SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
[X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 | |
OR | ||
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FROM THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-7521
FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
TEXAS (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
74-1504405 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
4001 HOMESTEAD ROAD, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77028-5585
(Address of principal executive office) (zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code (713) 672-9433
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X | No |
Yes | No X |
At June 30, 2006, the number of shares outstanding of the issuers only class of stock was 6,666,626 shares of Common Stock.
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES,
INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
JUNE 30, 2006 | MARCH 31, 2006 | ||||||||||
Unaudited |
|||||||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 715,397 | $ | 1,982,526 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for bad debts and cash
discounts of $37,276 at June 30 and March 31, 2006 |
19,176,123 | 17,494,313 | |||||||||
Inventories |
25,234,081 | 27,956,921 | |||||||||
Other |
25,360 | 117,243 | |||||||||
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS |
45,150,961 | 47,551,003 | |||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT: |
|||||||||||
Land |
1,118,273 | 486,653 | |||||||||
Buildings
and yard improvements |
4,106,153 | 4,088,149 | |||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
21,653,269 | 20,852,126 | |||||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
(17,890,866 | ) | (17,653,265 | ) | |||||||
8,986,829 | 7,773,663 | ||||||||||
OTHER ASSETS: |
|||||||||||
Cash value of officers life insurance |
618,617 | 606,223 | |||||||||
Deferred tax asset |
48,213 | | |||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 54,804,620 | $ | 55,930,889 | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|||||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
$ | 13,040,448 | $ | 16,713,944 | |||||||
Income taxes payable |
1,074,888 | 143,196 | |||||||||
Deferred credit for LIFO replacement |
125,275 | | |||||||||
Dividends payable |
533,330 | 533,330 | |||||||||
Contribution to profit sharing plan |
67,500 | 256,000 | |||||||||
Employee compensation and related expenses |
796,428 | 736,723 | |||||||||
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES |
15,637,869 | 18,383,193 | |||||||||
DEFERRED
INCOME TAXES |
| 4,618 | |||||||||
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS |
457,605 | 445,743 | |||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|||||||||||
Common stock, par value $1: |
|||||||||||
Authorized
shares 10,000,000 |
|||||||||||
Issued
shares 7,842,342 at June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006 |
7,842,342 | 7,842,342 | |||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
28,663,814 | 28,663,814 | |||||||||
Treasury
stock at cost (1,175,716 shares at June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006) |
(5,475,964 | ) | (5,475,964 | ) | |||||||
Retained
earnings |
7,678,954 | 6,067,143 | |||||||||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
38,709,146 | 37,097,335 | |||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 54,804,620 | $ | 55,930,889 | |||||||
2
FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS UNAUDITED
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | |||||||||
2006 | 2005 | ||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 52,623,730 | $ | 46,057,585 | |||||
Costs and expenses |
|||||||||
Costs of goods sold |
47,747,054 | 42,944,172 | |||||||
General, selling and administrative costs |
1,574,457 | 1,344,980 | |||||||
49,321,511 | 44,289,152 | ||||||||
Interest and other income |
(57,448 | ) | (45,535 | ) | |||||
Earnings before income taxes |
3,359,667 | 1,813,968 | |||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes: |
|||||||||
Current |
1,267,357 | 701,633 | |||||||
Deferred |
(52,831 | ) | (18,432 | ) | |||||
1,214,526 | 683,201 | ||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 2,145,141 | $ | 1,130,767 | |||||
Average number of common shares outstanding: |
|||||||||
Basic |
6,666,626 | 7,139,747 | |||||||
Diluted |
6,766,927 | 7,278,541 | |||||||
Net earnings per share: |
|||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.16 | |||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.32 | $ | 0.16 | |||||
Cash dividends declared per common share |
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 |
3
FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS UNAUDITED
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | |||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|||||||||||
Net earnings |
$ | 2,145,141 | $ | 1,130,767 | |||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by
operating activities: |
|||||||||||
Depreciation |
237,600 | 231,000 | |||||||||
Provision (benefit) for deferred taxes |
(52,831 | ) | (18,432 | ) | |||||||
Change
in post retirement benefits |
11,862 | 11,325 | |||||||||
Decrease (increase) in operating assets: |
|||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(1,681,810 | ) | 2,421,009 | ||||||||
Inventories |
2,722,840 | 3,036,263 | |||||||||
Prepaid
federal income taxes |
| 600,948 | |||||||||
Other current assets |
91,883 | 105,059 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: |
|||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(3,673,496 | ) | (1,056,098 | ) | |||||||
Contribution to profit-sharing plan payable |
(188,500 | ) | (202,000 | ) | |||||||
Employee compensation and related expenses |
59,705 | (74,417 | ) | ||||||||
Federal income taxes payable |
931,692 | | |||||||||
Deferred credit for LIFO replacement
|
125,275 | | |||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING
ACTIVITIES |
729,361 | 6,185,424 | |||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|||||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
(1,450,766 | ) | (51,868 | ) | |||||||
Decrease
(increase) in cash surrender value of officers life
insurance |
(12,394 | ) | (9,056 | ) | |||||||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
(1,463,160 | ) | (60,924 | ) | |||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|||||||||||
Cash dividends paid |
(533,330 | ) | (571,180 | ) | |||||||
Principal payments on notes payable |
| (2,897 | ) | ||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) IN FINANCING
ACTIVITIES |
(533,330 | ) | (574,077 | ) | |||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
(1,267,129 | ) | 5,550,423 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
1,982,526 | 205,375 | |||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD |
$ | 715,397 | $ | 5,755,798 | |||||||
4
FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
CONDENSED NOTES TO QUARTERLY REPORT UNAUDITED
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
NOTE A BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed, consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006.
NOTE B INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of prime coil, non-standard coil and tubular materials. Prime coil inventory consists primarily of raw materials, non-standard coil inventory consists primarily of finished goods and tubular inventory consists of both raw materials and finished goods. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or replacement market. Cost for prime coil inventory is determined under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Cost for non-standard coil inventory is determined using the specific identification method. Cost for tubular inventory is determined using the weighted average method.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, LIFO inventories were reduced but are expected to be replaced by March 31, 2007. A deferred credit of $125,275 was recorded at June 30, 2006 to reflect replacement costs in excess of LIFO cost.
A summary of inventory values follows:
June 30, | March 31, | |||||||
2006 | 2006 | |||||||
Prime
Coil Inventory |
$ | 9,333,379 | $ | 10,525,848 | ||||
Non-Standard
Coil Inventory |
1,926,724 | 788,266 | ||||||
Tubular Raw Material |
4,318,916 | 3,889,206 | ||||||
Tubular Finished Goods |
9,655,062 | 12,753,601 | ||||||
$ | 25,234,081 | $ | 27,956,921 | |||||
NOTE C LONG-TERM DEBT
The Company has a $6 million revolving credit facility which expires April 1, 2008. There were no amounts outstanding pursuant to the facility at June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006.
NOTE D STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The Company followed Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), for its employee stock options through March 31, 2006. Under APB 25, because the exercise price of the Companys employee stock options was equal to the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense was recognized.
If the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock based employee compensation for each of the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, net income and earnings per common share would be the same as reported income and earnings per common share as no options were granted in the quarter ended June 30, 2006 or June 30, 2005.
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)). SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) effective April 1, 2006. SFAS 123(R) permits adoption using one of two methods, a modified prospective method (Prospective Method) or a modified retrospective method (Retrospective Method). With the Prospective Method, costs are recognized beginning with the effective date based on the requirements of SFAS 123(R) for (i) all share-based payments granted after the effective date of SFAS 123(R), and (ii) all awards granted to employees prior to the effective date of SFAS 123(R) that remain unvested on the effective date. The Retrospective Method applies the requirements of the Prospective Method but further permits entities to restate all prior periods presented based on the amounts previously recognized under SFAS 123 for purposes of pro forma disclosures. The Company adopted the Prospective Method on April 1, 2006 and there was no impact on the financial statements as all of the options were vested as of April 1, 2006.
2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||
Exercise | Exercise | |||||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Shares | Price | |||||||||||||
Outstanding at beginning of quarter |
137,212 | $ | 2.35 | 224,718 | $ | 2.62 | ||||||||||
Granted |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Exercised |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Canceled or expired |
(2,894 | ) | $ | 3.13 | (10,979 | ) | $ | 2.40 | ||||||||
Outstanding at end of quarter |
134,318 | $ | 2.33 | 213,739 | $ | 2.63 | ||||||||||
Exercisable at the end of the quarter |
134,318 | $ | 2.33 | 213,739 | $ | 2.63 | ||||||||||
Weighted average fair value of options
granted during the quarter |
| |
Outstanding | Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Remaining | Exercise | Exercise | |||||||||||||||||
Exercise Price | Years | Shares | Price | Shares | Price | |||||||||||||||
$2.33 |
6.5 | 134,318 | $ | 2.33 | 134,318 | $ | 2.33 | |||||||||||||
The aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable and outstanding options at June 30, 2006 was $902,617.
NOTE E NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
FASB issued Statement
Financial Accounting Standards No. 151, Inventory
Costs, an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, (SFAS 151)
regarding current period expenses generated from abnormal inventory
costs associated with idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and
spoilage. Effective in fiscal 2007, SFAS 151 will be applicable to the
Company. SFAS 151 did not have a material impact in the quarter ended
June 30, 2006 and the Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS 151 will
have a material impact in future periods.
See also note D regarding the adoption of SFAS 123(R).
5
NOTE F SEGMENT INFORMATION
THREE MONTHS ENDED | ||||||||||
JUNE 30, | ||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||||
Net sales |
||||||||||
Coil |
$ | 27,885 | $ | 23,051 | ||||||
Tubular |
24,739 | 23,007 | ||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 52,624 | $ | 46,058 | ||||||
Operating profit |
||||||||||
Coil |
$ | 1,552 | $ | 878 | ||||||
Tubular |
2,786 | 1,734 | ||||||||
Total operating profit |
4,338 | 2,612 | ||||||||
Corporate expenses |
1,035 | 844 | ||||||||
Interest & other income |
(57 | ) | (46 | ) | ||||||
Total earnings before taxes |
$ | 3,360 | $ | 1,814 | ||||||
June
30, 2006 |
March
31, 2006 |
|||||||||
Segment assets |
||||||||||
Coil |
$ | 25,746 | $ | 24,528 | ||||||
Tubular |
27,578 | 28,684 | ||||||||
53,324 | 53,212 | |||||||||
Corporate assets | 1,481 | 2,719 | ||||||||
$ | 54,805 | $ | 55,931 | |||||||
Segment amounts reflected above are stated in thousands. General corporate expenses reflect general and administrative expenses not directly associated with segment operations and consist primarily of corporate executive and accounting salaries, professional fees and services, bad debts, accrued profit sharing expense, corporate insurance expenses and office supplies. Corporate assets consists primarily of cash and cash equivalents and the cash value of officers life insurance.
6
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations Three
Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30,
2005
During the three months ended June 30, 2006, sales, costs of goods sold and gross profit increased $6,566,145, $4,802,882 and $1,763,263, respectively, from the comparable amounts recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2005. These increases were related primarily to an increase in tons sold. The Company recorded tons sold of approximately 70,000 tons in the 2005 quarter compared to approximately 81,000 tons in the 2006 quarter. Average per ton selling prices declined approximately $15 per ton and had the effect of partially offsetting the above increase in sales relative to tons sold. Gross profit benefited from the increase in sales as well as an increase in margins earned on sales. Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased from approximately 6.8% in the 2005 quarter to approximately 9.3% in the 2006 quarter. During the 2006 quarter, the Company continued to experience strong market conditions for its products.
Coil product segment sales increased approximately $4,834,000 during the 2006 quarter. This increase resulted primarily from an increase in tons sold as coil tonnage shipped increased from approximately 34,000 tons in the 2005 quarter to approximately 41,000 tons in the 2006 quarter. The average per ton selling price was approximately the same for both quarters. Coil operating profit as a percentage of coil segment sales increased from approximately 3.8% in the 2005 quarter to 5.6% in the 2006 quarter. The Company experienced strong market conditions for coil products during the 2006 quarter.
In the 2006 quarter, the Companys Lone Star, Texas coil facility (LSCF) continued to experience a lack of supply of coil products from its primary coil supplier, Lone Star Steel Company (LSS). In fiscal 2006, the Company decided to phase out LSCF in fiscal 2007 and redeploy certain LSCF assets to a new coil operation to be located in close proximity to the Nucor Steel Company steel mill in Decatur, Alabama. LSCF, which produced a marginal profit in the 2006 quarter, accounted for approximately 3% of total sales in the 2006 quarter.
During the 2006 quarter, the Companys XSCP division located at Hickman, Arkansas, which markets non-standard coils received from Nucor Steel Company (NSC), continued to receive limited shipments of non-standard coils from NSC and the Company expects these limited shipments to continue. XSCP operating assets, when not used by XSCP, can be used at the Companys Hickman coil facility (Hickman).
The Company is primarily dependent on NSC for its supply of coil inventory. NSC continues to supply Hickman and XSCP with steel coils in amounts that are adequate for the Companys purposes. While current levels are adequate to sustain the Companys operations at Hickman and XSCP, a reduction in the supply of steel coils could have an adverse effect on the Companys coil operations.
Tubular product segment sales increased approximately $1,732,000 during the 2006 quarter. This increase resulted from an increase in tons sold from approximately 36,000 tons sold in the 2005 quarter compared to approximately 40,000 tons sold in the 2006 quarter. The increase in sales related to tons sold was partially offset by a decline of approximately $25 in the average per ton selling price of pipe products. Tubular product segment operating profits as a percentage of segment sales were approximately 7.5% and 11.3% in the 2005 and 2006 quarters, respectively. The Company continued to experience strong market conditions for its pipe products in the 2006 quarter.
During the 2006 quarter, LSS, the Companys primary supplier of tubular products and coil material used in pipe manufacturing, continued to supply such products in amounts that were adequate for the Companys purposes. The Company does not currently anticipate any significant change in such supply from LSS.
During the 2006 quarter, general, selling and administrative costs increased $229,477 from the amount recorded during the 2005 quarter. This increase was related primarily to increases in commissions and bonuses associated with the increase in earnings and volume.
Income taxes increased $531,325 from the comparable amount recorded during the 2005 quarter. This increase was primarily related to the increase in earnings before taxes. Effective tax rates were 36.2% and 37.7% in the 2006 and 2005 quarters, respectively.
7
FINANCIAL POSITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company remained in a strong, liquid position at June 30, 2006. Current ratios were 2.9 and 2.6 at June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, respectively. Working capital was $29,513,092 at June 30, 2006 and $29,167,810 at March 31, 2006.
During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company maintained assets and liabilities at levels it believed were commensurate with operations. Changes in current assets and liabilities during the 2006 quarter were related primarily to the ordinary course of business of the Company. The Company expects to continue to monitor, evaluate and manage balance sheet components depending on changes in market conditions and the Companys operations.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the Company purchased approximately $1,451,000 in fixed assets. These assets were related primarily to improvements to the small diameter pipe mill which began operation at Lone Star, Texas in April 2004 and land and equipment associated with the new coil operation to be located in Decatur, Alabama. In connection with this planned new operation, the Company intends to phase out its coil processing operations at Lone Star, Texas in fiscal 2007. At the Decatur site, the Company intends to construct a coil processing facility using, in part, assets currently used at its Lone Star facility. The Company expects that the Decatur processing facility will initially operate a hot roll steel temper mill and a hot roll steel cut-to-length and leveling line. The Company expects that the Decatur facility will commence operations in fiscal 2008. In addition to the funds to be used to purchase the real property in Alabama, the Companys Board of Directors has authorized up to an additional $16 million to be used for capital expenditures and working capital related to the acquisition improvement of the Decatur facility.
The Company has entered into an earnest money contract for the sale of the real property owned by the Company in Houston, Texas. The closing is subject to standard conditions, including inspections and feasibility studies. The Company anticipates closing on the sale in August 2006. Following the closing, the Company plans to lease the office building located on the Houston property and to maintain its corporate office at such location.
The Company has an arrangement with a bank which provides for a revolving line of credit facility (the revolving facility). Pursuant to the revolving facility, which expires April 1, 2008, the Company may borrow up to $6 million at the banks prime rate or 1.5% over LIBOR. The Company uses the revolving facility to support cash flow and will borrow and repay the note as working capital is required. At June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the revolving facility.
The Company has in the past and may in the future borrow funds on a term basis to build or improve facilities. The Company currently has no plans to borrow funds on a term basis.
Notwithstanding the current market conditions, the Company believes its cash flows from operations and borrowing capability under its revolving facility are adequate to fund its expected cash requirements for the next twenty-four months.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. One such accounting policy which requires significant estimates and judgments is the valuation of LIFO inventories in the Companys quarterly reporting. The quarterly valuation of inventory requires estimates of the year end quantities which is inherently difficult. Historically, these estimates have been materially correct. In addition, the Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable by providing for specifically identified accounts where collectibility is doubtful. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates estimates and judgments. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
From time to time, the Company may make certain statements that contain forward-looking information (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1996) and that involve risk and uncertainty. These forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, future results of operations, future production capacity and product quality. Forward-looking statements may be made by management orally or in writing including, but not limited to, this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Actual results and trends in the future may differ materially depending on a variety of factors including but not limited to changes in the demand and prices of the Company products, changes in the demand for steel and steel products in general and the Companys success in executing its internal operating plans.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the normal course of business the Company is exposed to market risks primarily from changes in the cost of steel in inventory and in interest rates. The Company closely monitors exposure to market risks and develops appropriate strategies to manage risk. With respect to steel purchases, there is no recognized market to purchase derivative financial instruments to reduce the inventory exposure risk on changing commodity prices. The exposure to market risk associated with interest rates relates primarily to debt. Recent debt balances are minimal and, as a result, direct exposure to interest rates changes is not significant.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys principal executive officer (CEO) and principal financial officer (CFO), evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006. Based on this evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 to ensure that information that is required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
8
FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Not applicable
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Not applicable
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
a). Not applicable | |
b). Not applicable | |
c). Not applicable |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
a). Not applicable | |
b). Not applicable |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits |
31.1 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by William E. Crow | |
31.2 | Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Ben Harper | |
32.1 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by William E. Crow | |
32.2 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Ben Harper |
9
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED | |||
Date August 14, 2006 | |||
By | /s/ BEN HARPER | ||
|
|||
Ben Harper, Senior Vice President-Finance | |||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | |||
10
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |
Exhibit 31.1
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by William E. Crow | |
Exhibit 31.2
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Ben Harper | |
Exhibit 32.1
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by William E. Crow | |
Exhibit 32.2
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Ben Harper |