UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant þ
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o

Check the appropriate box:

o		Preliminary Proxy Statement
o		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
þ		Definitive Proxy Statement
o		Definitive Additional Materials
o		Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

	þ		No fee required.
	o		Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
	1)		Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

5)

Total fee paid:

o

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

      o        Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

1)

Amount Previously Paid:

2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

3)

Filing Party:

4)

Date Filed:

 

April 18, 2011

 

Dear Stockholder:

 

You are invited to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of Complete Production Services, Inc. to be held on May 25, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. local time, at The St. Regis Houston, 1919 Briar Oaks Lane, Houston, Texas 77027.

 

At this year’s annual meeting you will be asked to: (i) elect three directors to serve for a three-year term; (ii) ratify the selection of our independent registered public accountants; (iii) hold an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers; (iv) hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers; and (v) transact such other business as may properly come before the annual meeting. The accompanying Notice of Meeting and Proxy Statement describe these matters. We urge you to read this information carefully.

 

Your board unanimously believes that (i) election of its nominees for directors, (ii) ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of independent registered public accountants, (iii) shareholder approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this Proxy Statement, and (iv) shareholder approval of holding an annual vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, each as described in the accompanying proxy statement, are in the best interests of Complete Production Services, Inc. and its stockholders, and, accordingly, recommends a vote “FOR” election of each of the three nominees for directors, “FOR” the ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accountants, “FOR” the approval of the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in the accompanying proxy statement, and “FOR” the approval of an annual vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. If your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, such nominee will NOT be able to vote your shares with respect to the following matters if you have not provided instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee: the election of directors, the advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers and the advisory vote to approve the frequency of future votes to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. We strongly encourage you to submit your proxy card or voting instruction form and exercise your right to vote as a stockholder.

 

In addition to the business to be transacted as described above, management will speak on our developments of the past year and respond to comments and questions of general interest to stockholders.

 

It is important that your shares be represented and voted whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting in person. If you receive a proxy card, you may vote by telephone, on the Internet or by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card. If you receive a voting instruction form from your broker or bank, follow the instructions on the form to vote your shares. Certain brokers permit voting over the telephone or on the Internet. Voting over the Internet, by telephone or by written proxy or voting instruction form will ensure your shares are represented at the annual meeting. Your vote is important!

 

Sincerely,

James F. Maroney
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel

 

COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
11700 Katy Freeway, Suite 300
Houston, Texas 77079

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 25, 2011

 

We will hold our annual meeting of stockholders at The St. Regis Houston, 1919 Briar Oaks Lane, Houston, Texas 77027, on May 25, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. local time, for the following purposes:

 

1. To elect Robert S. Boswell, Michael McShane, and Marcus A. Watts as directors with a three-year term expiring at the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal.

 

2. To ratify the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accountants for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

 

3. To hold an advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers as presented in this Proxy Statement.

 

4. To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.

 

5. To transact any other business as may properly come before the annual meeting or any adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting.

 

These items of business are described in the attached proxy statement. Only our stockholders of record at the close of business on April 11, 2011, the record date for the annual meeting, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the annual meeting.

 

A list of stockholders eligible to vote at our annual meeting will be available for inspection at the annual meeting, and at our executive offices during regular business hours for a period of no less than ten days prior to the annual meeting.

 

Your vote is very important. It is important that your shares be represented and voted whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting in person. You may vote by completing and mailing the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form, or by submitting a proxy over the Internet or by telephone, as indicated on the enclosed proxy card or the voting instruction form. Submitting a proxy over the Internet, by telephone or by mailing the enclosed proxy card or voting instruction form will ensure your shares are represented at the annual meeting.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,

James F. Maroney
Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel
Complete Production Services, Inc.

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

 

Your proxy is solicited on behalf of the board (the “board”) of Complete Production Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Complete Production Services,” “we,” “our” or “us”), for use at the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders to be held on Wednesday, May 25, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. local time, at The St. Regis Houston, 1919 Briar Oaks Lane, Houston, Texas 77027, or at any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof, for the purposes discussed in this proxy statement and in the accompanying notice of annual meeting and any business properly brought before the annual meeting. Directions to the 2011 annual meeting can be viewed at www.completeproduction.com/fin-reports. Proxies are solicited to give all stockholders of record an opportunity to vote on matters properly presented at the annual meeting.

 

We intend to mail this proxy statement and accompanying proxy card on or about April 18, 2011 to all stockholders entitled to vote at the annual meeting.

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the 2011 Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 25, 2011

 

This proxy statement, our 2010 annual report and a sample proxy card are available at: www.completeproduction.com/fin-reports⁽¹⁾. You are encouraged to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before submitting a proxy or voting at the annual meeting.

 

You are entitled to vote if you were a stockholder of record of our common stock as of the close of business on April 11, 2011. You are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held on all matters to be voted upon at the annual meeting. Your shares may be voted at the annual meeting only if you are present in person or represented by a valid proxy.

 

You may vote by attending the annual meeting and voting in person or you may vote by submitting a proxy. The method of voting by proxy differs depending on whether you hold your shares as a record holder or in “street name.” If you hold your shares of common stock as a record holder, you may vote by completing, dating and signing the proxy card that was included with the proxy statement and promptly returning it in the preaddressed, postage paid envelope provided to you, or by submitting a proxy over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the proxy card. The Internet and telephone voting facilities available to record holders will close at 12:00 p.m. Central time on May 24, 2011.

 

Your shares are said to be held in “street name” if they are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank, trust or other nominee, in which case the broker, bank, trust or other nominee is considered to be the stockholder of record with respect to such shares. Even if your shares are held in “street name,” you are still considered the beneficial owner of those shares, and you will receive a voting instruction form from your broker, bank or other nominee that includes instructions on how to vote your shares by mail. Your broker, bank or nominee may allow you to deliver your voting instructions over the Internet and may also permit you to submit voting instructions by telephone. Your voting instruction form will contain the details of any permitted Internet or telephonic voting.

 

 

⁽¹⁾  This website, wherever referenced in this proxy statement, is not intended to function as a hyperlink and the information contained on our website is not intended to be part of this proxy statement.

Important note:  If you hold some of you shares of record and other shares through a broker, you will receive a proxy card covering the shares of record and a separate voting instruction form with respect to the shares held through a broker. You will need to submit two proxies (the proxy card for your shares of record, and voting instruction form for your shares held through a broker, bank or other nominee) to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

 

If you vote through the Internet, you should be aware that you may incur costs to access the Internet, such as usage charges from telephone companies or Internet service providers and that these costs must be borne by you. If you vote by Internet or telephone, then you need not return a written proxy card by mail.

 

Your vote is very important. You should vote by submitting your proxy or voting instructions even if you plan to attend the annual meeting in person.

 

If You Do Not Specify How You Want Your Shares Voted

 

If you are a stockholder of record and you submit your properly signed proxy but do not specify how you want your shares voted on a proposal, the proxy holder will vote your shares:

 

 

In their discretion, the proxy holders named in the proxy are authorized to vote on any other matters that may properly come before the annual meeting and at any continuation, postponement or adjournment thereof. The board knows of no other items of business that will be presented for consideration at the annual meeting other than those described in this proxy statement.

 

If your shares are held in “street name” through a broker, bank or other nominee, your broker will vote your shares in accordance with your voting instructions. If you do not provide voting instructions to your broker your broker has discretionary authority to vote your shares on certain routine matters. Broker non-votes occur when your broker, bank or other nominee has not received voting instructions from you and does not have discretionary authority to vote your shares on a particular proposal or matter. The effect of a broker non-vote is that your shares will not be voted on any proposal or matter on which your broker or other nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote. Shares that constitute broker non-votes will be counted as present at the annual meeting for the purpose of determining a quorum, but will not be considered entitled to vote on the proposal in question.

 

Brokers generally have discretionary authority to vote on the ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accountants. Brokers, however, do not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors, say on pay advisory vote or the frequency advisory vote. We strongly encourage you to submit your voting instruction card and exercise your right to vote as a stockholder on these important proposals.

 

If you are a stockholder of record and plan to attend the annual meeting and wish to vote in person, a ballot will be available upon request at the annual meeting. Please note, however, that if your shares are held in “street name,” which means your shares are held of record by a broker, bank or other nominee, and you wish to vote in person at the annual meeting, you must bring to the annual meeting a legal proxy from the record holder of the shares (your broker or other nominee) authorizing you to vote at the annual meeting.

 

If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy at any time before your proxy is voted at the annual meeting by taking any of the following actions:

 

 

Written notices of revocation and other communications with respect to the revocation of proxies should be addressed to:

 

Complete Production Services, Inc.
11700 Katy Freeway, Suite 300
Houston, Texas 77079
Attn: Secretary

 

If your shares are held in “street name” by a broker or other nominee, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. You must contact your broker, bank or other nominee to find out how to do so.

 

At the close of business on April 11, 2011, 78,902,708 shares of our common stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. All votes will be tabulated by the inspector of election appointed for the annual meeting.

 

A majority of the outstanding shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy will constitute a quorum at the annual meeting. Shares of common stock held by persons attending the annual meeting but not voting, shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions as to a particular proposal and broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum.

 

Stockholder approval of each proposal requires the following votes:

 

 

 

Our board is soliciting proxies for the annual meeting from our stockholders. We will bear the entire cost of soliciting proxies from our stockholders. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, we will request that brokers, banks and other nominees that hold shares of our common stock, which are beneficially owned by our stockholders, send notices, proxies and proxy materials to those beneficial owners and secure those beneficial owners’ voting instructions. We will reimburse those record holders for their reasonable expenses. We have engaged Morrow & Co., LLC to assist in the solicitation of proxies and to provide related advice and informational support, for a service fee of approximately $5,500 plus customary expenses. We also may use several of our regular employees, who will not be specially compensated, to solicit proxies from our stockholders, either personally or by telephone, Internet, telegram, facsimile or special delivery letter.

 

If you need assistance in voting over the Internet or completing your proxy card or have questions regarding the annual meeting, please contact our investor relations department at (281) 372-2300 or investorrelations@completeproduction.com or write to: Complete Production Services, Inc., 11700 Katy Freeway, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77079, Attn: Investor Relations.

ITEM 1:

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation provides that the number of directors shall be set by our board. Our board has set the current authorized directors at seven members. The directors are divided into three classes, with each class serving for a term of three years. At each annual meeting, the term of one class expires. The following three Class III directors have a term expiring at this annual meeting: Robert S. Boswell, Michael McShane, and Marcus A. Watts.

 

Based upon the recommendation of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (the “Nominating Committee”), our board has nominated Robert S. Boswell, Michael McShane, and Marcus A. Watts for re-election as directors to the board. Each nominee currently serves on our board. If elected, each director nominee would serve a three-year term expiring at the close of our 2014 annual meeting, or until his successor is duly elected. Biographical information on each of the nominees is furnished below under “Director Biographical Information.”

Board Recommendation

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE THREE NAMED NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

 

Director Biographical Information

 

The biographical information concerning each of the nominees and continuing directors below describes each nominee’s and director’s history of service as one of our directors, business experience, public company directorships held currently or at any time during the past five years, involvement in certain legal or administrative proceedings, if applicable, and any other experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Nominating Committee and board to determine that the nominee or director should currently serve as a director of the board. There are no family relationships among our directors and executive officers.

 

 

 

 

Nominees for Election at the Annual Meeting to Serve for a Three-Year Term Expiring at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

Robert S. Boswell.  Mr. Boswell has served as our director since September 2005. He currently serves as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Laramie Energy II, LLC, a Denver-based privately held oil and gas exploration and production company he co-founded in June 2007. Mr. Boswell also serves on the Board of Toromont Industries, Ltd. and the Board of Trustees of the Boys and Girls Clubs of America and is Vice Chairman of St. Joseph Hospital Foundation.

 

Prior to the formation of Laramie Energy II, Mr. Boswell served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Laramie Energy, LLC, a privately held oil and gas exploration company, whose assets were sold in May 2007. From July 2004 until September 2005, Mr. Boswell served as a director of CES, one of our predecessors. Mr. Boswell served for many years as a director and executive of Forest Oil Corporation, a NYSE-listed independent exploration and production company, having served as a director from 1986 until September 2003 (also serving as Chairman of the Board from March 2000 until September 2003), Chief Executive Officer from December 1995 until September 2003, President from November 1993 to March 2000 and Chief Financial Officer from May 1991 until December 1995. Mr. Boswell also served as a director of C.E. Franklin Ltd., a provider of products and services to the oilfield industry, specifically completion products, from 1976 until May 2003.

 

Our board has concluded that, with his track record as an entrepreneur in the energy exploration industry, Mr. Boswell provides the board with leadership skills and an understanding of our operations, particularly with respect to our oilfield services operations in Canada and the U.S. Rocky Mountain region, and should serve as one of our directors. Mr. Boswell’s depth of experience at both the management and board level of a major NYSE company in the same industry contributes invaluable insight to our board as it confronts and seeks solutions to operational challenges and as it devises new strategic initiatives.

 

Michael McShane.  Mr. McShane has served as our director since March 2007. Mr. McShane also serves as a director of Spectra Energy Corp, a NYSE-listed provider of natural gas infrastructure, since April 2008,

Globalogix, a privately held company that provides comprehensive services to upstream oil & gas producers and operators, since June 2007, Forum Energy Technologies, a private international provider of manufactured technologies and applied products to the energy industry, since August 2010, Oasis Petroleum, a public exploration and production company focused on acquisition and development of unconventional oil and natural gas resources, since June 2010, and BOS Solutions, a private fluids management solutions company, since October 2010.

 

Previously, Mr. McShane served as a director and President and Chief Executive Officer of Grant Prideco, Inc., a NYSE-listed manufacturer and supplier of oilfield drill pipe and other drill stem products, from June 2002 until the completion of the merger of Grant Prideco with National Oilwell Varco, Inc. in April 2008, having also served as Chairman of the Board from May 2003 through April 2008. Prior to joining Grant Prideco, Mr. McShane was Senior Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer and director of BJ Services Company, a provider of pressure pumping, cementing, stimulation and coiled tubing services for oil and gas operators, from 1990 to June 2002, and Vice President — Finance from 1987 to 1990 while BJ Services Company was a division of Baker-Hughes. Mr. McShane joined BJ Services Company in 1987 from Reed Tool Company, where he was employed for seven years in various financial management positions. Additionally, Mr. McShane served as a director for Triton LLC, a private company which builds and supports technologies and systems for subsea remote intervention operations and applications. In August 2008, Triton LLC merged with Forum Oilfield Technologies, Subsea Services International, Global Flow Technologies, and Allied Technology to create Forum Energy Technologies.

 

Mr. McShane’s diverse career in the energy industry, from leading Grant Prideco, a manufacturer and supplier of oilfield equipment, to serving on the board of Triton LLC, a company focused on subsea remote intervention operations and applications, has led the board to conclude that Mr. McShane has the knowledge, skills and perspective relevant to an understanding of our operations and should serve as one of our directors. Furthermore, Mr. McShane’s directorial experience on public and private company boards, including as a member of the finance and audit committees of Spectra Energy Corp, coupled with his finance and accounting background as a certified public accountant, enhances our audit committee.

 

Marcus A. Watts.  Mr. Watts has served as our director since March 2007. Effective January 2011, Mr. Watts became President of The Friedkin Group, an umbrella company overseeing various business interests that are principally automotive related. From 1984 through December 2010, Mr. Watts served as a partner in the law firm of Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP where he practiced corporate and securities law and served as the Vice Chairman of the firm and managing partner of its Houston office. Mr. Watts is the Past Chairman of the Advisory Board of the Salvation Army, the Past Chairman and Executive Committee member of the Society for the Performing Arts, and serves as a member of various committees for YMCA and American Diabetes Association.

 

From January 2001 to June 2005, Mr. Watts served as a director of Cornell Companies, a NYSE-listed company which is a provider of corrections, treatment and educational services outsourced by federal, state and local governmental agencies.

 

Our board has concluded that, with 25 years of experience in corporate securities law and corporate governance matters, including having represented issuers of equity and debt, underwriters, boards of directors and special committees, Mr. Watts adds insight into the legal, regulatory and compliance issues we encounter from time to time and should serve as one of our directors. Mr. Watts’ prior service as a director of another NYSE-listed company enhances his contributions to our board meetings and deliberations.

 

Director Continuing in Office Until the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

Joseph C. Winkler.  Mr. Winkler has served as our Chief Executive Officer and Director since September 2005 and as our Chairman of the Board since March 2007. Mr. Winkler is a director of Petroleum Equipment Suppliers Association (PESA), an oilfield service and supply industry trade association and a director and member of the compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees of Dresser-Rand Group, Inc., a NYSE-listed provider of rotating equipment solutions. Mr. Winkler also is a member of the Dean’s Planning and Advisory Council at Louisiana State University.

Previously, Mr. Winkler served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Complete Energy Services, Inc. (“CES”) and as a director of CES, I.E. Miller Services, Inc. (“IEM”) and IPS, beginning in June 2005 (CES and IEM were combined with IPS in September 2005, with the resulting company renamed Complete Production Services, Inc.). Mr. Winkler also has extensive executive experience with National Oilwell Varco, Inc., a NYSE-listed oilfield capital equipment and services company, and its predecessor, Varco International, Inc., having served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from March 2005 until June 2005, President and Chief Operating Officer of Varco International from May 2003 until March 2005, and in various other executive capacities with Varco International, including as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, from April 1996 until May 2003. From 1993 to April 1996, Mr. Winkler served as the Chief Financial Officer of D.O.S., Ltd., a privately held provider of solids control equipment and services and coil tubing equipment to the oil and gas industry, which was acquired by Varco International in April 1996. Prior to joining D.O.S., Ltd., Mr. Winkler was Chief Financial Officer of Baker Hughes INTEQ, and served in a similar role for various companies owned by Baker Hughes Incorporated, including Eastman/Teleco and Milpark Drilling Fluids.

 

Mr. Winkler’s current role as our Chief Executive Officer and his past role as President and Chief Executive Officer of our predecessor provides him considerable knowledge of and familiarity with our operations. This extensive institutional knowledge, coupled with Mr. Winkler’s history of leadership and governance at National Oilwell Varco and its predecessor, position him to properly direct the review and deliberations of our board. Mr. Winkler’s career in the oilfield service industry provides our board with a valuable resource of information on the markets in which we operate and the business and financial factors driving our financial results. As our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Mr. Winkler serves as the bridge between our management and the board, ensuring that both groups act with a common purpose. For these reasons, our board has concluded that Mr. Winkler should serve as one of our directors.

 

Directors Continuing in Office Until the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

 

Harold G. Hamm.  Mr. Hamm has served as our director since September 2005, having served previously as a director of CES, one of our predecessors, from October 2004 until September 2005. Mr. Hamm has extensive leadership experience in public companies, and in particular in the oil and gas exploration and production industry. Since 2007, Mr. Hamm has served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of Continental Resources, Inc., a NYSE-listed independent exploration and production company founded by Mr. Hamm in 1967, and currently serves as its Chairman of the Board. Since October 2004, Mr. Hamm has served as Chairman of the Board of Hiland Holdings GP, the general partner of Hiland Partners LP, a private midstream master limited partnership, that focuses on the processing and marketing of natural gas and the fractionating and marketing of natural gas liquids. Previously, Mr. Hamm served as President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of Continental Gas, Inc., a midstream natural gas gathering company, since December 1994 and then served as Chief Executive Officer and a director until 2004.

 

Mr. Hamm is also actively engaged in relevant industry associations and charitable activities. He currently serves on the executive boards of the Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association, as past chairman, and of the Oklahoma Energy Explorers. Mr. Hamm is the founder and served as Chairman of the Board of Save Domestic Oil, Inc., is the founder and chairman of the Domestic Energy Producers Association and is past President of the National Stripper Well Association. Furthermore, the Harold and Sue Ann Hamm Foundation, which was founded in 2007, donated $13 million as a founding donor for the Harold Hamm Oklahoma Diabetes Center located on the campus of the University of Oklahoma. Mr. Hamm is also a member of the Board of the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation.

 

Our board has concluded that, with over 40 years of experience as a senior executive in the energy and oil and gas exploration and production industry, Mr. Hamm is widely recognized for his industry expertise, brings to the board a keen understanding of our industry, and should serve as one of our directors. In particular, Mr. Hamm’s historical experience in our industry from all aspects of both exploration and production of oil and gas enables him to provide our board with valuable insight into the Oklahoma and North Dakota markets and other areas where we operate. Mr. Hamm’s role on the boards of directors of several

large, publicly traded companies as well as his executive experience at Continental Resources provides him with the dual perspective to facilitate communications between management and board members.

 

W. Matt Ralls.  Mr. Ralls has served as our director since December 2005. Since January 2009, Mr. Ralls has served as the President, Chief Executive Officer and director of Rowan Companies, Inc., a NYSE-listed contract drilling and manufacturing company.

 

Mr. Ralls has extensive leadership and financial management experience in the oil and gas drilling and production industry. Mr. Ralls also has recent public company directorship experience, having served as a board member and on the audit and corporate governance committees of Enterprise Products GP and Enterprise GP Holdings L.P., a NYSE-listed company that owns various partnership interests in the midstream energy industry, from February 2006 to March 2007 and on the audit committee of El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P., a NYSE-listed natural gas transportation pipelines and storage company, from January 2008 to January 2009. Mr. Ralls served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of GlobalSantaFe Corporation, a NYSE-listed international contract drilling company, from June 2005 until the completion of the merger of GlobalSantaFe with Transocean, Inc. in November 2007, having also served in the role of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from November 2001 to June 2005. Mr. Ralls also has executive experience with other oil drilling and production companies, including as: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Global Marine from January 1999 to November 2001, when Global Marine merged to become GlobalSantaFe; Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Global Marine from 1997 to January 1999; Vice President of Capital Markets and Corporate Development for The Meridian Resource Corporation, a NYSE-listed corporation, from 1996 to 1997; and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and a director of Kelley Oil and Gas Corporation, a NASDAQ-listed company, from 1990 until 1996. Mr. Ralls also serves as a director for the American Petroleum Institute (API), and beginning January 2011, Mr. Ralls will serve as Chairman for the International Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC). API and IADC are trade associations for the oil and natural gas industry

 

Mr. Ralls spent the first 17 years of his career in commercial banking, mostly at the senior loan management level, with three large Texas banks, including NationsBank in San Antonio, Texas.

 

Mr. Ralls’ extensive financial and senior executive management experience at companies focusing on various phases of the drilling and production industry, which provides him with a keen grasp of our operations and financial results, has led the board to conclude that Mr. Ralls should serve as one of our directors. This background culminates in strong financial acumen and leadership skills that he contributes to our board of directors. Mr. Ralls’ finance background and past service on the audit committees of other public companies qualifies him as our Audit Committee’s Financial Expert.

 

James D. Woods.  Mr. Woods has served as our director since June 2001. Mr. Woods is currently retired and serves as a director of ESCO Technologies, a NYSE-listed supplier of engineered filtration products to the process, healthcare and transportation market, and Foster Wheeler Ltd., an OTC-traded holding company of various subsidiaries which provide a broad range of engineering, design, construction and environmental services. Mr. Woods serves as a director and is a past chairman of the Petroleum Equipment Supplier’s Association, the National Ocean Industries Association and The Greater Houston YMCA. He also serves as a director of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and as a trustee of the National Boys and Girls Club of America.

 

Mr. Woods enjoyed a long career at Baker Hughes Incorporated, having served as its Chief Executive Officer from April 1987 and Chairman from January 1989, in each case until January 1997, and most recently as its Chairman Emeritus and retired Chief Executive Officer.

 

Mr. Woods contributes considerable governance experience to our board, having recently served as a director and member of one or more board committees of the following public companies: OMI Corp., a NYSE-listed bulk shipping company, from 1998 to 2007 (compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees); USEC Inc., a NYSE-listed supplier of enriched uranium from 2001 to 2007 (audit committee); Integrated Production Services, Inc. (“IPS”) (renamed Complete Production Services subsequent to the combination of IPS with Complete Energy Services, Inc. and I.E. Miller Services, Inc. in September

2005) from June 2001 until September 2005; Kroger, Co., a NYSE-listed food retail company, from 1994 to 2001; and National Oilwell Varco, Inc., a NYSE-listed global provider of mechanical components for drilling rigs, from 1988 to 2006.

 

Our board has concluded that Mr. Woods should serve as one of our directors because his distinguished career as an executive in the oilfield service industry provides the board with leadership experience and expertise in our industry. In particular, Mr. Woods’ experience in managing the growth of Baker Hughes Incorporated, including his role in leading the merger of two of the largest companies in the oil service industry, lends considerable insight to the board in its endeavors to identify acquisition and growth opportunities.

 

Set forth below is information regarding each of our executive officers as of April 11, 2011:

 

 

Joseph C. Winkler. See above “— Director Continuing in Office Until the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.”

 

Brian K. Moore.  Mr. Moore has served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since March 2007 and prior to that served as our President, IPS Operations from September 2005 through March 2007. From April 2004 through September 2005, Mr. Moore served as President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of IPS, one of our predecessor companies. From January 2001 through April 2004, Mr. Moore served as General Manager — Oilfield Services, U.S. Land Central Region, at Schlumberger Ltd., an international oilfield and information services company. Prior to serving as General Manager — Oilfield Services, Mr. Moore served as Pressure Pumping Manager for Schlumberger’s Eastern Region from July 1999 to January 2001. Mr. Moore has over 30 years of oilfield service experience including 15 years with Camco International where he served in various management and engineering positions including General Manager — Coiled Tubing Operations.

 

Jose A. Bayardo.  Mr. Bayardo has served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since August 2010, and previously served as the Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer since October 2008. From February 2007 to October 2008, Mr. Bayardo served as our Vice President — Corporate Development and Investor Relations. From April 2006 to January 2007, he served as Vice President of our IPS Division’s Rocky Mountain and Mid-continent operations. From April 2003 to April 2006, he served as the Vice President of Corporate Development of IPS, our predecessor company. Prior to joining us, Mr. Bayardo was an investment banker with JPMorgan.

 

James F. Maroney.  Mr. Maroney has served as our Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel since October 2005. From August 2005 until October 2005, Mr. Maroney surveyed various opportunities until accepting employment with us. Mr. Maroney served as Of Counsel to National Oilwell Varco, Inc. from March 2005 to August 2005. He served as Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of Varco International from May 2000 until March 2005. Prior to that time, Mr. Maroney served as Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of Tuboscope, Inc., predecessor to Varco International.

Kenneth L. Nibling.  Mr. Nibling has served as our Vice President — Human Resources and Administration since October 2005. From August 2005 to October 2005, Mr. Nibling surveyed various opportunities until accepting employment with us. He served as Vice President, Human Resources of National Oilwell Varco, Inc. from March 2005 through July 2005. He served as Varco International, Inc.’s Vice President — Human Resources and Administration from May 2000 until March 2005. Prior to that time, Mr. Nibling served as Vice President — Human Resources and Administration of Tuboscope, Inc., predecessor to Varco International.

 

Dewayne Williams.  Mr. Williams has served as our Vice President — Accounting, Corporate Controller, Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Treasurer since May 2009. From September 2005 to May 2009, Mr. Williams served as our Assistant Controller. From August 2004 until September 2005, Mr. Williams served as the Financial Reporting Manager with Core Laboratories N.V., a publicly held oilfield service company, and from December 1999 to August 2004 he served as the SEC Reporting Manager of NATCO Group Inc., a publicly held oil service company. Prior to December 1999, Mr. Williams’ experience included Financial Reporting and Accounting Manager with Enron Corp, and service as an Audit Senior with Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P and with Arthur Andersen, L.L.P. Mr. Williams is a Certified Public Accountant.

 

Our board adheres to strong corporate governance practices and has adopted corporate governance guidelines to set forth its agreements concerning overall governance practices. Our board has also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which contains general guidelines for conducting our business that applies to all of our employees, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, our principal accounting officer and our controller, and a Code of Ethics for Non-Employee Directors that applies to all of our non-employee directors. Our guidelines and codes of ethics can be found in the corporate governance section of our website at www.completeproduction.com. In the event of any future amendments to certain provisions of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or any waivers of such provisions, applicable to our directors and executive officers, we intend to disclose such amendments or waivers at the same location on our website identified above.

 

Board Qualifications, Evaluation of Nominees and Consideration of Diversity

 

Our corporate governance guidelines provide our board and Nominating Committee with a roadmap for selecting and evaluating nominees for the board and for reviewing whether continuing directors possess attributes relevant to our business. The Nominating Committee evaluates the backgrounds and skills of continuing directors using criteria consistent with the criteria considered by the Nominating Committee in recommending new director candidates, which include:

 

 

In conducting its evaluation of candidates and continuing directors, the Nominating Committee assesses each individual in the context of the board as a whole, with the goal of assembling a board that has the ability to best perpetuate our success and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment. The Nominating Committee evaluates the diversity of backgrounds, skills, work experience, geographic representation and oil and gas industry focus that it believes are critical to a successful board for our company at this time. The Nominating Committee is especially interested in:

 

 

 

Although the Nominating Committee does not expect candidates and continuing directors to possess all of the foregoing attributes, each person should exhibit one or more of those characteristics.

 

To identify nominees, the Nominating Committee typically begins by polling board members and senior management for their recommendations, and will also consider candidates who are properly proposed by stockholders. The Nominating Committee has the option of retaining a third-party search firm to identify candidates if deemed necessary or advisable. The Nominating Committee, as it deems appropriate, also may review the composition and qualification of the boards of directors of our competitors or other similarly situated companies and may seek the input of industry experts or analysts. After reviewing the qualifications, experience, background and the potential effect upon board chemistry of any new candidate, the Nominating Committee will recommend final candidates for interviews by our independent directors and members of our senior management team. Once the Nominating Committee has reviewed and deliberated over the feedback of the entire board and senior management, as well as any other information gathered about a nominee, the Nominating Committee makes its recommendation to the board. As discussed under “Other Matters — Stockholder Proposals and Nominations,” any candidates properly recommended by stockholders for nomination to the board will be evaluated in the same manner that candidates suggested by board members, management or other parties are evaluated.

 

Board Leadership Structure

 

Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles have been combined since March 2007, within the first year after we became a public company. Our board has determined that balancing the combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer with a rotating presiding director position is the most appropriate leadership structure for our company at this time. In particular, the combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer facilitates centralized coherent leadership that maximizes the effectiveness of our board, given the breadth of our board’s industry experience, the board’s relatively small size and the long-standing history of many of our directors with us.. The combined role approach also minimizes any ambiguity about accountability among senior management and directors and aligns the strategy and goals of the board with management. The board’s leadership structure additionally fosters efficient decision-making critical to the success of our operations.

 

Our board maintains a rotating presiding director position in order to maximize the valuable input from our non-employee directors. The presiding director rotates every quarter in accordance with a pre-established schedule. We believe this structure enhances the opportunity for each director to contribute and provide individualized value on a regular basis, as well as facilitates coordination and communication among the non-management directors. The presiding director presides over the quarterly executive sessions of non-management members of the board. The presiding director may also synthesize any issues raised in the executive sessions and coordinate with and communicate such issues to the next scheduled presiding director.

 

The board recognizes the importance of regularly evaluating our particular circumstances to determine if our leadership structure continues to serve the best interests of us and our stockholders. To this end, the board engages in a regular assessment of whether the then current leadership structure remains the most appropriate for us. Our corporate governance guidelines permit the board to fill the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer with one individual or two different individuals and also allow the board to appoint a

permanent presiding non-employee director. As a result, the board has the flexibility to alter its leadership structure in the future to adapt to changing circumstances as and when needed.

 

Our board understands that management has the duty to manage the risks inherent to our company, but also understands that it must oversee an enterprise-wide approach to such risk management, which is designed to enhance management’s and the board’s ability to identify, understand, evaluate, articulate and successfully manage the various risks to which we are exposed. Our approach is designed to consider the probability and impact of occurrences, to cost effectively attempt to mitigate, preempt or avoid the impact of the identified risks in a manner that balances the benefits against the costs associated with the risk, while striving to achieve improved long-term financial and operational performance and enhanced stockholder value. We recognize that an enterprise-wide approach to risk management is not a means for eliminating all risk, and is a supplement to and not a replacement for proper internal controls.

 

Our board believes that a fundamental part of risk oversight is not only understanding the risks that we face, the steps management is taking to manage those risks and the effectiveness of those steps, but also an understanding of what level of risk is appropriate for us and how that level of risk may change over time or due to circumstances. Another key component of the board’s oversight is regular communications with senior management during board and committee meetings, and otherwise as advisable, regarding risk management, control and mitigation. Management monitors and assesses risk on an ongoing basis, with a focus on the following categories of risk that are fundamental to the success of our plans: strategic, legal, environmental, financial, information technology, human capital and operational. In particular, management regularly engages in the following processes in order to monitor the foregoing areas of risk: customer and competitor analysis, management succession planning, financial statement review, bi-weekly division updates, site visits by senior management, quarterly health, safety and environmental meetings, quarterly division president meetings and market reviews. To ensure active discussion about risk management and to facilitate the board’s role in risk oversight, each quarter management reports to the board on the results of our business in such a manner as to apprise the board of the risks inherent in the risk categories described above. In addition, enterprise risk management is more comprehensively reviewed by the board as part of the annual planning and budgeting process and oversight of the same is addressed at our regularly scheduled board meetings.

 

While the board has the ultimate responsibility for the oversight of the enterprise risk management process, various committees of the board are structured to oversee specific risks and report certain strategic oversight issues to the entire board, as set forth below. The committees periodically provide updates to the board regarding material risk management issues and management’s response.

 

 

Our board has determined that each of Messrs. McShane, Ralls, Watts and Woods is an independent member of the board under the listing standards of the NYSE and has no material relationship with us that would impair such director’s independence. Our board has further determined that each of our standing

committees (i.e., Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee) is comprised solely of independent members of our board. In making these determinations, our board considered all relationships between us and the director and the director’s family members. As noted above, our board determined Mr. Watts to be independent. Mr. Watts retired as a partner of the law firm of Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP (“LLB&L”) as of December 31, 2010. Through December 31, 2010, Mr. Watts was the partner in charge of our legal services account with LLB&L. Based on the amount paid by us to LLB&L in 2010 and the absence of any other material relationship between Mr. Watts and us, our board determined that Mr. Watts is independent as of January 2011. For a discussion of transactions involving Mr. Watts, as well as Messrs. Boswell and Hamm (whom our board determined to be not independent), see “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

 

Our board held four meetings during fiscal year 2010 and acted by unanimous written consent two times. During fiscal year 2010, all directors attended at least 75% of the combined total of (i) all board meetings and (ii) all meetings of committees of the board of which the director was a member. The chairman of the board or his designee, taking into account suggestions from other board members, establishes the agenda for each board meeting and distributes it in advance to each member of the board. Each board member is free to suggest the inclusion of items on the agenda. The board regularly meets in executive session without management present. The board has a policy that all directors attend the annual meeting of stockholders, absent unusual circumstances. All of our directors attended last year’s annual meeting of stockholders.

 

Our board maintains a standing: (i) Audit Committee, (ii) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and (iii) Compensation Committee. To view the charter of each of these committees please visit our website at www.completeproduction.com. The membership of our standing committees as of the record date is as follows:

 

 

 

 

Audit Committee

 

The Audit Committee has sole authority for the appointment, compensation and oversight of our independent registered public accountants and reviews the appointment, performance and replacement of our internal auditors, and has responsibility for reviewing and discussing with our management and our independent registered public accountants (when appropriate), the audited consolidated financial statements, prior to filing or issuance, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and our unaudited condensed consolidated financial information included in our earnings press releases. The Audit Committee carries out its responsibilities in accordance with the terms of its charter.

 

W. Matt Ralls (Chairman) and Michael McShane were members of the Audit Committee throughout fiscal year 2010. R. Graham Whaling was a member of the Audit Committee until his resignation from our board in January 2010, at which time his vacancy on the Audit Committee was filled by Mr. Woods.

Messrs. Ralls, McShane and Woods are currently members of the Audit Committee. Our board has determined that all of our Audit Committee members are financially literate under the current listing standards of the NYSE and are independent under the requirements of SEC Rule 10A-3. Our board has also determined that Mr. Ralls qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the Securities Exchange Commission, or SEC. During fiscal year 2010, the Audit Committee met eleven times.

 

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

 

Marcus A. Watts (Chairman) and James D. Woods were members of the Nominating Committee throughout fiscal year 2010 and are currently members of the Nominating Committee. The Nominating Committee met once and acted by unanimous written consent once in fiscal year 2010.

 

The purpose of the Nominating Committee is to make recommendations concerning the size and composition of our board and its committees, evaluate and recommend candidates for election as directors, develop, implement and review our corporate governance policies, and evaluate the effectiveness of our board. The Nominating Committee works with the board as a whole on an annual basis to determine the appropriate skills and characteristics required of board members in the context of the current make-up of the board and its committees.

 

Our entire board is responsible for nominating members for election to the board and for filling vacancies on the board that may occur between annual meetings of the stockholders. The Nominating Committee is responsible for identifying, screening and recommending candidates to the entire board for prospective board membership. In evaluating the suitability of individuals, the Nominating Committee considers many factors, including issues of experience, integrity, qualifications (such as an understanding of finance and marketing), educational and professional background and willingness to devote adequate time to board duties. See “— Board Qualifications, Evaluation of Nominees and Consideration of Diversity.” When formulating its board membership recommendations, the Nominating Committee also considers any advice and recommendations offered by our Chief Executive Officer. The Nominating Committee may also review the composition and qualification of the board of our competitors or other companies and may seek input from industry experts. In determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the Nominating Committee also considers the board’s and each committee’s annual performance self-evaluation as well as annual individual director evaluations, which address the director’s past attendance at meetings and participation in and contributions to the activities of the board and the like. The Nominating Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that can best perpetuate the success of the business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment.

 

The Nominating Committee will consider stockholder recommendations of candidates on the same basis as it considers all other candidates. Stockholder recommendations should be submitted to us under the procedures discussed in “Other Matters — Stockholder Proposals and Nominations,” and should include the candidate’s name, age, business address, residence address, principal occupation or employment, the number of shares beneficially owned by the candidate and information that would be required to solicit a proxy under federal securities law. In addition, the notice must include the recommending stockholder’s name, address, the number of shares beneficially owned and the time period those shares have been held.

 

Compensation Committee

 

Michael McShane (Chairman) and James D. Woods were the members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal year 2010, with R. Graham Whaling serving as Chairman through his resignation on January 15, 2010. The Nominating Committee recommended for appointment, and the board appointed, Marcus A. Watts to the Compensation Committee in February 2011. Messrs. McShane, Watts and Woods are currently members of the Compensation Committee. Our board has determined that all Compensation Committee members qualify as “non-employee directors” within the meaning of Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and as “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the

Internal Revenue Code. The Compensation Committee met five times and acted by unanimous written consent six times in fiscal year 2010

 

The Compensation Committee reviews and establishes the compensation of our executives officers, including our Chief Executive Officer, on an annual basis, has direct access to third party compensation consultants, and administers our stock incentive plans, including the review and grant of stock options and restricted stock to all eligible employees under our stock incentive plans.

 

The Compensation Committee reviews annually, generally in the first quarter of each fiscal year, the base salaries for our executive officers. The Compensation Committee also determines annually, generally during the first quarter, the annual cash bonuses to be awarded to our executive officers and certain members of senior management based upon pre-established financial performance criteria set under the Management Incentive Plan for the prior fiscal year and our performance relative to such criteria. In addition, under our equity grant policy, the Compensation Committee makes grants of equity awards at least annually and the grant date for the annual grant has been established as the last business day of January. Our Chief Executive Officer makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding our other executive officers’ compensation based on his evaluation of the performance of each other executive officer against objectives established by our Chief Executive Officer and the executive officer at the beginning of each year, the officer’s scope of responsibilities, our financial performance, retention considerations and general economic and competitive conditions.

 

The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to retain consultants and advisors as it may deem appropriate in its discretion, and the Compensation Committee has the sole authority to approve related fees and other retention terms. Since September 2006, the Compensation Committee has engaged Pearl Meyer & Partners (“PM&P”), independent compensation consultants, to advise the Compensation Committee on an ongoing basis. The consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee and works closely with our Vice President — Human Resources and Administration, who is management’s representative to the Compensation Committee. PM&P, when invited, attends meetings of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee determines when to hire, terminate or replace the consultant, and which projects are to be performed by the consultant. During fiscal 2010 and early 2011, the Compensation Committee directed PM&P to provide: (i) a summary report on projected 2010 increases in base salaries and total cash compensation for executives in the energy and energy services sector; (ii) a comprehensive market analysis of our executives’ 2010 compensation forms and levels, including an analysis of share allocation and usage levels, executive benefits and perquisites, and severance and change of control provisions; (iii) a framework for determining 2010 long-term incentive compensation; (iv) a summary report on recent developments in corporate governance and executive compensation; (v) a review of our Compensation Committee charter; (vi) a comprehensive market analysis of our director compensation forms and levels; (vii) a brief analysis of our financial performance compared to our peer group; and (viii) a summary overview of the 401(k) plans of our peer group. The only services provided by PM&P during 2010 were as directed by the Compensation Committee related to executive compensation and as directed by the Nominating Committee related to director compensation and evaluations.

 

Interested persons, including our stockholders, may communicate with our board, including our non-management directors, by sending a letter to our Secretary at our principal executive offices at 11700 Katy Freeway, Suite 300, Houston, Texas 77079. Our Secretary will submit all correspondence to the board or to any specific director to whom the correspondence is directed.

 

Our executive officers do not receive additional compensation for their service as directors. The table below summarizes the compensation received by our non-employee directors for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In December 2010, the Compensation Committee commissioned from PM&P a report on our director compensation program and a market analysis of director compensation trends. The report showed that (i) the annual cash retainer of $35,000 paid to our non-employee directors is well below the market median of $47,500 within our peer group; (ii) our annual total cash compensation is significantly less than our peer group’s median; (iii) our long term equity incentive grants of $100,000 are substantially less than our peer group’s median long term equity incentive grant levels of approximately $190,000 and (iv) total direct compensation for our non- employee directors, on average, was approximately $172,000 in 2010, compared to a median total of approximately $250,000 for our peer group. Our peer group for purposes of PM&P’s director compensation review is the same as the peer group described under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Approach for Determining Form and Amount of Compensation — Comparison to Market Practices.” The Compensation Committee had previously considered increasing director compensation in November 2008, but decided to maintain it at the level in effect since February 2007, the last time we increased director compensation, in light of the decline in economic and industry conditions in 2008. In December 2010 and early 2011, the Compensation Committee approved the following changes to our compensation program for non-employee directors:

 

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines.  In early 2011, the Compensation Committee recommended to our board for approval, and our board approved, new stock ownership guidelines for our named executive officers and non-employee directors. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Long-term Equity Incentive Awards — Stock Options and Restricted Stock — Stock Ownership Guidelines” for a description of the guidelines as they apply to our named executive officers. Under the guidelines, a non-employee director will have five years, beginning as of January 1, 2011, to attain the required ownership threshold, which was established as a share value equal to five times the annual cash retainer for such non-employee director. Compliance with the new ownership guidelines will be assessed on an annual basis as of December 31 of the applicable year.

 

The Audit Committee of our board has selected Grant Thornton LLP (“Grant Thornton”) as our independent registered public accountants for the year ending December 31, 2011, and the board has directed that management submit the selection of independent registered public accountants for ratification by the stockholders at the annual meeting. A representative of Grant Thornton is expected to be present at the annual meeting and will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she so desires and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

Stockholder ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton as our independent registered public accountants is not required by our bylaws or otherwise. However, the board is submitting the selection of Grant Thornton to the stockholders for ratification as a matter of corporate practice. If the stockholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain that firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders.

 

Board Recommendation

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF GRANT THORNTON LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011.

 

The following table shows ownership of our common stock on April 11, 2011, based on 78,902,708 shares of common stock outstanding on that date, by (i) each person known to us to own beneficially more than five percent (5%) of our capital stock; (ii) each director and nominee; (iii) our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and each of our other three most highly compensated executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2010 (collectively the “named executive officers”); and (iv) all of our current directors and nominees, named executive officers and executive officers as a group. Except to the extent indicated in the footnotes to the following table, the person or entity listed has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the shares that are deemed beneficially owned by such person or entity, subject to community property laws, where applicable:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity Compensation Plan Information

 

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2010, about compensation plans under which shares of our common stock may be issued to employees, consultants or non-employee directors of our board of directors upon exercise of options, warrants or rights.

 

 

 

 

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section discusses the compensation programs and policies for our named executive officers and the Compensation Committee’s role in the design and administration of these programs and policies, as well as specific compensation decisions for our named executive officers, who consist of:

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The Compensation Committee evaluates and establishes our executive’s compensation pursuant to a strategy that balances the stability of a base salary with appropriate equity incentives and performance-based cash awards. Generally, an employee’s level of responsibility correlates to the amount of compensation at risk, with greater responsibility equating to a higher proportion of total compensation mix being attributable to equity awards and performance-based cash bonuses.

 

Review of 2010 Financial Performance

 

Our financial and operational performance for our fiscal year 2010 was strong and greatly improved compared to 2009. Our improved performance was also reflected in the value delivered to our stockholders based on our stock price, which more than doubled in 2010. Highlights included:

 

 

 

2010 Compensation Highlights

 

Fiscal year 2009 was a challenging year due to the continued downturn in the economy, volatility in the oil and gas industry and reduced demand for our completion and production services. In 2009, we implemented strict cost saving measures and focused on generating cash flow and net income. In early 2010, in light of the continued challenging economic environment and the difficulties in assessing the magnitude and duration of the industry’s recovery, coupled with a desire to provide our management with additional incentive to improve 2010 financial and operating performance, the Compensation Committee took the following steps:

 

 

 

In July 2010, the Compensation Committee considered the favorable trends in our business relative to the challenging market conditions we experienced in 2009, and the increase in our asset utilization and pricing in most of our business lines and in most of our operating areas in the first two quarters of 2010, and took the following additional actions in recognition of improving conditions and to continue to provide appropriate performance incentives to our management:

 

 

Because we achieved net income and exceeded our “stretch” level of targeted Adjusted EBITDA in 2010, we paid 200% of the applicable target bonus opportunity under our MIP. The foregoing Compensation Committee actions resulted in higher total compensation than in 2009, in keeping with our philosophy of pay in line with performance, with each of Messrs. Winkler and Moore earning 200% of their original target bonus opportunity and Messrs. Bayardo, Maroney and Nibling earning 229%, 222% and 221%, respectively, of their original target bonus opportunity. Our bonus awards and further achievements during the fiscal year are discussed in more detail below.

 

2011 Developments and Changes

 

After giving consideration to our strong 2010 financial and operating performance, the Compensation Committee, in an effort to continue its pay for performance practices, implemented the following changes for 2011:

 

 

Compensation Governance and Best Practices

 

We strive to maintain strong governance standards with respect to our compensation programs, procedures and practices. The Compensation Committee has, among other things, taken the following actions in recent years:

 

 

Objectives and Elements of our Compensation Programs and Policies

 

The Compensation Committee’s objective is to provide a total compensation package that is balanced with the proper incentives and is competitive with public companies within our peer group, while aligning the interests of our executives with our stockholders. We believe a significant portion of compensation should be tied to our measurable performance, and our pay strategy for senior management results in a significant percentage of annual compensation being delivered in the form of equity, rather than cash. Our pay strategy also places more compensation at risk in the form of annual incentive opportunities and equity awards for employees with higher levels of responsibility. The following table summarizes the elements of compensation, the Compensation Committee’s strategy with respect to that element and the objectives served.

 

 

Consistent with our performance-based philosophy, we reserve the largest potential compensation awards for performance-based programs. Our annual performance-based cash bonus program rewards our short-term financial performance, while our long-term equity awards reward our long-term stock price performance and align the interests of our senior management with our stockholders. The average mix of 2010 compensation paid to our named executive officers is reflected below. Approximately 78% of our named executive officers’ pay is performance-based in the form of annual cash performance awards and long-term equity incentive awards.

 

Average NEO Compensation Mix

 

 

Approach for Determining Form and Amount of Compensation

 

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves all compensation decisions relating to our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers. Our Chief Executive Officer provides significant input regarding the compensation decisions of the other executive officers and annually makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee for consideration.

Use of Compensation Consultant

 

The Compensation Committee has retained Pearl Meyer & Partners (“PM&P”) since September 2006 as its compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee on an as needed basis. PM&P reports directly to the Compensation Committee and works closely with our Vice President — Human Resources and Administration, who is management’s representative to the Compensation Committee. PM&P, when invited, attends meetings of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee determines when to hire, terminate or replace the consultant, and which projects are to be performed by the consultant. PM&P did not provide any other services to the Company during 2010, other than to the Nominating Committee with respect to director compensation and evaluations.

 

Comparison to Market Practices

 

In January 2010, the Compensation Committee commissioned PM&P to perform a comprehensive market analysis of our executives’ compensation forms and levels. In its January 2010 report, PM&P compared our executives’ compensation forms and levels to peer company proxy data for the following pay components: (i) base salary; (ii) target annual cash incentives; (iii) target total cash compensation; (iv) long-term incentives (using grant date fair values); and (v) total direct compensation (target total cash compensation plus long-term incentives). In addition, in January 2010, the Compensation Committee commissioned PM&P to perform a study of long-term incentive trends and an analysis of peer group and our own share allocation and usage levels.

 

The Compensation Committee worked closely with management and the consultant to define the peer group companies in the oilfield products and services industry, determining to exclude certain companies which were considered too large or not comparable.

 

The peer group reviewed for early 2010 compensation determinations consisted of the same group of companies as the 2009 peer group, as set forth in the table below. In June 2010, to assess the impact of improving market and industry conditions on executive compensation practices, the Compensation Committee commissioned PM&P to update its comprehensive market analysis and review of our executives’ compensation

forms and levels. The peer group reviewed for the June 2010 report consisted of the same group of companies as the January 2010 and the 2009 peer groups.

 

 

 

 

All of the peer group companies are in the oil and gas field services industry, with the exception of Dresser-Rand Group Inc., which is in the engines and turbines industry. The data was regressed to reflect comparables for a company with a revenue size of $1.2 billion for named executive officers, and was trended to January 1, 2010 using an annual average aging factor of 3.2%, which the consultant advised was reflective of the slowing trend in compensation increases during the economic downturn and an anticipated modest increase in executive pay as of October 2009. The Compensation Committee intends to continually monitor the peer group to ensure that it is appropriate for benchmarking purposes.

Goals and Objectives for Form of Compensation Relative to Market

 

The Compensation Committee strives to target compensation for our named executive officers and other members of the senior management team relative to the market, as defined by the peer group described above, as follows:

 

 

We believe in retaining the best talent among our senior executive management team. While our pay philosophies were established as guidelines, the Compensation Committee also considers the performance of the executive officer over time, as well as our financial and operating performance and the performance of our stock price, as described above. To retain and motivate these key individuals, and while being mindful of industry and market conditions, the Compensation Committee may determine that it is in our best interests to provide total compensation packages with one or more members of our senior executive management that may deviate from the general principle of targeting compensation at the levels discussed above.

 

Components of Compensation

 

Base Salaries

 

Base salaries provide our executive officers with a degree of financial certainty and stability. In order to attract and retain highly qualified executives, in 2006 the Compensation Committee established a philosophy to provide base salaries comparable to those being paid by our peer group companies, targeting base salaries at the median market rates. The Compensation Committee annually reviews and determines the base salaries of our named executive officers. Salaries also are reviewed in the case of executive promotions or other significant changes in responsibilities. The Compensation Committee typically takes into consideration the Chief Executive Officer’s recommendations based on his evaluation of the performance of each other named executive officer against objectives established by the Chief Executive Officer and the executive at the beginning of each year and his subjective assessment of their performance during the year, the executive’s scope of responsibilities, our financial performance, retention considerations and general economic and competitive conditions.

 

In January 2010, the Compensation Committee reviewed the January 2010 study prepared by PM&P, which showed that our named executive officers’ 2009 base salaries were below the market median, with an average competitive position at the 21st percentile, and that total direct compensation at target performance was, on average, 70% of market median (with 2009 total direct compensation consisting of base salary and long-term equity incentive awards only given the suspension of the MIP in 2009). The Compensation Committee also compared our base salaries in effect prior to the March 2009 reduction and found them to be positioned at 94% of the market median. Although the pre-reduction salaries were closer to the Compensation Committee’s stated objectives of paying at market median, due to the challenging economic environment and difficulties in assessing the magnitude and duration of the recovery period, the Compensation Committee determined in January 2010 to keep base salaries at the reduced levels established in March 2009, as set forth in the table below.

 

In June 2010, in light of our improved financial and operational performance, and in order to best assess the impact of improving market and industry conditions on executive compensation practices, the Compensation Committee commissioned PM&P to update its comprehensive market analysis and review of our executives’ compensation forms and levels. The June 2010 report showed that base salaries in effect since April 2009 for our named executive officers and certain other members of senior management were, on average, at the 23rd percentile of the market. Based on the June 2010 report, and in line with our continued commitment to pay at market median and our improved outlook, the Compensation Committee determined to

increase base salaries as set forth in the table below. For the remainder of 2010, the named executive officers’ base salaries were at or slightly above the market median, as shown below. The Compensation Committee believed these increases were necessary for retaining our senior management team and encouraging the continued achievement of our short-term operational goals and long-term strategic objectives.

 

 

 

 

In January 2011, base salaries for our named executive officers and other members of our senior management team were increased by 4%. The Compensation Committee took this step based on PM&P’s June 2010 report, which found that full year base salaries for our named executive officers and other members of our senior management team were generally positioned at the 45th percentile of market and base salaries in 2011 for companies in the energy services sector are expected to increase by 3.5% to 4.0%. The increase in base salaries helps to ensure the Compensation Committee moves closer to its stated objective of targeting full year base salaries to be at the market median.

 

Annual Performance-Based Cash Bonuses

 

We maintain an annual cash performance-based bonus program titled the Management Incentive Plan, or MIP. Under our MIP, annual cash bonuses are earned based upon annual financial performance measures and targets established by the Compensation Committee at the commencement of each year. The MIP provides for four levels of targeted financial performance and corresponding payouts as a percentage of bonus opportunity: “Entry” paying at 10% of bonus opportunity; “Expected Value” paying at 100% of bonus opportunity; “Over Achievement” paying at 150% of bonus opportunity; and “Stretch” paying at 200% of bonus opportunity, with linear interpolation between the measures. Individual target bonus opportunity is expressed as a percentage of each participant’s base salary, which varies based on position. Based on market data initially reviewed by the Compensation Committee in early 2006, and revisited in 2010 based on PM&P’s January and June 2010 reports, this program facilitates our objective of aligning total direct compensation (base salaries, annual performance-based cash bonuses, and long-term equity awards) between the median and 75th percentile when our performance under our annual cash bonus plan is between the “Expected Value” and “Over Achievement” levels.

 

2010 Reinstatement of MIP after 2009 Suspension

 

The Compensation Committee suspended the MIP in 2009 due to challenging economic and industry conditions and related uncertainties. In March 2010, the Compensation Committee reviewed and evaluated the parameters of our annual MIP in light of our board-approved budget and strategic plan and current economic and industry conditions. In order to provide incentives for the executive officers to improve financial and

operating results and to properly reward achievement of 2010 goals, the Compensation Committee determined to reinstate the MIP for 2010 under slightly revised parameters as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

July 2010 Modifications to Target Bonus Opportunity

 

In July 2010, after reviewing PM&P’s updated report on executive compensation and assessing the general improvement in economic and industry conditions, as well as indicators of our own improved financial performance and outlook, the Compensation Committee approved a modification to the 2010 MIP as it related to the target bonus opportunities for our named executive officers. Under the modified 2010 MIP,

 

 

 

 

2010 MIP Targets

 

At the beginning of each calendar year, the Compensation Committee establishes in writing the financial performance criteria to be used for that fiscal year and the “Entry,” “Expected Value,” “Over Achievement” and “Stretch” performance levels related to that performance criteria. For fiscal 2010, the Compensation Committee adopted Adjusted EBITDA as the performance criteria in response to the impact of the reduced market activity and pricing that occurred in 2009 and our resulting focus on cash flow as we returned to profitability. In setting the actual Adjusted EBITDA targets for the year, the Compensation Committee considered, among other factors, our prior financial performance, budgeted performance and anticipated developments. For purposes of the 2010 MIP, Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure consisting of net income (loss) from continuing operations before net interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization, non-controlling interest and impairment loss, as reported in our public filings with the SEC.

 

In 2010, the performance objectives for our named executive officers were based completely on targeted Adjusted EBITDA for the first six months (40% weighting), the second six months (40% weighting) and the full year (20% weighting), as set forth in the table below. Following the end of the year in which the performance objectives are to be achieved, the Compensation Committee determines whether and to what extent the specified performance objectives have been achieved.

 

 

2010 MIP Actual Performance

 

Adjusted EBITDA was $141.2 million for the first half of 2010, $233.7 million for the second half of 2010 and $374.9 million for full year 2010, resulting in “Stretch” bonus awards, or 200% of each named executive officer’s bonus opportunity being payable for each of the three performance periods. The Compensation Committee determined that based on $84.2 million of net income for the year ended December 31, 2010, the higher target bonus opportunities payable in the event of net income discussed above would be applicable. This resulted in an actual weighted target bonus opportunity for each of our named executive officers equal to the target bonus opportunity for the full fiscal year with net income. The actual amounts awarded under the MIP to our named executive officers for fiscal year 2010, based on 200% of target bonus opportunity being payable, are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table.

 

2011 MIP

 

In March 2011, based on the recommendation of management, the Compensation Committee (i) determined to return to one annual performance period for the MIP (January 1 — December 31, 2011), (ii) established the performance metric for the named executive officers based on the achievement of pre-established levels of targeted EPS, and (iii) continued the target bonus opportunities as a percentage of base salary that were established in July 2010 for the performance period covering the second half of 2010

 

Long-term Equity Incentive Awards — Stock Options and Restricted Stock

 

Stock options and shares of restricted stock provide an incentive for our executives and other employees to focus their efforts towards a strategy that will increase our market value, as represented by our stock price. Capital accumulation from vested and unvested equity in these programs serves as a method for motivating and retaining our executives. Our employees, including our named executive officers, are eligible to participate in our annual grant of equity awards, which are made effective on the last business day of January in accordance with our Equity Award Policy. Grants of equity awards to our employees at other times during the year occur generally only in connection with certain events, such as a new hire, promotions, pursuant to obligations assumed in connection with acquisitions, or the achievement of certain individual or departmental performance objectives.

 

In connection with our initial public offering, the Compensation Committee established equity grant guidelines based on input from the compensation consultant and review of market practices. The guidelines established for our senior management, including our named executive officers, is to provide equity awards based on the value of the award on the date of grant as a multiple of the executive’s base salary. Our equity grant guidelines are consistent with our emphasis on long-term compensation that closely ties our executives’ compensation with the price of our common stock and satisfies our objective to link executive compensation to stockholder return. The Compensation Committee reviews these guidelines each year, and, as part of its review, considers the equity practices of our peer group and related market data, current and proposed total direct compensation, the rate of our share usage, the dilution of our common stock, and individual and

corporate performance achievements. The grant guidelines for each executive officer as originally approved in 2007 and as continued in 2010 were as follows:

 

 

The total value of the equity awards granted based on these guidelines is divided 35% for options and 65% for shares of restricted stock. The valuation of the options is based on a Black-Scholes model of option valuation, and the valuation of restricted stock is based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The Compensation Committee believes that the 35% options/65% restricted stock ratio, which was first implemented in 2008 and represented a shift toward a greater percentage of restricted stock, reduces our annual rate of share usage and helps address the retention disincentive created by underwater options and the potential that in a slowly rising or down market the “cost” of the options to us may be more than the value delivered to the recipient.

 

The Compensation Committee reviewed PM&P’s January 2010 report for market norms and trends for long-term incentive compensation. PM&P’s January 2010 report relied on the same peer group reviewed as part of the compensation consultant’s January 2009 review of our long-term incentive compensation and found that our named executive officers’ and senior management team’s long-term equity incentive values were, on average, at 83% of the market median and 61% of the 75th percentile of market. In order to continue to properly incentivize our executive officers while conserving our cash liquidity, and in light of the lower value of awards delivered in 2009 (81% of guideline value due to poor stock price performance), the Compensation Committee determined that equity awards granted in 2010 would be calculated as a multiple of base salary in accordance with our guidelines, but the base salary used to calculate the number of equity awards to be granted would be the higher base salary that was in effect as of January 1, 2009, prior to the 20% base salary reduction that took effect on March 1, 2009.

 

The Compensation Committee annually reviews the rate of share usage and dilution of our common stock resulting from the grant of our equity awards. In setting 2010 equity awards, the Compensation Committee reviewed our fiscal year 2009 rate of share usage of 2.86% (unadjusted) of the common shares outstanding, which was above the 75th percentile of the peer group companies. With stock price increases during 2010, our 2010 rate of share usage returned to normal levels, generally considered to be between the market median and 75th percentile, of less than 2.0% (unadjusted) of the common shares outstanding.

 

2011 Overview

 

As discussed above, the Compensation Committee commissioned an updated report on executive compensation practices and market trends from PM&P in June 2010. Our stated goals and objectives for long-term equity incentive awards are to target grant values between the market median and 75th percentile of market. PM&P’s June 2010 report showed that overall, our target salary grant multiples that form the basis of our equity grant guidelines position our executive officers, on average, at 71% of the average of the targeted value range. After considering the June 2010 report and in an effort to move closer to our goal of targeting long-term equity incentive values between the market median and 75th percentile of market, the Compensation

Committee determined in January 2011 to increase the equity grant guidelines as follows, effective January 1, 2011:

 

 

Delegation of Authority to Grant Equity Awards

 

Our board of directors maintains an Equity Award Sub-Committee, with our Chief Executive Officer serving as the sole member of this committee. The Compensation Committee and the board delegated to this committee the authority to grant equity awards to employees who are not Section 16 officers. The foregoing delegation is generally subject to the following limitations and conditions:

 

 

In accordance with this delegation of authority, for fiscal year 2010, the Equity Award Sub-Committee granted 37,700 options and 333,200 shares of restricted stock on our annual grant date of the last business day of January, which was January 29, 2010. The Equity Award Sub-Committee also was authorized to grant an aggregate of 60,000 options and shares of restricted stock to new hires throughout 2010 and actually granted zero options and 18,700 shares of restricted stock to new hires during the course of the year.

 

Policies with Respect to Equity Compensation Awards Determinations

 

Our board of directors and Compensation Committee maintain a written policy regarding granting of equity awards. Under our policy, we make grants of equity awards at least once annually and the grant date for the annual grant has been established as the last business day of January. The date of approval for such grants must precede, or occur on, the last business day of January. All options must be granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The Compensation Committee, in approving the annual grants is required to (i) specify the annual grants of equity awards to be made to each executive officer who is required to file reports pursuant to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, and (ii) specify the total grants to be made to the employees as a group comprising each of our business units and/or divisions, as applicable. The Equity Award Sub-Committee, consisting of our Chief Executive Officer, may then allocate the equity awards to the specific employees within such business units and/or divisions and such allocation shall be complete and evidenced by a unanimous written consent executed by the Equity Award Sub-Committee on or before the last business day of January.

 

The Compensation Committee and the Equity Award Sub-Committee may from time to time grant equity awards in addition to the annual grant effective as of a specified future date or upon the occurrence of a specified and objectively determinable future event, such as an individual’s commencement of employment or promotion, in which case such future date shall be the date of grant of the equity award. In no event may the grant date of an equity award be made effective as of a date earlier than the approval date of the award and in no event may the exercise price of an option grant be less than the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

In early 2011, the Compensation Committee recommended, and our board approved, stock ownership guidelines for our named executive officers and non-employee directors. Under the guidelines, named executive officers will have five years, beginning as of January 1, 2011, to attain the required ownership threshold, which was established as a share value equal to six times base salary, in the case of our Chief Executive Officer, and three times base salary, in the case of our other named executive officers. Compliance with the new ownership guidelines will be assessed on an annual basis as of December 31 of the applicable year. Unvested shares of restricted stock count toward satisfaction of the ownership guidelines, while vested and unvested outstanding options do not count towards satisfaction of the guidelines. Our board retains the discretion to amend these stock ownership guidelines, including the guidelines applicable to non-employee directors, from time to time.

 

Severance and Change of Control Agreements

 

Since 2006, the Compensation Committee has maintained agreements for the members of our senior management (currently totaling 12 employees), including our named executive officers, that provide such employees with certain payments and other benefits in the event of a change of control, in the event of a qualifying termination of employment in connection with a change of control and in the event of certain terminations of employment not related to a change of control. In originally adopting these agreements, the Compensation Committee considered the then existing terms of the agreement with our Chief Executive Officer providing certain severance and change of control benefits, and the then existing terms of the employment letters with our executive officers providing certain severance benefits. The Compensation Committee also sought to provide relative internal equity among the participants.

 

The benefits payable to our named executive officers in connection with a change of control vary with position and range from a multiple of three (for our CEO) to two and a half (for the other named executive officers) times salary and termination bonus, based on position, plus continuation of 401(k) contribution and health and other benefits for a period of years multiplied by the applicable multiple. These payments and benefits are payable only upon a double trigger, wherein the executive’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by the executive for good reason within six months prior to or two years following a change of control. The payments and benefits also include full acceleration of all equity awards upon a change of control (i.e., a single trigger). Gross-up payments to reimburse for excise taxes payable by the executive are provided to our named executive officers. These provisions are prevalent in our industry and ensure that the named executive officers will receive the full value of the expected payments. These provisions were also negotiated by certain of our executives at the time of their hiring. These agreements are designed to retain our executive officers and provide continuity of management in the event of an actual or threatened change in control and to ensure that our executive officers direct their energies to creating the best deal for our stockholders without concern for their personal prospects.

 

The agreements also provide certain benefits and payments in the event a named executive officer is terminated without cause. The benefits payable to our named executive officers in connection with this type of termination vary with position and range from a multiple of two (for our CEO) to one and two-thirds (for the other named executive officers) times salary and bonus, based on position, plus acceleration of all equity awards, and continuation of health and other benefits for a period of years multiplied by the applicable multiple. These provisions were consistent with the letter agreements of the executive officers and certain of the terms of our Chief Executive Officer’s agreement. These benefits were also prevalent in approximately two-thirds of the companies reviewed. A more complete description of the material terms of our severance and change of control arrangements can be found under “— Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control.”

 

Perquisites and Other Benefits

 

The only perquisite that we provide to our named executive officers that is not provided to our employees generally is a car allowance with an incremental cost of less than $10,000 per year and a physical exam with

an incremental cost of less than $2,000 per year. The car allowance is intended to cover expenses related to the lease, purchase, insurance and maintenance of a vehicle. It is provided in recognition of the need to have executive officers visit customers, business partners and other stakeholders in order to fulfill their job responsibilities. This travel causes wear and tear on personal vehicles and increases fuel expenses. We believe that providing this benefit is a relatively inexpensive way to enhance the competitiveness of the executive’s compensation package.

 

In November 2008, following a review by PM&P of our peer groups, the Compensation Committee established a nonqualified deferred compensation plan (the “DCP”), which is intended to be an excess benefit restoration plan, for our executive officers and other members of senior management. The DCP became effective as of January 1, 2009 and is similar to and operates in conjunction with our Complete Production Services Inc. 401(k) Employee Savings Plan (the “401(k) Plan”). Section 401(k) of the Code limits contributions and company matching for certain employees earning specified amounts in any year. As in the 401(k) Plan, contributions to the DCP are voluntary. The terms of the DCP permit us to match, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, an executive’s elective deferrals (up to 4% of the executive’s base salary, less the matching contributions we made under the 401(k) Plan) as well as to make discretionary contributions. The Compensation Committee felt that this was a valuable and appropriate benefit for the executives as it helped them plan for retirement and given that we do not provide any supplemental retirement benefits or other form of deferred compensation plan.

 

In 2009, based on management’s recommendation, the Compensation Committee determined to suspend company contributions to the DCP and our 401(k) Plan, effective as of May 1, 2009. Effective as of January 1, 2011, the Compensation Committee amended the 401(k) Plan to provide for reinstatement of matching contributions equal to 100% of a participant’s elective deferrals under the 401(k) Plan, in an amount not to exceed (i) 4% of the participant’s base salary plus cash bonus for the fiscal year, minus (ii) $9,800. The Compensation Committee also amended the DCP to provide for the reinstatement of contributions as of January 1, 2011.

 

Deductibility of Compensation

 

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the tax deductibility by a company of annual compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to certain of our executive officers. However, performance-based compensation that has been approved by stockholders is excluded from the $1,000,000 limit if, among other requirements, the compensation is payable only upon attainment of pre-established, objective performance goals and our board of directors’ committee that establishes such goals consists only of “outside directors.” All members of the Compensation Committee are intended to qualify as “outside directors.” Additionally, stock options will qualify for the performance-based exception where, among other requirements, the exercise price of the option is not less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant, and the plan includes a per-executive limitation on the number of shares for which options may be granted during a specified period. Our stock option grants under our equity plans are intended to meet the criteria of performance-based compensation under Section 162(m), while our restricted stock awards do not qualify as performance-based compensation. Compensation paid under the 2010 MIP did not qualify as performance-based compensation because the Compensation Committee established the 2010 MIP parameters outside of the time frames required under Section 162(m). As a result, approximately $3 million of the compensation paid by us to our named executive officers in 2010 was not deductible under Section 162(m) (including approximately $2.3 million of compensation paid to Mr. Winkler, our Chief Executive Officer).

 

The Compensation Committee considers the anticipated tax treatment to us and our executive officers when reviewing executive compensation and our compensation programs. While the tax impact of any compensation arrangement is one factor to be considered, such impact is evaluated in light of the Compensation Committee’s overall compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee will consider ways to maximize the deductibility of executive compensation, while retaining the discretion it deems necessary to compensate officers in a manner commensurate with performance and the competitive environment for executive talent. From time to time, the Compensation Committee may award compensation to our executive officers that is not fully deductible if it determines that such award is consistent with its

philosophy and is in our and our stockholders best interests, such as time vested grants of restricted stock or retention bonuses, as part of initial employment offers.

 

Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code impose certain adverse tax consequences on compensation treated as excess parachute payments. An executive is treated as having received excess parachute payments for purposes of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code if he or she receives compensatory payments or benefits that are contingent on a change in the ownership or control of a corporation, and the aggregate amount of such contingent compensatory payments and benefits equal or exceeds three times the executive’s base amount. If this occurs, the portion of the payments and benefits in excess of one times the base amount is treated as an excess parachute payment subject to a 20% excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, in addition to any applicable federal income and employment taxes. Also, the corporation’s compensation deduction in respect of the executive’s excess parachute payment is disallowed under Section 280G of the Code. If we were to be subject to a change of control, certain amounts received by our executives (for example, amounts attributable to the accelerated vesting of stock options and the payments and benefits payable upon a qualifying termination following a change of control) could be excess parachute payments under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code. We provide certain of our executive officers with tax gross-up payments in the event of a qualifying termination in connection with a change of control as the Compensation Committee believes this is consistent with market practice within our industry and these terms were negotiated by the executives in connection with their hiring.

 

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation

 

The Company has not previously conducted an advisory vote of the stockholders on executive compensation.

 

 

Summary Compensation Table

 

The following table sets forth summary information concerning the compensation awarded, paid to, or earned by each of our named executive officers for all services rendered in all capacities to us for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth summary information regarding all grants of plan-based awards made to our named executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2010:

 

 

 

 

 

The following table sets forth summary information regarding the outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers at December 31, 2010: