INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-32671
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
58-2555670 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 500, Atlanta, Georgia 30328
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(770) 857-4700
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 23, 2007, the number of shares of the registrants Common Stock outstanding was
69,288,488 shares.
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
Form 10-Q
Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2007
Table of Contents
1
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
120,852 |
|
|
$ |
204,257 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
17,169 |
|
|
|
16,193 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
110,377 |
|
|
|
77,354 |
|
Customer accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $845 and $985 at June 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
58,017 |
|
|
|
31,673 |
|
Related-parties |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
23,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,698 |
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds |
|
|
699,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
13,215 |
|
|
|
7,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,042,880 |
|
|
|
340,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
57,199 |
|
|
|
26,280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,079,420 |
|
|
|
79,575 |
|
Other intangible assets, net |
|
|
320,394 |
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
Cost method investments |
|
|
38,745 |
|
|
|
38,738 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
9,607 |
|
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other noncurrent assets |
|
|
1,448,166 |
|
|
|
126,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,548,245 |
|
|
$ |
493,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
39,576 |
|
|
$ |
13,228 |
|
Accrued salaries and benefits |
|
|
11,631 |
|
|
|
18,135 |
|
Current portion of licensing agreement |
|
|
59,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
17,984 |
|
|
|
2,991 |
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds |
|
|
699,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
6,216 |
|
|
|
3,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
871,962 |
|
|
|
37,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax liability, net |
|
|
47,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
203,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent portion of licensing agreement |
|
|
90,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned government grant |
|
|
11,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
18,136 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
370,321 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,242,283 |
|
|
|
38,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 25,000
shares authorized; no shares issued or
outstanding at June 30, 2007 and December
31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 194,275
shares authorized; 70,501 and 59,596
shares issued at June 30, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, respectively; 69,223
and 58,125 shares outstanding at June 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively |
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,278 and 1,471
shares at June 30, 2007 and December 31,
2006, respectively |
|
|
(25,427 |
) |
|
|
(9,748 |
) |
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,002,840 |
|
|
|
245,030 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
300,375 |
|
|
|
191,179 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
27,469 |
|
|
|
27,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
1,305,962 |
|
|
|
454,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
2,548,245 |
|
|
$ |
493,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
2
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net (including
$12,055 with related-parties for the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and
$6,867 for the three months ended June
30, 2006) |
|
$ |
226,713 |
|
|
$ |
106,892 |
|
|
$ |
117,372 |
|
|
$ |
63,657 |
|
Market data fees (including $329 with
related-parties for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and $269 for the
three months ended June 30, 2006) |
|
|
29,865 |
|
|
|
14,841 |
|
|
|
15,846 |
|
|
|
8,819 |
|
Other (including $826 and $1,030 with
related-parties for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and $416 and $561 for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively) |
|
|
6,684 |
|
|
|
2,140 |
|
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
263,262 |
|
|
|
123,873 |
|
|
|
136,654 |
|
|
|
73,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
43,475 |
|
|
|
22,549 |
|
|
|
21,717 |
|
|
|
11,932 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
11,577 |
|
|
|
5,925 |
|
|
|
6,714 |
|
|
|
3,235 |
|
Patent royalty |
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
3,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,198 |
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs |
|
|
10,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
25,132 |
|
|
|
10,621 |
|
|
|
13,002 |
|
|
|
5,501 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,257 |
|
|
|
6,497 |
|
|
|
7,748 |
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
107,090 |
|
|
|
48,804 |
|
|
|
60,125 |
|
|
|
26,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
156,172 |
|
|
|
75,069 |
|
|
|
76,529 |
|
|
|
47,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
5,692 |
|
|
|
2,428 |
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(8,124 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(4,329 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
9,331 |
|
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income (expense), net |
|
|
6,899 |
|
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
163,071 |
|
|
|
77,030 |
|
|
|
75,207 |
|
|
|
48,269 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
53,792 |
|
|
|
26,399 |
|
|
|
21,514 |
|
|
|
17,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
109,279 |
|
|
$ |
50,631 |
|
|
$ |
53,693 |
|
|
$ |
30,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
68,372 |
|
|
|
55,703 |
|
|
|
69,205 |
|
|
|
55,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
70,496 |
|
|
|
59,092 |
|
|
|
71,228 |
|
|
|
59,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Class A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Stock, |
|
|
Common Stock, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
Available- |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Series 1 |
|
|
Series 2 |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
For-Sale |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Hedges |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, January 1,
2006 |
|
|
18,400 |
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
|
35,782 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,541 |
) |
|
$ |
177,602 |
|
|
$ |
(6,899 |
) |
|
$ |
47,911 |
|
|
$ |
21,338 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
(2,450 |
) |
|
$ |
232,623 |
|
Other comprehensive
income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,525 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,432 |
|
Exercise of common
stock options |
|
|
2,407 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
21,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,818 |
|
Reversal of
deferred stock
compensation in
connection with
adoption of SFAS
No. 123(R) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,899 |
) |
|
|
6,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion of Class
A common stock,
Series 1 and Series
2 into common stock |
|
|
38,748 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
(2,863 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(35,885 |
) |
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury shares
received for stock
option tax payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(4,765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,765 |
) |
Stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,489 |
|
Issuance of
restricted stock |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
(746 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from
stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,313 |
|
Issuance of common
stock |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December
31, 2006 |
|
|
59,596 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,471 |
) |
|
|
(9,748 |
) |
|
|
245,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,179 |
|
|
|
29,863 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2,450 |
) |
|
|
454,468 |
|
Other comprehensive
income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
Exercise of common
stock options |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
5,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,088 |
|
Treasury shares
received for
restricted stock
and stock option
tax payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(18,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,715 |
) |
Treasury shares
received during
acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
Issuance of
restricted stock |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
3,599 |
|
|
|
(3,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefits from
stock option plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,236 |
|
Issuance of shares
for acquisitions |
|
|
10,303 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
707,663 |
|
Cumulative effect
of adoption of FIN
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
Stock-based
compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,165 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30,
2007 |
|
|
70,501 |
|
|
$ |
705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
(1,278 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,427 |
) |
|
$ |
1,002,840 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
300,375 |
|
|
$ |
29,857 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
(2,450 |
) |
|
$ |
1,305,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
109,279 |
|
|
$ |
50,631 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
9,356 |
|
Change in available-for-sale securities |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
109,337 |
|
|
$ |
59,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
109,279 |
|
|
$ |
50,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,257 |
|
|
|
6,497 |
|
Gain on disposal of assets |
|
|
(9,267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
269 |
|
Net realized gains on sales of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(1,042 |
) |
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
7,712 |
|
|
|
4,791 |
|
Deferred taxes |
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
1,202 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(40,094 |
) |
|
|
(13,222 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade, net |
|
|
(16,083 |
) |
|
|
(12,353 |
) |
Related-parties |
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
(2,030 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
(4,831 |
) |
Noncurrent assets |
|
|
(3,426 |
) |
|
|
801 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
32,395 |
|
|
|
10,150 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued salaries and benefits, and other liabilities |
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
(14,475 |
) |
|
|
(7,761 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
94,804 |
|
|
|
42,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(19,626 |
) |
|
|
(4,347 |
) |
Capitalized software development costs |
|
|
(5,337 |
) |
|
|
(3,229 |
) |
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(392,120 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets |
|
|
(8,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
13,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
144,851 |
|
|
|
106,283 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(174,650 |
) |
|
|
(125,459 |
) |
Increase in restricted cash |
|
|
(976 |
) |
|
|
(628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(443,043 |
) |
|
|
(27,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from Credit Agreement |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment on Credit Agreement |
|
|
(9,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance costs for Credit Agreement |
|
|
(2,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
40,094 |
|
|
|
13,222 |
|
Payments relating to treasury shares received for restricted stock and stock
option tax payments |
|
|
(19,279 |
) |
|
|
(2,560 |
) |
Payments relating to initial public offering of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options |
|
|
5,454 |
|
|
|
7,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
264,842 |
|
|
|
17,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(83,405 |
) |
|
|
34,092 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
204,257 |
|
|
|
20,002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
120,852 |
|
|
$ |
54,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds |
|
$ |
28,362 |
|
|
$ |
15,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
7,254 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental noncash investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for acquisitions |
|
$ |
707,663 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
6
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Nature of Business and Organization
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (the Company) owns and operates an Internet-based, global
electronic marketplace for facilitating trading in futures and over-the-counter (OTC) commodities
and derivative financial products (the Platform). The Company owns 100% of ICE Futures Holdings
Ltd, which is the sole shareholder of ICE Futures. ICE Futures operates as a United Kingdom (UK)
Recognized Investment Exchange for the purpose of trading energy commodity futures and options
contracts. The Company also owns 100% of the Board of Trade of the City of New York, Inc.
(NYBOT), which was acquired on January 12, 2007. NYBOT operates as a United States (US)
Designated Contract Market for the purpose of trading soft commodity and financial futures and
options contracts. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, the Company also has offices in London, New
York, Chicago, Houston, Calgary, Dublin and Singapore.
2. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding interim
financial reporting. Accordingly, the unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include
all of the information and footnotes required by US generally accepted accounting principles for
complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in
the opinion of the Companys management, necessary for a fair presentation of results for the
interim periods presented. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts that are reported in the consolidated financial statements and
accompanying disclosures. Although these estimates are based on managements best knowledge of
current events and actions that the Company may undertake in the future, actual results may be
different from the estimates. The results of operations for the six months and three months ended
June 30, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period or
the full fiscal year.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with
US generally accepted accounting principles. The unaudited consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances
and transactions between the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries have been eliminated in
consolidation. As discussed in Note 3, the Company completed the acquisition of NYBOT on January
12, 2007, and has included the financial results of NYBOT in its consolidated financial statements
beginning January 13, 2007.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current periods
financial statement presentation. Selling, general and administrative expenses of $3.2 million and
$2.2 million were reclassified to patent royalty expenses for the six months and three months ended
June 30, 2006, respectively.
3. Acquisitions
The Company completed its acquisition of NYBOT, formerly a member-owned not-for-profit
corporation, on January 12, 2007 (the Acquisition Date). In accordance with the Agreement and
Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) dated as of September 14, 2006, as amended by the First
Amendment dated October 30, 2006, among the Company, NYBOT and CFC Acquisition Co., a Delaware
corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, NYBOT merged with and into CFC
Acquisition Co., with CFC Acquisition Co. surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company under the name of NYBOT.
In the acquisition, each outstanding NYBOT membership interest was converted into, at the
election of each NYBOT member, either (i) cash equal to $1,074,719, (ii) 17,025 shares of the
Companys common stock or (iii) a combination of cash consideration and stock consideration, in
each case subject to proration in accordance with the
7
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Merger Agreement (the merger consideration). In addition, each outstanding NYBOT membership
interest was converted into the right to receive a pro rata share of any bonus pool amounts not
paid to NYBOT officers and governors and a pro rata share of NYBOTs excess working capital as of
the Acquisition Date. The Company determined that NYBOTs excess working capital as of the
Acquisition Date was $2.1 million and this amount was paid in cash to the NYBOT members that
received the merger consideration. The maximum amount of cash payable by the Company as merger
consideration, excluding the excess working capital, and including any cash payable in respect of
the bonus pool was $400 million. The Company paid the remainder of the merger consideration,
excluding the excess working capital and the cash portion of the bonus pool, in shares of the
Companys common stock.
The acquisition provided the Company with the potential for clearing, revenue and expense
synergies, as well as the opportunity to expand the Companys electronic trading platform into soft
commodities and financial products offered by NYBOT. The acquisition has been accounted for as a
purchase business combination. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their
estimated fair values as of January 12, 2007 based on a preliminary valuation. The total purchase
price was $1.1 billion, and was comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to NYBOT members |
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
Fair value of the Companys common stock issued |
|
|
706,663 |
|
Excess working capital |
|
|
2,109 |
|
Transaction costs |
|
|
14,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
1,123,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the acquisition, the Company issued 10.3 million shares of its common stock
to NYBOT members. The fair value of the Companys common stock was determined for accounting
purposes at $68.63 per share, which represented the average closing price of the Companys common
stock for the five business day period commencing two business days prior to the public
announcement of the acquisition on September 14, 2006. Acquisition-related transaction costs
include investment banking, legal and accounting fees, valuation, printing and other external costs
directly related to the acquisition.
The Merger Agreement specifies several events that may trigger the transition to fully
electronic trading and the termination of open-outcry trading of certain core products at NYBOT.
One such event is the failure of the average daily open-outcry volume in certain futures products
to equal at least 50% on a rolling 90-day basis as compared to the same period in 2005. In
addition, if all such core products in the aggregate fail to maintain at least 50% of average daily
open-outcry volume compared to the 2005 calendar year, NYBOT may elect to terminate open-outcry
trading in these core products. Core products at NYBOT mean Coffee C, Cocoa, Cotton No. 2, Sugar
No. 11, Frozen Concentrated Orange Juice, NFC Orange Juice and Sugar No. 14. As of June 30, 2007,
Coffee C, Cocoa and Sugar No. 11 have fallen below the 50% average daily volume threshold based
on a rolling 90-day average. As of June 30, 2007, core products in the aggregate have also fallen
below the threshold.
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation for NYBOT Acquisition
Under purchase accounting, the total purchase price was allocated to NYBOTs net tangible and
identifiable intangible assets based on their estimated fair values as of January 12, 2007, as set
forth below. The excess of the purchase price over the net tangible and identifiable intangible
assets was recorded as goodwill. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price was based upon a
preliminary third-party valuation. The primary areas of the purchase price allocation that are not
yet finalized relate to identifiable intangible assets, potential additional identifiable
intangible assets primarily relating to core trading products, restructuring costs, certain
liabilities and certain legal matters. The Company is continuing to review and validate estimates,
assumptions and valuation methodologies underlying the preliminary valuation. Accordingly, these
estimates and assumptions are subject to change, which could have a material impact on the
Companys financial statements. The preliminary purchase price allocation is as follows (in
thousands):
8
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
36,850 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
3,095 |
|
Customer accounts receivable |
|
|
10,123 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
807 |
|
Margin deposits and guaranty funds |
|
|
784,385 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
4,063 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
16,149 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
997,738 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
163,600 |
|
Other noncurrent assets |
|
|
21,678 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(31,156 |
) |
Accrued salaries and benefits |
|
|
(4,844 |
) |
Accrued restructuring costs |
|
|
(11,040 |
) |
Margin deposits and guaranty funds |
|
|
(784,385 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(59,714 |
) |
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(11,741 |
) |
Unearned government grant |
|
|
(12,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total preliminary purchase price allocation |
|
$ |
1,123,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
The
accounts payable and accrued liabilities amount above includes $16.3
million related to investment banking services performed for NYBOT in
connection with the acquisition, which was paid subsequent to the
Acquisition Date. This amount has been included as a component of cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired, in the accompanying consolidated statement of
cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The entire goodwill amount above will be included in the global OTC business segment. It has
not yet been determined which reporting unit the NYBOT goodwill will be included in for purposes of
future impairment testing.
Identifiable Intangible Assets for NYBOT Acquisition
In performing the preliminary purchase price allocation, the Company considered, among other
factors, the intention for future use of acquired assets, analyses of historical financial
performance and estimates of future performance of NYBOTs business. The preliminary estimate of
the fair value of intangible assets is based, in part, on a preliminary valuation using an income
approach, market approach or a cost approach, as appropriate. The rates utilized to discount net
cash flows to their present values were based on the Companys weighted average cost of capital and
ranged from 13.0% to 14.8%. These discount rates were determined after consideration of the
Companys rate of return on debt and equity and the weighted average return on invested capital.
The following table sets forth the components of intangible assets associated with the acquisition
as of June 30, 2007 (in thousands, except years):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
|
|
|
Intangible Asset |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Useful Life |
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
58,600 |
|
|
$ |
1,095 |
|
|
$ |
57,505 |
|
|
20 years |
Technology |
|
|
7,900 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
6,670 |
|
|
3 years |
Trade names |
|
|
16,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,800 |
|
|
Indefinite |
Non-compete agreements |
|
|
12,000 |
|
|
|
1,642 |
|
|
|
10,358 |
|
|
2-5 years |
DCM/DCO designation |
|
|
68,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,300 |
|
|
Indefinite |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
163,600 |
|
|
$ |
3,967 |
|
|
$ |
159,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated fair values of the above identifiable assets are preliminary and subject to
change, which could have a material impact on the Companys financial statements.
Customer relationships represent the underlying relationships with NYBOTs existing customers.
Technology represents both internally and externally developed software related to clearing
operations, back office, eCOPS, floor operations and general operations. Trade names represent the
estimated fair value of the NYBOT, eCOPS, FINEX, TIPS, U.S. Dollar Index, New York Board of Trade,
USDX, Coffee C, Cotton No. 2, Sugar No. 11, and other trade names and trademarks. Non-compete
agreements represent the estimated fair value of agreements with NYBOTs former management team.
DCM/DCO designation represents Designated Contract Market (DCM) and Derivatives Clearing
Organization (DCO) designations available from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) when certain standards are met. The customer
9
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
relationships intangible asset is being amortized using an accelerated method and the other
finite-lived intangible assets are being amortized using the straight-line method.
The Company is analyzing whether and how much of the purchase price should be allocated to an
additional identifiable intangible asset relating to the core trading product rights and
privileges. The results of this analysis could also materially impact amounts allocated to the
other preliminary identifiable intangible assets, such as trade names and customer relationships.
Accrued Restructuring Costs for NYBOT Acquisition
As a part of the acquisition of NYBOT, the Company formed a plan to restructure the NYBOT
duplicative employee functions to align them with the Companys existing business functions.
Consequently, the Company included an accrual for severance benefit costs of $11.0 million in the
purchase price allocation to account for the planned reduction in workforce related to the
duplicative functions. This amount and the related payments are documented in the following table
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance, January 12, 2007 |
|
$ |
11,040 |
|
Cost applied against the reserve |
|
|
9,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve balance, June 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Acquisition Contingencies for NYBOT Acquisition
The Company has identified certain pre-acquisition contingencies, discussed in Note 10, but
has yet to conclude whether the fair values for such contingencies are determinable. If, during the
purchase price allocation period, the Company is able to determine the fair value of a
pre-acquisition contingency, the Company will include that amount in the purchase price allocation.
If, as of the end of the purchase price allocation period, the Company is unable to determine the
fair value of a pre-acquisition contingency, the Company will evaluate whether to include an amount
in the purchase price allocation based on whether it is probable that a liability had been incurred
and whether an amount can be reasonably estimated. After the end of the purchase price allocation
period, any adjustment that results from a pre-acquisition contingency will be included in the
Companys operating results in the period in which the adjustment is determined. The purchase price
allocation period ends when the Company has all of the information that it has arranged to obtain
and that is known to be obtainable, but usually does not exceed one year from the date of
acquisition.
Pro Forma Financial Information for NYBOT Acquisition
The financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of
the Company and NYBOT, on a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been combined as of the
beginning of the periods presented. The pro forma financial information is presented for
informational purposes only and is not indicative of the results of operations that would have been
achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of the periods presented. Such pro
forma financial information is based on the historical financial statements of the Company and
NYBOT.
This pro forma financial information is based on estimates and assumptions that have been made
solely for purposes of developing such pro forma information, including, without limitation,
purchase accounting adjustments. The pro forma financial information presented below also includes
depreciation and amortization based on the preliminary valuation of NYBOTs tangible assets and
identifiable intangible assets resulting from the transaction and interest expense related to the
debt issued to complete the acquisition. The pro forma financial information does not reflect any
synergies or operating cost reductions that may be achieved from the combined operations. The pro
forma financial information combines the historical results for the Company and NYBOT for the six
months and three months ended June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
173,988 |
|
|
$ |
98,522 |
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
52,132 |
|
|
$ |
32,272 |
|
Earnings per common share Basic |
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
Earnings per common share Diluted |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
10
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
4. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company currently sponsors employee stock option and restricted stock plans. All stock
options are granted at an exercise price equal to the fair value of the common stock at the date of
grant. The grant date fair value is based on the closing stock price at the date of grant. The fair
value of the stock options and restricted stock on the date of the grant is recognized as expense
ratably over the vesting period, net of estimated forfeitures. The non-cash compensation expenses
recognized in our consolidated statements of income for our stock options and restricted stock were
$7.7 million and $4.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and
$3.9 million and $2.6 million for three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
The following is a summary of stock options activity for the six months ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price per |
|
|
Number of Options |
|
Option |
Outstanding at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
2,304,908 |
|
|
$ |
17.05 |
|
Granted |
|
|
14,697 |
|
|
|
138.91 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(581,482 |
) |
|
|
9.32 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(5,750 |
) |
|
|
10.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
1,732,373 |
|
|
|
20.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details of stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Aggregate Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual Life |
|
Value |
|
|
Number of Options |
|
Price |
|
(years) |
|
(In thousands) |
Vested or expected to vest |
|
|
1,686,562 |
|
|
$ |
18.89 |
|
|
|
7.20 |
|
|
$ |
204,429 |
|
Exercisable |
|
|
1,114,610 |
|
|
$ |
9.61 |
|
|
|
6.77 |
|
|
$ |
145,391 |
|
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006 was $74.7 million and $45.1 million, respectively, and the total intrinsic value of stock
options exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was $24.6 million and $39.0
million, respectively. As of June 30, 2007, there were $10.5 million in total unrecognized
compensation costs related to stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 2.3 years as the stock options vest.
In 2006, the Company granted 269,190 performance-based restricted shares for certain Company
employees. These shares vest over a three-year period based on the Companys financial performance
targets set by the Companys compensation committee for the year ending December 31, 2007. The
potential compensation expenses to be recognized under these performance-based restricted shares
would be $4.8 million if the Threshold Performance Target is met and 53,824 shares vest, $9.6
million if the Target Performance Target is met and 107,683 shares vest, $16.7 million if the Above
Target Performance Target is met and 188,420 shares vest, and $23.9 million if the Maximum
Performance Target is met and 269,190 shares vest. Under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123(R), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Company recognizes
compensation costs, net of forfeitures, over the vesting period for awards with performance
conditions only if it is probable that the condition will be satisfied. If the Company initially
determines that it is not probable that the performance condition will be satisfied and later
determines that it is probable that the performance condition will be satisfied, or vice versa, the
effect of the change in estimate will be accounted for in the period of change by recording a
cumulative catch-up adjustment to retroactively apply the new estimate. The Company would recognize
the remaining compensation costs over the remaining vesting period. The Compensation Committee,
pursuant to the authority delegated to it by the Companys Board of Directors, can exercise
discretion in determining whether a performance criteria has been satisfied. As of June 30, 2007,
the Company has determined that it is probable that the Target Performance Target will be met and
the Company recorded $1.6 million and $787,000 in non-cash compensation expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of income for the six months and three months ended June 30,
2007, respectively. The remaining $8.0 million in non-cash compensation expenses under the Target
11
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Performance Target will be expensed ratably over the remaining vesting period. If the
financial performance targets are not reached, or if the employees terminate their employment prior
to the end of the three-year vesting period, the corresponding performance-based restricted shares
will not be issued and the expense previously recognized will be reversed.
In September 2004, the Company granted 625,212 performance-based restricted shares for the
Companys senior officers. These shares vest based on Company financial performance relative to
three-year cumulative performance targets set by the Companys compensation committee for the
period from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2007. The potential compensation expenses to be
recognized under the performance-based restricted shares would be $1.4 million if the Minimum
Performance Target is met and 208,404 restricted shares vest, $2.8 million if the Target
Performance Target is met and 416,807 restricted shares vest or $4.2 million if the Maximum
Performance Target is met and 625,212 restricted shares vest. During the three months ended March
31, 2006, the Company determined that it was probable that the Target Performance Target will be
met and the Company recorded a cumulative catch-up adjustment to non-cash compensation expenses of
$1.2 million. During the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company determined that it was
probable that the Maximum Performance Target will be met and the Company recorded a cumulative
catch-up adjustment to non-cash compensation expenses of $943,000. The remaining $2.1 million in
non-cash compensation expenses under the Maximum Performance Target are being expensed ratably over
the remaining requisite service period from June 30, 2006 through December 31, 2007, including
$707,000 and $354,000 that was expensed during the six months and three months ended June 30, 2007,
respectively. If the financial performance targets are not reached, or if the employees terminate
their employment prior to the end of the three-year performance period, the corresponding
performance-based restricted shares will not vest and the expense previously recognized will be
reversed.
The following is a summary of the nonvested restricted shares activity for the six months
ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Number of |
|
Grant-Date Fair |
|
|
Restricted Stock Shares |
|
Value per Share |
Nonvested at January 1, 2007 |
|
|
1,356,706 |
|
|
$ |
17.34 |
|
Granted |
|
|
28,094 |
|
|
|
142.31 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(139,128 |
) |
|
|
23.70 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(3,043 |
) |
|
|
78.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
1,242,629 |
|
|
|
35.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock shares granted in the table above include both time-based and
performance-based grants. Performance-based restricted shares granted are presented in the table
above at the maximum number of restricted shares that would vest if the maximum performance targets
are met. Compensation expense for performance-based restricted shares is recognized when it is
probable that the performance targets will be met. As of June 30, 2007, there were $20.1 million in
total unrecognized compensation costs related to the time-based restricted stock and the
performance-based restricted stock. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of 2.2 years as the restricted stock vests. These unrecognized compensation costs
assume that the Target Performance Target will be met on the performance-based restricted shares
primarily granted in December 2006 and that the Maximum Performance Target will be met on the
performance-based restricted shares granted in September 2004.
5. Short-Term Investments
Short-term investments consist of available-for-sale securities. Available-for-sale securities
are carried at fair value with unrealized gains or losses, net of deferred income taxes, reported
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The cost of securities sold is based on
the specific identification method. As of June 30, 2007, available-for-sale securities consisted of
the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Equity securities |
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
US Treasury securities |
|
|
3,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,082 |
|
Commercial Paper |
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,117 |
|
Corporate bonds |
|
|
24,427 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
24,441 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
77,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
110,315 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
110,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The contractual maturities of the short-term investments as of June 30, 2007, were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair |
|
|
|
Value |
|
Maturities: |
|
|
|
|
Due within 1 year |
|
$ |
21,694 |
|
Due within 1 year to 5 years |
|
|
11,024 |
|
Due within 5 years to 10 years |
|
|
3,685 |
|
Due after 10 years |
|
|
73,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
110,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments that the Company intends to hold for more than one year would be classified as
long-term investments. As of June 30, 2007, the Company does not intend to hold any investments for
more than one year, and has therefore classified the entire $110.4 million as short-term
investments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
6. Credit Agreement
The Company financed the cash portion of the NYBOT acquisition with cash on hand and
borrowings under a senior unsecured credit facility (the Credit Agreement) dated January 12, 2007
that the Company entered into with Wachovia, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as
Syndication Agent, and the lenders named therein. In connection with the Credit Agreement, the
Company terminated its previous $50.0 million credit facility with Wachovia, under which no
borrowings were outstanding. The Credit Agreement provides for a term loan facility in the
aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million and a revolving credit facility in the aggregate
principal amount of $250.0 million (collectively, the Credit Facilities). In connection with the
acquisition, the Company used the proceeds of the $250.0 million term loan along with $164.6
million of cash on hand to finance the $414.6 million cash component of the acquisition and the
acquisition related expenses. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Company may borrow an
aggregate principal amount of up to $250.0 million under the revolving credit facility at any time
from the closing date of the Credit Agreement through the third anniversary of the closing date of
the merger, which is January 12, 2010. The Company has agreed to reserve $50.0 million of the
$250.0 million available under the revolving credit facility for use by ICE Clear US, NYBOTs
clearing organization. The remaining amount under the revolving credit facility can be used by the
Company for general corporate purposes.
Loans under the Credit Facilities shall, at the option of the Company, bear interest on the
principal amount outstanding at either (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin rate or (ii) a base
rate plus an applicable margin rate. The base rate will be equal to the higher of (i) Wachovias
prime rate or (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%. The applicable margin rate ranges from 0.50%
to 1.125% on the LIBOR loans and from 0.00% to 0.125% for the base rate loans based on the
Companys total leverage ratio calculated on a trailing twelve month period. Interest on each loan
is payable quarterly. As of June 30, 2007, the Company has a $240.6 million LIBOR loan outstanding
with a stated interest rate of 5.98%, including the applicable margin rate at June 30, 2007 on the
LIBOR loan which was 0.625%. For the borrowings under the term loan facility, the Company began
making payments on June 30, 2007, and will make payments quarterly thereafter until the fifth
anniversary of the closing date of the Merger. The Credit Agreement includes an unutilized
revolving credit commitment fee that is equal to the unused maximum revolver amount multiplied by
an applicable margin rate and is payable in arrears on a quarterly basis. The applicable margin
rate ranges from 0.10% to 0.20% based on the Companys total leverage ratio calculated on a
trailing twelve month period. Based on this calculation, the applicable margin rate was 0.125% at
June 30, 2007.
The Credit Agreement requires the Company to use 100% of the net cash proceeds raised from
debt issuances or assets dispositions, with certain limited exceptions, to prepay outstanding loans
under the Credit Facilities. With limited exceptions, the Company may prepay the outstanding loans
under the Credit Facilities, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty upon written notice to
the Administrative Agent. The Credit Agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants,
including, but not limited to, leverage and interest coverage ratios, as well as limitations or
required approvals for acquisitions, dispositions of assets and certain investments, the incurrence
of
13
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
additional debt or the creation of liens and other fundamental changes to the Companys
business. The Company has been and is currently in compliance with the relevant covenants under
the Credit Agreement.
7. Income Taxes
For the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, income before income taxes from domestic
operations was $79.7 million and $50.3 million, respectively, and income before income taxes from
foreign operations was $83.3 million and $26.7 million, respectively. For the three months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, income before income taxes from domestic operations was $38.8 million and
$31.2 million, respectively, and income before income taxes from foreign operations was $36.4
million and $17.0 million, respectively. Details of the income tax provision in the accompanying
unaudited consolidated statements of income for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2007
and 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
$ |
31,445 |
|
|
$ |
14,521 |
|
|
$ |
13,370 |
|
|
$ |
9,910 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
21,620 |
|
|
|
11,370 |
|
|
|
10,437 |
|
|
|
6,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,065 |
|
|
|
25,891 |
|
|
|
23,807 |
|
|
|
16,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax expense (benefit): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic |
|
|
(884 |
) |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
(1,007 |
) |
|
|
624 |
|
Foreign |
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(1,286 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
(2,293 |
) |
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax expense |
|
$ |
53,792 |
|
|
$ |
26,399 |
|
|
$ |
21,514 |
|
|
$ |
17,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities
in the consolidated financial statements and their respective tax bases which give rise to deferred
tax assets (liabilities) as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock compensation |
|
$ |
3,793 |
|
|
$ |
3,189 |
|
Patent amortization |
|
|
4,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation related accruals |
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
Contract terminations |
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
6,483 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(795 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
19,999 |
|
|
|
4,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
(58,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
(4,583 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
Tax on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,369 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(971 |
) |
|
|
(1,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(64,362 |
) |
|
|
(4,786 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(44,363 |
) |
|
|
(781 |
) |
Net current deferred tax assets (liabilities) |
|
|
3,319 |
|
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net noncurrent deferred tax assets (liabilities) |
|
$ |
(47,682 |
) |
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys effective tax rate decreased to 33.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2007
from 34.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The Companys effective tax rate decreased to
28.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from 35.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
The effective tax rate for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2007 is lower than the
federal statutory rate primarily due to a decrease in the amount of US taxes accrued on foreign
earnings, tax exempt interest income and tax credits, which are partially offset by state taxes and
non-deductible expenses. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2006 is lower
than
14
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
the statutory rate primarily due to tax exempt interest income and a $1.2 million reduction in
US residual taxes that was recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2006.
The undistributed earnings of the Companys foreign subsidiaries that had not been
indefinitely reinvested totaled $31.9 million as of December 31, 2006 and $29.3 million as of March
31, 2007. These earnings are not subject to US income tax until they are distributed to the US.
Historically, the Company has provided for deferred US federal income taxes on these undistributed
earnings in the accompanying consolidated statements of income as they were determined not to be
indefinitely reinvested. During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, the Company determined in
accordance with Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 23, Accounting for Income
Taxes-Special Areas, that an additional $31.2 million of the undistributed earnings will be
indefinitely reinvested, primarily relating to the cash required to establish and to fund the new
European clearing house that the Company will operate beginning in 2008. The undistributed earnings
that had been indefinitely reinvested total $51.0 million as of December 31, 2006 and $82.3 million
as of March 31, 2007. During the quarter ended June 30, 2007, the Company further determined that
all prior undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries will be indefinitely reinvested. The
Company made this determination on the basis of sufficient evidence that demonstrates that it will
invest the undistributed earnings overseas indefinitely. Under APB Opinion No. 23, when it becomes
apparent that some or all of the undistributed earnings of a foreign subsidiary on which income
taxes have been accrued in the past will not be remitted in the foreseeable future, then the parent
company should adjust income tax expense of the current period to reflect this change. For the
three months ended June 30, 2007, the impact of the Companys decision to indefinitely reinvest
prior undistributed earnings during 2007 was a reduction to tax expense of $3.6 million.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No.
48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition of
tax benefits, classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1,
2007. As a result of the adoption, the Company recognized a charge of $83,000 to the January 1,
2007 retained earnings balance. As of the adoption date, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits
of $13.2 million of which $5.0 million, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. The
Company recorded an increase to unrecognized tax benefits of $254,000 as of June 30, 2007, of which
approximately $1.8 million and $1.2 million increased income tax expense for the six months and
three months ended June 30, 2007, respectively. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to
income tax uncertainties as a component of interest expense. Any related penalties, if incurred,
would be included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Interest expense related to the
unrecognized tax benefits totaled $593,000 and $341,000 for the six months and three months ended
June 30, 2007, respectively. Accrued interest and penalties were $1.5 million and $2.1 million as
of January 1, 2007 and June 30, 2007, respectively.
The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the US federal
jurisdiction, and various state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no
longer subject to US federal, state, local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years
before 2003.
8. Unearned Government Grant
In November 2002, NYBOT entered into a ten-year agreement with the New York State Urban
Development Corporation d/b/a Empire State Development Corporation (ESDC). As a result of the
terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, the ESDC, in cooperation with
the New York City Economic Development Corporation d/b/a New York City Industrial Development
Agency, determined that NYBOT was eligible for assistance under the World Trade Center Job Creation
and Retention Program. In November 2002, NYBOT received a cash grant of $23.3 million for fixed
asset investment. This agreement requires NYBOT to maintain certain annual employment levels in a
certain geographic area of New York City and the grant is subject to recapture amounts on a
declining scale over a ten year term if NYBOT employment levels fall below the minimum level. The
grant is recognized in the income statement ratably in accordance with the ten-year recapture
schedule as a credit to depreciation and amortization expense. As of December 31, 2006, the
potential recapture amount had decreased to $12.2 million and is scheduled to decrease by $1.75
million at the end of each fiscal year going
15
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
forward. The following is a schedule of future grant amortization as of December 31, 2006 of
each year (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December 31: |
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
1,750 |
|
2008 |
|
|
1,750 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,750 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,750 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
5,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
9. Clearing of NYBOT through ICE Clear US
ICE Clear US (formerly known as the New York Clearing Corporation or NYCC), the clearing
organization for NYBOT and a Derivatives Clearing Organization under the CEA, performs the clearing and settlement of every futures and options on futures contract traded through NYBOT. ICE Clear US has equal and offsetting claims to and from clearing members on
opposite sides of each contract, standing as an intermediary on every contract cleared. ICE Clear
US is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NYBOT. ICE Clear US performs as the intermediary for any cleared futures contract or option until
the first to occur of: (i) the liquidation of such futures contract or option by the holder through
an offsetting trade, (ii) the exercise of any option (after which ICE Clear US continues as intermediary for the futures contract issued pursuant to such exercise), (iii) final cash
settlement of the futures contract, and (iv) issuance of a delivery notice by ICE Clear US to the
receiver with respect to a futures contract of a deliverer. To the extent that funds are not
otherwise available to satisfy an obligation under an applicable contract, ICE Clear US bears
counterparty credit risk in the event that future market movements create conditions that could
lead to clearing members failing to meet their obligations to the clearing organization. ICE Clear
US reduces its exposure through a risk management program that includes initial and ongoing
financial standards for admission as a clearing member, original and variation margin requirements,
mandatory deposits to a guaranty fund and the ability to assess clearing members.
ICE Clear US marks all outstanding futures contracts and options to market daily. Clearing
members that experience net losses under outstanding futures and options contracts since the prior
business day are required to pay ICE Clear US the amount of those net losses in cash. Clearing
members that experience net profits under outstanding futures and options contracts since the prior
business day are entitled to be paid those net profits by ICE Clear US in cash. The payments of
profits and losses are known as variation margin. ICE Clear US maintains separate bank accounts for
clearance of clearing members daily variation margin settlements. Generally, any significant daily
overnight balance in the clearance account is invested in money market mutual funds. ICE Clear US
requires all clearing members to maintain on deposit with ICE Clear US cash, money market mutual
fund shares, US Government obligations, or letters of credit to secure payment of such variation
margin as may become owing by the clearing members, and such deposits are known as original margin.
ICE Clear US is required under the CEA to segregate cash and securities deposited by clearing firms
on behalf of their customers.
ICE Clear USs By-laws provide that each clearing member make deposits in a fund known as a
guaranty fund (Guaranty Fund). These amounts serve to secure the obligations of a clearing member
to ICE Clear US and may be used to cover losses sustained by ICE Clear US as a result of the
default of the clearing member, as described in the By-laws. The By-laws further provide that all
income earned from investing clearing members cash deposits in the Guaranty Fund belong to ICE
Clear US and are included in interest income in the accompanying consolidated statements of income.
16
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
A clearing member that is the buyer of an option must pay the premium to ICE Clear US which,
in turn, pays the premium for each option to the clearing member that is the seller of an option.
No variation margin is paid or collected with respect to options. However, clearing members are
required to deposit with ICE Clear US original margin with respect to options sold, and the
required amount will increase or decrease each day to reflect the change in risk of those options
since the prior business day. No original margin is required with respect to options that have
been bought.
Should a particular clearing member fail to deposit original margin, or to make a variation
margin payment, when and as required, ICE Clear US may liquidate its open positions and use its
original margin and Guaranty Fund deposits to make up the amount owing. In the event that those
deposits are not sufficient to pay that amount in full, ICE Clear US may utilize the Guaranty Fund
deposits of all clearing members for that purpose and, in addition, may assess all clearing members
to meet any remaining shortfall. As of June 30, 2007, margin cash deposits and Guaranty Fund cash
deposits are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Original margin |
|
$ |
685,443 |
|
Variation margin |
|
|
11,730 |
|
Guaranty Fund |
|
|
2,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
699,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Clear US has recorded these cash deposits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet
as current assets with offsetting current liabilities to the clearing members who deposited the
funds. The majority of deposit balances are denominated in foreign currencies. Any foreign currency
gains or losses on the assets are fully offset by foreign currency gains or losses on the
offsetting liabilities. All cash, securities and letters of credit are only available to meet the
financial obligations of that clearing firm to ICE Clear US.
The Company has credit risk for maintaining these cash deposits at various financial
institutions. These deposits at times may exceed amounts in excess of federally insured limits.
The Company monitors these deposits and mitigates credit risk by keeping such deposits in several
financial institutions. The Company has not experienced losses related to these deposits.
In addition to the original margin, variation margin, and Guaranty Fund cash deposits made to
ICE Clear US, clearing members also pledge assets, including US Government obligations, money
market mutual funds and letters of credit, to ICE Clear US to mitigate its credit risk. The US
Government obligations, money market mutual funds and letters of credit are held in safekeeping and
any interest and gain or loss accrues to the clearing member. As of June 30, 2007, US Government
obligations and money market mutual funds pledged by the clearing members as original margin and
Guaranty Fund deposits, as detailed below, are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet as ICE Clear US does not take legal ownership:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government |
|
|
Money |
|
|
|
Securities at |
|
|
Market |
|
|
|
Face Value |
|
|
Mutual Fund |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Original margin |
|
$ |
2,555,375 |
|
|
$ |
633,655 |
|
Guaranty Fund |
|
|
87,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,642,779 |
|
|
$ |
633,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Russell Licensing Agreement
On June 15, 2007, the Company entered into an exclusive licensing agreement (the Licensing
Agreement) with the Frank Russell Company (Russell) to offer futures and options on futures
contracts based on the full range of Russells industry-leading benchmark US equity indexes,
including the Russell 1000® Index, Russell 2000® Index and Russell
3000® Index, as well as the related value and growth indexes offered by Russell. Under
the Licensing Agreement, the Company and its affiliates will for the first time have exclusive
rights to list futures contracts and options on futures contracts based on the full range of
Russells benchmark US equity indexes. NYBOT currently trades futures and options on futures on the
Russell 1000®, Russell 2000® and Russell 3000®, including certain
mini and full-size contracts, as well as the Russell 1000 Growth® and Russell 1000
Value® Indexes and the Russell 2000 Growth® and Russell 2000
Value® Indexes. The exclusive agreement with the Company will result in the transition
of all other valid licenses on futures and options on futures based on the Russell indexes.
The term of the Licensing Agreement is seven years and automatically renews for successive one
year periods unless terminated by either party. The Company will pay Russell $50.0 million up-front
for the exclusive rights under the Licensing Agreement and will also make annual royalty payments
to Russell based on the annual volume of contracts traded, subject to certain minimum annual
royalty payments. As the Company is required to pay the minimum annual royalty payments in order to
maintain the license rights, these payments qualify as liabilities as of the effective date of the
Licensing Agreement. Therefore, the Company has recorded a current and noncurrent liability
relating to the Licensing Agreement of $59.6 million and $90.0 million, respectively, in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007. The liabilities are based on the
present value of the future required payments, including the up-front $50.0 million payment, which
was paid in July 2007, and the minimum annual royalty payments. The corresponding Russell license
rights of $149.6 million have been recorded as an other intangible asset in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2007 and will be amortized over the seven year life of
the Licensing Agreement.
Beginning three years after the effective date of the Licensing Agreement, the Company will be
required to maintain a minimum level of average trading volume per quarter to preserve the
exclusive rights granted to it under the Licensing Agreement.
Patent Licensing Agreement
In March 2002, the Company entered into a long-term, non-exclusive licensing agreement with
eSpeed, Inc. (eSpeed), which granted the use of eSpeeds patent to the Company and its
majority-owned and controlled affiliates. Under the agreement, the Company was required to pay
minimum annual license fees of $2.0 million beginning April 5, 2002 through the expiration date of
the patent in February 2007 along with additional royalty payments calculated quarterly based upon
the volume of certain futures transactions executed on the Platform. The Company recorded
amortization expense of $283,000 and $1.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006, respectively, and $500,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2006 relating to the
licensing agreement. The Company made royalty payments of $1.7 million and $3.2 million during the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively and $2.2 million during the three months
ended June 30, 2006. The licensing agreement and related patent expired in February 2007 and no
future payments are required.
NYBOT eSpeed Agreement
In 2004, NYBOT entered into an agreement with eSpeed that terminated a previous agreement
between NYBOT and eSpeed which had concerned the establishment of an electronic marketplace, in
exchange for a one-time cash payment in 2004 and a commitment to make variable cash payments to
eSpeed based on the number of electronic products traded and executed by NYBOT through September
2017. The variable payment is based on the volume of NYBOT electronic contracts that are traded and
the variable payment has a cap of $1.0 million per year. These payments may be adjusted annually
for changes in the Consumer Price Index. NYBOT began executing electronic trading on February 2,
2007. Based on the electronic trading volumes for the six months ended June 30, 2007, NYBOT expects
to exceed the maximum annual number of electronic contracts traded during 2007, and expects a total
2007 payment to eSpeed of $1.0 million. The Company has expensed $516,000 and $258,000 as selling,
18
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income for
the six months and three months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
Middle East Sour Crude Oil Futures Contract Liquidity Provider Program
On May 21, 2007, the Company listed for trading the ICE Middle East Sour Crude futures
contract through ICE Futures. The contract is being offered free of trading fees for an initial
three-month period for all customers, except for those trades that occur off exchange and are
blocked into ICE Futures for clearing. Thereafter, the normal exchange fees will be in effect for
all customers except for five designated liquidity providers. These liquidity providers will trade
without charge for an additional six-month period as long as they meet certain market making
obligations under the Middle East Sour Crude futures liquidity provider program for the entire
nine-month period. The market making obligations require the liquidity providers to maintain
two-sided markets consisting of a simultaneous bid and offer during certain times and based on
certain prices. In addition to the nine months of free trading, the liquidity providers will also
receive a share in a liquidity provider pool program (the Liquidity Provider Pool), that is to be
established in each year beginning in 2008 through 2015 (the Measurement Period).
The Liquidity Provider Pool will be valued at 50% of the overall transaction fees received by
ICE Futures in relation to trading in the ICE Middle East Sour Crude futures contract in each
calendar year of the Measurement Period, net of certain expenses and taxes. The Liquidity Provider
Pool will be allocated between the eligible liquidity providers based on the following: (i) 30%
allocated equally among the eligible liquidity providers, (ii) 30% allocated on the basis of the
extent of their market making obligations, and (iii) 40% allocated on the basis of contract volumes
traded by the liquidity providers during that calendar year of the Measurement Period. However,
there is a 40% cap on the share in the annual Liquidity Provider Pool that any one liquidity
provider can receive in any calendar year in the Measurement Period. Payments under the provisions
of the Liquidity Provider Pool will be in the first quarter of the subsequent calendar year during
the Measurement Period.
Legal Proceedings
In November 2002, the New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (NYMEX) filed suit against the
Company in United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In the suit, NYMEX
alleges that the Company has infringed certain intellectual property rights of NYMEX through the
use of settlement prices of futures contracts listed on NYMEX and references to NYMEX in describing
products traded on the Platform. In September 2004, the Company filed a motion for summary judgment
seeking judgment as a matter of law with respect to the claims in NYMEXs complaint. In September
2005, the court granted the Companys motion for summary judgment dismissing all claims brought by
NYMEX. In dismissing all of NYMEXs claims, the court found that NYMEXs settlement prices were not
copyrightable works as a matter of law, and that the Company had not engaged in copyright or
trademark infringement in referencing NYMEXs publicly available settlement prices. NYMEXs
trademark dilution and tortious interference claims, which are state law claims, were dismissed on
jurisdictional grounds. NYMEX has filed an appeal with respect to the copyright claims and state
law claims, but not the federal trademark claims, and the case is presently pending before the
Second Circuit Court of Appeals.
In May 2000, Klein & Co. Futures, Inc. (Klein), a former clearing member of NYCC, defaulted
on its margin obligations to NYCC, which resulted in a margin deficiency and related liquidation
costs of approximately $6.0 million. NYCC, pursuant to its rules, then applied all funds on deposit
with it from Klein to cover the deficiency. Thereafter, the management of NYBOT decided that in the
interest of promoting confidence in the U.S. futures markets in general, and in NYBOTs markets in
particular, it would make whole any customer that suffered losses as a result of the default of
Klein, in return for the customer assigning its claims against Klein to NYBOT.
In July 2000, Klein commenced a civil action in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York against numerous defendants, including NYBOT, various affiliates of
NYBOT and officials of NYBOT and/or its affiliates. Kleins claims arise out of its collapse in the
wake of the recalculation of settlement prices for options on futures contracts based on the
Pacific Stock Exchange Technology Index, an index of technology stocks, in May 2000. Klein
purported to allege federal claims arising under the CEA and various state law claims. In February
2005, the District Court dismissed Kleins CEA claims with prejudice for lack of standing and
declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Kleins state law claims. In September 2006, a
panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the District Courts
decision. In October 2006, Klein filed a motion for
19
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
rehearing insomuch as the panel affirmed the District Courts dismissal of its CEA claims
against NYBOT and certain of its affiliates. That motion was denied and in March 2007 Klein filed a
petition in the Supreme Court of the United States requesting the right to file an appeal of the
Circuit Courts decision. The petition was granted and is scheduled to be heard in the fourth
quarter of 2007.
In March 2007, Klein filed a parallel action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York,
New York County, against certain defendants including NYBOT and its former president, alleging as
against NYBOT and its former president a claim for slander and libel relating to NYBOTs statement
in May 2000 that in connection with Kleins collapse, Klein had misused its customer funds to pay
its obligations to NYBOTs clearing house. In May 2007, NYBOT filed a motion to dismiss on multiple
grounds and Klein filed a response on July 10, 2007. NYBOTs reply to Kleins response was filed on
July 20, 2007.
In May 2001, NYBOT and NYCC commenced an action in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York against Klein. NYBOT and NYCC commenced this action in their capacity
as the assignees of certain claims that were held against Klein by its former customers. NYBOTs
action seeks to recover money owed by Klein to those customers in the wake of Kleins collapse. In
the same decision that dismissed the Klein action, the District Court dismissed all of Kleins
counterclaims against NYBOT, denied NYBOTs motion for judgment on the pleadings and found that the
complaint in NYBOTs action did not state a claim for which relief could be granted. However, the
District Court granted NYBOT leave to replead and in April 2005, NYBOT and NYCC filed an amended
complaint, which Klein subsequently moved to dismiss. NYBOT and NYCC opposed that motion which,
although fully briefed since August 2005, has not been decided by the court.
In December 2006, certain holders of non-equity trading permits (Permit Holders) of NYBOT
commenced an action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York seeking
declaratory, monetary and injunctive relief with respect to the merger. The Permit Holders allege
that, in violation of contract rights and/or rights under New Yorks Not-For-Profit Corporation
Law, they were not permitted to vote with respect to the merger and will not receive any part of
the merger consideration. The Permit Holders seek (i) to enjoin consummation of the merger, (ii)
declaratory relief regarding their past and future rights as Permit Holders, and (iii) an award of
unspecified damages on claims for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, unjust enrichment,
estoppel and fraud. On January 3, 2007, NYBOT filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, which was
granted by the court, in its entirety, in a decision rendered on April 6, 2007. The court also
denied the plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction. The Permit Holders have filed a notice
of appeal, and the time within which the Permit Holders may perfect their appeal has not yet
expired.
The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims that arise in the ordinary course of
business. The Company has concluded that these legal proceedings and claims, including those
specifically discussed above, have not proceeded sufficiently for their likely outcomes to be
determinable, and accordingly no amounts have been accrued in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. However, the Company does not believe that the resolution of these matters will have
a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial condition, results of operations,
or liquidity. It is possible, however, that future results of operations for any particular
quarterly or annual period could be materially and adversely affected by any new developments
relating to these proceedings and claims.
11. Asset Sales and Purchases
The Company entered into an agreement with a third-party to sell its former open-outcry
disaster recovery site in London. Prior to the closure of the Companys open-outcry floor in London
during April 2005, the building on this site was used as a backup open-outcry trading facility. In
August 2006, in connection with the sale, the Company received a non-refundable deposit of $1.3
million. The deposit was recorded as deferred revenue and restricted cash in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006. As of December 31, 2006, the net book value of
the land, which was included in the UK futures business segment, was $3.7 million and was
classified as an asset held for sale. The sale was completed in February 2007 at which time final
payment was received and a net gain on disposal of an asset of $9.3 million was recognized as other
income in the accompanying consolidated statement of income for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
On March 5, 2007, the Company purchased certain intangible assets related to widely-used
natural gas pricing indices for $8.1 million in cash from a third-party, including transaction
expenses. This payment includes $2.6
20
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
million made upon execution of the agreement and $5.5 million paid into an escrow account, for
which the Company has legal ownership. The future escrowed payments will be made to the third-party
in installments of $2.5 million, $1.5 million and $1.5 million on the first, second and third
anniversaries, respectively, of the agreement, contingent upon the third-party meeting certain
criteria. The Company currently believes that it is probable that these criteria will be met. As
such, the Company has recorded the entire purchase price, including the escrowed cash, as an
intangible asset with an indefinite life, which will be assessed periodically for impairment. At
June 30, 2007, $2.5 million of the escrowed cash is classified as current restricted cash and $3.0
million is classified as non-current restricted cash, with an offsetting current and non-current
accrued liability of $2.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively, in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheet. The Company will have the exclusive right to charge and collect fees for those
seeking license arrangements for these indices. The Company has recorded the intangible asset in
its global OTC business segment.
12. CBOT Merger-Related Transaction Costs
The Company incurred incremental direct merger-related transaction costs of $10.9 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2007 relating to the proposed merger with CBOT Holdings, Inc.
(CBOT), including $3.3 million in costs that were incurred during the three months ended March
31, 2007 and which were capitalized as of March 31, 2007. The Company did not succeed in its
proposed merger with CBOT, and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings, Inc. completed its
acquisition of CBOT on July 13, 2007. The $10.9 million in merger-related transaction costs
includes investment banking advisors, legal, accounting, proxy advisor, public relation services
and other external costs directly related to the proposed transaction. These costs have been
recorded as CBOT merger-related transaction costs in the accompanying consolidated statements of
income for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2007.
13. Segment Reporting
The Company has four principal business segments, consisting of its global OTC business
segment, its UK futures business segment, its market data business segment, and, effective with the
acquisition of NYBOT in January 2007, its US futures business segment. The market data business of
NYBOT has been included in the market data business segment and the remaining operations of NYBOT
have been included in the US futures business segment. Intersegment revenues and transactions
attributable to the performance of services are recorded at cost plus an agreed market percentage
intercompany profit. Intersegment revenues attributable to licensing transactions have been priced
in accordance with comparable third party agreements. Financial data for the Companys business
segments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
UK |
|
US |
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
OTC |
|
Futures |
|
Futures |
|
Data |
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
Business |
|
Business |
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Total |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
105,351 |
|
|
$ |
89,347 |
|
|
$ |
48,873 |
|
|
$ |
19,691 |
|
|
$ |
263,262 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
17,281 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,122 |
|
|
|
26,240 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,565 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
14,257 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
2,791 |
|
|
|
1,886 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
5,692 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
7,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,124 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
13,756 |
|
|
|
23,179 |
|
|
|
8,132 |
|
|
|
8,725 |
|
|
|
53,792 |
|
Net income |
|
|
32,880 |
|
|
|
52,371 |
|
|
|
9,428 |
|
|
|
14,600 |
|
|
|
109,279 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
1,648,691 |
|
|
|
123,146 |
|
|
|
763,897 |
|
|
|
12,511 |
|
|
|
2,548,245 |
|
Revenues from three customers of the UK futures business segment comprised 17.8%, 14.2% and
11.5% of the Companys UK futures revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2007. These references
to customers refer to the clearing member that clears trades on behalf of a trading entity or
trader conducting transactions on the Platform. If the clearing member ceased doing business, the
Company believes that the trading entity or trader would continue to conduct transactions on the
Platform and would clear those transactions through a different clearing member. No additional
customers accounted for more than 10% of the Companys segment revenues or consolidated revenues
during the six months ended June 30, 2007. The goodwill and the intangible assets related to the
NYBOT acquisition have been reflected in the global OTC business
segment above.
21
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
UK |
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
OTC |
|
Futures |
|
Data |
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
Business |
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
65,690 |
|
|
$ |
49,622 |
|
|
$ |
8,561 |
|
|
$ |
123,873 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
9,975 |
|
|
|
3,028 |
|
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
17,513 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5,458 |
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6,497 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,668 |
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2,428 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
12,414 |
|
|
|
10,953 |
|
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
|
26,399 |
|
Net income |
|
|
24,658 |
|
|
|
20,341 |
|
|
|
5,632 |
|
|
|
50,631 |
|
Revenues from one customer of the UK futures business segment comprised 13.8% of the Companys
UK futures revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006. No additional customers accounted for
more than 10% of the Companys segment revenues or consolidated revenues during the six months
ended June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
UK |
|
US |
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
OTC |
|
Futures |
|
Futures |
|
Data |
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
Business |
|
Business |
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Total |
|
|
(In thousands) |
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
52,583 |
|
|
$ |
44,020 |
|
|
$ |
29,508 |
|
|
$ |
10,543 |
|
|
$ |
136,654 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
7,338 |
|
|
|
1,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,712 |
|
|
|
12,070 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
6,101 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
1,228 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7,748 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,155 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
4,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,329 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2,599 |
|
|
|
8,234 |
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
4,502 |
|
|
|
21,514 |
|
Net income |
|
|
13,809 |
|
|
|
24,615 |
|
|
|
7,181 |
|
|
|
8,088 |
|
|
|
53,693 |
|
Revenues from three customers of the UK futures business segment comprised 16.7%, 14.5% and
11.6% of the Companys UK futures revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007. No additional
customers accounted for more than 10% of the Companys segment revenues or consolidated revenues
during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
UK |
|
Market |
|
|
|
|
OTC |
|
Futures |
|
Data |
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
Business |
|
Business |
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Segment |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers |
|
$ |
39,104 |
|
|
$ |
30,159 |
|
|
$ |
4,328 |
|
|
$ |
73,591 |
|
Intersegment revenues |
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
8,738 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,798 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
8,139 |
|
|
|
6,960 |
|
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
17,302 |
|
Net income |
|
|
13,952 |
|
|
|
12,925 |
|
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
|
30,967 |
|
Revenues from one customer of the UK futures business segment comprised 15.1% of the Companys
UK futures revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006. No additional customers accounted for
more than 10% of the Companys segment revenues or consolidated revenues during the three months
ended June 30, 2006.
14. Earnings Per Common Share
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted
earnings per common share computations for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2007 and
2006:
22
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
109,279 |
|
|
$ |
50,631 |
|
|
$ |
53,693 |
|
|
$ |
30,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
68,372 |
|
|
|
55,703 |
|
|
|
69,205 |
|
|
|
55,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
68,372 |
|
|
|
55,703 |
|
|
|
69,205 |
|
|
|
55,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options and restricted shares |
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
3,389 |
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
70,496 |
|
|
|
59,092 |
|
|
|
71,228 |
|
|
|
59,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share is calculated using the weighted average common shares
outstanding during the period. Common equivalent shares from stock options and restricted stock
awards, using the treasury stock method, are also included in the diluted per share calculations
unless their effect of inclusion would be antidilutive.
15. Subsequent Events
Subsequent Acquisition
On July 9, 2007, the Company acquired certain assets of ChemConnect Inc. for $13.5 million in
cash. ChemConnect is an electronic marketplace for the trading of OTC natural gas liquids and
chemical products, including propane, ethane, ethylene, propylene and benzene. In connection with
the acquisition, the Company transitioned the trading of these products to the Companys Platform.
The financial results will be included in the global OTC business segment from the date of
acquisition.
23
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the sections entitled Legal Proceedings and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains
forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
that are based on our present beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to us.
You can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as may, will, should,
could, would, targets, goal, expect, intend, plan, anticipate, believe,
estimate, predict, potential, continue, or the negative of these terms or other comparable
terminology. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and
involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of
activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these
forward-looking statements. These risks and other factors include those set forth under the heading
Risk Factors in this Form 10-Q, our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and other filings with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Forward-looking statements and other risks and factors that may affect our performance
include, but are not limited to: our business environment; increasing competition and consolidation
in our industry; technological developments, including clearing developments; accuracy of our cost
estimates and expectations, adjustments to exchange fees or commission rates; our belief that cash
flows will be sufficient to fund our working capital needs and capital expenditures at least
through the end of 2008; our ability to increase the connectivity to our marketplace; development
of new products and services; pursuit of strategic acquisitions and alliances on a timely,
cost-effective basis; maintaining existing market participants and attracting new ones; protection
of our intellectual property rights and our ability to not violate the intellectual property rights
of others; changes in domestic and foreign regulations or government policy; adverse litigation
results; our belief in our electronic platform and disaster recovery system technologies and the
ability to gain access to comparable products and services if our key technology contracts were
terminated; the benefits of the merger involving ICE and the New York Board of Trade, or NYBOT; and
the risk that the businesses will not be integrated successfully or the revenue opportunities, cost
savings and other anticipated synergies from the merger may not be fully realized or may take
longer to realize than expected. We caution you not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements as they speak only as of the date on which such statement is made, and
we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or to reflect the occurrence of
an unanticipated event. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management
to predict all factors that may affect our business and prospects. Further, management cannot
assess the impact of each factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination
of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any
forward-looking statements.
In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, unless otherwise indicated, the terms
IntercontinentalExchange, ICE, we, us, our, our company and our business refer to
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc., together with our consolidated subsidiaries. Due to rounding,
figures may not sum exactly.
Overview
We operate the leading electronic global futures and over-the-counter, or OTC, marketplace for
trading a broad array of energy products as well as the leading global soft commodities exchange.
Currently, we are the only marketplace to offer an integrated electronic platform for side-by-side
trading of energy products in both futures and OTC markets. Through our widely-distributed
electronic trading platform, our marketplace brings together buyers and sellers of derivative and
physical commodities contracts. We conduct our regulated UK futures markets through our
wholly-owned subsidiary, ICE Futures. We conduct our regulated US futures markets through our
wholly-owned subsidiary, the New York Board of Trade, or NYBOT, which also includes ICE Clear US, a
wholly-owned clearing house subsidiary of NYBOT (ICE Clear US was formerly known as the New York
Clearing Corp., or NYCC). We completed our acquisition of NYBOT on January 12, 2007.
On a consolidated basis, we recorded $263.3 million in revenues for the six months ended June
30, 2007, a 112.5% increase compared to $123.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. On a
consolidated basis, we recorded $109.3 million in net income for the six months ended June 30,
2007, a 115.8% increase compared to $50.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006. The
financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2007
24
include $10.9 million in CBOT merger-related transaction costs, or $7.0 million after tax.
Excluding the impact of the CBOT merger-related transaction costs, net of taxes, our adjusted net
income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 would have been $116.3 million. See Non-GAAP
Financial Measures. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, 66.8 million contracts were traded
in our UK futures markets, up 77.3% from 37.7 million UK futures contracts traded during the six
months ended June 30, 2006. During the six months ended June 30, 2007, 77.5 million contract
equivalents were traded in our global OTC markets, up 57.5% from 49.2 million global OTC contract
equivalents traded during the six months ended June 30, 2006. During the period from January 13,
2007 to June 30, 2007, 26.5 million contracts were traded in our US futures markets.
On a consolidated basis, we recorded $136.7 million in revenues for the three months ended
June 30, 2007, a 85.7% increase compared to $73.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
On a consolidated basis, we recorded $53.7 million in net income for the three months ended June
30, 2007, a 73.4% increase compared to $31.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006. The
financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2007 include $10.9 million in CBOT
merger-related transaction costs, or $7.0 million after tax. Excluding the impact of the CBOT
merger-related transaction costs, net of taxes, our adjusted net income for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 would have been $60.7 million. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures. During the three
months ended June 30, 2007, 32.8 million contracts were traded in our UK futures markets, up 56.1%
from 21.0 million UK futures contracts traded during the three months ended June 30, 2006. During
the three months ended June 30, 2007, 37.7 million contract equivalents were traded in our global
OTC markets, up 28.8% from 29.3 million global OTC contract equivalents traded during the three
months ended June 30, 2006. During the three months ended June 30, 2007, 15.3 million contracts
were traded in our US futures markets, up from 11.3 million contracts traded during the period from
January 13, 2007 to March 31, 2007.
Our Business Environment
Our business is primarily transaction-based, and our revenues and profitability relate
directly to the level of trading activity in our markets. Trading volumes are driven by a number of
factors, including the degree of volatility in commodities prices. Price volatility increases the
need to hedge contractual price risk and creates opportunities for arbitrage or speculative
trading. Changes in our UK futures trading volumes and global OTC average daily commissions have
also been driven by varying levels of liquidity and volatility both in our markets and in the
broader markets for energy commodities trading, which influence trading volumes across all of the
markets we operate.
We operate our UK futures and global OTC markets for energy commodities exclusively on
our electronic platform and we offer NYBOTs markets on both our electronic platform and through
our trading floor based in New York. We believe that the move toward electronic trade execution,
together with the improved accessibility for new market participants and the increased adoption of
energy commodities as a tradable, investable asset class, will support continued secular growth in
the global markets. As participation continues to increase and as participants continue to employ
more sophisticated financial instruments and risk management strategies to manage their price
exposure, we believe there remains opportunity for further growth in derivatives trading on a
global basis.
Global Clearing Strategy
In May 2007, we announced our plans to establish a European clearing house, based in London,
as part of our strategic plan to offer clearing services through wholly-owned clearing businesses
in the US and the UK. Currently, our energy futures and OTC derivatives businesses are cleared
through LCH.Clearnet Ltd., an independent third-party clearing house based in the UK. We currently
provide clearing services in the US for futures and option contracts executed on NYBOT through ICE
Clear US, which operates as a registered Derivatives Clearing Organization under the oversight of
the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or CFTC. The European clearing house we intend to
establish will be known as ICE Clear Europe. We anticipate that our European and US clearing houses
will partner to serve our global customer base across the commodities and financial products
marketplace, including futures and OTC markets. We intend to begin clearing our energy futures and
OTC contracts through ICE Clear Europe in the third quarter of 2008 following the migration of this
business from LCH.Clearnet. These clearing houses will complement our diverse futures and OTC
execution business while meeting the risk management and regulatory requirements of a global
marketplace. Gaining greater control over this core clearing capability will allow us to introduce
more services to the OTC markets for brokers and dealers. And finally, this
25
flexibility will allow us to increase our speed-to-market for new cleared products and to
expand our products further into the physical commodity markets.
Prior to commencing operations, ICE Clear Europe must be approved by the Financial Services
Authority, or FSA, as a Recognised Clearing House. The final FSA application is expected to be
submitted in the third quarter of 2007, and assuming that the information provided is satisfactory
and the timeline is met, regulatory approval is anticipated in early 2008. ICE Clear US and ICE
Clear Europe will leverage a common technology and development team from the outset.
On July 18, 2007, we formally notified LCH.Clearnet of our intention to terminate our clearing
agreement with them and provided them with the required one years written notices of termination
of the clearing agreements. The notices of termination specify that the termination date will be a
date agreed to between the parties, or, in the event that no agreement is reached between the
parties regarding a termination date, will be the date that is twelve months from the date of the
notice. ICE and ICE Futures provided LCH.Clearnet with the notices of termination in connection
with our previously announced plans to form a wholly-owned European clearing house.
Acquisitions and Strategic Alliances
On February 28, 2007, we acquired all the assets of Commoditrack, Inc., which enables us to
provide our customers a real-time risk management program as well as the ability to download trades
and access profit and loss detail on the electronic trading platform.
On March 5, 2007, we purchased certain intangible assets related to widely-used OTC natural
gas pricing indices from Intelligence Press, Inc. We will have the exclusive right to charge and
collect fees for those seeking license arrangements for these indices.
On March 27, 2007, we entered into an agreement with Natural Gas Exchange, Inc., or NGX, to
form a technology and clearing alliance for the North American natural gas and Canadian power
markets. Under the arrangement, the cleared and bilateral markets for North American physical
natural gas and Canadian electricity operated by NGX and us will be offered together on our
electronic trading platform. In turn, NGX will serve as the clearing house for these products. We
will recognize a portion of transaction fee revenues generated by products jointly developed under
this arrangement. The agreement is subject to applicable regulatory filings and approvals, and the
products are expected to be offered on our electronic trading platform in the fourth quarter of
2007.
On March 30, 2007, we entered into a license agreement with McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., which
operates an energy information business known as Platts. Platts collects market information from
energy traders and brokers and publishes daily price information in the form of indices or
assessments. Under the agreement, we will collaborate with Platts on the migration of Platts
processes to our electronic trading platform. In addition, we are providing Platts with real-time
streaming access to every bid, offer, and executed bid occurring on our trading platform related to
specified oil markets. We will compensate Platts as certain volume thresholds are achieved, and
Platts is reimbursing us for a portion of the development costs that are incurred to provide the
additional functionality to the trading platform. The arrangement was launched on our electronic
trading platform in June 2007.
On June 15, 2007, we entered into an exclusive licensing agreement with the Frank Russell
Company, or Russell, to offer futures and options on futures contracts based on the full range of
Russells industry-leading benchmark US equity indexes, including the Russell 1000®
Index, Russell 2000® Index and Russell 3000® Index, as well as the related
value and growth indexes offered by Russell. Under the licensing agreement, we will for the first
time have exclusive rights to list futures contracts based on the full range of Russells benchmark
US equity indexes. The term of the licensing agreement is seven years and automatically renews for
successive one year periods unless terminated by either party. We will make an up-front cash
payment to Russell for the exclusive rights under the licensing agreement and will also make annual
royalty payments to Russell based on the annual volume of contracts traded, subject to certain
minimum annual royalty payments. Beginning three years after the effective date of the licensing
agreement, we will be required to maintain a minimum level of average trading volume per quarter to
preserve the exclusive rights granted to it under the licensing agreement.
26
On June 22, 2007 we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire the Winnipeg Commodity
Exchange, or WCE, the leading agricultural commodity futures and options exchange in Canada and
home to the worlds leading canola futures contract, for $40 million Canadian dollars. Subject to
any necessary regulatory approvals, we expect to transition trading in WCEs markets to our
electronic trading platform. The acquisition is subject to approval of WCE shareholders, approval
of the Manitoba Securities Commission (which serves as the exchanges primary regulator), approval
by the Manitoba Court of Queens Bench and other conditions which are customary in transactions of
this nature. Subsequent to our entering into the definitive agreement with WCE, a third party made
an unsolicited non-binding proposal to acquire WCE for $50 million Canadian dollars, and under the
terms of our definitive agreement, WCE is permitted to negotiate and share information with such
party. Our definitive agreement with WCE provides us with, among other rights, the right to match
any competing proposal should the Board of WCE declare the terms of the other proposal superior to
our agreement. If we fail to match the competing offer, and are not successful in the acquisition
of WCE, then WCE is required to pay us a $1.2 million Canadian dollars termination fee. We are
currently reviewing our options.
On July 9, 2007, we acquired the trading business assets of ChemConnect Inc. ChemConnect
operated an electronic marketplace for trading of OTC natural gas liquids and chemical products,
including propane, ethane, ethylene, propylene and benzene. In connection with the acquisition, we
transitioned the trading of the ChemConnect products to our OTC electronic trading platform.
On March 15, 2007, we made a proposal to the board of directors of CBOT Holdings, Inc., or
CBOT, to combine our two companies in a stock-for-stock transaction. CBOT was at the time, and
continued to be, a party to a definitive agreement to merge with Chicago Mercantile Exchange
Holdings, Inc., or CME. We incurred incremental direct merger-related transaction costs of $10.9
million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 relating to our proposed merger with CBOT,
including $3.3 million in costs that were incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2007 and
which were capitalized as of March 31, 2007. We did not succeed in our proposed merger with CBOT
and the CME completed its acquisition of CBOT on July 13, 2007. The merger-related transaction
costs include investment banking advisors, legal, accounting, proxy advisor, public relation
services and other external costs directly related to the proposed transaction. These costs have
been recorded as CBOT merger-related transaction costs in the accompanying consolidated statements
of income for the six months and three months ended June 30, 2007.
We intend to continue to explore and pursue acquisition opportunities to strengthen our
business and grow our company. We may enter into business combination transactions, make
acquisitions or enter into strategic partnerships, joint ventures or alliances, any of which may be
material. We may enter into these transactions to acquire other businesses, products or
technologies to expand our products and services, advance our technology or take advantage of new
developments and potential changes in the industry.
Variability in Quarterly Comparisons
In addition to general conditions in the financial markets and in the energy markets in
particular, energy trading has historically been subject to variability in trading volumes due
primarily to five key factors. These factors include geopolitical events, weather, real and
perceived supply and demand imbalances, number of trading days in the period and seasonality. These
and other factors could cause our revenues to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. These fluctuations
may affect the reliability of quarter to quarter comparisons of our revenues and operating results
when, for example, these comparisons are between quarters in different seasons. Inter-seasonal
comparisons will not necessarily be indicative of our results for future periods.
Segment Reporting
For financial reporting purposes, our business is currently divided into four segments: our UK
futures business segment, our global OTC business segment, our US futures business segment and our
market data business segment. We began operating our US futures business segment upon the
completion of the NYBOT acquisition on January 12, 2007. For a discussion of these segments and
related financial disclosure, refer to Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q.
27
Intersegment Fees
Our global OTC business segment provides and supports the platform for electronic trading in
our energy UK futures business segment and our soft commodity and financial US futures business
segment. Intersegment fees include charges for developing, operating, managing and supporting the
platform for electronic trading in our futures business segments. Our futures business segments and
our global OTC business segment provide access to trading volumes to our market data business
segment. We determine the intercompany or intersegment fees to be paid by the business segments
based on transfer pricing standards and independent documentation. These intersegment fees have no
impact on our consolidated operating results. We expect the structure of these intersegment fees to
remain unchanged and expect that they will continue to have no impact on our consolidated operating
results.
Our UK Futures Business Segment
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, selected statement of income data in
dollars and as a percentage of revenues for our UK futures business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures |
|
$ |
43,917 |
|
|
|
48.2 |
% |
|
$ |
28,766 |
|
|
|
54.6 |
% |
Other futures products and options |
|
|
42,841 |
|
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
|
19,765 |
|
|
|
37.6 |
|
Intersegment fees |
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
3,028 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Market data fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
91,184 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
52,650 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1) |
|
|
13,819 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
11,471 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
12,187 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
9,291 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
862 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1,033 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
26,868 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
21,795 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
64,316 |
|
|
|
70.5 |
|
|
|
30,855 |
|
|
|
58.6 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
11,234 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
23,179 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
10,953 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
52,371 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
% |
|
$ |
20,341 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses and professional services expenses. |
A contract is a standardized quantity of the physical commodity underlying each futures
contract. The following table presents, for the periods indicated, trading activity in our UK
futures markets by commodity type based on the total number of contracts traded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Number of UK futures contracts traded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures |
|
|
29,563 |
|
|
|
20,383 |
|
|
|
14,637 |
|
|
|
10,209 |
|
ICE WTI Crude futures(1) |
|
|
24,985 |
|
|
|
9,105 |
|
|
|
12,181 |
|
|
|
6,789 |
|
ICE Gas Oil futures |
|
|
10,969 |
|
|
|
7,637 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
3,700 |
|
Other futures and options(1) |
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
66,795 |
|
|
|
37,681 |
|
|
|
32,822 |
|
|
|
21,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
A fee waiver applied to trade execution for our ICE WTI Crude futures
contracts from the launch date of February 3, 2006 through March 31,
2006. A fee waiver also applies to trade execution for our ICE Middle
East Sour Crude futures contracts from the launch date of May 21, 2007
through August 20, 2007 for all customers and through February 20,
2008 for five liquidity providers. Total volume in the ICE Middle
East Sour Crude futures contract was 74,000 contracts for the period
from May 21, 2007 to June 30, 2007. |
28
The following chart presents the exchange fee revenues by contract traded in our UK futures
markets for the periods presented:
UK Futures Exchange Fee Revenues
The following table presents our average daily open interest for our energy futures contracts.
Open interest is the number of contracts (long or short) that a member holds either for its own
account or on behalf of its clients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Open Interest UK futures contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Brent Crude futures |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
659 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
ICE WTI Crude futures |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
ICE Gas Oil futures |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Other futures and options |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,673 |
|
|
|
864 |
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Global OTC Business Segment
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, selected statement of income data in
dollars and as a percentage of revenues for our global OTC business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007(1) |
|
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas |
|
$ |
70,458 |
|
|
|
57.4 |
% |
|
$ |
44,692 |
|
|
|
59.1 |
% |
North American power |
|
|
18,510 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
11,244 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
Other commodities markets |
|
|
2,281 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Electronic trade confirmation |
|
|
2,604 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Intersegment fees |
|
|
17,281 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
9,975 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Market data fees |
|
|
10,174 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
6,243 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
122,632 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
75,665 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(2) |
|
|
41,112 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
30,129 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs(1) |
|
|
10,944 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
7,171 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
4,557 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,565 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
5,458 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
70,792 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
40,144 |
|
|
|
53.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007(1) |
|
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Operating income |
|
|
51,840 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
35,521 |
|
|
|
47.0 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(5,204 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
13,756 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
12,414 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income(1) |
|
$ |
32,880 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
% |
|
$ |
24,658 |
|
|
|
32.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2007 include $10.9
million in CBOT merger-related transaction costs. Excluding these charges, net
of taxes, our net income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 would have
been $39.9 million. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses and professional services expenses. |
Revenues in our global OTC business segment are generated primarily through commission fees
earned from trades and from data access fees. While we charge a monthly data access fee for access
to our electronic platform, we derive a substantial portion of our OTC revenues from commission
fees paid by participants for each trade that they execute or clear based on the underlying
commodity volume. In addition to our commission fees, a participant that chooses to clear a trade
must pay a fee to LCH.Clearnet for the benefit of clearing and another for the services of the
relevant member clearing firm, or futures commission merchant. Consistent with our UK futures
business, we currently derive no direct revenues from the clearing process for our global OTC
business and participants pay the clearing fees directly to LCH.Clearnet and the futures commission
merchants.
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the total volume of the underlying
commodity and number of contracts traded in our global OTC markets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(In millions) |
Total Volume OTC: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas (in million
British thermal units, or MMBtu) |
|
|
177,814 |
|
|
|
112,859 |
|
|
|
85,896 |
|
|
|
67,953 |
|
North American power (in megawatt hours) |
|
|
2,641 |
|
|
|
1,652 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
Global oil (in equivalent barrels of oil) |
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Number of OTC contracts traded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas |
|
|
71,130 |
|
|
|
45,154 |
|
|
|
34,358 |
|
|
|
27,190 |
|
North American power |
|
|
4,055 |
|
|
|
2,511 |
|
|
|
2,107 |
|
|
|
1,425 |
|
Global oil |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
77,537 |
|
|
|
49,245 |
|
|
|
37,697 |
|
|
|
29,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following chart presents the commission fee revenues by commodity traded in our global OTC
markets for the periods presented:
30
Global OTC Commission Fee Revenuess
Our US Futures Business Segment
The following table presents, for period from January 13, 2007 to June 30, 2007, selected
statement of income data in dollars and as a percentage of revenues for our soft commodity and
financial US futures business segment (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sugar futures |
|
$ |
19,681 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
% |
Other futures products and options |
|
|
26,421 |
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,771 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
48,873 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1) |
|
|
25,973 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
4,188 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
31,986 |
|
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
16,887 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
8,132 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,428 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses and professional services expenses. |
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, trading activity in our US futures
markets for commodity type based on the total number of contracts traded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 13, 2007 |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
To June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Number of US futures contracts traded: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soft commodity futures and options(1) |
|
|
24,711 |
|
|
|
14,439 |
|
Financial futures and options(2) |
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
26,522 |
|
|
|
15,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists primarily of sugar, coffee, cotton, orange juice, cocoa,
ethanol and wood pulp futures and options contracts. |
|
(2) |
|
Consists primarily of currency pairs (including euro-based, US
dollar-based, yen-based, sterling-based and other useful cross-rates
as well as our original contract based on the USDX), equity index and
commodity index futures and options contracts. |
31
The following table presents our average daily open interest for our US futures contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 13, 2007 |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
To June 30, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Open interest US futures contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soft commodity futures and options |
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
2,518 |
|
Financial futures and options |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
2,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Market Data Business Segment
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, selected statement of income data in
dollars and as a percentage of revenues for our market data business segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollar amounts in thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market data fees |
|
$ |
19,691 |
|
|
|
73.4 |
% |
|
$ |
8,561 |
|
|
|
65.5 |
% |
Intersegment fees |
|
|
7,122 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
4,510 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
26,813 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
13,071 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(1) |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
Intersegment expenses |
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
3,665 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
4,378 |
|
|
|
33.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
23,129 |
|
|
|
86.3 |
|
|
|
8,693 |
|
|
|
66.5 |
|
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
8,725 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,600 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
% |
|
$ |
5,632 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes compensation and benefits expenses and professional services expenses. |
We earn terminal and license fee revenues that we receive from data vendors through the
distribution of real-time and historical futures prices and other futures market data derived from
trading in our UK and US futures markets. We also earn subscription fee revenues from OTC daily
indices, view only access to the OTC markets and OTC and energy UK futures end of day reports. In
addition, we manage the market price validation curves whereby participant companies subscribe to
receive consensus market valuations.
Sources of Revenues
Transaction Fees
Transaction fees have accounted for, and are expected to continue to account for, a
substantial portion of our revenues. Transaction fees consist of exchange fees earned on futures
transactions, commission fees earned on OTC transactions, electronic confirmation fees and, for
transactions executed on NYBOT, clearing fees. We charge commission fees or exchange fees to both
the buyer and the seller in each transaction executed on our platform. Commission fees and exchange
fees are based on the number of contracts traded during each month multiplied by the commission
rate. A change to either our commission rate or to the volume of contracts we execute directly
affect our revenues. We also accept transactions that participants execute off-platform but wish to
have processed for clearing. We do not risk our own capital by engaging in any trading activities.
32
Transaction fees in our futures and OTC business segments are presented net of rebates that we
issue to customers to generate market liquidity. We implemented a rebate program in the ICE WTI
Crude market that began in April 2006 to promote trading and it continues through December 31, 2007
and we have also implemented a rebate program for the ICE Middle East Sour Crude market. From time
to time we may enter into market-maker agreements with certain participants to make markets in
certain contracts on our electronic trading platform.
Market Data Fees
Market data fees consist of terminal fees and license fees that we receive from data vendors
in exchange for the provision of real-time price information generated from our futures markets. We
invoice these data vendors monthly for terminal fees based on the number of terminals that carry
our futures market data. Each data vendor also pays a quarterly or annual license fee which is
deferred and recognized as revenue ratably over the period for which services are provided.
Market data fees also consist of data access fees that we have historically charged to
participants or customers that were not active traders who were registered to trade or view OTC
natural gas and power products on our electronic trading platform. The data access fees were based
on their historical trading activity and the number of users the participant firm had registered to
trade on our platform. We recognized the difference between the monthly data access fee for a given
participant and the actual amount of commission fees generated by such participant for trading
activity in that month as data access revenues. Beginning in March 2006, we changed the methodology
for charging OTC data access fees. We now charge OTC data access fees on a per-user basis to those
accessing our platform (both trading and view only access). We also began to charge data access
fees in our UK futures business segment beginning in February 2006, at the individual user
level.
Market data fees also consist of subscription fees that we receive from market
participants who subscribe to our OTC market data services through ICE Data. ICE Data has an
exclusive license to use our OTC market data and publishes the ICE Data end of day report, ICE
daily indices, as well as market price validation curves, which are available to subscribers for a
monthly subscription fee. ICE Data also markets real-time view only screen access to OTC markets
and charges subscribers a fee that varies depending on the number of users and the markets accessed
at each subscribing company. The revenues we receive from market data fees are deferred and
recognized as revenue ratably over the period for which services are provided.
Other Revenues
Other revenues primarily include revenues generated from membership fees, training seminars,
trade registration system fees, eCOPS documentation fees, initiation fees, booth fees, broker
telephone fees, grading fees, certification fees and licensing fees charged to the Chicago Climate
Exchange and the European Climate Exchange, among others.
Components of Expenses
Compensation and Benefits
Compensation and benefits expenses primarily consist of salaries, non-cash stock based
compensation, bonuses, payroll taxes, employer-provided medical and other benefit plan costs and
recruiting costs. Substantially all of our employees are full-time employees. We capitalized and
recorded as property and equipment a portion of our compensation and benefits costs for technology
employees engaged in software development and the enhancement of our electronic platform.
Professional Services
Professional services expenses primarily consist of outside legal, accounting and other
professional and consulting services expenses. We capitalize and record as property and equipment a
portion of the costs associated with fees for technology consultants engaged in software
development and enhancements to our electronic platform. We also capitalize certain professional
services expenses directly related to successful acquisitions. We expensed the remaining portion of
these fees in the month in which they were incurred.
33
Patent Royalty
We entered into a long-term, non-exclusive licensing agreement with a third party, which
granted us the use of the third partys patent. Under the agreement, we were required to pay
minimum annual license fees through the expiration date of the patent on February 20, 2007 along
with additional royalty payments calculated quarterly based upon the volume of certain futures
transactions executed on our platform. This licensing agreement ended on February 20, 2007 and no
payments are required after this date.
CBOT Merger-Related Transaction Costs
We incurred direct merger-related transaction costs relating to the proposed merger with CBOT.
We did not succeed with our proposed merger with CBOT, and the CME completed its acquisition of
CBOT on July 13, 2007. The merger-related transaction costs include investment banking advisors,
legal, accounting, proxy advisor, public relation services and other external costs directly
related to the proposed transaction.
Selling, General and Administrative
The major expense categories within selling, general and administrative expenses include cost
of hosting expenses, hardware and software support expenses, rent and occupancy expenses, and
marketing expenses. Cost of hosting expenses primarily consist of hosting and participant network
expenses. Our hosting expenses include the amounts we pay for the physical facilities, maintenance
and other variable costs associated with securely housing the hardware used to operate our
electronic platform, as well as our redundant disaster recovery facility. Our participant network
expenses include the amounts we pay to provide participants with direct connectivity to our
platform. Hardware and software support expenses primarily consist of external hardware and
software maintenance and support costs and trade registration system costs. We currently lease
office space in Atlanta, New York, Houston, Chicago, London, Singapore, Dublin and Calgary. Our
rent costs consist primarily of rent expense for these properties. Our occupancy expenses primarily
relate to the use of electricity, telephone lines and other miscellaneous operating costs.
Marketing expenses primarily consist of advertising, public relations and product promotion and
brand awareness campaigns, as well as for new and existing products and services. These expenses
also include our participation in seminars, trade shows, conferences and other industry events.
Other selling, general and administrative costs primarily consist of telephone and communications
expense, corporate insurance expense, travel expense, meals and entertainment expense and dues,
subscriptions and registration expense.
Depreciation and Amortization
We depreciate costs related to our property and equipment, including computer and network
equipment, software and internally developed software, office furniture and equipment and leasehold
improvements using the straight-line method based on estimated useful lives of the assets. We
capitalize costs, both internal and external, direct and incremental, related to software developed
or obtained for internal use in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position 98-1, Accounting for
Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use. We do not amortize goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite lives. We amortize intangible assets with contractual or finite
useful lives, in each case over the estimated useful lives of the intangible assets.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) consists primarily of interest income and expense, as well as gains and
losses on foreign currency transactions. We generate interest income from the investment of our
cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and restricted cash. Interest expense consists
of interest on the outstanding indebtedness and the unused fee calculated under our revolving
credit facility. We also recognized a gain during the three months ended March 31, 2007 for the
sale of our former open-outcry disaster recovery site in London.
Provision for Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes consists of current and deferred tax provisions relating to
federal, state and local taxes, as well as taxes related to foreign subsidiaries. We file a
consolidated United States federal income tax return
34
and file state income tax returns on a separate, combined or consolidated basis in accordance
with relevant state laws and regulations. Our foreign subsidiaries are based in the United Kingdom
and in Canada and we file separate local country income tax returns and take advantage of the
United Kingdoms group relief provisions when applicable. The difference between the statutory
income tax rate and our effective tax rate for a given fiscal period is primarily a reflection of
the tax effects of our foreign operations, general business and tax credits, tax exempt income,
state income taxes and the non-deductibility of certain expenses.
We recorded a tax benefit of $3.6 million in the second quarter of 2007 related to the
recognition of the indefinite reversal provision of Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion
No. 23, Accounting for Income Taxes Special Areas. The indefinite reversal provision of APB
Opinion No. 23 specifies that US income taxes should not be accrued on the undistributed earnings
of a foreign subsidiary if those earnings have been or will be invested indefinitely invested
outside the US. We had previously accrued US income taxes on a portion of the undistributed
earnings of our foreign subsidiaries.
Key Statistical Information
The following table presents key transaction volume information, as well as other selected
operating information, for the periods presented. A description of how we calculate our market
share, our trading volumes and other operating measures is set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for percentages and rate per contract) |
|
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Market Share of Selected Key Products: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total crude oil futures contracts traded globally |
|
|
112,712 |
|
|
|
62,772 |
|
|
|
55,453 |
|
|
|
33,278 |
|
ICE Brent Crude oil futures contracts traded |
|
|
29,563 |
|
|
|
20,383 |
|
|
|
14,637 |
|
|
|
10,209 |
|
ICE WTI Crude oil futures contracts traded |
|
|
24,985 |
|
|
|
9,105 |
|
|
|
12,181 |
|
|
|
6,789 |
|
Our crude oil futures market share |
|
|
48.4 |
% |
|
|
47.0 |
% |
|
|
48.4 |
% |
|
|
51.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cleared OTC Henry Hub natural gas contracts traded
on us and NYMEX-ClearPort |
|
|
61,933 |
|
|
|
44,157 |
|
|
|
28,200 |
|
|
|
26,723 |
|
Our cleared OTC Henry Hub natural gas contracts traded |
|
|
54,421 |
|
|
|
34,843 |
|
|
|
24,913 |
|
|
|
20,991 |
|
Our market share cleared OTC Henry Hub natural gas vs.
NYMEX-ClearPort |
|
|
87.9 |
% |
|
|
78.9 |
% |
|
|
88.3 |
% |
|
|
78.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cleared OTC PJM financial power contracts traded on
us and NYMEX- ClearPort |
|
|
1,502 |
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
637 |
|
Our cleared OTC PJM financial power contracts traded |
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
1,045 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
Our market share cleared OTC PJM financial power vs.
NYMEX-ClearPort |
|
|
96.4 |
% |
|
|
90.2 |
% |
|
|
97.3 |
% |
|
|
94.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Average Daily Trading Fee Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our UK futures business average daily exchange fee revenues |
|
$ |
683 |
|
|
$ |
382 |
|
|
$ |
676 |
|
|
$ |
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our US futures business average daily exchange fee revenues |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our bilateral global OTC business average daily commission
fee revenues |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
Our cleared global OTC business average daily commission
fee revenues |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our global OTC business average daily commission fee
revenues |
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total average daily exchange fee and commission fee
revenues |
|
$ |
1,816 |
|
|
$ |
836 |
|
|
$ |
1,841 |
|
|
$ |
996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our Trading Volume: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UK Futures volume |
|
|
66,795 |
|
|
|
37,681 |
|
|
|
32,822 |
|
|
|
21,022 |
|
UK Futures average daily volume |
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
US Futures volume |
|
|
26,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
US Futures average daily volume |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except for percentages and rate per contract) |
|
OTC volume |
|
|
77,537 |
|
|
|
49,245 |
|
|
|
37,697 |
|
|
|
29,275 |
|
OTC average daily volume |
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
Our Transaction or Rate per UK futures contract |
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
1.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
Our Transaction or Rate per US futures contract |
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
OTC Participants Trading Commission Percentages: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial companies (including merchant energy) |
|
|
49.6 |
% |
|
|
49.8 |
% |
|
|
50.3 |
% |
|
|
49.3 |
% |
Banks and financial institutions |
|
|
21.5 |
% |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
Liquidity providers |
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
|
27.9 |
% |
Percentage of OTC commission fees by the top 20 customers |
|
|
54.2 |
% |
|
|
55.7 |
% |
|
|
54.9 |
% |
|
|
60.4 |
% |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
Overview
Consolidated net income increased $58.6 million, or 115.8%, to $109.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 from $50.6 million for the comparable period in 2006. Net income from
our UK futures business segment increased $32.0 million, or 157.5%, to $52.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 from $20.3 million for the comparable period in 2006, primarily due to
higher transaction fees revenues. Net income from our global OTC business segment increased $8.2
million, or 33.3%, to $32.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $24.7 million for
the comparable period in 2006. Net income in our global OTC business segment increased primarily
due to significantly higher transaction fees revenues, partially offset by $10.9 million in CBOT
merger-related transaction costs incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007. Net income
from our market data business segment increased $9.0 million, or 159.2%, to $14.6 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 from $5.6 million for the comparable period in 2006. Net income in
our market data business segment increased primarily due to increased market data sales in our
futures businesses. Net income from our US futures business segment was $9.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007. Consolidated operating income, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, decreased to 59.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from 60.6% for the comparable
period in 2006. Consolidated net income, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to
41.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from 40.9% for the comparable period in 2006.
Our consolidated revenues increased $139.4 million, or 112.5%, to $263.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 from $123.9 million for the comparable period in 2006. This increase is
primarily attributable to increased trading volumes on our electronic trading platform, revenues
derived from NYBOT following the acquisition, and increased non-transaction revenues, primarily
market data fees. A significant factor driving our revenues and volume growth during this period
was the continued growth in trading volumes of our energy futures and cleared OTC contracts.
Consolidated operating expenses increased $58.3 million to $107.1 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 from $48.8 million for the comparable period in 2006, or 119.4%. This increase
is primarily attributable to $28.0 million in NYBOT operating expenses during the six months ended
June 30, 2007, amortization expenses on the NYBOT intangibles during the six months ended June 30,
2007, $10.9 million in CBOT merger-related transaction costs being incurred during the six months
ended June 30, 2007, and higher compensation expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2007 due
to non-cash compensation expenses recognized under SFAS No. 123(R) and an increase in our employee
headcount.
Revenues
Transaction Fees
Consolidated transaction fees increased $119.8 million, or 112.1%, to $226.7 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 from $106.9 million for the comparable period in 2006. Transaction
fees, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 86.1% for the six months ended June
30, 2007 from 86.3% for the comparable period in 2006.
Transaction fees generated in our UK futures business segment increased $38.2 million, or
78.8%, to $86.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $48.5 million for the
comparable period in 2006, while
36
declining as a percentage of consolidated revenues to 33.0% for the six months ended June 30,
2007 from 39.2% for the comparable period in 2006. The increase in transaction fees was primarily
due to an increase in our UK futures contract volumes and the decline in the percentage of
consolidated revenues is due to the inclusion of the NYBOT revenues. UK futures contract volumes
increased primarily due to increased liquidity brought by new market participants due to electronic
trading and the launch of the ICE WTI Crude futures contract in February 2006. Volumes in our UK
futures business segment increased 77.3% to 66.8 million contracts traded during the six months
ended June 30, 2007 from 37.7 million contracts traded during the comparable period in 2006. The
37.7 million contracts include 2.3 million ICE WTI Crude futures contracts for which we did not
charge any commissions during the six months ended June 30, 2006. Average transaction fees per
trading day for our UK futures business segment increased 78.8% to $683,000 per trading day for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 from $382,000 per trading day for the comparable period in 2006.
Transaction fees generated in our global OTC business segment increased $35.5 million, or
60.8%, to $93.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $58.4 million for the
comparable period in 2006, primarily due to increased trading volumes. Transaction fees in this
segment, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 35.6% for the six months ended June
30, 2007 from 47.1% for the comparable period in 2006. The decline in the percentage of
consolidated revenues is due to the inclusion of the NYBOT revenues. The number of transactions or
trades executed in our global OTC business segment increased by 80.3% to 2.7 million trades for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 from 1.5 million trades for the comparable period in 2006. Average
transaction fees per trading day for our global OTC business segment increased 62.0% to $736,000
per trading day for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $454,000 per trading day for the
comparable period in 2006.
Increased volumes in our global OTC business segment were primarily due to increased trading
activity in North American natural gas and power markets as a result of the availability of cleared
OTC contracts, as well as increased liquidity brought by new market participants and
weather-related volatility. Transaction fees generated by trading in North American natural gas
contracts increased $25.8 million, or 57.7%, to $70.5 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007 from $44.7 million for the comparable period in 2006. In addition, transaction fees generated
by trading in North American power contracts increased $7.3 million, or 64.6%, to $18.5 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $11.2 million for the comparable period in 2006. The
continued growth in trading volumes in OTC contracts can be attributed in part to the use of
cleared OTC contracts, which eliminates the need for a counterparty to post capital against each
trade and also reduces requirements for entering into multiple negotiated bilateral settlement
agreements to enable trading with other counterparties.
Revenues derived from electronic trade confirmation fees in our global OTC business segment
increased $1.0 million, or 65.1%, to $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $1.6
million for the comparable period in 2006. Consolidated electronic trade confirmation fees, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 1.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from
1.3% for the comparable period in 2006.
Transaction fees generated in our US futures business segment were $46.1 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007, which represented 17.5% of consolidated revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2007. NYBOT was acquired on January 12, 2007. NYBOT adjusted its exchange fee rates
effective June 1, 2007, including adding a surcharge on certain electronic trading products.
Average transaction fees per trading day for our US futures business segment were $397,000 for the
period from January 13, 2007 to June 30, 2007.
Market Data Fees
Consolidated market data fees increased $15.0 million, or 101.2%, to $29.9 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 from $14.8 million for the comparable period in 2006. This increase was
primarily due to the new terminal fees and license fees that we receive from data vendors derived
from NYBOT following the acquisition, increased data access fees in our global OTC and futures
markets and increased terminal fees and license fees that we receive from data vendors in exchange
for the provision of real-time price information generated from our UK futures markets. During the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we recognized $11.0 million and $6.8 million,
respectively, in data access fees and terminal fees in our UK futures and global OTC business
segments. The increase in the market data fees received from data vendors in our energy futures and
options business segment were due to both an increase in the average charge per terminal and an
increase in the number of terminals. During the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we
recognized $6.5 million and $5.6 million, respectively, in terminal and
37
license fees from data vendors in our UK futures business segment. We recognized $9.2 million
in terminal and license fees from data vendors in our US futures business segment during the period
from January 13, 2007 to June 30, 2007. Consolidated market data fees, as a percentage of
consolidated revenues, decreased to 11.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from 12.0% for the
comparable period in 2006.
Other Revenues
Consolidated other revenues increased $4.5 million to $6.7 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 from $2.1 million for the comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due
to trade registration system fees of $1.2 million recognized during the six months ended June 30,
2007 and $2.8 million in other revenues relating to NYBOT. Consolidated other revenues, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to 2.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from
1.7% for the comparable period in 2006.
Expenses
Compensation and Benefits
Consolidated compensation and benefits expenses increased $20.9 million, or 92.8%, to $43.5
million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $22.5 million for the comparable period in
2006. This increase was primarily due to the inclusion of $13.5 million in NYBOT compensation and
benefits expenses in our consolidated results for the six months ended June 30, 2007, an increase
in the non-cash compensation expenses and an increase in our employee headcount. The non-cash
compensation expenses recognized in our consolidated financial statements for our stock options and
restricted stock were $7.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $4.8
million for the comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due to non-cash compensation
costs recognized for the performance-based restricted stock that was granted in December 2006. Our
employee headcount increased from 212 employees as of June 30, 2006 to 260 employees as of June 30,
2007, excluding the NYBOT employees. Our NYBOT employee headcount decreased from 282 employees as
of January 12, 2007, the acquisition date, to 214 employees as of June 30, 2007. Consolidated
compensation and benefits expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 16.5%
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from 18.2% for the comparable period in 2006 primarily due
to our increased revenues.
Professional Services
Consolidated professional services expenses increased $5.7 million, or 95.4%, to $11.6 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $5.9 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
increase was primarily due to the inclusion of $2.8 million in NYBOT professional services expenses
in our consolidated results for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and $1.4 million in professional
services expenses incurred in our UK futures business segment relating to the establishment of ICE
Clear Europe, our European clearing house we are in the process of establishing. Consolidated
professional services expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 4.4% for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 from 4.8% for the comparable period in 2006.
Patent Royalty
Patent royalty expenses decreased $1.5 million, or 46.9%, to $1.7 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 from $3.2 million for the comparable period in 2006. Consolidated patent
royalty expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 0.6% for the six months
ended June 30, 2007 from 2.6% for the comparable period in 2006. The patent licensing agreement
terminated on February 20, 2007 and there were no patent royalty expenses after this date.
38
CBOT Merger-Related Transaction Costs
CBOT merger-related transaction costs were $10.9 million for the six months ended June 30,
2007. Consolidated CBOT merger-related transaction costs, as a percentage of consolidated revenues,
were 4.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2007. We did not incur any CBOT merger-related
transaction costs during the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Selling, General and Administrative
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses increased $14.5 million, or 136.6%,
to $25.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $10.6 million for the comparable
period in 2006. This increase was primarily due to the inclusion of $9.9 million in NYBOT selling,
general and administrative expenses and increased costs of hosting expenses, hardware and software
support, marketing expenses and rent expense that resulted from the growth of our business. We have
begun to relocate our technology operations and our support systems, including our primary data
center and our disaster recovery site, to Chicago. Our disaster recovery site was relocated from
London to Chicago in June 2007. The primary data center is scheduled to migrate from Atlanta to
Chicago beginning in early 2008. Therefore, we have incurred some redundant costs at our technology
facilities in Atlanta, London and Chicago during this transition period. Consolidated selling,
general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to 9.5%
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from 8.6% for the comparable period in 2006.
Depreciation and Amortization
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses increased $7.8 million, or 119.4%, to
$14.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from $6.5 million for the comparable period in
2006. This increase was primarily due to the amortization on the acquired NYBOT intangibles of $4.0
million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, the depreciation on the $19.6 million in fixed
asset additions incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and to the inclusion of $1.8
million in NYBOT depreciation expenses in our consolidated results for the six months ended June
30, 2007. Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, increased to 5.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from 5.2% for the comparable
period in 2006.
Other Income (Expense)
Consolidated other income increased $4.9 million to $6.9 million for the six months ended June
30, 2007 from $2.0 million for the comparable period in 2006. This increase primarily related to
the gain recognized on the sale of an asset and an increase in interest income, partially offset by
an increase in interest expense. Interest income increased $3.3 million to $5.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 from $2.4 million for the comparable period in 2006 primarily due to an
increase in our cash balances from the net cash provided by operations. We recognized a gain of
$9.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 on the sale of our former disaster recovery
site for our open-outcry in London. Interest expense increased $8.0 million to $8.1 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 from $120,000 for the comparable period in 2006 primarily due to the
interest expense and amortization associated with our $500 million Credit Agreement.
Income Taxes
Consolidated tax expense increased $27.4 million to $53.8 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 from $26.4 million for the comparable period in 2006, primarily due to the increase
in our pre-tax income. Our effective tax rate decreased to 33.0% for the six months ended June 30,
2007 from 34.3% for the comparable period in 2006, primarily due to a decrease in the amount of US
taxes accrued on foreign earnings and an increase in tax credits generated, which are partially
offset by higher New York state and City tax rates associated with the results of NYBOT.
39
Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2006
Overview
Consolidated net income increased $22.7 million, or 73.4%, to $53.7 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2007 from $31.0 million for the comparable period in 2006. Net income from
our UK futures business segment increased $11.7 million, or 90.4%, to $24.6 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2007 from $12.9 million for the comparable period in 2006, primarily due to
higher transaction fees revenues. Net income from our global OTC business segment decreased
$143,000, or 1.0%, to $13.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $14.0 million for
the comparable period in 2006. Net income in our global OTC business segment decreased primarily
due to $10.9 million in CBOT merger-related transaction costs expensed during the three months
ended June 30, 2007, partially offset by higher transaction fees revenues. Net income from our
market data business segment increased $4.0 million, or 97.8%, to $8.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 from $4.1 million for the comparable period in 2006. Net income in our market
data business segment increased primarily due to increased market data sales in our futures
businesses. Net income from our US futures business segment was $7.2 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007. Consolidated operating income, as a percentage of consolidated revenues,
decreased to 56.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from 64.4% for the comparable period in
2006. Consolidated net income, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 39.3% for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 from 42.1% for the comparable period in 2006.
Our consolidated revenues increased $63.1 million, or 85.7%, to $136.7 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2007 from $73.6 million for the comparable period in 2006. This increase is
primarily attributable to increased trading volumes on our electronic trading platform, revenues
derived from NYBOT following the acquisition, and increased non-transaction revenues, primarily
market data fees. A significant factor driving our revenues and volume growth during this period
was the continued growth in trading volumes of our energy futures and cleared OTC contracts.
Consolidated operating expenses increased $34.0 million to $60.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 from $26.2 million for the comparable period in 2006 or 129.7%. This increase
is primarily attributable to $14.9 million in NYBOT operating expenses during the three months
ended June 30, 2007, amortization expenses on the NYBOT intangibles of $2.1 million during the
three months ended June 30, 2007, $10.9 million in CBOT merger-related transaction costs expensed
during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and higher compensation expenses during the three
months ended June 30, 2007 due to non-cash compensation expenses recognized under SFAS No. 123(R)
and an increase in our employee headcount.
Revenues
Transaction Fees
Consolidated transaction fees increased $53.7 million, or 84.4%, to $117.4 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 from $63.7 million for the comparable period in 2006. Transaction
fees, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 85.9% for the three months ended June
30, 2007 from 86.5% for the comparable period in 2006.
Transaction fees generated in our UK futures business segment increased $13.1 million, or
44.1%, to $42.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $29.6 million for the
comparable period in 2006, while declining as a percentage of consolidated revenues to 31.2% for
the three months ended June 30, 2007 from 40.2% for the comparable period in 2006. The increase in
transaction fees was primarily due to an increase in our UK futures contract volumes and the
decline in the percentage of consolidated revenues was due to the inclusion of the NYBOT revenues.
UK futures contract volumes increased primarily due to increased liquidity brought by new market
participants due to electronic trading and the launch of the ICE WTI Crude futures contract in
February 2006. Volumes in our UK futures business segment increased 56.1% to 32.8 million contracts
traded during the three months ended June 30, 2007 from 21.0 million contracts traded during the
comparable period in 2006. Average transaction fees per trading day for our UK futures business
segment increased 44.1% to $676,000 per trading day for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from
$469,000 per trading day for the comparable period in 2006.
Transaction fees generated in our global OTC business segment increased $12.5 million, or
36.7%, to $46.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $34.1 million for the
comparable period in 2006, primarily due to increased trading volumes. Transaction fees in this
segment, as a percentage of consolidated
40
revenues, decreased to 34.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from 46.3% for the
comparable period in 2006. The decline in the percentage of consolidated revenues is due to the
inclusion of the NYBOT revenues. The number of transactions or trades executed in our global OTC
business segment increased by 70.7% to 1.4 million trades for the three months ended June 30, 2007
from 795,000 trades for the comparable period in 2006. Average transaction fees per trading day for
our global OTC business segment increased 36.3% to $718,000 per trading day for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 from $527,000 per trading day for the comparable period in 2006.
Increased volumes in our global OTC business segment were primarily due to increased trading
activity in North American natural gas and power markets as a result of the availability of cleared
OTC contracts, as well as increased liquidity brought by new market participants and increased
hedging activity. Transaction fees generated by trading in North American natural gas contracts
increased $7.9 million, or 30.0%, to $34.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from
$26.4 million for the comparable period in 2006. In addition, transaction fees generated by trading
in North American power contracts increased $3.3 million, or 51.5%, to $9.7 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2007 from $6.4 million for the comparable period in 2006.
Revenues derived from electronic trade confirmation fees in our global OTC business segment
increased $467,000, or 52.2%, to $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from
$895,000 for the comparable period in 2006. Consolidated electronic trade confirmation fees, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 1.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2007
from 1.2% for the comparable period in 2006.
Transaction fees generated in our US futures business segment were $28.2 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2007, which represented 20.6% of consolidated revenues for the three months
ended June 30, 2007. NYBOT was acquired on January 12, 2007. NYBOT adjusted its exchange fee rates
effective June 1, 2007, including adding a surcharge on certain electronic trading products.
Average transaction fees per trading day for our US futures business segment were $447,000 for the
three months ended June 30, 2007.
Market Data Fees
Consolidated market data fees increased $7.0 million, or 79.7%, to $15.8 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2007 from $8.8 million for the comparable period in 2006. This increase was
primarily due to the new terminal fees and license fees that we receive from data vendors derived
from NYBOT following the acquisition, increased data access fees in our global OTC and futures
markets and increased terminal fees and license fees that we receive from data vendors in exchange
for the provision of real-time price information generated from our UK futures markets. During the
three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we recognized $5.7 million and $4.8 million,
respectively, in data access fees and terminal fees in our UK futures and global OTC business
segments. The increase in the market data fees received from data vendors in our energy futures and
options business segment were due to both an increase in the average charge per terminal and an
increase in the number of terminals. During the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, we
recognized $3.3 million and $2.8 million, respectively, in terminal and license fees from data
vendors in our UK futures business segment. We recognized $5.1 million in terminal and license fees
from data vendors in our US futures business segment during the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Consolidated market data fees, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 11.6% for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 from 12.0% for the comparable period in 2006.
Other Revenues
Consolidated other revenues increased $2.3 million to $3.4 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 from $1.1 million for the comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due
to trade registration system fees of $537,000 recognized during the three months ended June 30,
2007 and $1.3 million in other revenues relating to NYBOT. Consolidated other revenues, as a
percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to 2.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2007
from 1.5% for the comparable period in 2006.
41
Expenses
Compensation and Benefits
Consolidated compensation and benefits expenses increased $9.8 million, or 82.0%, to $21.7
million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $11.9 million for the comparable period in
2006. This increase was primarily due to the inclusion of $6.3 million in NYBOT compensation and
benefits expenses, an increase in the non-cash compensation expenses and an increase in our
employee headcount during the three months ended June 30, 2007. The non-cash compensation expenses
recognized in our consolidated financial statements for our stock options and restricted stock were
$3.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $2.6 million for the
comparable period in 2006. This increase was primarily due to non-cash compensation costs
recognized for the performance-based restricted stock that was granted in December 2006. Our
employee headcount increased from 212 employees as of June 30, 2006 to 260 employees as of June 30,
2007, excluding the NYBOT employees. Our NYBOT employee headcount decreased from 282 employees as
of January 12, 2007, the acquisition date, to 214 employees as of June 30, 2007. Consolidated
compensation and benefits expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, decreased to 15.9%
for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from 16.2% for the comparable period in 2006 primarily due
to our increased revenues.
Professional Services
Consolidated professional services expenses increased $3.5 million, or 107.5%, to $6.7 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $3.2 million for the comparable period in 2006. This
increase was primarily due to the inclusion of $1.9 million in NYBOT professional services expenses
in our consolidated results for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and due to $862,000 in
professional services expenses incurred in our UK futures business segment relating to the
establishment of ICE Clear Europe, our new European clearing house. Consolidated professional
services expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to 4.9% for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 from 4.4% for the comparable period in 2006.
Patent Royalty
Patent royalty expenses were $2.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Consolidated patent royalty expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, were 3.0% for the
three months ended June 30, 2006. The patent licensing agreement terminated in February 2007 and
there were no patent royalty expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
CBOT Merger-Related Transaction Costs
CBOT merger-related transaction costs were $10.9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2007. Consolidated CBOT merger-related transaction costs, as a percentage of consolidated revenues,
were 8.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. We did not incur any CBOT merger-related
transaction costs during the three months ended June 30, 2006.
Selling, General and Administrative
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses increased $7.5 million, or 136.4%,
to $13.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $5.5 million for the comparable
period in 2006. This increase was primarily due to the inclusion of $5.5 million in NYBOT selling,
general and administrative expenses in our consolidated results for the three months ended June 30,
2007 and due to increased costs of hosting expenses, hardware and software support, marketing
expenses and rent expense that resulted from the growth of our business. We have begun to relocate
our technology operations and our support systems, including our primary data center and our
disaster recovery site, to Chicago. Our disaster recovery site was relocated from London to Chicago
in June 2007. The primary data center is scheduled to migrate from Atlanta to Chicago beginning in
early 2008. Therefore, we have incurred some redundant costs at our technology facilities in
Atlanta, London and Chicago during this transition period. Consolidated selling, general and
administrative expenses, as a percentage of consolidated revenues, increased to 9.5% for the three
months ended June 30, 2007 from 7.5% for the comparable period in 2006.
42
Depreciation and Amortization
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses increased $4.4 million, or 134.1%, to $7.7
million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $3.3 million for the comparable period in
2006. This increase was primarily due to the inclusion of $1.2 million in NYBOT depreciation
expenses in our consolidated results for the three months ended June 30, 2007, the depreciation on
the $19.6 million in fixed asset additions incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007 and
the amortization on the acquired NYBOT intangibles of $2.1 million for the three months ended June
30, 2007. Consolidated depreciation and amortization expenses, as a percentage of consolidated
revenues, increased to 5.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from 4.5% for the comparable
period in 2006.
Other Income (Expense)
Consolidated other income (expense) decreased to net other expense of $1.3 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 from net other income of $853,000 for the comparable period in
2006. This decrease primarily related to an increase in interest expense, partially offset by an
increase in interest income. Interest expense increased to $4.3 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 from $57,000 for the comparable period in 2006 primarily due to the interest expense
and amortization associated with our $500 million Credit Agreement. Interest income increased $1.6
million to $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from $1.3 million for the
comparable period in 2006 primarily due to an increase in our cash balances from the net cash
provided by operations.
Income Taxes
Consolidated tax expense increased $4.2 million to $21.5 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 from $17.3 million for the comparable period in 2006, primarily due to the increase
in our pre-tax income. Our effective tax rate decreased to 28.6% for the three months ended June
30, 2007 from 35.8% for the comparable period in 2006, primarily due to a decrease in the amount of
US taxes accrued on foreign earnings and an increase in tax credits generated, which are partially
offset by higher New York state and City tax rates associated with the results of NYBOT.
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth quarterly unaudited consolidated statements of income for the
periods presented. We believe that this data has been prepared on substantially the same basis as
our audited consolidated financial statements and includes all adjustments, consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of our consolidated results of
operations for the quarters presented. The historical results for any quarter do not necessarily
indicate the results expected for any future period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended, |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007(1) |
|
|
2007(2) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brent Crude futures |
|
$ |
21,796 |
|
|
$ |
22,121 |
|
|
$ |
18,003 |
|
|
$ |
17,357 |
|
|
$ |
15,290 |
|
Sugar futures |
|
|
12,430 |
|
|
|
7,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other futures products and options |
|
|
36,559 |
|
|
|
32,703 |
|
|
|
19,697 |
|
|
|
19,832 |
|
|
|
14,282 |
|
OTC: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North American natural gas |
|
|
34,275 |
|
|
|
36,183 |
|
|
|
35,655 |
|
|
|
36,955 |
|
|
|
26,369 |
|
North American power |
|
|
9,713 |
|
|
|
8,797 |
|
|
|
7,891 |
|
|
|
8,088 |
|
|
|
6,411 |
|
Other commodities markets |
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
Electronic trade confirmation services |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
Market data fees |
|
|
15,846 |
|
|
|
14,019 |
|
|
|
9,647 |
|
|
|
9,748 |
|
|
|
8,819 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
3,248 |
|
|
|
2,818 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
136,654 |
|
|
|
126,608 |
|
|
|
95,264 |
|
|
|
94,662 |
|
|
|
73,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
21,717 |
|
|
|
21,758 |
|
|
|
14,214 |
|
|
|
12,987 |
|
|
|
11,932 |
|
Professional services |
|
|
6,714 |
|
|
|
4,863 |
|
|
|
2,671 |
|
|
|
2,799 |
|
|
|
3,235 |
|
Patent royalty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
2,676 |
|
|
|
3,151 |
|
|
|
2,198 |
|
CBOT merger-related transaction costs(1) |
|
|
10,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
13,002 |
|
|
|
12,130 |
|
|
|
7,629 |
|
|
|
7,016 |
|
|
|
5,501 |
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended, |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007(1) |
|
|
2007(2) |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,748 |
|
|
|
6,509 |
|
|
|
3,890 |
|
|
|
3,327 |
|
|
|
3,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
60,125 |
|
|
|
46,965 |
|
|
|
31,080 |
|
|
|
29,280 |
|
|
|
26,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
76,529 |
|
|
|
79,643 |
|
|
|
64,184 |
|
|
|
65,382 |
|
|
|
47,416 |
|
Other income (expense), net(2) |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
8,221 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
2,731 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
21,514 |
|
|
|
32,278 |
|
|
|
18,408 |
|
|
|
24,468 |
|
|
|
17,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
53,693 |
|
|
$ |
55,586 |
|
|
$ |
48,992 |
|
|
$ |
43,645 |
|
|
$ |
30,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2007 include
$10.9 million in CBOT merger-related transaction costs. Excluding
these charges, net of taxes, our net income for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 would have been $60.7 million. See Non-GAAP
Financial Measures. |
|
(2) |
|
The financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2007
include the results of NYBOT for the period from January 13, 2007 to
March 31, 2007 and also include a gain of $9.3 million, or $5.8
million after tax, relating to the sale our former open-outcry
disaster recovery site in London. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since our inception we have financed our operations, growth and cash needs primarily through
income from operations and borrowings under our credit facilities. Our principal liquidity and
capital requirements have been to fund capital expenditures, working capital, strategic
acquisitions, and marketing and development of our electronic trading platform. We may need to
incur additional debt or issue additional equity to make strategic acquisitions or investments in
the future. We financed the cash portion of the merger with NYBOT with cash on hand and borrowings
under a senior unsecured credit facility discussed below.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Short-term Investments and Restricted Cash
We had consolidated cash and cash equivalents of $120.9 million and $204.3 million as of June
30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. We had $110.4 million and $77.4 million in short-term
investments as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively and $20.2 million and $16.2
million in current and noncurrent restricted cash as of June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively. We consider all short-term, highly liquid investments with remaining maturity dates
of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. We classify all investments
with original maturity dates in excess of three months and with maturities less than one year as
short-term investments. We classify all investments that we intend to hold for more than one year
as long-term investments. We classify all cash that is not available for general use, either due to
Financial Services Authority requirements or through restrictions in specific agreements, as
restricted cash. The decrease in the cash and cash equivalents and in short-term investments was
primarily due to the cash we used in connection with the acquisition of NYBOT in January 2007.
Cash Flow
The following tables present, for the periods indicated, the major components of net increases
(decreases) in cash and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
94,804 |
|
|
$ |
42,870 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(443,043 |
) |
|
|
(27,380 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
264,842 |
|
|
|
17,807 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(83,405 |
) |
|
$ |
34,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
Operating Activities
Consolidated net cash provided by operating activities was $94.8 million and $42.9 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Net cash provided by operating
activities primarily consists of net income adjusted for certain non-cash items, including
depreciation and amortization and the effects of changes in working capital. Fluctuations in net
cash provided by operating activities are primarily attributable to increases and decreases in our
net income between periods and, to a lesser extent, due to fluctuations in working capital. The
$51.9 million increase in net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June
30, 2007 from the comparable period in 2006 is primarily due to the $8.2 million increase in the
global OTC business segments net income, the $9.0 million increase in the market data business
segments net income, and the $32.0 million increase in the UK futures business segments net
income for the six months ended June 30, 2007 from the comparable period in 2006 and due to the
$9.4 million in the US futures business segments net income for the six months ended June 30,
2007. These amounts were partially offset by $40.1 million in excess tax benefits from stock-based
compensation.
Investing Activities
Consolidated net cash used in investing activities was $443.0 million and $27.4 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The consolidated net cash used in
investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily relates to the $392.1 million
in cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired. These activities also relate to sales and
purchases of available-for-sale investments, capital expenditures in each period for software,
including internally developed software, and for computer and network equipment. We had a net
increase in investments classified as available-for-sale of $29.8 million and $19.2 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. We incurred capitalized software development
costs of $5.3 million and $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and we had additional capital expenditures of $19.6 million and $4.3 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The additional capital expenditures
primarily relate to hardware purchases to continue the development and expansion of our electronic
platform and disaster recovery site.
Financing Activities
Consolidated net cash provided by financing activities was $264.8 million and $17.8 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Consolidated net cash provided by
financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2007 primarily relates to the $250.0 million
in proceeds received from the credit agreement and $40.1 million in excess tax benefits from
stock-based compensation, partially offset by $19.3 million in cash payments related to treasury
shares received for restricted stock and stock option tax payments.
Loan Agreements
We financed the cash portion of the NYBOT acquisition with cash on hand and borrowings under a
senior unsecured credit facility, or the Credit Agreement, dated January 12, 2007 that we entered
into with Wachovia, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and the
lenders named therein. In connection with the Credit Agreement, we terminated our previous $50.0
million credit facility with Wachovia, under which no borrowings were outstanding. The Credit
Agreement provides for a term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million and
a revolving credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of $250.0 million, or collectively,
the Credit Facilities. In connection with the acquisition, we used the proceeds of the $250.0
million term loan along with $164.6 million of cash on hand to finance the $414.6 million cash
component of the acquisition and the acquisition related expenses. Under the terms of the Credit
Agreement, we can borrow an aggregate principal amount of up to $250.0 million under the revolving
credit facility at any time from the closing date of the Credit Agreement through the third
anniversary of the closing date of the merger, which is January 12, 2010. We have agreed to reserve
$50.0 million of the $250.0 million available under the revolving credit facility for use by ICE
Clear US. The remaining amount under the revolving credit facility can be used by us for general
corporate purposes.
Loans under the Credit Facilities shall, at our option, bear interest on the principal amount
outstanding at either: (i) LIBOR plus an applicable margin rate or (ii) a base rate plus an
applicable margin rate. The base rate will be equal to the higher of (i) Wachovias prime rate or
(ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%. The applicable margin rate ranges from 0.50% to 1.125% on
the LIBOR loans and from 0.00% to 0.125% for the base rate loans based on our
45
total leverage ratio calculated on a trailing twelve month period. Interest on each loan is
payable quarterly. As of June 30, 2007, we have a six-month $240.6 million LIBOR loan outstanding
with a stated interest rate of 5.98%, including the applicable margin rate of 0.625%. For the
borrowings under the term loan facility, we began making payments on June 30, 2007, and will make
payments quarterly thereafter until the fifth anniversary of the closing date of the Merger. The
Credit Agreement includes an unutilized revolving credit commitment that is equal to the unused
maximum revolver amount multiplied by an applicable margin rate and is payable in arrears on a
quarterly basis. The applicable margin rate ranges from 0.10% to 0.20% based on our total leverage
ratio calculated on a trailing twelve month period. Based on this calculation, the applicable
margin rate was 0.125% at June 30, 2007.
The Credit Agreement requires us to use 100% of the net cash proceeds raised from debt
issuances or asset dispositions, with certain limited exceptions, to prepay outstanding loans under
the Credit Facilities. With limited exceptions, we may prepay the outstanding loans under the
Credit Facilities, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty upon written notice to the
Administrative Agent. The Credit Agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants, including,
but not limited to, leverage and interest coverage ratios, as well as limitations or required
approvals for acquisitions, dispositions of assets and certain investments, the incurrence of
additional debt or the creation of liens and other fundamental changes to our business. We have
been and are currently in compliance with the relevant covenants under the Credit Agreement.
Future Capital Requirements
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including the rate of our trading
volume growth, required technology initiatives, regulatory compliance costs, the timing and
introduction of new products and enhancements to existing products, and the continuing market
acceptance of our electronic platform. We currently expect to make capital expenditures ranging
between an aggregate of $30 million and $33 million in 2007 to support the continued expansion of
our UK futures, US futures, global OTC and market data businesses. We believe that our cash flows
from operations and our $250.0 million revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund our
working capital needs and capital expenditure requirements at least through the end of 2008.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table presents, for the periods indicated, our contractual obligations (which we
intend to fund from operations) and commercial commitments as of June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
1-3 Years |
|
|
4-5 Years |
|
|
5 Years |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Contractual Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and interest |
|
$ |
281,500 |
|
|
$ |
51,094 |
|
|
$ |
110,594 |
|
|
$ |
119,812 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
199,465 |
|
|
|
22,448 |
|
|
|
46,997 |
|
|
|
54,522 |
|
|
|
75,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
480,965 |
|
|
$ |
73,542 |
|
|
$ |
157,591 |
|
|
$ |
174,334 |
|
|
$ |
75,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We provide adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per common share on adjusted net income
as additional information regarding our operating results. These measures exclude the impact of the
CBOT merger-related transaction costs described below. We use these non-GAAP measures internally to
evaluate our performance and in making financial and operational decisions. We believe that our
presentation of these measures provides investors with greater transparency and supplemental data
relating to our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we believe the
presentation of these measures is useful for period-to-period comparison of results because the
CBOT merger-related transaction costs do not reflect our historical operating performance. These
measures are not in accordance with, or an alternative to, GAAP, and may be different from non-GAAP
measures used by other companies. Investors should not rely on any single financial measure when
evaluating our business. We strongly recommend that investors review the GAAP financial measures
included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including our consolidated financial statements and
the notes thereto.
46
Our management uses adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share as financial measures
to evaluate the performance of our business. When viewed in conjunction with our GAAP results and
the accompanying reconciliation, we believe adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share
provides a more complete understanding of factors affecting our business than GAAP measures alone.
Management uses adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share to evaluate operating
performance and management decisions made during the reporting period by excluding certain items
that we believe have less significance on the day-to-day performance of our business. Our internal
budgets are based on adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share, and we report our
adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share to our board of directors. In addition,
adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share is among the criteria used in determining
performance-based compensation. We understand that analysts and investors regularly rely on
non-GAAP financial measures, such as adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share, to assess
operating performance. We use adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share because they more
clearly highlight trends in our business that may not otherwise be apparent when relying solely on
GAAP financial measures, since adjusted net income and adjusted earnings per share eliminates from
our results specific financial items that have less bearing on our operating performance.
Adjusted net income is calculated by adding the CBOT merger-related transaction costs to net
income, and it is presented net of tax. We incurred incremental direct merger-related transaction
costs of $10.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2007 relating to our proposed merger
with CBOT. We did not succeed in our proposed merger with CBOT and the CME completed its
acquisition of CBOT on July 13, 2007. The $10.9 million in merger-related transaction costs include
investment banking advisors, legal, accounting, proxy advisor, public relation services and other
external costs directly related to the proposed transaction. Despite our plans to continue to
explore and pursue acquisition opportunities, we do not believe that this item is representative of
our past or future operating performance given that the magnitude of the expense was well outside
of our historical expenses. We believe that the CBOT merger-related transaction costs are
infrequent and unusual and are not representative of our historical operating performance because
we have not incurred similar significant merger-related costs within the prior periods and do not
expect to incur such costs again within the next several years. Adjusted earnings per common share
are calculated as adjusted net income divided by the actual weighted average common shares
outstanding.
The following table reconciles net income to adjusted net income and calculates adjusted
earnings per common share on adjusted net income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTC Business |
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
109,279 |
|
|
$ |
53,693 |
|
|
$ |
32,880 |
|
Add: CBOT merger-related transaction costs |
|
|
10,944 |
|
|
|
10,944 |
|
|
|
10,944 |
|
Less: Effective tax rate benefit of CBOT merger-related
transaction costs |
|
|
(3,906 |
) |
|
|
(3,906 |
) |
|
|
(3,906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted net income |
|
$ |
116,317 |
|
|
$ |
60,731 |
|
|
$ |
39,918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share on net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted earnings per common share on adjusted net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted basic |
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted diluted |
|
$ |
1.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
68,372 |
|
|
|
69,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
70,496 |
|
|
|
71,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any relationships to unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, which
have been established for the sole purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually limited purpose.
47
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board, or FASB, issued FASB Interpretation No.
48, or FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements in accordance with
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold
and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on de-recognition of
tax benefits, classification on the balance sheet, interest and penalties, accounting in interim
periods, disclosure and transition. We adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. As a
result of the adoption, we recognized a charge of $83,000 to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings
balance. As of the adoption date, we had unrecognized tax benefits of $13.2 million of which $5.0
million, if recognized, would affect our effective tax rate. We recorded an increase of our
unrecognized tax benefits of $254,000 as of June 30, 2007. We recognize interest accrued related to
income tax uncertainties as a component of interest expense. Any related penalties, if incurred,
would be included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Estimated interest accrued
related to the unrecognized tax benefits totaled $593,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
Accrued interest and penalties were $1.5 million and $2.1 million as of January 1, 2007 and June
30, 2007, respectively.
We or one of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the US federal jurisdiction, and
various state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, we are no longer subject to US
federal, state, local or foreign examinations by tax authorities for years before 2003.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Through June 30, 2007, there were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies
and estimates from those disclosed in the section Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2006 Form 10-K.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk in the ordinary course of business. This market risk
consists primarily of interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk.
Interest Rate Risk
We have exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relating to our cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, current and noncurrent restricted cash and indebtedness. As of
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, our cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and
current and noncurrent restricted cash were $251.4 million and $297.8 million, respectively, of
which $12.6 million and $23.5 million, respectively, were denominated in pounds sterling. The
remaining investments are denominated in US dollars. We would not expect our operating results or
cash flows to be significantly affected by changes in market interest rates. We do not use our
investment portfolio for trading or other speculative purposes.
At June 30, 2007, our credit facilities subject to interest rate risk consisted of a $240.6
million term loan. A hypothetical 100 basis point increase in long-term interest rates would
decrease annual pre-tax earnings by $2.4 million, assuming no change in the volume or composition
of our debt.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We have foreign currency transaction risk related to the settlement of foreign currency
denominated assets, liabilities and payables that occur through our foreign operations which are
received in or paid in pounds sterling due to the increase or decrease in the period-end foreign
currency exchange rates between periods. We had foreign currency transaction gains (losses) of
$93,000 and ($317,000) for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, primarily
attributable to the fluctuations of pounds sterling relative to the US dollar. The average exchange
rate of pounds sterling to the US dollar increased from 1.7973 for the six months ended June 30,
2006 to 1.9706 for the six months ended June 30, 2007.
48
We have historically generated a significant portion of our revenues from sales to
participants located outside of the United States, principally in the United Kingdom. Of our
consolidated revenues, 1.0% and 16.2% were denominated in pounds sterling for the six months ended
June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Of our consolidated operating expenses, 15.7% and 30.8% were
denominated in pounds sterling for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. As
the pounds sterling exchange rate changes, the US equivalent of revenues and expenses denominated
in foreign currencies changes accordingly. Our operating expenses, certain of which are denominated
in pounds sterling, increased $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to
the same period in the prior year due to the 9.6% increase in the average exchange rate of pounds
sterling to the US dollar for the six months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to the six months
ended June 30, 2006.
As of the second quarter of 2006, we began charging exchange fees in US dollars rather than in
pounds sterling in our key UK futures contracts, including crude oil and heating oil contracts. All
sales in our business are now denominated in US dollars, except for some small futures contracts in
our UK futures business segment. We may experience substantial gains or losses from foreign
currency transactions in the future given there are still net assets or net liabilities and
expenses of our UK subsidiaries financial statements that are denominated in pounds sterling. Our
UK operations in some instances function as a natural hedge because we generally hold an equal
amount of monetary assets and liabilities that are denominated in pounds sterling.
Impact of Inflation
We have not been adversely affected by inflation as technological advances and competition
have generally caused prices for the hardware and software that we use for our electronic platform
to remain constant or to decline. In the event of inflation, we believe that we will be able to
pass on any price increases to our participants, as the prices that we charge are not governed by
long-term contracts.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, have concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures are adequate and effective in timely alerting them to material information relating
to our company (including our consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in our periodic
SEC filings.
(b) Changes in internal controls. There were no significant changes in our internal controls
over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial
reporting. As a result, no corrective actions were taken.
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
NYMEX Claim of Infringement
On September 29, 2005, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted
our motion for summary judgment dismissing all claims brought by NYMEX against us in an action
commenced in November 2002. NYMEXs complaint alleged copyright infringement by us on the basis of
our use of NYMEXs publicly available settlement prices in two of our cleared OTC contracts. The
complaint also alleged that we infringe and dilute NYMEXs trademark rights by referring to NYMEX
trademarks in certain of our swap contract specifications and that we tortiously interfered with a
contract between NYMEX and the data provider that provides us with the NYMEX settlement prices
pursuant to a license. In dismissing all of NYMEXs claims, the court found that NYMEXs settlement
prices were not copyrightable works as a matter of law, and we had not engaged in copyright or
trademark infringement in referencing NYMEXs publicly available settlement prices. The trademark
dilution and tortious interference claims, which are state law claims, were dismissed on
jurisdictional grounds. While the court granted summary judgment in our favor on all claims, NYMEX
is currently appealing the decision regarding the copyright claims and state law claims in the
Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Oral arguments for the appeal
49
were held on November 16, 2006, but no decision has been rendered by the appellate court. We
do not believe that the resolution of this matter will have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Klein v. NYBOT; NYBOT v. Klein
On July 26, 2000, Klein & Co. Futures, Inc., or Klein, commenced a civil action, referred to
as the Klein Action, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (00
Civ. 5563) against numerous defendants, including NYBOT, various affiliates of NYBOT and officials
of NYBOT and/or its affiliates. Kleins claims arise out of its collapse in the wake of the
recalculation of settlement prices for futures and options on the Pacific Stock Exchange Technology
Index (an index of technology stocks) in May 2000. Klein purported to allege federal claims arising
under the CEA and various state law claims. On February 18, 2005, the District Court dismissed
Kleins CEA claims with prejudice in accordance with Section 22(b) of the CEA for lack of standing
and declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Kleins state law claims. That decision was
affirmed on September 18, 2006, by a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit, and a subsequent motion for rehearing insomuch as the panel affirmed the District Courts
dismissal of its CEA claims against NYBOT and certain of its affiliates. Klein filed a petition in
the Supreme Court of the United States seeking to appeal the decision of the United States Circuit
Court on March 14, 2007. The petition was granted and is scheduled to be heard in the fourth
quarter of 2007.
In March 2007, Klein filed a parallel action in the Supreme Court of the State of New York,
New York County, against certain defendants, including NYBOT and its former president. The action
alleges a claim of slander and libel against NYBOT and its former president relating to NYBOTs
statement in May 2000 that, in connection with Kleins collapse, Klein had misused its customer
funds to pay its obligations to NYBOTs clearing house. In May 2007, NYBOT filed a motion to
dismiss on multiple grounds and Klein filed a response on July 10, 2007. NYBOTs reply to Kleins
response was filed on July 20, 2007.
Also, on May 14, 2001, NYBOT and NYCC commenced an action, referred to as NYBOTs Action, in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (01 Civ. 4071) against
Klein. NYBOT and NYCC commenced this action in their capacity as the assignees of certain claims
that were held against Klein by its former customers. NYBOTs Action seeks to recover money owed by
Klein to those customers in the wake of Kleins collapse. In the same decision that dismissed the
Klein action, the District Court dismissed all of Kleins counterclaims against NYBOT, denied
NYBOTs motion for judgment on the pleadings and found that the complaint in NYBOTs Action did not
state a claim for which relief could be granted. However, the District Court granted NYBOT leave to
replead. On April 14, 2005, NYBOT and NYCC filed an amended complaint, which Klein subsequently
moved to dismiss. NYBOT and NYCC opposed that motion which, although fully briefed since August 5,
2005, has not yet been decided by the court.
Altman et al v. NYBOT
On April 6, 2007, the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, granted
NYBOTs motion to dismiss all claims brought against it in an action commenced on December 8, 2006,
by certain holders of non-equity trading permits, or Permit Holders, of NYBOT seeking declaratory,
monetary and injunctive relief with respect to the merger. Plaintiffs alleged that, in violation of
contract rights and/or rights under New Yorks Not-For-Profit Corporation Law, or NPCL, NYBOTs
Permit Holders, including plaintiffs, were not permitted to vote with respect to the merger and
would not receive any part of the merger consideration. Plaintiffs sought (i) to enjoin
consummation of the merger, (ii) declaratory relief regarding their past and future rights as
Permit Holders, and (iii) an award of unspecified damages on claims for breach of fiduciary duty,
breach of contract, unjust enrichment, estoppel and fraud. The court also denied the plaintiffs
motion for a preliminary injunction. The Permit Holders have filed a notice of appeal, and the time
within which the Permit Holders may perfect their appeal has not yet expired.
50
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Risk Factors in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10- K for the year ended
December 31, 2006 and in Part II, Item 1A of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2007, include detailed discussions of our risk factors. The information presented
below updates, and should be read in conjunction with, the risk factors and information disclosed
in the above referenced Form 10-K and Form 10-Q.
In connection with our strategy to form a wholly-owned European clearing house, we recently
announced our decision to terminate our clearing arrangements with LCH.Clearnet, which currently
provides clearing services for the trading of certain futures and cleared OTC contracts in our
markets. We cannot offer our futures and cleared OTC products without clearing services, and any
delay in commencing our European clearing operations could result in a disruption to our business
or materially and adversely affect financial condition and results of operations.
On July 18, 2007, we provided LCH.Clearnet with written notice of our intent to terminate our
contractual arrangements pursuant to which LCH.Clearnet currently provides clearing services to us
for all energy futures contracts and cleared OTC contracts traded in our markets. As provided in
our notice of termination, these services will terminate on a mutually agreed upon date or on the
date that is 12 months following the date of our written notice.
Following our merger with NYBOT, we own and operate a clearing house through NYCC, which we
have renamed ICE Clear US. ICE Clear US operates as a registered Derivatives Clearing Organization
under the oversight of the CFTC and serves as the designated clearing house for all trades executed
on NYBOTs exchange. As previously announced, we intend to expand our clearing operations globally
by establishing a wholly-owned clearing house in Europe, which we will name ICE Clear Europe. The
establishment of ICE Clear Europe, however, is subject to regulatory approval in the UK. We are
currently in the process of finalizing our application with the FSA for ICE Clear Europe to become
a Recognized Clearing House. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain regulatory
approval for ICE Clear Europe or if we do obtain such approval, that we will receive it on a timely
basis.
If our clearing services are suspended or interrupted and we are unable to provide clearing
services to our customers through an alternate provider on a timely basis, our business, financial
condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected. In particular, if
ICE Clear Europe is not able to provide clearing services for our energy futures products, or we do
not obtain clearing services from an alternate provider, following the termination of our agreement
with LCH.Clearnet, we may be unable to operate certain of our energy futures markets. For the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, transaction fees generated by our UK futures
business, which are also referred to as exchange fees, accounted for 39.3%, 36.7% and 42.0%,
respectively, of our consolidated revenues.
In addition, if ICE Clear US or ICE Clear Europe is not able to provide clearing services
relating to our OTC business following the termination of our agreements with LCH.Clearnet, we may
be unable to offer clearing services in connection with trading certain OTC contracts in our
markets for a considerable period of time. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
transaction fees derived from trading in cleared OTC contracts accounted for 38.6%, 37.5% and
21.7%, respectively, of our consolidated revenues. Our cleared OTC contracts have been a
significant component of our business, and accounted for 71.8%, 69.3% and 47.6% of revenues, net of
the intersegment fees, generated by our OTC business for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004, respectively.
Owning a clearing house exposes us to risks related to the cost of operating the clearing
house and the risk of defaults by our participants clearing trades through our clearing house.
Operating ICE Clear US and ICE Clear Europe will require material ongoing expenditures and
consume a significant portion of managements time. We cannot assure you that ICE Clear US
clearing arrangements will continue to be satisfactory to NYBOTs participants or will not require
additional substantial systems modifications to accommodate them in the future. Further, we cannot
assure you that the clearing services of ICE Clear Europe or ICE Clear US, as the designated
clearing house for certain of our energy futures and OTC contracts, respectively,
51
assuming appropriate authorizations are obtained, will be satisfactory to our participants.
The transition to new clearing facilities for many of our participants could be disruptive and
costly. Our operation of ICE Clear US and ICE Clear Europe may not be as successful and may not
provide us the benefits we anticipated. In addition, our operation of these clearing houses may not
generate sufficient revenues to cover the expenses we incur.
There are risks inherent in operating a clearing house, including exposure to the credit risk
of clearing members and defaults by clearing members could subject our business to substantial
losses. Although ICE Clear US currently has policies and procedures to help ensure that clearing
members can satisfy their obligations (and ICE Clear Europe will adopt comparable policies and
procedures), such policies and procedures may not succeed in preventing defaults. We also have in
place or will establish, as appropriate, various measures intended to enable our clearing houses to
cover any default and maintain liquidity, such as deposits in a guaranty fund. However, we cannot
assure you that these measures and safeguards will be sufficient to protect us from a default or
that we will not be materially and adversely affected in the event of a significant default.
Additionally, the default of any one of the clearing members could cause our customers to lose
confidence in the guarantee of ICE Clear US, or ICE Clear Europe following recognition, which would
have an adverse affect on our business.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Our annual meeting of shareholders was held in Atlanta, Georgia on May 10, 2007. At the annual
meeting, the shareholders were presented with two proposals as set forth in our annual proxy
statement, both of which were approved.
Out of 68,985,458 shares of stock entitled to vote at such meeting based upon the record date
of March 21, 2007, there were present in person or by proxy an aggregate of 53,752,801 shares,
constituting a quorum. The following sets forth detailed information regarding the results of the
voting at the meeting for each proposal:
Proposal 1. The shareholders elected the following directors to serve for the ensuing year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
Name of Nominee |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Withheld |
Charles R. Crisp |
|
|
53,325,143 |
|
|
|
427,658 |
|
Jean-Marc Forneri |
|
|
53,265,007 |
|
|
|
487,794 |
|
Fred W. Hatfield |
|
|
50,231,757 |
|
|
|
3,521,044 |
|
Terrence F. Martell |
|
|
51,134,140 |
|
|
|
2,618,661 |
|
Sir Robert Reid |
|
|
53,179,038 |
|
|
|
573,763 |
|
Frederic V. Salerno |
|
|
51,079,856 |
|
|
|
2,672,945 |
|
Richard L. Sandor |
|
|
51,160,764 |
|
|
|
2,592,037 |
|
Frederick W. Schoenhut |
|
|
49,078,517 |
|
|
|
4,674,284 |
|
Jeffrey C. Sprecher |
|
|
51,189,634 |
|
|
|
2,563,167 |
|
Judith A. Sprieser |
|
|
53,274,133 |
|
|
|
478,668 |
|
Vincent Tese |
|
|
53,180,411 |
|
|
|
572,390 |
|
Proposal 2. The shareholders ratified the appointment by the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
53,395,257 |
|
|
207,156 |
|
|
|
150,388 |
|
52
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description of Document |
10.1
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated as of April 30, 2007, between
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and Scott A. Hill (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to ICEs Current Report on Form
8-K, filed with the SEC on May 2, 2007, File No. 001-32671). |
10.2
|
|
|
|
License Agreement For Index-Related Derivative Products dated as
of June 15, 2007 between IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. and
Frank Russell Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
to ICEs Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June
20, 2007, File No. 001-32671). * |
31.1
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
31.2
|
|
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
32.1
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
32.2
|
|
|
|
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
* |
|
Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to certain portions of this exhibit.
Omitted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
53
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
|
|
Date: July 27, 2007 |
By: |
/s/ Scott A. Hill
|
|
|
|
Scott A. Hill |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
54