FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 1-13105
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
43-0921172
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
|
|
One CityPlace Drive, Suite 300, St. Louis, Missouri
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
63141
(Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (314) 994-2700
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
At May 5, 2009, there were 144,400,301 shares of the registrants common stock outstanding.
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Arch Coal, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales |
|
$ |
681,040 |
|
|
$ |
699,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS, EXPENSES AND OTHER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of coal sales |
|
|
547,126 |
|
|
|
514,404 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
73,041 |
|
|
|
73,042 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
25,114 |
|
|
|
25,680 |
|
Change in fair value of coal derivatives and coal trading activities, net |
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
(30,558 |
) |
Costs related to acquisition of Jacobs Ranch |
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating (income) expense, net |
|
|
(5,635 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642,468 |
|
|
|
582,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
38,572 |
|
|
|
116,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(20,018 |
) |
|
|
(20,488 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
6,468 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,550 |
) |
|
|
(20,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
25,022 |
|
|
|
96,661 |
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
|
(5,550 |
) |
|
|
15,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
30,572 |
|
|
|
81,421 |
|
Less: Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Arch Coal, Inc. |
|
$ |
30,579 |
|
|
$ |
81,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
142,789 |
|
|
|
143,497 |
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
142,848 |
|
|
|
144,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
Arch Coal, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
27,766 |
|
|
$ |
70,649 |
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
224,964 |
|
|
|
215,053 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
42,481 |
|
|
|
43,419 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
205,770 |
|
|
|
191,568 |
|
Prepaid royalties |
|
|
35,401 |
|
|
|
43,780 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
32,121 |
|
|
|
52,918 |
|
Coal derivative assets |
|
|
25,335 |
|
|
|
43,173 |
|
Other |
|
|
53,459 |
|
|
|
45,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
647,297 |
|
|
|
706,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
2,797,697 |
|
|
|
2,703,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid royalties |
|
|
86,151 |
|
|
|
66,918 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
46,832 |
|
|
|
46,832 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
327,617 |
|
|
|
294,682 |
|
Equity investments |
|
|
89,207 |
|
|
|
87,761 |
|
Other |
|
|
94,948 |
|
|
|
73,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
644,755 |
|
|
|
569,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,089,749 |
|
|
$ |
3,978,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
165,955 |
|
|
$ |
186,322 |
|
Coal derivative liabilities |
|
|
10,044 |
|
|
|
10,757 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
201,689 |
|
|
|
249,203 |
|
Current maturities of debt and short-term borrowings |
|
|
205,167 |
|
|
|
213,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
582,855 |
|
|
|
659,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,238,807 |
|
|
|
1,098,948 |
|
Asset retirement obligations |
|
|
260,876 |
|
|
|
255,369 |
|
Accrued pension benefits |
|
|
76,023 |
|
|
|
73,486 |
|
Accrued postretirement benefits other than pension |
|
|
58,943 |
|
|
|
58,163 |
|
Accrued workers compensation |
|
|
28,728 |
|
|
|
30,107 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
80,409 |
|
|
|
65,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,326,641 |
|
|
|
2,241,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, authorized 260,000 shares, issued 144,400 and
144,345 shares, respectively |
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
1,385,073 |
|
|
|
1,381,496 |
|
Treasury stock, 1,512 shares at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, at cost |
|
|
(53,848 |
) |
|
|
(53,848 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
496,451 |
|
|
|
478,734 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(74,894 |
) |
|
|
(79,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Arch Coal, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
1,754,230 |
|
|
|
1,728,733 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
|
8,878 |
|
|
|
8,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,763,108 |
|
|
|
1,737,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
4,089,749 |
|
|
$ |
3,978,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
Arch Coal, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
30,572 |
|
|
$ |
81,421 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
73,041 |
|
|
|
73,042 |
|
Prepaid royalties expensed |
|
|
9,461 |
|
|
|
8,863 |
|
Gain on dispositions of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(399 |
) |
Employee stock-based compensation |
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
3,634 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
(9,005 |
) |
|
|
(8,752 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(14,202 |
) |
|
|
(18,381 |
) |
Coal derivative assets and liabilities |
|
|
11,298 |
|
|
|
(29,597 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
(37,891 |
) |
|
|
16,025 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(14,440 |
) |
|
|
(811 |
) |
Other |
|
|
4,827 |
|
|
|
8,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
57,127 |
|
|
|
133,729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(191,886 |
) |
|
|
(244,491 |
) |
Proceeds from dispositions of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
Purchases of investments and advances to affiliates |
|
|
(5,881 |
) |
|
|
(812 |
) |
Additions to prepaid royalties |
|
|
(20,315 |
) |
|
|
(19,079 |
) |
Reimbursement of deposits on equipment |
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(214,659 |
) |
|
|
(263,960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from commercial paper and net borrowings on lines of credit |
|
|
137,265 |
|
|
|
150,646 |
|
Net payments on other debt |
|
|
(5,363 |
) |
|
|
(4,414 |
) |
Debt financing costs |
|
|
(4,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(12,862 |
) |
|
|
(10,010 |
) |
Issuance of common stock under incentive plans |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
114,649 |
|
|
|
138,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(42,883 |
) |
|
|
8,154 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
70,649 |
|
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
27,766 |
|
|
$ |
13,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Arch Coal, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Arch Coal, Inc. and its subsidiaries and controlled entities (the Company). The Companys primary
business is the production of steam and metallurgical coal from surface and underground mines
located throughout the United States, for sale to utility, industrial and export markets. The
Companys mines are located in southern West Virginia, eastern Kentucky, Virginia, Wyoming,
Colorado and Utah. All subsidiaries (except as noted below) are wholly-owned. Intercompany
transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial
reporting and U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission regulations. In the opinion of management,
all adjustments, consisting of normal, recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair
presentation, have been included. Results of operations for the three month period ended March 31,
2009 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the year ending December 31,
2009. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial
statements and related notes as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in Arch Coal,
Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
The Company owns a 99% membership interest in a joint venture named Arch Western Resources,
LLC (Arch Western) which operates coal mines in Wyoming, Colorado and Utah. The Company also acts
as the managing member of Arch Western.
2. Accounting Policies
New Accounting Pronouncements
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51
(Statement No. 160). Statement No. 160 requires that a noncontrolling interest (previously
referred to as minority interest) in a consolidated subsidiary be displayed in the consolidated
balance sheet as a separate component of equity and the amount of net income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest be included in consolidated net income on the face of the consolidated
statement of income. The adoption of Statement No. 160 resulted
in a decrease in other liabilities and an increase in total equity of $8.9 million as of December
31, 2008 from what was previously reported for the reclassification of the noncontrolling interest
in Arch Western. The adoption of Statement No. 160 resulted in a decrease in other operating
expense, net and an increase in net income of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008 from what was previously reported for the amount of income attributable to the noncontrolling
interest in Arch Western.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133 (Statement No. 161). Statement No. 161 requires additional disclosures about derivatives and
hedging activities, including qualitative disclosures about objectives for using derivatives. It
also requires tabular disclosures about the gross fair value of derivative instruments, gains and
losses from derivative instruments by type of contract, and the locations of these amounts in the
interim and annual financial statements. See Note 4, Derivatives for the disclosures required by
Statement No. 161.
On January 1, 2009, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141(R), Business
Combinations (Statement No. 141(R)) and Staff Position FAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets
Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in Business Combination that Arise from Contingencies, (FSP FAS
141(R)-1) became effective. The provisions of Statement No. 141(R) are effective for any business
combinations that occur on or after January 1, 2009. Statement No. 141(R) clarifies and amends the
accounting guidance for the acquirers recognition and measurement of the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree in a business combination. FSP
FAS 141(R)-1 amends Statement No. 141(R) and previous guidance, requiring that assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that arise from pre-acquisition contingencies be
recognized at fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157
(Statement No. 157) and
4
amending disclosure requirements to include changes in the range of possible outcomes for both
recognized and reasonably possible unrecognized pre-acquisition contingencies.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-01 Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP EITF
03-6-01). FSP EITF 03-6-01 clarifies whether instruments granted in share-based payment
transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and therefore need to be included in the
earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method. FSP EITF 03-6-01
had no effect on basic earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and resulted in
a decrease of $0.01 in basic earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2008 from what
was previously reported.
On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted Staff Position FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157, (FSP FAS 157-2) prospectively for the Companys fair value measurements other
than those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a
recurring basis. FSP FAS 157-2 deferred the effective date of Statement No. 157 for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities. FSP FAS 157-2 is effective for all fair value measurements
prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities after the date of adoption, however, there was no transition impact upon initial
adoption.
On January 1, 2009, the Company prospectively adopted EITF Issue 08-6, Accounting for Equity
Method Investments, (EITF 08-6). EITF 08-6 clarifies the application of the equity method. This
EITF concludes that equity method investments should be recognized using a cost accumulation model
and that the investments as a whole should be assessed for other-than-temporary impairment. EITF
08-6 also concludes on the accounting for gains or losses on the issuance of shares by the investee
and for the loss of significant influence. EITF 08-6 did not have a significant impact on the
accounting for the Companys equity investments.
3. Fair Value Measurements
Statement No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy, as defined below, gives the highest priority
to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest
priority to unobservable inputs.
|
|
|
Level 1 is defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets. Level 1 assets include available-for-sale equity securities and coal
futures that are submitted for clearing on the New York Mercantile Exchange. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 is defined as observable inputs other than Level 1 prices. These include
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for
identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that
are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the
full term of the assets or liabilities. The Companys level 2 assets and liabilities
include commodity contracts (coal and heating oil) with fair values derived from quoted prices in
over-the-counter markets or from prices received from direct broker quotes. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 is defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists,
therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. These include the
Companys commodity option contracts (primarily coal and heating oil) valued using
modeling techniques, such as Black-Scholes, that require the use of inputs,
particularly volatility, that are not observable. |
The table below sets forth, by level, the Companys financial assets and liabilities that are
accounted for at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investments |
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
25,335 |
|
|
|
3,992 |
|
|
|
20,349 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
25,652 |
|
|
$ |
4,309 |
|
|
$ |
20,349 |
|
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
$ |
51,590 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
53,262 |
|
|
$ |
(1,672 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
The Companys contracts with certain of its counterparties allow for the settlement of
contracts in an asset position with contracts in a liability position in the event of default or
termination. For classification purposes, the Company records the net fair value of all the
positions with these counterparties as a net asset or liability. Each level in the table above
displays the underlying contracts according to their classification in the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet, based on this counterparty netting.
The following table summarizes the change in the fair values of financial instruments
categorized as level 3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
1,050 |
|
Gains (losses), realized or unrealized: |
|
|
|
|
Recognized in earnings |
|
|
(387 |
) |
Recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
|
320 |
|
Settlements, purchases and issuances |
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
2,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains during the three months ended March 31, 2009 related to level 3 financial
instruments held on March 31, 2009 were $0.1 million.
4. Derivatives
The Company generally utilizes derivative financial instruments to manage exposures to
commodity prices. Additionally, the Company may hold certain coal derivative financial instruments
for trading purposes.
All derivative financial instruments are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value. In a
fair value hedge, the Company hedges the risk of changes in the fair value of a firm commitment,
typically a fixed-price coal sales contract. Changes in both the hedged firm commitment and the
fair value of a derivative used as a hedge instrument in a fair value hedge are recorded in
earnings. In a cash flow hedge, the Company hedges the risk of changes in future cash flows
related to a forecasted purchase or sale. Changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument
used as a hedge instrument in a cash flow hedge are recorded in other comprehensive income.
Amounts in other comprehensive income are reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction
affects earnings and are classified in a manner consistent with the transaction being hedged. The
Company formally documents the relationships between hedging instruments and the respective hedged
items, as well as its risk management objectives for hedge transactions.
The Company evaluates the effectiveness of its hedging relationships both at the hedges
inception and on an ongoing basis. Any ineffective portion of the change in fair value of a
derivative instrument used as a hedge instrument in a fair value or cash flow hedge
is recognized immediately in earnings. The ineffective portion is based on the extent to which
exact offset is not achieved between the change in fair value of the hedge instrument and the
cumulative change in expected future cash flows on the hedged transaction from inception of the
hedge in a cash flow hedge or the change in the fair value of the firm commitment in a fair value
hedge.
Diesel fuel price risk management
The Company is exposed to price risk with respect to diesel fuel purchased for use in its
operations. The Company purchases approximately 50 million gallons of diesel fuel annually in its
operations. To reduce the volatility in the price of diesel fuel for its operations, the Company
uses forward physical diesel purchase contracts, as well as heating oil swaps and purchased call
options. At March 31, 2009, the Company had protected the price of approximately 66% of its
remaining expected purchases for fiscal year 2009 and 28% of its expected purchases for fiscal year
2010. Since the changes in the price of heating oil highly correlate to changes in the price of the
hedged diesel fuel purchases, the heating oil swaps and purchased call options qualify for cash
flow hedge accounting. The Company held heating oil swaps and purchased call options for
approximately 36.2 million gallons as of March 31, 2009.
6
Coal risk management positions
The Company may sell or purchase forward contracts and options in the over-the-counter coal
market in order to manage its exposure to coal prices. The Company has exposure to the risk of
fluctuating coal prices related to forecasted sales or purchases of coal or to the risk of changes
in the fair value of a fixed price physical sales contract. Certain derivative contracts may be
designated as hedges of these risks.
At March 31, 2009, the Company held derivatives for risk management purposes totaling 0.9
million tons of coal that are expected to settle during the remainder of 2009 and 0.2 million tons
of coal that are expected to settle in 2010.
Coal trading positions
The Company may sell or purchase forward contracts, swaps and options in the over-the-counter
coal market for trading purposes. The Company may also include nonderivative contracts in its
trading portfolio. The Company is exposed to the risk of changes in coal prices on its coal
trading portfolio. The timing of the estimated future realization of the value of the trading
portfolio is 81% in the remainder of 2009, 18% in 2010 and 1% in 2011.
Tabular derivatives disclosures
The Companys contracts with certain of its counterparties allow for the settlement of
contracts in an asset position with contracts in a liability position in the event of default or
termination. Such netting arrangements reduce our credit exposure related to these counterparties.
For classification purposes, the Company records the net fair value of all the positions with these
counterparties as a net asset or liability. The amounts shown in the table below represent the
fair value position of individual contracts, regardless of the net position presented in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The fair value and location of derivatives reflected in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
As of March 31, 2009 |
|
Asset |
|
|
Liability |
|
(in thousands) |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging
Instruments Under Statement No. 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heating oil |
|
$ |
2,077 |
1 |
|
$ |
43,623 |
1 |
Coal |
|
|
2,837 |
2 |
|
|
26,770 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
4,914 |
|
|
|
70,393 |
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging
Instruments Under Statement No. 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal held for trading purposes |
|
|
147,551 |
2 |
|
|
116,714 |
2 |
Coal |
|
|
8,619 |
2 |
|
|
232 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
156,170 |
|
|
|
116,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
|
161,084 |
|
|
|
187,339 |
|
Effect of counterparty netting |
|
|
(135,749 |
) |
|
|
(135,749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives as classified in the
balance sheet |
|
$ |
25,335 |
|
|
$ |
51,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location in the Balance Sheet
|
|
|
1 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities ($41,546) |
|
2 |
|
Coal derivative assets ($25,335) and Coal derivative liabilities ($10,044) |
The Company had a current asset for the right to reclaim cash collateral of $13.8 million and
$6.6 million at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
These amounts are not included with the derivatives presented in the table above.
7
The effects of derivatives on measures of financial performance are as follows:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedged Items |
|
|
|
|
Derivatives in Statement No. 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
in Statement No. 133 |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Hedge |
|
|
|
|
Hedging Relationships |
|
Loss |
|
|
Relationships |
|
|
Gain |
|
Coal |
|
$ |
(3,188) |
1 |
|
Firm commitments |
|
$ |
3,188 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Ineffective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses Reclassified |
|
|
Portion and |
|
Derivatives in Statement No. 133 |
|
Loss Recognized |
|
|
from OCI |
|
|
Amount |
|
Cash Flow |
|
in OCI |
|
|
into Income |
|
|
Excluded from |
|
Hedging Relationships |
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
(Effective Portion) |
|
|
Effectiveness Testing) |
|
Heating oil |
|
$ |
(2,865 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,217) |
2 |
|
$ |
|
|
Coal |
|
|
(5,622 |
) |
|
|
(2,984) |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
$ |
(8,487 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,201 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as |
|
|
|
Hedging Instruments under |
|
|
|
Statement No. 133 |
|
Gain |
|
Coal |
|
$ |
181 |
3 |
Location in Statement of Income:
|
|
|
|
|
1-Coal sales |
|
|
|
2-Cost of coal sales |
|
|
|
3-Change in fair value of coal derivatives and coal trading activities, net |
During the next twelve months, based on fair values at March 31, 2009, losses on derivative
contracts designated as hedge instruments in cash flow hedges of approximately $59.0 million are
expected to be reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recognized net unrealized and
realized gains related to its trading portfolio (including derivative and non-derivative contracts)
of $0.3 million as reflected in the caption Change in fair value of coal derivatives and coal
trading activities, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of income. These
gains are not included in the above table.
5. Business Combinations
On March 8, 2009, Arch Coal entered into an agreement to purchase the Jacobs Ranch mining
complex in the Powder River Basin from Rio Tinto Energy America for a purchase price of $761.0
million. At December 31, 2008,
Jacobs Ranch controlled approximately 381 million tons of coal reserves as reported by Rio
Tinto Energy America, which are adjacent to the Companys Black Thunder mining complex. The Company
recognized costs of $3.4 million related to the potential acquisition in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statement of income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 in accordance with
Statement No. 141(R).
The completion of the transaction is subject to certain governmental and regulatory conditions
and approvals, including those under competition laws and regulations, and other customary
conditions.
There can be no
assurance that the transaction will be completed as contemplated in the agreement.
8
6. Stock-Based Compensation
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company granted options to purchase
approximately 1.0 million shares of common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $14.05
per share and a weighted average grant-date fair value of $6.62 per share. The options fair value
was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, using a weighted average risk-free
rate of 1.75%, a weighted average dividend yield of 2.56% and a weighted average volatility of
69.40%. The options vest ratably over four years. The options provide for the continuation of
vesting for retirement-eligible recipients that meet certain criteria. The expense for these
options will be recognized through the date that the employee first becomes eligible to retire and
is no longer required to provide service to earn part or all of the award. The Company also granted
35,000 shares of restricted stock during the three months ended March 31, 2009 at a weighted
average grant-date fair value of $14.05 per share. The restricted stock vests in three to four
years.
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense from all plans of $3.5 million and
$4.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This expense is
primarily included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed
consolidated statements of income.
7. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Coal |
|
$ |
74,964 |
|
|
$ |
64,683 |
|
Repair parts and supplies, net of allowance |
|
|
130,806 |
|
|
|
126,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
205,770 |
|
|
$ |
191,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Commercial paper |
|
$ |
32,936 |
|
|
$ |
65,671 |
|
Indebtedness to banks under credit facilities |
|
|
443,597 |
|
|
|
273,597 |
|
6.75% senior notes ($950.0 million face value) due July 1, 2013 |
|
|
955,807 |
|
|
|
956,148 |
|
Other |
|
|
11,634 |
|
|
|
16,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,443,974 |
|
|
|
1,312,413 |
|
Less current maturities of debt and short-term borrowings |
|
|
205,167 |
|
|
|
213,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,238,807 |
|
|
$ |
1,098,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current maturities of debt include amounts borrowed that are supported by credit
facilities that have a term of less than one year and amounts borrowed under credit facilities with
terms longer than one year that the Company does not intend to refinance on a long-term basis,
based on cash projections and managements plans. The Company had availability of approximately
$470.0 million under its credit facilities at March 31, 2009.
On March 6, 2009, the Company entered into an amendment (the Credit Amendment) to its $800.0
million secured revolving credit facility. The Credit Amendment amended certain covenants to make
them less restrictive, including those related to lien creation, restricted payments and subsidiary
guarantees of debt, in addition to an increase in the maximum leverage ratio, as defined, that the
Company must maintain. In connection with these changes, the borrowing pricing grid was increased
by 200 basis points and the rate on the unused portion of the facility was increased to 50 basis
points. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had approximately $375.0
million and $205.0 million of borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility,
respectively. At March 31, 2009, the Company had availability of $425.0 million under the revolving
credit facility.
On March 31, 2009, the Company entered into an amendment to its accounts receivable
securitization program revising certain terms to strengthen the credit quality of the pool of
receivables and increasing the interest rate. The credit facility supporting the borrowings under
the program was also renewed and now expires March 31, 2010.
9
The size of the program continues to allow for aggregate borrowings and letters of credit of up to $175.0 million. The Company had
borrowings under the program of $68.6 million at both March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The
Company also had letters of credit outstanding under the securitization program of $59.5 million as
of March 31, 2009. At March 31, 2009, the Company had availability of $45.0 million under the
accounts receivable securitization program.
Economic conditions have impacted the Companys ability to issue commercial paper up to the
$100.0 million maximum aggregate principal amount of the program. The commercial paper placement
program is supported by a line of credit that has been renewed and expires on April 30, 2010.
9. Taxes
As part of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (the Act) enacted on October 3, 2008,
the Company filed for black lung excise tax refunds on taxes paid on export sales subsequent to
October 1, 1990, along with interest computed at statutory rates. The Company recognized refunds
of $11.0 million, plus interest of $10.3 million, in the fourth quarter of 2008. The Internal
Revenue Service has approved the Companys claim for refund and the Company recorded income of $7.0
million during the three months ended March 31, 2009, to adjust the estimated amount to be
received, of which $6.1 million is reflected in the caption interest income in the accompanying
condensed consolidated income statement, with the remainder in cost of coal sales. The Company
received refunds of $3.8 million in the first quarter of 2009 and expects the remainder to be
received in the second quarter of 2009.
10. Workers Compensation Expense
The following table details the components of workers compensation cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Self-insured occupational disease benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
Net amortization |
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total occupational disease |
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
Traumatic injury claims and assessments |
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
3,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total workers compensation expense |
|
$ |
766 |
|
|
$ |
3,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Employee Benefit Plans
The following table details the components of pension benefit costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
3,229 |
|
|
$ |
3,150 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
3,659 |
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(4,483 |
) |
|
|
(4,600 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
Amortization of other actuarial losses |
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,155 |
|
|
$ |
2,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table details the components of other postretirement benefit costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
734 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
Amortization of prior service credit |
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Amortization of other actuarial gains |
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
(775 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
$ |
1,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
12. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income consists of net income and other comprehensive income. Other
comprehensive income items under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income, are transactions recorded in stockholders equity during the year, excluding
net income and transactions with stockholders.
The following table presents the components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
30,572 |
|
|
$ |
81,421 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension, postretirement and other post-employment benefits, net of reclassifications
into net income |
|
|
(171 |
) |
|
|
145 |
|
Available-for-sale securities, net of reclassifications into net income |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
1,056 |
|
Unrealized gains and losses on derivatives, net of reclassifications into net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives |
|
|
(5,432 |
) |
|
|
4,317 |
|
Reclassifications of (gains) losses into net income |
|
|
9,728 |
|
|
|
(1,585 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
34,659 |
|
|
$ |
85,354 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. Earnings per Share
The following table provides the basis for earnings per share calculations by presenting the
income available to common stockholders of the Company and by reconciling basic and diluted
weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Income for basic earnings per share calculation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocated to common stockholders |
|
$ |
30,546 |
|
|
$ |
81,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
142,789 |
|
|
|
143,497 |
|
Effect of common stock equivalents under incentive plans |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
Effect of common stock equivalents arising from preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
142,848 |
|
|
|
144,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 1.7 million shares of common stock were excluded from the calculation of
diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2009 because they
were antidilutive.
14. Guarantees
The Company has agreed to continue to provide surety bonds and letters of credit for the
reclamation and retiree healthcare obligations of Magnum Coal Company (Magnum) related to the
properties the Company sold to Magnum on December 31, 2005. The purchase agreement requires Magnum
to reimburse the Company for costs related to the surety bonds and letters of credit and to use
commercially reasonable efforts to replace the obligations. If the surety bonds and letters of
credit related to the reclamation obligations are not replaced by Magnum within a specified period
of time, Magnum must post a letter of credit in favor of the Company in the amounts of the
reclamation obligations. At March 31, 2009, the Company had approximately $92.0 million of surety
bonds related to properties sold to Magnum. As a result of Magnums purchase by Patriot Coal
Corporation, Magnum will be required to post letters of credit in the Companys favor for the full
amount of the reclamation obligation on or before February 2011.
Magnum also acquired certain coal supply contracts with customers who have not consented to
the contracts assignment from the Company to Magnum. The Company has committed to purchase coal
from Magnum to sell to those customers at the same price it is charging the customers for the sale.
In addition, certain contracts were assigned to Magnum, but the Company has guaranteed Magnums
performance under the contracts. The longest of
11
the coal supply contracts extends to the year 2017. If Magnum is unable to supply the coal for these coal sales contracts then the Company would be
required to purchase coal on the open market or supply contracts from its existing operations. At
market prices effective at March 31, 2009, the cost of purchasing 13.8 million tons of coal to
supply the contracts that have not been assigned over their duration would exceed the sales price
under the contracts by approximately $179.4 million, and the cost of purchasing 3.4 million tons of
coal to supply the assigned and guaranteed contracts over their duration would exceed the sales
price under the contracts by approximately $78.1 million. The Company has also guaranteed Magnums
performance under certain operating leases, the longest of which extends through 2011. If the
Company were required to perform under its guarantees of the operating lease agreements, it would
be required to make $5.2 million of lease payments. As the Company does not believe that it is
probable that it would have to purchase replacement coal or fulfill its obligations under the lease
guarantees, no losses have been recorded in the consolidated financial statements as of March 31,
2009. However, if the Company would have to perform under these guarantees, it could potentially
have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of
the Company.
In connection with the Companys acquisition of the coal operations of ARCO and the
simultaneous combination of the acquired ARCO operations and the Companys Wyoming operations into
the Arch Western joint venture, the Company agreed to indemnify the other member of Arch Western
against certain tax liabilities in the event that such liabilities arise prior to June 1, 2013 as a
result of certain actions taken, including the sale or other disposition of certain properties of
Arch Western, the repurchase of certain equity interests in Arch Western by Arch Western or the
reduction under certain circumstances of indebtedness incurred by Arch Western in connection with
the acquisition. If the Company were to become liable, the maximum amount of potential future tax
payments was $49.3 million at March 31, 2009, which is not recorded as a liability in the Companys
consolidated financial statements. Since the indemnification is dependent upon the initiation of
activities within the Companys control and the Company does not intend to initiate such
activities, it is remote that the Company will become liable for any obligation related to this
indemnification. However, if such indemnification obligation were to arise, it could potentially
have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations and financial condition of
the Company.
15. Contingencies
The Company is a party to numerous claims and lawsuits with respect to various matters. The
Company provides for costs related to contingencies when a loss is probable and the amount is
reasonably estimable. After conferring with counsel, it is the opinion of management that the
ultimate resolution of pending claims will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
16. Segment Information
The Company has three reportable business segments, which are based on the major low-sulfur
coal basins in which the Company operates. Each of these reportable business segments includes a
number of mine complexes. The Company manages its coal sales by coal basin, not by individual mine
complex. Geology, coal transportation routes to customers, regulatory environments and coal quality
are generally consistent within a basin. Accordingly, market and contract pricing have developed by
coal basin. Mine operations are evaluated based on their per-ton operating costs (defined as
including all mining costs but excluding pass-through transportation expenses), as well as on other
non-financial measures, such as safety and environmental performance. The Companys reportable
segments are the Powder River Basin (PRB) segment, with operations in Wyoming; the Western
Bituminous (WBIT) segment, with operations in Utah, Colorado and southern Wyoming; and the Central
Appalachia (CAPP) segment, with operations in southern West Virginia, eastern Kentucky and
Virginia.
12
Operating segment results for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are presented
below. Results for the operating segments include all direct costs of mining. Corporate, Other and
Eliminations includes the change in fair value of coal derivatives and coal trading activities,
net; corporate overhead; land management; other support functions; and the elimination of
intercompany transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other and |
|
|
|
|
PRB |
|
WBIT |
|
CAPP |
|
Eliminations |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Three months ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales |
|
$ |
311,242 |
|
|
$ |
122,557 |
|
|
$ |
247,241 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
681,040 |
|
Income (loss) from operations |
|
|
31,214 |
|
|
|
(7,655 |
) |
|
|
43,551 |
|
|
|
(28,538 |
) |
|
|
38,572 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,866,855 |
|
|
|
2,056,827 |
|
|
|
1,134,236 |
|
|
|
(968,169 |
) |
|
|
4,089,749 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
29,467 |
|
|
|
19,484 |
|
|
|
23,634 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
73,041 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
33,779 |
|
|
|
16,094 |
|
|
|
12,981 |
|
|
|
129,032 |
|
|
|
191,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal sales |
|
$ |
289,001 |
|
|
$ |
162,053 |
|
|
$ |
248,296 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
699,350 |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
32,485 |
|
|
|
34,061 |
|
|
|
49,582 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
116,724 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,751,366 |
|
|
|
1,965,108 |
|
|
|
825,042 |
|
|
|
(691,177 |
) |
|
|
3,850,339 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
29,320 |
|
|
|
21,458 |
|
|
|
21,804 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
73,042 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
38,177 |
|
|
|
60,318 |
|
|
|
22,582 |
|
|
|
123,414 |
|
|
|
244,491 |
|
A reconciliation of segment income from operations to consolidated income before income taxes
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
38,572 |
|
|
$ |
116,724 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(20,018 |
) |
|
|
(20,488 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
6,468 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
25,022 |
|
|
$ |
96,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
This document
contains forward-looking statements that is, statements related to future,
not past, events. In this context, forward-looking statements often address our expected future
business and financial performance, and often contain words such as expects, anticipates,
intends, plans, believes, seeks, or will. Forward-looking statements by their nature
address matters that are, to different degrees, uncertain. For us, particular uncertainties arise
from changes in the demand for our coal by the domestic electric generation industry; from
legislation and regulations relating to the Clean Air Act and other environmental initiatives; from
operational, geological, permit, labor and weather-related factors; from fluctuations in the amount
of cash we generate from operations; from future integration of acquired businesses; and from
numerous other matters of national, regional and global scale, including those of a political,
economic, business, competitive or regulatory nature. These uncertainties may cause our actual
future results to be materially different than those expressed in our forward-looking statements.
We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law. For a description of
some of the risks and uncertainties that may affect our future results, see Risk Factors under
Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and
under Part II, Item 1A of this report.
Overview
We are one of the largest coal producers in the United States. We sell substantially all of
our coal to power plants, steel mills and industrial facilities. The locations of our mines enable
us to ship coal to most of the major coal-fueled power plants, steel mills and export facilities
located in the United States.
Our three reportable business segments are based on the low-sulfur U.S. coal producing regions
in which we operate the Powder River Basin, the Western Bituminous region and the Central
Appalachia region. These geographically distinct areas are characterized by geology, coal
transportation routes to consumers, regulatory environments and coal quality. These regional
similarities have caused market and contract pricing environments to develop by coal region and
form the basis for the segmentation of our operations.
The Powder River Basin is located in northeastern Wyoming and southeastern Montana. The coal
we mine from surface operations in this region has a very low sulfur content and a low heat value
compared to the other regions in which we operate. The price of Powder River Basin coal is
generally less than that of coal produced in other regions because Powder River Basin coal exists
in greater abundance, is easier to mine and thus has a lower cost of production. In addition,
Powder River Basin coal is generally lower in heat value, which requires some electric power
generation facilities to blend it with higher Btu coal or retrofit some existing coal plants to
accommodate lower Btu coal. The Western Bituminous region includes western Colorado, eastern Utah
and southern Wyoming. Coal we mine from underground and surface mines in this region typically has
a low sulfur content and varies in heat value. Central Appalachia includes eastern Kentucky,
Tennessee, Virginia and southern West Virginia. Coal we mine from both surface and underground
mines in this region generally has a high heat value and low sulfur content. In addition, we may
sell a portion of the coal we produce in the Central Appalachia region as metallurgical coal, which
has high heat content, low expansion pressure, low sulfur content and various other chemical
attributes. As such, the prices at which we sell metallurgical coal to customers in the steel
industry generally exceed the prices offered by power plants and industrial users for steam coal.
In 2009, we expect U.S. power generation to decline approximately 4.0% due to weaker domestic
and international economic conditions. We also expect U.S. coal consumption to decline in 2009 in
response to reduced consumption for electricity generation, lower metallurgical coal demand
resulting from global steel production cuts and increased use of natural gas by some electricity
generation facilities. As a result of these market pressures, coupled with continued geological
challenges, cost pressures, regulatory hurdles and limited access to capital, we expect coal
production and capital spending levels across the domestic coal industry will be curtailed. Due to
weakening demand in response to challenging domestic economic conditions, we have decreased our
estimates of the amount of coal we plan to sell in 2009. In addition, we have decreased our
expected capital expenditures for 2009 and have established other process improvement initiatives
and cost containment programs.
During the first quarter of 2009, we announced our plans to purchase the Jacobs Ranch mining
complex in the Powder River Basin from Rio Tinto Energy America for a purchase price of $761.0
million. At December 31, 2008, Jacobs Ranch controlled approximately 381 million
tons of coal reserves, as reported by Rio Tinto Energy America, which are adjacent to our Black
Thunder mining complex. The transaction is subject to certain governmental and regulatory
conditions and approvals, including under competition laws and regulations, and other
14
customary conditions. We cannot provide assurance that the
transaction will be completed.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
Summary. Our results during the first quarter of 2009 when compared to the first quarter of
2008 were influenced primarily by lower sales volumes due to weak
market conditions, an increase in production costs, a decrease in gains from our coal
trading activities from the first quarter of 2008 and an income tax benefit in the first quarter of
2009.
Revenues. The following table summarizes information about coal sales for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and compares it with the information for the three months ended March 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Amount |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per ton data and percentages) |
Coal sales |
|
$ |
681,040 |
|
|
$ |
699,350 |
|
|
$ |
(18,310 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
)% |
Tons sold |
|
|
30,892 |
|
|
|
34,828 |
|
|
|
(3,936 |
) |
|
|
(11.3 |
)% |
Coal sales realization per ton sold |
|
$ |
22.04 |
|
|
$ |
20.08 |
|
|
$ |
1.96 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
% |
Coal sales decreased in the first quarter of 2009 from the first quarter of 2008 due to
lower sales volumes in all segments partially offset by the effect of higher price
realizations in all segments. We have provided more information about the tons sold and the coal
sales realizations per ton by operating segment under the heading Operating segment results
beginning on page 16.
Costs, expenses and other. The following table summarizes costs, expenses and other
components of operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and compares them with the
information for the three months ended March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
in Net Income |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Cost of coal sales |
|
$ |
547,126 |
|
|
$ |
514,404 |
|
|
$ |
(32,722 |
) |
|
|
(6.4 |
)% |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
73,041 |
|
|
|
73,042 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
25,114 |
|
|
|
25,680 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
Change in fair value of coal derivatives
and coal trading activities, net |
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
(30,558 |
) |
|
|
(30,030 |
) |
|
|
(98.3 |
) |
Costs related to acquisition of Jacobs Ranch |
|
|
3,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,350 |
) |
|
|
N/A |
|
Other operating (income) expense, net |
|
|
(5,635 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
5,693 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
642,468 |
|
|
$ |
582,626 |
|
|
$ |
(59,842 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of coal sales. Our cost of coal sales increased in the first quarter of 2009 from the
first quarter of 2008 due to higher spending across all operating segments. We have provided more
information about our operating segments under the heading Operating segment results beginning on
page 16.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization. When compared with the first quarter of 2008, higher
depreciation and amortization costs in the first quarter of 2009 resulting from capital additions
made in 2008 were offset by lower depletion costs resulting from lower production levels.
Selling, general and administrative expenses. The decrease in selling, general and
administrative expenses from the first quarter of 2008 to the first quarter of 2009 is due
primarily to a decrease in employee incentive compensation costs of $2.9 million, partially offset
by a $1.5 million contribution commitment in the first quarter of 2009 to a company participating
in the research and development of technologies for capturing carbon dioxide emissions.
15
Change in fair value of coal derivatives and coal trading activities, net. Net gains relate
to the net impact of
our coal trading activities and the change in fair value of other coal derivatives that have
not been designated as hedge instruments in a hedging relationship. Our coal trading function
enabled us to take advantage of the significant price movements in the coal markets during in the
first quarter of 2008.
Costs related to acquisition of Jacobs Ranch. These costs represent costs we incurred during
the first quarter of 2009 related to our announced acquisition of the Jacobs Ranch mine. Under
accounting rules we adopted in the first quarter of 2009, the costs of acquiring a business are
expensed as incurred.
Other operating (income) expense, net. The change in net other operating income in the first
quarter of 2009 from net other operating expense in the first quarter of 2008 is primarily the
result of an increase in the net income from bookouts (the offsetting of coal sales and purchase
contracts) of $2.8 million and an increase in income from equity investments of $1.7 million,
primarily from our interest in Knight Hawk Holdings, LLC. In addition, in 2008 we recognized $1.8
million of unrealized losses on investments in marketable equity securities.
Operating segment results. The following table shows results by operating segment for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and compares it with information for the three months ended March
31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Powder River Basin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons sold (in thousands) |
|
|
23,133 |
|
|
|
25,764 |
|
|
|
(2,631 |
) |
|
|
(10.2 |
)% |
Coal sales realization per ton sold (1) |
|
$ |
13.25 |
|
|
$ |
11.15 |
|
|
$ |
2.10 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
% |
Operating margin per ton sold (2) |
|
$ |
1.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Bituminous |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons sold (in thousands) |
|
|
3,951 |
|
|
|
5,051 |
|
|
|
(1,100 |
) |
|
|
(21.8 |
)% |
Coal sales realization per ton sold (1) |
|
$ |
28.11 |
|
|
$ |
26.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Operating margin per ton sold (2) |
|
$ |
(2.23 |
) |
|
$ |
6.59 |
|
|
$ |
(8.82 |
) |
|
|
(133.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Appalachia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tons sold (in thousands) |
|
|
3,808 |
|
|
|
4,013 |
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
)% |
Coal sales realization per ton sold (1) |
|
$ |
61.50 |
|
|
$ |
58.07 |
|
|
$ |
3.43 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
% |
Operating margin per ton sold (2) |
|
$ |
10.64 |
|
|
$ |
12.16 |
|
|
$ |
(1.52 |
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Coal sales prices per ton exclude certain transportation costs that we pass through
to our customers. We use these financial measures because we believe the amounts as adjusted
better represent the coal sales prices we achieved within our operating segments. Since other
companies may calculate coal sales prices per ton differently, our calculation may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures used by those companies. For the three months ended
March 31, 2009, transportation costs per ton were $0.21 for the Powder River Basin, $2.90 for
the Western Bituminous region and $3.43 for Central Appalachia. Transportation costs per ton
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 were $0.07 for the Powder River Basin, $5.33 for the
Western Bituminous region and $3.80 for Central Appalachia. |
|
(2) |
|
Operating margin per ton sold is calculated as coal sales revenues less cost of coal
sales and depreciation, depletion and amortization divided by tons sold. |
Powder River Basin The decrease in sales volume in the Powder River Basin in the first
quarter of 2009 when compared with the first quarter of 2008 is due to our production cutbacks in
response to weak market conditions. We idled one dragline in the fourth quarter of 2008 at the
Black Thunder mine and have since announced plans to idle another dragline in May 2009. Increases
in sales prices during the first quarter of 2009 when compared with the first quarter of 2008
primarily reflect higher pricing from contracts committed during periods of higher prices in 2008,
partially offset by the effect of lower pricing on market-index priced tons. On a per-ton basis,
operating margins in the first quarter of 2009 increased only slightly from the first quarter of
2008 due to an increase in per-ton costs, which partially offset the contribution from higher sales
prices. The increase in per-ton costs resulted primarily from the effect of spreading fixed costs
over lower production levels and higher labor costs, repairs and maintenance costs and
sales-sensitive costs. Our diesel purchases are hedged under our risk management program as
discussed further under Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk beginning on page 20.
Western Bituminous In the Western Bituminous region, in addition to our production cutbacks
in response to weakened coal markets, sales volume decreased during the first quarter of 2009 when
compared with the first quarter of 2008 due primarily to a roof fall in January 2009 at the West
Elk mining complex in Colorado that halted production for 10 days. Higher sales prices during the
first quarter of 2009 when compared to the first quarter of 2008 were the result of higher contract
pricing that was achieved after the roll off of lower-priced legacy contracts in 2008, partially
offset by adverse quality adjustments attributable to the coal produced from the West Elk complex
in the first quarter of 2009. Geologic conditions encountered after the transition to the new coal
seam at the West Elk
16
mining complex have increased the ash content of the coal produced. We expect these
conditions to continue into the second quarter of 2009, and
it is possible that these geologic conditions may impact our coal quality intermittently
in the future. We are exploring long-term solutions to deal with these conditions, including the
possibility of constructing a small preparation plant at the mine. Higher sales prices were offset
by higher per-ton operating costs, resulting in a decrease in operating margin per ton sold.
Higher per-ton operating costs resulted from the lower production levels and the West Elk geology
issues, as well as higher labor, supplies and repair and maintenance costs.
Central Appalachia The decrease in sales volumes in the first quarter of 2009 when compared
with the first quarter of 2008 is due primarily to a decrease in 2009 in required volumes under
sales contracts that we retained after selling the mining complexes from which they were sourced.
Higher realizations in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008 from higher
base pricing on contracts signed during periods of higher pricing in 2008 were in part offset by a
decrease in metallurgical coal sales volumes. We sold 0.4 million tons into metallurgical markets
in the first quarter of 2009 compared to 0.8 million tons in the first quarter of 2008, and because
metallurgical coal generally commands a higher price than steam coal, the decrease had a
detrimental impact on our average realizations. Weak economic conditions in the steel industry
have affected metallurgical coal demand. Operating margins per ton for the first quarter of 2009
decreased from the first quarter of 2008 despite the increase in sales prices, due primarily to
higher labor, supplies and repairs and maintenance costs and an increase tons sold from higher-cost
contract mines, which began production in late 2008.
Net interest expense. The following table summarizes our net interest expense for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and compares it with the information for the three months ended March
31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
Increase in Net Income |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
(20,018 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,488 |
) |
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
6,468 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
6,043 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(13,550 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,063 |
) |
|
$ |
6,513 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in net interest expense in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the first
quarter of 2008 is primarily due to $6.1 million of interest income recorded in the first quarter
of 2009 associated with refunds of black lung excise tax. The income recorded in the first quarter
of 2009 is an adjustment to our original estimate of the recoverable amount of the refund recorded
in the fourth quarter of 2008. Our interest costs in the first quarter of 2009 were lower than in
the first quarter of 2008 due to lower interest rates, but the impact was partially offset by a
decrease in interest costs capitalized.
Income taxes. Our effective income tax rate is sensitive to changes in estimates of annual
profitability and percentage depletion. The following table summarizes our income taxes for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and compares it with information for the three months ended March
31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
Increase in Net Income |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except percentages) |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
|
$ |
(5,550 |
) |
|
$ |
15,240 |
|
|
$ |
20,790 |
|
|
|
136.4 |
% |
The benefit from income taxes in the first quarter of 2009 was the result of lower pre-tax
income in the first quarter of 2009 when compared with the first quarter of 2008 and the impact of
percentage depletion.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Credit crisis and economic environment
The crisis in domestic and international financial markets has had a significant adverse
impact on a number of financial institutions. Since the beginning of the crisis, our ability to
issue commercial paper up to the maximum amount allowed under the program has been constrained.
The ongoing uncertainty in the financial markets may have an impact in the future on: the market
values of certain securities and commodities; the financial stability of our customers and
counterparties; availability under our lines of credit; the cost and availability of insurance and
financial surety programs, and pension plan funding requirements. We believe we have sufficient
liquidity under our credit facilities to satisfy working capital requirements and fund capital
expenditures, if needed. We had available borrowing capacity of $470.0 million under our lines of
credit at March 31, 2009 in addition to our cash on hand. Management will continue to closely
monitor our liquidity, credit markets and counterparty credit risk.
17
Management cannot predict with any certainty the impact to our liquidity of any further
disruption in the credit environment.
Liquidity and capital resources
Our primary sources of cash include sales of our coal production to customers, borrowings
under our credit facilities or other financing arrangements, and debt and equity offerings related
to significant transactions. Excluding any significant mineral reserve acquisitions, we generally
satisfy our working capital requirements and fund capital expenditures and debt-service obligations
with cash generated from operations or borrowings under our credit facility, accounts receivable
securitization or commercial paper programs. The borrowings under these arrangements are
classified as current if the underlying credit facilities expire within one year or if, based on
cash projections and management plans, we do not have the intent to replace them on a long-term
basis. Such plans are subject to change based on our cash needs.
We believe that cash generated from operations and borrowings under our credit facilities or
other financing arrangements will be sufficient to meet working capital requirements, anticipated
capital expenditures and scheduled debt payments for at least the next several years. We manage our
exposure to changing commodity prices for our non-trading, long-term coal contract portfolio
through the use of long-term coal supply agreements. We enter into fixed price, fixed volume supply
contracts with terms greater than one year with customers with whom we have historically had
limited collection issues. Our ability to satisfy debt service obligations, to fund planned
capital expenditures, to make acquisitions, to repurchase our common shares and to pay dividends
will depend upon our future operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic
conditions in the coal industry and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond
our control. In response to the economic environment and weakening coal markets, we have decreased
our 2009 capital spending plans and have established other process improvement initiatives and cost
containment programs in order to reduce costs.
We are currently evaluating our options of financing the Jacobs Ranch acquisition. These
options include cash from operations, borrowings under credit facilities, and other debt
instruments.
Our secured revolving credit facility allows for up to $800.0 million of borrowings and
expires June 23, 2011. We had borrowings outstanding under the revolving credit facility of $375.0
million at March 31, 2009 and $205.0 million at December 31, 2008. At March 31, 2009, we had
availability of $425.0 million under the revolving credit facility. Borrowings under the credit
facility bear interest at a floating rate based on LIBOR determined by reference to our leverage
ratio, as calculated in accordance with the credit agreement, as amended. Our revolving credit
facility is secured by substantially all of our assets, as well as our ownership interests in
substantially all of our subsidiaries, except our ownership interests in Arch Western Resources,
LLC and its subsidiaries. Financial covenants contained in our revolving credit facility consist
of a maximum leverage ratio, a maximum senior secured leverage ratio and a minimum interest
coverage ratio. The leverage ratio requires that we not permit the ratio of total net debt (as
defined in the facility) at the end of any calendar quarter to EBITDA (as defined in the facility)
for the four quarters then ended to exceed a specified amount. The interest coverage ratio
requires that we not permit the ratio of EBITDA (as defined in the facility) at the end of any
calendar quarter to interest expense for the four quarters then ended to be less than a specified
amount. The senior secured leverage ratio requires that we not permit the ratio of total net
senior secured debt (as defined in the facility) at the end of any calendar quarter to EBITDA (as
defined in the facility) for the four quarters then ended to exceed a specified amount. We were in
compliance with all financial covenants at March 31, 2009.
We entered into an amendment of our revolving credit facility during the first quarter of 2009
that amended certain covenants to make them less restrictive, including those related to lien
creation, restricted payments and subsidiary guarantees of debt, in addition to an increase in the
maximum leverage ratio, as defined, that we must maintain. In connection with these changes, the
borrowing pricing grid was increased by 200 basis points and the rate on the unused portion of the
facility was increased to 50 basis points
We are party to a $175.0 million accounts receivable securitization program whereby eligible
trade receivables are sold, without recourse, to a multi-seller, asset-backed commercial paper
conduit. The credit facility supporting the borrowings under the program is subject to renewal
annually and was renewed in the first quarter of 2009 and now expires March 31, 2010. Under the
terms of the program, eligible trade receivables consist of trade receivables generated by our
operating subsidiaries. Actual borrowing capacity is based on the allowable amounts of accounts
receivable as defined under the terms of the agreement. Outstanding borrowings under the program
were approximately $68.6 million at both March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. We also had letters
of credit
18
outstanding under the securitization program of $59.5 million as of March 31, 2009. At March
31, 2009 we had availability of $45.0 million under the accounts receivable securitization program.
Although the participants in the program bear the risk of non-payment of purchased receivables, we
have agreed to indemnify the participants with respect to various matters. The participants under
the program will be entitled to receive payments reflecting a specified discount on amounts funded
under the program, including drawings under letters of credit, calculated on the basis of the base
rate or commercial paper rate, as applicable. We pay facility fees, program fees and letter of
credit fees (based on amounts of outstanding letters of credit) at rates that vary with our
leverage ratio. Under the program, we are subject to certain affirmative, negative and financial
covenants customary for financings of this type, including restrictions related to, among other
things, liens, payments, merger or consolidation and amendments to the agreements underlying the
receivables pool. A termination event would permit the administrator to terminate the program and
enforce any and all rights, subject to cure provisions, where applicable. Additionally, the
program contains cross-default provisions, which would allow the administrator to terminate the
program in the event of non-payment of other material indebtedness when due and any other event
which results in the acceleration of the maturity of material indebtedness.
On March 31, 2009, we entered into an amendment of the accounts receivable securitization
program revising certain terms to strengthen the credit quality of the pool of receivables and
increasing the interest rate pricing.
We had commercial paper outstanding of $32.9 million at March 31, 2009 and $65.7 million at
December 31, 2008. Our commercial paper placement program provides short-term financing at rates
that are generally lower than the rates available under our revolving credit facility. Under the
program, as amended, we may sell up to $100.0 million in interest-bearing or discounted short-term
unsecured debt obligations with maturities of no more than 270 days. The commercial paper
placement program is supported by a line of credit that is subject to renewal annually and expires
April 30, 2010. The current credit market has affected our ability to issue commercial paper up to
the maximum amount allowed under the program, but we believe that the availability under our credit
facilities is sufficient to satisfy our liquidity needs.
Our subsidiary, Arch Western Finance LLC, has outstanding an aggregate principal amount of
$950.0 million of 6.75% senior notes due on July 1, 2013. The senior notes are guaranteed by Arch
Western Resources, LLC and certain of its subsidiaries and are secured by an intercompany note from
Arch Western Resources, LLC to Arch Coal, Inc. The indenture under which the senior notes were
issued contains certain restrictive covenants that limit Arch Western Resources, LLCs ability to,
among other things, incur additional debt, sell or transfer assets and make certain investments.
We have filed a universal shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the SEC that allows us
to offer and sell from time to time an unlimited amount of unsecured debt securities consisting of
notes, debentures, and other debt securities, common stock, preferred stock, warrants, and/or
units. Related proceeds could be used for general corporate purposes, including repayment of other
debt, capital expenditures, possible acquisitions and any other purposes that may be stated in any
related prospectus supplement.
The following is a summary of cash provided by or used in each of the indicated types of
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
57,127 |
|
|
$ |
133,729 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(214,659 |
) |
|
|
(263,960 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
114,649 |
|
|
|
138,385 |
|
Cash provided by operating activities decreased $76.6 million in the first three months of
2009 compared to the first three months of 2008, primarily as a result of a decrease in our
profitability in the first quarter of 2009, an increase in days sales outstanding in receivables
and an increase in incentive compensation payments.
Cash used in investing activities for the first three months of 2009 was $49.3 million less
than the amount used for the first three months of 2008, primarily due to a $52.6 million reduction
in capital expenditures. During the first three months of 2009, in addition to the last payment of
$122.0 million on the Little Thunder federal coal lease, we spent approximately $11.0 million on
additional longwall equipment at the West Elk mining complex in Colorado and approximately $30.0
million on a new shovel and haul trucks at the Black Thunder mine in Wyoming. During the first
three months of 2008, in addition to a payment of $122.0 million on the Little Thunder lease, we
spent
19
approximately $25.0 million on the construction of the loadout facility at our Black Thunder
mine in Wyoming and approximately $55.0 million for the transition to the new reserve area at our
West Elk mining complex. We completed the work on the loadout facility and transitioned to the new
seam at West Elk in the fourth quarter of 2008.
We also advanced $5.8 million to affiliates in the first quarter of 2009, $5.0 million more
than in the first quarter of 2008, and in 2009, received reimbursement of $3.2 million on deposits
that we made to purchase equipment that we subsequently leased.
Cash provided by financing activities was $23.7 million less during the first three months of
2009 compared to first three months of 2008, primarily due to the drawing down of our cash balance
since December 31, 2008. We also paid costs of $4.4 million in conjunction with the amendments to
our credit facilities discussed previously.
We paid dividends totaling $12.9 million in the first quarter of 2009, $2.9 million more than
in the first quarter of 2008, due to an increase in the dividend rate from $0.07 per share to $0.09
per share in April 2008.
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
The following table sets forth our ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preference
dividends for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31 |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preference dividends |
|
|
2.09x |
|
|
|
4.79x |
|
Critical Accounting Policies
In the first quarter of 2009, we adopted Staff Position FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157, which we refer to as FSP FAS 157-2, which delays the effective date of Statement
No. 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for those items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. We will
accordingly apply Statement No. 157 to all prospective fair value measurements required under
generally accepted accounting principles
In the first quarter of 2009, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51, which we
refer to as Statement No. 160. Statement No. 160 requires that a noncontrolling interest (minority
interest) in a consolidated subsidiary be displayed in the consolidated balance sheet as a separate
component of equity. Our net income on the face of the consolidated statement of income for all
periods presented now includes income attributable to the noncontrolling interest in our
subsidiary, Arch Western Resources, LLC. Earnings per share will continue to be calculated based
on income attributable to the controlling interest only. Our equity on the face of the
consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented now also includes equity attributable to the
noncontrolling interest.
In the first quarter of 2009, we adopted Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-01 Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities which we refer
to as FSP EITF 03-6-01. FSP EITF 03-6-01 clarifies whether instruments granted in share-based
payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and therefore need to be
included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class method. FSP
EITF 03-6-01 had no effect on our basic earnings per share calculation for the first quarter of
2009 and resulted in a $0.01 decrease in basic earnings per share for the first quarter of 2008
from what was previously reported.
Other than the adoption of these standards, there have been no significant changes to our
critical accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We manage our commodity price risk for our non-trading, long-term coal contract portfolio
through the use of long-term coal supply agreements, and to a limited extent, through the use of
derivative instruments. At March 31, 2009, our expected remaining 2009 production (based on the
lowered production levels) is committed, of which 5 to 6 million tons are not yet priced. We have
expected uncommitted volumes of 25 million to 35 million tons in 2010, with an additional 10
million tons committed but not yet priced. In 2011, we have expected uncommitted volumes of 75
million to 85 million tons, with an additional 10 million tons committed but not yet priced.
20
We are exposed to commodity price risk in our coal trading activities, which represents the
potential future loss that could be caused by an adverse change in the market value of coal. Our
coal trading portfolio included forward, swap and put and call option contracts at March 31, 2009.
With respect to our coal trading portfolio at March 31, 2009, the potential for loss of future
earnings resulting from changing coal prices was insignificant. The timing of the estimated future
realization of the value of our trading portfolio is 81% in 2009, 18% in 2010 and 1% in 2011.
We are also exposed to the risk of fluctuations in cash flows related to our purchase of
diesel fuel. We use approximately 50 million gallons of diesel fuel annually in our operations.
We enter into forward physical purchase contracts, as well as heating oil swaps and options, to
reduce volatility in the price of diesel fuel for our operations. At March 31, 2009, the Company
had protected the price of approximately 66% of its remaining expected purchases for fiscal year
2009 and 28% of its expected purchases for fiscal year 2010. The swap agreements essentially fix
the price paid for diesel fuel by requiring us to pay a fixed heating oil price and receive a
floating heating oil price. The call options protect against increases in diesel fuel prices.
Since the changes in the floating heating oil price highly correlate to changes in diesel fuel
prices, the derivatives qualify for hedge accounting and the changes in the fair value of the
derivatives are recorded through other comprehensive income, with any ineffectiveness recognized
immediately in income. At March 31, 2009, a $0.25 per gallon decrease in the price of heating oil
would result in an approximate $9.0 million increase in the expense related to the heating oil
derivatives, which would be offset by a decrease in the cost of our physical diesel purchases.
We are exposed to market risk associated with interest rates due to our existing level of
indebtedness. At March 31, 2009, $961.6 million of the face amount of our outstanding debt had
fixed interest rates, primarily our 6.75% senior notes, and $476.5 million of outstanding
borrowings have interest rates that fluctuate based on changes in the respective market rates. A
one percentage point increase in the interest rates related to these borrowings would result in an
annualized increase in interest expense of $4.8 million, based on borrowing levels at March 31,
2009.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
We performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2009. Based on that
evaluation, our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date. There were
no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are involved in various claims and legal actions in the ordinary course of business. In
the opinion of management, the outcome of such ordinary course of business proceedings and
litigation currently pending will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations
or financial results.
As described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, surface
mines at our Coal-Mac mining complex have been identified in an existing lawsuit brought by the
Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, which we refer to as OVEC, in the U.S. District Court for the
Southern District of West Virginia as having been granted Clean Water Act §404 permits by the Army
Corps of Engineers allegedly in violation of the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental
Policy Act. OVEC petitioned for rehearing on March 30, 2009, and the court required responses by
the remaining parties by April 28, 2009. Those responses have been filed, and the parties are
awaiting a decision by the court on the petition for rehearing.
You should see Part I, Item 3 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2008 for more information about some of the proceedings and litigation in which we are
involved.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Our business inherently involves certain risks and uncertainties. The risks and uncertainties
described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 are not
the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we
currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. Should one or more of any of
these risks materialize, our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity
could be materially adversely affected.
21
The acquisition of the Jacobs Ranch mine is subject to certain conditions, including the receipt of
approvals from certain governmental and regulatory authorities.
We cannot provide any assurance that the acquisition of the Jacobs Ranch mine will be consummated.
The completion of the acquisition is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including the
expiration or termination of applicable waiting periods under certain competition laws and the receipt of
consents and agreements from third parties. These third parties may impose conditions on the
consummation, or require changes to the terms, of the acquisition. Any such conditions or changes could
have the effect of delaying or preventing the consummation of the acquisition or imposing additional costs
on us or limiting our revenues following the acquisition. In addition, under certain circumstances, we may
incur termination fees if the acquisition agreement is terminated prior to consummation of the transaction.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
In September 2006, our board of directors authorized a share repurchase program for the
purchase of up to 14,000,000 shares of our common stock. There is no expiration date on the current
authorization, and we have not made any decisions to suspend or cancel purchases under the program.
As of March 31, 2009, there were 10,925,800 shares of our common stock available for purchase under
this program. We did not purchase any shares of our common stock under this program during the
quarter ended March 31, 2009. Based on the closing price of our common stock as reported on the New
York Stock Exchange on May 5, 2009, the approximate dollar value of our common stock that may yet
be purchased under this program was $188.6 million.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Our annual meeting of stockholders was held on April 23, 2009 in the lower level auditorium at
our headquarters at One CityPlace Drive, St. Louis, Missouri to elect Frank M. Burke, Patricia F.
Godley, Thomas A. Lockhart and Wesley M. Taylor as directors for a three-year term ending at the
annual meeting of our stockholders in 2012 and to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as
our independent public accounting firm.
The results of the votes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
Frank M. Burke |
|
|
89,718,970 |
|
|
|
40,650,826 |
|
Patricia F. Godley |
|
|
128,837,208 |
|
|
|
1,532,588 |
|
Thomas A. Lockhart |
|
|
89,817,206 |
|
|
|
40,552,589 |
|
Wesley M. Taylor |
|
|
89,954,989 |
|
|
|
40,414,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
Ratification of
appointment of
independent public
accountants |
|
|
129,459,237 |
|
|
|
624,626 |
|
|
|
285,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
22
Item 6. Exhibits.
The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2009, by and between Arch
Coal, Inc. and Magnum Coal Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.6 of the
registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008). |
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2009, by and between
Rio Tinto Sage LLC and Arch Coal, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of
the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2009).* |
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
First Amendment to Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 16,
2009, by and between Rio Tito Sage LLC and Arch Coal, Inc. |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Arch Coal, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 of the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 5,
2006). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Arch Coal, Inc. Bylaws, as amended effective as of December 5, 2008 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
December 10, 2008). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Performance Unit Contract (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the
registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 23, 2009). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of March 6, 2009, by and among Arch
Coal, Inc., the banks party thereto, Citicorp USA, Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
and Wachovia Bank, National Association, each in its capacity as syndication agent,
Bank of America, N.A. (as successor-by-merger to Fleet National Bank), as
documentation agent, and PNC Bank, National Association, as administrative agent
for the banks (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the registrants
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2009). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2009,
among Arch Receivable Company, LLC, Arch Coal Sales Company, Inc., Market Street
Funding LLC, the various financial institutions party thereto and PNC Bank,
National Association, as administrator and as LC Bank. |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preference dividends. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Steven F. Leer. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of John T. Drexler. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Steven F. Leer. |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of John T. Drexler. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Certain appendices, exhibits and/or similar attachments to this agreement have been omitted
pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The registrant will furnish supplementally a
copy of any omitted appendix, exhibit or similar attachment to the SEC upon request. |
23
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arch Coal, Inc.
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ John T. Drexler
|
|
|
|
John T. Drexler |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |
|
|
|
May 8, 2009 |
24