intended TDC range and the Committees past granting practices to officers. | |
C. | The competitive analysis included the in-the-money value of the officers carried-interest at certain assumed trading prices of QUALCOMM common stock. This information was also available to the Committee at the time it made the November 2006 stock option awards. The Committee noted that among the thirteen non-founder officers, 35% of the value is in unvested options, providing direct retention. Further, the in-the-money value aligns the officers interest with stockholders, and provides retention, because it would be difficult to duplicate the opportunity elsewhere. |
D. | The Committee and management agree that continuing to grant additional stock options to the officers is appropriate for the following reasons: |
1. | The opportunity to benefit from additional value creation through strong Company performance remains a dominant incentive among the officers, who have a high achievement orientation. | |
2. | The basis for the potential wealth accumulation is a high-risk, options-only program. | |
3. | The Company has no employment contracts or severance agreements with the officers, and no change-in-control provisions other than as provided to all employees in the stock plans and stock plan agreements. | |
4. | The peer companies provide long-term incentives to their executives annually, primarily in the form of options, so failure to provide a similar value would not be competitive in the context of QUALCOMMs total direct compensation program. |
27
5. | Equity grants facilitate executive and employee ownership, which management and the Board regard as important for commitment and motivation. | |
6. | Options retain executive talent through vesting and through potential long-term wealth creation, which would be difficult to duplicate elsewhere. |
E. | Based on the Target TDC for the CEO and the other Named Executive Officers, the November 2006 stock option award value was denominated into shares of QUALCOMM common stock by estimating the per share present value of an option. On Monday, November 6, 2006, the Committee approved a stock option award, with a grant date of Friday, November 10, 2006, to Dr. Paul Jacobs to purchase 770,000 shares of QUALCOMM common stock at an exercise price of $34.83. The grant is consistent with the Companys long-standing practice for establishing the grant date for all stock option awards to officers (i.e., the Friday of the week during which the Committee met to consider and approve the awards), and the Companys long-standing practice of setting the exercise price based on the most recent closing price available on the grant date (i.e., the closing price on the most recently completed trading day prior to the grant). |
VII. | Tax Considerations / Impact of accounting and tax treatments |
A. | In evaluating compensation program alternatives, the Committee considers the potential impact on QUALCOMM of Section 162(m) of the Tax Code. Section 162(m) eliminates the deductibility of compensation over $1 million paid to the Named Executive Officers, excluding performance-based compensation. Compensation programs generally will qualify as performance-based if (1) compensation is based on pre-established objective performance targets, (2) the programs material features have been approved by stockholders, and (3) there is no discretion to increase payments after the performance targets have been established for the performance period. |
B. | The Committee endeavors to maximize deductibility of compensation under Section 162(m) of the Tax Code to the extent practicable while maintaining a competitive, performance-based compensation program. The 2006 LTIP, approved by stockholders at the March 2006 annual meeting, identifies the material features of the Executive Bonus Program. Tax consequences, including but not limited to tax deductibility, are subject to many factors (such as changes in the tax laws and regulations or interpretations thereof and the timing and nature of various decisions by officers regarding deferred compensation and stock options) and are beyond the control of either the Committee or QUALCOMM. In addition, the Committee believes that it is important for it to retain maximum flexibility in designing transparent compensation programs that meet its stated objectives and fit within the Committees guiding principles. Finally, based on the amount of deductions the Company can take each year, the actual impact of the loss of deduction for compensation paid to the CEO and the other top highly compensated executives over the $1 million limitation has had a de minimis impact on the Companys overall tax position. For fiscal year 2006, the tax impact of non-deductibility was approximately $564,000. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Committee approved the FY07 annual bonus program and intends to administer the program in a manner that complies with Section 162(m) so that the Company may deduct compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the Named Executive Officers. QUALCOMM grants stock options in a manner that preserves the deductibility of their gains under Section 162(m). |
28
29
30
(1) | Shows the cumulative total return on investment assuming an investment of $100 in each of the Company, the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq-Industry on September 30, 2001. All returns are reported as of the Companys fiscal year end, which is the last Sunday of the month in which the fourth quarter ends, whereas the numbers for the S&P 500 are calculated as of the last day of the month in which the corresponding quarter ends. |
31
32
1. | The Committee shall be comprised of at least three directors who meet the independence and experience requirements contained in the NASDAQ listing standards, such independence and experience to be decided by the Governance Committee of the Board (the Governance Committee). | |
2. | At least one member of the Committee shall have past employment experience in finance or accounting, professional certification in accounting, or other comparable experience or background resulting in the individual being financially sophisticated, which may include being or having been a chief executive, chief financial or other senior officer with financial oversight responsibilities. | |
3. | Members of the Committee, including the chairperson of the Committee, shall be appointed annually by the Board on the recommendation of the Governance Committee. Members may be replaced by the Board at any time, but shall otherwise serve until a successor has been named. | |
4. | The Committee shall meet at least four times a year, with the authority to convene additional meetings, as circumstances require. The Committee may invite members of management, internal auditors, independent auditors, legal counsel or others to attend meetings and to provide relevant information. The Committee may include non-Committee members at its meetings, but shall also hold an executive session at each meeting at which only independent directors are present. | |
5. | The Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees when appropriate, or to one or more members of the Committee. | |
6. | The Committee shall maintain written minutes of its meetings, which minutes will be filed in the corporate minute book. |
1. | Be directly and solely responsible for the oversight, engagement and termination of any independent auditor employed by the Company for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or related work. Each independent auditor shall report directly to the Committee. | |
2. | Meet with the independent auditor prior to the audit and discuss the planning and staffing of the audit. | |
3. | Approve in advance the engagement of the independent auditor for all audit services and non-audit services and approve the fees and other terms of any such engagement. | |
4. | Obtain periodically from the independent auditor (i) a formal written statement of the matters required to be discussed by Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended, and (ii) any formal written statements received from the independent auditor consistent with and in satisfaction of Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, as amended, including without limitation, descriptions of (a) all relationships between the |
1
independent auditor and the Company, (b) any disclosed relationships or services that may impact auditor objectivity and independence and (c) whether any of the Companys senior finance personnel were recently employed by the independent auditor. |
5. | Evaluate annually the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent auditor. | |
6. | Consult with the independent auditor to assure the rotation of the lead audit partner having primary responsibility for the audit and the audit partner responsible for reviewing the audit every five years, consider issues related to the timing of such rotation and the transition to new lead and reviewing partners. | |
7. | Establish policies for the hiring of employees or former employees of the independent auditor, taking into account the impact of such policies on auditor independence. | |
8. | Review with the independent auditor: |
a. | Any significant difficulties encountered during the course of the audit, any restrictions on the scope of work or access to required information and any significant disagreement among management and the independent auditor in connection with the preparation of the financial statements. | |
b. | Any accounting adjustments. | |
c. | Any communications between the audit team and the independent auditors national office respecting auditing or accounting issues. |
d. | Any Management Representation letter or Internal Control Recommendation letter or Schedule of Unadjusted Differences issued, or proposed to be issued, by the independent auditor to the Company, and managements response. |
1. | Review and discuss with management and the independent auditor: |
a. | The Companys annual audited financial statements. | |
b. | Any certification, report, opinion or review rendered by the independent auditor. | |
c. | The Companys disclosure under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
d. | The critical accounting policies and practices used by the Company, all alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles, the ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments and the treatment preferred by the independent auditor. |
e. | Earnings press releases and other information provided to analysts and rating agencies, including pro forma or core business or other adjusted financial information. |
f. | Any significant judgments made in managements preparation of the financial statements and the view of each as to appropriateness of such judgments. |
g. | Any off-balance sheet transactions or structures and their effect on the Companys financial results and operations, as well as the disclosure regarding such transactions and structures in the Companys public filings. | |
h. | The effect of regulatory and accounting initiatives, improvements and resulting changes to the Companys auditing and accounting principles and practices. |
i. | Any correspondence with regulators or governmental agencies that raise material issues regarding the Companys financial statements or accounting policies. | |
j. | Any employee complaints or published reports that raise material issues regarding the Companys financial statements or accounting policies. |
2. | Report to the Board regarding any audit opinions that contain going concern qualifications. |
2
3. | Review prior to filing, all filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission containing the Companys financial statements, including but not limited to the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and the Annual Report on Form 10-K. | |
4. | Recommend to the Board whether the audited financial statements should be included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K. | |
5. | Periodically (but not less than annually) meet separately with the independent auditor. |
1. | Review and discuss annually with management its assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures for financial reporting. |
a. | Review annually with the independent auditor the attestation to, and report on, the assessment of controls made by management. | |
b. | Consider whether any changes to the internal controls or disclosure controls processes and procedures are appropriate in light of managements assessment or the independent auditors report. |
2. | Review and approve, at least annually, the internal audit scope, audit plans, budget and staffing and relevant process and programs of the internal audit function. Periodically review the scope, budget and significant results of any internal audit services provided by outside parties. The Committee shall also receive regular reports from the Companys internal auditor regarding the significant results of internal audits, and whether recommendations made in the audits have been implemented by Company management. The Committee shall meet separately with the senior internal auditor to discuss any matter that members of the Committee or the internal auditor believe should be discussed privately. | |
3. | Review with the principal executive and financial officers of the Company any report on significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls that could adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize or report financial data, any material weakness in internal controls identified to the independent auditors, and any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal controls. |
1. | Review and approve all related-party transactions after reviewing each such transaction for potential conflicts of interests and improprieties. The Committee may delegate review and approval of any compensation-related related-party transactions to the Compensation Committee. | |
2. | Establish procedures for receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. Assure, as necessary that appropriate remedial measures or actions are taken with respect to such complaints or concerns. | |
3. | Adopt a Code of Ethics for senior financial officers and provide for and review prompt disclosure to the public of any change in, or waiver of such Code of Ethics. Review conduct alleged to be in violation of such Code of Ethics and adopt as necessary or appropriate, remedial, disciplinary, or other measures with respect to such conduct. | |
4. | Review managements monitoring of compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. |
1. | Review the Companys policies and practices with respect to risk management. | |
2. | Discuss with management the Companys major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. |
3
3. | Discuss with management the Companys practices pertaining to foreign exchange, investments and derivatives. | |
4. | Prepare the Committees report required by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission to be included in the Companys annual proxy statement. | |
5. | Regularly report to the Board on the Committees activities, recommendations and conclusions. | |
6. | Review and reassess the Charters adequacy at least annually. | |
7. | Review its own performance, at least annually, for purposes of self-evaluation and to encourage the continuing improvement of the Committee in the execution of its responsibilities. | |
8. | On an annual basis, determine who among its members is to be designated for disclosure purposes as an audit committee financial expert as defined by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. |
1. | Have the authority to pay the fees and expenses of advisors and experts deemed necessary, as determined by the Committee, to permit the Committee to perform its duties under this Charter. The fees and expenses of these advisors and experts shall be paid by the Company. | |
2. | At its discretion, have the authority to initiate special investigations, and, if appropriate, hire special legal, accounting or other outside advisors or experts to assist the Committee, to fulfill its duties under this Charter. | |
3. | Also perform such other activities consistent with this Charter, the Companys Bylaws and governing law, as the Committee or the Board deems necessary or appropriate. |
4
PROXY | QUALCOMM INCORPORATED | PROXY | ||
PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS | ||||
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS | ||||
TO BE HELD ON MARCH 13, 2007 |
VOTE BY INTERNET www.proxyvote.com Have the proxy card ready when you access the simple instructions that appear on your computer screen. | ||||
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 5775 MOREHOUSE DRIVE, N-510F SAN DIEGO, CA 92121 |
||||
VOTE BY TELEPHONE 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone! Have this card ready when you call and follow the simple recorded instructions the vote voice provides to you. | ||||
VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign, and date this proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided. | ||||
The Internet and Telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on March 12, 2007. | ||||
IF YOU HAVE VOTED OVER THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE, THERE IS NO NEED FOR YOU TO MAIL BACK YOUR PROXY. THANK YOU FOR VOTING. |
For | Withhold | Exceptions | ||||||||
1. | To elect six Directors to hold office until the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. | All | All | |||||||
o | o | o | ||||||||
01) Barbara T. Alexander | 04) Sherry Lansing | |||||||||
02) Raymond V. Dittamore | 05) Peter M. Sacerdote | |||||||||
03) Irwin Mark Jacobs | 06) Marc I. Stern |
For | Against | Abstain | |||||||||
2. | To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent accountants for the Companys fiscal year ending September 30, 2007. | o | o | o |
Signature | Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date |