e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-4879
Diebold, Incorporated
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-0183970 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
5995 Mayfair Road, PO Box 3077, North Canton, Ohio
|
|
44720-8077 |
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (330) 490-4000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, $1.25 Par Value 65,690,461 shares as of July 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
231,619 |
|
|
$ |
328,426 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
151,482 |
|
|
|
177,442 |
|
Trade receivables, less allowances for doubtful accounts of $26,378
and $26,648, respectively |
|
|
416,893 |
|
|
|
330,982 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
466,561 |
|
|
|
448,243 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
82,318 |
|
|
|
84,950 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
31,102 |
|
|
|
36,874 |
|
Refundable income taxes |
|
|
21,126 |
|
|
|
93,907 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
113,953 |
|
|
|
87,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,515,054 |
|
|
|
1,588,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities and other investments |
|
|
73,960 |
|
|
|
73,989 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
615,898 |
|
|
|
613,377 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
417,432 |
|
|
|
408,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
198,466 |
|
|
|
204,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
32,942 |
|
|
|
32,834 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
419,082 |
|
|
|
450,937 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
202,413 |
|
|
|
204,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,441,917 |
|
|
$ |
2,554,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
$ |
21,108 |
|
|
$ |
16,915 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
163,608 |
|
|
|
147,496 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
186,913 |
|
|
|
198,989 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
302,333 |
|
|
|
379,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
673,962 |
|
|
|
743,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
554,925 |
|
|
|
553,008 |
|
Pensions and other benefits |
|
|
77,452 |
|
|
|
90,021 |
|
Postretirement and other benefits |
|
|
22,609 |
|
|
|
29,174 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
41,533 |
|
|
|
45,060 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
24,618 |
|
|
|
22,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diebold, Incorporated shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, no par value, 1,000,000 authorized shares, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, 125,000,000 authorized shares, 76,261,845 and 76,093,101
issued shares, 65,774,061 and 66,327,627 outstanding shares, respectively |
|
|
95,327 |
|
|
|
95,116 |
|
Additional capital |
|
|
301,797 |
|
|
|
290,689 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
1,029,027 |
|
|
|
1,011,448 |
|
Treasury shares, at cost, 10,487,784 and 9,765,474 shares, respectively |
|
|
(431,281 |
) |
|
|
(410,153 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
25,367 |
|
|
|
59,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Diebold, Incorporated shareholders equity |
|
|
1,020,237 |
|
|
|
1,046,379 |
|
Noncontrolling interests |
|
|
26,581 |
|
|
|
25,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,046,818 |
|
|
|
1,072,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
2,441,917 |
|
|
$ |
2,554,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
298,884 |
|
|
$ |
324,569 |
|
|
$ |
556,629 |
|
|
$ |
623,808 |
|
Services |
|
|
366,296 |
|
|
|
366,327 |
|
|
|
727,550 |
|
|
|
724,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665,180 |
|
|
|
690,896 |
|
|
|
1,284,179 |
|
|
|
1,348,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
221,742 |
|
|
|
244,906 |
|
|
|
414,019 |
|
|
|
469,569 |
|
Services |
|
|
265,294 |
|
|
|
277,080 |
|
|
|
534,006 |
|
|
|
557,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487,036 |
|
|
|
521,986 |
|
|
|
948,025 |
|
|
|
1,026,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
178,144 |
|
|
|
168,910 |
|
|
|
336,154 |
|
|
|
321,237 |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
110,791 |
|
|
|
105,352 |
|
|
|
209,768 |
|
|
|
197,365 |
|
Research, development and engineering expense |
|
|
16,402 |
|
|
|
16,950 |
|
|
|
34,850 |
|
|
|
32,788 |
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,289 |
|
|
|
122,302 |
|
|
|
248,714 |
|
|
|
230,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
46,855 |
|
|
|
46,608 |
|
|
|
87,440 |
|
|
|
91,084 |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income |
|
|
6,017 |
|
|
|
7,004 |
|
|
|
13,489 |
|
|
|
12,827 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,301 |
) |
|
|
(7,787 |
) |
|
|
(18,356 |
) |
|
|
(17,745 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss, net |
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
(5,194 |
) |
|
|
(1,798 |
) |
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
(23,386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes |
|
|
44,411 |
|
|
|
46,321 |
|
|
|
79,480 |
|
|
|
60,982 |
|
Taxes on income |
|
|
13,338 |
|
|
|
13,049 |
|
|
|
23,215 |
|
|
|
16,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
31,073 |
|
|
|
33,272 |
|
|
|
56,265 |
|
|
|
44,110 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
(8,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
30,390 |
|
|
|
31,714 |
|
|
|
54,612 |
|
|
|
35,471 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
3,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
29,731 |
|
|
$ |
30,430 |
|
|
$ |
53,655 |
|
|
$ |
32,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
65,936 |
|
|
|
66,252 |
|
|
|
66,121 |
|
|
|
66,214 |
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding |
|
|
66,636 |
|
|
|
66,786 |
|
|
|
66,678 |
|
|
|
66,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
30,414 |
|
|
$ |
31,988 |
|
|
$ |
55,308 |
|
|
$ |
40,717 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
(8,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
29,731 |
|
|
$ |
30,430 |
|
|
$ |
53,655 |
|
|
$ |
32,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flow from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
54,612 |
|
|
$ |
35,471 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
36,261 |
|
|
|
37,474 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
6,365 |
|
|
|
6,058 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(970 |
) |
Devaluation of Venezuelan balance sheet |
|
|
6,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided (used) by changes in certain assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
(97,317 |
) |
|
|
54,122 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(35,531 |
) |
|
|
17,016 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
(34,929 |
) |
|
|
22,956 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
22,318 |
|
|
|
(53,559 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
(3,462 |
) |
|
|
22,549 |
|
Certain other assets and liabilities |
|
|
23,977 |
|
|
|
(62,111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(16,047 |
) |
|
|
79,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations |
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,364 |
) |
Proceeds from maturities of investments |
|
|
157,630 |
|
|
|
102,255 |
|
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
9,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for purchases of investments |
|
|
(147,394 |
) |
|
|
(108,635 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(26,916 |
) |
|
|
(22,137 |
) |
Increase in certain other assets |
|
|
(13,194 |
) |
|
|
(16,012 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(18,349 |
) |
|
|
(49,893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(36,076 |
) |
|
|
(34,713 |
) |
Debt borrowings |
|
|
193,438 |
|
|
|
197,169 |
|
Debt repayments |
|
|
(186,547 |
) |
|
|
(226,028 |
) |
Distribution of affiliates earnings to noncontrolling interest holders |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(539 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Issuance of common shares |
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common shares |
|
|
(19,866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Withholding taxes paid for employees share-based compensation |
|
|
(1,262 |
) |
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(49,348 |
) |
|
|
(65,865 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(13,063 |
) |
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(96,807 |
) |
|
|
(35,227 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
328,426 |
|
|
|
241,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
$ |
231,619 |
|
|
$ |
206,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
5
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 1: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Diebold, Incorporated and
its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions
to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair
presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP); however, such information reflects all adjustments
(consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management,
necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods.
The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes contained in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009. In addition, some of the Companys statements in this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q may involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected future
results. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.
The Company has reclassified the presentation of certain prior-year information to conform to the
current presentation. As discussed in Note 15, effective in the first quarter of 2010, the Company
began management of its businesses on a geographic basis, changing from the previous model of sales
channel segments. In order to align the Companys external reporting of its financial results with
this organizational change, the Company has modified its segment reporting and has reclassified
prior period segment information to conform to the current period presentation of its segment
information.
The Companys Venezuelan operations consist of a fifty-percent owned subsidiary, which is
consolidated. On January 8, 2010, the Venezuelan government announced the devaluation of its
currency, the bolivar, and the establishment of a two-tier exchange structure. Subsequently,
during May 2010, the Venezuelan government seized control of the parallel market, thereby creating
a new government-controlled rate. Transitioning from the parallel rate to the new
government-controlled rate did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated
financial statements. The impact was a decrease of $500 and $7,000 to the Companys cash balance
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Net losses resulting from the
remeasurement of the Venezuelan financial statements were recorded in the condensed consolidated
statement of income for approximately $0.04 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2010. In
the future, if the Company converts bolivares at a rate other than the new government-controlled
rate, the Company may realize gains or losses that would be recorded in the statement of income.
The Companys significant accounting policies as reported in the Companys annual report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 were amended in the first quarter of 2010 upon the
adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13,
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 2009-13), and FASB ASU 2009-14, Certain Arrangements
That Include Software Elements (ASU 2009-14). On January 1, 2010, the Company elected to early
adopt ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 and there was no material impact on the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements. However, the adoption of ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 modifies
the Companys previously disclosed revenue recognition policy, which is presented below as revised.
ASU 2009-14 amends software revenue recognition guidance in FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 985-605 Software Revenue Recognition (ASC 985-605) to exclude from its scope the Companys
tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to
deliver a products essential functionality. ASU 2009-13 modifies the requirements that must be
met for the Company to recognize revenue from the sale of a delivered item that is part of a
multiple-deliverable arrangement when other items have not yet been delivered. ASU 2009-13
establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable in a
multiple-deliverable arrangement. The selling price must be based on vendor specific objective
evidence (VSOE), if available, or third-party evidence (TPE) if VSOE is not available, or estimated
selling price if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. Also, the residual method of allocating
arrangement consideration has been eliminated. ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 were applied on a
prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after adoption.
There were no changes to the Companys units of accounting within its multiple-deliverable
arrangements, how the Company allocates arrangement consideration or in the pattern or timing of revenue recognition as a
result of the adoption of these updates.
Revenue Recognition The Companys revenue recognition policy is consistent with the requirements of
FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition (ASC 605). In general, the Company records revenue when it is
realized, or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue to be realized, or realizable and
earned, when the following revenue recognition requirements are met: persuasive
6
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
evidence of an arrangement exists, which is a customer contract; the products or services have been approved by
the customer via delivery or installation acceptance; the sales price is fixed or determinable
within the contract; and collectability is probable.
For product sales, the Company determines that the earnings process is complete when title, risk of
loss and the right to use equipment has transferred to the customer. Within the North America
business segment, this occurs upon customer acceptance. Where the Company is contractually
responsible for installation, customer acceptance occurs upon completion of the installation of all
items at a job site and the Companys demonstration that the items are in operable condition. Where
the Company is not contractually responsible for installation, revenue recognition of these items
is upon shipment or delivery to a customer location depending on the terms in the contract. Within
the international business segment, customer acceptance is upon the earlier of delivery or
completion of the installation depending on the terms in the contract with the customer. The
Company has the following revenue streams related to sales to its customers:
Financial Self-Service Product & Integrated Services Revenue Financial
self-service products pertain to automated teller machines (ATMs). Included with the ATM is a
software component and a non-software component that function together to deliver the ATMs
essential functionality. The Company also provides service contracts on ATMs. Service
contracts typically cover a 12-month period and can begin at any given month after the
warranty period expires. The service provided under warranty is limited as compared to those
offered under service contracts. Further, warranty is not considered a separate deliverable
of the sale. The Companys warranty covers only replacement of defective parts inclusive of
labor. Service contracts are tailored to meet the individual needs of each customer. Service
contracts provide additional services beyond those covered under the warranty, and usually
include preventative maintenance service, cleaning, supplies stocking and cash handling, all
of which are not essential to the functionality of the equipment. Outsourced and managed
services include remote monitoring, trouble-shooting for self-service customers, training,
transaction processing, currency management, maintenance services and full support via person
to person or online communication.
Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 605, the application of which requires judgment
including the determination of whether an arrangement includes multiple deliverables. For
stand-alone sales of service contracts, revenue is recognized ratably over the life of the
contract period. In contracts that involve multiple-deliverable arrangements, product
maintenance services are typically accounted for under FASB ASC 605-20, Separately Priced
Extended Warranty and Product Maintenance Contracts (ASC 605-20). Amounts deferred for
undelivered deliverables are determined based upon the selling price of the deliverables as
prescribed in FASB ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition Multiple-Element Arrangements (ASC
605-25). The Company determines the selling price of deliverables within a
multiple-deliverable arrangement based on VSOE (price when sold on stand-alone basis) or the
estimated selling price where VSOE is not established for undelivered deliverables. Total
arrangement consideration is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all
deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any discount in the
arrangement proportionately to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverables selling
price. There have been no material changes to these estimates for the periods presented and
the Company believes that these estimates generally should not be subject to significant
changes in the future. However, changes to deliverables in future arrangements and the
ability to establish the selling price could materially impact the amount of earned or
deferred revenue.
Electronic Security Products & Integrated Services Revenue The Company provides
global product sales, service, installation, project management and monitoring of original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) electronic security products to financial, government, retail
and commercial customers. These solutions provide the Companys customers a single-source
solution to their electronic security needs. Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC
605. Revenue on sales of the products described above is recognized upon shipment,
installation or customer acceptance of the product as defined in the customer contract. In
contracts that involve multiple deliverables, product maintenance services are typically
accounted for under ASC 605-20. Amounts deferred for undelivered deliverables are based upon
the selling price of the deliverables as prescribed in ASC 605-25. The Company determines
the selling price of deliverables within a multiple-deliverable arrangement based on the
price charged when each deliverable is sold separately or estimated selling price. Total
arrangement consideration is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all
deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any discount in the
arrangement proportionately to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverables selling
price.
There have been no material
changes to these estimates for the periods presented and the Company believes that these
estimates generally should not be subject to significant changes in the future.
However, changes to deliverables in future arrangements and the ability to establish the selling price
could materially impact the amount of earned or deferred revenue.
7
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Physical Security & Facility Revenue The Company designs and manufactures several of
its physical security and facility
products. These consist of vaults, safe deposit boxes and safes, drive-up banking equipment
and a host of other banking facilities products. Revenue on sales of the products described
above is recognized when the revenue recognition requirements of ASC 605 have been met.
Election and Lottery Systems Revenue The Company offers election and lottery systems
product solutions and support to the government in Brazil. Election systems revenue consists
of election equipment, networking, tabulation and diagnostic software development, training,
support and maintenance. Lottery systems revenue consists of lottery equipment. The election
and lottery equipment components are included in product revenue. The software development,
training, support and maintenance components are included in service revenue. The election
and lottery systems contracts can contain multiple deliverables and custom terms and
conditions. For contracts that do not contain multiple deliverables, revenue is recognized
upon customer acceptance. In contracts that involve multiple deliverables, amounts deferred
for undelivered deliverables are based upon the selling price of the deliverables as
prescribed in ASC 605-25. The Company determines the selling price of deliverables within a
multiple-deliverable arrangement based on the estimated selling price. Total arrangement
consideration is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the
relative selling price method, which allocates any discount in the arrangement
proportionately to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverables selling price.
There have been no material
changes to these estimates for the periods presented and the Company believes that these
estimates generally should not be subject to significant changes in the future.
However, changes to deliverables in future arrangements and the ability to establish the selling price
could materially impact the amount of earned or deferred revenue.
Software Solutions & Service Revenue The Company offers software solutions consisting
of multiple applications that process events and transactions (networking software) along
with the related server. Sales of networking software represent software solutions to
customers that allow them to network various different vendors ATMs onto one network and
revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 985-605. Included within service revenue is
revenue from software support agreements, which are typically 12 months in duration and
pertain to networking software. For stand-alone sales of software support, revenue is
recognized ratably over the life of the contract period. In contracts that involve multiple
deliverables, amounts deferred for support are based upon VSOE of the value of the
deliverables as prescribed in ASC 985-605, which requires judgment about whether the
deliverables can be divided into more than one unit of accounting and whether the separate
units of accounting have value to the customer on a stand-alone
basis.
There have been no material
changes to these deliverables for the periods presented.
However, changes to
deliverables in future arrangements and the ability to establish VSOE could affect the timing of revenue recognition.
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
In May 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-19, Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency
Exchange Rates (ASU 2010-19). ASU 2010-19 is effective as of the announcement date of March 18,
2010. ASU 2010-19 provides the SEC staffs views on certain foreign currency issues related to
investments in Venezuela. These issues relate to Venezuelas highly inflationary status. The
adoption of the provisions of ASU 2010-19 did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 as noted above.
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted FASB ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures
(ASU 2010-06). ASU 2010-06 updates FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 requires
additional disclosures about fair value measurements including transfers in and out of levels 1 and
2 and a higher level of disaggregation for the different types of financial instruments. On January
1, 2010, the Company early adopted ASU 2010-06 related to the reconciliation of level 3 fair value
measurements, requiring information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements to be
presented separately. There was no material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated
financial statements related to the adoption of this guidance.
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted updated guidance included in FASB ASC 860-10, Transfers and
Servicing Overall. This guidance requires additional disclosures about the transfer and
de-recognition of financial assets and eliminates the concept of qualifying special-purpose
entities. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted updated guidance included in FASB ASC 810, Consolidation
(ASC 810), related to the consolidation of variable interest entities. This guidance requires ongoing reassessments of
whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. In addition, this
updated guidance amends the quantitative approach for determining the primary beneficiary of a
variable interest entity. ASC 810 amends certain guidance for determining whether an entity is a
variable
8
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
interest entity and adds additional reconsideration events for determining whether an
entity is a variable interest entity. Further, this guidance requires enhanced disclosures that
will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprises
involvement in a variable interest entity. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on
the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2: EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per
Share. Under this guidance, unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive
non-forfeitable dividends are considered participating securities and the two-class method of
computing earnings per share is required for all periods presented.
The Companys participating securities include restricted stock units, deferred shares and shares
that were vested, but deferred by the employee. The Company has calculated basic and diluted
earnings per share under both the treasury stock method and the two-class method. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, there was no impact in the per share amounts calculated
under the two methods, therefore the treasury stock method is disclosed below. The following data
show the amounts used in computing earnings per share under the treasury stock method and the
effect on the weighted-average number of shares of dilutive potential common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income used in basic and diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
30,414 |
|
|
$ |
31,988 |
|
|
$ |
55,308 |
|
|
$ |
40,717 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
(8,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
29,731 |
|
|
$ |
30,430 |
|
|
$ |
53,655 |
|
|
$ |
32,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of common shares used in
basic earnings per share |
|
|
65,936 |
|
|
|
66,252 |
|
|
|
66,121 |
|
|
|
66,214 |
|
Effect of dilutive shares |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares used in diluted
earnings per share |
|
|
66,636 |
|
|
|
66,786 |
|
|
|
66,678 |
|
|
|
66,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive shares (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive shares not used in calculating diluted
weighted-average shares |
|
|
2,078 |
|
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
2,089 |
|
|
|
2,715 |
|
9
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 3: OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The Company displays accumulated other comprehensive income separately from retained earnings and
additional capital in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Items recorded as other
comprehensive income (loss) include adjustments made for foreign currency translation under FASB
ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters, pension adjustments, net of tax under FASB ASC 715,
Compensation Retirement Benefits, hedging activities under FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging
and unrealized gains and losses for available-for-sale securities under FASB ASC 320, Investments.
The following table provides a reconciliation of total shareholders equity attributable to
Diebold, Incorporated and the noncontrolling interests for the three months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Diebold, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
Interests |
|
April 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,064,166 |
|
|
$ |
1,038,358 |
|
|
$ |
25,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
30,390 |
|
|
|
29,731 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges and translation |
|
|
(24,103 |
) |
|
|
(24,226 |
) |
|
|
123 |
|
Interest rate hedges |
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
(633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pensions and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
7,119 |
|
|
|
6,337 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional capital |
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(9,773 |
) |
|
|
(9,773 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared |
|
|
(17,981 |
) |
|
|
(17,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interest holders |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,046,818 |
|
|
$ |
1,020,237 |
|
|
$ |
26,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of total shareholders equity attributable to
Diebold, Incorporated and the noncontrolling interests for the three months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Diebold, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
Interests |
|
April 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
938,838 |
|
|
$ |
918,338 |
|
|
$ |
20,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
31,714 |
|
|
|
30,430 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges and translation |
|
|
67,608 |
|
|
|
65,858 |
|
|
|
1,750 |
|
Interest rate hedges |
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
101,801 |
|
|
|
98,767 |
|
|
|
3,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional capital |
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
3,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared |
|
|
(17,367 |
) |
|
|
(17,367 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interest holders |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,026,342 |
|
|
$ |
1,002,880 |
|
|
$ |
23,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table provides a reconciliation of total shareholders equity attributable to
Diebold, Incorporated and the noncontrolling interests for the six months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Diebold, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
Interests |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,072,026 |
|
|
$ |
1,046,379 |
|
|
$ |
25,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
54,612 |
|
|
|
53,655 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges and translation |
|
|
(36,459 |
) |
|
|
(36,445 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Interest rate hedges |
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pensions and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
20,686 |
|
|
|
19,743 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional capital |
|
|
11,108 |
|
|
|
11,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(21,128 |
) |
|
|
(21,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared |
|
|
(36,076 |
) |
|
|
(36,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interest holders |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,046,818 |
|
|
$ |
1,020,237 |
|
|
$ |
26,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of total shareholders equity attributable to
Diebold, Incorporated and the noncontrolling interests for the six months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Diebold, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
Total Equity |
|
|
Shareholders Equity |
|
|
Interests |
|
January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
964,258 |
|
|
$ |
946,601 |
|
|
$ |
17,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
35,471 |
|
|
|
32,078 |
|
|
|
3,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedges and translation |
|
|
53,602 |
|
|
|
50,651 |
|
|
|
2,951 |
|
Interest rate hedges |
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pensions and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
92,591 |
|
|
|
86,247 |
|
|
|
6,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional capital |
|
|
6,311 |
|
|
|
6,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared |
|
|
(34,713 |
) |
|
|
(34,713 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distribution to noncontrolling interest
holders |
|
|
(539) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,026,342 |
|
|
$ |
1,002,880 |
|
|
$ |
23,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 4: SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The Companys share-based compensation payments to employees are recognized in the statement of
income based on their grant-date fair values during the period in which the employee is required to
provide services in exchange for the award. Share-based compensation is recognized as a component
of selling and administrative expense. Total share-based compensation expense for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010 was $3,139 and $6,365, respectively. Total share-based compensation
expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was $3,133 and $6,058, respectively.
Options outstanding and exercisable under the Companys 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan
(as Amended and Restated as of April 13, 2009) as of June 30, 2010, and changes during the six
months ended June 30, 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
Contractual Term |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
(per share) |
|
|
(in years) |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
3,103 |
|
|
$ |
37.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired or forfeited |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
41.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
24.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
27.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
3,274 |
|
|
$ |
36.47 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
1,517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at June
30, 2010 |
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
$ |
40.12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
519 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference
between the closing price of the Companys common shares on the last trading day of the second
quarter of 2010 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options)
that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their
options on June 30, 2010. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the
fair market value of the Companys common shares. |
Unvested performance shares are based on a maximum potential payout. Actual shares granted at
the end of the performance period may be less than the maximum potential payout level depending on
achievement of performance share objectives. The following tables summarize information on
unvested restricted stock units (RSUs), performance shares and deferred shares for the six months
ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair |
|
|
|
Number of Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
RSUs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
470 |
|
|
$ |
32.64 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
38.67 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
45.58 |
|
Granted |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
27.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
602 |
|
|
$ |
29.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at January 1, 2010 |
|
|
719 |
|
|
$ |
36.70 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
57.88 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
58.65 |
|
Granted |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
35.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
760 |
|
|
$ |
31.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director Deferred Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oustanding at January 1,
2010 |
|
|
65 |
|
|
$ |
34.15 |
|
Granted |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
33.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
90 |
|
|
$ |
33.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 5: INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rate on continuing operations for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was 30.0
percent compared to 28.2 percent for the same period of 2009. While comparable, the 1.8 percentage
point increase in the effective tax rate was due to a variety of discrete items in the periods.
The effective tax rate on continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was 29.2
percent compared to 27.7 percent for the same period of 2009. While comparable, the 1.5 percentage
point increase in the effective tax rate was due to a variety of discrete items in the periods.
The tax rates for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009 included benefits related to
the U.S. research and development credit and certain look-through rules related to foreign
corporations, which expired on December 31, 2009. These benefits will not be incorporated into the
Companys 2010 results unless they are extended by Congress.
Additionally, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as well as the Health
Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (the Acts) were signed into law. Beginning in 2013,
the Acts eliminate the tax deduction of retiree prescription drug expenses that are reimbursed
under Medicare Part D. The resulting deferred tax charge of $339 from enactment of the Acts was
recognized in the results for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
NOTE 6: INVESTMENTS
The Companys investments, primarily in Brazil, consist of certificates of deposit and U.S. dollar
indexed bond funds, which are classified as available-for-sale and stated at fair value based upon
quoted market prices and net asset values, respectively. Deposits with banks and money market funds
classified as short-term investments include accrued interest. Unrealized gains and losses are
recorded in other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses are recognized in investment
income. Realized gains from the sale of securities were $33 for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010. Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities were $9,718 during the six
months ended June 30, 2010.
The Company has deferred compensation plans that enable certain employees to defer receipt of a
portion of their cash or share-based compensation and non-employee directors to defer receipt of
director fees at the participants discretion. For deferred cash-based compensation, the Company
established a rabbi trust which is recorded at fair value of the underlying securities within
securities and other investments. The related deferred compensation liability is recorded at fair
value within other long-term liabilities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on marketable
securities in the rabbi trust are recognized in investment income.
The Companys investments, excluding cash surrender value of insurance contracts of $66,432 and
$65,489 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost Basis |
|
|
Gain/(Loss) |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
As of June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
123,364 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
123,364 |
|
U.S. dollar indexed bond
funds |
|
|
27,463 |
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
28,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
150,827 |
|
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
151,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in a rabbi trust |
|
$ |
8,715 |
|
|
$ |
(1,187 |
) |
|
$ |
7,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
157,216 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
157,216 |
|
U.S. dollar indexed bond
funds |
|
|
20,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
177,442 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
177,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in a rabbi trust |
|
$ |
9,400 |
|
|
$ |
(900 |
) |
|
$ |
8,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 7: INVENTORIES
Major classes of inventories are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
200,776 |
|
|
$ |
196,110 |
|
Service parts |
|
|
137,940 |
|
|
|
145,719 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
59,666 |
|
|
|
56,492 |
|
Raw materials |
|
|
68,179 |
|
|
|
49,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories |
|
$ |
466,561 |
|
|
$ |
448,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8: OTHER ASSETS
Included in other assets are net capitalized computer software development costs of $57,591 and
$57,143 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Amortization expense on
capitalized software of $3,849 and $7,930 was included in product cost of sales for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively and $4,321 and $8,248 for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, respectively. Other long-term assets also consist of patents, trademarks and
other intangible assets. Where applicable, other assets are stated at cost and, if applicable, are
amortized ratably over the relevant contract period or the estimated life of the assets. Fees to
renew or extend the term of the Companys intangible assets are expensed when incurred. Impairment
of long-lived assets is recognized when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the expected future undiscounted cash flows
are less than the carrying amount of the asset group, an impairment loss may be recognized at that
time to reduce the asset to its fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 360, Property, Plant and
Equipment.
In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a $4,096 intangible asset impairment within
Diebold North America (DNA) continuing operations related to the 2004 acquisition of TFE Technology
Holdings, a maintenance provider of network and hardware service solutions to federal and state
government agencies and commercial firms. The impairment was a result of current negative cash
flows which are projected to persist related to this business due to non-renewal of certain
contracts. Based on an analysis of the discounted and undiscounted future cash flows related to
this business, the Company determined these customer contract intangible assets were fully impaired
as of June 30, 2010.
Investment in Affiliate Investment in the Companys non-consolidated affiliate is accounted for
under the equity method and consists of a 50 percent ownership in Shanghai Diebold King Safe
Company, Ltd. The balance of this investment as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $12,733
and $11,308, respectively, and fluctuated based on equity earnings and receipt of dividends. Equity
earnings from the non-consolidated affiliate are included in miscellaneous, net in the condensed
consolidated statements of income and were $673 and $1,425 for the three and six months ended June,
2010, respectively, and $755 and $1,273 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively.
NOTE 9: DEBT
Outstanding debt balances were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
Notes payable current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncommitted lines of credit |
|
$ |
21,108 |
|
|
$ |
16,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facility |
|
$ |
240,000 |
|
|
$ |
240,000 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
300,000 |
|
Industrial development revenue bonds |
|
|
11,900 |
|
|
|
11,900 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,025 |
|
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
554,925 |
|
|
$ |
553,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, the Company had various international short-term uncommitted lines of credit
with borrowing limits of $63,296. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings on
these lines of credit as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was
14
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
4.08 and 9.15 percent, respectively. Short-term uncommitted lines mature in less than one year.
The amount available under the short-term uncommitted lines at June 30, 2010 was $42,188.
In October 2009, the Company entered into a three-year credit facility. As of June 30, 2010, the
Company had borrowing limits under this facility totaling $491,748 ($400,000 and 75,000,
translated). Under the terms of the credit facility agreement, the Company has the ability, subject
to various approvals, to increase the borrowing limits by $200,000 and 37,500. Up to $30,000 and
15,000 of the revolving credit facility is available under a swing line subfacility. The
weighted-average interest rate on outstanding credit facility borrowings as of June 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 was 2.71 and 2.63 percent, respectively, which is variable based on the London
Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The amount available under the credit facility as of June 30, 2010
was $251,748.
In March 2006, the Company issued senior notes in an aggregate principal amount of $300,000 with a
weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.50 percent. The maturity dates of the senior notes are
staggered, with $75,000, $175,000 and $50,000 becoming due in 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively.
Additionally, the Company entered into a derivative transaction to hedge interest rate risk on
$200,000 of the senior notes, which was treated as a cash flow hedge. This reduced the effective
interest rate by 14 basis points from 5.50 to 5.36 percent.
In 1997, industrial development revenue bonds were issued on behalf of the Company. The proceeds
from the bond issuances were used to construct new manufacturing facilities in the United States.
The Company guaranteed the payments of principal and interest on the bonds by obtaining letters of
credit. The bonds were issued with a 20-year original term and are scheduled to mature in 2017.
Each industrial development revenue bond carries a variable interest rate, which is reset weekly by
the remarketing agents. The weighted-average interest rate on the bonds was 0.56 and 0.80 percent
as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The Companys financing agreements contain various restrictive financial covenants, including net
debt to capitalization and net interest coverage ratios. As of June 30, 2010, the Company was in
compliance with the financial covenants in its debt agreements.
NOTE 10: BENEFIT PLANS
The Company has pension plans covering certain U.S. employees. Plans that cover certain salaried
employees provide pension benefits based on the employees compensation during the ten years before
retirement. The Companys funding policy for salaried plans is to contribute annually based on
actuarial projections and applicable regulations. Plans covering certain hourly employees and union
members generally provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service. The Companys
funding policy for hourly plans is to make at least the minimum annual contributions required by
applicable regulations. Employees of the Companys operations in countries outside of the United
States participate to varying degrees in local pension plans, which in the aggregate are not
significant.
In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides healthcare and life insurance
benefits (referred to as other benefits) for certain retired employees. Eligible employees may be
entitled to these benefits based upon years of service with the Company, age at retirement and
collective bargaining agreements. Currently, the Company has made no commitments to increase these
benefits for existing retirees or for employees who may become eligible for these benefits in the
future. There are no plan assets and the Company funds the benefits as the claims are paid.
The following table sets forth the net periodic benefit cost for the Companys defined benefit
pension plans and other benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
2,499 |
|
|
$ |
2,726 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
7,681 |
|
|
|
7,237 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(9,603 |
) |
|
|
(9,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
1,344 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension benefit cost |
|
$ |
1,970 |
|
|
$ |
1,679 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
4,998 |
|
|
$ |
5,451 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost |
|
|
15,362 |
|
|
|
14,474 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(19,206 |
) |
|
|
(18,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension benefit cost |
|
$ |
3,968 |
|
|
$ |
3,271 |
|
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
$ |
526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows
There have been no significant changes to the 2010 plan year contribution amounts previously
disclosed. For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, contributions of $13,381 and $13,367,
respectively, were made to the qualified and non-qualified pension plans.
In addition to the qualified and non-qualified pension plans, union employees in one of the
Companys U.S. manufacturing facilities participated in the International Union of Electronic,
Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers-Communications Workers of America (IUE-CWA)
multi-employer pension fund. This facility was closed in 2008 which triggered a withdrawal
liability from the pension fund. The withdrawal liability was settled for $5,632 and was paid in
the second quarter of 2010.
NOTE 11: GUARANTEES AND PRODUCT WARRANTIES
In September 2009, the Company sold its U.S. election systems business. The related sale agreement
contained shared liability clauses pursuant to which the Company agreed to indemnify the purchaser
for 70 percent of any adverse consequences to the purchaser arising out of certain defined
potential litigation or obligations. As of June 30, 2010, there were no material adverse
consequences related to these shared liability indemnifications. The Companys maximum exposure
under the shared liability indemnifications is $8,000.
In 1997, industrial development revenue bonds were issued on behalf of the Company. The Company
guaranteed the payments of principal and interest on the bonds by obtaining letters of credit
(refer to note 9). The carrying value of the bonds was $11,900 as of June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009.
The Company provides its global operations guarantees and standby letters of credit through various
financial institutions to suppliers, customers, regulatory agencies and insurance providers. If the
Company is not able to make payment or fulfill contractual obligations, the suppliers, customers,
regulatory agencies and insurance providers may draw on the pertinent bank. At June 30, 2010, the
maximum future payment obligations related to these various guarantees totaled $71,579, of which
$22,628 represented standby letters of credit to insurance providers, and no associated liability
was recorded. At December 31, 2009, the maximum future payment obligations relative to these
various guarantees totaled $53,419, of which $22,628 represented standby letters of credit to
insurance providers, and no associated liability was recorded.
The Company provides its customers a manufacturers warranty and records, at the time of the sale,
a corresponding estimated liability for potential warranty costs. Estimated future obligations due
to warranty claims are based upon historical factors such as labor rates, average repair time,
travel time, number of service calls per machine and cost of replacement parts. Changes in the
Companys warranty liability balance are illustrated in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
62,673 |
|
|
$ |
43,009 |
|
Current period accruals (a) |
|
|
24,609 |
|
|
|
32,871 |
|
Current period settlements |
|
|
(23,694 |
) |
|
|
(22,208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30 |
|
$ |
63,588 |
|
|
$ |
53,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
includes the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations |
16
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
NOTE 12: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company uses derivatives to mitigate the negative economic consequences associated with the
fluctuations in currencies and interest rates. The Company records all derivative instruments on
the balance sheet at fair value and the changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings unless
specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows
derivative gains and losses to be reflected in the statement of income or other comprehensive
income together with the hedged exposure, and requires that the Company formally document,
designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting treatment.
Gains or losses associated with ineffectiveness must be reported currently in earnings. The Company
does not enter into any speculative positions with regard to derivative instruments.
The Company periodically evaluates its monetary asset and liability positions denominated in
foreign currencies. The impact of the Company and the counterparties credit risk on the fair value
of the contracts is considered as well as the ability of each party to execute its obligations
under the contract. The Company uses investment grade financial counterparties in these
transactions and believes that the resulting credit risk under these hedging strategies is not
significant.
FOREIGN EXCHANGE
Non-Designated Hedges A substantial portion of the Companys operations and revenues are
international. As a result, changes in foreign exchange rates can create substantial foreign
exchange gains and losses from the revaluation of non-functional currency monetary assets and
liabilities. The Companys policy allows the use of foreign exchange forward contracts with
maturities of up to 24 months to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on those foreign
currency asset and liability balances. The Company elected not to apply hedge accounting to its
foreign exchange forward contracts. Thus, spot-based gains/losses offset revaluation gains/losses
within foreign exchange loss, net and forward-based gains/losses represent interest expense. For
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, there were 201 and 407 non-designated foreign
exchange contracts that settled. As of June 30, 2010, there were 59 non-designated foreign exchange
contracts outstanding, primarily euro, British pound, Hungarian forint and Swiss franc, totaling
$523,030, which represents the absolute value of notional amounts.
Net Investment Hedges The Company has international subsidiaries with assets in excess of
liabilities that generate cumulative translation adjustments within other comprehensive income.
During 2009, the Company used derivatives to manage potential adverse changes in value of its net
investments in Brazil. The Company used the forward to forward method for its quarterly
retrospective and prospective assessments of hedge effectiveness. No ineffectiveness results if the
notional amount of the derivative matches the portion of the net investment designated as being
hedged because the Company uses derivative instruments with underlying exchange rates consistent
with its functional currency and the functional currency of the hedged net investment. Changes in
value that are deemed effective are accumulated in other comprehensive income where they will
remain until they are reclassified to income together with the gain or loss on the entire
investment upon substantial liquidation of the subsidiary.
INTEREST RATE
Cash Flow Hedges The Company has variable rate debt and is subject to fluctuations in interest
related cash flows due to changes in market interest rates. The Companys policy allows derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges which fix a portion of future variable-rate interest
expense. The Company has executed two pay-fixed receive-variable interest rate swaps, with a total
notional amount of $50,000, to hedge against changes in the LIBOR benchmark interest rate on a
portion of the Companys LIBOR-based borrowings. In October 2009, the Company used borrowings of
approximately $205,000 and 50,300 under its new credit facility to repay all amounts outstanding
under (and terminated) the prior credit facility. While the LIBOR-based cash flows designated in
the original hedge relationships remain probable of occurring, the Company elected to de-designate
the original cash flow hedging relationships and designated new hedging relationships in
conjunction with entering into its new credit facility.
The Companys monthly retrospective assessment of hedge effectiveness to determine whether the
hedging relationship continues to qualify for hedge accounting is performed using regression
analysis. The Companys monthly prospective assessment of hedge effectiveness to measure the extent
to which exact offset is not achieved is performed by comparing the cumulative change in the fair
value of the interest rate swaps to the cumulative change in the fair value of the hypothetical
interest rate swaps with critical terms that match the LIBOR-based borrowings. When computing
cumulative changes in fair values, the Company computes the difference between the current fair
value and the sum of all future discounted cash flows projected at designation that are not yet
paid or accrued as of the current valuation date in order to isolate changes in fair value
primarily attributable to changes in interest rates. Changes in value that are deemed effective are
accumulated in other comprehensive income and reclassified to interest expense when the hedged
17
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
interest is accrued. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized
losses of $73 and $79 representing the change in fair value of the interest rate swap that was
deemed ineffective. To the extent that it becomes probable that the Companys variable rate
borrowings will not occur, the gains or losses on the related cash flow hedges will be reclassified
from other comprehensive income to interest expense.
In December 2005 and January 2006, the Company executed cash flow hedges by entering into
receive-variable and pay-fixed interest rate swaps, with a total notional amount of $200,000,
related to the senior notes issuance in March 2006. Amounts previously recorded in other
comprehensive income related to the pre-issuance cash flow hedges will continue to be reclassified
to income on a straight-line basis through February 2016.
The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments designated and not
designated as hedging instruments and their respective balance sheet location:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location (1) |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
$ |
(1,571 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,122 |
) |
|
Other current liabilities |
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
(2,559 |
) |
|
|
(1,277 |
) |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability derivatives |
|
$ |
(4,130 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated |
|
$ |
(4,130 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,399 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
5,227 |
|
|
$ |
1,047 |
|
|
Other current assets |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset derivatives |
|
$ |
5,298 |
|
|
$ |
1,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability derivatives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
(1,483 |
) |
|
$ |
(560 |
) |
|
Other current assets |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
(738 |
) |
|
|
(2,171 |
) |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liability derivatives |
|
$ |
(2,221 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,731 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated |
|
$ |
3,077 |
|
|
$ |
(1,285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
(1,053 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The balance sheet location noted above represents the balance sheet line item where the
respective contract types are reported using a net basis due to master netting agreements with
counterparties. However, the asset derivative and liability derivative categories noted above
represent the Companys derivative positions on a gross contract by contract basis. |
18
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following tables summarize the impact of derivative instruments included in other comprehensive
income (loss) (OCI), pre-tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss recognized in OCI (effective portion) |
|
$ |
(552 |
) |
|
$ |
1,600 |
|
|
$ |
(651 |
) |
|
$ |
1,509 |
|
Loss reclassified from accumulated OCI (effective portion) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
214 |
|
Loss recognized in income (ineffective portion) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss recognized in OCI (effective portion) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,099 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,482 |
) |
Gains and losses related to interest rate contracts that are reclassified from accumulated OCI are
recorded in interest expense on the statement of income. The Company anticipates reclassifying
$1,242 from other comprehensive income to interest expense within the next 12 months.
The following table summarizes the gain (loss) recognized on non-designated derivative instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Income Statement Location |
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
$ |
(1,573 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,704 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,059 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,195 |
) |
|
Interest expense |
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
15,211 |
|
|
|
(26,781 |
) |
|
|
22,155 |
|
|
|
(17,988 |
) |
|
Foreign exchange loss, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
13,638 |
|
|
$ |
(28,485 |
) |
|
$ |
19,096 |
|
|
$ |
(23,183 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 13: RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES
Restructuring Charges
The following table summarizes the impact of the Companys restructuring charges/(accrual
adjustment benefits) on the condensed consolidated statements of income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cost of sales products |
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
482 |
|
|
$ |
2,404 |
|
Cost of sales services |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
1,798 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
3,400 |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
2,236 |
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
Research, development and engineering expense |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,194 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
|
$ |
8,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table summarizes the Companys restructuring charges/(accrual adjustment benefits)
within continuing operations for its DNA and Diebold International (DI) reporting segments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
DNA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
$ |
518 |
|
|
$ |
1,803 |
|
|
$ |
1,883 |
|
|
$ |
2,194 |
|
Other (1) |
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
2,134 |
|
DI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
3,713 |
|
Other (2) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,194 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
|
$ |
8,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Other restructuring adjustments and costs included in the DNA
segment include pension obligation and asset movement. |
|
(2) |
|
Other restructuring adjustments and costs included in the DI
segment include penalties and legal and professional fees. |
Restructuring charges of $1,930 and $3,467 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, related to reductions in the Companys global workforce, including realignment of the
organization and resources to better support opportunities in emerging growth markets and
consolidation of certain international facilities in efforts to optimize overall operational
performance. In December 2009, the Company began to implement a workforce reduction of
350 employees, which primarily affects its Canton, Ohio area facilities. As of June 30, 2010, the
Company expects to complete this workforce reduction no later than the end of 2010.
Restructuring charges of $356 and $2,194 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively, related to the Companys strategic global manufacturing realignment plans.
Restructuring accrual adjustment benefits in 2010 were primarily the result of a pension obligation
which was settled in the first quarter of 2010 (refer to note 10). The Companys global
manufacturing realignment plans include the closure of its manufacturing facilities in Newark, Ohio
and Cassis, France in 2008 and 2006, respectively. The Company believes the closure of the Newark
and Cassis facilities is substantially complete. The global manufacturing realignment plans also
include the movement of Opteva product manufacturing out of Lexington, North Carolina into other
facilities. The Company believes the move is substantially complete as of June 30, 2010. Security
manufacturing operations continue in the Lexington facility.
Other restructuring charges were $24 and $2,795 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The 2009 costs were primarily related to employee severance costs in connection with
the Companys sale of certain assets and liabilities in Argentina.
The following table summarizes the Companys cumulative total restructuring costs for the
significant plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Manufacturing |
|
|
|
Workforce Reductions |
|
|
Realignment |
|
Costs incurred to date: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA |
|
$ |
20,090 |
|
|
$ |
12,528 |
|
DI |
|
|
19,670 |
|
|
|
24,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs incurred to date |
|
$ |
39,760 |
|
|
$ |
37,145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining costs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
DI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining costs as of June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table summarizes the Companys restructuring accrual balances and related activity
for the six months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severance |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
15,195 |
|
|
$ |
6,722 |
|
|
$ |
21,917 |
|
Liabilities incurred/changes in estimates |
|
|
2,261 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
Liabilities paid |
|
|
(11,888 |
) |
|
|
(6,431 |
) |
|
|
(18,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
5,568 |
|
|
$ |
340 |
|
|
$ |
5,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Charges and Expense Reimbursements
Other charges and expense reimbursements consist of items that the Company determines are
non-routine in nature and are not expected to recur in future operations. Net non-routine income
of $4,130 impacted the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to net non-routine expenses of
$15,005 in the same period of 2009. Net non-routine income for 2010 consisted primarily of
reimbursements from the Companys director and officer (D&O) insurance carriers related to legal
and other expenses incurred as part of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and
Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations (government investigations) and was recorded in selling
and administrative expense. The Company continues to pursue reimbursement with its D&O insurance
carriers of approximately $6,900 of previously incurred legal and other expenditures related to the
government investigations. In June 2010, the SEC finalized the settlement of civil charges
stemming from the government investigations. The Company had previously reached an agreement in
principle in 2009 with the staff of the SEC and the Company accrued a $25,000 penalty in the first
quarter of 2009, which was paid in June 2010. Net non-routine expenses in 2009, consisted of
$1,328 in legal and other consultation fees recorded in selling and administrative expense related
to the government investigations and a $25,000 charge, recorded in miscellaneous, net, related to
the 2009 agreement in principle with the staff of the SEC to settle civil charges. In addition, in
2009 selling and administrative expense was offset by $11,323 of non-routine income, primarily
related to reimbursements from the Companys D&O insurance carriers related to legal and other
expenses incurred as part of the government investigations.
NOTE 14: FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities using one or more of the following three
valuation techniques:
|
|
|
Market approach Prices and other relevant information generated by market
transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Cost approach Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an
asset (replacement cost). |
|
|
|
|
Income approach Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount
based upon market expectations. |
The hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value is
divided into three levels:
|
|
|
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or
liabilities, unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in
markets that are not active or inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are
observable either directly or indirectly. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data. |
21
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Summary of Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Market Value
Assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurement are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
$ |
123,364 |
|
|
$ |
123,364 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
157,216 |
|
|
$ |
157,216 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
U.S. dollar indexed bond funds |
|
|
28,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets held in a rabbi trust |
|
|
7,528 |
|
|
|
7,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
8,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
|
3,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent consideration on sale of business |
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
164,013 |
|
|
$ |
130,892 |
|
|
$ |
31,862 |
|
|
$ |
1,259 |
|
|
$ |
188,815 |
|
|
$ |
165,716 |
|
|
$ |
20,713 |
|
|
$ |
2,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
$ |
667 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
667 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,772 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,772 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,797 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,797 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,171 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,171 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investments The Company has investments in certificates of deposit and U.S. dollar
indexed bond funds that are classified as available-for-sale and stated at fair value. U.S. dollar
indexed bond funds are reported at net asset value, which is the practical expedient for fair value
as determined by banks where funds are held.
Assets Held in a Rabbi Trust The fair value of the assets held in a rabbi trust (refer to
note 6) is derived from investments in a mix of money market, fixed income and equity funds managed
by Vanguard.
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts A substantial portion of the Companys operations and revenues
are international. As a result, changes in foreign exchange rates can create substantial foreign
exchange gains and losses from the revaluation of non-functional currency monetary assets and
liabilities. The foreign exchange contracts are valued using the market approach based on
observable market transactions of forward rates.
Interest Rate Swaps The Company has variable rate debt and is subject to fluctuations in interest
related cash flows due to changes in market interest rates. The Companys policy allows it to
periodically enter into derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges to fix some portion
of future variable rate based interest expense. The Company has executed two pay-fixed
receive-variable interest rate swaps to hedge against changes in the LIBOR benchmark interest rate
on a portion of the Companys LIBOR- based borrowings. The fair value of the swap is determined
using the income approach and is calculated based on LIBOR rates at the reporting date.
Contingent Consideration on Sale of Business The Companys September 2009 sale of its
U.S. elections systems business included contingent consideration related to 70 percent of any cash
collected over a five-year period on the accounts receivable balance of the sold business as of
August 31, 2009. The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined based on recent
collections on the accounts receivable as well as the probability of future anticipated collections
(level 3 inputs) and was recorded at the net present value of the future anticipated cash flows.
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of the Companys level 3 assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
2,386 |
|
Cash collections |
|
|
(1,807 |
) |
Fair value adjustments |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
1,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
22
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Summary of Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Carrying Value
The fair value of the Companys cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and accounts payable,
approximates the carrying value due to the relative short maturity of these instruments. The fair
value and carrying value of the Companys debt instruments are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
Current notes payable |
|
$ |
21,108 |
|
|
$ |
21,108 |
|
|
$ |
16,915 |
|
|
$ |
16,915 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
556,212 |
|
|
|
554,925 |
|
|
|
550,254 |
|
|
|
553,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt instruments |
|
$ |
577,320 |
|
|
$ |
576,033 |
|
|
$ |
567,169 |
|
|
$ |
569,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the Companys industrial development revenue bonds are measured using unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets categorized as level 1 inputs. The fair value
of the Companys current and long-term credit facility debt instruments approximates the carrying
value due to the relative short maturity of the revolving borrowings under these instruments. The
fair values of the Companys long-term senior notes was estimated using market observable inputs
for the Companys comparable peers with public debt, including quoted prices in active markets,
market indices and interest rate measurements, considered level 2 inputs.
NOTE 15: SEGMENT INFORMATION
In the first quarter of 2010, the Company began management of its businesses on a geographic basis,
changing from the previous model of sales channel segments. In order to align the Companys
external reporting of its financial results with this organizational change, the Company has
modified its segment reporting. The Company now reports the following two segments: DNA and DI.
The Companys chief operating decision maker regularly assesses information relating to these
segments to make decisions, including the allocation of resources. Management evaluates the
performance of the segments based on revenue and segment gross margin. Prior period segment
information has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
The DNA segment sells and services financial and retail systems in the United States and Canada.
The DI segment sells and services financial and retail systems over the remainder of the globe as
well as voting and lottery solutions in Brazil. Each segment buys the goods it sells from the
Companys manufacturing plants or through external suppliers. Intercompany sales between legal
entities are eliminated in consolidation and intersegment revenue is not significant. Each year,
intercompany pricing is agreed upon which drives operating profit contribution.
The reconciliation between segment information and the condensed consolidated financial statements
is disclosed. Revenue summaries by geographic area and product and service solutions are also
disclosed. Certain information not routinely used in the management of the DNA and DI segments,
information not allocated back to the segments or information that is impractical to report is not
shown. Items not allocated are as follows: investment income, interest expense, equity in the net
income of investees accounted for by the equity method, income tax expense or benefit and
discontinued operations.
23
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table presents information regarding the Companys segment information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DNA |
|
|
DI |
|
|
Total |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenue |
|
$ |
322,635 |
|
|
$ |
342,545 |
|
|
$ |
665,180 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
23,542 |
|
|
|
23,313 |
|
|
|
46,855 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
10,748 |
|
|
|
5,065 |
|
|
|
15,813 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
4,737 |
|
|
|
5,403 |
|
|
|
10,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenue |
|
$ |
362,454 |
|
|
$ |
328,442 |
|
|
$ |
690,896 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
25,563 |
|
|
|
21,045 |
|
|
|
46,608 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
8,456 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
9,593 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
6,483 |
|
|
|
5,048 |
|
|
|
11,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenue |
|
$ |
618,835 |
|
|
$ |
665,344 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,179 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
32,826 |
|
|
|
54,614 |
|
|
|
87,440 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
17,501 |
|
|
|
9,415 |
|
|
|
26,916 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
11,253 |
|
|
|
11,554 |
|
|
|
22,807 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
454,932 |
|
|
|
160,966 |
|
|
|
615,898 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,039,252 |
|
|
|
1,402,665 |
|
|
|
2,441,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer revenue |
|
$ |
718,137 |
|
|
$ |
630,010 |
|
|
$ |
1,348,147 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
48,809 |
|
|
|
42,275 |
|
|
|
91,084 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
15,266 |
|
|
|
6,871 |
|
|
|
22,137 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
12,926 |
|
|
|
10,820 |
|
|
|
23,746 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost |
|
|
451,358 |
|
|
|
156,673 |
|
|
|
608,031 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,225,429 |
|
|
|
1,306,985 |
|
|
|
2,532,414 |
|
24
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The following table presents information regarding the Companys revenue by geographic region and
by product and service solution:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue summary by geography |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diebold North America |
|
$ |
322,635 |
|
|
$ |
362,454 |
|
|
$ |
618,835 |
|
|
$ |
718,137 |
|
Diebold International: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Latin America including Brazil |
|
|
175,800 |
|
|
|
155,937 |
|
|
|
325,327 |
|
|
|
287,603 |
|
Asia Pacific |
|
|
90,416 |
|
|
|
83,683 |
|
|
|
188,858 |
|
|
|
182,620 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
76,329 |
|
|
|
88,822 |
|
|
|
151,159 |
|
|
|
159,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Diebold International |
|
|
342,545 |
|
|
|
328,442 |
|
|
|
665,344 |
|
|
|
630,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
665,180 |
|
|
$ |
690,896 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,179 |
|
|
$ |
1,348,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue summary by product and service solution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial self-service: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
$ |
203,741 |
|
|
$ |
265,538 |
|
|
$ |
407,441 |
|
|
$ |
505,500 |
|
Services |
|
|
265,449 |
|
|
|
270,619 |
|
|
|
533,257 |
|
|
|
529,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial self-service |
|
|
469,190 |
|
|
|
536,157 |
|
|
|
940,698 |
|
|
|
1,034,959 |
|
Security: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
48,945 |
|
|
|
57,379 |
|
|
|
100,395 |
|
|
|
115,829 |
|
Services |
|
|
100,832 |
|
|
|
95,708 |
|
|
|
194,273 |
|
|
|
194,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total security |
|
|
149,777 |
|
|
|
153,087 |
|
|
|
294,668 |
|
|
|
310,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total financial self-service & security |
|
|
618,967 |
|
|
|
689,244 |
|
|
|
1,235,366 |
|
|
|
1,345,668 |
|
Election and lottery
systems: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
46,198 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
48,793 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
Services |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total election and lottery systems |
|
|
46,213 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
48,813 |
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
665,180 |
|
|
$ |
690,896 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,179 |
|
|
$ |
1,348,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 16: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
During the third quarter of 2009, the Company sold its U.S. election systems business, primarily
consisting of its subsidiary Premier Election Solutions, Inc. (PESI), for $12,147, including $5,000
of cash and contingent consideration with a fair value of $7,147, which represents 70 percent of
any cash collected over a five-year period on the accounts receivable balance of the sold business
as of August 31, 2009. The sale agreement contained indemnification clauses pursuant to which the
Company agreed to indemnify the purchaser for any and all adverse consequences relating to certain
existing liabilities. In addition, the sale agreement contained shared liability clauses pursuant
to which the Company agreed to indemnify the purchaser for 70 percent of any adverse consequences
to the purchaser arising out of certain defined potential litigation or obligations. As of June 30,
2010, there were no material adverse consequences related to these shared liability
indemnifications. The Companys maximum exposure under the shared liability indemnifications is
$8,000. The carrying value of the indemnified and shared liabilities related to the PESI sale was
$1,531 as of June 30, 2010.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company decided to discontinue its enterprise security
operations in the Europe, Middle East and Africa region. The Company does not anticipate incurring
additional material charges associated with this closure.
25
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Summarized financial information for discontinued operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
160 |
|
|
$ |
10,158 |
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
17,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1,051 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,309 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,467 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,148 |
) |
Income tax benefit |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
3,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
(683 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,558 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,653 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ITEM 2: |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
OVERVIEW
Managements discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes that appear elsewhere in this quarterly report.
Introduction
Diebold, Incorporated is a global leader in providing integrated self-service delivery and security
systems and services primarily to the financial, enterprise, government, and retail markets.
Founded in 1859, the Company today has more than 16,000 employees with representation in nearly 90
countries worldwide.
During the past four years, the Companys management continued to execute against its strategic
roadmap developed in 2006 to strengthen operations and build a strong foundation for future success
in its two core lines of business: financial self-service and security solutions. This roadmap was
built around five key priorities: increase customer loyalty; improve quality; strengthen the supply
chain; enhance communications and teamwork; and rebuild profitability. In 2010, there are
encouraging signs of stabilization and growth in many of the Companys major geographic areas. The
Companys focus is on capturing this demand and on converting these opportunities into longer-term,
services-driven relationships whenever possible. Also, the Company will continue to focus on
remediation of its material weaknesses related to internal control over financial reporting.
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company delivered solid results despite a market environment
that remains challenging. The Company is successfully maintaining leading market positions and
increasing traction in others through its ability to deliver unmatched service support and software
solutions. Also encouraging is the sustained improvement in profitability in the Companys service
business and increased stability in the security business as new market segments which are
beginning to generate overall growth in orders. The Companys increasing success in areas such as
enterprise security is critical in its efforts to return the security business to growth moving
forward. Income from continuing operations attributable to Diebold, Incorporated, net of tax, for
the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $30,414 or $0.46 per share, a decrease of $1,574 or $0.02
per share, respectively, from the same period of 2009. Revenue for the three months ended June 30,
2010 was $665,180, a decrease of 3.7 percent from same period of 2009. Income from continuing
operations attributable to Diebold, Incorporated, net of tax, for the six months ended June 30,
2010 was $55,308 or $0.83 per share, an increase of $14,591 or $0.22 per share, respectively, from
the same period of 2009. Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $1,284,179, a decrease
of 4.7 percent from same period of 2009.
Vision and strategy
The Companys vision is to be recognized as the essential partner in creating and implementing
ideas that optimize convenience, efficiency and security. This vision is the guiding principle
behind the Companys transformation to becoming a more services-oriented company. Today, service
comprises more than 50 percent of the Companys revenue. The Company expects that this percentage
will continue to grow over time as the Company continues to build on its strong base of maintenance
and advanced services to deliver world-class integrated services. During the quarter, the Company
announced that Bellco Credit Union, among the 50 largest credit unions in the United States, chose
Diebold Integrated Services® to enhance the efficiency of its operations and provide the
latest financial innovations to its members. As part of the agreement, the Company upgraded 65
ATMs in Bellcos fleet. Fifty Diebold Opteva® terminals now include advanced deposit
automation technology, enhancing the self-service transaction experience for Bellco members. In
addition, Alliance Credit Union selected the Company to implement a complete outsourcing solution
for numerous banking operations. By employing Diebold Integrated Services® outsourcing
solutions, San Jose, California-based Alliance Credit Union reduced its banking vendor
relationships from nine parties to just one. With the Company as the single point of contact, the
credit union now has improved vendor accountability, streamlined budgeting and reduced operating
costs. While these examples represent a relatively small base, management is encouraged by the
rate at which this business is growing. In recognition of the Companys efforts, it was ranked
15th on the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals® 2010
Global Outsourcing 100 list.
Another area of focus within the financial self-service business is broadening the Companys
deposit automation solutions set, including check imaging, envelope-free currency acceptance,
teller automation, and payment and document imaging solutions. The Companys ImageWay®
check-imaging solution fulfills an industry-wide demand for cutting-edge technologies that enhance
efficiencies. To date, the Company has shipped more than 50,000 deposit automation modules.
27
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Financial institutions are eager to reduce costs and optimize management and productivity of their
ATM channels and they are increasingly exploring new solutions. The Company remains uniquely
positioned to provide the infrastructure necessary to manage all aspects of an ATM network . For
example, U.S. Bank is partnering with the Company to provide a multi-vendor software application to
run on the banks Prodigy ATM terminals across its expanding retail franchise. The Company
developed a custom software solution for the bank, built on the Companys cross-vendor Agilis
EmPower® application. The Company will achieve a milestone as it delivers this solution
to U.S. Bank ATMs more than 500,000 terminals around the world running Agilis software and
cross-vendor framework components. The Companys software solution offers advantages to U.S. Bank, including
operational efficiency and brand differentiation. The application provides a platform for enhanced
ATM services to its customers into the future, such as deposit automation. In addition, the
Company has introduced a comprehensive portfolio of skimming-protection solutions that help
financial institutions mitigate card skimming, one of the largest threats against the ATM channel
worldwide. Designed to provide effective countermeasures against known skimming attack vectors, the
Companys ATM Security Protection Suite consists of anti-skimming packages and an industry-leading
outsourced monitoring service. The suite offers five levels of protection to proactively guard
against increasingly sophisticated card-skimming attacks.
Within the security business, the Company is diversifying by expanding and enhancing offerings in
its financial, government, enterprise and retail markets. Looking ahead, management feels
enterprise security and other growth initiatives outside of the financial space particularly in
the security monitoring, retail and enterprise markets will help build growth. Additional
growth strategies include broadening the Companys solutions portfolio in fire, energy management,
remote video surveillance, logical security and integrated enterprise systems as well as expanding
the distribution model. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company launched Diebold Fire
Detection Solutions and Services, a service delivering fire detection hardware, software,
monitoring and services to customers facilities in the United States. The new offering will
enable the Company to deliver integrated fire and burglar protection to end users in a variety of
markets. The integration of these services can result in increased operational efficiencies,
greater consistency, reduced monitoring costs and even savings on insurance premiums for customers.
Also during the second quarter of 2010, the Company was awarded an order for an additional 30,000
election terminals in Brazil. Including this order, the Company will deliver a total of 195,000
election terminals in 2010. The Company is meeting its production schedules and is on track to
complete the order as planned.
The focus for 2010 is to continue striking an appropriate balance between reducing costs and
investing in future growth. The Company will continue to differentiate itself using its total value
proposition, particularly as it relates to growth in emerging markets, deposit automation, services
and security.
Cost savings initiatives, restructuring and other charges
In 2006, the Company launched the SmartBusiness (SB) 100 initiative to deliver $100,000 in cost
savings by the end of 2008. In September 2008, the Company announced a new goal to achieve an
additional $100,000 in cost savings called SB 200 by the end of 2011. The Company is currently on
track to meet its 2010 savings target. The SB 200 initiative has led to rationalization of product
development, streamlining procurement, realigning the Companys manufacturing footprint and
improving logistics.
The Company is committed to making the strategic decisions that not only streamline operations, but
also enhance its ability to serve its customers. The Company remains confident in its ability to
continue to execute on cost-reduction initiatives, deliver solutions that help improve customers
businesses and create shareholder value. Most recently, the Company announced it is realigning its
organization and resources to better support opportunities in the emerging growth markets,
resulting in the elimination of approximately 350 full-time jobs from its North America operations
and corporate functions and a fourth quarter 2009 charge of approximately $9,500. During the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred pre-tax restructuring charges of $1,194 or
$0.01 per share and $2,310 or $0.02 per share, respectively, primarily related to reductions in the
Companys global workforce. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company
incurred pre-tax restructuring charges of $4,000 or $0.05 per share and $8,456 or $0.10 per share,
respectively, primarily related to the sale of certain assets and liabilities in Argentina,
strategic global manufacturing realignment and reductions in the Companys global workforce.
Other charges and expense reimbursements consist of items that the Company determines are
non-routine in nature and are not expected to recur in future operations. Net non-routine income
of $4,130 impacted the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to net non-routine expenses of
$15,005 in the same period of 2009. Net non-routine income for 2010 consisted primarily of
reimbursements from the Companys director and officer (D&O) insurance carriers related to legal
and other expenses incurred as part of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
and Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations (government investigations) and was recorded in
selling and administrative expense. The Company continues to pursue reimbursement with its D&O
insurance carriers of approximately $6,900 of previously incurred legal and other expenditures
related to the government
28
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
investigations. In June 2010, the SEC finalized the settlement of civil
charges stemming from the government investigations. The Company had previously reached an
agreement in principle in 2009 with the staff of the SEC and the Company accrued a $25,000 penalty
in the first quarter of 2009, which was paid in June 2010. Net non-routine expenses in 2009,
consisted of $1,328 in legal and other consultation fees recorded in selling and administrative
expense related to the government investigations and a $25,000 charge, recorded in miscellaneous,
net, related to the 2009 agreement in principle with the staff of the SEC to settle civil charges.
In addition, in 2009 selling and administrative expense was offset by $11,323 of non-routine
income, primarily related to reimbursements from the Companys D&O insurance carriers related to
legal and other expenses incurred as part of the government investigations.
Business Drivers
The business drivers of the Companys future performance include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
demand for new service offerings, including integrated services and outsourcing; |
|
|
|
|
demand for security products and services for the financial, enterprise, retail and
government sectors; |
|
|
|
|
timing of a self-service upgrade and/or replacement cycle, including deposit automation in
mature markets such as the United States; and |
|
|
|
|
high levels of deployment growth for new self-service products in emerging markets, such as
Asia Pacific. |
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of the Companys financial condition and results of operations provides
information that will assist in understanding the financial statements and the changes in certain
key items in those financial statements. Comments on significant fluctuations follow the table.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the accompanying notes that appear elsewhere in this quarterly report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
Dollars |
|
|
Net sales |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
665,180 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
690,896 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,284,179 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,348,147 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
178,144 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
168,910 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
336,154 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
321,237 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
131,289 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
122,302 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
248,714 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
230,153 |
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
46,855 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
46,608 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
87,440 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
91,084 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
31,073 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
33,272 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
56,265 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
44,110 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
(683 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1,653 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(8,639 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Net income attributable to noncontrolling
interests |
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3,393 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
|
29,731 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
30,430 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
53,655 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
32,078 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Second Quarter 2010 Comparisons with Second Quarter 2009
Net Sales
The following table represents information regarding our net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Net sales |
|
$ |
665,180 |
|
|
$ |
690,896 |
|
|
$ |
(25,716 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
Financial self-service sales in the second quarter of 2010 decreased by $66,967 or 12.5 percent
compared to the same period of 2009. The decrease in financial self-service sales included a net
favorable currency impact of $20,824, of which $18,389 related to the
Brazilian real. North America decreased $31,106 or 14.1 percent due to reduced volume in the U.S.
national bank business as 2009 included a large project for a customer that upgraded the majority
of their ATM install base with the Companys deposit automation solution. The project began in the
second half of 2008 and was completed in the second quarter of 2009. On a fixed-rate basis, Brazil
decreased $48,716 or 35.6 percent due to declines in volume.
Security solutions sales in the second quarter of 2010 decreased by $3,310 or 2.2 percent compared
to the same period of 2009. North America decreased $8,713 or 6.2 percent due primarily to the lack
of new bank branch construction as a result of the continued weakness in the U.S. financial market.
Asia Pacific increased $3,923 or 73.8 percent from the second quarter of 2009 due to higher managed
and installation service revenue as well as favorable currency impact.
Brazilian-based election systems sales were $46,213 in the second quarter of 2010 compared to none
in the same period of 2009. This business has historically been cyclical, recurring every other
year. Lottery systems sales decreased $1,652 in the second quarter of 2010 compared to the same
period of 2009.
Gross Profit
The following table represents information regarding our gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Point Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Gross profit products |
|
$ |
77,142 |
|
|
$ |
79,663 |
|
|
$ |
(2,521 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Gross profit services |
|
|
101,002 |
|
|
|
89,247 |
|
|
|
11,755 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
$ |
178,144 |
|
|
$ |
168,910 |
|
|
$ |
9,234 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
|
24.4 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Product gross margin was 25.8 percent in the second quarter of 2010 compared to 24.5 percent
in the same period of 2009. The increase in product margin resulted from favorable geographic mix.
Additionally, product gross margin included $696 and $869 of restructuring charges in the second
quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The restructuring charges in 2010 and 2009 primarily
related to global manufacturing realignment and workforce reductions.
Service gross margin was 27.6 percent in the second quarter of 2010 compared to 24.4 percent in the
same period of 2009. The service margin improvement was driven by improved productivity, lower
service parts scrap expense, and reductions in workforce. Additionally, the second quarter of 2010
included net restructuring accrual adjustment benefits of $524 compared to restructuring charges of
$1,798 in the same period of 2009. The second quarter 2010 net restructuring accrual benefit
related to workforce reductions, and charges in the second quarter of 2009 related to workforce
reductions and service branch consolidation.
30
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating Expenses
The following table represents information regarding our operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
$ |
110,791 |
|
|
$ |
105,352 |
|
|
$ |
5,439 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Research, development, and engineering expense |
|
|
16,402 |
|
|
|
16,950 |
|
|
|
(548 |
) |
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
131,289 |
|
|
$ |
122,302 |
|
|
$ |
8,987 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expense in the second quarter of 2010 was impacted by $2,523 of net
unfavorable currency fluctuations. Selling and administrative expense in the second quarter of
2010 and 2009 included $50 and $1,323, respectively, of reimbursements from the Companys D&O
insurance carriers related to legal and other expenses incurred as part of the government
investigations. In addition, selling and administrative expense included $1,079 and $1,356 of restructuring charges in
the second quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The second-quarter 2010 restructuring charges
related primarily to workforce reductions, and charges in the second quarter of 2009 related to
workforce reductions and service branch consolidation.
Research, development, and engineering expense was 2.5 percent of net sales in both the second
quarter of 2010 and 2009. The $548 decrease in expense from prior year was paralleled by lower
sales volume.
An impairment charge of $4,096 was incurred in the second quarter of 2010 related to intangible
assets from the 2004 acquisition of TFE Technology Holdings (TFE), a maintenance provider of
network and hardware service solutions to federal and state government agencies and commercial
firms. The customer contract intangible assets related to this acquisition were fully impaired as
of June 30, 2010.
Operating Profit
The following table represents information regarding our operating profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
% Point Change |
|
% Change |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
46,855 |
|
|
$ |
46,608 |
|
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Operating profit margin |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit increased slightly from the prior year. Higher service margin performance was
partially offset by higher selling and administrative expense due to unfavorable currency impact
and higher levels of expense reimbursements in 2009. In addition, operating profit in the second
quarter of 2010 was adversely impacted by the impairment charge of $4,096 related to customer
contract intangible assets of TFE.
31
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Other Income (Expense)
The following table represents information regarding our other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
6,017 |
|
|
$ |
7,004 |
|
|
$ |
(987 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(9,301 |
) |
|
|
(7,787 |
) |
|
|
(1,514 |
) |
|
|
19.4 |
|
Foreign exchange loss, net |
|
|
(553 |
) |
|
|
(589 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
1,085 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
(2,444 |
) |
|
$ |
(287 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,157 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income in 2010 and 2009 included a (loss)/gain of ($710) and $1,002, respectively,
on assets held in a rabbi trust under a deferred compensation arrangement.
This decrease was partially offset by an increase in interest income on finance receivables.
Interest expense was
negatively impacted by $792 in credit facility fees in 2010 in addition to higher interest rates.
Miscellaneous, net in 2010 included $605 of other income related to fair value adjustments on the
contingent consideration from the sale of the U.S. election systems business.
In order to be
consistent with prior-year presentation, the
Company has reclassified $1,490 to investment income
for the three months ended June 30, 2010, which was previously
reported as miscellaneous, net within other income/(expense), in the
Companys second quarter 2010 earnings release.
Income from Continuing Operations
The following table represents information regarding our income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Point Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
31,073 |
|
|
$ |
33,272 |
|
|
$ |
(2,199 |
) |
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
Percent of net sales |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in net income from continuing operations was driven by higher selling and
administrative expense and the pre-tax impairment charge in the second quarter of 2010 of $4,096.
In addition, lower product sales volume and unfavorable movement in other income/expense reduced
income from continuing operations between years. These decreases were partially offset by higher
service gross profit. The 1.8 percentage point increase in the effective tax rate was due to a
variety of discrete items in the periods and expiration of the U.S. research and development credit
and certain look-through rules related to foreign corporations that otherwise would have reduced
the rate.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
The following table represents information regarding our loss from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
(683 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,558 |
) |
|
$ |
875 |
|
|
|
(56.2 |
) |
Included in the 2010 loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, are costs related to the
sale of the U.S. elections systems business and the December 2008 discontinuance of the Companys
Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA)-based enterprise security business. Included in the 2009
loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, are the results of the U.S. elections systems
business, which was sold in September 2009, and costs related to the December 2008 discontinuance
of the Companys EMEA-based enterprise security business. Refer to note 16 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements for further details of discontinued operations.
32
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net Income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated
The following table represents information regarding our net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
$ Change |
|
% Change |
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
29,731 |
|
|
$ |
30,430 |
|
|
$ |
(699 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
Based on the results from continuing and discontinued operations discussed above, the Company
reported net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated of $29,731 and $30,430 for the three
months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Segment Analysis and Operating Profit Summary
In the first quarter of 2010, the Company began management of its businesses on a geographic basis,
changing from the previous model of sales channel segments. In order to align the Companys
external reporting of its financial results with this organizational change, the Company has
modified its segment reporting. The Company now reports the following two segments: Diebold North
America (DNA) and Diebold International (DI). DNA net sales of $322,635 for the second quarter
2010 decreased $39,819 or 11.0 percent compared to the same period of 2009. The decrease in DNA net
sales was due to decreased product volume in the national and regional businesses, as well as
corresponding declines in installation, partially offset by increased U.S. maintenance service
volume. DI net sales of $342,545 for the second quarter of 2010 increased by $14,103 or 4.3 percent
compared to the same period of 2009, which included a net favorable currency impact of $20,611, of
which $18,663 related to the Brazilian real. In addition, there was higher sales volume in Brazil
election systems, Latin America and Asia Pacific. These increases were partially offset by
financial self-service volume decreases in Brazil and EMEA.
DNA operating profit for the second quarter of 2010 decreased by $2,021 or 7.9 percent compared to
the same period of 2009. Operating profit was unfavorably affected by lower product volume related to the national and
regional businesses, as well as corresponding declines in installation. Additionally, the
impairment charge related to customer contract intangible assets of TFE of $4,096 unfavorably
impacted DNA operating profit in the second quarter of 2010. The decreases were partially offset by
higher service profitability attributable to continued productivity gains, lower service parts
scrap expense, and reductions in workforce. DI operating profit for the second quarter of 2010
increased by $2,268 or 10.8 percent compared to the same period of 2009. Increases in product gross
profit resulted from increases in Brazil election systems volume and favorable geographic as well
as product mix. Increases in service gross profit resulted from higher parts sales in China, as
well as additional managed and installation service revenue. These increases were partially offset
by an increase in operating expenses.
Refer to note 15 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further details of segment
revenue and operating profit
33
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 Comparisons with Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
Net Sales
The following table represents information regarding our net sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,284,179 |
|
|
$ |
1,348,147 |
|
|
$ |
(63,968 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
Financial self-service sales in the first six months of 2010 decreased by $94,261 or 9.1
percent compared to the same period of 2009. The decrease in financial self-service sales included
a net favorable currency impact of $59,081, of which $45,638 related to the Brazilian real. North
America decreased $75,375 or 17.5 percent due to reduced volume in the U.S. national bank business
as 2009 included a large project for a customer that upgraded the majority of their ATM install
base with our deposit automation solution. The project began in the second half of 2008 and was
completed in the second quarter of 2009. On a fixed-rate basis, Brazil decreased $69,365 or 26.7
percent due to declines in volume.
Security solutions sales in the first six months of 2010 decreased by $16,041 or 5.2 percent
compared to the same period of 2009. North America decreased $23,927 or 8.3 percent due primarily
to the lack of new bank branch construction as a result of the continued weakness in the U.S.
financial market. Asia Pacific increased $6,287 or 67.0 percent from the first six months of 2009
due to higher managed and installation service revenue, increased parts sales, and favorable
currency impact.
Brazilian-based election systems sales were $46,218 in the first six months of 2010 compared to
none in the same period of 2009. This business has historically been cyclical, recurring every
other year.
Gross Profit
The following table represents information regarding our gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Point Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Gross profit products |
|
$ |
142,610 |
|
|
$ |
154,239 |
|
|
$ |
(11,629 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
Gross profit services |
|
|
193,544 |
|
|
|
166,998 |
|
|
|
26,546 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit |
|
$ |
336,154 |
|
|
$ |
321,237 |
|
|
$ |
14,917 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit margin |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
23.8 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Product gross margin was 25.6 percent in the first six months of 2010 compared to 24.7 percent
in the same period of 2009. The increase in product margin resulted from favorable geographic mix.
Additionally, product gross margin in the first six months of 2010 included restructuring charges
of $482 compared to $2,404 in the same period of 2009. Restructuring charges in 2010 and 2009
primarily related to global manufacturing realignment and workforce reductions.
Service gross margin was 26.6 percent in the first six months of 2010 compared to 23.1 percent in
the same period of 2009. The service margin improvement was driven by improved productivity and
lower service parts scrap expense in the United Sates as well as higher parts sales in China and
increased maintenance and managed service revenue. Additionally, the first six months of 2010
included net restructuring accrual adjustment benefits of $210 compared to restructuring charges of
$3,400 in the first six months of 2009. The first six months of 2010 restructuring accrual benefit
related primarily to workforce reductions, and charges in the first six months of 2009 related to
workforce reductions and service branch consolidation, as well as employee severance costs in
connection with the Companys sale of certain assets and liabilities in Argentina.
34
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Operating Expenses
The following table represents information regarding our operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Selling and administrative expense |
|
$ |
209,768 |
|
|
$ |
197,365 |
|
|
$ |
12,403 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Research, development, and engineering expense |
|
|
34,850 |
|
|
|
32,788 |
|
|
|
2,062 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
248,714 |
|
|
$ |
230,153 |
|
|
$ |
18,561 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and administrative expense in the first six months of 2010 was impacted by $8,175 of
unfavorable currency fluctuations as well as lower expense reimbursements. These increases were
partially offset by lower net spend as a result of continued focus on cost reduction initiatives.
Selling and administrative expense in the first six months of 2010 and 2009 included expense
reimbursements of $4,147 and $11,323, respectively, from the Companys D&O insurance carriers
related to legal and other expenses incurred as part of the government investigations. In
addition, selling and administrative expense included $2,236 and $2,675 of restructuring charges in
the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The 2010 restructuring charges related to
workforce reductions, and the 2009 restructuring charges primarily related to workforce reductions,
as well as employee severance costs in connection with the Companys sale of certain assets and
liabilities in Argentina.
Research, development, and engineering expense as a percent of net sales in the first six months of
2010 and 2009 was 2.7 percent and 2.4 percent, respectively. The increase as a percent of net sales
was due to lower sales volume. Additionally, research, development and engineering expense was
unfavorably impacted by $1,168 of net currency fluctuations.
An impairment charge of $4,096 was incurred in 2010 related to intangible assets of TFE. The
customer contract intangible assets related to this acquisition were fully impaired as of June 30,
2010.
Operating Profit
The following table represents information regarding our operating profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Point Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Operating profit |
|
$ |
87,440 |
|
|
$ |
91,084 |
|
|
$ |
(3,644 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
Operating profit margin |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in operating profit was due to reduced product sales volume resulting in lower
product gross profit as well as increased operating expenses due to unfavorable currency
fluctuations. Operating profit also decreased due to lower expense reimbursements from the
Companys D&O insurance carriers and the impairment charge in 2010. These decreases were partially
offset by higher service gross margins.
35
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Other Income (Expense)
The following table represents information regarding our other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Investment income |
|
$ |
13,489 |
|
|
$ |
12,827 |
|
|
$ |
662 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(18,356 |
) |
|
|
(17,745 |
) |
|
|
(611 |
) |
|
|
3.4 |
|
Foreign exchange loss, net |
|
|
(5,194 |
) |
|
|
(1,798 |
) |
|
|
(3,396 |
) |
|
|
188.9 |
|
Miscellaneous, net |
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
(23,386 |
) |
|
|
25,487 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
$ |
(7,960 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,102 |
) |
|
$ |
22,142 |
|
|
|
(73.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in foreign exchange loss, net was primarily related to currency devaluation in
Venezuela (refer to note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements). The change in
miscellaneous, net was largely due to a charge of $25,000 in 2009 as the Company reached an
agreement in principle with the staff of the SEC to settle civil charges. In June 2010, the SEC
settlement was finalized and paid.
In order to be
consistent with prior-year presentation, the
Company has reclassified $3,088 to investment income
for the six months ended June 30, 2010, which was previously
reported as miscellaneous, net within other income/(expense).
Income from Continuing Operations
The following table represents information regarding our income from continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
$ Change/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Point Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
56,265 |
|
|
$ |
44,110 |
|
|
$ |
12,155 |
|
|
|
27.6 |
|
Percent of net sales |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
29.2 |
% |
|
|
27.7 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in net income from continuing operations was related to the 2009 SEC charge of
$25,000 as well as higher gross profit, partially offset by higher operating expenses inclusive of
the impairment charge in second quarter of 2010. The 1.5 percentage point increase in the effective
tax rate was due to a variety of discrete items in the periods and expiration of the U.S. research
and development credit and certain look-through rules related to foreign corporations that
otherwise would have reduced the rate.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
The following table represents information regarding our loss from discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
$ |
(1,653 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,639 |
) |
|
$ |
6,986 |
|
|
|
(80.9 |
) |
Included in the 2010 loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, are costs related to the
sale of the U.S. elections systems business and the December 2008 discontinuance of the Companys
EMEA-based enterprise security business. Included in the 2009 loss from discontinued operations,
net of tax, are the results of the U.S. elections systems business, which was sold in September
2009, and costs related to the December 2008 discontinuance of the Companys EMEA-based enterprise
security business. Refer to note 16 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further
details of discontinued operations.
36
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net Income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated
The following table represents information regarding our net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated |
|
$ |
53,655 |
|
|
$ |
32,078 |
|
|
$ |
21,577 |
|
|
|
67.3 |
|
Based on the results from continuing and discontinued operations discussed above, the Company
reported net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated of $53,655 and $32,078 for the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Segment Analysis and Operating Profit Summary
DNA net sales of $618,835 for the first six months of 2010 decreased $99,302 or 13.8 percent
compared to the same period of 2009. The decrease in DNA net sales was due to decreased product
volume in the national and regional businesses, as well as the corresponding installation revenue,
partially offset by increased U.S. service volume. DI net sales of $665,344 for the first six
months of 2010 increased by $35,334 or 5.6 percent compared to the same period of 2009, which was
primarily the result of net favorable currency fluctuations of $58,656, of which $46,148 related to
the Brazilian real, as well as higher sales volume in Latin America and security solutions revenue
in Asia Pacific. These increases were partially offset by financial self-service volume decreases
in Brazil and EMEA.
DNA operating profit for the first six months of 2010 decreased by $15,983 or 32.7 percent compared
to the same period of 2009. Operating profit was unfavorably affected by lower product volume
related to the national and regional businesses, as well as corresponding declines in installation.
Additionally, DNA operating profit was unfavorably impacted by a $4,096 impairment charge related
to customer contract intangible assets of TFE in the second quarter of 2010. These decreases to DNA
operating profit were partially offset by higher service profitability attributable to continued
productivity gains and lower service parts scrap expense. DI operating profit for the first six
months of 2010 increased by $12,339 or 29.2 percent compared to the same period of 2009. Increased
product gross profit resulted from Brazilian election systems volume in 2010 partially offset by
lower financial self-service revenue. Increased service gross profit was due to higher parts sales,
as well as additional managed and installation service revenue. These increases were partially
offset by an increase in operating expenses.
Refer to note 15 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further details of segment
revenue and operating profit.
37
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital resources are obtained from income retained in the business, borrowings under the Companys
senior notes, committed and uncommitted credit facilities, long-term industrial revenue bonds, and
operating and capital leasing arrangements. Management expects that the Companys capital resources
will be sufficient to finance planned working capital needs, research and development activities,
investments in facilities or equipment, pension contributions, dividends and the purchase of the
Companys shares for at least the next 12 months. A substantial portion of cash and cash
equivalents and short-term investments reside in international tax jurisdictions. Repatriation of
these funds could be negatively impacted by potential foreign and domestic taxes. Part of the
Companys growth strategy is to pursue strategic acquisitions. The Company has made acquisitions in
the past and intends to make acquisitions in the future. The Company intends to finance any future
acquisitions with either cash and short-term investments, cash provided from operations, borrowings
under available credit facilities, proceeds from debt or equity offerings and/or the issuance of
common shares.
The following table summarizes the results of our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net cash flow (used in) provided by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
(16,047 |
) |
|
$ |
79,826 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(18,349 |
) |
|
|
(49,893 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(49,348 |
) |
|
|
(65,865 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(13,063 |
) |
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(96,807 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities was $16,047 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a
change of $95,873 from cash generated of $79,826 from the same period in 2009. Cash flows from
operating activities are generated primarily from operating income and managing the components of
working capital. Cash flows from operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010
were negatively affected by the payment of the $25,000 SEC settlement in June 2010. Additionally,
cash flows from operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 were negatively
affected by unfavorable changes in trade receivables, inventories, other current assets and
deferred revenue, partially offset by a $19,141 increase in net income and favorable changes in
accounts payable and certain other assets and liabilities.
Net cash used in investing activities was $18,349 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a
decrease of $31,544 from $49,893 for the same period in 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a
$5,364 decrease in payments for acquisitions and a $26,334 increase in net proceeds from maturities
and sale of investments in the first six months of 2010 compared to the same period of 2009. In
addition, during the first six months of 2010, the Company received $1,807 of proceeds from the
sale of discontinued operations. These activities were partially offset by an increase of $4,779
in capital expenditures.
Net cash used in financing activities was $49,348 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, a
decrease of $16,517 from $65,865 for the same period of 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a
$35,750 change in net debt activity, moving from net repayments of $28,859 to net borrowings of
$6,891. This was partially offset by $19,866 cash used to repurchase common shares during the
first six months of 2010.
The effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents for the six months included June
30, 2010 included $7,000 of devaluation related to Venezuela.
Dividends
The Company paid dividends of $36,076 and $34,713 in the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. Quarterly
dividends per share were $0.27 and $0.26 per share for 2010 and 2009, respectively.
38
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
All contractual cash obligations with initial and remaining terms in excess of one year and
contingent liabilities remained generally unchanged at June 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009.
The Company does not participate in transactions that facilitate off balance sheet arrangements.
In October 2009, the Company entered into a three-year credit facility. As of June 30, 2010, the
Company had borrowing limits totaling $491,748 ($400,000 and 75,000, translated) under this
facility. Under the terms of the credit facility agreement, the Company has the ability, subject to
various approvals, to increase the borrowing limits by $200,000 and 37,500. Up to $30,000 and
15,000 of the revolving credit facility is available under a swing line subfacility. The amount
available under the credit facility at June 30, 2010 was $251,748.
In March 2006, the Company issued senior notes in an aggregate principal amount of $300,000 with a
weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.50 percent. The maturity dates of the senior notes are
staggered, with $75,000, $175,000 and $50,000 becoming due in 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively.
Additionally, the Company entered into a derivative transaction to hedge interest rate risk on
$200,000 of the senior notes, which was treated as a cash flow hedge. This reduced the effective
interest rate by 14 basis points from 5.50 to 5.36 percent.
The Companys financing agreements contain various restrictive financial covenants, including net
debt to capitalization and net interest coverage ratios. As of June 30, 2010, the Company was in
compliance with the financial covenants in its debt agreements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Managements discussion and analysis of the Companys financial condition and results of operations
are based upon the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events.
These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities
reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities and reported amounts of revenues and
expenses. Such estimates include the value of purchase consideration, valuation of trade
receivables, inventories, goodwill, intangible assets, other long-lived assets, legal
contingencies, guarantee obligations, indemnifications and assumptions used in the calculation of
income taxes, pension and postretirement benefits and customer incentives, among others. These
estimates and assumptions are based on managements best estimates and judgment. Management
evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other
factors, including the current economic difficulties in the U.S. credit markets and the global
markets. Management monitors the economic conditions and other factors and will adjust such
estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Illiquid credit markets, volatile
foreign currency and equity, and declines in the global economic environment have combined to
increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As future events and their
effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these
estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment
will be reflected in the financial statements in future periods.
Management believes there have been no significant changes, except for those discussed below,
during the six months ended June 30, 2010 to the items that the Company disclosed as its critical
accounting policies and estimates in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009.
The Companys critical accounting policies as reported in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 were amended in the first quarter of 2010 upon the adoption of
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13,
Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 2009-13), and FASB ASU 2009-14, Certain Arrangements
That Include Software Elements (ASU 2009-14). On January 1, 2010, the Company elected to early
adopt ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 and there was no material impact on the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements. However, the adoption of ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 modifies
the Companys previously disclosed revenue recognition policy, which is presented below as revised.
ASU 2009-14 amends software revenue recognition guidance in FASB Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 985-605 Software Revenue Recognition (ASC 985-605) to exclude from its scope the Companys
tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to
deliver a products essential functionality. ASU 2009-13 modifies the requirements that must be
met for the Company to recognize revenue from the sale of a delivered item that is part of a
multiple-deliverable arrangement when other items have not yet been delivered. ASU 2009-13
establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable in a
multiple-deliverable arrangement. The selling price must be based on
vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE), if available, or third-party evidence (TPE) if VSOE is
not available, or estimated selling
39
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
price if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. Also, the residual
method of allocating arrangement consideration has been eliminated. ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14
were applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified
after adoption. There were no changes to the Companys units of accounting within its
multiple-deliverable arrangements, how the Company allocates arrangement consideration or in the
pattern or timing of revenue recognition as a result of the adoption of these updates.
Revenue Recognition The Companys revenue recognition policy is consistent with the requirements of
FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition (ASC 605). In general, the Company records revenue when it is
realized, or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue to be realized, or realizable and
earned, when the following revenue recognition requirements are met: persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, which is a customer contract; the products or services have been approved by
the customer via delivery or installation acceptance; the sales price is fixed or determinable
within the contract; and collectability is probable.
For product sales, the Company determines that the earnings process is complete when title, risk of
loss and the right to use equipment has transferred to the customer. Within the North America
business segment, this occurs upon customer acceptance. Where the Company is contractually
responsible for installation, customer acceptance occurs upon completion of the installation of all
items at a job site and the Companys demonstration that the items are in operable condition.
Where the Company is not contractually responsible for installation, revenue recognition of these
items is upon shipment or delivery to a customer location depending on the terms in the contract.
Within the international business segment, customer acceptance is upon the earlier of delivery or
completion of the installation depending on the terms in the contract with the customer. The
Company has the following revenue streams related to sales to its customers:
Financial Self-Service Product & Integrated Services Revenue Financial
self-service products pertain to ATMs. Included with the ATM is a software component and a
non-software component that function together to deliver the ATMs essential functionality.
The Company also provides service contracts on ATMs. Service contracts typically cover a
12-month period and can begin at any given month after the warranty period expires. The
service provided under warranty is limited as compared to those offered under service
contracts. Further, warranty is not considered a separate deliverable of the sale. The
Companys warranty covers only replacement of defective parts inclusive of labor. Service
contracts are tailored to meet the individual needs of each customer. Service contracts
provide additional services beyond those covered under the warranty, and usually include
preventative maintenance service, cleaning, supplies stocking and cash handling, all of which
are not essential to the functionality of the equipment. Outsourced and managed services
include remote monitoring, trouble-shooting for self-service customers, training, transaction
processing, currency management, maintenance services and full support via person to person
or online communication.
Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 605, the application of which requires judgment
including the determination of whether an arrangement includes multiple deliverables. For
stand-alone sales of service contracts, revenue is recognized ratably over the life of the
contract period. In contracts that involve multiple-deliverable arrangements, product
maintenance services are typically accounted for under FASB ASC 605-20, Separately Priced
Extended Warranty Product Maintenance Contracts (ASC 605-20). Amounts deferred for
undelivered deliverables are determined based upon the selling price of the deliverables as
prescribed in FASB ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition Multiple-Element Arrangements (ASC
605-25). The Company determines the selling price of deliverables within a
multiple-deliverable arrangement based on VSOE (price when sold on stand-alone basis) or the
estimated selling price where VSOE is not established for undelivered deliverables. Total
arrangement consideration is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all
deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any discount in the
arrangement proportionately to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverables selling
price. There have been no material changes to these estimates for the periods presented and
the Company believes that these estimates generally should not be subject to significant
changes in the future. However, changes to the deliverables in future arrangements and the
ability to establish the selling price could materially impact the amount of earned or
deferred revenue.
Electronic Security Products & Integrated Services Revenue The Company provides
global product sales, service, installation, project management and monitoring of original
equipment manufacturer (OEM) electronic security products to financial, government, retail
and commercial customers. These solutions provide the Companys customers a single-source
solution to their electronic security needs. Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC
605. Revenue on sales of the products described above is recognized upon shipment,
installation or customer acceptance of the product as defined in the customer contract. In
contracts that involve multiple deliverables, product maintenance services are typically
accounted for under ASC 605-20. Amounts deferred for undelivered deliverables are based upon
the selling price of the deliverables as
40
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
prescribed in ASC 605-25. The Company determines the selling price of deliverables within a
multiple-deliverable arrangement based on the price charged when each deliverable is sold
separately or estimated selling price. Total arrangement consideration is allocated at the
inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method,
which allocates any discount in the arrangement proportionately to each deliverable on the
basis of each deliverables selling price. There have been no material changes to these estimates for the periods
presented and the Company believes that these estimates generally should not be subject to
significant changes in the future. However, changes to deliverables in future arrangements and
the ability to establish the selling price could materially impact the amount of earned or
deferred revenue.
Physical Security & Facility Revenue The Company designs and manufactures several of
its physical security and facility
products. These consist of vaults, safe deposit boxes and safes, drive-up banking equipment
and a host of other banking facilities products. Revenue on sales of the products described
above is recognized when the revenue recognition requirements of ASC 605 have been met.
Election and Lottery Systems Revenue The Company offers election and lottery systems
product solutions and support to the government in Brazil. Election systems revenue consists
of election equipment, networking, tabulation and diagnostic software development, training,
support and maintenance. Lottery systems revenue consists of lottery equipment. The election
and lottery equipment components are included in product revenue. The software development,
training, support and maintenance components are included in service revenue. The election
and lottery systems contracts can contain multiple deliverables and custom terms and
conditions. For contracts that do not contain multiple deliverables, revenue is recognized
upon customer acceptance. In contracts that involve multiple deliverables, amounts deferred
for undelivered deliverables are based upon the selling price of the deliverables as
prescribed in ASC 605-25. The Company determines the selling price of deliverables within a
multiple-deliverable arrangement based on the estimated selling price. Total arrangement
consideration is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the
relative selling price method, which allocates any discount in the arrangement
proportionately to each deliverable on the basis of each
deliverables selling price. There have been no material
changes to these estimates for the periods presented and the Company believes that these
estimates generally should not be subject to significant changes in the future.
However, changes to deliverables in future arrangements and the ability to establish the selling price
could materially impact the amount of earned or deferred revenue.
Software Solutions & Service Revenue The Company offers software solutions consisting
of multiple applications that process events and transactions (networking software) along
with the related server. Sales of networking software represent software solutions to
customers that allow them to network various different vendors ATMs onto one network and
revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 985-605. Included within service revenue is
revenue from software support agreements, which are typically 12 months in duration and
pertain to networking software. For stand-alone sales of software support, revenue is
recognized ratably over the life of the contract period. In contracts that involve multiple
deliverables, amounts deferred for support are based upon VSOE of the value of the
deliverables as prescribed in ASC 985-605, which requires judgment about whether the
deliverables can be divided into more than one unit of accounting and whether the separate
units of accounting have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. There have been no material
changes to these deliverables for the periods presented. However, changes to
deliverables in future arrangements and the ability to establish VSOE could affect the timing of revenue recognition.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing
Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, (ASU 2010-20). ASU 2010-20 updates FASB ASC 310,
Receivables. This update requires additional disclosures to assist financial statement users in
assessing the nature of credit risk in an entitys financing receivables, how that risk is analyzed
in determining the related allowance for credit losses, and changes to the allowance during the
reporting period. ASU 2010-20 is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after
December 15, 2010. The adoption of this update will not have an impact on the financial statements
of the Company, however, the Company will provide additional disclosure as required by ASU 2010-20.
41
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of June 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT DISCLOSURE
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, statements that are not reported financial results or other
historical information are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give current
expectations or forecasts of future events and are not guarantees of future performance. These
forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the Companys future operating
performance, the Companys share of new and existing markets, the Companys short- and long-term
revenue and earnings growth rates, the Companys implementation of cost-reduction initiatives and
measures to improve pricing, including the optimization of the Companys manufacturing capacity.
The use of the words will, believes, anticipates, expects, intends and similar
expressions is intended to identify forward-looking statements that have been made and may in the
future be made by or on behalf of the Company.
Although the Company believes that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable
assumptions regarding, among other things, the economy, its knowledge of its business, and on key
performance indicators that impact the Company, these forward-looking statements involve risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. The Company is not obligated to update
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date hereof. Some of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
competitive pressures, including pricing pressures and technological developments; |
|
|
|
changes in the Companys relationships with customers, suppliers, distributors and/or
partners in its business ventures; |
|
|
|
changes in political, economic or other factors such as currency exchange rates, inflation
rates, recessionary or expansive trends, taxes and regulations and laws affecting the
worldwide business in each of the Companys operations, including Brazil, where a significant
portion of the Companys revenue is derived; |
|
|
|
the Companys ability to take actions to mitigate the effect of the Venezuelan currency
devaluation, further devaluation, actions of the Venezuelan government, and economic
conditions in Venezuela; |
|
|
|
the continuing effects of the recent economic downturn and the disruptions in the financial
markets, including the bankruptcies, restructurings or consolidations of financial
institutions, which could reduce our customer base and/or adversely affect our customers
ability to make capital expenditures, as well as adversely impact the availability and cost of
credit; |
|
|
|
acceptance of the Companys product and technology introductions in the marketplace; |
|
|
|
the amount of cash and non-cash charges in connection with the restructuring of the
Companys North America operations and corporate functions, and the closure of the Companys
Newark, Ohio facility; |
|
|
|
changes in the Companys intention to repatriate cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments residing in international tax jurisdictions could negatively impact foreign and
domestic taxes; |
|
|
|
unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments; |
|
|
|
variations in consumer demand for financial self-service technologies, products and
services; |
|
|
|
potential security violations to the Companys information technology systems; |
|
|
|
the investment performance of the Companys pension plan assets, which could require us to
increase the Companys pension contributions, and significant changes in health care costs,
including those that may result from government action such as the recently enacted U.S.
health care legislation; |
|
|
|
the outcome of the Companys global FCPA review and any actions taken by government
agencies in connection with the Companys self disclosure; and |
|
|
|
the Companys ability to achieve benefits from its cost-reduction initiatives and other
strategic changes. |
42
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
ITEM 3: |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent in its international
operations denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. A hypothetical 10 percent movement
in the applicable foreign exchange rates would have resulted in an increase or decrease in
operating profit of approximately $6,910 and $5,087 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. The sensitivity model assumes an instantaneous, parallel shift in the foreign
currency exchange rates. Exchange rates rarely move in the same direction. The assumption that
exchange rates change in an instantaneous or parallel fashion may overstate the impact of changing
exchange rates on amounts denominated in a foreign currency.
The Companys risk-management strategy uses derivative financial instruments such as forwards to
hedge certain foreign currency exposures. The intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on
the underlying exposures, with gains and losses on the derivative contracts hedging these
exposures. The Company does not enter into derivatives for trading purposes. The Companys primary
exposures to foreign exchange risk are movements in the euro/dollar, pound/dollar, dollar/forint
and dollar/franc. There were no significant changes in the Companys foreign exchange risks in the
first six months of 2010 compared with 2009.
The Companys Venezuelan operations consist of a fifty-percent owned subsidiary, which is
consolidated. On January 8, 2010, the Venezuelan government announced the devaluation of its
currency, the bolivar, and the establishment of a two-tier exchange structure. Subsequently,
during May 2010, the Venezuelan government seized control of the parallel market, thereby creating
a new government-controlled rate. Transitioning from the parallel rate to the new
government-controlled rate did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated
financial statements. The impact was a decrease of $500 and $7,000 to the Companys cash balance
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Net losses resulting from the
remeasurement of the Venezuelan financial statements were recorded in the condensed consolidated
statement of income for approximately $0.04 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2010. In
the future, if the Company converts bolivares at a rate other than the new government-controlled
rate, the Company may realize gains or losses that would be recorded in the statement of income.
The Company manages interest rate risk with the use of variable rate borrowings under its committed
and uncommitted credit facilities and interest rate swaps. Variable rate borrowings under the
credit facilities totaled $273,008 at June 30, 2010, of which $50,000 was effectively converted to
fixed rate using interest rate swaps. A one percentage point increase or decrease in interest rates
would have resulted in an increase or decrease in interest expense for the six months ended June
30, 2010 and 2009 of approximately $1,213 and 1,526, respectively, including the impact of the swap
agreements. The Companys primary exposure to interest rate risk is movements in London Interbank
Offered Rate (LIBOR), which is consistent with prior periods. As discussed in note 12 to the
condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company hedged $200,000 of the fixed rate
borrowings under its private placement agreement, which was treated as a cash flow hedge. This
reduced the effective interest rate by 14 basis points from 5.50 to 5.36 percent.
43
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
ITEM 4: |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
This quarterly report includes the certifications of our chief executive officer (CEO) and
chief financial officer (CFO) required by Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. See Exhibits 31.1 and
31.2. This Item 4 includes information concerning the controls and control evaluations referred to
in those certifications.
Based on the performance of procedures by management, designed to ensure the reliability of
financial reporting, management believes that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements fairly present, in all material respects, the Companys financial position, results of
operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods presented. Refer to Note 1 in the
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under
the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports
filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosures.
In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report, management, under the supervision and
with the participation of the CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of disclosure controls and
procedures, including the remedial actions described below, as of the end of the period covered by
this report. Based on this evaluation, certain material weaknesses in internal control over
financial reporting, as discussed in detail below and disclosed in previous filings, have not been
remediated. As a result, the CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of June 30, 2010, and through the
filing of this quarterly report, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective due to material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, as discussed in
detail below. As described in detail throughout this Item 4, management continues to take actions
to remediate material weaknesses in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
The Company continues to use the management certification process to identify matters that might
require disclosure and to encourage transparency and accountability with respect to the accuracy of
the Companys disclosures in order to strengthen disclosure controls and procedures. This process
requires multiple levels of management to provide sub-certifications, all of which are aggregated
and reported to the CEO and CFO for assessment prior to filing the quarterly condensed consolidated
financial statements. The Company utilized this process in preparing this quarterly report.
Management notes that the following previously identified control deficiencies constitute material
weaknesses as of June 30, 2010:
Selection, Application and Communication of Accounting Policies: The previously reported
material weakness relating to application of accounting policies is not considered remediated as
the Company did not appropriately apply the revenue recognition policy for training and maintenance
services in certain international entities. Based on a review of an accrued liability account that
is used to record the commitment to provide these services, it was noted that the services were not
properly identified and accounted for as separate deliverables in multiple-deliverable arrangements
at inception. This misapplication of the revenue recognition policy is a result of insufficient
knowledge of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to properly identify and account
for multiple-deliverable arrangements. This control deficiency resulted in errors that were noted
during the execution of account reconciliation control procedures. Although none of these errors
were material, either individually or in the aggregate, and these errors did not result in
adjustments to the financial statements, management has concluded that the related control
deficiency constitutes a material weakness since it is reasonably possible that these errors could
have been material.
Controls over Income Taxes: During 2009, management determined that control procedures were
not effective related to providing adequate review and oversight of the calculation of the income
tax provision. These control deficiencies resulted in errors that required out-of-period
adjustments in the Companys 2009 tax provision. Although none of these errors were material,
either individually or in the aggregate, management has concluded that the related control
deficiencies constitute a material weakness since it is reasonably possible that these errors could
have been material.
44
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
As previously reported under Item 9A Controls and Procedures in the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, management concluded that the internal control over
financial reporting was not effective based on the material weaknesses identified. Management has
continued to work on remediation efforts since the filing of that report. During the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, there were no changes in internal control that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
REMEDIATION STEPS TO ADDRESS MATERIAL WEAKNESSES
Management is committed to remediating its remaining material weaknesses in a timely fashion.
Managements Sarbanes-Oxley compliance function is responsible for helping to monitor short-term
and long-term remediation plans. In addition, the Company has an executive owner to direct the
necessary remedial changes to the overall design of its internal control over financial reporting
and to address the root causes of the material weaknesses. The leadership team is committed to
achieving and maintaining a strong control environment, high ethical standards and financial
reporting integrity. This commitment will continue to be communicated to and reinforced with all
associates.
The remediation efforts, outlined below, are intended to address the identified material weaknesses
in internal control over financial reporting.
Selection, Application and Communication of Accounting Policies:
During the second quarter of 2010, corporate management, in conjunction with operational finance
management, designed processes to enhance existing controls related to the identification and
accounting for the deliverables in multiple-deliverable arrangements in accordance with the
Companys revenue recognition policy. As part of the process design, a comprehensive Revenue
Recognition Template, tailored to the specific terms and conditions in the Companys sales
contracts, was developed to facilitate operational finance associates with completing and
documenting detailed sales contract reviews.
At the end of the second quarter of 2010, corporate management began the implementation process by
conducting focused training sessions in all divisions for operational
finance associates responsible for
the application of the revenue recognition policy to multiple-deliverable arrangements. This
training included a detailed review of the application of the Companys policy pertaining to
multiple-deliverable arrangement revenue recognition as well as instructions on the completion of
the Revenue Recognition Template. The goal of this training was to enhance and augment the depth
of knowledge of the responsible operational finance associates to reduce the risk of future
accounting errors. The Company continues to assess the application of the Companys revenue
recognition policy and this assessment will continue through the end of 2010.
During the third quarter, operational finance associates will begin to implement the usage of the
Revenue Recognition Template to complete and document detailed sales contract reviews on
multiple-deliverable arrangements. As part of this implementation process, corporate management
will continue to align and implement controls that provide the proper oversight of the recording
and reporting of the Companys multiple-deliverable arrangements globally. In addition, management
plans to assess its global finance organization to assure there are resources with sufficient
knowledge to properly apply the revenue recognition policy going forward.
At this time, the Company anticipates the remediation efforts related to this material weakness
will be fully implemented by the end of 2010.
Controls over Income Taxes:
During the second quarter of 2010, management, with the assistance of third party consultants,
initiated activities in its remediation plan to address the root
causes of the tax material weakness. These ongoing activities include:
|
|
|
Performing a focused review of tax balance sheet accounts within foreign entities; |
|
|
|
|
Accelerating key activities to be completed in the annual tax provision process and
increasing the level of senior finance management review of the tax provision; |
|
|
|
|
Enhancing and expanding key controls for greater accuracy and completeness in the tax
provision process and sub-processes; |
|
|
|
|
Analyzing and revising the Companys tax ledger accounts in order to deploy
standardized, tax-sensitized trial balances; and |
|
|
|
|
Redefining roles and responsibilities in the corporate tax organization and expanding the tax organization to address resource constraints. |
At this time, the Company anticipates the remediation efforts related to this material weakness
will be fully implemented by the end of 2010.
45
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
The Companys management believes the remediation measures described above will remediate the
identified control deficiencies and strengthen the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. As management continues to evaluate and work to improve its internal control over
financial reporting, it may be determined that additional measures must be taken to address control
deficiencies or it may be determined that the Company needs to modify, or in appropriate
circumstances not to complete, certain of the remediation measures.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
(Dollars in thousands)
At June 30, 2010, the Company was a party to several lawsuits that were incurred in the normal
course of business, none of which individually or in the aggregate is considered material by
management in relation to the Companys financial position or results of operations. In
managements opinion, the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements would not be
materially affected by the outcome of any present legal proceedings, commitments, or asserted
claims.
In addition to the routine legal proceedings noted above, the Company has been served with various
lawsuits, filed against it and certain current and former officers and directors, by shareholders
and participants in the Companys 401(k) savings plan, alleging breaches of fiduciary duties with
respect to the 401(k) plan. These complaints seek compensatory damages in unspecified amounts, fees
and expenses related to such lawsuits and the granting of extraordinary equitable and/or injunctive
relief. For each of these lawsuits, the date each complaint was filed, the name of the plaintiff
and the federal court in which such lawsuit is pending are as follows:
|
|
|
McDermott v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV170 (N.D. Ohio, filed January 24,
2006). |
|
|
|
|
Barnett v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV361 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 15,
2006). |
|
|
|
|
Farrell v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV307 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 8,
2006). |
|
|
|
|
Forbes v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV324 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 10,
2006). |
|
|
|
|
Gromek v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV579 (N.D. Ohio, filed March 14, 2006). |
The McDermott, Barnett, Farrell, Forbes and Gromek cases, which allege breaches of fiduciary duties
under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 with respect to the 401(k) plan, have
been consolidated into a single proceeding. In May 2009, the Company agreed to settle the 401(k)
class action litigation for $4,500, to be paid out of the Companys insurance policies. The
settlement is subject to final documentation and approval of the court.
On June 30, 2010, a shareholder filed a putative class action complaint in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio alleging violations of the federal securities laws
against the Company, certain current and former officers, and the Companys independent auditors
(Louisiana Police Employees Retirement System v. KPMG et al., No. 10-CV-1461). The
complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages and fees and expenses related to the lawsuit. The
complaint generally relates to the matters set forth in the court documents filed by the SEC on
June 2, 2010, discussed below.
The Company, including certain of its subsidiaries, filed a lawsuit on May 30, 2008 (Premier
Election Solutions, Inc., et al. v. Board of Elections of Cuyahoga County, et al., Case No.
08-CV-05-7841, (Franklin Cty. Ct Common Pleas)) against the Board of Elections of Cuyahoga County,
Ohio, the Board of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, (collectively, the County), and
Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner (Secretary) regarding several Ohio contracts under which
the Company provided voting equipment and related services to the State of Ohio and a number of its
counties. The lawsuit was precipitated by the Countys threats to sue the Company for unspecified
damages. The complaint seeks a declaration that the Company met its contractual obligations. In
response, on July 15, 2008, the County filed an answer and counterclaim alleging that the voting
system was defective and seeking declaratory relief and unspecified damages under several theories
of recovery. In addition, the County is trying to pierce the Companys corporate veil and hold
Diebold, Incorporated directly liable for acts and omissions alleged to have been committed by its
subsidiaries (even though Diebold, Incorporated is not a party to the contracts). In connection
with the Companys recent sale of those subsidiaries, the Company has agreed to indemnify the
subsidiaries and their purchaser from any and all liabilities arising out of the lawsuit. In March
2010, the Company and the County agreed to settle their claims for $7,500, to be paid out of the
Companys insurance policies, and the
court has dismissed the portion of the lawsuit involving the County.
The Secretary has also filed an answer and counterclaim seeking declaratory relief and unspecified
damages under several theories of
46
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
recovery. The Butler County Board of Elections has joined in, and
incorporated by reference, the Secretarys counterclaim. The Company has filed motions to dismiss
and for more definite statement of the counterclaims. The motions are fully briefed and are
awaiting a decision by the court. The Secretary has also added ten Ohio counties as additional
defendants, claiming that those counties also experienced problems with the voting systems, but
many of those counties have moved for dismissal. In addition, the Secretary has moved the court for
leave to add 37 additional Ohio counties who use the voting system as defendants, contending that
they have an interest in the litigation and must be made parties. The Secretarys motion remains
pending. Over the past several months, the Company has been actively engaged in settlement
discussions with the Secretary and the Ohio counties and, as a result, the case has been formally
stayed. A settlement with one of the counties, Montgomery County, has been reached so far for an
immaterial amount, to be paid out of the Companys insurance policies, and free or discounted
products and services, to be provided by the Companys former subsidiary.
Management is unable to determine the financial statement impact, if any, of the putative federal
securities class action and the Secretarys actions as June 30, 2010.
The Company was informed during the first quarter of 2006 that the staff of the SEC had begun an
informal inquiry relating to the Companys revenue recognition policy. In the second quarter of
2006, the Company was informed that the SECs inquiry had been converted to a formal, non-public
investigation. In the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company also learned that the DOJ had begun a
parallel investigation. On May 1, 2009, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the
staff of the SEC to settle civil charges stemming from the staffs pending investigation. In
addition, the Company has been informed by the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Northern District of
Ohio that it will not bring criminal charges against the Company for the transactions and
accounting issues that are the subject of the SEC investigation. The Company recorded a charge of
$25,000 in the first quarter of 2009 in connection with the agreement in principle.
On June 2, 2010, the SEC filed materials in U.S. District Court finalizing the settlement of civil
charges stemming from the investigation conducted by the Division of Enforcement of the SEC. Under
the terms of the settlement, the Company has consented, without admitting or denying civil
securities fraud charges, to a judgment requiring payment of a civil penalty of $25,000 and an
injunction against committing or causing any violations or future violations of certain specified
provisions of the federal securities laws. The Company paid the penalty to the SEC in June 2010.
While conducting due diligence in connection with a potential acquisition in Russia, the Company
identified certain transactions and payments by its subsidiary in Russia (primarily during 2005 to
2008) that potentially implicate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), particularly the books
and records provisions of the FCPA. While the Companys current assessment indicates that the
transactions and payments in question do not materially impact or alter the Companys condensed
consolidated financial statements, the Company continues to collect information and is conducting
an internal review of its global FCPA compliance. At this time, the Company cannot predict the
outcome or impact of this global review. In addition, the Company has voluntarily self-reported
its findings to the SEC and the DOJ and intends to fully cooperate with these agencies in their
review.
47
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS
(Dollars in thousands)
The following risk factors, in addition to the risk factors previously disclosed in the Companys
quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, are certain risk factors that
could affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. These risk
factors should be considered in connection with evaluating the forward-looking statements contained
in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q because they could cause actual results to differ materially
from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. These risk factors are not the only ones we
face. If any of these events actually occur, our business, financial condition, operating results
or cash flows could be negatively affected.
We caution the reader to keep these risk factors in mind and refrain from attributing undue
certainty to any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this quarterly
report.
Because our operations are conducted worldwide, they are affected by risks of doing business
abroad.
We generate a significant percentage of revenue from sales and service operations conducted outside
the United States. Revenue from international operations amounted to approximately 50.9 percent in
2009, 52.0 percent in 2008 and 49.1 percent in 2007 of total revenue during these respective years.
Accordingly, international operations are subject to the risks of doing business abroad, including
the following:
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates; |
|
|
|
transportation delays and interruptions; |
|
|
|
political and economic instability and disruptions; |
|
|
|
restrictions on the transfer of funds; |
|
|
|
the imposition of duties and tariffs; |
|
|
|
import and export controls; |
|
|
|
changes in governmental policies and regulatory environments; |
|
|
|
disadvantages of competing against companies from countries that are not
subject to U.S. laws and regulations, including the Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act (FCPA); |
|
|
|
labor unrest and current and changing regulatory environments; |
|
|
|
the uncertainty of product acceptance by different cultures; |
|
|
|
the risks of divergent business expectations or cultural incompatibility
inherent in establishing joint ventures with foreign partners; |
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing multi-national operations; |
|
|
|
limitations on the ability to enforce legal rights and remedies; |
|
|
|
reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; and |
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences. |
Any of these events could have an adverse effect on our international operations by reducing the
demand for our products or decreasing the prices at which we can sell our products, thereby
adversely affecting our financial condition or operating results. We may not be able to continue to
operate in compliance with applicable customs, currency exchange control regulations, transfer
pricing regulations or any other laws or regulations to which we may be subject. In addition, these
laws or regulations may be modified in the future, and we may not be able to operate in compliance
with those modifications.
The Companys Venezuelan operations consist of a fifty-percent owned subsidiary, which is
consolidated. On January 8, 2010, the Venezuelan government announced the devaluation of its
currency, the bolivar, and the establishment of a two-tier exchange structure. Subsequently,
during May 2010, the Venezuelan government seized control of the parallel market, thereby creating
a new government-controlled rate. Transitioning from the parallel rate to the new
government-controlled rate did not have a material impact on the Companys condensed consolidated
financial statements. The impact was a decrease of $500 and $7,000 to the Companys cash balance
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Net losses resulting from the
remeasurement of the Venezuelan financial statements were recorded in the condensed consolidated
statement of income for approximately $0.04 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2010. In
the future, if the Company converts bolivares at a rate other than the new government-controlled
rate, the Company may realize gains or losses that would be recorded in the statement of income.
We may be exposed to liabilities under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and any determination that
the Company or any of its subsidiaries has violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
We are subject to compliance with various laws and regulations, including the FCPA and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws, which generally prohibit companies
and their intermediaries from engaging in bribery or making other improper payments to foreign
officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business or gaining an unfair business
advantage. It also requires proper record keeping and characterization of such payments in our
reports filed with the SEC.
While our employees and agents are required to comply with these laws, we operate in many parts of
the world that have experienced governmental and commercial corruption to some degree and, in certain
circumstances, strict compliance with antibribery laws may conflict with local customs and
practices. Foreign companies, including some that may compete with us, may not be subject to the
FCPA; such companies may be more likely to engage in prohibited activities which
could have a significant adverse impact on our ability to compete for business in such countries.
Despite our commitment to legal compliance and corporate ethics, we cannot ensure that our internal
control policies and procedures will always protect us from intentional, reckless or negligent acts committed by
our employees or agents. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could
disrupt our business and result in financial penalties, debarment from government contracts and
other consequences that may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operations.
In particular, while conducting due diligence in connection with a potential acquisition in Russia,
we recently identified certain transactions and payments by our subsidiary in Russia (primarily
during 2005 to 2008) that potentially implicate the FCPA, particularly the books and records
provisions of the FCPA. While our current assessment indicates that the transactions and payments
in question do not materially impact or alter our financial statements, we continue to collect
information and we are conducting an internal review of our global FCPA compliance. At this time,
we cannot predict the outcome or impact of this global review. In addition, we have voluntarily
self-reported our findings to the SEC and the DOJ and we intend to fully cooperate with these
agencies in their review. We cannot predict the outcome of these or any future government reviews;
however, any indictment, conviction or material fine, debarment or settlement arising out of these
reviews could have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition, results of
operation and future prospects.
In addition, our business opportunities in Russia might be adversely affected by these reviews and
any subsequent findings. Other countries in which we do business may also initiate their own reviews and
impose similar penalties, including prohibition of our participating in or curtailment of business
operations in those jurisdictions. If it is determined that a violation of the FCPA has occurred,
such violation may give rise to an event of default under our loan agreements. We could also face
third-party claims in connection with any such violation or as a result of the outcome of the current or any future government reviews. Our
disclosure, internal review, any current or future governmental
review and any findings regarding any alleged violations of the FCPA could, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse affect on
our reputation and our ability to obtain new business or retain existing business from our current
clients and potential clients, to attract and retain employees and to access the capital markets.
48
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Information concerning the Companys share repurchases made during the second quarter of 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Shares that May Yet |
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Average Price Paid |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Be Purchased Under |
|
Period |
|
(1) |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Announced Plans (2) |
|
|
the Plans (2) |
|
April |
|
|
159,703 |
|
|
$ |
32.81 |
|
|
|
154,949 |
|
|
|
2,434,551 |
|
May |
|
|
67,763 |
|
|
|
29.73 |
|
|
|
67,500 |
|
|
|
2,367,051 |
|
June |
|
|
118,000 |
|
|
|
28.62 |
|
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
|
2,279,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
345,466 |
|
|
|
30.98 |
|
|
|
310,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes 4,754 and 263 shares in April and May, respectively, surrendered or deemed
surrendered to the Company in connection with the Companys share-based compensation plans. In
addition, includes 30,000 shares in June surrendered to the Company in connection with a
former executives settlement with the SEC. Because these 30,000 shares were surrendered at
no cost to the Company, they are excluded from the average price paid per share. |
|
(2) |
|
The Company purchased 310,449 common shares in the second quarter of 2010 pursuant to its
share repurchase plan. The total number of shares repurchased as part of the publicly
announced share repurchase plan was 9,720,949 as of June 30, 2010. The plan was approved by
the Board of Directors in April 1997 and authorized the repurchase of up to two million
shares. The plan was amended in June 2004 to authorize the repurchase of an additional two
million shares, and was further amended in August and December 2005 to authorize the
repurchase of an additional six million shares. In February 2007, the Board of Directors
approved an increase in the Companys share repurchase program by authorizing the repurchase
of up to an additional two million of the Companys outstanding common shares. The Company may
purchase shares from time to time in open market purchases or privately negotiated
transactions. The Company may make all or part of the purchases pursuant to accelerated share
repurchases or Rule 10b5-1 plans. The plan has no expiration date. |
ITEM 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4: RESERVED
ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION
None.
49
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS
|
|
|
3.1(i)
|
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1(i) to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1994 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
3.1(ii)
|
|
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(ii) to
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Certificate of Amendment by Shareholders to Amended Articles of Incorporation of Diebold,
Incorporated incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrants Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1996 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Amended Articles of Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.1
|
|
Form of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.5(i)
|
|
Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan I as amended and restated January 1, 2008 incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.5(i) to Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.5(ii)
|
|
Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan II as amended and restated July 1, 2002 incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.5(ii) to Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.5(iii)
|
|
Pension Restoration Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.5(iii) to Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File
No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.5(iv)
|
|
Pension Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(iv)
to Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.5(v)
|
|
401(k) Restoration Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.5(v) to Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No.
1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.5(vi)
|
|
401(k) Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(vi) to
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.7(i)
|
|
1985 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Diebold, Incorporated incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1992 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.7(ii)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated 1985 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of
Diebold, Incorporated incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 (ii) to Registrants Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.7(iii)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated 1985 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of
Diebold, Incorporated incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 (ii) to Registrants Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.7(iv)
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan No. 2 for Directors of Diebold, Incorporated incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.7(iv) to Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
(Commission File No. 1-4879) |
50
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
*10.8(i)
|
|
1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as of February 7, 2001
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-60578 |
|
|
|
*10.8(ii)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as of
February 7, 2001 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 (ii) to Registrants Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.8(iii)
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to the 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as of
February 7, 2001 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 (iii) to Registrants Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.8(iv)
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to the 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as of
February 7, 2001 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 (iv) to Registrants Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.8(v)
|
|
Amended and Restated 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as of
April 13, 2009 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Form 8-K filed on
April 29, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.9
|
|
Long-Term Executive Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Registrants
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.10
|
|
Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan No. 2 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.11
|
|
Annual Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Registrants Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.13(i)
|
|
Forms of Deferred Compensation Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to Deferred Compensation Agreement
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1996 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.13(ii)
|
|
Section 162(m) Deferred Compensation Agreement (as amended and restated January 29, 1998)
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 (ii) to Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.14
|
|
Deferral of Stock Option Gains Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the
Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (Commission File No.
1-4879) |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2009, by and among the Company, the Subsidiary
Borrowers (as defined therein) party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent
and a lender, and the other lenders party thereto incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Registrants Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
10.20(i)
|
|
Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2001 by and among DCC Funding LLC,
Diebold Credit Corporation, Diebold, Incorporated, Receivables Capital Corporation and Bank of
America, National Association and the financial institutions from time to time parties thereto
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20(i) to Registrants Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2001 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
10.20(ii)
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of May 2001, by and among
DCC Funding LLC, Diebold Credit Corporation, Diebold, Incorporated, Receivables Capital
Corporation and Bank of America, National Association and the financial institutions from time to
time parties thereto incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 (ii) to Registrants Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March, 31, 2001 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.22
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Registrants Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.23
|
|
Form of Restricted Share Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants
Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.24
|
|
Form of RSU Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Form 8-K filed
on September 21, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.25
|
|
Form of Performance Share Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrants
Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
51
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
*10.26
|
|
Diebold, Incorporated Annual Cash Bonus Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to
Registrants Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 16, 2010 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
10.27
|
|
Form of Note Purchase Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Form
8-K filed on March 8, 2006 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.28
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Diebold, Incorporated and Thomas W. Swidarski,
as amended as of December 29, 2008 incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Registrants
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.29
|
|
Amended and Restated Employment [Change in Control] Agreement between Diebold, Incorporated and
Thomas W. Swidarski, as amended as of December 29, 2008 incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.29 to Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
*10.30
|
|
Form of Deferred Shares Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrants
Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879) |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 |
|
|
|
**101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
**101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
**101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
**101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
**101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
* |
|
Reflects management contract or other compensatory arrangement. |
|
** |
|
XBRL (Extensible
Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a
registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act
of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
52
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 9, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Thomas W. Swidarski
|
|
|
|
Thomas W. Swidarski |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 9, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Bradley C. Richardson
|
|
|
|
Bradley C. Richardson |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
53
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of June 30, 2010
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
EXHIBIT NO. |
|
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
|
|
|
*101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
*101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
*101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
*101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
*101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
* |
|
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration
statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for
purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these
sections. |
54