sv1za
As filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on July 26, 2010
Registration
No. 333-166397
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Amendment No. 3
to
Form S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
Under
The Securities Act of
1933
RealPage, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
7372
|
|
75-2788861
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
4000 International
Parkway
Carrollton, Texas
75007
Tel:
(972) 820-3000
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of Registrants
principal executive offices)
Timothy J. Barker
4000 International
Parkway
Carrollton, Texas
75007
Tel:
(972) 820-3000
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
Paul R. Tobias
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Professional Corporation
900 S. Capital of Texas Hwy.
Las Cimas IV, Fifth Floor
Austin, Texas 78746
Tel: (512) 338-5400
|
|
William H. Hinman Jr.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
2550 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel: (650) 251-5000
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer þ Smaller
reporting
company o
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. Neither we nor the selling stockholders may sell these
securities until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus
is not an offer to sell these securities, and neither we nor the
selling stockholders are soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any state where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION, DATED JULY 26, 2010
13,500,000 Shares
RealPage,
Inc.
Common
Stock
This is the initial
public offering of our common stock. We are selling
6,000,000 shares of common stock and the selling
stockholders identified in this prospectus are selling
7,500,000 shares of common stock. We will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock by the selling
stockholders.
Prior to this
offering, there has been no public market for our common stock.
The initial public offering price of our common stock is
expected to be between $ and
$ per share. We have applied
to list our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market under the
symbol RP.
The underwriters
have an option to purchase a maximum of
2,025,000 additional shares from certain of the selling
stockholders to cover over-allotments.
After this offering,
Stephen T. Winn, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board, and entities beneficially owned by Mr. Winn,
will own approximately 46.0% of our common stock.
Investing in our
common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors on page 11.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price to
|
|
Discounts and
|
|
Proceeds to
|
|
Proceeds to
|
|
|
Public
|
|
Commissions
|
|
RealPage
|
|
Selling
Stockholders
|
|
Per share
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
Delivery of the
shares of common stock will be made on or
about ,
2010.
Neither the
Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or
determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
|
Credit
Suisse |
Deutsche Bank Securities |
|
|
William
Blair & Company |
RBC Capital Markets |
|
|
JMP
Securities |
Pacific Crest Securities |
The date of this
prospectus
is ,
2010.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate on the date of this document.
Dealer
Prospectus Delivery Obligation
Until ,
2010 (25 days after the commencement of this offering), all
dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as an underwriter and with
respect to unsold allotments or subscriptions.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus and does not contain all of the information you
should consider in making your investment decision. You should
read this entire prospectus carefully, especially the risks of
investing in our common stock discussed under Risk
Factors and the consolidated financial statements and
related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus, before
making an investment decision.
Company
Overview
We are a leading provider of on demand software solutions for
the rental housing industry. Our broad range of property
management solutions enables owners and managers of
single-family and a wide variety of multi-family rental property
types to manage their marketing, pricing, screening, leasing,
accounting, purchasing and other property operations. Our on
demand software solutions are delivered through an integrated
software platform that provides a single point of access and a
shared repository of prospect, resident and property data. By
integrating and streamlining a wide range of complex processes
and interactions among the rental housing ecosystem of owners,
managers, prospects, residents and service providers, our
platform optimizes the property management process and improves
the experience for all of these constituents.
Our solutions enable property owners and managers to increase
revenues and reduce operating costs through higher occupancy,
improved pricing methodologies, new sources of revenue from
ancillary services, improved collections and more integrated and
centralized processes. As of June 30, 2010, over
6,100 customers used one or more of our on demand software
solutions to help manage the operations of approximately
5.2 million rental housing units. Our customers include
nine of the ten largest multi-family property management
companies in the United States, ranked as of January 1,
2010 by the National Multi Housing Council, based on number of
units managed.
We sell our solutions through our direct sales organization. Our
total revenues were approximately $83.6 million,
$112.6 million, $140.9 million and $86.2 million
in 2007, 2008, 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively. In the same periods, we had operating (loss)
income of approximately ($1.6 million),
($0.4 million), $6.9 million and $2.9 million,
respectively, and net (loss) income of approximately
($3.1 million), ($3.2 million), $28.4 million and
($39 thousand), respectively. Net income for 2009 included
a discrete tax benefit of approximately $26.0 million as a
result of a reduction of our net deferred tax assets valuation
allowance.
Our Adjusted EBITDA in 2007, 2008, 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2010 was approximately $6.0 million,
$13.1 million, $25.6 million and $15.2 million,
respectively. We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to investors
in evaluating our operating performance. Our management uses
Adjusted EBITDA in conjunction with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP, operating
performance measures as part of its overall assessment of our
performance for planning purposes, including the preparation of
our annual operating budget, to evaluate the effectiveness of
our business strategies and to communicate with our board of
directors concerning our financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA
should not be considered as an alternative financial measure to
net (loss) income, which is the most directly comparable
financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, or any
other measure of financial performance calculated in accordance
with GAAP. The following table presents a reconciliation of net
(loss) income to Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,429
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Depreciation and asset impairment
|
|
|
4,854
|
|
|
|
9,847
|
|
|
|
9,231
|
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
5,784
|
|
|
|
4,496
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
4,528
|
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(26,028
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
Acquisition-related expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
5,984
|
|
|
$
|
13,064
|
|
|
$
|
25,593
|
|
|
$
|
15,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
For further discussion regarding Adjusted EBITDA, see footnote 5
to the table in Selected Consolidated Financial Data.
Industry
Overview
The rental housing market is large and characterized by
challenging and location-specific operating requirements,
diverse industry participants, significant mobility among
residents and a variety of property types, including
single-family and a wide range of
multi-family
property types, including conventional, affordable, privatized
military, student and senior housing. According to the
U.S. Census Bureau American Housing Survey for the United
States: 2007, there were 39.3 million rental housing units
in the United States in 2007. Based on U.S. Census Bureau
data and our own estimates, we believe that the overall size of
the U.S. rental housing market, including rent, utilities
and insurance, exceeds $300 billion annually. We estimate
that the total addressable market for our current on demand
software solutions is approximately $5.5 billion per year.
This estimate assumes that each of the 39.3 million rental units
in the United States has the potential to generate annually a
range of approximately $100 in revenue per unit for
single-family units to approximately $240 in revenue per unit
for conventional multi-family units. We base this potential
revenue assumption on our review of the purchasing patterns of
our existing customers with respect to our on demand software
solutions, the on demand software solutions currently utilized
by our existing customers, the number of units our customers
manage with these solutions and our current pricing for our on
demand software solutions.
Rental property management spans both the resident lifecycle and
the operations of a property. The resident lifecycle can be
separated into four key stages: prospect, applicant, residency
and post-residency. Each stage of the lifecycle has unique
requirements, such as identifying and capturing quality
prospects, processing applications, assessing applicants
credit risk, processing payments to and from residents and
service providers and managing resident turnover. In addition to
managing the resident lifecycle, property owners and managers
must also manage the operations of their properties, including
material and service provider procurement, insurance and risk
mitigation, utility and energy management, information
technology and telecommunications management, accounting,
expense tracking and management, document management, security,
staff hiring and training, staff performance measurement and
management and marketing. A property owners or
managers ability to effectively address these requirements
can significantly impact their revenue and profitability.
A variety of software applications have been developed to
automate many of these functions. However, these applications
often require property owners and managers to implement a myriad
of third-party
and/or
internally developed point solutions. These solutions can be
expensive to implement and maintain and are often ineffective at
helping property owners and managers increase rental revenue and
reduce costs.
The
RealPage Solution
We provide a platform of on demand software solutions that
integrate and streamline rental property management business
functions. Our solutions enable owners and managers of
single-family and a wide variety of multi-family rental property
types, including conventional, affordable, privatized military,
student and senior housing, to manage their marketing, pricing,
screening, leasing, accounting, purchasing and other property
operations. These functions have traditionally been addressed by
individual, disparate applications. Our solutions enable
property owners and managers to increase revenues and reduce
operating costs through higher occupancy, improved pricing
methodologies, new sources of revenue from ancillary services,
improved collections and more integrated and centralized
business processes. Our solutions contribute to a more efficient
property management process and an improved experience for all
of the constituents involved in the rental housing ecosystem,
including owners, managers, prospects, residents and service
providers.
We believe the benefits of our solutions for our customers
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Increased revenues. Our solutions help our
customers improve sales and marketing effectiveness, optimize
pricing and occupancy and improve collection of rental payments,
utility expenses, late fees and other charges.
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced operating costs. Our solutions help
our customers streamline and automate many ongoing property
management functions, centralize certain property operations,
control purchasing by on-site personnel and eliminate the need
to own and support property management applications and
associated hardware infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
Improved quality of service for residents and
prospects. Our solutions expedite the processing
of a variety of recurring transactions and increase the
frequency and quality of communication with residents and
prospects, providing higher resident satisfaction and increased
differentiation from competing properties that do not use our
solutions.
|
|
|
|
Streamlined and simplified property management business
processes. Our solutions share data and automate
the workflow of certain business processes, thereby eliminating
redundant data entry and simplifying many recurring tasks.
|
|
|
|
Ability to integrate third-party products and
services. Our open architecture and application
framework facilitate the integration of third-party applications
and services into our solutions.
|
|
|
|
Increased visibility into property
performance. Our integrated platform and common
data repository enable owners and managers to gain a
comprehensive view of the operational and financial performance
of each of their properties.
|
|
|
|
Simple implementation and support. Our
solutions include pre-configured extensions that meet the
specific needs of a variety of property types and can be easily
tailored by our customers to meet the specific needs of their
properties or business processes.
|
|
|
|
Improved scalability. Our application
infrastructure is designed to evolve with our customers
needs.
|
The competitive strengths of our solutions are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated on demand software platform based on a common data
repository. Our solutions are delivered through
an integrated on demand software platform that provides a single
point of access via the Internet to all of our products and a
common repository of prospect, resident and property data.
|
|
|
|
Large and growing ecosystem of property owners, managers,
prospects, residents and service providers. Our
solutions automate and streamline many of the recurring
transactions and interactions among a large and expanding rental
housing ecosystem of property owners and managers, prospects,
residents and service providers.
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive platform of on demand software solutions for
property management. We provide what we believe
to be the broadest range of on demand capabilities for managing
the resident lifecycle and core operational processes for
residential property management.
|
|
|
|
Deep rental housing industry expertise. We
design our solutions based on our extensive rental housing
industry expertise, insight into industry trends and
developments and best practices.
|
|
|
|
Open cloud computing architecture. Our cloud
computing architecture enables our solutions to interface with
many of our customers existing systems and allows our
customers to outsource the management of third-party business
applications.
|
Our
Strategy
We intend to leverage the breadth of our solutions and industry
presence to solidify our position as a leading provider of on
demand software solutions to the rental housing industry. The
key elements of our strategy to accomplish this objective are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
acquire new customers;
|
|
|
|
increase the adoption of additional solutions within our
existing customer base;
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
add new solutions to our platform; and
|
|
|
|
pursue acquisitions of complementary businesses, products and
technologies.
|
Risks
Affecting Us
Our business is subject to a number of risks that you should
understand before making an investment decision. These risks are
discussed more fully in Risk Factors following this
prospectus summary. Some of these risks are:
|
|
|
|
|
our quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and
may fluctuate in the future, which could cause our stock price
to decline;
|
|
|
|
we have a history of operating losses and may not maintain
profitability in the future;
|
|
|
|
if we are unable to manage the growth of our diverse and complex
operations, our financial performance may suffer;
|
|
|
|
our business depends substantially on customers renewing and
expanding their subscriptions for our solutions and any increase
in customer cancellations or decline in customer renewals and
expansions would harm our future operating results;
|
|
|
|
we face intense competitive pressures and our failure to compete
successfully could harm our operating results;
|
|
|
|
we may not be able to continue to add new customers, which could
adversely affect our operating results; and
|
|
|
|
if we are not able to integrate past or future acquisitions
successfully, our operating results and prospects could be
harmed.
|
Risks
Related to this Offering and Ownership of Our Common
Stock
There are risks related to this offering and the ownership of
our common stock that you should understand before making an
investment decision. These risks are discussed more fully in
Risk Factors following this prospectus summary. One
of these risks is that, upon completion of this offering, the
concentration of our capital stock owned by insiders, including
Stephen T. Winn, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board, and entities beneficially owned by Mr. Winn, will limit
your ability to influence corporate matters.
Company
Information
We were incorporated in the State of Delaware in December 2003
through a merger with our predecessor entity, RealPage, Inc., a
Texas corporation, which was originally incorporated in November
1998 as Seren Capital Acquisition Corp. Our principal executive
offices are located at 4000 International Parkway, Carrollton,
Texas 75007, and our telephone number is
(972) 820-3000.
Our website address is www.realpage.com. The information on, or
that can be accessed through, our website is not part of this
prospectus.
RealPage®,
OneSite®,
OneSite Leasing and
Rentstm,
OneSite
Facilitiestm,
OneSite
Purchasingtm,
OneSite
Accountingtm,
OneSite
Budgetingtm,
Propertyware®,
HUDManager®,
RentRoll®,
i-CAMtm,
Tenant
Pro®,
Spectratm,
CrossFire®,
CrossFire Contact
Centertm,
CrossFire Leasing
Portaltm,
CrossFire Resident
Portaltm,
CrossFire
Studiotm,
M/PF
Research®,
YieldStar®,
YieldStar Price
Optimizertm,
LeasingDesk®,
LeasingDesk
Screeningtm,
LeasingDesk Insurance
Servicestm,
eRenterPlantm,
Credit
Optimizertm,
Velocitytm,
OpsTechnologytm,
OpsMarkettm,
OpsAdvantagetm,
OpsBuyertm,
OpsBidtm,
Domin-8®,
Lead2Lease®
and
PropertyLinkOnlinetm
are our trademarks and registered trademarks appearing in this
prospectus. All other trademarks and trade names appearing in
this prospectus are the property of their respective owners.
4
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
6,000,000 shares |
|
|
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders |
|
7,500,000 shares |
|
|
|
Total common stock offered |
|
13,500,000 shares |
|
|
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering |
|
62,305,404 shares |
|
|
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to pay
accumulated and unpaid dividends on our outstanding shares of
Series A, Series A1 and Series B convertible
preferred stock that have accrued at a rate of 8% per annum of
the original issue price of each such share of preferred stock,
compounded quarterly, of which the amount expected to be paid in
cash is $0.4 million as of June 30, 2010, to repay
approximately $17.2 million of our indebtedness outstanding
as of June 30, 2010 and for general corporate purposes,
including working capital. We also may use a portion of the net
proceeds to acquire complementary businesses or technologies. We
will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the
selling stockholders. See Use of Proceeds. |
|
|
|
Risk factors |
|
You should read the Risk Factors section of this
prospectus for a discussion of factors that you should consider
carefully before deciding to invest in shares of our common
stock. |
|
Proposed NASDAQ Global Market symbol |
|
RP |
The number of shares of common stock that will be outstanding
after this offering is based on 55,962,216 shares of our
common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2010 plus 343,188
shares of our common stock issuable in payment of accumulated
and unpaid dividends on our Series A, Series A1 and
Series B convertible preferred stock accrued as of
June 30, 2010 and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
9,127,034 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of options outstanding as of June 30, 2010 (including
155,000 shares of our common stock that we expect to be
sold in this offering by certain selling stockholders upon the
exercise of vested options at the closing of this offering)
under our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, with a weighted average
exercise price of $4.88 per share;
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
options outstanding as of June 30, 2010 issued to directors
pursuant to stock option agreements outside of our 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan, with a weighted average exercise price of
$7.06 per share;
|
|
|
|
|
|
499,999 shares of our common stock issued on July 1,
2010 in connection with our acquisition of eReal Estate
Integration, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,499,272 shares of common stock reserved for future
issuance under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, which will become
effective in connection with this offering (including
999,272 shares of common stock reserved, as of
June 30, 2010, for future issuance under our 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan, which shares will be added to the shares
reserved under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, upon its
effectiveness); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
of our common stock issuable in payment of accumulated and
unpaid dividends on our Series A, Series A1 and
Series B convertible preferred stock accrued after
June 30, 2010.
|
5
Unless otherwise indicated, the information in this prospectus
assumes:
|
|
|
|
|
the 1-for-2 reverse stock split of our common stock and
convertible preferred stock effected in July 2010;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the conversion of all outstanding shares of our convertible
preferred stock into 29,043,748 shares of common stock
effective upon the completion of this offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
no exercise of options outstanding as of June 30, 2010;
|
|
|
|
|
|
no exercise by the underwriters of their right to purchase up to
2,025,000 shares of common stock to cover
over-allotments; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the filing of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and the effectiveness of our amended and restated
bylaws, which will occur immediately upon the completion of this
offering.
|
6
Summary
Consolidated Financial Data
The following tables present summary consolidated financial data
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and summary consolidated
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009
and June 30, 2010. We have derived the consolidated
statement of operations data for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 and the consolidated
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 from
our audited consolidated financial statements, which appear
elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the consolidated
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2007 from our audited
consolidated financial statements that are not included in this
prospectus. We have derived the consolidated statement of
operations data for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2010 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30,
2010 from our unaudited consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this prospectus. You should read this
information in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements, the related notes to these financial statements and
the information in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand
|
|
$
|
62,592
|
|
|
$
|
95,192
|
|
|
$
|
128,377
|
|
|
$
|
60,116
|
|
|
$
|
76,866
|
|
On premise
|
|
|
11,560
|
|
|
|
7,582
|
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
|
|
2,878
|
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
Professional and other
|
|
|
9,429
|
|
|
|
9,794
|
|
|
|
8,665
|
|
|
|
4,117
|
|
|
|
5,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
83,581
|
|
|
|
112,568
|
|
|
|
140,902
|
|
|
|
67,111
|
|
|
|
86,187
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
35,703
|
|
|
|
46,058
|
|
|
|
58,513
|
|
|
|
27,603
|
|
|
|
36,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
47,878
|
|
|
|
66,510
|
|
|
|
82,389
|
|
|
|
39,508
|
|
|
|
49,795
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
21,708
|
|
|
|
28,806
|
|
|
|
27,446
|
|
|
|
13,598
|
|
|
|
17,304
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
18,047
|
|
|
|
23,923
|
|
|
|
27,804
|
|
|
|
13,013
|
|
|
|
16,365
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
9,756
|
|
|
|
14,135
|
|
|
|
20,210
|
|
|
|
8,723
|
|
|
|
13,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense
|
|
|
49,511
|
|
|
|
66,864
|
|
|
|
75,460
|
|
|
|
35,334
|
|
|
|
46,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(1,633
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
6,929
|
|
|
|
4,174
|
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
Interest expense and other, net
|
|
|
(1,510
|
)
|
|
|
(2,152
|
)
|
|
|
(4,528
|
)
|
|
|
(1,983
|
)
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before taxes
|
|
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
|
(2,506
|
)
|
|
|
2,401
|
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(26,028
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,429
|
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(9,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,658
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,611
|
|
|
$
|
(845
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,363
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(9,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,658
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,611
|
|
|
$
|
(845
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,363
|
)
|
Net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Weighted average shares used in computing net (loss) income per
share attributable to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
10,223
|
|
|
|
13,886
|
|
|
|
23,934
|
|
|
|
23,831
|
|
|
|
25,901
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
10,223
|
|
|
|
13,886
|
|
|
|
25,511
|
|
|
|
23,831
|
|
|
|
25,901
|
|
Pro forma net income per share attributable to common
stockholders
(unaudited)(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding used in computing
net income per share attributable to common shareholders
(unaudited)(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents(3)
|
|
$
|
2,731
|
|
|
$
|
4,248
|
|
|
$
|
4,427
|
|
|
$
|
5,132
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
30,414
|
|
|
|
49,119
|
|
|
|
51,003
|
|
|
|
54,969
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
59,518
|
|
|
|
102,340
|
|
|
|
142,113
|
|
|
|
160,517
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
54,969
|
|
|
|
75,705
|
|
|
|
78,050
|
|
|
|
86,385
|
|
Total deferred revenue
|
|
|
41,052
|
|
|
|
47,232
|
|
|
|
49,428
|
|
|
|
50,854
|
|
Current and long-term
debt(4)
|
|
|
23,809
|
|
|
|
48,943
|
|
|
|
53,990
|
|
|
|
64,743
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
87,954
|
|
|
|
129,622
|
|
|
|
136,757
|
|
|
|
153,049
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
78,534
|
|
|
|
71,675
|
|
|
|
71,832
|
|
|
|
73,047
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(106,969
|
)
|
|
|
(98,957
|
)
|
|
|
(66,476
|
)
|
|
|
(65,579
|
)
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA(5)
|
|
$
|
5,984
|
|
|
$
|
13,064
|
|
|
$
|
25,593
|
|
|
$
|
15,199
|
|
Operating cash flow
|
|
|
4,441
|
|
|
|
7,962
|
|
|
|
24,758
|
|
|
|
8,197
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
7,122
|
|
|
|
10,263
|
|
|
|
9,509
|
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Selected Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of on demand customers at period end
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
2,669
|
|
|
|
5,032
|
|
|
|
6,186
|
|
Number of on demand units at period end (in thousands)
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
3,833
|
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
5,206
|
|
Total number of employees at period end
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pro forma net income per share represents net income divided by
the pro forma weighted average shares outstanding as though the
conversion of our redeemable convertible preferred stock into
common stock occurred on the original issuance dates. We plan to
use $17.2 million of the proceeds of this offering for
reduction of our indebtedness. Pro forma net income per share
reflects the effect of our use of proceeds from the offering to
repay debt. The pro forma calculation assumes the sale
of shares
of common stock offered by us used for this debt reduction at an
assumed public offering price of
$ per |
8
|
|
|
|
|
share, the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of
this prospectus, after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and our estimated offering costs payable. Pro forma
net income per share was computed as follows: actual net income
of $28.4 million and net (loss) of $39 thousand was
increased by approximately $2.1 million and
$1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
the six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively,
representing the pro forma reduction in interest expense, net of
tax, resulting from the use of net offering proceeds to reduce
indebtedness. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding reflects the
conversion of our redeemable convertible preferred stock (using
the if-converted method) into common stock as though the
conversion had occurred on the original dates of issuance. The
pro forma weighted average shares outstanding assumes the sale
of 6,000,000 shares of common stock issued by us through
this offering
including shares
offered by us used for the debt reduction noted in (1) above. In
addition, pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding,
as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010,
considers (a) the issuance of 1,418,669 shares of our
common stock in payment of a portion of dividends accrued on our
Series A, Series A1 and Series B convertible
preferred stock through December 31, 2009 and declared on
December 31, 2009, (b) the issuance of
342,696 shares of common stock in payment of a portion of
dividends accrued on our Series A, Series A1 and
Series B convertible preferred stock through March 31,
2010 and declared on April 23, 2010 and (c) the
issuance of 343,188 shares of our common stock in payment
of a portion of accumulated and unpaid dividends on our
Series A, Series A1 and Series B convertible
preferred stock as of June 30, 2010, each as if such shares
had been issued on January 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Excludes restricted cash. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes capital lease obligations. |
|
(5) |
|
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net (loss) income plus depreciation
and asset impairment, amortization of intangible assets,
interest expense, net, income tax expense (benefit), stock-based
compensation expense and acquisition-related expense. |
|
|
|
We believe that the use of Adjusted EBITDA is useful to
investors and other users of our financial statements in
evaluating our operating performance because it provides them
with an additional tool to compare business performance across
companies and across periods. We believe that: |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA provides investors and other users of our
financial information consistency and comparability with our
past financial performance, facilitates period-to-period
comparisons of operations and facilitates comparisons with our
peer companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial
measures to supplement their GAAP results; and
|
|
|
|
it is useful to exclude certain non-cash charges, such as
depreciation and asset impairment, amortization of intangible
assets and stock-based compensation and non-core operational
charges, such as acquisition-related expense, from Adjusted
EBITDA because the amount of such expenses in any specific
period may not directly correlate to the underlying performance
of our business operations and these expenses can vary
significantly between periods as a result of new acquisitions,
full amortization of previously acquired tangible and intangible
assets or the timing of new stock-based awards, as the case may
be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use Adjusted EBITDA in conjunction with traditional GAAP
operating performance measures as part of our overall assessment
of our performance, for planning purposes, including the
preparation of our annual operating budget, to evaluate the
effectiveness of our business strategies and to communicate with
our board of directors concerning our financial performance. |
|
|
|
We do not place undue reliance on Adjusted EBITDA as our only
measure of operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be
considered as a substitute for other measures of liquidity or
financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP. There
are limitations to using non-GAAP financial measures, including
that other companies may calculate these measures differently
than we do, that they do not reflect our capital expenditures or
future requirements for capital expenditures and that they do
not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working
capital. We compensate for the inherent limitations associated
with using Adjusted EBITDA measures through disclosure of these
limitations, presentation of our financial statements in
accordance with GAAP and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to
the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net (loss) income. |
9
The following table presents a reconciliation of net (loss)
income to Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,429
|
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Depreciation and asset impairment
|
|
|
4,854
|
|
|
|
9,847
|
|
|
|
9,231
|
|
|
|
4,513
|
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
5,784
|
|
|
|
2,684
|
|
|
|
4,496
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
4,528
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(26,028
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
Acquisition-related expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
5,984
|
|
|
$
|
13,064
|
|
|
$
|
25,593
|
|
|
$
|
12,549
|
|
|
$
|
15,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents stock-based compensation included
in each expense category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
490
|
|
|
$
|
1,476
|
|
|
$
|
2,805
|
|
|
$
|
1,178
|
|
|
$
|
2,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of
risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties
described below, together with the financial and other
information contained in this prospectus, including our
consolidated financial statements and related notes, before
deciding whether to purchase shares of our common stock. If any
of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial
condition, results of operations and future prospects could be
materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market
price of our common stock could decline and you could lose part
or all of your investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
quarterly operating results have fluctuated in the past and may
fluctuate in the future, which could cause our stock price to
decline.
Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate as a result of a
variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control.
Fluctuations in our quarterly operating results may be due to a
number of factors, including the risks and uncertainties
discussed elsewhere in this prospectus. Some of the important
factors that could cause our revenues and operating results to
fluctuate from quarter to quarter include:
|
|
|
|
|
the extent to which on demand software solutions maintain
current and achieve broader market acceptance;
|
|
|
|
our ability to timely introduce enhancements to our existing
solutions and new solutions;
|
|
|
|
our ability to increase sales to existing customers and attract
new customers;
|
|
|
|
changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors;
|
|
|
|
the variable nature of our sales and implementation cycles;
|
|
|
|
general economic, industry and market conditions in the rental
housing industry that impact the financial condition of our
current and potential customers;
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of our investment in research and
development activities;
|
|
|
|
technical difficulties, service interruptions or security
breaches;
|
|
|
|
our ability to hire and retain qualified key personnel,
including the rate of expansion of our sales force;
|
|
|
|
changes in the legal, regulatory or compliance environment
related to the rental housing industry, fair credit reporting,
payment processing, privacy, utility billing, the Internet and
e-commerce;
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of operating expenses and capital
expenditures related to the expansion of our operations and
infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
the timing of revenue and expenses related to recent and
potential acquisitions or dispositions of businesses or
technologies;
|
|
|
|
our ability to integrate acquisitions in a cost-effective and
timely manner;
|
|
|
|
litigation and settlement costs, including unforeseen
costs; and
|
|
|
|
new accounting pronouncements and changes in accounting
standards or practices, particularly any affecting the
recognition of subscription revenue or accounting for mergers
and acquisitions.
|
Fluctuations in our quarterly operating results may lead
analysts to change their long-term model for valuing our common
stock, cause us to face short-term liquidity issues, impact our
ability to retain or attract key personnel or cause other
unanticipated issues, all of which could cause our stock price
to decline. As a result of the potential variations in our
quarterly revenue and operating results, we believe that
quarter-to-
11
quarter comparisons of our revenues and operating results may
not be meaningful and the results of any one quarter should not
be relied upon as an indication of future performance.
We
have a history of operating losses and may not maintain
profitability in the future.
We have not been consistently profitable on a quarterly or
annual basis. We experienced net losses of $3.1 million and
$3.2 million in 2007 and 2008, respectively, and a net loss
of $39 thousand for the
six-month
period ended June 30, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, our
accumulated deficit was $89.8 million. While we have
experienced significant growth over recent quarters and our net
income was $28.4 million in 2009, we may not be able to
sustain or increase our growth or profitability in the future.
Net income for 2009 included a discrete tax benefit of
approximately $26.0 million as a result of a reduction of
our net deferred tax assets valuation allowance. We expect to
make significant future expenditures related to the development
and expansion of our business. In addition, following the
completion of this offering, we expect that our general and
administrative expenses will increase due to the additional
operational and reporting costs associated with being a public
company. As a result of these increased expenditures and
expenses, we will need to generate and sustain increased revenue
to achieve future profitability expectations. We may incur
significant losses in the future for a number of reasons,
including the other risks and uncertainties described in this
prospectus. Additionally, we may encounter unforeseen operating
expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown
factors that may result in losses in future periods. If these
losses exceed our expectations or our growth expectations are
not met in future periods, our financial performance will be
affected adversely.
If we
are unable to manage the growth of our diverse and complex
operations, our financial performance may suffer.
The growth in the size, complexity and diversity of our business
and the expansion of our product lines and customer base has
placed, and our anticipated growth may continue to place, a
significant strain on our managerial, administrative,
operational, financial and other resources. We have experienced
rapid growth over the past three years. We increased our number
of employees from 532 as of December 31, 2006 to 1,260 as
of June 30, 2010 and our number of on demand customers from
1,469 as of December 31, 2006 to 6,186 as of June 30,
2010. We increased the number of on demand product centers that
we offer from 20 as of December 31, 2006 to 42 as of
June 30, 2010 and have added four on premise property
management systems as a result of our February 2010
acquisition. In addition, in the past, we have grown and expect
to continue to grow through acquisitions. For example, we
recently acquired eReal Estate Integration, Inc., a lead
management and lead syndication business. Our ability to
effectively manage our anticipated future growth will depend on,
among other things, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
successfully supporting and maintaining a broad range of
solutions;
|
|
|
|
maintaining continuity in our senior management and key
personnel;
|
|
|
|
attracting, retaining, training and motivating our employees,
particularly technical, customer service and sales personnel;
|
|
|
|
enhancing our financial and accounting systems and controls;
|
|
|
|
enhancing our information technology infrastructure; and
|
|
|
|
managing expanded operations in geographically dispersed
locations.
|
If we do not manage the size, complexity and diverse nature of
our business effectively, we could experience delayed software
releases and longer response times for assisting our customers
with implementation of our solutions and could lack adequate
resources to support our customers on an ongoing basis, any of
which could adversely affect our reputation in the market and
our ability to generate revenue from new or existing customers.
12
The
nature of our platform is complex and highly integrated and if
we fail to successfully manage releases or integrate new
solutions, it could harm our revenues, operating income and
reputation.
We manage a complex platform of solutions that consists of our
property management systems and integrated software-enabled
value-added services. Many of our solutions include a large
number of product centers that are highly integrated and require
interoperability with each other and our other solutions, as
well as products and services of third-party service providers.
Additionally, we typically deploy new releases of the software
underlying our on demand software solutions on a monthly or
quarterly schedule depending on the solution. Due to this
complexity and the condensed development cycles under which we
operate, we may experience errors in our software or unexpected
performance issues from time to time. For example, our solutions
may face interoperability difficulties with software operating
systems or programs being used by our customers, or new
releases, upgrades, fixes or the integration of acquired
technologies may have unanticipated consequences on the
operation and performance of our other solutions. If we
encounter integration challenges or discover errors in our
solutions late in our development cycle, it may cause us to
delay our launch dates. Any major integration or
interoperability issues or launch delays could have a material
adverse effect on our revenues, operating income and reputation.
Our
business depends substantially on customers renewing and
expanding their subscriptions for our solutions and any increase
in customer cancellations or decline in customer renewals or
expansions would harm our future operating
results.
We generally license our solutions pursuant to customer
agreements with a term of one year. Our customers have no
obligation to renew these agreements after their term expires,
or to renew these agreements at the same or higher annual
contract value. In addition, under specific circumstances, our
customers have the right to cancel their customer agreements
before they expire, for example, in the event of an uncured
breach by us, or in some circumstances, by paying a cancellation
fee. In addition, customers often purchase a higher level of
professional services in the initial term than they do in
renewal terms to ensure successful activation. As a result, our
ability to grow is dependent in part on customers purchasing
additional solutions or professional services after the initial
term of their customer agreement. Though we maintain and analyze
historical data with respect to rates of customer renewals,
upgrades and expansions, those rates may not accurately predict
future trends in customer renewals. Our customers renewal
rates may decline or fluctuate for a number of reasons,
including, but not limited to, their satisfaction or
dissatisfaction with our solutions, our pricing, our
competitors pricing, reductions in our customers
spending levels or reductions in the number of units managed by
our customers. If our customers cancel their agreements with us
during their term, do not renew their agreements, renew on less
favorable terms or do not purchase additional solutions or
professional services in renewal periods, our revenue may grow
more slowly than expected or decline and our profitability may
be harmed.
Additionally, we have experienced, and expect to continue to
experience, some level of customer turnover as properties are
sold and the new owners and managers of properties previously
owned or managed by our customers do not continue to use our
solutions. We cannot predict the amount of customer turnover we
will experience in the future. However, we have experienced
slightly higher rates of customer turnover with our recently
acquired Propertyware property management system, primarily
because it serves smaller properties than our OneSite property
management system, and we may experience higher levels of
customer turnover to the extent Propertyware grows as a
percentage of our revenues. If we experience increased customer
turnover, our financial performance and operating results could
be adversely affected.
We have also experienced, and expect to continue to experience,
some number of consolidations of our customers with other
parties. If one of our customers consolidates with a party who
is not a customer, our customer may decide not to continue to
use our solutions. In addition, if one of our customers is
consolidated with another customer, the acquiring customer may
have negotiated lower prices for our solutions or may use fewer
of our solutions than the acquired customer. In each case, the
consolidated entity may attempt to negotiate lower prices for
using our solutions as a result of their increased size. These
consolidations may cause us to lose customers or require us to
reduce prices as a result of enhanced customer leverage, which
could cause our financial performance and operating results to
be adversely affected.
13
Because
we recognize subscription revenue over the term of the
applicable customer agreement, a decline in subscription
renewals or new service agreements may not be reflected
immediately in our operating results.
We generally recognize revenue from customers ratably over the
terms of their customer agreements, which are typically one
year. As a result, much of the revenue we report in each quarter
is deferred revenue from customer agreements entered into during
previous quarters. Consequently, a decline in new or renewed
customer agreements in any one quarter will not be fully
reflected in our revenue or our results of operations until
future periods. Accordingly, this revenue recognition model also
makes it difficult for us to rapidly increase our revenue
through additional sales in any period, as revenue from new
customers must be recognized over the applicable subscription
term.
We may
not be able to continue to add new customers and retain and
increase sales to our existing customers, which could adversely
affect our operating results.
Our revenue growth is dependent on our ability to continually
attract new customers while retaining and expanding our service
offerings to existing customers. Growth in the demand for our
solutions may be inhibited and we may be unable to sustain
growth in our customer base for a number of reasons, including,
but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
our inability to market our solutions in a cost-effective manner
to new customers or in new vertical or geographic markets;
|
|
|
|
our inability to expand our sales to existing customers;
|
|
|
|
our inability to build and promote our brand; and
|
|
|
|
perceived security, reliability, quality or compatibility
problems with our solutions.
|
A substantial amount of our past revenue growth was derived from
purchases of upgrades and additional solutions by existing
customers. Our costs associated with increasing revenue from
existing customers are generally lower than costs associated
with generating revenue from new customers. Therefore, a
reduction in the rate of revenue increase from our existing
customers, even if offset by an increase in revenue from new
customers, could reduce our profitability and have a material
adverse effect on our operating results.
If we
are not able to integrate past or future acquisitions
successfully, our operating results and prospects could be
harmed.
We have acquired new technology and domain expertise through
multiple acquisitions, including our most recent acquisition of
eReal Estate Integration, Inc. in July 2010. We expect to
continue making acquisitions. The success of our future
acquisition strategy will depend on our ability to identify,
negotiate, complete and integrate acquisitions. Acquisitions are
inherently risky, and any acquisitions we complete may not be
successful. Any acquisitions we pursue would involve numerous
risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in integrating and managing the operations and
technologies of the companies we acquire;
|
|
|
|
diversion of our managements attention from normal daily
operations of our business;
|
|
|
|
our inability to maintain the key employees, the key business
relationships and the reputations of the businesses we acquire;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisitions may generate insufficient revenue to offset our
increased expenses associated with acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our responsibility for the liabilities of the businesses we
acquire, including, without limitation, liabilities arising out
of their failure to maintain effective data security and privacy
controls prior to the acquisition;
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
difficulties in complying with new regulatory standards to which
we were not previously subject;
|
|
|
|
delays in our ability to implement internal standards, controls,
procedures and policies in the businesses we acquire; and
|
|
|
|
adverse effects of acquisition activity on the key performance
indicators we use to monitor our performance as a business.
|
Our current acquisition strategy includes the acquisition of
companies that offer property management systems that may not
interoperate with our software-enabled
value-added
services. In order to integrate and fully realize the benefits
of such acquisitions, we expect to build application interfaces
that enable such customers to use a wide range of our solutions
while they continue to use their legacy management systems. In
addition, over time we expect to migrate the acquired
companys customers to our on demand property management
systems to retain them as customers and to be in a position to
offer them our solutions on a cost-effective basis. These
efforts may be unsuccessful or entail costs that result in
losses or reduced profitability.
We may be unable to secure the equity or debt funding necessary
to finance future acquisitions on terms that are acceptable to
us, or at all. If we finance acquisitions by issuing equity or
convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders will
likely experience ownership dilution, and if we finance future
acquisitions with debt funding, we will incur interest expense
and may have to comply with additional financing covenants or
secure that debt obligation with our assets.
If we
are unable to successfully develop or acquire and sell
enhancements and new solutions, our revenue growth will be
harmed and we may not be able to meet profitability
expectations.
The industry in which we operate is characterized by rapidly
changing customer requirements, technological developments and
evolving industry standards. Our ability to attract new
customers and increase revenue from existing customers will
depend in large part on our ability to successfully develop,
bring to market and sell enhancements to our existing solutions
and new solutions that effectively respond to the rapid changes
in our industry. Any enhancements or new solutions that we
develop or acquire may not be introduced to the market in a
timely or cost-effective manner and may not achieve the broad
market acceptance necessary to generate the revenue required to
offset the operating expenses and capital expenditures related
to development or acquisition. If we are unable to timely
develop or acquire and sell enhancements and new solutions that
keep pace with the rapid changes in our industry, our revenue
will not grow as expected and we may not be able to maintain or
meet profitability expectations.
We
derive a substantial portion of our revenue from a limited
number of our solutions and failure to maintain demand for these
solutions or diversify our revenue base through increasing
demand for our other solutions could negatively affect our
operating results.
Historically, a majority of our revenue was derived from sales
of our OneSite property management system and our LeasingDesk
software-enabled
value-added
service. If we are unable to develop enhancements to these
solutions to maintain demand for these solutions or to diversify
our revenue base by increasing demand for our other solutions,
our operating results could be negatively impacted.
We use
a small number of data centers to deliver our solutions. Any
disruption of service at our facilities could interrupt or delay
our customers access to our solutions, which could harm
our operating results.
The ability of our customers to access our service is critical
to our business. We currently serve a majority of our customers
from a primary data center located in Carrollton, Texas. We also
maintain a secondary data center in downtown Dallas, Texas,
approximately 20 miles from our primary data center.
Services of our most recent acquisitions are provided from data
centers located in Wisconsin, Ohio, Kansas, Texas and Winnipeg,
Canada. It is our intent to migrate all data centers to our
primary and secondary data centers in Carrollton and Dallas. Any
event resulting in extended interruption or delay in our
customers access to our services or their data could harm
our operating results. There can be no certainty that the
measures we have taken to eliminate single points of failure in
the primary and secondary data centers will be
15
effective to prevent or minimize interruptions to our
operations. Our facilities are vulnerable to interruption or
damage from a number of sources, many of which are beyond our
control, including, without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
extended power loss;
|
|
|
|
telecommunications failures from multiple telecommunication
providers;
|
|
|
|
natural disaster or an act of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
software and hardware errors, or failures in our own systems or
in other systems;
|
|
|
|
network environment disruptions such as computer viruses,
hacking and similar problems in our own systems and in other
systems;
|
|
|
|
theft and vandalism of equipment; and
|
|
|
|
actions or events caused by or related to third parties.
|
The occurrence of an extended interruption of services at one or
more of our data centers could result in lengthy interruptions
in our services. Since January 1, 2007, we have experienced
two extended service interruptions lasting more than eight hours
caused by equipment and hardware failures. Our service level
agreements require us to refund a prorated portion of the access
fee if we fail to satisfy our service level commitments related
to availability. Refunds for breach of this service level
commitment have resulted in immaterial payments to customers in
the past. An extended service outage could result in refunds to
our customers and harm our customer relationships.
We attempt to mitigate these risks through various business
continuity efforts, including redundant infrastructure, 24 x 7 x
365 system activity monitoring, backup and recovery procedures,
use of a secure off-site storage facility for backup media,
separate test systems and change management and system security
measures, but our precautions may not protect against all
potential problems. Our secondary data center is equipped with
physical space, power, storage and networking infrastructure and
Internet connectivity to support the solutions we provide in the
event of the interruption of services at our primary data
center. Even with this secondary data center, however, our
operations would be interrupted during the transition process
should our primary data center experience a failure. Moreover,
both our primary and secondary data centers are located in the
greater metropolitan Dallas area. As a result, any regional
disaster could affect both data centers and result in a material
disruption of our services.
For customers who specifically pay for accelerated disaster
recovery services, we replicate their data from our primary data
center to our secondary data center with the necessary stand-by
servers and disk storage available to provide services within
two hours of a disaster. This process is currently audited by
some of our customers who pay for this service on an annual
basis. For customers who do not pay for such services, our
current service level agreements with our customers require that
we provide disaster recovery within 72 hours.
Disruptions at our data centers could cause disruptions in our
services and data loss or corruption. This could damage our
reputation, cause us to issue credits to customers, subject us
to potential liability or costs related to defending against
claims or cause customers to terminate or elect not to renew
their agreements, any of which could negatively impact our
revenues.
We
provide service level commitments to our customers, and our
failure to meet the stated service levels could significantly
harm our revenue and our reputation.
Our customer agreements provide that we maintain certain service
level commitments to our customers relating primarily to product
functionality, network uptime, critical infrastructure
availability and hardware replacement. For example, our service
level agreements generally require that our solutions are
available 98% of the time during coverage hours (normally
6:00 a.m. though 10:00 p.m. Central time daily)
365 days per year. If we are unable to meet the stated
service level commitments, we may be contractually obligated to
provide customers with refunds or credits. Additionally, if we
fail to meet our service level commitments a
16
specified number of times within a given time frame or for a
specified duration, our customers may terminate their agreement
with us or extend the term of their agreement at no additional
fee. As a result, a failure to deliver services for a relatively
short duration could cause us to issue credits or refunds to a
large number of affected customers or result in the loss of
customers. In addition, we cannot assure you that our customers
will accept these credits, refunds, termination or extension
rights in lieu of other legal remedies that may be available to
them. Our failure to meet our commitments could also result in
substantial customer dissatisfaction or loss. Because of the
loss of future revenues through the issuance of credits or the
loss of customers or other potential liabilities, our revenue
could be significantly impacted if we cannot meet our service
level commitments to our customers.
We
face intense competitive pressures and our failure to compete
successfully could harm our operating results.
The market for our solutions is intensely competitive,
fragmented and rapidly changing with relatively low barriers to
entry. With the introduction of new technologies and market
entrants, we expect competition to intensify in the future.
Increased competition generally could result in pricing
pressures, reduced sales and reduced margins. Often we compete
to sell our solutions against existing systems that our
potential customers have already made significant expenditures
to install.
We face competition primarily from point solution providers,
including traditional software vendors, application service
providers, or ASPs, and other software as a service, or SaaS,
providers. Our competitors vary depending on our product and
service. Our principal competitors in the multi-family
enterprise resource planning, or ERP, market are AMSI Property
Management (owned by Infor Global Solutions, Inc.), MRI Software
LLC and Yardi Systems, Inc. These competitors offer both
software and ASP delivery platforms. In the last 12 months
Yardi Systems, Inc. has expanded into other competitive areas
through smaller acquisitions and internally developed systems.
In the single-family market, our ERP systems compete primarily
with AppFolio, Inc. and DIY Real Estate Solutions (recently
acquired by Yardi Systems, Inc.).
We offer a number of software-enabled value-added services that
compete with a disparate and large group of competitors. In the
applicant screening market, our principal competitors are
ChoicePoint Inc. (a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier Group plc),
CoreLogic, Inc. (formerly First Advantage Corporation, an
affiliate of The First American Corporation), TransUnion Rental
Screening Solutions, Inc. (a subsidiary of TransUnion LLC),
Yardi Systems, Inc. (following its recent acquisition of
RentGrow Inc., an applicant screening provider), On-Site.com and
many other smaller regional and local screening companies. In
the insurance market, our principal competitors are Assurant,
Inc., Bader Company, CoreLogic, Inc. and a number of national
insurance underwriters (including GEICO Corporation) that market
renters insurance. There are many smaller screening and
insurance providers in the risk mitigation area that we
encounter less frequently, but they nevertheless present a
competitive presence in the market.
In the customer relationship management, or CRM, market, we
compete with providers of contact center and call tracking
services, including Call Source Inc., Level One, Inc.,
Yardi Systems, Inc. (which recently announced its intention to
build a call center) and numerous regional and local call
centers. In addition, we compete with lead tracking solution
providers, including Call Source Inc., Lead Tracking Solutions
(a division of O.C. Concepts, Inc.) and Whos Calling, Inc.
In addition, we compete with content syndication providers
Realty DataTrust Corporation, RentSentinel.com (owned by Yield
Technologies, Inc.), RentEngine (owned by MyNewPlace.com) and
rentbits.com, Inc. Finally, we compete with companies providing
web portal services, including Apartments24-7.com, Inc., Ellipse
Communications, Inc., Property Solutions International, Inc.,
Spherexx.com and Yardi Systems, Inc. Certain Internet listing
services also offer websites for their customers, usually as a
free value add to their listing service.
In the utility billing market, we compete at a national level
with American Utility Management, Inc., Conservice, LLC, ista
North America, Inc., NWP Services Corporation and Yardi Systems,
Inc. (following its recent acquisition of Energy Billing
Systems, Inc.). Many other smaller utility billing companies
compete for smaller rental properties or in regional areas.
17
In the revenue management market, we compete with PROS Holdings,
Inc., The Rainmaker Group, Inc. and Yardi Systems, Inc.
In the spend management market, we compete with Site Stuff, Inc.
(owned by Yardi Systems, Inc.), AvidXchange, Inc., Nexus
Systems, Inc., Ariba, Inc. and Oracle Corporation.
In the payment processing market, we compete with Chase
Paymentech Solutions, LLC (a subsidiary of JPMorgan
Chase & Co.), First Data Corporation, Fiserv, Inc.,
MoneyGram International, Inc., NWP Services Corporation,
Property Solutions International, Inc., RentPayment.com (a
subsidiary of Yapstone, Inc.), Yardi Systems, Inc. and a number
of national banking institutions.
In addition, many of our existing or potential customers have
developed or may develop their own solutions that may be
competitive with our solutions. We also may face competition for
potential acquisition targets from our competitors who are
seeking to expand their offerings.
With respect to all of our competitors, we compete based on a
number of factors, including total cost of ownership, ease of
implementation, product functionality and scope, performance,
security, scalability and reliability of service, brand and
reputation, sales and marketing capabilities and financial
resources. Some of our existing competitors and new market
entrants may enjoy substantial competitive advantages, such as
greater name recognition, longer operating histories, a larger
installed customer base and larger marketing budgets, as well as
greater financial, technical and other resources. In addition,
any number of our existing competitors or new market entrants
could combine or consolidate to become a more formidable
competitor with greater resources. As a result of such
competitive advantages, our existing and future competitors may
be able to:
|
|
|
|
|
develop superior products or services, gain greater market
acceptance and expand their offerings more efficiently or more
rapidly;
|
|
|
|
adapt to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer
requirements more quickly;
|
|
|
|
take advantage of acquisition and other opportunities more
readily;
|
|
|
|
adopt more aggressive pricing policies and devote greater
resources to the promotion of their brand and marketing and
sales of their products and services; and
|
|
|
|
devote greater resources to the research and development of
their products and services.
|
If we are not able to compete effectively, our operating results
will be harmed.
We integrate our software-enabled
value-added
services with competitive ERP applications for some of our
customers. We also provide services to assist in the
implementation, training, support and hosting with respect to
the integration of some of our competitors applications
with our solutions. We sometimes rely on the cooperation of our
competitors to implement solutions for our customers. However,
frequently our reliance on the cooperation of our competitors
can result in delays in integration. There is no assurance that
our competitors, even if contractually obligated to do so, will
continue to cooperate with us or will not prospectively alter
their obligations to do so. We also occasionally develop
interfaces between our software-enabled
value-added
services and competitor ERP systems without their cooperation or
consent. There is no assurance that our competitors will not
alter their applications in ways that inhibit integration or
assert that their intellectual property rights restrict our
ability to integrate our solutions with their applications. If
our competitors do not continue to cooperate with us or if they
alter their applications in ways that inhibit or restrict the
integration of our solutions and we are not able to find
alternative ways to integrate our solutions with our
competitors applications, our business will be harmed.
Variability
in our sales and activation cycles could result in fluctuations
in our quarterly results of operations and cause our stock price
to decline.
The sales and activation cycles for our solutions, from initial
contact with a potential customer to contract execution and
activation, vary widely by customer and solution. We do not
recognize revenue until the solution is
18
activated. While most of our activations follow a set of
standard procedures, a customers priorities may delay
activation and our ability to recognize revenue, which could
result in fluctuations in our quarterly operating results.
Many
of our customers are price sensitive, and if market dynamics
require us to change our pricing model or reduce prices, our
operating results will be harmed.
Many of our existing and potential customers are price
sensitive, and recent adverse global economic conditions have
contributed to increased price sensitivity in the multi-family
housing market and the other markets that we serve. As market
dynamics change, or as new and existing competitors introduce
more competitive pricing or pricing models, we may be unable to
renew our agreements with existing customers or customers of the
businesses we acquire or attract new customers at the same price
or based on the same pricing model as previously used. As a
result, it is possible that we may be required to change our
pricing model, offer price incentives or reduce our prices,
which could harm our revenue, profitability and operating
results.
If we
do not effectively expand and train our sales force, we may be
unable to add new customers or increase sales to our existing
customers and our business will be harmed.
We continue to be substantially dependent on our sales force to
obtain new customers and to sell additional solutions to our
existing customers. We believe that there is significant
competition for sales personnel with the skills and technical
knowledge that we require. Our ability to achieve significant
revenue growth will depend, in large part, on our success in
recruiting, training and retaining sufficient numbers of sales
personnel to support our growth. New hires require significant
training and, in most cases, take significant time before they
achieve full productivity. Our recent hires and planned hires
may not become as productive as we expect, and we may be unable
to hire or retain sufficient numbers of qualified individuals in
the markets where we do business or plan to do business. If we
are unable to hire and train sufficient numbers of effective
sales personnel, or the sales personnel are not successful in
obtaining new customers or increasing sales to our existing
customer base, our business will be harmed.
Material
defects or errors in the software we use to deliver our
solutions could harm our reputation, result in significant costs
to us and impair our ability to sell our
solutions.
The software applications underlying our solutions are
inherently complex and may contain material defects or errors,
particularly when first introduced or when new versions or
enhancements are released. We have from time to time found
defects in the software applications underlying our solutions
and new errors in our existing solutions may be detected in the
future. Any errors or defects that cause performance problems or
service interruptions could result in:
|
|
|
|
|
a reduction in new sales or subscription renewal rates;
|
|
|
|
unexpected sales credits or refunds to our customers, loss of
customers and other potential liabilities;
|
|
|
|
delays in customer payments, increasing our collection reserve
and collection cycle;
|
|
|
|
diversion of development resources and associated costs;
|
|
|
|
harm to our reputation and brand; and
|
|
|
|
unanticipated litigation costs.
|
Additionally, the costs incurred in correcting defects or errors
could be substantial and could adversely affect our operating
results.
Failure
to effectively manage the development of our solutions and data
processing efforts outside the United States could harm our
business.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to process high
volumes of customer data and enhance existing solutions and
develop new solutions rapidly and cost effectively. We currently
maintain an office in
19
Hyderabad, India where we employ development and data processing
personnel. We believe that performing these activities in
Hyderabad increases the efficiency and decreases the costs of
our development and data processing efforts. Managing and
staffing international operations requires managements
attention and financial resources. The level of cost-savings
achieved by our international operations may not exceed the
amount of investment and additional resources required to manage
and operate these international operations. Additionally, if we
experience problems with our workforce or facilities in
Hyderabad, our business could be harmed due to delays in product
release schedules or data processing services.
We
rely on third-party technologies and services that may be
difficult to replace or that could cause errors, failures or
disruptions of our service, any of which could harm our
business.
We rely on a number of third-party providers, including, but not
limited to, computer hardware and software vendors and database
providers, to deliver our solutions. We currently utilize
equipment, software and services from Avaya Inc., Cisco Systems,
Inc., Dell Inc., EMC Corporation, Microsoft Corporation, Oracle
Corporation and salesforce.com, inc., as well as many other
smaller providers. Our OneSite Accounting service relies on a
SaaS-based accounting system developed and maintained by a
third-party service provider. We host this application in our
data centers and provide supplemental development resources to
extend this accounting system to meet the unique requirements of
the rental housing industry. Our shared cloud portfolio
reporting service will utilize software licensed from IBM. We
expect to utilize additional service providers as we expand our
platform. Although the third-party technologies and services
that we currently require are commercially available, such
technologies and services may not continue to be available on
commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Any loss of the right
to use any of these technologies or services could result in
delays in the provisioning of our solutions until alternative
technology is either developed by us, or, if available, is
identified, obtained and integrated, and such delays could harm
our business. It also may be time consuming and costly to enter
into new relationships. Additionally, any errors or defects in
the third-party technologies we utilize or delays or
interruptions in the third-party services we rely on could
result in errors, failures or disruptions of our services, which
also could harm our business.
We
depend upon third-party service providers for important payment
processing functions. If these third-party service providers do
not fulfill their contractual obligations or choose to
discontinue their services, our business and operations could be
disrupted and our operating results would be
harmed.
We rely on several large payment processing organizations to
enable us to provide payment processing services to our
customers, including electronic funds transfers, or EFT, check
services, bank card authorization, data capture, settlement and
merchant accounting services and access to various reporting
tools. These organizations include Paymentech, LLC, Jack
Henry & Associates, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
and Wells Fargo, N.A. We also rely on third-party hardware
manufacturers to manufacture the check scanning hardware our
customers utilize to process transactions. Some of these
organizations and service providers are competitors who also
directly or indirectly sell payment processing services to
customers in competition with us. With respect to these
organizations and service providers, we have significantly less
control over the systems and processes than if we were to
maintain and operate them ourselves. In some cases, functions
necessary to our business are performed on proprietary
third-party systems and software to which we have no access. We
also generally do not have long-term contracts with these
organizations and service providers. Accordingly, the failure of
these organizations and service providers to renew their
contracts with us or fulfill their contractual obligations and
perform satisfactorily could result in significant disruptions
to our operations and adversely affect operating results. In
addition, businesses that we have acquired, or may acquire in
the future, typically rely on other payment processing service
providers. We may encounter difficulty converting payment
processing services from these service providers to our payment
processing platform. If we are required to find an alternative
source for performing these functions, we may have to expend
significant money, time and other resources to develop or obtain
an alternative, and if developing or obtaining an alternative is
not accomplished in a timely manner and without significant
disruption to our business, we may be unable to fulfill our
responsibilities to customers or meet their expectations, with
the attendant potential for liability claims, damage to our
reputation, loss of ability to attract or maintain customers and
reduction of our revenue or profits.
20
We
face a number of risks in our payment processing business that
could result in a reduction in our revenues and
profits.
In connection with our payment processing services, we collect
resident funds and subsequently remit these resident funds to
our customers after varying holding periods. These funds are
settled through our sponsor bank, and in the case of EFT, our
Originating Depository Financial Institution, or ODFI.
Currently, we rely on Wells Fargo, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
N.A. as our sponsor banks. In 2010, we expect to enter into
similar sponsor bank relationships with one or more other
national banking institutions. The custodial balances that we
hold for our customers at our sponsor bank are identified in our
consolidated balance sheets as restricted cash and the
corresponding liability for these custodial balances is
identified as customer deposits. Our payment processing business
and related maintenance of custodial accounts subjects us to a
number of risks, including, but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
liability for customer costs related to disputed or fraudulent
merchant transactions if those amounts exceed the amount of the
customer reserves we have established to make such payments;
|
|
|
|
limits on the amount of custodial balances that any single ODFI
will underwrite;
|
|
|
|
reliance on bank sponsors and card payment processors and other
service providers to process bank card transactions;
|
|
|
|
failure by us or our bank sponsors to adhere to applicable laws
and regulatory requirements or the standards of the Visa and
MasterCard credit card associations;
|
|
|
|
incidences of fraud or a security breach or our failure to
comply with required external audit standards; and
|
|
|
|
our inability to increase our fees at times when Visa and
MasterCard increase their merchant transaction processing fees.
|
If any of these risks related to our payment processing business
were to occur, our business or financial results could be
negatively affected. Additionally, with respect to the
processing of EFTs, we are exposed to financial risk. EFTs
between a resident and our customer may be returned for
insufficient funds, or NSFs, or rejected. These NSFs and rejects
are charged back to the customer by us. However, if we or our
sponsor banks are unable to collect such amounts from the
customers account or if the customer refuses or is unable
to reimburse us for the chargeback, we bear the risk of loss for
the amount of the transfer. While we have not experienced
material losses resulting from chargebacks in the past, there
can be no assurance that we will not experience significant
losses from chargebacks in the future. Any increase in
chargebacks not paid by our customers may adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations.
If our
security measures are breached and unauthorized access is
obtained to our customers or their residents data,
we may incur significant liabilities, our solutions may be
perceived as not being secure and customers may curtail or stop
using our solutions.
The solutions we provide involve the collection, storage and
transmission of confidential personal and proprietary
information regarding our customers and our customers
current and prospective residents. Specifically, we collect,
store and transmit a variety of customer data including, but not
limited to, the demographic information and payment histories of
our customers prospective and current residents.
Additionally, we collect and transmit sensitive financial data
such as credit card and bank account information. If our
security measures are breached as a result of third-party
actions or any employees or contractors errors or
malfeasance or otherwise, and someone obtains unauthorized
access to this information, we could incur significant liability
to our customers and to their prospective or current residents
or significant fines and sanctions by processing networks or
governmental bodies, any of which could result in harm to our
business and damage to our reputation.
We also rely upon our customers as users of our system to
promote security of the system and the data within it, such as
administration of customer-side access credentialing and control
of customer-side display of
21
data. On occasion, our customers have failed to perform these
activities in such a manner as to prevent unauthorized access to
data. To date, these breaches have not resulted in claims
against us or in material harm to our business, but we cannot be
certain that the failure of our customers in future periods to
perform these activities will not result in claims against us,
which could expose us to potential litigation and harm to our
reputation.
There can be no certainty that the measures we have taken to
protect the privacy and integrity of our customers and
their current or prospective residents data are adequate
to prevent or remedy unauthorized access to our system. Because
techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to, or to
sabotage, systems change frequently and generally are not
recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to
anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventive
measures. Experienced computer programmers seeking to intrude or
cause harm, or hackers, may attempt to penetrate our service
infrastructure from time to time. Although we have not
experienced any material security breaches to date, a hacker who
is able to penetrate our service infrastructure could
misappropriate proprietary or confidential information or cause
interruptions in our services. We might be required to expend
significant capital and resources to protect against, or to
alleviate, problems caused by hackers, and we may not have a
timely remedy against a hacker who is able to penetrate our
service infrastructure. In addition to purposeful breaches, the
inadvertent transmission of computer viruses could expose us to
security risks. If an actual or perceived breach of our security
occurs or if our customers and potential customers perceive
vulnerabilities, the market perception of the effectiveness of
our security measures could be harmed and we could lose sales
and customers.
If we
are unable to cost-effectively scale or adapt our existing
architecture to accommodate increased traffic, technological
advances or changing customer requirements, our operating
results could be harmed.
As we continue to increase our customer base, the number of
users accessing our on demand software solutions over the
Internet will continue to increase. Increased traffic could
result in slow access speeds. Since our customer agreements
typically include service availability commitments, slow access
speeds or our failure to accommodate increased traffic could
result in breaches of our customer agreements. In addition, the
market for our solutions is characterized by rapid technological
advances and changes in customer requirements. In order to
accommodate increased traffic and respond to technological
advances and evolving customer requirements, we expect that we
will be required to make future investments in our network
architecture. If we do not implement future upgrades to our
network architecture cost-effectively, or if we experience
prolonged delays or unforeseen difficulties in connection with
upgrading our network architecture, our service quality may
suffer and our operating results could be harmed.
Because
certain solutions we provide depend on access to customer data,
decreased access to this data or the failure to comply with
applicable privacy laws and regulations or address privacy
concerns applicable to such data could harm our
business.
Certain of our solutions depend on our continued access to our
customers data regarding their prospective and current
residents, including data compiled by other third-party service
providers who collect and store data on behalf of our customers.
Federal and state governments and agencies have adopted, or are
considering adopting, laws and regulations regarding the
collection, use and disclosure of such data. Any decrease in the
availability of such data from our customers, or other third
parties that collect and store such data on behalf of our
customers, and the costs of compliance with, and other burdens
imposed by, applicable legislative and regulatory initiatives
may limit our ability to collect, aggregate or use this data.
Any limitations on our ability to collect, aggregate or use such
data could reduce demand for certain of our solutions.
Additionally, any inability to adequately address privacy
concerns, even if unfounded, or comply with applicable privacy
laws, regulations and policies, could result in liability to us
or damage to our reputation and could inhibit sales and market
acceptance of our solutions and harm our business.
22
The
market for on demand software solutions in the rental housing
industry is new and continues to develop, and if it does not
develop further or develops more slowly than we expect, our
business will be harmed.
The market for on demand software solutions in the rental
housing industry delivered via the Internet through a web
browser is rapidly growing but still relatively immature
compared to the market for traditional on premise software
installed on a customers local personal computer or
server. It is uncertain whether the on demand delivery model
will achieve and sustain high levels of demand and market
acceptance, making our business and future prospects difficult
to evaluate and predict. While our existing customer base has
widely accepted this new model, our future success will depend,
to a large extent, on the willingness of our potential customers
to choose on demand software solutions for business processes
that they view as critical. Many of our potential customers have
invested substantial effort and financial resources to integrate
traditional enterprise software into their businesses and may be
reluctant or unwilling to switch to on demand software
solutions. Some businesses may be reluctant or unwilling to use
on demand software solutions because they have concerns
regarding the risks associated with security capabilities,
reliability and availability, among other things, of the on
demand delivery model. If potential customers do not consider on
demand software solutions to be beneficial, then the market for
these solutions may not further develop, or it may develop more
slowly than we expect, either of which would adversely affect
our operating results.
Economic
trends that affect the rental housing market may have a negative
effect on our business.
Our customers include a range of organizations whose success is
intrinsically linked to the rental housing market. Economic
trends that negatively affect the rental housing market may
adversely affect our business. The recent downturn in the global
economy has caused volatility in the real estate markets,
generally, including the rental housing market, and increases in
the rates of mortgage defaults and bankruptcy. Continued
instability or downturns affecting the rental housing market may
have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects,
financial condition and results of operations by:
|
|
|
|
|
reducing the number of occupied sites and units on which we earn
revenue;
|
|
|
|
preventing our customers from expanding their businesses and
managing new properties;
|
|
|
|
causing our customers to reduce spending on our solutions;
|
|
|
|
subjecting us to increased pricing pressure in order to add new
customers and retain existing customers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
causing our customers to switch to lower-priced solutions
provided by our competitors or internally developed solutions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
delaying or preventing our collection of outstanding accounts
receivable; and
|
|
|
|
causing payment processing losses related to an increase in
customer insolvency.
|
We may
require additional capital to support business growth, and this
capital might not be available.
We intend to continue to make investments to support our
business growth and may require additional funds to respond to
business challenges or opportunities, including the need to
develop new solutions or enhance our existing solutions, enhance
our operating infrastructure or acquire businesses and
technologies. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or
debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise
additional funds through further issuances of equity or
convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could
suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we
issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to
those of holders of our common stock. Debt financing secured by
us in the future could involve additional restrictive covenants
relating to our capital raising activities and other financial
and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us
to obtain additional capital and to pursue business
opportunities, including potential acquisitions. In addition, we
may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms
favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate
financing or financing on
23
terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to
continue to support our business growth and to respond to
business challenges or opportunities could be significantly
limited.
Our
debt obligations contain restrictions that impact our business
and expose us to risks that could adversely affect our liquidity
and financial condition.
On September 3, 2009, we entered into a credit facility
with Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (formerly Wells Fargo
Foothill, LLC) and Comerica Bank. As amended on
June 22, 2010, the credit facility provides for borrowings
of up to $81.9 million, subject to a borrowing formula,
including a revolving facility of up to $10.0 million, with
a sublimit of $5.0 million for the issuance of letters of
credit on our behalf, and a term loan facility of up to
$71.9 million. At June 30, 2010, we had
$5.7 million outstanding indebtedness under the revolving
facility and approximately $40.3 million of outstanding
indebtedness under the term loan facility. Our interest expense
in 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2010 for the
credit facility was approximately $0.9 million and
$1.5 million, respectively.
Advances under the credit facility may be voluntarily prepaid,
and must be prepaid with the proceeds of certain dispositions,
extraordinary receipts, indebtedness and equity, with excess
cash flow and in full upon a change in control, other than in
connection with an initial public offering, so long as we
complete this offering by December 31, 2010. Reductions of
the revolver, voluntary prepayments and mandatory prepayments
from the proceeds of indebtedness and equity are each subject to
a prepayment premium of 1.0% prior to June 22, 2011, 0.5%
on or after June 22, 2011 and prior to June 22, 2012
and 0% thereafter. Such prepayments will be applied first to
reduce the term loan, and then to reduce availability under the
revolver.
All of our obligations under the loan facility are secured by
substantially all of our property. All of our existing and
future domestic subsidiaries are required to guaranty our
obligations under the credit facility, other than certain
immaterial subsidiaries and our payment processing subsidiary,
RealPage Payment Processing Services, Inc. Our foreign
subsidiaries may, under certain circumstances, be required to
guaranty our obligations under the credit facility. Such
guarantees by existing and future subsidiaries are and will be
secured by substantially all of the property of such
subsidiaries.
Our credit facility contains customary covenants, which limit
our and certain of our subsidiaries ability to, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness or guarantee indebtedness of
others;
|
|
|
|
create liens on our assets;
|
|
|
|
enter into mergers or consolidations;
|
|
|
|
dispose of assets;
|
|
|
|
prepay indebtedness or make changes to our governing documents
and certain of our agreements;
|
|
|
|
pay dividends and make other distributions on our capital stock,
and redeem and repurchase our capital stock;
|
|
|
|
make investments, including acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
enter into transactions with affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
make capital expenditures.
|
Our credit facility also contains customary affirmative
covenants, including, among other things, requirements to: take
certain actions in the event we form or acquire new
subsidiaries; hold annual meetings with our lenders; provide
copies of material contracts and amendments to our lenders;
locate our collateral only at specified locations; and use
commercially reasonable efforts to ensure that certain material
contracts permit the assignment of the contract to our lenders;
subject in each case to customary exceptions and qualifications.
We are also required to comply with a fixed charge coverage
ratio, which is a ratio of our
24
EBITDA to our fixed charges as determined in accordance with
the credit facility, of 1.15:1.00 for the period ended
June 30, 2010, 1.225:1.00 for each subsequent period until
September 30, 2010, and 1.25:1:00 thereafter, and a senior
leverage ratio, which is a ratio of the outstanding principal
balance of our term loan plus our outstanding revolver usage to
our EBITDA as determined in accordance with the credit facility,
of 2.25:1.00 for each period until December 31, 2009, with
step-downs until September 30, 2011, when the ratio is set
at 1.35:1.00 for such period and thereafter.
The credit facility contains customary events of default,
subject to customary cure periods for certain defaults, that
include, among others, non-payment defaults, covenant defaults,
material judgment defaults, bankruptcy and insolvency defaults,
cross-defaults to certain other material indebtedness,
inaccuracy of representations and warranties and a failure to
extend the maturity date of certain subordinated debt on or
before December 31, 2010 or to repay such debt on terms
satisfactory to our lenders.
If we experience a decline in cash flow due to any of the
factors described in this Risk Factors section or
otherwise, we could have difficulty paying interest and
principal amounts due on our indebtedness and meeting the
financial covenants set forth in our credit facility. If we are
unable to generate sufficient cash flow or otherwise obtain the
funds necessary to make required payments under our credit
facility, or if we fail to comply with the requirements of our
indebtedness, we could default under our credit facility. In
addition, to date we have obtained waivers under our credit
facility, but such waivers were not related to a decline in our
cash flow. As a result of our ongoing communications with the
lenders under our credit facility, our lenders were aware of the
transactions and circumstances leading up to these waivers and
we expected to receive their approval with regard to such
transactions and circumstances, whether in the form of a
consent, waiver, amendment or otherwise. The waivers under the
credit facility were in connection with procedural requirements
under our credit agreement related to: two acquisition
transactions we entered into in September 2009; an update to the
credit agreement schedules to include certain arrangements we
have in place, and had in place at the time of closing of the
credit facility, with our subsidiary that serves as a special
purpose vehicle for processing payments, including a guaranty
made by us for the benefit of our subsidiary in favor of Wells
Fargo Bank; the payment of cash dividends of approximately
$16,000 more than the amount agreed to by the lenders; and with
respect to our fixed charge coverage ratio as a result of
payments approved by our board of directors and discussed with
our lenders for a cash dividend paid in December 2009 and for
payments on promissory notes held by holders of our preferred
stock in connection with a prior declared dividend. While we
view each of these as one-time events, and while we were able to
successfully negotiate waivers for such defaults and amendments
to our credit facility to ensure such events would be in
compliance with the terms of the credit facility consistent with
our ongoing discussions with our lenders about these events, we
may in the future fail to comply with the terms of our credit
facility and be unable to negotiate a waiver of any such
defaults with our lenders. Any default that is not cured or
waived could result in the acceleration of the obligations under
the credit facility, an increase in the applicable interest rate
under the credit facility and a requirement that our
subsidiaries that have guaranteed the credit facility pay the
obligations in full, and would permit our lender to exercise
remedies with respect to all of the collateral that is securing
the credit facility, including substantially all of our and our
subsidiary guarantors assets. Any such default could have
a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial
condition.
Even if we comply with all of the applicable covenants, the
restrictions on the conduct of our business could adversely
affect our business by, among other things, limiting our ability
to take advantage of financings, mergers, acquisitions and other
corporate opportunities that may be beneficial to the business.
Even if the credit facility were terminated, additional debt we
could incur in the future may subject us to similar or
additional covenants.
We also have substantial equipment lease obligations, which
totaled approximately $1.5 million as of June 30,
2010. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from our
operations or cash from other sources in order to meet the
payment obligations under these equipment leases, we may lose
the right to possess and operate the equipment used in our
business, which would substantially impair our ability to
provide our solutions and could have a material adverse effect
on our liquidity or results of operations.
25
Assertions
by a third party that we infringe its intellectual property,
whether successful or not, could subject us to costly and
time-consuming litigation or expensive licenses.
The software and technology industries are characterized by the
existence of a large number of patents, copyrights, trademarks
and trade secrets and by frequent litigation based on
allegations of infringement, misappropriation, misuse and other
violations of intellectual property rights. We have received in
the past, and may receive in the future, communications from
third parties claiming that we have infringed or otherwise
misappropriated the intellectual property rights of others. Our
technologies may not be able to withstand any third-party claims
against their use. Since we currently have no patents, we may
not use patent infringement as a defensive strategy in such
litigation. Additionally, although we have licensed from other
parties proprietary technology covered by patents, we cannot be
certain that any such patents will not be challenged,
invalidated or circumvented. If such patents are invalidated or
circumvented, this may allow existing and potential competitors
to develop products and services that are competitive with, or
superior to, our solutions.
Many of our customer agreements require us to indemnify our
customers for certain third-party intellectual property
infringement claims, which could increase our costs as a result
of defending such claims and may require that we pay damages if
there were an adverse ruling or settlement related to any such
claims. These types of claims could harm our relationships with
our customers, may deter future customers from purchasing our
solutions or could expose us to litigation for these claims.
Even if we are not a party to any litigation between a customer
and a third party, an adverse outcome in any such litigation
could make it more difficult for us to defend our intellectual
property in any subsequent litigation in which we are a named
party.
Any intellectual property rights claim against us or our
customers, with or without merit, could be time-consuming,
expensive to litigate or settle and could divert
managements attention and our financial resources. Any
such litigation could force us to stop selling, incorporating or
using our solutions that include the challenged intellectual
property or redesign those solutions that use the technology. In
addition, we may have to pay damages if we are found to be in
violation of a third partys rights. We may have to procure
a license for the technology, which may not be available on
reasonable terms, if at all, may significantly increase our
operating expenses or may require us to restrict our business
activities in one or more respects. As a result, we may also be
required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which
could require significant effort and expense. We cannot assure
you we would be able to develop alternative solutions or, if
alternative solutions were developed, that they would perform as
required or be accepted in the relevant markets. In some
instances, if we are unable to offer non-infringing technology,
or obtain a license for such technology, we will be required to
refund some or the entire license fee paid for the infringing
technology to our customers.
Our exposure to risks associated with the use of intellectual
property may be increased as a result of acquisitions, as we
have a lower level of visibility into the development process
with respect to acquired technology or the care taken to
safeguard against infringement risks. Third parties may make
infringement and similar or related claims after we have
acquired technology that had not been asserted prior to our
acquisition.
Any
failure to protect and successfully enforce our intellectual
property rights could compromise our proprietary technology and
impair our brands.
Our success depends significantly on our ability to protect our
proprietary rights to the technologies we use in our solutions.
If we are unable to protect our proprietary rights adequately,
our competitors could use the intellectual property we have
developed to enhance their own products and services, which
could harm our business. We rely on a combination of copyright,
service mark, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as
confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions, to
establish and protect our proprietary rights, all of which
provide only limited protection. We currently have no issued
patents or pending patent applications and may be unable to
obtain patent protection in the future. In addition, if any
patents are issued in the future, they may not provide us with
any competitive advantages, may not be issued in a manner that
gives us the protection that we seek and may be successfully
challenged by third parties. Unauthorized parties may attempt to
copy or otherwise obtain and use the technologies underlying our
solutions. Monitoring unauthorized use of our technologies is
difficult, and we do not know whether the steps we have taken
will prevent unauthorized use of our technology. If we are
unable to protect our proprietary rights, we may find ourselves
at a
26
competitive disadvantage to others who have not incurred the
substantial expense, time and effort required to create similar
innovative products.
We cannot assure you that any future service mark or trademark
registrations will be issued for pending or future applications
or that any registered service marks or trademarks will be
enforceable or provide adequate protection of our proprietary
rights. If we are unable to secure new marks, maintain already
existing marks and enforce the rights to use such marks against
unauthorized third-party use, our ability to brand, identify and
promote our solutions in the marketplace could be impaired,
which could harm our business.
We customarily enter into agreements with our employees,
contractors and parties with whom we do business to limit access
to and disclosure of our proprietary information. The steps we
have taken, however, may not prevent unauthorized use or the
reverse engineering of our technology. Moreover, we may be
required to release the source code of our software to third
parties under certain circumstances. For example, some of our
customer agreements provide that if we cease to maintain or
support a certain solution without replacing it with a successor
solution, then we may be required to release the source code of
the software underlying such solution. In addition, others may
independently develop technologies that are competitive to ours
or infringe our intellectual property. Enforcement of our
intellectual property rights also depends on our legal actions
being successful against these infringers, but these actions may
not be successful, even when our rights have been infringed.
Furthermore, the legal standards relating to the validity,
enforceability and scope of protection of intellectual property
rights in Internet-related industries are uncertain and still
evolving.
Additionally, if we sell our solutions internationally in the
future, effective patent, trademark, service mark, copyright and
trade secret protection may not be available or as robust in
every country in which our solutions are available. As a result,
we may not be able to effectively prevent competitors outside
the United States from infringing or otherwise misappropriating
our intellectual property rights, which could reduce our
competitive advantage and ability to compete or otherwise harm
our business.
Current
and future litigation against us could be costly and time
consuming to defend.
We are from time to time subject to legal proceedings and claims
that arise in the ordinary course of business, including claims
brought by our customers in connection with commercial disputes,
claims brought by our customers current or prospective
residents, including potential class action lawsuits based on
asserted statutory or regulatory violations, and employment
claims made by our current or former employees. Litigation,
regardless of its outcome, may result in substantial costs and
may divert managements attention and our resources, which
may harm our business, overall financial condition and operating
results. In addition, legal claims that have not yet been
asserted against us may be asserted in the future. Insurance may
not cover such claims, may not be sufficient for one or more
such claims and may not continue to be available on terms
acceptable to us, or at all. A claim brought against us that is
uninsured or underinsured could result in unanticipated costs,
thereby harming our operating results.
On June 15, 2009, a prospective resident of one of our
customers filed a class action lawsuit styled Minor v.
RealPage, Inc. against us in the U.S. District Court
for the Central District of California, which was transferred to
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Texas
(No. 4:09CV-00439).
The plaintiff has alleged two individual claims and three
class-based
causes of action against us. Individually, the plaintiff alleges
that we (i) willfully failed to employ reasonable
procedures to ensure the maximum accuracy of our resident
screening reports as required by 15 U.S.C.
§ 1681e(b) and, in the alternative,
(ii) negligently (within the meaning of 15 U.S.C.
§ 1681o(a)) failed to employ reasonable procedures to
ensure the maximum accuracy of our resident screening reports,
as required by 15 U.S.C. § 1681e(b), in each case
stemming from our provision of a report that allegedly included
inaccurate criminal conviction information. The plaintiff seeks
actual, statutory and punitive damages on her individual claims.
In her capacity as the putative class representative, the
plaintiff also alleges that we: (i) willfully failed to
provide legally mandated disclosures upon a consumers
request inconsistent with 15 U.S.C. § 1681g;
(ii) willfully failed to provide prompt notice of
consumers disputes to the data furnishers who provided us
with the information whose accuracy was in question, as required
by 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a)(2); and
(iii) willfully failed to provide prompt notice of
consumers disputes to the consumer reporting agencies
providing us with the information whose accuracy was
27
in question, as required by 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(f).
She seeks statutory and punitive damages, a declaration that our
practices and procedures are in violation of the Fair Credit
Reporting Act and attorneys fees and costs. Because this
lawsuit is at an early stage, it is not possible to predict its
outcome. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to the
claims in this case and intend to defend it vigorously. See
Business Legal Proceedings for further
information regarding this claim.
On March 4, 2008, we were named as a defendant in a class
action lawsuit styled Taylor, et al. v. Acxiom Corp.,
et al. filed in the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas
(No. 2:07-CV-00001).
Plaintiffs alleged that we obtained and held motor vehicle
records in bulk from the State of Texas, an allegedly improper
purpose in violation of the federal Drivers Privacy
Protection Act, or the DPPA. In addition, the plaintiffs alleged
that we obtained these records for the purpose of re-selling
them, another allegedly improper purpose in violation of the
DPPA. Plaintiffs further purported to represent a putative class
of approximately 20.0 million individuals affected by the
defendants alleged DPPA violations. They sought statutory
damages of $2,500 per each violation of the DPPA, punitive
damages and an order requiring defendants to destroy information
obtained in violation of the DPPA. In September 2008, the U.S.
District Court dismissed plaintiffs complaint for failure
to state a claim. The plaintiffs subsequently appealed the
dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth
Circuit. In November 2009, the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument
on the appeal. In July 2010, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the
U.S. District Courts dismissal. See
Business Legal Proceedings for further
information regarding this claim.
In March 2010, the District Attorney of Ventura County,
California issued an administrative subpoena to us seeking
certain information related to our provision of utility billing
services in the State of California. A representative of the
District Attorney has informed us that the subpoena was issued
in connection with a general investigation of industry practices
with respect to utility billing in California. Utility billing
in California is subject to regulation by state law and various
state administrative agencies, including the California Public
Utility Commission, or the CPUC, and the Division of Weights and
Measures, or the DWM. We have provided the District Attorney
with the information requested in the subpoena. As of July 23,
2010, the District Attorneys office has not initiated an
administrative or other enforcement action against us, nor have
they asserted any violations of the applicable regulations by
us. Given the early stage of this investigation, it is difficult
to predict its outcome and whether the District Attorney will
pursue an administrative or other enforcement action against us
in the State of California and what the result of any such
action would be. However, penalties or assessments of violations
of regulations promulgated by the CPUC or DWM may be calculated
on a per occurrence basis. Due to the large number of billing
transactions we process for our customers in California, our
potential liability in an enforcement action could be
significant. If the District Attorney ultimately pursues an
administrative or other enforcement action against us, we
believe that we have meritorious defenses to the potential
claims and would defend them vigorously. However, even if we
were successful in defending against such claims, the
proceedings could result in significant costs and divert
managements attention. See Business
Legal Proceedings for further information regarding this
claim.
We
could be sued for contract or product liability claims, and such
lawsuits may disrupt our business, divert managements
attention and our financial resources or have an adverse effect
on our financial results.
We provide warranties to customers of certain of our solutions
relating primarily to product functionality, network uptime,
critical infrastructure availability and hardware replacement.
General errors, defects, inaccuracies or other performance
problems in the software applications underlying our solutions
or inaccuracies in the data we provide to our customers could
result in financial or other damages to our customers. There can
be no assurance that any limitations of liability set forth in
our contracts would be enforceable or would otherwise protect us
from liability for damages. We maintain general liability
insurance coverage, including coverage for errors and omissions,
in amounts and under terms that we believe are appropriate.
There can be no assurance that this coverage will continue to be
available on terms acceptable to us, or at all, or in sufficient
amounts to cover one or more large product liability claims, or
that the insurer will not deny coverage for any future claim.
The successful assertion of one or more large product liability
claims against us that exceeds available insurance coverage,
could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects,
financial condition and results of operations.
28
If we
fail to develop our brands cost-effectively, our financial
condition and operating results could be harmed.
We market our solutions under discrete brand names. We believe
that developing and maintaining awareness of our brands is
critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our existing and
future solutions and is an important element in attracting new
customers and retaining our existing customers. Additionally, we
believe that developing these brands in a cost-effective manner
is critical in meeting our expected margins. In the past, our
efforts to build our brands have involved significant expenses
and we intend to continue to make expenditures on brand
promotion. Brand promotion activities may not yield increased
revenue, and even if they do, any increased revenue may not
offset the expenses we incurred in building our brands. If we
fail to cost-effectively build and maintain our brands, we may
fail to attract new customers or retain our existing customers,
and our financial condition and results of operations could be
harmed.
If we
fail to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our
ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements
could be impaired, which could harm our operating results, our
ability to operate our business and investors views of
us.
Ensuring that we have adequate internal financial and accounting
controls and procedures in place so that we can produce accurate
financial statements on a timely basis is a costly and
time-consuming effort that needs to be re-evaluated frequently.
Our internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements in accordance with GAAP. We are in the
process of documenting, reviewing and improving our internal
controls and procedures for compliance with Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which
requires annual management assessment of the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting and a report by
our independent auditors. Both we and our independent auditors
will be testing our internal controls in connection with the
audit of our financial statements for the year ending
December 31, 2011 and, as part of that testing, may
identify areas for further attention and improvement. If we fail
to maintain proper and effective internal controls, our ability
to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be
impaired, which could harm our operating results, harm our
ability to operate our business and reduce the trading price of
our stock.
Changes
in, or errors in our interpretations and applications of,
financial accounting standards or practices may cause adverse,
unexpected financial reporting fluctuations and affect our
reported results of operations.
A change in accounting standards or practices can have a
significant effect on our reported results and may even affect
our reporting of transactions completed before the change is
effective. New accounting pronouncements and varying
interpretations of accounting pronouncements have occurred and
may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the
questioning of current practices or errors in our
interpretations and applications of financial accounting
standards or practices may adversely affect our reported
financial results or the way in which we conduct our business.
We
will incur increased costs and demands upon management as a
result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting
public companies, which could harm our operating
results.
As a public company, we will incur significant legal,
accounting, investor relations and other expenses that we did
not incur as a private company, including costs associated with
public company reporting requirements. We also have incurred and
will incur costs associated with current corporate governance
requirements, including requirements under Section 404 and
other provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules
implemented by the Securities Exchange Commission and the NASDAQ
Global Market. We expect these rules and regulations to increase
our legal and financial compliance costs substantially and to
make some activities more time-consuming and costly. We also
expect that, as a public company, it will be more expensive for
us to obtain director and officer liability insurance and that
it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified
individuals to serve on our board of directors or as our
executive officers.
29
Government
regulation of the rental housing industry, including background
screening services and utility billing, the Internet and
e-commerce
is evolving, and changes in regulations or our failure to comply
with regulations could harm our operating results.
The rental housing industry is subject to extensive and complex
federal, state and local regulations. Our services and solutions
must work within the extensive and evolving regulatory
requirements applicable to our customers and third-party service
providers, including, but not limited to, those under the Fair
Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Housing Act, the Deceptive Trade
Practices Act, the DPPA, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, the Fair
and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, the Privacy Rules,
Safeguards Rule and Consumer Report Information Disposal Rule
promulgated by the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, the
regulations of the United States Department of Housing and Urban
Development, or HUD, and complex and divergent state and local
laws and regulations related to data privacy and security,
credit and consumer reporting, deceptive trade practices,
discrimination in housing, utility billing and energy and gas
consumption. These regulations are complex, change frequently
and may become more stringent over time. Although we attempt to
structure and adapt our solutions and service offerings to
comply with these complex and evolving laws and regulations, we
may be found to be in violation. If we are found to be in
violation of any applicable laws or regulations, we could be
subject to administrative and other enforcement actions as well
as class action lawsuits. Additionally, many applicable laws and
regulations provide for penalties or assessments on a per
occurrence basis. Due to the nature of our business, the type of
services we provide and the large number of transactions
processed by our solutions, our potential liability in an
enforcement action or class action lawsuit could be significant.
In addition, entities such as HUD and the FTC have the authority
to promulgate rules and regulations that may impact our
customers and our business. We believe increased regulation is
likely in the area of data privacy, and laws and regulations
applying to the solicitation, collection, processing or use of
personally identifiable information or consumer information
could affect our customers ability to use and share data,
potentially reducing demand for our on demand software solutions.
We deliver our on demand software solutions over the Internet
and sell and market certain of our solutions over the Internet.
As Internet commerce continues to evolve, increasing regulation
by federal, state or foreign agencies becomes more likely.
Taxation of products or services provided over the Internet or
other charges imposed by government agencies or by private
organizations for accessing the Internet may also be imposed.
Any regulation imposing greater fees for Internet use or
restricting information exchange over the Internet could result
in a decline in the use of the Internet and the viability of on
demand software solutions, which could harm our business and
operating results.
Our
LeasingDesk insurance business is subject to governmental
regulation which could reduce our profitability or limit our
growth.
We hold insurance agent licenses from a number of individual
state departments of insurance and are subject to state
governmental regulation and supervision in connection with the
operation of our LeasingDesk insurance business. This state
governmental supervision could reduce our profitability or limit
the growth of our LeasingDesk insurance business by increasing
the costs of regulatory compliance, limiting or restricting the
solutions we provide or the methods by which we provide them or
subjecting us to the possibility of regulatory actions or
proceedings. Our continued ability to maintain these insurance
agent licenses in the jurisdictions in which we are licensed
depends on our compliance with the rules and regulations
promulgated from time to time by the regulatory authorities in
each of these jurisdictions. Furthermore, state insurance
departments conduct periodic examinations, audits and
investigations of the affairs of insurance agents.
In all jurisdictions, the applicable laws and regulations are
subject to amendment or interpretation by regulatory
authorities. Generally, such authorities are vested with
relatively broad discretion to grant, renew and revoke licenses
and approvals and to implement regulations. Accordingly, we may
be precluded or temporarily suspended from carrying on some or
all of the activities of our LeasingDesk insurance business or
otherwise be fined or penalized in a given jurisdiction. No
assurances can be given that our LeasingDesk insurance business
can continue to be conducted in any given jurisdiction as it has
been conducted in the past.
30
We
generate commission revenue from the insurance policies we sell
as a registered insurance agent and if insurance premiums
decline or if the insureds experience greater than expected
losses, our revenues could decline and our operating results
could be harmed.
Through our wholly owned subsidiary, Multifamily Internet
Ventures LLC, a managing general insurance agency, we generate
commission revenue from offering liability and renters
insurance. Additionally, Multifamily Internet Ventures LLC has
recently commenced the sale of additional insurance products,
including auto and other personal lines insurance, to residents
that buy renters insurance from us. These policies are
ultimately underwritten by various insurance carriers. Some of
the property owners and managers that subscribe to our solution
opt to require residents to purchase rental insurance policies
and agree to allow Multifamily Internet Ventures LLC to act as
the exclusive insurance broker to their property. If demand for
residential rental housing declines, property owners and
managers may be forced to reduce their rental rates and to stop
requiring the purchase of rental insurance in order to reduce
the overall cost of renting. If property owners or managers
cease to require renters insurance, elect to offer
policies from competing providers or insurance premiums decline,
our revenues from selling insurance policies will be adversely
affected.
Additionally, one type of commission paid by insurance carriers
to Multifamily Internet Ventures LLC is contingent commission,
which is based on claims experienced at the properties for which
the residents purchase insurance. In the event that claims by
the insureds increase unexpectedly, the contingent commission we
typically earn will be adversely affected. As a result, our
quarterly operating results could fall below the expectations of
analysts or investors, in which event our stock price may
decline.
Our
ability to use net operating losses to offset future taxable
income may be subject to certain limitations.
In general, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code, a corporation
that undergoes an ownership change is subject to
limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change net
operating losses, or NOLs, to offset future taxable income. Our
ability to utilize NOLs of companies that we may acquire in the
future may be subject to limitations. Future changes in our
stock ownership, some of which are outside of our control, could
result in an ownership change under Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code. For these reasons, we may not be able to
utilize a material portion of the NOLs reflected on our balance
sheet, even if we maintain profitability.
If we
are required to collect sales and use taxes on the solutions we
sell in additional taxing jurisdictions, we may be subject to
liability for past sales and our future sales may
decrease.
States and some local taxing jurisdictions have differing rules
and regulations governing sales and use taxes, and these rules
and regulations are subject to varying interpretations that may
change over time. We review these rules and regulations
periodically and currently collect and remit sales taxes in
taxing jurisdictions where we believe we are required to do so.
However, additional state
and/or local
taxing jurisdictions may seek to impose sales or other tax
collection obligations on us, including for past sales. A
successful assertion that we should be collecting additional
sales or other taxes on our solutions could result in
substantial tax liabilities for past sales, discourage customers
from purchasing our solutions or may otherwise harm our business
and operating results. This risk is greater with regard to
solutions acquired through acquisitions.
We may also become subject to tax audits or similar procedures
in jurisdictions where we already collect and remit sales taxes.
A successful assertion that we have not collected and remitted
taxes at the appropriate levels may also result in substantial
tax liabilities for past sales. Liability for past taxes may
also include very substantial interest and penalty charges. Our
customer contracts provide that our customers must pay all
applicable sales and similar taxes. Nevertheless, customers may
be reluctant to pay back taxes and may refuse responsibility for
interest or penalties associated with those taxes. If we are
required to collect and pay back taxes and the associated
interest and penalties, and if our customers fail or refuse to
reimburse us for all or a portion of these amounts, we will
incur unplanned expenses that may be substantial. Moreover,
imposition of such taxes on our solutions going forward will
effectively increase the cost of such solutions to our customers
and may adversely affect our ability to retain existing
customers or to gain new customers in the areas in which such
taxes are imposed.
31
Changes
in our effective tax rate could harm our future operating
results.
We are subject to federal and state income taxes in the United
States and various foreign jurisdictions, and our domestic and
international tax liabilities are subject to the allocation of
expenses in differing jurisdictions. Our tax rate is affected by
changes in the mix of earnings and losses in jurisdictions with
differing statutory tax rates, including jurisdictions in which
we have completed or may complete acquisitions, certain
non-deductible expenses arising from the requirement to expense
stock options and the valuation of deferred tax assets and
liabilities, including our ability to utilize our net operating
losses. Increases in our effective tax rate could harm our
operating results.
We
rely on our management team and need additional personnel to
grow our business, and the loss of one or more key employees or
our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could
harm our business.
Our success and future growth depend on the skills, working
relationships and continued services of our management team. The
loss of our Chief Executive Officer or other senior executives
could adversely affect our business. Our future success also
will depend on our ability to attract, retain and motivate
highly skilled software developers, marketing and sales
personnel, technical support and product development personnel
in the United States and internationally. All of our employees
work for us on an at-will basis. Competition for these types of
personnel is intense, particularly in the software industry. As
a result, we may be unable to attract or retain qualified
personnel. Our inability to attract and retain the necessary
personnel could adversely affect our business.
Our
corporate culture has contributed to our success, and if we
cannot maintain this culture as we grow, we could lose the
innovation, creativity and teamwork fostered by our culture, and
our business may be harmed.
We believe that a strong corporate culture that nurtures core
values and philosophies is essential to our long-term success.
We call these values and philosophies the RealPage
Promise and we seek to practice the RealPage Promise in
our actions every day. The RealPage Promise embodies our
corporate values with respect to customer service, investor
communications, employee respect and professional development
and management decision-making and leadership. As our
organization grows and we are required to implement more complex
organizational structures, we may find it increasingly difficult
to maintain the beneficial aspects of our corporate culture
which could negatively impact our future success.
Risks
Related to this Offering and Ownership of our Common
Stock
The
concentration of our capital stock owned by insiders upon the
completion of this offering will limit your ability to influence
corporate matters.
We anticipate that our executive officers, directors, current 5%
or greater stockholders and entities affiliated with them will
together beneficially own approximately 73.5% of our common
stock following this offering, or 70.3% if the underwriters
exercise their over-allotment option in full. Further, we
anticipate that Stephen T. Winn, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board, and entities beneficially owned by
Mr. Winn will hold an aggregate of approximately 46.0% of
our common stock following this offering, or 46.0% if the
underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full. This
significant concentration of ownership may adversely affect the
trading price for our common stock because investors often
perceive disadvantages in owning stock in companies with
controlling stockholders. Depending on the size of the offering
and the number of shares of common stock, if any, to be sold in
the offering by Mr. Winn and entities beneficially owned by Mr.
Winn, Mr. Winn, and entities beneficially owned by Mr. Winn, may
be able to control our management and affairs and matters
requiring stockholder approval, including the election of
directors and the approval of significant corporate
transactions, such as mergers, consolidations or the sale of
substantially all of our assets. Consequently, this
concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying or
preventing a change of control, including a merger,
consolidation or other business combination involving us, or
discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or
otherwise attempting to obtain control, even if that change of
control would benefit our other stockholders.
32
An
active, liquid and orderly trading market for our common stock
may not develop, the price of our stock may be volatile and you
could lose all or part of your investment.
Before this offering, there has been no public market for shares
of our common stock. We cannot predict the extent to which
investor interest in our company will lead to the development of
a trading market or how liquid that market might become. The
initial public offering price for the shares of our common stock
will be determined by negotiations among us, the selling
stockholders and the underwriters, and may not be indicative of
the price that will prevail in the trading market following this
offering. In addition, the trading price of our common stock
following this offering is likely to be highly volatile and
could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various
factors, including, but not limited to, those described in this
Risk Factors section, some of which are beyond our
control. Factors affecting the trading price of our common stock
will include:
|
|
|
|
|
variations in our operating results or in expectations regarding
our operating results;
|
|
|
|
variations in operating results of similar companies;
|
|
|
|
announcements of technological innovations, new solutions or
enhancements, strategic alliances or agreements by us or by our
competitors;
|
|
|
|
announcements by competitors regarding their entry into new
markets, and new product, service and pricing strategies;
|
|
|
|
marketing and advertising initiatives by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
the gain or loss of customers;
|
|
|
|
threatened or actual litigation;
|
|
|
|
major changes in our board of directors or management;
|
|
|
|
recruitment or departure of key personnel;
|
|
|
|
changes in the estimates of our operating results or changes in
recommendations by any research analysts that elect to follow
our common stock;
|
|
|
|
market conditions in our industry and the economy as a whole;
|
|
|
|
the overall performance of the equity markets;
|
|
|
|
sales of our shares of common stock by existing stockholders;
|
|
|
|
volatility in our stock price, which may lead to higher
stock-based compensation expense under applicable accounting
standards; and
|
|
|
|
adoption or modification of regulations, policies, procedures or
programs applicable to our business.
|
In addition, the stock market in general, and the market for
technology and specifically Internet-related companies, has
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have
often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating
performance of those companies. Broad market and industry
factors may harm the market price of our common stock regardless
of our actual operating performance. These fluctuations may be
even more pronounced in the trading market for our stock shortly
following this offering. In addition, in the past, following
periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price
of a particular companys securities, securities class
action litigation has often been instituted against these
companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could
result in substantial costs and a diversion of our
managements attention and our resources, whether or not we
are successful in such litigation.
33
Our
stock price could decline due to the large number of outstanding
shares of our common stock eligible for future
sale.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public
market following this offering, or the perception that these
sales could occur, could cause the market price of our common
stock to decline. These sales could also make it more difficult
for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future
at a time and price that we deem appropriate.
Upon completion of this offering, we will have
62,305,404 shares of common stock outstanding, assuming no
exercise of outstanding options after June 30, 2010. The
shares sold in this offering will be immediately tradable
without restriction. Of the remaining shares:
|
|
|
|
|
101,000 shares will be eligible for sale immediately upon
completion of this offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,790 shares will be eligible for sale beginning
90 days after the date of this prospectus; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,695,614 shares will be eligible for sale upon the
expiration of
lock-up
agreements, subject in some cases to volume and other
restrictions of Rule 144 and Rule 701 under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act.
|
The lock-up
agreements expire 180 days after the date of this
prospectus, except that the
180-day
period may be extended in certain cases for up to 34 additional
days under certain circumstances where we announce or
pre-announce earnings or a material event occurs within
approximately 17 days prior to, or approximately
16 days after, the termination of the
180-day
period. The representatives of the underwriters may, in their
sole discretion and at any time without notice, release all or
any portion of the securities subject to
lock-up
agreements.
Following this offering, holders of 73.7% of our common stock
not sold in this offering will be entitled to rights with
respect to the registration of these shares under the Securities
Act. See Description of Capital Stock
Registration Rights. If we register their shares of common
stock following the expiration of the
lock-up
agreements, these stockholders could sell those shares in the
public market without being subject to the volume and other
restrictions of Rule 144 and Rule 701.
After the closing of this offering, we intend to register
approximately 13,184,982 shares of common stock that have
been issued or reserved for future issuance under our stock
incentive plans. Of these
shares, shares
will be eligible for sale upon the exercise of vested options
after the expiration of the
lock-up
agreements.
Because
our initial public offering price is substantially higher than
the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share of
our outstanding common stock, new investors will incur immediate
and substantial dilution.
We expect the initial public offering price of our common stock
to be substantially higher than the pro forma as adjusted net
tangible book value per share of our common stock based on the
total value of our tangible assets less our total liabilities
immediately following this offering. Therefore, if you purchase
common stock in this offering, you will experience immediate and
substantial dilution of approximately
$ per share, the difference
between the price you pay for our common stock and its pro forma
as adjusted net tangible book value after the completion of this
offering. Furthermore, investors purchasing common stock in this
offering will own only approximately 9.6% of our shares
outstanding after the completion of this offering even though
they will have contributed %
of the total consideration received by us in connection with our
sales of common stock. After this offering, we will have an
aggregate of 49,983,290 shares of common stock authorized
but unissued and not reserved for issuance under our stock
option plans or otherwise. We intend to continue to actively
pursue strategic acquisitions. We may pay for such acquisitions,
partly or in full, through the issuance of additional equity.
Following the completion of this offering, we may issue
62,694,596 shares of our common stock without any action or
approval by our stockholders. Any issuance of shares in
connection with our acquisitions, the exercise of stock options
or
34
otherwise would dilute the percentage ownership held by the
investors who purchase our shares in this offering.
Our
management will have broad discretion over the use of the
proceeds we receive in this offering and might not apply the
proceeds in ways that increase the value of your
investment.
Our management will have broad discretion in the application of
the net proceeds of this offering. We intend to use net proceeds
of this offering to pay accumulated and unpaid dividends on our
outstanding shares of Series A, Series A1 and
Series B convertible preferred stock that have accrued at a
rate of 8% per annum of the original issue price of each such
share of preferred stock, compounded quarterly, of which the
amount expected to be paid in cash is $0.4 million as of
June 30, 2010, and to repay approximately
$17.2 million of our indebtedness outstanding as of
June 30, 2010. Although we currently expect to apply the
net proceeds from this offering primarily for working capital
and general corporate purposes, which may include future
investments in, or acquisitions of, complementary businesses,
products or technologies, we cannot specify with certainty how
we will apply these net proceeds and our use of the net proceeds
of this offering may not increase the value of your investment.
Our
charter documents and Delaware law could prevent a takeover that
stockholders consider favorable and could also reduce the market
price of our stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our
amended and restated bylaws, to be effective upon the completion
of this offering, will contain provisions that could delay or
prevent a change in control of our company. These provisions
could also make it more difficult for stockholders to elect
directors and take other corporate actions. These provisions
include:
|
|
|
|
|
not providing for cumulative voting in the election of directors;
|
|
|
|
authorizing our board of directors to issue, without stockholder
approval, preferred stock with rights senior to those of our
common stock;
|
|
|
|
prohibiting stockholder action by written consent; and
|
|
|
|
requiring advance notification of stockholder nominations and
proposals.
|
These and other provisions to be included in our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and
restated bylaws, to be effective upon the completion of this
offering, and under Delaware law could discourage potential
takeover attempts, reduce the price that investors might be
willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock and
result in the market price of our common stock being lower than
it would be without these provisions. See Description of
Capital Stock Preferred Stock and
Description of Capital Stock Anti-Takeover
Effects of Delaware Law and Our Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws.
If
securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our
business or if they publish negative evaluations of our stock,
the price of our stock could decline.
We expect that the trading price for our common stock may be
affected by research or reports that industry or financial
analysts publish about us or our business. If one or more of the
analysts who cover us downgrade their evaluations of our stock,
the price of our stock could decline. If one or more of these
analysts cease coverage of our company, we could lose visibility
in the market for our stock, which in turn could cause our stock
price to decline.
We do
not anticipate paying any dividends on our common
stock.
We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common
stock in the foreseeable future. If we do not pay cash
dividends, you could receive a return on your investment in our
common stock only if the market price of our common stock has
increased when you sell your shares. In addition, the terms of
our credit facilities currently restrict our ability to pay
dividends.
35
SPECIAL
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INDUSTRY
DATA
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that are
based on our managements beliefs and assumptions and on
information currently available to our management. The
forward-looking statements are contained principally in
Prospectus Summary, Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations, Business
and Executive Compensation. Forward-looking
statements include information concerning our possible or
assumed future results of operations, business strategies,
financing plans, competitive position, industry environment,
potential growth opportunities, potential market opportunities
and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements
include all statements that are not historical facts and can be
identified by terms such as anticipates,
believes, could, seeks,
estimates, expects, intends,
may, plans, potential,
predicts, projects, should,
will, would or similar expressions and
the negatives of those terms.
Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements to be materially different
from any future results, performance or achievements expressed
or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss these
risks in greater detail in Risk Factors and
elsewhere in this prospectus. Given these uncertainties, you
should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our
managements beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of
this prospectus. You should read this prospectus and the
documents that we have filed as exhibits to the registration
statement, of which this prospectus is a part, completely and
with the understanding that our actual future results may be
materially different from what we expect.
Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update
these forward-looking statements publicly, or to update the
reasons actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new
information becomes available in the future.
This prospectus also contains estimates and other information
concerning our industry, including market opportunity, size and
growth rates, that are based on industry and government
publications, reports, surveys and forecasts, including those
generated by the United States Census Bureau and the National
Multi Housing Council, and on assumptions that we have made that
are based on that data, our review of the purchasing patterns of
our existing customers with respect to our current on demand
software solutions, the on demand software solutions currently
utilized by our existing customers, the number of units our
customers manage with these solutions and customer demand for
our solutions. This information involves a number of assumptions
and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight
to these estimates. With respect to information contained in
industry and government publications, surveys and forecasts, we
have assessed the information in the publications and found it
to be reasonable and believe the publications are reliable.
While we believe the market opportunity and market size
information included in this prospectus is based on reasonable
assumptions, such information is inherently imprecise. In
addition, projections, assumptions and estimates of the future
performance of the industry in which we operate and the markets
we serve are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty
and risk, including those described in Risk Factors.
36
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds from our sale of
6,000,000 shares of common stock in this offering at an
assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the midpoint of
the price range set forth on the front cover of this prospectus,
after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions
and estimated offering expenses, will be approximately
$ million. A $1.00
increase (decrease) in the assumed initial public offering price
of $ per share would
increase (decrease) our net proceeds to us from this offering by
approximately
$ million, assuming the
number of shares offered by us, as set forth on the cover page
of this prospectus, remains the same and after deducting
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses that we expect to pay. We will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock by the
selling stockholders.
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering to pay
accumulated and unpaid dividends on our outstanding shares of
Series A, Series A1 and Series B convertible
preferred stock that have accrued at a rate of 8% per annum of
the original issue price of each such share of preferred stock,
compounded quarterly, of which the amount expected to be paid in
cash is $0.4 million as of June 30, 2010, and to repay
approximately $17.2 million of our indebtedness outstanding
as of June 30, 2010. As a result of the anticipated payment
of accumulated and unpaid dividends on our Series A,
Series A1 and Series B convertible preferred stock,
certain of our affiliates who are holders of our Series A,
Series A1 and Series B convertible preferred stock
will receive a portion of the net proceeds from this offering.
The outstanding indebtedness under our unsecured subordinated
promissory notes held by certain holders of our preferred stock
has a stated maturity of the earlier of either October 1,
2013 for notes issued December 31, 2008 or April 1,
2014 for notes issued April 23, 2010, immediately prior to
this offering or immediately prior to our acquisition by another
person or the sale of all or substantially all of our assets. At
June 30, 2010, we had $7.2 million of outstanding
indebtedness under the unsecured subordinated promissory notes.
These outstanding amounts bear interest at a per annum rate
equal to 8.0%. Pursuant to the terms of our unsecured
subordinated promissory notes, we will be required to repay the
outstanding principal amount and all accrued and unpaid interest
under our unsecured subordinated promissory notes from the net
proceeds from this offering. We expect this repayment to be
approximately $7.2 million.
The outstanding indebtedness under our secured promissory notes
held by HV Capital Investors, L.L.C. has a stated maturity of
August 1, 2013. At June 30, 2010, we had
$10.0 million of outstanding indebtedness under two secured
promissory notes in principal amount of $5.0 million each.
These outstanding amounts bear interest at a per annum rate
equal to 13.75%, payable quarterly in arrears. We intend to use
net proceeds of this offering to repay all indebtedness
outstanding under one or both of our secured promissory notes.
We expect this repayment to be approximately $10.0 million.
We currently do not intend to prepay with the proceeds from this
offering any additional outstanding indebtedness.
The principal reasons for this offering are to establish a
public market for our common stock, provide liquidity for our
stockholders and facilitate our future access to public markets.
Other than as described above, we do not have current specific
plans for the use of a significant portion of the net proceeds
from this offering. However, we generally intend to use our
remaining net proceeds from this offering for working capital
and general corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of the
net proceeds received by us from this offering for the future
acquisition of, or investment in, businesses, products or
technologies that enhance or add new services or additional
functionality to our solutions, further solidify our market
position or allow us to offer complementary products, services
or technologies which we believe will further enhance our
competitive position. Accordingly, our management will have
broad discretion in the application of these proceeds and
investors will be relying on the judgment of our management
regarding their application.
Pending use of the proceeds from this offering, we intend to
invest the remaining proceeds in short-term, interest-bearing
investment grade securities.
37
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock for the
foreseeable future. Instead, we anticipate that all of our
earnings will be used for the operation and growth of our
business. Any future determination to declare cash dividends
would be subject to the discretion of our board of directors and
would depend upon various factors, including our results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity requirements,
restrictions that may be imposed by applicable law and our
contracts and other factors deemed relevant by our board of
directors. In addition, the terms of our credit facilities
currently restrict our ability to pay dividends.
38
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our consolidated cash and cash
equivalents and capitalization as of June 30, 2010 on:
|
|
|
|
|
a pro forma basis to reflect the conversion of all outstanding
shares of our convertible preferred stock into
29,043,748 shares of our common stock upon the closing of
this offering; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a pro forma as adjusted basis to reflect (i) our receipt of
the net proceeds from our sale of shares of common stock in this
offering at an assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the midpoint of
the range set forth on the front cover of this prospectus, after
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses and (ii) the application of the
net proceeds from this offering as described under Use of
Proceeds.
|
The information in this table also reflects the 1-for-2 reverse
stock split of our common stock and convertible preferred stock
effected in July 2010 and the issuance of 343,188 shares of
our common stock in payment of accumulated and unpaid dividends
on our Series A, Series A1 and Series B convertible preferred
stock accrued as of June 30, 2010.
The information below is illustrative only and our
capitalization following the completion of this offering will be
adjusted based on the actual initial public offering price and
other terms of this offering determined at pricing. You should
read this table in conjunction with Selected Consolidated
Financial Data and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
and our consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
5,132
|
|
|
$
|
5,132
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
$
|
5,673
|
|
|
$
|
5,673
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Current and long
term-debt(1)
|
|
|
59,070
|
|
|
|
59,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible preferred stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock Series A and A1,
$0.001 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,906,250 shares authorized, issued and outstanding,
actual; 25,906,250 shares authorized, no shares issued or
outstanding, pro forma; no shares authorized, issued and
outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
52,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock Series B,
$0.001 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,625,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding,
actual; 1,625,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or
outstanding, pro forma; no shares authorized, issued and
outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
6,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock Series C,
$0.001 par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,512,498 authorized, issued and outstanding, actual;
1,512,498 shares authorized, no shares issued or
outstanding, pro forma; no shares authorized issued and
outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
13,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
$
|
73,047
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes capital lease obligations. |
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value per share
67,500,000 shares authorized; 27,125,629 issued and
26,918,468 outstanding, actual; 67,500,000 shares
authorized, 56,512,565 issued and 56,305,404 outstanding,
pro forma; 125,000,000 shares authorized,
62,512,565 issued and 62,305,404 outstanding, pro
forma as adjusted
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; no shares authorized,
issued or outstanding, actual or pro forma;
10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or
outstanding, pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
25,185
|
|
|
|
98,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(942
|
)
|
|
|
(942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(89,836
|
)
|
|
|
(89,836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(65,579
|
)
|
|
|
7,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
72,211
|
|
|
$
|
72,211
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of pro forma and pro forma as adjusted shares of
common stock shown as issued and outstanding in the table are
based on the number of shares of our common stock outstanding as
of June 30, 2010 and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
9,127,034 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of options outstanding as of June 30, 2010 (including
155,000 shares of our common stock that we expect to be
sold in this offering by certain selling stockholders upon the
exercise of vested options at the closing of this offering)
under our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, with a weighted average
exercise price of $4.88 per share;
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
options outstanding as of June 30, 2010 issued to directors
pursuant to stock option agreements outside of our 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan, with a weighted average exercise price of $7.06
per share;
|
|
|
|
|
|
499,999 shares of our common stock issued on July 1,
2010 in connection with our acquisition of eReal Estate
Integration, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,499,272 shares of common stock reserved for future
issuance under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, which will become
effective in connection with this offering (including
999,272 shares of common stock reserved, as of
June 30, 2010, for future issuance under our 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan, which shares will be added to the shares
reserved under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, upon its
effectiveness); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
of our common stock issuable in payment of accumulated and
unpaid dividends on our Series A, Series A1 and Series B
convertible preferred stock accrued after June 30, 2010.
|
A $1.00 increase or decrease in the assumed initial public
offering price would result in an approximately
$ million decrease or
increase in each of pro forma as adjusted cash and cash
equivalents, additional paid-in capital, total
stockholders (deficit) equity and total capitalization.
40
DILUTION
As of June 30, 2010, our pro forma net tangible book value
(deficit) was approximately $(55.1) million, or $(0.98) per
share of common stock. Our pro forma net tangible book value
(deficit) per share represents the amount of our total tangible
assets less our liabilities, divided by the shares of common
stock outstanding at June 30, 2010 after giving effect to
the 1-for-2 reverse stock split of our common stock and
convertible preferred stock effected in July 2010, the
conversion of all outstanding shares of our convertible
preferred stock into 29,043,748 shares of common stock
effective upon the completion of this offering and the issuance
of 343,188 shares of our common stock in payment of
accumulated and unpaid dividends on our Series A, Series A1 and
Series B convertible preferred stock accrued as of June 30,
2010. Our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value at
June 30, 2010 would have been
$ million, or
$ per share of common stock
after giving effect to our sale of 6,000,000 shares of
common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public
offering price of $ per
share, the midpoint of the price range set forth on the front
cover of this prospectus. Our pro forma as adjusted net tangible
book value also assumes the deduction of (i) estimated
underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses,
(ii) the application of a portion of the proceeds of this
offering to pay accumulated and unpaid dividends on our
outstanding shares of Series A, Series A1 and
Series B convertible preferred stock that have accrued at a
rate of 8%, per annum of the original issue price of each such
share of preferred stock, compounded quarterly, of which the
amount expected to be paid in cash is $0.4 million as of
June 30, 2010, and (iii) the application of a portion
of the proceeds of this offering to repay approximately
$17.2 million of our indebtedness outstanding as of
June 30, 2010.
This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value
of $ per share to existing
stockholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book
value of $ per share to
purchasers of common stock in this offering.
The following table illustrates this dilution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial offering price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value per share as of June 30,
2010
|
|
$
|
(0.98
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase per share attributable to this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value per share after
this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible book value dilution per share to new investors in
this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If all our outstanding options and warrants had been exercised
and assuming our receipt of the full exercise price in cash, our
pro forma net tangible book value (deficit) as of June 30,
2010 would have been $(9.9) million, or $(0.15) per share,
and the pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value after this
offering would have been
$ million, or
$ per share, causing
dilution to new investors of
$ per share.
The following table summarizes, on a pro forma as adjusted basis
as of June 30, 2010, the total number of shares of common
stock purchased from us, the total consideration paid to us and
the average price per share paid to us by existing stockholders
and by new investors purchasing shares in this offering at the
initial public offering price of
$ , the midpoint of the price
range set forth on the front cover of this prospectus, before
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Average Price Per
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
56,305,404
|
|
|
|
90.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
98,259,305
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
6,000,000
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
62,305,404
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The calculations in the foregoing table are based on
55,962,216 shares of our common stock as of June 30,
2010 plus 343,188 shares of our common stock issuable in
payment of accumulated and unpaid
41
dividends on our Series A, Series A1 and Series B convertible
preferred stock accrued as of June 30, 2010 and exclude:
|
|
|
|
|
9,127,034 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of options outstanding as of June 30, 2010 (including
155,000 shares of our common stock that we expect to be
sold in this offering by certain selling stockholders upon the
exercise of vested options at the closing of this offering)
under our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, with a weighted average
exercise price of $4.88 per share;
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
options outstanding as of June 30, 2010 issued to directors
pursuant to stock option agreements outside of our 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan, with a weighted average exercise price of $7.06
per share;
|
|
|
|
|
|
499,999 shares of our common stock issued on July 1,
2010 in connection with our acquisition of eReal Estate
Integration, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,499,272 shares of common stock reserved for future
issuance under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, which will become
effective in connection with this offering (including
999,272 shares of common stock reserved, as of
June 30, 2010, for future issuance under our 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan, which shares will be added to the shares
reserved under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, upon its
effectiveness); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares
of our common stock issuable in payment of accumulated and
unpaid dividends on our Series A, Series A1 and
Series B convertible preferred stock accrued after
June 30, 2010.
|
42
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
We have derived the consolidated statements of operations data
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and
the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2008 and
2009 from our audited consolidated financial statements, which
have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent
registered public accounting firm, and are included elsewhere in
this prospectus. We have derived the consolidated statement of
operations data for the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2006 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2005 and 2006 from our unaudited consolidated
financial statements that are not included in this prospectus.
We have derived the consolidated statement of operations data
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 and the
consolidated balance sheet data as of June 30, 2010 from
our unaudited consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus. We have derived the consolidated
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2007 from our audited
consolidated financial statements, which have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, but are not included in this
prospectus. You should read the following selected consolidated
financial data in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and related notes, the information in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and the other
financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our
historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future
results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand
|
|
$
|
21,049
|
|
|
$
|
36,525
|
|
|
$
|
62,592
|
|
|
$
|
95,192
|
|
|
$
|
128,377
|
|
|
$
|
60,116
|
|
|
$
|
76,866
|
|
On premise
|
|
|
17,277
|
|
|
|
15,183
|
|
|
|
11,560
|
|
|
|
7,582
|
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
|
|
2,878
|
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
Professional and other
|
|
|
4,801
|
|
|
|
6,937
|
|
|
|
9,429
|
|
|
|
9,794
|
|
|
|
8,665
|
|
|
|
4,117
|
|
|
|
5,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
43,127
|
|
|
|
58,645
|
|
|
|
83,581
|
|
|
|
112,568
|
|
|
|
140,902
|
|
|
|
67,111
|
|
|
|
86,187
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
29,168
|
|
|
|
29,596
|
|
|
|
35,703
|
|
|
|
46,058
|
|
|
|
58,513
|
|
|
|
27,603
|
|
|
|
36,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
13,959
|
|
|
|
29,049
|
|
|
|
47,878
|
|
|
|
66,510
|
|
|
|
82,389
|
|
|
|
39,508
|
|
|
|
49,795
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
15,075
|
|
|
|
16,959
|
|
|
|
21,708
|
|
|
|
28,806
|
|
|
|
27,446
|
|
|
|
13,598
|
|
|
|
17,304
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
7,142
|
|
|
|
10,487
|
|
|
|
18,047
|
|
|
|
23,923
|
|
|
|
27,804
|
|
|
|
13,013
|
|
|
|
16,365
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
5,782
|
|
|
|
6,267
|
|
|
|
9,756
|
|
|
|
14,135
|
|
|
|
20,210
|
|
|
|
8,723
|
|
|
|
13,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense
|
|
|
27,999
|
|
|
|
33,713
|
|
|
|
49,511
|
|
|
|
66,864
|
|
|
|
75,460
|
|
|
|
35,334
|
|
|
|
46,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(14,040
|
)
|
|
|
(4,664
|
)
|
|
|
(1,633
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
6,929
|
|
|
|
4,174
|
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
Interest expense and other, net
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
|
(508
|
)
|
|
|
(1,510
|
)
|
|
|
(2,152
|
)
|
|
|
(4,528
|
)
|
|
|
(1,983
|
)
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before taxes
|
|
|
(14,421
|
)
|
|
|
(5,172
|
)
|
|
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
|
(2,506
|
)
|
|
|
2,401
|
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(26,028
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(14,421
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,172
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,429
|
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(19,426
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,590
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,658
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,611
|
|
|
$
|
(845
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,363
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(19,426
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,590
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,658
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,611
|
|
|
$
|
(845
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,363
|
)
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(2.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(2.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Weighted average shares used in computing net (loss) income per
share attributable to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
10,011
|
|
|
|
10,223
|
|
|
|
13,886
|
|
|
|
23,934
|
|
|
|
23,831
|
|
|
|
25,901
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
9,544
|
|
|
|
10,011
|
|
|
|
10,223
|
|
|
|
13,886
|
|
|
|
25,511
|
|
|
|
23,831
|
|
|
|
25,901
|
|
Pro forma net income per share attributable to common
stockholders
(unaudited)(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding used in computing
net income per share attributable to common stockholders
(unaudited)(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents(3)
|
|
$
|
5,341
|
|
|
$
|
2,493
|
|
|
$
|
2,731
|
|
|
$
|
4,248
|
|
|
$
|
4,427
|
|
|
$
|
5,132
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
16,951
|
|
|
|
18,843
|
|
|
|
30,414
|
|
|
|
49,119
|
|
|
|
51,003
|
|
|
|
54,969
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
27,292
|
|
|
|
32,511
|
|
|
|
59,518
|
|
|
|
102,340
|
|
|
|
142,113
|
|
|
|
160,517
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
34,025
|
|
|
|
44,178
|
|
|
|
54,969
|
|
|
|
75,705
|
|
|
|
78,050
|
|
|
|
86,385
|
|
Total deferred revenue
|
|
|
33,114
|
|
|
|
36,283
|
|
|
|
41,052
|
|
|
|
47,232
|
|
|
|
49,428
|
|
|
|
50,854
|
|
Current and long-term
debt(4)
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
6,682
|
|
|
|
23,809
|
|
|
|
48,943
|
|
|
|
53,990
|
|
|
|
64,743
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
49,275
|
|
|
|
59,485
|
|
|
|
87,954
|
|
|
|
129,622
|
|
|
|
136,757
|
|
|
|
153,049
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
66,514
|
|
|
|
72,300
|
|
|
|
78,534
|
|
|
|
71,675
|
|
|
|
71,832
|
|
|
|
73,047
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(88,497
|
)
|
|
|
(99,274
|
)
|
|
|
(106,969
|
)
|
|
|
(98,957
|
)
|
|
|
(66,476
|
)
|
|
|
(65,579
|
)
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted
EBITDA(5)
|
|
$
|
(8,162
|
)
|
|
$
|
(692
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,984
|
|
|
$
|
13,064
|
|
|
$
|
25,593
|
|
|
$
|
15,199
|
|
Operating cash flow
|
|
|
(2,614
|
)
|
|
|
969
|
|
|
|
4,441
|
|
|
|
7,962
|
|
|
|
24,758
|
|
|
|
8,197
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
3,970
|
|
|
|
5,597
|
|
|
|
7,122
|
|
|
|
10,263
|
|
|
|
9,509
|
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Selected Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of on demand customers at period end
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
1,469
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
2,669
|
|
|
|
5,032
|
|
|
|
6,186
|
|
Number of on demand units at period end (in thousands)
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
1,708
|
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
3,833
|
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
5,206
|
|
Total number of employees at period end
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Pro forma net income per share represents net income divided by
the pro forma weighted average shares outstanding as though the
conversion of our redeemable convertible preferred stock into
common stock occurred on the original issuance dates. We plan to
use $17.2 million of the proceeds of this offering for
reduction of our indebtedness. Pro forma net income per share
reflects the effect of our use of proceeds from the offering to
repay debt. The pro forma calculation assumes the sale
of shares
of common stock offered by us used for this debt reduction at an
assumed public offering price of
$ per share, the midpoint of
the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and our
estimated offering costs payable. Pro forma net income per share
was computed as follows: actual net income of $28.4 million
and net (loss) of $39 thousand was increased by
approximately $2.1 million and $1.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively, representing the pro forma
reduction in interest expense, net of tax, resulting from the
use of net offering proceeds to reduce indebtedness. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding reflects the
conversion of our redeemable convertible preferred stock (using
the if-converted method) into common stock as though the
conversion had occurred on the original dates of issuance. The
pro forma weighted average shares outstanding assumes the sale
of 6,000,000 shares of common stock issued by us through
this offering
including shares
offered by us used for the debt reduction noted in (1) above. In
addition, pro forma weighted average common shares outstanding,
as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010, considers
(a) the issuance of 1,418,669 shares of our common stock in
payment of a portion of dividends accrued on our Series A,
Series A1 and Series B convertible preferred stock
through December 31, 2009 and declared on December 31,
2009, (b) the issuance of 342,696 shares of common
stock in payment of a portion of dividends accrued on our
Series A, Series A1 and Series B convertible
preferred stock through March 31, 2010 and declared on
April 23, 2010 and (c) the issuance of
343,188 shares of our common stock in payment of a portion
of accumulated and unpaid dividends on our Series A,
Series A1 and Series B convertible preferred stock as
of June 30, 2010, each as if such shares had been issued on
January 1, 2009. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Excludes restricted cash. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes capital lease obligations. |
|
(5) |
|
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net (loss) income plus depreciation
and asset impairment, amortization of intangible assets,
interest expense, net, income tax expense (benefit), stock-based
compensation expense and acquisition-related expense. |
|
|
|
We believe that the use of Adjusted EBITDA is useful to
investors and other users of our financial statements in
evaluating our operating performance because it provides them
with an additional tool to compare business performance across
companies and across periods. We believe that: |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA provides investors and other users of our
financial information consistency and comparability with our
past financial performance, facilitates period-to-period
comparisons of operations and facilitates comparisons with our
peer companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial
measures to supplement their GAAP results; and
|
|
|
|
it is useful to exclude certain non-cash charges, such as
depreciation and asset impairment, amortization of intangible
assets and stock-based compensation and non-core operational
charges, such as acquisition-related expense, from Adjusted
EBITDA because the amount of such expenses in any specific
period may not directly correlate to the underlying performance
of our business operations and these expenses
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
can vary significantly between periods as a result of new
acquisitions, full amortization of previously acquired tangible
and intangible assets or the timing of new stock-based awards,
as the case may be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use Adjusted EBITDA in conjunction with traditional GAAP
operating performance measures as part of our overall assessment
of our performance, for planning purposes, including the
preparation of our annual operating budget, to evaluate the
effectiveness of our business strategies and to communicate with
our board of directors concerning our financial performance. |
|
|
|
We do not place undue reliance on Adjusted EBITDA as our only
measure of operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be
considered as a substitute for other measures of liquidity or
financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP. There
are limitations to using non-GAAP financial measures, including
that other companies may calculate these measures differently
than we do, that they do not reflect our capital expenditures or
future requirements for capital expenditures and that they do
not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working
capital. We compensate for the inherent limitations associated
with using Adjusted EBITDA measures through disclosure of these
limitations, presentation of our financial statements in
accordance with GAAP and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to
the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net (loss) income. |
The following table presents a reconciliation of net (loss)
income to Adjusted EBITDA (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(14,421
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,172
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,429
|
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Depreciation and asset impairment
|
|
|
2,010
|
|
|
|
3,269
|
|
|
|
4,854
|
|
|
|
9,847
|
|
|
|
9,231
|
|
|
|
4,513
|
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
5,784
|
|
|
|
2,684
|
|
|
|
4,496
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
4,528
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(26,028
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
Acquisition-related expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(8,162
|
)
|
|
$
|
(692
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,984
|
|
|
$
|
13,064
|
|
|
$
|
25,593
|
|
|
$
|
12,549
|
|
|
$
|
15,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents stock-based compensation included
in each expense category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
490
|
|
|
$
|
1,476
|
|
|
$
|
2,805
|
|
|
$
|
1,178
|
|
|
$
|
2,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations should be read together with
Selected Consolidated Financial Data and our
financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere
in this prospectus. This discussion contains forward-looking
statements, based on current expectations and related to our
plans, estimates, beliefs and anticipated future financial
performance. These statements involve risks and uncertainties
and our actual results may differ materially from those
anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of
many factors, including those set forth under Risk
Factors, Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements and Industry Data and elsewhere in this
prospectus.
Overview
We are a leading provider of on demand software solutions for
the rental housing industry. Our broad range of property
management solutions enable owners and managers of single-family
and a wide variety of multi-family rental property types to
manage their marketing, pricing, screening, leasing, accounting,
purchasing and other property operations. We deliver our on
demand software solutions via the Internet through an integrated
software platform that provides a single point of access and a
shared repository of prospect, resident and property data.
We derive a substantial majority of our revenue from sales of
our on demand software solutions. We also derive revenue from
our professional and other services. A small percentage of our
revenue is derived from sales of our on premise software
solutions to our existing on premise customers. Our on demand
software solutions are sold pursuant to subscription license
agreements, and our on premise software solutions are sold
pursuant to term or perpetual license agreements and associated
maintenance agreements. Typically, we price our solutions based
primarily on the number of units the customer manages with our
solutions. For our insurance and transaction-based solutions, we
price based on a fixed commission rate of earned premiums or a
fixed rate per transaction, respectively. We sell our solutions
through our direct sales organization and derive substantially
all of our revenue from sales in the United States. Our revenue
has increased from $83.6 million in 2007 to
$140.9 million in 2009 and was $86.2 million in the
six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase in revenue has
primarily been driven by increased sales of our on demand
software solutions, a substantial amount of which has been
derived from purchases of additional on demand software
solutions by our existing customers. In 2009 and in the six
months ended June 30, 2010, our on demand revenue
represented 91.1% and 89.2% of our total revenue, respectively.
While the adoption of on demand software solutions in the rental
housing industry is growing rapidly, it remains at a relatively
early stage of development. Additionally, there is a low level
of penetration of our on demand software solutions in our
existing customer base. We believe these factors present us with
significant opportunities to generate revenue through sales of
additional on demand software solutions. Our existing and
potential customers base their decisions to invest in our
solutions on a number of factors, including general economic
conditions. Accordingly, macroeconomic conditions negatively
impacted our business in 2009 and in the six months ended
June 30, 2010 and may continue to negatively impact our
business.
Our company was formed in 1998 to acquire Rent Roll, Inc., which
marketed and sold on premise property management systems for the
conventional and affordable multi-family rental housing markets.
In June 2001, we released OneSite, our first on demand property
management system. Since 2002, we have expanded our on demand
software solutions to include a number of software-enabled
value-added services that provide complementary sales and
marketing, asset optimization, risk mitigation, billing and
utility management and spend management capabilities. In
connection with this expansion, we have allocated greater
resources to the development and infrastructure needs of
developing and increasing sales of our suite of on demand
software solutions. In addition, since July 2002, we have
completed 14 acquisitions of complementary technologies and
businesses (including our recent February 2010 and July 2010
acquisitions) to supplement our internal product development and
sales and marketing efforts, enabling us to expand the scope of
our solutions, the types of rental housing properties served by
our solutions and our customer base.
47
Key
Business Metrics
In addition to traditional financial measures, we monitor our
operating performance using a number of financially and
non-financially derived metrics that are not included in our
consolidated financial statements. We monitor the key
performance indicators reflected in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(in thousands, except dollar per unit data)
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
83,581
|
|
|
$
|
112,568
|
|
|
$
|
140,902
|
|
|
$
|
67,111
|
|
|
$
|
86,187
|
|
On demand revenue
|
|
$
|
62,592
|
|
|
$
|
95,192
|
|
|
$
|
128,377
|
|
|
$
|
60,116
|
|
|
$
|
76,866
|
|
On demand revenue as a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
74.9%
|
|
|
|
84.6%
|
|
|
|
91.1%
|
|
|
|
89.6%
|
|
|
|
89.2%
|
|
Ending on demand units
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
3,833
|
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
4,108
|
|
|
|
5,206
|
|
Average on demand units
|
|
|
2,293
|
|
|
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
4,128
|
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
|
|
4,895
|
|
Annualized on demand revenue per average on demand unit
|
|
$
|
27.30
|
|
|
$
|
30.34
|
|
|
$
|
31.10
|
|
|
$
|
30.37
|
|
|
$
|
31.41
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
5,984
|
|
|
$
|
13,064
|
|
|
$
|
25,593
|
|
|
$
|
12,549
|
|
|
$
|
15,199
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of total revenue
|
|
|
7.2%
|
|
|
|
11.6%
|
|
|
|
18.2%
|
|
|
|
18.7%
|
|
|
|
17.6%
|
|
On demand revenue. This metric represents the
license and subscription fees for accessing our on demand
software solutions, typically licensed for one year terms,
commission income from sales of renters insurance policies
and transaction fees for certain of our on demand software
solutions. We consider on demand revenue to be a key business
metric because we believe the market for our on demand software
solutions represents the largest growth opportunity for our
business.
On demand revenue as a percentage of total
revenue. This metric represents on demand revenue
for the period presented divided by total revenue for the same
period. We use on demand revenue as a percentage of total
revenue to measure our success in executing our strategy to
increase the penetration of our on demand software solutions and
expand our recurring revenue streams attributable to these
solutions. We expect our on demand revenue to remain a
significant percentage of our total revenue although the actual
percentage may vary from period to period due to a number of
factors, including the timing of acquisitions, professional and
other revenue and on premise perpetual license sales and
maintenance fees resulting from our February 2010 acquisition.
Ending on demand units. This metric represents
the number of rental housing units managed by our customers with
one or more of our on demand software solutions at the end of
the period. We use ending on demand units to measure the success
of our strategy of increasing the number of rental housing units
managed with our on demand software solutions. Property unit
counts are provided to us by our customers as new sales orders
are processed. Property unit counts may be adjusted periodically
as information related to our customers properties is
updated or supplemented, which could result in adjusting the
number of units previously reported. We expect ending on demand
units will continue to increase in 2010 and 2011.
On demand revenue per average on demand
unit. This metric represents on demand revenue
for the period presented divided by average on demand units for
the same period. For interim periods, the calculation is
performed on an annualized basis. We calculate average on demand
units as the average of the beginning and ending on demand units
for each quarter in the period presented. We monitor this metric
to measure our success in increasing the number of on demand
software solutions utilized by our customers to manage their
rental housing units, our overall revenue and profitability. On
demand revenue per average on demand unit for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2010 are annualized.
Adjusted EBITDA. We define this metric as net
(loss) income plus depreciation and asset impairment;
amortization of intangible assets; interest expense, net; income
tax expense (benefit); stock-based
48
compensation expense and acquisition-related expense. We
believe that the use of Adjusted EBITDA is useful in evaluating
our operating performance because it excludes certain non-cash
expenses, including depreciation, amortization and stock-based
compensation. Adjusted EBITDA is not determined in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States, or GAAP, and should not be considered as a substitute
for or superior to financial measures determined in accordance
with GAAP. For further discussion regarding Adjusted EBITDA and
a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, refer to the
table below. Our Adjusted EBITDA grew from approximately
$6.0 million in 2007 to approximately $25.6 million in
2009 and approximately $15.2 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2010, as a result of our efforts to expand
market share and increase revenue.
The following provides a reconciliation of net (loss) income to
Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,429
|
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Depreciation and asset impairment
|
|
|
4,854
|
|
|
|
9,847
|
|
|
|
9,231
|
|
|
|
4,513
|
|
|
|
5,051
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
5,784
|
|
|
|
2,684
|
|
|
|
4,496
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
1,510
|
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
|
4,528
|
|
|
|
1,983
|
|
|
|
2,936
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(26,028
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
Acquisition-related expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
5,984
|
|
|
$
|
13,064
|
|
|
$
|
25,593
|
|
|
$
|
12,549
|
|
|
$
|
15,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key
Components of our Results of Operations
Revenue
We derive our revenue from three primary sources: our on demand
software solutions; our on premise software solutions; and our
professional and other services. In 2007, 2008, 2009 and the six
months ended June 30, 2010, we generated revenue of
$83.6 million, $112.6 million, $140.9 million and
$86.2 million, respectively.
On Demand
Revenue
Revenue from our on demand software solutions is comprised of
license and subscription fees for accessing our on demand
software solutions, typically licensed for one year terms,
commission income from sales of renters insurance
policies, and transaction fees for certain on demand software
solutions, such as payment processing, spend management and
billing services. Typically, we price our on demand software
solutions based primarily on the number of units the customer
manages with our solutions. For our insurance and
transaction-based
solutions, we price based on a fixed commission rate of earned
premiums or a fixed rate per transaction, respectively.
In 2007, 2008, 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2010,
revenue from our on demand software solutions was approximately
$62.6 million, $95.2 million, $128.4 million and
$76.9 million, respectively, representing approximately
74.9%, 84.6%, 91.1% and 89.2% of our total revenue for the same
periods. Revenue from our on demand software solutions has
continued to increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of
our total revenue as we have ceased actively marketing our on
premise software solutions to new customers and as many of our
existing on premise customers have transitioned to our on demand
software solutions. We expect our on demand revenue to continue
to increase in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue
in 2010, although the actual percentage of revenue may vary from
period to period due to a number of factors, including the
impact of acquisitions and revenue derived from our professional
and other services related to our on demand software solutions.
49
On
Premise Revenue
Our on premise software solutions are distributed to our
customers and maintained locally on the customers
hardware. Revenue from our on premise software solutions is
comprised of license fees under term and perpetual license
agreements. Typically, we have licensed our on premise software
solutions pursuant to term license agreements with an initial
term of one year that include maintenance and support. Customers
can renew their term license agreement for additional one-year
terms at renewal price levels. In February 2010, we completed a
strategic acquisition of assets that included on premise
software solutions that were historically marketed and sold
pursuant to perpetual license agreements and related maintenance
agreements.
We no longer actively market our on premise software solutions
to new customers, and only license our on premise software
solutions to a small portion of our existing on premise
customers as they expand their portfolio of rental housing
properties. While we intend to continue to support our recently
acquired on premise software solutions, we expect that many of
the customers who license these solutions will transition to our
on demand software solutions over time.
In 2007, 2008, 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2010,
revenue from our on premise software solutions was approximately
$11.6 million, $7.6 million, $3.9 million and
$4.3 million, respectively, representing approximately
13.8%, 6.7%, 2.7% and 5.0% of our total revenue for the same
periods, respectively. Revenue from our on premise software
solutions has continued to decrease in absolute dollars as we
have ceased actively marketing our on premise software solutions
to new customers and as many of our existing on premise
customers have transitioned to our on demand software solutions.
We expect our on premise revenue to decrease over time in
absolute dollars and as a percentage of our total revenue;
however, our February 2010 acquisition could result in a
near-term
increase in on premise revenue in terms of both absolute dollars
and as a percentage of our total revenue until we transition
these customers to our on demand software solutions. In
addition, the actual percentage of revenue may vary from period
to period due to a number of factors, including the impact of
our recent and potential future acquisition of on premise
software solutions.
Professional
and Other Revenue
Revenue from professional and other services consists of
consulting and implementation services, training and other
ancillary services. Professional and other services engagements
are typically time and material.
We complement our solutions with professional and other
services. In 2007, 2008, 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2010, revenue from professional and other services
was approximately $9.4 million, $9.8 million,
$8.7 million and $5.0 million, respectively,
representing approximately 11.3%, 8.7%, 6.2% and 5.8% of our
total revenue for the same periods, respectively. We expect
professional and other services will represent 10.0% or less of
our total revenue in 2010 consistent with 2008 and 2009
performance.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of personnel costs related to
our operations, support services, training and implementation
services, expenses related to the operation of our data center
and fees paid to third-party service providers. Personnel costs
include salaries, bonuses, stock-based compensation and employee
benefits. Cost of revenue also includes an allocation of
facilities costs, overhead costs and depreciation, as well as
amortization of acquired technology related to strategic
acquisitions and amortization of capitalized development costs.
We allocate facilities costs, overhead costs and depreciation
based on headcount. We expect our cost of revenue in 2010 to
increase in absolute dollars.
Operating
Expenses
We classify our operating expenses into three categories:
product development, sales and marketing, and general and
administrative. Our operating expenses primarily consist of
personnel costs, which includes compensation, employee benefits
and payroll taxes, costs for third-party contracted development,
marketing, legal, accounting and consulting services and other
professional service fees. Personnel costs for each category
50
of operating expenses include salaries, bonuses, stock-based
compensation and employee benefits for employees in that
category. In addition, our operating expenses include an
allocation of our facilities costs, overhead costs and
depreciation based on headcount for that category, as well as
amortization of purchased intangible assets resulting from our
acquisitions.
Our operating expenses increased in absolute dollars in each of
2008 and 2009 as we have built infrastructure and added
employees across all categories in order to accelerate and
support our growth and to expand our markets. We expect our
operating expenses in 2010 to continue to increase in absolute
dollars as compared to 2009, as the capacity we have added in
prior years is more fully utilized and we continue to create
operating leverage.
Product development. Product development
expense consists primarily of personnel costs for our product
development employees and executives and fees to contract
development vendors. Our product development efforts are focused
primarily on increasing the functionality and enhancing the ease
of use of our on demand software solutions and expanding our
suite of on demand software solutions. In 2008, we established a
product development and service center in Hyderabad, India to
take advantage of strong technical talent at lower personnel
costs compared to the United States. We expect our product
development expenses in 2010 to increase in absolute dollars.
Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing
expense consists primarily of personnel costs for our sales,
marketing and business development employees and executives,
travel and entertainment and marketing programs. Marketing
programs consist of advertising, tradeshows, user conferences,
public relations, industry sponsorships and affiliations and
product marketing. In addition, sales and marketing expense
includes amortization of certain purchased intangible assets,
including customer relationships and key vendor and supplier
relationships obtained in connection with our acquisitions. We
expect our sales and marketing expense in 2010 to increase in
absolute dollars.
General and administrative. General and
administrative expense consists of personnel costs for our
executive, finance and accounting, human resources, management
information systems and legal personnel, as well as legal,
accounting and other professional service fees and other
corporate expenses. We expect our general and administrative
expense in 2010 to increase in absolute dollars as compared to
2009 primarily due to the increased costs of operating as a
public company.
Interest
Expense, Net
Interest expense, net, consists primarily of interest income and
interest expense. Interest income represents earnings from our
cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. Interest
expense is associated with our term loan, revolver, secured
promissory note, promissory note issued to preferred
stockholders, capital lease obligations and certain
acquisition-related liabilities. Total amounts outstanding under
our interest-bearing obligations at December 31, 2007, 2008
and 2009 and June 30, 2010 include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30,
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Term loan
|
|
$
|
9,583
|
|
|
$
|
12,650
|
|
|
$
|
33,688
|
|
|
$
|
40,305
|
|
Revolver
|
|
|
8,584
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,673
|
|
Secured promissory note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Promissory notes issued to preferred stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,064
|
|
|
|
8,173
|
|
|
|
7,247
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
5,642
|
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
1,519
|
|
Interest bearing acquisition-related liabilities
|
|
|
3,455
|
|
|
|
2,966
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
2,215
|
|
We expect interest expense to decrease in absolute dollars and
as a percentage of our total revenue in the periods following
this public offering as we anticipate repaying a portion of our
outstanding term loan and repaying all of our secured promissory
note and promissory notes issued to preferred stockholders.
51
Income
Taxes
Historically, we have incurred annual operating losses and have
not benefited from these losses and have only provided for state
and foreign income taxes. As of December 31, 2009, we had
net operating loss carry forwards for federal and state income
tax purposes of approximately $67.2 million. In December
2009, based on current year income and projected future year
income, we concluded that it is more likely than not that the
net deferred tax assets recorded will be realized. As such, we
deemed it appropriate to decrease this valuation allowance by
$27.0 million during 2009. If not utilized, our federal net
operating loss and tax credit carry forwards will begin to
expire in 2018. While not currently subject to an annual
limitation, the utilization of these carry forwards may become
subject to an annual limitation because of provisions in the
Internal Revenue Code that are applicable if we experience an
ownership change, which may occur, for example, as a
result of this offering or other issuances of stock.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with GAAP. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a
particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does
not require managements judgment in its application, while
in other cases, managements judgment is required in
selecting among available alternative accounting standards that
allow different accounting treatment for similar transactions.
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and
related disclosures require us to make estimates, assumptions
and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets,
liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses, and related
disclosures. We base our estimates and assumptions on historical
experience and other factors that we believe to be reasonable
under the circumstances. In some instances, we could reasonably
use different accounting estimates, and in some instances
results could differ significantly from our estimates. We
evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. To
the extent that there are differences between our estimates and
actual results, our future financial statement presentation,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will
be affected.
We believe that the assumptions and estimates associated with
revenue recognition, accounts receivable, business combinations,
goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives,
impairment of long-lived assets, intangible assets, stock-based
compensation, income taxes and capitalized product development
costs have the greatest potential impact on our consolidated
financial statements. Therefore, we believe the accounting
policies discussed below are critical to understanding our
historical and future performance, as these policies relate to
the more significant areas involving our managements
judgments, assumptions and estimates.
Revenue
Recognition
We derive our revenue from three primary sources: our on demand
software solutions; our on premise software solutions; and
professional and other services. We commence revenue recognition
when all of the following conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
|
there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement;
|
|
|
|
the solution and/or service has been provided to the customer;
|
|
|
|
the collection of the fees is probable; and
|
|
|
|
the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or
determinable.
|
For multi-element arrangements that include multiple solutions
and/or
services, we allocate arrangement consideration to all
deliverables that have stand-alone value based on their relative
selling prices. In such circumstances, we utilize the following
hierarchy to determine the selling price to be used for
allocating revenue to deliverables as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE), if
available. The price at which we sell the element
in a separate stand-alone transaction;
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party evidence of selling price (TPE), if VSOE of
selling price is not available. Evidence from us
or other companies of the value of a largely interchangeable
element in a transaction; and
|
|
|
|
Estimated selling price (ESP), if neither VSOE nor TPE of
selling price is available. Our best estimate of
the stand-alone selling price of an element in a transaction.
|
Our process for determining ESP for deliverables without VSOE or
TPE considers multiple factors that may vary depending upon the
unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable. Key
factors primarily considered in developing ESP include prices
charged by us for similar offerings when sold separately,
pricing policies and approvals from standard pricing and other
business objectives.
From time to time, we sell on demand software solutions with
professional services. In such cases, we allocate arrangement
consideration based on our estimated selling price of the on
demand software solution and VSOE of the selling price of the
professional services.
On Demand
Revenue
Our on demand revenue consists of license and subscription fees,
transaction fees related to certain of our software-enabled
value-added services and commissions derived from us selling
certain risk mitigation services.
License and subscription fees are comprised of a charge billed
at the initial order date and monthly or annual subscription
fees for accessing our on demand software solutions.
The license fee billed at the initial order date is recognized
as revenue on a straight-line basis over the longer of the
contractual term or the period in which the customer is expected
to benefit, which we consider to be four years. Recognition
starts once the product has been activated. Revenue from monthly
and annual subscription fees is recognized on a straight-line
basis over the access period.
As part of our risk mitigation services to the rental housing
industry, we act as an insurance agent and derive commission
revenue from the sale of insurance products to individuals. The
commissions are based upon a percentage of the premium that the
insurance company charges to the policyholder and are subject to
forfeiture in instances where a policyholder cancels prior to
the end of the policy. If the policy is cancelled, our
commissions are forfeited as a percent of the unearned premium.
As a result, we recognize the commissions related to these
services ratably over the policy term as the associated premiums
are earned.
We recognize revenue from transaction fees derived from certain
of our software-enabled value-added services as the related
services are performed.
On
Premise Revenue
Revenue from our on premise software solutions is comprised of
an annual term license, which includes maintenance and support.
Customers can renew their annual term license for additional
one-year terms at renewal price levels. We recognize the annual
term license on a straight-line basis over the license term.
In addition, we have arrangements that include perpetual
licenses with maintenance and other services to be provided over
a fixed term. We allocate and defer revenue equivalent to the
VSOE of fair value for the undelivered elements and recognize
the difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount
deferred for the undelivered elements as revenue. We have
determined that we do not have VSOE of fair value for our
customer support and professional services in these specific
arrangements. As a result, the elements within our
multiple-element sales agreements do not qualify for treatment
as separate units of accounting. Accordingly, we account for
fees received under multiple-element arrangements with customer
support or other professional services as a single unit of
accounting and recognize the entire arrangement ratably over the
longer of the customer support period or the period during which
professional services are rendered.
Professional
and Other Revenue
Professional and other revenue is recognized as the services are
rendered for time and material contracts. Training revenues are
recognized after the services are performed.
53
Accounts
Receivable
For several of our solutions, we invoice our customers prior to
the period in which service is provided. Accounts receivable
represent trade receivables from customers when we have invoiced
for software solutions
and/or
services and we have not yet received payment. We present
accounts receivable net of an allowance for doubtful accounts.
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of customers to make
required payments, or the customer cancelling prior to the
service being rendered. In doing so, we consider the current
financial condition of the customer, the specific details of the
customer account, the age of the outstanding balance, the
current economic environment and historical credit trends. As a
result of a portion of our allowance being for services not yet
rendered, a portion of our allowance is charged as an offset to
deferred revenue, which does not have an effect on the statement
of operations. Any change in the assumptions used in analyzing a
specific account receivable might result in an additional
allowance for doubtful accounts being recognized in the period
in which the change occurs.
Business
Combinations
When we acquire businesses, we allocate the total consideration
to the fair value of tangible assets and liabilities and
identifiable intangible assets acquired. Any residual purchase
price is recorded as goodwill. The allocation of the purchase
price requires management to make significant estimates in
determining the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities
assumed, especially with respect to intangible assets. These
estimates are based on the application of valuation models using
historical experience and information obtained from the
management of the acquired companies. These estimates can
include, but are not limited to, the cash flows that an asset is
expected to generate in the future, the appropriate weighted
average cost of capital and the cost savings expected to be
derived from acquiring an asset. These estimates are inherently
uncertain and unpredictable. In addition, unanticipated events
and circumstances may occur which may affect the accuracy or
validity of these estimates. Beginning in 2009, we began
including the fair value of contingent consideration to be paid
within the total consideration allocated to the fair value of
the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives
We test goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite
lives for impairment separately on an annual basis in the fourth
quarter of each year. Additionally, we test goodwill and other
intangible assets with indefinite lives in the interim if events
and circumstances indicate that goodwill and other intangible
assets with indefinite lives may be impaired. The events and
circumstances that we consider include the significant
under-performance relative to projected future operating results
and significant changes in our overall business
and/or
product strategies. We evaluate impairment of goodwill using a
two-step process. The first step involves a comparison of the
fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the
carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value,
the second step of the process involves a comparison of the fair
value and carrying amount of the goodwill of that reporting unit
and determination of the impairment charge, if any. We evaluate
other intangible assets with indefinite lives by estimating the
fair value of those assets based on estimated future earnings
derived from the assets using an income approach model. If the
carrying amount of the other intangible assets with indefinite
lives exceeds the fair value, we recognize an impairment loss
equal to the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the
fair market value of the asset. If an event occurs that causes
us to revise our estimates and assumptions used in analyzing the
value of our goodwill and other intangible assets with
indefinite lives, the revision could result in a non-cash
impairment charge that could have a material impact on our
financial results.
We recorded goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite
lives in conjunction with all seven of our business acquisitions
completed since the beginning of 2007. We test goodwill for
impairment based on a single reporting unit. We believe we
operate in a single reporting unit because our chief operating
decision maker does not regularly review our operating results
other than at a consolidated level for purposes of decision
making regarding resource allocation and operating performance.
54
Impairment
of Long-lived Assets
We perform an impairment review of long-lived assets held and
used whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider
important that could trigger an impairment review include, but
are not limited to, significant under-performance relative to
projected future operating results, significant changes in the
manner of our use of the acquired assets or our overall business
and/or
product strategies and significant industry or economic trends.
When we determine that the carrying value of a long-lived asset
may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more
of these indicators, we determine the recoverability by
comparing the carrying amount of the asset to net future
undiscounted cash flows that the asset is expected to generate.
We would then recognize an impairment charge equal to the amount
by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of
the asset.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible assets consist of acquired developed product
technologies, acquired customer relationships, vendor
relationships, non-competition agreements and trade names. We
record intangible assets at fair value and amortize those with
finite lives over the shorter of the contractual life or the
estimated useful life. We estimate the useful lives of acquired
developed product technologies and customer relationships based
on factors that include the planned use of each developed
product technology and the expected pattern of future cash flows
to be derived from each developed product technology and
existing customer relationships. We include amortization of
acquired developed product technologies in cost of revenue,
amortization of acquired customer relationships in sales and
marketing expenses and amortization of vendor relationships and
non-competition agreements in general and administrative
expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Prior to January 1, 2006, we accounted for share-based
awards, including stock options, to employees using the
intrinsic value method. Under the intrinsic value method,
compensation expense was measured on the date of award as the
difference, if any, between the deemed fair value of our common
stock and the option exercise price, multiplied by the number of
options granted. The option exercise prices and fair value of
our common stock are determined by our board of directors based
on a review of various objective and subjective factors. No
compensation expense was recorded for stock options issued to
employees prior to January 1, 2006 because all options were
granted in fixed amounts and with fixed exercise prices at least
equal to the fair value of our common stock at the date of grant.
Effective January 1, 2006, we changed our accounting
treatment to recognize compensation expense based on the fair
value of all share-based awards granted, modified, repurchased
or cancelled on or after that date.
Our stock-based compensation is measured on the grant date based
on the fair value of the award and is recognized as an expense
over the requisite service period, which is generally the
vesting period, on a straight-line basis.
The fair value of share-based awards is calculated through the
use of option pricing models. These models require subjective
assumptions regarding future share price volatility and the
expected life of each option grant.
The fair value of employee stock options granted since
January 1, 2006 was estimated at the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model by applying the following
weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
1.5-4.8
|
%
|
Expected option life (in years)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
50-60
|
%
|
At each stock option grant date, we utilized peer group data to
calculate our expected volatility. Expected volatility was based
on historical and expected volatility rates of comparable
publicly traded peers. The expected life of each option grant is
based on existing employee exercise patterns and our historical
pre-vested
55
forfeiture experience. The risk-free interest rate was based on
the treasury yield rate with a maturity corresponding to the
expected option life assumed at the grant date.
Changes to the underlying assumptions may have a significant
impact on the underlying value of the stock options, which could
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
We have granted stock options at exercise prices above the fair
value of our common stock as of the grant date, as determined by
our compensation committee on a contemporaneous basis. Given the
absence of any active market for our common stock, the fair
value of the common stock underlying stock options granted was
determined by our compensation committee, with input from our
management. In arriving at these valuations, our compensation
committee and management also considered contemporaneous
third-party valuations.
Valuation
of Common Stock
In 2009 and through June 2010, we granted options to purchase
shares of our common stock as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
Fair Value
|
Grant Date
|
|
Options Granted
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Per Share
|
|
February 2009
|
|
|
718,750
|
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
$
|
5.44
|
|
June 2009
|
|
|
285,500
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
5.76
|
|
September 2009
|
|
|
881,000
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
5.04
|
|
October 2009
|
|
|
112,500
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
5.04
|
|
November 2009
|
|
|
236,250
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
5.04
|
|
December 2009
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
5.66
|
|
February 2010
|
|
|
920,500
|
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
April 2010
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
May 2010
|
|
|
466,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
7.96
|
|
June 2010
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
7.96
|
|
July 2010
|
|
|
569,250
|
|
|
|
9.00
|
|
|
|
8.78
|
|
Significant
Factors in Determining Fair Value
For all grant dates in 2009 and 2010, we granted employees
options at exercise prices greater than the fair value of the
underlying common stock at the time of grant, as determined by
our compensation committee on a contemporaneous basis. To
determine the fair value of our common stock, we consider many
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our current and historical operating performance;
|
|
|
|
our expected future operating performance;
|
|
|
|
our financial condition at the grant date;
|
|
|
|
the liquidation rights and other preferences of our preferred
stock;
|
|
|
|
any recent privately negotiated sales of our securities to
independent third parties;
|
|
|
|
input from management;
|
|
|
|
the lack of marketability of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
the potential future marketability of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
the business risks inherent in our business and in technology
companies, generally;
|
|
|
|
the market performance of comparable publicly traded
companies; and
|
|
|
|
the U.S. and global capital market conditions.
|
56
Valuation
Methodologies Used in Determining Fair Value
In valuing our common stock, we utilize a probability weighted
expected return method to estimate the value of our common stock
based upon an analysis of expected future cash flows considering
possible future liquidity events, as well as the liquidation
rights and other preferences of our preferred stock. In
determining the value of our common stock on each grant date in
2009 and 2010, we considered two possible scenarios: the
completion of an initial public offering, or the IPO Scenario,
and remaining private, or the Private Scenario. For purposes of
determining the fair market value of our common stock on each
grant date in 2009 and 2010, we estimated the probability of the
future liquidity event being our initial public offering at 75%
and remaining a private company at 25%.
In valuing our common stock in the IPO Scenario, we utilize a
market approach that estimates the fair value of a company by
applying to that company the market multiples of comparable
publicly traded companies. Based on the range of these observed
multiples, we apply judgment in determining an appropriate
multiple to apply to our metrics in order to derive an
indication of value. In connection with valuing our common stock
under the IPO Scenario for grants in February, June and
September 2009, we determined fair value based on the
probability of going public in 2009, 2010 or 2011. In connection
with valuing our common stock under the IPO Scenario for grants
in December 2009 and February and May 2010, we determined the
probability of going public in 2010 or 2011. For each of the
grants in 2009 and 2010, we concluded that the market value of
invested capital to revenue multiple would yield the most
appropriate indication of value for us based on our projections.
In valuing our common stock in the Private Scenario, we apply
the income and market approaches utilizing a terminal period
value and a residual revenue growth rate of 5.5% in the terminal
year based on our expectation of long-term growth. In connection
with valuing our common stock under the Private Scenario, we
apply the income approach utilizing discounted cash flows. We
concluded that this was the best indication of value because,
beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008, we had moved towards a
long-term expectation of earnings.
Fair
Value of Stock Option Grants in 2009 and 2010
February 2009. In connection with our stock
option grants in February 2009, we considered the factors
described above as well as a contemporaneous valuation report
dated February 27, 2009. The valuation used a risk-adjusted
discount of 24.75% and an estimated time to an initial public
offering between one and three years, as well as a scenario in
which the company would continue as a private entity. As we
considered scenarios of liquidity through an initial public
offering during 2009, 2010, 2011, or remaining private, a
non-marketability discount was estimated at 20.0%, 28.0%, 33.0%
and 40.0% for each of the scenarios, respectively. The expected
outcomes were weighted 25.0% toward an initial public offering
during 2009, 25.0% toward an initial public offering during
2010, 25.0% toward an initial public offering during 2011 and
25.0% toward continuation as a private company. This valuation
indicated a fair value of $5.44 per share for our common stock
and we granted options at an exercise price of $6.00 per share.
June 2009. In connection with our stock option
grants in June 2009, we considered the factors described above,
including the slight recovery of the U.S. and global
capital markets and its impact on our short term projected
revenue growth and comparable publicly traded peers since the
grants in February 2009, as well as a contemporaneous valuation
report dated June 4, 2009. The valuation used a
risk-adjusted discount of 24.75% and an estimated time to an
initial public offering between one and three years, as well as
a scenario in which the company would continue as a private
entity. As we considered scenarios of liquidity through an
initial public offering during 2009, 2010, 2011, or remaining
private, a non-marketability discount was estimated at 18.0%,
29.0%, 35.0% and 43.0% for each of the scenarios, respectively.
The expected outcomes were weighted 25.0% toward an initial
public offering during 2009, 25.0% toward an initial public
offering during 2010, 25.0% toward an initial public offering
during 2011 and 25.0% toward continuation as a private company.
This valuation indicated a fair value of $5.76 per share for our
common stock and we granted options at an exercise price of
$6.00 per share.
September 2009. In connection with our stock
option grants in September 2009, we considered the factors
described above, including the continued recovery of the
U.S. and global capital markets offset by the
57
reduction in our projected revenue growth due to mixed
expectations of projected macroeconomic conditions since the
grants in June 2009, as well as a contemporaneous valuation
report dated September 18, 2009. The valuation used a
risk-adjusted discount of 22.0% and an estimated time to an
initial public offering between one and three years, as well as
a scenario in which the company would continue as a private
entity. As we considered scenarios of liquidity through an
initial public offering during 2009, 2010, 2011, or remaining
private, a non-marketability discount was estimated at 13.0%,
26.0%, 33.0% and 41.0% for each of the scenarios, respectively.
The expected outcomes were weighted 25.0% toward an initial
public offering during 2009, 25.0% toward an initial public
offering during 2010, 25.0% toward an initial public offering
during 2011 and 25.0% toward continuation as a private company.
This valuation indicated a fair value of $5.04 per share for our
common stock and we granted options at an exercise price of
$6.00 per share.
October and November 2009. In connection with
our stock options grants in October and November, we continued
to use the $5.04 per share valuation analyzed in September. Our
board of directors reviewed the events since the grant of
options in September 2009 and the continued recovery of the
U.S. capital markets and concluded that there had been no
significant change in our performance to cause an increase or
decrease in the per share valuation of our common stock and
granted options at an exercise price of $6.00 per share.
December 2009. In connection with our stock
option grants in December 2009, we considered the factors
described above, including our improved sales performance and
outlook and the improved market performance of our comparable
public company peers since the September 2009 grants, as well as
a contemporaneous valuation report dated December 15, 2009.
The valuation used a risk-adjusted discount of 19.5% and an
estimated time to an initial public offering between one and two
years, as well as a scenario in which the company would continue
as a private entity. As we considered scenarios of liquidity
through an initial public offering during 2010, 2011, or
remaining private, a non-marketability discount was estimated at
24.0%, 32.0% and 42.0% for each of the scenarios, respectively.
The expected outcomes were weighted 50.0% toward an initial
public offering during 2010, 25.0% toward an initial public
offering during 2011 and 25.0% toward continuation as a private
company. This valuation indicated a fair value of $5.66 per
share for our common stock and we granted options at an exercise
price of $6.00 per share.
February 2010. In connection with our stock
option grants in February 2010, we considered the factors
described above, including our improved sales performance and
outlook and the improved market performance of our comparable
public company peers since the December 2009 grants, as well as
a contemporaneous valuation report dated February 25, 2010.
The valuation used a risk-adjusted discount of 20.0% and an
estimated time to an initial public offering between one and two
years, as well as a scenario in which the company would continue
as a private entity. As we considered scenarios of liquidity
through an initial public offering during 2010, 2011, or
remaining private, a non-marketability discount was estimated at
22.0%, 31.0% and 41.0% for each of the scenarios, respectively.
The change in the non-marketability discount from the previous
grants relates to an increase in the likelihood of our initial
public offering occurring in the more current term. The expected
outcomes were weighted 75% toward an initial public offering
(75% toward an offering in 2010 and 25% toward an offering in
2011) and 25% toward continuation as a private company. This
valuation indicated a fair value of $6.74 per share for our
common stock and we granted options at an exercise price of
$7.50 per share.
April and May 2010. In connection with our
stock option grants in April and May 2010, we considered the
factors described above, including our improved sales
performance and outlook and the improved market performance of
our comparable public company peers since the February 2010
grants, as well as a contemporaneous valuation report dated
May 12, 2010 for the May 2010 grants. The valuation used a
risk-adjusted discount of 18.0% and an estimated time to an
initial public offering between one and two years, as well as a
scenario in which the company would continue as a private
entity. As we considered scenarios of liquidity through an
initial public offering during 2010, 2011, or remaining private,
a non-marketability discount was estimated at 16.0%, 24.0% and
34.0% for each of the scenarios, respectively. The change in the
non-marketability discount from the previous grants relates to
an increase in the likelihood of our initial public offering
occurring in the more current term. The expected outcomes were
weighted 75% toward an initial public offering (75% toward an
offering in 2010 and 25% toward an offering in 2011) and 25%
toward
58
continuation as a private company. This valuation indicated a
fair value of $7.96 per share for our common stock and we
granted options at an exercise price of $8.00 per share.
June 2010. In connection with our stock option
grants in June 2010, we continued to use the $7.96 per share
valuation analyzed in May. Our board of directors reviewed the
events since the grant of options in May 2010 and concluded that
there had been no significant change in our performance to cause
an increase or decrease in the per share valuation of our common
stock and granted options at an exercise price of $8.00 per
share.
July 2010. In connection with our stock option
grants in July 2010, we considered the factors described above,
including our improved sales performance and outlook and the
improved market performance of our comparable public company
peers since the June 2010 grants, as well as a contemporaneous
valuation report dated July 14, 2010. The valuation used a
risk-adjusted discount of 17.3% and an estimated time to an
initial public offering between one and two years, as well as a
scenario in which the company would continue as a private
entity. As we considered scenarios of liquidity through an
initial public offering during 2010, 2011, or remaining private,
a non-marketability discount was estimated at 9.0%, 23.0% and
36.0% for each of the scenarios, respectively. The change in
non-marketability discount from the previous grants relates to
an increase in the likelihood of our initial public offering
occurring in the more current term. The expected outcomes were
weighted 80% toward an initial public offering (87.5% toward an
offering in 2010, 12.5% toward an offering in 2011) and 20.0%
toward continuation as a private company. This valuation
indicated a fair value of $8.78 per share for our common stock
and we granted options at an exercise price of $9.00 per share.
Due to our additional option grants since June 30, 2010, we
expect to recognize $0.3 million in incremental stock-based
compensation expense during the year ending December 31,
2010. In future periods, our stock-based compensation expense is
expected to increase as a result of our existing unrecognized
stock-based compensation and as we issue additional stock-based
awards to continue to attract and retain employees and
independent directors.
Assuming the sale of shares contemplated by this offering is
consummated at $ per share,
which is the midpoint of the range of the initial public
offering prices listed on the cover page of this prospectus, the
aggregate intrinsic values of vested and unvested options to
purchase shares of our common stock outstanding as of
June 30, 2010 would be
$ million and
$ million,
respectively. Although it is possible that the completion of
this offering will add value to the shares of our common stock
because they will have increased liquidity and marketability,
the amount of any additional value cannot be measured with
precision or certainty.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are provided based on the liability method, which
results in income tax assets and liabilities arising from
temporary differences. Temporary differences are differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their
reported amounts in the financial statements that will result in
taxable or deductible amounts in future years. The liability
method requires the effect of tax rate changes on current and
accumulated deferred income taxes to be reflected in the period
in which the rate change was enacted. The liability method also
requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation
allowance unless it is more likely than not that the assets will
be realized.
We may recognize the tax benefit from uncertain tax positions
only if it is at least more likely than not that the tax
position will be sustained on examination by the taxing
authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The
tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a
position should be measured based on the largest benefit that
has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized
upon settlement with the taxing authorities. Upon our adoption
of the related standard, there was no liability for uncertain
tax positions due to the fact that there were no material
identified tax benefits that were considered uncertain positions.
We record net deferred tax assets to the extent we believe these
assets will more likely than not be realized. We consider
whether a valuation allowance is needed on our deferred tax
assets by evaluating all
59
positive and negative evidence relative to its ability to
recover deferred tax assets, including scheduled reversals of
deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax
planning strategies and recent financial operations. In
projecting future taxable income, we begin with historical
results, if any, and incorporate assumptions including the
amount of future state, federal and foreign pretax operating
income, the reversal of temporary differences, and the
implementation of feasible and prudent tax planning strategies,
if any. These assumptions require significant judgment about the
forecasts of future taxable income and are consistent with the
plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying
businesses. Given the nature of our recurring revenue streams,
we believe we have a reasonable basis to estimate future taxable
income. Prior to the year ended December 31, 2009, we had
incurred losses and it was difficult to assert that deferred tax
assets were recoverable with this negative evidence. In calendar
year 2009, we generated profits on an annual basis.
Additionally, we believe it is more likely than not that our
temporary differences will reverse and provide taxable income
prior to the expiration of our net operating losses. Based on
consideration of the weight of positive and negative evidence,
including forecasted operating results, we concluded that there
was sufficient positive evidence that a portion of our deferred
tax assets are more likely than not recoverable as of
December 31, 2009. Accordingly, we reversed
$27.0 million of our valuation allowance at year-end.
Our effective tax rates are primarily affected by the amount of
our taxable income or losses in the various taxing jurisdictions
in which we operate, the amount of federal and state net
operating losses and tax credits, the extent to which we can
utilize these net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits
and certain benefits related to stock option activity.
Capitalized
Product Development Costs
We capitalize specific product development costs, including
costs to develop software products or the software components of
our solutions to be marketed to our customers, as well as
software programs to be used solely to meet our internal needs.
The costs incurred in the preliminary stages of development
related to research, project planning, training, maintenance and
general and administrative activities, and overhead costs are
expensed as incurred. The costs of relatively minor upgrades and
enhancements to the software are also expensed as incurred. Once
an application has reached the development stage, internal and
external costs incurred in the performance of application
development stage activities, including materials, services and
payroll-related costs for employees are capitalized, if direct
and incremental, until the software is substantially complete
and ready for its intended use. Capitalization ceases upon
completion of all substantial testing. We also capitalize costs
related to specific upgrades and enhancements when it is
probable the expenditures will result in additional
functionality. Capitalized costs are recorded as part of
property and equipment. Internal use software is amortized on a
straight-line basis over its estimated useful life, generally
three years. We capitalized $1.5 million, $1.4 million
and $0.8 million of product development costs during the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 and the six months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and recognized
amortization expense of $0.8 million, $0.9 million,
$1.3 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million
during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively,
included as a component of cost of revenue. Unamortized product
development cost was $2.9 million, $3.1 million and
$3.2 million at December 31, 2008 and 2009 and the six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Management
evaluates the useful lives of these assets on an annual basis
and tests for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances occur that could impact the recoverability of
these assets. There were no impairments to internal use software
during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 or 2009 and
the six months ended June 30, 2010.
60
Results
of Operations
The following tables set forth our results of operations for the
specified periods. The period-to-period comparison of financial
results is not necessarily indicative of future results.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand
|
|
$
|
62,592
|
|
|
$
|
95,192
|
|
|
$
|
128,377
|
|
|
$
|
60,116
|
|
|
$
|
76,866
|
|
On premise
|
|
|
11,560
|
|
|
|
7,582
|
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
|
|
2,878
|
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
Professional and other
|
|
|
9,429
|
|
|
|
9,794
|
|
|
|
8,665
|
|
|
|
4,117
|
|
|
|
5,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
83,581
|
|
|
|
112,568
|
|
|
|
140,902
|
|
|
|
67,111
|
|
|
|
86,187
|
|
Cost of
revenue(1)
|
|
|
35,703
|
|
|
|
46,058
|
|
|
|
58,513
|
|
|
|
27,603
|
|
|
|
36,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
47,878
|
|
|
|
66,510
|
|
|
|
82,389
|
|
|
|
39,508
|
|
|
|
49,795
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
development(1)
|
|
|
21,708
|
|
|
|
28,806
|
|
|
|
27,446
|
|
|
|
13,598
|
|
|
|
17,304
|
|
Sales and
marketing(1)
|
|
|
18,047
|
|
|
|
23,923
|
|
|
|
27,804
|
|
|
|
13,013
|
|
|
|
16,365
|
|
General and
administrative(1)
|
|
|
9,756
|
|
|
|
14,135
|
|
|
|
20,210
|
|
|
|
8,723
|
|
|
|
13,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense
|
|
|
49,511
|
|
|
|
66,864
|
|
|
|
75,460
|
|
|
|
35,334
|
|
|
|
46,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(1,633
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
6,929
|
|
|
|
4,174
|
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
Interest expense and other, net
|
|
|
(1,510
|
)
|
|
|
(2,152
|
)
|
|
|
(4,528
|
)
|
|
|
(1,983
|
)
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before taxes
|
|
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
|
(2,506
|
)
|
|
|
2,401
|
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(26,028
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,429
|
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
61
The following table sets forth our results of operations for the
specified periods as a percentage of our revenue for those
periods. The period-to-period comparison of financial results is
not necessarily indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(as a percentage of total revenue)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand
|
|
|
74.9
|
%
|
|
|
84.6
|
%
|
|
|
91.1
|
%
|
|
|
89.6
|
%
|
|
|
89.2
|
%
|
On premise
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Professional and other
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
|
42.7
|
|
|
|
40.9
|
|
|
|
41.5
|
|
|
|
41.1
|
|
|
|
42.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
57.3
|
|
|
|
59.1
|
|
|
|
58.5
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
|
|
57.8
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
26.0
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
19.0
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
13.0
|
|
|
|
15.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
59.3
|
|
|
|
59.5
|
|
|
|
53.5
|
|
|
|
52.7
|
|
|
|
54.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Interest expense and other, net
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before taxes
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
(18.5
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2010
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except dollar per unit data)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand
|
|
$
|
60,116
|
|
|
$
|
76,866
|
|
|
$
|
16,750
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
On premise
|
|
|
2,878
|
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
Professional and other
|
|
|
4,117
|
|
|
|
5,029
|
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
67,111
|
|
|
|
86,187
|
|
|
|
19,076
|
|
|
|
28.4
|
|
On demand unit metrics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending on demand units
|
|
|
4,108
|
|
|
|
5,206
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
|
Average on demand units
|
|
|
3,959
|
|
|
|
4,895
|
|
|
|
936
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
Annualized on demand revenue per average on demand unit
|
|
$
|
30.37
|
|
|
$
|
31.41
|
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
On demand revenue. Our on demand revenue
increased $16.8 million, or 27.9%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 as compared to same period in 2009, primarily
due to an increase in rental property units managed with our on
demand solutions and an increase in the number of our on demand
solutions utilized by our existing customer base.
On premise revenue. On premise revenue
increased $1.4 million, or 49.1%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009,
primarily as a result of our February 2010 acquisition. During
February 2010, we completed a strategic acquisition of assets
that included on premise software solutions that have been
historically marketed and sold pursuant to perpetual license
agreements and related
62
maintenance agreements. During the first half of 2010, the
February 2010 acquisition contributed $1.2 million of
revenue related to maintenance agreements and perpetual license
sales. The revenue increase from the February 2010 acquisition
was partially offset by our decision to cease actively marketing
our legacy on premise solutions in 2003 and our efforts to
migrate customers of our on premise solutions to our on demand
solutions. While we intend to continue to support our recently
acquired on premise software solutions, we expect that many of
the customers who license these solutions will over time
transition to our on demand software solutions.
Professional and other revenue. Professional
and other services revenue increased $0.9 million, or
22.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared
to the same period in 2009, primarily due to an increase in
revenue from consulting services.
Total revenue. Our total revenue increased
$19.1 million, or 28.4%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009,
primarily due to an increase in rental property units managed
with our on demand solutions and improved penetration of our on
demand solutions into our customer base.
On demand unit metrics. As of June 30,
2010, one or more of our on demand solutions was utilized in the
management of 5.2 million rental property units,
representing an increase of 1.1 million units, or
26.7% as compared to June 30, 2009. The increase in the
number of rental property units managed by one or more of our on
demand solutions was due to new customer sales and marketing
efforts and our 2009 and 2010 acquisitions in the second half of
2009 and the first half of 2010 contributing approximately 9.1%
of ending on demand units as of June 30, 2010. In the first
six months of 2010, our annualized on demand revenue per average
on demand unit was $31.41, representing an increase of $1.04, or
3.4%, as compared to the first six months of 2009, primarily due
to improved penetration of our on demand solutions into our
customer base.
Cost
of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
24,313
|
|
|
$
|
30,788
|
|
|
$
|
6,475
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,290
|
|
|
|
5,604
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
27,603
|
|
|
$
|
36,392
|
|
|
$
|
8,789
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue. Cost of revenue increased
$8.8 million, or 31.8%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009.
The increase in cost of revenue was primarily due to: a
$6.4 million increase from costs related to the increased
sales of our solutions, which includes investments in
infrastructure and other support services, $1.9 million
increase in non-cash amortization of acquired technology as a
result of our 2009 and 2010 acquisitions; a $0.4 million
increase in property and equipment depreciation expense
resulting from expanding our infrastructure to support revenue
delivery activities; and $0.1 million increase in
stock-based compensation related to our professional services
and data center operations personnel. Cost of revenue as a
percentage of total revenue was 42.2% for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 as compared to 41.1% for the same period in
2009. The increase as a percentage of total revenue was
primarily due to an increase in non-cash amortization of
acquired technology as a result of our 2009 and 2010
acquisitions.
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Product development
|
|
$
|
12,554
|
|
|
$
|
16,186
|
|
|
$
|
3,632
|
|
|
|
28.9
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,044
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product development expense
|
|
$
|
13,598
|
|
|
$
|
17,304
|
|
|
$
|
3,706
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
Product development. Product development
expense increased $3.7 million, or 27.3%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period
in 2009. The increase in product development expense was
primarily due to: a $3.1 million increase in personnel
expense primarily related to the associated costs to support our
growth initiatives and the addition of new solutions and a
$0.5 million increase in stock-based compensation related
to product development personnel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Change
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
10,958
|
|
|
$
|
14,279
|
|
|
$
|
3,321
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
2,086
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales and marketing expense
|
|
$
|
13,013
|
|
|
$
|
16,365
|
|
|
$
|
3,352
|
|
|
|
25.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing
expense increased $3.4 million, or 25.8%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period
in 2009. The increase in sales and marketing expense was
primarily due to: a $1.5 million increase in personnel
expense; a $1.0 million increase in marketing program
expense in the first quarter of 2010 as part of our strategy to
expand our market share and further penetrate our existing
customer base with sales of additional on demand solutions; a
$0.8 million increase in general sales and marketing
activities such as travel and consulting related fees; and a
$0.1 million increase in stock-based compensation related
to sales and marketing personnel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
Change
|
|
%Change
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
8,109
|
|
|
$
|
12,525
|
|
|
$
|
4,416
|
|
|
|
54.4
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
614
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and administrative expense
|
|
$
|
8,723
|
|
|
$
|
13,261
|
|
|
$
|
4,538
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative. General and
administrative expense increased $4.5 million, or 52.0%,
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the
same period in 2009. The increase in general and administrative
expense was primarily due to: a $2.1 million increase in
personnel expense related to accounting, management information
systems, legal, human resources and business development staff
to support the growth in our business; a $0.3 million
increase in professional fees primarily related to pursuing
acquisition opportunities; a $0.4 million increase in
stock-based compensation; and a $1.1 million increase other
general and administrative activities such as travel, consulting
and facility and information technology related expense driven
by the investments in our administrative support functions.
Interest
Expense and Other, Net
Interest expense, net, increased $0.9 million, or 47.6%,
for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the
same period in 2009. The increase in interest expense, net, was
primarily due to higher average debt balances related to the
financing of our 2009 and 2010 acquisitions.
Provision
for Taxes
Our effective tax rate was approximately 37.0% for the six
months ended June 30, 2010. In the six months ended
June 30, 2010, we incurred a tax benefit of $23,000
resulting from our net loss before taxes. In the six months
ended June 30, 2009, we incurred tax expense of
$0.2 million primarily as a result of state income tax
expense, and we did not benefit our losses until December 2009.
64
Year
Ended December 31, 2008 and 2009
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except dollar per unit data)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand
|
|
$
|
95,192
|
|
|
$
|
128,377
|
|
|
$
|
33,185
|
|
|
|
34.9
|
%
|
On premise
|
|
|
7,582
|
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
|
|
(3,722
|
)
|
|
|
(49.1
|
)
|
Professional and other
|
|
|
9,794
|
|
|
|
8,665
|
|
|
|
(1,129
|
)
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
112,568
|
|
|
$
|
140,902
|
|
|
$
|
28,334
|
|
|
|
25.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand unit metrics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending on demand units
|
|
|
3,833
|
|
|
|
4,551
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
Average on demand units
|
|
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
4,128
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
On demand revenue per average on demand unit
|
|
$
|
30.34
|
|
|
$
|
31.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
On demand revenue. Our on demand revenue
increased $33.2 million, or 34.9%, in 2009 as compared to
2008, primarily due to a 31.5% increase in the average on demand
units managed with our on demand software solutions and an
increase in the number of our on demand software solutions
utilized by our existing customer base.
On premise revenue. On premise revenue
decreased $3.7 million, or (49.1)%, in 2009 as compared to
2008, primarily due to the impact of our decision to cease
actively marketing our on premise software solutions and our
efforts to migrate customers of our on premise software
solutions to our on demand software solutions. In addition, our
on premise software solution for conventional multi-family
properties, RentRoll, was discontinued and was no longer
supported after July 2009.
Professional and other revenue. Professional
and other services revenue decreased $1.1 million, or
(11.5)%, in 2009 as compared to 2008, primarily due to a
decrease in revenue from training and consulting services and a
decrease in revenue from sub-meter installations.
Total revenue. Our total revenue increased
$28.3 million, or 25.2%, in 2009 as compared to 2008,
primarily due to an increase in rental property units managed
with our on demand software solutions and improved penetration
of our on demand software solutions into our customer base.
On demand unit metrics. As of
December 31, 2009, one or more of our on demand software
solutions was utilized in the management of 4.6 million
rental housing units, representing an increase of approximately
718,000 units, or 18.7%, as compared to 2008. The increase
in the number of rental units managed by one or more of our on
demand software solutions was primarily due to new customer
sales and marketing efforts, our 2009 acquisitions, which
contributed approximately 3.8% of ending on demand units,
and to a lesser degree, migration of our current customers from
our on premise software solutions to our on demand software
solutions. In 2009, our on demand revenue per average on demand
unit was $31.10, representing an increase of $0.76, or 2.5%, as
compared to 2008, primarily due to improved penetration of our
on demand software solutions into our customer base.
Cost
of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
40,783
|
|
|
$
|
51,260
|
|
|
$
|
10,477
|
|
|
|
25.7
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
7,253
|
|
|
|
1,978
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
46,058
|
|
|
$
|
58,513
|
|
|
$
|
12,455
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
Cost of revenue. Cost of revenue increased
$12.5 million, or 27.0%, in 2009 as compared to 2008. The
increase in cost of revenue was primarily due to: a
$10.2 million increase from costs related to the increased
sales of our solutions; a $1.1 million increase in non-cash
amortization of acquired technology as a result of our 2008 and
2009 acquisitions; a $0.9 million increase in property and
equipment depreciation expense resulting from expanding our
infrastructure to support revenue delivery activities; and
$0.3 million increase in
stock-based
compensation related to our professional services and data
center operations personnel.
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
$
|
26,514
|
|
|
$
|
25,277
|
|
|
$
|
(1,237
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
2,169
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product development expense
|
|
$
|
28,806
|
|
|
$
|
27,446
|
|
|
$
|
(1,360
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development. Product development
expense decreased $1.4 million, or (4.7)%, in 2009 as
compared to 2008. The decrease in product development expense
was primarily due to: the absence of non-recurring charges
related to the discontinuance of a business development project
in 2008; a decrease in third-party development costs; and a
decrease in depreciation of property and equipment. The decrease
was partially offset by an increase in stock-based compensation
in 2009 related to our product development personnel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
21,649
|
|
|
$
|
23,744
|
|
|
$
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
4,060
|
|
|
|
1,786
|
|
|
|
78.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales and marketing expense
|
|
$
|
23,923
|
|
|
$
|
27,804
|
|
|
$
|
3,881
|
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing
expense increased $3.9 million, or 16.2%, in 2009 as
compared to 2008. The increase in sales and marketing expense
was primarily due to: a $1.7 million increase in non-cash
intangible amortization related to our 2008 and 2009
acquisitions, which included acquired customer relationships and
key supplier and vendor relationships; a $1.5 million
increase in personnel expense and a $1.0 million increase
in marketing program expense in 2009 as part of our strategy to
expand our market share and further penetrate our existing
customer base with sales of additional on demand software
solutions; and a $0.2 million increase in stock-based
compensation related to our sales and marketing personnel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
12,979
|
|
|
$
|
18,923
|
|
|
$
|
5,944
|
|
|
|
45.8
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,156
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and administrative expense
|
|
$
|
14,135
|
|
|
$
|
20,210
|
|
|
$
|
6,075
|
|
|
|
43.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative. General and
administrative expense increased $6.1 million, or 43.0%, in
2009 as compared to 2008. The increase in general and
administrative expense was primarily due to: a $2.8 million
increase in personnel expense and expense related to accounting,
management information systems, legal, human resources and
business development staff to support the growth in our
business; a $0.7 million increase in legal fees primarily
related to pursuing and closing acquisition opportunities; a
$0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation; and an
increase in various other general and administrative expenses
driven by the investments in our administrative functions.
66
Interest
Expense and Other, Net
Interest expense and other, net, increased $2.4 million, or
110.4%, in 2009 as compared to 2008. The increase in interest
expense, net, was primarily due to higher average debt balances
related to the financing of our acquisitions and the issuance of
notes payable to holders of our preferred stock in December 2008
in payment of accrued dividends. See Note 7 to Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Provision
for Taxes
We have not incurred federal income taxes due to the carry
forward of net operating losses. At December 31, 2009, we
had a net operating loss carry forward for federal income tax
purposes of approximately $67.2 million that will begin to
expire in 2018. We have historically offset all of our net
deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance. However, in
December 2009, based on current year income and our
projections of future income, we concluded it was more likely
than not that certain of our deferred tax assets would be
realizable, and therefore the valuation allowance was reduced by
$27.0 million.
Year
Ended December 31, 2007 and 2008
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except dollar per unit data)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand
|
|
$
|
62,592
|
|
|
$
|
95,192
|
|
|
$
|
32,600
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
%
|
On premise
|
|
|
11,560
|
|
|
|
7,582
|
|
|
|
(3,978
|
)
|
|
|
(34.4
|
)
|
Professional and other
|
|
|
9,429
|
|
|
|
9,794
|
|
|
|
365
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$
|
83,581
|
|
|
$
|
112,568
|
|
|
$
|
28,987
|
|
|
|
34.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand unit metrics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending on demand units
|
|
|
2,800
|
|
|
|
3,833
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
36.9
|
|
Average on demand units
|
|
|
2,293
|
|
|
|
3,138
|
|
|
|
845
|
|
|
|
36.9
|
|
On demand revenue per average on demand unit
|
|
$
|
27.30
|
|
|
$
|
30.34
|
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
On demand revenue. On demand revenue increased
$32.6 million, or 52.1%, in 2008 as compared to 2007,
primarily due to an increase in rental property units managed
with our on demand software solutions and an increase in the
number of our on demand software solutions utilized by our
existing customer base.
On premise revenue. On premise revenue
decreased $4.0 million, or (34.4)%, in 2008 as compared to
2007. The revenue decrease was primarily due to: our higher
focus on sales of our on demand software solutions; a decrease
in the number of rental property units utilizing our on premise
software solutions, which was a result of customers converting
to our on demand software solutions, not renewing their on
premise software license or customers property sites
turning over due to their sale or change in property management
company.
Professional and other revenue. Professional
and other revenue increased $0.4 million, or 3.9%, in 2008
as compared to 2007, primarily due to increased consulting and
implementation activity associated with new sales of our on
demand software solutions, which was partially offset by lower
training and seminar revenue.
Total revenue. Our total revenue increased
$29.0 million, or 34.7%, in 2008 as compared to 2007,
primarily due to an increase in rental property units managed
with our on demand software solutions and improved penetration
of our on demand software solutions into our customer base.
On demand unit metrics. As of
December 31, 2008, one or more of our on demand software
solutions was utilized in the management of 3.8 million
rental property units, an increase of approximately
1.0 million
67
units, or 36.9%, as compared to 2007. The increase in the number
of rental property units managed by one or more of our on demand
software solutions was primarily due to new customer sales and
marketing efforts, our 2008 acquisitions, which contributed
approximately 10.5% of ending on demand units, and, to a
lesser degree, migration of our current customers from our on
premise software solutions. In 2008, our on demand revenue per
average on demand unit was $30.34, representing an increase of
$3.04, or 11.1%, as compared to 2007, primarily due to improved
penetration of our on demand software solutions into our
customer base.
Cost
of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
32,056
|
|
|
$
|
40,783
|
|
|
$
|
8,727
|
|
|
|
27.2
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,647
|
|
|
|
5,275
|
|
|
|
1,628
|
|
|
|
44.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
35,703
|
|
|
$
|
46,058
|
|
|
$
|
10,355
|
|
|
|
29.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue. Cost of revenue increased
$10.4 million, or 29.0%, in 2008 as compared to 2007. The
increase in cost of revenue was primarily due to: a
$8.6 million increase from costs related to the increased
sales of our solutions; a $1.3 million increase in property
and equipment depreciation expense resulting from expanding our
infrastructure to support revenue delivery activities; and a
$0.3 million increase in non-cash amortization of acquired
technology as a result of our 2008 acquisitions.
Operating
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
$
|
20,459
|
|
|
$
|
26,514
|
|
|
$
|
6,055
|
|
|
|
29.6
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,249
|
|
|
|
2,292
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
83.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product development
|
|
$
|
21,708
|
|
|
$
|
28,806
|
|
|
$
|
7,098
|
|
|
|
32.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development. Product development
expense increased $7.1 million, or 32.7%, in 2008 as
compared to 2007. The increase in product development expense
was primarily due to: a $3.8 million increase in personnel
expense primarily related to the associated costs to support our
growth initiatives and the addition of new solutions; a
$1.0 million increase in depreciation of property and
equipment from expanding our infrastructure to support our
revenue growth; a $0.8 million non-cash asset disposal
resulting from the discontinuance of a business development
project in 2008; and a $0.5 million increase in stock-based
compensation related to our product development personnel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
$
|
16,215
|
|
|
$
|
21,649
|
|
|
$
|
5,434
|
|
|
|
33.5
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
|
|
2,274
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
24.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales and marketing expense
|
|
$
|
18,047
|
|
|
$
|
23,923
|
|
|
$
|
5,876
|
|
|
|
32.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing. Sales and marketing
expense increased $5.9 million, or 32.6%, in 2008 as
compared to 2007. The increase in sales and marketing expense
was primarily due to: a $3.2 million increase in personnel
expense related to expanding our sales and marketing workforce
as part of our strategy to increase our market share and further
penetrate our existing customer base with additional on demand
software solutions; a $1.5 million increase in marketing
program expense in support of our growth strategy; a
$0.4 million increase in property and equipment
depreciation expense; and a $0.2 million increase in
stock-based compensation related to our sales and marketing
personnel.
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
9,357
|
|
|
$
|
12,979
|
|
|
$
|
3,622
|
|
|
|
38.7
|
%
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
1,156
|
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
189.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and administrative expense
|
|
$
|
9,756
|
|
|
$
|
14,135
|
|
|
$
|
4,379
|
|
|
|
44.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative. General and
administrative expense increased $4.4 million, or 44.9%, in
2008 as compared to 2007. The increase in general and
administrative expense was primarily due to: a $2.4 million
increase in personnel expense related to an increase in
accounting, management information systems, legal and human
resources personnel to support the growth in our business; a
$0.8 million increase in depreciation of property and
equipment in 2008 driven by the investments in our
administrative support functions; a $0.3 million increase
in stock-based compensation related to our general and
administrative personnel; and an increase various other general
and administrative expenses driven by the investment in our
administrative functions necessary to support our growth.
Interest
Expense and Other, Net
Interest expense and other, net, increased $0.6 million, or
42.5%, in 2008 as compared to 2007. The increase in interest
expense, net, was primarily due to higher average debt balances
related to the financing of our acquisition activities.
Provision
for Taxes
We have recorded a valuation allowance related to income taxes
to reflect uncertainties associated with the realization of
deferred tax assets. As a result, the benefit from income taxes
is zero in 2007.
69
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The following table presents our unaudited consolidated
quarterly results of operations for the nine fiscal quarters
ended June 30, 2010. This information is derived from our
unaudited consolidated financial statements, and includes all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
that we consider necessary for fair statement of our financial
position and operating results for the quarters presented.
Operating results for these periods are not necessarily
indicative of the operating results for a full year. Historical
results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected in future periods. You should read this data together
with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes
to these financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand
|
|
$
|
22,486
|
|
|
$
|
24,520
|
|
|
$
|
27,462
|
|
|
$
|
29,264
|
|
|
$
|
30,852
|
|
|
$
|
33,069
|
|
|
$
|
35,192
|
|
|
$
|
37,207
|
|
|
$
|
39,659
|
|
On premise
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
1,774
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
1,868
|
|
|
|
2,424
|
|
Professional and other
|
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
|
2,982
|
|
|
|
2,525
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
2,117
|
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
26,739
|
|
|
|
29,268
|
|
|
|
31,761
|
|
|
|
32,643
|
|
|
|
34,468
|
|
|
|
35,654
|
|
|
|
38,137
|
|
|
|
41,378
|
|
|
|
44,809
|
|
Cost of
revenue(1)
|
|
|
10,811
|
|
|
|
12,074
|
|
|
|
13,113
|
|
|
|
13,035
|
|
|
|
14,568
|
|
|
|
15,201
|
|
|
|
15,709
|
|
|
|
17,858
|
|
|
|
18,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
15,928
|
|
|
|
17,194
|
|
|
|
18,648
|
|
|
|
19,608
|
|
|
|
19,900
|
|
|
|
20,453
|
|
|
|
22,428
|
|
|
|
23,520
|
|
|
|
26,275
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
development(1)
|
|
|
7,074
|
|
|
|
6,932
|
|
|
|
8,132
|
|
|
|
6,711
|
|
|
|
6,887
|
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
8,315
|
|
|
|
8,989
|
|
Sales and
marketing(1)
|
|
|
5,600
|
|
|
|
6,325
|
|
|
|
6,690
|
|
|
|
6,180
|
|
|
|
6,833
|
|
|
|
7,363
|
|
|
|
7,428
|
|
|
|
7,540
|
|
|
|
8,825
|
|
General and
administrative(1)
|
|
|
3,456
|
|
|
|
3,648
|
|
|
|
3,858
|
|
|
|
4,536
|
|
|
|
4,187
|
|
|
|
4,552
|
|
|
|
6,935
|
|
|
|
6,522
|
|
|
|
6,739
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense
|
|
|
16,130
|
|
|
|
16,905
|
|
|
|
18,680
|
|
|
|
17,427
|
|
|
|
17,907
|
|
|
|
18,590
|
|
|
|
21,536
|
|
|
|
22,377
|
|
|
|
24,553
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
2,181
|
|
|
|
1,993
|
|
|
|
1,863
|
|
|
|
892
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
1,722
|
|
Interest expense and other, net
|
|
|
(418
|
)
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
(781
|
)
|
|
|
(985
|
)
|
|
|
(998
|
)
|
|
|
(1,123
|
)
|
|
|
(1,422
|
)
|
|
|
(1,464
|
)
|
|
|
(1,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before taxes
|
|
|
(620
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(813
|
)
|
|
|
1,196
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
(530
|
)
|
|
|
(321
|
)
|
|
|
259
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(26,246
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(685
|
)
|
|
$
|
(204
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,127
|
|
|
$
|
910
|
|
|
$
|
676
|
|
|
$
|
25,716
|
|
|
$
|
(203
|
)
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
507
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
355
|
|
|
$
|
368
|
|
|
$
|
457
|
|
|
$
|
565
|
|
|
$
|
613
|
|
|
$
|
726
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
$
|
1,094
|
|
|
$
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
The following table sets forth our results of operations for the
specified periods as a percentage of our revenue for those
periods. The period-to-period comparison of financial results is
not necessarily indicative of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(as a percentage of total revenue)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand
|
|
|
84.1
|
%
|
|
|
83.8
|
%
|
|
|
86.5
|
%
|
|
|
89.6
|
%
|
|
|
89.5
|
%
|
|
|
92.7
|
%
|
|
|
92.3
|
%
|
|
|
89.9
|
%
|
|
|
88.5
|
%
|
On premise
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
Professional and other
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software and services
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
41.3
|
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
|
|
41.2
|
|
|
|
43.2
|
|
|
|
41.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
59.6
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
58.7
|
|
|
|
60.1
|
|
|
|
57.7
|
|
|
|
57.4
|
|
|
|
58.8
|
|
|
|
56.8
|
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
23.7
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
18.7
|
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
|
18.9
|
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
57.8
|
|
|
|
58.8
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
52.0
|
|
|
|
52.1
|
|
|
|
56.5
|
|
|
|
54.1
|
|
|
|
54.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
Interest expense and other, net
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.5
|
)
|
|
|
(3.0
|
)
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before taxes
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
(68.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
67.4
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our revenue increased in each of the quarters presented above
primarily as a result of increases in rental property units
managed with our on demand software solutions, successful
efforts to increase the number of on demand software solutions
utilized by our customer base and our 2008, 2009 and 2010
acquisitions. To date, we have not experienced any significant
impact on our results of operations due to seasonality.
Cost of revenue increased over the course of the quarters
presented above primarily due to increase in operating costs
related to the increased sales of our solutions; higher
technology support costs in order to support our growth; the
cost of revenue added by our acquisitions; and higher non-cash
amortization of technology acquired through our acquisitions.
While cost of revenue increased in absolute dollars, gross
margin has remained relatively consistent in each of the
quarters presented, except for the six months ended
June 30, 2010. Cost of revenue as a percentage of total
revenue increased during the six months ended June 30, 2010
as compared to previous quarters primarily due to an
increase in non-cash amortization of acquired technology as a
result of our acquisitions and our investment in infrastructure
and other support services.
Operating expense has steadily increased in absolute dollars
over the course of the quarters presented above primarily due to
increased personnel related expenses in support of our growth
initiatives in addition to incremental expenses associated with
acquired companies. Operating expense may vary as a result of
the timing of sales and marketing activities, the timing of
acquisitions or the discontinuance of projects, among other
factors. For example, operating expense decreased from the
fourth quarter of 2008 to the first quarter of 2009 primarily
due to a decline in product development expense attributable to
the discontinuance of a business development project during the
fourth quarter of 2008. Additionally, during the fourth quarter
of 2009, operating expense increased as a percentage of revenue
when compared to the prior three quarters primarily as a result
of an increase in general and administrative expense associated
with higher professional fees and other costs related to
pursuing acquisition opportunities combined with incremental
general and administrative expense associated with the
acquisitions we completed during the third and fourth quarters
of 2009. Since our inception, we have made significant
investments in developing new solutions, enhancing existing
solutions, and expanding our sales and marketing efforts in
order to increase our market share and to
71
further penetrate our existing customer base with additional on
demand software solutions. As a result of these investments, we
have experienced significant revenue growth, which has resulted
in a trend of decreased operating expense as a percentage of our
total revenue.
Reconciliation
of Quarterly Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We anticipate that our investor and analyst presentations will
include Adjusted EBITDA. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net (loss)
income plus depreciation and asset impairment, amortization of
intangible assets, interest expense, net, income tax expense
(benefit), stock-based compensation expense and
acquisition-related expense. We believe that the use of Adjusted
EBITDA is useful to investors and other users of our financial
statements in evaluating our operating performance because it
provides them with an additional tool to compare business
performance across companies and across periods. We believe that:
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA provides investors and other users of our
financial information consistency and comparability with our
past financial performance, facilitates period-to-period
comparisons of operations and facilitates comparisons with our
peer companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial
measures to supplement their GAAP results; and
|
|
|
|
it is useful to exclude certain non-cash charges, such as
depreciation and asset impairment, amortization of intangible
assets and stock-based compensation and non-core operational
charges, such as acquisition-related expense, from Adjusted
EBITDA because the amount of such expenses in any specific
period may not directly correlate to the underlying performance
of our business operations and these expenses can vary
significantly between periods as a result of new acquisitions,
full amortization of previously acquired tangible and intangible
assets or the timing of new stock-based awards, as the case may
be.
|
We use Adjusted EBITDA in conjunction with traditional GAAP
operating performance measures as part of our overall assessment
of our performance, for planning purposes, including the
preparation of our annual operating budget, to evaluate the
effectiveness of our business strategies and to communicate with
our board of directors concerning our financial performance.
We do not place undue reliance on Adjusted EBITDA as our only
measure of operating performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be
considered as a substitute for other measures of liquidity or
financial performance reported in accordance with GAAP. There
are limitations to using non-GAAP financial measures, including
that other companies may calculate these measures differently
than we do, that they do not reflect our capital expenditures or
future requirements for capital expenditures and that they do
not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working
capital. We compensate for the inherent limitations associated
with using the Adjusted EBITDA measures through disclosure of
these limitations, presentation of our financial statements in
accordance with GAAP and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to
the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net (loss) income.
The following table presents a reconciliation of net (loss)
income to Adjusted EBITDA for the nine fiscal quarters ended
June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(685
|
)
|
|
$
|
(204
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,451
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,127
|
|
|
$
|
910
|
|
|
$
|
676
|
|
|
$
|
25,716
|
|
|
$
|
(203
|
)
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
Depreciation and asset impairment
|
|
|
2,018
|
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
2,043
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
2,419
|
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
774
|
|
|
|
1,362
|
|
|
|
1,322
|
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
1,821
|
|
|
|
2,214
|
|
|
|
2,282
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
1,464
|
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(26,246
|
)
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
95
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
Acquisition-related expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
2,504
|
|
|
$
|
3,232
|
|
|
$
|
4,949
|
|
|
$
|
6,151
|
|
|
$
|
6,398
|
|
|
$
|
6,307
|
|
|
$
|
6,737
|
|
|
$
|
7,231
|
|
|
$
|
7,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We have financed our operations primarily through private
placements of preferred equity securities and common stock,
secured credit facilities with commercial lenders, a private
placement of subordinated debt securities and cash provided by
operating activities. Our primary sources of liquidity as of
June 30, 2010 consisted of $5.1 million of cash and
cash equivalents, $4.3 million available under our
revolving line of credit and $10.7 million of current
assets less current liabilities (excluding $42.1 million of
deferred revenue).
Our principal uses of liquidity have been to fund our
operations, working capital requirements, capital expenditures
and acquisitions and to service our debt obligations. We expect
that working capital requirements, capital expenditures and
acquisitions will continue to be our principal needs for
liquidity over the near term. Our planned capital expenditures
for 2010 are not expected to exceed $12.0 million. In addition,
we have made several acquisitions in which a portion of the cash
purchase price is payable at various times through 2014. We
expect to fund these obligations from cash provided by operating
activities.
We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, working
capital (excluding deferred revenue) and our cash flow from
operations, together with the proceeds of this offering, will be
sufficient to fund our operations and planned capital
expenditures and service our debt obligations for at least the
next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend
on many factors, including our rate of revenue growth, the
timing and size of acquisitions, the expansion of our sales and
marketing activities, the timing and extent of spending to
support product development efforts, the timing of introductions
of new solutions and enhancements to existing solutions and the
continuing market acceptance of our solutions. We may enter into
acquisitions of, complementary businesses, applications or
technologies, in the future, which could require us to seek
additional equity or debt financing. Additional funds may not be
available on terms favorable to us, or at all.
The following table sets forth cash flow data for the periods
indicated therein:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
4,441
|
|
|
$
|
7,962
|
|
|
$
|
24,758
|
|
|
$
|
14,030
|
|
|
$
|
8,197
|
|
Net cash (used) in investing activities
|
|
|
(16,155
|
)
|
|
|
(32,320
|
)
|
|
|
(24,676
|
)
|
|
|
(4,876
|
)
|
|
|
(18,010
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
11,952
|
|
|
|
25,875
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
(5,506
|
)
|
|
|
10,531
|
|
Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
In the six months ended June 30, 2010, we generated
$8.2 million of net cash from operating activities, which
consisted of our net loss of $39 thousand and changes in working
capital of $3.6 million, offset by net non-cash income of
$11.8 million representing a decrease of $5.8 million
or 41.6%, as compared to the same period in 2009. Net non-cash
charges to income primarily consisted of depreciation,
amortization and stock-based compensation expense. The
$3.6 million use of operating cash flow primarily resulting
from the change in working capital was primarily due to
collection of our accounts receivable and general timing
differences in other current assets, offset by the change in
deferred revenue and capitalization of deferred costs associated
with our pending public offering. Excluding deferred revenue
acquired from our February 2010 acquisition, deferred
revenue decreased for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as
a result of the amortization of annual license fees for on
demand and on premise solutions.
In 2009, we generated $24.8 million of net cash from
operating activities, which consisted of our net income of
$28.4 million, offset by net non-cash income of
$8.5 million, representing an increase of
$16.8 million, or 211.0%, as compared to 2008. Net non-cash
charges primarily consisted of a non-cash deferred tax benefit
offset by depreciation, amortization and stock-based
compensation expense. The increase in our net cash from
operating activities in 2009 was primarily due to our net
income, cash inflows from changes in working capital and greater
collection of accounts receivable, which resulted in an
improvement in the number of days that sales were outstanding
from 68 days in 2008 to 57 days in 2009. This decrease
in accounts receivable occurred despite an increase in revenues
during the fourth quarter.
73
In 2008, we generated $8.0 million of net cash from
operating activities, which consisted of our net loss of
$3.2 million, offset by net non-cash charges of
$13.9 million, representing an increase of
$3.5 million, or 79.3%, as compared to 2007. Net non-cash
charges to income primarily consisted of depreciation,
amortization and stock-based compensation expense. The increase
in our net cash from operating activities in 2008 was primarily
due to cash outflows from changes in working capital including
an increase in accounts receivable of $7.6 million from
increased sales during the fourth quarter, partially offset by
an increase in deferred revenues of $5.6 million. The
increase in our net cash from operating activities in 2008 was
primarily due to a reduction in our net loss, an increase of
$6.3 million in non-cash charges and an increase in
deferred revenue from increased sales during the fourth quarter,
partially offset by increases in accounts receivable.
In 2007, we generated $4.4 million of net cash from
operating activities, which consisted of our net loss of
$3.1 million, offset by net non-cash charges of
$7.6 million. Net non-cash charges to income primarily
consisted of depreciation, amortization and stock-based
compensation expense. Additionally, cash outflows from changes
in working capital included an increase in accounts receivable
of $5.2 million from increased sales near the end of the
year, partially offset by an increase in deferred revenues of
$4.4 million.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
In the six months ended June 30, 2010, our investing
activities used $18.0 million. Investing activities
consisted of acquisition consideration of $12.9 million net
of cash acquired for our 2010 acquisition, acquisition-related
payments of $0.4 million for commitments related to prior
years acquisitions and $4.7 million of capital
expenditures. The increase in cash used in investing activities
from 2009 relates to the consideration paid net of cash acquired
for our 2010 acquisition combined with an increase in capital
spending.
In 2009, our investing activities used $24.7 million.
Investing activities consisted of acquisition consideration of
$11.6 million net of cash acquired for our 2009
acquisitions, acquisition-related payments of $3.6 million
for commitments related to prior years acquisitions and
$9.5 million of capital expenditures. The decrease in cash
used in investing activities from 2008 relates to a decrease in
capital spending of $0.8 million combined with a decrease
in acquisition-related payments of $6.9 million.
In 2008, our investing activities used $32.3 million.
Investing activities consisted of $20.1 million for our
2008 acquisitions, acquisition-related payments of
$1.9 million for commitments related to prior years
acquisitions and capital expenditures of $10.3 million. The
increase in cash used in investing activities from 2007 relates
to an increase in capital spending of $3.1 million and an
increase in acquisition-related payments of $13.0 million.
In 2007, our investing activities used $16.2 million.
Investing activities consisted of $7.0 million for our 2007
acquisition, acquisition-related payments of $2.1 million
for commitments related to prior years acquisitions and
capital expenditures of $7.1 million.
Capital expenditures in the six months ended June 30, 2010
and in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were primarily related to investments
in technology infrastructure to support our growth initiatives.
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
Our financing activities provided $10.5 million in the six
months ended June 30, 2010, representing an increase of
$16.0 million, as compared to the same period of 2009. Cash
provided by financing activities in 2010 was primarily related
to net proceeds from borrowings under our credit facility,
offset by payments for scheduled term debt maturities, capital
lease obligations and preferred stockholder notes payable.
During the same period of 2009, we did not borrow funds under
our credit facility and made payments for scheduled term debt
maturities, capital lease obligations and preferred stockholder
notes payable.
Our financing activities provided $0.1 million in 2009,
representing a decrease of $25.8 million, or 99.6%, as
compared to 2008. Cash provided by financing activities in 2009
was primarily related to net proceeds from refinancing our
credit facility, offset by payments for scheduled term debt
maturities, capital lease obligations and preferred stockholder
notes payable.
Our financing activities provided $25.9 million in 2008,
representing an increase of $13.9 million, or 116.5%, as
compared to 2007. On February 22, 2008, in order to secure
capital for future growth and business
74
development activities, we entered into a securities purchase
agreement whereby investors purchased an aggregate of
1,512,498 shares of Series C convertible preferred
stock at a purchase price of $9.00 per share resulting in
$13.4 million of net proceeds. Additionally, we had net
proceeds of $4.5 million from our credit facility,
$10.0 million of proceeds from a private placement of a
note purchase agreement and common stock issuances of
$0.6 million resulting from employees and third
parties exercise of stock options and warrants. These
proceeds were offset by $2.6 million of scheduled payments
of capital lease obligations.
Our financing activities provided $12.0 million in 2007.
Cash provided by financing activities in 2007 was primarily
related to net proceeds of $11.5 million from our credit
facility and common stock issuances of $1.1 million
resulting from employees and third parties exercise
of stock options and warrants. These proceeds were offset by
$0.7 million of scheduled payments of capital lease
obligations.
Cash provided by financing activities during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and during 2009, 2008 and 2007 was used
to support our operations until we achieved positive operating
cash flow, as a funding source for acquisitions and for capital
expenditures related to the expansion of our technology
infrastructure.
Contractual
Obligations, Commitments and Contingencies
The following table summarizes, as of December 31, 2009 and
as adjusted for our June 2010 debt amendment, our minimum
payments for long-term debt and other obligations for the next
five years and thereafter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1-3 years
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$
|
67,316
|
|
|
$
|
9,330
|
|
|
$
|
17,548
|
|
|
$
|
40,438
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest payments on long-term debt
obligations(1)
|
|
|
11,346
|
|
|
|
3,507
|
|
|
|
5,724
|
|
|
|
2,115
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital (finance) leases
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
1,670
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
27,051
|
|
|
|
4,922
|
|
|
|
8,197
|
|
|
|
7,591
|
|
|
|
6,341
|
|
Acquisition-related
liabilities(2)
|
|
|
4,359
|
|
|
|
1,653
|
|
|
|
1,842
|
|
|
|
864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
112,345
|
|
|
$
|
21,082
|
|
|
$
|
33,914
|
|
|
$
|
51,008
|
|
|
$
|
6,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The amount of interest payments on long-term debt obligations
represents current obligations as of December 31, 2009, but
reflects the interest rates in effect per our June 2010 debt
amendment. These payments are subject to change based on changes
to interest rates and our planned prepayment of our currently
outstanding long-term debt obligations with the net proceeds of
the offering. |
|
(2) |
|
We have made several acquisitions in which a portion of the cash
purchase price is payable at various times through 2014. |
Long-Term
Debt Obligations
In September 2009, we entered into a credit facility which
provided for a $35.0 million term loan and a
$10.0 million revolving line of credit. A portion of the
proceeds from the credit facility was used to repay the balance
outstanding under our prior credit facility. The term loan and
revolving line of credit are collateralized by substantially all
our personal property. Prior to the June 2010 amendment
discussed below, the term loan and revolving line of credit bore
interest at rates of the greater of 7.5%, a stated rate of 5.0%
plus LIBOR (or, if greater, 2.5%), or a stated rate of 5.0% plus
the banks prime rate (or, if greater, 3.5%, the federal
funds rate plus 0.5% or three month LIBOR plus 1.0%).
In February 2010, we entered into an amendment to the credit
facility. Under the terms of the amendment, the original term
loan was increased by an additional $10.0 million. The
proceeds from the amendment were primarily used to finance the
February 2010 acquisition of certain assets of Domin-8
Enterprise Solutions, Inc. The related interest rates and
maturity periods remained consistent with the terms of the
credit facility. Until the June 2010
75
amendment discussed below, we made principal payments on the
term loan in quarterly installments of approximately $1.8
million. In June 2010, we entered into a subsequent amendment to
the credit facility. Under the terms of the June 2010 amendment,
an additional $30 million in term loans was made available
for borrowing until December 22, 2011. After the June 2010
amendment, the term loan and revolving line of credit bear
interest at a stated rate of 3.5% plus LIBOR, or a stated rate
of 0.75% plus Wells Fargos prime rate (or, if greater, the
federal funds rate plus 0.5% or three month LIBOR plus 1.0%).
Interest on the term loans and the revolver is payable monthly,
or for LIBOR loans, at the end of the applicable 1-, 2-, or
3-month
interest period. Under the terms of the June 2010 amendment,
principal payments on the term loan will be paid in quarterly
installments equal to 3.75% of the principal amount of term
loans, with the balance of all term loans and the revolver due
on June 30, 2014. The effects of the payments related to
this amendment have been included in the table above.
Our credit facility contains customary covenants which limit our
and certain of our subsidiaries ability to, among other
things, incur additional indebtedness or guarantee indebtedness
of others; create liens on our assets; enter into mergers or
consolidations; dispose of assets; prepay indebtedness or make
changes to our governing documents and certain of our
agreements; pay dividends and make other distributions on our
capital stock, and redeem and repurchase our capital stock; make
investments, including acquisitions; enter into transactions
with affiliates; and make capital expenditures. Our credit
facility additionally contains customary affirmative covenants,
including requirements to, among other things, take certain
actions in the event we form or acquire new subsidiaries; hold
annual meetings with our lenders; provide copies of material
contracts and amendments to our lenders; locate our collateral
only at specified locations; and use commercially reasonable
efforts to ensure that certain material contracts permits the
assignment of the contract to our lenders; subject in each case
to customary exceptions and qualifications. We are also required
to comply with a fixed charge coverage ratio, which is a ratio
of our EBITDA to our fixed charges as determined in accordance
with the credit facility, of 1.15:1.00 for the period ended
June 30, 2010, 1.225:1.00 for each subsequent period until
September 30, 2010, and 1.25:1:00 thereafter, and a senior
leverage ratio, which is a ratio of the outstanding principal
balance of our term loan plus our outstanding revolver usage to
our EBITDA as determined in accordance with the credit facility,
of 2.25:1.00 for each period until December 31, 2009, with
step-downs until July 31, 2011, when the ratio is set at
1.35:1.00 for such period and thereafter.
We have obtained waivers under our credit facility, which were
not related to a decline in our cash flow. As a result of our
ongoing communications with the lenders under our credit
facility, our lenders were aware of the transactions and
circumstances leading up to the waivers and we expected to
receive their approval with regard to such transactions and
circumstances, whether in the form of a consent, waiver,
amendment or otherwise. Specifically, we have obtained waivers
under our credit facility in connection with procedural
requirements under our credit agreement relating to; two
acquisition transactions we entered into in September 2009; an
update to the credit agreement schedules to include a certain
arrangement we have in place, and had in place at the time of
closing of the credit facility, with our subsidiary that serves
as a special purpose vehicle for processing payments, including
a guaranty made by us for the benefit of our subsidiary in favor
of Wells Fargo Bank; the payment of cash dividends of
approximately $16,000 more than the amount agreed to by the
lenders; and with respect to our fixed charge coverage ratio as
a result of payments approved by our board of directors and
discussed with our lenders for a cash dividend paid in December
2009 and for payments on promissory notes held by holders of our
preferred stock in connection with a prior declared dividend.
The fixed charge coverage ratio is a ratio of our EBITDA to our
fixed charges as determined in accordance with the credit
facility, and was required to be 1.225:1.00 for the three-month
period ending September 30, 2009, the six-month period
ended December 31, 2009 and the most recent compliance
period, the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2010. Our
actual fixed charge coverage ratio for such periods was 1.22 to
1.00, 1.22 to 1.00 and 1.14 to 1.00, respectively. However,
excluding the impact of dividend related payments our fixed
charge coverage ratio for such periods was 1.72 to 1:00, 1.44 to
1.00 and 1.38 to 1.00, respectively. In addition to the waivers
we obtained from our lenders, on February 10, 2010, we
entered into an amendment to the credit facility with the
lenders to, among other things, amend the definition of
fixed charges to specifically exclude the cash
dividend payment. In the event the lenders did not waive these
defaults or fail to waive any other default under our credit
facility, the obligations under the credit facility could be
accelerated, the applicable interest rate under the credit
facility could be increased, and our subsidiaries that have
guaranteed the credit facility could be required to pay the
obligations in full, and our lenders would be permitted to
exercise remedies with respect to all of the collateral that is
securing the credit facility, including substantially all
76
of our and our subsidiary guarantors assets. Any such
default that is not cured or waived could have a material
adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition.
In August 2008, we entered into a note purchase agreement with a
separate lender. Under the terms of the agreement, we issued
secured promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of
$10.0 million with an interest rate of 13.75%, payable
quarterly. These notes are to be paid in full before
August 1, 2013. These notes are collateralized by all our
personal property and are subordinated to the Credit Agreement.
The balance of these notes at December 31, 2009 was
$10.0 million.
On December 30, 2008, in connection with a declaration of
dividend for all holders of our preferred stock, we issued
promissory notes to the holders of our preferred stock in an
aggregate principal amount of $11.1 million. The promissory
notes bear interest at a rate of 8% and are payable in 16
consecutive quarterly payments of principal and interest. An
additional amount equal to $0.9 million became payable in
September 2009 under the terms of these promissory notes and
will be paid upon maturity. The payments may be deferred at the
discretion of the board of directors. The balance of these notes
at December 31, 2009 was $8.2 million.
On April 23, 2010, in connection with a declaration of
dividend for holders of our Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock, Series A1 Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B
Convertible Preferred Stock, we issued promissory notes to the
holders of those series in an aggregate principal amount of
$0.4 million. The promissory notes bear interest at a rate
of 8% and are payable in 16 consecutive quarterly payments of
principal and interest, with the first payment due on
July 1, 2010. The payments may be deferred at the
discretion of the board of directors.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements and
we do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or
financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as
structured finance or special purpose entities, which have been
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting
Standards Codification
In September 2009, we adopted the Accounting Standards
Codification, or ASC, established by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board, or FASB. The FASB established the ASC as the
single source of authoritative non-governmental GAAP,
superseding various existing authoritative accounting
pronouncements. It eliminates the previous GAAP hierarchy and
establishes one level of authoritative GAAP. All other
literature is considered non-authoritative. The FASB will not
issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff
Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it
will issue an Accounting Standards Update, or ASU. The FASB will
not consider ASUs as authoritative in their own right. ASUs will
serve only to update the ASC, provide background information
about the guidance and provide the bases for conclusions on the
change(s) in the ASC.
Business
Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance regarding business
combinations, which significantly changes the principles and
requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest
in the acquiree, and the goodwill acquired. This statement is
effective prospectively, except for certain retrospective
adjustments to deferred tax balances, for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. We applied these provisions to our
2009 acquisitions which resulted in expensing related
transaction costs and valuing contingent consideration at the
date of acquisition.
Fair
Value Measurements
In September 2009, the FASB issued an ASU providing
clarification for measuring the fair value of a liability when a
quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is
not available. It also clarifies that when estimating the fair
value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to
include a separate input or
77
adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a
restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. This
ASU is effective for fiscal periods beginning after
August 27, 2009. The Company does not believe this update
will have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements.
Subsequent
Events
In May 2009, the FASB issued an ASU that established general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur
after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. Although there is new
terminology, the standard is based on the same principles as
those that currently exist in the auditing standards. The
standard, which requires Companies to evaluate the disclosure of
subsequent events, is effective for interim or annual periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of this update had
no impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial
position.
Multiple
Element Arrangements
In October 2009, the FASB issued an ASU that amended the
accounting rules addressing revenue recognition for
multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements by eliminating the
existing criteria that objective and reliable evidence of fair
value for undelivered products or services exist in order to be
able to separately account for deliverables. Additionally, the
ASU provides for elimination of the use of the residual method
of allocating arrangement consideration and requires that
arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the
arrangement to all deliverables that can be accounted for
separately based on their relative selling price. A hierarchy
for estimating such selling price is included in the update.
This ASU will be effective prospectively for revenue
arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company adopted these accounting standards for
all periods herein.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an ASU that changes the
criteria for determining when an entity should account for
transactions with customers using the revenue recognition
guidance applicable to the selling or licensing of software.
This ASU is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements
entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on
or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The
Company does not believe this update will have a material impact
on its consolidated financial statements.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our
financial position due to adverse changes in financial market
prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily a result
of fluctuations in interest rates. We do not hold or issue
financial instruments for trading purposes.
We had cash and cash equivalents of $2.7 million,
$4.2 million, $4.4 million and $5.1 million at
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and June 30, 2010,
respectively. We held these amounts primarily in cash or money
market funds.
We hold cash and cash equivalents for working capital purposes.
We do not have material exposure to market risk with respect to
investments, as our investments consist primarily of highly
liquid investments purchased with original maturities of three
months or less. We do not use derivative financial instruments
for speculative or trading purposes; however, we may adopt
specific hedging strategies in the future. Any declines in
interest rates, however, will reduce future interest income.
We had total outstanding debt of $18.2 million,
$43.7 million, $51.9 million and $63.2 million at
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and June 30, 2010,
respectively. The interest rate on this debt is variable and
adjusts periodically based on the three-month LIBOR rate. If the
LIBOR rate changes by 1%, our annual interest expense would
change by approximately $0.4 million.
78
BUSINESS
Company
Overview
We are a leading provider of on demand software solutions for
the rental housing industry. Our broad range of property
management solutions enables owners and managers of
single-family and a wide variety of multi-family rental property
types to manage their marketing, pricing, screening, leasing,
accounting, purchasing and other property operations. Our on
demand software solutions are delivered through an integrated
software platform that provides a single point of access and a
shared repository of prospect, resident and property data. By
integrating and streamlining a wide range of complex processes
and interactions among the rental housing ecosystem of owners,
managers, prospects, residents and service providers, our
platform helps optimize the property management process and
improves the experience for all of these constituents.
Our solutions enable property owners and managers to increase
revenues and reduce operating costs through higher occupancy,
improved pricing methodologies, new sources of revenue from
ancillary services, improved collections and more integrated and
centralized processes. As of June 30, 2010, over
6,000 customers used one or more of our on demand software
solutions to help manage the operations of approximately
5.2 million rental housing units. Our customers include
nine of the ten largest multi-family property management
companies in the United States, ranked as of January 1,
2010 by the National Multi Housing Council, based on number of
units managed.
We sell our solutions through our direct sales organization. Our
total revenues were approximately $83.6 million,
$112.6 million, $140.9 million and $86.2 million
in 2007, 2008, 2009 and the six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively. In the same periods, we had operating (loss)
income of approximately ($1.6 million),
($0.4 million), $6.9 million and $2.9 million,
respectively, and net (loss) income of approximately
($3.1 million), ($3.2 million), $28.4 million and
($39 thousand), respectively. Net income for 2009 included a
discrete tax benefit of approximately $26.0 million as a
result of a reduction of our net deferred tax assets valuation
allowance.
Industry
Overview
The
rental housing market is large, growing and
complex.
The rental housing market is large and characterized by
challenging and location-specific operating requirements,
diverse industry participants, significant mobility among
residents and a variety of property types, including
single-family
and a wide range of
multi-family
property types, including conventional, affordable, privatized
military, student and senior housing. According to the
U.S. Census Bureau American Housing Survey for the United
States: 2007, there were 39.3 million rental housing units
in the United States in 2007. The U.S. Census Bureau
divides the rental housing market into the following categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
Property Size
|
|
Estimated Units
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Single-family properties
|
|
|
|
|
1 unit
|
|
|
13.8
|
|
2-4 units
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
Multi-family properties
|
|
|
|
|
5-9 units
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
10-49 units
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
50 or more units
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Rental Units
|
|
|
39.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on U.S. Census Bureau data and our own estimates, we
believe that the overall size of the U.S. rental housing
market, including rent, utilities and insurance, exceeds
$300 billion annually. We estimate that the total
addressable market for our current on demand software solutions
is approximately $5.5 billion per year. This estimate
assumes that each of the 39.3 million rental units in the
United States has the potential to generate annually a range of
approximately $100 in revenue per unit for single-family units
to approximately $240 in revenue per unit for conventional
multi-family units. We base this potential revenue
79
assumption on our review of the purchasing patterns of our
existing customers with respect to our on demand software
solutions, the on demand software solutions currently utilized
by our existing customers, the number of units our customers
manage with these solutions and our current pricing for on
demand software solutions. Furthermore, the U.S. rental
housing market has recently benefited from a number of
significant trends, including decreased home ownership resulting
in additional renter households and tougher mortgage lending
standards reducing first-time home purchases and contributing to
lower rates of renter attrition as renters choose to remain in
rental units.
Rental
property management spans both the resident lifecycle and the
operations of a property.
The resident lifecycle can be separated into four key stages:
prospect, applicant, residency and post-residency. Each stage
has unique requirements, and a property owners or
managers ability to effectively address these requirements
can significantly impact revenue and profitability.
|
|
|
Resident Lifecycle Stage
|
|
Property Owner/Manager Objectives
|
|
Prospect
|
|
increase number of leads through effective marketing
|
|
|
optimize the advertising spending and marketing
budget for each property
|
|
|
capture every lead in a timely manner
|
|
|
create a compelling online experience for each
property
|
|
|
identify quality prospects
|
|
|
determine appropriate market rental rates
|
|
|
increase prospect-to-resident conversion rates
|
Applicant
|
|
automate application process
|
|
|
assess applicant credit history and ability to pay
rent
|
|
|
assess applicant criminal background
|
|
|
determine optimal rental rates and lease terms
required to maximize revenue
|
|
|
manage risk through renters insurance programs
|
Residency
|
|
foster resident retention through effective
communications and responsive service
|
|
|
manage rental payments and collections
|
|
|
maintain property, including improvements and
routine maintenance
|
|
|
manage service provider network, including utilities
and telecommunications vendors
|
|
|
renew as high a percentage of lease expirations as
possible
|
|
|
determine optimal renewal rental rates required to
maximize revenue
|
Post-residency
|
|
improve collection of move-out expenses, including
uncovered repairs and unpaid utilities
|
|
|
manage process to efficiently and cost-effectively
prepare the unit for new residents
|
|
|
process final account statements and security
deposit refunds
|
In addition to managing the resident lifecycle, property owners
and managers must also manage the operations of their
properties. Critical components of property operations include
materials and service provider procurement, insurance and risk
mitigation, utility and energy management, information
technology and telecommunications management, accounting,
expense tracking and management, document management, security,
staff hiring and training, staff performance measurement and
management and marketing.
Managing the resident lifecycle and the operations of a property
involves several different constituents, including property
owners and managers, prospects, residents and service providers.
Property owners can include
single-property
owners, multi-property owners, national residential apartment
syndicators that may own thousands of units through a variety of
investment funds and real estate investment trusts, or REITs.
Property managers often are responsible for a large number of
properties that can range from single-family units to large
apartment communities. Property owners and managers also need to
manage a variety of service providers, including utilities,
insurance providers, video, voice and data providers and
maintenance and capital goods suppliers. Managing these diverse
relationships, combined with frequent resident turnover and
regulatory and compliance requirements, can make the operations
of even a small portfolio of rental properties
80
complex. Challenges are compounded for owners and managers
responsible for a large portfolio of geographically dispersed
properties, which require overseeing potentially hundreds of
thousands of individual rental processes.
|
|
|
Legacy
information technology solutions designed to manage the rental
housing property management process are
inadequate.
|
During the 1970s and 1980s, the rental housing
market was highly fragmented and regionally organized. During
this period, the first property management systems and software
solutions emerged to help property owners and managers with
basic accounting and record keeping functions. These solutions
provided limited functionality and scalability and often were
not tailored to the specific needs of rental housing property
owners and managers.
Beginning in the mid 1990s, the rental housing market
began to consolidate and large, nationally focused and publicly
financed companies emerged, which aggregated significant numbers
of units. The rise of national real estate portfolio managers,
many of them accountable to public shareholders, created a need
for more sophisticated and scalable property management systems
that included a centralized database and were designed to
optimize and automate multiple business processes within the
resident lifecycle and property operations. Despite increasing
market demands, the available solutions continued to be
insufficient to fully address the complex requirements of rental
housing property owners and managers, which moved beyond basic
accounting and record keeping functions to also include
value-added services such as Internet marketing, applicant
screening, billing solutions and analytics for pricing and yield
optimization.
To address their complex and evolving requirements, many rental
housing property owners and managers have historically
implemented a myriad of single point solutions
and/or
internally developed solutions to manage their properties. These
solutions can be expensive to implement and maintain and often
lack integrated functionality to help owners and managers
increase rental revenue or reduce costs. In addition, many
rental housing property owners and managers still rely on paper
or spreadsheet-based approaches, which are typically time
intensive and prone to human error or internal mismanagement. We
believe these historical solutions are inadequate because they:
|
|
|
|
|
require significant customization to implement, which frequently
inhibits upgrading to new versions or platforms in a timely
manner;
|
|
|
|
require information technology, or IT, resources to support
integration points between property management systems and
disparate value-added services;
|
|
|
|
require IT resources to implement and maintain data security,
data integrity, performance and business continuity solutions;
|
|
|
|
lack scalability and flexibility to account for the expansion or
contraction of a property portfolio;
|
|
|
|
lack robust marketing and tracking capabilities for converting
prospects to residents;
|
|
|
|
lack effective spend management capabilities for controlling
property management costs;
|
|
|
|
lack comprehensive analytics for pricing and yield optimization;
|
|
|
|
lack workflow level integration;
|
|
|
|
do not provide owners and managers with visibility into overall
property performance; and
|
|
|
|
cannot be easily updated to meet new regulations and compliance
requirements.
|
On
demand software solutions are well suited to meet the rental
housing markets needs.
The ubiquitous nature of the Internet, widespread broadband
adoption and improved network reliability and security have
enabled the deployment and delivery of business-critical
applications over the Internet. The on demand delivery model is
substantially more cost-effective than traditional on premise
software solutions that generally have higher deployment and
support costs and require the customer to purchase and maintain
the associated servers, storage, networks, security and disaster
recovery solutions.
81
The
RealPage Solution
We provide a platform of on demand software solutions that
integrates and streamlines rental property management business
functions. Our solutions enable owners and managers of
single-family and a wide variety of multi-family rental property
types, including conventional, affordable, privatized military,
student and senior housing, to manage their marketing, pricing,
screening, leasing, accounting, purchasing and other property
operations. These functions have traditionally been addressed by
individual, disparate applications. Our solutions enable
property owners and managers to increase revenues and reduce
operating costs through higher occupancy, improved pricing
methodologies, new sources of revenue from ancillary services,
improved collections and more integrated and centralized
business processes. Our solutions contribute to a more efficient
property management process and an improved experience for all
of the constituents involved in the rental housing ecosystem,
including owners, managers, prospects, residents and service
providers.
Benefits
to Our Customers
We believe the benefits of our solutions for our customers
include the following:
Increased revenues. Our solutions enable our
customers to increase their revenues by improving their sales
and marketing effectiveness, optimizing their pricing and
occupancy and improving collection of rental payments, utility
expenses, late fees and other charges.
Reduced operating costs. Our solutions help
our customers reduce costs by streamlining and automating many
ongoing property management functions, centralizing and
controlling purchasing by
on-site
personnel and transferring costs from the site to more efficient
centrally managed operations. Our on demand delivery model also
reduces owners and managers operating costs by
eliminating their need to own and support the applications or
associated hardware infrastructure. In addition, our integrated
solutions consolidate the initial implementation and training
costs and ongoing support associated with multiple applications
that each provide only components of the functionality provided
by our solutions. This is particularly important for property
owners and managers who want to reduce enterprise-class IT
infrastructure, support and staff training.
Improved quality of service for residents and
prospects. Our solutions improve the level of
service that property owners and managers provide to residents
and prospects by enabling many transactions to be completed
online, expediting the processing of rental applications,
maintenance service requests and payments and increasing the
frequency and quality of communication with residents and
prospects, providing higher resident satisfaction and increased
differentiation from competing properties that do not use our
solutions.
Streamlined and simplified property management business
processes. Our on demand platform provides
integrated solutions for managing a wide variety of property
management processes that have traditionally been managed
manually or through separate applications. Our solutions utilize
common authentication that enables data sharing and workflow
automation of certain business processes, thereby eliminating
redundant data entry and simplifying many recurring tasks. The
efficiency of our solutions allows onsite and corporate
personnel to utilize their time more effectively and to focus on
the strategic priorities of the business. We also make extensive
use of online training courseware and our solutions are designed
to be usable by new employees almost immediately after their
hiring, addressing an acute need of the multi-family industry in
which employee turnover is high.
Ability to integrate third-party products and
services. Our open architecture and application
framework facilitate the integration of third-party applications
and services into our solutions. This enables property managers
to conduct these business functions through the same system that
they already use for many of their other tasks and to leverage
the same repository of prospect, resident and property data that
supports our solutions.
Increased visibility into property
performance. Our integrated platform and common
data repository enable owners and managers to gain a
comprehensive view of the operational and financial performance
of each of their properties. Our solutions provide a library of
standard reports, dashboards, scorecards and alerts, and we also
provide interfaces to several widely used report writers and
business intelligence tools. In addition, our on demand delivery
model makes it possible to deliver benchmark data aggregated
across more than 10,000 properties, factor rental payment
history into applicant screening processes and create more
accurate supply/demand models and statistically based price
elasticity models to improve price optimization.
82
Simple implementation and support. Our
solutions include pre-configured extensions that meet the
specific needs of a variety of property types and can be easily
tailored by our customers to meet more specific requirements of
their properties and business processes. We strive to minimize
the need for professional consulting services to implement our
solutions and train personnel.
Improved scalability. We host our solutions
for our customers, thereby reducing or eliminating our
customers costs associated with expanding or contracting
IT infrastructure as their property portfolios evolve. We also
bear the risk of technological obsolescence because we own and
manage our data center infrastructure and are continually
upgrading it to newer generations of technology without any
incremental cost to our customers.
Competitive
Strengths of our Solutions
The competitive strengths of our solutions are as follows:
Integrated on demand software platform based on a common data
repository. Our solutions are delivered through
an integrated on demand software platform that provides a single
point of access via the Internet with a common repository of
prospect, resident and property data, which permits our
solutions to access requested data through offline data transfer
or in real-time.
Large and growing ecosystem of property owners, managers,
prospects, residents and service
providers. Through June 30, 2010, we have
established a customer base of over 6,000 customers who use one
or more of our on demand software solutions to help manage the
operations of approximately 5.2 million rental housing
units. Our customers include nine of the ten largest
multi-family property management companies in the United States,
ranked as of January 1, 2010 by the National Multi Housing
Council, based on number of units managed. Our solutions
automate and streamline many of the recurring transactions and
interactions among this large and expanding ecosystem of
property owners and managers, prospects, residents and service
providers, including prospect inquiries, applications, monthly
rent payments and service requests. As the number of
constituents of our ecosystem increases, the volume of data in
our common data repository and its value to the constituents of
our ecosystem grows.
Comprehensive platform of on demand software solutions for
property management. Our on demand property
management systems and integrated software-enabled
value-added
services provide what we believe to be the broadest range of on
demand capabilities for managing the resident lifecycle and core
operational processes for residential property management. Our
software-enabled
value-added
services provide complementary sales and marketing, asset
optimization, risk mitigation, billing and utility management
and spend management capabilities that collectively enable our
customers to manage every stage of the resident lifecycle. In
addition, we offer shared cloud services, including reporting,
payment, document management and training functionality that are
common to all of our product families. These comprehensive
solutions enable us to address the needs of a wide range of
property owners and managers across a broad range of rental
housing property types.
Deep rental housing industry expertise. We
have been serving the rental housing industry exclusively for
over 10 years and our 20 most senior management team
members have an average of 16 years experience in the
rental housing industry. We design our solutions based on our
extensive rental housing industry expertise, insight into
industry trends and developments and property management best
practices that help our customers simplify the challenges of
owning and managing rental properties.
Open cloud computing architecture. Our cloud
computing architecture enables our solutions to interface with
our customers existing systems and allows our customers to
outsource the management of third-party business applications.
This open architecture enables our customers to buy our
solutions incrementally while continuing to use existing
third-party solutions, allowing us to shorten sales cycles and
increase adoption of our solutions within our target market.
83
Our
Strategy
We intend to leverage the breadth of our solutions and industry
presence to solidify our position as a leading provider of on
demand software solutions to the rental housing industry. The
key elements of our strategy to accomplish this objective are as
follows:
Acquire new customers. We intend to actively
pursue new customer relationships with property owners and
managers that do not currently use our solutions. In addition to
marketing our core property management systems, we will also
seek to sell our software-enabled
value-added
services to customers of other third-party property management
systems by utilizing our open architecture to facilitate
integration of our solutions with those systems.
Increase the adoption of additional solutions within our
existing customer base. Many of our customers
rely on our property management systems to manage their daily
operations and track all of their critical prospect, resident
and property information. Additionally, some of our customers
utilize our software-enabled value-added services to complement
third-party ERP systems. We have continually introduced new
software-enabled
value-added
services to complement our property management systems and
marketed our on demand property management systems to our
customers who are utilizing third-party ERP systems. We believe
that the penetration of our on demand software solutions to date
has been modest and that there exists significant potential for
additional on demand revenue from sales of our on demand
software solutions to our customer base. We have significant
opportunities to further leverage the critical role that our
solutions play in our customers operations by increasing
the adoption of our on demand property management systems and
software-enabled
value-added
services within our existing customer base, and we intend to
actively focus on upselling and cross-selling our solutions to
our customers.
Add new solutions to our platform. We believe
that we offer the most comprehensive platform of on demand
software solutions for the rental housing industry. The breadth
of our platform enables our customers to control many aspects of
the residential rental property management process. We have a
unique opportunity to add new capabilities that further enhance
our platform, and we intend to continue developing and
introducing new solutions to sell to both new and existing
customers. These solutions may include localized solutions to
support our customers as they grow their international
operations. We also intend to develop new relationships with
third-party application providers that can use our open
architecture to offer additional product and service
capabilities to their customers through the use of our platform.
Pursue acquisitions of complementary businesses, products and
technologies. Since March 2005, we have completed
10 acquisitions that have enabled us to expand our
platform, enter into new rental property markets and expand our
customer base. We intend to continue to selectively evaluate
opportunities to acquire businesses and technologies that may
help us accomplish these and other strategic objectives.
Products
and Services
Our platform consists of our property management systems and
five families of software-enabled
value-added
services. Our software-enabled value-added services provide
complementary sales and marketing, asset optimization, risk
mitigation, billing and utility management and spend management
capabilities that collectively enable our customers to manage
the stages of the resident lifecycle. Each of our property
management systems and our software-enabled value-added services
include multiple product centers that provide distinct
capabilities and can be licensed separately or as a bundled
package. Each product center is integrated with a central
repository of prospect, resident and property data.
Our platform also includes a set of shared cloud services,
including reporting, payment, document management and training
functionality that are common to all of our product families.
Third-party applications can access our property management
systems using our RealExchange platform.
Our platform is designed to serve as a single system of record
for all of the constituents of the rental housing ecosystem,
including owners, managers, prospects, residents and service
providers, and to support the entire resident lifecycle, from
prospect to applicant to residency to post-residency. Common
authentication, work flow and user experience across product
families enables each of these constituents to access different
applications as appropriate for their role.
84
We offer different versions of our platform for different types
of properties. For example, our platform supports the specific
and distinct requirements of:
|
|
|
|
|
conventional single-family properties (four units or less);
|
|
|
conventional multi-family properties (five or more units);
|
|
|
affordable Housing and Urban Development, or HUD, properties;
|
|
|
affordable tax credit properties;
|
|
|
privatized military housing;
|
|
|
student housing; and
|
|
|
senior living.
|
Property
Management Systems
Our property management systems are typically referred to as
Enterprise Resource Planning, or ERP, systems. These solutions
manage core property management business processes, including
leasing, accounting, purchasing and facilities management, and
include a central database of prospect, applicant, resident and
property information that is accessible in real time by our
other solutions. Our property management systems also interface
with most popular general ledger accounting systems through our
RealExchange platform to products offered by AMSI Property
Management (owned by Infor Global Solutions, Inc.), Microsoft
Corporation, MRI Software, LLC, Yardi Systems, Inc. and many
others. This makes it possible for customers to deploy our
solutions using our accounting system or a third-party
accounting system.
85
OneSite
OneSite is our flagship on demand property management system for
multi-family properties. OneSite includes 10 individual product
centers. Six versions of OneSite are tailored to the specific
needs of conventional multi-family, affordable HUD, affordable
tax credit, privatized military housing, student housing and
senior living properties.
|
|
|
Product Center
|
|
Key Functionality
|
|
OneSite Leasing & Rents
|
|
Prospects, generates, presents and records price quotations,
generates lease documents, schedules move-ins and posts
financial transactions to the resident ledger for both new
residents and renewal of existing resident leases. Six versions
support the unique needs of our target residential rental
markets.
|
OneSite Facilities
|
|
Manages asset warranties, service requests and unit turnovers so
that when a resident moves out, the resident ledger is
automatically updated with any damages to be incorporated into
the residents final account statement.
|
OneSite Purchasing
|
|
Manages work orders and procurement activities and calculates
operating budget variances.
|
OneSite Accounting
|
|
Provides back-office general ledger, accounts payable and cash
management functions. We license OneSite Accounting from a
third-party accounting software provider and have modified it to
meet the needs of the rental housing industry.
|
OneSite Budgeting
|
|
Enables owners and managers to budget property performance and
transfer budgets into the general ledger.
|
Propertyware
Propertyware is our on demand property management system for
single-family properties and small, centrally managed
multi-family properties. Propertyware consists of four product
centers including accounting, maintenance and work order
management, marketing spend management and portal services. In
addition, we offer our screening and payment solutions through
our Propertyware brand to single-family and small centrally
managed multi-family properties.
Other
Property Management Systems
We also offer six additional on premise property management
systems RentRoll, HUDManager, Tenant Pro, Spectra,
i-CAM, and Management Plus. RentRoll serves small conventional
apartment communities. HUDManager serves small HUD, Rural
Housing Services and tax credit subsidized apartment
communities. Tenant Pro serves the needs of small conventional
properties. Spectra is a conventional apartment and commercial
modular property management system that serves both the U.S. and
the Canadian markets. i-CAM and Management Plus property
management software automates and streamlines rental activities
for affordable housing.
Most of our RentRoll and HUDManager on premise customers have
migrated to our on demand property management systems. Four of
our additional on premise property management
systems Tenant Pro, Spectra,
i-CAM and
Management Plus were acquired in February 2010. Over
time, we expect many customers of these on premise property
management systems to migrate to our on demand OneSite or
Propertyware systems; however, we will continue to support our
on premise property management systems for the foreseeable
future and integrate our software-enabled value-added services
into them.
Collectively, our on premise property management systems
represented less than 2.7% of our total revenue in 2009 and we
expect that our on premise property management systems,
including the revenue
86
attributable to the on premise property management systems that
we acquired in February 2010, will represent less than 5% of our
total revenue in 2010.
Software-Enabled
Value-Added Services
In addition to property management systems, we offer
software-enabled value-added services consisting of five product
families and 24 product centers that provide complementary sales
and marketing, asset optimization, risk mitigation, billing and
utility management and spend management capabilities. Our
software-enabled value-added services are tightly integrated
with our OneSite property management system, and we are actively
integrating them with our other property management systems.
CrossFire
(Sales & Marketing Systems)
The CrossFire product family is usually referred to as a
customer relationship management, or CRM, system. It includes
product centers that manage marketing and leasing operations and
enable owners and managers to originate, capture, track, manage
and close more leads.
|
|
|
Product Center
|
|
Key Functionality
|
|
CrossFire Content Management System
|
|
Provides a central repository of property marketing and listing
content, including descriptions, photos, video or animated
tours, floor plans and site plans.
|
CrossFire Contact Center
|
|
Provides call and email routing technology and agent staffing on
a permanent or overflow basis to answer phone calls and emails
from prospects or residents.
|
CrossFire Lead2Lease
|
|
Provides phone and Internet lead tracking and lead management
services integrated with popular property management systems.
|
CrossFire Leasing Portal
|
|
Enables owners and managers to create customized property
websites with rich content and search capabilities, including
transaction widgets for checking availability, generating a
price quote, applying for residency, leasing an apartment online
and paying rent and deposits online.
|
CrossFire PropertyLinkOnline
|
|
Provides a syndication service that pushes property content to
search engines, Internet listing services and classified listing
web sites.
|
CrossFire Resident Portal
|
|
Provides a portal that enables residents to view community
events, enter or check the status of service requests, review
statements, pay rent online and renew leases.
|
CrossFire Studio
|
|
Provides advertising and marketing planning services through a
talented team of multi-family marketing experts including
advertising placement and performance evaluation, leasing and
renewal campaign design and marketing consulting services.
|
YieldStar
(Asset Optimization Systems)
Rental housing property rents have traditionally been set by
owners and managers based on their knowledge of the market and
other intangible or intuitive criteria. YieldStar is a
scientific yield management system, similar to those used in the
airline and hotel industries, that enables owners and managers
to optimize rents to achieve the overall highest yield, or
combination of rent and occupancy, at each property.
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Center
|
|
Key Functionality
|
|
|
|
|
YieldStar Price Optimizer
|
|
Uses current customer and market data and statistically derived
supply/demand forecasts and price elasticity models to calculate
and present optimal prices for each rental unit.
|
|
|
|
|
YieldStar Pricing Advisory Services
|
|
Offers outsourced pricing management advisory services for
owners and managers who want to utilize Price Optimizer without
incurring the costs to staff and support it in-house.
|
|
|
|
|
M/PF Research
|
|
Provides multi-family housing market research through a
well-established and trusted name in multi-family market
intelligence. The M/PF Research database includes monthly and
quarterly information on occupancy and rents for more than
36,000 rental housing properties in the United States
representing 284 defined metropolitan statistical areas as of
February 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
LeasingDesk
(Risk Mitigation Systems)
LeasingDesk risk mitigation systems enable rental housing
property owners and managers to reduce delinquency, liability
and property damage risk.
|
|
|
Product Center
|
|
Key Functionality
|
|
LeasingDesk Screening
|
|
Evaluates an applicants credit using a scoring model
calibrated to predict resident default and payment behavior by
leveraging our proprietary database of resident rental payment
history generated from our property management systems.
|
Criminal Background Services
|
|
Ascertains if a prospective resident has committed a crime or
been evicted from a previous apartment by accessing databases
that are aggregated from third-party data providers.
|
Credit Optimizer
|
|
Allows owners and managers to optimize credit thresholds based
on occupancy levels and adjust deposit and rent amounts based on
the default risk of the resident in a yield neutral manner.
Credit Optimizer is expected to remain in beta testing
throughout 2010.
|
LeasingDesk Insurance Services
|
|
Offers liability and renters insurance. Liability policies
protect owners and managers against financial loss due to
resident-caused damage, while renters insurance provides
additional coverage for resident personal belongings in the
event of loss.
|
88
Velocity
(Billing and Utility Management Services)
Velocity offers a complete range of billing and utility
management services.
|
|
|
Product Center
|
|
Key Functionality
|
|
Convergent Billing Services
|
|
Provides automated monthly invoicing services enabling owners
and managers to increase collections by sending each resident a
monthly invoice that combines rent, small balances and utility
charges onto a single invoice.
|
Energy Recovery Services
|
|
Provides automated utility billing services to enable owners and
managers to detect and collect utility costs that are the
residents responsibility.
|
Infrastructure Services
|
|
Provides contractor services to install electric, gas and water
meters in apartment communities through three individual product
centers. Velocity also provides consulting services to assist
owners and managers in implementing and managing energy, media,
data and telecom services at their communities.
|
OpsTechnology
(Spend Management Systems)
OpsTechnology offers spend management systems that enable owners
and managers to better control costs.
|
|
|
Product Center
|
|
Key Functionality
|
|
OpsBuyer
|
|
Integrates purchase orders, onsite accounts payable, automated
workflow approval (including mobile approvals), budget and spend
limit control, centralized expense reporting tools and document
management through our on demand spend management tool.
|
OpsMarket
|
|
Enables owners and managers to create private marketplaces to
manage the transactions between their properties and their
preferred suppliers and service providers through our on demand
eProcurement solution.
|
OpsInvoice
|
|
Provides an on demand invoice management solution that
centralizes the processing of both electronic and paper invoices
across the owners or managers portfolio.
|
OpsAdvantage
|
|
Offers a catalog of negotiated discounts for selected vendors
across several major purchasing categories for owners and
managers that are too small to negotiate volume discounts.
|
OpsBid
|
|
Provides an on demand procurement system used primarily for
larger capital and rehab related purchases that are not ordered
regularly.
|
89
Shared
Cloud Services
We offer shared cloud services that are tightly integrated with
our property management systems and software-enabled valued
added services.
|
|
|
Cloud Services
|
|
Key Functionality
|
|
Portfolio Reporting
|
|
Aggregates the data from our other solutions and third-party
applications and gives owners and managers access to business
critical reports and actionable analytical information about the
performance of their properties.
|
Document Management
|
|
Provides storage, retrieval, security, and archiving of all
documents and forms associated with a property management
companys business processes and procedures.
|
Payment Processing
|
|
Enables owners and managers to collect rent and other payments
electronically from residents through check, money order,
automated clearing house, or ACH, or credit/debit card.
|
Online Learning
|
|
Allows owners and managers to train geographically dispersed
employees in a cost-effective and timely fashion, and allows
employees to complete their coursework at their convenience.
|
The
RealPage Cloud
We operate a robust application infrastructure, marketed to our
customers as The RealPage Cloud, which supports the delivery of
our solutions and also allows owners and managers to outsource
portions of their IT operations. The RealPage Cloud operates
over redundant 10GBPS dedicated fiber links connecting two data
centers containing hundreds of servers and multiple storage area
networks. This architecture makes it possible to expand the data
center incrementally with little or no disruption as more users
or additional applications are added. The RealPage Cloud
consists of more than 1,300 virtual servers, 400 physical
servers and 600 terabytes of data. The RealPage Cloud spans
approximately 30,000 locations and processes an average of
approximately 17 million transactions per day and, at
peak times, supports over 75,000 unique users.
The RealPage Cloud is based on an open architecture that enables
third-party applications to access OneSite and other
applications hosted in the RealPage Cloud through our
RealExchange (formerly referred to as AppExchange) Platform that
provides access to more than 150 different public and private
web services and XML gateways that are used to import and export
data through third party Application Program Interfaces (APIs)
and process hundreds of thousands of transactions per day.
RealExchange also enables our cloud services to access and
interface with third-party property management systems as well
as our software-enabled
value-added
services.
In addition, our system is designed to replicate data into a
Universal Data Store, or UDS, each day. Access to UDS is enabled
through an access layer called UDS Direct, which enables
customers to build portfolio reports, dashboards and alerts
using any Open Database Connectivity or Java Database
Connectivity compliant report writer tool such as Microsoft
Excel, Microsoft Access, Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Service
or Crystal Reports. UDS is also transmitted to a number of our
larger customers each night to feed portfolio reporting systems
that they have built internally.
As of June 30, 2010, we employed 46 professionals who
are responsible for maintaining data security, integrity,
availability, performance and business continuity in our cloud
computing facilities. We annually conduct two major audits of
our cloud computing infrastructure, including SAS 70
Type II and Payment Card Industry, or PCI, audits. In
addition, certain customers conduct separate business continuity
audits of their own.
In addition to our production data centers, we manage a separate
development and quality assurance testing facility used to
control the pre-production testing required before each new
release of our on demand
90
software. We typically deploy new releases of the software
underlying our on demand software solutions on a monthly or
quarterly schedule depending on the solution.
Professional
Services
We have developed repeatable, cost-effective consulting and
implementation services to assist our customers in taking
advantage of the capabilities enabled by our platform. Our
consulting and implementation methodology leverages the nature
of our on demand software architecture, the industry-specific
expertise of our professional services employees and the design
of our platform to simplify and expedite the implementation
process. Our consulting and implementation services include
project and application management procedures, business process
evaluation, business model development and data conversion. Our
consulting teams work closely with customers to ensure the
smooth transition and operation of our systems.
We also offer a variety of training programs through our Online
Learning Services for training administrators and onsite
property managers on the use of our solutions and on current
issues in the property management industry. Training options
include regularly hosted classroom and online instruction
(through our online learning courseware) as well as online
seminars, or webinars. We also enable our customers to integrate
their own training content with our content to deliver an
integrated and customized training program for their on-site
property managers.
Product
Support
We offer product support services that provide our customers
with assistance from our product support professionals by phone
or email in resolving issues with our solutions. We offer three
product support options: Standard, Frontline and Platinum. The
Standard option includes product support during business hours.
The Frontline option includes the features of the Standard
option plus escalation to senior support representatives. The
Platinum option includes the features of the Frontline option
plus emergency product support on Saturdays and a designated
senior product support liaison. Technology support is also
available for consultations on firewalls, communications,
security measures (including virus alerts), workstation
configuration and disaster recovery options.
We also sponsor the RealPage User Group to facilitate
communications between us and our community of users. The
RealPage User Group is governed by a steering committee of our
customers, which consists of two elected positions and
subcommittee chairs, each representing a RealPage product center
or group of product centers.
Product
Development
We devote a substantial portion of our resources to developing
new solutions and enhancing existing solutions, conducting
product testing and quality assurance testing, improving core
technology and strengthening our technological expertise in the
rental housing industry. We typically deploy new releases of the
software underlying our on demand software solutions on a
monthly or quarterly schedule depending on the solution. As of
June 30, 2010, our product development group consisted of
238 employees in North America and 55 employees
located in Hyderabad, India. Product development expense totaled
$21.7 million, $28.8 million, $27.4 million and
$17.3 million for 2007, 2008, 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2010, respectively.
Sales and
Marketing
We sell our software and services through our direct sales
organization. As of June 30, 2010, we employed
91 sales representatives. Our sales force is organized by
geographic region and divided into teams based on the size of
our prospective customers and property type. This focus provides
a higher level of service and understanding of our
customers unique needs. Our typical sales cycle with a
prospective customer begins with the generation of a sales lead
through Internet marketing, tele-sales efforts, trade shows or
other means of referral. The sales lead is followed by an
assessment of the customers requirements, sales
presentations and
91
product demonstrations. Our sales cycle can vary substantially
from customer to customer, but typically requires three to six
months for larger customers and one to six weeks for smaller
customers.
In addition to new customer sales, we sell additional solutions
and consulting services to our existing customers to help them
more efficiently and effectively manage their properties as the
rental housing market evolves and competitive conditions change.
We generate customer leads, accelerate sales opportunities and
build brand awareness through our marketing programs. Our
marketing programs target property management company
executives, technology professionals and senior business
leaders. Our marketing team focuses on the unique needs of
customers within our target markets. Our marketing programs
include the following activities:
|
|
|
|
|
field marketing events for customers and prospects;
|
|
|
|
participation in, and sponsorship of, user conferences, trade
shows and industry events;
|
|
|
|
customer programs, including user meetings and our online
customer community;
|
|
|
|
online marketing activities, including email campaigns, online
advertising, web campaigns, webinars and use of social media,
including blogging, Facebook, and Twitter;
|
|
|
|
public relations; and
|
|
|
|
use of our website to provide product and company information,
as well as learning opportunities for potential customers.
|
We host our annual user conference where customers both
participate in and deliver a variety of programs designed to
help accelerate business performance through the use of our
integrated platform of solutions. The conferences feature a
variety of customer speakers, panelists and presentations
focused on businesses of all sizes. The event also brings
together our customers, technology vendors, service providers
and other key participants in the rental housing industry to
exchange ideas and best practices for improving business
performance. Attendees gain insight into our product plans and
participate in interactive sessions that give them the
opportunity to provide input into new features and functionality.
Strategic
Relationships
We maintain relationships with a variety of technology vendors
and service providers to enhance the capabilities of our
integrated platform of solutions. This approach allows us to
expand our platform and customer base and to enter new markets.
We have established the following types of strategic
relationships:
Technology
Vendors
We have relationships with a number of leading technology
companies whose products we integrate into our platform or offer
to complement our solutions. The cooperative relationships with
our software and hardware technology partners allow us to build,
optimize and deliver a broad range of solutions to our customers.
Service
Providers
We have relationships with a number of service providers that
offer complementary services that integrate into our platform
and address key requirements of rental property owners and
managers, including credit card and ACH services, transaction
processing capabilities and insurance underwriting services.
Customers
We are committed to developing long-term customer relationships
and working closely with our customers to configure our
solutions to meet the evolving needs of the rental housing
industry. Our customers include REITs, leading property
management companies, fee managers, regionally based owner
operators and service providers. As of June 30, 2010, we
had 6,186 customers who used one or more of our on demand
92
software solutions to help manage the operations of
approximately 5.2 million rental housing units. Our
customers include nine of the ten largest multi-family property
management companies in the United States, ranked as of
January 1, 2010 by the National Multi Housing Council,
based on number of units managed. For the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2010, no one customer accounted for more than 5%
of our revenue.
See Note 2 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for the year ended December 31, 2009 for further
information regarding measurement of our international revenue
and location of our long-lived assets.
Competition
We face competition primarily from point solution providers
including traditional software vendors and other on demand
software providers. To a lesser extent, we also compete with
internally developed and maintained solutions. Our competitors
vary depending on our solution. Our current principal
competitors include:
|
|
|
|
|
in the multi-family ERP market, AMSI Property Management (owned
by Infor Global Solutions, Inc.), MRI Software LLC and Yardi
Systems, Inc. and, in the single-family ERP market, AppFolio,
Inc. and DIY Real Estate Solutions (recently acquired by Yardi
Systems, Inc.);
|
|
|
|
in the applicant screening market, ChoicePoint Inc. (a
subsidiary of Reed Elsevier Group plc), CoreLogic, Inc (formerly
First Advantage Corporation, an affiliate of the First American
Corporation), TransUnion Rental Screening Solutions, Inc. (a
subsidiary of TransUnion LLC) and Yardi Systems, Inc.
(following its recent acquisition of RentGrow Inc., an applicant
screening provider), On-Site.com and many other smaller regional
and local screening companies;
|
|
|
|
in the insurance market, Assurant, Inc., Bader Company,
CoreLogic, Inc. and a number of national insurance underwriters
(including GEICO Corporation) that market renters insurance;
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the CRM market, contact center and call tracking service
providers Call Source Inc., Level One, Inc., Yardi Systems,
Inc. (which recently announced its intention to build a call
center) and numerous regional and local call centers, lead
tracking solution providers Call Source, Inc. Lead Tracking
Solutions (a division of O.C. Concepts, Inc.) and Whos
Calling, Inc., content syndication providers Realty DataTrust
Corporation, RentSentinel.com (owned by Yield Technologies,
Inc.), RentEngine (owned by MyNewPlace.com), rentbits.com, Inc.
and companies providing web portal services, including
Apartments24-7.com,
Inc., Ellipse Communications, Inc., Property Solutions
International, Inc., Spherexx.com, Yardi Systems, Inc., Internet
listing sources and many other smaller web portal designers;
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the utility billing market, American Utility Management,
Inc., Conservice, LLC, ista North America, Inc., NWP Services
Corporation, Yardi Systems, Inc. (following its recent
acquisition of Energy Billing Systems, Inc.) and many other
smaller regional or local utilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the revenue management market, PROS Holdings, Inc., The
Rainmaker Group, Inc. and Yardi Systems, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the spend management market, SiteStuff, Inc. (owned by Yardi
Systems, Inc., AvidXchange, Inc., Nexus Systems, Inc., Oracle
Corporation; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the payment processing space, Chase Paymentech Solutions, LLC
(a subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co.), First Data
Corporation, Fiserv, Inc., MoneyGram International, Inc., NWP
Services Corporation, Property Solutions International, Inc.,
RentPayment.com (a subsidiary of Yapstone, Inc.), Yardi Systems,
Inc. and a number of national banking institutions.
|
The principal competitive factors in our industry include total
cost of ownership, level of integration with property management
systems, ease of implementation, product functionality and
scope, performance, security, scalability and reliability of
service, brand and reputation, sales and marketing capabilities
and financial resources of the provider. We believe that we
compete favorably with our competitors on the basis of these
factors. We also believe that none of our more significant
competitors currently offer a more comprehensive or integrated
on demand software solution. However, some of our existing
competitors have greater name recognition, longer operating
histories, larger installed customer bases, larger sales and
marketing budgets, as well as greater financial, technical and
other resources.
93
Intellectual
Property
We rely on a combination of copyright, trademark and trade
secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and
contractual restrictions, to establish and protect our
proprietary rights. These laws, procedures and restrictions
provide only limited protection. We currently have no issued
patents or pending patent applications. In the future, we may
file patent applications, but patents may not be issued with
respect to these patent applications, or if patents are issued,
they may not provide us with any competitive advantages, may not
be issued in a manner that gives us the protection that we seek
and may be successfully challenged by third parties.
We endeavor to enter into agreements with our employees and
contractors and with parties with whom we do business in order
to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary
information. We cannot be certain that the steps we have taken
will prevent unauthorized use or reverse engineering of our
technology. Moreover, others may independently develop
technologies that are competitive with ours or that infringe on
our intellectual property. The enforcement of our intellectual
property rights also depends on any legal actions against these
infringers being successful, but these actions may not be
successful, even when our rights have been infringed.
Furthermore, effective patent, trademark, trade dress, copyright
and trade secret protection may not be available in every
country in which our solutions are available over the Internet.
In addition, the legal standards relating to the validity,
enforceability and scope of protection of intellectual property
rights are uncertain and still evolving.
Employees
As of June 30, 2010, we had approximately
1,260 employees. We consider our current relationship with
our employees to be good. Our employees are not represented by a
labor union and are not subject to a collective bargaining
agreement.
Facilities
We currently lease approximately 184,000 square feet of
space for our corporate headquarters and data center in
Carrollton, Texas under lease agreements that expire in August
2016. We have offices in Tulsa, Oklahoma; Camarillo, California;
Irvine, California; San Francisco, California;
San Diego, California; Williston, Vermont; Mason, Ohio;
Atlanta, Georgia; Washington, D.C.; Winnipeg, Manitoba,
Canada and Hyderabad, India. We believe our current and planned
data centers and office facilities will be adequate for the
foreseeable future.
We also license data center space and collocation services at a
facility in Dallas, Texas for our secondary data center pursuant
to a master services agreement with DataBank Holdings Ltd., or
DataBank. Our agreement with DataBank has an initial term of 36
months and automatically renews for successive one-year terms
unless we elect to terminate the agreement by giving notice
30 days prior to the end of a current term, in which case
the agreement terminates at the end of such term. The initial
term of our agreement with DataBank expired on May 31,
2010, and the agreement automatically renews for successive
one-year terms. We may also terminate the master services
agreement for convenience upon 30 days notice and payment
of specified fees, and either party may terminate the agreement
for cause and without penalty. Following termination of the
master services agreement for any reason, DataBank is obligated
to continue to provide such services related to the termination
as we may reasonably request, but only for a period of
15 days. Any unplanned termination of our master services
agreement with DataBank or DataBanks failure to perform
its obligations under the agreement would require us to move our
secondary data center to another provider and could cause
disruptions in the continuous availability of our secondary data
center or some of our services.
Legal
Proceedings
From time to time, we have been and may be involved in various
legal proceedings arising from our ordinary course of business.
On June 15, 2009, a prospective resident of one of our
customers filed a class action lawsuit styled Minor v.
RealPage, Inc. against us in the U.S. District Court
for the Central District of California. By the parties
mutual
94
stipulation in August 2009, the action was transferred to the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
(No. 4:09CV-00439).
The plaintiff has alleged two individual claims and three
class-based
causes of action against us. Individually, the plaintiff alleges
that we (i) willfully failed to employ reasonable
procedures to ensure the maximum accuracy of our resident
screening reports as required by 15 U.S.C.
§ 1681e(b) and, in the alternative,
(ii) negligently (within the meaning of 15 U.S.C.
§ 1681o(a)) failed to employ reasonable procedures to
ensure the maximum accuracy of our resident screening reports,
as required by 15 U.S.C. § 1681e(b), in each case
stemming from our provision of a report that allegedly included
inaccurate criminal conviction information. The plaintiff seeks
actual, statutory and punitive damages on her individual claims.
In her capacity as the putative class representative, the
plaintiff also alleges that we: (i) willfully failed to
provide legally mandated disclosures upon a consumers
request inconsistent with 15 U.S.C. § 1681g;
(ii) willfully failed to provide prompt notice of
consumers disputes to the data furnishers who provided us
with the information whose accuracy was in question, as required
by 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681i(a)(2); and
(iii) willfully failed to provide prompt notice of
consumers disputes to the consumer reporting agencies
providing us with the information whose accuracy was in
question, as required by
15 U.S.C. § 1681i(f). The plaintiff seeks
certification of three separate classes in connection with these
claims. She also seeks statutory and punitive damages, a
declaration that our practices and procedures are in violation
of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and attorneys fees and
costs. Because this lawsuit is at an early stage, it is not
possible to predict its outcome. We believe that we have
meritorious defenses to the claims in this case and intend to
defend it vigorously.
In January 2007, plaintiffs filed five separate but nearly
identical class action lawsuits in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Texas against more than 100
defendants. We were named as a defendant in one of those
actions, Taylor, et al. v. Safeway, Inc., et al.
(No. 2:07-CV-00017).
On March 4, 2008, the Court consolidated these actions with
the lead case, Taylor, et al. v. Acxiom Corp., et
al.
(No. 2:07-CV-00001).
In their operative pleading, plaintiffs alleged that we obtained
and held motor vehicle records in bulk from the State of Texas,
an allegedly improper purpose in violation of the federal
Drivers Privacy Protection Act, or the DPPA. In addition,
the plaintiffs alleged that we obtained these records for the
purpose of re-selling them, another allegedly improper purpose
in violation of the DPPA. Plaintiffs further purported to
represent a putative class of approximately 20.0 million
individuals affected by the defendants alleged DPPA
violations. They sought statutory damages of $2,500 per each
violation of the DPPA, punitive damages and an order requiring
defendants to destroy information obtained in violation of the
DPPA. In September 2008, the U.S. District Court dismissed
plaintiffs complaint for failure to state a claim. The
plaintiffs subsequently appealed the dismissal to the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The primary
issue on appeal is whether plaintiffs alleged any
injury-in-fact
that would give them standing to bring their claims. Predicate
issues include whether obtaining and merely holding data states
a claim under the DPPA, and whether re-selling data likewise
states an actionable claim. In November 2009, the Fifth Circuit
heard oral argument on the appeal. In July 2010, the Fifth
Circuit affirmed the U.S. District Courts dismissal.
In March 2010, the District Attorney of Ventura County,
California issued an administrative subpoena to us seeking
certain information related to our provision of utility billing
services in the State of California. A representative of the
District Attorney has informed us that the subpoena was issued
in connection with a general investigation of industry practices
with respect to utility billing in California. Utility billing
in California is subject to regulation by state law and various
state administrative agencies, including the California Public
Utility Commission, or the CPUC, and the Division of Weights and
Measures, or the DWM. We have provided the District Attorney
with the information requested in the subpoena. As of
July 23, 2010, the District Attorneys office has not
initiated an administrative or other enforcement action against
us, nor have they asserted any violations of the applicable
regulations by us. Given the early stage of this investigation,
it is difficult to predict its outcome and whether the District
Attorney will pursue an administrative or other enforcement
action against us in the State of California and what the result
of any such action would be. However, penalties or assessments
of violations of regulations promulgated by the CPUC or DWM may
be calculated on a per occurrence basis. Due to the large number
of billing transactions we process for our customers in
California, our potential liability in an enforcement action
could be significant. If the District Attorney ultimately
pursues an administrative or other enforcement action against
us, we believe that we have meritorious defenses to the
potential claims and would defend them vigorously. However, even
if we were successful in defending against such claims, the
proceedings could result in significant costs and divert
managements attention.
95
MANAGEMENT
Executive
Officers and Directors
Our executive officers and directors and their ages and
positions as of July 15, 2010 are set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Stephen T. Winn
|
|
63
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
Timothy J. Barker
|
|
48
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
Dirk D. Wakeham
|
|
44
|
|
President
|
Margot Lebenberg
|
|
42
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
|
Ashley Chaffin Glover
|
|
38
|
|
Executive Vice President, Multifamily Solutions
|
Jason D. Lindwall
|
|
39
|
|
Chief Operations Officer
|
Alfred R. Berkeley, III
(1),(2)
|
|
65
|
|
Director
|
Richard M. Berkeley
(2),(3)
|
|
58
|
|
Director
|
Peter Gyenes
(1),(2),(3)
|
|
64
|
|
Director
|
Jeffrey T. Leeds
(3)
|
|
54
|
|
Director
|
Jason A. Wright
(1),(2),(3)
|
|
38
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Member of our audit committee. |
|
(2) |
|
Member of our compensation committee. |
|
(3) |
|
Member of our nominating and governance committee |
Stephen T. Winn has served as our Chief Executive
Officer, Chairman of the Board and a member of our board of
directors since November 1998. From November 1998 to
December 2009, Mr. Winn also served as our President. From
January 1998 to March 1999, Mr. Winn served in various
executive positions, including President of Research Institute
of America, a provider of information services to the accounting
industry and a wholly owned subsidiary of Thomson Reuters
Corporation. From June 1969 to January 1998, Mr. Winn
served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Computer
Language Research Inc., a publicly traded company focused on tax
compliance, tax research and accounting software, which was
acquired by Thomson Reuters Corporation. Mr. Winn is a
member of the board of directors of the National Multi Housing
Council. In January 2002, he was one of five people recognized
by the National Apartment Association as a leader in the
multi-family industry. Mr. Winn received his B.S. in
electrical engineering from The University of Texas at Austin
and his M.S. in management from Stanford University. In addition
to Mr. Winns role as our Chief Executive Officer, we
believe Mr. Winns qualifications to serve on our
board of directors include his previous service in executive
positions at various public and private technology companies and
his extensive experience in the multi-family rental housing
industry.
Timothy J. Barker has served as our Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer since he joined us in October 2005. Prior
to joining us, Mr. Barker served from March 2003 to
September 2005 as Chief Financial Officer of etalk Corporation,
a provider of enterprise class contact management performance
solutions. From August 2000 to March 2003, Mr. Barker
worked as an independent consultant and provided chief financial
officer consulting services to public and private companies.
From November 1995 to July 2000, Mr. Barker held various
positions at F.Y.I. Incorporated (most recently known as
SOURCECORP, Incorporated), a document and information
outsourcing solution provider, including Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Barker received
his B.B.A. in accounting from Texas Tech University and has been
a Certified Public Accountant in the state of Texas since 1985.
Dirk D. Wakeham has served as our President since
December 2009 and previously served as our Executive Vice
President, Property Solutions, from January 2009 to November
2009 and our Senior Vice President, President, LeasingDesk Risk
Mitigation Systems, from April 2007 to December 2008. Prior to
joining us in April 2007, Mr. Wakeham was the Founder,
President and Chief Executive Officer of Multifamily Internet
Ventures, LLC, which he founded in 2001 and we acquired in April
2007. He also
96
previously served as Senior Vice President at Western National
Group, where he was responsible for the management and
deployment of enterprise systems focused on the management and
operation of a diverse multi-family portfolio. Mr. Wakeham
received his B.A. in business administration from California
State University, Fullerton.
Margot Lebenberg has served as our Executive Vice
President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary since May 2010.
Since 1998, Ms. Lebenberg served as the founder and
President of Living Mountain Capital L.L.C., a business advisory
consulting firm specializing in corporate development, strategic
alliances and restructurings. From June 2004 to August 2007,
Ms. Lebenberg was Executive Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary at The Princeton Review, Inc. through its share
issuance to Bain Capital Venture Investors, LLC. From February
2003 to March 2004, Ms. Lebenberg was Executive Vice
President, General Counsel, Managing Director and Secretary at
Soundview Technology Group, Inc. through its sale to The Charles
Schwab Corporation. From November 2001 to January 2003,
Ms. Lebenberg served as Vice President, Assistant General
Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Cantor Fitzgerald and its
affiliate eSpeed, Inc., which was acquired by BGC Partners, Inc.
From May 1996 to July 2000, she was Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary of F.Y.I. Incorporated (most
recently known as SOURCECORP, Incorporated), a document and
information outsourcing solution provider. Previously she was a
business and finance attorney at Morgan, Lewis &
Bockius LLP in New York City. Ms. Lebenberg received her
B.A. in economics and history from SUNY Binghamton and her J.D.
from Fordham University School of Law.
Jason D. Lindwall has served as our Chief Operations
Officer since joining us in April 2008. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Lindwall held various positions, including Chief
Information Officer, at Aspen Square Management, Inc. from
December 1993 to February 2008. Mr. Lindwall received his
B.S. in business administration computer information systems
from Western New England College.
Ashley Chaffin Glover has served as our Executive Vice
President, Multifamily Solutions since January 2010 and
previously served as our Executive Vice President, Resident
Solutions from April 2009 to January 2010 and as our Senior
Vice President, President, Velocity Utility and Billing
Services, from March 2005 until April 2009. From November
2004 through early March 2005, Ms. Chaffin Glover served us
in a consulting capacity in conjunction with our acquisition of
The Pleco Group, LLC. From August 1995 to July 1997 and again
from August 1999 to July 2003, Ms. Chaffin Glover handled
both international and domestic assignments for
McKinsey & Company. Ms. Chaffin Glover received
her B.S. in computer science from Southern Methodist University
and her M.B.A. from Harvard University.
Alfred R. Berkeley, III has served as a member of
our board of directors since December 2003 and as Chairman of
our audit committee since January 2004. Mr. Berkeley
currently serves as the Chairman of Pipeline Financial Group,
Inc., the parent of Pipeline Trading Systems LLC, a block
trading brokerage service, which he joined in December 2003.
From December 2003 to March 2010, Mr. Berkeley also served
as the Chief Executive Officer of Pipeline Financial Group, Inc.
He also serves as Vice-Chairman of the National Infrastructure
Advisory Council for the President of the United States, a
trustee of Johns Hopkins University and a member of the Johns
Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, LLC. He formerly
served as Vice Chairman of the Nomination Evaluation Committee
for the National Medal of Technology and Innovation, which makes
candidate recommendations to the Secretary of Commerce. He was
appointed Vice Chairman of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. in July
2000, serving through July 2003, and served as President of
NASDAQ from 1996 until 2000. From 1972 to 1996,
Mr. Berkeley served in a number of capacities at Alex.
Brown & Sons Incorporated, which was acquired by
Bankers Trust New York Corporation and later by Deutsche Bank
AG. Most recently, he was Managing Director in the corporate
finance department where he financed computer software and
electronic commerce companies. He joined Alex. Brown &
Sons Incorporated as a Research Analyst in 1972 and became a
general partner in 1983. From 1985 to 1987, he served as Head of
Information Services for the firm. From 1988 to 1990,
Mr. Berkeley took a leave of absence from Alex.
Brown & Sons Incorporated to serve as President and
Chief Executive Officer of Rabbit Software Inc., a public
telecommunications software company. He served as a captain in
the United States Air Force and a major in the United States Air
Force Reserve. Mr. Berkeley also served as a director of
Webex Communications, Inc., which was acquired by Cisco Systems,
Inc. (NASDAQ: CSCO) in May 2007. Mr. Berkeley also served
as a director of Kintera, Inc. until May 2008, when it was
acquired by Blackbaud,
97
Inc. (NASDAQ: BLKB). Mr. Berkeley served as a director of
the National Research Exchange, Inc., a registered broker
dealer, until it ceased operations in December 2007.
Mr. Berkeley currently serves on the board of directors of
ACI Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: ACIW). Mr. Berkeley also
serves as a director of several private companies.
Mr. Berkeley received his B.A. in English from the
University of Virginia and his M.B.A. from The Wharton School of
the University of Pennsylvania. We believe
Mr. Berkeleys qualifications to serve on our board of
directors include his extensive experience in corporate finance
and securities matters, including his experience as Chief
Executive Officer of various companies and his leadership
positions with the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc., and his knowledge
gained from service on the boards of various public and private
companies and federal committees.
Richard M. Berkeley has served as a member of our board
of directors since December 2005, as a member of each of our
compensation committee and nominating and governance committee
since May 2007 and as Chairman of our nominating and governance
committee since February 2010. Mr. Berkeley is a member of
Camden Partners Holdings, LLC, where he focuses on investments
in the business and financial services, health care and
education markets for the firm. Prior to joining Camden Partners
in October 2002, Mr. Berkeley spent 19 years with
Alex. Brown & Sons Incorporated and its successor
organizations, Bankers Trust New York Corporation and
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., where he was responsible for the
origination, structuring and consummation of private equity
financings for public and private companies. He currently serves
on the board of directors of a number of private companies,
educational institutions and charitable organizations.
Mr. Berkeley served as an officer in the United States Air
Force between 1974 and 1976. He received his B.A. in
history, J.D. and M.B.A. from the University of Virginia.
We believe Mr. Berkeleys qualifications to serve on
our board of directors include his extensive business experience
and knowledge in equity financings.
Peter Gyenes has served as a member or our board of
directors since January 2010. Mr. Gyenes has served as the
non-executive Chairman of the board of directors of Sophos plc,
a global security software company, since May 2006.
Mr. Gyenes served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of Ascential Software Corporation (NASDAQ: ASCL), a market
leader in data integration software, and its predecessor
companies VMark Software, Ardent Software and Informix from 1996
until it was acquired by International Business Machines
Corporation in 2005. He currently serves on the boards of
directors of Lawson Software, Inc. (NASDAQ: LWSN), Netezza
Corporation (NYSE: NZ), Pegasystems Inc. (NASDAQ: PEGA) and
VistaPrint Limited (NASDAQ: VPRT), as well as several private
companies, and serves as trustee emeritus of the Massachusetts
Technology Leadership Council. Mr. Gyenes previously served
on the board of directors of webMethods Inc. (NASDAQ: WEBM)
(acquired by Software AG Darmstadt) from 2005 to 2007, Applix,
Inc. (NASDAQ: APLX) (acquired by Cognos, Inc.) from 2000 to 2007
and BladeLogic, Inc. (NASDAQ: BLOG) (acquired by BMC Software,
Inc.) from 2006 to 2008. Mr. Gyenes received his B.A. in
mathematics and his M.B.A. in marketing from Columbia
University. We believe Mr. Gyenes qualifications to
serve on our board of directors include his experience as the
Chief Executive Officer of a publicly traded company, his
knowledge gained from service on the boards of various public
and private companies and his more than 40 years of
experience in technology, sales, marketing and general
management positions within the computer systems and software
industry.
Jeffrey T. Leeds has served as a member of our board of
directors and a member of our nominating and governance
committee since December 1999. He is President and Co-Founder of
Leeds Equity Partners, LLC, which he co-founded in 1993, a
private equity firm that focuses on the education, information
services and training industries. Prior to co-founding Leeds
Equity Partners, Mr. Leeds spent seven years specializing
in mergers and acquisitions and corporate finance at Lazard
Freres & Co. LLC, a subsidiary of Lazard Group LLC.
Prior to joining Lazard Freres & Co. LLC,
Mr. Leeds served as a law clerk to the Hon. William J.
Brennan, Jr. of the Supreme Court of the United States
during the 1985 October Term. Mr. Leeds also worked in
the corporate department of the law firm of Cravath,
Swaine & Moore LLP in New York after graduating from
law school. Mr. Leeds currently serves on the board of
directors of Education Management Corporation (NASDAQ: EDMC),
Instituto de Banca y Comercio and SeatonCorp. and as a
Trustee on the United Federation of Teachers Charter
School Board in New York City. Mr. Leeds received his B.A.
in history summa cum laude from Yale University and his
J.D. from Harvard Law School. He was also a Marshall
98
Scholar at the University of Oxford. We believe
Mr. Leeds qualifications to serve on our board of
directors include his extensive business and legal experience in
corporate finance and his knowledge gained from service on the
boards of various public and private companies.
Jason A. Wright has served as a member or our board of
directors since December 2003 and as the Chairman of our
compensation committee since October 2006 and a member of our
audit committee since January 2004. Mr. Wright is a partner
in the Tech & Telecom Group at Apax Partners LLC,
where he focuses primarily on investments in enterprise software
and technology-enabled services. Prior to joining Apax in 2000,
Mr. Wright served in a variety of roles at General Electric
Capital Corporation, a subsidiary of General Electric
Corporation, including the evaluation and execution of
investment opportunities for the Technology Ventures Group, and
Mr. Wright was also a consultant at Andersen Consulting,
now Accenture plc. Mr. Wright currently serves on the board
of directors of various private companies. Mr. Wright
received his B.A. in economics from Tufts University and his
M.B.A. in finance from The Wharton School of the University of
Pennsylvania. We believe Mr. Wrights qualifications
to serve on our board of directors include his extensive
business and financial experience related to enterprise software
and technology-enabled services companies.
Our executive officers are elected by, and serve at the
discretion of, our board of directors. Certain of our
stockholders who beneficially own shares representing
approximately 97.1% of our outstanding capital stock as of
June 30, 2010 have entered into a shareholders agreement
that, among other things, provides for the voting of their
shares with respect to the constituency of our board of
directors. See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions 2010 Shareholders Agreement
for further description of this agreement. The current members
of our board of directors have been elected by our stockholders
voting in accordance with the terms of this agreement, which
will terminate upon completion of this offering.
With the exception of Alfred R. Berkeley, III and Richard
M. Berkeley, who are brothers, there are no family relationships
among any of our directors or executive officers.
In addition to the information presented above regarding each
directors specific experience, qualifications, attributes
and skills that led our board of directors to the conclusion
that each should serve as a director, we also believe that all
of our directors have demonstrated business acumen, ethical
integrity and an ability to exercise sound judgment, as well as
a commitment of service to us and our board of directors.
Board of
Directors
Our board of directors currently consists of six members. At
each annual meeting of stockholders, our directors will be
elected for a one-year term until their successors are elected
and qualified, or until their earlier resignation or removal.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our
amended and restated bylaws, to be effective upon the completion
of this offering, will provide that the number of our directors
will be fixed from time to time by a resolution of the majority
of our board of directors. Nine directors are currently
authorized.
Director
Independence
In February 2010, our board of directors undertook a review of
the independence of our directors and considered whether any
director has a material relationship with us that could
compromise his or her ability to exercise independent judgment
in carrying out his or her responsibilities. As a result of this
review, our board of directors determined that Alfred R.
Berkeley, III, Richard M. Berkeley, Jeffrey T. Leeds, Jason A.
Wright and Peter Gyenes, representing five of our six directors
currently in office, are independent directors as
defined under the rules of the SEC and the NASDAQ Global Market,
or NASDAQ, and constitute a majority of independent directors of
our board of directors as required by the rules of the SEC and
NASDAQ.
Board
Leadership Structure
Our board of directors believes that our Chief Executive
Officer, Stephen T. Winn, is best situated to serve as Chairman
of the Board because he is the director most familiar with our
business and industry, and
99
most capable of effectively identifying strategic priorities
and leading the discussion and execution of strategy. Our
independent directors have different perspectives and roles in
strategic development. Our independent directors bring
experience, oversight and expertise from outside the company and
industry, while our Chief Executive Officer brings
company-specific experience and expertise. Our board of
directors believes that the combined role of Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board promotes strategy development
and execution, and facilitates information flow between
management and our board of directors, which are essential to
effective governance. We do not have a lead independent director.
Our board of directors oversees risk management in a number of
ways. Our audit committee oversees the management of financial
and accounting related risks as an integral part of it duties.
Similarly, our compensation committee considers risk management
when setting the compensation policies and programs for our
executive officers and other employees. Our full board of
directors receives reports on various risk related items at each
of its regular meetings including risks related to intellectual
property, taxes, products and employees. Our board of directors
also receives periodic reports on our efforts to manage such
risks through insurance or self-insurance.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
Our board of directors has an audit committee, a compensation
committee and a nominating and governance committee, each of
which has the composition and responsibilities described below.
Audit
Committee
Our audit committee is responsible for, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
selecting and hiring our independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
approving the audit and non-audit services to be performed by
our independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
evaluating the qualifications, performance and independence of
our independent auditors;
|
|
|
|
monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our
compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate
to financial statements or accounting matters;
|
|
|
|
reviewing the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control
policies and procedures;
|
|
|
|
discussing the scope and results of the audit with the
independent auditors and reviewing with management and the
independent auditors our interim and year-end operating results;
|
|
|
|
preparing the audit committee report required in this prospectus
and in our annual proxy statement; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing and evaluating, at least annually, its own performance
and that of its members, including compliance with the committee
charter.
|
Our audit committee is currently composed of Alfred R.
Berkeley, III, Jason A. Wright and Peter Gyenes.
Mr. Berkeley has been appointed the Chairman of our audit
committee. Our board of directors has determined that each
member of our audit committee is independent under the
applicable requirements of NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations.
Our board of directors has determined that each member of our
audit committee meets the requirements for financial literacy
and sophistication, and qualifies as an audit committee
financial expert, under the applicable requirements of
NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations.
Our board of directors has adopted an audit committee charter.
We believe that the composition of our audit committee, and our
audit committees charter and functioning, will comply with
the applicable requirements of NASDAQ and SEC rules and
regulations. We intend to comply with future requirements to the
extent they become applicable to us.
Following the completion of this offering, the full text of our
audit committee charter will be posted on the investor relations
portion of our website at
http://www.realpage.com
and will be available without charge, upon request in writing to
RealPage, Inc., 4000 International Parkway, Carrollton, Texas
75007, Attn: Chief Legal Officer.
100
Compensation
Committee
Our compensation committee is responsible for, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant
to compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other
executive officers;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and approving the following for our Chief Executive
Officer and our other executive officers: annual base salaries,
annual incentive bonuses, including the specific goals and
amounts, equity compensation, employment agreements, severance
arrangements and change in control arrangements and any other
benefits, compensation or arrangements;
|
|
|
|
reviewing the succession planning for our executive officers;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and recommending compensation goals and bonus and
stock compensation criteria for our employees;
|
|
|
|
reviewing and recommending compensation programs for outside
directors;
|
|
|
|
preparing the compensation discussion and analysis and
compensation committee report that the SEC requires in our
annual proxy statement;
|
|
|
|
administering, reviewing and making recommendations with respect
to our equity compensation plans; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing and evaluating, at least annually, its own performance
and that of its members, including compliance with the committee
charter.
|
Our compensation committee is currently composed of Jason A.
Wright, Alfred R. Berkeley, III, Richard M. Berkeley and
Peter Gyenes, each of whom is a non-employee member of our board
of directors. Mr. Gyenes has been appointed to serve as the
Chairman of our compensation committee. Our board of directors
has determined that each member of our compensation committee is
independent under the applicable requirements of NASDAQ and SEC
rules and regulations, is a non-employee director, as defined by
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, or the Exchange Act, and is an outside director, as
defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code.
Our board of directors has adopted a compensation committee
charter. We believe that the composition of our compensation
committee, and our compensation committees charter and
functioning, will comply with the applicable requirements of
NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations. We intend to comply with
future requirements to the extent they become applicable to us.
Following the completion of this offering, the full text of our
compensation committee charter will be posted on the investor
relations portion of our web site at
http://www.realpage.com
and will be available without charge, upon request in writing to
RealPage, Inc., 4000 International Parkway, Carrollton, Texas
75007, Attn: Chief Legal Officer.
Nominating
and Governance Committee
Our nominating and governance committee is responsible for,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
assisting our board of directors in identifying prospective
director nominees and recommending nominees for each annual
meeting of stockholders to the board of directors;
|
|
|
|
reviewing developments in corporate governance practices and
developing and recommending governance principles applicable to
our board of directors;
|
|
|
|
overseeing the evaluation of our board of directors and
management;
|
|
|
|
recommending members for each board committee to our board of
directors; reviewing and monitoring our code of business conduct
and ethics and actual and potential conflicts of interest of
members of our board of directors and officers; and
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
reviewing and evaluating, at least annually, its own performance
and that of its members, including compliance with the committee
charter.
|
Our nominating and governance committee is currently composed of
Richard M. Berkeley, Peter Gyenes, Jeffrey T. Leeds and Jason A.
Wright. Mr. Berkeley has been appointed the Chairman of our
nominating and governance committee. Our board of directors has
determined that each member of our nominating and governance
committee is independent under the applicable requirements of
NASDAQ and SEC rules and regulations.
Our board of directors has adopted a nominating and governance
committee charter. We believe that the composition of our
nominating and governance committee, and our nominating and
governance committees charter and functioning, will comply
with the applicable requirements of NASDAQ and SEC rules and
regulations. We intend to comply with future requirements to the
extent they become applicable to us.
Following the completion of this offering, the full text of our
nominating and governance committee charter will be posted on
the investor relations portion of our website at
http://www.realpage.com
and will be available without charge, upon request in writing to
RealPage, Inc., 4000 International Parkway, Carrollton, Texas
75007, Attn: Chief Legal Officer.
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics
Our board of directors has adopted a code of business conduct
and ethics. The code applies to all of our employees, officers
(including our principal executive officer, principal financial
officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons
performing similar functions), including directors and
consultants. Following the completion of this offering, the full
text of our code of business conduct and ethics will be posted
on the investor relations portion of our website at
http://www.realpage.com
and will be available without charge, upon request in writing to
RealPage, Inc., 4000 International Parkway, Carrollton, Texas
75007, Attn: Chief Legal Officer. We intend to disclose future
amendments to certain provisions of our code of business conduct
and ethics, or waivers of such provisions, applicable to any
principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller, or persons
performing similar functions or our directors on our website.
The inclusion of our website address in this prospectus does not
include or incorporate by reference the information on our
website into this prospectus.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of our compensation committee is an officer
or employee of our company. None of our executive officers
currently serves, or in the past year has served, as a member of
the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity
that has one or more executive officers serving on our board of
directors or compensation committee.
Director
Compensation
Historically, we have not paid any cash compensation to our
directors for their services as directors or as members of
committees of our board of directors. We have instead granted
options to our non-employee directors who are not affiliated
with our major stockholders as set forth below. However,
effective April 1, 2010, we will provide our independent
directors with both cash and equity compensation as described
below.
Stock
Option Grants to Alfred R. Berkeley, III
On January 9, 2004, we granted an option to purchase
125,000 shares of our common stock to Alfred R. Berkeley,
III at an exercise price of $2.00. Mr. Berkeley exercised
this option on June 28, 2007 and the shares of our common
stock acquired by Mr. Berkeley upon such exercise are fully
vested.
On March 11, 2005, we granted an option to purchase
50,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Berkeley at
an exercise price of $2.00. Mr. Berkeley exercised this
option on June 28, 2007 and the shares of our common stock
acquired by Mr. Berkeley upon such exercise are fully
vested.
102
On December 17, 2008, we granted an option to purchase
25,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Berkeley at
an exercise price of $6.00. Mr. Berkeley exercised this
option in November and December 2009. We have a right to
repurchase all shares acquired upon exercise of the option,
which repurchase right expires as to one forty-eighth of the
shares issued upon exercise of the stock option on the last day
of each month beginning in January 2009, subject to
Mr. Berkeleys continued service through each
applicable date.
Stock
Option Grants to Peter Gyenes
On December 18, 2009, we granted a contingent option to
purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock to Peter Gyenes
at an exercise price of $6.00. The contingencies of the grant
were satisfied and the grant became effective on
December 29, 2009. This grant was subsequently cancelled
and terminated and replaced by a grant to Peter Gyenes of an
option to purchase 60,000 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $7.50 on February 25, 2010. The stock
option vests with respect to 5% of the shares subject to the
stock option each quarter commencing on the first day of the
calendar quarter immediately following the grant date for 15
consecutive quarters and, with respect to the remaining 25% of
the shares subject to the stock option, on the first day of the
next following calendar quarter, subject to continued service
through each applicable date. In the event of a change of
control, as defined in the stock option agreement with
Mr. Gyenes, all of the options subject to the agreement
will become fully vested and exercisable.
Independent
Director Compensation Plan
In February 2010, our compensation committee approved the
following compensation plan for our independent directors, which
became effective April 1, 2010. Our stockholders approved
the independent director compensation plan in March 2010.
The term independent directors for purposes of our
independent director compensation plan will be as defined in our
Fifth Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, dated as of
June 7, 2010, prior to the effectiveness of the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and
will be as defined by our board of directors following
effectiveness.
|
|
|
Retainer
|
|
$6,000 per quarter
|
Audit committee chair retainer
|
|
$4,500 per quarter
|
Audit committee member (excluding chair) retainer
|
|
$3,000 per quarter
|
Other board committee chair retainer
|
|
$3,000 per quarter
|
Other committee member (excluding chair) retainer
|
|
$1,500 per quarter
|
Annual equity grant
|
|
$50,000 restricted stock
value(1)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The forfeiture provision of each annual restricted stock grant
will lapse with respect to 5% of the restricted shares subject
to the grant each quarter commencing on the first day of the
calendar quarter immediately following the grant date for 15
consecutive quarters and the forfeiture provision will lapse
with respect to the remaining 25% of the restricted shares
subject to the grant on the first day of the next following
calendar quarter, subject to the continuous service of the
director through each applicable date. |
On May 12, 2010, we issued 6,666 restricted shares of our
common stock to each of Alfred R. Berkeley, III and Peter
Gyenes pursuant to our independent director compensation plan.
103
Director
Compensation Table for Year Ended December 31,
2009
The following table sets forth the annual director compensation
paid or accrued by us to individuals who were directors during
any part of 2009. The table excludes Mr. Winn, who is our
Chief Executive Officer and who did not receive any compensation
from us in his role as director in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned or
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Paid in Cash ($)
|
|
Awards
($)(1)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Alfred R. Berkeley, III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard M. Berkeley
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Gyenes
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
158,257
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
158,257
|
|
Jeffrey T. Leeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jason A. Wright
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 8 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009 for a discussion of assumptions made in
determining the grant date fair value of our stock option awards. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Reflects contingent grant to Mr. Gyenes of options to
purchase 50,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise
price of $6.00 per share on December 18, 2009. The
contingencies of the grant were satisfied and the grant became
effective on December 29, 2009. This grant was subsequently
cancelled and terminated and replaced by a grant to
Mr. Gyenes of options to purchase 60,000 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $7.50 on February 25,
2010. The aggregate grant date fair value of this subsequent
grant computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 is $222,589. |
104
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The following discussion and analysis of compensation
arrangements of our principal executive officer, principal
financial officer and each of the next three most highly
compensated executive officers, referred to as our named
executive officers, for 2009 should be read together with the
compensation tables and related disclosures that follow this
discussion.
Compensation
Philosophy and Objectives
Our philosophy is to provide compensation to each of our named
executive officers that is commensurate with his or her position
and experience, furnish incentives sufficient for the named
executive officer to meet and exceed short-term and long-term
corporate objectives as determined by our board of directors and
align the named executive officers incentives with the
long-term interests of our stockholders. Additionally, our
executive compensation program is intended to provide
significant motivation for our named executive officers to
remain employed by us unless and until our board of directors
finds that retention of the named executive officer is no longer
in accord with our corporate objectives.
Based on this philosophy, the primary objectives of our board of
directors and compensation committee with respect to executive
compensation are to:
|
|
|
|
|
attract, retain and motivate skilled and knowledgeable executive
talent;
|
|
|
|
ensure that executive compensation is aligned with our corporate
strategies and business objectives; and
|
|
|
|
align the incentives of the named executive officers with the
creation of value for stockholders.
|
To achieve these objectives, our compensation committee
periodically evaluates our executive compensation program with
the goal of establishing compensation at levels our compensation
committee believes to be competitive with those of our
competitive peer group companies and other companies in our
geographical regions that compete with us for executive talent.
Additionally, we design our executive compensation program to
tie a portion of each named executive officers overall
cash compensation to key strategic, financial and operational
goals set by our board of directors.
Compensation
Decision-Making Process
Our compensation committee is responsible for overseeing and
approving our executive compensation program. Our compensation
committee currently consists of four members. The current
members of our compensation committee are Jason A. Wright,
Alfred R. Berkeley, III, Richard M. Berkeley and Peter
Gyenes. Mr. Gyenes has been appointed to serve as the
Chairman of our compensation committee. Our board of directors
has determined that each member of our compensation committee is
independent under the applicable requirements of NASDAQ and SEC
rules and regulations, is a non-employee director, as defined by
Rule 16b-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act and is an outside director,
as defined pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. For a discussion of the
specific responsibilities of our compensation committee, see
Management Committees of the Board of
Directors Compensation Committee.
Our Chief Executive Officer makes base salary, cash bonus and
long-term incentive compensation recommendations to the
compensation committee for each of our named executive officers
based on his or her level of responsibility, performance and
contribution to achieving our overall corporate objectives. Our
compensation committee considers the Chief Executive
Officers input but retains complete authority to approve
all compensation related decisions for our named executive
officers. Additionally, our Chief Executive Officer is not
permitted to be present during deliberations or voting by the
compensation committee regarding his performance goals,
performance evaluation or compensation level and abstains from
voting in sessions where our board of directors acts on the
compensation committees recommendations regarding his
compensation.
105
For purposes of determining compensation levels for our named
executive officers, our compensation committee considers the
recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer, our overall
achievement of corporate objectives, the level of
responsibility, performance and individual contributions of our
named executive officers, each named executive officers
equity ownership and the compensation committee members
own experience in compensation-related matters. For purposes of
evaluating compensation levels for 2009 and 2010, our
compensation committee also considered competitive market
benchmarking data as described in Executive
Compensation Competitive Positioning. Based on
these considerations, our compensation committee approved
compensation packages for each of our named executive officers
in 2009 and 2010, the components of which are further described
in Executive Compensation Compensation
Components.
In February 2010, our board of directors approved a new
compensation committee charter in anticipation of our initial
public offering, and our compensation committee approved 2010
salaries for our named executive officers and our 2010
Management Incentive Plan.
Competitive
Positioning
Our compensation committee has the authority to engage outside
consultants from time to time, as the committee sees fit, to
conduct market reviews of our executive compensation program and
philosophy in order to assess the competitiveness of our
program. In the third quarter of 2008, our compensation
committee engaged Mercer LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., or Mercer, a global
human resources and financial services consulting firm, to
conduct an independent market review of our executive
compensation program. To analyze our executive compensation
program, Mercer used two public company market references to
compare our total compensation practices for our executives to
those in our market:
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly Held Companies Surveys. Two private
surveys regarding executive compensation in the technology
industry, the Watson Wyatt Executive Compensation Survey and the
Towers Perrin Executive Compensation Survey; and
|
|
|
|
Select Peer Group. Publicly available data for
a competitive peer group of publicly traded on demand software
and services companies of similar size experiencing rapid
revenue growth comparable to ours with total employees in the
range of 500 to 1,000, or the Select Peer Group.
|
The Select Peer Group was developed in consultation between our
compensation committee, our management team and Mercer and
consisted of the following organizations:
|
|
|
Blackboard Inc.
|
|
RightNow Technologies
|
DealerTrack Holdings, Inc.
|
|
NetSuite Inc.
|
Kenexa Corporation
|
|
Unica Corporation
|
Ultimate Software Group, Inc.
|
|
Callidus Software Inc.
|
Omniture, Inc.
|
|
athenahealth, Inc
|
Concur Technologies, Inc.
|
|
SuccessFactors, Inc.
|
Taleo Corporation
|
|
Constant Contact, Inc.
|
SumTotal Systems, Inc.
|
|
DemandTec, Inc.
|
Mercer benchmarked our 2008 executive compensation levels,
including base salaries, performance-based cash bonuses and
long-term equity incentive awards, to those of other executives
in the Select Peer Group where sufficient peer proxy data was
available and against the Publicly Held Companies Surveys where
insufficient peer proxy data was available and reported their
findings to the compensation committee. The Mercer analysis
indicated that the base salaries and the target
performance-based cash bonuses of each of our named executive
officers who were employed by us in 2008 were generally
consistent with market median levels with the exception that our
Chief Executive Officers target performance-based cash
bonus was in the 25th percentile. Additionally, the Mercer
analysis indicated that our long-term equity incentive levels
were below the 25th percentile.
106
In 2009, our compensation committee did not engage outside
consultants to conduct an independent market review of our
executive compensation program. However, our Chief Executive
Officer reviewed publicly available compensation data for the
Select Peer Group. For purposes of evaluating compensation
levels for 2009 and 2010, our compensation committee considered
Mercers analysis and our Chief Executive Officers
review of publicly available information for the Select Peer
Group but did not target any specific percentile rank with
respect to any of our compensation components in determining
appropriate compensation levels for our named executive
officers. In each of 2009 and 2010, this competitive market
benchmarking data was one of many factors considered by our
compensation committee in determining appropriate compensation
levels for our named executive officers.
Compensation
Components
Base
Salaries
Base salaries are used to recognize the experience, skills,
knowledge and responsibilities required of all our named
executive officers. Base salaries for our named executive
officers have typically been negotiated as a part of the
employment agreements with our named executive officers at the
outset of employment. However, from time to time, at the
discretion of our compensation committee and consistent with our
executive compensation program objectives, base salaries for our
named executive officers, together with other components of
compensation, are evaluated for adjustment based on an
assessment of the overall achievement of corporate objectives,
each named executive officers sustained performance and
compensation trends in our industry. Each named executive
officers employment agreement requires that his or her
base salary be reviewed no less frequently than annually;
however, none of our named executive officers has an employment
agreement that provides for automatic or scheduled increases in
base salary.
In December 2008, our compensation committee conducted a
review of our executive compensation program for purposes of
evaluating compensation levels for our executives for 2009.
Based on the considerations described above in Executive
Compensation Compensation Decision-Making
Process, our compensation committee approved base salary
increases to be effective as of January 1, 2009 for each of
our named executive officers except for our Chief Executive
Officer. The percentage increase for each named executive
officer was based on our compensation committees
assessment of the various considerations described above. In the
case of Mr. Wakeham and Ms. Chaffin Glover, the
increase in base salary was primarily due to the named executive
officers increased responsibilities associated with
promotions. Our compensation committee did not increase our
Chief Executive Officers base salary for 2009 because of
the substantial incentive provided by our Chief Executive
Officers significant ownership of our common stock. The
table below shows base salaries for our named executive officers
for 2008 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Base
|
|
2009 Base
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Current Title
|
|
Salary(1)
|
|
Salary(2)
|
|
% Increase
|
|
Stephen T. Winn
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy J. Barker
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
285,000
|
|
|
|
315,000
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Dirk D. Wakeham
|
|
President(3)
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Ashley Chaffin Glover
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Multifamily
Solutions(5)
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
18.2
|
|
William E.
Van Valkenberg(7)
|
|
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects base salary at end of 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects base salary at beginning of 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Wakeham assumed the title and responsibilities of
President in January 2010. He served as our Executive Vice
President, Property Solutions, from April 2009 to January 2010
and as our Senior Vice President, President, LeasingDesk Risk
Mitigation Systems, for prior periods in 2009. |
107
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Wakehams salary was increased from $260,000 to
$300,000 effective April 1, 2009 in connection with his
promotion to Executive Vice President, Property Solutions. |
|
(5) |
|
Ms. Chaffin Glover assumed the title and responsibilities
of Executive Vice President, Multifamily Solutions in January
2010. She served as our Executive Vice President, Resident
Solutions from April 2009 to January 2010 and as our Senior Vice
President, President, Velocity Utility and Billing Services, for
prior periods in 2009. |
|
(6) |
|
Ms. Chaffin Glovers salary was increased from
$260,000 to $300,000 effective April 1, 2009 in connection
with her promotion to Executive Vice President, Resident
Solutions. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Van Valkenberg commenced his employment with us in
September 2009 after providing consulting services to us from
June 2009 to September 2009. Mr. Van Valkenbergs
employment with us ended and he ceased to be an executive
officer effective as of May 11, 2010. |
In February 2010, our compensation committee conducted a review
of our executive compensation program for purposes of evaluating
compensation levels for our executives for 2010. Based on the
considerations described above in Executive
Compensation Compensation Decision-Making
Process, our compensation committee approved base salary
increases to be effective as of January 1, 2010 for each of
our named executive officers except for our Chief Executive
Officer. The percentage increase for each named executive
officer was based on our compensation committees
assessment of the various considerations described above. In the
case of Mr. Wakeham and Ms. Chaffin Glover, the
increase in base salary was primarily due to the named executive
officers increased responsibilities associated with
promotions. Our compensation committee again did not increase
our Chief Executive Officers base salary for 2010 because
of the substantial incentive provided by our Chief Executive
Officers significant ownership of our common stock. The
table below shows base salaries for our named executive officers
for fiscal 2009 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Base
|
|
2010 Base
|
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Title
|
|
Salary(1)
|
|
Salary(2)
|
|
% Increase
|
|
Stephen T. Winn
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy J. Barker
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
315,000
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
Dirk D. Wakeham
|
|
President(3)
|
|
|
300,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
330,000
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
Ashley Chaffin Glover
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Multifamily
Solutions(5)
|
|
|
300,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
320,000
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
William E.
Van Valkenberg(7)
|
|
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Reflects base salary at the end of 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects base salary at beginning of 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
Mr. Wakeham assumed the title and responsibilities of
President in January 2010. He served as our Executive Vice
President, Property Solutions, from April 2009 to January 2010
and as our Senior Vice President, President, LeasingDesk Risk
Mitigation Systems, for prior periods in 2009. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Wakehams salary was increased from $260,000 to
$300,000 effective April 1, 2009 in connection with his
promotion to Executive Vice President, Property Solutions. |
|
(5) |
|
Ms. Chaffin Glover assumed the title and responsibilities
of Executive Vice President, Multifamily Solutions in January
2010. She served as our Executive Vice President, Resident
Solutions from April 2009 to January 2010 and as our Senior Vice
President, President, Velocity Utility and Billing Services, for
prior periods in 2009. |
|
(6) |
|
Ms. Chaffin Glovers salary was increased from
$260,000 to $300,000 effective April 1, 2009 in connection
with her promotion to Executive Vice President, Resident
Solutions. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Van Valkenberg commenced his employment with us in
September 2009 after providing consulting services to us from
June 2009 to September 2009. Mr. Van Valkenbergs
employment with us ended and he ceased to be an executive
officer effective as of May 11, 2010. |
108
Performance-Based
Cash Bonuses
Our named executive officers participate in our annual
non-equity management incentive plan, or management incentive
plan, along with our other senior managers. Our annual
management incentive plan is intended to provide cash
compensation to our named executive officers and senior managers
for their contribution to the achievement of our strategic,
operational and financial objectives. Our named executive
officers earn amounts under our management incentive plan based
on our achievement of financial performance objectives,
including overall corporate revenue and adjusted EBITDA targets
and product family specific revenue and profit targets for those
participants of our management incentive plan that have direct
responsibility over the operations specific to one of our
product families, and an assessment of the named executive
officers individual performance. For purposes of the
management incentive plan, adjusted EBITDA is calculated the
same as Adjusted EBITDA as described in footnote 5 to the
table in Selected Consolidated Financial Data except
that purchase accounting adjustments are also added back. Our
compensation committee approves a management incentive plan each
year that outlines overall corporate objectives for the fiscal
year in addition to establishing guidelines for calculating
management incentive plan bonuses in the event that performance
objectives are partially achieved or exceeded.
A portion of our management incentive plan bonuses are typically
paid out quarterly based on progression towards the annual
achievement of performance objectives. The actual annual cash
bonus paid to participants under our management incentive plan
with respect to a particular fiscal year is adjusted at year end
based on actual achievement of both financial and individual
performance objectives. We do not have any formal or informal
policies regarding the adjustment or recovery of bonus payments
made under the management incentive plan in the event a relevant
performance objective upon which the payment was made is not
ultimately achieved.
Under the management incentive plan for 2009, or the 2009
Management Incentive Plan, the target bonus for Mr. Winn
was 75% of Mr. Winns base salary with a maximum bonus
potential of 200% of Mr. Winns target bonus for
achieving financial and individual performance objectives in
excess of the targets and a minimum bonus potential of 0% of
Mr. Winns target bonus. The 2009 Management Incentive
Plan target bonus for each other named executive officer was 50%
of the named executive officers base salary with a maximum
bonus potential of 200% of the named executive officers
target bonus for achieving financial and individual performance
objectives in excess of the targets and a minimum bonus
potential of 0% of the named executive officers target
bonus. Our 2009 revenue target was approximately 30% higher than
our 2008 target while our 2009 adjusted EBITDA target was
approximately 100% higher than our 2008 target. The compensation
committee believed that the 2009 targets were challenging, but
attainable, based on the increases in our revenue and adjusted
EBITDA in 2008 relative to 2007 and directly aligned our named
executive officers short-term incentives with the creation
of long-term stockholder value. Our compensation committee had
sole discretion to adjust targets and awards under the 2009
Management Incentive Plan for significant, non-controllable
circumstances that were not included in our 2009 operating plan;
however, our compensation committee did not exercise such
discretion under the 2009 Management Incentive Plan. For each of
Messrs. Winn, Barker and Van Valkenberg, the achievement of
2009 bonus targets for overall corporate revenue, overall
corporate adjusted EBITDA and individual performance ratings
were weighted 30%, 45% and 25%, respectively. We weighted the
individual 2009 Management Incentive Plans more heavily toward
achieving adjusted EBITDA over revenue targets for
Messrs. Winn, Barker and Van Valkenberg because we believe
that increases in adjusted EBITDA will drive our long-term
success and result in greater opportunity for profit in the
future. For Ms. Chaffin Glover and Mr. Wakeham, the
achievement of 2009 Management Incentive Plan bonus targets for
revenue, adjusted EBITDA and individual performance ratings were
weighted 50% (of which, 15% was based on overall corporate
performance and 35% was based on the performance of operations
under the named executive officers direct management), 25%
(of which, 10% was based on overall corporate performance and
15% was based on the performance of operations under the named
executive officers direct management) and 25%,
respectively. We weighted the individual 2009 Management
Incentive Plans for Ms. Chaffin Glover and Mr. Wakeham
more heavily toward achieving revenue over adjusted EBITDA
because we believe that the positions held by Ms. Chaffin
Glover and Mr. Wakeham have more direct influence over
revenue performance than our other named executive officers.
Additionally, we weighted
109
the performance of the operations under these named executive
officers direct management over our overall corporate
performance in order to motivate and incentivize the named
executive officers to drive growth in operations under their
direct management.
The charts below set forth our 2009 Management Incentive
Plans overall corporate internal revenue and adjusted
EBITDA performance targets, the revenue and percentage of target
revenue actually achieved and the adjusted EBITDA and percentage
of target adjusted EBITDA actually achieved.
|
|
Note: |
The 2009 Management Incentive Plan results are different from
similar metrics disclosed elsewhere in this registration
statement as they were based on preliminary results and included
add backs for purchase accounting and other one-time adjustments
related to license fees billed at the initial order date. For
2009 Management Incentive Plan purposes, the license fees billed
at the initial order date are recognized on a straight-line
basis over the contractual term. For GAAP reporting purposes,
license fees billed at the initial order date are recognized as
revenue on a straight-line basis over the longer of the
contractual term or the period in which the customer is expected
to benefit, which we consider to be four years.
|
The following table summarizes the actual bonuses paid to our
named executive officers pursuant to the 2009 Management
Incentive Plan based on achievement of 2009 performance
objectives as compared to each named executive officers
target bonuses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Actual Bonus as
|
|
|
Target
|
|
Actual
|
|
a Percent of
|
Executive
|
|
Bonus ($)
|
|
Bonus ($)
|
|
Target Bonus
|
|
Stephen T. Winn
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
246,765
|
|
|
|
82.3
|
%
|
Timothy J. Barker
|
|
|
157,500
|
|
|
|
149,240
|
|
|
|
94.8
|
|
Dirk D. Wakeham
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
131,585
|
|
|
|
87.7
|
|
Ashley Chaffin Glover
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
120,335
|
|
|
|
80.2
|
|
William E.
Van Valkenberg(1)
|
|
|
40,685
|
|
|
|
34,878
|
|
|
|
85.7
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Mr. Van Valkenberg commenced his employment with us in
September 2009. Mr. Van Valkenbergs annual bonus
opportunity under the 2009 Management Incentive Plan was subject
to proration based on the actual number of days he was employed
by us during 2009. Mr. Van Valkenbergs employment
with us ended and he ceased to be an executive officer effective
as of May 11, 2010. |
The Management Incentive Plan for 2010, or the 2010 Management
Incentive Plan, was approved by our compensation committee in
February 2010 and revised in May 2010. The 2010 Management
Incentive Plan target bonus for Mr. Winn is 100% of
Mr. Winns base salary with a maximum bonus potential
of 200% of Mr. Winns target bonus for achieving
financial and individual performance objectives in excess of the
targets and a minimum bonus potential of 0% of
Mr. Winns target bonus. The 2010 Management Incentive
Plan target bonus for Ms. Chaffin Glover and
Messrs. Barker and Van Valkenberg is 50% of the named
executive officers base salary with a maximum bonus
potential of 200% of the named executive officers target
bonus for achieving financial and individual performance
objectives in excess of the targets and a minimum bonus
potential of 0% of the named executive officers target
bonus. The 2010 Management Incentive Plan target bonus for
Mr. Wakeham is 62.5% of Mr. Wakehams base salary
with a maximum bonus potential of 200% of
110
Mr. Wakehams target bonus for achieving financial and
individual performance objectives in excess of the targets and a
minimum bonus potential of 0% of Mr. Wakehams target
bonus. The performance metrics under the 2010 Management
Incentive Plan are the same as the performance metrics under our
2009 Management Incentive Plan and include revenue and adjusted
EBITDA targets and individual performance ratings. The
compensation committee believes that the 2010 targets are
challenging, but attainable, based on the increases in our
revenue and adjusted EBITDA in 2009 relative to 2008 and will
continue to align our named executive officers short-term
incentives with the creation of long-term stockholder value. For
each of Messrs. Winn, Barker and Van Valkenberg, the
achievement of 2010 bonus targets for overall corporate revenue,
overall corporate adjusted EBITDA and individual performance
ratings are weighted 30%, 45% and 25%, respectively. We weighted
the individual 2010 Management Incentive Plans more heavily
toward achieving adjusted EBITDA over revenue targets for
Messrs. Winn, Barker and Van Valkenberg because we believe
that increases in adjusted EBITDA will drive our long-term
success and result in greater opportunity for profit in the
future. For Mr. Wakeham, the achievement of 2010 bonus
targets for overall corporate revenue, overall corporate
adjusted EBITDA and individual performance ratings are weighted
45%, 30% and 25%, respectively. For Ms. Chaffin Glover, the
achievement of 2010 Management Incentive Plan bonus targets for
revenue, adjusted EBITDA and individual performance ratings are
weighted 50% (of which, 15% was based on overall corporate
performance and 35% was based on the performance of operations
under the named executive officers direct management), 25%
(of which, 10% was based on overall corporate performance and
15% was based on the performance of operations under the named
executive officers direct management) and 25%,
respectively. We weighted the individual 2010 Management
Incentive Plan for Mr. Wakeham and Ms. Chaffin Glover
more heavily toward achieving revenue over adjusted EBITDA
because we believe that the positions held by these named
executive officers have more direct influence over revenue
performance than our other named executive officers.
Additionally, we weighted the performance of the operations
under Ms. Chaffin Glovers direct management over our
overall corporate performance in order to motivate and
incentivize Ms. Chaffin Glover to drive growth in
operations under her direct management. Our compensation
committee retains sole discretion to adjust targets and awards
under the 2010 Management Incentive Plan for significant,
non-controllable circumstances that were not included in our
2010 operating budget.
Equity
Incentive Awards
Our equity award program is the primary vehicle for offering
long-term incentives to our named executive officers.
Historically, our equity awards to our named executive officers
have been in the form of stock options. We believe that
equity-based compensation provides our named executive officers
with a direct interest in our long-term performance, creates an
ownership culture and aligns the interests of our named
executive officers and our stockholders.
Grants of stock option awards, including those to our named
executive officers, are all approved by our compensation
committee and are granted at an exercise price at or above the
fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
Consistent with the terms of our options granted to our other
employees, options granted to our named executive officers
typically vest over a four-year period in accordance with one of
the following vesting schedules, subject to continued service
through each applicable vesting date:
|
|
|
|
|
The stock option vests in equal quarterly installments over
16 consecutive quarters commencing on the first day of the
calendar quarter immediately following the grant date; or
|
|
|
|
The stock option vests with respect to 5% of the shares subject
to the stock option each quarter commencing on the first day of
the calendar quarter immediately following the grant date for 15
consecutive quarters and, with respect to the remaining 25% of
the shares subject to the stock option, on the first day of the
next following calendar quarter, subject to continued service
through each applicable date.
|
We believe that the four-year vesting period of our stock option
grants furthers our objective of executive retention as it
provides an incentive to our executives to remain in our employ
during the vesting period.
We typically make an initial stock option grant to new
executives in connection with the commencement of his or her
employment. Additionally, at the discretion of our board of
directors and consistent with our
111
executive compensation program objectives, our compensation
committee typically evaluates and approves equity awards for our
new employees quarterly and equity awards for our existing
employees, including our named executive officers, annually, to
re-establish or bolster incentives to retain our employees. The
stock options we granted to our named executive officers in 2009
are set forth under Executive Compensation
Grants of Plan-Based Awards. On February 25, 2010, we
granted options to purchase 175,000, 112,500 and
150,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Barker, Ms.
Chaffin Glover and Mr. Wakeham, respectively, at an exercise
price per share of $7.50. These stock options vest with respect
to 5% of the shares subject to the stock option each quarter
commencing on the first day of the calendar quarter immediately
following the grant date for 15 consecutive quarters and, with
respect to the remaining 25% of the shares subject to the stock
option, on the first day of the next following calendar quarter,
subject to continued service through each applicable date. In
determining the size of stock option grants to our named
executive officers in 2009 and 2010, our compensation committee
considered comparative equity ownership of executives employed
by companies in our Select Peer Group, our overall achievement
of corporate objectives, the applicable named executive
officers achievement of individual performance objectives,
the achievement of certain strategic initiatives, the amount of
equity previously awarded to the named executive officer, the
vesting of previous awards and the recommendations of our Chief
Executive Officer. Mr. Van Valkenberg was not granted stock
options or other equity awards in 2010, as he had recently been
granted an option to purchase 150,000 shares of our common
stock upon the commencement of his full-time employment with us
in September 2009.
Mr. Winn, our Chief Executive Officer, has not received
equity based compensation historically. Mr. Winns
primary equity compensation continues to come from expected
returns on his ownership of our stock. As a significant
stockholder, Mr. Winns personal wealth is tied
directly to sustaining stock price appreciation and performance,
which directly aligns Mr. Winns interests with
overall stockholder interests.
At the discretion of our compensation committee, we expect to
continue to grant new stock options to named executive officers
annually consistent with our overall executive compensation
program objectives. In determining the size of stock option
grants to named executive officers in future years, we expect
that our compensation committee will consider comparative equity
ownership of executives employed by companies in our Select Peer
Group, our financial performance, the applicable named executive
officers achievement of performance objectives, the amount
of equity compensation previously awarded to the named executive
officer, the vesting of previous awards and the recommendations
of our Chief Executive Officer.
Severance
and Change in Control Benefits
Our employment agreements with our named executive officers
provide for payments and other benefits in the event of
termination of employment in certain circumstances. For a
description of these payments and other benefits, see
Executive Compensation Potential Payments on
Termination or Change in Control.
Our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan provides that stock options
granted to a participant under our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
will become 100% vested on the participants death or
disability (as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code) unless the stock option agreement provides
otherwise. Each of the outstanding stock options granted to our
named executive officers has been granted under our 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan and would be subject to this acceleration benefit
in the event of the named executive officers death or
disability. We generally do not provide for accelerated vesting
of options held by our employees or named executive officers in
connection with change in control transactions. However, our
stock option agreements with Mr. Barker provide for
accelerated vesting in connection with certain change in control
transactions as further described under Executive
Compensation Potential Payments on Termination or
Change in Control Arrangements with Timothy J.
Barker. Our compensation committee determined that it was
appropriate to provide for payments and accelerated vesting for
Mr. Barker, but not our other named executive officers, in
connection with certain change in control transactions because
the position of Chief Financial Officer is more likely to be
affected by such a transaction than the positions held by our
other named executive officers (other than Chief Executive
Officer). However, our compensation committee did not believe it
was necessary to provide for additional payments to
Mr. Winn in the event of certain change in control
transactions given his significant ownership of our common stock.
112
We believe that these severance arrangements help us to attract
and retain key management talent in an industry where there is
significant competition for management talent. We believe that
entering into these agreements helps the named executive
officers maintain continued focus and dedication to their
assigned duties and maximizes stockholder value. The terms of
these agreements were determined after review by our
compensation committee of our retention goals for each named
executive officer, as well as analysis of market data, similar
agreements established by our Select Peer Group and applicable
law.
Benefits
and Other Compensation
We maintain broad-based employee benefit plans, which are
provided to all eligible U.S.-based employees. These plans
include a group medical program, a group dental program, life
insurance, disability insurance, flexible spending accounts and
a 401(k) savings plan. Other benefit programs offered to all
full-time U.S.-based employees include programs for job-related
educational assistance, an employee referral program, group term
life insurance equivalent to 1.5 times an employees annual
base salary up to a $600,000 maximum and an employee assistance
program. All U.S.-based executives are eligible to participate
in our employee benefit plans on the same basis as our other
full-time employees, with the exception of the employee referral
program, in which our named executive officers are ineligible to
participate.
We believe these benefits are consistent with the benefits
offered by companies with which we compete for employees and are
necessary to attract and retain qualified employees.
Perquisites
We believe that cash and equity compensation are the two key
components in attracting and retaining management talent and
therefore do not generally provide any substantial perquisites
to our named executive officers.
Commencing in June 2010, Mr. Winn also receives a limited number
of additional benefits and perquisites to be used for tax,
estate and financial planning assistance. The total pre-tax
protected benefit for this purpose is limited to no more than
$150,000 for 2010 and $50,000 for subsequent years.
Tax and
Accounting Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally
disallows a tax deduction for certain compensation in excess of
$1.0 million per year paid by a publicly held company to
its chief executive officer or any of its three other most
highly paid executive officers (other than the companys
chief executive officer and chief financial officer). Qualifying
performance-based compensation is not subject to the deduction
limitation if specified requirements are met. In addition,
grandfather provisions may apply to certain
compensation arrangements that were entered into by a company
before it was publicly held. We generally intend to structure
the performance-based portion of our executive compensation,
when feasible, to comply with exemptions in Section 162(m)
so that the compensation remains tax deductible to us. However,
to remain competitive with other employers, our compensation
committee may, in its judgment, authorize compensation payments
that do not comply with the exemptions in Section 162(m)
when it believes that such payments are appropriate to attract
and retain executive talent.
113
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table provides information regarding the
compensation of our named executive officers during our year
ended December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
Plan
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary ($)
|
|
Bonus ($)
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
($)(3)
|
|
Total ($)
|
|
Stephen T. Winn
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
246,765
|
|
|
$
|
3,675
|
|
|
$
|
650,440
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy J. Barker
|
|
2009
|
|
|
315,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
320,631
|
|
|
|
149,240
|
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
788,546
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dirk D.
Wakeham(4)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
290,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,505
|
|
|
|
131,585
|
|
|
|
51,853
|
(6)
|
|
|
729,943
|
|
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashley Chaffin
Glover(7)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
290,000
|
(8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,505
|
|
|
|
120,335
|
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
|
670,515
|
|
Executive Vice President,
Multifamily Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Van
Valkenberg(9)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
79,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372,726
|
|
|
|
34,878
|
|
|
|
96,338
|
(10)
|
|
|
583,557
|
|
Chief Legal Officer and
Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value computed in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 8 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009 for a discussion of assumptions made in
determining the grant date fair value of our stock option awards. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents awards under our 2009 Management Incentive Plan. The
material terms of these annual incentive awards are described in
this section under Compensation Discussion and
Analysis Compensation Components
Performance-Based Bonuses. |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the amount of our matching contributions under our
401(k) savings plan unless additional forms of other
compensation are also indicated in relevant footnotes to this
table. |
|
(4) |
|
Mr. Wakeham assumed the title and responsibilities of
President in January 2010. He served as our Executive Vice
President, Property Solutions, from April 2009 to January 2010
and as our Senior Vice President, President, LeasingDesk Point
of Lease Systems, for prior periods in 2009. |
|
(5) |
|
Mr. Wakehams salary was increased from $260,000 to
$300,000 in April 2009 in conjunction with his promotion to
Executive Vice President, Property Solutions. |
|
(6) |
|
Consists of (i) $1,304 of matching contributions under our
401(k) savings plan, (ii) $43,510 of relocation related
expense reimbursements and (iii) tax gross-up of $7,039
associated with taxable relocation related expenses. |
|
(7) |
|
Ms. Chaffin Glover assumed the title and responsibilities
of Executive Vice President, Multifamily Solutions in January
2010. She served as our Executive Vice President, Resident
Solutions from April 2009 to January 2010 and as our Senior Vice
President, President, Velocity Utility and Billing Services, for
prior periods in 2009. |
|
(8) |
|
Ms. Chaffin Glovers salary was increased from
$260,000 to $300,000 in April 2009 in conjunction with her
promotion to Executive Vice President, Resident Solutions. |
|
(9) |
|
Mr. Van Valkenberg commenced his employment with us in
September 2009 and provided consulting services to us from June
2009 to September 2009. His 2009 compensation represents the
amounts paid to him as an employee from September 24, 2009
to December 31, 2009 and as a consultant for prior periods
in 2009. Mr. Van Valkenbergs employment with us ended
and he ceased to be an executive officer effective as of
May 11, 2010. Mr. Van Valkenberg is entitled to
receive certain payments and benefits pursuant to the terms of
an Employment Release Agreement entered into on June 8,
2010. See Related Party Transactions
Employment Arrangements and Indemnification Agreements. |
114
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Consists of (i) $125 of matching contributions under our
401(k) savings plan, (ii) $7,742 of relocation related
expense reimbursements, (iii) tax gross-up of $3,753
associated with taxable relocation related expenses,
(iv) $65,000 in consulting payments paid to
Mr. Van Valkenberg in accordance with the terms of his
consulting agreement prior to commencement of his full-time
employment with us and (v) $19,717 in expense
reimbursements paid to Mr. Van Valkenberg in
accordance with the terms of his consulting agreement prior to
commencement of his full-time employment with us. |
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
The following table sets forth information regarding grants of
compensation in the form of plan-based awards made during 2009
to our named executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under
|
|
Securities
|
|
Exercise or Base
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
($)(1)
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Price of Option
|
|
Option
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
Minimum
|
|
Target
|
|
Maximum
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
Awards
($/Sh)(2)
|
|
Awards
($)(3)
|
|
Stephen T. Winn
|
|
|
2/26/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
300,000
|
|
|
$
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy J. Barker
|
|
|
2/26/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
(4)
|
|
$
|
6.00
|
|
|
$
|
320,631
|
|
|
|
|
2/26/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,500
|
|
|
|
315,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dirk D. Wakeham
|
|
|
2/26/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
256,505
|
|
|
|
|
2/26/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashley Chaffin Glover
|
|
|
2/26/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
(4)
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
256,505
|
|
|
|
|
2/26/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Van
Valkenberg(6)
|
|
|
9/28/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
(5)
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
372,726
|
|
|
|
|
9/24/2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,685
|
|
|
|
81,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents awards under our Management Incentive Plan for fiscal
2009. The material terms of these annual incentive awards are
discussed in this section under Compensation Discussion
and Analysis Compensation Components
Performance-Based Bonuses. |
|
(2) |
|
In determining the exercise price of options granted in 2009,
our compensation committee retained an independent valuation
firm to complete a contemporaneous common stock valuation using
the probability-weighted expected return method, which involved
analyzing future values under two possible outcomes and then
probability-weighting those values. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects the aggregate grant date fair value computed in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. See Note 8 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009 for a discussion of assumptions made in
determining the grant date fair value of our stock option awards. |
|
(4) |
|
Stock options vest in equal quarterly installments over 16
consecutive quarters commencing on the first day of the calendar
quarter immediately following the grant date, subject to
continued service through each applicable date. |
|
(5) |
|
Stock option vests with respect to 5% of the shares subject to
the stock option each quarter commencing on the first day of the
calendar quarter immediately following the grant date for 15
consecutive quarters and, with respect to the remaining 25% of
the shares subject to the stock option, on the first day of the
next following calendar quarter, subject to continued service
through each applicable date. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Pursuant to the terms of his option agreement, if Mr. Van
Valkenberg ceases to be a service provider, the unvested portion
of his option immediately terminates, and Mr. Van
Valkenberg has a period of 90 days following the date he
ceases to be a service provider in which to exercise any options
that are vested at such date. Pursuant to the terms of an
Employment Release Agreement with us dated June 8, 2010,
Mr. Van Valkenberg will cease to be a service provider
after July 31, 2010. As of July 31, 2010, Mr. Van
Valkenberg will be vested in a total of 30,000 shares under his
option agreement, with an exercise price of $6.00 per share. The
remaining unvested options held by Mr. Van Valkenberg will
be forfeited effective as of August 1, 2010. |
115
Outstanding
Equity Awards at December 31, 2009
The following table sets forth information regarding equity
awards held by our named executive officers as of
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
Unexercised Options
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
That Have Not
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Option
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable (#)(1)
|
|
Vested (#)
|
|
Price ($)
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
Stephen T. Winn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy J. Barker
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$2.00
|
|
|
|
10/27/2015
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
37,500
|
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
12/15/2016
|
|
|
|
|
32,812
|
|
|
|
42,188
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
23,437
|
|
|
|
101,563
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
2/26/2019
|
|
Dirk D. Wakeham
|
|
|
78,125
|
|
|
|
46,875
|
|
|
|
3.00
|
|
|
|
4/12/2017
|
|
President
|
|
|
32,812
|
|
|
|
42,188
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
18,750
|
|
|
|
81,250
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
2/26/2019
|
|
Ashley Chaffin Glover
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
3/3/2015
|
|
Executive Vice President, Multifamily
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
12/13/2015
|
|
Solutions
|
|
|
18,750
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
|
|
12/15/2016
|
|
|
|
|
21,875
|
|
|
|
28,125
|
|
|
|
7.00
|
|
|
|
3/1/2018
|
|
|
|
|
18,750
|
|
|
|
81,250
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
2/26/2019
|
|
William E. Van Valkenberg
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
142,500
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
9/28/2019
|
|
Chief Legal Officer and
Secretary(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The listed stock options were granted under our 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan. Stock options granted to Ms. Chaffin Glover
and Messrs. Barker and Wakeham vest ratably over 16
quarters commencing on the first day of the calendar quarter
immediately following the grant date, subject to continued
service through each applicable vesting date, and the stock
option granted to Mr. Van Valkenberg vests with respect to
5% of the shares subject to the stock option each quarter
commencing on the first day of the calendar quarter immediately
following the grant date for 15 consecutive quarters and the
remaining 25% of the on the first day of the next following
calendar quarter, subject to continued service through each
applicable date. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Pursuant to the terms of his option agreement, if Mr. Van
Valkenberg ceases to be a service provider, the unvested portion
of his option immediately terminates, and Mr. Van
Valkenberg has a period of 90 days following the date he
ceases to be a service provider in which to exercise any options
that are vested at such date. Pursuant to the terms of an
Employment Release Agreement with us dated June 8, 2010,
Mr. Van Valkenberg will cease to be a service provider
after July 31, 2010. As of July 31, 2010, Mr. Van
Valkenberg will be vested in a total of 30,000 shares under
his option agreement, with an exercise price of $6.00 per share.
The remaining unvested options will be forfeited effective as of
August 1, 2010. |
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
None of our named executive officers exercised their outstanding
stock options during 2009.
Pension
Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
We do not provide a pension plan for our employees and none of
our named executive officers participated in a nonqualified
deferred compensation plan during the year ended
December 31, 2009.
116
Employment
Agreements
The following descriptions of the terms of the employment
agreements with our named executive officers are intended as a
summary only and are qualified in their entirety by reference to
the employment agreements filed as exhibits to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Stephen
T. Winn
We entered into an employment agreement with Stephen T. Winn,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board, on
December 30, 2003. The employment agreement with
Mr. Winn provides for a base salary at a rate not less than
$265,000 per year until December 31, 2003 and thereafter at
a rate not less than $275,000 per year with a target annual
bonus of not less than 50% of his base salary and a potential
maximum annual bonus of up to 100% of his base salary based on
the achievement of performance criteria established by our
compensation committee. Mr. Winns current base salary
is $400,000 and target annual bonus is 100% of his annual base
salary with a potential maximum annual bonus of up to 200% of
his annual base salary.
Mr. Winn is entitled to four weeks paid vacation per year,
is eligible to participate in all employee welfare benefits
plans and other benefit programs made available generally to our
employees or senior executives and is reimbursed for all
reasonable business expenses including travel by private
aircraft for business purposes of up to $150,000 per year.
Additionally, we will make available to Mr. Winn all fringe
benefits and perquisites that are made available to other senior
executives. Mr. Winn also receives a limited number of
additional benefits and perquisites described under
Executive Compensation Compensation
Components Perquisites. As part of his
employment, Mr. Winn is entitled to payments upon
termination of his employment in certain circumstances as
described below under Executive Compensation
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in
Control Arrangements with Stephen T. Winn. Our
employment agreement with Mr. Winn, among other things,
also includes confidentiality provisions and non-competition,
non-interference and non-disparagement obligations during his
employment and for a three-year period following termination.
Timothy
J. Barker
We entered into an employment agreement with Timothy J. Barker,
our Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, on October 31,
2005. On October 27, 2005, in accordance with the terms of
his employment agreement, Mr. Barker was granted an option
to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $2.00. The stock option vests in equal
quarterly installments over 16 consecutive quarters
commencing on the first day of the calendar quarter immediately
following the grant date, subject to continued service through
each applicable date. We subsequently amended the employment
agreement with Mr. Barker on January 1, 2010. As
amended, the employment agreement with Mr. Barker provides
for a base salary at a rate not less than $350,000 per year
effective January 1, 2010. Under the terms of his amended
employment agreement, Mr. Barker is eligible to receive a
target annual bonus of 50% of his base salary and a potential
maximum annual bonus of up to 100% of his base salary based on
the achievement of performance criteria established by our
compensation committee. Mr. Barkers current base
salary is $350,000 and target annual bonus is 50% of his annual
base salary with a potential maximum annual bonus of up to 100%
of his annual base salary. On February 25, 2010, in
accordance with the terms of his amended employment agreement,
Mr. Barker was granted an option to purchase 175,000 shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of $7.50. The stock
option vests with respect to 5% of the shares subject to the
stock option each quarter commencing on the first day of the
calendar quarter immediately following the grant date for 15
consecutive quarters and, with respect to the remaining 25% of
the shares subject to the stock option, on the first day of the
next following calendar quarter, subject to
Mr. Barkers continued service through each applicable
date.
Mr. Barker is entitled to three weeks paid vacation per
year, is eligible to participate in all employee welfare
benefits plans and other benefit programs made available
generally to our employees or senior executives and is
reimbursed for all reasonable business expenses. Additionally,
we will make available to Mr. Barker all fringe benefits
and perquisites that are made available to other senior
executives. As part of his
117
employment, Mr. Barker is also entitled to payments and
other benefits upon termination of his employment in certain
circumstances, and our stock option agreements with
Mr. Barker provide for accelerated vesting in connection
with certain change in control transactions, as described below
under Executive Compensation Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Arrangements with Timothy J. Barker. Our amended
employment agreement with Mr. Barker, among other things,
also includes confidentiality provisions and non-competition,
non-interference and non-disparagement obligations during his
employment and for a one-year period following termination.
Dirk
D. Wakeham
Multifamily Internet Ventures, LLC, which we acquired in
April 2007, entered into an employment agreement with Dirk
D. Wakeham, which was subsequently amended on April 12,
2007. Mr. Wakeham has served as our President since January
2010. As amended, the employment agreement with Mr. Wakeham
provides for a base salary at a rate not less than $225,000 per
year. Under the terms of his amended employment agreement,
beginning in 2007, Mr. Wakeham is eligible to receive an
annual bonus under the terms of our management incentive plan of
50% of his base salary for achievement of the management
incentive plan at 100% and the potential to receive up to 100%
of his base salary if the performance criteria stipulated in the
management incentive plan is exceeded. Mr. Wakehams
current base salary is $330,000 and target annual bonus is 62.5%
of his annual base salary with a potential maximum annual bonus
of up to 125% of his annual base salary. In addition,
Mr. Wakeham received a one-time lump sum payment of $14,700
following the closing of our acquisition of Multifamily Internet
Ventures, LLC, which amount represented the difference between
the amount he was paid by Multifamily Internet Ventures, LLC,
for the period from January 1, 2007 and April 12, 2007
and the amount he would have been paid during such period if he
had been paid at the base salary specified in his employment
agreement. On April 12, 2007, in accordance with the terms
of his employment agreement, Mr. Wakeham was granted an
option to purchase 125,000 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $3.00. The stock option vests in equal
quarterly installments over 16 consecutive quarters
commencing on the first day of the calendar quarter immediately
following the grant date, subject to continued service through
each applicable date.
Mr. Wakeham is entitled to three weeks paid vacation per
year, is eligible to participate in all employee welfare
benefits plans and other benefit programs made available
generally to our employees or senior executives and is
reimbursed for all reasonable business expenses. Additionally,
we will make available to Mr. Wakeham all fringe benefits
and perquisites that are made available to other senior
executives. As part of his employment, Mr. Wakeham is also
entitled to certain payments upon termination of his employment
in certain circumstances as described below under
Executive Compensation Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control Arrangements with
Our Other Named Executive Officers. Our employment
agreement with Mr. Wakeham, among other things, also
includes confidentiality provisions and non-interference and
non-disparagement obligations during his employment and for a
period of 24 months following termination.
Ashley
Chaffin Glover
We entered into an employment agreement with Ashley Chaffin
Glover on March 3, 2005. Ms. Chaffin Glover has served as
our Executive Vice President, Multifamily Solutions since
January 2010. The employment agreement with Ms. Chaffin
Glover provides for a base salary at a rate not less than
$150,000 per year. Under the terms of her employment agreement,
beginning in 2005, Ms. Chaffin Glover is eligible to
receive a target annual bonus of 40% of her base salary and a
potential maximum annual bonus of up to 80% of her base salary
based on the achievement of performance criteria established by
our compensation committee. Ms. Chaffin Glovers
annual bonus opportunity for 2005 was prorated for the portion
of 2005 that she was employed by us. Ms. Chaffin
Glovers current base salary is $320,000 and target annual
bonus is 50% of her annual base salary with a potential maximum
annual bonus of up to 100% of her annual base salary. On
March 3, 2005, in accordance with the terms of her
employment agreement, Ms. Chaffin Glover was granted an
option to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $2.00. The stock option
118
vests in equal quarterly installments over 16 consecutive
quarters commencing on the first day of the calendar quarter
immediately following the grant date, subject to continued
service through each applicable date.
Ms. Chaffin Glover is entitled to three weeks paid vacation
per year, is eligible to participate in all employee welfare
benefits plans and other benefit programs made available
generally to our employees or senior executives and is
reimbursed for all reasonable business expenses. Additionally,
we will make available to Ms. Chaffin Glover all fringe
benefits and perquisites that are made available to other senior
executives. As part of her employment, Ms. Chaffin Glover
is also entitled to certain payments upon termination of her
employment in certain circumstances as described below under
Executive Compensation Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control Arrangements with
Our Other Named Executive Officers. Our employment
agreement with Ms. Chaffin Glover, among other things, also
includes confidentiality provisions and non-competition,
non-interference and non-disparagement obligations during her
employment and for a one-year period following termination.
William
E. Van Valkenberg
We entered into an employment agreement with William E. Van
Valkenberg, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, on
September 24, 2009. The employment agreement with
Mr. Van Valkenberg provides for a base salary at a rate not
less than $300,000 per year. Under the terms of his employment
agreement, beginning in 2009, Mr. Van Valkenberg is
eligible to receive an annual bonus under the terms of our
management incentive plan of 50% of his base salary for
achievement of the management incentive plan at 100% and the
potential to receive up to 100% of his base salary if the
performance criteria for this potential is achieved as set forth
in the management incentive plan. Mr. Van Valkenbergs
annual bonus opportunity under the 2009 Management Incentive
Plan was subject to proration based on the actual number of days
he was employed by us during the year.
Mr. Van Valkenbergs current base salary is
$300,000 and target annual bonus is 50% of his annual base
salary with a potential maximum annual bonus of up to 100% of
his annual base salary. In addition,
Mr. Van Valkenberg will be reimbursed up to $125,000
for relocation expenses (excluding payment of commissions or
other costs associated with buying or selling a home) associated
with his relocation to Dallas. Prior to his relocation to
Dallas, Texas, we also paid for a furnished two bedroom
apartment within proximity to our office for
Mr. Van Valkenbergs use and reimbursed travel
expenses for him and his spouse in accordance with our standard
travel policy. On September 28, 2009, in accordance with
the terms of his employment agreement,
Mr. Van Valkenberg was granted an option to purchase
150,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$6.00. The stock option vests with respect to 5% of the shares
subject to the stock option each quarter commencing on the first
day of the calendar quarter immediately following the grant date
for 15 consecutive quarters and, with respect to the remaining
25% of the shares subject to the stock option, on the first day
of the next following calendar quarter, subject to continued
service through each applicable date.
Mr. Van Valkenberg is entitled to three weeks paid
vacation per year, is eligible to participate in all employee
welfare benefits plans and other benefit programs made available
generally to our employees or senior executives and is
reimbursed for all reasonable business expenses. Additionally,
we will make available to Mr. Van Valkenberg all
fringe benefits and perquisites that are made available to other
senior executives. As part of his employment,
Mr. Van Valkenberg is also entitled to certain
payments upon termination of his employment in certain
circumstances as described below under Executive
Compensation Potential Payments Upon Termination or
Change in Control Arrangements with Our Other Named
Executive Officers. Our employment agreement with
Mr. Van Valkenberg, among other things, also includes
confidentiality provisions and non-competition, non-interference
and non-disparagement obligations during his employment and for
a period of six months following termination. Mr. Van
Valkenbergs employment with us ended and he ceased to be
an executive officer effective as of May 11, 2010. On
June 8, 2010, we entered into an Employment Release
Agreement with Mr. Van Valkenberg which is described in
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Employment Arrangements and
Indemnification Agreements.
Prior to entering into the employment agreement with
Mr. Van Valkenberg, we entered into a consulting agreement
with Mr. Van Valkenberg on June 28, 2009. Under the
consulting agreement, Mr. Van Valkenberg performed legal
consulting services for us on a
project-by-project
basis in exchange for consulting fees in the amount of $1,000
per day. In addition, Mr. Van Valkenberg was entitled to
reimbursement for his reasonable
119
out-of-pocket expenses related to the consulting services. The
consulting agreement with Mr. Van Valkenberg, among other
things, included confidentiality and intellectual property
assignment provisions and employee non-solicitation obligations
during the consulting period and for a period of 12 months
following termination.
Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Our employment agreements with our named executive officers
provide for payments in the event of termination of employment
in certain circumstances, and our stock option agreements with
Mr. Barker provide for accelerated vesting in connection
with certain change in control transactions. In addition, all
outstanding stock options granted to our named executive
officers would become 100% vested upon the named executive
officers death or disability (as defined in
Section 22(e)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code) pursuant to
the terms of our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. The descriptions and
tables that follow describe the payments and benefits that we
would owe to each of our named executive officers, pursuant to
the applicable employment and stock option agreements with our
named executive officers and our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, and
are qualified in their entirety by reference to the relevant
agreements and our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan filed as exhibits
to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Definition
of Cause
Under the employment agreements with our named executive
officers, Cause is generally defined as the
occurrence of any of the following events:
|
|
|
|
|
conviction for criminal acts;
|
|
|
|
making a materially false statement to our auditors or legal
counsel;
|
|
|
|
falsification of any corporate document or form;
|
|
|
|
any material breach by the named executive officer of his or her
material obligations to us or of any published company policy;
|
|
|
|
any material breach by the named executive officer of the
provisions of his or her employment agreement;
|
|
|
|
making a material misrepresentation of fact or omission to
disclose material facts in relation to transactions occurring in
our business and financial matters; and
|
|
|
|
continued performance of his or her duties in an incompetent,
unprofessional, unsuccessful, insubordinate or negligent manner.
|
Pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements, certain of
our named executive officers have the ability to cure one or
more of the foregoing breaches prior to termination, generally
within ten days after receipt of written notice of breach.
Definition
of Good Reason
Under the terms of the employment agreements of our named
executive officers, Good Reason is generally defined
as any material failure on our part to comply with any of our
material obligations under the employment agreement, which
failure has not been cured within ten calendar days after
written notice has been given to us. Additionally, the
employment agreement with Mr. Winn further provides that
our failure to continue his status as President and Chief
Executive Officer or to accord him the powers, duties, reporting
responsibilities and perquisites contemplated in his employment
agreement shall constitute good reason.
Definition
of Disability
Under our employment agreements with each of our named executive
officers, we may terminate the named executive officers
employment for disability if, as a result of the
named executive officers incapacity due to physical or
mental illness, he or she has been absent from his or her duties
on a full-time
120
basis for (i) a period of six consecutive months or
(ii) for shorter periods aggregating six months during any
12 month period.
Arrangements
with Stephen T. Winn
Pursuant to our employment agreement with Mr. Winn, in the
event of his termination by reason of death or disability,
Mr. Winn is entitled to receive salary continuation
payments in an aggregate amount equal to 50% of his current
salary in six equal monthly installments and a lump sum cash
payment equal to any earned but unpaid salary and bonus and any
accrued but unused vacation.
In addition, except in the event of our liquidation, dissolution
or winding up, whether voluntary or involuntary, or cessation of
our business in the ordinary course for any reason, if
Mr. Winns employment is terminated by us without
cause or by Mr. Winn for good reason, Mr. Winn is
entitled to a lump sum payment equal to 150% of his annual base
salary payable within five days of his termination and 100% of
his target annual bonus for the year payable after the year end
based on achievement of any criteria or conditions to payment
that are contingent on our earnings or other financial
performance for the year.
Arrangements
with Timothy J. Barker
Pursuant to our amended employment agreement with
Mr. Barker, in the event of termination by reason of death
or disability, by us without cause or by Mr. Barker for
good reason, Mr. Barker is entitled to receive salary
continuation payments in an aggregate amount equal to 50% of his
current annual salary in six equal monthly installments and a
lump sum cash payment equal to any earned but unpaid salary and
bonus and any accrued but unused vacation as of the termination
date. In the event such termination occurs within twelve months
following the consummation of a business combination
transaction, the salary continuation payments to
Mr. Barker would be increased to an aggregate amount equal
to 100% of his annual base salary payable in twelve equal
monthly installments under the terms of his amended employment
agreement. The salary continuation payments are conditioned upon
Mr. Barker executing a full release and covenant not to sue
on or before the thirtieth day following his termination.
Additionally, the stock option agreements related to our stock
option grants to Mr. Barker on February 26, 2009,
February 29, 2008, December 15, 2006 and
October 27, 2005 provide that 100% of the unvested options
subject to the agreements will fully vest upon a business
combination transaction. The stock option agreement
related to our stock option grant to Mr. Barker on
February 25, 2010 provides that 50% of the unvested options
subject to the agreement will fully vest upon a business
combination transaction and 100% of the unvested options
subject to the agreement will fully vest if Mr. Barker
ceases to be a service provider for any reason other than for
Cause (as defined in Mr. Barkers amended employment
agreement) within one year of the consummation of a
business combination transaction.
For purposes of Mr. Barkers amended employment
agreement and stock option agreements, a business
combination transaction is defined to include our merger
with or into another entity where we are not the surviving
entity, our dissolution, the sale of all or substantially all
our assets and the transfer of beneficial ownership representing
40% or more of the voting power of our then outstanding
securities to a person or group other than Seren Capital, Ltd.,
Stephen T. Winn, affiliates of Stephen T. Winn and a trustee or
other fiduciary holding securities under one of our employee
benefit plans.
Arrangements
with Our Other Named Executive Officers
Pursuant to our employment agreements with each of
Ms. Chaffin Glover and Messrs. Van Valkenberg and
Wakeham, in the event of termination by reason of death or
disability, by us without cause or by the named executive
officer for good reason, each of these named executive officers
is entitled to receive salary continuation payments in an
aggregate amount equal to 50% of their current annual salary and
a lump sum cash payment equal to any earned but unpaid salary
and bonus and any accrued but unused vacation as of the
termination date. The salary continuation payments to
Ms. Chaffin Glover are payable in twelve equal monthly
installments at an amount per installment equal to one
twenty-fourth of Ms. Chaffin Glovers current annual
salary. The salary continuation payments to Messrs. Van
Valkenberg and Wakeham are payable in six
121
equal monthly installments at an amount per installment equal to
one-twelfth of the named executive officers current annual
salary. The salary continuation payments are conditioned upon
the named executive officer executing a full release and
covenant not to sue on or before the thirtieth day
following termination.
The following table provides the total dollar value of the
compensation that would be paid to each of our named executive
officers assuming a change in control or the termination of his
or her employment in certain defined circumstances on
December 31, 2009, pursuant to the arrangements described
above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without Cause
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Good Reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 12 Months of a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination on
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
|
Death or
|
|
|
Cause or for
|
|
|
Combination
|
|
|
Combination
|
|
Named Executive Officer
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Good Reason
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Stephen T. Winn
|
|
Severance Payment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$600,000
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
(1),(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$200,000
|
|
|
|
$900,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy J. Barker
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$157,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
$157,500
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$315,000
|
(6)
|
|
|
Option Acceleration
|
|
|
$39,500
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$39,500
|
(5),(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$39,500
|
|
|
|
$157,500
|
|
|
|
$157,500
|
|
|
|
$39,500
|
|
|
|
$315,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dirk D. Wakeham
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Acceleration
|
|
|
$124,688
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$124,688
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ashley Chaffin Glover
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Acceleration
|
|
|
$19,750
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$19,750
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William E. Van
Valkenberg(7)
|
|
Salary Continuation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Acceleration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
|
$150,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amount would not be paid in the event of Mr. Winns
termination in connection with our liquidation, dissolution or
winding up, whether voluntary or involuntary, or cessation of
our business in the ordinary course for any reason. |
|
(2) |
|
Value represents target bonus for Mr. Winn for 2009.
Subject to achievement of any criteria or conditions to the
payment of Mr. Winns target bonus which are
contingent on our earnings or other financial performance for
the year. |
|
(3) |
|
Amount of salary continuation payment if termination is not
within twelve months following the consummation of a business
combination transaction. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Value represents the gain our named executive officers would
receive, calculated as the positive difference between our stock
price on December 31, 2009 and the exercise price of the
named executive officers unvested options subject to
acceleration upon the named executive officers death or
disability pursuant to our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. On
December 31, 2009, our stock price was $5.66. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Value represents the gain Mr. Barker would receive,
calculated as the positive difference between our stock price on
December 31, 2009 and the exercise price of
Mr. Barkers unvested options subject to acceleration
upon a business combination transaction pursuant to the terms of
certain of his stock option agreements with us. On
December 31, 2009, our stock price was $5.66. |
122
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Amount reflects payments that would have been made pursuant to
Mr. Barkers employment agreement, as amended on
January 1, 2010, if the amended employment agreement had
been in effect on December 31, 2009 in order to provide
meaningful, current information. |
|
(7) |
|
Mr. Van Valkenbergs employment with us ended and he
ceased to be an executive officer effective as of May 11,
2010. On June 8, 2010, we entered into an Employment
Release Agreement with Mr. Van Valkenberg which is
described in Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Employment Arrangements and
Indemnification Agreements. Under the Release Agreement,
we will pay Mr. Van Valkenberg cash payments of up to
approximately $185,000. |
Employee
Benefit Plans
Amended
and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
Our Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, or our 1998
Stock Incentive Plan, was first adopted by our board of
directors on November 24, 1998 and approved by our
stockholders on November 24, 1998. The 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan has been amended and restated. The 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan has a ten year term, which was restarted in an amendment
and restatement of the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan in
June 2010. Our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan provides for the
grant of incentive stock options, within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code to our employees
and any parent and subsidiary corporations employees, and
for the grant of non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock and performance units to our employees
and consultants and any parent and subsidiary corporations
employees and consultants.
We have reserved a total of 11,000,000 shares of our common
stock for issuance pursuant to our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan. As
of June 30, 2010, options to purchase 9,127,034 shares
of common stock were outstanding and 999,272 shares were
available for future grant under our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan.
Our compensation committee administers our 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan. Under our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, our compensation
committee has the power to determine the terms of the awards,
including the employees and consultants who will receive awards,
the exercise price, the number of shares subject to each award,
the vesting schedule and exercisability of awards and the manner
of payment of the exercise price of the award. The administrator
also has the authority to institute an exchange program whereby
the exercise prices of outstanding awards may be increased or
reduced, outstanding awards may be surrendered or cancelled in
exchange for awards with a higher or lower exercise price, or
outstanding awards may be transferred to a third party.
With respect to all stock options granted under the 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan, the exercise price must at least be equal to the
fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and
the term of an option may not exceed ten years, except that with
respect to incentive stock options granted to any participant
who owns more than 10% of the voting power of all classes of our
outstanding stock as of the grant date, the term must not exceed
five years and the exercise price must equal at least 110% of
the fair market value on the grant date.
After termination of an employee or consultant, he or she may
exercise his or her option for the period of time stated in the
option agreement, or if not so stated, for 30 days
following termination in the case of an employee holding options
or stock appreciation rights granted before February 22,
2008, for 90 days following termination in the case of an
employee holding options or stock appreciation rights granted on
or after February 22, 2008 and for 30 days following
termination in the case of a consultant holding options or stock
appreciation rights. If termination of an employee is due to
disability or death, the option will become 100% vested and will
remain exercisable for 12 months after the date of such
employees death or disability, but in no event later than
the date on which the option or stock appreciation right
terminates. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our compensation
committee may provide for more restrictive periods of exercise
or for forfeiture of awards or cash or common stock received
pursuant to awards if an employee is terminated for cause or
commits enumerated actions harmful to our interests within one
year following a voluntary termination.
Restricted stock grants may be made alone, in addition to or in
tandem with other awards granted under our 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan. Restricted stock grants are grants of shares of our common
stock subject to forfeiture restrictions that lapse in
accordance with terms and conditions established by our
compensation committee. Our compensation committee determines
the number of shares subject to a restricted stock grant to
123
any employee or consultant and may impose whatever conditions to
the lapse of forfeiture restrictions it determines to be
appropriate. Unless our compensation committee determines
otherwise, shares subject to restricted stock grants that are
still subject to forfeiture restrictions upon termination of the
purchasers service with us are automatically forfeited.
However, unless provided otherwise in the agreement relating to
a restricted stock grant, forfeiture restrictions shall lapse
with respect to restricted stock grants made to an employee upon
such employees death, disability, or retirement from
active employment at or after age 65.
Our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan provides that upon the occurrence
of a business combination transaction, each option,
stock appreciation right and performance unit will terminate
upon the effective date of such transaction (provided that
holders of vested stock appreciation rights will receive cash
equal to the amount they would have received upon exercise of
the vested right and holders of performance units will receive
the prorated value of such unit as if all applicable performance
objectives had been met) and all forfeiture restrictions
applicable to restricted stock grants shall continue in full
force and effect, unless otherwise provided in the agreement
relating to an award or the provision of substitute securities
of another corporation arising without the necessity of the
action of our board of directors is made in connection with the
transaction. Our 1998 Stock Incentive Plan defines
business combination transactions to include our
merger with or into another corporation, our dissolution, the
sale of substantially all of our assets and the transfer of
beneficial ownership of securities representing 40% or more of
the voting power of our then outstanding securities to a person
or group other than Seren Capital, Ltd., Stephen T. Winn,
affiliates of Stephen T. Winn and a trustee or other fiduciary
holding securities under one of our employee benefit plans.
Unless our compensation committee otherwise provides in the
agreement governing a non-qualified stock option, non-qualified
stock options or stock appreciation rights granted before
September 28, 2009, may be transferred by the holder to
members of the holders immediate family, trusts for the
benefit of such immediate family members and partnerships in
which such immediate family members are the only partners,
provided that no consideration is provided for the transfer.
Incentive stock options and performance units granted before
September 28, 2009 and all awards granted on and after
September 28, 2009 under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan,
unless determined otherwise by our compensation committee, are
generally not transferable other than by will or the laws of
descent and distribution, and may be exercised only during the
lifetime of the participant and only by such participant.
Our board of directors has the authority to amend, alter,
suspend or terminate the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan provided such
action does not impair the rights of any participant without the
written consent of such participant. In February 2010, our board
of directors terminated our ability to make grants under our
1998 Stock Incentive Plan effective upon the closing of this
offering. Following the closing of this offering, we will grant
equity awards under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. However, our
1998 Stock Incentive Plan will continue to govern the terms and
conditions of all outstanding equity awards granted under our
1998 Stock Incentive Plan.
2010
Equity Incentive Plan
Our board of directors adopted our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan on
February 26, 2010 to be effective upon completion of this
offering subject to the approval of our stockholders. Our
stockholders approved the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan on
July 22, 2010. Our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan provides for
the grant of incentive stock options, within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, to our employees
and any parent and subsidiary corporations employees, and
for the grant of nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance
units and performance shares to our employees, directors and
consultants and our parent and subsidiary corporations
employees and consultants.
The total number of shares of our common stock reserved for
issuance pursuant to the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan will be
determined by our board of directors prior to its effectiveness.
The total number of shares of our common stock reserved under
our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan will be increased by (a) any
shares which have been reserved but not issued under our 1998
Stock Incentive Plan and are not subject to any awards granted
thereunder, and (b) any shares subject to stock options or
similar awards granted under the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan that
expire or otherwise terminate without having been exercised in
full and shares
124
issued pursuant to awards granted under the 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan that are forfeited to or repurchased by us. The
maximum number of shares that may be added to the 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan from the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan is
10,126,314 shares. In addition, our 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan provides for annual increases in the number of shares
available for issuance thereunder on the first day of each
fiscal year, beginning with our 2011 fiscal year, equal to the
lesser of:
|
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 shares of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0% of our outstanding shares on the last day of the
immediately preceding fiscal year; or
|
|
|
|
such other amount as our board of directors may determine.
|
If an award expires or becomes unexercisable without having been
exercised in full, is surrendered pursuant to an exchange
program, or, with respect to restricted stock, restricted stock
units, performance shares or performance units, is forfeited to
or repurchased by us, the unpurchased shares (or for awards
other than options and stock appreciation rights, the forfeited
or repurchased shares) which were subject thereto will become
available for future grant or sale under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan. Upon exercise of a stock appreciation right
settled in shares, only shares actually issued pursuant to the
stock appreciation right will cease to be available under our
2010 Equity Incentive Plan. Shares used to pay the exercise
price of an award or to satisfy the tax withholding obligations
related to an award will become available for future grant or
sale under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. Shares that have
actually been issued under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan under
any award will not be returned to our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
and will not become available for future distribution under our
2010 Equity Incentive Plan; provided, however, that if shares of
restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares or
performance units are repurchased by us or are forfeited to us,
such shares will become available for future grant under our
2010 Equity Incentive Plan. To the extent an award is paid out
in cash rather than stock, such cash payment will not reduce the
number of shares available for issuance under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan.
If we declare a dividend or other distribution or engage in a
recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split,
reorganization, merger, consolidation,
split-up,
spin-off, combination, repurchase, or exchange of shares or
other securities of the Company, or other change in the
corporate structure of the Company affecting our shares, the
administrator will adjust the (i) number and class of
shares available for issuance under our 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan, (ii) number, class and price of shares subject to
outstanding awards, and (iii) specified per-person limits
on awards to reflect the change.
Our board of directors or a committee of our board will
administer our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. To the extent the
administration determines it desirable to qualify awards granted
under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan as performance based
compensation within the meaning of Section 162(m) of
the Internal Revenue Code, the committee will consist of two or
more outside directors within the meaning of
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The
administrator has the power to select the employees, consultants
and directors who will receive awards, to determine the terms of
the awards, including the exercise price, the number of shares
subject to each such award, the exercisability of the awards and
the form of consideration payable upon exercise. The
administrator also has the authority to institute an exchange
program whereby the exercise prices of outstanding awards may be
increased or reduced, outstanding awards may be surrendered or
cancelled in exchange for awards with a higher or lower exercise
price, or outstanding awards may be transferred to a third party.
The exercise price of options granted under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan must at least be equal to the fair market value
of our common stock on the date of grant. The term of an
incentive stock option may not exceed ten years, except that
with respect to any participant who owns more than 10% of the
voting power of all classes of our outstanding stock as of the
grant date, the term must not exceed five years and the exercise
price must equal at least 110% of the fair market value on the
grant date. The administrator determines the terms of all other
options.
After termination of an employee, director or consultant, he or
she may exercise his or her option for the period of time stated
in the option agreement. Generally, if termination is due to
death or disability, the option
125
will remain exercisable for twelve months. In all other cases,
the option will generally remain exercisable for three months.
However, an option generally may not be exercised later than the
expiration of its term.
Stock appreciation rights may be granted under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan. Stock appreciation rights allow the recipient to
receive the appreciation in the fair market value of our common
stock between the exercise date and the date of grant. The
administrator determines the terms of stock appreciation rights,
including when such rights become exercisable and whether to pay
the increased appreciation in cash or with shares of our common
stock, or a combination thereof. The exercise price of stock
appreciation rights granted under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
must at least be equal to 100% of the fair market value of our
common stock on the date of grant. Stock appreciation rights
expire under the same rules that apply to stock options.
Restricted stock may be granted under our 2010 Equity Incentive
Plan. Restricted stock awards are shares of our common stock
that vest in accordance with terms and conditions established by
the administrator. The administrator will determine the number
of shares of restricted stock granted to any service provider.
The administrator may impose whatever conditions to vesting it
determines to be appropriate. For example, the administrator may
set restrictions based on the achievement of specific
performance goals. Shares of restricted stock that do not vest
are subject to our right of repurchase or forfeiture.
Our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan provides for an automatic grant
to outside directors of a nondiscretionary award of restricted
stock on April 1 of each year, beginning in 2011, equal to
$50,000 in value on the grant date (rounded up to the nearest
whole share). This automatic restricted stock award will be
issued for no cash consideration and will be forfeited and
automatically transferred to and reacquired by us at no cost if
the director ceases services as a member of our board of
directors. This forfeiture provision will lapse as to 5% of the
award on the first day of each calendar quarter for 15
consecutive calendar quarters beginning on first day of the
calendar quarter immediately following the date of grant, and as
to the remaining 25% of the award on the first day of the
calendar quarter immediately following such fifteenth
consecutive quarter, subject to the grantees continued
service as a director through each such date.
Restricted stock units may be granted under our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan. Restricted stock units are awards that will
result in a payment to a participant at the end of a specified
period only if performance goals established by the
administrator are achieved or the award otherwise vests. The
administrator may impose whatever conditions to vesting,
restrictions and conditions to payment it determines to be
appropriate. For example, the administrator may set restrictions
based on the achievement of specific performance goals, on the
continuation of service or employment or any other basis
determined by the administrator. Payments of earned restricted
stock units may be made, in the administrators discretion,
in cash or with shares of our common stock, or a combination
thereof.
Performance units and performance shares may be granted under
our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan. Performance units and
performance shares are awards that will result in a payment to a
participant only if performance goals established by the
administrator are achieved or the awards otherwise vest. The
administrator will establish organizational or individual
performance goals in its discretion, which, depending on the
extent to which they are met, will determine the number
and/or the
value of performance units and performance shares to be paid out
to participants. Performance units shall have an initial dollar
value established by the administrator prior to the grant date.
Performance shares shall have an initial value equal to the fair
market value of our common stock on the grant date. Payment for
performance units and performance shares may be made in cash or
in shares of our common stock with equivalent value, or in some
combination, as determined by the administrator.
Unless the administrator provides otherwise, our 2010 Equity
Incentive Plan does not allow for the transfer of awards and
only the recipient of an award may exercise an award during his
or her lifetime.
Our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan provides that in the event of our
change in control, as defined in the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan,
each outstanding award will be treated as the administrator
determines, including that the successor corporation or its
parent or subsidiary will assume or substitute an equivalent
award for each outstanding award. The administrator is not
required to treat all awards similarly. If there is no
assumption or substitution of outstanding awards, the awards
will fully vest, all restrictions will lapse, all
126
awards with performance-based vesting will have all performance
goals deemed achieved at 100% of target levels and all other
terms and conditions met and the awards will become fully
exercisable. The administrator will provide notice to the
recipient that he or she has the right to exercise the option
and stock appreciation right as to all of the shares subject to
the award. The option or stock appreciation right will terminate
upon the expiration of the period of time the administrator
provides in the notice. In the event the service of an outside
director is terminated on or following a change in control,
other than pursuant to a voluntary resignation, his or her
options and stock appreciation rights that are not assumed or
substituted in the change in control will fully vest and become
immediately exercisable, all restrictions on restricted stock
will lapse and all performance goals or other vesting
requirements for performance shares and units will be deemed
achieved and all other terms and conditions met.
Our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan will automatically terminate in
2020, unless we terminate it sooner. In addition, our board of
directors has the authority to amend, alter, suspend or
terminate the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan provided such action
does not impair the rights of any participant without the
written consent of such participant.
401(k)
Retirement Plan
We maintain a 401(k) plan which covers substantially all of our
employees. The 401(k) plan is an essential part of the
retirement package needed to attract and retain employees in our
industry. The 401(k) plan permits employees to contribute a
portion of their compensation to the plan on a pre-tax basis, up
to a 2010 statutory limit of $16,500. For employees
50 years of age or older, an additional
catch-up
contribution of $5,500 is allowable. We may provide a matching
contribution, the amount of which is determined at our
discretion. For 401(k) contributions made in calendar 2009, we
matched an amount equal to 25% of each participants
elective deferral, up to 6% of a participants compensation.
Limitations
on Liability and Indemnification Matters
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, to be
effective upon the completion of this offering, will contain
provisions that limit the liability of our directors for
monetary damages to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware
law. Consequently, our directors will not be personally liable
to us or our stockholders for monetary damages for any breach of
fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:
|
|
|
|
|
any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to us or our
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
any act or omission not in good faith or that involves
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or
redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law; or
|
|
|
|
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws, to be effective upon the completion
of this offering, will provide that we are required to indemnify
our directors and officers, in each case to the fullest extent
permitted by Delaware law. Our amended and restated bylaws also
will provide that we are obligated to advance expenses incurred
by a director or officer in advance of the final disposition of
any action or proceeding, and permit us to secure insurance on
behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any
liability arising out of his or her actions in that capacity
regardless of whether we would otherwise be permitted to
indemnify him or her under the provisions of Delaware law. Prior
to completion of this offering, we will enter into agreements to
indemnify our directors, executive officers and other employees
as determined by our board of directors. With specified
exceptions, these agreements will provide for indemnification
for related expenses including, among other things,
attorneys fees, judgments, fines and settlement amounts
incurred by any of these individuals in any action or
proceeding. We believe that these bylaw provisions and
indemnification agreements are necessary to attract and retain
qualified persons as directors and officers. We also maintain
directors and officers liability insurance.
127
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions to be
included in our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, to be effective
upon the completion of this offering, may discourage
stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors and
officers for breach of their fiduciary duty. They may also
reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against our
directors and officers, even though an action, if successful,
might benefit us and other stockholders. Further, a
stockholders investment may be adversely affected to the
extent that we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards
against directors and officers as required by these
indemnification provisions. At present, there is no pending
litigation or proceeding involving any of our directors,
officers or employees for which indemnification is sought, and
we are not aware of any threatened litigation that may result in
claims for indemnification.
128
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Since January 1, 2007, there has not been, nor is there
currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar
transactions to which we were or are a party in which the amount
involved exceeded or exceeds $120,000 and in which any of our
directors, executive officers, holders of more than 5% of any
class of our voting securities, or any member of the immediate
family of any of the foregoing persons, had or will have a
direct or indirect material interest, other than compensation
arrangements with directors and executive officers, which are
described where required in this prospectus under
Executive Compensation, and the transactions
described below.
Private
Placement Financings
In February 2008, we sold 1,512,498 shares of our
Series C Convertible Preferred Stock at a price of $9.00
per share for an aggregate price of $13,612,500, all of which
were sold to investors that are our affiliates, including
Timothy J. Barker, Apax Excelsior VI, L.P. and affiliated
entities, or the Apax Funds, and Camden Strategic Fund III,
L.P. and affiliated entities, or the Camden Funds. The Camden
Funds are not affiliated with Camden Property Trust.
Registration
Rights Agreement
In connection with our Series C financing described above,
we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Registration
Rights Agreement, or the Registration Rights Agreement, with
several of our significant stockholders and affiliates,
including Stephen T. Winn and entities affiliated with
Mr. Winn, Timothy J. Barker, the Apax Funds, individuals
affiliated with the Apax Funds, the Camden Funds, individuals
affiliated with the Camden Funds, Advance Capital Partners, L.P.
and affiliated entities, or the Advance Capital Funds, and
individuals affiliated with the Advance Capital Funds, including
one of our directors, Jeffrey T. Leeds. Pursuant to this
agreement, we granted such stockholders certain registration
rights with respect to shares of our common stock issuable upon
conversion of the shares of preferred stock held by them, shares
of our common stock issuable upon exercise of certain warrants
held by them and shares of our common stock then held or
thereafter acquired by such stockholders. For more information
regarding the Registration Rights Agreement, see
Description of Capital Stock Registration
Rights.
2010
Shareholders Agreement
In June 2010, we entered into a Fifth Amended and Restated
Shareholders Agreement, or 2010 Shareholders Agreement, with
several of our significant stockholders including Stephen T.
Winn, individuals and entities affiliated with Mr. Winn,
Timothy J. Barker, the Apax Funds, individuals affiliated with
the Apax Funds, the Camden Funds, individuals affiliated with
the Camden Funds, the Advance Capital Funds and individuals
affiliated with the Advance Capital Funds, including one of our
directors, Jeffrey T. Leeds. The 2010 Shareholders Agreement,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
provides for the voting of shares with respect to the
constituency of our board of directors and our compensation
committee and audit committee;
|
|
|
|
provides for the redemption, on certain terms and conditions, of
all or any portion of the Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock held by Advance Capital and its affiliates;
|
|
|
|
grants our preferred stockholders certain rights of first
refusal and co-sale with respect to proposed transfers of our
securities by certain stockholders;
|
|
|
|
grants our preferred stockholders a right of first offer with
respect to sales of our shares by us, subject to specified
exclusions (which exclusions are expected to include the sale of
the shares pursuant to this prospectus); and
|
|
|
|
obligates us to deliver periodic financial statements to our
major investors.
|
129
We anticipate that the 2010 Shareholders Agreement will
terminate upon completion of this offering. This is not a
complete description of the 2010 Shareholders Agreement and is
qualified by the full text of the 2010 Shareholders Agreement
filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this
prospectus is a part.
Stock
Options
Certain stock option and restricted stock grants to our
non-employee directors who are not affiliated with our major
stockholders are described in Management
Director Compensation.
Certain stock option grants to our named executive officers are
described in Executive Compensation Grants of
Plan-Based Awards, Executive
Compensation Outstanding Equity Awards at
December 31, 2009 and Executive
Compensation Employment Agreements.
In addition to those option grants, on February 29, 2008,
we granted an option to purchase 150,000 shares of our
common stock to Jason D. Lindwall at an exercise price of $7.00.
The shares subject to the stock option vest in equal quarterly
installments over 16 consecutive quarters commencing on the
first day of the calendar quarter immediately following the
grant date, subject to continued service through each applicable
date.
On February 26, 2009, we granted an option to purchase
50,000 shares of our common stock to Jason D. Lindwall at
an exercise price of $6.00. The shares subject to the stock
option vest in equal quarterly installments over 16 consecutive
quarters commencing on the first day of the calendar quarter
immediately following the grant date, subject to continued
service through each applicable date.
On February 25, 2010, we granted options to purchase
175,000, 112,500, 25,000 and 150,000 shares of our common
stock to Timothy J. Barker, Ashley Chaffin Glover, Jason D.
Lindwall and Dirk D. Wakeham, respectively, at an exercise price
of $7.50. Such stock options vest with respect to 5% of the
shares subject to the stock option each quarter commencing on
the first day of the calendar quarter immediately following the
grant date for 15 consecutive quarters and, with respect to the
remaining 25% of the shares subject to the stock option, on the
first day of the next following calendar quarter, subject to
continued service through each applicable date. Our stock option
agreement with Mr. Barker related to his stock option grant
on February 25, 2010 provides for accelerated vesting in
connection with certain change in control transactions as
described under Executive Compensation
Potential Payments on Termination or Change in
Control Arrangements with Timothy J. Barker.
On May 12, 2010, we granted options to purchase
225,000 shares of our common stock to Margot Lebenberg at
an exercise price of $8.00. Such stock options vest with respect
to 5% of the shares subject to the stock option each quarter
commencing on the first day of the calendar quarter immediately
following the grant date for 15 consecutive quarters and, with
respect to the remaining 25% of the shares subject to the stock
option, on the first day of the next following calendar quarter,
subject to continued service through each applicable date. Our
stock option agreement with Ms. Lebenberg related to this
stock option grant provides for accelerated vesting in certain
circumstances. In the event Ms. Lebenberg ceases to be a
service provider other than for Cause (as defined in our
employment agreement with Ms. Lebenberg dated May 12,
2010), then unvested options subject to the agreement in an
amount equal to the difference between 50,000 and
Ms. Lebenbergs then current vested options under the
agreement will vest on the date Ms. Lebenberg ceases to be
a service provider. Additionally, 50% of the unvested options
subject to the agreement will fully vest upon a business
combination transaction (as defined in our 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan) and 100% of the unvested options subject to the
agreement will fully vest if Ms. Lebenberg ceases to be a
service provider for any reason other than for Cause (as defined
in our employment agreement with Ms. Lebenberg) within one
year of the consummation of a business combination
transaction.
Employment
Arrangements and Indemnification Agreements
We have entered into employment agreements with each of our
executive officers that include, among other things,
compensation terms, provisions regarding payments upon
termination in certain circumstances and confidentiality and
non-competition provisions. The employment agreements with our
named executive officers are described under Executive
Compensation Employment Agreements.
130
Employment
Release Agreement with William Van Valkenberg
On June 8, 2010, we entered into an Employment Release
Agreement with William Van Valkenberg, our former Chief Legal
Officer. The Employment Release Agreement provides, among other
things, that:
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Van Valkenbergs employment with us terminated on
May 11, 2010;
|
|
|
|
from May 11, 2010 through July 31, 2010, Mr. Van
Valkenberg continues to serve as a consultant to us providing
consulting services as specifically requested;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Van Valkenbergs options will continue to vest
through July 31, 2010 and such vested options to purchase
30,000 shares will be exercisable through October 29,
2010;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will pay Mr. Van Valkenberg up to $5,000 for relocation
expenses and reimburse him $14,395.16 for rent due for the
balance of the term of his apartment rental in Dallas, Texas;
|
|
|
|
we will pay Mr. Van Valkenberg his base salary for a period
of six months following May 11, 2010 and will pay up to
40 hours of his accrued and unused vacation balance plus an
additional payment of $10,000 for May 31, 2010;
|
|
|
|
to the extent permitted by law, we will indemnify Mr. Van
Valkenberg for judgments, fines, settlement payments and
expenses in any claim or proceeding to which he is made a party
by reason of his performance of the consulting services
contemplated by the Employment Release Agreement; and
|
|
|
|
in consideration of the Employment Release Agreement and all
payments and benefits paid or accorded to Mr. Van
Valkenberg under the Employment Release Agreement, Mr. Van
Valkenberg releases us, and our past and present parents,
affiliates, subsidiaries, benefit plans, directors, officers,
fiduciaries, employees, agents, attorneys, successors and
assigns from all claims related in any way to his employment
with or separation from us, whether known or unknown or
hereafter arising, from the beginning of time up to and
including the date of the Employment Release Agreement.
|
This is not a complete description of the Employment Release
Agreement and is qualified by the full text of the Employment
Release Agreement with Mr. Van Valkenberg filed as an
exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus
is a part.
Employment
Agreement with Margot Lebenberg
We entered into an employment agreement with Margot Lebenberg,
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, on
May 12, 2010. The employment agreement with
Ms. Lebenberg provides for a base salary at a rate not less
than $315,000 per year. Under the terms of her employment
agreement, beginning in 2010, Ms. Lebenberg is eligible to
receive an annual bonus under the terms of our management
incentive plan of 50% of her base salary for achievement of the
management incentive plan at 100% and the potential to receive
up to 100% of her base salary if the performance criteria for
this potential is achieved as set forth in management incentive
plan. Ms. Lebenbergs annual bonus opportunity under
the 2010 Management Incentive Plan is subject to proration based
on the actual number of days she is employed by us during the
year. Ms. Lebenbergs current base salary is $315,000
and target annual bonus is 50% of her annual base salary with a
potential maximum annual bonus of up to 100% of her annual base
salary. Ms. Lebenberg is guaranteed to receive a minimum of
50% of her target annual bonus for the 12 months commencing
July 19, 2010. In addition, Ms. Lebenberg will be
reimbursed up to $50,000 for relocation expenses associated with
her relocation to Dallas and will be permitted to use our
guaranteed purchase offer services for assistance in selling her
home in New York, New York. Prior to her relocation to Dallas,
Texas, we will pay for temporary housing for
Ms. Lebenbergs use and reimburse travel expenses for
her and her household in accordance with our standard travel
policy. On May 12, 2010, in accordance with the terms of
her employment agreement, Ms. Lebenberg was granted an
option to purchase 225,000 shares of our common stock at an
exercise price of $8.00 as further described in Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions Stock
Options. Ms. Lebenberg is entitled to three weeks
paid vacation per year, is eligible to participate in all
employee welfare benefits plans and other benefit programs and
policies made available generally to our employees or senior
executives and is reimbursed for all reasonable business
expenses.
131
Additionally, we will make available Ms. Lebenberg all
fringe benefits and perquisites that are made available to other
senior executives. If Ms. Lebenbergs employment is
terminated by reason of her death or disability, by us without
cause or by Ms. Lebenberg for good reason, we are obligated
to pay her or her estate, as the case may be, (i) 18 equal
monthly installments of an amount equal to
one-twelfth
of her base salary per installment if such termination occurs
within 12 months of May 12, 2010, (ii) 12 equal
monthly installments of an amount equal to
one-twelfth
of her base salary per installment if such termination occurs
within the period that is more than 12 months and up to
24 months after May 12, 2010 or within 12 months
of a business combination transaction, and (iii) six equal
monthly installments of an amount equal to
one-twelfth
of her base salary per installment if such termination occurs
more than 24 months after May 12, 2010, plus, in each
case, a lump sum cash payment equal to any earned but unpaid
salary and bonus and any accrued but unused vacation as of the
termination date. The salary continuation payments are
conditioned upon Ms. Lebenberg executing a full release and
covenant not to sue on or before the thirtieth day following her
termination. Definitions of cause, good
reason and disability in our employment
agreement with Ms. Lebenberg are substantially the same as
those set forth in Executive Compensation
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
and the definition of business combination
transaction in our employment agreement with
Ms. Lebenberg is substantially the same as set forth in
Executive Compensation Potential Payments Upon
Termination or Change in Control Arrangements with
Timothy J. Barker. Our employment agreement with
Ms. Lebenberg, among other things, also includes
confidentiality provisions and non-competition, non-interference
and non-disparagement obligations during her employment and for
a period of six months following termination. This is not a
complete description of the Employment Agreement and is
qualified by the full text of the Employment Agreement with
Ms. Lebenberg filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Prior to the completion of this offering, we will enter into
indemnification agreements with each of our directors and
officers. The indemnification agreements and the indemnification
provisions, which will be included in our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, to
be effective upon the completion of this offering, will require
us to indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest extent
permitted by Delaware law. For further information, see
Executive Compensation Limitations on
Liability and Indemnification Matters.
Other
Transactions with our Significant Stockholders
On December 31, 2008, we declared and paid all dividends
then accrued and unpaid on outstanding shares of our convertible
preferred stock. We issued an aggregate of 8,147,441 shares
of our common stock and promissory notes in an aggregate
principal amount of $11,064,391.53 to our holders of convertible
preferred stock in payment of this dividend, including
3,859,197 shares of our common stock and promissory notes
in an aggregate principal amount of $4,631,043.20 to Stephen T.
Winn and entities affiliated with Mr. Winn,
10,662 shares of our common stock and promissory notes in
an aggregate principal amount of $33,482.44 to Timothy J.
Barker, 3,037,167 shares of our common stock and promissory
notes in an aggregate principal amount of $4,345,977.78 to the
Apax Funds, 854,202 shares of our common stock and
promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of
$1,025,047.60 to the Advance Capital Funds, 13,097 shares
of our common stock and promissory notes in an aggregate
principal amount of $15,718.77 to Jeffrey T. Leeds, one of our
directors, and 347,081 shares of our common stock and
promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of $969,070.74
to the Camden Funds. We expect to repay all amounts outstanding
under the promissory notes issued in this dividend upon
completion of this offering. See Use of Proceeds.
On December 31, 2009, we declared and paid all dividends
then accrued and unpaid on outstanding shares of our convertible
preferred stock. We issued an aggregate of 1,418,669 shares
of our common stock and cash in an aggregate amount of
$2,515,832 to our holders of convertible preferred stock in
payment of this dividend, including 654,352 shares of our
common stock and cash in an aggregate amount of $785,225.56 to
Stephen T. Winn and entities affiliated with Mr. Winn,
3,220 shares of our common stock and cash in an aggregate
amount of $13,620.12 to Timothy J. Barker, 515,366 shares
of our common stock and cash in an aggregate amount of
$1,142,187.95 to the Apax Funds, 144,947 shares of our
common stock and cash in an aggregate amount of $173,937.49 to
the Advance Capital Funds, 2,222 shares of our common stock
and cash
132
in an aggregate amount of $2,667.08 to Jeffrey T. Leeds, one of
our directors, and 92,734 shares of our common stock and
cash in an aggregate amount of $387,332.82 to the Camden Funds.
On April 23, 2010, we declared and paid all dividends
accrued and unpaid on outstanding shares of our Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A1 Convertible
Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
through and including March 31, 2010. We issued an
aggregate of 342,632 shares of our common stock and
promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of $435,226.65
to our holders of such series of convertible preferred stock in
payment of this dividend, including 157,164 shares of our
common stock and promissory notes in an aggregate principal
amount of $188,600.07 to Stephen T. Winn and entities affiliated
with Mr. Winn, 770 shares of our common stock and
promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of $1,849.50
to Timothy J. Barker, 125,321 shares of our common stock
and promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of
$150,389.28 to the Apax Funds, 35,247 shares of our common
stock and promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of
$42,296.88 to the Advance Capital Funds, 540 shares of our
capital stock and promissory notes in an aggregate principal
amount of $649.46 to Jeffrey T. Leeds, one of our directors, and
22,189 shares of our common stock and promissory notes in
an aggregate principal amount of $48,825.77 to the Camden Funds.
We expect to repay all amounts outstanding under the promissory
notes issued in this dividend upon completion of this offering.
See Use of Proceeds.
In 2007, 2008 and 2009, we reimbursed Seren Capital, Ltd., a
significant stockholder and an entity controlled by Stephen T.
Winn, approximately $87,000, $34,000 and $44,000, respectively,
for our use of an airplane owned by Seren Capital, Ltd.
We employ Chris Winn, a son of Stephen T. Winn. In 2009, we paid
Chris Winn total cash compensation of approximately $133,000. On
December 12, 2008, we granted Chris Winn an option to
purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price
per share of $6.00. On November 19, 2009, we granted
Chris Winn an option to purchase 17,500 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price per share of $6.00.
Policies
and Procedures for Related Party Transactions
As provided by our audit committee charter to be effective upon
completion of this offering, our audit committee is responsible
for reviewing and approving in advance any related party
transaction. Prior to the effectiveness of such audit committee
charter, related party transactions were approved by our board
of directors. Neither the board of directors nor the audit
committee has adopted specific policies or guidelines relating
to the approval of related party transactions. The members of
our board of directors determine whether to approve a related
party transaction in the exercise of their fiduciary duties as
directors. Related party transactions have been approved by a
majority of the board of directors, including a majority of the
disinterested directors with respect to such transaction. Upon
completion of this offering, the directors who are members of
our audit committee will determine whether to approve related
party transactions in the exercise of their fiduciary duties as
directors and members of the audit committee.
133
PRINCIPAL
AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table sets forth information regarding beneficial
ownership of our common stock as of July 15, 2010 and as
adjusted to reflect the shares of common stock to be issued and
sold in the offering by:
|
|
|
|
|
each person or group of affiliated persons known by us to be the
beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
each of our named executive officers;
|
|
|
|
each of our directors;
|
|
|
|
all executive officers and directors as a group; and
|
|
|
|
each of our selling stockholders.
|
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules
of the SEC. The information does not necessarily indicate
beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under these rules,
the number of shares of common stock deemed outstanding includes
shares issuable upon exercise of options or warrants held by the
respective person or group which may be exercised or converted
within 60 days after July 15, 2010. For purposes of
calculating each persons or groups percentage
ownership, stock options and warrants exercisable within
60 days after July 15, 2010 are included for that
person or group but not the stock options or warrants of any
other person or group.
Percentage of beneficial ownership is based on
56,861,964 shares of common stock outstanding as of
July 15, 2010, which includes 399,749 shares of common
stock issuable in payment of accumulated and unpaid dividends on
our Series A, Series A1 and Series B convertible
preferred stock accrued as of July 15, 2010, and
62,861,964 shares of common stock outstanding after
completion of this offering.
Unless otherwise indicated and subject to applicable community
property laws, to our knowledge, each stockholder named in the
following table possesses sole voting and investment power over
the shares listed, except for those jointly owned with that
persons spouse. Unless otherwise noted below, the address
of each person listed on the table is
c/o RealPage,
Inc., 4000 International Parkway, Carrollton, Texas 75007.
Beneficial ownership representing less than 1% is denoted with
an asterisk (*).
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Owned After the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Offering if Over-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially
|
|
Subject
|
|
Allotment Option
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
Number of
|
|
Owned After the
|
|
to Over-
|
|
is Exercised
|
|
|
Prior to the Offering
|
|
Shares
|
|
Offering
|
|
Allotment
|
|
in Full
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Offered
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Option
|
|
Shares
|
|
Percentage
|
|
5% Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Advance Capital Partners,
L.P.(1)
|
|
|
3,887,733
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,887,733
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
450,131
|
|
|
|
2,437,602
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
%
|
Entities affiliated with Apax Excelsior VI,
L.P.(2)
|
|
|
14,934,167
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,934,167
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
1,574,869
|
|
|
|
9,359,298
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
Stephen T. Winn and entities affiliated with Stephen T.
Winn(3)
|
|
|
30,339,962
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
1,647,500
|
|
|
|
28,692,462
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,692,462
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen T.
Winn(3)
|
|
|
30,339,962
|
|
|
|
53.4
|
|
|
|
1,647,500
|
|
|
|
28,692,462
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,692,462
|
|
|
|
45.6
|
|
Timothy J.
Barker(4)
|
|
|
498,684
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
448,684
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448,684
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Dirk D.
Wakeham(5)
|
|
|
200,937
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
182,937
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,937
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Ashley Chaffin
Glover(6)
|
|
|
215,937
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
200,937
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200,937
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
William E. Van
Valkenberg(7)
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Alfred R.
Berkeley, III(8)
|
|
|
149,166
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
149,166
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,166
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Richard M.
Berkeley(9)
|
|
|
2,792,025
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
2,242,025
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,242,025
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Peter
Gyenes(10)
|
|
|
12,666
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,666
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,666
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Jeffrey T.
Leeds(11)
|
|
|
3,947,342
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
|
2,947,342
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
450,131
|
|
|
|
2,497,211
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Jason A.
Wright(2)
|
|
|
14,934,167
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
10,934,167
|
|
|
|
17.4
|
|
|
|
1,574,869
|
|
|
|
9,359,298
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
All executive officers and directors as a group
(11 people)(12)
|
|
|
53,159,636
|
|
|
|
92.1
|
|
|
|
7,280,500
|
|
|
|
45,879,136
|
|
|
|
72.0
|
|
|
|
2,025,000
|
|
|
|
43,854,136
|
|
|
|
68.9
|
|
Other Selling Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entities affiliated with Camden Partners Strategic Fund III,
L.P.(13)
|
|
|
2,677,025
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
2,127,025
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,127,025
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Brandon B.
Bible(14)
|
|
|
108,906
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
98,906
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,906
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
David
Carner(15)
|
|
|
152,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
137,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Mark
Case(16)
|
|
|
310,937
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
290,937
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,937
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
William P.
Chaney(17)
|
|
|
88,906
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
80,906
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,906
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Norman
Denler(18)
|
|
|
113,749
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
103,749
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103,749
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Robert
Dilworth(19)
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,500
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
James W.
Harrison(20)
|
|
|
142,031
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
129,031
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,031
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jason D.
Lindwall(21)
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Andrea
Massey(22)
|
|
|
136,249
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
123,249
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,249
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Michael
Mueller(23)
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jeffrey and Patricia Roper, tenants in
common(24)
|
|
|
410,312
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
390,312
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,312
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Dean R.
Schmidt(25)
|
|
|
454,219
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
434,219
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434,219
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Janine Steiner
Jovanovic(26)
|
|
|
94,843
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
84,843
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,843
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Leslie L.
Turner(27)
|
|
|
145,625
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
132,625
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,625
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents 928,171 shares held by Advance Capital Offshore
Partners, L.P. and 2,959,562 shares held by Advance Capital
Partners, L.P., which includes 9,749 shares issuable to
Advance Capital Offshore Partners, L.P. and 31,088 shares
issuable to Advance Capital Partners, L.P. in payment of
accumulated and unpaid dividends accrued as of July 15,
2010. Advance Capital Management, LLC, or Advance Capital
Management, is the general partner of Advance Capital
Associates, L.P., or Advance Capital Associates, which is the
general partner of Advance Capital Partners, L.P. and Advance
Capital Offshore Associates, LDC, which is the general partner
of Advance Capital Offshore Partners, L.P. Because Jeffrey T.
Leeds and |
135
|
|
|
|
|
Robert A. Bernstein are the members of Advance Capital
Management, which is the general partner of Advance Capital
Associates, which is the general partner of Advance Capital
Partners, L.P. and Advance Capital Offshore Associates, LDC,
which is the general partner of Advance Capital Offshore
Partners, L.P., Messrs. Leeds and Bernstein may be deemed to
have sole voting and dispositive power of the shares held by
Advance Capital Offshore Partners, L.P. and Advance Capital
Partners, L.P., or the Advance Capital Funds. The address of the
Advance Capital Funds and their affiliated entities and
individuals is 350 Park Avenue, 23rd Floor, New York, New
York 10022. For a discussion of our material relationships with
the Advance Capital Funds and affiliated entities, see
Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions. |
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Represents 12,761,251 shares held by Apax Excelsior VI,
L.P., 1,042,403 shares held by Apax Excelsior VI-A C.V.,
694,436 shares held by Apax Excelsior VI-B C.V. and
436,077 shares held by Patricof Private Investment Club
III, L.P., which includes 124,077 shares issuable to Apax
Excelsior VI, L.P., 10,135 shares issuable to Apax
Excelsior VI-A C.V., 6,751 shares issuable to Apax
Excelsior VI-B C.V. and 4,240 shares issuable to Patricof
Private Investment Club III, L.P. in payment of accumulated and
unpaid dividends accrued as of July 15, 2010. Apax
Managers, Inc., or Apax Managers, is the general partner of Apax
Excelsior VI Partners, L.P., or Apax Excelsior VI Partners,
which is the general partner of each of Apax Excelsior VI, L.P.,
Apax Excelsior VI-A C.V., Apax Excelsior VI-B C.V. and Patricof
Private Investment Club III, or the Apax Funds. John F. Megrue
is the sole director of Apax Managers, Inc. and may be deemed to
have voting and dispositive power over the shares held by the
Apax Funds. Mr. Megrue disclaims beneficial ownership over
the shares held by the Apax Funds except to the extent of his
pecuniary interest therein. The address of the Apax Funds and
their affiliated entities and individuals is 601 Lexington
Avenue, New York, New York 10022. For a discussion of our
material relationships with the Apax Funds and affiliated
entities, see Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions. |
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Represents 22,728,665 shares held by Seren Capital, Ltd.,
which includes 181,505 shares issuable to Seren Capital,
Ltd. in payment of accumulated and unpaid dividends accrued as
of July 15, 2010, 125,000 shares held by Seren
Catalyst, L.P., 615,625 shares held by Stephen T. Winn 1996
Family LPA, 5,370,672 shares held by Stephen T. Winn, which
includes 2,903 shares issuable to Stephen T. Winn in
payment of accumulated and unpaid dividends accrued as of
July 15, 2010, and 1,500,000 shares held by Melinda G. Winn
and Stephen T. Winn, as trustees of the Melinda G. Winn 2010
QTIP Trust. Stephen T. Winn is the sole manager and president of
Seren Capital Management, L.L.C., which is the general partner
of Seren Capital, Ltd. and Seren Catalyst, L.P., or the Seren
Partnerships and, by virtue of this relationship, has sole
voting and dispositive power over the shares held by the Seren
Partnerships. Mr. Winn is the general partner of the
Stephen T. Winn 1996 Family LPA and has voting and dispositive
power over the shares held by the Stephen T. Winn 1996 Family
LPA. Stephen T. Winn and Melinda G. Winn are trustees of the
Melinda G. Winn 2010 QTIP Trust and share voting and dispositive
power over the shares held by the Melinda G. Winn 2010 QTIP
Trust. For a discussion of our material relationships with
Mr. Winn and his affiliated entities, see Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions. |
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Represents 215,559 shares held by Timothy J. Barker, which
includes 907 shares issuable to Timothy J. Barker in
payment of accumulated and unpaid dividends accrued as of
July 15, 2010, and 283,125 shares issuable upon the
exercise of options to purchase shares of our common stock held
by Mr. Barker that are fully vested and exercisable within
60 days of July 15, 2010. For a discussion of our
material relationships with Mr. Barker, see Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions. |
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Mr. Wakeham
that are fully vested and exercisable within 60 days of
July 15, 2010. |
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Ms. Chaffin
Glover that are fully vested and exercisable within 60 days
of July 15, 2010. |
|
|
|
(7) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Mr. Van
Valkenberg that are fully vested and exercisable within
60 days of July 15, 2010.
Mr. Van Valkenbergs employment with us ended and
he ceased to be an executive officer effective as of
May 11, 2010. |
136
|
|
|
(8) |
|
Represents 91,666 shares held by Alfred R.
Berkeley, III, of which 14,583 are subject to a repurchase
right held by us which lapses with respect to an additional
520.8 shares on the last day of each calendar month
provided that Mr. Berkeley remains a director on each such
applicable date and 6,332 are subject to forfeiture to us, which
forfeiture restriction lapses as to an additional
333.3 shares on the first day of each calendar quarter and
as to the remaining 1,666.5 shares on April 1, 2014,
provided that Mr. Berkeley remains a director on each such
applicable date, and 57,500 held by Muriel Van Dusen Berkeley
and Richard M. Berkeley, as Trustees of the 2009 Berkeley Family
Resource Trust dated
12/11/2009,
or the Berkeley Family Trust. Muriel Van Dusen Berkeley and
Richard M. Berkeley are the trustees of the Berkeley Family
Trust and share voting and dispositive power over the shares
held by the Berkeley Family Trust. By virtue of his relationship
with his spouse, Muriel Van Dusen Berkeley, Alfred R. Berkeley
may be deemed to share voting and dispositive power over the
shares held by the Berkeley Family Trust. Mr. Berkeley is
an affiliate of a broker-dealer, purchased the securities in the
ordinary course of business and, at the time of the purchase of
the securities to be resold, had no agreements or
understandings, directly or indirectly, with any person to
distribute the securities. |
|
|
|
(9) |
|
Represents 2,570,176 shares held by Camden Partners
Strategic Fund III, L.P., which includes 25,092 shares
issuable to Camden Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P. in
payment of accumulated and unpaid dividends accrued as of
July 15, 2010, 106,849 shares held by Camden Partners
Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P., which includes 1,041 shares issuable to Camden
Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. in payment of accumulated and unpaid dividends accrued as
of July 15, 2010, 57,500 held by Muriel Van Dusen Berkeley
and Richard M. Berkeley, as Trustees of the 2009 Berkeley Family
Resource Trust dated
12/11/2009
and 57,500 held by Richard M. Berkeley, as Trustee of the Alfred
and Muriel Berkeley Survivorship Trust dated
12/1/2005.
Camden Partners Strategic Manager, LLC, or Camden Partners
Strategic Manager, is the managing member of Camden Partners
Strategic III, LLC, or Camden Partners Strategic III, which is
the general partner of each of Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III, L.P. and Camden Partners Strategic Fund III-A,
L.P., or the Camden Funds. Because Richard M. Berkeley is the
managing member of Camden Partners Strategic Manager, Camden
Partners Strategic Manager is the managing member of Camden
Partners Strategic III and Camden Partners
Strategic III is the general partner of each of the Camden
Funds, Mr. Berkeley may be deemed to have voting and
dispositive power over the shares held by the Camden Funds.
Mr. Berkeley and Muriel Van Dusen Berkeley are the trustees
of the 2009 Berkeley Family Resource Trust dated
12/11/2009,
or the Berkeley Family Trust, and share voting and dispositive
power over the shares held by the Berkeley Family Trust along
with Alfred R. Berkeley, who may be deemed to share voting
and dispositive power over the shares held by the Berkeley
Family Trust by virtue of his relationship with his spouse,
Muriel Van Dusen Berkeley. Mr. Berkeley is the trustee of
the Alfred and Muriel Berkeley Survivorship Trust dated
12/1/2005,
or the Berkeley Survivorship Trust, and has voting and
dispositive power over the shares held by the Berkeley
Survivorship Trust. Mr. Berkeley disclaims beneficial
ownership of shares held by the Berkeley Family Trust and the
Berkeley Survivorship Trust, except to the extent of any
pecuniary interest therein. Mr. Berkeley is an affiliate of
a broker-dealer, purchased the securities in the ordinary course
of business and, at the time of the purchase of the securities
to be resold, had no agreements or understandings, directly or
indirectly, with any person to distribute the securities. The
address of the Camden Funds and their affiliated entities and
individuals is 500 E. Pratt Street, Suite 1200,
Baltimore, Maryland 21202. For a discussion of our material
relationships with Camden Partners and its affiliated entities,
see Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions. The Camden Funds are not affiliated with
Camden Property Trust. |
|
|
|
(10) |
|
Represents 6,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of
options to purchase shares of our common stock held by
Mr. Gyenes that are fully vested and exercisable within
60 days of July 15, 2010 and 6,666 restricted shares
of our common stock, of which 6,332 are subject to forfeiture to
us, which forfeiture restriction lapses as to an additional
333.3 shares on the first day of each calendar quarter and
as to the remaining 1,666.5 shares on April 1, 2014,
provided that Mr. Gyenes remains a director on each such
applicable date. |
|
|
|
(11) |
|
Represents 59,609 shares held by Jeffrey T. Leeds, which
includes 625 shares issuable to Jeffrey T. Leeds in payment
of accumulated and unpaid dividends accrued as of July 15,
2010, 928,171 shares held by |
137
|
|
|
|
|
Advance Capital Offshore Partners, L.P. and
2,959,562 shares held by Advance Capital Partners, L.P.,
which includes 9,749 shares issuable to Advance Capital
Offshore Partners, L.P. and 31,088 shares issuable to
Advance Capital Partners, L.P. in payment of accumulated and
unpaid dividends accrued as of July 15, 2010. Because
Mr. Leeds is a member of Advance Capital Management, LLC,
which is the general partner of Advance Capital Associates,
L.P., which is the general partner of Advance Capital Partners,
L.P. and Advance Capital Offshore Associates, LDC, which is the
general partner of Advance Capital Offshore Partners, L.P.,
Mr. Leeds may be deemed to have voting and dispositive
power of the shares held by Advance Capital Offshore Partners,
L.P. and Advance Capital Partners, L.P. For a discussion of our
material relationships with Mr. Leeds, see Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions. |
|
|
|
(12) |
|
Consists of 5,744,172 shares held of record by our
directors and executive officers, which includes 4,435 shares
issuable to our directors and executive officers in payment of
accumulated and unpaid dividends accrued as of July 15,
2010, and of which 14,583 shares are subject to a
repurchase right held by us that lapses with respect to an
additional 520.8 shares on the last day of each calendar
month provided that Mr. A. Berkeley remains one of our
directors on each such applicable date, 12,664 are subject to
forfeiture to us, which forfeiture restriction lapses as to an
additional 333.3 shares on the first day of each calendar
quarter and 1,666.5 shares on April 1, 2014, provided
that Mr. A. Berkeley remains one of our directors on
each such applicable date, and as to an additional
333.3 shares on the first day of each calendar quarter and
1,666.5 shares on April 1, 2014, provided that
Mr. Gyenes remains one of our directors on each such
applicable date, 832,249 shares issuable upon the exercise
of options held by our directors and executive officers that are
fully vested and exercisable within 60 days of
July 15, 2010 and 46,583,215 shares held by entities
over which our directors and executive officers may be deemed to
have voting or dispositive power, which includes 393,678 shares
issuable to entities over which our directors and executive
officers may be deemed to have voting or dispositive power in
payment of accumulated and unpaid dividends accrued as of
July 15, 2010. Excludes Mr. Van Valkenberg, as he
was no longer an executive officer as of May 11, 2010. |
|
|
|
(13) |
|
Represents 2,570,176 shares held by Camden Partners
Strategic Fund III, L.P. and 106,849 shares held by
Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P., which includes 25,092 shares issuable to Camden
Partners Strategic Fund III, L.P. and 1,041 shares
issuable to Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P. in payment of accumulated and unpaid dividends accrued as
of July 15, 2010. Camden Partners Strategic Manager, LLC,
or Camden Partners Strategic Manager, is the managing member of
Camden Partners Strategic III, LLC, or Camden Partners Strategic
III, which is the general partner of Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III, L.P. and Camden Partners Strategic
Fund III-A,
L.P., or the Camden Funds. Because Richard M. Berkeley, Don
Hughes, Dick Johnston and David Warnock are the managing members
of Camden Partners Strategic Manager, Camden Partners Strategic
Manager is managing member of Camden Partners Strategic III
and Camden Partners Strategic III is the general partner of
the Camden Funds, Messrs. Berkeley, Hughes, Johnston and
Warnock may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over
the shares held by the Camden Funds. The address of the Camden
Funds and their affiliated entities and individuals is
500 E. Pratt Street, Suite 1200, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202. For a discussion of our material relationships
with the Camden Funds and affiliated entities, see Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions. The Camden
Funds are not affiliated with Camden Property Trust. |
|
|
|
(14) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Mr. Bible that
are fully vested and exercisable within 60 days of July 15,
2010. Mr. Bible is one of our employees. |
|
|
|
(15) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Mr. Carner that
are fully vested and exercisable within 60 days of July 15,
2010. Mr. Carner is one of our employees. |
|
|
|
(16) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Mr. Case that
are fully vested and exercisable within 60 days of July 15,
2010. Mr. Case is one of our employees. |
138
|
|
|
(17) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Mr. Chaney that
are fully vested and exercisable within 60 days of July 15,
2010. Mr. Chaney is one of our employees. |
|
|
|
(18) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Mr. Denler that
are fully vested and exercisable within 60 days of July 15,
2010. Mr. Denler is one of our employees. |
|
|
|
(19) |
|
Mr. Dilworth is an affiliate of a broker-dealer, purchased the
securities in the ordinary course of business and, at the time
of the purchase of the securities to be resold, had no
agreements or understandings, directly or indirectly, with any
person to distribute the securities. Mr. Dilworth is a
party to our Fifth Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement
and our Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights
Agreement. For a description of the terms of these agreements,
see Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions 2010 Shareholders Agreement and
Description of Capital Stock Registration
Rights. |
|
|
|
(20) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Mr. Harrison
that are fully vested and exercisable within 60 days of
July 15, 2010. Mr. Harrison is one of our employees. |
|
|
|
(21) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Mr. Lindwall
that are fully vested and exercisable within 60 days of
July 15, 2010. For a discussion of our material
relationships with Mr. Lindwall, see Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions. |
|
|
|
(22) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Ms. Massey that
are fully vested and exercisable within 60 days of July 15,
2010. Ms. Massey is one of our employees. |
|
|
|
(23) |
|
Mr. Mueller is a party to our Fifth Amended and Restated
Shareholders Agreement and our Second Amended and Restated
Registration Rights Agreement. For a description of the terms of
these agreements, see Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions 2010 Shareholders Agreement
and Description of Capital Stock Registration
Rights. |
|
|
|
(24) |
|
Represents 200,000 shares held by Jeffrey Roper and
Patricia Roper, tenants in common and 210,312 shares
issuable upon the exercise of options to purchase shares of our
common stock held by Mr. Roper that are fully vested and
exercisable within 60 days of July 15, 2010.
Mr. Roper is one of our employees. |
|
|
|
(25) |
|
Represents 75,000 shares held by Mobileneer, Ltd.,
50,000 shares held by Dean R. Schmidt and
329,219 shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Mr. Schmidt
that are fully vested and exercisable within 60 days of
July 15, 2010. Mr. Schmidt is a partner of Mobileneer,
Ltd. and may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over
the shares held by Mobileneer, Ltd. The address of Mobileneer,
Ltd. is 5208 Seascape Lane, Plano, Texas 75093. Mr. Schmidt
is one of our employees. |
|
|
|
(26) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Ms. Steiner
Jovanovic that are fully vested and exercisable within
60 days of July 15, 2010. Ms. Steiner Jovanovic
is one of our employees. |
|
|
|
(27) |
|
Represents shares issuable upon the exercise of options to
purchase shares of our common stock held by Ms. Turner that
are fully vested and exercisable within 60 days of
July 15, 2010. Ms. Turner is one of our employees. |
139
DESCRIPTION
OF CAPITAL STOCK
General
The following is a summary of the rights of our common stock and
preferred stock and certain provisions of our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated
bylaws, as they will be in effect upon the completion of this
offering. For more detailed information, please see our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and
restated bylaws, to be effective upon completion of this
offering, which will be filed as exhibits to the registration
statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Immediately following the completion of this offering, our
authorized capital stock will consist of 135,000,000 shares,
with a par value of $0.001 per share, of which:
|
|
|
|
|
125,000,000 shares are designated as common stock; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 shares are designated as preferred stock.
|
At June 30, 2010, assuming the conversion of all
outstanding shares of our convertible preferred stock into
common stock and the issuance of 343,188 shares of our
common stock in payment of accumulated and unpaid dividends on
our Series A, Series A1 and Series B convertible
preferred stock accrued as of June 30, 2010, we had
outstanding 56,305,404 shares of common stock, held of
record by 102 stockholders. In addition, as of
June 30, 2010, we had outstanding options to acquire
9,212,034 shares of common stock.
Common
Stock
The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per
share on all matters to be voted on by the stockholders. Subject
to preferences that may be applicable to any outstanding shares
of preferred stock, holders of common stock are entitled to
receive ratably such dividends as may be declared by our board
of directors out of funds legally available therefor. In the
event we liquidate, dissolve or wind up, holders of common stock
are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after
payment of liabilities and the liquidation preferences of any
outstanding shares of preferred stock. Holders of common stock
have no preemptive, conversion or subscription rights. There are
no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable to the
common stock. All outstanding shares of common stock are, and
all shares of common stock to be outstanding upon completion of
this offering will be, fully paid and nonassessable.
Preferred
Stock
Our board of directors has the authority, without further action
by the stockholders, to issue from time to time the preferred
stock in one or more series, to fix the number of shares of any
such series and the designation thereof and to fix the rights,
preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed
upon such preferred stock, including dividend rights, dividend
rate, conversion rights, voting rights, rights and terms of
redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preference and
sinking fund terms, any or all of which may be greater than or
senior to the rights of the common stock. The issuance of
preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of
holders of common stock and reduce the likelihood that such
holders will receive dividend payments and payments upon
liquidation. Such issuance could have the effect of decreasing
the market price of our common stock. The issuance of preferred
stock or even the ability to issue preferred stock could have
the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in
control. We have no present plans to issue any shares of
preferred stock.
Registration
Rights
Second
Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement
We have entered into a Second Amended and Restated Registration
Rights Agreement dated February 22, 2008, or the
Registration Rights Agreement, with certain of our stockholders.
Subject to the terms of this agreement, the holders of an
aggregate of 53,089,614 shares of our common stock, or
their permitted
140
transferees, are entitled to rights with respect to the
registration of these shares under the Securities Act. These
rights include demand registration rights, short-form
registration rights and piggyback registration rights.
The following description of the terms of the Registration
Rights Agreement is intended as a summary only and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to the Registration Rights
Agreement filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of
which this prospectus is a part.
Demand registration rights. Under the terms of
the Registration Rights Agreement, the holders of a majority of
our then outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock
and the holders of a majority of our then outstanding
Series A1 Convertible Preferred Stock each may make a
written request to us for the registration of the offer and sale
of all or part of the shares having registration rights, or
registrable securities, under the Securities Act if the amount
of registrable securities to be registered has an aggregate
market value, based upon the offering price to the public, equal
to at least $10 million. We will be required, upon such
written request, to deliver notice of such registration request
to the other holders of registrable securities within ten days
after our receipt of the request and to use our best efforts to
effect the requested registration within 90 days after we
have given written notice. We are required to effect only two
registrations pursuant to this provision of the registration
agreement at the request of holders of a majority of the
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and one registration
pursuant to this provision of the registration statement at the
request of holders of a majority of the Series A1
Convertible Preferred Stock. We are not required to effect a
demand registration prior to six months after the completion of
this offering.
Short-form registration rights. If we are
eligible to file a registration statement on
Form S-3
or any successor form with similar short-form
disclosure requirements, the holders of registrable securities
under the Registration Rights Agreement have unlimited rights to
request registration of their shares on
Form S-3
provided that the registrable securities to be registered have
an aggregate market value, based upon the offering price to the
public, equal to at least $2.5 million. We are not required
to effect more than two short form registrations in any
12-month
period.
Piggyback registration rights. If we register
any of our securities either for our own account or for the
account of other security holders, the holders of the
registrable securities under the Registration Rights Agreement
are entitled to include their registrable securities in the
registration subject to certain exceptions relating to employee
benefit plans and mergers and acquisitions. The managing
underwriters of any underwritten offering may limit the number
of registrable securities included in the underwritten offering
if the underwriters believe that including these shares would
materially or adversely affect the offering subject to certain
limitations.
Expenses. All fees, costs and expenses of
registrations pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement will
be borne by us except for the underwriting fees, discounts or
commissions attributable to the sale of the registrable
securities, which shall be borne by the holders selling such
registrable securities in the registration.
1998 Shareholders
Agreement
We have also entered into a Shareholders Agreement with certain
of our stockholders dated December 1, 1998, as amended, or
the 1998 Shareholders Agreement, pursuant to which the holders
of an aggregate of 29,798,243 shares of our common stock,
or their permitted transferees, are entitled to piggyback
registration rights for registrations occurring after a public
market for shares of our common stock has been established.
Under the terms of the 1998 Shareholders Agreement, a
public market for shares of our common stock has been
established when at least 15% of our common stock has been sold
pursuant to one or more effective registration statements under
the Securities Act and our common stock is publicly traded in
the over-the-counter market or is listed on a national
securities exchange.
The following description of the registration rights provisions
included in the 1998 Shareholders Agreement is intended as
a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
the 1998 Shareholders Agreement filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.
Piggyback registration rights. Under the terms
of the 1998 Shareholders Agreement, if we register shares
of our common stock for sale to the public after the
establishment of a public market for the shares, the
141
holders of shares having registration rights under the 1998
Shareholders Agreement, or registrable shares, are entitled to
include their registrable shares in the registration subject to
certain exceptions relating to employee benefit plans and
mergers and acquisitions. The managing underwriters of any
underwritten offering may limit the number of registrable shares
included in the underwritten offering if the underwriters
believe that including these shares would materially or
adversely affect the offering subject to certain limitations.
Expenses. All fees, costs and expenses of
piggyback registrations pursuant to the 1998 Shareholders
Agreement will be borne by us except for the fees of counsel to
the selling holders and underwriting fees, discounts or
commissions attributable to the sale of the registrable shares,
which will be borne by the selling holders.
Rights of
First Offer,
Co-Sale and
Appraisal
Pursuant to the 1998 Shareholders Agreement, Seren Capital,
Ltd., an entity affiliated with Stephen T. Winn, is entitled to
a right of first offer with respect to 100,000 shares of
our common stock and holders of an aggregate of
100,000 shares of our common stock, or their permitted
transferees, are entitled to co-sale and appraisal rights with
respect to their shares in certain circumstances. These rights
terminate if a public market for shares of our common stock has
been established. Under the terms of our 1998 Shareholders
Agreement, a public market for shares of our common stock has
been established when at least 15% of our common stock then
outstanding has been sold pursuant to one or more effective
registration statements under the Securities Act and our common
stock is publicly traded in the over-the-counter market or is
listed on a national securities exchange.
The following description of the rights of first offer, co-sale
and appraisal included in the 1998 Shareholders Agreement
is intended as a summary only and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to the 1998 Shareholders Agreement filed as an
exhibit to the registration statement to which this prospectus
is part.
If a party to the 1998 Shareholders Agreement desires to
transfer shares of our common stock to a third party, such
stockholder is required first to give notice to Seren Capital,
Ltd. and to offer to sell to Seren Capital, Ltd. the shares of
common stock such stockholder proposes to transfer. Seren
Capital, Ltd. is controlled by Stephen T. Winn.
Under the terms of the 1998 Shareholders Agreement, if
Stephen T. Winn or entities or individuals affiliated with him
propose to sell any of their shares of common stock, they must
first offer to the other stockholders who are party to the
1998 Shareholders Agreement an opportunity to sell their
respective pro rata share of the shares proposed to be sold in
such proposed sale.
In addition, if Stephen T. Winn or entities or individuals
affiliated with him, together with any other party or parties to
the 1998 Shareholders Agreement collectively owning over
50% of our outstanding common stock determine to sell their
common stock to a third party, whether by sale, merger or
consolidation, or to cause us to sell all or substantially all
of our assets to a third party, such stockholders may, at their
option, require the other stockholders who are parties to the
1998 Shareholders Agreement to vote their shares in favor
of such transaction and sell their shares in such transaction.
If any stockholder who is a party to the 1998 Shareholders
Agreement is required to sell their shares in connection with a
sale of our company and disagrees with the terms of such sale,
that stockholder may obtain an appraisal of his or her common
stock and, depending on the result of the appraisal, may cause
us to pay that stockholder the appraised price of his or her
common stock and the costs of the appraisal.
Anti-Takeover
Effects of Delaware Law and Our Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws
Certain provisions of Delaware law and our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated
bylaws, as they will be in effect upon the completion of this
offering, contain provisions that could have the effect of
delaying, deferring or discouraging another party from acquiring
control of us. These provisions, which are summarized below, may
have the effect of discouraging coercive takeover practices and
inadequate takeover bids. These provisions are also designed, in
part, to encourage persons seeking to acquire control of us to
first negotiate with our board of directors. We believe that the
benefits of
142
increased protection of our potential ability to negotiate with
an unfriendly or unsolicited acquirer outweigh the disadvantages
of discouraging a proposal to acquire us because negotiation of
these proposals could result in an improvement of their terms.
Undesignated preferred stock. As discussed
above, our board of directors has the ability to issue preferred
stock with voting or other rights or preferences that could
impede the success of any attempt to change control of us. These
and other provisions may have the effect of deferring hostile
takeovers or delaying changes in control or management of our
company.
Limits on ability of stockholders to act by written consent
or call a special meeting. Our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation will provide that our stockholders
may not act by written consent. This limit on the ability of our
stockholders to act by written consent may lengthen the amount
of time required to take stockholder actions. As a result, a
holder controlling a majority of our capital stock would not be
able to amend our bylaws or remove directors without holding a
meeting of our stockholders called in accordance with our
amended and restated bylaws.
In addition, our amended and restated bylaws will provide that
special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by the
chairperson of our board of directors, our Chief Executive
Officer, our president (in the absence of our Chief Executive
Officer) or our board of directors. Our amended and restated
bylaws will prohibit a stockholder from calling a special
meeting, which may delay the ability of our stockholders to
force consideration of a proposal or for holders controlling a
majority of our capital stock to take any action, including the
removal of directors.
Requirements for advance notification of stockholder
nominations and proposals. Our amended and restated bylaws
will establish advance notice procedures with respect to
stockholder proposals and the nomination of candidates for
election as directors, other than nominations made by or at the
direction of our board of directors or a committee of our board
of directors. However, our amended and restated bylaws may have
the effect of precluding the conduct of certain business at a
meeting if the proper procedures are not followed. These
provisions may also discourage or deter a potential acquirer
from conducting a solicitation of proxies to elect the
acquirers own slate of directors or otherwise attempting
to obtain control of our company.
Board vacancies filled only by majority of directors then in
office. Vacancies and newly created seats on our
board of directors may be filled only by our board of directors.
Only our board of directors may determine the number of
directors on our board of directors. The inability of
stockholders to determine the number of directors or to fill
vacancies or newly created seats on our board of directors makes
it more difficult to change the composition of our board of
directors, but these provisions promote a continuity of existing
management.
No cumulative voting. The Delaware General
Corporation Law provides that stockholders are not entitled to
the right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless
our certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and
restated bylaws do not expressly provide for cumulative voting.
Directors removed only for cause. Our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that
directors may be removed by stockholders only for cause.
Delaware anti-takeover statute. We are subject
to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law regulating corporate takeovers. In general,
Section 203 prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation
from engaging, under certain circumstances, in a business
combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three
years following the date on which the person became an
interested stockholder unless:
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to the date of the transaction, the board of directors of
the corporation approved either the business combination or the
transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an
interested stockholder;
|
|
|
|
Upon completion of the transaction that resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested
stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of the
corporation outstanding at the time the transaction commenced,
excluding for purposes of determining the voting stock
outstanding,
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
but not the outstanding voting stock owned by the interested
stockholder, (1) shares owned by persons who are directors
and also officers and (2) shares owned by employee stock
plans in which employee participants do not have the right to
determine confidentially whether shares held subject to the plan
will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or subsequent to the date of the transaction, the business
combination is approved by the board of directors of the
corporation and authorized at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders, and not by written consent, by the affirmative
vote of at least
662/3%
of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the
interested stockholder.
|
Generally, a business combination includes a merger, asset or
stock sale, or other transaction resulting in a financial
benefit to the interested stockholder. An interested stockholder
is a person who, together with affiliates and associates, owns
or, within three years prior to the determination of interested
stockholder status, did own 15% or more of a corporations
outstanding voting stock. We expect the existence of this
provision to have an anti-takeover effect with respect to
transactions our board of directors does not approve in advance.
We also anticipate that Section 203 may also
discourage attempts that might result in a premium over the
market price for the shares of common stock held by stockholders.
The provisions of Delaware law and our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated
bylaws, as they will be in effect upon the completion of this
offering, could have the effect of discouraging others from
attempting hostile takeovers and, as a consequence, they may
also inhibit temporary fluctuations in the market price of our
common stock that often result from actual or rumored hostile
takeover attempts. These provisions may also have the effect of
preventing changes in our management. It is possible that these
provisions could make it more difficult to accomplish
transactions that stockholders may otherwise deem to be in their
best interests.
Transfer
Agent and Registrar
Upon completion of this offering the transfer agent and
registrar for our common stock will be Computershare Trust
Company, N.A. The transfer agents address is 250 Royall
Street, Canton, Massachusetts 02021 and its telephone number is
(800) 962-4284.
The
NASDAQ Global Market Listing
We have applied to list the shares of our common stock on the
NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol RP.
144
SHARES
ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for
shares of our common stock. Future sales of substantial amounts
of shares of our common stock, including shares issued upon the
exercise of outstanding options or warrants, in the public
market after this offering, or the possibility of these sales
occurring, could adversely affect the prevailing market price
for our common stock from time to time or impair our ability to
raise equity capital in the future.
Upon the completion of this offering, a total of
62,305,404 shares of common stock will be outstanding. Of
these shares, all 13,500,000 shares of common stock sold in
this offering, plus any shares sold upon exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option, will be freely
tradable in the public market without restriction or further
registration under the Securities Act, unless these shares are
held by affiliates, as that term is defined in
Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
The remaining 48,805,404 shares of common stock will be
restricted securities, as that term is defined in
Rule 144 under the Securities Act. These restricted
securities are eligible for public sale only if they are
registered under the Securities Act or if they qualify for an
exemption from registration under Rules 144 or 701 under
the Securities Act, which are summarized below.
Subject to the
lock-up
agreements described below and the provisions of Rules 144
and 701 under the Securities Act, these restricted securities
will be available for sale in the public market as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
On the date of this prospectus
|
|
|
101,000
|
|
Between 90 and 180 days (subject to extension) after the
date of this prospectus
|
|
|
8,790
|
|
At various times beginning more than 180 days (subject to
extension) after the date of this prospectus
|
|
|
48,695,614
|
|
In
addition, shares
of common stock will be eligible for sale upon exercise of
vested options 180 days following the effective date of
this offering, subject to extension as described under
Underwriting.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, once we
have been subject to public company reporting requirements for
at least 90 days, a person who is not deemed to have been
one of our affiliates for purposes of the Securities Act at any
time during 90 days preceding a sale and who has
beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for at least
six months, including the holding period of any prior owner
other than our affiliates, is entitled to sell such shares
without complying with the manner of sale, volume limitation or
notice provisions of Rule 144, subject to compliance with
the public information requirements of Rule 144. If such a
person has beneficially owned the shares proposed to be sold for
at least one year, including the holding period of any prior
owner other than our affiliates, then such person is entitled to
sell such shares without complying with any of the requirements
of Rule 144.
In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, once we
have been subject to public company reporting requirements for
90 days, an affiliate of ours who owns shares that were
acquired from us or an affiliate of ours at least six months
prior to the proposed sale is entitled to sell, upon the
expiration of the
lock-up
agreements described below, within any three-month period
beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a
number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the number of shares of common stock then outstanding,
which will equal approximately 623,054 shares immediately
after the offering; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume of the common stock during the
four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on
Form 144 with respect to such sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 by our affiliates or persons selling
shares on behalf of our affiliates are also subject to certain
manner of sale provisions and notice requirements and to the
availability of current public information about us.
145
Rule 701
Rule 701 generally allows a stockholder who purchased
shares of our common stock pursuant to a written compensatory
plan or contract in compliance with Rule 701 and who is not
deemed to have been our affiliate during the immediately
preceding 90 days to sell these shares in reliance upon
Rule 144, but without being required to comply with the
public information, holding period, volume limitation or notice
provisions of Rule 144. Rule 701 permits our
affiliates who purchase shares of our common stock pursuant to a
written compensatory plan or contract in compliance with
Rule 701 to sell these shares in reliance upon
Rule 144 without complying with the holding period
requirements of Rule 144. All holders of
Rule 701 shares, however, are required to wait until
90 days after the date of this prospectus before selling
such shares pursuant to Rule 701.
Lock-Up
Agreements
We, all of our officers and directors and holders of
substantially all of our outstanding stock and options have
agreed that, without the prior written consent of Credit Suisse
Securities (USA) LLC and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., we and
they will not, during the period ending 180 days after the
date of this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
offer, sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of,
directly or indirectly, any shares of our common stock or
securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for
any shares of our common stock, enter into a transaction that
would have the same effect, or
|
|
|
|
enter into any swap, hedge or other arrangement that transfers,
in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences of
ownership of our common stock,
|
whether any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery
of our common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise.
This agreement is subject to certain exceptions, and is also
subject to extension for up to an additional 34 days, as
set forth under Underwriting.
Registration
Rights
Upon completion of this offering, the holders of
45,911,303 shares of common stock or their transferees will
be entitled to various rights with respect to the registration
of these shares under the Securities Act. Registration of these
shares under the Securities Act would result in these shares
becoming fully tradable without restriction under the Securities
Act immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration,
except for shares purchased by affiliates. See Description
of Capital Stock Registration Rights for
additional information.
Registration
Statements
We intend to file a registration statement on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act covering all of the shares of common
stock subject to options outstanding or reserved for issuance
under our stock plans. We expect to file this registration
statement as soon as practicable after this offering. However,
none of the shares registered on
Form S-8
will be eligible for resale until the expiration of the
lock-up
agreements to which they are subject.
146
MATERIAL
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX AND ESTATE TAX
CONSEQUENCES TO
NON-U.S.
HOLDERS
The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal
income tax and estate tax consequences of the ownership and
disposition of our common stock to
non-U.S. holders,
but does not purport to be a complete analysis of all the
potential tax considerations relating thereto. This summary is
based upon the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury
regulations promulgated thereunder, administrative rulings and
judicial decisions, all as of the date hereof. These authorities
may be changed, possibly retroactively, so as to result in
U.S. federal income or estate tax consequences different
from those set forth below. We have not sought any ruling from
the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, with respect to the
statements made and the conclusions reached in the following
summary, and there can be no assurance that the IRS will agree
with such statements and conclusions.
This summary also does not address the tax considerations
arising under the laws of any
non-U.S.,
state or local jurisdiction or under U.S. federal gift and
estate tax laws, except to the limited extent below. In
addition, this discussion does not address tax considerations
applicable to an investors particular circumstances or to
investors that may be subject to special tax rules, including,
without limitation:
|
|
|
|
|
banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
persons subject to the alternative minimum tax;
|
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
|
controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment
companies and corporations that accumulate earnings to avoid
U.S. federal income tax;
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method
of accounting for their securities holdings;
|
|
|
|
persons that own, or are deemed to own, more than five percent
of our capital stock (except to the extent specifically set
forth below);
|
|
|
|
certain former citizens or long-term residents of the United
States;
|
|
|
|
persons who hold our common stock as a position in a hedging
transaction, straddle, conversion
transaction or other risk reduction transaction;
|
|
|
|
persons who do not hold our common stock as a capital asset
(within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue
Code; and
|
|
|
|
persons deemed to sell our common stock under the constructive
sale provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
|
In addition, if a partnership or entity classified as a
partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our
common stock, the tax treatment of a partner generally will
depend on the status of the partner and upon the activities of
the partnership. Accordingly, partnerships that hold our common
stock, and partners in such partnerships, should consult their
tax advisors.
You are urged to consult your tax advisor with respect to the
application of the U.S. federal income tax laws to your
particular situation, as well as any tax consequences of the
purchase, ownership and disposition of our common stock arising
under the U.S. federal estate or gift tax rules or under the
laws of any state, local,
non-U.S. or
other taxing jurisdiction or under any applicable tax treaty.
Non-U.S.
Holder Defined
For purposes of this discussion, you are a
non-U.S. holder
if you are any holder other than:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the United States;
|
147
|
|
|
|
|
a corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation created
or organized in the United States or under the laws of the
United States or any political subdivision thereof;
|
|
|
|
an estate whose income is subject to U.S. federal income
tax regardless of its source; or
|
|
|
|
a trust (x) whose administration is subject to the primary
supervision of a U.S. court and which has one or more
U.S. persons who have the authority to control all
substantial decisions of the trust or (y) which has made an
election to be treated as a U.S. person.
|
Distributions
We have not made any distributions on our common stock, and we
do not plan to make any distributions for the foreseeable
future. However, if we do make distributions on our common
stock, those payments will constitute dividends for
U.S. tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or
accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under
U.S. federal income tax principles. To the extent those
distributions exceed both our current and our accumulated
earnings and profits, they will constitute a return of capital
and will first reduce your basis in our common stock, but not
below zero, and then will be treated as gain from the sale of
stock.
Any dividend paid to you generally will be subject to
U.S. withholding tax either at a rate of 30% of the gross
amount of the dividend or such lower rate as may be specified by
an applicable income tax treaty. In order to receive a reduced
treaty rate, you must provide us with an IRS
Form W-8BEN
or other appropriate version of IRS
Form W-8
certifying qualification for the reduced rate. A
non-U.S. holder
of shares of our common stock eligible for a reduced rate of
U.S. withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty may
obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing an
appropriate claim for refund with the IRS. If the
non-U.S. holder
holds the stock through a financial institution or other agent
acting on the
non-U.S. holders
behalf, the
non-U.S. holder
will be required to provide appropriate documentation to the
agent, which then will be required to provide certification to
us or our paying agent, either directly or through other
intermediaries.
Dividends received by you that are effectively connected with
your conduct of a U.S. trade or business (and, if an income
tax treaty applies, such dividend is attributable to a permanent
establishment maintained by the
non-U.S. holder
in the United States) are exempt from such withholding tax. In
order to obtain this exemption, you must provide us with an IRS
Form W-8ECI
or other applicable IRS
Form W-8
properly certifying such exemption. Such effectively connected
dividends, although not subject to withholding tax, are taxed at
the same graduated rates applicable to U.S. persons, net of
certain deductions and credits, subject to an applicable income
tax treaty providing otherwise. In addition, if you are a
corporate
non-U.S. holder,
dividends you receive that are effectively connected with your
conduct of a U.S. trade or business may also be subject to
a branch profits tax at a rate of 30% or such lower rate as may
be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.
Gain on
Disposition of Common Stock
You generally will not be required to pay U.S. federal
income tax on any gain realized upon the sale or other
disposition of our common stock unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with your conduct of a
U.S. trade or business (and, if an income tax treaty
applies, the gain is attributable to a permanent establishment
maintained by you in the United States);
|
|
|
|
you are an individual who is present in the United States for a
period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the
calendar year in which the sale or disposition occurs and
certain other conditions are met; or
|
|
|
|
our common stock constitutes a U.S. real property interest
by reason of our status as a U.S. real property holding
corporation, or a USRPHC, for U.S. federal income tax
purposes at any time within
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
the shorter of the five-year period preceding the disposition or
your holding period for our common stock.
|
We believe that we are not currently and will not become a
USRPHC. However, because the determination of whether we are a
USRPHC depends on the fair market value of our U.S. real
property relative to the fair market value of our other business
assets, there can be no assurance that we will not become a
USRPHC in the future. Even if we become a USRPHC, however, as
long as our common stock is regularly traded on an established
securities market, such common stock will be treated as
U.S. real property interests only if you actually or
constructively hold more than five percent of such regularly
traded common stock at any time during the applicable period
that is specified in the Internal Revenue Code.
If you are a
non-U.S. holder
described in the first bullet above, you will be required to pay
tax on the net gain derived from the sale under regular
graduated U.S. federal income tax rates, and corporate
non-U.S. holders
described in the first bullet above may be subject to the branch
profits tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified
by an applicable income tax treaty. If you are an individual
non-U.S. holder
described in the second bullet above, you will be required to
pay a flat 30% tax on the gain derived from the sale, which tax
may be offset by U.S. source capital losses (even though
you are not considered a resident of the United States). You
should consult any applicable income tax or other treaties that
may provide for different rules.
Federal
Estate Tax
Our common stock beneficially owned by an individual who is not
a citizen or resident of the United States (as defined for U.S.
federal estate tax purposes) at the time of death will generally
be includable in the decedents gross estate for U.S.
federal estate tax purposes, unless an applicable estate tax
treaty provides otherwise.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
Generally, we must report annually to the IRS the amount of
dividends paid to you, your name and address, and the amount of
tax withheld, if any. A similar report is sent to you. Pursuant
to applicable income tax treaties or other agreements, the IRS
may make these reports available to tax authorities in your
country of residence.
Payments of dividends or of proceeds on the disposition of stock
made to you may be subject to information reporting and backup
withholding at a current rate of 28% unless you establish an
exemption, for example by properly certifying your
non-U.S. status
on a
Form W-8BEN
or another appropriate version of IRS
Form W-8.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, backup withholding and
information reporting may apply if either we or our paying agent
has actual knowledge, or reason to know, that you are a
U.S. person.
Backup withholding is not an additional tax; rather, the
U.S. income tax liability of persons subject to backup
withholding will be reduced by the amount of tax withheld. If
withholding results in an overpayment of taxes, a refund or
credit may generally be obtained from the IRS, provided that the
required information is furnished to the IRS in a timely manner.
Recently
Enacted Legislation Affecting Taxation of Our Common Stock Held
By or Through Foreign Entities
Recently enacted legislation generally will impose a
U.S. federal withholding tax of 30% on dividends and the
gross proceeds of a disposition of our common stock paid after
December 31, 2012 to a foreign financial institution unless
such institution enters into an agreement with the
U.S. government to withhold on certain payments and to
collect and provide to the U.S. tax authorities substantial
information regarding U.S. account holders of such
institution (which includes certain equity and debt holders of
such institution, as well as certain account holders that are
foreign entities with U.S. owners). The legislation also
will generally impose a U.S. federal withholding tax of 30%
on dividends and the gross proceeds of a disposition of our
common stock paid after December 31, 2012 to a
non-financial foreign entity unless such entity provides the
withholding agent with a certification identifying the direct
and indirect U.S. owners of the entity. Under
149
certain circumstances, a
non-U.S. stockholder
might be eligible for refunds or credits of such taxes.
Prospective investors are encouraged to consult with their own
tax advisors regarding the possible implications of this
legislation on their investment in our common stock.
Stockholders are encouraged to consult with their own tax
advisors regarding the possible implications of the legislation
on their investment in our common stock.
The preceding discussion of U.S. federal tax
considerations is for general information only. It is not tax
advice. Each prospective investor should consult its own tax
advisor regarding the particular U.S. federal, state and
local and
Non-U.S. tax
consequences of purchasing, holding and disposing of our common
stock, including the consequences of any proposed change in
applicable laws.
150
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement
dated ,
2010 we and the selling stockholders have agreed to sell to the
underwriters named below, for whom Credit Suisse Securities
(USA) LLC and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. are acting as
representatives, the following respective numbers of shares of
common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriter
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
JMP Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
Pacific Crest Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
RBC Capital Markets Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
William Blair & Company, L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are
obligated to purchase all the shares of common stock in the
offering if any are purchased, other than those shares covered
by the over-allotment option described below. The underwriting
agreement also provides that if an underwriter defaults, the
purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be
increased or, in some circumstances, the offering may be
terminated.
Certain of the selling stockholders have granted to the
underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase on a pro rata basis up to 2,025,000
additional shares at the initial public offering price less the
underwriting discounts and commissions. The option may be
exercised only to cover any over-allotments of common stock.
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock
initially at the public offering price on the cover page of this
prospectus and to selling group members at that price less a
selling concession of $ per share.
The underwriters and selling group members may allow a discount
of $ per share on sales to other
broker/dealers. After the initial public offering, the
representatives may change the public offering price and
concession and discount to broker/dealers.
The following table summarizes the compensation and estimated
expenses we and the selling stockholders will pay:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
Without
|
|
|
With
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment
|
|
|
Over-allotment
|
|
|
Over-allotment
|
|
|
Over-allotment
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses payable by us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by the selling
stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses payable by the selling stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The representatives have informed us that they do not expect
sales to accounts over which the underwriters have discretionary
authority to exceed 5% of the shares of common stock being
offered.
We have agreed that we will not offer, sell, contract to sell,
pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file
with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act
relating to, any shares of our common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares
of our common stock, or publicly disclose the intention to make
any offer, sale, pledge, disposition or filing, without the
prior written consent of the representatives for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus, except grants
of, or issuances pursuant to the exercise of, employee stock
options granted pursuant to the terms of a plan now in effect
and limited issuances in connection with acquisitions and other
strategic transactions so long as
151
such recipients execute a
lock-up
agreement in the form described below covering the remaining
portion of the 180 day-period after the date of this
prospectus. However, in the event that either (1) during
the last 17 days of the
lock-up
period, we release earnings results or material news or a
material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period, then in either case the expiration of the
lock-up
will be extended until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings
results or the occurrence of the material news or event, as
applicable, unless the representatives waive, in writing, such
an extension.
Subject to certain exceptions, our officers, directors and
holders of substantially all of our outstanding stock, options
and warrants have agreed that they will not offer, sell,
contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or
indirectly, any shares of our common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares
of our common stock, enter into a transaction that would have
the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other
arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the
economic consequences of ownership of our common stock, whether
any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery of our
common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or
publicly disclose the intention to make any such offer, sale,
pledge or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap,
hedge or other arrangement, without, in each case, the prior
written consent of the representatives for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus. However, in the
event that either (1) during the last 17 days of the
lock-up
period, we release earnings results or material news or a
material event relating to us occurs or (2) prior to the
expiration of the
lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
lock-up
period, then in either case the expiration of the
lock-up
will be extended until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the date of the release of the earnings
results or the occurrence of the material news or event, as
applicable, unless the representatives waive, in writing, such
an extension.
We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters against liabilities under the Securities Act, or
contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to
make in that respect.
We have applied to list the shares of our common stock on the
NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol RP.
In connection with the offering the underwriters may engage in
stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions, syndicate
covering transactions and penalty bids in accordance with
Regulation M under the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum.
|
|
|
|
Over-allotment transactions involve sales by the underwriters of
shares in excess of the number of shares the underwriters are
obligated to purchase, which creates a syndicate short position.
The short position may be either a covered short position or a
naked short position. In a covered short position, the number of
shares over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the
number of shares that they may purchase in the over-allotment
option. In a naked short position, the number of shares involved
is greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment
option. The underwriters may close out any covered short
position by either exercising their over-allotment option
and/or
purchasing shares in the open market.
|
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through
the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares
than could be covered by the over-allotment option, a naked
short position, the position can only be closed out by buying
shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely
to be created if the underwriters are
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
concerned that there could be downward pressure on the price of
the shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely
affect investors who purchase in the offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions.
|
These stabilizing transactions, over-allotment transactions,
syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may have the
effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our common
stock or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price
of the common stock. As a result the price of our common stock
may be higher than the price that might otherwise exist in the
open market. These transactions may be effected on the NASDAQ
Global Market or otherwise and, if commenced, may be
discontinued at any time.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
web sites maintained by one or more of the underwriters, or
selling group members, if any, participating in this offering
and one or more of the underwriters participating in this
offering may distribute prospectuses electronically. The
representatives may agree to allocate a number of shares to
underwriters and selling group members for sale to their online
brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be
allocated by the underwriters and selling group members that
will make Internet distributions on the same basis as other
allocations.
From time to time, the underwriters may perform investment
banking and advisory services for us for which they may receive
customary fees and expenses.
The shares of common stock are offered for sale in those
jurisdictions in the United States, Europe and elsewhere where
it is lawful to make such offers.
Each of the underwriters has represented and agreed that it has
not offered, sold or delivered and will not offer, sell or
deliver any of the shares of common stock directly or
indirectly, or distribute this prospectus or any other offering
material relating to the shares of common stock, in or from any
jurisdiction except under circumstances that will result in
compliance with the applicable laws and regulations thereof and
that will not impose any obligations on us except as set forth
in the underwriting agreement.
European
Economic Area
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
that has implemented the Prospectus Directive, each, a Relevant
Member State, each underwriter represents and agrees that with
effect from and including the date on which the Prospectus
Directive is implemented in that Relevant Member State, or the
Relevant Implementation Date, it has not made and will not make
an offer of Securities to the public in that Relevant Member
State prior to the publication of a prospectus in relation to
the Securities that has been approved by the competent authority
in that Relevant Member State or, where appropriate, approved in
another Relevant Member State and notified to the competent
authority in that Relevant Member State, all in accordance with
the Prospectus Directive, except that it may, with effect from
and including the Relevant Implementation Date, make an offer of
Securities to the public in that Relevant Member State at any
time,
(a) to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to
operate in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or
regulated, whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in
securities;
(b) to any legal entity which has two or more of
(1) an average of at least 250 employees during the
last financial year; (2) a total balance sheet of more than
43,000,000 and (3) an annual net turnover of more
than 50,000,000, as shown in its last annual or
consolidated accounts;
(c) to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than
qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive)
subject to obtaining the prior consent of the manager for any
such offer; or
(d) in any other circumstances that do not require the
publication by the Issuer of a prospectus pursuant to
Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive.
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of Shares to the public in relation to any
Shares in any Relevant Member State means the communication in
any form and by any means of sufficient
153
information on the terms of the offer and the Shares to be
offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or
subscribe the Shares, as the same may be varied in that Member
State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in
that Member State and the expression Prospectus Directive means
Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing
measure in each Relevant Member State.
Notice to
Investors in the United Kingdom
Each of the underwriters severally represents, warrants and
agrees as follows:
(a) it has only communicated or caused to be communicated
and will only communicate or cause to be communicated an
invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity
(within the meaning of section 21 of the Financial Services
and Markets Act 2000, or the FSMA) to persons who have
professional experience in matters relating to investments
falling with Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and
Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 or in
circumstances in which section 21 of FSMA does not apply to
us; and
(b) it has complied with, and will comply with all
applicable provisions of FSMA with respect to anything done by
it in relation to the shares of common stock in, from or
otherwise involving the United Kingdom.
Notice to
Residents of Japan
The underwriters will not offer or sell any of our common stock
directly or indirectly in Japan or to, or for the benefit of any
Japanese person or to others, for re-offering or re-sale
directly or indirectly in Japan or to any Japanese person,
except in each case pursuant to an exemption from the
registration requirements of, and otherwise in compliance with,
the Securities and Exchange Law of Japan and any other
applicable laws and regulations of Japan. For purposes of this
paragraph, Japanese person means any person resident
in Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized
under the laws of Japan.
Notice to
Residents of Hong Kong
The underwriters and each of their affiliates have not
(i) offered or sold, and will not offer or sell, in Hong
Kong, by means of any document, our common stock other than
(a) to professional investors as defined in the
Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap.571) of Hong Kong and any
rules made under that Ordinance or (b) in other
circumstances which do not result in the document being a
prospectus as defined in the Companies Ordinance
(Cap. 32) of Hong Kong or which do not constitute an offer
to the public within the meaning of that Ordinance or
(ii) issued or had in its possession for the purposes of
issue, and will not issue or have in its possession for the
purposes of issue, whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere any
advertisement, invitation or document relating to our common
stock which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely
to be accessed or read by, the public in Hong Kong (except if
permitted to do so under the securities laws of Hong Kong) other
than with respect to our securities which are or are intended to
be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to
professional investors as defined in the Securities
and Futures Ordinance and any rules made under that Ordinance.
The contents of this document have not been reviewed by any
regulatory authority in Hong Kong. You are advised to exercise
caution in relation to the offer. If you are in any doubt about
any of the contents of this document, you should obtain
independent professional advice.
Notice to
Residents of Singapore
This prospectus or any other offering material relating to our
common stock has not been and will not be registered as a
prospectus with the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the
common stock will be offered in Singapore pursuant to exemptions
under Section 274 and Section 275 of the Securities
and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore, or the
Securities and Futures Act. Accordingly our common stock may not
be offered or sold, or be the subject of an invitation for
subscription or purchase, nor may this prospectus or any other
offering material relating to our common stock be circulated or
distributed, whether directly or indirectly, to the public or
any member of the public in Singapore other than (a) to an
institutional investor or
154
other person specified in Section 274 of the Securities and
Futures Act, (b) to a sophisticated investor, and in
accordance with the conditions specified in Section 275 of
the Securities and Futures Act or (c) otherwise pursuant
to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other
applicable provision of the Securities and Futures Act.
Notice to
Residents of Germany
Each person who is in possession of this prospectus is aware of
the fact that no German sales prospectus (Verkaufsprospekt)
within the meaning of the Securities Sales Prospectus Act,
Wertpapier-Verkaufsprospektgesetz, or the Act, of the Federal
Republic of Germany has been or will be published with respect
to our common stock. In particular, each underwriter has
represented that it has not engaged and has agreed that it will
not engage in a public offering in (offentliches Angebot) within
the meaning of the Act with respect to any of our common stock
otherwise than in accordance with the Act and all other
applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
Notice to
Residents of France
The shares of common stock are being issued and sold outside the
Republic of France and that, in connection with their initial
distribution, it has not offered or sold and will not offer or
sell, directly or indirectly, any shares of common stock to the
public in the Republic of France, and that it has not
distributed and will not distribute or cause to be distributed
to the public in the Republic of France this prospectus or any
other offering material relating to the shares of common stock,
and that such offers, sales and distributions have been and will
be made in the Republic of France only to qualified investors
(investisseurs qualifiés) in accordance with
Article L.411-2
of the Monetary and Financial Code and decrét
no. 98-880
dated 1st October, 1998.
Notice to
Residents of the Netherlands
Our common stock may not be offered, sold, transferred or
delivered in or from the Netherlands as part of their initial
distribution or at any time thereafter, directly or indirectly,
other than to, individuals or legal entities situated in the
Netherlands who or which trade or invest in securities in the
conduct of a business or profession (which includes banks,
securities intermediaries (including dealers and brokers),
insurance companies, pension funds, collective investment
institution, central governments, large international and
supranational organizations, other institutional investors and
other parties, including treasury departments of commercial
enterprises, which as an ancillary activity regularly invest in
securities (hereinafter, the Professional Investors), provided
that in the offer, prospectus and in any other documents or
advertisements in which a forthcoming offering of our common
stock is publicly announced (whether electronically or
otherwise) in the Netherlands it is stated that such offer is
and will be exclusively made to such Professional Investors.
Individual or legal entities who are not Professional Investors
may not participate in the offering of our common stock, and
this prospectus or any other offering material relating to our
common stock may not be considered an offer or the prospect of
an offer to sell or exchange our common stock.
Notice to
Residents of Italy
No prospectus has or will be registered in the Republic of Italy
with the Italian Stock Exchange Commission (Commissione
Nazionale per le Societá di Borsa), or Consob, pursuant
to the Prospectus Directive and Italian laws and regulations on
financial products. Accordingly, the common stock may not be
offered, sold or delivered in the Republic of Italy, and copies
of this prospectus or any other document relating to the common
stock may not be distributed in the Republic of Italy, except to
(a) qualified investors (investori qualificati), or
the Qualified Investors, pursuant to Article 100 of
Legislative Decree no. 58 dated February 24, 1998, as
amended, or the Financial Act, as defined in
Article 34-ter
of Consob Regulation no. 11971 dated May 14. 1999,
as amended, Regulation no. 11971; or (b) in
circumstances where there is an exemption from the rules
governing an offer to the public of financial products pursuant
to Article 94 et seq. of the Financial Act, and
to Regulation no. 11971. Any offer, sale or delivery of the
common stock in the Republic of Italy must be (a) made by
an investment firm, a bank or financial intermediary authorized
to engage in such
155
activities in Italy, in compliance with the Financial Act and
with Legislative Decree no. 385 dated September 1,
1993, as amended and Consob Regulation no. 16190 dated
October 29, 2007, as amended, and any other applicable law
and regulation; and (b) in compliance with any applicable
Italian laws and regulations and any other condition or
limitation that may be imposed by Consob, the Bank of Italy
(Banca dItalia) and any other relevant Italian
authorities.
Notice to
Residents of Switzerland
The common stock may not and will not be publicly offered,
distributed or re-distributed in or from Switzerland and neither
this prospectus nor any other solicitation for investments in
the common stock may be communicated or distributed in
Switzerland in any way that could constitute a public offering
within the meaning of Articles 652a and 1156 of the Swiss
Code of Obligations. This prospectus may not be copied,
reproduced, distributed or passed on to others without the prior
written consent of the international underwriters. This
prospectus is not a prospectus within the meaning of
Articles 652a and 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations or
a listing prospectus according to the Listing Rules of the SIX
Swiss Exchange and may not comply with the information standards
required thereunder. We will not apply for a listing of our
common stock on any Swiss stock exchange or other Swiss
regulated market and this prospectus may not comply with the
information required under the relevant listing rules.
156
NOTICE TO
CANADIAN RESIDENTS
Resale
Restrictions
The distribution of the common stock in Canada is being made
only on a private placement basis exempt from the requirement
that we and the selling stockholders prepare and file a
prospectus with the securities regulatory authorities in each
province where trades of common stock are made. Any resale of
the common stock in Canada must be made under applicable
securities laws which will vary depending on the relevant
jurisdiction, and which may require resales to be made under
available statutory exemptions or under a discretionary
exemption granted by the applicable Canadian securities
regulatory authority. Purchasers are advised to seek legal
advice prior to any resale of the common stock.
Representations
of Purchasers
By purchasing common stock in Canada and accepting a purchase
confirmation a purchaser is representing to us, the selling
stockholders and the dealer from whom the purchase confirmation
is received that:
|
|
|
|
|
the purchaser is entitled under applicable provincial securities
laws to purchase the common stock without the benefit of a
prospectus qualified under those securities laws,
|
|
|
|
where required by law, that the purchaser is purchasing as
principal and not as agent,
|
|
|
|
the purchaser has reviewed the text above under Resale
Restrictions, and
|
|
|
|
the purchaser acknowledges and consents to the provision of
specified information concerning its purchase of the common
stock to the regulatory authority that by law is entitled to
collect the information.
|
Further details concerning the legal authority for this
information is available on request.
Rights of
Action Ontario Purchasers Only
Under Ontario securities legislation, certain purchasers who
purchase a security offered by this prospectus during the period
of distribution will have a statutory right of action for
damages, or while still the owner of the common stock, for
rescission against us and the selling stockholders in the event
that this prospectus contains a misrepresentation without regard
to whether the purchaser relied on the misrepresentation. The
right of action for damages is exercisable not later than the
earlier of 180 days from the date the purchaser first had
knowledge of the facts giving rise to the cause of action and
three years from the date on which payment is made for the
common stock. The right of action for rescission is exercisable
not later than 180 days from the date on which payment is
made for the common stock. If a purchaser elects to exercise the
right of action for rescission, the purchaser will have no right
of action for damages against us or the selling stockholders. In
no case will the amount recoverable in any action exceed the
price at which the common stock were offered to the purchaser
and if the purchaser is shown to have purchased the securities
with knowledge of the misrepresentation, we and the selling
stockholders will have no liability. In the case of an action
for damages, we and the selling stockholders will not be liable
for all or any portion of the damages that are proven to not
represent the depreciation in value of the common stock as a
result of the misrepresentation relied upon. These rights are in
addition to, and without derogation from, any other rights or
remedies available at law to an Ontario purchaser. The foregoing
is a summary of the rights available to an Ontario purchaser.
Ontario purchasers should refer to the complete text of the
relevant statutory provisions.
Enforcement
of Legal Rights
All of our directors and officers as well as the experts named
herein and the selling stockholders may be located outside of
Canada and, as a result, it may not be possible for Canadian
purchasers to effect service of process within Canada upon us or
those persons. All or a substantial portion of our assets and
the assets of those persons may be located outside of Canada
and, as a result, it may not be possible to satisfy a judgment
157
against us or those persons in Canada or to enforce a judgment
obtained in Canadian courts against us or those persons outside
of Canada.
Taxation
and Eligibility for Investment
Canadian purchasers of common stock should consult their own
legal and tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of
an investment in the common stock in their particular
circumstances and about the eligibility of the common stock for
investment by the purchaser under relevant Canadian legislation.
LEGAL
MATTERS
The validity of the shares of common stock offered hereby will
be passed upon for us by Wilson Sonsini Goodrich &
Rosati, Professional Corporation, Austin, Texas. Certain legal
matters in connection with the offering will be passed upon for
the underwriters by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP,
Palo Alto, California.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of RealPage, Inc. at
December 31, 2008 and 2009, and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2009, appearing in this
prospectus and the registration statement have been audited by
Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public
accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon appearing
elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon such report
given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and
auditing.
WHERE YOU
CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on
Form S-1
under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of common
stock we are offering. The registration statement, including the
attached exhibits and schedule, contains additional relevant
information about us and our common stock. This prospectus does
not contain all of the information set forth in the registration
statement and the exhibits and schedule thereto. The rules and
regulations of the SEC allow us to omit from this prospectus
certain information included in the registration statement.
For further information about us and the common stock, you may
inspect a copy of the registration statement and the exhibits
and schedule to the registration statement without charge at the
offices of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain copies of all or any
part of the registration statement from the Public Reference
Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549 upon the payment of the prescribed
fees. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public
Reference Room by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains
reports, proxy and information statements and other information
regarding registrants that file electronically with the SEC. You
can also inspect our registration statement on this website.
158
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
RealPage, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
RealPage, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31,
2008 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in redeemable convertible preferred stock
and stockholders deficit and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our
audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in
the index under Item 16(b). These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and
schedule are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged
to perform an audit of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of RealPage, Inc. at December 31, 2008
and 2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009 in conformity with United States
generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion,
the related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects, the information set
forth within.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements,
the Company changed its method of accounting for business
combinations on January 1, 2009.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
April 28, 2010, except for Note 15, as to which the
date is July 23, 2010
F-2
RealPage,
Inc.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share
amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,248
|
|
|
$
|
4,427
|
|
|
$
|
5,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
14,131
|
|
|
|
14,886
|
|
|
|
18,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of
$2,895, $2,222, and $2,100 at December 31, 2008 and 2009
and June 30, 2010 (unaudited), respectively
|
|
|
27,459
|
|
|
|
25,841
|
|
|
|
24,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,110
|
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
3,281
|
|
|
|
2,739
|
|
|
|
4,532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
49,119
|
|
|
|
51,003
|
|
|
|
54,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment, and software, net
|
|
|
19,137
|
|
|
|
20,749
|
|
|
|
20,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
17,849
|
|
|
|
27,366
|
|
|
|
32,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identified intangible assets, net
|
|
|
15,125
|
|
|
|
22,891
|
|
|
|
30,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset, net of valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,803
|
|
|
|
18,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
4,309
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
102,340
|
|
|
$
|
142,113
|
|
|
$
|
160,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and
stockholders deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
3,405
|
|
|
$
|
3,705
|
|
|
$
|
4,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
13,255
|
|
|
|
10,830
|
|
|
|
11,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue
|
|
|
38,712
|
|
|
|
39,976
|
|
|
|
42,120
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
6,216
|
|
|
|
8,412
|
|
|
|
9,823
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer deposits held in restricted accounts
|
|
|
14,117
|
|
|
|
15,127
|
|
|
|
18,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
75,705
|
|
|
|
78,050
|
|
|
|
86,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
8,520
|
|
|
|
9,452
|
|
|
|
8,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion
|
|
|
27,498
|
|
|
|
43,449
|
|
|
|
47,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
6,767
|
|
|
|
5,806
|
|
|
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
129,622
|
|
|
|
136,757
|
|
|
|
153,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, Series A and A1,
$0.001 par value: authorized, issued and outstanding
25,906,250 shares (liquidation value $51,823, $51,823 and
$52,856 at December 31, 2008 and 2009 and June 30, 2010
(unaudited), respectively):
|
|
|
51,724
|
|
|
|
51,786
|
|
|
|
52,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, Series B,
$0.001 par value: authorized, issued and outstanding
1,625,000 shares (liquidation value $6,500, $6,500 and
$6,631 at December 31, 2008 and 2009 and June 30, 2010
(unaudited), respectively):
|
|
|
6,478
|
|
|
|
6,491
|
|
|
|
6,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock, Series C,
$0.001 par value: authorized, issued and outstanding
1,512,498 shares (liquidation value $13,613, $13,613 and
$13,613 at December 31, 2008 and 2009 and June 30, 2010
(unaudited), respectively):
|
|
|
13,473
|
|
|
|
13,555
|
|
|
|
13,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 67,500,000 shares
authorized and 23,771,624, 26,667,319 and 27,125,629 issued and
23,702,182 26,460,781 and 26,918,468 outstanding as of
December 31, 2008, 2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited),
respectively
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
19,693
|
|
|
|
24,232
|
|
|
|
25,185
|
|
|
|
98,203
|
|
Treasury stock shares, at cost 69,442, 206,538 and
207,161 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 and
June 30, 2010 (unaudited), respectively
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
(938
|
)
|
|
|
(942
|
)
|
|
|
(942
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(118,226
|
)
|
|
|
(89,797
|
)
|
|
|
(89,836
|
)
|
|
|
(89,836
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(98,957
|
)
|
|
|
(66,476
|
)
|
|
|
(65,579
|
)
|
|
|
7,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities, redeemable convertible preferred stock and
stockholders deficit
|
|
$
|
102,340
|
|
|
$
|
142,113
|
|
|
$
|
160,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-3
RealPage,
Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand
|
|
$
|
62,592
|
|
|
$
|
95,192
|
|
|
$
|
128,377
|
|
|
$
|
60,116
|
|
|
$
|
76,866
|
|
On premise
|
|
|
11,560
|
|
|
|
7,582
|
|
|
|
3,860
|
|
|
|
2,878
|
|
|
|
4,292
|
|
Professional and other
|
|
|
9,429
|
|
|
|
9,794
|
|
|
|
8,665
|
|
|
|
4,117
|
|
|
|
5,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
83,581
|
|
|
|
112,568
|
|
|
|
140,902
|
|
|
$
|
67,111
|
|
|
$
|
86,187
|
|
Cost of
revenue(1)
|
|
|
35,703
|
|
|
|
46,058
|
|
|
|
58,513
|
|
|
|
27,603
|
|
|
|
36,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
47,878
|
|
|
|
66,510
|
|
|
|
82,389
|
|
|
|
39,508
|
|
|
|
49,795
|
|
Operating expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
development(1)
|
|
|
21,708
|
|
|
|
28,806
|
|
|
|
27,446
|
|
|
|
13,598
|
|
|
|
17,304
|
|
Sales and
marketing(1)
|
|
|
18,047
|
|
|
|
23,923
|
|
|
|
27,804
|
|
|
|
13,013
|
|
|
|
16,365
|
|
General and
administrative(1)
|
|
|
9,756
|
|
|
|
14,135
|
|
|
|
20,210
|
|
|
|
8,723
|
|
|
|
13,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense
|
|
|
49,511
|
|
|
|
66,864
|
|
|
|
75,460
|
|
|
|
35,334
|
|
|
|
46,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(1,633
|
)
|
|
|
(354
|
)
|
|
|
6,929
|
|
|
|
4,174
|
|
|
|
2,865
|
|
Interest expense and other, net
|
|
|
(1,510
|
)
|
|
|
(2,152
|
)
|
|
|
(4,528
|
)
|
|
|
(1,983
|
)
|
|
|
(2,927
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
|
(2,506
|
)
|
|
|
2,401
|
|
|
|
2,191
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(26,028
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,429
|
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(9,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,658
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,611
|
|
|
$
|
(845
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,363
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(9,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,658
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,611
|
|
|
$
|
(845
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,363
|
)
|
Net (loss) income per share attributable to common
stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Weighted average shares used in computing net (loss) income per
share attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
10,223
|
|
|
|
13,886
|
|
|
|
23,934
|
|
|
|
23,831
|
|
|
|
25,901
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
10,223
|
|
|
|
13,886
|
|
|
|
25,511
|
|
|
|
23,831
|
|
|
|
25,901
|
|
Pro forma net income per share attributable to common
stockholders
(unaudited)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
Pro forma weighted average shares outstanding used in computing
net income per share attributable to common stockholders
(unaudited)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,945
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
367
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
Product development
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
727
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Pro forma net income per share and
pro forma weighted average shares outstanding are computed in
contemplation of our public offering. See Note 11 for
discussion of calculation.
|
See accompanying notes
F-4
RealPage,
Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock and
Stockholders Deficit
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable Convertible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Treasury Shares
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
27,532
|
|
|
$
|
72,300
|
|
|
|
|
10,066
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
12,591
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(111,874
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(99,273
|
)
|
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,234
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,234
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
485
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
969
|
|
Exercise of stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
Warrants issued to a customer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007
|
|
|
27,532
|
|
|
|
78,534
|
|
|
|
|
10,638
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
8,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115,017
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,969
|
)
|
Issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
13,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,698
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,698
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
Exercise of stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,653
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,914
|
)
|
|
|
|
8,148
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,850
|
|
Treasury stock purchase, at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
29,044
|
|
|
|
71,675
|
|
|
|
|
23,771
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
19,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118,226
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
(98,957
|
)
|
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,678
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,678
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
Exercise of stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Common stock warrants converted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,521
|
)
|
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,005
|
|
Issuances related to acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,862
|
|
Treasury stock purchase, at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(137
|
)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,429
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009
|
|
|
29,044
|
|
|
|
71,832
|
|
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
24,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89,797
|
)
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
(938
|
)
|
|
|
(66,476
|
)
|
Accretion of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,376
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Common stock warrants converted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,161
|
)
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
Issuance of restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock purchase, at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Net (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
29,044
|
|
|
$
|
73,047
|
|
|
|
|
27,125
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
25,185
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(89,836
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
$
|
(942
|
)
|
|
$
|
(65,579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-5
RealPage,
Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,429
|
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,127
|
|
|
|
10,997
|
|
|
|
14,769
|
|
|
|
7,004
|
|
|
|
9,544
|
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
(26,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
1,476
|
|
|
|
2,805
|
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
|
2,386
|
|
Loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Impairment of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in business combinations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(5,168
|
)
|
|
|
(7,622
|
)
|
|
|
2,407
|
|
|
|
4,611
|
|
|
|
2,601
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
559
|
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
(1,744
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
|
|
(1,140
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(1,915
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
733
|
|
Accrued compensation, taxes and benefits
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
(461
|
)
|
|
|
(448
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
4,382
|
|
|
|
5,561
|
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
(1,169
|
)
|
|
|
(3,075
|
)
|
Other current and long-term liabilities
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
|
|
922
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
4,441
|
|
|
|
7,962
|
|
|
|
24,758
|
|
|
|
14,030
|
|
|
|
8,197
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, equipment and software
|
|
|
(7,122
|
)
|
|
|
(10,263
|
)
|
|
|
(9,509
|
)
|
|
|
(4,111
|
)
|
|
|
(4,718
|
)
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(9,033
|
)
|
|
|
(22,057
|
)
|
|
|
(15,167
|
)
|
|
|
(765
|
)
|
|
|
(13,292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(16,155
|
)
|
|
|
(32,320
|
)
|
|
|
(24,676
|
)
|
|
|
(4,876
|
)
|
|
|
(18,010
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from notes payable
|
|
|
10,917
|
|
|
|
15,521
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Payments on notes payable
|
|
|
(7,015
|
)
|
|
|
(2,454
|
)
|
|
|
(16,853
|
)
|
|
|
(3,799
|
)
|
|
|
(4,745
|
)
|
Proceeds from (payments on) revolving credit facility, net
|
|
|
7,584
|
|
|
|
1,416
|
|
|
|
(10,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,673
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(678
|
)
|
|
|
(2,558
|
)
|
|
|
(5,592
|
)
|
|
|
(1,629
|
)
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
Issuance of redeemable convertible preferred stock, net of costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock dividend
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,516
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Purchase of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
(489
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
11,952
|
|
|
|
25,875
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
(5,506
|
)
|
|
|
10,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
3,648
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
Effect of exchange rate on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
2,493
|
|
|
|
2,731
|
|
|
|
4,248
|
|
|
|
4,248
|
|
|
|
4,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
2,731
|
|
|
$
|
4,248
|
|
|
$
|
4,427
|
|
|
$
|
7,896
|
|
|
$
|
5,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
1,212
|
|
|
$
|
2,651
|
|
|
$
|
3,833
|
|
|
$
|
1,784
|
|
|
$
|
2,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets acquired under capital leases
|
|
$
|
6,320
|
|
|
$
|
2,077
|
|
|
$
|
2,462
|
|
|
$
|
2,638
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued dividends and accretion of preferred stock
|
|
$
|
6,234
|
|
|
$
|
7,698
|
|
|
$
|
5,678
|
|
|
$
|
3,017
|
|
|
$
|
2,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of preferred stock dividend to common shares
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,850
|
|
|
$
|
3,005
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-6
RealPage,
Inc.
RealPage, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries,
(Company or we or us) is a provider of property management
solutions that enable owners and managers of single-family and a
wide variety of multi-family rental property types to manage
their marketing, pricing, screening, leasing, accounting,
purchasing and other property operations. Our on demand software
solutions are delivered through an integrated software platform
that provides a single point of access and a shared repository
of prospect, resident and property data. By integrating and
streamlining a wide range of complex processes and interactions
among the rental housing ecosystem of owners, managers,
prospects, residents and service providers, our platform
optimizes the property management process and improves the
experience for all of these constituents. Our solutions enable
property owners and managers to optimize revenues and reduce
operating costs through higher occupancy, improved pricing
methodologies, new sources of revenue from ancillary services,
improved collections and more integrated and centralized
processes.
|
|
2.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis
of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2008 and 2009 and June 30, 2010
(unaudited) and the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2010 represent our financial position,
results of operations and cash flows as of and for the periods
then ended. The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of RealPage, Inc. and our wholly-owned subsidiaries.
All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
In preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements,
we have reviewed, as determined necessary by our management,
events that have occurred after June 30, 2010, up until the
issuance of the financial statements. As such, our management
was not aware of any subsequent events, other than those
disclosed herein, requiring additional disclosure.
Applicable
Accounting Guidance
Any reference in these notes to applicable accounting guidance
is meant to refer to the authoritative non-governmental United
States generally accepted accounting principles as found in the
Financial Accounting Standards Boards (FASB) Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC).
Unaudited
Interim Financial Information
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated balance sheet as
of June 30, 2010, the consolidated statements of income and
cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010,
and the consolidated statement of convertible preferred stock
and stockholders deficit for the six months ended
June 30, 2010 are unaudited. These unaudited interim
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States. In the opinion of our management, the unaudited
interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on
the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements
and include all adjustments necessary for the fair statement of
our financial position, as of June 30, 2010, the results of
operations and cash flows for the six months ended June 30,
2009 and 2010 and stockholders deficit for the six months
ended June 30, 2010. The results of operations for the six
months ended June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative
of the results to be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2010 or for any other period.
F-7
Unaudited
Pro Forma Presentation
Assuming achievement of the net proceeds and per share price
requirements of a qualified public offering, upon the
consummation of the initial public offering contemplated in this
prospectus and consent of 90% of our Series A redeemable
convertible preferred stock, all of the outstanding shares of
our convertible preferred stock will convert into shares of our
common stock. The December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010
unaudited pro forma balance sheet data has been prepared
assuming the conversion of the redeemable convertible preferred
stock outstanding into 29,043,748 shares of common stock.
The unaudited pro forma net income per share attributed to
common stockholders for the periods ended December 31, 2009
and June 30, 2010 were computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding and have been prepared
assuming the conversion of the convertible preferred stock
outstanding into 29,043,748 shares of common stock.
Accounting
Reclassification
In the second quarter of 2010, an adjustment was made to
reclassify amounts previously reported as current portion of
deferred revenue. This adjustment resulted in increase to the
long term portion of deferred revenue of $3.5 million and
$4.0 million as of December 31, 2008 and 2009,
respectively, and corresponding decreases in the current portion
of deferred revenue and current liabilities. These changes did
not have an impact on our consolidated statements of operations
or statements of cash flows for any period presented.
Segment
and Geographic Information
Our chief operating decision maker is our Chief Executive
Officer, who reviews financial information presented on a
company-wide basis. As a result, we determined that the Company
has a single reporting segment and operating unit structure.
Principally, all of our revenues for the periods ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and June 30, 2009 and
2010 (unaudited) were in North America.
Net long-lived assets held were $18.6 million,
$20.3 million and $19.7 million in North America and
$0.6 million, $0.5 million and $0.6 million in
our international subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 and
2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited), respectively.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
(GAAP) requires our management to make certain estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
periods. Significant estimates include the allowance for
doubtful accounts; the useful lives of intangible assets and the
recoverability or impairment of tangible and intangible asset
values; purchase accounting allocations and related reserves;
revenue and deferred revenue; stock-based compensation; and our
effective income tax rate and the recoverability of deferred tax
assets, which are based upon our expectations of future taxable
income and allowable deductions. Actual results could differ
from these estimates.
Cash
Equivalents
We consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity date,
when purchased, of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Our cash accounts, including an overnight repurchase account,
are maintained at various financial institutions and may, from
time to time, exceed federally insured limits. The Company has
not experienced any losses in such accounts.
F-8
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts
receivable result from substantially all of our customers being
in the multi-family rental housing market. Our customers,
however, are dispersed across different geographic areas. We do
not require collateral from customers. We maintain an allowance
for losses based upon the expected collectability of accounts
receivable. Accounts receivable are written off upon
determination of non-collectability following established
Company policies based on the aging from the accounts receivable
invoice date.
No single customer accounted for 5% or more of our revenue or
accounts receivable for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008 or 2009 or the six months ended June 30, 2009 or 2010
(unaudited).
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted a new accounting
standard which defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and expands on required disclosures
regarding fair value measurements. This standard applies to
reported balances that are required or permitted to be measured
at fair value under existing accounting pronouncements
accordingly, but does not require any new fair value
measurements of previously reported balances. The adoption had
no impact on our consolidated results of operations or financial
position.
Financial assets and liabilities with carrying amounts
approximating fair value include cash and cash equivalents,
restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and
accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The carrying
amount of these financial assets and liabilities approximates
fair value because of their short maturities. The carrying
amount of our debt and other long-term liabilities approximates
their fair value. The fair value of debt was based upon our
managements best estimate of interest rates that would be
available for similar debt obligations as of December 31,
2008 and 2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited) and was
consistent with the interest rates we received in connection
with the refinancing of our debt obligations in February 2010.
Accounts
Receivable
For several of our solutions, we invoice customers prior to the
period in which service is provided. Accounts receivable
represent trade receivables from customers when we have invoiced
for software solutions
and/or
services and we have not yet received payment. We present
accounts receivable net of an allowance for doubtful accounts.
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of customers to make
required payments, or the customer cancelling prior to the
service being rendered. In doing so, we consider the current
financial condition of the customer, the specific details of the
customer account, the age of the outstanding balance, the
current economic environment and historical credit trends. As a
result, a portion of our allowance is for services not yet
rendered and, therefore, is charged as an offset to deferred
revenue, which does not have an effect on the statement of
operations. Any change in the assumptions used in analyzing a
specific account receivable might result in an additional
allowance for doubtful accounts being recognized in the period
in which the change occurs.
Property,
Equipment and Software
Property, equipment and software are recorded at cost less
accumulated depreciation and amortization, which are computed
using the straight-line method over the following estimated
useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
3-10 years
|
|
Data processing and communications equipment
|
|
|
3-10 years
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and other equipment
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
Software
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Software includes purchased software and internally developed
software. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the
shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful lives of the
assets.
F-9
Business
Combinations
When we acquire businesses, we allocate the total consideration
paid to the fair value of the tangible assets, liabilities, and
identifiable intangible assets acquired. Any residual purchase
consideration is recorded as goodwill. The allocation of the
purchase price requires our management to make significant
estimates in determining the fair values of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed, in particular with respect to identified
intangible assets. These estimates are based on the application
of valuation models using historical experience and information
obtained from the management of the acquired companies. These
estimates can include, but are not limited to, the cash flows
that an asset is expected to generate in the future, the
appropriate weighted-average cost of capital and the cost
savings expected to be derived from acquiring an asset. These
estimates are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. In
addition, unanticipated events and circumstances may occur which
may affect the accuracy or validity of these estimates. In
accordance with new accounting guidance, beginning in 2009, we
began including the fair value of contingent consideration to be
paid within the total consideration allocated to the fair value
of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. This requires us
to make estimates regarding the fair value of the amounts to be
paid. Additionally, we expense acquisition-related costs as
incurred rather than including as a component of purchase price.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
We perform an impairment review of long-lived assets held and
used whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider
important that could trigger an impairment review include, but
are not limited to, significant under-performance relative to
projected future operating results, significant changes in the
manner of our use of the acquired assets or our overall business
and/or
product strategies. When we determine that the carrying value of
a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based upon the
existence of one or more of these indicators, we determine the
recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of the asset or
asset group to net future undiscounted cash flows that the asset
or assets are expected to generate. We would then recognize an
impairment charge equal to the amount by which the carrying
amount exceeds the fair market value of the asset or assets.
In December 2008, we decided to sell certain assets associated
with one of our service offerings with a net book value of
$1.8 million. Assets identified for sale were written down
to their estimated market value at December 31, 2008,
resulting in a loss of $0.8 million. The estimated market
value of $1.0 million was based on observable prices for
similar assets. We have recorded these assets in other current
assets in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
2008. During 2009, a portion of these assets were sold. The
balance of these assets at December 31, 2009, was
$0.2 million. As the held for sale criteria were no longer
met, these assets were reclassified to fixed assets at
December 31, 2009.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets with Indefinite Lives
We test goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite
lives for impairment separately on an annual basis in the fourth
quarter of each year. Additionally, we will test goodwill and
other intangible assets with indefinite lives in the interim if
events and circumstances indicate that goodwill and other
intangible assets with indefinite lives may be impaired. The
events and circumstances that we consider include significant
under-performance relative to projected future operating results
and significant changes in our overall business
and/or
product strategies. We evaluate impairment of goodwill using a
two-step process. The first step involves a comparison of the
fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the
carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value,
the second step of the process involves a comparison of the fair
value and carrying amount of the goodwill of that reporting unit
and determination of the impairment charge, if any. We evaluate
other intangible assets with indefinite lives by estimating the
fair value of those assets based on estimated future earnings
derived from the assets using the income approach model. If the
carrying amount of the other intangible assets with indefinite
lives exceeds the fair value, we would recognize an impairment
loss equal to the excess of carrying value over fair value. If
an event occurs that would cause us to revise our estimates and
assumptions used in analyzing the value of our goodwill and
other intangible assets with indefinite lives, the revision
could result in a non-cash impairment charge that could have a
material impact on
F-10
our financial results. There was no impairment of goodwill or
intangible assets with indefinite lives in 2007, 2008 or 2009.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible assets consist of acquired developed product
technologies, acquired customer relationships, vendor
relationships, non-competition agreements and tradenames. We
record intangible assets at fair value and amortize those with
finite lives over the shorter of the contractual life or the
estimated useful life. We estimate the useful lives of acquired
developed product technologies and customer relationships based
on factors that include the planned use of each developed
product technology and the expected pattern of future cash flows
to be derived from each developed product technology and
existing customer relationships. We include amortization of
acquired developed product technologies in cost of revenue,
amortization of acquired customer relationships in sales and
marketing expenses and amortization of vendor relationships and
non-competition agreements in general and administrative
expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
Income
Taxes
Income taxes are provided based on the liability method, which
results in income tax assets and liabilities arising from
temporary differences. Temporary differences are differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their
reported amounts in the financial statements that will result in
taxable or deductible amounts in future years. The liability
method requires the effect of tax rate changes on current and
accumulated deferred income taxes to be reflected in the period
in which the rate change was enacted. The liability method also
requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation
allowance unless it is more likely than not that the assets will
be realized.
We may recognize a tax benefit from uncertain tax positions only
if it is at least more likely than not that the tax position
will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities,
based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits
recognized in the financial statements from such a position are
measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than
50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement with the taxing
authorities. Upon our adoption of the related standard, there
was no liability for uncertain tax positions due to the fact
that there were no identified tax benefits that were considered
uncertain positions.
We establish valuation allowances when necessary to reduce
deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. We
evaluate the need for, and the adequacy of, valuation allowances
based on the expected realization of our deferred tax assets.
The factors used to assess the likelihood of realization include
historical earnings, our latest forecast of taxable income and
available tax planning strategies that could be implemented to
realize the net deferred tax assets.
Our effective tax rates are primarily affected by the amount of
our taxable income or losses in the various taxing jurisdictions
in which we operate, the amount of federal and state net
operating losses and tax credits, the extent to which we can
utilize these net operating loss carryforwards and tax credits
and certain benefits related to stock option activity.
Revenue
Recognition
We derive our revenue from three primary sources: our on demand
software solutions; our on premise software solutions; and
professional and other services. We commence revenue recognition
when all of the following conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
|
there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement;
|
|
|
|
the solution and/or service has been provided to the customer;
|
|
|
|
the collection of the fees is probable; and
|
|
|
|
the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or
determinable.
|
F-11
For multi-element arrangements that include multiple software
solutions
and/or
services, we allocate arrangement consideration to all
deliverables that have stand-alone value based on their relative
selling prices. In such circumstances, we utilize the following
hierarchy to determine the selling price to be used for
allocating revenue to deliverables as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE), if
available. The price at which we sell the element
in a separate stand-alone transaction;
|
|
|
|
Third-party evidence of selling price (TPE), if VSOE of
selling price is not available. Evidence from us
or other companies of the value of a largely interchangeable
element in a transaction; and
|
|
|
|
Estimated selling price (ESP), if neither VSOE nor TPE of
selling price is available. Our best estimate of
the stand-alone selling price of an element in a transaction.
|
Our process for determining ESP for deliverables without VSOE or
TPE considers multiple factors that may vary depending upon the
unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable. Key
factors primarily considered in developing ESP include prices
charged by us for similar offerings when sold separately,
pricing policies and approvals from standard pricing and other
business objectives.
From time to time, we sell on demand software solutions with
professional services. In such cases, as each element has stand
alone value, we allocate arrangement consideration based on our
estimated selling price of the on demand software solution and
VSOE of the selling price of the professional services.
On Demand
Revenue
Our on demand revenue consists of license and subscription fees,
transaction fees related to certain of our software-enabled
value-added services and commissions derived from us selling
certain risk mitigation services.
License and subscription fees are comprised of a charge billed
at the initial order date and monthly or annual subscription
fees for accessing our on demand software solutions. The license
fee billed at the initial order date is recognized as revenue on
a straight-line basis over the longer of the contractual term or
the period in which the customer is expected to benefit, which
we consider to be four years. Recognition starts once the
product has been activated. Revenue from monthly and annual
subscription fees is recognized on a straight-line basis over
the access period.
We recognize revenue from transaction fees derived from certain
of our software-enabled value-added services as the related
services are performed.
As part of our risk mitigation services to the rental housing
industry, we act as an insurance agent and derive commission
revenue from the sale of insurance products to individuals. The
commissions are based upon a percentage of the premium that the
insurance company charges to the policyholder and are subject to
forfeiture in instances where a policyholder cancels prior to
the end of the policy. If the policy is cancelled, our
commissions are forfeited as a percent of the unearned premium.
As a result, recognize the commissions related to these services
ratably over the policy term as the associated premiums are
earned.
On
Premise Revenue
Revenue from our on premise software solutions is comprised of
an annual term license, which includes maintenance and support.
Customers can renew their annual term license for additional
one-year terms at renewal price levels. We recognize the annual
term license on a straight-line basis over the contract term.
In addition, we have arrangements that include perpetual
licenses with maintenance and other services to be provided over
a fixed term. We allocate and defer revenue equivalent to the
VSOE of fair value for the undelivered elements and recognize
the difference between the total arrangement fee and the amount
deferred for the undelivered elements as revenue. We have
determined that we do not have VSOE of fair value for its
customer support and professional services in these specific
arrangements. As a result, the elements within its
multiple-element sales agreements do not qualify for treatment
as separate units of accounting. Accordingly, we account for
fees received under multiple-element arrangements with customer
support or other professional
F-12
services as a single unit of accounting and recognize the entire
arrangement ratably over the longer of the customer support
period or the period during which professional services are
rendered.
Professional
and Other Revenue
Professional & other revenue is recognized as the services
are rendered for time and material contracts. Training revenues
are recognized after the services are performed.
Deferred
Revenue
Deferred revenue primarily consists of billings or payments
received in advance of revenue recognition from our subscription
service described above and is recognized as the revenue
recognition criteria are met. For several of our solutions, we
invoice our customers in annual, monthly or quarterly
installments in advance of the commencement of the service
period. Accordingly, the deferred revenue balance does not
represent the total contract value of annual subscription
agreements.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost of revenue consists primarily of salaries and related
personnel expenses of our operations and support personnel,
including training and implementation services, expenses related
to the operation of our data center, fees paid to third-party
providers, allocations of facilities overhead costs and
depreciation, amortization of acquired technologies and
amortization of capitalized software.
Customer
Acquisition Costs
The costs of obtaining new customers are expensed as incurred.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We record stock-based compensation expense for options granted
to employees based on the estimated fair value for the awards,
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of
grant. We recognize expense over the requisite service period,
which is generally the vesting period, on a straight-line basis.
At each stock option grant date, we utilize peer group data to
calculate our expected volatility. Expected volatility is based
on historical and expected volatility rates of publicly traded
peers. The expected life of each option grant is based on
existing employee exercise patterns. The risk-free rate is based
on the treasury yield rate with a maturity corresponding to the
expected option life assumed at the grant date. We do not
estimate forfeitures as the awards vest quarterly over the
related service term.
Changes to the underlying assumptions may have a significant
impact on the underlying value of the stock options, which could
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
We have granted stock options at exercise prices believed to be
equal to or above the fair market value of our common stock, as
of the grant date. Given the absence of any active market for
our common stock, the fair market value of the common stock
underlying stock options granted was determined by our
compensation committee, with input from our management, and
considered contemporaneous third-party valuations.
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 (unaudited), we
incurred expenses of $0.5 million, $1.5 million,
$2.8 million, $1.2 million and $2.4 million,
respectively, for stock-based compensation expense.
Capitalized
Product Development Costs
We capitalize specific product development costs, including
costs to develop software products or the software components of
our solutions to be marketed to external users, as well as
software programs to be used solely to meet our internal needs.
The costs incurred in the preliminary stages of development
related to research, project planning, training, maintenance and
general and administrative activities, and overhead costs are
expensed as incurred. The costs of relatively minor upgrades and
enhancements to the software are also expensed as incurred. Once
an application has reached the development stage, internal and
external costs
F-13
incurred in the performance of application development stage
activities, including costs of materials, services and payroll
and payroll-related costs for employees, are capitalized, if
direct and incremental, until the software is substantially
complete and ready for its intended use. Capitalization ceases
upon completion of all substantial testing. We also capitalize
costs related to specific upgrades and enhancements when it is
probable the expenditures will result in additional
functionality. Capitalized costs are recorded as part of
property and equipment. Internal use software is amortized on a
straight-line basis over its estimated useful life, generally
three years. We capitalized $1.5 million, $1.4 and
$0.8 million of product development costs during the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2010 (unaudited), respectively, and recognized
amortization expense of $0.8 million, $0.9 million,
$1.3 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million
during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 (unaudited),
respectively, included as a component of cost of revenue.
Unamortized product development cost was $2.9 million,
$3.1 million and $3.2 million at December 31,
2008 and 2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited), respectively.
Our management evaluates the useful lives of these assets on an
annual basis and tests for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances occur that could impact the recoverability of
these assets. There were no impairments to internal use software
during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 or 2009.
Advertising
Expenses
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred and totaled
$3.4 million, $4.9 million, $5.9 million,
$2.5 million and $3.5 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2010 (unaudited), respectively.
Accrued
Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Accrued compensation, payroll taxes, and benefits
|
|
$
|
5,264
|
|
|
$
|
5,034
|
|
|
$
|
4,971
|
|
Current portion of capital leases
|
|
|
2,852
|
|
|
|
1,540
|
|
|
|
1,280
|
|
Current portion of liabilities related to acquisitions
|
|
|
3,358
|
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
|
|
2,134
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
2,353
|
|
|
|
2,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
13,255
|
|
|
$
|
10,830
|
|
|
$
|
11,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Capital leases, less current portion
|
|
$
|
2,377
|
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
$
|
239
|
|
Long-term liabilities related to acquisitions, less current
portion
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
2,455
|
|
|
|
1,690
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
|
2,762
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other long-term liabilities
|
|
$
|
6,767
|
|
|
$
|
5,806
|
|
|
$
|
4,529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently
Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2009, we adopted the FASB ASC. The FASB established
the ASC as the single source of authoritative non-governmental
GAAP, superseding various existing authoritative accounting
pronouncements.
F-14
It eliminates the previous GAAP hierarchy and establishes one
level of authoritative GAAP. All other literature is considered
non-authoritative. The FASB will not issue new standards in the
form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task
Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue an Accounting Standards
Update (ASU). The FASB will not consider ASUs as authoritative
in their own right. ASUs will serve only to update the ASC,
provide background information about the guidance and provide
the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the ASC.
In December 2007, the FASB issued guidance regarding business
combinations, which significantly changes the principles and
requirements for how the acquirer of a business recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets
acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest
in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. This statement is
effective prospectively, except for certain retrospective
adjustments to deferred tax balances, for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. We applied these provisions to our
2009 acquisitions which resulted in expensing related
transaction costs and valuing contingent consideration at the
date of acquisition. See Note 3.
In May 2009, the FASB issued an ASU that established general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur
after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are
issued or are available to be issued. Although there is new
terminology, the standard is based on the same principles as
those that currently exist in the auditing standards. The
standard, which includes a new required disclosure of the date
through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events, is
effective for interim or annual periods ending after
June 15, 2009. The adoption had no impact on our
consolidated results of operations or financial position.
In September 2009, the FASB issued an ASU providing
clarification for measuring the fair value of a liability when a
quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is
not available. It also clarifies that, when estimating the fair
value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to
include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating
to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of
the liability. This ASU is effective for fiscal periods
beginning after August 27, 2009. We do not believe this
update will have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
2007
Acquisition
In April 2007, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding
member interests of Multifamily Internet Ventures, LLC, the
Irvine, California-based parent company of LeasingDesk LLC
(LeasingDesk). We purchased LeasingDesk to be able to provide
resident insurance programs to the multi-family housing
industry. The LeasingDesk product line includes eRenterPlan, a
liability policy that insures owners against financial loss due
to resident-caused damage, or an enhanced version of the product
which includes renters insurance, providing additional
coverage for resident personal belongings in the event of loss.
The aggregate purchase price was $7.3 million, net of cash
acquired, including cash payment of $7.1 million and
acquisition-related costs of $0.2 million. In April 2008,
we also paid $0.3 million in contingent consideration. The
fair value of this contingent consideration was not included
within total consideration at the acquisition date. This payment
was recorded as additional goodwill. The purchase price of the
acquisition was allocated to the net assets acquired based on
the fair values at the date of the acquisition. Goodwill
associated with the LeasingDesk acquisition is deductible for
tax purposes. We included the operating results in our
consolidated results of operations from the effective date of
the acquisition.
F-15
We allocated the purchase price for LeasingDesk as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LeasingDesk
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Developed product technologies
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
120
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
420
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,241
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(434
|
)
|
Net other assets (liabilities)
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
7,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
Acquisitions
In January 2008, we entered into an asset purchase agreement
with WebRoomz, LLC (WebRoomz) to acquire technology for an on
demand leasing system for the student and privatized military
housing markets. WebRoomz is a web-based portal that allows
tenants to match roommates and manages the entire leasing
process using a document management system. The aggregate
purchase price was $1.2 million, which included the payment
of cash and acquisition related costs of $0.1 million. We
included the operating results in our consolidated results of
operations from the effective date of the acquisition.
In October 2008, we completed an acquisition of all of the
issued and outstanding stock of OpsTechnology, Inc. (Ops). Ops
offers three on demand products designed to improve efficiencies
and reduce costs for multi-family companies. The aggregate
purchase price at closing, net of acquired cash, was
$21.6 million, which included a cash payment of
$20.3 million, acquisition-related costs of
$0.3 million and an additional cash payment of
$2.7 million, which was paid on the first anniversary of
the acquisition date. In addition, certain former owners of Ops
earned 333,332 shares of our common stock by achieving
certain revenue targets in 2009. This increased the overall
consideration by $1.7 million. The fair value of this
contingent consideration was not included within total
consideration at the acquisition date. This payment was recorded
as additional goodwill.
We made both of these acquisitions because of the immediate
availability of product offerings that complemented our existing
products. We accounted for the Webroomz and Ops acquisitions
using the purchase method of accounting. Goodwill associated
with the Webroomz acquisition is deductible for tax purposes;
however, the goodwill associated with the Ops acquisition is not
deductible for tax purposes.
We allocated the purchase prices for Webroomz and Ops as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Webroomz
|
|
|
Ops
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed product technologies
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
2,457
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,884
|
|
Vendor relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,650
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,840
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
953
|
|
|
|
7,253
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(619
|
)
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(644
|
)
|
Net other assets (liabilities)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,181
|
|
|
$
|
21,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
2009
Acquisitions
In September 2009, we purchased substantially all of the assets
of Evergreen Solutions, Inc. (Evergreen). The acquisition of
Evergreen further advanced our ability to offer open access to
our products for clients and certified partners, and improves
our ability to offer integration of our products and services
with third-party solutions. The aggregate purchase price at
closing was $0.9 million, which included a cash payment of
$0.7 million and the fair value of contingent consideration
of $0.2 million, which was paid in March 2010 and is based
on the collection of pre-acquisition accounts receivable
balances from customers. The $0.2 million is recorded
within the current portion of acquisition related liabilities on
the balance sheet. The customer relationships have useful lives
of four years and are amortized in proportion to the estimated
cash flows derived from the relationship. We have determined
that the tradename has an indefinite life, as we anticipate
keeping the tradename for the foreseeable future given its
recognition in the marketplace. All direct acquisition costs
were immaterial and expensed as incurred. We included the
operating results of this acquisition in our consolidated
results of operations from the effective date of the acquisition.
In September 2009, we purchased 100% of the outstanding stock of
A.L. Wizard, Inc. (ALW). The acquisition of ALW immediately
provided us with an application of on demand software and
services for residential property management customers who
manage senior living properties. The aggregate purchase price at
closing was $2.8 million, net of cash acquired of
$0.2 million, which included a cash payment of
$2.5 million upon acquisition and additional cash payments
of $0.5 million, half of which is due on the first
anniversary of the acquisition date, with the remaining amount
due 18 months from the acquisition date. The
$0.5 million is recorded in acquisition-related liabilities
on the balance sheet. We acquired deferred revenue as a
contractual obligation, which was recorded at its assessed fair
value of $0.5 million. The fair value was determined by
incorporating the total cost to service the revenue and a normal
profit margin for the industry. The customer relationships have
useful lives of seven years and are amortized in proportion to
the estimated cash flows derived from the relationship. Acquired
developed product technologies have a useful life of three years
and are amortized straight-line over the estimated useful life.
We have determined that the tradename has an indefinite life, as
we anticipate keeping the tradename for the foreseeable future
given its recognition in the marketplace. All direct acquisition
costs were immaterial and expensed as incurred. We included the
operating results of this acquisition in our consolidated
results from the effective date of the acquisition.
In November 2009, we purchased 100% of the outstanding stock of
Propertyware, Inc. (Propertyware). The acquisition of
Propertyware provided an entry into the single-family and small,
centrally managed multi-family property markets. The acquisition
also expanded the breadth of products Propertyware will make
available to its residential property management customers. The
aggregate purchase price at closing was $11.9 million, net
of cash acquired, which included a cash payment of
$9.0 million and additional cash payments of
$0.5 million payable on the first anniversary of the
acquisition date and $0.5 million payable 18 months
after the acquisition date. The $1.0 million is recorded in
acquisition-related liabilities on the balance sheet. In
addition, the purchase price included the issuance of 500,000
restricted common shares which vest as certain revenue targets
are achieved as defined in the purchase agreement. The fair
value of these shares is estimated to be $2.2 million and
is based on our managements estimate of the fair value of
the stock and the probability of the achievement of these
revenue targets. These shares have a maximum value of
$2.5 million. We acquired deferred revenue as a contractual
obligation, which was recorded at its assessed fair value of
$0.5 million. The acquired intangibles were recorded at
fair value based on assumptions made by us. The customer
relationships have useful lives of ten years and are
amortized in proportion to the estimated cash flows derived from
the relationship. Acquired developed product technologies have a
useful life of three years and are amortized straight-line
over the estimated useful life. We have determined that the
tradename has an indefinite life, as we anticipate keeping the
tradename for the foreseeable future given its recognition in
the marketplace. All direct acquisition costs were immaterial
and expensed as incurred. We included the operating results of
this acquisition in our consolidated results of operations from
the effective date of the acquisition.
We made each of these acquisitions because of the immediate
availability of product offerings that complemented our existing
products. We accounted for the Evergreen, ALW and Propertyware
acquisitions by allocating the total consideration, including
the fair value of contingent consideration to the fair value of
assets received and liabilities assumed. Goodwill associated
with the Evergreen acquisition is deductible for tax
F-17
purposes; however, the goodwill associated with the ALW and
Propertyware acquisitions is not deductible for tax purposes.
We allocated the purchase prices for Evergreen, ALW and
Propertyware as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evergreen
|
|
|
ALW
|
|
|
Propertyware
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed product technologies
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,192
|
|
|
$
|
7,427
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
1,080
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
|
|
6,144
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(520
|
)
|
|
|
(451
|
)
|
Deferred tax (liability)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(863
|
)
|
|
|
(3,407
|
)
|
Net other assets
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
885
|
|
|
$
|
2,783
|
|
|
$
|
11,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
Acquisitions
In February 2010, we acquired the assets of Domin-8 Enterprise
Solutions, Inc. (Domin-8). The acquisition of these assets
improved our ability to serve our multi-family clients with
mixed portfolios that include smaller, centrally-managed
apartment communities. The aggregate purchase price at closing
was $12.9 million, net of cash acquired, which was paid
upon acquisition of the assets. We acquired deferred revenue as
a contractual obligation, which was recorded at its assessed
fair value of $4.5 million. The fair value of the deferred
revenue was determined based on estimated costs to support
acquired contracts plus a reasonable margin. The acquired
intangibles were recorded at fair value based on assumptions
made by us. The customer relationships have useful lives of
approximately six years and are amortized in proportion to
the estimated cash flows derived from the relationship. Acquired
developed product technologies have a useful life of three years
and are amortized straight-line over the estimated useful life.
We have determined that the tradename has an indefinite life, as
we anticipate keeping the tradename for the foreseeable future
given its recognition in the marketplace. Approximately
$0.7 million and $0.3 million of transaction costs
related to this acquisition were expensed as incurred during
2009 and the period ending June 30, 2010, respectively. We
included the operating results of this acquisition in our
consolidated results of operations from the effective date of
the acquisition. This acquisition was financed from the proceeds
from the amended credit facility (See Note 6) and cash
flow from operations.
We made this acquisition because of the immediate availability
of product offerings that complemented our existing products. We
accounted for this acquisition by allocating the total
consideration to the fair value of assets received and
liabilities assumed. Goodwill associated with this acquisition
is deductible for tax purposes.
We allocated the purchase price for Domin-8 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domin-8
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Developed product technologies
|
|
$
|
3,678
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
6,418
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,778
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(4,502
|
)
|
Net other assets
|
|
|
1,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
12,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
In July, 2010, we purchased 100% of the outstanding stock of
eReal Estate Integration, Inc. (eREI) for approximately
$10.0 million. The acquisition of eREI improved our lead
management and lead syndication capabilities. This acquisition
was financed from proceeds from our revolving line of credit and
cash flows from operations. Due to the timing of this
acquisition, the purchase price allocation was not complete as
of the date of this filing due to the pending completion of the
valuation of intangible assets. All direct acquisition costs
were immaterial and expensed as incurred.
Pro Forma
Results of Acquisitions
The following table presents unaudited pro forma results of
operations for 2007, 2008 and 2009 as if the aforementioned
acquisitions, including Domin-8 and eREI, had occurred at the
beginning of each period presented. We prepared the pro forma
financial information for the combined entities for comparative
purposes only, and it is not indicative of what actual results
would have been if the acquisitions had taken place at the
beginning of the periods presented, or of future results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On demand
|
|
$
|
73,723
|
|
|
$
|
109,453
|
|
|
$
|
136,624
|
|
|
$
|
78,165
|
|
On premise
|
|
|
17,605
|
|
|
|
16,673
|
|
|
|
13,035
|
|
|
|
5,042
|
|
Professional and other
|
|
|
13,723
|
|
|
|
15,041
|
|
|
|
12,080
|
|
|
|
5,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
105,051
|
|
|
|
141,167
|
|
|
|
161,739
|
|
|
|
88,264
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(6,308
|
)
|
|
|
(16,667
|
)
|
|
|
28,663
|
|
|
|
(551
|
)
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common stockholders:
|
|
|
(12,308
|
)
|
|
|
(24,116
|
)
|
|
|
10,845
|
|
|
|
(2,875
|
)
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
(12,308
|
)
|
|
|
(24,116
|
)
|
|
|
10,845
|
|
|
|
(2,875
|
)
|
Net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(1.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.74
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.74
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.43
|
|
|
$
|
(0.11
|
)
|
The acquisitions in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 were financed with
cash flows from operations and financing activities.
Acquisition-Related
Liabilities from Pre-2007 Acquisition
In connection with a 2002 acquisition, a liability was recorded
for a $6.0 million earn-out payable to the seller, as
payment was considered probable. At December 31, 2008 and
2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited), we owed
$3.0 million, $2.5 million and $2.2 million,
respectively, in remaining earn-out fees relating to this
acquisition, of which $2.5 million, $2.0 million and
$1.7 million are included in other long-term liabilities on
the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2008 and
2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited), respectively.
F-19
4. Property,
Equipment and Software
Property, equipment and software consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
$
|
5,069
|
|
|
$
|
6,039
|
|
|
$
|
6,404
|
|
Data processing and communications equipment
|
|
|
20,078
|
|
|
|
26,969
|
|
|
|
27,805
|
|
Furniture, fixtures, and other equipment
|
|
|
5,233
|
|
|
|
6,251
|
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
Software
|
|
|
19,005
|
|
|
|
21,807
|
|
|
|
24,187
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,385
|
|
|
|
61,066
|
|
|
|
65,403
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(30,248
|
)
|
|
|
(40,317
|
)
|
|
|
(45,106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and software, net
|
|
$
|
19,137
|
|
|
$
|
20,749
|
|
|
$
|
20,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for property, equipment
and software was $5.7 million, $9.2 million,
$10.3 million, $4.9 million and $5.7 million for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 (unaudited),
respectively. This includes depreciation for assets purchased
through capital leases.
|
|
5.
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, and the six months ended
June 30, 2010 (unaudited), is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
9,194
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
|
|
449
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
8,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
17,849
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
|
|
1,679
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
7,838
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
27,366
|
|
Goodwill acquired
|
|
|
4,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
32,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets consisted of the following at
December 31, 2008 and 2009 and June 30, 2010
(unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Finite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technologies
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
$
|
2,801
|
|
|
$
|
(412
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,389
|
|
|
$
|
11,421
|
|
|
$
|
(1,870
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,551
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
1-10 years
|
|
|
|
7,539
|
|
|
|
(2,469
|
)
|
|
|
5,070
|
|
|
|
9,707
|
|
|
|
(4,301
|
)
|
|
|
5,406
|
|
Vendor relationships
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
5,650
|
|
|
|
(311
|
)
|
|
|
5,339
|
|
|
|
5,650
|
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
Non-competition agreement
|
|
|
4-5 years
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,110
|
|
|
|
(3,245
|
)
|
|
|
12,865
|
|
|
|
26,898
|
|
|
|
(7,754
|
)
|
|
|
19,144
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,747
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,370
|
|
|
$
|
(3,245
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,125
|
|
|
$
|
30,645
|
|
|
$
|
(7,754
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Finite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developed technologies
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
|
$
|
15,102
|
|
|
$
|
(4,237
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,865
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
1-10 years
|
|
|
|
16,125
|
|
|
|
(5,797
|
)
|
|
|
10,328
|
|
Vendor relationships
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
5,650
|
|
|
|
(1,500
|
)
|
|
|
4,150
|
|
Non-competition agreements
|
|
|
4-5 years
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,997
|
|
|
|
(11,631
|
)
|
|
|
25,366
|
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,025
|
|
|
$
|
(11,631
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There was no impairment of goodwill or trade names indicated
during 2008 or 2009.
Amortization of finite-lived intangible assets was
$1.5 million, $1.8 million, $4.5 million,
$2.1 million, and $3.9 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2010 (unaudited), respectively.
As of June 30, 2010 (unaudited), the following table sets
forth the estimated amortization of intangible assets for the
years ending December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010 (6 months)
|
|
$
|
3,870
|
|
2011
|
|
|
8,086
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,686
|
|
2013
|
|
|
3,082
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,336
|
|
The following table summarizes the components of debt as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Revolver
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,673
|
|
Term loan
|
|
|
12,650
|
|
|
$
|
33,688
|
|
|
|
40,305
|
|
Promissory notes issued to preferred stockholders
|
|
|
11,064
|
|
|
|
8,173
|
|
|
|
7,247
|
|
Secured promissory notes
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,714
|
|
|
$
|
51,861
|
|
|
$
|
63,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2009, we entered into a Credit Agreement (Credit
Agreement) with two lenders, which provided for
$35.0 million term loan and a $10.0 million revolving
line of credit. A portion of the proceeds from the Credit
Agreement was used to repay the balance outstanding under our
prior credit agreement. The term loan and revolving line of
credit bear interest at rates of the greater of 7.5%, a stated
rate of 5.0% plus LIBOR, or a stated rate of 5.0% plus the
banks prime rate (or, if greater than 3.5%, the federal
funds rate plus 0.5% or three month LIBOR plus 1.0%). The term
loan and revolving line of credit were collateralized by all of
our personal property and are subject to financial covenants,
including meeting certain financial measures.
F-21
In February 2010, we entered into an amendment to the Credit
Agreement. Under the terms of the amendment, the original term
loan was increased by an additional $10.0 million. The
related interest rates and maturity periods remained consistent
with the terms of Credit Agreement.
In June 2010, we entered into a subsequent amendment to the
Credit Facility. Under the terms of the June 2010
amendment, an additional $30 million in delayed draw term
loans was made available for borrowing until December 22,
2011. After the June 2010 amendment, the term loan and revolving
line of credit bear interest at a stated rate of 3.5% plus
LIBOR, or a stated rate of 0.75% plus Wells Fargos prime
rate (or, if greater, the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or three
month LIBOR plus 1.0%). Under the terms of the June 2010
amendment, principal payments on the term loan will be paid in
quarterly installments equal to 3.75% of the principal amount of
term loans, with the balance of all term loans and the revolver
due on June 30, 2014. In June 2010, we borrowed from our
revolving line of credit for an amount of $3.0 million in
order to partially facilitate an acquisition. In July 2010, we
borrowed an additional $2.0 million from our revolving line
of credit. As of June 30, 2010, we are in compliance with
our debt covenants.
In August 2008, we entered into a note purchase agreement with a
separate lender. Under the terms of the agreement, we issued
secured promissory notes (Notes) in the amount of
$10.0 million with an interest rate of 13.75%, payable
quarterly. The Notes are to be paid in full before
August 1, 2013. The Notes are collateralized by all of our
personal property and are subordinated to the Credit Agreement.
On December 30, 2008 and April 23, 2010, in connection
with a declaration of a dividend for all holders of our
redeemable convertible preferred stock, we issued promissory
notes to the holders of our convertible preferred stock
(Stockholder Notes) in an aggregate principal amount of
$11.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The
Stockholder Notes bear interest at a rate of 8% and are payable
in 16 consecutive quarterly payments of principal and interest.
We must meet certain debt to EBITDA levels and exceed minimum
and average cash balance requirements in order to make the
interest payments. Additionally, an amount equal to
$1.2 million will be paid upon maturity to holders of the
Stockholder Notes. We recognized $0.2 million and
$0.1 million of additional interest expense related to
these notes during the year ended December 31, 2009 and the
six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited), respectively.
The payments may be deferred at the discretion of the board of
directors.
After giving effect to the June 2010 amendment to the Credit
Agreement and April 23, 2010 Stockholder Notes, principal
payments are due in the five years ending December 31 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
9,330
|
|
2011
|
|
|
9,115
|
|
2012
|
|
|
8,433
|
|
2013
|
|
|
16,390
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
24,048
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock
|
At June 30, 2010, we had outstanding 15,806,250 shares
of Series A Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
(Series A Preferred), 10,100,000 shares of
Series A1 Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
(Series Al Preferred), 1,625,000 shares of
Series B Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
(Series B Preferred) and 1,512,498 shares of
Series C Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock
(Series C Preferred). The Series C Preferred was
issued on February 28, 2008, at a purchase price of $9.00
per share.
Each holder of preferred stock generally votes with our common
stock and is entitled to the number of votes equal to the number
of shares of common stock into which the preferred stock could
be converted. Each share of preferred stock is convertible at
the option of the holder at the liquidation preference, as
defined below, divided by the original issue price. Conversion
is mandatory upon written consent or affirmative vote at a
meeting of the holders of a majority of the then outstanding
shares of Series A Preferred, or, with such
F-22
consent of the holders of the Series A Preferred,
immediately prior to the closing of a qualified initial public
offering (IPO), as defined in our certificate of incorporation.
The holders of Series A Preferred, Series A1 Preferred
and Series B Preferred are entitled to receive cumulative
cash dividends at the rate of 8% per annum of the original issue
price if and when declared out of funds legally available by the
board of directors. To the extent declared, the dividends are
payable quarterly. Upon conversion, the holders may also elect
to convert an amount equal to 62.5% of all then accrued and
unpaid dividends into common stock at the applicable conversion
rate. The holders of Series C Preferred are entitled to
receive cumulative cash dividends at the rate of 8% per annum of
the original issue price if and when declared by the board of
directors, for the first 18 months after issuance and are
entitled to noncumulative dividends thereafter. Dividends on
Series C Preferred shares may not be paid until dividends
have been declared and paid to holders of the Series A
Preferred, Series A1 Preferred and Series B Preferred.
On December 31, 2008, dividends of $27.9 million were
declared by the board of directors. These dividends were
distributed through the issuance of 8,147,441 common shares and
subordinated notes of $11.1 million. On December 31,
2009, dividends of $5.5 million were declared by the board
of directors. These dividends were distributed through the
issuance of 1,418,669 common shares and payment of
$2.5 million in cash. On April 23, 2010, dividends of
$1.2 million were declared by the board of directors. These
dividends were distributed through the issuance of 342,632
common shares and subordinated notes of $0.4 million.
Upon any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company,
the holders of the Series A Preferred, Series A1
Preferred, Series B Preferred and Series C Preferred
will be entitled to receive the original issue price plus all
accrued and unpaid dividends (Liquidation Preference). The
holders of the Series A Preferred, Series B Preferred
and Series C Preferred are entitled to receive the full
Liquidation Preference prior to any distribution to the holders
of the Series A1 Preferred. Upon liquidation, after the
holders of the Series A Preferred, Series B Preferred,
Series C Preferred and Series A1 Preferred have been
paid in full the Liquidation Preference, our remaining assets
shall be distributed ratably among the holders of the common
stock then outstanding and the holders of the Series A
Preferred, Series A1 Preferred and Series B Preferred,
on an as-converted basis, until the holders of such series of
preferred stock have received an aggregate of three times the
issue price per share of each such series of preferred stock
(Participation Payment). After the holders of the Series A
Preferred, Series A1 Preferred and Series B Preferred
have received the Participation Payment, the holders of such
series of preferred stock shall not have any further right as
holders of preferred stock to participate in any distributions
of our remaining assets, which shall be distributed ratably
solely to the holders of common stock.
The Series A Preferred, Series B Preferred and
Series C Preferred are redeemable at the option of the
holders of the Series A Preferred beginning on
December 31, 2011, if we have not completed a liquidation
or qualified IPO. Upon election by the holders of the
Series A Preferred to redeem the Series A Preferred,
the holders of the Series B Preferred and Series C
Preferred may elect to redeem such series of preferred stock. If
the holders of the Series A Preferred, Series B
Preferred and Series C Preferred elect to redeem, the
redemption price will generally be paid over four years. The
Series A1 Preferred is redeemable and will be paid over a
12-month
period once the holders of the Series A Preferred and, if
applicable, the Series B Preferred and Series C
Preferred have elected and been paid for a redemption. The
redemption price is the greater of the original purchase price
per share plus all accrued dividends or the fair market value
per share as of the most recent fiscal quarter ended prior to
the date that the initial redemption notice is sent to the
Company. Based on the estimated fair value of the Company as of
June 30, 2010 (unaudited), the redemption price of the
Series A Preferred, Series A1 Preferred, Series B
Preferred and Series C Preferred would exceed the original
purchase price plus all accrued dividends as of the first
redemption date by approximately $158.1 million. As of
June 30, 2010, we have not provided for additional
accretion of this amount for the Series A Preferred,
Series A1 Preferred and Series B Preferred beyond the
original purchase price plus accrued dividends, as we believe
that it is probable that the Series A Preferred,
Series A1 Preferred, Series B Preferred and
Series C Preferred plus accrued dividends will be converted
into common stock prior to the redemption date.
At December 31, 2011, if we have not completed a
liquidation or qualified IPO, and the Series A Preferred
holders have not given notice to redeem the Series A
Preferred, certain Series A Preferred
F-23
stockholders, who hold 2,906,250 shares, may require us to
redeem all or any portion of its Series A Preferred shares.
One hundred eighty days notice is required, and we may
issue common stock to make redemption payments if cash is not
sufficient for the redemption payments and ongoing business
requirements.
|
|
8.
|
Share
Options and Warrants
|
Stock
Option Plan
Our Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (Stock
Incentive Plan) provides for awards which may be granted in the
form of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options,
restricted stock, stock appreciation rights and performance
units with value based upon our performance. Stock options
generally vest ratably over four years following the date of
grant and expire ten years from the date of the grant. We also
grant awards to our directors, generally in the form of stock
options, in accordance with the Board of Directors Policy (Board
Plan). The options generally vest immediately and have a
four-year term. Should a director leave the board, we have the
right to repurchase shares as if the options vested on a pro
rata basis. In 2009, we began issuing options that vest over
four years with 75% vesting ratably over 15 quarters and
the remaining 25% vesting on the 16th quarter. All outstanding
options were granted at exercise prices equal to or exceeding
our estimate of the fair market value of our common stock at the
date of grant. There were 75,000 and 85,000 outstanding director
options at December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010
(unaudited), respectively. In addition, there were 261,173
shares of restricted stock that were issued and outstanding
under the Stock Incentive Plan at December 31, 2009 and
June 30, 2010.
In May 2010, we issued 13,332 shares of restricted stock to
our independent board members pursuant to our independent
director compensation plan.
The following table summarizes transactions under our Stock
Incentive Plan and Board Plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Prices
|
|
Price
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
4,733,859
|
|
|
|
2.00 - 2.50
|
|
|
|
2.06
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,116,750
|
|
|
|
3.00 - 5.50
|
|
|
|
3.68
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(484,391
|
)
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
(354,296
|
)
|
|
|
2.00 - 3.50
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
5,011,922
|
|
|
|
2.00 - 5.50
|
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,987,000
|
|
|
|
6.00 - 7.00
|
|
|
|
6.55
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(332,454
|
)
|
|
|
2.00 - 7.00
|
|
|
|
2.32
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
(431,905
|
)
|
|
|
2.00 - 7.00
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
6,234,563
|
|
|
|
2.00 - 7.00
|
|
|
|
3.67
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,284,000
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(177,891
|
)
|
|
|
2.00 - 6.00
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
(411,943
|
)
|
|
|
2.00 - 7.00
|
|
|
|
4.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
7,928,729
|
|
|
|
2.00 - 7.00
|
|
|
|
4.33
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,549,000
|
|
|
|
7.50 - 8.00
|
|
|
|
7.70
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(93,556
|
)
|
|
|
2.00 - 6.00
|
|
|
|
2.33
|
|
Forfeited/cancelled
|
|
|
(172,139
|
)
|
|
|
2.00 - 8.00
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
9,212,034
|
|
|
|
2.00 - 8.00
|
|
|
|
4.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited),
there were approximately 366,000 and 999,272 shares
available for future grants under the Stock Incentive Plan and
Board Plan, respectively. Our board of directors and
stockholders approved increases to the number of shares of
common stock reserved for issuance under our 1998 Stock
Incentive Plan in April 2010 and June 2010.
F-24
The weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted
during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and
the six months ended June 30, 2010 (unaudited) was
$3.44 $5.80, $5.26 and $7.22, respectively. The aggregate
intrinsic value of stock options exercised in the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2010 (unaudited) was $0.9 million,
$0.6 million, $0.4 million and $0.5 million
respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding stock
options was $12.9 million and $28.4 million as of
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited),
respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of options
exercisable was $12.1 million and $22.3 million as of
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited),
respectively.
The following table summarizes outstanding stock options at
December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited), that
are vested and expected to vest, non-vested, and stock options
that are currently exercisable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
June 30, 2010 (unaudited)
|
|
|
Fully Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully Vested
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vest
|
|
Non-Vested
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Vest
|
|
Non-Vested
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
7,647,137
|
|
|
|
3,577,919
|
|
|
|
4,350,808
|
|
|
|
8,804,835
|
|
|
|
4,339,508
|
|
|
|
4,872,215
|
|
Weighted average remaining contractual life
|
|
|
7.20
|
|
|
|
9.02
|
|
|
|
5.83
|
|
|
|
7.16
|
|
|
|
8.98
|
|
|
|
5.72
|
|
Weighted average price per share
|
|
$
|
4.26
|
|
|
$
|
5.88
|
|
|
$
|
3.04
|
|
|
$
|
4.79
|
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
|
$
|
3.39
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited),
the total future compensation cost related to nonvested stock
options to be recognized in the consolidated statement of
operations was $6.9 million and $9.9 million,
respectively, with a weighted average period over which these
awards are expected to be recognized of 2.4 years and
2.4 years, respectively. Of the June 30, 2010
(unaudited) total, $3.4 million, $3.2 million,
$2.3 million and $1.2 million will be recognized in
2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively.
The total number of stock options that vested during the year
ended December 31, 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2010 (unaudited) was 1,490,060 and 521,407
respectively. The fair value of these options was
$5.9 million and $4.2 million, respectively.
In July 2010, we granted 569,250 options to purchase shares of
common stock. The exercise price for these options was $9.00 per
share.
Stock-Based
Compensation Assumptions
We have utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model as the
appropriate model for determining the fair value of stock-based
awards. The awards granted in 2007, 2008, 2009, and the first
six months of 2010 (unaudited) were valued using the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
1.5-4.8
|
%
|
Expected option life (in years)
|
|
|
6
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
50-60
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate. This is the average
U.S. Treasury rate (having a term that most closely
approximates the expected life of the option) for the period in
which the option was granted.
Expected life of the options. This is the period of time
that the options granted are expected to remain outstanding.
Dividend yield. We have never declared or paid dividends
on our common stock and do not anticipate paying dividends in
the foreseeable future.
Expected volatility. Volatility is a measure of the
amount by which a financial variable such as a share price has
fluctuated (historical volatility) or is expected to fluctuate
(expected volatility) during a period. The
F-25
Company was privately held during the periods presented and
arrived at a volatility rate after considering historical and
expected volatility rates of publicly traded peers.
Stock
Purchase Warrants
In December 2005, we issued two-year fully exercisable warrants
to purchase 87,500 shares of common stock at $2.00 per
share to two significant customers. The estimated fair value of
the warrants was de minimis. In December 2007, the warrants were
exercised.
In July 2007, we issued one-year fully exercisable warrants to
purchase 75,000 shares of common stock at $3.50 per share
to a customer. The estimated fair value of the warrants was
$47,000. The value of the warrants was recorded as a discount to
unearned revenue and was amortized into revenue over the period
of expected benefit with an order signed at that time. In June
2008, the warrants were exercised.
In connection with the issuance of the Series A Preferred,
we issued to current and prior stockholders stock purchase
warrants representing the right to purchase an aggregate of
4,578,000 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price
of $0.002 per share. These warrants contained a net-cash
settlement provision and accordingly were recorded as a
liability; however, due to various measures determining
exercisability and vesting, the fair value of this liability was
nominal. In February 2008, these warrants were amended to be
fully vested at the time of the issuance of the Series C
Preferred. In 2008, stockholders exercised warrants to purchase
4,553,000 shares of common stock, and the remaining 25,000
warrants expired.
We issued a five-year warrant to purchase 225,000 shares of
common stock at $0.02 per share in connection with a 2004
acquisition. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, 200,000 and
zero shares, respectively, remained outstanding in connection
with this warrant.
We issued a five-year warrant to purchase 25,000 and
12,500 shares of common stock at $2.00 per share in
connection with 2004 and 2005 amendments to our prior credit
facility. In May 2009, the warrant to purchase
25,000 shares was automatically net exercised for 15,808
shares of common stock. As of December 31, 2009, the
Company has 12,500 warrants outstanding. In March 2010, the
warrant to purchase 12,500 shares was automatically net
exercised for 8,790 shares of common stock. As of
June 30, 2010, we have no warrants outstanding.
|
|
9.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Lease
Commitments
We lease office space and equipment under capital and operating
leases that expire at various times through 2016. We recognize
lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the
lease terms.
The assets under capital lease are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Data processing and communications equipment
|
|
$
|
3,336
|
|
|
$
|
5,679
|
|
Software
|
|
|
5,616
|
|
|
|
5,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,952
|
|
|
|
11,582
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(3,169
|
)
|
|
|
(6,411
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under capital lease, net
|
|
$
|
5,783
|
|
|
$
|
5,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
Aggregate annual rental commitments at December 31, 2009,
under operating leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable
lease terms greater than one year and capital leases are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Capital Leases
|
|
|
Leases
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,670
|
|
|
$
|
4,922
|
|
2011
|
|
|
538
|
|
|
|
4,372
|
|
2012
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,809
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
2,273
|
|
|
$
|
27,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less amount representing average interest at 9.1%
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(1,540
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense was $3.1 million, $4.5 million,
$5.1 million, $2.5 million and $3.2 million for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, and the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010 (unaudited),
respectively.
Guarantor
Arrangements
We have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and
directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or
director is or was serving at our request in such capacity. The
term of the indemnification period is for the officer or
directors lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future
payments we could be required to make under these
indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, we have a
director and officer insurance policy that limits our exposure
and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.
As a result of our insurance policy coverage, we believe the
estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is
minimal. Accordingly, we had no liabilities recorded for these
agreements as of December 31, 2008 and 2009, or
June 30, 2010 (unaudited).
In the ordinary course of our business, we enter into standard
indemnification provisions in our agreements with our customers.
Pursuant to these provisions, we indemnify our customers for
losses suffered or incurred in connection with third-party
claims that our products infringed upon any U.S. patent,
copyright, trademark or other intellectual property right. Where
applicable, we generally limit such infringement indemnities to
those claims directed solely to our products and not in
combination with other software or products. With respect to our
products, we also generally reserve the right to resolve such
claims by designing a non-infringing alternative, by obtaining a
license on reasonable terms, or by terminating our relationship
with the customer and refunding the customers fees.
The potential amount of future payments to defend lawsuits or
settle indemnified claims under these indemnification provisions
is unlimited in certain agreements; however, we believe the
estimated fair value of these indemnity provisions is minimal,
and, accordingly, we had no liabilities recorded for these
agreements as of December 31, 2008 and 2009, or
June 30, 2010 (unaudited).
Litigation
We are subject to litigation and claims arising in the ordinary
course of business. Our management believes that the probable
resolution of any such litigation will not materially affect our
consolidated financial position and results of operations.
F-27
|
|
10.
|
Funds
Held for Others
|
In connection with our payment processing services, we collect
tenant funds and subsequently remit these tenant funds to our
customers after varying holding periods. These funds are settled
through our Originating Depository Financial Institution (ODFI)
custodial account at a major bank. As part of this processing,
we earn interest from the time the money is collected from the
tenants until the time of remittance to our customers
accounts. This interest generated from the ODFI custodial
account balances is included in revenue and was
$0.2 million, $0.1 million, $0.0 million,
$0.0 million and $0.0 million for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2010 (unaudited), respectively.
The ODFI custodial account balances were $12.7 million,
$13.0 million and $16.9 million at December 31,
2008 and 2009 and June 30, 2010 (unaudited), respectively.
The ODFI custodial account balances are included in our
consolidated balance sheets as restricted cash. The
corresponding liability for these custodial balances is
reflected as customer deposits. In connection with the timing of
our payment processing services, we are exposed to credit risk
in the event of nonperformance by other parties, such as
returned checks. We utilize credit analysis and other controls
to manage the credit risk exposure. We have not experienced any
credit losses to date. Any expected losses are included in our
accounts receivable allowances on our consolidated balance sheet.
In January 2007, we established a wholly owned subsidiary,
RealPage Payment Processing Services, Inc. (RPPS), a
bankruptcy-remote, special-purpose entity, and transferred the
ODFI custodial accounts and all ACH transaction processing
responsibilities to RPPS. We provide processing and
administrative services to RPPS through a services agreement.
The obligations of RPPS under the ODFI custodial account
agreement are guaranteed by us.
In connection with our resident insurance products, we collect
premiums from policy holders and subsequently remit the premium,
net of our commission, to the underwriter. We maintain separate
accounts for these transactions. We had $1.5 million,
$1.9 million and $1.6 million in restricted cash for
the periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, and
June 30, 2010 (unaudited), respectively, and
$1.5 million, $2.2 million and $1.6 million in
customer deposits related to these insurance products for
periods ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 and June 30,
2010 (unaudited), respectively.
|
|
11.
|
Net
Income (Loss) Per Share
|
Net income (loss) per share is presented in conformity with the
two-class method required for participating securities. Holders
of Series A Preferred, Series A1 Preferred,
Series B Preferred and Series C Preferred
are each entitled to receive 8% per annum cumulative dividends,
payable prior and in preference to any dividends on any other
shares of our capital stock. In the event a dividend is paid on
common stock, holders of Series A Preferred,
Series A1 Preferred, Series B Preferred,
Series C Preferred and non-vested restricted stock are
entitled to a proportionate share of any such dividend as if
they were holders of common shares (on an as-if converted
basis). Holders of Series A Preferred, Series A1
Preferred, Series B Preferred, Series C Preferred and
non-vested restricted stock do not share in loss of the Company.
Under the two-class method, basic net income per share
attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing the
net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Net income attributable to common stockholders is determined by
allocating undistributed earnings, calculated as net income less
current period Series A Preferred,
Series A1 Preferred, Series B Preferred and
Series C Preferred cumulative dividends, between the
holders of common stock and Series A Preferred,
Series A1 Preferred, Series B Preferred and
Series C Preferred. Diluted net income per share
attributable to common stockholders is computed by using the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding, including
potential dilutive shares of common stock assuming the dilutive
effect of outstanding stock options using the treasury stock
method.
Pro forma basic and diluted net income per share were computed
to give effect to the conversion of the Series A Preferred,
Series A1 Preferred, Series B Preferred and Series C Preferred
using the as-if converted
F-28
method into common stock as though the conversion had occurred
as of January 1, 2009, or original date of issuance, if
later.
The following table presents the calculation of basic and
diluted net income per share attributable to common stockholders
and pro forma basic and diluted net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,209
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,429
|
|
|
$
|
2,037
|
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
8% cumulative dividends on participating preferred stock
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
(7,449
|
)
|
|
|
(5,521
|
)
|
|
|
(2,882
|
)
|
|
|
(2,324
|
)
|
Undistributed earnings allocated to participating preferred and
restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,297
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to common
stockholders basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(9,143
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,658
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,611
|
|
|
$
|
(845
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,363
|
)
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares used in computing basic net
income (loss) per share
|
|
|
10,223
|
|
|
|
13,886
|
|
|
|
23,934
|
|
|
|
23,831
|
|
|
|
25,901
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares used in computing basic net
income (loss) per share
|
|
|
10,223
|
|
|
|
13,886
|
|
|
|
23,934
|
|
|
|
23,831
|
|
|
|
25,901
|
|
Add weighted average effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares used in computing diluted net
income (loss) per share
|
|
|
10,223
|
|
|
|
13,886
|
|
|
|
25,511
|
|
|
|
23,831
|
|
|
|
25,901
|
|
Net (loss) income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(0.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.44
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(0.89
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.42
|
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
Shares used in computing pro forma net income per share
(unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average common shares from above
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,901
|
|
Add assumed conversion of convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,044
|
|
Shares used in computing pro forma basic net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,945
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares from above
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,901
|
|
Add conversion of Series A, Series A1, Series B,
Series C convertible preferred stock excluded under the two
class method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,044
|
|
Shares used in computing pro forma diluted net income per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,945
|
|
Pro forma net income per share (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
F-29
|
|
12.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
We purchased transportation services of approximately $87,000,
$34,000 and $44,000, for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2008 and 2009 from a significant stockholder and company
controlled by our Chief Executive Officer.
In connection with the residential relocation of one of our
executives, an independent
third-party
relocation company purchased a home in June 2010, on the
Companys behalf, for approximately $0.9 million pursuant
to the standard
home-sale
assistance terms utilized by us in the ordinary course of
business.
Our effective tax rate for the six month period ending
June 30, 2010 was approximately 37% and accordingly a
benefit was recognized as we consider it realizable. The
provision for income taxes consists of the following as of
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
197
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
(25,147
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,161
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
(26,308
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
703
|
|
|
$
|
(26,028
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of our income tax benefit computed at the
U.S. federal statutory tax rate to the actual income tax
expense is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Expense derived by applying the Federal income tax rate to
(loss) income before taxes
|
|
$
|
(1,068
|
)
|
|
$
|
(872
|
)
|
|
$
|
837
|
|
State income tax, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Foreign income tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,036
|
)
|
Nondeductible expenses
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Losses not benefitted
|
|
|
1,046
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(121
|
)
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
703
|
|
|
$
|
(26,028
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant components of our deferred tax assets and
liabilities are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment, and software
|
|
$
|
597
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
6,101
|
|
|
$
|
8,228
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
25,579
|
|
|
|
24,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
32,277
|
|
|
|
32,498
|
|
F-30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
|
|
|
(31,563
|
)
|
|
|
(4,527
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
27,971
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment, and software
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,868
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(476
|
)
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
(1,611
|
)
|
|
|
(4,714
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(1,846
|
)
|
|
|
(7,058
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets/(liabilities)
|
|
$
|
(1,132
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our management periodically evaluates the realizability of the
deferred tax assets and recognizes the tax benefit when it is
determined they are realizable. At such time, if it is
determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax
assets are realizable, the valuation allowance will be adjusted.
In December 2009, based on current year income, and our
projections of future income, we concluded it was more likely
than not that certain of our deferred tax assets would be
realizable, and therefore the valuation allowance was reduced by
$27.0 million.
Our federal net operating loss carryforwards of
$67.2 million will begin to expire in 2020. A change in
ownership, as defined in Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code, may limit utilization of the federal net operating
loss and research and development credit carryforwards.
A cumulative change in ownership among material shareholders, as
defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code during a
three-year period, may limit utilization of the federal net
operating loss and research and development credit
carryforwards. Based on available information, the Company
believes it is not currently subject the Section 382 limitation.
If triggered under current conditions, the timing of utilization
of our net operating loss may be impacted.
Uncertain
Tax Positions
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted a new accounting
standard relating to the accounting for uncertain tax positions.
We recorded no additional tax liability as a result of the
adoption of this standard and no adjustments to the
January 1, 2007 balance of retained deficit, and therefore
no accrued interest and penalties recognized as of
January 1, 2007. At December 31, 2008 and 2009, we had
no unrecognized tax benefits. Our policy is to include interest
and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax
expense, and as of December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2009, there were no accrued interest and penalties.
We file consolidated and separate tax returns in the
U.S. federal jurisdiction and in several state
jurisdictions and one foreign jurisdiction. We are no longer
subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations for years
before 2006 and are no longer subject to state and local income
tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2005. We
are not currently under audit for federal, state or any foreign
jurisdictions.
|
|
14.
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
In 1998, our board of directors approved a defined contribution
plan that provides retirement benefits under the provisions of
Selection 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Our 401(k) Plan
(Plan) covers substantially all employees who meet a minimum
service requirement. Under the Plan, we can elect to make
voluntary contributions. Contributions of $0.2 million,
$0.3 million, $0.4 million, $0.2 million and
$0.2 million were made by us for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2010 (unaudited), respectively.
F-31
On July 22, 2010, the board of directors approved an
amended and restated certificate of incorporation that will,
prior to the effectiveness of the registration statement, effect
a reverse stock split of every 2 outstanding shares of
preferred stock and common stock into 1 share of preferred
stock or common stock, respectively. The par value of the common
and convertible preferred stock will not be adjusted as a result
of the reverse stock split. All issued and outstanding common
stock, restricted stock, redeemable convertible preferred stock,
and warrants for common stock and per share amounts contained in
the financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to
reflect this reverse stock split for all periods presented. The
reverse stock split was effected on July 23, 2010.
F-32
PART II
Information
Not Required in Prospectus
|
|
Item 13.
|
Other
Expenses of Issuance and Distribution
|
The following table presents the costs and expenses, other than
underwriting discounts and commissions, payable by us in
connection with the sale of common stock being registered. All
amounts are estimates except the SEC registration fee and the
FINRA filing fees.
|
|
|
|
|
SEC Registration fee
|
|
$
|
10,695.00
|
|
FINRA filing fee
|
|
|
15,500.00
|
|
NASDAQ Global Market listing fee
|
|
|
*
|
|
Printing and engraving expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Legal fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Accounting fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Blue sky fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
Custodian and transfer agent fees
|
|
|
*
|
|
Miscellaneous fees and expenses
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
To be filed by amendment.
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers
|
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law
authorizes a corporations board of directors to grant, and
authorizes a court to award, indemnity to officers, directors
and other corporate agents.
As permitted by Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, the registrants amended and restated
certificate of incorporation to be effective upon the completion
of this offering includes provisions that eliminate the personal
liability of its directors and officers for monetary damages for
a breach of their fiduciary duty as directors and officers.
In addition, as permitted by Section 145 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, the registrants amended and
restated bylaws to be effective upon the completion of this
offering provide that:
|
|
|
|
|
The registrant shall indemnify its directors and officers for
serving the registrant in those capacities or for serving other
business enterprises at the registrants request, to the
fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides
that a corporation may indemnify such person if such person
acted in good faith and in a manner such person reasonably
believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the
registrant and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, had no
reasonable cause to believe such persons conduct was
unlawful.
|
|
|
|
The registrant may, in its discretion, indemnify employees and
agents in those circumstances in which indemnification is not
required by law.
|
|
|
|
The registrant will be required to advance expenses, as
incurred, to its directors and officers in connection with
defending a proceeding, except that such director or officer
shall undertake to repay such advances if it is ultimately
determined that such person is not entitled to indemnification.
|
|
|
|
The registrant will not be obligated pursuant to the bylaws to
indemnify a person with respect to proceedings initiated by that
person, except with respect to proceedings authorized by the
registrants board of directors. The rights conferred in
the bylaws are not exclusive, and the registrant is authorized
to enter into indemnification agreements with its directors,
officers, employees and agents and to obtain insurance to
indemnify such persons.
|
II-1
|
|
|
|
|
The registrant may not retroactively amend the bylaw provisions
to reduce its indemnification obligations to directors,
officers, employees and agents.
|
Prior to the completion of this offering, the registrant plans
to enter into separate indemnification agreements with each of
its directors and executive officers that provide the maximum
indemnity allowed to directors and executive officers by
Section 145 of the Delaware General Corporation Law and
also provides for certain additional procedural protections. The
registrant also maintains insurance to insure directors and
officers against certain liabilities.
These indemnification provisions and the indemnification
agreements to be entered into between the registrant and its
officers and directors may be sufficiently broad to permit
indemnification of the registrants officers and directors
for liabilities (including reimbursement of expenses incurred)
arising under the Securities Act.
The underwriting agreement filed as Exhibit 1.1 to this
registration statement provides for indemnification by the
underwriters of the registrant and its officers and directors
for certain liabilities arising under the Securities Act and
otherwise.
|
|
Item 15.
|
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities
|
1. On July 25, 2007, the registrant sold and issued to
one of its customers who was an accredited investor a warrant to
purchase 50,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise
price per share of $2.00. The issuance and sale of these
securities were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant
to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by
an issuer not involving a public offering.
2. On July 26, 2007, the registrant granted to certain
of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
69,750 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $3.50. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
3. On July 26, 2007, the registrant sold and issued to
one of its customers who was an accredited investor a warrant to
purchase 75,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise
price per share of $3.50. The issuance and sale of these
securities were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant
to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by
an issuer not involving a public offering.
4. On October 17, 2007, the registrant sold and issued
pursuant to an option exercise by one of its executive officers
an aggregate of 125,000 shares of its common stock at a
purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $250,000. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
5. On October 23, 2007, the registrant sold and issued
pursuant to option exercises by one of its directors an
aggregate of 175,000 shares of its common stock at a
purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $350,000. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
6. On November 29, 2007, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
173,000 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $5.50. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
7. On November 29, 2007, the registrant granted to one
of its employees who was also an accredited investor options to
purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares of its common stock
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an
exercise price per share of $5.50. The issuance and sale of
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
II-2
8. On December 19, 2007, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 37,500 shares of its common stock
pursuant to the exercise of a warrant held by one of its
customers who was an accredited investor at a purchase price of
$2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of $75,000. The
issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt
from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving a
public offering.
9. On December 20, 2007, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 50,000 shares of its common stock
pursuant to the exercise of a warrant held by one of its
customers who was an accredited investor at a purchase price of
$2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of $100,000. The
issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt
from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving a
public offering.
10. On January 4, 2008, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 18,750 shares of its common stock pursuant
to an option exercise by the holder of a stock option issued
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a
purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $37,500. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
11. On January 30, 2008, the registrant sold and
issued pursuant to option exercises by one of its directors an
aggregate of 175,000 shares of its common stock at a
purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $350,000. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
12. On February 8, 2008, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 5,156 shares of its common stock
pursuant to option exercises by a holder of stock options issued
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a
purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $10,313. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
13. On February 18, 2008, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 656 shares of its common stock
pursuant to option exercises by the holder of stock options
issued under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at
a purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate
consideration of $1,313. The issuance and sale of these
securities were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant
to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
14. On February 22, 2008, the registrant sold and
issued to seven accredited investors who were also existing
stockholders of the registrant an aggregate of
1,512,498 shares of its Series C Convertible Preferred
Stock at a price of $9.00 per share for an aggregate price of
$13,612,500. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
15. On February 28, 2008, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 22,499 shares of its common stock
pursuant to option exercises by a holder of stock options issued
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a
purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $45,000. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
16. On February 29, 2008, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
243,250 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $7.00. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
II-3
17. On February 29, 2008, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees who were also accredited investors
options to purchase an aggregate of 417,500 shares of its
common stock under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan at an exercise price per share of $7.00. The issuance and
sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
18. On February 29, 2008, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 5,234 shares of its common stock
pursuant to option exercises by a holder of stock options issued
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a
purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $10,469. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
19. On March 18, 2008, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 781 shares of its common stock pursuant to
an option exercise by the holder of a stock option issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase
price of $5.50 per share for an aggregate consideration of
$4,295.50. The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed
to be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
20. On March 21, 2008, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 703 shares of its common stock pursuant to
an option exercise by the holder of a stock option issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase
price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of
$1,406. The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to
be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
21. On April 10, 2008, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 3,750,000 shares of its common stock
pursuant to the exercise of a warrant held by an executive
officer, director and stockholder at a purchase price of $0.002
per share for an aggregate consideration of $7,500. The issuance
and sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
22. On April 10, 2008, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 153,125 shares of its common stock pursuant
to the exercise of a warrant held by an accredited investor
affiliated with an executive officer, director and stockholder
at a purchase price of $0.002 per share for an aggregate
consideration of $306.25. The issuance and sale of these
securities were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant
to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by
an issuer not involving a public offering.
23. On April 25, 2008, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 469 shares of its common stock pursuant to
an option exercise by the holder of a stock option issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase
price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of $938.
The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to be
exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated
under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to a
compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
24. On May 20, 2008, the registrant sold and issued an
aggregate of 75,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to
the exercise of a warrant held by a former stockholder of the
registrants predecessor corporation who was an accredited
investor at a purchase price of $0.002 per share for an
aggregate consideration of $150. The issuance and sale of these
securities were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant
to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by
an issuer not involving a public offering.
25. On May 29, 2008, the registrant granted to certain
of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
150,750 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $7.00. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
II-4
26. On May 29, 2008, the registrant granted to certain
of its employees who were also accredited investors options to
purchase an aggregate of 148,000 shares of its common stock
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an
exercise price per share of $7.00. The issuance and sale of
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
27. On June 18, 2008, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 750 shares of its common stock pursuant to
an option exercise by the holder of a stock option issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase
price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of
$1,500. The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to
be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
28. On June 30, 2008, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 75,000 shares of its common stock pursuant
to the exercise of a warrant held by one of its customers who
was an accredited investor at a purchase price of $3.50 per
share for an aggregate consideration of $262,500. The issuance
and sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
29. On July 15, 2008, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 25,000 shares of its common stock pursuant
to option exercises by a holder of stock options issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, 6,250 of which
were sold and issued at a purchase price of $3.50 per share and
18,750 of which were sold and issued at a purchase price per
share of $3.00, for an aggregate consideration of $78,125. The
issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt
from registration pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under
the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to a compensatory
benefit plan approved by the registrants board of
directors.
30. On July 20, 2008, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
45,000 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $7.00. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
31. On July 20, 2008, the registrant granted to one of
its employees who was also an accredited investor options to
purchase an aggregate of 87,500 shares of its common stock
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an
exercise price per share of $7.00. The issuance and sale of
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
32. On August 7, 2008, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 2,578 shares of its common stock pursuant
to option exercises by a holder of a stock options issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, 1,953 of which
were sold and issued at a purchase price of $2.00 per share and
625 of which were sold and issued at a purchase price per share
of $7.00, for an aggregate consideration of $8,282. The issuance
and sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the
Securities Act as transactions pursuant to a compensatory
benefit plan approved by the registrants board of
directors.
33. On September 15, 2008, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 4,687 shares of its common stock
pursuant to an option exercise by the holder of a stock option
issued under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at
a purchase price of $5.50 per share for an aggregate
consideration of $25,781.25. The issuance and sale of these
securities were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant
to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
34. On October 7, 2008, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 875 shares of its common stock pursuant to
option exercises by a holder of stock options issued under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase price
of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of $1,750. The
issuance and sale of
II-5
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act
as transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved
by the registrants board of directors.
35. On October 8, 2008, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 500,000 shares of its common stock pursuant
to the exercise of a warrant held by a former stockholder of the
registrants predecessor corporation who was an accredited
investor at a purchase price of $0.002 per share for an
aggregate consideration of $1,000. The issuance and sale of
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
36. On October 20, 2008, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 25,000 shares of its common stock
pursuant to the exercise of a warrant held by one of its
employees who was an accredited investor at a purchase price of
$0.02 per share for an aggregate consideration of $500. The
issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt
from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving a
public offering.
37. On October 29, 2008, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 46,875 shares of its common stock
pursuant to option exercises by a holder of a stock options
issued under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan,
37,500 of which were sold and issued at a purchase price of
$2.50 per share and 9,375 of which were sold and issued at a
purchase price per share of $3.50, for an aggregate
consideration of $126,562.50. The issuance and sale of these
securities were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant
to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
38. On November 4, 2008, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 562 shares of its common stock
pursuant to an option exercise by the holder of a stock option
issued under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at
a purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate
consideration of $1,125. The issuance and sale of these
securities were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant
to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
39. On November 19, 2008, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 21,875 shares of its common stock
pursuant to an option exercise by the holder of a stock option
issued under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at
a purchase price of $3.00 per share for an aggregate
consideration of $65,625. The issuance and sale of these
securities were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant
to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
40. On December 12, 2008, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
298,500 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $6.00. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
41. On December 12, 2008, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees who were also accredited investors
options to purchase an aggregate of 147,500 shares of its
common stock under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan at an exercise price per share of $6.00. The issuance and
sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
42. On December 12, 2008, the registrant granted to
certain of its directors options to purchase an aggregate of
50,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price per
share of $6.00. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
43. On December 17, 2008, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
170,000 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an
II-6
exercise price per share of $6.00. The issuance and sale of
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act
as transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved
by the registrants board of directors.
44. On December 17, 2008, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees who were also accredited investors
options to purchase an aggregate of 230,000 shares of its
common stock under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan at an exercise price per share of $6.00. The issuance and
sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
45. On December 30, 2008, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 75,000 shares of its common stock
pursuant to the exercise of a warrants held by two former
stockholders of the registrants predecessor corporation
who were accredited investor sat a purchase price of $0.002 per
share for an aggregate consideration of $150. The issuance and
sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
46. On December 31, 2008, the registrant issued an
aggregate of 8,147,441 shares of its common stock to
holders of its convertible preferred stock in partial payment of
cumulative dividends accrued on the convertible preferred stock
through such date. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
47. On February 26, 2009, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
268,750 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $6.00. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
48. On February 26, 2009, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees who were also accredited investors
options to purchase an aggregate of 450,000 shares of its
common stock under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan at an exercise price per share of $6.00. The issuance and
sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
49. On March 9, 2009, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 200,000 shares of its common stock pursuant
to the exercise of a warrant held by one of its employees who
was an accredited investor at a purchase price of $0.02 per
share for an aggregate consideration of $4,000. The issuance and
sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
50. On April 3, 2009, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 2,031 shares of its common stock pursuant
to an option exercise by the holder of a stock option issued
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a
purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $4,063. The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed
to be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
51. On May 28, 2009, the registrant sold and issued an
aggregate of 15,808 shares of its common stock pursuant to
the exercise of a warrant held by one of its lenders who was an
accredited investor at a purchase price of $2.00 per share for
an aggregate consideration of $31,617. The issuance and sale of
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
52. On June 4, 2009, the registrant granted to certain
of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
230,500 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $6.00. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration
II-7
pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act
as transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved
by the registrants board of directors.
53. On June 4, 2009, the registrant granted to certain
of its employees who were also accredited investors options to
purchase an aggregate of 55,000 shares of its common stock
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an
exercise price per share of $6.00. The issuance and sale of
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
54. On June 17, 2009, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 1,858 shares of its common stock pursuant
to option exercises by a holder of a stock options issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, 1,015 of which
were sold and issued at a purchase price of $2.00 per share and
781 of which were sold and issued at a purchase price per share
of $2.50, for an aggregate consideration of $3,984.75. The
issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt
from registration pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under
the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to a compensatory
benefit plan approved by the registrants board of
directors.
55. On June 17, 2009, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 62 shares of its common stock pursuant to
an option exercise by the holder of a stock option issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase
price of $6.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of $375.
The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to be
exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving a
public offering.
56. On August 13, 2009, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 84,375 shares of its common stock pursuant
to an option exercise by the holder of a stock option issued
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a
purchase price of $3.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $253,125. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
57. On August 14, 2009, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 562 shares of its common stock pursuant to
an option exercise by the holder of a stock option issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase
price of $3.50 per share for an aggregate consideration of
$1,968.75. The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed
to be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
58. On September 18, 2009, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 1,250 shares of its common stock
pursuant to option exercises by a holder of stock options issued
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a
purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $2,500. The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed
to be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
59. On September 28, 2009, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
324,000 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $6.00. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
60. On September 28, 2009, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees and consultants who were also
accredited investors options to purchase an aggregate of
557,500 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $6.00. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
II-8
61. On October 6, 2009, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 1,719 shares of its common stock pursuant
to option exercises by a holder of stock options issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase
price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of
$3,438. The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to
be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
62. On October 21, 2009, the registrant issued
169,767 shares of its common stock to certain of its
current or former employees and consultants as compensation for
the achievement of certain performance milestones agreed to in
connection with the registrants acquisition of
OpsTechnology, Inc. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
63. On October 21, 2009, the registrant issued
163,565 shares of its common stock to certain of its
current employees who were also accredited investors as
compensation for the achievement of certain performance
milestones agreed to in connection with the registrants
acquisition of OpsTechnology, Inc. The issuance and sale of
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
64. On October 28, 2009, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
112,500 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $6.00. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
65. On October 28, 2009, the registrant awarded and
issued 11,174 restricted shares of its common stock to employees
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan in
connection with the registrants acquisition of
Propertyware, Inc. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
66. On October 28, 2009, the registrant awarded and
issued 249,999 restricted shares of its common stock to
employees who were also accredited investors under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan in connection with
the registrants acquisition of Propertyware, Inc. The
issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt
from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving a
public offering.
67. On October 28, 2009, the registrant issued 488,825
restricted shares of its common stock to nine accredited
investors in partial consideration of the registrants
acquisition of Propertyware, Inc. The issuance and sale of these
securities were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant
to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by
an issuer not involving a public offering.
68. On November 19, 2009, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
181,250 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $6.00. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
69. On November 19, 2009, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees who were also accredited investors
options to purchase an aggregate of 55,000 shares of its
common stock under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan at an exercise price per share of $6.00. The issuance and
sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
70. On November 28, 2009, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 60,156 shares of its common stock
pursuant to option exercises by a holder of stock options issued
under the registrants 1998 Stock
II-9
Incentive Plan at a purchase price of $2.00 per share for an
aggregate consideration of $120,313. The issuance and sale of
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act
as transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved
by the registrants board of directors.
71. On November 28, 2009, the registrant sold and
issued pursuant to option exercises by one of its directors an
aggregate of 18,875 shares of its common stock at a
purchase price of $6.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $113,250. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
72. On December 8, 2009, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 937 shares of its common stock
pursuant to an option exercise by the holder of a stock option
issued under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at
a purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate
consideration of $1,875. The issuance and sale of these
securities were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant
to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
73. On December 23, 2009, the registrant sold and
issued pursuant to option exercises by one of its directors an
aggregate of 6,125 shares of its common stock at a purchase
price of $6.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of
$36,750. The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed
to be exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of
the Securities Act as a transaction by an issuer not involving a
public offering.
74. On December 29, 2009, the registrant granted to
one of its directors an option to purchase an aggregate of
50,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price per
share of $6.00. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
75. On December 31, 2009, the registrant issued an
aggregate of 1,418,669 shares of its common stock to
holders of its convertible preferred stock in partial payment of
cumulative dividends accrued on the convertible preferred stock
through such date. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
76. On January 8, 2010, the registrant sold and issued
pursuant to an option exercise by one of its executive officers
an aggregate of 12,500 shares of its common stock at a
purchase price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $25,000. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
77. On January 8, 2010, the registrant sold and issued
pursuant to an option exercise by one of its officers who was
also an accredited investor an aggregate of 12,500 shares
of its common stock at a purchase price of $2.00 per share for
an aggregate consideration of $25,000. The issuance and sale of
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
78. On January 8, 2010, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 25,000 shares of its common stock pursuant
to an option exercise by the holder of a stock option issued
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a
purchase price of $3.00 per share for an aggregate consideration
of $75,000. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
79. On January 14, 2010, the registrant sold and
issued an aggregate of 1,000 shares of its common stock
pursuant to an option exercise by the holder of a stock option
issued under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at
a purchase price of $2.50 per share for an aggregate
consideration of $2,500. The issuance
II-10
and sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the
Securities Act as transactions pursuant to a compensatory
benefit plan approved by the registrants board of
directors.
80. On February 25, 2010, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
265,500 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $7.50. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
81. On February 25, 2010, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees who were also accredited investors
options to purchase an aggregate of 595,000 shares of its
common stock under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive
Plan at an exercise price per share of $7.50. The issuance and
sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
82. On February 25, 2010, the registrant granted to
certain of its directors options to purchase an aggregate of
60,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price per
share of $7.50. The issuance and sale of these securities were
deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
83. On March 1, 2010, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 500 shares of its common stock pursuant to
an option exercise by the holder of a stock option issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase
price of $6.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of
$3,000. The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to
be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
84. On March 18, 2010, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 8,790 shares of its common stock pursuant
to the exercise of a warrant held by one of its lenders who was
an accredited investor at a purchase price of $2.00 per share
for an aggregate consideration of $17,581. The issuance and sale
of these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
85. On March 25, 2010, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 15,000 shares of its common stock pursuant
to option exercises by a holder of stock options issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase
price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of
$30,000. The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed
to be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
86. On April 20, 2010, the registrant granted to one
of its employees who was also an accredited investor options to
purchase an aggregate of 12,500 shares of its common stock
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an
exercise price per share of $7.50. The issuance and sale of
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
87. On April 23, 2010, the registrant issued an
aggregate of 342,632 shares of its common stock to holders
of its Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A1
Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Convertible
Preferred Stock in partial payment of cumulative dividends
accrued on such series of convertible preferred stock through
March 31, 2010. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
88. On May 12, 2010, the registrant awarded and issued
an aggregate of 13,332 restricted shares of its common stock to
the registrants independent directors in accordance with
the registrants independent director
II-11
compensation plan. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a transaction by an
issuer not involving a public offering.
89. On May 12, 2010, the registrant granted to certain
of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
228,500 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $8.00. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
90. On May 12, 2010, the registrant granted to certain
of its employees who were also accredited investors options to
purchase an aggregate of 237,500 shares of its common stock
under the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an
exercise price per share of $8.00. The issuance and sale of
these securities were deemed to be exempt from registration
pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act as a
transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
91. On May 13, 2010, the registrant sold and issued an
aggregate of 806 shares of its common stock pursuant to
option exercises by the holder of stock options issued under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase price
of $6.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of $4,839. The
issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt
from registration pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under
the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to a compensatory
benefit plan approved by the registrants board of
directors.
92. On June 3, 2010, the registrant granted to one of
its employees an option to purchase an aggregate of
150,000 shares of its common stock under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price
per share of $8.00. The issuance and sale of these securities
were deemed to be exempt from registration pursuant to
Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act as
transactions pursuant to a compensatory benefit plan approved by
the registrants board of directors.
93. On June 18, 2010, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 1,250 shares of its common stock pursuant to an
option exercise by the holder of a stock option issued under the
registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase price
of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of $2,500. The
issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt
from registration pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under
the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to a compensatory
benefit plan approved by the registrants board of
directors.
94. On June 30, 2010, the registrant sold and issued
an aggregate of 25,000 shares of its common stock pursuant
to option exercises by the holder of stock options issued under
the registrants 1998 Stock Incentive Plan at a purchase
price of $2.00 per share for an aggregate consideration of
$50,000. The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed
to be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
95. On July 1, 2010, the registrant issued 499,999
restricted shares of its common stock to six accredited
investors in partial consideration of the registrants
acquisition of eReal Estate Integration, Inc. The issuance and
sale of these securities were deemed to be exempt from
registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
96. On July 14, 2010, the registrant granted to
certain of its employees options to purchase an aggregate of
569,250 shares of its common stock under the registrants
1998 Stock Incentive Plan at an exercise price per share of
$9.00. The issuance and sale of these securities were deemed to
be exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 701
promulgated under the Securities Act as transactions pursuant to
a compensatory benefit plan approved by the registrants
board of directors.
None of the foregoing transactions involved any underwriters,
underwriting discounts or commissions. Stock certificates and
warrants issued in the foregoing transactions bear appropriate
Securities Act legends as to the restricted nature of such
securities.
II-12
|
|
Item 16.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant currently in effect
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant to be effective upon the completion of this offering
|
|
3
|
.3**
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant in effect before the completion of this
offering
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant to be
effective upon the completion of this offering
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Common Stock certificate of the Registrant
|
|
4
|
.2**
|
|
Shareholders Agreement among the Registrant and certain
stockholders, dated December 1, 1998, as amended July 16, 1999
and November 3, 2000
|
|
4
|
.3**
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement among
the Registrant and certain stockholders, dated February 22, 2008
|
|
4
|
.4**
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement among the
Registrant and certain stockholders, dated March 17, 2010
|
|
4
|
.5**
|
|
Letter Agreement between the Registrant and Camden Partners
Strategic Fund III, L.P. regarding management rights, dated
December 14, 2005
|
|
4
|
.6**
|
|
Letter Agreement between the Registrant and Camden Partners
Strategic Fund III-A, L.P. regarding management rights, dated
December 14, 2005
|
|
4
|
.7**
|
|
Fifth Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement among the
Registrant and certain stockholders, dated June 7, 2010
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional
Corporation
|
|
10
|
.1**
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement to be entered into between the
Registrant and each of its directors and officers
|
|
10
|
.2+**
|
|
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.2A+**
|
|
Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant
|
|
10
|
.2B+**
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Shares
|
|
10
|
.2C+**
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Second Series)
|
|
10
|
.2D+**
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement
|
|
10
|
.2E+**
|
|
Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant (May 2010)
|
|
10
|
.2F+**
|
|
Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant (May 2010
California)
|
|
10
|
.2G+**
|
|
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (June 2010)
|
|
10
|
.2H+**
|
|
Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant (Accelerated Vesting)
|
|
10
|
.3+**
|
|
Form of Directors Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement
|
|
10
|
.4+
|
|
2010 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.5+**
|
|
Form of 2009 Management Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.6+**
|
|
Form of 2010 Management Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.6A+**
|
|
Form of 2010 Management Incentive Plan (as revised May 2010)
|
|
10
|
.7+**
|
|
Stand-Alone Stock Option Agreement between the Registrant and
Peter Gyenes, dated February 25, 2010
|
|
10
|
.8+**
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Second Series) under the
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan between the
Registrant and Timothy J. Barker dated October 27, 2005
|
|
10
|
.9+**
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Second Series) under the
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan between the
Registrant and Timothy J. Barker dated February 26, 2009
|
|
10
|
.10+**
|
|
Notice of Stock Option Grant under the Amended and Restated 1998
Stock Incentive Plan between the Registrant and Timothy J.
Barker dated February 25, 2010
|
|
10
|
.11+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Stephen T. Winn,
dated December 30, 2003
|
|
10
|
.12+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Timothy J.
Barker, dated October 31, 2005
|
|
10
|
.13+**
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Registrant and
Timothy J. Barker, dated January 1, 2010
|
|
10
|
.14+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and William E.
Van Valkenberg, dated September 24, 2009
|
II-13
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.15+**
|
|
Master Agreement for Consulting Services between the Registrant
and William E. Van Valkenberg, dated June 28, 2009
|
|
10
|
.16+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Ashley Chaffin
Glover, dated March 3, 2005
|
|
10
|
.17+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between Multifamily Internet Ventures, LLC
and Dirk D. Wakeham, dated April 12, 2007 and amended
April 12, 2007
|
|
10
|
.18**
|
|
Credit Agreement among the Registrant, Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC
and Comerica Bank dated, September 3, 2009
|
|
10
|
.19**
|
|
Security Agreement among the Registrant, OpsTechnology, Inc.,
Multifamily Internet Ventures, LLC, Starfire Media, Inc.,
RealPage India Holdings, Inc. and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC,
dated September 3, 2009
|
|
10
|
.20**
|
|
General Continuing Guaranty among OpsTechnology, Inc.,
Multifamily Internet Ventures, LLC, Starfire Media, Inc.,
RealPage India Holdings, Inc. and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC,
dated September 3, 2009
|
|
10
|
.21**
|
|
Waiver and First Amendment to Credit Agreement among the
Registrant, Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC and Comerica Bank, dated
September 16, 2009
|
|
10
|
.22**
|
|
General Continuing Guaranty between A.L. Wizard, Inc. and Wells
Fargo Foothill, LLC, dated September 25, 2009
|
|
10
|
.23**
|
|
Waiver and Second Amendment to Credit Agreement among the
Registrant, Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC and Comerica bank, dated
October 15, 2009
|
|
10
|
.24**
|
|
General Continuing Guarantee between Propertyware, Inc. and
Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, dated November 6, 2009
|
|
10
|
.25**
|
|
Supplement No. 2 to Security Agreement between
Propertyware, Inc. and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, dated
November 6, 2009
|
|
10
|
.26**
|
|
Consent and Third Amendment to Credit Agreement among the
Registrant, Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, and Comerica Bank dated
December 23, 2009
|
|
10
|
.27**
|
|
Waiver, Consent and Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement among
the Registrant, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (f/k/a Wells
Fargo Foothill, LLC) and Comerica Bank dated February 10,
2010
|
|
10
|
.28**
|
|
General Security Agreement between 43642 Yukon, Inc. and
Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (f/k/a Wells Fargo Foothill,
LLC), dated February 10, 2010
|
|
10
|
.29**
|
|
Guarantee between 43642 Yukon, Inc. and Wells Fargo Capital
Finance, LLC (f/k/a Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC), dated
February 10, 2010
|
|
10
|
.30**
|
|
Share Pledge between the Registrant and Wells Fargo Capital
Finance, LLC (f/k/a Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC), dated
February 10, 2010
|
|
10
|
.31**
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and HV Capital
Investors, L.L.C., dated August 1, 2008
|
|
10
|
.32**
|
|
Security Agreement between the Registrant and HV Capital
Investors, L.L.C., dated August 1, 2008
|
|
10
|
.33**
|
|
Form of Secured Promissory Note issued by the Registrant to HV
Capital Investors, L.L.C. on August 1, 2008 and
September 19, 2008
|
|
10
|
.34**
|
|
First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement between the
Registrant and HV Capital Investors, L.L.C., dated
January 20, 2009 and effective as of December 31, 2008
|
|
10
|
.35**
|
|
Form of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Note (Series A and
Series A1)
|
|
10
|
.35A**
|
|
Schedule of Holders of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Notes
(Series A and Series A1)
|
|
10
|
.36**
|
|
Form of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Note (Series B and
Series C)
|
|
10
|
.36A**
|
|
Schedule of Holders of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Notes
(Series B and Series C)
|
|
10
|
.37**
|
|
Form of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Note (April 2010)
|
|
10
|
.37A**
|
|
Schedule of Holders of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Notes
(April 2010)
|
|
10
|
.38**
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Notes among
the Registrant and certain holders of its Unsecured Subordinated
Promissory Notes
|
|
10
|
.39**
|
|
Lease Agreement between the Registrant and CB Parkway Business
Center V, Ltd., dated July 23, 1999
|
|
10
|
.40**
|
|
First Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and CB
Parkway Business Center V, Ltd., dated November 29,
1999
|
|
10
|
.41**
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and
CB Parkway Business Center V, Ltd., dated January 30,
2006
|
|
10
|
.42**
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and CB
Parkway Business Center V, Ltd., dated August 28, 2006
|
II-14
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.43**
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and
ARI-Commercial Properties, Inc., dated November 2007
|
|
10
|
.44**
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and
ARI-Commercial Properties, Inc., dated February 4, 2009
|
|
10
|
.45**
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and
ARI-Commercial Properties, Inc., dated March 30, 2009
|
|
10
|
.46**
|
|
Lease Agreement between the Registrant and Savoy IBP 8,
Ltd., dated August 28, 2006
|
|
10
|
.47**
|
|
First Amendment to Lease Agreement among the Registrant,
ARI-International Business Park, LLC, ARI -IBP 1, LLC, ARI
- IBP 2, LLC, ARI - IBP 3, LLC, ARI - IBP 4, LLC,
ARI - IBP 5, LLC, ARI - IBP 6, LLC, ARI - IBP 7,
LLC, ARI - IBP 8, LLC, ARI - IBP 9, LLC, ARI -
IBP 11, LLC and ARI - IBP 12, LLC, dated
December 28, 2009
|
|
10
|
.48**
|
|
Master Services Agreement between the Registrant and DataBank
Holdings Ltd., dated May 31, 2007
|
|
10
|
.49+**
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Shares (Outside Directors)
|
|
10
|
.50+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Jason Lindwall,
dated January 8, 2008
|
|
10
|
.51+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Margot
Lebenberg, dated May 12, 2010
|
|
10
|
.52+**
|
|
Notice of Stock Option Grant under the Amended and Restated 1998
Stock Incentive Plan between the Registrant and Margot
Lebenberg, dated May 12, 2010
|
|
10
|
.53+**
|
|
Employment Release Agreement between the Registrant and William
Van Valkenberg, dated June 8, 2010
|
|
10
|
.54**
|
|
Consent and Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement among the
Registrant, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (f/k/a Wells Fargo
Foothill, LLC) and Comerica Bank, dated June 22, 2010
|
|
10
|
.55**
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement among the Registrant, Wells
Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (f/k/a Wells Fargo Foothill,
LLC) and Comerica Bank, dated June 22, 2010
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional
Corporation (contained in Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
24
|
.1**
|
|
Power of Attorney (contained in the signature page to this
registration statement)
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
** |
|
Previously filed. |
|
|
|
Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this
exhibit. These portions have been omitted from the Registration
Statement and submitted separately to the Securities and
Exchange Commission. |
II-15
|
|
(b)
|
Financial
Statement Schedules
|
The following schedule is filed as part of this registration
statement:
All other schedules have been omitted because the information
required to be presented in them is not applicable or is shown
in the financial statements or related notes.
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
REALPAGE, INC.
December 31, 2009
(in thousands)
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Charged to
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Costs and
|
|
Due to
|
|
|
|
End of
|
Description
|
|
of Year
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
Deduction(1)
|
|
Year
|
|
Year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
923
|
|
|
$
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,413
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2,413
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,895
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2,895
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
(1,289
|
)
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. |
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the
underwriter at the closing specified in the underwriting
agreements, certificates in such denominations and registered in
such names as required by the underwriter to permit prompt
delivery to each purchaser.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and
controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing
provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that
in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the
opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
1. For purposes of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, the information omitted from the form of
prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in
reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of
prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities
Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as
of the time it was declared effective.
2. For the purpose of determining any liability under the
Securities Act, each post-effective amendment that contains a
form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
II-16
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the
registrant has duly caused this Amendment to the Registration
Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Carrollton, State of
Texas, on this
26th day
of July, 2010.
REALPAGE, INC.
Stephen T. Winn
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, this Amendment to the Registration Statement has been
signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stephen
T. Winn
Stephen
T. Winn
|
|
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
July 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Timothy
J. Barker
Timothy
J. Barker
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
|
July 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Alfred
R. Berkeley, III
|
|
Director
|
|
July 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Richard
M. Berkeley
|
|
Director
|
|
July 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Peter
Gyenes
|
|
Director
|
|
July 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Jeffrey
T. Leeds
|
|
Director
|
|
July 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
Jason
A. Wright
|
|
Director
|
|
July 26, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*By:
|
|
/s/ Stephen
T. Winn
Stephen
T. Winn
Attorney-in-Fact
|
|
|
|
|
II-17
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
1
|
.1*
|
|
Form of Underwriting Agreement
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant currently in effect
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Registrant to be effective upon the completion of this offering
|
|
3
|
.3**
|
|
Bylaws of the Registrant in effect before the completion of this
offering
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant to be
effective upon the completion of this offering
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Common Stock certificate of the Registrant
|
|
4
|
.2**
|
|
Shareholders Agreement among the Registrant and certain
stockholders, dated December 1, 1998, as amended July 16,
1999 and November 3, 2000
|
|
4
|
.3**
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement among
the Registrant and certain stockholders, dated February 22,
2008
|
|
4
|
.4**
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement among the
Registrant and certain stockholders, dated March 17, 2010
|
|
4
|
.5**
|
|
Letter Agreement between the Registrant and Camden Partners
Strategic Fund III, L.P. regarding management rights, dated
December 14, 2005
|
|
4
|
.6**
|
|
Letter Agreement between the Registrant and Camden Partners
Strategic Fund III-A, L.P. regarding management rights, dated
December 14, 2005
|
|
4
|
.7**
|
|
Fifth Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement among the
Registrant and certain stockholders, dated June 7, 2010
|
|
5
|
.1
|
|
Opinion of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional
Corporation
|
|
10
|
.1**
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement to be entered into between the
Registrant and each of its directors and officers
|
|
10
|
.2+**
|
|
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.2A+**
|
|
Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant
|
|
10
|
.2B+**
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Shares
|
|
10
|
.2C+**
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Second Series)
|
|
10
|
.2D+**
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement
|
|
10
|
.2E+**
|
|
Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant (May 2010)
|
|
10
|
.2F+**
|
|
Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant (May 2010
California)
|
|
10
|
.2G+**
|
|
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (June 2010)
|
|
10
|
.2H+**
|
|
Form of Notice of Stock Option Grant (Accelerated Vesting)
|
|
10
|
.3+**
|
|
Form of Directors Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement
|
|
10
|
.4+
|
|
2010 Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.5+**
|
|
Form of 2009 Management Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.6+**
|
|
Form of 2010 Management Incentive Plan
|
|
10
|
.6A+**
|
|
Form of 2010 Management Incentive Plan (as revised May 2010)
|
|
10
|
.7+**
|
|
Stand-Alone Stock Option Agreement between the Registrant and
Peter Gyenes, dated February 25, 2010
|
|
10
|
.8+**
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Second Series) under the
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan between the
Registrant and Timothy J. Barker dated October 27, 2005
|
|
10
|
.9+**
|
|
Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (Second Series) under the
Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Incentive Plan between the
Registrant and Timothy J. Barker dated February 26, 2009
|
|
10
|
.10+**
|
|
Notice of Stock Option Grant under the Amended and Restated 1998
Stock Incentive Plan between the Registrant and Timothy J.
Barker dated February 25, 2010
|
|
10
|
.11+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Stephen T. Winn,
dated December 30, 2003
|
|
10
|
.12+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Timothy J.
Barker, dated October 31, 2005
|
|
10
|
.13+**
|
|
Amendment to Employment Agreement between the Registrant and
Timothy J. Barker, dated January 1, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.14+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and William E.
Van Valkenberg, dated September 24, 2009
|
|
10
|
.15+**
|
|
Master Agreement for Consulting Services between the Registrant
and William E. Van Valkenberg, dated June 28, 2009
|
|
10
|
.16+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Ashley Chaffin
Glover, dated March 3, 2005
|
|
10
|
.17+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between Multifamily Internet Ventures, LLC
and Dirk D. Wakeham, dated April 12, 2007 and amended
April 12, 2007
|
|
10
|
.18**
|
|
Credit Agreement among the Registrant, Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC
and Comerica Bank dated, September 3, 2009
|
|
10
|
.19**
|
|
Security Agreement among the Registrant, OpsTechnology, Inc.,
Multifamily Internet Ventures, LLC, Starfire Media, Inc.,
RealPage India Holdings, Inc. and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC,
dated September 3, 2009
|
|
10
|
.20**
|
|
General Continuing Guaranty among OpsTechnology, Inc.,
Multifamily Internet Ventures, LLC, Starfire Media, Inc.,
RealPage India Holdings, Inc. and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC,
dated September 3, 2009
|
|
10
|
.21**
|
|
Waiver and First Amendment to Credit Agreement among the
Registrant, Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC and Comerica Bank, dated
September 16, 2009
|
|
10
|
.22**
|
|
General Continuing Guaranty between A.L. Wizard, Inc. and Wells
Fargo Foothill, LLC, dated September 25, 2009
|
|
10
|
.23**
|
|
Waiver and Second Amendment to Credit Agreement among the
Registrant, Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC and Comerica bank, dated
October 15, 2009
|
|
10
|
.24**
|
|
General Continuing Guarantee between Propertyware, Inc. and
Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, dated November 6, 2009
|
|
10
|
.25**
|
|
Supplement No. 2 to Security Agreement between Propertyware,
Inc. and Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, dated November 6, 2009
|
|
10
|
.26**
|
|
Consent and Third Amendment to Credit Agreement among the
Registrant, Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC, and Comerica Bank dated
December 23, 2009
|
|
10
|
.27**
|
|
Waiver, Consent and Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement among
the Registrant, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (f/k/a Wells
Fargo Foothill, LLC) and Comerica Bank dated February 10,
2010
|
|
10
|
.28**
|
|
General Security Agreement between 43642 Yukon, Inc. and Wells
Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (f/k/a Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC),
dated February 10, 2010
|
|
10
|
.29**
|
|
Guarantee between 43642 Yukon, Inc. and Wells Fargo Capital
Finance, LLC (f/k/a Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC), dated
February 10, 2010
|
|
10
|
.30**
|
|
Share Pledge between the Registrant and Wells Fargo Capital
Finance, LLC (f/k/a Wells Fargo Foothill, LLC), dated
February 10, 2010
|
|
10
|
.31**
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement between the Registrant and HV Capital
Investors, L.L.C., dated August 1, 2008
|
|
10
|
.32**
|
|
Security Agreement between the Registrant and HV Capital
Investors, L.L.C., dated August 1, 2008
|
|
10
|
.33**
|
|
Form of Secured Promissory Note issued by the Registrant to HV
Capital Investors, L.L.C. on August 1, 2008 and
September 19, 2008
|
|
10
|
.34**
|
|
First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement between the
Registrant and HV Capital Investors, L.L.C., dated
January 20, 2009 and effective as of December 31, 2008
|
|
10
|
.35**
|
|
Form of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Note (Series A and
Series A1)
|
|
10
|
.35A**
|
|
Schedule of Holders of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Notes
(Series A and Series A1)
|
|
10
|
.36**
|
|
Form of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Note (Series B and
Series C)
|
|
10
|
.36A**
|
|
Schedule of Holders of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Notes
(Series B and Series C)
|
|
10
|
.37**
|
|
Form of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Note (April 2010)
|
|
10
|
.37A**
|
|
Schedule of Holders of Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Notes
(April 2010)
|
|
10
|
.38**
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Unsecured Subordinated Promissory Notes
among the Registrant and certain holders of its Unsecured
Subordinated Promissory Notes
|
|
10
|
.39**
|
|
Lease Agreement between the Registrant and CB Parkway Business
Center V, Ltd., dated July 23, 1999
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.40**
|
|
First Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and CB
Parkway Business Center V, Ltd., dated November 29,
1999
|
|
10
|
.41**
|
|
Second Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and
CB Parkway Business Center V, Ltd., dated January 30,
2006
|
|
10
|
.42**
|
|
Third Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and CB
Parkway Business Center V, Ltd., dated August 28, 2006
|
|
10
|
.43**
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and
ARI-Commercial Properties, Inc., dated November 2007
|
|
10
|
.44**
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and
ARI-Commercial Properties, Inc., dated February 4, 2009
|
|
10
|
.45**
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Lease Agreement between the Registrant and
ARI-Commercial Properties, Inc., dated March 30, 2009
|
|
10
|
.46**
|
|
Lease Agreement between the Registrant and Savoy IBP 8,
Ltd., dated August 28, 2006
|
|
10
|
.47**
|
|
First Amendment to Lease Agreement among the Registrant,
ARI-International Business Park, LLC, ARI -IBP 1, LLC, ARI
- IBP 2, LLC, ARI - IBP 3, LLC, ARI - IBP 4, LLC,
ARI - IBP 5, LLC, ARI - IBP 6, LLC, ARI - IBP 7,
LLC, ARI - IBP 8, LLC, ARI - IBP 9, LLC, ARI -
IBP 11, LLC and ARI - IBP 12, LLC, dated
December 28, 2009
|
|
10
|
.48**
|
|
Master Services Agreement between the Registrant and DataBank
Holdings Ltd., dated May 31, 2007
|
|
10
|
.49+**
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Restricted Shares (Outside Directors)
|
|
10
|
.50+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Jason Lindwall,
dated January 8, 2008
|
|
10
|
.51+**
|
|
Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Margot
Lebenberg, dated May 12, 2010
|
|
10
|
.52+**
|
|
Notice of Stock Option Grant under the Amended and Restated 1998
Stock Incentive Plan between the Registrant and Margot
Lebenberg, dated May 12, 2010
|
|
10
|
.53+**
|
|
Employment Release Agreement between the Registrant and William
Van Valkenberg, dated June 8, 2010
|
|
10
|
.54**
|
|
Consent and Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement among the
Registrant, Wells Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (f/k/a Wells Fargo
Foothill, LLC) and Comerica Bank, dated June 22, 2010
|
|
10
|
.55**
|
|
Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement among the Registrant, Wells
Fargo Capital Finance, LLC (f/k/a Wells Fargo Foothill,
LLC) and Comerica Bank, dated June 22, 2010
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
|
|
23
|
.2
|
|
Consent of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional
Corporation (contained in Exhibit 5.1)
|
|
24
|
.1**
|
|
Power of Attorney (contained in the signature page to this
registration statement)
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
|
* |
|
To be filed by amendment. |
|
** |
|
Previously filed. |
|
|
|
Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this
exhibit. These portions have been omitted from the Registration
Statement and submitted separately to the Securities and
Exchange Commission. |