e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-31720
PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
30-0168701
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
800 Nicollet Mall, Suite 800 |
|
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
55402
(Zip Code) |
(612) 303-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer o Non-Accelerated Filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
As of October 27, 2006, the registrant had 18,583,156 shares of Common Stock outstanding.
Piper Jaffray Companies
Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
1
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except share data) |
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
97,756 |
|
|
$ |
60,869 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents segregated for regulatory purposes |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers (net of allowance of $0 at September 30, 2006 and $1,793 at December 31, 2005) |
|
|
93,559 |
|
|
|
54,421 |
|
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
441,731 |
|
|
|
299,056 |
|
Deposits with clearing organizations |
|
|
39,678 |
|
|
|
64,379 |
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
177,892 |
|
|
|
222,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities owned |
|
|
803,418 |
|
|
|
517,310 |
|
Trading securities owned and pledged as collateral |
|
|
4,848 |
|
|
|
236,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading securities owned |
|
|
808,266 |
|
|
|
753,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets (net of accumulated depreciation and
amortization of $51,726 and $76,581 respectively) |
|
|
24,957 |
|
|
|
41,752 |
|
Goodwill (net of accumulated amortization of $38,364 and $52,531, respectively) |
|
|
231,567 |
|
|
|
317,167 |
|
Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization of $2,933 and $1,733, respectively) |
|
|
1,867 |
|
|
|
3,067 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
31,845 |
|
|
|
24,626 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
91,441 |
|
|
|
69,200 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
442,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,075,559 |
|
|
$ |
2,354,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term bank financing |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Payables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
|
80,789 |
|
|
|
73,781 |
|
Checks and drafts |
|
|
14,780 |
|
|
|
53,304 |
|
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
296,881 |
|
|
|
259,597 |
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
3,560 |
|
|
|
245,786 |
|
Trading securities sold, but not yet purchased |
|
|
273,547 |
|
|
|
332,204 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
121,664 |
|
|
|
171,551 |
|
Other liabilities and accrued expenses |
|
|
341,151 |
|
|
|
138,122 |
|
Liabilities held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,182,372 |
|
|
|
1,419,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares authorized: 100,000,000 at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued: 19,487,319 at September 30, 2006 and at December 31, 2005; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
outstanding: 16,959,795 at September 30, 2006 and 18,365,177 at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
718,776 |
|
|
|
704,005 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
305,038 |
|
|
|
90,431 |
|
Less common stock held in treasury, at cost: 2,527,524 shares at September 30, 2006 and 1,122,142 at
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
(127,630 |
) |
|
|
(35,422 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(3,192 |
) |
|
|
(4,382 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
893,187 |
|
|
|
754,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,075,559 |
|
|
$ |
2,354,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking |
|
$ |
72,107 |
|
|
$ |
73,407 |
|
|
$ |
203,107 |
|
|
$ |
169,909 |
|
Institutional brokerage |
|
|
34,964 |
|
|
|
42,476 |
|
|
|
122,136 |
|
|
|
121,699 |
|
Interest |
|
|
16,663 |
|
|
|
11,357 |
|
|
|
44,728 |
|
|
|
32,015 |
|
Other income |
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
12,131 |
|
|
|
2,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
124,597 |
|
|
|
128,189 |
|
|
|
382,102 |
|
|
|
326,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
8,064 |
|
|
|
25,786 |
|
|
|
23,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
116,107 |
|
|
|
120,125 |
|
|
|
356,316 |
|
|
|
302,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
69,079 |
|
|
|
72,649 |
|
|
|
202,656 |
|
|
|
177,262 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
6,878 |
|
|
|
7,710 |
|
|
|
21,705 |
|
|
|
22,912 |
|
Communications |
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
5,683 |
|
|
|
16,737 |
|
|
|
18,081 |
|
Floor brokerage and clearance |
|
|
3,759 |
|
|
|
3,887 |
|
|
|
9,807 |
|
|
|
11,336 |
|
Marketing and business development |
|
|
5,887 |
|
|
|
4,827 |
|
|
|
17,188 |
|
|
|
15,793 |
|
Outside services |
|
|
6,344 |
|
|
|
5,237 |
|
|
|
19,472 |
|
|
|
16,911 |
|
Cash award program |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
Restructuring-related expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,595 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
2,838 |
|
|
|
3,319 |
|
|
|
10,185 |
|
|
|
9,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
101,058 |
|
|
|
104,316 |
|
|
|
300,423 |
|
|
|
283,607 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before
income tax expense |
|
|
15,049 |
|
|
|
15,809 |
|
|
|
55,893 |
|
|
|
19,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
5,521 |
|
|
|
4,871 |
|
|
|
19,730 |
|
|
|
5,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
9,528 |
|
|
|
10,938 |
|
|
|
36,163 |
|
|
|
13,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
177,085 |
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
178,444 |
|
|
|
10,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
186,613 |
|
|
$ |
15,148 |
|
|
$ |
214,607 |
|
|
$ |
23,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per basic common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
1.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
9.82 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
9.73 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per basic common share |
|
$ |
10.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
11.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per diluted common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
1.87 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
Income from discontinued operations |
|
|
9.29 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
9.25 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per diluted common share |
|
$ |
9.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
11.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
18,031 |
|
|
|
18,841 |
|
|
|
18,348 |
|
|
|
18,814 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
19,071 |
|
|
|
19,107 |
|
|
|
19,294 |
|
|
|
19,007 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
Piper Jaffray Companies
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
214,607 |
|
|
$ |
23,720 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
10,512 |
|
|
|
13,458 |
|
Gain on sale of PCS branch network |
|
|
(327,749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(11,598 |
) |
|
|
(1,105 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
21,433 |
|
|
|
14,231 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
Decrease (increase) in operating assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents segregated for regulatory purposes |
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
|
33,058 |
|
|
|
(56,415 |
) |
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
(141,257 |
) |
|
|
194,319 |
|
Deposits with clearing organizations |
|
|
24,701 |
|
|
|
1,182 |
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell |
|
|
44,952 |
|
|
|
(24,677 |
) |
Net trading securities owned |
|
|
(113,311 |
) |
|
|
(146,195 |
) |
Other receivables |
|
|
(5,099 |
) |
|
|
(4,543 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(11,859 |
) |
|
|
4,016 |
|
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers |
|
|
(18,900 |
) |
|
|
20,518 |
|
Checks and drafts |
|
|
(38,524 |
) |
|
|
(21,504 |
) |
Brokers, dealers and clearing organizations |
|
|
275,066 |
|
|
|
(5,498 |
) |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(13,527 |
) |
|
|
(10,517 |
) |
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(41,662 |
) |
|
|
(38,876 |
) |
Other liabilities and accrued expenses |
|
|
166,832 |
|
|
|
7,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
33,875 |
|
|
|
(28,732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of PCS branch network |
|
|
701,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed assets, net |
|
|
(6,456 |
) |
|
|
(14,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
695,405 |
|
|
|
(14,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in securities loaned |
|
|
(234,676 |
) |
|
|
23,868 |
|
Decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
|
|
(228,699 |
) |
|
|
(138,745 |
) |
Increase in short-term bank financing |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
170,000 |
|
Repayment of subordianted debt |
|
|
(180,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
(42,381 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(693,375 |
) |
|
|
12,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency adjustment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
36,887 |
|
|
|
(30,335 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
60,869 |
|
|
|
67,387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
97,756 |
|
|
$ |
37,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
35,137 |
|
|
$ |
28,483 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
36,981 |
|
|
$ |
10,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock for retirement plan obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,966 shares and 331,434 shares for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively |
|
$ |
9,013 |
|
|
$ |
13,187 |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
Piper Jaffray Companies
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Background and Basis of Presentation
Background
Piper Jaffray Companies is the parent company of Piper Jaffray & Co. (Piper Jaffray), a
securities broker dealer and investment banking firm; Piper Jaffray Ltd., a firm providing
securities brokerage and investment banking services in Europe headquartered in London, England;
Piper Jaffray Financial Products Inc., an entity that facilitates customer derivative transactions;
Piper Jaffray Financial Products II Inc., an entity dealing primarily in variable rate municipal
products; and other immaterial subsidiaries. Piper Jaffray Companies and its subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company) operate as one reporting segment providing investment banking
services and institutional sales, trading and research services. As discussed more fully in Note
14, the Company completed the sale of its Private Client Services branch network and certain
related assets to UBS Financial Services, Inc., a subsidiary of UBS AG (UBS), on August 11, 2006,
thereby exiting the Private Client Services (PCS) business.
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Piper Jaffray Companies, its
wholly owned subsidiaries and other entities in which the Company has a controlling financial
interest. All material intercompany balances have been eliminated. Certain financial information
for prior periods has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with respect to Form 10-Q and reflect
all adjustments that in the opinion of management are normal and recurring and that are necessary
for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. In accordance with these
rules and regulations, certain disclosures that are normally included in annual financial
statements have been omitted. The consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. These principles require management to make certain estimates and
assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the
consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The nature of the Companys
business is such that the results of any interim period may not be indicative of the results to be
expected for a full year.
Note 2 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Refer to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, for a
full summary of the Companys significant accounting policies. Updates to the Companys significant
accounting policies are described below.
Revenue Recognition
Investment Banking Investment banking revenues, which include underwriting fees, management
fees and advisory fees, are recorded when services for the transactions are completed under the
terms of each engagement. Expenses associated with such transactions are deferred until the related
revenue is recognized or the engagement is otherwise concluded. Investment banking revenues are
presented net of related expenses.
Institutional Brokerage Institutional brokerage revenues include (i) commissions paid by
customers for the execution of brokerage transactions in listed and overthecounter (OTC) equity,
fixed income and convertible debt securities, which are recorded on a trade date basis; (ii)
trading gains and losses and (iii) fees paid to the Company for equity research.
5
Other Assets
Other assets includes investments in partnerships, investments to fund deferred compensation
liabilities, prepaid expenses, and net deferred tax assets. In addition, other assets includes
55,440 restricted shares of NYSE Group, Inc. On March 7, 2006, upon the consummation of the merger
of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (NYSE) and Archipelago Holdings, Inc., NYSE Group, Inc.
became the parent company of New York Stock Exchange, LLC (which is the successor to the NYSE) and
Archipelago Holdings, Inc. In connection with the merger, the Company received $0.8 million in cash
and 157,202 shares of NYSE Group, Inc. common stock in exchange for the two NYSE seats owned by the
Company. The Company sold 101,762 shares of NYSE Group, Inc. common stock in a secondary offering
during the second quarter of 2006.
Note 3 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No.
48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN
48). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with
FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a two-step process to
recognize and measure a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The first step
is recognition, whereby a determination is made whether it is more-likely-than-not that a tax
position will be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the position. The
second step is to measure a tax position that meets the recognition threshold to determine the
amount of benefit to recognize. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. FIN 48 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating
the impact of FIN 48 on the Companys results of operations and financial condition.
In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Considering the Effects
of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements
(SAB 108). SAB 108 requires the evaluation of prior year misstatements in quantifying
misstatements in the current year financial statements. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years
ending after November 15, 2006. In the initial year of adoption, the cumulative effect of applying
SAB 108, if any, will be recorded as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings.
In subsequent years, previously undetected material misstatements require restatement of the
financial statements. The Company does not believe adoption of SAB 108 will impact the Companys
results of operations or financial condition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No.
157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does
not require any new fair value measurements, but its application may, for some entities, change
current practice. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 157 on the Companys results of operations and
financial condition.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R) (SFAS 158). SFAS 158 requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded
status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or
liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in the funded status in
the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. In addition, SFAS 158 requires
disclosure in the notes to the financial statements of the estimated portion of net actuarial gains
or losses, prior service costs or credits and transition assets or obligations in other
comprehensive income that will be recognized in net periodic benefit cost over the fiscal year.
These requirements are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. SFAS 158 also
requires employers to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of its year-end
statement of financial position. This requirement is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 158 on the Companys
results of operations and financial condition.
Note 4 Derivatives
Derivative contracts are financial instruments such as forwards, futures, swaps or option
contracts that derive their value from underlying assets, reference rates, indices or a combination
of these factors. A derivative contract generally represents future commitments to purchase or sell
financial instruments at specified terms on a specified date or to exchange currency or interest
payment streams based on the contract or notional amount. Derivative contracts exclude certain cash
instruments, such as mortgage-backed securities, interest-only and principal-only obligations and
indexed debt instruments that derive their values or contractually required cash flows from the
price of some other security or index.
6
The Company uses interest rate swaps, interest rate locks, and forward contracts to facilitate
customer transactions and as a means to manage risk in certain inventory positions. The Company
also enters into interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate exposure associated with
holding residual interest securities from its tender option bond program. As of September 30, 2006,
and December 31, 2005, the Company was counterparty to notional/contract amounts of $5.7 billion
and $4.6 billion, respectively, of derivative instruments.
The market or fair values related to derivative contract transactions are reported in trading
securities owned and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased on the consolidated statements
of financial condition and any unrealized gain or loss resulting from changes in fair values of
derivatives is recognized in institutional brokerage on the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company does not utilize hedge accounting as described within SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Derivatives are reported on a net-by-counterparty
basis when a legal right of offset exists under a legally enforceable master netting agreement in
accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts.
Fair values for derivative contracts represent amounts estimated to be received from or paid
to a counterparty in settlement of these instruments. These derivatives are valued using quoted
market prices when available or pricing models based on the net present value of estimated future
cash flows. The valuation models used require inputs including contractual terms, market prices,
yield curves, credit curves and measures of volatility. The net fair value of derivative contracts
was approximately $18.3 million and $17.0 million as of September 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005,
respectively.
Note 5 Securitizations
In connection with its tender option bond program, as of September 30, 2006, the Company has
outstanding securitizations of $279.2 million of highly rated municipal bonds. Each municipal bond
is sold into a separate trust that is funded by the sale of variable rate certificates to
institutional customers seeking variable rate tax-free investment products. These variable rate
certificates reprice weekly. Securitization transactions meeting certain SFAS 140 criteria are
treated as sales, with the resulting gain included in institutional brokerage on the consolidated
statements of operations. If a securitization does not meet the sale of asset requirements of SFAS
140, the transaction is recorded as a borrowing. The Company retains a residual interest in each
structure and accounts for the residual interest as a trading security, which is recorded at fair
value in trading securities owned on the consolidated statements of financial condition. The fair
value of retained interests was $7.4 million at September 30, 2006, with a weighted average life of
8.7 years. The fair value of retained interests is estimated based on the present value of future
cash flows using managements best estimates of the key assumptionsexpected yield, credit losses
of 0 percent and a 12 percent discount rate. At September 30, 2006, the sensitivity of the current
fair value of retained interests to immediate 10 percent and 20 percent adverse changes in the key
economic assumptions was not material. The Company receives a fee to remarket the variable rate
certificates derived from the securitizations.
Certain cash flow activity for the municipal bond securitizations described above during the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 includes:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from new securitizations |
|
$ |
7,578 |
|
Remarketing fees received |
|
|
106 |
|
Cash flows received on retained interests |
|
|
5,525 |
|
Three securitization transactions were designed such that they did not meet the asset sale
requirements of SFAS 140; therefore, the Company consolidated these trusts. As a result, the
Company has recorded an asset for the underlying bonds of approximately $51.2 million in trading
securities owned and a liability for the certificates sold by the trust for approximately $50.1
million in other liabilities and accrued expenses on the consolidated statement of financial
condition as of September 30, 2006. The Company has economically hedged the activities of these
securitizations with interest rate swaps, which have been recorded at fair value and resulted in a
liability of approximately $4.8 million at September 30, 2006.
The Company has contracted with a major third-party financial institution to act as the
liquidity provider for the Companys tender option bond securitized trusts. The Company has agreed
to reimburse this party for losses associated with providing liquidity to the trusts. The maximum
exposure to loss at September 30, 2006 was $251.2 million, representing the outstanding amount of
all trust certificates at that date. This exposure to loss is mitigated by the underlying municipal
bonds held in the trusts, which are either AAA or AA rated. These bonds had a market value of
approximately $263.2 million at September 30, 2006. The
Company believes the likelihood it will be required to fund the reimbursement agreement obligation under any
provision of the arrangement is remote, and accordingly, no liability for such guarantee has been
recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
7
Note 6 Receivables from and Payables to Brokers, Dealers and Clearing Organizations
Amounts receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations at September 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Receivable arising from unsettled securities
transactions, net |
|
$ |
35,290 |
|
|
$ |
108,454 |
|
Deposits paid for securities borrowed |
|
|
366,152 |
|
|
|
92,495 |
|
Receivable from clearing organizations |
|
|
24,054 |
|
|
|
50,236 |
|
Securities failed to deliver |
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
34,946 |
|
Other |
|
|
10,310 |
|
|
|
12,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
441,731 |
|
|
$ |
299,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations at September 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 included:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Deposits received for securities loaned |
|
$ |
275,500 |
|
|
$ |
234,676 |
|
Payable to clearing organizations |
|
|
11,313 |
|
|
|
8,117 |
|
Securities failed to receive |
|
|
9,266 |
|
|
|
16,609 |
|
Other |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
296,881 |
|
|
$ |
259,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2006, the Company began operating a stock loan conduit business. The
business consists of a matched book where the Company will borrow a security from an independent
party in the securities business and then loan the exact same security to a third party who needs
the security. The Company earns interest income on the securities borrowed and pays interest
expense on the securities loaned, earning a net spread on the transactions. Prior to the third
quarter of 2006, the Company participated in securities lending activities by using customer excess
margin securities to finance customer receivables. Deposits paid for securities borrowed and
deposits received for securities loaned approximate the market value of the securities. Securities
failed to deliver and receive represent the contract value of securities that have not been
delivered or received by the Company on settlement date.
8
Note 7 Trading Securities Owned and Trading Securities Sold, But Not Yet Purchased
Trading securities owned and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Owned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
31,693 |
|
|
$ |
13,260 |
|
Convertible securities |
|
|
53,955 |
|
|
|
9,221 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
101,015 |
|
|
|
68,017 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
239,816 |
|
|
|
329,057 |
|
U.S. government securities |
|
|
30,352 |
|
|
|
26,652 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
326,875 |
|
|
|
286,531 |
|
Other |
|
|
24,560 |
|
|
|
21,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
808,266 |
|
|
$ |
753,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sold, but not yet purchased: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
39,402 |
|
|
$ |
8,367 |
|
Convertible securities |
|
|
2,652 |
|
|
|
2,572 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
13,262 |
|
|
|
31,588 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
106,161 |
|
|
|
157,132 |
|
U.S. government securities |
|
|
105,365 |
|
|
|
127,833 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,705 |
|
|
|
4,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
273,547 |
|
|
$ |
332,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, trading securities owned in the amount of $4.8
million and $236.6 million, respectively, have been pledged as collateral for the Companys secured
borrowings, repurchase agreements and securities loaned activities.
Trading securities sold, but not yet purchased represent obligations of the Company to deliver
the specified security at the contracted price, thereby creating a liability to purchase the
security in the market at prevailing prices. The Company is obligated to acquire the securities
sold short at prevailing market prices, which may exceed the amount reflected on the consolidated
statements of financial condition. The Company economically hedges changes in market value of its
trading securities owned utilizing trading securities sold, but not yet purchased, interest rate
swaps, futures and exchange-traded options. It is the Companys practice to economically hedge a
significant portion of its trading securities owned.
9
Note 8 Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The following table presents the changes in the carrying value of goodwill and intangible
assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing |
|
|
Discontinued |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Operations |
|
|
Operations |
|
|
Company |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
231,567 |
|
|
$ |
85,600 |
|
|
$ |
317,167 |
|
Goodwill acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill disposed in PCS sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(85,600 |
) |
|
|
(85,600 |
) |
Impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
231,567 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
231,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
3,067 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,067 |
|
Intangible assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,200 |
) |
Impairment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company wrote-off $85.6 million of goodwill in conjunction with the sale of the PCS branch
network. The intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over three years.
Note 9 Financing
The Company has uncommitted credit agreements with banks totaling $675 million at September
30, 2006, composed of $555 million in discretionary secured lines of which $0 was outstanding at
September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and $120 million in discretionary unsecured lines of
which $50 million and $0 was outstanding at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
In addition, the Company has established arrangements to obtain financing at the end of each
business day using as collateral the Companys securities held by its clearing bank and by another
broker dealer. Repurchase agreements and securities loaned to other broker dealers are also used as
sources of funding.
On August 15, 2006 the Company utilized proceeds from the sale of its PCS branch network to
pay in full its $180 million subordinated loan with U.S. Bancorp.
The Companys short-term financing bears interest at rates based on the London Interbank
Offered Rate or federal funds rate. At September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the weighted
average interest rate on borrowings was 6.00 percent and 5.55 percent, respectively. At September
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, no formal compensating balance agreements existed, and the Company
was in compliance with all debt covenants related to these facilities.
Note 10 Legal Contingencies
The Company has been the subject of customer complaints and also has been named as a defendant
in various legal proceedings arising primarily from securities brokerage and investment banking
activities, including certain class actions that primarily allege violations of securities laws and
seek unspecified damages, which could be substantial. Also, the Company is involved from time to
time in investigations and proceedings by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations.
10
The Company has established reserves for potential losses that are probable and reasonably
estimable that may result from pending and potential complaints, legal actions, investigations and
proceedings. In addition to the Companys established reserves, U.S. Bancorp has agreed to
indemnify the Company in an amount up to $17.5 million for certain legal and regulatory matters.
Approximately $13.2 million of this amount remained available as of September 30, 2006.
As part of the asset purchase agreement between UBS and the Company for the sale of the PCS
branch network, UBS agreed to assume certain liabilities of the PCS business, including certain
liabilities and obligations arising from litigation, arbitration, customer complaints and other
claims related to the PCS business. In certain cases we have agreed to indemnify UBS for
litigation matters after UBS has incurred costs of $6.0 million related to these matters. In
addition, we have retained liabilities arising from regulatory matters and certain litigation
relating to the PCS business prior to the sale. The amount of loss in excess of the $6.0 million
indemnification threshold and for other PCS litigation matters deemed to be probable and reasonably
estimable are included in the Companys established reserves. Adjustment to litigation reserves
for matters pertaining to the PCS business are included within discontinued operations on the
consolidated statements of operations.
Given uncertainties regarding the timing, scope, volume and outcome of pending and potential
litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings and other factors, the amounts of reserves are
difficult to determine and of necessity subject to future revision. Subject to the foregoing,
management of the Company believes, based on its current knowledge, after consultation with outside
legal counsel and after taking into account its established reserves and the U.S. Bancorp indemnity
agreement, that pending legal actions, investigations and proceedings will be resolved with no
material adverse effect on the financial condition of the Company. However, if during any period a
potential adverse contingency should become probable or resolved for an amount in excess of the
established reserves and U.S. Bancorp indemnification, the results of operations in that period
could be materially adversely affected.
Note 11 Net Capital Requirements and Other Regulatory Matters
As a registered broker dealer and member firm of the NYSE, Piper Jaffray is subject to the
Uniform Net Capital Rule of the SEC and the net capital rule of the NYSE. Piper Jaffray has elected
to use the alternative method permitted by the SEC rule, which requires that it maintain minimum
net capital of the greater of $1.0 million or 2 percent of aggregate debit balances arising from
customer transactions, as such term is defined in the SEC rule. Under the NYSE rule, the NYSE may
prohibit a member firm from expanding its business or paying dividends if resulting net capital
would be less than 5 percent of aggregate debit balances. Advances to affiliates, repayment of
subordinated debt, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals by Piper Jaffray are subject to
certain notification and other provisions of the SEC and NYSE rules. In addition, Piper Jaffray is
subject to certain notification requirements related to withdrawals of excess net capital.
At September 30, 2006, net capital under the SEC rule was $370.6 million, or 280.2 percent of
aggregate debit balances, and $367.9 million in excess of the minimum net capital required under
the SEC rule.
Piper Jaffray is also registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and
therefore is subject to CFTC regulations.
Piper Jaffray Ltd., which is a registered United Kingdom broker dealer, is subject to the
capital requirements of the United Kingdom Financial Services Authority (FSA). As of September
30, 2006, Piper Jaffray Ltd. was in compliance with the capital requirements of the FSA.
Note 12 Stock-Based Compensation and Cash Award Program
The Company maintains one stock-based compensation plan, the Piper Jaffray Companies Amended
and Restated 2003 Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plan (Long-Term Incentive Plan). The plan
permits the grant of equity awards, including non-qualified stock options and restricted stock, to
the Companys employees and directors for up to 4.5 million shares of common stock. In 2004, 2005
and 2006, the Company has granted shares of restricted stock and options to purchase Piper Jaffray
Companies common stock to employees and granted options to purchase Piper Jaffray Companies common
stock to its non-employee directors. The Company believes that such awards help align the interests
of employees and directors with those of shareholders and serve as an employee
retention tool. The awards granted to employees have three-year cliff vesting periods. The
director awards are fully vested upon grant. The maximum term of the stock options granted to
employees and directors is ten years. The plan provides for accelerated vesting of option and
restricted stock awards if there is a change in control of the Company (as defined in the plan), in
the event of a participants death, and at the discretion of the compensation committee of the
Companys board of directors.
11
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation under the fair
value method of accounting as prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123,
Accounting and Disclosure of Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and
Disclosure. As such, the Company had recorded stock-based compensation expense in the consolidated
statement of operations at fair value, net of estimated forfeitures.
Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 123(R) (SFAS 123(R)), Share-Based Payment, using the modified
prospective transition method. SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on fair
value, net of estimated forfeitures. Because the Company historically expensed all equity awards
based on the fair value method, net of estimated forfeitures, SFAS 123(R) did not have a material
effect on the Companys measurement or recognition methods for stock-based compensation.
Employee and director stock options granted prior to January 1, 2006, were expensed by the
Company on a straight-line basis over the option vesting period, based on the estimated fair value
of the award on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Employee and director
stock options granted after January 1, 2006, are expensed by the Company on a straight-line basis
over the required service period, based on the estimated fair value of the award on the date of
grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. At the time it adopted SFAS 123(R), the Company
changed the expensing period from the vesting period to the required service period, which
shortened the period over which options are expensed for employees who are retiree-eligible on the
date of grant or become retiree-eligible during the vesting period. The number of employees that
fell within this category at January 1, 2006 was not material. In accordance with SEC guidelines,
the Company did not alter the expense recorded in connection with prior option grants for the
change in the expensing period.
Employee restricted stock grants prior to January 1, 2006, are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the vesting period based on the market price of Piper Jaffray Companies common stock on
the date of grant. Restricted stock grants after January 1, 2006, are valued at the market price of
the Companys common stock on the date of grant and amortized on a straight-line basis over the
required service period. The majority of the Companys restricted stock grants provide for
continued vesting after termination, so long as the employee does not violate non-competition and
certain other post-termination restrictions, as set forth in the award agreements. The Company
considers the required service period to be the greater of the vesting period or the
non-competition period. The Company believes that the non-competition restrictions meet the SFAS
123(R) definition of a substantive service requirement.
The Company recorded compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, of $6.8 million and
$5.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $21.4
million and $14.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively,
related to employee stock option and restricted stock grants. The tax benefit related to the total
compensation cost for stock-based compensation arrangements totaled $2.6 million and $1.9 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $8.2 million and $5.5
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
In connection with the sale of the Companys PCS branch network, the Company undertook a plan
to significantly restructure the Companys support infrastructure. The Company accelerated the
equity award vesting for employees terminated as part of this restructuring. The acceleration of
equity awards was deemed to be a modification of the awards as defined by SFAS 123(R). For the
three months ending September 30, 2006, the Company recorded $1.9 million of expense in
discontinued operations related to the modification of equity awards to accelerate service vesting.
Unvested equity awards related to employees transferring to UBS as part of the PCS sale were
canceled. See Notes 14 and 15 for further discussion of the Companys discontinued operations and
restructuring activities.
The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model using assumptions such as the risk-free interest rate, the dividend yield, the
expected volatility and the expected life of the option. The risk-free interest rate assumption is
based on the U.S. treasury bill rate with a maturity equal to the expected life of the option. The
dividend yield assumption is based on the assumed dividend payout over the expected life of the
option. The expected volatility assumption is based on industry comparisons. The Company has only
been a publicly traded company for approximately 33 months; therefore, it does not have sufficient
historical data to determine an appropriate expected volatility. The expected life assumption is
based on an average of the following two factors: 1) industry comparisons; and 2) the guidance
provided by the SEC in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107). SAB 107 allows the use of an
12
acceptable methodology under which the Company can take the midpoint of the vesting date and the
full contractual term. The following table provides a summary of the valuation assumptions used by
the Company to determine the estimated value of stock option grants in Piper Jaffray Companies
common stock for the nine months ended September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Weighted average assumptions in option valuation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rates |
|
|
4.55 |
% |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
Stock volatility factor |
|
|
40.08 |
% |
|
|
38.03 |
% |
Expected life of options (in years) |
|
|
5.53 |
|
|
|
5.83 |
|
Weighted average fair value of options granted |
|
$ |
22.14 |
|
|
$ |
16.58 |
|
The following table summarizes the Companys stock options outstanding for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Options |
|
Average |
|
Contractual |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Term (Years) |
|
Value |
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
643,032 |
|
|
$ |
42.29 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
$ |
11,786,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
50,560 |
|
|
|
53.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(10,271 |
) |
|
|
42.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled |
|
|
(152,000 |
) |
|
|
42.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
531,321 |
|
|
$ |
43.16 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
9,276,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at September 30, 2006 |
|
|
73,420 |
|
|
$ |
43.31 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,270,900 |
|
As of September 30, 2006, there was $3.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to stock options expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.39 years.
The following table summarizes the Companys nonvested restricted stock for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Nonvested |
|
Average |
|
|
Restricted |
|
Grant Date |
|
|
Stock |
|
Fair Value |
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,417,444 |
|
|
$ |
41.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
840,592 |
|
|
|
48.21 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(48,599 |
) |
|
|
45.25 |
|
Canceled |
|
|
(594,443 |
) |
|
|
44.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
1,614,994 |
|
|
$ |
43.76 |
|
As of September 30, 2006, there was $37.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to restricted stock expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.98 years.
In connection with the Companys spin-off from U.S. Bancorp, the Company established a cash
award program pursuant to which it granted cash awards to a broad-based group of employees to aid
in retention of employees and to compensate employees for the value of U.S. Bancorp stock options
and restricted stock lost by employees. The cash awards are being expensed over a four-year period
ending December 31, 2007. Participants must be employed on the date of payment to receive payment
under the award. Expense related to the cash award program is included as a separate line item on
the Companys consolidated statements of operations.
13
Note 13 Shareholders Equity
Issuance and Purchase of Shares
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company reissued 190,966 common shares
out of treasury in fulfillment of $9.0 million in obligations under the Piper Jaffray Companies
Retirement Plan. The Company also reissued 38,687 common shares out of treasury as a result of
vesting and exercise transactions under the Long-Term Incentive Plan. In the third quarter of
2006, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreement with a financial
institution pursuant to which the Company repurchased 1.6 million shares of its common stock.
Under the agreement, the financial institution purchased an equivalent number of shares of the
Companys common stock in the open market. The shares repurchased by the Company were subject to a
future price adjustment based upon the weighted average price of the Companys common stock over an
agreed upon period, subject to a specified collar. In October 2006, the Company settled the ASR.
The Company elected settlement in shares and received 13,492 additional shares of common stock.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated
by adjusting the weighted average outstanding shares to assume conversion of all potentially
dilutive restricted stock and stock options. The computation of earnings per share is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
186,613 |
|
|
$ |
15,148 |
|
|
$ |
214,607 |
|
|
$ |
23,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares for basic and diluted calculations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average shares used in basic computation |
|
|
18,031 |
|
|
|
18,841 |
|
|
|
18,348 |
|
|
|
18,814 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
Average shares used in diluted computation |
|
|
19,071 |
|
|
|
19,107 |
|
|
|
19,294 |
|
|
|
19,007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
10.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
11.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
9.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
11.12 |
|
|
$ |
1.25 |
|
Note 14 Discontinued Operations
On August 11, 2006, the Company and UBS completed the sale of the Companys PCS branch network
under a previously announced asset purchase agreement. The purchase price under the asset purchase
agreement was approximately $750 million, which included $500 million for the branch network and
approximately $250 million for the net assets of the branch network, consisting principally of
customer margin receivables.
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal
of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144), the results of PCS operations have been classified as
discontinued operations for all periods presented and the related assets and liabilities included
in the sale have been classified as held for sale. The Company recorded income from discontinued
operations, net of tax of $177.1 million and $178.4 million for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2006, respectively. The Company has reclassified $442.9 million in assets and $145.0
million in liabilities as held for sale as of December 31, 2005 related to the sale of the PCS
branch network to UBS. Upon completion of the sale of the PCS branch network on August 11, 2006,
the assets and liabilities related to the PCS branch network were transferred to UBS.
14
In connection with the sale of the Companys PCS branch network, the Company initiated a plan
to significantly restructure the Companys support infrastructure. As described more fully in Note
15, the Company incurred $56.9 million in restructuring costs related to the restructuring plan for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006. All restructuring and transaction costs related to the
sale of the PCS branch network are included within discontinued operations in accordance with SFAS
144.
Note 15 Restructuring
The Company has incurred pre-tax restructuring costs of $56.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 in connection with the sale of the Companys PCS branch network to UBS.
The expense was incurred upon implementation of a specific restructuring plan to reorganize the
Companys support infrastructure.
The restructuring charges include the cost of severance, benefits, outplacement costs and
equity award accelerated vesting costs associated with the termination of employees. The severance
amounts were determined based on a one-time severance benefit enhancement to the Companys existing
severance pay program in place at the time of termination notification and will be paid out over a
benefit period of up to one year from the time of termination. Approximately 315 employees have
received a severance package. In addition, the Company has incurred restructuring charges for
contract termination costs related to the reduction of office space and the modification of
technology contracts. Contract termination fees are determined based on the provisions of SFAS No.
146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which among other things
requires the recognition of a liability for contract termination under a cease-use date concept.
The Company also incurred restructuring charges for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets
determined in accordance with SFAS 144.
The following table presents a summary of activity with respect to the restructuring-related
liability:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
|
|
Provision charged to operating expense |
|
|
56,919 |
|
Cash outlays |
|
|
(20,719 |
) |
Noncash write-downs |
|
|
(3,254 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
32,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
15
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and related notes and exhibits included elsewhere in this report.
Certain statements in this report may be considered forward-looking. Statements that are not
historical or current facts, including statements about beliefs and expectations, are
forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements cover, among other things, the future
prospects of Piper Jaffray Companies. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and
uncertainties, and important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those
anticipated, including those factors discussed below under External Factors Impacting Our
Business as well as the factors identified under Risk Factors in Part 1, Item 1A of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as updated in our subsequent reports
filed with the SEC, including any updates found in Part II, Item 1A of this report on Form 10-Q.
These reports are available at our Web site at www.piperjaffray.com and at the SEC Web site at
www.sec.gov. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake
no obligation to update them in light of new information or future events.
Executive Overview
Our continuing operations are principally engaged in providing investment banking,
institutional brokerage and related financial services to corporations, public sector and
non-profit entities in the United States, Europe and Asia, where we recently opened an office in
Shanghai, China. Our revenues are generated primarily through the receipt of advisory and financing
fees earned on investment banking and public finance activities, commissions and sales credits
earned on equity and fixed income transactions, and net interest earned on securities inventories.
While we maintain securities inventories primarily to facilitate customer transactions, our capital
markets business also realizes profits and losses from trading activities related to these
securities inventories.
The securities business is a human capital business; accordingly, compensation and benefits
comprise the largest component of our expenses, and our performance is dependent upon our ability
to attract, develop and retain highly skilled employees who are motivated and committed to provide
the highest quality of service and guidance to clients throughout their lifecycle.
Our discontinued operations consist of the operations of our Private Client Services (PCS)
retail brokerage business through August 11, 2006, the date we closed the sale of our PCS branch
network and certain related assets to UBS Financial Services, Inc., a subsidiary of UBS AG (UBS),
the gain on the sale of the PCS branch network and related restructuring and transaction costs.
Our retail brokerage business provided financial advice and a wide range of financial products and
services to individual investors through a network of branch offices. Revenues were generated
primarily through the receipt of commissions earned on equity and fixed income transactions and for
distribution of mutual funds and annuities, fees earned on fee-based client accounts and net
interest from customers margin loan balances. We received $500 million for the sale of the branch
network and approximately $250 million for the net assets of the branch network, consisting
principally of customer margin receivables. We did not realize any portion of the additional cash
consideration of up to $75 million available under the asset purchase agreement with UBS dependent
on post-closing performance of the transferred business. The sale resulted in after-tax proceeds
of approximately $510 million and an after-tax book gain for the nine months ended September 30,
2006 of $169 million, net of restructuring and transaction charges. We expect to incur additional
pre-tax restructuring costs during the fourth quarter of 2006 related to severance benefits,
contract termination costs and other business expenses.
Our divestiture of the PCS branch network had a material impact on our results of operations
and financial condition. The majority of our customer receivables and payables were eliminated,
stock loan liabilities that helped finance customer receivables were repaid, we wrote-off goodwill
related to PCS of $85.6 million, and we significantly changed our capitalization structure by
repaying $180 million in subordinated debt and repurchasing 1.6 million common shares through an
accelerated share repurchase agreement for an aggregate purchase price of $100 million. In
addition, certain equity awards held by PCS employees were forfeited upon the employees transfer
to UBS, and certain equity awards held by severed employees were vested on an accelerated basis.
As discussed above, the results of our PCS business operations, the gain on the sale of our PCS
branch network and the related restructuring and transaction costs have been classified within
discontinued operations with prior period PCS results of operations reclassified to discontinued
operations for a comparable presentation. See Notes 14 and 15 to our unaudited financial
statements for a further discussion of our discontinued operations and restructuring.
We plan to utilize a portion of the remaining after-tax proceeds from the PCS branch network
sale to accelerate the growth of our existing capital markets businesses and to enter new
businesses to support our strategic priorities. Deployment of proceeds may include acquisitions to expand existing businesses or to enter new businesses.
In addition, as opportunities arise we anticipate we will use more
capital to facilitate customer activity and for principal activities to leverage our expertise. Principal activities may include investing our
own capital to a greater extent than we have in the past. These investments may include taking
proprietary positions in equity or debt securities of public and private companies.
As part of
our growth strategy we also intend to
increase the number of business sectors or industries in which we specialize, enhance our product
offerings and expand the geographic reach of our services. Within the corporate sector we have
traditionally operated in the health care, technology, financial institutions, consumer and
aircraft finance sectors. We have recently expanded into the alternative energy, business services
and industrial growth sectors to serve our corporate clients. In addition, we have expanded our
fixed income financing capabilities to
16
provide services to the hospitality and commercial real
estate industries. In the third quarter of 2006, as part of our efforts to enhance our product
offerings, we announced a strategic relationship with CIT Group, Inc. (CIT) to offer
middle-market companies a comprehensive set of financing solutions. We also increased our
geographic reach in the third quarter of 2006 by strengthening our international presence with the
addition of offices in Madrid and Shanghai. These growth initiatives will require investments in
personnel and other expenses, which may have a short-term negative impact on our profitability as
it may take time to develop meaningful revenues from these growth initiatives.
RESULTS FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, our net income, including continuing and
discontinued operations, was $186.6 million, or $9.79 per diluted share, up from net income of
$15.1 million, or $0.79 per diluted share, for the year-ago period. Net income for the third
quarter of 2006 included $179.7 million, after tax and net of restructuring and transaction costs,
related to the gain on the sale to UBS of the PCS branch network and certain related assets. For
the quarter ended September 30, 2006, net income from continuing operations totaled $9.5 million,
or $0.50 per diluted share, down from net income of $10.9 million, or $0.57 per diluted share, in
the year-ago period. Net revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2006 were $116.1
million, down 3.3 percent from $120.1 million for the same quarter last year.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, our net income increased to $214.6 million, or
$11.12 per diluted share, from $23.7 million, or $1.25 per diluted share, for the corresponding
period in the prior year. Net revenues from continuing operations for the first nine months of 2006
increased 17.7 percent to $356.3 million, compared to $302.7 million for the first nine months of
2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, net income from continuing operations increased
to $36.2 million, or $1.87 per diluted share, from $13.2 million, or $0.70 per diluted share, for
the corresponding period in the prior year.
EXTERNAL FACTORS IMPACTING OUR BUSINESS
Performance in the financial services industry in which we operate is highly correlated to the
overall strength of economic conditions and financial market activity. Overall market conditions
are a product of many factors, which are mostly unpredictable and beyond our control. These factors
may affect the financial decisions made by investors, including their level of participation in the
financial markets. In turn, these decisions may affect our business results. With respect to
financial market activity, our profitability is sensitive to a variety of factors, including the
volume and value of trading in securities, the volatility of the equity and fixed income markets,
the level and shape of various yield curves, and the demand for investment banking services as
reflected by the number and size of equity and debt financings and merger and acquisition
transactions.
Factors that differentiate our business within the financial services industry also may affect
our financial results. For example, our business focuses primarily on middle market companies in
specific sectors such as the health care, technology, financial institutions, consumer, aircraft
finance, alternative energy, business services, and industrial growth industries within the
corporate sector and on health care, higher education, housing, hospitality and state and local
government entities within the government/non-profit sector. These sectors may experience growth or
downturns independently of general economic and market conditions, or may face market conditions
that are disproportionately better or worse than those impacting the economy and markets generally.
In either case, our business could be affected differently than overall market trends. Given the
variability of the capital markets and securities businesses, our earnings may fluctuate
significantly from period to period, and results of any individual period should not be considered
indicative of future results.
17
Results of Operations
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005
The following table provides a summary of the results of our operations and the results of our
operations as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a Percentage of Net |
|
|
|
Results of Operations |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
v2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking |
|
$ |
72,107 |
|
|
$ |
73,407 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
)% |
|
|
62.1 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
Institutional brokerage |
|
|
34,964 |
|
|
|
42,476 |
|
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
Interest |
|
|
16,663 |
|
|
|
11,357 |
|
|
|
46.7 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Other income |
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
949 |
|
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
124,597 |
|
|
|
128,189 |
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
107.3 |
|
|
|
106.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
8,064 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
116,107 |
|
|
|
120,125 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
69,079 |
|
|
|
72,649 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
59.5 |
|
|
|
60.5 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
6,878 |
|
|
|
7,710 |
|
|
|
(10.8 |
) |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Communications |
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
5,683 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
Floor brokerage and clearance |
|
|
3,759 |
|
|
|
3,887 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Marketing and business development |
|
|
5,887 |
|
|
|
4,827 |
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Outside services |
|
|
6,344 |
|
|
|
5,237 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Cash award program |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
(49.0 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
2,838 |
|
|
|
3,319 |
|
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
101,058 |
|
|
|
104,316 |
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
87.0 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before tax expense |
|
|
15,049 |
|
|
|
15,809 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
5,521 |
|
|
|
4,871 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
9,528 |
|
|
|
10,938 |
|
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
8.2 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
177,085 |
|
|
|
4,210 |
|
|
|
4,106.3 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
186,613 |
|
|
$ |
15,148 |
|
|
|
1,131.9 |
% |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M Not Meaningful
Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2006, was $186.6 million, which
included $177.1 million in income from discontinued operations related to the sale of our PCS
branch network. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, investment banking revenues
decreased slightly to $72.1 million. Revenues from equity and debt financings were stronger than
the year-ago period and were offset by a decline in advisory services revenues, which were at
record levels for us as of one year ago. Institutional brokerage revenues decreased 17.7 percent
from the prior-year period to $35.0 million as a result of decreased equity volumes and lower
interest rate product revenues. For the third quarter of 2006, net interest income increased to
$8.2 million, up from $3.3 million for the third quarter of 2005. In August 2006, we repaid $180
million in subordinated debt with proceeds from the sale of the PCS branch network, reducing
interest expense. Additionally, we have invested the excess proceeds from the sale in short-term
interest bearing instruments generating interest income. Other income for the three months ended
September 30, 2006, remained flat compared to the prior-year period. For the three months ended
September 30, 2006,
18
non-interest
expenses from continuing operations were $101.1 million, down 3.1
percent from $104.3 million for the year-ago period. This decrease was principally the result of a
decline in variable compensation and benefits expenses for the three months ended September 30,
2006, driven by lower revenues and profitability.
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits expenses, which are the largest component of our expenses, include
salaries, commissions, bonuses, benefits, employment taxes and other employee costs. A substantial
portion of compensation expense is comprised of variable incentive arrangements, including
discretionary bonuses, the amount of which fluctuates in proportion to the level of business
activity, increasing with higher revenues and operating profits. Other compensation costs,
primarily base salaries and benefits, are more fixed in nature.
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, compensation and benefits expenses decreased
4.9 percent to $69.1 million, from $72.6 million for the prior-year period, due primarily to lower
variable compensation resulting from a decline in net revenues and profitability. Compensation and
benefits expenses as a percentage of net revenues decreased to 59.5 percent, compared to 60.5
percent for the third quarter of 2005.
Occupancy and Equipment
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, occupancy and equipment expenses were $6.9
million, compared with $7.7 million in the prior-year period. The decrease was attributable to
prior investments in technology becoming fully depreciated in the first quarter of 2006. In the
fourth quarter of 2006, we anticipate entering into a new lease contract related to our London
office and exiting our current lease contract. As a result, we will incur expenses of approximately
$1.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2006 related to payment of the remaining 2006 lease payments,
early exit penalties and leasehold write-offs.
Communications
Communication expenses include costs for telecommunication and data communication, primarily
consisting of expense for obtaining third-party market data information. For the third quarter of
2006, communication expenses were $5.8 million, essentially flat when compared with the
corresponding period in the prior year.
Floor Brokerage and Clearance
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, floor brokerage and clearance expenses declined
3.3 percent to $3.8 million from the same period last year as a result of our continued efforts to
reduce expenses associated with accessing electronic communication networks, offset in part by
incremental expense related to our European trading system.
Marketing and Business Development
Marketing and business development expenses include travel and entertainment, postage,
supplies and promotional and advertising costs. For the third quarter of 2006, marketing and
business development expenses increased 22.0 percent to $5.9 million, compared with $4.8 million
for the third quarter of 2005. This increase was driven by deal-related travel and entertainment
expense from higher equity financing activity in the third quarter of 2006.
Outside Services
Outside services expenses include securities processing expenses, outsourced technology and
operations functions, outside legal fees and other professional fees. For the three months ended
September 30, 2006, outside services expenses increased to $6.3 million, compared with $5.2 million
in the prior-year period due to services associated with our equity trading system being bundled
and provided by a single vendor. Previously, these services were provided by multiple vendors and
were recorded in communications, floor brokerage and clearance and outside services. In addition,
we incurred increased professional fees expenses related to recruitment of capital markets
personnel.
19
Cash Award Program
In connection with our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp in 2003, we established a cash award program
pursuant to which we granted cash awards to a broad-based group of our employees. The award program
was designed to aid in retention of employees and to compensate for the value of U.S. Bancorp stock
options and restricted stock lost by our employees as a result of the spin-off. The cash awards are
being expensed over a four-year period ending December 31, 2007. For the three months ended
September 30, 2006, cash awards expense decreased 49.0 percent to $0.5 million, compared with the
prior-year period. The sale of our PCS branch network resulted in the forfeiture and accelerated
vesting of approximately half of our cash awards and as a result, our ongoing cash award expense
will decrease. We anticipate incurring approximately $0.3 million of cash award expense within
continuing operations in the fourth quarter of 2006 and approximately $1.5 million of cash awards
expense in 2007.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses include insurance costs, license and registration fees, expenses
related to our charitable giving program, amortization on intangible assets and litigation-related
expenses, which consist of the amounts we reserve and/or pay out related to legal and regulatory
matters. For the three months ended September 30, 2006, other operating expenses decreased 14.5
percent to $2.8 million, compared with the prior-year period primarily due to a decline in
litigation-related charges.
Income Taxes
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, income taxes from continuing operations were
$5.5 million, an effective tax rate of 36.7 percent, compared with an income tax expense of $4.9
million and an effective tax rate of 30.8 percent, for the corresponding period in 2005. The
increase in our effective tax rate from the prior-year period is primarily due to a decrease in the
ratio of municipal interest income, which is non-taxable, to total taxable income.
NET REVENUES FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS (DETAIL)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
v2005 |
|
Net revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional sales and trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
$ |
14,723 |
|
|
$ |
15,616 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
)% |
Equities |
|
|
28,591 |
|
|
|
32,455 |
|
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total institutional sales and trading |
|
|
43,314 |
|
|
|
48,071 |
|
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
Investment banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
|
18,920 |
|
|
|
15,809 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
Equities |
|
|
27,792 |
|
|
|
18,166 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
Advisory services |
|
|
25,395 |
|
|
|
39,432 |
|
|
|
(35.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment banking |
|
|
72,107 |
|
|
|
73,407 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
(1,353 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
$ |
116,107 |
|
|
$ |
120,125 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M Not Meaningful
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, net revenues were $116.1 million, down 3.3
percent compared with the prior-year period.
Institutional sales and trading revenues comprise all the revenues generated through trading
activities, primarily the facilitation of customer trades. To assess the profitability of
institutional sales and trading activities, we aggregate institutional brokerage revenues with the
net interest income or expense associated with financing, hedging and holding long or short
inventory positions. Our results in the sales and trading area vary from quarter to quarter with
changes in trading margins, trading volumes and the timing of transactions as a result of market
opportunities. Increased price transparency in the fixed income market, pressure from institutional
clients in the equity market to reduce commissions and the use of alternative trading systems in
the equity market have put pressure on trading margins. We expect this pressure to continue.
20
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, institutional sales and trading revenues were
$43.3 million, a decrease of 9.9 percent compared with $48.1 million recorded in the prior-year
period. Fixed income institutional sales and trading revenues decreased 5.7 percent to $14.7
million for the three months ended September 30, 2006, compared with $15.6 million for the
corresponding period in 2005. This decrease was due primarily to a decline in sales of interest
rate products, offset in part by higher revenues from high-yield and structured products. Equity
institutional sales and trading revenue decreased 11.9 percent for the three months ended September
30, 2006, to $28.6 million. This decline compared to the prior-year period was primarily driven by
lower volumes, offset in part by increased revenues from algorithmic and program trading (APT)
and convertibles.
In the third quarter of 2006, investment banking revenues decreased slightly to $72.1 million.
Advisory services revenues decreased 35.6 percent to $25.4 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2006, compared to record high advisory services revenues in the third quarter of
2005. Partially offsetting this decrease was higher fixed income and equity financing revenues.
Fixed income financing revenues increased 19.7 percent to $18.9 million. The increased revenues
compared to the prior-year period are due to stronger public finance revenues, resulting
principally from higher average revenues per transaction. We completed 111 public finance issues
with a par value of $1.5 billion during the third quarter of 2006, compared with 107 issues with a
par value of $1.5 billion during the third quarter of 2005. Equity financing revenues increased
53.0 percent to $27.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2006. Consistent with the
industry, we completed fewer equity financing transactions; however, our revenues increased in the
third quarter of 2006 when compared with the prior-year period due to higher average revenues per
transaction. During the three months ended September 30, 2006, we completed 17 equity financings
(8 lead-managed), raising $1.9 billion in capital for our clients, compared with 21 equity
financings (7 lead-managed), raising $2.2 billion in capital, during the three months ended
September 30, 2005.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Discontinued operations include the operating results of our PCS business, the gain on sale of
the PCS branch network, and restructuring and transaction costs. The sale of the PCS branch
network to UBS closed on August 11, 2006.
For the three months ended September 30, 2006, income from discontinued operations, net of
tax, was $177.1 million. See Note 14 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements for
further discussion of our discontinued operations.
In connection with the sale of our PCS branch network, we implemented a plan to significantly
restructure our support infrastructure. We recorded $40.7 million in pre-tax restructuring costs
during the third quarter of 2006. We expect to incur additional costs during the fourth quarter of
2006 related to severance benefits, contract termination costs and other business expenses.
21
FINANCIAL SUMMARY FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005
The following table provides a summary of the results of our operations and the results of our
operations as a percentage of net revenues for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a Percentage of Net |
|
|
|
Results of Operations |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
v2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking |
|
$ |
203,107 |
|
|
$ |
169,909 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
57.0 |
% |
|
|
56.1 |
% |
Institutional brokerage |
|
|
122,136 |
|
|
|
121,699 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
Interest |
|
|
44,728 |
|
|
|
32,015 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Other income |
|
|
12,131 |
|
|
|
2,403 |
|
|
|
404.8 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
382,102 |
|
|
|
326,026 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
107.2 |
|
|
|
107.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
25,786 |
|
|
|
23,332 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues |
|
|
356,316 |
|
|
|
302,694 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
202,656 |
|
|
|
177,262 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
|
58.6 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
|
|
21,705 |
|
|
|
22,912 |
|
|
|
(5.3 |
) |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Communications |
|
|
16,737 |
|
|
|
18,081 |
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Floor brokerage and clearance |
|
|
9,807 |
|
|
|
11,336 |
|
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Marketing and business development |
|
|
17,188 |
|
|
|
15,793 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Outside services |
|
|
19,472 |
|
|
|
16,911 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Cash award program |
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
3,201 |
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Restructuring-related expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,595 |
|
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
10,185 |
|
|
|
9,516 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest expenses |
|
|
300,423 |
|
|
|
283,607 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
84.3 |
|
|
|
93.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before tax expense |
|
|
55,893 |
|
|
|
19,087 |
|
|
|
192.8 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
19,730 |
|
|
|
5,854 |
|
|
|
237.0 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
36,163 |
|
|
|
13,233 |
|
|
|
173.3 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
178,444 |
|
|
|
10,487 |
|
|
|
1,601.6 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
214,607 |
|
|
$ |
23,720 |
|
|
|
804.8 |
% |
|
|
60.2 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/M Not Meaningful
Except as discussed below, the underlying reasons for variances to prior year are
substantially the same as the comparative quarterly discussion, and the statements in the foregoing
discussion also apply.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, net income, including both continuing and
discontinued operations, totaled $214.6 million, which included a gain of $169.1 million, after-tax
and net of restructuring and transaction costs, from the sale of our PCS branch network. Net
revenues from continuing operations increased to $356.3 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2006, an increase of 17.7 percent from the corresponding period in the prior year. Investment
banking revenues increased 19.5 percent to $203.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2006, compared with revenues of $169.9 million in the prior-year period. This increase was
primarily attributable to higher equity underwriting activity. Institutional brokerage revenues
remained essentially flat when compared with the prior-year period. Other income for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 was $12.1 million, compared with $2.4 million for the corresponding
period in the
22
prior
year. The increase was primarily due to a $9.3 million gain related to our
ownership of two seats on the New York Stock Exchange, which were exchanged for cash and restricted
shares of the NYSE Group, Inc. We sold approximately 65 percent of our NYSE Group, Inc. restricted
shares in a secondary offering during the second quarter of 2006. Non-interest expenses increased
to $300.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, from $283.6 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2005. This increase was attributable to increased variable compensation
and benefits expenses due to higher revenues and profitability, offset in part by an $8.6 million
restructuring charge taken in the second quarter of 2005.
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
Communications
Communication expenses include costs for telecommunication and data communication, primarily
consisting of expense for obtaining third-party market data information. For the first nine months
of 2006, communication expenses were $16.7 million, down 7.4 percent from the corresponding period
in 2005. The decrease was due to costs savings associated with a change in vendors related to our
equity trading system and a portion of these costs now being recorded within outside services.
Restructuring-Related Expense
In the third quarter of 2005, we implemented certain expense reduction measures as a means to
better align our cost infrastructure with our revenues. This resulted in a pre-tax restructuring
charge of $8.6 million, consisting of $4.9 million in severance benefits and $3.7 million related
to the reduction of office space.
Other Operating Expenses
Other operating expenses include insurance costs, license and registration fees, expenses
related to our charitable giving program, amortization on intangible assets and litigation-related
expenses, which consist of the amounts we reserve and/or pay out related to legal and regulatory
matters. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, other operating expenses increased to $10.2
million, compared with $9.5 million for the year-ago period. The increase of 7.0 percent was
primarily a result of increased charitable giving expenses, offset in part by a reduction in
litigation-related expenses.
23
NET REVENUES FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS (DETAIL)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
v2005 |
|
Net revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional sales and trading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
$ |
53,959 |
|
|
$ |
47,275 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
Equities |
|
|
92,880 |
|
|
|
89,322 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total institutional sales and trading |
|
|
146,839 |
|
|
|
136,597 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Investment banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
|
50,347 |
|
|
|
47,199 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Equities |
|
|
83,483 |
|
|
|
55,464 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
Advisory services |
|
|
69,277 |
|
|
|
67,246 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment banking |
|
|
203,107 |
|
|
|
169,909 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
Other income |
|
|
6,370 |
|
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
|
|
N/M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenues |
|
$ |
356,316 |
|
|
$ |
302,694 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, net revenues were $356.3 million, up 17.7
percent compared with the corresponding period in the prior year.
Institutional sales and trading revenues comprise all the revenues generated through trading
activities, primarily the facilitation of customer trades. To assess the profitability of
institutional sales and trading activities, we aggregate institutional brokerage revenues with the
net interest income or expense associated with financing, economically hedging and holding long or
short inventory positions. Our results in the sales and trading area vary from quarter to quarter
with changes in trading margins, trading volumes and the timing of transactions as a result of
market opportunities. Increased price transparency in the fixed income market, pressure from
institutional clients in the equity market to reduce commissions and the use of alternative trading
systems in the equity market have put pressure on trading margins. We expect this pressure to
continue.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, institutional sales and trading revenues
increased 7.5 percent to $146.8 million, compared with $136.6 million for the prior-year period.
Fixed income institutional sales and trading revenues increased 14.1 percent to $54.0 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2006, compared with $47.3 million for the corresponding period
in 2005. We were able to improve year-over-year performance through higher cash sales and trading
and increased high-yield and structured product revenues, offset in part by lower interest rate
product revenues. Equity institutional sales and trading revenue increased 4.0 percent for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006, to $92.9 million due to incremental sales and trading revenue
related to our European expansion and increased revenues from APT and convertibles partially offset
by decreased revenues from lower volumes and pressure by institutional clients to reduce
commissions.
For the first nine months of 2006, investment banking revenues increased 19.5 percent to
$203.1 million, compared with $169.9 million in the first nine months of 2005. Equity underwriting
revenues increased 50.5 percent to $83.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
which was due to more completed transactions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we
completed 68 equity offerings, raising $8.8 billion in capital for our clients, compared with 56
equity offerings, raising $6.8 billion in capital, during the nine months ended September 30, 2005.
Fixed income underwriting revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 increased 6.7
percent to $50.3 million. The increase was driven by higher public finance revenues, as an
increase in average revenue per transaction more than offset fewer completed transactions.
Advisory services revenues increased 3.0 percent to $69.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, as higher average revenues per transaction offset the decline in completed
transactions. We completed 31 mergers and acquisitions transactions valued at $5.1 billion for the
first nine months of 2006, compared with 35 deals valued at $6.2 billion for the first nine months
of 2005.
24
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The underlying reasons for fluctuations in discontinued operations between the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 are substantially the same as those described in the comparative
discussion for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recent accounting pronouncements are set forth in Note 3 to our unaudited consolidated
financial statements and are incorporated herein by reference.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our accounting and reporting policies comply with GAAP and conform to practices within
the securities industry. The preparation of financial statements in compliance with GAAP and
industry practices require us to make estimates and assumptions that could materially affect
amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those
policies that we believe to be the most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and
results of operations and that require us to make estimates that are difficult, subjective or
complex. Most accounting policies are not considered by us to be critical accounting policies.
Several factors are considered in determining whether or not a policy is critical, including, among
others, whether the estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements taken as a
whole, the nature of the estimates, the ability to readily validate the estimates with other
information, including third-party or independent sources, the sensitivity of the estimates to
changes in economic conditions and whether alternative accounting methods may be used under GAAP.
For a full description of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated
financial statements included in our Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005. We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following are our
critical accounting policies:
VALUATION OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Trading securities owned, trading securities owned and pledged as collateral, and trading
securities sold, but not yet purchased on our consolidated statements of financial condition
consist of financial instruments recorded at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses related to
these financial instruments are reflected on our consolidated statements of operations.
The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation
sale. When available, we use observable market prices, observable market parameters, or broker or
dealer prices (bid and ask prices) to derive the fair value of the instrument. In the case of
financial instruments transacted on recognized exchanges, the observable market prices represent
quotations for completed transactions from the exchange on which the financial instrument is
principally traded. Bid prices represent the highest price a buyer is willing to pay for a
financial instrument at a particular time. Ask prices represent the lowest price a seller is
willing to accept for a financial instrument at a particular time.
A substantial percentage of the fair value of our trading securities owned, trading securities
owned and pledged as collateral, and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased are based on
observable market prices, observable market parameters, or derived from broker or dealer prices.
The availability of observable market prices and pricing parameters can vary from product to
product. Where available, observable market prices and pricing or market parameters in a product
may be used to derive a price without requiring significant judgment. In certain markets,
observable market prices or market parameters are not available for all products, and fair value is
determined using techniques appropriate for each particular product. These techniques involve some
degree of judgment.
For investments in illiquid or privately held securities that do not have readily determinable
fair values, the determination of fair value requires us to estimate the value of the securities
using the best information available. Among the factors considered by us in determining the fair
value of financial instruments are the cost, terms and liquidity of the investment, the financial
condition and operating results of the issuer, the quoted market price of publicly traded
securities with similar quality and yield, and other factors generally pertinent to the valuation
of investments. In instances where a security is subject to transfer restrictions, the value of the
security is based primarily on the quoted price of a similar security without restriction but may
be reduced by an amount estimated to reflect such restrictions. In addition, even where the value
of a security is derived from an independent source, certain assumptions may be required to
determine the securitys fair value. For instance, we assume that the size of positions in
securities that we hold would not be large enough to affect the quoted price of the securities if
we sell them, and that any such sale would happen in an orderly manner. The actual value realized
upon disposition could be different from the currently estimated fair value.
Fair values for derivative contracts represent amounts estimated to be received from or paid
to a third party in settlement of these instruments. These derivatives are valued using quoted
market prices when available or pricing models based on the net present value of estimated future
cash flows. Management deemed the net present value of estimated future cash flows model to be the
best estimate of fair value as most of our derivative products are interest rate products. The
valuation models used require inputs including contractual terms, market prices, yield curves,
credit curves and measures of volatility. The valuation models are monitored over the life of the
derivative product. If there are any changes in the underlying inputs, the model is updated for
those new inputs.
25
The following table presents the carrying value of our trading securities owned, trading
securities owned and pledged as collateral and trading securities sold, but not yet purchased for
which fair value is measured based on quoted prices or other independent sources versus those for
which fair value is determined by management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading |
|
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Securities Sold, |
|
|
|
Securities Owned |
|
|
But Not Yet |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
or Pledged |
|
|
Purchased |
|
Fair value of securities excluding derivatives, based on quoted prices and independent sources |
|
$ |
774,848 |
|
|
$ |
266,842 |
|
Fair value of securities excluding derivatives, as determined by management |
|
|
8,793 |
|
|
|
6,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivatives as determined by management |
|
|
24,625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
808,266 |
|
|
$ |
273,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments carried at contract amounts that approximate fair value have short-term
maturities (one year or less), are repriced frequently or bear market interest rates and,
accordingly, are carried at amounts approximating fair value. Financial instruments carried at
contract amount on our consolidated statements of financial condition include receivables from and
payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations, securities purchased under agreements to
resell, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, receivables from and payables to customers,
short-term financing and subordinated debt.
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and expands disclosures regarding fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not
require any new fair value measurements, but its application may, for some entities, change current
practice. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are
currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 157 on our results of operations and financial condition.
GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
We record all assets and liabilities acquired in purchase acquisitions, including goodwill, at
fair value as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business
Combinations. Determining the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired requires certain
management estimates. In conjunction with the sale of our PCS branch network to UBS, we wrote-off
$85.6 million of goodwill during the third quarter of 2006. At September 30, 2006, we had goodwill
of $231.6 million, principally as a result of the 1998 acquisition of our predecessor, Piper
Jaffray Companies Inc., and its subsidiaries by U.S. Bancorp.
Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, we are required to perform impairment tests of our goodwill and intangible assets annually
and more frequently in certain circumstances. We have elected to test for goodwill impairment in
the fourth quarter of each calendar year. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process, which
requires management to make judgments in determining what assumptions to use in the calculation.
The first step of the process consists of estimating the fair value of each operating segment based
on a discounted cash flow model using revenue and profit forecasts and comparing those estimated
fair values with carrying values, which includes the allocated goodwill. If the estimated fair
value is less than the carrying values, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the
impairment by determining an implied fair value of goodwill. The determination of a reporting
units implied fair value of goodwill requires us to allocate the estimated fair value of the
reporting unit to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit. Any unallocated fair value
represents the implied fair value of goodwill, which is compared to its corresponding carrying
value. We completed our last goodwill impairment test as of October 31, 2005, and no impairment was
identified.
As noted above, the initial recognition of goodwill and other intangible assets and the
subsequent impairment analysis requires management to make subjective judgments concerning
estimates of how the acquired assets or businesses will perform in the future using valuation
methods including discounted cash flow analysis. Events and factors that may significantly affect
the estimates include, among others, competitive forces and changes in revenue growth trends, cost
structures, technology, discount rates and market conditions. Additionally, estimated cash flows
may extend beyond ten years and, by their nature, are difficult to determine over an extended time
period. To assess the reasonableness of cash flow estimates and validate assumptions used in our
estimates, we review historical performance of the underlying assets or similar assets.
In assessing the fair value of our operating segments, the volatile nature of the securities
markets and our industry requires us to consider the business and market cycle and assess the stage
of the cycle in estimating the timing and extent of future cash flows. In addition to estimating
the fair value of an operating segment based on discounted cash flows, we consider other
information to validate the reasonableness of our valuations, including public market comparables,
multiples of recent mergers and acquisitions of similar businesses and third-party assessments.
Valuation multiples may be based on revenues, price-to-earnings and
tangible capital ratios of comparable public companies and
26
business segments. These multiples may be adjusted
to consider competitive differences including size, operating leverage and other factors. We
determine the carrying amount of an operating segment based on the capital required to support the
segments activities, including its tangible and intangible assets. The determination of a
segments capital allocation requires management judgment and considers many factors, including the
regulatory capital requirements and tangible capital ratios of comparable public companies in
relevant industry sectors. In certain circumstances, we may engage a third party to validate
independently our assessment of the fair value of our operating segments. If during any future
period it is determined that an impairment exists, the results of operations in that period could
be materially adversely affected.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
As part of our compensation to employees and directors, we use stock-based compensation,
consisting of stock options and restricted stock. Effective January 1, 2004, we elected to account
for stock-based employee compensation on a prospective basis under the fair value method, as
prescribed by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting and Disclosure of
Stock-Based Compensation, and as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure. The fair value method
requires stock based compensation to be expensed in the consolidated statement of operations at
their fair value.
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123(R) (SFAS 123(R)), Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective
transition method. SFAS 123(R) requires all stock-based compensation to be expensed in the
consolidated statement of operations at fair value, net of estimated forfeitures. Because we have
expensed all equity awards based on the fair value method, net of estimated forfeitures, SFAS
123(R) did not have a material effect on our measurement or recognition methods for stock-based
compensation.
Compensation paid to employees in the form of stock options or restricted stock is generally
amortized on a straight-line basis over the required service period of the award, which is
typically three years, and is included in our results of operations as compensation expense, net of
estimated forfeitures. The majority of our restricted stock grants provide for continued vesting
after termination, providing the employee does not violate non-competition and certain other
post-termination restrictions, as set forth in the award agreements. We consider the required
service period to be the greater of the vesting period or the non-competition period. We believe
that our non-competition restrictions meet the SFAS 123(R) definition of a substantive service
requirement.
Stock-based compensation granted to our non-employee directors is in the form of stock
options. Stock-based compensation paid to directors is immediately vested (i.e., there is no
continuing service requirement) and is included in our results of operations as outside services
expense as of the date of grant.
In determining the estimated fair value of stock options, we use the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. This model requires management to exercise judgment with respect to certain
assumptions, including the expected dividend yield, the expected volatility, and the expected life
of the options. The expected dividend yield assumption is based on the assumed dividend payout over
the expected life of the option. The expected volatility assumption is based on industry
comparisons, as we have limited information on which to base our volatility estimates because we
have only been a public company since the beginning of 2004. The expected life of options
assumption is based on the average of the following two factors: 1) industry comparisons; and 2)
the guidance provided by the SEC in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107). SAB 107 allowed
the use of an acceptable methodology under which we can take the midpoint of the vesting date and
the full contractual term. We believe our approach for calculating an expected life to be an
appropriate method in light of the lack of any historical data regarding employee exercise behavior
or employee post-termination behavior. Additional information regarding assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes pricing model can be found in Note 12 to our unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
CONTINGENCIES
We are involved in various pending and potential legal proceedings related to our business,
including litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings. Some of these matters involve claims
for substantial amounts, including claims for punitive and other special damages. The number of
these legal proceedings has increased in recent years. We have, after consultation with outside
legal counsel and consideration of facts currently known by management, recorded estimated losses
in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies, to the extent that claims are probable of loss and the amount of the loss can be
reasonably estimated. The determination of these reserve amounts requires significant judgment on
the part of management. In making these determinations, we consider many factors, including, but
not limited to, the loss and damages sought by the plaintiff or claimant, the basis and validity of
the claim, the likelihood of a successful defense against the claim,
and the potential for, and magnitude of, damages or settlements from such pending and potential litigation and
arbitration proceedings, and fines and penalties or orders from regulatory agencies.
27
Under the terms of our separation and distribution agreement with U.S. Bancorp and ancillary
agreements entered into in connection with the spin-off, we generally are responsible for all
liabilities relating to our business, including those liabilities relating to our business while it
was operated as a segment of U.S. Bancorp under the supervision of its management and board of
directors and while our employees were employees of U.S. Bancorp servicing our business. Similarly,
U.S. Bancorp generally is responsible for all liabilities relating to the businesses U.S. Bancorp
retained. However, in addition to our established reserves, U.S. Bancorp agreed to indemnify us in
an amount up to $17.5 million for losses that result from certain matters, primarily third-party
claims relating to research analyst independence. U.S. Bancorp has the right to terminate this
indemnification obligation in the event of a change in control of our company. As of September 30,
2006, approximately $13.2 million of the indemnification remained available.
As part of our asset purchase agreement with UBS for the sale of our PCS branch network, UBS
agreed to assume certain liabilities of the PCS business, including certain liabilities and
obligations arising from litigation, arbitration, customer complaints and other claims related to
the PCS business. In certain cases we have agreed to indemnify UBS for litigation matters after
UBS has incurred costs of $6.0 million related to these matters. In addition, we have retained
liabilities arising from regulatory matters and certain litigation relating to the PCS business
prior to the sale.
Subject to the foregoing, we believe, based on our current knowledge, after appropriate
consultation with outside legal counsel and after taking into account our established reserves and
the U.S. Bancorp indemnity agreement, that pending litigation, arbitration and regulatory
proceedings will be resolved with no material adverse effect on our financial condition. However,
if, during any period, a potential adverse contingency should become probable or resolved for an
amount in excess of the established reserves and indemnification, the results of operations in that
period could be materially adversely affected.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity is of critical importance to us given the nature of our business. Insufficient
liquidity resulting from adverse circumstances contributes to, and may be the cause of, financial
institution failure. Accordingly, we regularly monitor our liquidity position, including our cash
and net capital positions, and we have implemented a liquidity strategy designed to enable our
business to continue to operate even under adverse circumstances, although there can be no
assurance that our strategy will be successful under all circumstances.
We have a liquid balance sheet. Most of our assets consist of cash and assets readily
convertible into cash. Securities inventories are stated at fair value and are generally readily
marketable. Receivables and payables with customers and brokers and dealers usually settle within a
few days. As part of our liquidity strategy, we emphasize diversification of funding sources. We
utilize a mix of funding sources and, to the extent possible, maximize our lower-cost financing
associated with repurchase agreements. Our assets are financed by our cash flows from operations,
equity capital, bank lines of credit and proceeds from securities sold under agreements to
repurchase. The fluctuations in cash flows from financing activities are directly related to daily
operating activities from our various businesses.
A significant component of our employees compensation is paid in an annual bonus. The timing
of these bonus payments, which generally are paid in February, has a significant impact on our cash
position and liquidity when paid.
We currently do not pay cash dividends on our common stock.
On August 11, 2006, we closed the sale of our PCS branch network and certain related assets to
UBS. We received proceeds of approximately $500 million for our branch network and $250 million
for certain other assets, consisting primarily of customer margin loans. During the third quarter
of 2006, we utilized these proceeds to repay all of our $180 million in subordinated debt
outstanding, repurchase 1.6 million in common shares through an accelerated share repurchase
agreement for an aggregate price of $100 million, repaid stock loan liabilities and reduced
securities sold under agreements to repurchase. We anticipate paying approximately $165 million in
income tax liabilities related to the gain on the sale of our PCS branch network in the fourth
quarter of 2006.
In connection with the sale of our PCS branch network, our board of directors authorized the
repurchase of $180 million in common shares through December 31, 2007. Following our accelerated
share repurchase, we have $80 million of share repurchase authorization remaining, and we expect to
conduct open market share purchases under this authorization through December 31, 2007.
28
FUNDING SOURCES
We have available discretionary short-term financing on both a secured and unsecured basis.
Secured financing is obtained through the use of repurchase agreements and secured bank loans. Bank
loans and repurchase agreements are typically collateralized by the firms securities inventory.
Short-term funding is generally obtained at rates based upon the federal funds rate.
To finance customer receivables we utilized an average of $4 million in short-term bank loans
and an average of $81 million in securities lending arrangements in the third quarter of 2006. This
compares to an average of $16 million in short-term bank loans and $248 million in average
securities lending arrangements in the third quarter of 2005. Average net repurchase agreements
(excluding economic hedges) of $56 million and $220 million in the third quarter of 2006 and the
third quarter of 2005, respectively, were primarily used to finance inventory. The reduction in
average short-term bank loans, securities lending arrangements and average net repurchase
agreements during the third quarter of 2006 was due to the receipt of approximately $750 million in
proceeds from the sale of our PCS branch network. Growth in our securities inventory is generally
financed through repurchase agreements or securities lending. Bank financing supplements these
sources as necessary. On September 30, 2006, we had $50 million outstanding in short-term bank
financing.
As of September 30, 2006, we had uncommitted credit agreements with banks totaling $675
million, comprising $555 million in discretionary secured lines and $120 million in discretionary
unsecured lines. We have been able to obtain necessary short-term borrowings in the past and
believe we will continue to be able to do so in the future. We also have established arrangements
to obtain financing using as collateral our securities held by our clearing bank or by another
broker dealer at the end of each business day.
On August 15, 2006, we utilized proceeds from the sale of our PCS branch network to pay in
full our $180 million subordinated loan with U.S. Bancorp.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table provides a summary of our contractual obligations as of September 30,
2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4th quarter |
|
|
through |
|
|
through |
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
Operating leases |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
|
$ |
26.2 |
|
|
$ |
39.3 |
|
|
$ |
94.2 |
|
Cash award program |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Venture fund commitments (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The venture fund commitments have no specified call dates. The timing of capital
calls is based on market conditions and investment opportunities. |
As of September 30, 2006, our minimum lease commitments for non-cancelable office space
leases were $94.2 million. Certain leases have renewal options and clauses for escalation and
operation cost adjustments. We have commitments to invest an additional $7.2 million in venture
capital funds.
CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
As a registered broker dealer and member firm of the NYSE, our broker dealer subsidiary is
subject to the uniform net capital rule of the SEC and the net capital rule of the NYSE. We have
elected to use the alternative method permitted by the uniform net capital rule, which requires
that we maintain minimum net capital of the greater of $1.0 million or 2 percent of aggregate debit
balances arising from customer transactions, as this is defined in the rule. The NYSE may prohibit
a member firm from expanding its business or paying dividends if resulting net capital would be
less than 5 percent of aggregate debit balances. Advances to affiliates, repayment of subordinated
liabilities, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals are subject to certain notification and
other provisions of the uniform net capital rule and the net capital rule of the NYSE. We expect
these provisions will not impact our ability to meet current and future obligations. In addition,
we are subject to certain notification requirements related to withdrawals of excess net
capital from our broker dealer subsidiary. Our broker dealer subsidiary is also registered
with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and therefore is subject to CFTC
regulations. Piper Jaffray Ltd., our registered United Kingdom broker dealer subsidiary, is subject
to the capital requirements of the U.K. Financial Services Authority.
29
At September 30, 2006, net capital under the SECs Uniform Net Capital Rule was
$370.6 million or 280.2 percent of aggregate debit balances, and $367.9 million in excess of the
minimum required net capital.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We enter into various types of off-balance sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of
business. We hold retained interests in non-consolidated entities, incur obligations to commit
capital to non-consolidated entities, enter into derivative transactions, enter into non-derivative
guarantees and enter into other off-balance sheet arrangements.
We enter into arrangements with special-purpose entities (SPEs), also known as variable
interest entities. SPEs are corporations, trusts or partnerships that are established for a limited
purpose. SPEs, by their nature, generally are not controlled by their equity owners, as the
establishing documents govern all material decisions. Our primary involvement with SPEs relates to
securitization transactions in which highly rated fixed rate municipal bonds are sold to an SPE. We
follow Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140 (SFAS 140), Accounting for Transfers
and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities a Replacement of FASB
Statement No. 125, to account for securitizations and other transfers of financial assets.
Therefore, we derecognize financial assets transferred in securitizations provided that such
transfer meets all of the SFAS 140 criteria. See Note 5, Securitizations, in the notes to our
unaudited consolidated financial statements for a complete discussion of our securitization
activities.
We have investments in various entities, typically partnerships or limited liability
companies, established for the purpose of investing in emerging growth companies or other private
or public equity. We commit capital or act as the managing partner or member of these entities.
These entities are reviewed under variable interest entity and voting interest entity standards. If
we determine that an entity should not be consolidated, we record these investments on the equity
method of accounting. The lower of cost or market method of accounting is applied to investments
where we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operations of an
entity. For a complete discussion of our activities related to these types of partnerships, see
Note 6, Variable Interest Entities, to our consolidated financial statements included in our
Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
We enter into derivative contracts in a principal capacity as a dealer to satisfy the
financial needs of clients. We also use derivative products to manage the interest rate and market
value risks associated with our security positions. For a complete discussion of our activities
related to derivative products, see Note 4, Derivatives, in the notes to our unaudited
consolidated financial statements.
In the third quarter of 2006, we entered into a strategic relationship with CIT to provide
clients with debt solutions, including senior secured and unsecured debt, second lien facilities,
subordinated financings and mezzanine loans. Our strategic relationship with CIT offers us the
possibility of committing capital alongside CIT in connection with offering debt solutions to our
clients as opportunities arise.
Our other types of off-balance-sheet arrangements include contractual commitments and
guarantees. For a discussion of our activities related to these off-balance sheet arrangements, see
Note 14, Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees, to our consolidated financial statements
included in our Annual Report to Shareholders on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Enterprise Risk Management
Risk is an inherent part of our business. In the course of conducting business
operations, we are exposed to a variety of risks. Market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk,
operational risk, and legal, regulatory and compliance risk are the principal risks we face in
operating our business. We seek to identify, assess and monitor each risk in accordance with
defined policies and procedures. The extent to which we properly identify and effectively manage
each of these risks is critical to our financial condition and profitability. For a full
description of our risk management framework, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
VALUE-AT-RISK
Value-at-Risk (VaR) is the potential loss in value of our trading positions due to adverse
market movements over a defined time horizon with a specified confidence level. We perform a daily
historical simulated VaR analysis on substantially all of our trading positions, including fixed
income, equities, convertible bonds and all associated economic hedges. We use a VaR model because
it provides a common metric for
30
assessing market risk across business lines and products. The modeling
of the market risk characteristics of our trading positions involves a number of assumptions and
approximations. While we believe that these assumptions and approximations are reasonable,
different assumptions and approximations could produce materially different VaR estimates. For
example, we include the risk-reducing diversification benefit between various securities because it
is highly unlikely that all securities would have an equally adverse move on a typical trading day.
We report an empirical VaR based on net realized trading revenue volatility. Empirical VaR
presents an inclusive measure of our historical risk exposure, as it incorporates virtually all
trading activities and types of risk including market, credit, liquidity and operational risk. The
exhibit below presents VaR using the past 250 days of net trading revenue. Consistent with industry
practice, when calculating VaR we use a 95 percent confidence level and a one-day time horizon for
calculating both empirical and simulated VaR. This means there is a 1 in 20 chance that daily
trading net revenues will fall below the expected daily trading net revenues by an amount at least
as large as the reported VaR. As a result, shortfalls from expected trading net revenues on a
single trading day that are greater than the reported VaR would be anticipated to occur, on
average, about once a month.
The following table quantifies the empirical VaR for each component of market risk for the periods
presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Interest Rate Risk |
|
$ |
274 |
|
|
$ |
324 |
|
Equity Price Risk |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Undiversified Risk |
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
Diversification Benefit |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Diversified Value-at-Risk |
|
$ |
410 |
|
|
$ |
536 |
|
The table below illustrates the daily high, low and average value-at-risk calculated for each
component of market risk during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and the year ended
December 31, 2005, respectively.
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Average |
Interest Rate Risk |
|
$ |
355 |
|
|
$ |
273 |
|
|
$ |
319 |
|
Equity Price Risk |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
Aggregate Undiversified Risk |
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
Aggregate Diversified Value-at-Risk |
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Average |
Interest Rate Risk |
|
$ |
1,436 |
|
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
$ |
538 |
|
Equity Price Risk |
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
314 |
|
Aggregate Undiversified Risk |
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
Aggregate Diversified Value-at-Risk |
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
31
We use model-based VaR simulations for managing risk on a daily basis. Model-based VaR
derived from simulation has inherent limitations, including reliance on historical data to predict
future market risk and the parameters established in creating the models that limit quantitative
risk information outputs. There can be no assurance that actual losses occurring on any given day
arising from changes in market conditions will not exceed the VaR amounts shown below or that such
losses will not occur more than once in a 20-day trading period. In addition, different VaR
methodologies and distribution assumptions could produce materially different VaR numbers. Changes
in VaR between reporting periods are generally due to changes in levels of risk exposure,
volatilities and/or correlations among asset classes.
The following table quantifies the simulated VaR for each component of market risk for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, |
|
|
At December 31, |
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Interest Rate Risk |
|
$ |
584 |
|
|
$ |
309 |
|
Equity Price Risk |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Undiversified Risk |
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
Diversification Benefit |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Diversified Value-at-Risk |
|
$ |
604 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
In addition to daily VaR estimates, we calculate the potential market risk to our trading
positions under selected stress scenarios. We calculate the daily 99.9 percent VaR estimates both
with and without diversification benefits for each risk category and firmwide. These stress tests
allow us to measure the potential effects on net revenue from adverse changes in market
volatilities, correlations and trading liquidity. Supplementary measures employed by Piper Jaffray
to monitor and manage market risk exposure include the following: net market position and basis
point values, option sensitivities, and inventory turnover. All metrics are aggregated by asset
concentration and are used for monitoring limits, exception approvals and strategic control.
We anticipate our aggregate VaR may increase in future periods as we commit more of our own
capital to proprietary investments.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information under the caption Enterprise Risk Management in Item 2, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, in this Form 10-Q is
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or
submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. During the third quarter
of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, there was no change in our system of internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
32
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Due to the nature of our business, we are involved in a variety of legal proceedings. These
proceedings include litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings, which may arise from, among
other things, client account activity, underwriting or other transactional activity, employment
matters, regulatory examinations of our businesses and investigations of securities industry
practices by governmental agencies and self-regulatory organizations. The securities industry is
highly regulated, and the regulatory scrutiny applied to securities firms has increased
dramatically in recent years, resulting in a higher number of regulatory investigations and
enforcement actions and significantly greater uncertainty regarding the likely outcome of these
matters. The number of litigation and arbitration proceedings also has increased in recent years.
Accordingly, in recent years we have incurred higher expenses for legal proceedings than
previously.
At the time of our spin-off from U.S. Bancorp, we assumed liability for certain legal
proceedings that named U.S. Bancorp as a defendant but related to the business we managed when
Piper Jaffray was a subsidiary of U.S. Bancorp. In those situations, we generally have agreed with
U.S. Bancorp that we will manage the proceedings and indemnify U.S. Bancorp for the related
expenses, including the amount of any judgment. In turn, U.S. Bancorp agreed to indemnify us for
certain legal proceedings relating to our business prior to the spin-off (as described in Note 10
to our unaudited consolidated financial statements).
As part of our asset purchase agreement with UBS for the sale of our PCS branch network, UBS
agreed to assume certain liabilities of the PCS business, including certain liabilities and
obligations arising from litigation, arbitration, customer complaints and other claims related to
the PCS business. In certain cases we have agreed to indemnify UBS for litigation matters after
UBS has incurred costs of $6.0 million related to these matters. In addition, we have retained
liabilities arising from regulatory matters and certain litigation relating to the PCS business
prior to the sale.
Litigation-related expenses include amounts we reserve and/or pay out as legal and regulatory
settlements, awards or judgments, and fines. Parties who initiate litigation and arbitration
proceedings against us may seek substantial or indeterminate damages, and regulatory investigations
can result in substantial fines being imposed on us. We reserve for contingencies related to legal
proceedings at the time and to the extent we determine the amount to be probable and reasonably
estimable. However, it is inherently difficult to predict accurately the timing and outcome of
legal proceedings, including the amounts of any settlements, judgments or fines. We assess each
proceeding based on its particular facts, our outside advisors and our past experience with
similar matters, and expectations regarding the current legal and regulatory environment and other
external developments that might affect the outcome of a particular proceeding or type of
proceeding. We believe, based on our current knowledge, after appropriate consultation with outside
legal counsel, in light of our established reserves and the indemnification available from U.S.
Bancorp, that pending litigation, arbitration and regulatory proceedings, including those described
below, will be resolved with no material adverse effect on our financial condition. Of course,
there can be no assurance that our assessments will reflect the ultimate outcome of pending
proceedings, and the outcome of any particular matter may be material to our operating results for
any particular period, depending, in part, on the operating results for that period and the amount
of established reserves and indemnification. We generally have denied, or believe that we have
meritorious defenses and will deny, liability in all significant litigation and arbitration
proceedings currently pending against us, and we intend to vigorously defend such actions.
33
Initial Public Offering Allocation Litigation
We have been named, along with other leading securities firms, as a defendant in many putative
class actions filed in 2001 and 2002 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New
York involving the allocation of securities in certain initial public offerings. The courts order,
dated August 8, 2001, transferred all related class action complaints for coordination and pretrial
purposes as In re Initial Public Offering Allocation Securities Litigation, Master File No. 21 MC
92 (SAS). These complaints assert claims pursuant to Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 and
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder. The
claims are based, in part, upon allegations that between 1998 and 2000, in connection with acting
as an underwriter of certain initial public offerings of technology and Internet-related companies,
we obtained excessive compensation by allocating shares in these initial public offerings to
preferred customers who, in return, purportedly agreed to pay additional compensation to us in the
form of excess commissions that we failed to disclose. The complaints also allege that our
customers who received favorable allocations of shares in initial public offerings agreed to
purchase additional shares of the same issuer in the secondary market at pre-determined prices.
These complaints seek unspecified damages. The defendants motions to dismiss the complaints were
filed on July 1, 2002, and oral argument on the motions to dismiss was heard on November 14, 2002.
The court entered its order largely denying the motions to dismiss on February 19, 2003. A status
conference was held with the court on July 11, 2003, for purposes of establishing a case management
plan setting forth discovery deadlines, selecting focus cases and briefing class certification.
Seventeen focus cases were selected, including eleven cases for purposes of merits discovery and
six cases for purposes of class certification. We are named defendants in two of the merits focus
cases and none of the class certification focus cases. On October 13, 2004, the court issued an
opinion largely granting plaintiffs motions for class certification in the six class certification
focus cases. Defendants filed a petition seeking leave to appeal the class certification ruling on
October 27, 2004. Plaintiffs filed their opposition to the petition on November 8, 2004, and
defendants filed their reply in further support of the petition on November 15, 2004. The United
States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted the defendants petition on June 30, 2005.
Defendants filed their brief on October 3, 2005. Plaintiffs response was filed on December 19,
2005, and defendants filed their reply on January 27, 2006. Oral argument on the class
certification appeal was heard on June 6, 2006. A decision on the appeal is currently pending.
Discovery is proceeding at this time with respect to the remaining eleven focus cases selected for
merits discovery.
Initial Public Offering Fee Antitrust Litigation
We have been named, along with other leading securities firms, as a defendant in several
putative class actions filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in
1998. The courts order, dated February 11, 1999, consolidated these purported class actions for
all purposes as In re Public Offering Fee Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 98 CV 7890 (LMM). The
consolidated amended complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages, treble damages and
injunctive relief. The consolidated amended complaint was filed on behalf of purchasers of shares
issued in certain initial public offerings for U.S. companies and alleges that defendants conspired
in offerings of an amount between $20 million and $80 million to fix the underwriters discount at
7.0 percent of the offering amount in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The court
dismissed this consolidated action with prejudice and denied plaintiffs motion to amend the
complaint and include an issuer plaintiff. The court stated that its decision did not affect any
class actions filed on behalf of issuer plaintiffs. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed
the district courts decision on December 13, 2002 and remanded the action to the district court. A
motion to dismiss was filed with the district court on March 26, 2003 seeking dismissal of this
action and the issuer plaintiff action described below in their entirety, based upon the argument
that the determination of underwriting fees is implicitly immune from the antitrust laws because of
the extensive federal regulation of the securities markets. Plaintiffs filed their opposition to
the motion to dismiss on April 25, 2003. The underwriter defendants filed a motion for leave to
file a supplemental memorandum of law in further support of their motion to dismiss on June 10,
2003. The court denied the motion to dismiss based upon implied immunity in its memorandum and
order dated June 26, 2003. A supplemental memorandum in support of the motion to dismiss,
applicable only to this action because the purported class consists of indirect purchasers, was
filed on June 24, 2003 and sought dismissal based upon the argument that the proposed class members
cannot state claims upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiffs filed a supplemental memorandum in
opposition to defendants motion to dismiss on July 9, 2003, and defendants filed a reply in
further support of the motion to dismiss on July 25, 2003. The court entered its memorandum and
order granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss on February 24, 2004. Plaintiffs
damage claims were dismissed because they were indirect purchasers, but the motion to dismiss was
denied with respect to plaintiffs claims for injunctive relief. We filed our answer to the
consolidated amended complaint on April 22, 2004. Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification
and supporting memorandum of law on September 16, 2004. Class discovery concluded on April 11,
2005, and defendants filed their brief in opposition to plaintiffs motion for class certification
on May 25, 2005. Plaintiffs reply brief in support of their motion for class certification was
filed on October 20, 2005, and defendants filed a surreply brief in opposition to class
certification on November 15, 2005. Plaintiffs filed a summary judgment motion on liability on
October 25, 2005. The Court denied class certification of an issuer class in its Memorandum and
Order dated April 18, 2006. The Order further requires the purchaser plaintiffs to notify the Court
within 14 days as to their intention of pursuing class certification of purchaser class to pursue
injunctive
34
relief without the prospect of recovery of money damages. Plaintiffs filed a Rule 23(f) application
with respect to the denial of class certification on May 1, 2006. The Court granted their request
that the response to Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment be adjourned until 30 days after a
ruling on the 23(f) application or the Second Circuit rules on the appeal, whichever is later.
The Second Circuit Court accepted the Plaintiffs Rule 23(f) application with respect to the denial
of class certification. The briefing on that issue is in progress.
Similar purported class actions also have been filed against us in the U.S. District Court for
the Southern District of New York on behalf of issuer plaintiffs asserting substantially similar
antitrust claims based upon allegations that 7.0 percent underwriters discounts violate the
Sherman Act. These purported class actions were consolidated by the district court as In re Issuer
Plaintiff Initial Public Offering Fee Antitrust Litigation, Case No. 00 CV 7804 (LMM), on May 23,
2001. These complaints also seek unspecified compensatory damages, treble damages and injunctive
relief. Plaintiffs filed a consolidated class action complaint on July 6, 2001. The district court
denied defendants motion to dismiss the complaint on September 30, 2002. Defendants filed a motion
to certify the order for interlocutory appeal on October 15, 2002. On March 26, 2003, a motion to
dismiss based upon implied immunity was also filed in connection with this action. The court denied
the motion to dismiss on June 26, 2003. Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification and
supporting memorandum of law on September 16, 2004. Class discovery concluded on April 11, 2005.
Defendants filed their brief in opposition to plaintiffs motion for class certification on May 25,
2005, and plaintiffs reply brief in support of their motion for class certification was filed on
October 20, 2005. Defendants filed a surreply brief in opposition to class certification on
November 15, 2005. Plaintiffs filed a summary judgment motion on liability on October 25, 2005. The
Court denied class certification of an issuer class in its Memorandum and Order dated April 18,
2006. The Order further requires the purchaser plaintiffs to notify the Court within 14 days as to
their intention of pursuing class certification of purchaser class to pursue injunctive relief
without the prospect of recovery of money damages. Plaintiffs filed a Rule 23(f) application with
respect to the denial of class certification on May 1, 2006. The Court granted their request that
the response to Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment be adjourned until 30 days after a ruling
on the 23(f) application or the Second Circuit rules on the appeal, whichever is later. The Second
Circuit Court accepted the Plaintiffs Rule 23(f) application with respect to the denial of class
certification. The briefing on that issue is in progress.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The discussion of our business and operations should be read together with the risk factors
contained in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
filed with the SEC, as updated in our subsequent reports on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC. These
risk factors describe various risks and uncertainties to which we are or may become subject. These
risks and uncertainties have the potential to affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations, cash flows, strategies or prospects in a material and adverse manner. The following
information updates the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and subsequent
Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q:
Increases in capital commitments in our proprietary trading, investing and similar activities
increase the potential for significant losses.
The trend in capital markets is toward larger and more frequent commitments of capital by
financial services firms in many of their activities, and as we implement our growth strategy
following the divestiture of our PCS branch network we expect to increasingly commit our own
capital to engage in proprietary trading, investing and similar activities. Our results of
operations in a given period may be affected by the nature and scope of these activities, and such
activities will subject us to market fluctuations and volatility that may adversely affect the
value of our positions, which could result in significant losses and reduce our revenues and
profits. In addition, commitments of capital may lead to a greater concentration of risk, which
may cause us to suffer losses even when business conditions are generally favorable for others in
the industry.
35
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases made by or on behalf
of Piper Jaffray Companies or any affiliated purchaser (as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934), of our common stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
In addition, a third-party trustee makes open-market purchases of our common stock from time
to time pursuant to the Piper Jaffray Companies Retirement Plan, under which participating
employees may allocate assets to a company stock fund.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Approximate Dollar Value |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
of Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Average Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Purchased Under the Plans |
|
Period |
|
Purchased(1) |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
or Programs |
|
Month #1 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
(July 1, 2006 to July 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month #2 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
(August 1, 2006 to August 31, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Month #3 |
|
|
1,635,035 |
|
|
$ |
60.66 |
|
|
|
1,635,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
(September 1, 2006 to September 30, 2006) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,635,035 |
|
|
$ |
60.66 |
|
|
|
1,635,035 |
|
|
$80 million
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On August 14, 2006 we announced that our board of directors had authorized the
repurchase up to $180 million of common shares over a period commencing with the closing of the
sale of our PCS branch network to UBS and ending on December 31, 2007. On August 16, 2006, we
entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement with Goldman, Sachs & Co. to repurchase
$100 million of our common stock on an accelerated basis. We paid $100 million to Goldman Sachs on
August 21, 2006 and received 1,635,035 shares pursuant to the accelerated share repurchase on
September 1, 2006. On October 2, 2006, we completed the accelerated share repurchase with the
receipt of an additional 13,492 shares for a total of 1,648,527 shares received pursuant to the
accelerated share repurchase. The accelerated share repurchase agreements are further described in
our report on Form 8-K dated August 17, 2006, and are filed as Exhibit 10.1 hereto. We have $80
million of repurchase authorization remaining, and we expect to conduct open market share purchases
under this authorization through December 31, 2007. |
36
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Method of |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Filing |
10.1
|
|
Master Confirmation between Piper Jaffray Companies and Goldman
Sachs & Co., dated August 16, 2006, and Supplemental Confirmation
thereto dated August 16, 2006, with Trade Notification dated
September 1, 2006.
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Filed herewith |
37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on
November 3, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
Its
|
|
/s/ Andrew S. Duff
Chairman and CEO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
Its
|
|
/s/ Thomas P. Schnettler
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
38
Exhibit Index
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Method of |
Number |
|
Description |
|
Filing |
10.1
|
|
Master Confirmation between Piper Jaffray Companies and Goldman
Sachs & Co., dated August 16, 2006, and Supplemental Confirmation
thereto dated August 16, 2006, with Trade Notification dated
September 1, 2006.
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
Filed herewith |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications furnished pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Filed herewith |