e8vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): November 16, 2009
DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
001-32318
|
|
73-1567067 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(IRS Employer |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
|
|
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
20 NORTH BROADWAY, OKLAHOMA CITY, OK
|
|
73102 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (405) 235-3611
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to
simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
|
|
|
o |
|
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
|
Information Regarding Forward-Looking Estimates
This report includes forward-looking statements as defined by the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Such statements are those concerning, without limitation, strategic plans, expectations
and objectives for future operations, including associated revenue, cost and financial position
projections. In addition, forward-looking statements exclude statements of historical facts and
generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will,
expect, intend, project, estimate, anticipate, believe, or continue or similar
terminology.
Our forward-looking statements included in this report are subject to a number of assumptions,
risks and uncertainties that are discussed below. Many of these assumptions, risks and
uncertainties are beyond the control of Devon. Although we believe that the expectations reflected
in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations
will prove to have been correct. Investors are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are
not guarantees of future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from
those projected in the forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this report
are made as of the date of this report. We assume no duty to revise our forward-looking statements
based on changes in internal estimates, expectations or otherwise.
|
|
|
Item 2.05 |
|
Costs Associated With Exit or Disposal Activities |
In a news release issued on
November 16, 2009, we unveiled our plan to strategically reposition
Devon
as a high-growth North American onshore exploration and production company. We intend to
divest all of our U.S. Offshore and International assets. We plan to direct the proceeds to
our high-return North America Onshore portfolio and to retire debt. We expect to complete the
divestitures throughout 2010 and to have finished the process by year-end.
We estimate that we will incur approximately $200 million to $275 million of total one-time
restructuring costs in connection with the planned 2010 divestitures. This estimate includes $175
million to $225 million of employee severance costs and $25 million to $50 million of contract
termination and other costs. We expect to recognize
the employee severance
costs during the fourth quarter of 2009.
We expect the majority of the remaining restructuring costs will be
recognized during
2010.
We
estimate that approximately $125 million to $175 million of the estimated total costs will
result in future cash expenditures. The majority of the costs that will not result in future cash
expenditures consist of employee severance costs related to accelerated vesting of stock awards.
We are providing our 2010 forward-looking estimates in this report. These estimates are based
on our examination of historical operating trends, the information being used to prepare our
forthcoming December 31, 2009 reserve reports and other data in our possession or available from
third parties.
As mentioned above, we announced plans to strategically reposition Devon by divesting our U.S.
Offshore and International assets. Although we expect to complete the divestitures throughout 2010,
all estimates in this report assume the divestitures close at the end of 2010. The assets to be
divested represent approximately 11% of our estimated 2009 production and 7% of our forecasted
December 31, 2009 proved reserves.
As a result of these planned divestitures, all revenues, expenses and capital related to our
International operations will be reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements.
Accordingly, all forward-looking estimates in this document exclude amounts related to our
International operations, unless otherwise noted. The operations related to our U.S. Offshore
assets will remain in our continuing operations.
2
A summary of our 2010 forward-looking estimates is included at the end of this report. Because
the 2009 estimates we have previously provided include amounts related to our International
operations, the summary also includes 2009 estimates that present our International operations
separately as discontinued.
Definitions
This report includes references to various abbreviations relating to volumetric production
terms and other defined terms. These abbreviations and terms are defined as follows:
Bbl or Bbls means barrel or barrels.
Bbls/d means barrels per day.
Bcf means billion cubic feet.
Boe means barrel of oil equivalent, determined by using the ratio of one Bbl of oil or NGLs
to six Mcf of gas.
Btu means British thermal units, a measure of heating value.
Canada means our operations encompassing oil and gas properties located in Canada.
Federal Funds Rate means the interest rate at which depository institutions lend balances at
the Federal Reserve to other depository institutions overnight.
Inside FERC refers to the publication Inside F.E.R.C.s Gas Market Report.
International means our operations encompassing oil and gas properties that lie outside the
United States and Canada.
LIBOR means London Interbank Offered Rate.
MMBbls means million Bbls.
MMBoe means million Boe.
MMBtu means million Btu.
MMBtu/d means million Btu per day.
Mcf means thousand cubic feet.
MMcf means million cubic feet.
NGL or NGLs means natural gas liquids.
North America Onshore means our operations encompassing oil and gas properties in the
continental United States and Canada.
NYMEX means New York Mercantile Exchange.
Oil includes crude oil and condensate.
U.S. Offshore means our operations encompassing oil and gas properties in the Gulf of
Mexico.
U.S. Onshore means our operations encompassing oil and gas properties in the continental
United States.
3
General Assumptions and Risks Related to Our Estimates
We caution that our future oil, gas and NGL production, revenues and expenses are subject to
all of the risks and uncertainties normally associated with exploring for, developing, producing
and selling oil, gas and NGLs. These risks include, but are not limited to, price volatility,
inflation or lack of availability of goods and services, environmental risks, drilling risks,
regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in estimating future oil and gas production or
reserves, and other risks discussed below.
Additionally, we caution that our future marketing and midstream revenues and expenses are
subject to all of the risks and uncertainties normally associated with transporting oil, gas and
NGLs and processing natural gas. These risks include, but are not limited to, price volatility,
environmental risks, regulatory changes, the uncertainty inherent in estimating future processing
volumes and pipeline throughput, cost of goods and services and other risks discussed below.
Also, the financial results of our foreign operations are subject to currency exchange rate
risks. Unless otherwise noted, all of the following dollar amounts are expressed in U.S. dollars.
Financial amounts related to our Canadian operations have been converted to U.S. dollars using an
estimated average 2010 exchange rate of $0.95 dollar to $1.00 Canadian dollar. The actual 2010
exchange rate may vary materially from this estimate. Such variations could have a material effect
on these forward-looking estimates.
Other specific risks associated with our price and production estimates are provided
immediately below. Additional risks are discussed throughout this report in the context of line
items most affected by such risks.
Specific Assumptions and Risks Related to Price and Production Estimates
Prices for oil, gas and NGLs are determined primarily by prevailing market conditions. Market
conditions for these products are influenced by regional and worldwide economic conditions, weather
and other local market conditions. These factors are beyond our control and are difficult to
predict. In addition, volatility in general oil, gas and NGL prices may vary considerably due to
differences between regional markets, differing quality of oil produced (i.e., sweet crude versus
heavy or sour crude), differing Btu content of gas produced, transportation availability and costs
and demand for the various products derived from oil, gas and NGLs. Substantially all of our
revenues are attributable to sales, processing and transportation of these three commodities.
Consequently, our financial results and resources are highly influenced by price volatility. We
expect this volatility to continue throughout 2010.
Estimates for future production of oil, gas and NGLs are based on the assumption that market
demand and prices for oil, gas and NGLs will continue at levels that allow for profitable discovery
and production of these products. There can be no assurance of such stability. Most of our Canadian
production of oil, gas and NGLs is subject to government royalties that fluctuate with prices.
Thus, price fluctuations can affect reported production. Also, our production of oil related to our
discontinued operations in Azerbaijan and China is governed by payout agreements with the
governments of these countries. If the payout under these agreements is attained earlier than
projected, our net production and proved reserves in such areas could be reduced.
Estimates for future processing and transport of oil, gas and NGLs are based on the assumption
that market demand and prices for oil, gas and NGLs will continue at levels that allow for
profitable processing and transport of these products. There can be no assurance of such stability.
The production, transportation, processing and marketing of oil, gas and NGLs are complex
processes that are subject to disruption. These disruptions result from transportation and
processing availability, mechanical failure, human error, hurricanes and other meteorological
events, and numerous other factors. The 2010 forward-looking estimates in this report were prepared
assuming demand, curtailment, producibility and general market conditions for our oil, gas and NGLs
during 2010 will be substantially similar to 2009, unless otherwise noted.
4
Operating Items
Oil, Gas and NGL Production
Set forth below are our estimates of oil, gas and NGL production for 2010. We estimate that
our combined oil, gas and NGL production will total approximately 229 to 233 MMBoe. The following
estimates for oil, gas and NGL production are calculated at the midpoint of the estimated range for
total production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil |
|
|
Gas |
|
|
NGLs |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(MMBbls) |
|
|
(Bcf) |
|
|
(MMBbls) |
|
|
(MMBoe) |
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Canada |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Onshore |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and Gas Prices
We expect our 2010 average prices for the oil and gas production from each of our operating
areas to differ from the NYMEX price as set forth in the following table. The expected ranges for
prices are exclusive of the anticipated effects of the financial contracts presented in the
Commodity Price Risk Management section below.
The NYMEX price for oil is determined using the monthly average of settled prices on each
trading day for benchmark West Texas Intermediate crude oil delivered at Cushing, Oklahoma. The
NYMEX price for gas is determined using the first-of-month South Louisiana Henry Hub price index as
published monthly in Inside FERC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Range of Prices |
|
|
|
as a % of NYMEX Price |
|
|
|
Oil |
|
|
Gas |
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
90% to 100% |
|
75% to 85% |
Canada |
|
65% to 75% |
|
85% to 95% |
North America Onshore |
|
72% to 82% |
|
77% to 87% |
U.S. Offshore |
|
95% to 105% |
|
100% to 110% |
Commodity Price Risk Management
From time to time, we enter into NYMEX related financial commodity collar and price swap
contracts. Such contracts are used to manage the inherent uncertainty of future revenues due to oil
and gas price volatility. Although these financial contracts do not relate to specific production
from our operating areas, they will affect our overall revenues, earnings and cash flow in 2010.
As of November 10, 2009, our financial commodity contracts pertaining to 2010 consisted of oil
price collars and gas price swaps. The key terms of these contracts are presented in the following
tables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil Price Collars |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor Price |
|
|
Ceiling Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Floor Range |
|
|
Average Price |
|
|
Ceiling Range |
|
|
Average Price |
|
Period |
|
(Bbls/d) |
|
|
($/Bbl) |
|
|
($/Bbl) |
|
|
($/Bbl) |
|
|
($/Bbl) |
|
Total year |
|
|
71,000 |
|
|
$ |
65.00 - $70.00 |
|
|
$ |
67.18 |
|
|
$ |
90.35 - $103.30 |
|
|
$ |
96.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Price Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Average Price |
|
Period |
|
(MMBtu/d) |
|
|
($/MMBtu) |
|
Total year |
|
|
1,085,000 |
|
|
$ |
6.18 |
|
5
To the extent that monthly NYMEX prices in 2010 are outside of the ranges established by the
collars or differ from those established by the swaps, we and the counterparties to the contracts
will cash-settle the difference. Such settlements will either increase or decrease our revenues for
the period. Also, we will mark-to-market the contracts based on their fair values throughout 2010.
Changes in the contracts fair values will also be recorded as increases or decreases to our
revenues. The expected ranges of our realized prices as a percentage of NYMEX prices, which are
presented earlier in this report, do not include any estimates of the impact on our prices from
monthly settlements or changes in the fair values of our price collars and swaps.
Marketing and Midstream Revenues and Expenses
Marketing and midstream revenues and expenses are derived primarily from our gas processing
plants and gas pipeline systems. These revenues and expenses vary in response to several factors.
The factors include, but are not limited to, changes in production from wells connected to the
pipelines and related processing plants, changes in the absolute and relative prices of gas and
NGLs, provisions of contractual agreements and the amount of repair and maintenance activity
required to maintain anticipated processing levels and pipeline throughput volumes.
These factors increase the uncertainty inherent in estimating future marketing and midstream
revenues and expenses. Given these uncertainties, we estimate that our 2010 marketing and midstream
operating profit will be between $450 million and $500 million. We estimate that marketing and
midstream revenues will be between $1.85 billion and $2.10 billion, and marketing and midstream
expenses will be between $1.40 billion and $1.60 billion.
Production and Operating Expenses
Our production and operating expenses include lease operating expenses, transportation costs
and production taxes. These expenses vary in response to several factors. Among the most
significant of these factors are additions to or deletions from the property base, changes in the
general price level of services and materials that are used in the operation of the properties, the
amount of repair and workover activity required and changes in production tax rates. Oil, gas and
NGL prices also have an effect on lease operating expenses and impact the economic feasibility of
planned workover projects.
Given these uncertainties, we expect that our 2010 lease operating expenses will be between
$1.86 billion and $2.01 billion. This estimated range includes $1.69 billion to $1.82 billion
related to our North America Onshore business and $0.17 to $0.19 billion associated with our U.S.
Offshore operations.
Additionally, we estimate that our production taxes for 2010 will be between 2.75% and 3.25%
of total oil, gas and NGL revenues, excluding the effect on revenues from derivative contracts upon
which production taxes are not assessed. We estimate our 2010 production tax rates for our North
America Onshore operations will range from 2.75% to 3.25% of revenues. We estimate the U.S.
Offshore rates will range from 1.25% to 1.75% of revenues.
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization (DD&A)
Our 2010 oil and gas property DD&A rate will depend on various factors. Most notable among
such factors are the amount of proved reserves that will be added from drilling or acquisition
efforts in 2010 compared to the costs incurred for such efforts, revisions to our year-end 2009
reserve estimates that, based on prior experience, are likely to be made during 2010, as well as
reductions of carrying value resulting from full cost ceiling tests.
Given these uncertainties, we estimate that our oil and gas property related DD&A rate will be
between $7.75 per Boe and $8.25 per Boe. Based on these DD&A rates and the production estimates set
forth earlier, oil and gas property related DD&A expense for 2010 is expected to be between $1.79
billion and $1.91 billion. For our North America Onshore assets, we estimate the DD&A rate will
range from $7.75 to $8.25 per Boe, resulting in estimated DD&A expense of $1.70 billion to $1.81
billion. Our U.S. Offshore DD&A rate is estimated to be between $6.75 and $7.25 per Boe, resulting
in estimated DD&A expense of $0.09 billion to $0.10 billion.
6
Additionally, we expect that our depreciation and amortization expense related to non-oil and
gas property fixed assets will total between $270 million and $300 million in 2010. This estimate
relates entirely to our North America Onshore assets.
Accretion of Asset Retirement Obligation
Accretion of asset retirement obligation in 2010 is expected to be between $95 million and
$105 million. This estimated range includes $70 million to $80 million related to our North America
Onshore business and $25 million associated with our U.S. Offshore operations.
General and Administrative Expenses (G&A)
Our G&A includes employee compensation and benefits costs and the costs of many different
goods and services used in support of our business. G&A varies with the level of our operating
activities and the related staffing and professional services requirements. In addition, employee
compensation and benefits costs vary due to various market factors that affect the level and type
of compensation and benefits offered to employees. Also, goods and services are subject to general
price level increases or decreases. Therefore, significant variances in any of these factors from
current expectations could cause actual G&A to vary materially from the estimate.
Given these limitations, we estimate our G&A for 2010 will be between $580 million and $620
million. This estimate includes approximately $115 million of non-cash, share-based compensation,
net of related capitalization in accordance with the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas
properties.
Restructuring Costs
In conjunction with the planned 2010 asset divestitures, we estimate we will incur certain
one-time restructuring costs totaling between $200 million and $275 million. Such costs will
consist of employee severance and termination costs, contract termination costs and other
associated costs. We expect to recognize the employee severance costs during the fourth quarter of 2009.
We expect the majority of the remaining restructuring
costs will be recognized during 2010.
Reduction of Carrying Value of Oil and Gas Properties
We follow the full cost method of accounting for our oil and gas properties. Under the full
cost method, our net book value of oil and gas properties, less related deferred income taxes (the
costs to be recovered), may not exceed a calculated full cost ceiling. The ceiling limitation
is the discounted estimated after-tax future net revenues from oil and gas properties plus the cost
of unevaluated properties.
The ceiling is imposed separately by country. The costs to be recovered are compared to the
ceiling on a quarterly basis. If the costs to be recovered exceed the ceiling, the excess is
written off as an expense. An expense recorded in one period may not be reversed in a subsequent
period even though higher oil and gas prices may have increased the ceiling applicable to the
subsequent period.
Future net revenues are calculated using prices that represent the average of the
first-day-of-the-month price for the 12-month period prior to the end of each quarterly period.
These prices are held constant indefinitely and are not changed except where different prices are
fixed and determinable from applicable contracts for the remaining term of those contracts. Costs
included in future net revenues are determined in a similar manner.
Because the ceiling calculation dictates the use of prices that are not representative of
future prices and requires a 10% discount factor, the resulting value is not indicative of the true
fair value of the reserves. Oil and gas prices have historically been cyclical and, for any
particular 12-month period, can be either higher or lower than our long-term price forecast, which
is a more appropriate input for estimating fair value. Therefore, oil and gas property writedowns
that result from applying the full cost ceiling limitation, and that are caused by fluctuations in
price as opposed to reductions to the underlying quantities of reserves, should not be viewed as
absolute indicators of a reduction of the ultimate value of the related reserves.
7
Due to the volatile nature of oil and gas prices, it is not possible to predict whether we
will incur full cost writedowns in 2010.
Interest Expense
Future interest rates and debt outstanding have a significant effect on our interest expense.
We can only marginally influence the prices we will receive in 2010 from sales of oil, gas and NGLs
and the resulting cash flow. This increases the margin of error inherent in estimating future
outstanding debt balances and related interest expense. Other factors that affect outstanding debt
balances and related interest expense, such as the amount and timing of capital expenditures are
generally within our control.
As of September 30, 2009, we had total debt of $7.4 billion. This included $6.0 billion of
fixed-rate debt and $1.4 billion of variable-rate commercial paper borrowings. The fixed-rate debt
bears interest at an overall weighted average rate of 7.24%. The commercial paper borrowings bear
interest at variable rates based on a standard index such as the Federal Funds Rate, LIBOR, or the
money market rate as found on the commercial paper market. As of September 30, 2009, the weighted
average variable rate for our commercial paper borrowings was 0.32%. Additionally, any future
borrowings under our credit facilities would bear interest at various fixed-rate options for
periods up to twelve months and are generally less than the prime rate.
Based on the factors above, we expect our 2010 interest expense to be between $375 million and
$415 million. The estimated interest expense is exclusive of the anticipated effects of the
interest rate swap contracts presented in the Interest Rate Risk Management section below.
The 2010 interest expense estimate above is comprised of three primary components interest
related to outstanding debt, fees and issuance costs, and capitalized interest. We expect the
interest expense in 2010 related to our fixed-rate and floating-rate debt, including net accretion
of related discounts, to be between $455 million and $495 million. We expect the interest expense
in 2010 related to facility and agency fees, amortization of debt issuance costs and other
miscellaneous items not related to outstanding debt balances to be between $10 million and $20
million. We also expect to capitalize between $90 million and $100 million of interest during 2010.
Interest Rate Risk Management
From time to time, we enter into interest rate swaps. Such contracts are used to manage our
exposure to interest rate volatility.
As of November 10, 2009, our interest rate swaps pertaining to 2010 consisted of instruments
with a total notional amount of $1.85 billion. These consist of instruments with a notional amount
of $1.15 billion in which we receive a fixed rate and pay a variable rate. The remaining
instruments consist of forward starting swaps. Under the terms of the forward starting swaps, we
will net settle these contracts in September 2011. The net settlement amount will be based upon us
paying a weighted-average fixed rate of 3.99% and receiving a floating rate that is based upon the
three-month LIBOR. The difference between the fixed and floating rate will be applied to the
notional amount for the 30-year period from September 30, 2011 to September 30, 2041. The key terms
of these contracts are presented in the following tables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-to-Floating Swaps |
|
|
Fixed Rate |
|
Variable |
|
|
Notional |
|
Received |
|
Rate Paid |
|
Expiration |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$300 |
|
4.30% |
|
Six month LIBOR |
|
July 18, 2011 |
$100 |
|
1.90% |
|
Federal funds rate |
|
August 3, 2012 |
$500 |
|
3.90% |
|
Federal funds rate |
|
July 18, 2013 |
$250 |
|
3.85% |
|
Federal funds rate |
|
July 22, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$1,150 |
|
3.82% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward Starting Swaps |
|
|
Fixed Rate |
|
Variable |
|
|
Notional |
|
Paid |
|
Rate Received |
|
Expiration |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$700 |
|
3.99% |
|
Three month LIBOR |
|
September 30, 2011 |
Income Taxes
Our financial income tax rate in 2010 will vary materially depending on the actual amount of
financial pre-tax earnings. The tax rate for 2010 will be significantly affected by the
proportional share of consolidated pre-tax earnings generated by our United States and Canadian
operations due to the different tax rates of each country. Also, certain tax deductions and credits
will have a fixed impact on 2010 income tax expense regardless of the level of pre-tax earnings
that are produced. Additionally, significant changes in estimated capital expenditures, production
levels of oil, gas and NGLs, the prices of such products, marketing and midstream revenues, or any
of the various expense items could materially alter the effect of these tax deductions and credits
on 2010 financial income tax rates.
Given the uncertainty of pre-tax earnings, we expect that our total financial income tax rate
in 2010 will be between 20% and 40%. The current income tax rate is expected to be between 10% and
20%. The deferred income tax rate is expected to be between 10% and 20%. These ranges do not
include the impact of current and deferred income taxes that will be recognized upon the completion
of the 2010 asset divestitures.
Discontinued Operations
As previously discussed, we intend to divest our U.S. Offshore and International assets. As a
result of these planned divestitures, all revenues, expenses and capital related to our
International operations will be reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements.
The operations related to our U.S. Offshore assets will remain in our continuing operations.
The following table shows the estimates for 2010 production, pricing, expenses and capital
associated with our discontinued International operations for 2010. These estimates assume the
sales will occur at the end of 2010. Pursuant to accounting rules for discontinued operations, the
International assets will not be subject to DD&A during 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
|
($ in millions, except per Boe) |
|
Oil production (MMBbls) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil area price as a % of NYMEX |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOE |
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
Production tax as % of revenue |
|
|
10.25 |
% |
|
|
10.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of ARO |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax rates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
Deferred |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development capital |
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
Exploration capital |
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total development & exploration |
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other capital |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
9
Capital Resources, Uses and Liquidity
Capital Expenditures
Though we have completed several major property acquisitions in recent years, these
transactions are opportunity driven. Thus, we do not forecast, nor can we reasonably predict, the
timing or size of such possible acquisitions.
Our capital expenditures budget is based on an expected range of future oil, gas and NGL
prices as well as the expected costs of the capital additions. Should actual prices received differ
materially from our price expectations for our future production, some projects may be accelerated
or deferred and, consequently, may increase or decrease total 2010 capital expenditures. In
addition, if the actual material or labor costs of the budgeted items vary significantly from the
anticipated amounts, actual capital expenditures could vary materially from our estimates.
Given the limitations discussed above, the following table shows expected ranges for drilling,
development and facilities expenditures by geographic area. Development capital includes
development activity related to reserves classified as proved and drilling that does not offset
currently productive units and for which there is not a certainty of continued production from a
known productive formation. Exploration capital includes exploratory drilling to find and produce
oil or gas in previously untested fault blocks or new reservoirs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onshore |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
Onshore |
|
|
Offshore |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Development capital |
|
$ |
2,210-$2,470 |
|
|
$ |
1,010-$1,140 |
|
|
$ |
3,220-$3,610 |
|
|
$ |
820-$900 |
|
|
$ |
4,040-$4,510 |
|
Exploration capital |
|
$ |
520-$560 |
|
|
$ |
20-$30 |
|
|
$ |
540-$590 |
|
|
$ |
100-$120 |
|
|
$ |
640-$710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,730-$3,030 |
|
|
$ |
1,030-$1,170 |
|
|
$ |
3,760-$4,200 |
|
|
$ |
920-$1,020 |
|
|
$ |
4,680-$5,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the above expenditures for drilling, development and facilities, we expect to
capitalize between $330 million and $350 million of G&A expenses in accordance with the full cost
method of accounting and to capitalize between $65 million and $75 million of interest. We also
expect to pay between $80 million and $90 million for plugging and abandonment charges.
Additionally, we expect to spend between $380 million and $430 million on our marketing and
midstream assets, which primarily include our oil pipelines, gas processing plants, and gas
pipeline systems. We expect to spend between $375 million and $425 million for corporate and other
fixed assets.
Other Cash Uses
Our management expects the policy of paying a quarterly common stock dividend to continue.
With the current $0.16 per share quarterly dividend rate and 444 million shares of common stock
outstanding as of September 30, 2009, dividends are expected to approximate $285 million.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Our estimated 2010 cash uses, including our capital activities, are expected to be funded
primarily through a combination of our existing cash balances and operating cash flow. Any
remaining cash uses could be funded by increasing our borrowings under our commercial paper program
or with borrowings from the available capacity under our credit facilities, which was approximately
$2.0 billion as of November 2, 2009. The amount of operating cash flow to be generated during 2010
is uncertain due to the factors affecting revenues and expenses as previously cited. However, we
expect our combined capital resources to be adequate to fund our anticipated capital expenditures
and other cash uses for 2010.
If significant other acquisitions or other unplanned capital requirements arise during the
year, we could utilize our existing credit facilities and/or seek to establish and utilize other
sources of financing.
10
Summary of Forward-Looking Estimates
The following tables summarize our 2010 forward-looking estimates related to our continuing
operations. As previously discussed, on November 16, 2009, we announced plans to divest our U.S.
Offshore and International assets.
As a result of the planned divestitures, the following tables include separate United States
Offshore estimates for production, pricing, LOE, production taxes, oil and gas property DD&A, ARO
accretion and capital. Also, all revenues, expenses and capital related to our International
operations will be reported as discontinued operations in our financial statements. Accordingly,
the forward-looking estimates in the following tables exclude amounts related to our International
operations. Because the 2009 estimates we have previously provided include amounts related to our
International operations, the following tables also include 2009 estimates that present our
International operations separately as discontinued.
Financial amounts related to our Canadian operations in the following tables have been
converted to U.S. dollars using estimated average exchange rates of $0.95 and $0.86 dollar to $1.00
Canadian dollar for 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Oil production (MMBbls): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Canada |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Onshore |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas production (Bcf): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
701 |
|
Canada |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Onshore |
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
926 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL production (MMBbls): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Canada |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Onshore |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined production (MMBoe): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
Canada |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Onshore |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As % of NYMEX Range |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
Oil operating area prices 1: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
Canada |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
North America Onshore |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
82 |
% |
|
|
70 |
% |
|
|
80 |
% |
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
105 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
105 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas operating area prices 1: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
85 |
% |
Canada |
|
|
85 |
% |
|
|
95 |
% |
|
|
83 |
% |
|
|
93 |
% |
North America Onshore |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
87 |
% |
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
110 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
110 |
% |
|
|
|
1 |
|
The expected ranges for our operating area prices as a percentage of NYMEX prices do
not include any estimates of the impact on our prices from monthly cash settlements or changes
in the fair values of our hedging instruments as presented on pages 5 and 6. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onshore |
|
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
|
($ in millions, except per Boe) |
|
Marketing & midstream: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,850 |
|
|
$ |
2,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
|
$ |
1,400 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,400 |
|
|
$ |
1,600 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOE |
|
$ |
1,690 |
|
|
$ |
1,820 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
1,860 |
|
|
$ |
2,010 |
|
|
$ |
1,740 |
|
|
$ |
2,060 |
|
Production tax as % of revenue |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
1.25 |
% |
|
|
1.75 |
% |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
2.25 |
% |
|
|
2.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil & gas DD&A per Boe |
|
$ |
7.75 |
|
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
|
$ |
6.75 |
|
|
$ |
7.25 |
|
|
$ |
7.75 |
|
|
$ |
8.25 |
|
|
$ |
7.60 |
|
|
$ |
8.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil & gas DD&A |
|
$ |
1,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,810 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
1,790 |
|
|
$ |
1,910 |
|
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
|
$ |
1,850 |
|
Non-oil & gas DD&A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
300 |
|
Accretion of ARO |
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
G&A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
580 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
415 |
|
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax rates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Development capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
$ |
2,210 |
|
|
$ |
2,470 |
|
|
$ |
1,520 |
|
|
$ |
1,790 |
|
Canada |
|
$ |
1,010 |
|
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
|
$ |
740 |
|
|
$ |
870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Onshore |
|
$ |
3,220 |
|
|
$ |
3,610 |
|
|
$ |
2,260 |
|
|
$ |
2,660 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
$ |
820 |
|
|
$ |
900 |
|
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total development |
|
$ |
4,040 |
|
|
$ |
4,510 |
|
|
$ |
2,720 |
|
|
$ |
3,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
560 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
Canada |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Onshore |
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total exploration |
|
$ |
640 |
|
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
$ |
320 |
|
|
$ |
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total development & exploration: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Onshore |
|
$ |
2,730 |
|
|
$ |
3,030 |
|
|
$ |
1,670 |
|
|
$ |
1,960 |
|
Canada |
|
$ |
1,030 |
|
|
$ |
1,170 |
|
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North America Onshore |
|
$ |
3,760 |
|
|
$ |
4,200 |
|
|
$ |
2,450 |
|
|
$ |
2,880 |
|
U.S. Offshore |
|
$ |
920 |
|
|
$ |
1,020 |
|
|
$ |
590 |
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total development & exploration |
|
$ |
4,680 |
|
|
$ |
5,220 |
|
|
$ |
3,040 |
|
|
$ |
3,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized G&A |
|
$ |
330 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
$ |
65 |
|
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
Plugging & abandonment |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
Marketing & midstream |
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
330 |
|
Corporate & other |
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
215 |
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other capital |
|
$ |
1,230 |
|
|
$ |
1,370 |
|
|
$ |
1,025 |
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
The following table summarizes our 2010 and 2009 forward-looking estimates related to our
discontinued International operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
High |
|
|
|
($ in millions, except per Boe) |
|
Oil production (MMBbls) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil area price as a % of NYMEX |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOE |
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
Production tax as % of revenue |
|
|
10.25 |
% |
|
|
10.75 |
% |
|
|
8.25 |
% |
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of ARO |
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax rates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
20 |
% |
Deferred |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development capital |
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
Exploration capital |
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total development & exploration |
|
$ |
460 |
|
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other capital |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
14
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Danny J. Heatly
|
|
|
|
Danny J. Heatly |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President
Accounting and Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
Date: November 16, 2009
15