sv1
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
March 30, 2007
Registration
No. 333-
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM S-1
REGISTRATION
STATEMENT
Under
The Securities Act of
1933
COMSCORE, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
7389
|
|
54-19555550
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
11465 Sunset Hills
Road
Suite 200
Reston, Virginia 20190
(703) 438-2000
(Address, including zip code,
and telephone number, including area code, of Registrants
principal executive offices)
Magid M.
Abraham, Ph.D.
President and Chief Executive
Officer
comScore, Inc.
11465 Sunset Hills
Road
Suite 200
Reston, Virginia 20190
(703) 438-2000
(Name, address, including zip
code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for
service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey D. Saper, Esq.
Robert G. Day, Esq.
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
|
|
Christiana L. Lin, Esq.
General Counsel
11465 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 200
Reston, Virginia 20190
Telephone: (703) 438-2000
Facsimile: (703) 438-2051
|
|
Andrew J. Pitts, Esq.
Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Worldwide Plaza
825 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10019
Telephone: (212) 474-1000
Facsimile: (212) 474-3700
|
Mark R. Fitzgerald, Esq.
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati,
Professional Corporation
1700 K Street, N.W., Fifth Floor
Washington, D.C. 20006
Telephone: (202) 973-8800
Facsimile: (202) 973-8899
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public: As soon as practicable after the
effective date of this Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
please check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Aggregate Offering
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Price(1)(2)
|
|
|
Registration Fee
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
per share
|
|
|
$86,250,000
|
|
|
$2,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Estimated solely for the purpose of
computing the amount of the registration fee pursuant to
Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
|
(2)
|
|
Includes shares of common stock
that may be purchased by the underwriters to cover
over-allotments, if any.
|
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT
TO COMPLETION, DATED MARCH 30, 2007
PRELIMINARY
PROSPECTUS
Shares
Common
Stock
Prior to this
offering, there has been no public market for our common stock.
The initial public offering price of the common stock is
expected to be between $ and
$ per share. We intend to
apply to list our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market under
the symbol SCOR.
We are
selling shares
of common stock and the selling stockholders are
selling shares
of common stock. We will not receive any of the proceeds from
the shares of common stock sold by the selling stockholders.
The underwriters
have an option to purchase a maximum
of additional
shares from us and the selling stockholders to cover
over-allotments of shares. The underwriters can exercise this
right at any time within 30 days from the date of this
prospectus.
Investing in our
common stock involves risks. See Risk Factors on
page 8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
|
Proceeds to
|
|
|
Price to
|
|
Discounts and
|
|
Proceeds to
|
|
Selling
|
|
|
Public
|
|
Commissions
|
|
comScore
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
Per Share
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
|
$
|
Neither the
Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities
commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or
determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any
representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Delivery of the
shares of common stock will be made on or
about ,
2007.
|
|
Credit
Suisse |
Deutsche
Bank Securities |
The date of this
prospectus
is ,
2007
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate on the date of this document.
Dealer
Prospectus Delivery Obligation
Until ,
2007 (25 days after the commencement of this offering) all
dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or
not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with
respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
comScore, Media Metrix and
MyMetrix are registered trademarks in the U.S. and
several other countries. Our unregistered trademarks and
service marks include: Ad Metrix,
Campaign R/F,
Campaign Metrix, comScore Marketing
Solutions, Marketing Solutions, Plan
Metrix, qSearch, Video Metrix and
World Metrix.
PROSPECTUS
SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the
information you should consider before buying shares in this
offering. Therefore, you should read this entire prospectus
carefully, including the Risk Factors section
beginning on page 8 and our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes. Unless the context requires
otherwise, the words we, us,
our and comScore refer to comScore, Inc.
and its consolidated subsidiaries.
comScore,
Inc.
We provide a leading digital marketing intelligence platform
that helps our customers make better-informed business decisions
and implement more effective digital business strategies. Our
products and solutions offer our customers deep insights into
consumer behavior, including objective, detailed information
regarding usage of their online properties and those of their
competitors, coupled with information on consumer demographic
characteristics, attitudes, lifestyles and offline behavior.
Our digital marketing intelligence platform is comprised of
proprietary databases and a computational infrastructure that
measures, analyzes and reports on digital activity. The
foundation of our platform is data collected from our comScore
panel of more than two million Internet users worldwide who have
granted us explicit permission to confidentially measure their
Internet usage patterns, online and certain offline buying
behavior and other activities. By applying advanced statistical
methodologies to our panel data, we project consumers
online behavior for the total online population and a wide
variety of user categories.
We deliver our digital marketing intelligence through our
comScore Media Metrix product family and through comScore
Marketing Solutions. Media Metrix delivers digital media
intelligence by providing an independent, third-party
measurement of the size, behavior and characteristics of Web
site and online advertising network audiences among home, work
and university Internet users as well as insights into the
effectiveness of online advertising. Our Marketing Solutions
products combine the proprietary information gathered from the
comScore panel with the vertical industry expertise of comScore
analysts to deliver digital marketing intelligence, including
the measurement of online advertising effectiveness, customized
for specific industries. We typically deliver our Media Metrix
products electronically in the form of weekly, monthly or
quarterly reports. Customers can access current and historical
Media Metrix data and analyze these data anytime online. Our
Marketing Solutions products are typically delivered on a
monthly, quarterly or ad hoc basis through electronic reports
and analyses.
In 2006, we generated revenues of $66.3 million and had
cash flow from operations of $10.9 million. We derive our
revenues primarily from the fees that we charge for
subscription-based products and customized projects. A
significant characteristic of our business model is our large
percentage of subscription-based contracts. Subscription-based
revenues have grown to 75% of our total revenues in 2006. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained in this
prospectus for a discussion of how we determine
subscription-based revenues.
Our
Industry
The Internet is a global digital medium for commerce, content,
advertising and communications. According to IDC, the number of
global Internet users is projected to grow from approximately
968 million in 2005 to over 1.7 billion in 2010. As
the online population continues to grow, the Internet is
increasingly becoming a tool for research and commerce and for
distributing and consuming media.
The interactive nature of digital media on the Internet enables
businesses to access a wealth of user information that was
virtually unavailable through offline audience measurement and
marketing intelligence techniques. Digital media provide
businesses with the opportunity to measure detailed user
activity, such as how users interact with Web page content; to
assess how users respond to online marketing, such as which
online ads users click on to pursue a transaction; and to
analyze how audiences and user behavior compare
1
across various Web sites. This type of detailed user data can be
combined with demographic, attitudinal and transactional
information to develop a deeper understanding of user behavior,
attributes and preferences.
We believe that the growth in the online and digital media
markets for digital commerce, content, advertising and
communications creates an unprecedented opportunity for
businesses to acquire a deeper understanding of both their
customers and their competitive market position. Businesses can
use accurate, relevant and objective digital marketing
intelligence to develop and validate key strategies and improve
performance.
The
comScore Digital Marketing Intelligence Platform
We provide a leading digital marketing intelligence platform
that enables our customers to devise and implement more
effective digital business strategies.
Key attributes of our platform include:
Panel of global Internet users. Our ability to
provide digital marketing intelligence is based on information
continuously gathered from a broad cross-section of more than
two million Internet users worldwide who have granted us
explicit permission to confidentially measure their Internet
usage patterns, online and certain offline buying behavior and
other activities.
Scalable technology infrastructure. We
developed our databases and computational infrastructure to
support the growth in online activity among our global Internet
panel and the increasing complexity of digital content formats,
advertising channels and communication applications. The design
of our technology infrastructure is based on distributed
processing and data capture environments that allow for the
collection and organization of vast amounts of data on online
activity.
Benefits of our platform include:
Advanced digital marketing intelligence. We
use our proprietary technology to compile vast amounts of data
on Internet user activity and to organize that data into
discrete, measurable elements that can be used to provide
actionable insights to our customers.
Objective third-party resource for digital marketing
intelligence. We are an independent company that
is not affiliated with the digital businesses we measure and
analyze, allowing us to serve as an objective third-party
provider of digital marketing intelligence.
Vertical industry expertise. We have developed
expertise across a variety of industries to provide digital
marketing intelligence specifically tailored to the needs of our
customers operating in specific industry sectors. We have
dedicated personnel to address the automotive, consumer packaged
goods, entertainment, financial services, media, pharmaceutical,
retail, technology, telecommunications and travel industries.
Ease of use and functionality. The comScore
digital marketing intelligence platform is designed to be easy
to use by our customers. Our products are primarily available
through the Internet using a standard browser; our customers do
not need to install additional hardware or software to access
our products.
Our
Strategy
Our objective is to be the leading provider of global digital
marketing intelligence products. We plan to pursue our objective
through internal initiatives and, potentially, through
acquisitions and other investments. The principal elements of
our strategy are to:
|
|
|
|
|
deepen relationships with current customers;
|
|
|
|
grow our customer base;
|
|
|
|
expand our digital marketing intelligence platform;
|
|
|
|
address emerging digital media;
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
extend technology leadership;
|
|
|
|
build brand awareness through media exposure; and
|
|
|
|
grow internationally.
|
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our business is subject to a number of risks that you should be
aware of before making an investment decision. These risks are
discussed more fully in the section entitled Risk
Factors immediately following this prospectus summary. We
have a limited operating history, and we must continue to retain
and attract customers. We must be able to maintain an Internet
user panel of sufficient size in order to provide the quality of
marketing intelligence demanded by our customers. Although we
were profitable in each quarter of 2006, we were not profitable
in 2005, and we had, at December 31, 2006, an accumulated
deficit of $99.5 million.
Company
Information
We incorporated in August 1999 in Delaware. Our principal
offices are located at 11465 Sunset Hills Road,
Suite 200, Reston, Virginia 20190. Our telephone number is
(703) 438-2000.
You can access our Web site at www.comscore.com. Information
contained on our Web site is not part of this prospectus and is
not incorporated in this prospectus by reference.
comScore, Media Metrix and MyMetrix are registered trademarks in
the U.S. and several other countries. Our unregistered
trademarks and service marks include: Ad Metrix, Campaign R/F,
Campaign Metrix, comScore Marketing Solutions, Marketing
Solutions, Plan Metrix, qSearch, Video Metrix and World Metrix.
3
The
Offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by us |
|
shares |
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders
|
|
shares |
|
Total common stock offered |
|
shares |
|
Common stock outstanding after this offering
|
|
shares |
|
Use of proceeds |
|
We intend to use the net proceeds from this offering for working
capital, for capital expenditures and for other general
corporate purposes. We may also use a portion of our net
proceeds to fund potential acquisitions. We will not receive any
proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock by the
selling stockholders. See Use of Proceeds. |
|
Proposed NASDAQ Global Market symbol
|
|
SCOR |
|
Risk factors |
|
See Risk Factors and other information included in
this
prospectus
for a discussion of factors you should carefully consider before
deciding to invest in shares of our common stock. |
The number of shares of common stock that will be outstanding
after this offering is based on 108,025,682 shares
outstanding as of December 31, 2006 and excludes:
|
|
|
|
|
13,619,700 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
options outstanding at a weighted-average exercise price of
$0.40 per share;
|
|
|
|
5,316,147 shares of common stock reserved for future
issuance under our 1999 Stock Plan;
|
|
|
|
7,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for future
issuance under our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, which will be
effective upon completion of this offering;
|
|
|
|
100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of a warrant, which warrant shall terminate if not exercised
prior to this offering, at an exercise price of $1.00 per
share; and
|
|
|
|
775,923 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of warrants, which total includes warrants for our preferred
stock that will become exercisable for common stock after this
offering, at a weighted-average exercise price of $0.96 per
share.
|
Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus
assumes:
|
|
|
|
|
a -for-
reverse split of our common stock that will occur prior to the
consummation of this offering;
|
|
|
|
the conversion, in accordance with our certificate of
incorporation, of all our shares of outstanding preferred stock
into shares of our common stock;
|
|
|
|
no exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase up
to
additional shares to cover over-allotments, consisting
of
shares to be purchased from us
and
shares to be purchased from the selling stockholders; and
|
|
|
|
the adoption of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and bylaws that will occur immediately prior to
the consummation of this offering.
|
4
Summary
Historical Financial Data
You should read the summary historical financial data set forth
below in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements,
the notes to our consolidated financial statements and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. The consolidated statements of operations data
and the consolidated statements of cash flows data for each of
the three years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 as
well as the consolidated balance sheet data as of
December 31, 2005 and 2006 are derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements that are included elsewhere in
this prospectus. Our historical results are not necessarily
indicative of results to be expected for future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
34,894
|
|
|
$
|
50,267
|
|
|
$
|
66,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues(1)
|
|
|
13,153
|
|
|
|
18,218
|
|
|
|
20,560
|
|
Selling and marketing(1)
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
18,953
|
|
|
|
21,473
|
|
Research and development(1)
|
|
|
5,493
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
|
9,009
|
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
4,982
|
|
|
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
8,293
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
2,437
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses from operations
|
|
|
37,874
|
|
|
|
54,113
|
|
|
|
60,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
|
(2,980
|
)
|
|
|
(3,846
|
)
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
231
|
|
(Loss) gain from foreign currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
125
|
|
Revaluation of preferred stock
warrant liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(3,226
|
)
|
|
|
(4,164
|
)
|
|
|
5,719
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(3,226
|
)
|
|
|
(3,982
|
)
|
|
|
5,669
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(3,226
|
)
|
|
|
(4,422
|
)
|
|
|
5,669
|
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred
stock
|
|
|
(2,141
|
)
|
|
|
(2,638
|
)
|
|
|
(3,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(5,367
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,060
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation is included in the line
items above as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
The following table presents consolidated balance sheet data as
of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis without any adjustments to reflect subsequent
or anticipated events;
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis reflecting (i) the conversion of all
outstanding shares of our Series A, Series B,
Series C,
Series C-1,
Series D and Series E preferred stock into an
aggregate of 86,286,697 shares of our common stock
effective immediately prior to the completion of this offering,
for a total of 108,025,682 shares of common stock, which
amount includes 1,738,172 shares subject to put and (ii) the
reclassification of our preferred stock warrant liabilities from
current liabilities to additional paid in capital effective upon
the completion of this offering; and
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis reflecting the conversion and
reclassification described above and the receipt by us of the
net proceeds from the sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public
offering price of $ per
share, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
as Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments
|
|
$
|
16,032
|
|
|
$
|
16,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
31,493
|
|
|
|
31,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
42,087
|
|
|
|
42,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
32,880
|
|
|
|
31,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations,
long-term
|
|
|
2,261
|
|
|
|
2,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock subject to put
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
101,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(99,557
|
)
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
1,907
|
|
|
$
|
4,253
|
|
|
$
|
10,905
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,745
|
|
|
|
5,123
|
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other Financial and Operating
Data (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(2)
|
|
$
|
(221
|
)
|
|
$
|
730
|
|
|
$
|
9,945
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus the (benefit)
provision for income taxes, depreciation, amortization of
purchased intangible assets and stock-based compensation; plus
interest expense (income) and other income. Adjusted EBITDA is
not a measure of liquidity calculated in accordance with GAAP,
and should be viewed as a supplement to not a
substitute for our results of operations presented
on the basis of GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA does not purport to
represent cash flow provided by, or used in, operating
activities as defined by GAAP. Our statement of cash flows
presents our cash flow activity in accordance with GAAP.
Furthermore, Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to
similarly-titled measures reported by other companies. |
We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to an investor in
evaluating our operating performance for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA is widely used by investors to measure a
companys operating performance without regard to items
such as interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
and stock-based compensation, which can vary substantially from
company to company depending upon accounting methods and book
value of assets, capital structure and the method by which
assets were acquired; and
|
|
|
|
analysts and investors use Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental
measure to evaluate the overall operating performance of
companies in our industry.
|
Our management uses Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
as a measure of operating performance, because it does not
include the impact of items not directly resulting from our core
operations;
|
|
|
|
for planning purposes, including the preparation of our annual
operating budget;
|
|
|
|
to allocate resources;
|
|
|
|
to evaluate the effectiveness of our business
strategies; and
|
|
|
|
in communications with our board of directors and stockholders
concerning our financial performance.
|
A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most
directly comparable GAAP measure, for each of the fiscal periods
indicated is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(3,226
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,422
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,669
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
2,437
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
2,389
|
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
|
2,888
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(221
|
)
|
|
$
|
730
|
|
|
$
|
9,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our common stock offered by this prospectus
involves a substantial risk of loss. You should carefully
consider these risk factors, together with all of the other
information included in this prospectus, before you decide to
purchase shares of our common stock. The occurrence of any of
the following risks could materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition or operating results. In that
case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and
you may lose part or all of your investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business and Our Technologies
If we
are not able to maintain a panel of sufficient size and scope,
or if the costs of maintaining our panel materially increase,
our business would be harmed.
We believe that the quality, size and scope of our Internet user
panel are critical to our business. There can be no assurance,
however, that we will be able to maintain a panel of sufficient
size and scope to provide the quality of marketing intelligence
that our customers demand from our products. If we fail to
maintain a panel of sufficient size and scope, customers might
decline to purchase our products or renew their subscriptions,
our reputation could be damaged and our business could be
materially and adversely affected. We expect that our panel
costs may increase and may comprise a greater portion of our
cost of revenues in the future. The costs associated with
maintaining and improving the quality, size and scope of our
panel are dependent on many factors, many of which are beyond
our control, including the participation rate of potential panel
members, the turnover among existing panel members and
requirements for active participation of panel members, such as
completing survey questionnaires. Concerns over the potential
unauthorized disclosure of personal information or the
classification of our software as spyware or
adware may cause existing panel members to uninstall
our software or may discourage potential panel members from
installing our software. To the extent we experience greater
turnover, or churn, in our panel than we have historically
experienced, these costs would increase more rapidly. In
addition, publishing content on the Internet and purchasing
advertising space on Web sites may become more expensive or
restrictive in the future, which could decrease the availability
and increase the cost of advertising the incentives we offer to
panel members. To the extent that such additional expenses are
not accompanied by increased revenues, our operating margins
would be reduced and our financial results would be adversely
affected.
Our
quarterly results of operations may fluctuate in the future. As
a result, we may fail to meet or exceed the expectations of
securities analysts or investors, which could cause our stock
price to decline.
Our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate as a result of
a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control.
If our quarterly revenues or results of operations do not meet
or exceed the expectations of securities analysts or investors,
the price of our common stock could decline substantially. In
addition to the other risk factors set forth in this Risk
Factors section, factors that may cause fluctuations in
our quarterly revenues or results of operations include:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to increase sales to existing customers and attract
new customers;
|
|
|
|
our failure to accurately estimate or control costs;
|
|
|
|
our revenue recognition policies related to the timing of
contract renewals, delivery of products and duration of
contracts and the corresponding timing of revenue recognition;
|
|
|
|
the mix of subscription-based versus project-based revenues;
|
|
|
|
the impact on our contract renewal rates, in particular for our
subscription-based products, caused by our customers
budgetary constraints, competition, customer dissatisfaction or
our customers actual or perceived lack of need for our
products;
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of significant customers;
|
|
|
|
the effect of revenues generated from significant one-time
projects;
|
|
|
|
the amount and timing of capital expenditures and operating
costs related to the maintenance and expansion of our operations
and infrastructure;
|
|
|
|
the timing and success of new product introductions by us or our
competitors;
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
variations in the demand for our products and the implementation
cycles of our products by our customers;
|
|
|
|
changes in our pricing and discounting policies or those of our
competitors;
|
|
|
|
service outages, other technical difficulties or security
breaches;
|
|
|
|
limitations relating to the capacity of our networks, systems
and processes;
|
|
|
|
maintaining appropriate staffing levels and capabilities
relative to projected growth;
|
|
|
|
adverse judgments or settlements in legal disputes;
|
|
|
|
the timing of costs related to the development or acquisition of
technologies, services or businesses to support our existing
customer base and potential growth opportunities; and
|
|
|
|
general economic, industry and market conditions and those
conditions specific to Internet usage and online businesses.
|
We believe that our quarterly revenues and results of operations
on a
year-over-year
and sequential
quarter-over-quarter
basis may vary significantly in the future and that
period-to-period
comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful. You
should not rely on the results of prior quarters as an
indication of future performance.
The
market for digital marketing intelligence is at an early stage
of development, and if it does not develop, or develops more
slowly than expected, our business will be harmed.
The market for digital marketing intelligence products is at a
relatively early stage of development, and it is uncertain
whether these products will achieve high levels of demand and
increased market acceptance. Our success will depend to a
substantial extent on the willingness of companies to increase
their use of such products. Factors that may affect market
acceptance include:
|
|
|
|
|
the reliability of digital marketing intelligence products;
|
|
|
|
public concern regarding privacy and data security;
|
|
|
|
decisions of our customers and potential customers to develop
digital marketing intelligence capabilities internally rather
than purchasing such products from third-party suppliers like us;
|
|
|
|
decisions by industry associations in the United States or in
other countries that result in association-directed awards, on
behalf of their members, of digital measurement contracts to one
or a limited number of competitive vendors;
|
|
|
|
the ability to maintain high levels of customer
satisfaction; and
|
|
|
|
the rate of growth in eCommerce, online advertising and digital
media.
|
The market for our products may not develop further, or may
develop more slowly than we expect, either of which could
adversely affect our business and operating results.
We
have a limited operating history and may not be able to achieve
financial or operational success.
We were incorporated in 1999 and introduced our first syndicated
Internet audience measurement product in 2000. Many of our other
products were first introduced during the past few years.
Accordingly, we are still in the early stages of development and
have only a limited operating history upon which our business
can be evaluated. You should evaluate our likelihood of
financial and operational success in light of the risks,
uncertainties, expenses, delays and difficulties associated with
an early-stage business in an evolving market, some of which may
be beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully manage any growth we may achieve in
the future;
|
|
|
|
the risks associated with operating a business in international
markets, including China; and
|
|
|
|
our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses,
technologies or services.
|
9
We
have a history of significant net losses, may incur significant
net losses in the future and may not maintain
profitability.
We have incurred significant losses in recent periods, including
net losses of $3.2 million and $4.4 million in 2004
and 2005, respectively. Although we achieved net income of
$5.7 million in 2006, we cannot assure you that we will
continue to sustain or increase profitability in the future. As
of December 31, 2006, we had an accumulated deficit of
$99.5 million. Because a large portion of our costs are
fixed, we may not be able to reduce or maintain our expenses in
response to any decrease in our revenues, which would adversely
affect our operating results. In addition, we expect operating
expenses to increase as we implement certain growth initiatives,
which include, among other things, the development of new
products, expansion of our infrastructure, plans for
international expansion and general and administrative expenses
associated with being a public company. If our revenues do not
increase to offset these expected increases in costs and
operating expenses, our operating results would be materially
and adversely affected. You should not consider our revenue
growth in recent periods as indicative of our future
performance, as our operating results for future periods are
subject to numerous uncertainties.
Material
defects or errors in our data collection and analysis systems
could damage our reputation, result in significant costs to us
and impair our ability to sell our products.
Our data collection and analysis systems are complex and may
contain material defects or errors. In addition, the large
amount of data that we collect may cause errors in our data
collection and analysis systems. Any defect in our panelist data
collection software, network systems, statistical projections or
other methodologies could result in:
|
|
|
|
|
loss of customers;
|
|
|
|
damage to our brand;
|
|
|
|
lost or delayed market acceptance and sales of our products;
|
|
|
|
interruptions in the availability of our products;
|
|
|
|
the incurrence of substantial costs to correct any material
defect or error;
|
|
|
|
sales credits, refunds or liability to our customers;
|
|
|
|
diversion of development resources; and
|
|
|
|
increased warranty and insurance costs.
|
Any material defect or error in our data collection systems
could adversely affect our reputation and operating results.
Our
business may be harmed if we deliver, or are perceived to
deliver, inaccurate information to our customers or to the
media.
If the information that we provide to our customers or the media
is inaccurate, or perceived to be inaccurate, our brand may be
harmed. The information that we collect or that is included in
our databases and the statistical projections that we provide to
our customers may contain inaccuracies. Any dissatisfaction by
our customers or the media with our digital marketing
intelligence, measurement or data collection and statistical
projection methodologies could have an adverse effect on our
ability to retain existing customers and attract new customers
and could harm our brand. Additionally, we could be
contractually required to pay damages, which could be
substantial, to certain of our customers if the information we
provide to them is found to be inaccurate. Any liability that we
incur or any harm to our brand that we suffer because of actual
or perceived irregularities or inaccuracies in the data we
deliver to our customers could harm our business.
10
Our
business may be harmed if we change our methodologies or the
scope of information we collect.
We have in the past and may in the future change our
methodologies or the scope of information we collect. Such
changes may result from identified deficiencies in current
methodologies, development of more advanced methodologies,
changes in our business plans or expressed or perceived needs of
our customers or potential customers. Any such changes or
perceived changes, or our inability to accurately or adequately
communicate to our customers and the media such changes and the
potential implications of such changes on the data we have
published or will publish in the future, may result in customer
dissatisfaction, particularly if certain information is no
longer collected or information collected in future periods is
not comparable with information collected in prior periods. For
example, in 2002, we integrated our existing methodologies with
those of Jupiter Media Metrix, which we had recently acquired.
As part of this process, we discontinued reporting certain
metrics. Some customers were dissatisfied and either terminated
their subscriptions or failed to renew their subscriptions
because of these changes. Future changes to our methodologies or
the information we collect may cause similar customer
dissatisfaction and result in loss of customers.
We may
lose customers or be liable to certain customers if we provide
poor service or if our products do not comply with our customer
agreements.
Errors in our systems resulting from the large amount of data
that we collect, store and manage could cause the information
that we collect to be incomplete or to contain inaccuracies that
our customers regard as significant. The failure or inability of
our systems, networks and processes to adequately handle the
data in a high quality and consistent manner could result in the
loss of customers. In addition, we may be liable to certain of
our customers for damages they may incur resulting from these
events, such as loss of business, loss of future revenues,
breach of contract or loss of goodwill to their business.
Our insurance policies may not cover any claim against us for
loss of data, inaccuracies in data or other indirect or
consequential damages and defending a lawsuit, regardless of its
merit, could be costly and divert managements attention.
Adequate insurance coverage may not be available in the future
on acceptable terms, or at all. Any such developments could
adversely affect our business and results of operations.
The
market for digital marketing intelligence is highly competitive,
and if we cannot compete effectively, our revenues will decline
and our business will be harmed.
The market for digital marketing intelligence is highly
competitive and is evolving rapidly. We compete primarily with
providers of digital media intelligence and related analytical
products and services. We also compete with providers of
marketing services and solutions, with full-service survey
providers and with internal solutions developed by customers and
potential customers. Our principal competitors include:
|
|
|
|
|
large and small companies that provide data and analysis of
consumers online behavior, including Compete Inc., Hitwise
Pty. Ltd and NetRatings, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
online advertising companies that provide measurement of online
ad effectiveness, including aQuantive, Inc., DoubleClick Inc.,
ValueClick, Inc. and WPP Group plc;
|
|
|
|
companies that provide audience ratings for TV, radio and other
media that have extended or may extend their current services,
particularly in certain international markets, to the
measurement of digital media, including Arbitron Inc., Nielsen
Media Research, Inc. and Taylor Nelson Sofres plc;
|
|
|
|
analytical services companies that provide customers with
detailed information of behavior on their own Web sites,
including Omniture, Inc., WebSideStory, Inc. and WebTrends
Corporation;
|
|
|
|
full-service market research firms and survey providers that may
measure online behavior and attitudes, including Harris
Interactive Inc., Ipsos Group, Taylor Nelson Sofres plc and The
Nielsen Company; and
|
|
|
|
specialty information providers for certain industries that we
serve, including IMS Health Incorporated (healthcare) and
Telephia, Inc. (telecommunications).
|
11
Some of our current competitors have longer operating histories,
access to larger customer bases and substantially greater
resources than we do. As a result, these competitors may be able
to devote greater resources to marketing and promotional
campaigns, panel retention, panel development or development of
systems and technologies than we can. In addition, some of our
competitors may adopt more aggressive pricing policies.
Furthermore, large software companies, Internet portals and
database management companies may enter our market or enhance
their current offerings, either by developing competing services
or by acquiring our competitors, and could leverage their
significant resources and pre-existing relationships with our
current and potential customers.
If we are unable to compete successfully against our current and
future competitors, we may not be able to retain and acquire
customers, and we may consequently experience a decline in
revenues, reduced operating margins, loss of market share and
diminished value from our products.
Concern
over spyware and privacy, including any violations of privacy
laws or perceived misuse of personal information, could cause
public relations problems and could impair our ability to
recruit panelists or maintain a panel of sufficient size and
scope, which in turn could adversely affect our ability to
provide our products.
Any perception of our practices as an invasion of privacy,
whether legal or illegal, may subject us to public criticism.
Existing and future privacy laws and increasing sensitivity of
consumers to unauthorized disclosures and use of personal
information may create negative public reaction related to our
business practices. Public concern has increased recently
regarding certain kinds of downloadable software known as
spyware and adware. These concerns might
cause users to refrain from downloading software from the
Internet, including our proprietary technology, which could make
it difficult to recruit additional panelists or maintain a panel
of sufficient size and scope to provide meaningful marketing
intelligence. In response to spyware and adware concerns,
numerous programs are available, many of which are available for
free, that claim to identify and remove spyware and adware from
users computers. Some of these anti-spyware programs have
in the past identified, and may in the future identify, our
software as spyware or as a potential spyware application. We
actively seek to prevent the inclusion of our software on lists
of spyware applications or potential spyware applications, to
apply best industry practices for obtaining appropriate consent
from panelists and protecting the privacy and confidentiality of
our panelist data and to comply with existing privacy laws.
However, to the extent that we are not successful, or to the
extent that new anti-spyware programs classify our software as
spyware or as a potential spyware application, our brand may be
harmed and users of these programs may uninstall our software.
Any resulting reputational harm or decrease in the size or scope
of our panel could reduce the demand for our products, increase
the cost of recruiting panelists and adversely affect our
ability to provide our products to our customers. Any of these
effects could harm our business.
Any
unauthorized disclosure or theft of private information we
gather could harm our business.
Unauthorized disclosure of personally identifiable information
regarding Web site visitors, whether through breach of our
secure network by an unauthorized party, employee theft or
misuse, or otherwise, could harm our business. If there were an
inadvertent disclosure of personally identifiable information,
or if a third party were to gain unauthorized access to the
personally identifiable information we possess, our operations
could be seriously disrupted and we could be subject to claims
or litigation arising from damages suffered by panel members or
pursuant to the agreements with our customers. In addition, we
could incur significant costs in complying with the multitude of
state, federal and foreign laws regarding the unauthorized
disclosure of personal information. For example, California law
requires companies that maintain data on California residents to
inform individuals of any security breaches that result in their
personal information being stolen. Finally, any perceived or
actual unauthorized disclosure of the information we collect
could harm our reputation, substantially impair our ability to
attract and retain panelists and have an adverse impact on our
business.
12
We may
encounter difficulties managing our growth, which could
adversely affect our results of operations.
We have experienced significant growth in recent periods. We
have substantially expanded our overall business, customer base,
headcount, data collection and processing infrastructure and
operating procedures as our business has grown. We increased our
total number of full time employees from 176 employees as of
December 31, 2003 to 377 employees as of December 31,
2006, and we expect to continue to expand our workforce to meet
our strategic objectives. In addition, during this same period,
we made substantial investments in our network infrastructure
operations as a result of our growth. We believe that we will
need to continue to effectively manage and expand our
organization, operations and facilities in order to accommodate
our expected future growth. If we continue to grow, our current
systems and facilities may not be adequate. Our need to
effectively manage our operations and growth requires that we
continue to assess and improve our operational, financial and
management controls, reporting systems and procedures. If we are
not able to efficiently and effectively manage our growth, our
business may be impaired.
If the
Internet advertising and eCommerce markets develop slower than
we expect, our business will suffer.
Our future success will depend on continued growth in the use of
the Internet as an advertising medium, a continued increase in
eCommerce spending and the proliferation of the Internet as a
platform for a wide variety of consumer activities. These
markets are evolving rapidly, and it is not certain that their
current growth trends will continue.
The adoption of Internet advertising, particularly by
advertisers that have historically relied on traditional offline
media, requires the acceptance of new approaches to conducting
business. Advertisers may perceive Internet advertising to be
less effective than traditional advertising for marketing their
products. They may also be unwilling to pay premium rates for
online advertising that is targeted at specific segments of
users based on their demographic profile or Internet behavior.
The online advertising and eCommerce markets may also be
adversely affected by privacy issues relating to such targeted
advertising, including that which makes use of personalized
information. Furthermore, online merchants may not be able to
establish online commerce models that are cost effective and may
not learn how to effectively compete with other Web sites or
offline merchants. In addition, consumers may not continue to
shift their spending on goods and services from offline outlets
to the Internet. As a result, growth in the use of the Internet
for eCommerce may not continue at a rapid rate, or the Internet
may not be adopted as a medium of commerce by a broad base of
customers or companies worldwide. Because of the foregoing
factors, among others, the market for Internet advertising and
eCommerce may not continue to grow at significant rates. If
these markets do not continue to develop, or if they develop
slower than expected, our business will suffer.
Our
growth depends upon our ability to retain existing large
customers and add new large customers; however, to the extent we
are successful in doing so, our ability to maintain
profitability and positive cash flow may be
impaired.
Our success depends in part on our ability to sell our products
to large customers and on the renewal of the subscriptions of
those customers in subsequent years. For the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, we derived over 38%, 41%
and 39%, respectively, of our total revenues from our top 10
customers. The loss of any one or more of those customers could
decrease our revenues and harm our current and future operating
results. The addition of new large customers or increases in
sales to existing large customers may require particularly long
implementation periods and other costs, which may adversely
affect our profitability. To compete effectively, we have in the
past been, and may in the future be, forced to offer significant
discounts to maintain existing customers or acquire other large
customers. In addition, we may be forced to reduce or withdraw
from our relationships with certain existing customers or
refrain from acquiring certain new customers in order to acquire
or maintain relationships with important large customers. As a
result, new large customers or increased usage of our products
by large customers may cause our profits to decline and our
ability to sell our products to other customers could be
adversely affected.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from a single
customer, Microsoft Corporation. For the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, we derived approximately
5%, 14% and 12%, respectively,
13
of our total revenues from Microsoft. If Microsoft were to cease
or substantially reduce its use of our products, our revenues
and earnings might decline.
If we
fail to develop our brand, our business may
suffer.
We believe that building and maintaining awareness of comScore
and our portfolio of products in a cost-effective manner is
critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our current and
future products and is an important element in attracting new
customers. We rely on our relationships with the media and the
exposure we receive from numerous citations of our data by media
outlets to build brand awareness and credibility among our
customers and the marketplace. Furthermore, we believe that
brand recognition will become more important for us as
competition in our market increases. Our brands success
will depend on the effectiveness of our marketing efforts and on
our ability to provide reliable and valuable products to our
customers at competitive prices. Our brand marketing activities
may not yield increased revenues, and even if they do, any
increased revenues may not offset the expenses we incur in
attempting to build our brand. If we fail to successfully market
our brand, we may fail to attract new customers, retain existing
customers or attract media coverage to the extent necessary to
realize a sufficient return on our brand-building efforts, and
our business and results of operations could suffer.
Failure
to effectively expand our sales and marketing capabilities could
harm our ability to increase our customer base and achieve
broader market acceptance of our products.
Increasing our customer base and achieving broader market
acceptance of our products will depend to a significant extent
on our ability to expand our sales and marketing operations. We
expect to continue to rely on our direct sales force to obtain
new customers. We plan to continue to expand our direct sales
force both domestically and internationally. We believe that
there is significant competition for direct sales personnel with
the sales skills and technical knowledge that we require. Our
ability to achieve significant growth in revenues in the future
will depend, in large part, on our success in recruiting,
training and retaining sufficient numbers of direct sales
personnel. In general, new hires require significant training
and substantial experience before becoming productive. Our
recent hires and planned hires may not become as productive as
we require, and we may be unable to hire or retain sufficient
numbers of qualified individuals in the future in the markets
where we currently operate or where we seek to conduct business.
Our business will be seriously harmed if the efforts to expand
our sales and marketing capabilities are not successful or if
they do not generate a sufficient increase in revenues.
We
have limited experience with respect to our pricing model, and
if the prices we charge for our products are unacceptable to our
customers, our revenues and operating results will be
harmed.
We have limited experience in determining the prices for our
products that our existing and potential customers will find
acceptable. As the market for our products matures, or as new
competitors introduce new products or services that compete with
ours, we may be unable to renew our agreements with existing
customers or attract new customers at the prices we have
historically charged. As a result, it is possible that future
competitive dynamics in our market may require us to reduce our
prices, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues,
profitability and operating results.
We
derive a significant portion of our revenues from sales of our
subscription-based digital marketing intelligence products. If
our customers terminate or fail to renew their subscriptions,
our business could suffer.
We currently derive a significant portion of our revenues from
our subscription-based digital marketing intelligence products.
Subscription-based products accounted for 70% and 75% of our
revenues in 2005 and 2006, respectively. However, if our
customers terminate their subscriptions for our products, do not
renew their subscriptions, delay renewals of their subscriptions
or renew on terms less favorable to us, our revenues could
decline and our business could suffer.
Our customers have no obligation to renew after the expiration
of their initial subscription period, which is typically one
year, and we cannot assure you that current subscriptions will
be renewed at the same or higher price levels, if at all. Some
of our customers have elected not to renew their subscription
agreements
14
with us in the past. If we experience a change of control, as
defined in such agreements, some of our customers have the right
to terminate their subscriptions. Moreover, some of our major
customers have the right to cancel their subscription agreements
without cause at any time. We have limited historical data with
respect to rates of customer subscription renewals, so we cannot
accurately predict future customer renewal rates. Our customer
renewal rates may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number
of factors, including customer satisfaction or dissatisfaction
with our products, the prices or functionality of our products,
the prices or functionality of products offered by our
competitors, mergers and acquisitions affecting our customer
base or reductions in our customers spending levels.
If we
are unable to sell additional products to our existing customers
or attract new customers, our revenue growth will be adversely
affected.
To increase our revenues, we believe we must sell additional
products to existing customers and regularly add new customers.
If our existing and prospective customers do not perceive our
products to be of sufficient value and quality, we may not be
able to increase sales to existing customers and attract new
customers, and our operating results will be adversely affected.
We
depend on third parties for data that is critical to our
business, and our business could suffer if we cannot continue to
obtain data from these suppliers.
We rely on third-party data sources for information regarding
certain offline activities of our panelists. The availability
and accuracy of these data is important to the continuation and
development of our products that link online activity to offline
purchases. If this information is not available to us at
commercially reasonable terms, or is found to be inaccurate, it
could harm our reputation, business and financial performance.
System
failures or delays in the operation of our computer and
communications systems may harm our business.
Our success depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation
of our computer and communications systems and the third-party
data centers we use. Our ability to collect and report accurate
data may be interrupted by a number of factors, including our
inability to access the Internet, the failure of our network or
software systems, computer viruses, security breaches or
variability in user traffic on customer Web sites. A failure of
our network or data gathering procedures could impede the
processing of data, cause the corruption or loss of data or
prevent the timely delivery of our products.
In the future, we may need to expand our network and systems at
a more rapid pace than we have in the past. Our network or
systems may not be capable of meeting the demand for increased
capacity, or we may incur additional unanticipated expenses to
accommodate these capacity demands. In addition, we may lose
valuable data, be unable to obtain or provide data on a timely
basis or our network may temporarily shut down if we fail to
adequately expand or maintain our network capabilities to meet
future requirements. Any lapse in our ability to collect or
transmit data may decrease the value of our products and prevent
us from providing the data requested by our customers. Any
disruption in our network processing or loss of Internet user
data may damage our reputation and result in the loss of
customers, and our business and results of operations could be
adversely affected.
We
rely on a small number of third-party service providers to host
and deliver our products, and any interruptions or delays in
services from these third parties could impair the delivery of
our products and harm our business.
We host our products and serve all of our customers from two
third-party data center facilities located in Virginia and
Illinois. While we operate our equipment inside these
facilities, we do not control the operation of either of these
facilities, and, depending on service level requirements, we may
not continue to operate or maintain redundant data center
facilities for all of our products or for all of our data, which
could increase our vulnerability. These facilities are
vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes,
hurricanes, floods,
15
fires, power loss, telecommunications failures and similar
events. They are also subject to break-ins, computer viruses,
sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism and other misconduct. A
natural disaster or an act of terrorism, a decision to close the
facilities without adequate notice or other unanticipated
problems could result in lengthy interruptions in availability
of our products. We may also encounter capacity limitations at
our third-party data centers. Additionally, our data center
facility agreements are of limited durations, and our data
center facilities have no obligation to renew their agreements
with us on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If we are
unable to renew our agreements with the owners of the facilities
on commercially reasonable terms, or if we migrate to a new data
center, we may experience delays in delivering our products
until an agreement with another data center facility can be
arranged or the migration to a new facility is completed.
Further, we depend on access to the Internet through third-party
bandwidth providers to operate our business. If we lose the
services of one or more of our bandwidth providers for any
reason, we could experience disruption in the delivery of our
products or be required to retain the services of a replacement
bandwidth provider. It may be difficult for us to replace any
lost bandwidth on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, due
to the large amount of bandwidth our operations require.
Our operations also rely heavily on the availability of
electrical power and cooling capacity, which are also supplied
by third-party providers. If we or the third-party data center
operators that we use to deliver our products were to experience
a major power outage or if the cost of electrical power
increases significantly, our operations and profitability would
be harmed. If we or the third-party data centers that we use
were to experience a major power outage, we would have to rely
on back-up
generators, which may not function properly, and their supply
may be inadequate. Such a power outage could result in the
disruption of our business. Additionally, if our current
facilities fail to have sufficient cooling capacity or
availability of electrical power, we would need to find
alternative facilities.
Any errors, defects, disruptions or other performance problems
with our products caused by third parties could harm our
reputation and may damage our business. Interruptions in the
availability of our products may reduce our revenues due to
increased turnaround time to complete projects, cause us to
issue credits to customers, cause customers to terminate their
subscription and project agreements or adversely affect our
renewal rates. Our business would be harmed if our customers or
potential customers believe our products are unreliable.
Because
our long-term success depends, in part, on our ability to expand
the sales of our products to customers located outside of the
United States, our business will become increasingly susceptible
to risks associated with international operations.
We have very limited experience operating in markets outside of
the United States. Our inexperience in operating our business
outside of the United States may increase the risk that the
international expansion efforts we have begun to undertake will
not be successful. In addition, conducting international
operations subjects us to new risks that we have not generally
faced in the United States. These risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
recruitment and maintenance of a sufficiently large and
representative panel both globally and in certain countries;
|
|
|
|
different customer needs and buying behavior than we are
accustomed to in the United States;
|
|
|
|
difficulties and expenses associated with tailoring our products
to local markets, including their translation into foreign
languages;
|
|
|
|
difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;
|
|
|
|
longer accounts receivable payment cycles and difficulties in
collecting accounts receivable;
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences, including the complexities
of foreign value-added taxes and restrictions on the
repatriation of earnings;
|
|
|
|
reduced or varied protection for intellectual property rights in
some countries;
|
|
|
|
the burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws and
regulations;
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in currency exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
increased accounting and reporting burdens and
complexities; and
|
|
|
|
political, social and economic instability abroad, terrorist
attacks and security concerns.
|
Additionally, operating in international markets requires
significant management attention and financial resources. We
cannot be certain that the investments and additional resources
required to establish and maintain operations in other countries
will hold their value or produce desired levels of revenues or
profitability. We cannot be certain that we will be able to
maintain and increase the size of the Internet user panel that
we currently have in various countries or that we will be able
to recruit a representative sample for our audience measurement
products. In addition, there can be no assurance that Internet
usage and eCommerce will continue to grow in international
markets. In addition, governmental authorities in various
countries have different views regarding regulatory oversight of
the Internet. For example, the Chinese government has recently
taken steps to restrict the content available to Internet users
in China.
The impact of any one or more of these risks could negatively
affect or delay our plans to expand our international business
and, consequently, our future operating results.
If we
fail to respond to technological developments, our products may
become obsolete or less competitive.
Our future success will depend in part on our ability to modify
or enhance our products to meet customer needs, to add
functionality and to address technological advancements. For
example, online publishers and advertisers have recently started
to use Asynchronous JavaScript and XML, or AJAX, a development
technique that allows Web applications to quickly make
incremental updates without having to refresh the entire Web
page. AJAX may make page views a less useful metric for
measuring the usage and effectiveness of online media. If our
products are not effective at addressing evolving customer needs
that result from increased AJAX usage, our business may be
harmed. Similarly, technological advances in the handheld device
industry may lead to changes in our customers
requirements. For example, if certain handheld devices become
the primary mode of receiving content and conducting
transactions on the Internet, and we are unable to adapt our
software to collect information from such devices, then we would
not be able to report on online activity. To remain competitive,
we will need to develop new products that address these evolving
technologies and standards. However, we may be unsuccessful in
identifying new product opportunities or in developing or
marketing new products in a timely or cost-effective manner. In
addition, our product innovations may not achieve the market
penetration or price levels necessary for profitability. If we
are unable to develop enhancements to, and new features for, our
existing products or if we are unable to develop new products
that keep pace with rapid technological developments or changing
industry standards, our products may become obsolete, less
marketable and less competitive, and our business will be harmed.
The
success of our business depends in large part on our ability to
protect and enforce our intellectual property
rights.
We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, service mark,
trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality
procedures and contractual restrictions, to establish and
protect our proprietary rights, all of which provide only
limited protection. While we have filed a number of patent
applications and own one issued patent, we cannot assure you
that any additional patents will be issued with respect to any
of our pending or future patent applications, nor can we assure
you that any patent issued to us will provide adequate
protection, or that any patents issued to us will not be
challenged, invalidated, circumvented, or held to be
unenforceable in actions against alleged infringers. Also, we
cannot assure you that any future trademark or service mark
registrations will be issued with respect to pending or future
applications or that any of our registered trademarks and
service marks will be enforceable or provide adequate protection
of our proprietary rights. Furthermore, adequate (or any)
patent, trademark, service mark, copyright and trade secret
protection may not be available in every country in which our
services are available.
We endeavor to enter into agreements with our employees and
contractors and with parties with whom we do business in order
to limit access to and disclosure of our proprietary
information. We cannot be certain
17
that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use of
our technology or the reverse engineering of our technology.
Moreover, third parties might independently develop technologies
that are competitive to ours or that infringe upon our
intellectual property. In addition, the legal standards relating
to the validity, enforceability and scope of protection of
intellectual property rights in Internet-related industries are
uncertain and still evolving, both in the United States and in
other countries. The protection of our intellectual property
rights may depend on our legal actions against any infringers
being successful. We cannot be sure any such actions will be
successful.
An
assertion from a third party that we are infringing its
intellectual property, whether such assertions are valid or not,
could subject us to costly and time-consuming litigation or
expensive licenses.
The Internet, software and technology industries are
characterized by the existence of a large number of patents,
copyrights, trademarks and trade secrets and by frequent
litigation based on allegations of infringement or other
violations of intellectual property rights, domestically or
internationally. As we grow and face increasing competition, the
probability that one or more third parties will make
intellectual property rights claims against us increases. In
such cases, our technologies may be found to infringe on the
intellectual property rights of others. Additionally, many of
our subscription agreements may require us to indemnify our
customers for third-party intellectual property infringement
claims, which would increase our costs if we have to defend such
claims and may require that we pay damages and provide
alternative services if there were an adverse ruling in any such
claims. Intellectual property claims could harm our
relationships with our customers, deter future customers from
subscribing to our products or expose us to litigation. Even if
we are not a party to any litigation between a customer and a
third party, an adverse outcome in any such litigation could
make it more difficult for us to defend against intellectual
property claims by the third party in any subsequent litigation
in which we are a named party. Any of these results could
adversely affect our brand, business and results of operations.
One of our competitors has filed patent infringement lawsuits
against others, demonstrating this partys propensity for
patent litigation. It is possible that this third party, or some
other third party, may bring an action against us, and thus
cause us to incur the substantial costs and risks of litigation.
Any intellectual property rights claim against us or our
customers, with or without merit, could be time-consuming and
expensive to litigate or settle and could divert management
resources and attention. An adverse determination also could
prevent us from offering our products to our customers and may
require that we procure or develop substitute products that do
not infringe on other parties rights.
With respect to any intellectual property rights claim against
us or our customers, we may have to pay damages or stop using
technology found to be in violation of a third partys
rights. We may have to seek a license for the technology, which
may not be available on reasonable terms or at all, may
significantly increase our operating expenses or may
significantly restrict our business activities in one or more
respects. We may also be required to develop alternative
non-infringing technology, which could require significant
effort and expense. Any of these outcomes could adversely affect
our business and results of operations.
Domestic
or foreign laws, regulations or enforcement actions may limit
our ability to collect and use information about Internet users
or restrict or prohibit our product offerings, causing a
decrease in the value of our products and an adverse impact on
the sales of our products.
Our business could be adversely impacted by existing or future
laws or regulations of, or actions by, domestic or foreign
regulatory agencies. For example, privacy concerns could lead to
legislative, judicial and regulatory limitations on our ability
to collect, maintain and use information about Internet users in
the United States and abroad. Various state legislatures,
including those of Utah and California, have enacted legislation
designed to protect Internet users privacy, for example by
prohibiting spyware. In recent years, similar legislation has
been proposed in other states and at the federal level and has
been enacted in foreign countries, most notably by the European
Union, which adopted a privacy directive regulating the
collection of personally identifiable information online. These
laws and regulations, if drafted or interpreted broadly, could
be deemed to apply to the technology we use, and could restrict
our information collection methods or decrease the amount and
utility of the information that we would be permitted to
collect. In addition, our ability to conduct business in certain
foreign jurisdictions, including China, is restricted by the
laws, regulations and agency actions of those jurisdictions. The
costs of
18
compliance with, and the other burdens imposed by, these and
other laws or regulatory actions may prevent us from selling our
products or increase the costs associated with selling our
products, and may affect our ability to invest in or jointly
develop products in the United States and in foreign
jurisdictions.
In addition, failure to comply with these and other laws and
regulations may result in, among other things, administrative
enforcement actions and fines, class action lawsuits and civil
and criminal liability. State attorneys general, governmental
and non-governmental entities and private persons may bring
legal actions asserting that our methods of collecting, using
and distributing Web site visitor information are illegal or
improper, which could require us to spend significant time and
resources defending these claims. For example, some companies
that collect, use and distribute Web site visitor information
have been the subject of governmental investigations and
class-action
lawsuits. Any such regulatory or civil action that is brought
against us, even if unsuccessful, may distract our
managements attention, divert our resources, negatively
affect our public image or reputation among our panelists and
customers and harm our business.
The impact of any of these current or future laws or regulations
could make it more difficult or expensive to attract or maintain
panelists, particularly in affected jurisdictions, and could
adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Laws
related to the regulation of the Internet could adversely affect
our business.
Laws and regulations that apply to communications and commerce
over the Internet are becoming more prevalent. In particular,
the growth and development of the market for eCommerce has
prompted calls for more stringent tax, consumer protection and
privacy laws in the United States and abroad that may impose
additional burdens on companies conducting business online. The
adoption, modification or interpretation of laws or regulations
relating to the Internet or our customers digital
operations could negatively affect the businesses of our
customers and reduce their demand for our products.
If we
fail to respond to evolving industry standards, our products may
become obsolete or less competitive.
The market for our products is characterized by rapid
technological advances, changes in customer requirements,
changes in protocols and evolving industry standards. For
example, industry associations such as the Advertising Research
Foundation, the Council of American Survey Research
Organizations, the Internet Advertising Bureau and the Media
Ratings Council have independently initiated efforts to either
review online market research methodologies or to develop
minimum standards for online market research. Any standards
adopted by such organizations may lead to costly changes to our
procedures and methodologies. As a result, the cost of
developing our digital marketing intelligence products could
increase. If we do not adhere to standards prescribed by such
industry associations, our customers could choose to purchase
products from competing companies that meet such standards.
Furthermore, industry associations based in countries outside of
the United States often endorse certain vendors or
methodologies. If our methodologies fail to receive an
endorsement from an important industry association located in a
foreign country, advertising agencies, media companies and
advertisers in that country may not purchase our products. As a
result, our efforts to further expand internationally could be
adversely affected.
The
success of our business depends on the continued growth of the
Internet as a medium for commerce, content, advertising and
communications.
Expansion in the sales of our products depends on the continued
acceptance of the Internet as a platform for commerce, content,
advertising and communications. The use of the Internet as a
medium for commerce, content, advertising and communications
could be adversely impacted by delays in the development or
adoption of new standards and protocols to handle increased
demands of Internet activity, security, reliability, cost,
ease-of-use,
accessibility and
quality-of-service.
The performance of the Internet and its acceptance as a medium
for commerce, content commerce, content, advertising and
communications has been harmed by viruses, worms, and similar
malicious programs, and the Internet has experienced a variety
of outages and other delays as a result of damage to portions of
its infrastructure. If for any reason the Internet does not
remain a medium for widespread commerce, content, advertising
and communications, the demand for our products would be
significantly reduced, which would harm our business.
19
We
rely on our management team and need additional personnel to
grow our business, and the loss of one or more key employees or
the inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could
harm our business.
Our success and future growth depends to a significant degree on
the skills and continued services of our management team,
including our founders, Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D. and Gian M.
Fulgoni. Our future success also depends on our ability to
retain, attract and motivate highly skilled technical,
managerial, marketing and customer service personnel, including
members of our management team. All of our employees work for us
on an at-will basis. We plan to hire additional personnel in all
areas of our business, particularly for our sales, marketing and
technology development areas, both domestically and
internationally, which will likely increase our recruiting and
hiring costs. Competition for these types of personnel is
intense, particularly in the Internet and software industries.
As a result, we may be unable to successfully attract or retain
qualified personnel. Our inability to retain and attract the
necessary personnel could adversely affect our business.
We may
expand through investments in, or acquisitions of, other
companies, any of which may not be successful and may divert our
managements attention.
Our business strategy may include acquiring complementary
products, technologies or businesses. We also may enter into
relationships with other businesses in order to expand our
product offerings, which could involve preferred or exclusive
licenses, discount pricing or investments in other companies.
Negotiating any such transactions could be time-consuming,
difficult and expensive, and our ability to close these
transactions may be subject to regulatory or other approvals and
other conditions which are beyond our control. Consequently, we
can make no assurances that any such transactions, if undertaken
and announced, would be completed.
An acquisition, investment or business relationship may result
in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. In
particular, we may encounter difficulties assimilating or
integrating the businesses, technologies, products, personnel or
operations of the acquired companies, particularly if the key
personnel of the acquired company choose not to be employed by
us, and we may have difficulty retaining the customers of any
acquired business due to changes in management and ownership.
Acquisitions may also disrupt our ongoing business, divert our
resources and require significant management attention that
would otherwise be available for ongoing development of our
business. Moreover, we cannot assure you that the anticipated
benefits of any acquisition, investment or business relationship
would be realized or that we would not be exposed to unknown
liabilities. In connection with any such transaction, we may:
|
|
|
|
|
encounter difficulties retaining key employees of the acquired
company or integrating diverse business cultures;
|
|
|
|
issue additional equity securities that would dilute the common
stock held by existing stockholders;
|
|
|
|
incur large charges or substantial liabilities;
|
|
|
|
become subject to adverse tax consequences, substantial
depreciation or deferred compensation charges;
|
|
|
|
use cash that we may need in the future to operate our
business; and
|
|
|
|
incur debt on terms unfavorable to us or that we are unable to
repay.
|
The impact of any one or more of these factors could adversely
affect our business or results of operations or cause the price
of our common stock to decline substantially.
Changes
in, or interpretations of, accounting rules and regulations,
including recent rules and regulations regarding expensing of
stock options, could result in unfavorable accounting charges or
cause us to change our compensation policies.
Accounting methods and policies, including policies governing
revenue recognition, expenses and accounting for stock options
are continually subject to review, interpretation, and guidance
from relevant accounting authorities, including the Financial
Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, and the SEC. Changes
20
to, or interpretations of, accounting methods or policies in the
future may require us to reclassify, restate or otherwise change
or revise our financial statements, including those contained in
this prospectus.
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 123R (revised 2004), Share-Based
Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS No. 123R). SFAS No. 123R
supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees, and amends SFAS No. 95,
Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in
SFAS No. 123R is similar to the approach described in
SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123R
requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants
of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income
statement based on their fair values. We were required to adopt
SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006, and have
adopted it as of that date.
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, we accounted for
share-based payments to employees through December 31, 2005
using APB Opinion No. 25s intrinsic value method and,
as such, generally recognized no compensation cost for employee
stock options. Accordingly, the adoption of
SFAS No. 123Rs fair value method has had a
significant impact on the presentation of our results of
operations, although it has not impacted our overall financial
position. The long-term impact of adoption of
SFAS No. 123R cannot be predicted at this time because
it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the
future and the assumptions for the variables which impact the
computation of the fair value of any such grants.
Historically, we have used stock options as part of our
compensation programs to motivate and retain existing employees
and to attract new employees. Because we are now required to
expense stock options, we may choose to reduce our reliance on
stock options as part of our compensation packages. If we reduce
our use of stock options, it may be more difficult for us to
retain and attract qualified employees. If we do not reduce our
use of stock options, our expenses in future periods may
increase. Beginning in 2007, we expect to make use of restricted
stock awards and reduce our use of stock options as a form of
stock-based compensation, but we cannot be certain whether or
how our stock-based compensation policy will change in the
future.
Investors
could lose confidence in our financial reports, and our business
and stock price may be adversely affected, if our internal
control over financial reporting is found by management or by
our independent registered public accounting firm to not be
adequate or if we disclose significant existing or potential
deficiencies or material weaknesses in those
controls.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us
to include a report on our internal control over financial
reporting in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for each year beginning with the year ending December 31,
2008. That report must include managements assessment of
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of the end of that and each subsequent fiscal year.
Additionally, our independent registered public accounting firm
will be required to issue a report on managements
assessment of our internal control over financial reporting and
on their evaluation of the operating effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting.
We continue to evaluate our existing internal controls against
the standards adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board, or PCAOB. During the course of our ongoing evaluation of
our internal controls, we have in the past identified, and may
in the future identify, areas requiring improvement, and may
have to design enhanced processes and controls to address issues
identified through this review. Remedying any significant
deficiencies or material weaknesses that we or our independent
registered public accounting firm may identify could require us
to incur significant costs and expend significant time and
management resources. We cannot assure you that any of the
measures we may implement to remedy any such deficiencies will
effectively mitigate or remedy such deficiencies. In addition,
we cannot assure you that we will be able to complete the work
necessary for our management to issue its management report in a
timely manner, or that we will be able to complete any work
required for our management to be able to conclude that our
internal control over financial reporting is operating
effectively. If we are not able to complete the assessment under
Section 404 in a timely manner or to remedy any identified
material weaknesses, we and our independent registered public
accounting firm would be unable to conclude that our internal
control over financial reporting is effective as of
December 31, 2008. If our internal control over financial
reporting is
21
found by management or by our independent registered public
accountant to not be adequate or if we disclose significant
existing or potential deficiencies or material weaknesses in
those controls, investors could lose confidence in our financial
reports, we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by
The NASDAQ Global Market, the Securities and Exchange Commission
or other regulatory authorities and our stock price could be
adversely affected.
A determination that there is a significant deficiency or
material weakness in the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting could also reduce our ability to obtain
financing or could increase the cost of any financing we obtain
and require additional expenditures to comply with applicable
requirements.
Our
net operating loss carryforwards may expire unutilized or
underutilized, which could prevent us from offsetting future
taxable income.
We have experienced changes in control that have
triggered the limitations of Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code on our net operating loss carryforwards. As a
result, we may be limited in the portion of net operating loss
carryforwards that we can use in the future to offset taxable
income for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.
At December 31, 2006, we had both federal and state net
operating loss carryforwards of approximately $81.2 million
each which are available to offset future taxable income. The
federal net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in
2020. The state net operating loss carryforwards began to expire
in 2006.
In addition, at December 31, 2005 and 2006, we had net
operating loss carryforwards for tax purposes related to our
foreign subsidiaries of $966,000 and $703,000, respectively,
which begin to expire in 2010.
In 2006, deferred tax assets, before valuation allowance,
decreased approximately $2.4 million due to our use of net
operating loss carryforwards to offset taxable income.
We periodically assess the likelihood that we will be able to
recover our deferred tax assets. We consider all available
evidence, both positive and negative, including historical
levels of income, expectations and risks associated with
estimates of future taxable income and ongoing prudent and
feasible profits. As a result of this analysis of all available
evidence, both positive and negative, we concluded that a full
valuation allowance against deferred tax assets should be
applied as of December 31, 2006. To the extent we determine
that all or a portion of our valuation allowance is no longer
necessary, we will recognize an income tax benefit in the period
such determination is made for the reversal of the valuation
allowance. Once the valuation allowance is eliminated or
reduced, its reversal will no longer be available to offset our
current tax provision. These events could have a material impact
on our reported results of operations.
We may
require additional capital to support business growth, and this
capital may not be available on acceptable terms or at
all.
We intend to continue to make investments to support our
business growth and may require additional funds to respond to
business challenges, including the need to develop new products
or enhance our existing products, enhance our operating
infrastructure and acquire complementary businesses and
technologies. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or
debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise
additional funds through further issuances of equity or
convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders could
suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we
issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to
those of holders of our common stock. Any debt financing secured
by us in the future could include restrictive covenants relating
to our capital raising activities and other financial and
operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to
obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities,
including potential acquisitions. In addition, we may not be
able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us or
at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or
financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our
ability to continue to support our business growth and to
respond to business challenges could be significantly limited.
In addition, the terms of any additional equity or debt
issuances may adversely affect the value and price of our common
stock.
22
Risks
Related to this Offering
We
cannot assure you that a market will develop for our common
stock or what the market price of our common stock will
be.
Before this offering, there was no public trading market for our
common stock, and we cannot assure you that one will develop or
be sustained after this offering. If a market does not develop
or is not sustained, it may be difficult for you to sell your
shares of common stock at an attractive price or at all. We
cannot predict the prices at which our common stock will trade.
The initial public offering price for our common stock will be
determined through our negotiations with the underwriters, and
may not bear any relationship to the market price at which our
common stock will trade after this offering or to any other
established criteria of the value of our business. The price of
our common stock that will prevail in the market after this
offering may be higher or lower than the price you pay,
depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control
and may not be related to our operating performance. It is
possible that, in future quarters, our operating results may be
below the expectations of securities analysts or investors. As a
result of these and other factors, the price of our common stock
may decline, possibly materially. These fluctuations could cause
you to lose all or part of your investment in our common stock.
The public trading price for our common stock after this
offering will be affected by a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from
time to time;
|
|
|
|
volatility in the market price and trading volume of technology
companies and of companies in our industry;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes or fluctuations in our operating
results;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated changes in expectations regarding our
performance by investors or securities analysts;
|
|
|
|
the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock
after this offering or changes in financial estimates by
analysts;
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated developments in our competitors
businesses or the competitive landscape;
|
|
|
|
actual or perceived inaccuracies in information we provide to
our customers or the media;
|
|
|
|
litigation involving us, our industry or both;
|
|
|
|
regulatory developments;
|
|
|
|
privacy and security concerns, including public perception of
our practices as an invasion of privacy;
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions and trends;
|
|
|
|
major catastrophic events;
|
|
|
|
sales of large blocks of our stock;
|
|
|
|
the timing and success of new product introductions or upgrades
by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
changes in our pricing policies or payment terms or those of our
competitors;
|
|
|
|
concerns relating to the security of our network and systems;
|
|
|
|
our ability to expand our operations, domestically and
internationally, and the amount and timing of expenditures
related to this expansion; or
|
|
|
|
departures of key personnel.
|
In addition, the stock prices of many technology companies have
experienced wide fluctuations that have often been unrelated to
the operating performance of those companies.
23
In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price
of a companys securities, securities class action
litigation has often been brought against that company. If our
stock price is volatile, we may become the target of securities
litigation, which could result in substantial costs and divert
our managements attention and resources from our business.
Our
stock price could decline due to the large number of outstanding
shares of our common stock eligible for future
sale.
Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public
market following this offering, or the perception that these
sales could occur, could cause the market price of our common
stock to decline. These sales could also make it more difficult
for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future
at a time and price that we deem appropriate.
Upon completion of this offering, we will
have outstanding
shares of common stock, assuming no exercise of the
underwriters over-allotment option and no exercise of
outstanding options or warrants
after ,
2007.
The shares
sold pursuant to this offering will be immediately tradable
without restriction. Of the remaining shares:
|
|
|
|
|
shares
will be eligible for sale immediately upon completion of this
offering, subject in some cases to volume and other restrictions
of Rule 144 and Rule 701 under the Securities Act;
|
|
|
|
shares
will be eligible for sale upon the expiration of
lock-up
agreements, subject in some cases to volume and other
restrictions of Rule 144 and Rule 701 under the
Securities Act; and
|
|
|
|
shares
will be eligible for sale upon the exercise of vested options
after the expiration of the
lock-up
agreements.
|
The lock-up
agreements expire 180 days after the date of this
prospectus, provided that the
180-day
period may be extended in certain cases for up to 34 additional
days under certain circumstances where we announce or
pre-announce earnings or a material event within approximately
17 days prior to, or approximately 16 days after, the
termination of the
180-day
period. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC may, in its sole
discretion and at any time without notice, release all or any
portion of the securities subject to
lock-up
agreement. After the closing of this offering, we intend to
register
approximately shares
of common stock that have been reserved for future issuance
under our stock incentive plans.
Insiders
will continue to have substantial control over us after this
offering, which could limit your ability to influence the
outcome of key transactions, including a change of
control.
Our directors, executive officers and each of our stockholders
who own greater than 5% of our outstanding common stock and
their affiliates, in the aggregate, will beneficially own
approximately % of the outstanding shares of our
common stock after this offering. As a result, these
stockholders, if acting together, would be able to influence or
control matters requiring approval by our stockholders,
including the election of directors and the approval of mergers,
acquisitions or other extraordinary transactions. They may have
interests that differ from yours and may vote in a way with
which you disagree and which may be adverse to your interests.
This concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying,
preventing or deterring a change of control of our company,
could deprive our stockholders of an opportunity to receive a
premium for their common stock as part of a sale of our company
and might affect the market price of our common stock.
Our
management will have broad discretion over the use of the
proceeds from this offering and may not apply the proceeds of
this offering in ways that increase the value of your
investment.
Our management will have broad discretion to use the net
proceeds we receive from this offering, and you will be relying
on its judgment regarding the application of these proceeds. We
expect to use the net proceeds from this offering for general
corporate purposes, which may include working capital, capital
expenditures, other corporate expenses and potential
acquisitions of complementary products, technologies or
businesses. We have not allocated these net proceeds for any
specific purposes. However, management may not apply the net
proceeds of this offering in ways that increase the value of
your investment.
24
If you
purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you will
experience substantial and immediate dilution.
If you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, you
will experience substantial and immediate dilution of
$ per share based on an
assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the mid-point of
the range shown on the cover of this prospectus, because the
price that you pay will be substantially greater than the net
tangible book value per share of the common stock that you
acquire. This dilution is due in large part to the fact that our
earlier investors paid substantially less than the initial
public offering price when they purchased their shares of our
capital stock. You will experience additional dilution upon the
exercise of options to purchase common stock under our equity
incentive plans, if we issue restricted stock to our employees
under these plans or if we otherwise issue additional shares of
our common stock. See Dilution.
We
will incur increased costs and demands upon management as a
result of complying with the laws and regulations affecting a
public company, which could adversely affect our operating
results.
As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting
and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.
In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as rules
implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission and The
NASDAQ Stock Market, requires certain corporate governance
practices for public companies. Our management and other
personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to
public reporting requirements and corporate governance. We
expect these rules and regulations to significantly increase our
legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities
more time-consuming and costly. We will also incur additional
costs associated with our public company reporting requirements.
We are unable to currently estimate these costs with any degree
of certainty. If these costs are not offset by increased
revenues and improved financial performance, our operating
results would be adversely affected. We also expect these rules
and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for
us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we
may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or
incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar
coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to
attract and retain qualified people to serve on our board of
directors or as executive officers.
Provisions
in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and under
Delaware law might discourage, delay or prevent a change of
control of our company or changes in our management and,
therefore, depress the trading price of our common
stock.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions
that could depress the trading price of our common stock by
acting to discourage, delay or prevent a change of control of
our company or changes in our management that the stockholders
of our company may deem advantageous. These provisions:
|
|
|
|
|
establish a classified board of directors so that not all
members of our board of directors are elected at one time;
|
|
|
|
authorize blank check preferred stock that our board
of directors could issue to increase the number of outstanding
shares to discourage a takeover attempt;
|
|
|
|
prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which means that
all stockholder actions must be taken at a meeting of our
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
prohibit stockholders from calling a special meeting of our
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
provide that the board of directors is expressly authorized to
make, alter or repeal our bylaws; and
|
|
|
|
establish advance notice requirements for nominations for
elections to our board of directors or for proposing matters
that can be acted upon by stockholders at stockholder meetings.
|
Additionally, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law, which prohibits a Delaware corporation
from engaging in any of a broad range of business combinations
with any interested stockholder for a period of
three years following the date on which the stockholder became
an interested stockholder and which may discourage,
delay or prevent a change of control of our company.
25
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND INDUSTRY
DATA
This prospectus, including the sections entitled
Summary, Risk Factors,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and
Business, contains forward-looking statements. These
statements may relate to, but are not limited to, expectations
of future operating results or financial performance, capital
expenditures, introduction of new products, regulatory
compliance, plans for growth and future operations, as well as
assumptions relating to the foregoing. Forward-looking
statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties,
some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. These risks and
other factors include, but are not limited to, those listed
under Risk Factors. In some cases, you can identify
forward-looking statements by terminology such as
may, will, should,
could, expect, plan,
anticipate, believe,
estimate, predict, intend,
potential, might, would,
continue or the negative of these terms or other
comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions.
Actual events or results may differ materially.
We believe that it is important to communicate our future
expectations to our investors. However, there may be events in
the future that we are not able to accurately predict or control
and that may cause our actual results to differ materially from
the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements.
Except as required by applicable law, including the securities
laws of the United States and the rules and regulations of the
SEC, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements after we distribute this prospectus,
whether as a result of any new information, future events or
otherwise. Potential investors should not place undue reliance
on our forward-looking statements. Before you invest in our
common stock, you should be aware that the occurrence of any of
the events described in the Risk Factors section and
elsewhere in this prospectus could harm our business, prospects,
operating results and financial condition. Although we believe
that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking
statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results,
levels of activity, performance or achievements.
This prospectus also contains estimates and other information
concerning our industry, including market size and growth rates
of the markets in which we participate, that are based on
industry publications, surveys and forecasts, including those
generated by Forrester Research, IDC, JupiterResearch,
Infonetics, the Internet Advertising Bureau and
PriceWaterhouseCoopers. This information involves a number of
assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give
undue weight to these estimates. These industry publications,
surveys and forecasts generally indicate that their information
has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but do
not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of their
information. We have not independently verified their data and
accordingly cannot guarantee their accuracy or completeness. The
industry in which we operate is subject to a high degree of
uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including
those described in Risk Factors. These and other
factors could cause actual results to differ materially from
those expressed in these publications, surveys and forecasts.
26
USE OF
PROCEEDS
We estimate that the net proceeds from the sale of
the shares of our common
stock that we are selling in this offering will be approximately
$ million, based on an
assumed initial public offering price of
$ per share, the mid-point of
the range on the front cover of this prospectus, after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering
expenses. If the underwriters over-allotment option is
exercised in full, we estimate that we will receive additional
net proceeds of approximately
$ million. We will not
receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of our common stock
by the selling stockholders.
The principal purposes of this offering are to obtain additional
capital, to create a public market for our common stock and to
facilitate our future access to the public equity markets.
We will use the net proceeds from this offering for general
corporate purposes, which may include working capital, capital
expenditures, other corporate expenses and acquisitions of
complementary products, technologies or businesses. We currently
have no agreements or commitments with respect to any such
acquisitions. The timing and amount of our actual expenditures
will be based on many factors, including cash flows from
operations and the anticipated growth of our business. Pending
these uses, we intend to invest the net proceeds of this
offering primarily in short-term, investment-grade,
interest-bearing instruments.
If we were to price the offering at
$ per share, the low end of
the range on the cover of this prospectus, we estimate that we
would receive net proceeds of
$ million, assuming the total
number of shares offered by us remains the same and after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us. If we were to price the
offering at $ per share, the
high end of the range on the cover of this prospectus, then we
estimate that we would receive net proceeds of
$ million, assuming the total
number of shares offered by us remains the same and after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us.
DIVIDEND
POLICY
We have never declared or paid any dividends on our capital
stock. We anticipate that we will retain any earnings to support
operations and to finance the growth and development of our
business. Accordingly, we do not expect to pay cash dividends on
our common stock in the foreseeable future.
27
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth our cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments and capitalization as of
December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
on an actual basis without any adjustments to reflect subsequent
or anticipated events;
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma basis reflecting (i) the conversion of all
outstanding shares of our Series A, Series B,
Series C,
Series C-1,
Series D and Series E preferred stock into an
aggregate of 86,286,697 shares of our common stock
effective immediately prior to the completion of this offering,
for a total of 108,025,682 shares of common stock, which
amount includes 1,738,172 shares subject to put and
(ii) the reclassification of our preferred stock warrant
liabilities from current liabilities to additional paid in
capital effective upon the completion of this offering; and
|
|
|
|
on a pro forma as adjusted basis reflecting the conversion and
reclassification described above and the receipt by us of the
net proceeds from the sale
of shares
of common stock in this offering at an assumed initial public
offering price of $ per
share, after deducting the estimated underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us.
|
You should read this table in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in
this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
as Adjusted
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments
|
|
$
|
16,032
|
|
|
$
|
16,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock warrant liabilities
|
|
|
1,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred stock,
$0.001 par value, 73,673,224 shares authorized;
71,829,471 shares issued and outstanding actual; no shares
issued or outstanding pro forma and pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
101,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock subject to put right,
1,738,172 shares outstanding
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
|
|
4,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
(deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par
value; 130,000,000 shares authorized,
20,000,813 shares issued and outstanding actual;
150,000,000 shares authorized, 106,287,510 shares
issued and outstanding pro forma
and shares
issued and outstanding pro forma as adjusted
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(99,502
|
)
|
|
|
(99,502
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
(deficit)
|
|
|
(99,557
|
)
|
|
|
3,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
|
$
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above excludes, as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
13,619,700 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
options outstanding at a weighted-average exercise price of
$0.40 per share;
|
|
|
|
5,316,147 shares of common stock reserved for future
issuance under our 1999 Stock Plan;
|
|
|
|
7,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for future
issuance under our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, which will be
effective upon completion of this offering;
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of a warrant, which warrant shall terminate if not exercised
prior to this offering, at an exercise price of $1.00 per
share; and
|
|
|
|
775,923 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of warrants, which total includes warrants for our preferred
stock that will become exercisable for common stock after this
offering, at a weighted-average exercise price of $0.96 per
share.
|
A $1.00 decrease or increase in the offering price would result
in an approximately $ million
increase or decrease in each of as adjusted cash and cash
equivalents, as adjusted additional paid-in capital, as adjusted
total stockholders equity and as adjusted total
capitalization, assuming the total number of shares offered by
us remains the same and after deducting estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses
payable by us.
29
DILUTION
If you invest in our common stock, your interest will be diluted
to the extent of the difference between the public offering
price per share of our common stock and the pro forma as
adjusted net tangible book value per share of our common stock
after this offering. Our pro forma net tangible book value as of
December 31, 2006 was $5.2 million, or $0.05 per
share of common stock. Pro forma net tangible book value per
share represents total tangible assets less total liabilities,
divided by the number of shares of common stock outstanding
after giving effect to the conversion of all outstanding shares
of our Series A, Series B, Series C,
Series C-1,
Series D and Series E preferred stock into an
aggregate of 86,286,697 shares of our common stock
effective immediately prior to the completion of this offering,
for a total of 108,025,682 shares of common stock
outstanding on December 31, 2006, which amount includes
1,738,172 shares subject to put. After giving effect to the sale
by us
of shares
of our common stock in this offering at the assumed initial
public offering price of
$ per share, the mid-point of
the range on the front cover of this prospectus, and after
deducting the underwriting discounts and commissions and our
estimated offering expenses, our pro forma as adjusted net
tangible book value as of December 31, 2006 would have been
$ million, or
$ per share. This represents
an immediate increase in net tangible book value of
$ per share to our existing
stockholders and an immediate dilution of
$ per share to our new
investors purchasing shares of common stock in this offering.
The following table illustrates this dilution on a per share
basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed initial public offering
price per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Pro forma net tangible book value
per share as of December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in pro forma net tangible
book value per share attributable to this offering per share to
existing investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible
book value per share after this offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilution per share to new investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth as of December 31, 2006, on
a pro forma as adjusted basis, the differences between the
number of shares of common stock purchased from us, the total
consideration paid, and the average price per share paid by
existing stockholders and new investors purchasing shares of our
common stock in this offering based on an assumed initial public
offering price of $ per
share, the mid-point of the range on the front cover of this
prospectus, and before deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Existing stockholders
|
|
|
108,025,682
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
88,752,479
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
$
|
0.82
|
|
New investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table above excludes, as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
13,619,700 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of
options outstanding at a weighted-average exercise price of
$0.40 per share;
|
|
|
|
5,316,147 shares of common stock reserved for future
issuance under our 1999 Stock Plan;
|
|
|
|
7,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance
under our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan, which will be effective
upon completion of this offering;
|
|
|
|
100,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of a warrant, which warrant shall terminate if not exercised
prior to this offering, at an exercise price of $1.00 per
share; and
|
|
|
|
775,923 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise
of warrants, which total includes warrants for our preferred
stock that will become exercisable for common stock after this
offering, at a weighted-average exercise price of $0.96 per
share.
|
30
If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in
full, the percentage of shares of common stock held by existing
stockholders will decrease to approximately % of the
total number of shares of our common stock outstanding after
this offering, and the number of shares held by new investors
will be increased
to ,
or approximately % of the total number of shares of
our common stock outstanding after this offering.
A $1.00 decrease in the assumed offering price would decrease
our net tangible book value after this offering by
$ million and dilution in net
tangible book value per share to new investors by
$ , assuming the total number of
shares offered by us remains the same and after deducting
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us. A $1.00 decrease in the assumed
offering price would decrease each of total consideration paid
by new investors in the offering and total consideration paid by
all stockholders by
$ million, assuming the total
number of shares offered by us remains the same and before
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us.
A $1.00 increase in the assumed offering price would increase
our net tangible book value after this offering by
$ million and dilution in net
tangible book value per share to new investors by
$ , assuming the total number of
shares offered by us remains the same and after deducting
estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us. A $1.00 increase in the assumed
offering price would increase each of total consideration paid
by new investors in the offering and total consideration paid by
all stockholders by
$ million, assuming the total
number of shares offered by us remains the same and before
deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us.
31
SELECTED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the selected consolidated financial data set
forth below in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements, the notes to our consolidated financial statements
and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations contained elsewhere in
this prospectus.
The consolidated statements of operations data and the
consolidated statements of cash flows data for the years ended
January 31, 2003 and December 31, 2003 as well as the
consolidated balance sheet data as of January 31, 2003 and
December 31, 2003 and 2004 are derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements not included in this
prospectus. The consolidated statements of operations data and
the consolidated statements of cash flows data for each of the
three years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006 as well
as the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31,
2005 and 2006 are derived from our audited consolidated
financial statements that are included elsewhere in this
prospectus. In 2003, we changed our fiscal year to the twelve
months ended December 31. The year ended January 31,
2003 and the year ended December 31, 2003 in the table
below both include the results of operations for the month ended
January 31, 2003. The pro forma basic net income per share
data are unaudited and give effect to the conversion into common
stock of all outstanding shares of our Series A,
Series B, Series C,
Series C-1,
Series D and Series E preferred stock from their dates
of original issuance. Our historical results are not necessarily
indicative of results to be expected for future periods.
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
15,400
|
|
|
$
|
23,355
|
|
|
$
|
34,894
|
|
|
$
|
50,267
|
|
|
$
|
66,293
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues(1)
|
|
|
14,925
|
|
|
|
15,671
|
|
|
|
13,153
|
|
|
|
18,218
|
|
|
|
20,560
|
|
Selling and marketing(1)
|
|
|
9,134
|
|
|
|
11,677
|
|
|
|
13,890
|
|
|
|
18,953
|
|
|
|
21,473
|
|
Research and development(1)
|
|
|
6,172
|
|
|
|
5,444
|
|
|
|
5,493
|
|
|
|
7,416
|
|
|
|
9,009
|
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
4,431
|
|
|
|
4,124
|
|
|
|
4,982
|
|
|
|
7,089
|
|
|
|
8,293
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
2,437
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses from operations
|
|
|
35,224
|
|
|
|
37,688
|
|
|
|
37,874
|
|
|
|
54,113
|
|
|
|
60,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
|
(19,824
|
)
|
|
|
(14,333
|
)
|
|
|
(2,980
|
)
|
|
|
(3,846
|
)
|
|
|
5,587
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(885
|
)
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
231
|
|
(Loss) gain from foreign currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
125
|
|
Revaluation of preferred stock
warrant liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(20,708
|
)
|
|
|
(14,928
|
)
|
|
|
(3,226
|
)
|
|
|
(4,164
|
)
|
|
|
5,719
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(20,708
|
)
|
|
|
(14,928
|
)
|
|
|
(3,226
|
)
|
|
|
(3,982
|
)
|
|
|
5,669
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(20,708
|
)
|
|
|
(14,928
|
)
|
|
|
(3,226
|
)
|
|
|
(4,422
|
)
|
|
|
5,669
|
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred
stock
|
|
|
(2,216
|
)
|
|
|
(2,476
|
)
|
|
|
(2,141
|
)
|
|
|
(2,638
|
)
|
|
|
(3,179
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(22,924
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,404
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,367
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,060
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to
common stockholders per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(1.77
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.29
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.46
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
Weighted-average number of shares
used in per share calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
12,918,989
|
|
|
|
13,451,440
|
|
|
|
14,358,561
|
|
|
|
15,650,969
|
|
|
|
19,236,064
|
|
Pro forma net (loss) income
attributable to common stockholders per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma weighted-average number
of shares used in per share calculations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation is included in the line
items above as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments
|
|
$
|
6,973
|
|
|
$
|
9,557
|
|
|
$
|
8,404
|
|
|
$
|
9,174
|
|
|
$
|
16,032
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
11,778
|
|
|
|
15,482
|
|
|
|
15,678
|
|
|
|
20,792
|
|
|
|
31,493
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
23,603
|
|
|
|
22,154
|
|
|
|
22,967
|
|
|
|
29,477
|
|
|
|
42,087
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
13,645
|
|
|
|
15,515
|
|
|
|
18,591
|
|
|
|
27,220
|
|
|
|
32,880
|
|
Equipment loan and capital lease
obligations, long-term
|
|
|
4,072
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
2,261
|
|
Preferred stock warrant
liabilities and common stock subject to put
|
|
|
404
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
4,997
|
|
|
|
5,362
|
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
78,586
|
|
|
|
93,737
|
|
|
|
95,878
|
|
|
|
98,516
|
|
|
|
101,695
|
|
Stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(73,735
|
)
|
|
|
(89,919
|
)
|
|
|
(95,230
|
)
|
|
|
(102,294
|
)
|
|
|
(99,557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash
Flows Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
$
|
(12,653
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,912
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,907
|
|
|
$
|
4,253
|
|
|
$
|
10,905
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,865
|
|
|
|
6,604
|
|
|
|
2,745
|
|
|
|
5,123
|
|
|
|
4,259
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
1,962
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
1,208
|
|
|
|
1,071
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Other Financial and Operating
Data (unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(2)
|
|
$
|
(13,930
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,558
|
)
|
|
$
|
(221
|
)
|
|
$
|
730
|
|
|
$
|
9,945
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus the (benefit)
provision for income taxes, depreciation, amortization of
purchased intangible assets and stock-based compensation; plus
interest expense (income) and other income. Adjusted EBITDA is
not a measure of liquidity calculated in accordance with GAAP,
and should be viewed as a supplement to not a
substitute for our results of operations presented
on the basis of GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA does not purport to
represent cash flow provided by, or used in, operating
activities as defined by GAAP. Our statement of cash flows
presents our cash flow activity in accordance with GAAP.
Furthermore, Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to
similarly-titled measures reported by other companies. |
We believe Adjusted EBITDA is useful to an investor in
evaluating our operating performance for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA is widely used by investors to measure a
companys operating performance without regard to items
such as interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization,
and stock-based compensation, which can vary substantially from
company to company depending upon accounting methods and book
value of assets, capital structure and the method by which
assets were acquired; and
|
|
|
|
analysts and investors use Adjusted EBITDA as a supplemental
measure to evaluate the overall operating performance of
companies in our industry.
|
Our management uses Adjusted EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
as a measure of operating performance, because it removes the
impact of items not directly resulting from our core operations;
|
|
|
|
for planning purposes, including the preparation of our internal
annual operating budget;
|
|
|
|
to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of
our business;
|
|
|
|
to evaluate the effectiveness of our operational
strategies; and
|
|
|
|
in communications with the board of directors, stockholders,
analysts and investors concerning our financial performance.
|
A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income, the most
directly comparable GAAP measure, for each of the fiscal periods
indicated is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(20,708
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,928
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,226
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,422
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,669
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
50
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
772
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
2,437
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
5,303
|
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
2,389
|
|
|
|
2,686
|
|
|
|
2,888
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
(13,930
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,558
|
)
|
|
$
|
(221
|
)
|
|
$
|
730
|
|
|
$
|
9,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the
related notes to those statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. In addition to historical financial information, the
following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking
statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions.
Our actual results and timing of selected events may differ
materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of many factors, including those
discussed under Risk Factors and elsewhere in this
prospectus. See Cautionary Note Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements.
Overview
We provide a leading digital marketing intelligence platform
that helps our customers make better-informed business decisions
and implement more effective digital business strategies. Our
products and solutions offer our customers deep insights into
consumer behavior, including objective, detailed information
regarding usage of their online properties and those of their
competitors, coupled with information on consumer demographic
characteristics, attitudes, lifestyles and offline behavior.
Our digital marketing intelligence platform is comprised of
proprietary databases and a computational infrastructure that
measures, analyzes and reports on digital activity. The
foundation of our platform is data collected from our comScore
panel of more than two million Internet users worldwide who have
granted us explicit permission to confidentially measure their
Internet usage patterns, online and certain offline buying
behavior and other activities. By applying advanced statistical
methodologies to our panel data, we project consumers
online behavior for the total online population and a wide
variety of user categories.
We deliver our digital marketing intelligence through our
comScore Media Metrix product family and through comScore
Marketing Solutions. Media Metrix delivers digital media
intelligence by providing an independent, third-party
measurement of the size, behavior and characteristics of Web
site and online advertising network audiences among home, work
and university Internet users as well as insight into the
effectiveness of online advertising. Our Marketing Solutions
products combine the proprietary information gathered from the
comScore panel with the vertical industry expertise of comScore
analysts to deliver digital marketing intelligence, including
the measurement of online advertising effectiveness, customized
for specific industries. We typically deliver our Media Metrix
products electronically in the form of weekly, monthly or
quarterly reports. Customers can access current and historical
Media Metrix data and analyze these data anytime online. Our
Marketing Solutions products are typically delivered on a
monthly, quarterly or ad hoc basis through electronic reports
and analyses.
Our company was founded in August 1999. By 2000, we had
established a panel of Internet users and began delivering
digital marketing intelligence products that measured online
browsing and buying behavior to our first customers. We also
introduced netScore, our initial syndicated Internet audience
measurement product. We accelerated our introduction of new
products in 2003 with the launch of Plan Metrix (formerly
AiM 2.0), qSearch, the Campaign R/F (Reach and Frequency)
analysis system and product offerings that measure online
activity at the local market level. By 2004, we had built a
global panel of over two million Internet users. In that year,
in cooperation with Arbitron, we launched a service that
provides ratings of online radio audiences. In 2005, we expanded
our presence in Europe by opening an office in London. In 2006,
we continued to expand our measurement capabilities with the
launch of World Metrix, a product that provides worldwide data
on digital media usage, and Video Metrix, our product that
measures the audience for streaming online video.
We have complemented our internal development initiatives with
select acquisitions. On June 6, 2002, we acquired
certain Media Metrix assets from Jupiter Media Metrix, Inc.
Through this acquisition, we acquired certain Internet audience
measurement services that report details of Web site usage and
visitor demographics. On July 28, 2004, we acquired the
outstanding stock of Denaro and Associates, Inc, otherwise known
as Q2 Brand Intelligence, Inc. or Q2, to improve our
ability to provide our customers more robust survey research
integrated with our underlying digital marketing intelligence
platform. The total cost of the
37
acquisition was approximately $3.3 million, consisting of
cash and shares of our common stock. For the
ninety-day
period beginning July 28, 2007, the former shareholder of
Q2 (or its transferees) has the right to sell
1,060,000 shares of our common stock back to us for an
aggregate price of $2.65 million, or $2.50 per share.
On January 4, 2005, we acquired the assets and assumed
certain liabilities of SurveySite Inc., or SurveySite. Through
this acquisition, we acquired proprietary Internet-based
data-collection technologies and increased our customer
penetration and revenues in the survey business. The total cost
of the acquisition was approximately $3.6 million,
consisting of cash and shares of our common stock. For the
ninety-day
period beginning January 1, 2008, the former shareholders
of SurveySite (or their transferees) have the right to sell
678,172 shares of our common stock back to us for an
aggregate price of approximately $1.8 million, or
$2.67 per share.
Our total revenues have grown from $15.4 million during the
fiscal year ending January 31, 2003 to $66.3 million
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, a
compounded annual growth rate of approximately 63%. By
comparison, our total expenses from operations have grown from
$35.2 million to $60.7 million over the same period, a
compounded annual growth rate of approximately 20%. The growth
in our revenues was primarily the result of:
|
|
|
|
|
increased sales to existing customers, as a result of our
efforts to deepen our relationships with these clients by
increasing their awareness of, and confidence in, the value of
our digital marketing intelligence platform;
|
|
|
|
growth in our customer base through the addition of new
customers;
|
|
|
|
increases in the prices of our products and services;
|
|
|
|
the sales of new products to existing and new customers; and
|
|
|
|
growth in sales outside of the U.S. as a result of entering
into new international markets.
|
As of December 31, 2006, we had 706 customers, compared to
334 as of January 31, 2003. We sell most of our products
through our direct sales force.
Our
Revenues
We derive our revenues primarily from the fees that we charge
for subscription-based products and customized projects. We
define subscription-based revenues as revenues that we generate
from products that we deliver to a customer on a recurring
basis. We define project revenues as revenues that we generate
from customized projects that are performed for a specific
customer on a non-recurring basis. We market our
subscription-based products, customized projects and survey
services within the comScore Media Metrix product family and
through comScore Marketing Solutions.
A significant characteristic of our business model is our large
percentage of subscription-based contracts. Subscription-based
revenues accounted for 78% of our total revenues in 2004 and
decreased to 70% of total revenues in 2005 primarily due to the
acquisition of SurveySite. Subscription-based revenues increased
to 75% of total revenues in 2006.
Many of our customers who initially purchased a customized
project have subsequently purchased one of our
subscription-based products. Similarly, many of our
subscription-based customers have subsequently purchased
additional customized projects.
Historically, we have generated most of our revenues from the
sale and delivery of our products to companies and organizations
located within the United States. We intend to expand our
international revenues by selling our products and deploying our
direct sales force model in additional international markets in
the future. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006,
our international revenues were $5.7 million, an increase
of $2.4 million over international revenues of
$3.4 million for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005. International revenues comprised approximately 9% of our
total revenues in 2006 as compared to 7% of total revenues in
2005.
38
We anticipate that revenues from our U.S. customers will
continue to constitute the substantial majority of our revenues,
but we expect that revenues from customers outside of the
U.S. will increase as a percentage of total revenues as we
build greater international recognition of our brand and expand
our sales operations globally.
Subscription
Revenues
We generate a significant proportion of our subscription-based
revenues from our Media Metrix product family. Products within
the Media Metrix family include Media Metrix 2.0, Plan Metrix,
World Metrix and Video Metrix. We intend to commercially launch
Ad Metrix in the second quarter of 2007. These product offerings
provide subscribers with intelligence on digital media usage,
audience characteristics, audience demographics and online and
offline purchasing behavior. Customers who subscribe to our
Media Metrix products are provided with login IDs to our Web
site, have access to our database and can generate reports at
anytime.
We also generate subscription-based revenues from certain
reports and analyses provided through comScore Marketing
Solutions, if that work is procured by customers for at least a
nine month period and the customer enters into an agreement to
continue or extend the work. Through our Marketing Solutions
products, we deliver digital marketing intelligence relating to
specific industries, such as automotive, consumer packaged
goods, entertainment, financial services, media, pharmaceutical,
retail, technology, telecommunications and travel. This
marketing intelligence leverages our global consumer panel and
extensive database to deliver information unique to a particular
customers needs on a recurring schedule, as well as on a
continual-access basis. Our Marketing Solutions customer
agreements typically include a fixed fee with an initial term of
at least one year. We also provide these products on a
non-subscription basis as described under Project
Revenues below.
In addition, we generate subscription-based revenues from survey
products that we sell to our customers. In conducting our
surveys, we generally use our global Internet user panel. After
questionnaires are distributed to the panel members and
completed, we compile their responses and then deliver our
findings to the customer, who also has ongoing access to the
survey response data as they are compiled and updated over time.
These data include responses and information collected from the
actual survey questionnaire and can also include behavioral
information that we passively collect from our panelists. If a
customer contractually commits to having a survey conducted on a
recurring basis, we classify the revenues generated from such
survey products as subscription-based revenues. Approximately
half of the revenues derived from survey products are generated
on a subscription basis. Our contracts for survey services
typically include fixed fee agreements that range from two
months to one year.
Project
Revenues
We generate project revenues by providing customized information
reports to our customers on a non-recurring basis as part of our
comScore Marketing Solutions. For example, a customer in the
media industry might request a custom report that profiles the
behavior of the customers active online users and
contrasts their market share and loyalty with similar metrics
for a competitors online user base. If this customer
continues to request the report beyond an initial project term
of at least nine months and enters into an agreement to purchase
the report on a recurring basis, we begin to classify these
future revenues as subscription-based.
In the second quarter of 2007, we intend to commercially launch
Campaign Metrix, a product that will provide detailed
information about online advertising campaigns. Project revenues
from Campaign Metrix will be generated when a customer accesses
or downloads a report through our Web site. Pricing for our
Campaign Metrix product will initially be based on the scope of
the information provided in the report generated by the customer.
39
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based on our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The
preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts
reported in our financial statements and the accompanying notes.
We base our estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
While our significant accounting policies are described in more
detail in the notes to our consolidated financial statements
included in this prospectus, we believe the following accounting
policies to be the most critical to the judgments and estimates
used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenues in accordance with Securities and Exchange
Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104,
Revenue Recognition (SAB 104). SAB 104 requires
that four basic criteria must be met prior to revenue
recognition: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, (ii) delivery has occurred or the services have
been rendered, (iii) the fee is fixed and determinable, and
(iv) collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably
assured. Certain of our arrangements contain multiple elements,
consisting of the various services we offer. We account for
these arrangements in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. We have
determined that we do not have objective and reliable evidence
of fair value for any of our services. We therefore account for
all elements in our multiple element service arrangements as a
single unit of accounting and recognize the total value of the
arrangement on a straight-line basis over the longest contract
term.
We generate revenues by providing access to our online database
or delivering information obtained from our database, usually in
the form of periodic reports. Revenues are typically recognized
on a straight-line basis over the period in which access to data
or reports are provided, which generally ranges from three to
24 months.
We also generate revenues through survey services under
contracts ranging in term from two months to one year. Our
survey services consist of survey and questionnaire design with
subsequent data collection, analysis and reporting. We recognize
revenues on a straight-line basis over the estimated data
collection period once the survey or questionnaire design has
been delivered. Any change in the estimated data collection
period results in an adjustment to revenues recognized in future
periods.
Generally, our contracts are non-cancelable. A limited number of
customers, however, have the right to cancel their contracts by
providing us with written notice of cancellation. In the event
that a customer cancels its contract, it is not entitled to a
refund for prior services, and it will be charged for costs
incurred plus services performed up to the cancellation date.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
We record goodwill and intangible assets when we acquire other
businesses. The allocation of acquisition costs to intangible
assets and goodwill involves the extensive use of
managements estimates and assumptions, and the result of
the allocation process can have a significant impact on our
future operating results. Under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets (SFAS 142), intangible assets with
finite lives are amortized over their useful lives while
goodwill and indefinite lived assets are not amortized, but
rather are periodically tested for impairment. An impairment
review generally requires developing assumptions and projections
regarding our operating performance. In accordance with
SFAS 142, we have determined that all of our goodwill is
associated with one reporting unit as we do not operate separate
lines of business with respect to our services. Accordingly, on
an annual basis we perform the impairment assessment for
goodwill required under SFAS 142 at the enterprise level by
comparing the fair value of a reporting unit, based on estimated
future cash flow, to its carrying value including goodwill
recorded by the reporting unit. If the carrying value exceeds
the fair value, impairment is measured by comparing the derived
fair value of the goodwill to its carrying value and any
impairment
40
determined is recorded in the current period. If our estimates
or the related assumptions change in the future, we may be
required to record impairment charges to reduce the carrying
value of these assets, which could be material.
Long-lived
assets
Our long-lived assets primarily consist of property and
equipment and intangible assets. In accordance with SFAS
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, we evaluate the recoverability of our
long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying value of such assets may not
be recoverable. If an indication of impairment is present, we
compare the estimated undiscounted future cash flows to be
generated by the asset to its carrying amount. If the
undiscounted future cash flows are less than the carrying amount
of the asset, we record an impairment loss equal to the excess
of the assets carrying amount over its fair value. The
fair value is determined based on valuation techniques such as a
comparison to fair values of similar assets or using a
discounted cash flow analysis. Substantially all of our
long-lived assets are located in the United States. Although we
believe that the carrying values of our long-lived assets are
appropriately stated, changes in strategy or market conditions
or significant technological developments could significantly
impact these judgments and require adjustments to recorded asset
balances. There were no impairment charges recognized during the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, or 2006.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
We manage credit risk on accounts receivable by performing
credit evaluations of our customers on a selective basis, by
reviewing our accounts and contracts and by providing
appropriate allowances for uncollectible amounts. Allowances are
based on managements judgment, which considers historical
experience and specific knowledge of accounts that may not be
collectible. We make provisions based on our historical bad debt
experience, a specific review of all significant outstanding
invoices and an assessment of general economic conditions. If
the financial condition of a customer deteriorates, resulting in
an impairment of its ability to make payments, additional
allowances may be required.
Income
Taxes
We account for income taxes using the liability method in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. We estimate our tax liability through calculations we
perform for the determination of our current tax liability,
together with assessing temporary differences resulting from the
different treatment of items for income tax and financial
reporting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax
assets and liabilities, which are recorded on our balance sheet.
Management then assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets
will be recovered in future periods. In assessing the need for a
valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset, we
consider factors such as future reversals of existing taxable
temporary differences, taxable income in prior carryback years,
if carryback is permitted under the tax law, tax planning
strategies and future taxable income exclusive of reversing
temporary differences and carryforwards. To the extent that we
cannot conclude that it is more likely than not that the benefit
of such assets will be realized, we establish a valuation
allowance to adjust the net carrying value of such assets.
To date, we have recorded a valuation allowance against our
deferred tax assets, principally net operating loss
carryforwards, due to uncertainty regarding our ability to
generate future taxable income. Any current income tax benefit
or provision to date has been offset by changes in the valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets. To the extent we
determine that all or a portion of our valuation allowance is no
longer necessary, we will recognize an income tax benefit in the
period such determination is made for the reversal of the
valuation allowance. Once the valuation allowance is eliminated,
its reversal will no longer be available to offset our current
tax provision. These events could have a material impact on our
reported results of operations.
As of December 31, 2006, we had $81.2 million of both
federal and state net operating loss carryforwards each of which
begin to expire in 2020 for federal and began to expire in 2006
for state income tax reporting
41
purposes. In addition, we had net operating loss carryforwards
related to our foreign subsidiaries totalling $966,000 as of
December 31, 2005 and $703,000 as of December 31,
2006, which begin to expire in 2010. Under Section 382 of
the Internal Revenue Code, the utilization of net operating loss
carryforwards is limited based on changes in percentage of our
ownership. As a result of prior ownership changes, we believe
that we will be limited in our use of net operating loss
carryforwards to offset taxable income.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Through December 31, 2005, as permitted by
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123), we applied the intrinsic value
method for accounting for stock-based compensation as set forth
in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25).
For purposes of the pro forma disclosures required under
SFAS 123, we used the minimum-value method to estimate the
fair value of our stock-based awards. On January 1, 2006,
we adopted SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123R). Under SFAS 123R, a
non-public company that previously used the minimum value method
for pro forma disclosure purposes is required to adopt the
standard using the prospective method. Under the prospective
method, all awards granted, modified or settled after the date
of adoption are accounted for using the measurement, recognition
and attribution provisions of SFAS 123R. As a result,
stock-based awards granted prior to the date of adoption of
SFAS 123R will continue to be accounted for under
APB 25 with no recognition of stock-based compensation in
future periods, unless such awards are modified or settled.
Subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 123R, we estimate the
fair value of our stock-based awards on the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The determination of
fair value using the Black-Scholes model requires a number of
complex and subjective variables. One key input into the model
is the estimated fair value of our common stock on the date of
grant. Our board of directors has estimated the fair value of
our common stock for the purpose of establishing exercise prices
for our stock option grants. Our board has relied upon market
place transaction history as well as the assistance of
independent valuation specialists for purposes of estimating the
fair value of our common stock.
Other key variables in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
include the expected volatility of our common stock price, the
expected term of the award and the risk-free interest rate. In
addition, under SFAS 123R, we are required to estimate
forfeitures of unvested awards when recognizing compensation
expense. If factors change and we employ different assumptions
in the application of SFAS 123R in future periods, the
compensation expense we record may differ significantly from
what we have recorded during 2006.
At December 31, 2006, total estimated unrecognized
compensation expense related to unvested stock-based awards
granted prior to that date was $1.3 million, which is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
1.86 years.
We expect stock-based compensation expense to increase in
absolute dollars as a result of the adoption of SFAS 123R
as options that were granted at the beginning of 2006 and beyond
vest. Beginning in 2007, we expect to make use of restricted
stock awards and reduce our use of stock options as a form of
stock-based compensation. The actual amount of stock-based
compensation expense we record in any fiscal period will depend
on a number of factors, including the number of shares subject
to the stock options issued, the fair value of our common stock
at the time of issuance and the expected volatility of our stock
price over time.
Estimation
of Fair Value of Warrants to Purchase Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock
On July 1, 2005, we adopted FASB Staff Position
150-5 (FSP
150-5). Our
outstanding warrants to purchase shares of our redeemable
convertible preferred stock are subject to the requirements in
FSP 150-5,
which require us to classify these warrants as current
liabilities and to adjust the value of these warrants to their
fair value at the end of each reporting period. At the time of
adoption, we recorded $440,000 for the cumulative effect of this
change in accounting principle to reflect the cumulative change
in estimated fair value of these warrants as of that date. We
recorded $14,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005 and
$224,000 for the year ended December 31, 2006, to reflect
further increases in the estimated fair value of the
42
warrants. We estimated the fair value of these warrants at the
respective dates using the Black-Scholes option valuation model,
based on the estimated market value of the underlying redeemable
convertible preferred stock at the valuation measurement date,
the contractual term of the warrant, risk-free interest rates
and expected dividends on and expected volatility of the price
of the underlying redeemable convertible preferred stock. These
estimates, especially the market value of the underlying
redeemable convertible preferred stock and the expected
volatility, are highly judgmental and could differ materially in
the future.
Upon the closing of this offering, all outstanding warrants to
purchase shares of our preferred stock will become warrants to
purchase shares of our common stock and, as a result, will no
longer be subject to FSP
150-5. The
then-current aggregate fair value of these warrants will be
reclassified from liabilities to additional paid-in capital, a
component of stockholders equity, and we will cease to
record any related periodic fair value adjustments. We
anticipate that we will incur a non-cash charge relating to our
outstanding warrants for preferred stock in the period in which
this offering closes. Assuming that the price at which our
common stock is valued for these purposes is the initial public
offering price of
$
per share, the amount of that charge would be approximately
$ .
The exact amount of the charge may depend on the closing trading
price of our common stock on The NASDAQ Global Market
on ,
the expected date of the closing of this offering.
Seasonality
Historically, a slightly higher percentage of our customers have
renewed their subscription products with us toward the end of
the fourth quarter. While we execute projects for our customers
throughout the year, we have historically experienced a slight
upturn in our project-based business in the fourth quarter.
Results
of Operations
The following table sets forth selected consolidated statements
of operations data as a percentage of total revenues for each of
the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
36.2
|
|
|
|
31.0
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
|
|
37.7
|
|
|
|
32.4
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
13.6
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses from operations
|
|
|
108.5
|
|
|
|
107.7
|
|
|
|
91.6
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
|
(8.5
|
)
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
(Loss) gain from foreign currency
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Revaluation of preferred stock
warrant liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred
stock
|
|
|
(6.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to
common stockholders
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(14.0
|
)%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
Years
Ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 v.
|
|
|
2005 v.
|
|
|
2004 v.
|
|
|
2005 v.
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
34,894
|
|
|
$
|
50,267
|
|
|
$
|
66,293
|
|
|
$
|
15,373
|
|
|
$
|
16,026
|
|
|
|
44.1
|
%
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
Total revenues increased for the year ended December 31,
2006 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2005. This
increase was largely driven by a combination of increased
business with existing customers, continued growth in the number
of customers for both our subscription and our project-based
products and, to a lesser extent, general increases in our price
levels from 2005 to 2006. Our customer base grew during this
period from 565 as of December 31, 2005 to 706 as of
December 31, 2006.
In 2005, total revenues increased from 2004 primarily due to the
growth in our subscription revenues driven by deepening
relationships with existing customers, the expansion of our
customer base, revenues attributable to the acquisition of
SurveySite and Q2, the introduction of new products,
international expansion and, to a lesser extent, general
increases in our price levels in 2005 from 2004. In addition, we
were successful in growing our project revenues with existing
and new customers during this period. Our customer base grew
during this period from 469 as of December 31, 2004 to 565
as of December 31, 2005. Our 2005 revenues were positively
impacted by the acquisitions of SurveySite and Q2. SurveySite,
which we acquired on January 4, 2005, contributed
$5.1 million in revenues in 2005. Q2 contributed
$3.6 million in revenues in 2005 as compared to
$1.5 million in revenues in 2004, following our acquisition
of Q2 on July 28, 2004.
Revenues from customers outside of the U.S. totaled
$3.4 million, or approximately 7% of total revenues, in
2005 and totaled approximately $5.7 million, or
approximately 9% of total revenues, in 2006, representing an
increase of $2.4 million. This increase was primarily due
to our ongoing efforts to expand our international presence,
which included the opening of a European office in London in the
first half of 2005.
Cost of
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 v.
|
|
|
2005 v.
|
|
|
2004 v.
|
|
|
2005 v.
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
13,153
|
|
|
$
|
18,218
|
|
|
$
|
20,560
|
|
|
$
|
5,065
|
|
|
$
|
2,342
|
|
|
|
38.5
|
%
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
As a percentage of revenues
|
|
|
37.7
|
%
|
|
|
36.2
|
%
|
|
|
31.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues consists primarily of expenses related to
operating our network infrastructure and the recruitment,
maintenance and support of our consumer panels. Expenses
associated with these areas include the salaries and related
expenses of network operations, survey operations, custom
analytics and technical support, all of which are expensed as
they are incurred. Cost of revenues also includes data
collection costs for our products and operational costs
associated with our data centers, including depreciation expense
associated with computer equipment.
Cost of revenues increased in 2006 as compared to 2005,
primarily due to increased costs associated with supporting our
consumer panel and data centers. Cost of revenues declined as a
percentage of revenues over the same period primarily due to an
increase in revenues and a moderation of the increases in costs
to build and maintain our panel. The decline in cost of revenues
as a percentage of revenues was offset in part by increases in
bandwidth and data costs, which grew 9%. The headcount and costs
associated with our technology staff grew at a lower rate than
our growth in revenues.
Cost of revenues increased in 2005 as compared to 2004 primarily
due to our acquisition of SurveySite and higher costs associated
with data center operations and employee salaries, benefits and
related costs required to support growth in our revenues and
customer base during 2005. The cost of revenues as a percentage
of revenues declined in 2005 compared to 2004 due to relatively
flat panel costs and smaller
44
increases in bandwidth and data center costs, which did not grow
at the same rate as our customer base and revenues. The
headcount and costs associated with our technology staff grew at
a lower rate than our growth in revenues.
We expect cost of revenues to increase in absolute dollar
amounts as we seek to grow our business but vary as a percentage
of revenues depending on whether we benefit from investments in
our panel and network infrastructure.
Selling
and Marketing Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 v.
|
|
|
2005 v.
|
|
|
2004 v.
|
|
|
2005 v.
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses
|
|
$
|
13,890
|
|
|
$
|
18,953
|
|
|
$
|
21,473
|
|
|
$
|
5,063
|
|
|
$
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
36.5
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
As a percentage of revenues
|
|
|
39.8
|
%
|
|
|
37.7
|
%
|
|
|
32.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries,
benefits, commissions and bonuses paid to our direct sales force
and industry analysts, as well as costs related to online and
offline advertising, product management, industry conferences,
promotional materials, public relations, other sales and
marketing programs, and allocated overhead, including rent and
depreciation. All selling and marketing costs are expensed as
they are incurred. Commission plans are developed for our
account managers with criteria and size of sales quotas that
vary depending upon the individuals role. Commissions are
paid to a salesperson and are expensed as selling and marketing
costs when a sales contract is executed by both the customer and
comScore. In the case of multi-year agreements, one year of
commissions is paid initially, with the remaining amounts paid
at the beginning of the succeeding years.
Selling and marketing expenses increased in 2006 as compared to
2005 in absolute dollars, primarily due to increased employee
salaries and benefits and related costs resulting from
additional account management personnel in our sales force, plus
an increase in commission costs associated with increased
revenues. Our selling and marketing headcount increased from
143 employees as of December 31, 2005 to
155 employees as of December 31, 2006. In addition,
the expansion of our European office in London and increased
marketing efforts in Europe contributed to our increase in
selling and marketing expenses and headcount in 2006. The
decrease in selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of
revenues during this period reflects the increased productivity
of our direct sales force and an increase in revenues.
Selling and marketing expenses increased in 2005 as compared to
2004, primarily due to an increase in the number of account
managers, higher commissions associated with our growth in
revenues and an increase in online and offline advertising and
promotional efforts in support of building our brands. In
addition, our selling and marketing headcount increased from 77
employees as of December 31, 2004 to 143 employees as of
December 31, 2005. The acquisition of SurveySite and the
opening of our first European office in London also contributed
to our increase in selling and marketing expenses and headcount
in 2005. The decrease in selling and marketing expenses as a
percentage of revenues during this period reflected the
increased productivity of our direct sales force.
We expect selling and marketing expenses to increase in absolute
dollar amounts as we continue to grow our selling and marketing
efforts but to vary in future periods as a percentage of
revenues depending on whether we benefit from increased
productivity in our sales force and from increased revenues
resulting in part from our ongoing marketing initiatives.
45
Research
and Development Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 v.
|
|
|
2005 v.
|
|
|
2004 v.
|
|
|
2005 v.
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
5,493
|
|
|
$
|
7,416
|
|
|
$
|
9,009
|
|
|
$
|
1,923
|
|
|
$
|
1,593
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
|
21.5
|
%
|
As a percentage of revenues
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses include new product
development costs, consisting primarily of compensation and
related costs for personnel associated with research and
development activities, and allocated overhead, including rent
and depreciation.
Research and development expenses increased in 2006 as compared
to 2005 primarily due to increased headcount and our continued
focus on developing new products, such as World Metrix, Video
Metrix, Campaign Metrix and Ad Metrix. Research and development
costs decreased slightly as a percentage of revenues, primarily
due to our growth in revenues.
The increase in research and development expenses in 2005
compared to 2004 was due to new product development activity,
including the launch of a streaming media audience measurement
product. The acquisition and integration of SurveySites
operations also contributed to the absolute dollar increase in
research and development costs during this period.
We expect research and development expenses to increase in
absolute dollar amounts as we continue to enhance and expand our
product offerings. As a result of the size and diversity of our
panel and our historical investment in our technology
infrastructure, we expect that we will be able to develop new
products with moderate increases in research and development
spending as compared to our growth in revenues. We also expect
research and development expenses to moderate due to our
decision to outsource certain software development activities in
2005.
General
and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 v.
|
|
|
2005 v.
|
|
|
2004 v.
|
|
|
2005 v.
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
4,982
|
|
|
$
|
7,089
|
|
|
$
|
8,293
|
|
|
$
|
2,107
|
|
|
$
|
1,204
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
As a percentage of revenues
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and related expenses for executive management, finance,
accounting, human capital, legal, information technology and
other administrative functions, as well as professional fees,
overhead, including allocated rent and depreciation, and
expenses incurred for other general corporate purposes.
General and administrative expenses increased in 2006 as
compared to 2005, primarily due to increased professional fees
and expanding our finance department. As a percentage of
revenues, general and administrative expenses decreased in 2006
as compared to 2005, due primarily to our growth in revenues.
General and administrative expenses increased in 2005 as
compared to 2004, primarily due to higher salaries, benefits and
related costs associated with our existing employees plus an
increase in our general and administrative headcount from 14
employees as of December 31, 2004 to 27 employees as of
December 31, 2005. The higher headcount was due primarily
to an increase in employees in such functions as finance,
accounting, human capital and legal, as we built our staff and
infrastructure to support our growth. Our acquisition of
SurveySite also contributed to the increase in general and
administrative expenses and related headcount in 2005. On a
percentage of revenues basis, general and administrative
expenses were flat in 2005 as compared to 2004, as the increase
in headcount related to broadening our administrative support
capabilities and the acquisition of SurveySite was offset by the
growth in our customer base and revenues.
46
We expect general and administrative expenses to increase on an
absolute basis in future annual periods as we incur increased
costs associated with being a public company. Operating as a
public company will present additional management and reporting
requirements that will significantly increase our
directors and officers liability insurance premiums
and professional fees both in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of revenues. We also anticipate hiring additional
personnel to help manage future growth and our operations as a
public company.
Amortization
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 v.
|
|
|
2005 v.
|
|
|
2004 v.
|
|
|
2005 v.
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
$
|
356
|
|
|
$
|
2,437
|
|
|
$
|
1,371
|
|
|
$
|
2,081
|
|
|
$
|
(1,066
|
)
|
|
|
584.6
|
%
|
|
|
(43.7
|
)%
|
As a percentage of revenues
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense consists of charges related to the
amortization of intangible assets associated with past
acquisitions.
Amortization expense decreased during fiscal year 2006 over 2005
because certain intangible assets related to previous
acquisitions were fully amortized as of that period.
The increase in amortization expense from 2004 to 2005 in
absolute dollars is attributable primarily to the amortization
expense relating to the Q2 acquisition on July 28, 2004 and
the SurveySite acquisition on January 4, 2005.
Absent additional acquisitions, we expect amortization expense
to continue to decline as the remaining amount of intangible
assets related to previous acquisitions is amortized.
Interest
(Expense) Income, Net
Interest income consists primarily of interest earned from
short-term investments, such as auction rate securities, and our
cash and cash equivalent balances. Interest expense is incurred
due to capital leases pursuant to several equipment loan and
security agreements and a line of credit that we have entered
into in order to finance the lease of various hardware and other
equipment purchases. Our capital lease obligations are secured
by a senior security interest in eligible equipment.
Interest (expense) income, net was $(246,000) in 2004,
$(208,000) in 2005 and $231,000 in 2006. The
year-to-year
change from 2004 to 2005 and from 2005 to 2006 primarily
reflects the net effect of interest income that we earned on our
cash balances offset by the interest expense associated with the
capital leases that we had in place in each year. Our net
interest expense decreased from 2004 to 2005 due to our larger
cash and investments balances and the lower amounts outstanding
under our capital leases. We reported net interest income in
2006 due to a $6.9 million increase in our cash and
investments balance. We also continued to reduce the outstanding
balance on our outstanding capital lease obligations.
Gain/Loss
on Foreign Currency Transactions
Our gains and losses on foreign currency transactions arise from
our Canadian and United Kingdom foreign subsidiaries that hold
cash and receivables in currencies other than its functional
currency. Our loss on foreign currency transactions in 2005 was
$96,000. We recorded a gain of $125,000 in 2006 as a result of
fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar
and the Canadian dollar, Euro and British Pound.
Provision
for Income Taxes
As of December 31, 2006, we had net operating loss
carryforwards for federal income tax purposes in the amount of
approximately $81.2 million, which begin to expire in 2020
for federal and began to expire in 2006 for state income tax
reporting purposes. In the future, we intend to utilize any
carryforwards available to us to reduce our tax payments. These
carryforwards may be subject to annual limitations based on
changes in
47
percentage of our ownership as limited under Section 382 of
the Internal Revenue Code. In 2005, we had an income tax benefit
of $182,000 related to a deferred tax liability of $356,000
associated with a temporary difference related to certain
acquired intangible assets of SurveySite. This compares to an
income tax expense of $50,000 in 2006 reflecting a payment of
alternative minimum tax (AMT) partly offset by a decrease in the
deferred tax liability.
Quarterly
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth selected unaudited quarterly
consolidated statement of operations data for each of the
quarters indicated. The consolidated financial statements for
each of these quarters have been prepared on the same basis as
the audited consolidated financial statements included in this
prospectus and, in the opinion of management, include all
adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the
consolidated results of operations for these periods. You should
read this information together with our consolidated financial
statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
prospectus. These quarterly operating results are not
necessarily indicative of the results for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
Jun. 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
Jun. 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
11,135
|
|
|
$
|
13,150
|
|
|
$
|
12,953
|
|
|
$
|
13,029
|
|
|
$
|
14,985
|
|
|
$
|
16,906
|
|
|
$
|
16,165
|
|
|
$
|
18,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues(1)
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
|
|
4,602
|
|
|
|
4,817
|
|
|
|
5,148
|
|
|
|
5,205
|
|
|
|
4,977
|
|
|
|
5,230
|
|
Selling and marketing(1)
|
|
|
4,234
|
|
|
|
4,813
|
|
|
|
4,821
|
|
|
|
5,085
|
|
|
|
5,345
|
|
|
|
5,323
|
|
|
|
5,171
|
|
|
|
5,634
|
|
Research and development(1)
|
|
|
1,678
|
|
|
|
1,876
|
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
2,137
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
2,273
|
|
|
|
2,341
|
|
General and administrative(1)
|
|
|
1,489
|
|
|
|
1,804
|
|
|
|
1,779
|
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
|
|
1,918
|
|
|
|
2,176
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
2,302
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
612
|
|
|
|
601
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses from operations
|
|
|
11,958
|
|
|
|
13,959
|
|
|
|
13,722
|
|
|
|
14,474
|
|
|
|
14,919
|
|
|
|
15,295
|
|
|
|
14,651
|
|
|
|
15,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
|
(823
|
)
|
|
|
(809
|
)
|
|
|
(769
|
)
|
|
|
(1,445
|
)
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
1,611
|
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
2,396
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
(Loss) gain from foreign currency
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
Revaluation of preferred stock
warrant liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(211
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(902
|
)
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
|
|
(886
|
)
|
|
|
(1,495
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
|
2,649
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
(829
|
)
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
|
|
(1,456
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
|
2,599
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
(829
|
)
|
|
|
(1,288
|
)
|
|
|
(1,456
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
1,390
|
|
|
|
1,595
|
|
|
|
2,599
|
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred
stock
|
|
|
(611
|
)
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
(675
|
)
|
|
|
(709
|
)
|
|
|
(742
|
)
|
|
|
(777
|
)
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to
common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(1,460
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,472
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,963
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,165
|
)
|
|
$
|
(657
|
)
|
|
$
|
613
|
|
|
$
|
783
|
|
|
$
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amortization of stock-based compensation is included in the line
items above as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
Jun. 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
Jun. 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a Percentage of Total Revenues
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
Jun. 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 31,
|
|
|
Jun. 30,
|
|
|
Sept. 30,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
35.3
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
38.0
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
|
|
|
37.2
|
|
|
|
39.0
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
14.7
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses from operations
|
|
|
107.4
|
|
|
|
106.2
|
|
|
|
105.8
|
|
|
|
111.1
|
|
|
|
99.6
|
|
|
|
90.5
|
|
|
|
90.6
|
|
|
|
86.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from operations
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Interest (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
(Loss) gain from foreign currency
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
Revaluation of preferred stock
warrant liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes
and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(8.1
|
)
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
(6.8
|
)
|
|
|
(11.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
14.5
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income
taxes
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
Accretion of redeemable preferred
stock
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
(4.9
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
(4.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income attributable to
common stockholders
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
(11.2
|
)
|
|
|
(15.1
|
)
|
|
|
(16.6
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over the eight quarters of 2005 and 2006, revenues have
generally increased due primarily to increases in subscription
revenues from existing customers, growth in our customer base
(both domestically and internationally), general increases in
pricing for our products and the acquisition of SurveySite. In
2005, revenues increased sequentially from the first quarter to
the second quarter before declining slightly in the third
quarter and remaining relatively flat in the fourth quarter.
Over these quarterly periods, fluctuations in project revenues
partially offset the steady growth in subscription revenues and
contributed to the relatively flat revenues on a sequential
basis from the second through the fourth quarters of 2005. In
2006, revenues increased significantly
49
on a sequential basis in the first and second quarters before
decreasing in the third quarter due to fluctuations in the
closing of agreements relating to, and the execution of,
projects. Revenues increased significantly in the fourth quarter
of 2006 due to increased growth in subscription revenues for
existing and new customers. Subscription revenues increased
sequentially in each of the quarters presented.
Cost of revenues as a percentage of total revenues held
relatively steady in each of the quarters in 2005 before
declining in 2006. The decrease in cost of revenues on a
percentage basis was due to the growth in revenues relative to
the moderation in fixed costs to support our consumer panel,
data center and technical infrastructure.
On an absolute basis, total expenses from operations increased
significantly in the second quarter of 2005 due primarily to
costs associated with the integration of the Q2 and SurveySite
acquisitions and certain expenses for external data sources.
Total expenses from operations remained relatively flat in the
third quarter of 2005 and increased in the fourth quarter of
2005, primarily due to higher sales costs related to the opening
of our first European sales office, located in London, and
increased general and administrative costs in support of overall
business growth. On an absolute basis, total expenses from
operations declined slightly in the first quarter of 2006 before
increasing in the second quarter of 2006, due to increases in
general and administrative expenses associated with the hiring
of new finance personnel and increases in professional services
fees related to anticipated business expansion. In addition,
expenses from operations increased in the second quarter of 2006
due to higher research and development costs tied to the
development of several new products. After a decline in the
third quarter, expenses from operations increased again in the
fourth quarter of 2006, due to increased commissions tied to
higher sales growth plus higher salaries, benefits and related
costs associated with hiring additional personnel in our
operations, technology, sales, research and development and
general and administrative organizations to support the growth
of our business. The total expenses from operations in 2006
increased at a lower rate than revenues and we were consequently
able to better leverage our cost structure.
We became profitable on a net income basis in the first quarter
of 2006, and were profitable on a net income basis every quarter
in 2006 as our revenues increased significantly during these
periods and our costs grew at a lower rate.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The following table summarizes our cash flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Consolidated Cash Flow
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
$
|
1,907
|
|
|
$
|
4,253
|
|
|
$
|
10,905
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(1,332
|
)
|
|
|
(2,505
|
)
|
|
|
(9,573
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
(952
|
)
|
|
|
(1,092
|
)
|
|
|
(1,381
|
)
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on
cash
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
and equivalents
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
Since our inception, we have funded our operations and met our
capital expenditure requirements primarily with venture capital
and private equity funding. In five separate issuances of
preferred stock, from Series A on September 27, 1999
to Series E on August 1, 2003, we have raised over
$88 million from a number of institutional investors. The
proceeds from all of these issuances have been used for general
business purposes, with the exception of the Series E
Preferred Stock offering, which was partially used to extinguish
a $1.5 million bank note. Each share of preferred stock is
convertible into common stock at the respective conversion ratio
for each series of preferred stock at any time, subject to
adjustment triggered by changes in our capitalization such as a
stock split. Conversion is automatic in the event of a public
offering of common stock at a price of at least $2.50 per
share with gross proceeds of at least $25 million. This
conversion is expected to take place upon consummation of this
offering.
Our principal uses of cash historically have consisted of
payroll and other operating expenses and payments related to the
purchase of equipment primarily to support our consumer panel
and technical
50
infrastructure required to support our customer base. Since the
beginning of 2004, we have purchased over $4.6 million in
property and equipment, made $3.9 million in principal
payments on capital lease obligations, and spent
$1.9 million as the cash component of consideration paid
for acquisitions.
As of December 31, 2006, our principal sources of liquidity
consisted of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments
of $16.0 million.
Operating
Activities
Our cash flows from operating activities are significantly
influenced by our investments in personnel and infrastructure to
support the anticipated growth in our business, increases in the
number of customers using our products and the amount and timing
of payments made by these customers.
We generated approximately $10.9 million of net cash from
operating activities during 2006. The significant components of
cash flows from operations were net income of $5.7 million,
$4.3 million in non-cash depreciation and amortization
expenses, a $1.4 million increase in accounts payable and
accrued expenses and a $3.1 million increase in amounts
collected from customers in advance of when we recognize
revenues as a result of our growing customer base, offset by a
$3.9 million increase in accounts receivable.
We generated $4.3 million of net cash from operating
activities during 2005. The significant components of cash flows
from operations were a $6.4 million increase in amounts
collected from customers in advance of when we recognized
revenues as a result of our growing customer base, and
$5.1 million in non-cash depreciation and amortization
expenses. These items were partially offset by a
$3.5 million net increase in accounts receivable related to
our larger customer base, a net loss of $4.4 million and
other uses of cash in operations.
We generated $1.9 million of net cash from operating
activities in 2004. The significant components of cash flows
from operations were a $0.6 million increase in amounts
collected from customers in advance of when we recognized
revenues as a result of our growing customer base, a
$1.7 million net increase in accounts payable and accrued
expenses due to the timing of payments to our vendors when
compared to the same period in 2003 and $2.7 million in
non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses. These items
were partially offset by a $0.7 million net increase in
accounts receivable due to our larger customer base, a net loss
of $3.2 million and other uses of cash in operations.
Investing
Activities
Our primary investing activities have consisted of purchases of
computer network equipment to support our Internet user panel
and maintenance of our database, furniture and equipment to
support our operations, and payments related to the acquisition
of several companies. As our customer base continues to expand,
we expect purchases of technical infrastructure equipment to
grow in absolute dollars. The extent of these investments will
be affected by our ability to expand relationships with existing
customers, grow our customer base, introduce new digital formats
and increase our international presence.
We used $9.6 million of net cash in investing activities
during 2006, a net $7.0 million of which was used to
purchase short-term investments, $2.3 million of which was
used to purchase property and equipment and $0.3 million of
which was used to pay contingent considerations associated with
our Q2 and SurveySite acquisitions. We used $2.5 million of
net cash in investing activities during 2005, of which
$1.1 million was used to purchase property and equipment,
$0.9 million was used as part of the acquisition of
SurveySite and $0.3 million was used to pay contingent
consideration associated with the Q2 acquisition. In 2004, we
used $1.3 million of net cash in investing activities,
$1.2 million of which was used to purchase property and
equipment and $0.9 million of which was used as part of the
consideration for the acquisition of Q2, partially offset by
$0.8 million in net proceeds from the sale of short-term
investments.
We expect to achieve greater economies of scale and operating
leverage as we expand our customer base and utilize our Internet
user panel and technical infrastructure more efficiently. While
we anticipate that it will be necessary for us to continue to
invest in our Internet user panel, technical infrastructure and
technical personnel to support the combination of an increased
customer base, new products, international expansion and new
digital market intelligence formats, we believe that these
investment requirements will be less than
51
the revenue growth generated by these actions. This should
result in a lower rate of growth in our capital expenditures to
support our technical infrastructure. In any given period, the
timing of our incremental capital expenditure requirements could
impact our cost of revenues, both in absolute dollars and as a
percentage of revenues.
Financing
Activities
Our primary financing activities since 2004 have consisted of
financings to fund the acquisition of capital assets. We entered
into an equipment lease agreement with GE Capital in 2003 and a
line of credit agreement with GE Capital in 2005 to finance the
purchase of hardware and other computer equipment to support our
business growth. These borrowings were secured by a senior
security interest in the equipment acquired under the facility.
In December 2006, we entered into an equipment lease agreement
with Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC to finance
the purchase of new hardware and other computer equipment as we
continue to expand our technology infrastructure in support of
our business growth. This agreement includes a $5 million
line of credit available through December 31, 2007. Through
December 31, 2006, we used this credit facility to
establish an equipment lease for the amount of approximately
$2.9 million. The base term for this lease is three years
and includes a small charge in the event of prepayment.
We used $1.4 million of net cash in financing activities
during 2006. We used $1.6 million to make payments on our
capital lease obligations partially offset by $241,000 in
proceeds from the exercise of our common stock options.
We used $1.1 million of net cash from financing activities
during 2005. We used $1.2 million to make payments on our
capital lease obligations partially offset by $136,000 in
proceeds from the exercise of our common stock options.
In 2004, we used approximately $1.0 million of cash in
financing activities. Substantially all of the use of this cash
resulted from payments on our capital lease obligations.
We do not have any special purpose entities, and other than
operating leases for office space, described below, we do not
engage in off-balance sheet financing arrangements.
Contractual
Obligations and Known Future Cash Requirements
Set forth below is information concerning our known contractual
obligations as of December 31, 2006 that are fixed and
determinable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations
|
|
$
|
4,418
|
|
|
$
|
1,986
|
|
|
$
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
5,058
|
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
|
2,063
|
|
|
|
760
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,476
|
|
|
$
|
3,995
|
|
|
$
|
4,495
|
|
|
$
|
760
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our principal lease commitments consist of obligations under
leases for office space and computer and telecommunications
equipment. We finance the purchase of some of our computer
equipment under a capital lease arrangement over a period of
36 months. Our purchase obligations relate to outstanding
orders to purchase computer equipment and are typically small;
they do not materially impact our overall liquidity.
We currently have a line of credit for up to $5.0 million
available to us until December 31, 2007. We have used
$2.9 million of such line of credit to establish an
equipment lease for the amount of approximately
$2.9 million bearing interest at a rate of 7.75% per annum.
52
Future
Capital Requirements
We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents, and
short-term investments and operating cash flow, will be
sufficient to meet our projected operating and capital
expenditure requirements for at least the next twelve months. In
addition, we expect that the net proceeds from this offering
will provide us with the financial flexibility to execute our
strategic objectives, including the ability to make acquisitions
and strategic investments. Our ability to generate cash,
however, is subject to our performance, general economic
conditions, industry trends and other factors. To the extent
that funds from this offering, combined with existing cash, cash
equivalents, short-term investments and operating cash flow are
insufficient to fund our future activities and requirements, we
may need to raise additional funds through public or private
equity or debt financing. If we issue equity securities in order
to raise additional funds, substantial dilution to existing
stockholders may occur.
For the
ninety-day
period beginning July 28, 2007, the former shareholder of
Q2 has the right to sell its 1,060,000 shares back to us
for an aggregate price of $2.65 million, or $2.50 per
share. For the
ninety-day
period beginning January 1, 2008, the former shareholders
of SurveySite have the right to sell their 678,172 shares
back to us for an aggregate price of approximately
$1.8 million, or $2.67 per share.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our
financial position due to adverse changes in financial market
prices and rates. We do not hold or issue financial instruments
for trading purposes or have any derivative financial
instruments. To date, most payments made under our contracts are
denominated in U.S. dollars and we have not experienced
material gains or losses as a result of transactions denominated
in foreign currencies. As of December 31, 2006, our cash
reserves were maintained in money market investment accounts and
fixed income securities totaling $16.0 million. These
securities, like all fixed income instruments, are subject to
interest rate risk and will decline in value if market interest
rates increase. We have the ability to hold our fixed income
investments until maturity and, therefore, we would not expect
to experience any material adverse impact in income or cash flow.
Foreign
Currency Risk
A portion of our revenues is derived from transactions
denominated in U.S. dollars, even though we maintain sales and
business operations in foreign countries. As such, we have
exposure to adverse changes in exchange rates associated with
operating expenses of our foreign operations, but we believe
this exposure to be immaterial at this time. As such, we do not
currently engage in any transactions that hedge foreign currency
exchange rate risk. As we grow our international operations, our
exposure to foreign currency risk could become more significant.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109. This interpretation clarifies the accounting for
income taxes by prescribing that a company should use a
more-likely-than-not recognition threshold based on the
technical merits of the tax position taken. Tax provisions that
meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold should be
measured as the largest amount of tax benefits, determined on a
cumulative probability basis, which is more likely than not to
be realized upon ultimate settlement in the financial statement.
The interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting for interim
periods, disclosure and transition, and explicitly excludes
income taxes from the scope of SFAS No. 5, Accounting
for Contingencies. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. We are currently
assessing the effect of FIN 48 on our consolidated
financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements. The purpose of this statement is
to define fair value, establish a framework for measuring fair
value and enhance disclosures about fair value measurements. The
measurement and disclosure requirements are effective for us as
of January 1, 2008 and are applied prospectively. We are
currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this new
guidance on our results of operations and financial position.
53
BUSINESS
Overview
We provide a leading digital marketing intelligence platform
that helps our customers make better-informed business decisions
and implement more effective digital business strategies. Our
products and solutions offer our customers deep insights into
consumer behavior, including objective, detailed information
regarding usage of their online properties and those of their
competitors, coupled with information on consumer demographic
characteristics, attitudes, lifestyles and offline behavior.
Our digital marketing intelligence platform is comprised of
proprietary databases and a computational infrastructure that
measures, analyzes and reports on digital activity. The
foundation of our platform is data collected from our comScore
panel of more than two million Internet users worldwide who have
granted us explicit permission to confidentially measure their
Internet usage patterns, online and certain offline buying
behavior and other activities. By applying advanced statistical
methodologies to our panel data, we project consumers
online behavior for the total online population and a wide
variety of user categories.
We deliver our digital marketing intelligence through our
comScore Media Metrix product family and through comScore
Marketing Solutions. Media Metrix delivers digital media
intelligence by providing an independent, third-party
measurement of the size, behavior and characteristics of Web
site and online advertising network audiences among home, work
and university Internet users as well as insight into the
effectiveness of online advertising. Our Marketing Solutions
products combine the proprietary information gathered from the
comScore panel with the vertical industry expertise of comScore
analysts to deliver digital marketing intelligence, including
the measurement of online advertising effectiveness, customized
for specific industries. We typically deliver our Media Metrix
products electronically in the form of weekly, monthly or
quarterly reports. Customers can access current and historical
Media Metrix data and analyze these data anytime online. Our
Marketing Solutions products are typically delivered on a
monthly, quarterly or ad hoc basis through electronic reports
and analyses.
Industry
Background
Growth
of Digital Commerce, Content, Advertising and
Communications
The Internet is a global digital medium for commerce, content,
advertising and communications. According to IDC, the number of
global Internet users is projected to grow from approximately
968 million in 2005 to over 1.7 billion in 2010. As
the online population continues to grow, the Internet is
increasingly becoming a tool for research and commerce and for
distributing and consuming media. According to IDC, the global
business-to-consumer
eCommerce market is projected to grow from $411 billion in
2005 to $1 trillion in 2010. According to Jupiter Research, over
80% of online users in the United States research offline
purchases using the Internet, making the Internet an important
channel for both online and offline merchants. Consumers are
also using the Internet to access an increasing amount of
digital content across media formats including video, music,
text and games. According to IDC, the domestic markets for
online video and music consumption are projected to reach over
$1.7 billion and over $3.3 billion, respectively, in
2010.
As consumers increasingly use the Internet to research and make
purchases and to consume digital media, advertisers are shifting
more of their marketing budgets to digital channels. According
to the Internet Advertising Bureau and PriceWaterhouseCoopers,
domestic online advertising spending, including search
advertising, grew to $16.8 billion in 2006, an increase of
34% over 2005. Despite the size and growth of the digital
marketing sector, the shift of traditional advertising spending
to the Internet has yet to match the rate of consumption of
online media. According to Forrester Research, digital
advertising represented only 6% of the total United States
advertising market in 2004 despite consumers spending 16% of
their available media time online. As advertisers spend more of
their marketing budgets to reach Internet users, we believe that
digital marketing will continue to grow.
In addition to the growth in online commerce, content and
marketing, a number of new digital technologies and devices are
emerging that enable users to access content and communicate in
new ways.
54
Internet-enabled mobile phones allow users to access digital
content such as games, music, video and news on their mobile
devices through a wireless connection to the Internet. According
to IDC, the worldwide number of shipments of converged mobile
devices is projected to grow from 57 million in 2005 to
261 million in 2010, representing compounded annual growth
of 36% over that period. Other digital communications
technologies such as voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) utilize
the Internet network infrastructure to enable efficient and
cost-effective personal communications such as chat and
VoIP-based
telephony. According to Infonetics, the worldwide number of VoIP
subscribers is projected to grow from 24.5 million in 2005
to 140.7 million in 2009. Delivery of digital television
services over a network infrastructure using Internet Protocol,
or IPTV, has a number of advantages over conventional
television, including two-way communications, digital content
and features, and interactivity. According to Infonetics, the
worldwide number of IPTV subscribers is projected to grow from
2.4 million in 2005 to 68.9 million in 2009. We
believe these and other new digital media and communications
devices and services offer a similar opportunity as the Internet
for us to measure and analyze user behavior.
Importance
of Digital Marketing Intelligence
The interactive nature of digital media such as the Internet
enables businesses to access a wealth of user information that
was virtually unavailable through offline audience measurement
and marketing intelligence techniques. Digital media provide
businesses with the opportunity to measure detailed user
activity, such as how users interact with Web page content; to
assess how users respond to online marketing, such as which
online ads users click on to pursue a transaction; and to
analyze how audiences and user behavior compare across various
Web sites. This type of detailed user data can be combined with
demographic, attitudinal and transactional information to
develop a deeper understanding of user behavior, attributes and
preferences. Unlike offline media such as television and radio,
which generally only allow for the passive measurement of
relative audience size, digital media enable businesses to
actively understand the link between digital content,
advertising and user behavior.
We believe that the growth in the online and digital media
markets for digital commerce, content, advertising and
communications creates an unprecedented opportunity for
businesses to acquire a deeper understanding of both their
customers and their competitive market position. Businesses can
use accurate, relevant and objective digital marketing
intelligence to develop and validate key strategies and improve
performance. For example, with a deep understanding of the size,
demographic composition and other characteristics of its
audience, an online content provider can better communicate the
value of its audience to potential advertisers. With detailed
metrics on the effectiveness of an online advertising campaign
and how that campaign influences online and offline purchasing
behavior, a business can refine its marketing initiatives. With
insight into market share and customer behavior and preferences,
a business can understand not only how its digital business is
performing relative to its competitors but also the drivers
behind such performance. Moreover, by using the appropriate
digital marketing intelligence, businesses can refine their
digital content, commerce, advertising and communications
initiatives to enhance the effectiveness and return on
investment of their marketing spending, enabling them to build
more successful businesses.
Challenges
in Providing Digital Marketing Intelligence
While the interactive and dynamic nature of digital markets
creates the opportunity for businesses to gain deep insights
into user behavior and competitive standing, there are a number
of issues unique to the Internet that make it challenging for
companies to provide digital marketing intelligence. Compared to
offline media such as television or radio, the markets for
digital media are significantly more fragmented, complex and
dynamic. As of December 2006, we believe that there were more
than 17,000 and 25,000 U.S. and global Web sites, respectively,
that each receive more than 30,000 unique visitors per month, as
compared to only a few hundred channels typically available with
standard digital cable or satellite television and broadcast or
satellite radio. The complexities of online user activity and
the breadth of digital content and advertising make providing
digital marketing intelligence a technically challenging and
highly data-intensive process.
Digital media continues to develop at a rapid pace and includes
numerous formats such as textual content, streaming and
downloadable video and music, instant messaging, VoIP telephony,
online gaming and email.
55
Digital advertising also includes multiple formats such as
display, search, rich media and video. Detailed user activity
such as viewing, clicking or downloading various components of a
Web page across digital media or interacting with various
advertising formats creates a substantial amount of data that
must be captured on a continuous basis. The data must also be
cleansed for quality, relevancy and privacy protection and be
organized to enable companies to obtain relevant digital
marketing intelligence. This capture of audience data can prove
extremely challenging when it involves millions of Internet
users with varying demographic characteristics accessing tens of
thousands of Web sites across diverse geographies. In addition,
the ongoing development of digital media programming languages
and technologies contributes to the challenge of accurately
measuring user activity. For example, online publishers and
advertisers have recently started to use Asynchronous JavaScript
and XML, or AJAX, a development technique that allows Web
applications to quickly make incremental updates without having
to refresh the entire Web page. Prior to AJAX, marketers relied
heavily on page view statistics to plan and evaluate their
online media spending programs. With AJAX, we believe marketers
are beginning to question the definition of, and need for, page
views, and are seeking alternative metrics for measuring the
usage and effectiveness of online media. To maintain their
relevance, audience and media measurement technologies must keep
pace with the continued evolution and increasing complexity of
digital media.
Need for Accuracy and Reliability. Relevant
digital marketing intelligence requires access to accurate and
reliable global data that measure online user activity. Existing
data collection methodologies, including those that rely on
third party sources, surveys or panels, face significant
challenges and limitations. Survey or panel methodologies must
measure a sufficiently large and representative sample size of
Internet users to accurately capture data that is statistically
projectable to the broader Internet population. In addition, the
international composition of Internet audiences requires a
geographically dispersed sample to accurately capture global
digital activity. Digital marketing intelligence that depends on
third-party sources to obtain Internet audience usage data has
the potential to be biased, may be constrained by the data that
the third party is capable of capturing, and may be limited in
its application. For example, a solution that relies on data
supplied by an Internet service provider, or ISP, may show a
bias toward the demographic composition or other characteristics
of that ISPs users. We believe that a meaningful digital
media sourcing methodology must be based on data sourced from a
large, representative global sample of online users that can be
parsed, enhanced, mined and analyzed; must evolve rapidly and be
flexible to adapt to changing technologies; and must be able to
provide actionable digital marketing intelligence that can be
used to improve business decision-making.
Need for Third-Party Objectivity. We believe
that the availability of objective third-party data that measure
digital audience size, behavior, demographic and attitudinal
characteristics represents a key factor in the continued growth
of digital content, advertising and commerce. This is similar to
offline media markets, such as television and radio, whose
development was significantly enhanced by the introduction of
third-party audience measurement ratings that provided a basis
for the pricing of advertising in those media. As the buying and
selling of online advertising continues to grow, we believe that
companies on both sides of the advertising transaction will
increasingly seek third-party marketing intelligence to assess
the value and effectiveness of digital media. In addition, as
advertisers work with Web site publishers to target online
advertising campaigns to reach a specific demographic or
behavioral user profile, the need for objective audience and
user information, unbiased by either party to the transaction,
will become increasingly important.
Need for Competitive Information. In addition
to the scope, complexity and rapid evolution of online digital
media, the lack of data on competitors makes it difficult for
companies to gain a comprehensive view of user behavior beyond
their own digital businesses. While products and tools exist
that enable companies to understand user activity on their own
Web sites, these products are unable to provide a view of
digital audience activity on other Web sites or offline. In
order for publishers, marketers, merchants and service providers
to benefit from accurate and comprehensive digital marketing
intelligence they need to understand user activity on Web sites
across the Internet and how online consumer behavior translates
into offline actions.
56
The
comScore Digital Marketing Intelligence Platform
We provide a leading digital marketing intelligence platform
that enables our customers to devise and implement more
effective digital business strategies. Our platform is comprised
of proprietary databases and a computational infrastructure that
measures, analyzes and reports digital activity from our global
panel of more than two million Internet users. We offer our
customers deep insights into consumer behavior on their own
online properties and those of their competitors, including
objective, detailed information on users demographic
characteristics, attitudes, lifestyles and multi-channel buying
activity. We also provide industry-specific metrics to our
customers.
We deliver our digital marketing intelligence through our
comScore Media Metrix product family and through comScore
Marketing Solutions. Media Metrix provides intelligence on
digital media usage, including a measurement of the size,
behavior and characteristics of the audiences for individual Web
sites and advertising networks within the global home, work and
university Internet user populations as well as insight into the
effectiveness of online advertising. Our Marketing Solutions
products combine the proprietary information gathered from our
user panel with the vertical industry expertise of comScore
analysts to deliver digital marketing intelligence customized
for specific industries. Media Metrix and Marketing Solutions
products are typically delivered electronically in the form of
periodic reports, through customized analyses or are generally
available online via a user interface on the comScore Web site.
Key attributes of our platform include:
|
|
|
|
|
Panel of global Internet users. Our ability to
provide digital marketing intelligence is based on information
continuously gathered from a broad cross-section of more than
two million Internet users worldwide who have granted us
explicit permission to confidentially measure their Internet
usage patterns, online and certain offline buying behavior and
other activities. Through our proprietary technology, we measure
detailed Internet audience activity across the spectrum of
digital content and marketing channels. Many comScore panelists
also participate in online survey research that captures and
integrates demographic, attitudinal, lifestyle and product
preference information with Internet behavior data. The global
nature of our Internet panel enables us to provide digital
marketing intelligence for over 30 individual countries. Our
global capability is valuable to companies based in
international markets as well as to multi-national companies
that want to better understand their global Internet audiences
and the effectiveness of their global digital business
initiatives.
|
|
|
|
Scalable technology infrastructure. We
developed our databases and computational infrastructure to
support the growth in online activity among our global Internet
panel and the increasing complexity of digital content formats,
advertising channels and communication applications. The design
of our technology infrastructure is based on distributed
processing and data capture environments that allow for the
collection and organization of vast amounts of data on online
activity, including usage of proprietary networks such as AOL,
instant messaging and audio and video streaming. Our database
infrastructure currently captures approximately 182 million
Web pages and 4.5 billion URL records each week from our
global Internet panel, resulting in over 28 terabytes of data
collected by our platform each month. We believe that our
efficient and scalable technology infrastructure allows us to
operate and expand our data collection infrastructure on a
cost-effective basis. In recognition of the scale of our data
collection and warehousing technology, we have received multiple
awards, including the 2003, 2004 and 2005 Winter Corporation
Grand Prize for Database Size on a Windows NT Platform.
|
Benefits of our platform include:
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced digital marketing intelligence. We
use our proprietary technology to compile vast amounts of data
on Internet user activity and to organize the data into
discrete, measurable elements that can be used to provide
actionable insights to our customers. We believe that our
digital marketing intelligence platform enables companies to
gain a deeper understanding of their digital audiences, which
allows them to better assess and improve their company and
product-specific competitive position. Because our marketing
intelligence is based on a large sample of global Internet users
and can incorporate
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
multi-channel transactional data, we are able to provide
companies with an enhanced understanding of digital audience
activity beyond their own Web sites and the ability to better
assess the link between digital marketing and offline user
activity. Digital content providers, marketers, advertising
agencies, merchants and service providers can use the insights
our platform provides to craft improved marketing campaigns and
strategies and to measure the effectiveness and return on
investment of their digital initiatives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objective third-party resource for digital marketing
intelligence. We are an independent company that
is not affiliated with the digital businesses we measure and
analyze, allowing us to serve as an objective third-party
provider of digital marketing intelligence. Because businesses
use our data to plan and evaluate the purchase and sale of
online advertising and to measure the effectiveness of digital
marketing, it is important that we provide unbiased data,
marketing intelligence, reports and analyses. We deploy advanced
statistical methodologies in building and maintaining the
comScore global Internet user panel and utilize proven data
capture, and computational practices in collecting,
statistically projecting, aggregating and analyzing information
regarding online user activity. We believe that our approach
ensures that the insights we provide are as objective as
possible and allows us to deliver products and services that are
of value to our customers in their key business decision-making.
We believe that the media industry views us as a highly
recognized and credible resource for digital marketing
intelligence. For example, between March 1 and
December 31, 2006, our information on digital activity was
cited more than 16,500 times by third-party media outlets, an
average of approximately 55 citations per day. Our data are
regularly cited by well-known media outlets such as the
Associated Press, Reuters, Bloomberg, CNBC, The New York
Times and The Wall Street
Journal. Moreover, many of the leading Wall
Street investment banks also purchase and cite our data in their
published research reports prepared by financial analysts that
cover Internet businesses.
|
|
|
|
Vertical industry expertise. We have developed
expertise across a variety of industries to provide digital
marketing intelligence specifically tailored to the needs of our
customers operating in specific industry sectors. We have
dedicated personnel to address the automotive, consumer packaged
goods, entertainment, financial services, media, pharmaceutical,
retail, technology, telecommunications and travel sectors. We
believe that companies across different industries have distinct
information and marketing intelligence needs related to
understanding their digital audiences and buyers, evaluating
marketing initiatives and understanding company or
product-specific competitive position. For example, a
pharmaceutical company may want to understand how online
research by consumers influences new prescriptions for a
particular drug, while a financial services company may want to
assess the effectiveness of its online advertising campaigns in
signing up new consumers and how this compares to the efforts of
its competitors. By working with companies in various industries
over the course of multiple years, we have developed
industry-specific applications of our data and our client
service representatives have developed industry-specific
knowledge and expertise that allow us to deliver relevant and
meaningful marketing insight to our customers.
|
|
|
|
Ease of use and functionality. The comScore
digital marketing intelligence platform is designed to be easy
to use by our customers. Our Media Metrix products are available
through the Internet using a standard browser. Media Metrix
customers can also run customized reports and refine their
analyses using an intuitive interface available on our Web site.
Our Marketing Solutions products are available either through
the Internet or by using standard software applications such as
Microsoft Excel, Microsoft PowerPoint or SPSS analytical
software. Our customers do not need to install additional
hardware or complex software to access and use our products.
|
58
Strategy
Our objective is to be the leading provider of global digital
marketing intelligence products. We plan to pursue our objective
through internal initiatives and, potentially, through
acquisitions and other investments. The principal elements of
our strategy are to:
|
|
|
|
|
Deepen relationships with current
customers. We intend to work closely with our
customers to enable them to continuously enhance the value they
obtain from our digital marketing intelligence platform. Many of
our customers are Fortune 1000 companies that deploy
multiple marketing initiatives, and we believe many of our
customers would benefit from more extensive use of our product
offerings to gain additional insights into their key digital
initiatives. We will work to develop and expand our customer
relationships to increase our customers use of our digital
marketing intelligence platform.
|
|
|
|
Grow our customer base. As the digital media,
commerce, marketing and communications sectors continue to grow,
we believe the demand for digital marketing intelligence
products will increase. To meet this increase in market demand,
we intend to invest in sales, marketing and account management
initiatives in an effort to expand our customer base. We intend
to offer both general and industry-specific digital marketing
products that deliver value to a wide range of potential
customers in current and new industry verticals.
|
|
|
|
Expand our digital marketing intelligence
platform. We expect to continue to increase our
product offerings through our digital marketing intelligence
platform. As digital markets become more complex, we believe
that companies will require new information and insights to
measure, understand and evaluate their digital business
initiatives. We intend to develop new applications that leverage
our digital marketing intelligence platform to be able to
provide the most timely and relevant information to our
customers. For example, in 2003 we were one of the first
companies to offer data, analysis and reports on the
fast-growing Internet search market.
|
|
|
|
Address emerging digital media. The extension
of digital media and communications to include new formats such
as VoIP, IP television, content for mobile phones and next
generation gaming consoles creates new opportunities to measure
and analyze emerging digital media. We intend to extend our
digital marketing platform to capture, measure and analyze user
activity in these emerging digital media and communications
formats.
|
|
|
|
Extend technology leadership. We believe that
the scalability and functionality of our database and
computational infrastructure provide us with a competitive
advantage in the digital media intelligence market. Accordingly,
we intend to continue to invest in research and development to
extend our technology leadership. We intend to continue to
enhance our technology platform to improve scalability,
performance and cost effectiveness and to expand our product
offerings.
|
|
|
|
Build brand awareness through media
exposure. Our digital media, commerce and
marketing information is frequently cited by media outlets. In
addition, we proactively provide them with data and insights
that we believe may be relevant to their news reports and
articles. We believe that media coverage increases awareness and
credibility of the comScore and Media Metrix brands and
supplements our marketing efforts. We intend to continue to work
with media outlets, including news distributors, newspapers,
magazines, television networks, radio stations and online
publishers, to increase their use of comScore data in content
that discusses digital sector activity.
|
|
|
|
Grow internationally. While we are currently
in the early stages of providing customers with international
services, we believe that a significant opportunity exists to
provide our product offerings to multi-national and
international companies. Approximately half of the existing
comScore Internet user panel resides outside of the United
States. In July 2006, we launched World Metrix, a product that
measures global digital media usage. World Metrix is based on a
sample of online users from countries that comprise
approximately 95% of the global Internet population. We plan to
expand our sales and marketing and account management presence
outside the U.S. as we provide a broader array of digital
marketing intelligence products that are tailored to local
country markets as well as the global marketplace.
|
59
Our
Product Offerings
We deliver our digital marketing intelligence through our
comScore Media Metrix product family and through comScore
Marketing Solutions.
comScore
Media Metrix
Media Metrix provides its subscribers, consisting primarily of
publishers, marketers, advertising agencies and advertising
networks, with intelligence on digital media usage and a
measurement of the size, behavior and characteristics of the
audiences for Web sites and advertising networks among home,
work and university Internet populations. Media Metrix also
provides insights into the effectiveness of online advertising.
Media Metrix data can be used to accurately identify and target
key online audiences, evaluate the effectiveness of digital
marketing and commerce initiatives, support the selling of
online advertising by publishers, and to identify and exploit
relative competitive standing. The vast majority of our Media
Metrix subscribers access selected reports and analyses through
the MyMetrix user interface on our Web site.
Our flagship product, Media Metrix 2.0, details the online
activity and site visitation behavior of Internet users,
including use of proprietary networks such as AOL, instant
messaging, audio and video streaming, and other digital
applications. Our customers subscribe to ongoing access to our
digital marketing intelligence reports and analyses, including:
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive reports detailing online behavior for home, work
and university audiences;
|
|
|
|
demographic characteristics of visitors to Web sites and
properties;
|
|
|
|
buying power metrics that profile Web site audiences based on
their online buying behavior;
|
|
|
|
detailed measurement and reporting of online behavior for over
30 countries and over 100 U.S. local markets;
|
|
|
|
measurement of key ethnic segments, including the online
Hispanic population; and
|
|
|
|
reach and frequency metrics for online advertising campaigns
that show the percent of a target audience reached and the
frequency of exposure to advertising messages.
|
A representative MyMetrix screenshot, detailing the most visited
online properties in the United States for December 2006, is
shown on the following page.
60
In addition to our core offering, customers can subscribe to the
following additional products in the Media Metrix product family:
Plan Metrix. Plan Metrix is a product that
combines the continuously and passively observed Internet
behavior provided by Media Metrix with comprehensive attitude,
lifestyle and product usage data collected through online
surveys of our U.S. Internet user panel. Plan Metrix
provides advertising agencies, advertisers and publishers with
multiple views of Web site audiences including their online
behavior, demographics, lifestyles, attitudes, technology
product ownership, product purchases and offline media usage.
These data are used in the design and evaluation of online
marketing campaigns. For example, an online auto retailer could
use Plan Metrix to help understand which Web sites a prospective
automobile purchaser is most likely to visit prior to making a
purchase decision.
World Metrix. We provide insights into
worldwide Internet activity through our World Metrix product,
which delivers aggregate information about the behavior of
online users on a global basis, for approximately 30 individual
countries and for regional aggregations such as Latin America,
Europe and Asia Pacific. For example, a content publisher can
understand its market share of the global Internet audience
using our World Metrix product.
Video Metrix. Video Metrix provides insights
into the viewing of streaming video by U.S. Internet users.
The product measures a wide range of video players and formats,
including Windows Media, Flash, RealMedia and QuickTime. Video
Metrix offers site-level measurement and audience ratings by
demographics and
time-of-day
to assist agencies, advertisers and publishers in designing and
implementing media plans that include streaming video. For
example, an advertiser that is seeking to maximize the exposure
of its streaming video ads to its target audience could use
Video Metrix to help understand on which sites and at what times
of the day its target audience is viewing the most streaming
video.
Ad Metrix. Available through the Media Metrix
client interface, Ad Metrix provides advertisers, agencies and
publishers with a variety of online advertising metrics relating
to impressions, or advertisements on a Web site that reach a
target audience. Ad Metrix helps customers determine the
impressions delivered by advertising campaigns across Web sites
and online properties, including how many visitors are reached
with advertisements and how often. In addition, Ad Metrix allows
customers to determine the demographic profile of the
advertising audience at a particular site, as well as how the
volume of impressions changes over time on that site. The Ad
Metrix data are consistent with offline media planning metrics
such as GRPs, or gross rating points, which measure the percent
of a target audience that is reached with an advertisement
weighted by the number of exposures. For example, an advertiser
might use Ad Metrix to plan the online portion of an advertising
campaign for a sports product on sites that have previously
successfully delivered advertising impressions to a target
demographic audience. A publisher might use Ad Metrix data to
measure its share of advertising impressions relative to
competitive publishers. Ad Metrix was launched in early 2007 in
beta format and we plan to commercially launch this product in
the second quarter of 2007.
62
Some examples of Media Metrix digital marketing intelligence
measurements and their customer uses are described in the
following table.
|
|
|
|
Digital Marketing Intelligence
Measurement
|
|
|
Examples of Customer
Uses
|
Site Traffic & Usage
Intensity
|
|
|
rank Web sites based
on online usage metrics such as unique visitors, page views or
minutes of use
|
|
|
|
drill-down to standard
or customer-defined site subsets such as channels or
sub-channels
(such as Yahoo! Finance and Yahoo! Sports)
|
|
|
|
analyze statistics
over time such as trends in site visitors within demographic
segments
|
|
|
|
assess which Web site
audiences are growing or declining, which sites are most
attractive to particular demographic segments or which sites or
digital applications have the highest level of usage
|
|
|
|
identify the source of
traffic to a particular Web site or channel within a site
|
Quantitative Consumer Information
|
|
|
profile site users
based on life-stage or offline behavior such as
panelist-reported TV usage, car ownership, health conditions or
offline purchases
|
|
|
|
efficiently identify
and target a particular user segment (e.g., people who say they
are likely to buy a car in the next six months)
|
|
|
|
quantify the audience
overlap between different consumer segments or Web sites to
identify the number of unique visitors reached
|
Online Buying Power
|
|
|
quantify the
propensity of a particular Web sites audience to purchase
certain categories of products (e.g., consumer electronics)
online
|
Competitive Intelligence
|
|
|
compare the standings
of Web sites within particular content categories, such as
finance or health information
|
|
|
|
quantify audience size
relative to competitors, including share of usage within a
category and usage trends across competitors
|
|
|
|
track major
competitors, quantify their growth, and identify initiatives to
promote growth and market share
|
Reach and Frequency
|
|
|
identify and quantify
the size of audiences reached by individual Web sites and
determine how often they reach those audiences
|
|
|
|
assist with the
planning of online advertising campaigns that need to achieve
specific reach or frequency objectives against a targeted
audience across multiple Web sites
|
|
|
|
design the most
cost-effective media plans that can achieve campaign objectives
for reach and frequency
|
|
|
|
|
63
comScore
Marketing Solutions
comScore Marketing Solutions products use our global database,
computational infrastructure and our staff of experienced
analytical personnel to help customers design more effective
marketing strategies that increase sales, reduce costs, deepen
customer relationships and ultimately enhance a customers
competitive position. We offer solutions tailored for specific
industry verticals, including the automotive, consumer packaged
goods, entertainment, financial services, media, pharmaceutical,
retail, technology, telecommunications and travel sectors. Many
of our Marketing Solutions products are delivered to subscribers
on a recurring schedule such as monthly or quarterly. In some
cases, we provide customized reports and analyses that combine
our expertise with other proprietary information to address a
specific customer need.
The core information products offered by comScore Marketing
Solutions include:
Market Share Reports. These reports track a
companys share of market as measured by industry-specific
performance metrics. The metrics of choice vary by industry
vertical, including as examples: share of online credit card
spending for credit card issuers; share of online travel
spending for travel companies; or share of subscribers for ISPs.
In each case, market share reports provide an ongoing
measurement of competitive performance and insight into the
factors driving changes in market share.
Competitive Benchmark Reports. These reports
allow customers to compare themselves to competitors using
various industry-specific metrics. For example, retailers may
look at metrics such as the rate of conversion of site visitors
to buyers, average order size or rate of repeat purchases among
existing customers. Banks may focus on the percentage of bank
customers using online bill payment services, or compare the
effectiveness of customer acquisition programs as reflected by
the percentage of leads they acquire that ultimately sign up for
an online account. In each case, a customer may define and
obtain
best-of-category
metrics and use them as a benchmark to monitor its business
performance over time.
Loyalty and Retention Analysis. These analyses
provide an understanding of the extent to which consumers are
also engaged with competitors, and identifies loyalty drivers to
assist customers in capturing a higher share of the
consumers wallet. For example, a travel company might
quantify the potential business lost when consumers visit its
site, do not complete a purchase but then visit a competing site
to book a travel reservation. Retention or churn analyses
quantify consumer losses to competitors and the key drivers of
such losses. For example, a narrowband Internet service provider
may track the rate of attrition among its customer base,
identify which competitors are capturing those lost customers,
and analyze the characteristics of the lost customers in order
to gain insight into ways to improve retention.
Customer Satisfaction Reports. These reports
are based on panelist responses to survey questionnaires that
ascertain the degree of satisfaction with various products or
services offered to consumers. This information is often
integrated with the online usage information that we collect
from our panelists in order to identify which digital media
usage activities affect customer satisfaction. For instance, a
sports portal may use these reports to determine which features,
such as participating in fantasy sports leagues or viewing
streaming video clips, affect customer satisfaction and loyalty
the most.
qSearch. This product is a monthly scorecard
of the search market that provides a comparison of search
activity across portals and major search engines. It helps
identify the reach of a search engine, the loyalty of its user
base, the frequency of search queries, and the effectiveness of
sponsored links displayed on search result pages in driving
referrals to advertiser sites. qSearch is used by major search
engines and advertising agencies in planning search campaigns.
Campaign Metrix. This product provides
detailed information about specific online advertising
campaigns. These reports, available through a Web-based
interface, describe for each advertising image, or
creative within an advertising campaign, the size
and demographic composition of the audience exposed to that
particular advertisement, the average number of impressions
delivered and other details regarding ad formats and ad sizes
used in the campaign. An advertiser, agency or publisher could
use Campaign Metrix to gain insight into the effectiveness of an
online advertising campaign by examining the number of unique
users exposed to the campaign, the number of times on average
that a unique user was exposed to the campaign and
64
whether the campaign reached the targeted audience demographic.
This product was launched in February 2007 in beta format and we
plan to commercially launch this product in the second quarter
of 2007.
Internet Advertising Effectiveness
Studies. These studies provide an understanding
of the effectiveness of particular advertising campaigns by
measuring the online and offline behavior of a target
group of comScore panelists, following their exposure to a
particular advertisement, and comparing their behavior to that
of a control group of comScore panelists who were
not exposed to such advertisements. This type of a study allows
a marketer to understand the impact of their advertising
campaign and to estimate the return on their investment in
online marketing.
Survey-Based Products. These products leverage
our ability to administer surveys to our panel members to obtain
valuable information that can be seamlessly integrated with
online behavioral data to provide our clients with additional
insights into the drivers of consumer behavior.
Customers
As of December 31, 2006, we had 706 customers, including
over 100 Fortune 1000 customers. Our customers include:
|
|
|
|
|
fifteen of the top twenty online properties, based on total
unique visitors, as ranked by our Media Metrix database for the
month of December 2006, including Microsoft, Yahoo!, AOL and
Google;
|
|
|
|
ten of the top twenty U.S. Internet service providers,
based on the number of subscribers as of the third quarter of
2006, as ranked by ISP Planet;
|
|
|
|
the top ten investment banks, based on 2006 revenues, as ranked
by Dealogic;
|
|
|
|
97 advertising and media buying agencies;
|
|
|
|
five of the top six consumer banks, based on consolidated assets
as of December 31, 2006, as ranked by the Federal Reserve
System, National Information Center;
|
|
|
|
seven of the top ten pharmaceutical companies, based on 2005
worldwide sales, as ranked by IMS Health; and
|
|
|
|
seven of the top eight credit card issuers, based on total
credit cards outstanding in 2006, as ranked by the 2006 Nilson
Report.
|
One of our customers, Microsoft Corporation, accounted for 5% of
our revenues in the year ended December 31, 2004, 14% of
our revenues in the year ended December 31, 2005 and 12% of
our revenues in the year ended December 31, 2006.
The following examples are provided as an illustration of the
development and growth of our relationships with our customers:
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is a leading provider of software,
services and solutions. Since 2001, Microsofts Internet
division, MSN, has used our global panel data to better
understand the needs of consumers, to help guide product
planning strategies and to measure the impact of online
marketing efforts, and has increased its use of our products in
each subsequent year. Since 2004, MSN has purchased detailed
Internet clickstream data patterns to study how consumers use
MSN and competitive services, in order to better meet consumer
needs. Since June 2005, MSN has used our qSearch product to
measure and benchmark the behavior of consumers and competitors
in the Internet search market. Since 2005, we have also provided
MSN with advertising studies that it has used to measure the
impact of MSNs online marketing campaigns and demonstrate
to clients the effectiveness of online advertising. In addition,
since 1999, Microsoft has been a customer of SurveySite, a
company that we acquired on December 31, 2004. comScore
SurveySite provides Microsoft with insights about their
customers, partners and employees by conducting online
qualitative research and quantitative surveys, including ongoing
customer satisfaction tracking programs. comScore SurveySite has
been a Premier Vendor for Online Research to Microsoft since
2002. comScore SurveySite was also the winner of the 2005
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft Vendor Program Excellence Award in Technology in
recognition of its innovative SiteRecruit system. In 2006,
comScore SurveySite was also named a Relationship Marketing
Specialty Vendor, a designation shared by only five market
research vendors worldwide. comScore SurveySite has worked
across all of Microsofts principal business groups
including Platform Products and Services, Business Products and
Services and Entertainment and Devices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Verizon Communications is a leader in delivering
broadband and other wireline and wireless communication
innovations to business, government and wholesale and retail
customers. Since 2001, Verizon Communications has used comScore
Marketing Solutions products to better understand the
competitive landscape in the Internet access industry and trends
in broadband offerings. Starting with the purchase of an ISP
market share analysis for two specific markets, Verizon
Communications now uses our data and analyses in over 40 markets
to not only understand its competitive position in the industry,
but also to determine the efficacy of its broadband product line
and to help guide marketing strategies. Verizon Communications
also uses other comScore Marketing Solutions products to obtain
answers to a variety of other business issues.
|
|
|
|
Starcom USA is an independent operating unit of
Starcom MediaVest Group, a global advertising and marketing
agency. Starcom has been a customer of comScores Marketing
Solutions products since 2004, when it purchased an analysis to
quantify the impact of a Fortune 500 clients online
advertising on its share of consumer eCommerce spending during
the 2003 holiday shopping season. In 2005, Starcom expanded the
relationship to include comScore Marketing Solutions
online survey capabilities. Since 2004, Starcoms purchases
of our products have expanded from purchasing surveys and
holiday season eCommerce tracking to purchases covering almost
the entire year. Starcom uses our digital market intelligence to
analyze the impact of online advertising on its clients
share of consumer eCommerce spending at a total Internet and
product category level. Starcom also uses our marketing
solutions brand accountability analyses that we generate from
survey results from our global consumer Internet panel.
|
|
|
|
Yahoo! is a leading global Internet portal. Yahoo!
became a customer when we acquired certain Media Metrix assets
in 2002. Since then, Yahoo! has purchased additional Media
Metrix products and in 2004 chose comScore as Yahoo!s
source of record for Internet audience measurement and search.
Yahoo! has exclusively used Media Metrix for digital marketing
intelligence in the U.S. since 2006. In 2002, our
relationship with Yahoo! expanded with the launch of our qSearch
product that tracks consumers use of various search
engines. qSearch information is used by Yahoo! in numerous
aspects of managing its search business, including product
development, market share tracking, competitive analysis, ad
effectiveness and executive reporting. Yahoo! also commissioned
us to conduct several analyses that measured the degree to which
offline sales and latent online sales (sales made days or weeks
after the initial click-through) were impacted by search
advertising. In late 2005 and throughout 2006, Yahoo! integrated
our advertising effectiveness testing products into its suite of
advertiser products, thereby enabling its advertisers to analyze
campaign effectiveness by measuring a variety of different
metrics including offline sales, surveyed branding and
awareness, online site usage and trademark search activity. In
2006, we completed two significant studies for Yahoo! entitled
Close the Loop a study on the link
between search and image advertising, and Brand Advocates:
The Impact of Search and Social Media on Branding. We
became a preferred provider of services to Yahoo! in 2006. In
2007, our relationship with Yahoo! grew with the addition of
international and worldwide data and ongoing adoption of certain
of our new syndicated and custom comScore digital marketing
intelligence products.
|
Selling
and Marketing
We sell the majority of our products through a direct sales
force. Sales of the comScore Media Metrix product suite to new
clients are managed by sales representatives assigned
specifically to new business development. A separate group of
account managers within our sales organization is assigned to
manage, renew and increase sales to existing Media Metrix
customers. The comScore Marketing Solutions sales organization
is organized vertically by industry with account executives
dedicated to selling into the
66
automotive, consumer packaged goods, entertainment, financial
services, media, pharmaceutical, retail, technology,
telecommunications and travel sectors and other industries.
Marketing Solutions account executives are tasked with both
identifying and generating new business in specific verticals as
well as servicing existing customers. Our sales and account
representatives receive a base salary and are eligible for
bonuses or commissions based on performance.
Our marketing communications staff is primarily focused on
leveraging the use of comScore data and insights by the media
and maximizing the number of times that comScore is cited as a
source of information. We believe that the use of our data by
general and industry-specific media outlets increases
recognition of the comScore brand name and serves to help
validate the value of the analyses and products we provide. In
order to accomplish this goal, we seek to maintain relationships
with key news distributors, publications, TV networks, reporters
and other media outlets. We believe that the media views us as a
highly recognized and credible resource for digital marketing
intelligence. For example, between March 1 and
December 31, 2006, comScore data were cited more than
16,500 times by third-party media outlets, an average of over 55
citations per day. Moreover, we are regularly cited by
well-known news distributors, publications and TV networks such
as the Associated Press, Reuters, Bloomberg, CNBC, The New
York Times and The Wall Street Journal. We also
target various industry conferences and tradeshows as part of
our marketing efforts. These events are typically focused on a
particular industry, allowing us to demonstrate to industry
participants the value of our products to businesses in that
industry.
Panel and
Methodology
The foundation of our digital marketing intelligence platform is
data collected from our comScore panel, which includes more than
two million persons worldwide whose online behavior we have
explicit permission to measure on a continuous, passive basis.
We believe that our panel is one of the largest global panels of
its kind, delivering a multi-faceted view of digital media usage
and transactional activity as well as selected offline activity.
By applying advanced statistical methodologies to our panel
data, we project the behavior of the total online population.
We recruit our panel through a variety of online recruitment
programs that have been tested and refined since our inception
to ensure a diverse sample that sufficiently represents the
broader global Internet population. In addition, in the United
States we enlist a
sub-sample
of panelists through various offline recruiting methods.
Participants in the comScore research panel receive a package of
benefits that is designed to appeal to a broad variety of user
categories. Examples of such benefits include, as of December
2006, free security applications such as server-based virus
protection, encrypted file protection, encrypted network disk
storage locations for user backups; free general purpose
applications such as screensavers and games; sweepstakes; cash
payments; and points that may be redeemed for prizes.
Participants data and privacy are protected by defined
privacy policies that safeguard personally-identifiable
information. This combination of recruiting methods allows us to
maintain a panel large enough to provide statistically
representative samples in most demographic segments.
We continuously determine the size, demographics and other
characteristics of the online population using enumeration
surveys of tens of thousands of persons annually, whereby
respondents are asked a variety of questions about their
Internet use, as well as demographic and other descriptive
questions about themselves and their households. The sample of
participants in each enumeration survey is selected using a
random recruiting methodology. The result is an
up-to-date
picture of the population to which the comScore sample is then
projected. We use the results from the enumeration surveys to
weight and statistically project the panel data to ensure that
the projected data reflect the characteristics of the Internet
population.
Privacy
We believe that a key factor differentiating our digital
marketing intelligence is our ability to track and analyze
online usage behavior using the data collected from our panel.
Since the founding of our company, we have endeavored to
undertake such data collection and analysis responsibly and only
with consumer permission. Participation in our research panel is
voluntary. Participants must consent to our privacy and data
67
security practices before our software collects information on
the users online activity. In addition, we provide
panelists with multiple opportunities and methods to remove
themselves from our panel. We limit the type of information that
we collect by identifying and filtering certain personal
information from the data collected. The collected data is
secured using multiple layers of physical and digital security
mechanisms. Moreover, we maintain a strict policy of not sharing
panelists personally identifiable information with our
customers. Understanding the sensitive nature of the data that
we collect and analyze, each year we undergo an independent
third-party audit of our privacy and data security practices by
Ernst & Young, a leading digital-assurance firm. This
audit involves a review of the disclosures we make and the
consents obtained from our panelists, review of our data
security practices, and testing of these practices, including
attempts to penetrate our network and compromise our systems.
Each year, since 2000, we have been certified as meeting the
AICPA/CICA WebTrust criteria for online privacy.
Technology
and Infrastructure
We have developed a proprietary system for the measurement of
the activity of our global online panel. This system is
continuously refined and developed to address the changing
digital media landscape and to meet new customer business needs.
The system is comprised of hundreds of servers that operate
using software built on Microsoft and other technologies. Our
technology infrastructure is operated in two third-party Tier-1
co-location facilities (one in Virginia and the other in
Illinois). Our systems have multiple redundancies and are
structured to ensure the continuation of business operations in
the event of network failure or if one of our data centers has
been rendered inoperable. As of December 31, 2006, our
technology team (excluding employees devoted to research and
development) was comprised of over 105 full-time employees
(or full-time equivalents) working in four different geographic
locations, who design, develop, maintain and operate our entire
technology infrastructure. In addition, we have established a
relationship with a third party firm for software development in
an economically beneficial locale as a means to augment our
technology efforts for discrete projects.
Our development efforts have spanned all aspects of our
business. We have developed a data capture system that operates
across our panelists computers in almost 200 countries and
is used for the real-time capture of consumer Internet behavior.
We have built a large scale, efficient and proprietary system
for processing massive amounts of data. Typically our systems
handle and process data in excess of 10 billion input
records per month. Despite the scale of processing required,
these data are generally available on a daily basis for our
business use. We have also developed a highly efficient and
scalable system for the extraction and tabulation of all online
activities of our panelists. Likewise, we have created a highly
scalable data warehousing environment that allows ready access
and analysis of the data we collect. This system, based on
Sybase IQ, was awarded the 2003, 2004 and 2005 Grand Prize for
the largest Microsoft-based decision support warehouse by the
Winter Corporation. In December 2006, we were recognized as a
2007 Technology Pioneer by the World Economic Forum. We believe
our scalable and highly cost-effective systems and processing
methods provide us with a significant competitive advantage.
Our customers access our digital marketing intelligence product
offerings through a variety of methods including MyMetrix, our
proprietary, Web-based analysis and reporting system, which in
the month of December 2006 was used by 4,020 users to produce
more than 170,000 reports.
Research
and Development
Our research and development efforts focus on the enhancement of
our existing products and the development of new products to
meet our customers digital marketing intelligence needs
across a broad range of industries and applications. Because of
the rapidly growing and evolving use of the Internet and other
digital mediums for commerce, content, advertising and
communications, these efforts are critical to satisfying our
customers demand for relevant digital marketing
intelligence. As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately
82 full-time employees (or full-time equivalents) working
on research and development activities (excluding employees on
our technology team cited under Technology and
Infrastructure above). In addition, we involve management
and operations personnel in our research and development
efforts. In
68
2006, 2005 and 2004, we spent $9.0 million,
$7.4 million and $5.5 million, respectively, on
research and development.
Intellectual
Property
We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, copyright and
trade secret laws in the United States and other jurisdictions
together with confidentiality procedures and contractual
provisions to protect our proprietary technology and our brand.
We seek patent protection on inventions that we consider
important to the development of our business. We control access
to our proprietary technology and enter into confidentiality and
invention assignment agreements with our employees and
consultants and confidentiality agreements with other third
parties.
Our success depends in part on our ability to develop patentable
products and obtain, maintain and enforce patent and trade
secret protection for our products, including successfully
defending these patents against any third-party challenges, both
in the United States and in other countries. We may be able to
protect our technologies from unauthorized use by third parties
to the extent that we own or have licensed valid and enforceable
patents or trade secrets that cover them. However, the degree of
future protection of our proprietary rights is uncertain because
legal means afford only limited protection and may not
adequately protect our rights or permit us to gain or keep our
competitive advantage.
Currently, we own one issued U.S. patent and have twelve
U.S. and foreign patent applications pending, and we intend to
file, or request that our licensors file, additional patent
applications for patents covering our products. However, patents
may not be issued for any pending or future pending patent
applications owned by or licensed to us, and claims allowed
under any issued patent or future issued patent owned or
licensed by us may not be valid or sufficiently broad to protect
our technologies. Any issued patents owned by or licensed to us
now or in the future may be challenged, invalidated, held
unenforceable or circumvented, and the rights under such patents
may not provide us with the expected benefits. In addition,
competitors may design around our technology or develop
competing technologies. Intellectual property rights may also be
unavailable or limited in some foreign countries, which could
make it easier for competitors to capture or increase their
market share with respect to related technologies. Although we
are not currently involved in any legal proceedings related to
intellectual property, we could incur substantial costs to
defend ourselves in suits brought against us or in suits in
which we may assert our patent rights against others. An
unfavorable outcome in any such litigation could have a material
adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In addition to patent and trade secret protection, we also rely
on several trademarks and service marks to protect our
intellectual property assets. We are the owner of numerous
trademarks and service marks and have applied for registration
of our trademarks and service marks in the United States and in
certain other countries to establish and protect our brand names
as part of our intellectual property strategy. Some of our
registered marks include comScore, Media Metrix and MyMetrix.
Our intellectual property policy is to protect our products,
technology and processes by asserting our intellectual property
rights where we believe it is appropriate and prudent. Any
pending or future pending patent applications owned by or
licensed to us (in the United States or abroad) may not be
allowed or may in the future be challenged, invalidated, held
unenforceable or circumvented, and the rights under such patents
may not provide us with competitive advantages. Any significant
impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm our
business or our ability to compete. Protecting our intellectual
property rights is costly and time consuming. Any increase in
the unauthorized use of our intellectual property could make it
more expensive to do business and harm our operating results.
There is always the risk that third parties may claim that we
are infringing upon their intellectual property rights and, if
successful in proving such claims, we could be prevented from
selling our products.
For additional, important information related to our
intellectual property, please review the information set forth
in Risk Factors Risks Related to Our Business,
Our Technologies and Our Industry.
69
Competition
The market for digital marketing intelligence is highly
competitive and evolving rapidly. We compete primarily with
providers of digital marketing intelligence and related
analytical products and services. We also compete with providers
of marketing services and solutions, with survey providers, as
well as with internal solutions developed by customers and
potential customers. Our principal competitors include:
|
|
|
|
|
large and small companies that provide data and analysis of
consumers online behavior, including Compete Inc., Hitwise
Pty. Ltd and NetRatings, Inc.;
|
|
|
|
online advertising companies that provide measurement of online
ad effectiveness, including aQuantive, Inc., DoubleClick Inc.,
ValueClick Inc., and WPP Group plc;
|
|
|
|
companies that provide audience ratings for TV, radio and other
media that have extended or may extend their current services,
particularly in certain international markets, to the
measurement of digital media, including Arbitron Inc., Nielsen
Media Research, Inc. and Taylor Nelson Sofres plc;
|
|
|
|
analytical services companies that provide customers with
detailed information of behavior on their own Web sites,
including Omniture, Inc., WebSideStory, Inc. and WebTrends
Corporation;
|
|
|
|
full-service market research firms and survey providers that may
measure online behavior and attitudes, including Harris
Interactive Inc., Ipsos Group, Taylor Nelson Sofres plc and The
Nielsen Company; and
|
|
|
|
specialty information providers for certain industries that we
serve, including IMS Health Incorporated (healthcare) and
Telephia, Inc. (telecommunications).
|
Some of our current competitors have longer operating histories,
relationships with more customers and substantially greater
resources than we do. As a result, these competitors may be able
to devote more resources to marketing and promotional campaigns,
panel retention and development techniques or technology and
systems development than we can. In addition, some of our
competitors may be able to adopt more aggressive pricing
policies. Furthermore, large software companies, Internet
portals and database management companies may enter the market
or enhance their current offerings, either by developing
competing services or by acquiring our competitors, and could
leverage their significant resources and pre-existing
relationships with our current and potential customers.
We believe the principal competitive factors in our markets
include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the ability to provide actual and perceived high-quality,
accurate and reliable data regarding Internet and other digital
media audience behavior and activity in a timely manner,
including the ability to maintain a large and statistically
representative sample panel;
|
|
|
|
the ability to adapt product offerings to emerging digital media
technologies and standards;
|
|
|
|
the breadth and depth of our products and their flexibility and
ease of use;
|
|
|
|
the availability of data across various industry verticals and
geographic areas and our expertise across these verticals and in
these geographic areas;
|
|
|
|
the ability to offer survey-based information combined with
digital media usage, eCommerce data and other online information
collected from panelists;
|
|
|
|
the ability to offer high-quality analytical services based on
Internet and other digital media audience measurement
information;
|
|
|
|
the ability to offer products that meet the changing needs of
customers and provide high-quality service; and
|
|
|
|
the prices that are charged for products based on the perceived
value delivered.
|
We believe that we compete favorably with our competitors on the
basis of these factors. However, if we are unable to compete
successfully against our current and future competitors, we may
not be able to acquire
70
and retain customers, and we may consequently experience a
decline in revenues, reduced operating margins, loss of market
share and diminished value from our products.
Employees
As of December 31, 2006, we had 377 employees. None of our
employees is represented by a labor union. We have experienced
no work stoppages and believe that our employee relations are
good.
Legal
Generally, we are involved in various legal proceedings arising
from the normal course of business activities. Currently, we do
not believe that resolution of these matters will have a
material adverse impact on our consolidated results of
operations, cash flows or our financial position. However,
depending on the amount and timing, an unfavorable resolution of
a matter could materially affect our future results of
operations, cash flows or financial position in a particular
period.
Facilities
Our corporate headquarters and executive offices are located in
Reston, Virginia, where we occupy approximately
34,000 square feet of office space under a lease that
expires in June 2008. We also lease space in various locations
throughout the United States and in Toronto and London for sales
and other personnel. If we require additional space, we believe
that we would be able to obtain such space on commercially
reasonable terms.
71
MANAGEMENT
Executive
Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
our current executive officers and directors:
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
|
Executive Officers
|
|
|
|
|
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D.
|
|
48
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Director
|
Gian M. Fulgoni
|
|
59
|
|
Executive Chairman of the Board of
Directors
|
John M. Green
|
|
55
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
Gregory T. Dale
|
|
37
|
|
Chief Technology Officer
|
Christiana L. Lin
|
|
37
|
|
General Counsel and Chief Privacy
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Employee
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas D. Berman(1)(2)
|
|
49
|
|
Director
|
Bruce Golden(3)
|
|
48
|
|
Director
|
William J. Henderson(2)(3)
|
|
59
|
|
Director
|
Ronald J. Korn(1)(3)
|
|
66
|
|
Director
|
Frederick R. Wilson(1)(2)
|
|
45
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Member of the audit committee. |
|
(2) |
|
Member of the compensation committee. |
|
(3) |
|
Member of the nominating and governance committee. |
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D., one of our co-founders, has
served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director since
September 1999. In 1995, Dr. Abraham founded Paragren
Technologies, Inc., which specialized in delivering large scale
Customer Relationship Marketing systems for strategic and target
marketing, and served as its Chief Executive Officer from 1995
to 1999. Prior to founding Paragren, Dr. Abraham was
employed by Information Resources, Inc. from 1985 until 1995,
where he was President and Chief Operating Officer from 1993 to
1994 and later Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors from 1994
until 1995. Since May 2006, Dr. Abraham has also been a
member of the board of directors of ES3, LLC, a storage and
logistics services company. Dr. Abraham received the Paul
Green Award in 1996 and the William F. ODell Award in 2000
from the American Marketing Association for a 1995 article that
he co-authored in the Journal of Marketing Research. He received
a Ph.D. in Operations Research and an M.B.A. from MIT. He also
holds an Engineering degree from the École Polytechnique in
France.
Gian M. Fulgoni, one of our co-founders, has served as
Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors since September
1999. Prior to co-founding comScore, Mr. Fulgoni was
employed by Information Resources, Inc., where he served as
President from 1981 to 1989, Chief Executive Officer from 1986
to 1998 and Chairman of the Board of Directors from 1991 until
1995. Mr. Fulgoni has served on the board of directors of
PetMed Express, Inc. since 2002 and previously served from
August 1999 through November 2000. Mr. Fulgoni also serves
on the board of directors of INXPO, LLC, an Illinois-based
provider of virtual events, since July 2005. He also served on
the board of directors of Platinum Technology, Inc. from 1990 to
1999, U.S. Robotics, Inc. from 1991 to 1994, and
Yesmail.com, Inc. from 1999 to 2000. Mr. Fulgoni has twice
been named an Illinois Entrepreneur of the Year. In 1992, he
received the Wall Street Transcript Award for outstanding
contributions as Chief Executive Officer of Information
Resources, Inc. in enhancing the overall value of that company
to the benefit of its shareholders. Educated in the United
Kingdom, Mr. Fulgoni holds an M.A. in Marketing from the
University of Lancaster and a B.Sc. in Physics from the
University of Manchester.
John M. Green has served as Chief Financial Officer since
May 2006. Prior to joining comScore, Mr. Green served as
the Chief Financial Officer and U.S. Services Business
Leader for BioReliance, a subsidiary of Invitrogen Corporation,
from 2004 to March 2006. Prior to joining BioReliance,
Mr. Green
72
served as the General Manager, Business Integrations at
Invitrogen from September 2003 to April 2004. From March 2001
through August 2003, Mr. Green served as the Chief
Financial Officer for InforMax, and as its Chief Operating
Officer from October 2001 until the sale of InforMax and
integration into Invitrogen in August 2003. Prior to 2001,
Mr. Green held several financial and operating management
roles, including serving as Executive Vice President of
Operations at HMSHost Corporation, Senior Vice President of
Finance and Corporate Controller at Marriott International
Incorporated and Director of Business Planning and Director of
Finance, Central Europe, at PepsiCo, Inc. Mr. Green
received an M.Sc. in Economics from The London School of
Economics and a B.A. in Political Science/International
Relations from Tufts University.
Gregory T. Dale has served as Chief Technology Officer
since October 2000. Prior to that, he served as Vice President,
Product Management starting in September 1999. Prior to joining
us, he served as Vice President of Client Service at Paragren
Technologies, Inc., a company that specialized in enterprise
relationship marketing. He holds a B.S. in Industrial Management
from Purdue University.
Christiana L. Lin has served as General Counsel and Chief
Privacy Officer since January 2006. Prior to that, she served as
our Corporate Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer starting in
March 2003. Prior to that, she served as our Deputy General
Counsel starting in February 2001. Ms. Lin holds a J.D.
from the Georgetown University Law Center and a B.A. in
Political Science from Yale University.
Thomas D. Berman has served as a director since August
2001. Mr. Berman is a partner with Adams Street Partners,
where he has led investments in information technology and
business services companies since 1990. He served on the board
of directors of PathScale, Inc. from May 2004 to April 2006 and
has served on the board of directors of Adams Harris, Inc. since
March 2006. Mr. Berman holds an S.B. in Electrical
Engineering from MIT and an S.M. from the Sloan School of
Management at MIT.
Bruce Golden has served as a director since June 2002. He
is a partner at Accel Partners, which he joined in 1997.
Mr. Golden has led a number of investments in enterprise
software and Internet-related companies while at Accel and
currently serves as a member of the boards of directors at
several private companies. He holds an M.B.A. from Stanford
University and a B.A. from Columbia University.
William J. Henderson has served as a director since
August 2001. Mr. Henderson was the 71st Postmaster
General of the United States. He served in that position from
May 1998 until his retirement in May 2001. Mr. Henderson
also served as the Chief Operations Officer of Netflix, Inc.
from January 2006 until February 2007. Mr. Henderson also
currently serves on the board of directors of Acxiom
Corporation, where he has been a director since June 2001.
Mr. Henderson holds a B.S. from the University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill and served in the U.S. Army.
Ronald J. Korn has served as a director since November
2005. Since 1991, he has served as the President of Ronald Korn
Consulting, which provides business and marketing services.
Mr. Korn served as a director, chairman of the audit
committee, and member of the loan committee of Equinox
Financial Corporation from 1999 until its acquisition in October
2005. Since 2002, he has served as a director, chairman of the
audit committee and a member of the compensation and nominating
and governance committees of PetMed Express, Inc. and since July
2003, he has served as a director, chairman of the audit
committee and a member of the compensation committee of Ocwen
Financial Corporation. Prior to that, Mr. Korn was a
partner and employee of KPMG, LLP, from 1961 to 1991, where he
was the managing partner of KPMGs Miami office from 1985
until 1991. Mr. Korn holds a B.S. from the University of
Pennsylvania, Wharton School and a J.D. from New York University
Law School.
Frederick R. Wilson has served as a director since August
1999. He has served as managing partner of Union Square Ventures
since August 2003. He is also a managing partner of Flatiron
Partners and has held that position since August 1996. He holds
an M.B.A. from the Wharton School of Business at the University
of Pennsylvania and an S.B. in Mechanical Engineering from MIT.
Board
Composition
Upon completion of this offering, our directors will be divided
into three classes serving staggered three-year terms.
Class I, Class II and Class III directors will
serve until our annual meetings of stockholders in
73
2008, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Upon expiration of the term
of class of directors, directors in that class will be eligible
to be elected for a new three-year term at the annual meeting of
stockholders in the year in which their term expires. This
classification of directors could have the effect of increasing
the length of time necessary to change the composition of a
majority of our board of directors. In general, at least two
annual meetings of stockholders will be necessary for
stockholders to effect a change in a majority of the members of
our board of directors.
Our board of directors currently consists of seven members.
Messrs. Abraham, Berman and Wilson are Class I
directors and will serve for one year. Messrs. Henderson
and Korn are Class II directors and will serve for two
years. Messrs. Fulgoni and Golden are Class III
directors and will serve for three years.
Board
Committees
Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a
compensation committee and a nominating and governance committee.
Audit
Committee
Our audit committee consists of Messrs. Berman, Korn and
Wilson, with Mr. Korn serving as chairman. Our audit
committee oversees our corporate accounting and financial
reporting process and internal controls over financial
reporting. Our audit committee evaluates the independent
registered public accounting firms qualifications,
independence and performance; engages and provides for the
compensation of the independent registered public accounting
firm; approves the retention of the independent registered
public accounting firm to perform any proposed permissible
non-audit services; reviews our consolidated financial
statements; reviews our critical accounting policies and
estimates and internal controls over financial reporting; and
discusses with management and the independent registered public
accounting firm the results of the annual audit and the reviews
of our quarterly consolidated financial statements. We believe
that our audit committee members meet the requirements for
independence and financial literacy under the current
requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, The NASDAQ
Global Market and SEC rules and regulations. In addition, the
board of directors has determined that Mr. Korn is
qualified as an audit committee financial expert within the
meaning of SEC regulations. We have made this determination
based on information received by our board of directors,
including questionnaires provided by the members of our audit
committee. We believe that our audit committee complies with the
applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, The
NASDAQ Global Market and SEC rules and regulations. We intend to
comply with future requirements to the extent they become
applicable to us. We have adopted an audit committee charter. We
expect that the committee will meet no less frequently than
quarterly. Our audit committee has previously met approximately
two to four times each year in connection with the annual audit
of our financial statements.
Compensation
Committee
Our compensation committee consists of Messrs. Berman,
Henderson and Wilson, with Mr. Henderson serving as chair.
Our compensation committee reviews and recommends policy
relating to compensation and benefits of our officers and
employees, including reviewing and approving corporate goals and
objectives relevant to compensation of the Chief Executive
Officer and other senior officers, evaluating the performance of
these officers in light of those goals and objectives and
setting compensation of these officers based on such
evaluations. The compensation committee also administers the
issuance of stock options and other awards under our stock
plans. We believe that the composition of our compensation
committee meets the requirements for independence under, and the
functioning of our compensation committee complies with, any
applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, The
NASDAQ Global Market and SEC rules and regulations. We intend to
comply with future requirements to the extent they become
applicable to us. We have adopted a compensation committee
charter. We expect that the committee will meet at least once a
year. Our compensation committee has previously met on an annual
basis to review key compensation decisions.
74
Nominating
and Governance Committee
Our nominating and governance committee consists of
Messrs. Golden, Henderson and Korn, with Mr. Golden
serving as chairman, each of whom the board of directors has
determined is an independent director under the rules of The
NASDAQ Global Market. The nominating and governance committee
recommends to the board of directors nominees for election as
directors, and meets as necessary to review director candidates
and nominees for election as directors.
Code of
Business Conduct and Ethics
Our board of directors has adopted a code of business conduct
and ethics, which establishes the standards of ethical conduct
applicable to all directors, officers and employees of our
company. The code addresses, among other things, conflicts of
interest, compliance with disclosure controls and procedures and
internal controls over financial reporting, corporate
opportunities and confidentiality requirements. The audit
committee is responsible for applying and interpreting our code
of business conduct in situations where questions are presented
to the committee.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None of the members of our compensation committee is an
executive officer or employee of our company. None of our
executive officers serves as a member of the compensation
committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers
serving on our compensation committee.
Director
Compensation
None of our non-employee directors are currently compensated for
service on the board of directors. We do, however, reimburse
director expenses for attending meetings of the board of
directors.
We previously granted equity awards for the purchase of our
common stock to two of our present non-employee directors,
William Henderson and Ronald Korn, upon their initial
appointment to our board of directors. A warrant to purchase
100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$1.00 per share was issued on June 26, 2001 to
Mr. Henderson, Such warrant shall terminate on the earlier
of (i) June 26, 2011; (ii) the completion of this
offering; or (iii) a change of control as defined in the
warrant. In addition, Mr. Henderson was previously granted
stock options for the purchase of 30,000 shares of our
common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share on
April 9, 2002 and for the purchase of 50,000 shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $0.90 per share on
December 27, 2005. Mr. Korn was awarded stock options
for the purchase of 100,000 shares of our common stock at
an exercise price of $0.85 per share on November 25,
2005. The warrant for the purchase of 100,000 shares of our
common stock issued to Mr. Henderson, the stock options for
the purchase of 80,000 shares of common stock granted to
Mr. Henderson and the stock option for the purchase of
100,000 shares of common stock granted to Mr. Korn
remain outstanding as of December 31, 2006.
Upon the closing of this offering, our non-employee directors
will be entitled to an annual grant of restricted stock having a
value of $50,000 at the time of the grant. Non-employee
directors will also be paid an annual cash retainer of $25,000
for serving on our board of directors, an additional annual cash
retainer of $10,000 for serving as the chairman of our audit
committee and $7,500 for serving as the chair of our
compensation committee.
Our non-employee directors did not receive any compensation for
their services as directors in 2006.
Limitations
on Director and Officer Liability and Indemnification
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation as will be
in effect upon completion of this offering limits the liability
of our directors to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware
law. Delaware law provides
75
that directors of a corporation will not be personally liable
for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as
directors, except liability for:
|
|
|
|
|
any breach of their duty of loyalty to the corporation or its
stockholders;
|
|
|
|
acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional
misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
|
unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or
redemptions; or
|
|
|
|
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our
amended and restated bylaws will provide that we are required to
indemnify our directors and officers, in each case to the
fullest extent permitted by Delaware law. Any repeal of or
modification to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws may not
adversely affect any right or protection of a director or
officer for or with respect to any acts or omissions of such
director or officer occurring prior to such amendment or repeal.
Our bylaws will also provide that we shall advance expenses
incurred by a director or officer in advance of the final
disposition of any action or proceeding, and permit us to secure
insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other
agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in
connection with their services to us, regardless of whether our
bylaws permit such indemnification.
We have entered into separate indemnification agreements with
our directors and executive officers, in addition to the
indemnification provided for in our bylaws. These agreements,
among other things, provide that we will indemnify our directors
and executive officers for certain expenses (including
attorneys fees), judgments, fines, penalties and
settlement amounts incurred by a director or executive officer
in any action or proceeding arising out of such persons
services as one of our directors or executive officers, or any
other company or enterprise to which the person provides
services at our request. We believe that these provisions and
agreements are necessary to attract and retain qualified persons
as directors and executive officers.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions that
will be contained in our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws may discourage
stockholders from bringing a lawsuit against our directors for
breach of their fiduciary duty. They may also reduce the
likelihood of derivative litigation against our directors and
officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us
and other stockholders. Further, a stockholders investment
may be adversely affected to the extent that we pay the costs of
settlement and damage awards against directors and officers as
required by these indemnification provisions. There is no
pending litigation or proceeding involving one of our directors
or executive officers as to which indemnification is required or
permitted and we are not aware of any threatened litigation or
proceeding that may result in a claim for indemnification.
76
COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Our
Philosophy
The objective of our compensation programs for employees is to
retain and attract top talent. The plans are designed to reward,
motivate and align employees to achieve business results and to
reinforce accountability. In determining the compensation of
senior executives, we are guided by the following key principles:
|
|
|
|
|
Competition. Compensation should reflect the
competitive marketplace, so we can retain, attract, and motivate
talented executives.
|
|
|
|
Accountability for Business
Performance. Compensation should be tied, in
part, to financial performance, so that executives are held
accountable through their compensation for contributions to the
performance of the company as a whole through the performance of
the businesses for which they are responsible.
|
|
|
|
Accountability for Individual
Performance. Compensation should be tied, in
part, to the individuals performance to encourage and
reflect individual contributions to our performance. Our board
of directors considers individual performance as well as
performance of the businesses and responsibility areas that an
individual oversees, and weights these factors as appropriate in
assessing a particular individuals performance.
|
|
|
|
Alignment with Stockholder
Interests. Compensation should be tied, in part,
to our financial performance through equity awards to align
executives interests with those of our stockholders.
|
|
|
|
Independence. An independent committee of our
board of directors should be, and is, responsible for reviewing
and establishing the compensation for our Chief Executive
Officer and Executive Chairman, and for reviewing and approving
the compensation recommendations made by our Chief Executive
Officer for all of our other executive officers.
|
Application
of our Philosophy
Our executive compensation and benefit program aims to encourage
our management team to continually pursue our strategic
opportunities while effectively managing the risks and
challenges inherent to our business. Specifically, we have
created an executive compensation package that balances short
versus long-term components, cash versus equity elements, and
fixed versus contingent payments, in ways we believe are most
appropriate to incentivize our senior management and reward them
for achieving the following goals:
|
|
|
|
|
develop a culture that embodies a passion for our business,
creative contribution and a drive to achieve established goals
and objectives;
|
|
|
|
provide leadership to the organization in such a way as to
maximize the results of our business operations;
|
|
|
|
lead us by demonstrating forward thinking in the operation,
development and expansion of our business;
|
|
|
|
effectively manage organizational resources to derive the
greatest value possible from each dollar invested; and
|
|
|
|
take strategic advantage of the market opportunity to expand and
grow our business.
|
Our executive compensation structure not only aims to be
competitive in our industry, but also to be fair relative to
compensation paid to other professionals within our
organization, relative to our short and long-term performance
and relative to the value we deliver to our stockholders. We
seek to maintain a performance-oriented culture and a
compensation approach that rewards our executive officers when
we achieve our goals and objectives, while putting at risk an
appropriate portion of their compensation against the
possibility that our goals and objectives may not be achieved.
Overall, our approach is designed to relate the compensation of
our executive officers to: the achievement of short and longer
term goals and objectives; their willingness to challenge and
improve existing policies and structures; and their capability
to take advantage of unique opportunities and overcome difficult
challenges within our business.
77
Role of
Our Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee approves, administers and interprets
our executive compensation and benefit policies, including our
1999 Stock Plan, our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan and our
short-term compensation, long-term incentives and benefits
programs. Our compensation committee is appointed by our board
of directors, and consists entirely of directors who are
outside directors for purposes of
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and
non-employee directors for purposes of
Rule 16b-3
under the Exchange Act. Our compensation committee is comprised
of Messrs. Berman, Henderson and Wilson, and is chaired by
Mr. Henderson.
Our compensation committee reviews and makes recommendations to
our board of directors to ensure that our executive compensation
and benefit program is consistent with our compensation
philosophy and corporate governance guidelines and, subject to
the approval of our board of directors, is responsible for
establishing the executive compensation packages offered to our
executive officers. We believe our executives base salary,
target annual bonus levels and long-term incentive award values
are set at competitive levels.
Our compensation committee has taken the following steps to
ensure that our executive compensation and benefit program is
consistent with both our compensation philosophy and our
corporate governance guidelines:
|
|
|
|
|
regularly reviewed the performance of and the total compensation
earned by or awarded to our Chief Executive Officer and
Executive Chairman independent of input from them;
|
|
|
|
examined on an annual basis the performance of our other named
executive officers and other key employees with assistance from
our Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman, and approved
compensation packages that are competitive in the marketplace;
and
|
|
|
|
regularly held executive sessions of the compensation committee
meeting without management present.
|
Components
of our Executive Compensation Program.
Our executive compensation program consists of three components:
short-term compensation (including base salary and annual
performance bonuses), long-term incentives and benefits.
Short-term
Compensation
We utilize short-term compensation, including base salary,
annual adjustments to base salary and annual performance
bonuses, to motivate and reward our key executives in accordance
with our performance-based program. Each individuals
short-term compensation components are tied to an annual
assessment of his or her progress against established objectives.
Base salary is used to recognize the experience, skills,
knowledge and responsibilities required of each executive
officer, as well as competitive market conditions. In
establishing the 2007 base salaries of the executive officers,
our compensation committee and management took into account a
number of factors, including the executives seniority,
position and functional role, level of responsibility and, to
the extent such individual was employed by us for at least the
prior six months, his or her accomplishments against personal
and group objectives. For newly hired executives, we consider
the base salary of the individual at his or her prior
employment, any unique personal circumstances that motivated the
executive to leave that prior position to join us and the
compensation range for the particular role being filled. In
addition, we consider the competitive market for corresponding
positions within comparable geographic areas and industries.
The base salary of our executive officer group is reviewed on an
annual basis and adjustments are made to reflect
performance-based factors, as well as competitive conditions.
Increases are considered within the context of our overall
annual merit increase structure as well as individual and market
competitive factors. We do not apply specific formulas to
determine increases. Generally, executive officer salaries are
adjusted effective the first quarter of each year based on a
review of:
|
|
|
|
|
their achievement of specific objectives established during the
prior review;
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
an assessment of their professional effectiveness, consisting of
a portfolio of competencies that include leadership, commitment,
creativity and organizational accomplishment; and
|
|
|
|
their knowledge, skills and attitude, focusing on capabilities,
capacity and the ability to drive results.
|
Annual performance bonuses for our executive officers are tied
to the achievement of our annual company goals and objectives,
functional area goals,
and/or
individual performance objectives. We set clearly defined goals
for each executive officer, with an emphasis on quantifiable and
achievable targets. A portion of each executive officers
bonus is clearly tied to the achievement of specific targets
relative to the performance of the particular business segment
or functional area for which they are responsible, with the
remainder tied to similar targets relative to our overall
financial performance. Individual awards under the program are
based on a thorough review of the applicable performance results
of the company, business, function or individual as compared to
the applicable goals. Each individual may receive an award from
zero to 100% of his or her target bonus based on the review.
Magid Abraham, our Chief Executive Officer, periodically reviews
the performance of our executive officers on the basis noted
above and recommends to the compensation committee any base
salary changes or bonuses deemed appropriate.
For the 2005 and 2006 performance measurement years, executive
bonuses were paid out in one installment during the month of
February following the measurement year.
Long-term
Compensation
Our long-term compensation program has historically consisted
solely of stock options. Option grants made to executive
officers are designed to provide them with incentive to execute
their responsibilities in such a way as to generate long-term
benefit to us and our stockholders. Through possession of stock
options, our executives participate in the long-term results of
their efforts, whether by appreciation of our companys
value or the impact of business setbacks, either
company-specific or industry based. Additionally, stock options
provide a means of ensuring the retention of key executives, in
that they are in almost all cases subject to vesting over an
extended period of time.
Stock options are granted periodically, and are subject to
vesting based on the executives continued employment. Most
options vest evenly over four years, beginning on the date of
the grant. A portion of options granted to our executives vest
according to defined performance milestones rather than solely
based on time.
Upon joining us, each executive is granted an initial option
award that is primarily based on competitive conditions
applicable to the executives specific position. In
addition, the compensation committee considers the number of
options owned by other executives in comparable positions within
our company. We believe this strategy is consistent with the
approach of other companies at the same stage of development in
our industry and, in our compensation committees view, is
appropriate for aligning the interests of our executives with
those of our stockholders over the long term.
Periodic awards to executive officers are made based on an
assessment of their sustained performance over time, their
ability to impact results that drive value to our stockholders
and their organization level. Equity awards are not granted
regularly or automatically to our executives on an annual basis.
Magid Abraham, our Chief Executive Officer, periodically reviews
the performance of our executive officers on the basis noted
above and recommends to the compensation committee any equity
awards deemed appropriate. The compensation committee reviews
any such recommendations and presents them to our board of
directors for approval, if appropriate.
During 2006, our board of directors granted stock options based
upon the recommendations of our compensation committee. These
grants were generally made during regularly scheduled board
meetings. The exercise price of options was determined by our
board of directors after taking into account a variety of
factors, including the quality and growth of our management team
and specific and general market comparables within our industry.
In addition, our board of directors took into account the
valuation opinion of our outside consultant, who provided
valuations of our common stock at the end of each calendar
quarter.
79
On March 18, 2007, we awarded an aggregate of
1,180,000 shares of restricted stock to our named executive
officers based upon the recommendations of our compensation
committee, taking into account the factors described above.
Beginning in 2007, we expect to increase our use of restricted
stock awards and reduce our use of stock options as a form of
stock-based compensation.
Benefits
We provide the following benefits to our executive officers on
the same basis as the benefits provided to all employees:
|
|
|
|
|
health and dental insurance;
|
|
|
|
life insurance;
|
|
|
|
short-and long-term disability; and
|
|
|
|
401(k) plan.
|
These benefits are consistent with those offered by other
companies and specifically with those companies with which we
compete for employees.
Our
Competitive Market
The market for experienced management with the knowledge, skills
and experience our organization requires is highly competitive.
Our objective is to attract and retain the most highly qualified
executives to manage each of our business functions. In doing
so, we draw upon a pool of talent that is highly sought after by
other companies in our industry and those industries that also
produce the requisite skills we seek.
We believe that our ability to offer significant upside
potential through restricted stock
and/or other
equity instruments gives us a competitive advantage.
Nonetheless, we must also offer cash compensation to our
existing and prospective employees through base salaries and
cash bonuses that are competitive in the marketplace and allow
them to satisfy their day to day financial requirements.
We also compete on the basis of our vision of future success,
our culture and company values and the excellence of our
management personnel. In all of these areas, we compete with
other market research and technology companies.
Total
Compensation
We intend to continue our strategy of compensating our named
executive officers at competitive levels, with the opportunity
to impact their total annual compensation through
performance-based incentive programs that include both cash and
equity elements. Our approach to total executive compensation is
designed to drive results that maximize our financial
performance and deliver value to our stockholders. In light of
our compensation philosophy, we believe that the total
compensation package for our executives should continue to
consist of base salary, annual cash performance bonus and
long-term equity-based incentives.
Evolution
of our Compensation Approach
Our compensation approach is necessarily tied to our stage of
development as a company. Accordingly, the specific direction,
emphasis and components of our executive compensation program
will continue to evolve as our company and its underlying
business strategy continue to grow and develop. For example, we
intend to reduce our executive compensation programs
emphasis on stock options as a long-term incentive component in
favor of other forms of equity compensation such as restricted
stock awards. Similarly, we may revise how we measure senior
executive performance to take into account the unique
requirements of being a public company, including, but not
limited to, strict compliance with the standards of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act. In addition, we may engage a compensation consultant
to assist our compensation committee in continuing to evolve our
executive compensation program, and we may look to programs
implemented by comparable public companies in refining our
compensation approach.
80
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table sets forth the summary information
concerning compensation during 2006 for the following persons:
(i) our chief executive officer, (ii) our current
chief financial officer and any individual serving as our chief
financial officer during 2006 and (iii) the three most
highly compensated of our other executive officers who received
compensation during 2006 of at least $100,000 and who were
executive officers on December 31, 2006. We refer to these
persons as our named executive officers elsewhere in
this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D.
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
$
|
297,612
|
|
|
$
|
117,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,072
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
417,957
|
|
President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Green
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
156,731
|
|
|
|
47,019
|
|
|
$
|
87,366
|
|
|
|
42
|
(2)
|
|
|
291,158
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gian M. Fulgoni
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
281,635
|
|
|
|
111,409
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,072
|
(1)
|
|
|
396,116
|
|
Executive Chairman of the
Board
of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Dale
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
222,115
|
|
|
|
44,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,072
|
(1)
|
|
|
269,610
|
|
Chief Technology
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christiana L. Lin
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
149,077
|
|
|
|
29,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,173
|
(3)
|
|
|
181,065
|
|
General Counsel and Chief
Privacy Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheri Huston
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
60,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,345
|
(4)
|
|
|
202,117
|
|
Former Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes discretionary matching contributions of $3,000 each by
us to Dr. Abrahams, Mr. Fulgonis and
Mr. Dales respective 401(k) plan accounts and payment
of life insurance premiums on behalf of each officer. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents life insurance premium paid by us on behalf of
Mr. Green. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes discretionary matching contributions of $2,000 by us to
the Ms. Lins 401(k) plan account and payment of life
insurance premiums on behalf of Ms. Lin. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes payment of health insurance premiums for six months,
payment of unused accrued vacation, discretionary matching
contributions by us to the officers 401(k) account,
payment of life insurance premiums on behalf of the officer and
a severance payment equivalent to six months salary. |
Grants of
Plan-Based Awards
Our board of directors approved awards under our 1999 Stock Plan
to several of our named executive officers in 2006. See
Benefit Plans 1999 Stock Plan for more
detail regarding these options.
81
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
grants of plan-based awards to named executive officers in 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Other Option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awards: Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Exercise or Base
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Price per Share
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant Date
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
of Option Awards
|
|
|
Magid M. Abraham, Ph.D.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive
Officer and
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Green
|
|
|
5/9/2006
|
|
|
|
650,000
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gian M. Fulgoni
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Chairman of the Board
of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Dale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Technology
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christiana L. Lin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Counsel and Chief
Privacy Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheri Huston
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
1/48th of the total number of shares subject to option vest
monthly. |
Outstanding
Equity Awards at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards: Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities
|
|
|
of Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
|
Unexercised Options
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Unearned Options
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Dr. Magid M. Abraham
|
|
|
1,083,465
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,622,030
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
12/16/2013
|
|
President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John M. Green
|
|
|
81,248
|
(2)
|
|
|
568,752
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
5/9/2016
|
|
Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gian M. Fulgoni
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,166,725
|
(3)
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
12/16/2013
|
|
Executive Chairman of the
Board of Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gregory T. Dale
|
|
|
170,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
4/28/2014
|
|
Chief Technology
Officer
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
4/28/2014
|
|
|
|
|
59,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
4/28/2014
|
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
4/28/2014
|
|
|
|
|
90,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
4/28/2014
|
|
|
|
|
99,998
|
(2)
|
|
|
50,002
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
4/28/2014
|
|
|
|
|
91,665
|
(2)
|
|
|
108,335
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
|
2/2/2015
|
|
|
|
|
18,749
|
(2)
|
|
|
56,251
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
|
|
12/28/2015
|
|
Christiana L. Lin
|
|
|
5,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
4/28/2014
|
|
General Counsel and
Chief
|
|
|
5,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
|
|
4/28/2014
|
|
Privacy Officer
|
|
|
21,879
|
(4)
|
|
|
6,245
|
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|