10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 0-15536
CODORUS VALLEY BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
23-2428543 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
105 Leader Heights Road, P.O. Box 2887, York, Pennsylvania
|
|
17405 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
717-747-1519
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since the last report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company þ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date. On November 5, 2009, 4,061,445 shares of common stock, par value
$2.50, were outstanding.
Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.
Form 10-Q Index
- 2 -
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits with banks |
|
$ |
1,319 |
|
|
$ |
3,254 |
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
10,339 |
|
|
|
11,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
11,658 |
|
|
|
14,875 |
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
|
180,147 |
|
|
|
72,163 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value $2,372 2009 and $2,283 2008) |
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
Restricted investment in bank stocks, at cost |
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
7,373 |
|
Loans (net of deferred fees of $703 2009 and $566 2008) |
|
|
637,128 |
|
|
|
573,078 |
|
Less-allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(6,514 |
) |
|
|
(4,690 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans |
|
|
630,614 |
|
|
|
568,388 |
|
Premises and equipment, net |
|
|
11,535 |
|
|
|
11,900 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
26,831 |
|
|
|
22,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
869,827 |
|
|
$ |
702,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing |
|
$ |
54,664 |
|
|
$ |
47,781 |
|
Interest bearing |
|
|
658,311 |
|
|
|
550,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
|
712,975 |
|
|
|
598,129 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,283 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
69,280 |
|
|
|
19,186 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
10,310 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
4,715 |
|
|
|
4,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
797,280 |
|
|
|
650,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $2.50 per share; $1,000 liquidation
preference, 1,000,000 shares authorized; 16,500 shares issued and
outstanding 2009 and 0 2008 |
|
|
15,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; 10,000,000 shares
authorized; 4,061,445 shares issued and outstanding 2009 and
4,017,033 2008 |
|
|
10,154 |
|
|
|
10,043 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
36,904 |
|
|
|
35,877 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
5,057 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
3,843 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
72,547 |
|
|
|
52,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
869,827 |
|
|
$ |
702,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
- 3 -
Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Income
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees |
|
$ |
8,945 |
|
|
$ |
8,215 |
|
|
$ |
25,578 |
|
|
$ |
24,286 |
|
Investment securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable |
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
1,823 |
|
Tax-exempt |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Federal funds sold |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
Other |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
10,382 |
|
|
|
9,165 |
|
|
|
29,634 |
|
|
|
27,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
3,711 |
|
|
|
3,674 |
|
|
|
11,077 |
|
|
|
10,712 |
|
Federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Long-term and junior subordinated debt |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
4,231 |
|
|
|
4,031 |
|
|
|
12,695 |
|
|
|
11,762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
6,151 |
|
|
|
5,134 |
|
|
|
16,939 |
|
|
|
15,677 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
|
|
5,551 |
|
|
|
4,781 |
|
|
|
14,456 |
|
|
|
14,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment services fees |
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
Income from mutual fund, annuity and insurance sales |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
Income from bank owned life insurance |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
Other income |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
Gain on sales of mortgages |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
Gain on sales of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
|
1,748 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
|
5,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel |
|
|
3,199 |
|
|
|
2,744 |
|
|
|
9,702 |
|
|
|
8,277 |
|
Occupancy of premises, net |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
Postage, stationery and supplies |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
Professional and legal |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
Marketing and advertising |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
FDIC insurance |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Debit card processing |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
Charitable donations |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
Telephone |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Other |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
6,148 |
|
|
|
4,923 |
|
|
|
18,075 |
|
|
|
14,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes (benefit) |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
2,034 |
|
|
|
4,736 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
|
3,624 |
|
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
831 |
|
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
|
$ |
1,620 |
|
|
$ |
3,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share, basic |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
Net income per common share, diluted |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
See accompanying notes.
- 4 -
Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
2,332 |
|
|
$ |
3,624 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
Provision for foreclosed real estate |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of investment in real estate partnership |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance investment |
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
Originations of held for sale mortgages |
|
|
(64,025 |
) |
|
|
(29,376 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of held for sale mortgages |
|
|
66,232 |
|
|
|
23,926 |
|
Gain on sales of held for sale mortgages |
|
|
(761 |
) |
|
|
(303 |
) |
Gain on sales of securities |
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable |
|
|
(942 |
) |
|
|
224 |
|
Increase in other assets |
|
|
(1,455 |
) |
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
Decrease in other liabilities |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
5,265 |
|
|
|
(999 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
(131,440 |
) |
|
|
(16,016 |
) |
Maturities and calls |
|
|
18,332 |
|
|
|
15,665 |
|
Sales |
|
|
8,947 |
|
|
|
6,639 |
|
Securities held-to-maturity, calls |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,036 |
|
Increase in restricted investment in bank stock |
|
|
(1,570 |
) |
|
|
(980 |
) |
Net increase in loans made to customers |
|
|
(63,979 |
) |
|
|
(84,009 |
) |
Purchases of premises and equipment |
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
(2,276 |
) |
Investment in life insurance |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(170,398 |
) |
|
|
(79,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in demand and savings deposits |
|
|
58,799 |
|
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
Net increase in time deposits |
|
|
56,047 |
|
|
|
65,923 |
|
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings |
|
|
(18,283 |
) |
|
|
12,400 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
66,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(15,906 |
) |
|
|
(869 |
) |
Cash dividends paid to preferred shareholders |
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid to common shareholders |
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
|
(1,526 |
) |
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock and common stock warrants |
|
|
16,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127 |
) |
Issuance of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
Cash paid in lieu of fractional shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
161,916 |
|
|
|
51,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(3,217 |
) |
|
|
(29,132 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
14,875 |
|
|
|
39,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
11,658 |
|
|
$ |
9,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
- 5 -
Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
Unaudited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands, except share data) |
|
Stock |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,043 |
|
|
$ |
35,877 |
|
|
$ |
5,057 |
|
|
$ |
1,204 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
52,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,332 |
|
Other comprehensive gain, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on securities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock and common stock warrants
issued, net of issuance costs of $39 |
|
|
15,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,461 |
|
Preferred stock discount accretion |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock cash dividends ($0.23 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(926 |
) |
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(495 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
Issuance of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,164 shares under dividend reinvestment
and stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
7,581 shares under employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
13,667 shares of stock-based compensation awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
15,790 |
|
|
$ |
10,154 |
|
|
$ |
36,904 |
|
|
$ |
5,856 |
|
|
$ |
3,843 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
72,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,347 |
|
|
$ |
32,516 |
|
|
$ |
6,267 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
48,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect adjustment for adoption
of EITF Issue No. 06-04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(703 |
) |
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,624 |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on securities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock cash dividends ($0.386 per share, adjusted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,526 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,526 |
) |
Common stock 5% stock dividend 187,363 shares at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
2,492 |
|
|
|
(2,966 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Purchase of 8,002 shares for treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
(127 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Issuance of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,710 shares under stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
818 |
|
7,997 shares under the dividend
reinvestment and stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
Re-issuance of 8,002 shares under
employee stock purchase plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,993 |
|
|
$ |
35,763 |
|
|
$ |
4,696 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
- 6 -
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note 1Basis of Presentation
The interim unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information,
the instructions to Form 10-Q, and FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 270-10-S99 (Prior
authoritative literature: Article 10 of Regulation S-X). Accordingly, the interim financial
statements do not include all of the financial information and footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the
interim financial statements include all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial
condition and results of operations for the reported periods, and are of a normal and recurring
nature.
These statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the audited financial statements
contained in the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. and its
wholly owned bank subsidiary, PeoplesBank, A Codorus Valley Company (PeoplesBank), and its wholly
owned nonbank subsidiary, SYC Realty Company, Inc. (collectively referred to as Codorus Valley or
the Corporation). PeoplesBank has two wholly owned subsidiaries, Codorus Valley Financial
Advisors, Inc. and SYC Settlement Services, Inc. All significant intercompany account balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The combined results of operations of the
nonbank subsidiaries are not material to the consolidated financial statements.
The results of operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
In accordance with FASB ASC 855-10-25 (Prior authoritative literature: FAS No. 165, Subsequent
Events), the Corporation evaluated the events and transactions that occurred after the balance
sheet date of September 30, 2009, but before the financial statements were issued for potential
recognition or disclosure. In preparing these financial statements, the Corporation evaluated the
events and transactions that occurred from September 30, 2009 through November 10, 2009, the date
these financial statements were issued.
Note 2Significant Accounting Policies
Stock Dividend and Per Share Computations
All per share computations include the effect of stock dividends declared. The weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding used for basic and diluted calculations are provided
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
831 |
|
|
$ |
1,130 |
|
|
$ |
1,620 |
|
|
$ |
3,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic) |
|
|
4,051 |
|
|
|
3,986 |
|
|
|
4,036 |
|
|
|
3,953 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted) |
|
|
4,051 |
|
|
|
4,002 |
|
|
|
4,036 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.92 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive stock options and common stock warrants excluded from the computation of earnings per share |
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
- 7 -
Comprehensive Income
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that recognized
revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets
and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported
as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net
income, are components of comprehensive income. The components of other comprehensive income
(loss) and related tax effects are presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period |
|
$ |
4,604 |
|
|
$ |
326 |
|
|
$ |
4,289 |
|
|
$ |
(132 |
) |
Reclassification adjustment for gains included in income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) |
|
|
4,604 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
3,998 |
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
Tax effect |
|
|
(1,565 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(1,359 |
) |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax amount |
|
$ |
3,039 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
2,639 |
|
|
$ |
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow Information
For purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Corporation considers interest bearing deposits
with banks, cash and due from banks, and federal funds sold to be cash and cash equivalents.
Noncash items for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 consisted of the
transfer of loans to foreclosed real estate for $2,992,000 and $1,674,000, respectively, and the
transfer of loans held for sale to loans for investment for $3,585,000 and $0, respectively.
Supplemental Benefit Plans
In January 2009, the Corporation incurred a non-recurring cost of $242,000 to restructure employee
benefit plans. Restructuring the benefit plans resulted in federal income tax benefit so that the
overall transaction had an insignificant impact on net income.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes for the current three-month period was $75,000 and for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 was a $298,000 credit, or tax benefit, which reflected a
low level of pretax income and a significant increase in tax-exempt income. The year-to-date tax
benefit included a non-recurring federal income tax benefit of $242,000 associated with
restructuring employee benefit plans in the first quarter of 2009.
Reclassification
Certain amounts in the 2008 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to
the 2009 presentation.
- 8 -
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 140. This statement prescribes the information that a reporting
entity must provide in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets, the effects of a
transfer on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows and a transferors
continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. Specifically, among other aspects,
SFAS 166 amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and
Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities, or SFAS 140, by removing the
concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity from SFAS 140 and removes the exception from
applying FIN 46(R) to variable interest entities that are qualifying special-purpose entities. It
also modifies the financial-components approach used in SFAS 140. SFAS 166 is effective for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2009. We have not determined the effect that the adoption of
SFAS 166 will have on our financial position or results of operations.
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.
SFAS 168 replaces SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, to
establish the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as the source of authoritative accounting
principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in preparation of
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United
States. The new standard became effective for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. The adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial position or results of operations. Technical references to
generally accepted accounting principals included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are provided under the new FASB ASC structure with the prior terminology included parenthetically.
In November 2008, the SEC released a proposed roadmap regarding the potential use by U.S. issuers
of financial statements prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards
(IFRS). IFRS is a comprehensive series of accounting standards published by the International
Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Under the proposed roadmap, the Company may be required to
prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS as early as 2014. The SEC will make a
determination in 2011 regarding the mandatory adoption of IFRS. The Corporation is currently
assessing the impact that this potential change would have on its consolidated financial
statements, and it will continue to monitor the development of the potential implementation of
IFRS.
Note 3Securities Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 320-10-65 (Prior authoritative literature: FSP No. FAS
115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments). FASB ASC
320-10-65 clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining
whether a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired. For debt securities, management must
assess whether (a) it has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that
it will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are done
before assessing whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. Previously, this
assessment required management to assert it has both the intent and the ability to hold a security
for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value to avoid
recognizing an other-than-temporary impairment. This change does not affect the need to forecast
recovery of the value of the security through either cash flows or market price.
In instances when a determination is made that an other-than-temporary impairment exists but the
investor does not intend to sell the debt security and it is unlikely that the investor will be
required to sell the debt security prior to its anticipated recovery, FASB ASC 320-10-65 changes
the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the income
statement. The other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total
other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash
flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the
total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total
other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of
the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other
comprehensive income. FASB ASC 320-10-65 is effective for the Corporation for interim and annual
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009 and thereafter. The adoption of FASB ASC 320-10-65
did not have a material impact on the Corporations financial condition or results of operation.
- 9
A summary of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities at September 30, 2009 and December
31, 2008 is provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Gross Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. agency |
|
$ |
13,528 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,681 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
73,355 |
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
76,382 |
|
U.S. agency mortgage-backed |
|
|
87,441 |
|
|
|
2,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale |
|
$ |
174,324 |
|
|
$ |
5,883 |
|
|
$ |
(60 |
) |
|
$ |
180,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities-corporate trust preferred |
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
2,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
2,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. agency |
|
$ |
5,001 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,135 |
|
State and municipal |
|
|
32,392 |
|
|
|
926 |
|
|
|
(242 |
) |
|
|
33,076 |
|
U.S. agency mortgage-backed |
|
$ |
32,946 |
|
|
$ |
1,012 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
33,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale |
|
$ |
70,339 |
|
|
$ |
2,072 |
|
|
$ |
(248 |
) |
|
$ |
72,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities-corporate trust preferred |
|
$ |
2,432 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
(171 |
) |
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total held-to-maturity |
|
$ |
2,432 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
(171 |
) |
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at September 30, 2009 by
contractual maturity are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities if
call options on select debt issues are exercised in the future. Mortgage-backed securities are
included in the maturity categories based on average expected life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Value |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
4,295 |
|
|
$ |
4,348 |
|
|
$ |
516 |
|
|
$ |
518 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
112,948 |
|
|
|
116,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
51,753 |
|
|
|
53,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
5,328 |
|
|
|
5,586 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities |
|
$ |
174,324 |
|
|
$ |
180,147 |
|
|
$ |
2,438 |
|
|
$ |
2,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 10 -
Gross gains realized from the sale of available-for-sale securities were $291,000 and $123,000 for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Realized gains and losses from
the sale of available-for-sale securities are computed on the basis of specific identification of
the adjusted cost of each security and are shown net as a separate line item in the income
statement. Securities, issued by agencies of the federal government, with a carrying value of
$66,987,000 and $24,843,000 on September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, were pledged
to secure public and trust deposits.
The table below shows investments gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment
category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position, at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
12 months or more |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal |
|
$ |
4,147 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
503 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4,650 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired debt securities, available- for-sale |
|
$ |
4,147 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
503 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4,650 |
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities-corporate trust preferred |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,853 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
1,853 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and municipal |
|
$ |
6,046 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,046 |
|
|
$ |
242 |
|
U.S. agency mortgage-backed |
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired debt securities, available- for-sale |
|
$ |
6,645 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,645 |
|
|
$ |
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities-corporate trust preferred |
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
$ |
171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2009, the unrealized losses within the less than 12 months category of
$59,000 in the available-for-sale portfolio were attributable to eight different municipality
securities. The unrealized loss within the 12 months or more category of $1,000 in the
available-for-sale portfolio was attributable to one municipal security and $68,000 in the
held-to-maturity portfolio was attributable to three corporate trust preferred securities.
Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are analyzed quarterly for possible
other-than-temporary impairment. The analysis considers, among other factors: 1) whether the
Corporation has the intent to sell its securities prior to market recovery or maturity; 2) whether
it is more likely than not that the Corporation will be required to sell its securities prior to
market recovery or maturity; 3) default rates/history by security type; 4) third-party securities
ratings; 5) third-party guarantees; 6) subordination; 7) payment delinquencies; and 8) current
financial news.
Management believes that unrealized losses at September 30, 2009 were primarily the result of
changes in market interest rates and that it has the ability to hold these investments for a time
necessary to recover the amortized cost. To date, the Corporation has collected all interest and
principal on its investment securities as scheduled. Management believes that collection of the
contractual principal and interest is probable and therefore, all impairment is considered to be
temporary.
- 11 -
Note 4Restricted Investment in Bank Stocks
Restricted stock, which represents required investments in the common stock of correspondent banks,
is carried at cost and as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consists of the common stock
of FHLB of Pittsburgh (FHLB) and Atlantic Central Bankers Bank (ACBB). In December 2008, the FHLB
notified member banks that it was suspending dividend payments and the repurchase of capital stock.
Management evaluates the restricted stock for impairment in accordance with FASB ASC 942-325-35
(Prior authoritative literature: Statement of Position (SOP) 01-6, Accounting by Certain Entities
(Including Entities With Trade Receivables) That Lend to or Finance the Activities of Others).
Managements determination of whether these investments are impaired is based on their assessment
of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by recognizing temporary declines in
value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their cost is
influenced by criteria such as: (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as
compared to the capital stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has
persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make payments required by law or regulation and
the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the FHLB, and (3) the impact
of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the
FHLB.
Management believes no impairment charge was necessary related to the restricted stock as of
September 30, 2009.
Note 5Loans
The composition of the loan portfolio was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Commercial, industrial and agricultural |
|
$ |
400,311 |
|
|
$ |
348,111 |
|
Real estate construction and development |
|
|
110,985 |
|
|
|
100,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial related loans |
|
|
511,296 |
|
|
|
448,199 |
|
Real estate residential mortgages |
|
|
71,757 |
|
|
|
64,928 |
|
Installment |
|
|
54,075 |
|
|
|
59,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer related loans |
|
|
125,832 |
|
|
|
124,879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
637,128 |
|
|
$ |
573,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6Deposits
The composition of deposits was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Noninterest bearing demand |
|
$ |
54,664 |
|
|
$ |
47,781 |
|
NOW |
|
|
51,466 |
|
|
|
50,027 |
|
Money market |
|
|
181,489 |
|
|
|
133,924 |
|
Savings |
|
|
22,949 |
|
|
|
20,037 |
|
Time CDs less than $100,000 |
|
|
236,730 |
|
|
|
206,293 |
|
Time CDs $100,000 or more |
|
|
165,677 |
|
|
|
140,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
712,975 |
|
|
$ |
598,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 12 -
Note 7Long-term Debt
PeoplesBanks obligations to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLBP) are primarily fixed
rate instruments. A summary of long-term debt at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, is
provided below. The increase in long-term debt since year-end 2008 provided the financing for a
leverage strategy, which is discussed in other sections of this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Obligations of PeoplesBank to FHLBP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due December 2009, 3.47%, convertible quarterly after December 2006 |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
Due February 2010, 1.55% |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due June 2010, 4.32% |
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Due January 2011, 2.06% |
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due January 2011, 4.30%, amortizing |
|
|
3,749 |
|
|
|
3,964 |
|
Due August 2011, 2.42% |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due January 2012, 2.34% |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Due June 2012, 4.25%, amortizing |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
Due May 2013, 3.46%, amortizing |
|
|
2,036 |
|
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,826 |
|
|
|
18,699 |
|
Capital lease obligation |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
69,280 |
|
|
$ |
19,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 8Regulatory Matters
Codorus Valley and PeoplesBank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered
by banking regulators. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory
and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a
material effect on Codorus Valleys financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and
the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Codorus Valley and PeoplesBank must meet
specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain
off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts
and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators.
- 13 -
Quantitative measures established by regulators to ensure capital adequacy require Codorus Valley
and PeoplesBank to maintain minimum ratios, as set forth below, to total and Tier 1 capital as a
percentage of risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital to quarter-to-date average assets
(leverage ratio). Management believes that Codorus Valley and PeoplesBank were well capitalized on
September 30, 2009, based on FDIC capital guidelines. The increase in the capital ratios since
year-end 2008 primarily reflects the sale of $16.5 million of cumulative perpetual preferred stock,
which qualifies as Tier 1 capital, to the U.S. Department of the Treasury under its Capital
Purchase Program, described more fully in Note 9Shareholders Equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum for |
|
|
Well Capitalized |
|
|
|
Actual |
|
|
Capital Adequacy |
|
|
Minimum* |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Ratio |
|
Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. (consolidated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk based |
|
$ |
78,369 |
|
|
|
11.86 |
% |
|
$ |
26,441 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Total risk based |
|
|
84,883 |
|
|
|
12.84 |
|
|
|
52,881 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Leverage |
|
|
78,369 |
|
|
|
9.14 |
|
|
|
34,312 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk based |
|
$ |
60,613 |
|
|
|
10.03 |
% |
|
$ |
24,179 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Total risk based |
|
|
65,303 |
|
|
|
10.80 |
|
|
|
48,357 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Leverage |
|
|
60,613 |
|
|
|
9.12 |
|
|
|
26,576 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PeoplesBank, A Codorus Valley Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk based |
|
$ |
73,106 |
|
|
|
11.15 |
% |
|
$ |
26,223 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
39,334 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Total risk based |
|
|
79,620 |
|
|
|
12.15 |
|
|
|
52,446 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
65,557 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
Leverage |
|
|
73,106 |
|
|
|
8.58 |
|
|
|
34,097 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
42,621 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 risk based |
|
$ |
56,857 |
|
|
|
9.49 |
% |
|
$ |
23,964 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
$ |
35,947 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
Total risk based |
|
|
61,547 |
|
|
|
10.27 |
|
|
|
47,929 |
|
|
|
8.00 |
|
|
|
59,911 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
Leverage |
|
|
56,857 |
|
|
|
8.63 |
|
|
|
26,359 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
32,949 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To be well capitalized under prompt corrective action provisions. |
Note 9Shareholders Equity
Preferred Stock Issued to the United States Department of the Treasury
In connection with the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA), the U.S. Treasury
Department (Treasury) initiated a Capital Purchase Program (CPP) which allowed for qualifying
financial
institutions to issue preferred stock to the Treasury, subject to certain limitations and terms.
The EESA was developed to attract broad participation by strong financial institutions, to
stabilize the financial system and increase lending to benefit the national economy and citizens of
the United States.
On January 9, 2009, the Corporation entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with the Treasury
pursuant to which the Corporation sold to the Treasury, for an aggregate purchase price of $16.5
million, 16,500 shares of non-voting cumulative perpetual preferred stock, $1,000 liquidation
value, $2.50 par value, and warrants to purchase up to 263,859 shares of common stock, par value
$2.50 per share, with an exercise price of $9.38 per share. As a condition under the CPP, without
the consent of the Treasury, the Corporations share repurchases are limited to purchases in
connection with the administration of any employee benefit plan, including purchases to offset
share dilution in connection with any such plans. This restriction is effective until January 9,
2012 or until the Treasury no longer owns any of the Corporations preferred shares issued under
the CPP. The Corporations preferred stock is included as a component of Tier 1 capital in
accordance with regulatory capital requirements. See Note 8, Regulatory Matters for details of
the Corporations regulatory capital.
The preferred stock ranks senior to the Corporations common shares and pays a compounded
cumulative dividend at a rate of 5 percent per year for the first five years, and 9 percent per
year thereafter. Dividends are payable quarterly on February 15th, May 15th, August 15th and
November 15th. The Corporation is prohibited from paying any dividend with respect to shares of
common stock or repurchasing or redeeming any shares of the Corporations common shares in any
quarter unless all accrued and unpaid dividends are paid on the preferred stock for all past
dividend periods (including the latest completed dividend period), subject to certain limited
exceptions. In addition, without the prior consent of the Treasury, the Corporation is prohibited
from declaring or paying any cash dividends on common shares in excess of $0.12 per share, which
was the last quarterly cash dividend per share declared prior to October 14, 2008. The preferred
stock is non-voting, other than class voting rights on matters that could adversely affect the
preferred stock, and is generally redeemable at the liquidation value at any time in whole or in
part (i.e., a minimum of 25 percent of the issue price) with regulatory permission.
- 14 -
Common Stock Warrants
The 263,859 shares of common stock warrants issued to the Treasury have a term of 10 years
(expiring January 9, 2019) and are exercisable at any time, in whole or in part, at an exercise
price of $9.38 per share (subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments). The Treasury may not
exercise the warrants for, or transfer the warrants with respect to, more than half of the initial
shares of common stock underlying the warrants prior to the earlier of (i) the date on which the
Corporation receives aggregate gross proceeds of not less than $16.5 million from one or more
qualified equity offerings and (ii) December 31, 2009. The number of shares to be delivered upon
settlement of the warrants will be reduced by 50% if the Corporation receives aggregate gross
proceeds of at least 100 percent of the aggregate liquidation preference of the preferred stock
from one or more qualified equity offerings prior to December 31, 2009.
The $16.5 million of proceeds was allocated to the preferred stock and the warrants based on their
relative fair values at issuance ($15.7 million was allocated to the preferred stock and $783,000
to the warrants). The difference between the initial value allocated to the preferred stock of
approximately $15.7 million and the liquidation value of $16.5 million, i.e., the preferred stock
discount, will be charged to retained earnings over the first five years of the contract as an
adjustment to the dividend yield using the effective yield method.
Note 10Contingent Liabilities
Management was not aware of any material contingent liabilities on September 30, 2009.
Note 11Guarantees
Codorus Valley does not issue any guarantees that would require liability recognition or
disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit. Standby letters of credit are written
conditional commitments issued by PeoplesBank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third
party. Generally, all letters of credit, when issued, have expiration dates within one year. The
credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as those that are
involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Corporation generally holds collateral
and/or personal guarantees supporting these commitments. The Corporation had $4,792,000 of standby
letters of credit outstanding on September 30, 2009, compared to $4,010,000 on December 31, 2008.
Management believes that the proceeds obtained through a liquidation of collateral and the
enforcement of guarantees would be sufficient to cover the potential amount of future payment
required under the corresponding letters of credit. The amount of the liability as of September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued, was not
material. Many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn and therefore,
generally do not present significant liquidity risk to the Corporation or PeoplesBank.
Note 12Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB ASC 820-10 (Prior authoritative literature: FASB Statement
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value under GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. FASB ASC
820-10 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
As permitted by the accounting guidance, the Corporation began applying FASB ASC 820-10 to all
non-financial assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis effective for its fiscal
year beginning January 1, 2009.
- 15
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 820-10-65 (Prior authoritative literature: FSP No. FAS
157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have
Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly). FASB ASC 820-10,
defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the liability
in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market
participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. FASB ASC 820-10-65 provides
additional guidance on determining when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability
has significantly decreased. FASB ASC 820-10-65 also includes guidance on identifying circumstances
when a transaction may not be considered orderly.
FASB ASC 820-10-65 provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine
whether there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or
liability in relation to normal market activity for the asset or liability. When the reporting
entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the
asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant
adjustments to the related prices may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with FASB
ASC 820-10.
FASB ASC 820-10-65 clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and
level of activity for the asset or liability, some transactions may not be orderly. In those
situations, the entity must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether the
transaction is orderly. FASB ASC 820-10-65 provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that
a transaction is not orderly. A transaction price that is not associated with an orderly
transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.
FASB ASC 820-10-65 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods for the Corporation for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and thereafter. The adoption of FASB ASC 820-10-65 did not have a
material impact on the Corporations financial condition or results of operations.
FASB ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods
used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest
priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value
hierarchy under FASB ASC 820-10 are as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement
date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either
directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the
fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported with little or no market activity).
An assets or liabilitys level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
- 16
For assets measured at fair value, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value
hierarchy are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
180,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
180,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,467 |
|
Other real estate owned |
|
$ |
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
668 |
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale |
|
$ |
72,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
Measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans |
|
$ |
3,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,151 |
|
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB ASC 825-10-50 (Prior authoritative literature: FSP No. FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments). FASB ASC
825-10-50 amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to
require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of
publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FASB ASC 825-10-50 also amends
APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized
financial information at interim reporting periods.
FASB ASC 825-10-50 is effective for the Corporation for interim periods ending June 15, 2009 and
after. The adoption of FASB ASC 825-10-50 did not have a material impact on the Corporations
financial condition or results of operations.
The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire
Corporation since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the
Corporations assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree
of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Corporations disclosures and
those of other companies may not be meaningful. The methods and assumptions that follow were used
to estimate the fair values of the Corporations financial instruments at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
Cash and cash equivalents (carried at cost)
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate
those assets fair values.
Securities
The fair values of securities available-for-sale (carried at fair value) and held-to-maturity
(carried at amortized cost) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally
recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical
technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on
quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities
relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.
- 17 -
Restricted investment in bank stocks (carried at cost)
The carrying amount of restricted investment in bank stocks approximates fair value, and considers
the limited marketability of such securities.
Loans held for sale (carried at lower of cost or fair value)
The fair value of loans held for sale is determined, when possible, using quoted secondary-market
prices. If no such quoted prices exist, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices
for a similar loan or loans, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan. At September 30,
2009, the fair value of loans held for sale exceeded the cost basis. Therefore, no write-down to
fair value, valuation allowance or charge to earnings was recorded.
Loans (carried at cost)
Generally, for variable and adjustable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant
change in credit risk, fair value is based on carrying value. Fair values for other loans in the
portfolio are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance
sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans. Projected future
cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and
prepayments of principal.
Impaired loans (generally carried at fair value)
Impaired loans are those that are accounted for under FASB ASC 310-10-35-22 (Prior authoritative
literature: FASB Statement No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan), in which
the Corporation has measured impairment generally based on the fair value of the loans collateral.
Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the
properties, or discounted cash flows based upon the expected proceeds. A portion of the allowance
for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans if the value of the collateral supporting such loans
is deemed to be less than the unpaid balance. If these allocations cause the allowance for loan
losses to require increase, such increase is reported as a component of the provision for loan
losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes that the
uncollectability of a loan is confirmed. These loans are included as Level 3 fair values, based on
the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The fair value
consists of loan balances of $5,330,000, net of a valuation allowance of $1,863,000. Additional
provision for loan losses on these impaired loans was $1,743,000 for the nine-months ended
September 30, 2009. Of this amount, $126,000 pertained to the third quarter.
Other Real Estate Owned (carried at lower of cost or fair value)
Other real estate property acquired through foreclosure is initially recorded at fair value of the
property at the transfer date less estimated selling cost. Subsequently, other real estate owned is
carried at the lower of its carrying value or the fair value less estimated selling cost. Fair
value is usually determined based upon an independent third-party appraisal of the property or
occasionally upon a recent sales offer. The carrying value of other real estate, with a valuation
allowance recorded subsequent to initial foreclosure, which
represents only one property, was $668,000, which is net of a valuation allowance of $189,000 that
was established in the third quarter of 2009.
Interest receivable and payable (carried at cost)
The carrying amount of interest receivable and interest payable approximates its fair value.
Deposit liabilities (carried at cost)
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., noninterest and interest bearing checking,
money market and savings accounts), by definition, are equal to the amount payable on demand at the
reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for variable rate time deposits that
reprice frequently are based on carrying value. Fair values for fixed rate time deposits are
estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being
offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities of
time deposits.
- 18 -
Short-term borrowings (carried at cost)
The carrying amounts of short-term borrowings approximate their fair values.
Long-term debt (carried at cost)
Fair values of FHLB advances are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted
prices for new FHLB advances with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining
maturity. These prices are obtained from this active market and represent a market value that is
deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.
Junior subordinated debt (carried at cost)
The fair value of junior subordinated debt is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based
on market rates and spread characteristics currently offered on such debt with similar credit risk
characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.
Off-balance sheet financial instruments (disclosed at cost)
Fair values for the Corporations off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments and
letters of credit) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar
agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties
credit standing. These amounts were not considered to be material at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
The estimated fair values of the Corporations financial instruments were as follows at September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
11,658 |
|
|
$ |
11,658 |
|
|
$ |
14,875 |
|
|
$ |
14,875 |
|
Securities, available-for-sale |
|
|
180,147 |
|
|
|
180,147 |
|
|
|
72,163 |
|
|
|
72,163 |
|
Securities, held-to-maturity |
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
2,372 |
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
2,283 |
|
Restricted investment in bank stocks |
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
4,262 |
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
|
|
2,692 |
|
Loans held for sale |
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
7,373 |
|
|
|
7,409 |
|
Loans |
|
|
630,614 |
|
|
|
634,071 |
|
|
|
568,388 |
|
|
|
565,982 |
|
Interest receivable |
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing demand, NOW, money market and savings deposits |
|
$ |
310,568 |
|
|
$ |
310,568 |
|
|
$ |
251,769 |
|
|
$ |
251,769 |
|
Time deposits |
|
|
402,407 |
|
|
|
407,036 |
|
|
|
346,360 |
|
|
|
351,201 |
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,283 |
|
|
|
18,283 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
69,280 |
|
|
|
70,323 |
|
|
|
19,186 |
|
|
|
19,757 |
|
Junior subordinated debt |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
4,566 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 19 -
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Managements discussion and analysis of the significant changes in the results of operations,
capital resources and liquidity presented in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for
Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. (Codorus Valley or the Corporation), a bank holding company, and its
wholly owned subsidiary, PeoplesBank, A Codorus Valley Company (PeoplesBank), are provided below.
Codorus Valleys consolidated financial condition and results of operations consist almost entirely
of PeoplesBanks financial condition and results of operations. Current performance does not
guarantee, and may not be indicative of, similar performance in the future.
Forward-looking statements:
Management of the Corporation has made forward-looking statements in this Form 10-Q. These
forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements
include information concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of the Corporation
and its subsidiaries. When words such as believes, expects, anticipates or similar
expressions occur in the Form 10-Q, management is making forward-looking statements.
Note that many factors, some of which are discussed elsewhere in this report and in the documents
that are incorporated by reference, could affect the future financial results of the Corporation
and its subsidiaries, both individually and collectively, and could cause those results to differ
materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by
reference in this Form 10-Q. These factors include:
|
|
operating, legal and regulatory risks; |
|
|
the possibility of a prolonged economic downturn; |
|
|
political and competitive forces affecting banking, securities, asset management and credit
services businesses; and |
|
|
the risk that managements analysis of these risks and forces could be incorrect and/or
that the strategies developed to address them could be unsuccessful. |
The Corporation undertakes no obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this report. Readers
should carefully review the risk factors described in other documents that Codorus Valley files
periodically with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Critical accounting estimates:
Disclosure of Codorus Valleys significant accounting policies is included in Note 1 to the
consolidated financial statements of the 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2008. Some of these policies require management to make significant judgments,
estimates and assumptions that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and
liabilities.
Management makes significant estimates in determining the allowance for loan losses. Management
considers a variety of factors in establishing this estimate such as current economic conditions,
diversification of the loan portfolio, delinquency statistics, results of internal loan reviews,
financial and managerial strengths of borrowers, adequacy of collateral, if collateral dependent,
and present value of future cash flows and other relevant factors. Estimates related to the value
of collateral also have a significant impact on whether or not management continues to accrue
income on delinquent loans and on the amounts at which foreclosed real estate is recorded on the
balance sheet. Additional information is contained in Managements Discussion and Analysis
regarding critical accounting estimates, including the provision and allowance for loan losses,
located on pages 27 and 35 of this Form 10-Q.
- 20 -
The Corporation records its available-for-sale securities portfolio at fair value. Fair values for
these securities are determined based on methodologies in accordance with FASB ASC 820-10 (Prior
authoritative literature: SFAS No. 157), and as clarified by several FASB staff positions. Fair
values for debt securities are volatile and may be influenced by any number of factors, including
market interest rates, prepayment speeds, discount rates, credit ratings and yield curves. Fair
values for debt securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market
prices are not available, fair values are based on the quoted prices of similar instruments or an
estimate of fair value by using a range of fair value estimates in the market place as a result of
the illiquid market specific to the type of security. When the fair value of a debt security is
below its amortized cost, and depending on the length of time the condition exists and the extent
the fair value is below amortized cost, additional analysis is performed to determine whether an
other-than-temporary impairment condition exits. Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt
securities are analyzed quarterly for possible other-than-temporary impairment. The analysis
considers whether the Corporation has the intent to sell its debt securities prior to market
recovery or maturity and whether it is more likely than not that the Corporation will be required
to sell its debt securities prior to market recovery or maturity. Often, information available to
conduct these assessments is limited and rapidly changing; making estimates of fair value subject
to judgment. If actual information or conditions are different than estimated, the extent of the
impairment of the debt security may be different than previously estimated, which could have a
material effect on the Corporations results of operations and financial condition.
Management discussed the development and selection of critical accounting estimates and related
Management Discussion and Analysis disclosure with the Audit Committee. There were no material
changes made to the critical accounting estimates during the periods presented within this report.
Three months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to three months ended September 30, 2008
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The Corporation earned net income available to common shareholders of $831,000 or $0.21 per share
($0.21 diluted) for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to $1,130,000 or
$0.28 per share ($0.28 diluted), for the third quarter of 2008. The $299,000 or 26 percent decrease in net income
available to common shareholders was attributable to increases in the provision for loan losses,
noninterest expenses and preferred dividends, which offset increases in net interest income and
noninterest income and a decrease in income taxes.
The $247,000 increase in the provision for loan losses was due to a decline in loan quality as a
result of the long-drawn economic recession, depressed real estate values and increased
unemployment. A significant increase in the loan portfolio balance during the current period also
required an increase in the provision. The $1,225,000 or 25 percent increase in noninterest
expenses was due primarily to increases in personnel expense, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC) insurance premiums and foreclosed real estate expenses. The $455,000 or 17 percent increase
in personnel expense resulted from staff additions associated with planned business growth,
particularly expansion of the banking franchise in the prior year. The $192,000 increase in FDIC
insurance premiums was the result of an industry-wide increase in assessment rates and an increase
in the volume of deposits upon which the assessment is based. The $224,000 increase in foreclosed
real estate costs reflected an increase in the number of properties acquired in satisfaction of
debts. Net interest income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, was $6,151,000, an
increase of $1,017,000 or 19 percent above the third quarter of 2008 due primarily to an increase
in the average volume of earning assets, principally business loans and investment securities. The
net interest margin was 3.22 percent for the third quarter of 2009, compared to 3.52 percent for
the third quarter of 2008. Net interest margin is net interest income (tax equivalent basis) as a
percentage of average earning assets. The $130,000 or 8 percent increase in noninterest income was
due primarily to an increase in gains from a larger volume of sales of mortgages. An increase in
income from bank owned life insurance, which reflected
additional investment in 2008, also contributed to the increase in noninterest income. The $271,000
decrease in income tax was the result of a decrease in pretax income and an increase in tax exempt
income.
A more detailed analysis of the factors and trends affecting corporate earnings follows.
- 21 -
INCOME STATEMENT ANALYSIS
Net interest income
Net interest income for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009, was $6,151,000, an
increase of $1,017,000 or 20 percent above the third quarter of 2008 due primarily to an increase
in the average volume of earning assets. The net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, was
3.22 percent for the third quarter of 2009, compared to 3.52 percent for the third quarter of 2008.
The decrease in the net interest margin reflected: the low level of market interest rates, which
has depressed yields on variable (floating) rate loans, overnight investments and investment
securities; an elevated level of nonperforming assets; and excess liquidity.
For the third quarter of 2009, total interest income increased $1,217,000 or 13 percent above 2008
due primarily to an increase in the average volume of earning assets. Earning assets averaged $798
million and yielded 5.32 percent (tax equivalent basis) for the current quarter, compared to $600
million and 6.19 percent, respectively, for the third quarter of 2008. The $198 million or 33
percent increase in average earning assets was primarily the result of strong growth in the
business loan and investment securities portfolios.
For the third quarter of 2009, total interest expense increased $200,000 or 5 percent above the
third quarter of 2008 due to a larger volume of interest bearing liabilities. Total interest
bearing liabilities averaged $733 million at an average rate of 2.29 percent for the current
quarter, compared to $537 million and 2.99 percent, respectively, for the third quarter of 2008.
The $196 million or 36 percent increase in average interest bearing liabilities was the result of
strong growth in the average volume of time deposits and money market deposits. An increase in the
average volume of long-term debt, which provided the financing for a leverage strategy described
elsewhere in this report, also contributed to the increase in interest bearing liabilities. More
information about net interest income is provided in the year-to-date section of this report.
Provision for loan losses
For the quarter ended September 30, 2009, the provision for loan losses was $600,000, compared to
$353,000 for the third quarter of 2008. The $247,000 or 70 percent increase was due to a decline
in loan quality as a result of the long-drawn economic recession, depressed real estate values and
increased unemployment. A significant increase in the loan portfolio balance during the current
period required an increase in the provision.
Noninterest income
The following table presents the components of total noninterest income for the third quarter of
2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008. Total noninterest income increased $130,000 or 8
percent.
- 22 -
Table 1 Noninterest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment services fees |
|
$ |
347 |
|
|
$ |
307 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Income from mutual fund, annuity and insurance sales |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from bank owned life insurance |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Other income |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Gain on sales of mortgages |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
1,748 |
|
|
$ |
1,618 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The discussion that follows addresses changes in selected categories of noninterest income.
Trust and investment services feesThe increase reflected an increase in income from sales growth
of settlement advisory services and the periodic recognition of estate fee income.
Income from mutual fund, annuity and insurance salesThe decrease in income from the sale of mutual
funds, annuities and insurance products by Codorus Valley Financial Advisors, a subsidiary of
PeoplesBank, was a result of depressed capital markets and the impact it had on the volume of sales
and fees. A portion of our fees is calculated on market prices of assets under management.
Service charges on deposit accountsIn spite of increases in deposit volumes and number of accounts
during the current quarter, service charges were flat as deposit clients exhibited conservative
spending and money management behavior due to concerns about the economic recession and job
security.
Income from bank owned life insuranceThe increase in income from bank owned life insurance (BOLI)
was due to an additional investment of approximately $4 million in November 2008 and an increase in
the crediting rates on existing policies that were transferred to new insurance providers.
Other incomeThe increase in other income was due in part to an increase in income from real estate
settlement services provided by SYC Settlement Services, a subsidiary of PeoplesBank.
Gain on sales of mortgagesThe increase in gains from the sale of mortgages was the result of an
increase in the volume of sales. During the current quarter, the low level of market interest rates
and the first time homebuyers tax credit program, both influenced by the federal government to
stimulate the economy, increased mortgage banking activity.
Noninterest expense
The following table presents the components of total noninterest expense for the third quarter of
2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008. Total noninterest expense increased $1,225,000 or 25
percent.
- 23 -
Table 2 Noninterest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel |
|
$ |
3,199 |
|
|
$ |
2,744 |
|
|
$ |
455 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Occupancy of premises, net |
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Postage, stationery and supplies |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
Professional and legal |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Marketing and advertising |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
FDIC insurance |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
Debit card processing |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Charitable donations |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
Telephone |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
Other |
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
6,148 |
|
|
$ |
4,923 |
|
|
$ |
1,225 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The discussion that follows addresses changes in selected categories of noninterest expense.
PersonnelThe increase in personnel expense, comprised of wages/sales commissions, payroll taxes
and employee benefits, resulted primarily from the full years effect of staff additions associated
with expansion of the banking franchise in the prior year. In 2008, three full service financial
centers were added, one in the first quarter of 2008 and two in the fourth quarter of that year.
Occupancy of premises, netThe increase in occupancy expense, comprised of rent, depreciation,
maintenance, insurance, real estate taxes and utilities, increased primarily as a result of
expanding the banking franchise in the prior year.
Furniture and equipmentThe increase in furniture and equipment expense was primarily the result of
an increase in depreciation expense from capital expenditures that supported expansion of the
banking franchise and information technology initiatives.
Marketing and advertisingThe decrease in marketing and advertising expenses was due primarily to
the timing of expenditures and to a lesser degree reductions to the marketing budget.
FDIC insuranceThe increase in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance premiums was
the result of an industry-wide increase in assessment rates and an increase in the volume of
deposits upon which the assessment is based.
TelephoneThe increase in telephone expense reflected one-time conversion costs to a new carrier,
telecommunication enhancements and expansion of the banking franchise. During 2008, the
Corporations telecommunications carrier abruptly declared bankruptcy, which temporarily disrupted
service and resulted in disputes pertaining to the validity of billing charges. A portion of the
increase in 2009 telephone expense pertained to catch-up billings from the prior year from the
replacement telecommunications carrier.
Foreclosed real estateThe increase in foreclosed real estate expenses reflected an increase in the
number of properties acquired in satisfaction of debt. The current quarter included a $189,000
provision for the decline in the net realizable value of a foreclosed property that management is
actively trying to liquidate.
- 24 -
OtherThe increase in other expense, which is comprised of many underlying expenses, increased
primarily as a result of a $78,000 increase in carrying costs on a larger volume of impaired
commercial loans and a
$39,000 increase in appraisal expenses associated with loan growth. The remaining increase in other
expenses was generally due to corporate growth.
Income taxes
The provision for income tax for the third quarter of 2009 was $75,000, compared to $346,000 for
the same period in 2008. The decrease in income tax was the result of a decrease in pretax income
and an increase in tax-exempt income. For both periods the Corporations statutory federal income
tax rate was 34 percent. The Corporations effective federal income tax rate was approximately 5
percent for the third quarter of 2009 and 21 percent for the third quarter of 2008. The effective
tax rate differs from the statutory tax rate due to the impact of low-income housing credits and
tax-exempt income including income from bank owned life insurance. The effective tax rate for 2009
decreased primarily as a result of the decrease in pretax income.
Nine months ended September 30, 2009,
compared to nine months ended September 30, 2008
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The Corporation earned net income available to common shareholders of $1,620,000 or $0.40 per share
($0.40 diluted) for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, compared to $3,624,000 or $0.92
per share ($0.91 diluted), for the same period of 2008. The $2,004,000 or 55 percent decrease in
net income available to common shareholders was primarily the result of increases in the provision
for loan losses, noninterest expenses and preferred dividends, which offset increases in net
interest income and noninterest income and a decrease in income taxes.
The $1,070,000 or 76 percent increase in the provision for loan losses was the result of additions
to the allowance for impaired commercial real estate loans and significant growth in the loan
portfolio balance. Allocations to the allowance were deemed necessary due to continued uncertainty
in the economy, depressed real estate values and an increase in the level of nonperforming loans.
The $3,514,000 or 24 percent increase in noninterest expense was due primarily to an increase in
operating expenses associated with expansion of the banking franchise, an increase in Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) deposit insurance premiums, and an increase in carrying costs
and loss provisions associated with impaired loans and foreclosed real estate. During 2008, the
Corporation added three full service financial centers to its banking franchise bringing the total
number of financial centers to seventeen, fifteen located in Pennsylvania and two located in
Maryland. Current period FDIC insurance premiums totaled $1,154,000, an increase of $916,000 or 385
percent above the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008. Of the total insurance premiums,
$382,000 (or $252,000 after tax) pertained to a special FDIC assessment effective June 30, 2009,
which was imposed on all commercial financial institutions. The remaining increase in deposit
insurance premiums was caused by an industry-wide increase in assessment rates by the FDIC and an
increase in the volume of deposits upon which the assessment is based. Carrying costs and loss
provisions associated with impaired loans and foreclosed real estate increased $405,000 above the
prior year, which reflected increases in the volume of impaired loans and foreclosed real estate. A
$242,000 non-recurring cost of restructuring employee benefit plans in the current period also
contributed to the increase in noninterest expense. Restructuring the benefit plans resulted in a
federal income tax benefit so that the overall transaction had an insignificant impact on net
income.
- 25 -
Net interest income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, was $16,939,000, an
increase of $1,262,000 or 8 percent above the same period in 2008 due to a larger volume of earning
assets, principally business loans and investment securities. The net interest margin was 3.10
percent for the first nine months of 2009, compared to 3.75 percent for the same period in 2008.
Total noninterest income was $5,653,000 for the current nine-month period, an increase of $452,000
or 9 percent above 2008, as adjusted to exclude securities gains. The increase in noninterest
income was primarily attributable to increases in gains from the
sale of mortgages and income from bank owned life insurance. The provision for income tax for the
current period was a $298,000 credit (benefit), compared to a $1,112,000 expense for the same
period in 2008. The decrease in income tax was the result of a decrease in pretax income, an
increase in tax-exempt income and the recognition of a non-recurring $242,000 tax benefit
associated with restructuring employee benefit plans.
Total assets were approximately $870 million on September 30, 2009, an increase of $220 million or
34 percent above September 30, 2008. Asset growth occurred primarily in the business loans and
investment securities portfolios, which were funded primarily by an increase in deposits,
principally money market and time deposits, and to a lesser degree, borrowing from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Pittsburgh.
Net income as a percentage of average shareholders equity (ROE) was 4.47 percent for the first
nine months (annualized) of 2009, compared to 9.72 percent for the same period of 2008. Net income
as a percentage of average total assets (ROA) was 0.38 percent for the first nine months
(annualized) of 2009, compared to 0.78 percent for the same period of 2008. The decrease in both
ratios for 2009 reflected the decrease in earnings. The ROE ratio was further depressed as a result
of a $16.5 million capital addition described in the Shareholders Equity and Capital Adequacy
section of this report. The efficiency ratio (noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest
income plus noninterest income on a tax equivalent basis) was 76.9 percent for the first nine
months of 2009, compared to 68.5 percent for the same period of 2008. The increase in the
efficiency ratio during the current period reflected the increase in operating expenses described
above.
On September 30, 2009, the nonperforming assets ratio was 3.98 percent, compared to 1.93 percent
for September 30, 2008. Net loan charge-offs for the current nine month period totaled $659,000,
compared to $488,000 for the same period in 2008. Information regarding nonperforming assets is
provided in the Risk Management section of this report, including Table 5Nonperforming Assets.
Based on a recent evaluation of probable loan losses and the current loan portfolio, management
believes that the allowance is adequate to support losses inherent in the loan portfolio on
September 30, 2009. An analysis of the allowance is provided in Table 6Analysis of Allowance for
Loan Losses.
Note 8Regulatory Matters, shows that PeoplesBank exceeded the minimum ratios for well capitalized
institutions on September 30, 2009.
A more detailed analysis of the factors and trends affecting corporate earnings follows.
INCOME STATEMENT ANALYSIS
Net interest income
Net interest income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, was $16,939,000, an
increase of $1,262,000 or 8 percent above the same period in 2008 due primarily to an increase in
the average volume of earning assets. The net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, was 3.10
percent for the first nine months of 2009, compared to 3.75 percent for the same period in 2008.
The decrease in the net interest margin reflected: the low level of market interest rates, which
has depressed yields on variable (floating) rate loans, overnight investments and investment
securities; an elevated level of nonperforming assets; excess liquidity; and the impact of the
leverage strategy implemented earlier this year.
Interest income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 totaled $29,634,000, an increase
of $2,195,000 or 8 percent above 2008 due primarily to an increase in the average volume of earning
assets. Earning assets averaged $767 million and yielded 5.31 percent (tax equivalent basis) for
the current period, compared to $576 million and 6.48 percent, respectively, for the first nine
months of 2008. The $191 million or 33 percent increase in average earning assets was primarily the
result of strong growth in the business loan and investment securities portfolios. The increase in
business loans reflected additions to the business banking staff and changes in the competitive
landscape that benefited the Corporation. The increase in investment securities, principally U.S.
agency mortgage-backed bonds and tax-exempt municipal bonds,
resulted from the leverage strategy, which is discussed in the Investment Securities section of
this report. The leverage strategy is expected to make a positive contribution to net interest
income; however, the 2 percent tax equivalent margin spread resulting from this strategy is
expected to constrain the Corporations net interest margin.
- 26 -
Interest expense for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 totaled $12,695,000, an
increase of $933,000 or 8 percent above 2008 due primarily to an increase in the average volume of
interest bearing liabilities. Total interest bearing liabilities averaged $697 million at an
average rate of 2.43 percent for the current period, compared to $517 million and 3.04 percent,
respectively, for the first nine months of 2008. The $180 million or 35 percent increase in
interest bearing liabilities was the result of increases in the average volume of time deposits,
money market deposits and long-term debt. Federally insured bank deposits continue to provide a
safe haven to our clients who are increasingly concerned about the economic recession, volatility
in the capital markets and rising unemployment. The addition of three financial centers in 2008 and
competitive pricing also contributed to the increase in deposit volumes. The increase in long-term
debt provided the financing for a leverage strategy, which is discussed in the Long-term Debt
section of this report.
Provision for loan losses
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, the provision for loan losses was $2,483,000,
compared to $1,413,000 for same period in 2008. The $1,070,000 or 76 percent increase was due
primarily to a decline in loan quality as a result of the long-drawn economic recession, depressed
real estate values and increased unemployment. A significant increase in the loan portfolio balance
during the current period also contributed to the increase in the provision. Information about loan
quality is provided in the Nonperforming Asset section of this report on page 33.
Noninterest income
The following table presents the components of total noninterest income for the nine-month period
ended September 30, 2009, compared to the same nine-month period in 2008. After removing the impact
of gains from the sale of investment securities, total noninterest income increased $452,000 or 9
percent above 2008.
Table 3 Noninterest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust and investment services fees |
|
$ |
961 |
|
|
$ |
983 |
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
)% |
Income from mutual fund, annuity and insurance sales |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Service charges on deposit accounts |
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Income from bank owned life insurance |
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Other income |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Gain on sales of mortgages |
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Gain on sales of securities |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income |
|
$ |
5,653 |
|
|
$ |
5,033 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- 27 -
The discussion that follows addresses changes in selected categories of noninterest income.
Trust and investment services feesThe decrease in income from trust operations was the result of
depressed capital markets and the impact that it had on our fees, which are generally calculated on
the market price of assets under management.
Income from mutual fund, annuity and insurance salesThe decrease in income from the sale of mutual
fund, annuity and insurance products by Codorus Valley Financial Advisors, a subsidiary of
PeoplesBank, was a result of depressed capital markets and the impact it had on the volume of sales
and fees. A portion of our fees are calculated on market prices of assets under management.
Service charges on deposit accountsIn spite of increases in deposit volumes and number of accounts
during the current period, service charges increased only slightly as deposit clients exhibited
conservative spending and money management behavior in response to concerns about the economic
recession and job security.
Income from bank owned life insurance (BOLI)The increase in BOLI was due to an additional
investment of approximately $4 million in November 2008 and an increase in the crediting rates on
existing policies that were transferred to new insurance providers. The additional investment in
BOLI provides a competitive tax-free return to the Corporation while providing a life insurance
benefit to additional members of the management team.
Other incomeThe increase in other income was due primarily to increases in income from real estate
settlement services provided by SYC Settlement Services, a subsidiary of PeoplesBank, and merchant
credit card services.
Gain on sales of mortgagesThe increase in gains from the sale of mortgages was the result of an
increase in the volume of sales. During the current period, the low level of market interest rates
and the first time homebuyers tax credit program, both influenced by the federal government to
stimulate the economy, increased mortgage banking activity.
Gain on sales of securitiesDuring the current period, PeoplesBank took advantage of the low
interest rate environment and sold approximately $9 million in U.S. agency mortgage-backed bonds,
which generated $291,000 in gains that were recognized into income. Sale proceeds were reinvested
into U.S. agency mortgage-backed bonds and tax-exempt municipal securities.
Noninterest expense
The following table presents the components of total noninterest expense for the first nine months
of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008. Total noninterest expenses increased $3,514,000
or 24 percent.
- 28 -
Table 4 Noninterest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel |
|
$ |
9,702 |
|
|
$ |
8,277 |
|
|
$ |
1,425 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Occupancy of premises, net |
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
1,144 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Postage, stationery and supplies |
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Professional and legal |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Marketing and advertising |
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
FDIC insurance |
|
|
1,154 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
Debit card processing |
|
|
383 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Charitable donations |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
621 |
|
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
Telephone |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
Foreclosed real estate |
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,084 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
18,075 |
|
|
$ |
14,561 |
|
|
$ |
3,514 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The discussion that follows addresses changes in selected categories of noninterest expense.
PersonnelThe increase in personnel expense, comprised of wages/sales commissions, payroll taxes
and employee benefits, resulted primarily from the full years effect of staff additions associated
with expansion of the banking franchise in the prior year. During 2008, PeoplesBank added three
full service financial centers, one in the first quarter and two in the fourth quarter of that
year. A non-recurring cost of $242,000 in the first quarter of 2009 to restructure employee benefit
plans also contributed to the increase in personnel expense. However, restructuring the benefit
plans resulted in a federal income tax benefit so that the overall transaction had an insignificant
impact on net income.
Occupancy of premises, netThe percent increase in occupancy expense, comprised of rent,
depreciation, maintenance, insurance, real estate taxes and utilities, increased primarily as a
result of expanding the banking franchise.
Furniture and equipmentThe increase in furniture and equipment expense was primarily the result of
an increase in depreciation expense from capital expenditures that supported franchise expansion
and information technology initiatives.
Marketing and advertisingThe decrease in marketing and advertising expenses was due primarily
to the timing of expenditures and to reductions to the marketing budget.
FDIC insuranceThe increase in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) premiums was the result
of an industry-wide increase in assessment rates, an increase in the volume of deposits upon which
the assessment is based, and a special assessment totaling $382,000. Effective June 30, 2009, the
FDIC imposed a special assessment on all commercial financial institutions, based on 5 basis points
of total assets less Tier 1 capital.
- 29 -
On September 30, 2009, the FDIC sent a notice of proposed rulemaking, which would require insured
depository institutions to prepay their quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of
2009, and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012, on December 30, 2009. The proposed assessment rate would
be the insured institutions base assessment rate in effect on September 30, 2009. That rate would
be increased by 3 basis points in 2011 and 2012. Also for purposes of calculating the prepaid
amount, an insured institutions third quarter 2009 assessment base, e.g., total domestic deposits,
would be increased quarterly at a 5 percent annual growth rate through the end of 2012. Insured
institutions would record the entire prepaid assessment as a prepaid expense and amortize an
appropriate amount as an expense to coincide with the time period. For
example, the prepaid premium expense associated with the first quarter of 2010 would be expensed in
that period and the related prepaid premium asset reduced by the same amount. This accounting
process would continue every quarter until the prepaid assessment was depleted. The FDIC is
proposing prepaid assessments as a means of collecting enough funds to meet its upcoming liquidity
needs. This strategy is preferable to a continuation of special assessments, which can erode a
depository institutions capital base.
Charitable donationsThe level of charitable donations was particularly large in the prior period.
During the first quarter of 2008, the Corporation accrued $444,000 for a donation commitment that
qualified for a $400,000 (90%) state tax credit for educational improvement. The tax credit was
used to reduce the Pennsylvania shares tax expense included in the other expense category.
TelephoneThe increase in telephone expense reflected one-time conversion costs to a new carrier,
telecommunication enhancements and expansion of the banking franchise. During 2008, the
Corporations telecommunications carrier abruptly declared bankruptcy, which temporarily disrupted
service and resulted in disputes pertaining to the validity of billing charges. A portion of the
increase in 2009 telephone expense pertained to catch-up billings from the prior year from the
replacement telecommunications carrier.
Foreclosed real estateThe foreclosed real estate category includes carrying costs, typically
insurance, real estate taxes and legal fees, and losses associated with declines in the net
realizable value of the property. The increase in the current period expense generally reflects a
larger portfolio of foreclosed real estate properties.
OtherThe increase in other expense, which is comprised of many underlying expenses, increased
primarily as a result of increases in Pennsylvania shares tax and carrying costs on impaired loans.
Shares tax expense increased $425,000 because the level of shares tax for 2008 was unusually low as
a result of recognizing a $400,000 tax credit in that year. The tax credit is described above in
the charitable donations category. Carrying costs on impaired loans (typically insurance, real
estate taxes and legal fees, and on a less frequent basis expenditures to maintain operations for a
going concern) increased $147,000 due primarily to an increase in the volume of impaired loans.
In the period ahead, it is probable that noninterest expenses will increase as a result of
increased FDIC deposit insurance premiums, increased carrying costs associated with impaired
assets, planned improvements to selected corporate facilities, investment in technology
initiatives, regulatory compliance and normal business growth.
Income taxes
The provision for income tax was a $298,000 credit, or tax benefit, for the current nine-month
period, compared to a $1,112,000 expense for the same period in 2008. The $1,410,000 decrease in
the tax provision was the result of a decrease in pretax income, an increase in tax-exempt income
and the recognition of a one-time $242,000 tax benefit associated with restructuring employment
plans. For both periods, the Corporations statutory federal income tax rate was 34 percent. The
Corporations effective federal income tax rate was negative for the current nine-month period and
22 percent for the first nine months of 2008. The effective tax rate differs from the statutory tax
rate due to the impact of low income housing credits and tax-exempt income including income from
bank owned life insurance. The effective tax rate for 2009 decreased primarily as a result of the
decrease in pretax income.
- 30 -
BALANCE SHEET REVIEW
Investment securities
On September 30, 2009, the fair value of the securities available-for-sale portfolio totaled $180
million, compared to $72 million at year-end 2008. The increase in the investment securities
portfolio was primarily the result of implementing an $80 million leverage strategy that involved
investing in investment grade U.S. agency mortgage-backed bonds (3-4 year average lives) and
tax-exempt municipal bonds (5-10 year maturities), which were financed by borrowing from the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh. The leverage strategy, which was completed in April 2009, is
expected to generate a 2 percent tax-equivalent margin spread, which will cover the dividends
payable and related costs associated with the recent issuance of preferred stock described in Note
9Shareholders Equity. During the current period, PeoplesBank took advantage of the low interest
rate environment and sold approximately $9 million in U.S. agency mortgage-backed bonds, which
generated $291,000 in gains that were recognized into income. Sale proceeds were reinvested into
U.S. agency mortgage-backed bonds and tax-exempt municipal bonds.
Restricted investment in bank stocks
At September 30, 2009, PeoplesBank held $4,262,000 in restricted common stock, compared to
$2,692,000 at year-end 2008. The increase was required to obtain advances from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLBP) to finance the leverage strategy previously discussed. Investment
in restricted stock is a condition to obtaining credit from the FHLBP and the Atlantic Central
Bankers Bank (ACBB) organizations. Of the total, $4,187,000 consisted of stock issued by the FHLBP
and $75,000 issued by the ACBB. In December 2008, the FHLBP announced the suspension of the payment
of dividends on its common stock and its repurchase of capital stock as strategies to preserve its
capital.
Loans
On September 30, 2009, total loans were $637 million, an increase of $64 million or 11 percent
above year-end 2008. The increase was attributable to an increase in business loans, the result of
additions to the business banking staff and changes in the competitive landscape that benefited the
Corporation. As a result of the recessionary economy and rising unemployment there has been little
or no demand for consumer loans. The average yield (tax equivalent basis) earned on total loans was
5.78 percent for the current nine-month period, compared to 6.80 percent for the first nine months
of 2008. The decline in loan yields, particularly floating rate loans, reflected a series of
aggressive interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve Bank from September 2007 through April 2008
and again during the fourth quarter of 2008 in its continuing efforts to stimulate the recessionary
economy. The historically low level of the LIBOR reflects the impact of a global economic recession
and disrupted credit markets. The composition of the Corporations loan portfolio at September 30,
2009, compared to December 31, 2008, is provided in Note 5Loans.
Deposits
On September 30, 2009, total deposits were approximately $713 million, an increase of $115 million
or 19 percent above year-end 2008. The increase in total deposits, as shown in Note 6Deposits,
occurred primarily in the time (CD) and money market deposit categories and were generated from
local markets. The Corporation does not rely on brokered deposits to fund its operation. On
September 30, 2009, the volume of brokered deposits was less than $7 million, which resulted from
participation in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS). Federally insured
bank deposits continue to provide safe haven to our clients who are increasingly concerned about
the economic recession, volatility in the capital markets and rising unemployment. The addition of
three financial centers in 2008 and competitive pricing also contributed to the increase in deposit
volumes. The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits was 2.40 percent for the current period
nine month period, compared to 2.95 percent for the first nine months of 2008.
- 31 -
Long-term debt
On September 30, 2009, long-term debt totaled $69 million, compared to $19 million at year-end
2008. During the current period, PeoplesBank borrowed approximately $66 million in term debt from
the Federal
Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLBP). Maturities were staggered over three years at an average rate
of 2.04 percent. PeoplesBank borrowed from the FHLBP to finance investments in securities. i.e.,
effect a leverage strategy, to generate sufficient margin spread to cover the costs of the
dividends payable on the preferred stock issued in January 2009 as described below in the
shareholders equity and capital adequacy section and in Note 9Shareholders Equity. In April
2009, PeoplesBank paid off a $15 million/2% FHLBP advance prior to its August 2010 maturity to
reduce excess liquidity and interest expense. A listing of outstanding long-term debt obligations
is provided in Note 7Long-term Debt.
Shareholders equity and capital adequacy
Shareholders equity or capital enables Codorus Valley to maintain asset growth and absorb losses.
Total shareholders equity was approximately $72.5 million on September 30, 2009, an increase of
approximately $20.4 million or 39 percent above December 31, 2008. The increase was caused
primarily by the issuance of $16.5 million of preferred stock described below. An increase in
accumulated other comprehensive income from unrealized gains, net of federal income tax, on
securities available for sale also contributed to the increase in shareholders equity.
The Corporation typically pays cash dividends on a quarterly basis. The Board of Directors
determines the dividend rate after considering the Corporations capital requirements, current and
projected net income, and other factors. On October 13, 2009, the Board of Directors declared a
quarterly cash dividend of $0.03 per common share payable on November 10, 2009, to shareholders of
record October 27, 2009. This dividend follows a $0.03 per share dividend paid in August, a $0.08
per share dividend paid in May, and a $0.12 per share dividend paid in February. Total cash
dividends for 2009 will total $0.26 per share, compared to $0.51 per share, as adjusted, for 2008.
The decrease in common cash dividends for 2009 reflects the decline in earnings and the need to
preserve capital for balance sheet growth and for unexpected losses that could arise from a
prolonged economic recession. The Corporations recent participation in the U.S. Department of the
Treasurys Capital Purchase Program requires regulatory approval to increase quarterly cash
dividends on common stock above the $0.12 per share level that prevailed just prior to the issuance
of the preferred stock.
As previously disclosed, on January 9, 2009, the Corporation sold 16,500 shares of $1,000
liquidation value ($2.50 par value) nonvoting cumulative perpetual preferred stock to the U.S.
Department of the Treasury (Treasury) under the Treasurys voluntary Capital Purchase Program (CPP)
and received $16.5 million in capital funds. Codorus Valley, which is well capitalized, plans to
use the capital to sustain its loan growth plans, expand its banking franchise and to strengthen
its capital base against economic uncertainties. The preferred stock, which qualifies as Tier 1
capital, is generally redeemable at any time in whole or in part (i.e., a minimum of 25 percent of
the issue price) with regulatory permission. The dividend on the preferred stock is 5 percent per
annum for the first five years, and 9 percent thereafter and is paid quarterly. Under the CPP, the
Corporation was also required to issue a warrant (option) to the Treasury to allow the Treasury to
purchase 263,859 shares of common stock at an initial exercise price of $9.38 per share (subject to
adjustment for stock dividends, splits, etc.). The 10-year warrant can be exercised by the Treasury
at any time on or before January 9, 2019. The CPP places restrictions on the ability of
participating institutions, without obtaining permission from the Treasury, to increase dividends
and repurchase common stock. The CPP also places restrictions on incentive compensation to senior
executives. The annual after-tax cost of the preferred stock is approximately $982,000, ($825,000
in dividends plus $157,000 for the average implied cost of the warrant), which is charged to
retained earnings. Management initiated an $80 million leverage strategy to generate sufficient
income to offset costs associated with the dividends payable on the preferred stock. The leverage
strategy, which was completed in April 2009, involved borrowing from the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Pittsburgh and investing the proceeds in investment grade securities to achieve a 2 percent margin
spread.
- 32 -
Codorus Valley and PeoplesBank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered
by banking regulators that involve quantitative guidelines and qualitative judgments. Quantitative
measures established by regulators pertain to minimum capital ratios, as set forth in Note
8Regulatory Matters, to
the financial statements. Management believes that Codorus Valley and PeoplesBank were well
capitalized on September 30, 2009, based on FDIC capital guidelines. The increase in the capital
ratios since year-end 2008 reflects the issuance of $16.5 million of cumulative perpetual preferred
stock, which qualifies as Tier 1 capital, to the U.S. Department of the Treasury under its Capital
Purchase Program, described above and in Note 9Shareholders Equity.
RISK MANAGEMENT
Credit risk management
The Credit Risk Management section included in Item 7 of our 2008 Form 10-K provides a general
overview of the credit risk management process and loan concentrations. Credit risk represents the
possibility that a loan client, counterparty or issuer may not perform in accordance with
contractual terms posing one of the most significant risks to the Corporation. In addition to the
credit risk controls described in the Form 10-K, management also uses loan-to-value ratios (LTV
ratios) to minimize the risk of loss on the loan portfolio. At September 30, 2009, the LTV ratios
listed below were in effect. An acceptable appraisal is required on all real estate secured loans.
Further, an appraisal performed by an independent licensed appraiser is required for real estate
secured loans where the amount is above $100,000 or is non-owner occupied or if the LTV ratio is
above 70 percent for commercial property or above 90 percent of the tax assessed value for owner
occupied residential property.
|
|
|
|
|
Loan type |
|
LTV ratio % |
|
Residential, owner occupied 1-4 units, tax assessment |
|
|
90 |
|
Residential, owner occupied 1-4 units, certified appraisal |
|
|
80 |
|
Residential, non-owner occupied 1-4 units, certified appraisal |
|
|
75 |
|
Residential, 5 or more units |
|
|
75 |
|
Agricultural |
|
|
75 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
70 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
65 |
|
Vacant land |
|
|
65 |
|
Nonperforming assets
The following table presents asset categories posing the greatest risk of loss. Management
generally places a loan on nonaccrual status and ceases accruing interest income, i.e., recognizes
interest income on a cash basis, when loan payment performance is unsatisfactory and the loan is
past due 90 days or more. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest represent
loans that are contractually past due, but are well collateralized and in the process of
collection. The final category, foreclosed real estate, is real estate acquired to satisfy debts.
The paragraphs below explain significant changes in the aforementioned categories for September 30,
2009, compared to December 31, 2008.
- 33 -
Table 5 Nonperforming Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
$ |
19,946 |
|
|
$ |
8,396 |
|
Accruing loans that are contractually past due
90 days or more as to principal or interest |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Foreclosed real estate, net of allowance |
|
|
4,974 |
|
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
25,577 |
|
|
$ |
10,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans as a % of total period-end loans |
|
|
3.13 |
% |
|
|
1.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets as a % of total period-end
loans and net foreclosed real estate |
|
|
3.98 |
% |
|
|
1.83 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets as a % of total period-end
shareholdersequity |
|
|
35.26 |
% |
|
|
20.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a multiple of
nonaccrual loans |
|
|
.3 |
x |
|
|
.6 |
x |
On September 30, 2009, nonaccrual loans consisted of collateralized business and mortgage loans,
and consumer loans. The nonaccrual loan portfolio balance totaled $19,946,000 on September 30,
2009, and was comprised of 19 unrelated accounts ranging in size from $2,000 to $5,109,000. Four
unrelated commercial real estate loan accounts, which represent 91 percent of the total nonaccrual
loan portfolio balance, are described below.
Loan no. 1PeoplesBank owns a 28.91 percent participation loan interest. Accordingly, its share of
the outstanding principal balance of the loan is $5,109,000. The collateral supporting the loan is
a condominium building located in a popular resort area. In November 2009, the borrower plans to
conduct a public auction for 15 of the 81 condominium units for sale, which is part of a broader
plan between the borrower and the participating banks to repay the loan.
Loan no. 2The outstanding principal loan balance is $5,041,000. During the second quarter of this
year based on an appraisal of the improved real estate collateralizing the loan and other factors,
management established a $1,649,000 allowance for possible loss. Management is in the process of
pursuing its remedies against the borrowers and guarantors.
Loan no. 3The outstanding principal loan balance is $4,638,000. In managements judgment the loan
is adequately collateralized by improved real estate. A public auction for the property is
scheduled for November 2009.
Loan no. 4The outstanding principal loan balance is $3,298,000. This account is collateralized by
266 acres of unimproved land that has been approved for residential development. A public auction
for the property is scheduled for December 2009.
Further provision for loan losses may be required on nonaccrual loans when additional information
becomes available, including the outcome of public auctions.
- 34 -
Management has established a loss allowance for selected accounts where the net realizable value of
the collateral is insufficient to repay the loan. Management and the Board of Directors evaluate
the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses at least quarterly. Collection efforts, including
modification of contractual terms for individual accounts based on prevailing market conditions and
liquidation of collateral assets, are being employed to maximize recovery.
On September 30, 2009, loans past due 90 days or more totaled $657,000. Of this total, $450,000
pertained to a commercial loan that has matured. Subsequent to September 30, the loan term was
extended and additional collateral was obtained from the borrower to bring the loan into compliance
with the Corporations LTV ratio policy.
On September 30, 2009, foreclosed real estate, net of allowance, totaled $4,974,000, compared to
$2,052,000 on December 31, 2008. The current portfolio, which is included in the other assets
category, contains five unrelated properties, which management is actively attempting to liquidate.
Property no. 1The property is an unoccupied nine unit condominium building with a carrying value
of $1,822,000, which is being held in a non-bank subsidiary of the Corporation pending eventual
sale of the individual units. To date, the Corporation has received letters of intent to purchase
two of the units.
Property no. 2The property is improved real estate and has a carrying value of $348,000. In
October 2009 this property was sold for cash. The sale resulted in full recovery of the principal
carrying value plus a $113,000 gain, which will be recognized in fourth quarter operations.
Property no. 3PeoplesBank has a 25 percent participation loan interest in this improved real
estate. The carrying value of PeoplesBanks interest is $699,000.
Property no. 4PeoplesBank has an 18.4 percent participation loan interest in this improved real
estate. The carrying value of PeoplesBanks interest is $668,000, which is net of a $189,000
allowance for possible loss.
Property no. 5PeoplesBank has a 64 percent participation loan interest in 42 improved lots, which
are approved for residential development. The carrying value of PeoplesBanks interest is
$1,437,000.
Other than property no. 4, there was no valuation allowance for foreclosed real estate as
management believes there were no declines in the fair value of individual assets since the
properties were foreclosed on and a new carrying basis was established.
Allowance for loan losses
The Corporation accounts for the credit risk associated with lending activities through its
allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses. The provision is generally an expense
recognized in the income statement to adjust the allowance to its proper balance, as determined
through the Corporations allowance adequacy review procedures. The Corporation stresses the timely
detection and prompt communication of potential credit problems among its lending staff and senior
management and closely monitors impaired credits on an on-going basis in its efforts to maximize
recovery.
The allowance was $6,514,000 or 1.02 percent of total loans, on September 30, 2009, compared to
$4,359,000 and 0.83 percent, respectively, on September 30, 2008. The increase in the allowance
reflects credit quality issues for selected commercial real estate loans and was based on
managements estimate of the amount necessary to bring the allowance to a level reflective of the
risk in the loan portfolio and loan growth. Management also considered macro-economic factors that
could adversely affect the ability of PeoplesBanks loan clients to repay their loans, including
the general economic recession, rising unemployment and continued downturn in the real estate
market. The Corporation does not participate in the
subprime lending market, and accordingly, it has no direct loss exposure to subprime lending. Based
on its evaluation of probable loan losses in the current portfolio, management believes that the
allowance is adequate to support losses inherent in the loan portfolio on September 30, 2009.
- 35 -
Table 6 Analysis of Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance-January 1, |
|
$ |
4,690 |
|
|
$ |
3,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision charged to operating expense |
|
|
2,483 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Real estate-construction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
481 |
|
Real estate-mortgage |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans charged off |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Real estate-mortgage |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Consumer |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance-September 30, |
|
$ |
6,514 |
|
|
$ |
4,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized net charge-offs to
average total loans |
|
|
0.15 |
% |
|
|
0.14 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
at period-end |
|
|
1.02 |
% |
|
|
0.83 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans
and loans past due 90 days or more |
|
|
31.6 |
% |
|
|
53.1 |
% |
Liquidity risk management
At September 30, 2009, management believes that liquidity was adequate based on the potential
liquidation of a $180 million portfolio of available-for-sale securities, valued at September 30,
2009, and available credit from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (FHLBP). On September 30,
2009, available funding from the FHLBP was approximately $47 million. The Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows, included in this report, present the changes in cash from operating, investing and
financing activities. Codorus Valleys loan-to-deposit ratio, which is used as a broad measure of
liquidity, was approximately 89.4 percent on September 30, 2009, compared to 95.8 percent on
December 31, 2008. The decrease in the ratio was the result of deposit growth outpacing loan
growth.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Codorus Valleys financial statements do not reflect various commitments that are made in the
normal course of business, which may involve some liquidity risk. These commitments consist
primarily of commitments to grant new loans, unfunded commitments under existing loan facilities,
and letters of credit issued under the same standards as on-balance sheet instruments. Unused
commitments on September 30, 2009, totaled
$166,185,000 and consisted of $133,123,000 in unfunded commitments under existing loan facilities,
$28,270,000 to grant new loans and $4,792,000 in letters of credit. Normally these commitments
have fixed
expiration dates or termination clauses and are for specific purposes. Accordingly, many of the
commitments are expected to expire without being drawn and therefore, generally do not present
significant liquidity risk to the Corporation or PeoplesBank.
- 36 -
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
|
|
|
Item 4T. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
The Corporation carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the
Corporations management, including the Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based upon the evaluation, the Corporations Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2009, the Corporations disclosure
controls and procedures are effective. The Corporations disclosure controls and procedures are
designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that information required to be disclosed
in the Corporations reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, must
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, that the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs, and inherent limitations that may not prevent fraud,
particularly by collusion of two or more people or by management override of a control.
There has been no change in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, that has materially affected or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
On October 2, 2009, the SEC announced that auditor attestation reports for non-accelerated filers
(smallest public companies with a public float below $75 million) relative to compliance with
section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are required for fiscal years ending on or after June
15, 2010, (effectively December 31, 2010 for the Corporation). This announcement extended the
previous expiration date for this requirement which was for fiscal years ending on or after
December 15, 2009.
Part IIOTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal proceedings |
There are no legal proceedings pending against Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. or any of its
subsidiaries which are expected to have a material impact upon the financial position and/or
operating results of the Corporation. Management is not aware of any proceedings known or
contemplated by government authorities.
Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds |
Nothing to report.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults upon senior securities |
Nothing to report.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Submission of matters to a vote of security holders |
Nothing to report.
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other information |
Nothing to report.
- 37 -
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on October 14, 2005.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended By-laws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on November 15, 2007.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
Certificate of Designations for the Series A Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with
the Commission on January 15, 2009.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
Rights Agreement dated as of November 4, 2005 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on November 8, 2005.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of January 9, 2009, between the Registrant and the
United States Department of Treasury (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on January 15, 2009.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Warrant, dated January 9, 2009, to purchase shares of Common Stock of the Registrant
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form
8-K, filed with the Commission on January 15, 2009.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Code of Ethics (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the Registrants Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on March 3, 2008.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
- 38 -
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned there unto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc. |
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
November 10, 2009
|
|
/s/ Larry J. Miller |
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Larry J. Miller
President & CEO
(Principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
November 10, 2009
|
|
/s/ Jann A. Weaver |
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Jann A. Weaver
Treasurer & Assistant Secretary
(Principal financial and accounting officer) |
- 39 -