UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1
(Mark one)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________________________ to _______________________________________________
Commission file number 000-10972
First Farmers and Merchants Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Tennessee |
|
62-1148660 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
816 South Garden Street |
|
|
Columbia, Tennessee |
|
38402 1148 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (931) 388-3145 |
||
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
||
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
None |
|
None |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $10.00 par value per share |
||
(Title of class) |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
[ ]Yes [ X ] No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
[ ]Yes [ X ] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
[ X ]Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
[ X ]Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ X ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer [ ] |
Accelerated filer [ X ] |
Non-accelerated filer [
] |
Smaller reporting company [ ] |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). [ ] Yes [ X ]No
The aggregate market value of the registrants common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2013 was approximately $121,936,983 based on the reported price at which the common stock was last sold in a transaction known to the registrant.
As of March 1, 2014, the registrant had outstanding 5,021,012 shares of common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Selected sections from Annual Report to Shareholders for Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013 titled Comparative Performance and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations -- Part I and II of this Report.
Proxy Statement for 2014 Annual Shareholders Meeting to be held on April 15, 2014 -- Part III of this Report.
EXPLANATORY NOTE AMENDMENT NO. 1
The sole purpose of this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) is to amend the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Original Filing) of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation (the Corporation), which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 5, 2014, to provide in Item 8 of Part II of the Original Filing a Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 5, 2014 as to the Corporations audited financial statements and a Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 5, 2014 as to the Corporations internal control over financial reporting. This Amendment No.1 replaces the two reports that were included in Exhibit 13 to the Original Filing, which were dated March 6, 2014.
Item 8 of Part II and Item 15 of Part III of this Amendment No. 1 have been amended solely to reflect the filing of the reports dated March 5, 2014 and to provide updated certifications of the Corporations principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and SEC Rule 12b-15, as amended. Except as expressly described herein, no other changes have been made to the Original Filing and the Original Filing continues to speak as of its date. This Amendment No. 1 has not been updated to reflect events occurring subsequent to the date that the Original Filing was filed with the SEC.
PART II
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
(a) Consolidated Financial Statements: The Corporations consolidated financial statements are included beginning on Page F-1 immediately following this page.
1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audit Committee, Board of Directors
and Shareholders
First Farmers and Merchants Corporation
Columbia, Tennessee
We have audited First Farmers and Merchants Corporations (Corporation) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Corporations management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying management report on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Corporations internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Corporation, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and receipts and expenditures of the Corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Corporation and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Corporations assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of December 31, 2013, and our report dated March 5, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
//s//BKD, LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
March 5, 2014
F-1
FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION
COLUMBIA, TENNESSEE
MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The management of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation is responsible for the preparation, integrity, and fair presentation of its published financial statements and all other information presented in its annual report. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and, as such, include amounts based on informed judgments, assumptions and estimates made by management.
The management of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Corporations internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Corporations management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statement. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
The Corporations management assessed the effectiveness of the Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (1992). Based on our assessment we believe that, as of December 31, 2013, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
BKD, LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation included in this annual report, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. The report, which expresses an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, is included in this annual report.
|
F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audit Committee, Board of Directors
and Shareholders
First Farmers and Merchants Corporation
Columbia, Tennessee
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation (Corporation) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013. The Corporations management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Our audits included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 5, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
//s//BKD, LLP
Louisville, Kentucky
March 5, 2014
F-3
FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES |
||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS |
||||||
|
|
|||||
December 31, |
December 31, |
|||||
|
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data) |
2013 |
|
2012 |
||
ASSETS |
Cash and due from banks |
$ |
20,391 |
$ |
23,443 |
|
Interest-bearing due from banks |
25,167 |
31,953 |
||||
Federal funds sold |
9,850 |
15,000 |
||||
Total cash and cash equivalents |
55,408 |
70,396 |
||||
Securities |
||||||
Available-for-sale (amortized cost $346,892 |
||||||
and
$339,971 as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, |
329,714 |
345,718 |
||||
Held-to-maturity (fair market value $28,595 |
||||||
and
$33,420 as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, |
27,839 |
31,755 |
||||
Total securities |
357,553 |
377,473 |
||||
Loans, net of deferred fees |
606,766 |
567,159 |
||||
Allowance for loan and lease losses |
(8,595) |
(8,809) |
||||
Net loans |
598,171 |
558,350 |
||||
Bank premises and equipment, net |
24,868 |
26,417 |
||||
Other real estate owned |
1,438 |
5,678 |
||||
Bank owned life insurance |
25,867 |
25,112 |
||||
Goodwill |
9,018 |
9,018 |
||||
Deferred tax asset |
10,905 |
3,884 |
||||
Other assets |
10,605 |
14,035 |
||||
|
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ |
1,093,833 |
|
$ |
1,090,363 |
LIABILITIES |
Deposits |
|||||
Noninterest-bearing |
$ |
179,823 |
$ |
169,136 |
||
Interest-bearing |
777,514 |
763,713 |
||||
Total deposits |
957,337 |
932,849 |
||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
18,095 |
17,068 |
||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
15,728 |
15,755 |
||||
Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances |
- |
10,100 |
||||
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES |
991,160 |
|
975,772 |
||
SHAREHOLDERS' |
Common stock - $10 par value per share, 8,000,000 shares |
|||||
EQUITY |
authorized; 5,021,012 and 5,180,000 shares issued |
|||||
and outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and |
||||||
December 31, 2012, respectively |
50,210 |
51,800 |
||||
Retained earnings |
61,369 |
57,366 |
||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
(9,001) |
5,330 |
||||
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY BEFORE |
102,578 |
114,496 |
||||
Noncontrolling interest - preferred stock of subsidiary |
95 |
95 |
||||
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
102,673 |
114,591 |
||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND |
||||||
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
$ |
1,093,833 |
|
$ |
1,090,363 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements. |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME |
|||||||
Years Ended December 31, |
|||||||
|
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||
INTEREST AND |
Interest and fees on loans |
$ |
28,653 |
27,951 |
29,838 |
||
DIVIDEND |
Income on investment securities |
||||||
INCOME |
Taxable interest |
5,501 |
4,967 |
4,219 |
|||
Exempt from federal income tax |
2,913 |
3,106 |
3,616 |
||||
Dividends |
294 |
360 |
295 |
||||
|
Total interest income |
37,361 |
36,384 |
37,968 |
|||
INTEREST |
Interest on deposits |
2,694 |
3,343 |
4,223 |
|||
EXPENSE |
Interest on other borrowings |
213 |
498 |
719 |
|||
Total interest expense |
2,907 |
3,841 |
4,942 |
||||
Net interest income |
34,454 |
32,543 |
33,026 |
||||
Provision for loan and lease losses |
- |
1,120 |
3,125 |
||||
|
Net interest income after provision |
34,454 |
31,423 |
29,901 |
|||
NONINTEREST |
Gain on loans sold |
437 |
511 |
469 |
|||
INCOME |
Trust department income |
2,298 |
2,119 |
1,999 |
|||
|
Service fees on deposit accounts |
6,479 |
6,689 |
6,784 |
|||
Brokerage fees |
361 |
231 |
36 |
||||
Earnings on bank owned life insurance |
497 |
705 |
717 |
||||
Gain on sale of securities |
829 |
2,294 |
1,458 |
||||
Loss on foreclosed property |
(308) |
(1,317) |
(948) |
||||
Other non-interest income |
523 |
399 |
457 |
||||
|
Total noninterest income |
11,116 |
11,631 |
10,972 |
|||
NONINTEREST |
Salaries and employee benefits |
17,901 |
19,406 |
18,836 |
|||
EXPENSE |
Net occupancy expense |
2,581 |
2,528 |
2,488 |
|||
Furniture and equipment expense |
1,397 |
1,334 |
1,224 |
||||
Data processing expense |
2,288 |
2,007 |
1,867 |
||||
Legal and professional fees |
1,037 |
943 |
997 |
||||
Stationary and office supplies |
293 |
279 |
286 |
||||
Advertising and promotions |
1,090 |
1,179 |
1,217 |
||||
FDIC Insurance premium expense |
728 |
703 |
875 |
||||
Other real estate expense |
128 |
309 |
640 |
||||
Other noninterest expense |
5,370 |
4,826 |
4,687 |
||||
Total noninterest expenses |
32,813 |
33,514 |
33,117 |
||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
12,757 |
9,540 |
7,756 |
||||
|
Provision for income taxes |
2,865 |
1,916 |
744 |
|||
Net
income before noncontrolling interest - dividends on |
9,892 |
7,624 |
7,012 |
||||
Noncontrolling
interest-dividends on preferred stock |
16 |
16 |
16 |
||||
|
Net income for common shareholders |
$ |
9,876 |
$ |
7,608 |
$ |
6,996 |
PER SHARE |
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding |
5,110,849 |
5,315,634 |
5,393,765 |
|||
|
Earnings per share |
$ |
1.93 |
$ |
1.43 |
$ |
1.30 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-5
FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
||||
Net Income for common shareholders |
$ |
9,876 |
$ |
7,608 |
$ |
6,996 |
||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
||||||||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax (benefit) expenses of ($8,507), $1,204, and $2,960 |
(13,589) |
1,923 |
4,728 |
|||||
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains included in net income, net of taxes of ($319), ($883), and ($561), respectively |
(510) |
(1,411) |
(897) |
|||||
Change in unfunded portion of postretirement benefit obligations, net of tax of ($146), $1,008 and $1,214, respectively |
(232) |
1,610 |
1,940 |
|||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
(14,331) |
2,122 |
5,771 |
|||||
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
$ |
(4,455) |
$ |
9,730 |
$ |
12,767 |
||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-6
FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES |
|||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||||||||||
Accumulated |
|||||||||||
Other |
|||||||||||
Shares of |
Preferred |
Common |
Retained |
Comprehensive |
|||||||
Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 |
stock |
Stock |
Stock |
Earnings |
Income (Loss) |
Total |
|||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
5,430,000 |
$ |
95 |
$ |
54,300 |
$ |
54,524 |
$ |
(2,563) |
$ |
106,356 |
Net income before dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary |
7,012 |
7,012 |
|||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
5,771 |
5,771 |
|||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(100,000) |
(1,000) |
(2,011) |
(3,011) |
|||||||
Cash dividends declared, $0.74 per share |
(3,963) |
(3,963) |
|||||||||
Cash dividends - preferred stock of subsidiary |
|
|
|
(16) |
|
(16) |
|||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
5,330,000 |
95 |
53,300 |
55,546 |
3,208 |
112,149 |
|||||
Net income before dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary |
7,624 |
7,624 |
|||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
2,122 |
2,122 |
|||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(150,000) |
(1,500) |
(1,900) |
(3,400) |
|||||||
Cash dividends declared, $0.74 per share |
(3,888) |
(3,888) |
|||||||||
Cash dividends - preferred stock of subsidiary |
|
|
|
(16) |
|
(16) |
|||||
Balance at December 31, 2012 |
5,180,000 |
95 |
51,800 |
57,366 |
5,330 |
114,591 |
|||||
Net income before dividends on preferred stock of subsidiary |
9,892 |
9,892 |
|||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
(14,331) |
(14,331) |
|||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(158,988) |
(1,590) |
(2,132) |
(3,722) |
|||||||
Cash dividends declared, $0.74 per share |
(3,741) |
(3,741) |
|||||||||
Cash dividends - preferred stock of subsidiary |
(16) |
(16) |
|||||||||
Balance AT December 31, 2013 |
5,021,012 |
$ |
95 |
$ |
50,210 |
$ |
61,369 |
$ |
(9,001) |
$ |
102,673 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-7
FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES |
|||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
|||||||
Years Ended December 31, |
|||||||
|
(unaudited) |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
|||
OPERATING |
Net income available for common shareholders |
$ |
9,876 |
$ |
7,608 |
$ |
6,996 |
ACTIVITIES |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided |
||||||
by (used in) operating activities |
|||||||
Provision for loan losses |
- |
1,120 |
3,125 |
||||
Provision for depreciation and amortization of |
|||||||
premises and equipment |
1,543 |
1,412 |
1,270 |
||||
Deferred tax benefit (expense) |
1,950 |
(340) |
(1,216) |
||||
Net securities gains |
(829) |
(2,294) |
(1,458) |
||||
Gains on loans sold |
(437) |
(511) |
(417) |
||||
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale |
21,047 |
28,625 |
24,402 |
||||
Funding of mortgage loans held for sale |
(18,481) |
(28,065) |
(23,985) |
||||
Loss on other real estate owned |
308 |
1,317 |
948 |
||||
Gain (loss) on sale of premises and equipment |
38 |
(10) |
- |
||||
Amortization of investment security premiums, |
|||||||
net of accretion of discounts |
1,312 |
3,526 |
2,094 |
||||
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance contracts |
(497) |
(705) |
(717) |
||||
(Increase) decrease in |
|||||||
Other assets |
1,243 |
741 |
1,177 |
||||
Increase (decrease) in |
|||||||
Other liabilities |
(287) |
2,647 |
534 |
||||
Total adjustments |
6,910 |
7,463 |
5,757 |
||||
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
16,786 |
15,071 |
12,753 |
|||
INVESTING |
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities |
137,150 |
421,346 |
140,580 |
|||
ACTIVITIES |
Proceeds from maturities and calls of available-for-sale securities |
44,908 |
68,673 |
106,270 |
|||
Proceeds from maturities and calls of held-to-maturity securities |
3,890 |
3,430 |
4,725 |
||||
Purchases of investment securities |
|||||||
available-for-sale |
(189,436) |
(521,837) |
(323,222) |
||||
Net (increase) decrease in loans |
(38,267) |
(50,846) |
38,031 |
||||
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned |
2,378 |
1,810 |
1,683 |
||||
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment |
799 |
- |
- |
||||
Purchases of premises and equipment |
(831) |
(786) |
(263) |
||||
Purchase of life insurance policies |
(258) |
(2,282) |
(2,799) |
||||
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
(39,667) |
(80,492) |
(34,995) |
|||
FINANCING |
Net increase in deposits |
24,488 |
76,419 |
64,604 |
|||
ACTIVITIES |
Net increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
1,027 |
721 |
10,162 |
|||
Payments to FHLB borrowings |
(10,100) |
(7,000) |
(7,000) |
||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(3,722) |
(3,400) |
(3,011) |
||||
Cash dividends paid on common stock |
(3,800) |
(3,944) |
(1,991) |
||||
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
7,893 |
62,796 |
62,764 |
|||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(14,988) |
(2,625) |
40,522 |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
70,396 |
73,021 |
32,499 |
||||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ |
55,408 |
$ |
70,396 |
$ |
73,021 |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information |
|||||||
Cash paid during the period for expenses |
|||||||
Interest on deposits and borrowed funds |
$ |
2,816 |
$ |
3,717 |
$ |
5,235 |
|
Income taxes |
2,072 |
860 |
1,143 |
||||
Loans to facilitate sale of other real estate owned |
1,905 |
1,774 |
- |
||||
|
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans |
312 |
1,355 |
1,375 |
|||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements. |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-8
NOTE 1 GENERAL AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Accounting Policies
The accounting principles followed and the methods of applying those principles conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) and to general practices in the banking industry. The significant accounting policies applicable to First Farmers and Merchants Corporation (the Corporation) are summarized as follows.
Nature of Operations
The Corporation is a bank holding company whose principal activity is the ownership and management of its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Farmers and Merchants Bank (the Bank). The Bank is primarily engaged in providing a full range of banking and financial services, including lending, investing of funds, obtaining deposits, trust and wealth management operations, and other financing activities to individual and corporate customers in the middle Tennessee area. The Bank is subject to competition from other financial institutions. The Corporation and Bank are subject to the regulation of certain federal and state agencies and undergo periodic examinations by those regulatory authorities.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements present the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Farmers and Merchants Bank. The Bank has the following direct and indirect subsidiaries: F & M West, Inc., Maury Tenn, Inc., and Maury Tenn Properties, Inc. Noncontrolling interests consist of preferred shares in Maury Tenn Properties, Inc. that are owned by third parties and Maury Tenn, Inc. The preferred shares in Maury Tenn Properties, Inc. receive dividends, which are included in the consolidated statements of income. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Certain items in prior financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management of the Corporation and the Bank to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Those estimates and assumptions also affect disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan and lease losses, the fair value of financial instruments, the valuation of foreclosed real estate, valuation of goodwill, valuation of deferred tax assets and the liability related to post-retirement benefits.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
The Corporations banking activities include granting commercial, residential, and consumer loans to customers primarily located in central and south central Tennessee and Northern Alabama. The Corporation is continuing to manage all components of its portfolio mix in a manner to reduce risk from changes in economic conditions. Concentrations of credit, as defined for regulatory purposes, are reviewed quarterly by management to ensure that internally established limits based on Tier 1 Capital plus allowance for loan losses and total capital are not exceeded. At December 31, 2013 our concentrations of commercial real estate, rental and leasing loans were 119.6% of Tier 1 Capital plus the allowance for loan and lease losses, respectively. Health care and social assistance loans were 46.3%. Manufacturing and construction loans were 25.4%. Wholesale trade credits were 25.2%. These percentages are within our internally established limits regarding concentrations of credit.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-9
Loans secured by non-farm, non-residential real estate comprised 29.0% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2013. Management remains comfortable with the real estate exposure levels within the commercial loan portfolio. Management believes the commercial real estate portion remains well diversified across several different property types and several different geographic markets, stretching primarily from Davidson County, Tennessee to northern Alabama.
Cash and Due From Banks
Included in cash and due from banks are reserve amounts that are required to be maintained in the form of cash and balances due from the Federal Reserve Bank and other banks. At December 31, 2013, the Banks required reserve was $2,560 at the Federal Reserve. From time to time throughout the year, the Banks balances due from other financial institutions exceeded Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) insurance limits. The Bank had one account over the limit at December 31, 2013 and it was $261. Furthermore, federal funds sold are essentially uncollateralized loans to other financial institutions.
Cash Equivalents
The Corporation considers all liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash due from banks and federal funds sold. Federal funds are sold for one-day periods.
Securities
Certain debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to maturity and recorded at amortized cost. Securities not classified as held to maturity are classified as available for sale and recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income, net of tax. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interest method over the terms of the securities. Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and are determined using the specific identification method.
For debt securities with fair value below amortized cost when the Corporation does not intend to sell a debt security, and it is more likely than not the Corporation will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, it recognizes the credit component of an other-than-temporary impairment of a debt security in earnings and the remaining portion in other comprehensive income. For held-to-maturity debt securities, the amount of an other-than-temporary impairment recorded in other comprehensive income for the noncredit portion of a previous other-than-temporary impairment is amortized prospectively over the remaining life of the security on the basis of the timing of future estimated cash flows of the security.
If declines in fair value are other than temporary, the carrying value of the securities is written down to fair value as a realized loss with a charge to income for the portion attributable to credit losses and a charge to other comprehensive income for the portion that is not credit related. For available-for-sale and held-to-maturity debt securities that management has no intent to sell and believes that it more likely than not will not be required to sell prior to recovery, only the credit loss component of the impairment is recognized in earnings, while the noncredit loss is recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. The credit loss component recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the remaining term of the security based on cash flow projections.
Loans
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoffs are reported at their outstanding principal balances adjusted for unearned income, charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, any unamortized deferred fees or costs on originated loans and unamortized premiums or discounts on purchased loans.
For loans amortized at cost, interest income is accrued based on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, as well as premiums and discounts, are deferred and amortized as a level yield adjustment over the respective term of the loan.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-10
The accrual of interest on mortgage and commercial loans is discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days past due unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection. Past-due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an earlier date if collection of principal or interest is considered doubtful.
All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual or charged off are reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.
Discounts and premiums on purchased commercial loans are amortized to income using the interest method over the remaining period to contractual maturity and adjusted for anticipated prepayments.
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
The allowance for loan and lease losses is established through provisions for loan and lease losses charged against income. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management determines that the uncollectibility of a loan has been confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance account in the period received.
The adequacy of the allowance for loan and lease losses is evaluated quarterly in conjunction with loan review reports and evaluations that are discussed in meetings with loan officers, credit administration and the Corporations Board of Directors. The Banks past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect a borrowers ability to repay (including the timing of future payments), the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors are considered in this evaluation. This process is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that are susceptible to significant change, including the amounts and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired loans. The allowance for loan and lease losses is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb estimated losses inherent in the loan portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due (principal and interest) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrowers prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, the loans obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Groups of loans with similar risk characteristics are collectively evaluated for impairment based on the groups historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions and other relevant factors that affect repayment of the loans. Accordingly, the Bank does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment measurements, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement due to financial difficulties of the borrower.
When any secured commercial loan is considered uncollectable, whether past due or not, a current assessment of the value of the underlying collateral is made. If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the collateral, the loan is placed on nonaccrual and the loan is charged down to the value of the collateral less estimated cost to sell or a specific reserve equal to the difference between book value of the loan and the fair value assigned to the collateral is created until such time as the loan is foreclosed. When the foreclosed collateral has been legally assigned to the Corporation, a charge off is taken, if necessary, in order that the remaining balance reflects the fair value estimated less costs to sell the collateral then transferred to other real estate owned or other repossessed assets. When any unsecured commercial loan is considered uncollectable the loan is charged off no later than at 90 days past due.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-11
All closed-end consumer loans (excluding conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate) are charged off no later than 120 days (4 monthly payments) delinquent. If a loan is considered uncollectable, it is charged off earlier than 120 days delinquent. For conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate, when a loan is 90 days past due, a current assessment of the value of the real estate is made. If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the property, the loan is placed on nonaccrual and foreclosure proceedings are initiated. When the foreclosed property has been legally assigned to the Corporation, a charge-off is taken with the remaining balance, reflecting the fair value less estimated costs to sell, transferred to other real estate owned.
Loans Held for Sale
Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value in the aggregate. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to noninterest income. Gains and losses on loan sales are recorded in noninterest income. The Corporation does not retain servicing rights on loans sold. Loans held for sale at December 31, 2013 and 2012 totaled $327 and $2,456, respectively.
Other Real Estate
Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. Subsequent to foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the valuation allowance are included in net income or expense from foreclosed assets.
When foreclosed properties are acquired current appraisals are obtained on the properties. Additionally, periodic updated appraisals are obtained on unsold foreclosed properties. When an updated appraisal reflects a market value below the current book value, a charge is booked to current earnings to reduce the property to its new market value less expected selling costs. Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 24 months.
Premises and Equipment
Premises and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The provision for depreciation is computed principally on an accelerated method over the estimated useful life of an asset, which ranges from 15 to 39 years for buildings and from three to 25 years for equipment. Costs of major additions and improvements are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Gains or losses from the disposition of property are reflected in operations, and the asset accounts and related allowances for depreciation are reduced.
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock are required investments for institutions that are members of the Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank systems. The required investment in the common stock is based on a predetermined formula, carried at cost and evaluated for impairment. At December 31, 2013 and 2012 Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock totaled $3,879.
Goodwill
Goodwill is evaluated annually for impairment. Quantitative and qualitative assessments are performed to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not the fair value is less than the carrying amount, including goodwill. If, based on the evaluation, it is determined to be more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then goodwill is tested further for impairment. If the implied fair value of goodwill is lower than its carrying amount, a goodwill impairment is indicated and goodwill is written down to its implied fair value. Subsequent increases in goodwill value are not recognized in the financial statements.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-12
Transfers of Financial Assets
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been isolated from the Corporationput presumptively beyond the reach of the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership, (2) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets and (3) the Corporation does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity or the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets.
Income Taxes
The Corporation files consolidated income tax returns with its subsidiaries. The Corporation accounts for income taxes in accordance with income tax accounting guidance (ASC 740, Income Taxes). The income tax accounting guidance results in two components of income tax expense: current and deferred. Current income tax expense reflects taxes to be paid or refunded for the current period by applying the provisions of the enacted tax law to the taxable income or excess of deductions over revenues. The Corporation determines deferred income taxes using the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is based on the tax effects of the differences between the book and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and enacted changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period in which they occur. Deferred income tax expense results from changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities between periods. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on the weight of evidence available, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Tax positions are recognized if it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the tax position will be realized or sustained upon examination. The term more likely than not means a likelihood of more than 50 percent; the terms examined and upon examination also include resolution of the related appeals or litigation processes, if any. A tax position that meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold is initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The determination of whether or not a tax position has met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold considers the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date and is subject to managements judgment. With a few exceptions, the Corporation is no longer subject to U.S. federal tax examinations for years before 2010, and state and local tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2010.
The Corporation recognizes interest and penalties on income taxes as a component of income tax expense.
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which are classified as secured borrowings, generally mature within one to four days from the transaction date. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are reflected at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction
Fair Value Measurements
FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and requires certain disclosures about fair value measurements. See Note 13 Fair Value Measurement. In general, fair values of financial instruments are based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use, as input, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and the Corporations creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-13
Shareholders Equity and Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share represent income available to shareholders divided by the weighted average number of shares of Corporation common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional shares of common stock that would have been outstanding if potentially dilutive shares of common stock had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed conversion. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, there were no potentially dilutive shares of common stock issuable.
In 2013, the Corporation adopted a plan to repurchase shares of its common stock. The plan allowed the purchase of up to 200,000 shares. The Corporation purchased 158,988 shares in 2013. In 2012, the Corporation adopted a plan to repurchase up to 150,000 shares of common stock . The Corporation repurchased 150,000 shares in 2012. For 2011, the Corporation adopted a similar plan allowing it to repurchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock. The Corporation repurchased 100,000 shares in 2011.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income (loss) consists of net income and other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable income tax expenses or benefits. Other comprehensive (loss) income includes unrealized appreciation or depreciation on available-for-sale securities and changes in the net actuarial gain or loss of the postretirement benefit obligation.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), included in shareholders equity, are as follows as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
Years Ended December 31, |
|||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
|||||||
Net unrealized gains (losses) |
|||||||||
on available-for-sale securities |
$ |
(17,178) |
$ |
5,747 |
$ |
4,914 |
|||
Net actuarial gain on unfunded portion |
|||||||||
of postretirement benefit obligation |
2,542 |
2,920 |
302 |
||||||
(14,636) |
8,667 |
5,216 |
|||||||
Tax effect - (expense) benefit |
5,635 |
|
(3,337) |
|
(2,008) |
||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
(9,001) |
|
$ |
5,330 |
|
$ |
3,208 |
Transfers Between Fair Value Hierarchy Levels
Transfers in and out of Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (other significant observable inputs) and Level 3 (significant unobservable inputs) are recognized on the period end date.
Segment Reporting
Management analyzes the operations of the Corporation assuming one operating segment, community lending services.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ASU 2013-02 amends recent guidance related to the reporting of comprehensive income to enhance the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 became effective for the Corporation on January 1, 2013 and did not have a significant impact on the Corporations financial statements. See Note 2 Other Comprehensive Income (Loss).
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-14
ASU 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists (Topic 740-10) a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. ASU 2013-11 provides guidance on financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss (NOL) carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists. The objective is to eliminate diversity in practice resulting from a lack of guidance on this topic. ASU 2013-11 will be effective for the Corporation after December 15, 2013 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporations financial statements.
ASU 2013-12, Definition of a Public Business Entity An Addition to the Master Glossary amends the Master Glossary of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to include one definition of public business entity for future use in U.S. GAAP. The definition of a public business entity will be used in considering the scope of new financial guidance and will identify whether the guidance does or does not apply to business entities. The amendment does not affect existing requirements, but instead improves U.S. GAAP by providing a single definition of public business entity for use in future financial accounting and reporting guidance. There is no actual effective date for the amendment in this Update. However, the term public business entity will be used beginning with ASU 2014-01. ASU 2013-12 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporations financial statements.
ASU 2014-04, Receivables Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40) clarifies when an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs that is, when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan receivable should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized. The new update requires a creditor to reclassify a collateralized consumer mortgage loan to real estate property upon obtaining legal title to the real estate collateral, or the borrower voluntarily conveying all interest in the real estate property to the lender to satisfy the loan through a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement. The update is effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Corporations financial statements.
NOTE 2 ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (AOCI) BY COMPONENT
Amounts reclassified from AOCI and the affected line items in the statements of income during the periods ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, were as follows:
Affected Line Item in the |
|||||||||||||
Amounts Reclassified from AOCI |
|||||||||||||
Years Ended |
|||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
December 31, 2011 |
|||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities |
$ |
829 |
$ |
2,294 |
$ |
1,458 |
Realized gain (loss) on sale of securities |
||||||
(319) |
(883) |
(561) |
Tax (expense) benefit |
||||||||||
$ |
510 |
$ |
1,411 |
$ |
897 |
Net reclassified amount | |||||||
Amortization of defined benefit pension items |
|||||||||||||
Actuarial gains (losses) |
$ |
(190) |
$ |
- |
$ |
205 |
|||||||
73 |
- |
(79) |
Tax (expense) benefit |
||||||||||
$ |
(117) |
$ |
- |
$ |
126 |
Net reclassified amount |
|||||||
Total reclassifications out of AOCI |
$ |
393 |
$ |
1,411 |
$ |
1,023 |
|||||||
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-15
NOTE 3 SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are summarized as follows:
Amortized |
Gross Unrealized |
Fair |
|||||||
December 31, 2013 |
Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
Value |
|||||
Available-for-sale securities |
|||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
$ |
112,863 |
$ |
- |
$ |
7,791 |
$ |
105,072 |
|
U.S. Government sponsored agency mortgage backed securities |
168,045 |
27 |
10,649 |
157,423 |
|||||
States and political subdivisions |
45,237 |
1,240 |
140 |
46,337 |
|||||
Corporate bonds |
20,747 |
280 |
145 |
20,882 |
|||||
|
$ |
346,892 |
$ |
1,547 |
$ |
18,725 |
$ |
329,714 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities |
|||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ |
27,839 |
$ |
756 |
$ |
- |
$ |
28,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Amortized |
Gross Unrealized |
Fair |
|||||||
December 31, 2012 |
Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
Value |
|||||
Available-for-sale securities |
|||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
$ |
143,897 |
$ |
400 |
$ |
280 |
$ |
144,017 |
|
U.S. Government sponsored agency mortgage backed securities |
131,917 |
1,856 |
55 |
133,718 |
|||||
States and political subdivisions |
47,273 |
3,306 |
- |
50,579 |
|||||
Corporate bonds |
16,884 |
529 |
9 |
17,404 |
|||||
|
$ |
339,971 |
$ |
6,091 |
$ |
344 |
$ |
345,718 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities |
|||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ |
31,755 |
$ |
1,665 |
$ |
- |
$ |
33,420 |
|
Certain investments in debt securities are reported in the financial statements at an amount less than their historical cost. Total fair value of these investments at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $269,691 and $83,579, which was approximately 75% and 22%, respectively, of the Corporations available-for-sale and held-to-maturity investment portfolio. The Corporation evaluates its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for impairment. The analysis performed as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 indicated that all impairment was considered temporary, market driven due primarily to fluctuations in market interest rates and not credit-related.
The following table shows the Corporations investments gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Corporations investments with unrealized losses that were not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment class and length of time that individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2013 and 2012:
Less than 12 months |
12 months or Greater |
Total |
|||||
December 31, 2013 |
Fair |
Unrealized |
Fair |
Unrealized |
Fair |
Unrealized |
|
Type of Security |
Value |
Losses |
Value |
|
Losses |
Value |
Losses |
US Government agencies |
$ 100,533 |
$ 7,330 |
$ 4,539 |
$ 461 |
$ 105,072 |
$ 7,791 |
|
US Government sponsored agency mortgage |
|||||||
backed securities |
144,134 |
10,073 |
8,698 |
576 |
152,832 |
10,649 |
|
States and political subdivisions |
2,615 |
140 |
- |
- |
2,615 |
140 |
|
Corporate bonds |
8,590 |
121 |
582 |
24 |
9,172 |
145 |
|
$ 255,872 |
$ 17,664 |
$ 13,819 |
|
$ 1,061 |
$ 269,691 |
$ 18,725 |
|
Less than 12 months |
12 months or Greater |
Total |
|||||
Fair |
Unrealized |
Fair |
Unrealized |
Fair |
Unrealized |
||
Type of Security |
Value |
Losses |
Value |
|
Losses |
Value |
Losses |
US Government agencies |
$ 68,979 |
$ 280 |
$ - |
$ - |
$ 68,979 |
$ 280 |
|
US Government sponsored agency mortgage |
|||||||
backed securities |
12,881 |
55 |
- |
- |
12,881 |
55 |
|
Corporate bonds |
1,719 |
9 |
- |
- |
1,719 |
9 |
|
$ 83,579 |
$ 344 |
$ - |
|
$ - |
$ 83,579 |
$ 344 |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-16
The unrealized losses on the Corporations investments in direct obligation of U.S. government agencies and U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage backed securities were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost basis of the investments. Because the Corporation does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not the Corporation will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized basis, which may be maturity, the Corporation does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2013.
The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities and held-to-maturity securities at December 31, 2013, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
Available-for-Sale |
|
Held-to-Maturity |
|||
December 31, 2013 |
Amortized |
Estimated |
Amortized |
Estimated |
|
Cost |
Fair Value |
|
Cost |
Fair Value |
|
Within one year |
$ 5,841 |
$ 5,920 |
$ 3,135 |
$ 3,208 |
|
One to five years |
26,404 |
26,489 |
7,043 |
7,305 |
|
Five to ten years |
131,468 |
124,308 |
16,554 |
16,953 |
|
After ten years |
15,134 |
15,574 |
1,107 |
1,129 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
168,045 |
157,423 |
- |
- |
|
Total |
$ 346,892 |
$ 329,714 |
|
$ 27,839 |
$ 28,595 |
The carrying value of securities pledged as collateral to secure public deposits and for other purposes was $210,494 at December 31, 2013 and $210,800 at December 31, 2012.
The book value of securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to $34,978 and $26,500 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Gross gains of $1,026, $2,455and $1,509 resulting from sales of available-for-sale securities were realized for at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. A loss of $197 was included in the net gain of $829 for December 31, 2013. A loss of $161 was included in the net gain of $2,294 for December 31, 2012. Losses of $51 were included in the net gain of $1,458 for December 31, 2011.
NOTE 4 LOANS
The following table presents the Banks loans by category as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
December 31, 2013 |
December 31, 2012 |
|||
Commercial |
||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ |
94,702 |
$ |
83,631 |
Non-farm, nonresidential real estate |
176,213 |
167,565 |
||
Construction and development |
29,938 |
36,323 |
||
Commercial loans secured by real estate |
26,940 |
23,983 |
||
Other commercial |
26,582 |
24,423 |
||
Total commercial |
354,375 |
335,925 |
||
Residential |
||||
Consumer loans |
10,957 |
11,621 |
||
Single family residential |
213,763 |
196,349 |
||
Other retail |
27,671 |
23,264 |
||
Total residential and consumer |
252,391 |
231,234 |
||
$ |
606,766 |
$ |
567,159 |
|
Less: |
||||
Allowance for possible loan losses |
(8,595) |
(8,809) |
||
Total net loans |
$ |
598,171 |
$ |
558,350 |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-17
Loan Origination/Risk Management. The Corporation has certain lending policies and procedures in place that are designed to maximize loan income within an acceptable level of risk. Management reviews and approves these policies and procedures on a regular basis. A reporting system supplements the review process by providing management with frequent reports related to loan production, loan quality, concentrations of credit, loan delinquencies and non-performing and potential problem loans. Diversification in the loan portfolio is a means of managing risk associated with fluctuations in economic conditions.
Commercial and industrial loans are underwritten after evaluating and understanding the borrowers ability to operate profitably and prudently expand its business. Underwriting standards are designed to promote relationship banking rather than transactional banking. Once it is determined that the borrowers management possesses sound ethics and solid business acumen, the Corporations management examines current and projected cash flows to determine the ability of the borrower to repay their obligations as agreed. Commercial and industrial loans are primarily made based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial and industrial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.
Commercial real estate loans are subject to underwriting standards and processes similar to commercial and industrial loans, in addition to those of real estate loans. These loans are viewed primarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is largely dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. Management monitors and evaluates commercial real estate loans based on collateral, geography and risk grade criteria. As a general rule, the Corporation avoids financing single-purpose projects unless other underwriting factors are present to help mitigate risk. The Corporation also utilizes third-party experts to provide insight and guidance about economic conditions and trends affecting market areas it serves. In addition, management tracks the level of owner-occupied commercial real estate loans versus non-owner occupied loans. At December 31, 2013, approximately seventy percent of the outstanding principal balance of the Corporations commercial real estate loans was secured by owner-occupied properties, compared to eighty percent at December 31, 2012.
With respect to loans to developers and builders that are secured by non-owner occupied properties that the Corporation may originate from time to time, the Corporation generally requires the borrower to have had an existing relationship with the Corporation and have a proven record of success. Construction loans are underwritten utilizing feasibility studies, independent appraisal reviews, sensitivity analysis of absorption and lease rates and financial analysis of the developers and property owners. Construction loans are generally based upon estimates of costs and value associated with the complete project. These estimates may be inaccurate. Construction loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project. Sources of repayment for these types of loans may be pre-committed permanent loans from approved long-term lenders, sales of developed property or an interim loan commitment from the Corporation until permanent financing is obtained. These loans are closely monitored by on-site inspections and are considered to have higher risks than other real estate loans due to their ultimate repayment being sensitive to interest rate changes, governmental regulation of real property, general economic conditions and the availability of long-term financing.
The Corporation originates residential and consumer loans utilizing a computer-based credit scoring analysis to supplement the underwriting process. To monitor and manage consumer loan risk, policies and procedures are developed and modified, as needed, jointly by line and staff personnel. This activity, coupled with relatively small loan amounts that are spread across many individual borrowers, minimizes risk. Additionally, trend and outlook reports are reviewed by management on a regular basis. Underwriting standards for home equity loans are heavily influenced by statutory requirements, which include, but are not limited to, a maximum loan-to-value percentage of 80%, collection remedies, the number of such loans a borrower can have at one time and documentation requirements.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-18
The Corporation contracts with a third party vendor to perform loan reviews. The Corporation reviews and validates the credit risk program on an annual basis. Results of these reviews are presented to management. The loan review process complements and reinforces the risk identification and assessment decisions made by lenders and credit personnel, as well as the Corporations policies and procedures.
The goal of the bank is to diversify loans to avoid a concentration of credit in a specific industry, person, entity, product, service, or any area vulnerable to a tax law change or an economic event. A concentration of credit occurs when obligations, direct or indirect, of the same or affiliated interests represent 15 percent or more of the Banks capital structure. Commercial real estate rental and leasing represented the highest concentration at 120% of tier 1 capital. The Board of Directors recognizes that the Banks geographic trade area imposes some limitations regarding loan diversification if the bank is to perform the function for which it has been chartered. Specifically, lending to qualified borrowers within the banks trade area will naturally cause concentrations of real estate loans in the primary communities served by the bank and loans to employees of major employers in the area.
The following table provides details regarding the aging of the Banks loan portfolio:
December 31, 2013 |
30 - 89 Days
|
90 Days and Greater
|
Total
|
Current |
Total Loans |
|||||
Retail |
||||||||||
Consumer |
$ |
182 |
$ |
3 |
$ |
185 |
$ |
10,772 |
$ |
10,957 |
Single family residential |
3,805 |
83 |
3,876 |
209,887 |
213,763 |
|||||
Other retail |
319 |
28 |
359 |
27,312 |
27,671 |
|||||
Retail total |
$ |
4,306 |
$ |
114 |
$ |
4,420 |
$ |
247,971 |
$ |
252,391 |
Commercial |
||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ |
428 |
$ |
1,328 |
$ |
1,756 |
$ |
92,946 |
$ |
94,702 |
Non-farm, non-residential real estate |
393 |
- |
393 |
175,820 |
176,213 |
|||||
Construction and development |
- |
28 |
28 |
29,910 |
29,938 |
|||||
Commercial loans secured by real estate |
38 |
178 |
216 |
26,724 |
26,940 |
|||||
All other commercial |
- |
1,249 |
1,249 |
25,333 |
26,582 |
|||||
Commercial total |
$ |
859 |
$ |
2,783 |
$ |
3,642 |
$ |
350,733 |
$ |
354,375 |
Total |
$ |
5,165 |
$ |
2,897 |
$ |
8,062 |
$ |
598,704 |
$ |
606,766 |
December 31, 2012 |
30 - 89 Days
|
90 Days and Greater
|
90 Days and Greater
|
Current |
Total Loans |
|||||
Retail |
||||||||||
Consumer |
$ |
112 |
$ |
7 |
$ |
119 |
$ |
11,502 |
$ |
11,621 |
Single family residential |
3,543 |
387 |
3,930 |
192,419 |
196,349 |
|||||
Other retail |
193 |
- |
193 |
23,071 |
23,264 |
|||||
Retail total |
$ |
3,848 |
$ |
394 |
$ |
4,242 |
$ |
226,992 |
$ |
231,234 |
Commercial |
||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ |
618 |
$ |
1,457 |
$ |
2,075 |
$ |
81,556 |
$ |
83,631 |
Non-farm, non-residential real estate |
666 |
448 |
1,114 |
166,451 |
167,565 |
|||||
Construction and development |
160 |
- |
160 |
36,163 |
36,323 |
|||||
Commercial loans secured by real estate |
22 |
193 |
215 |
23,768 |
23,983 |
|||||
All other commercial |
741 |
1,379 |
2,120 |
22,303 |
24,423 |
|||||
Commercial total |
$ |
2,207 |
$ |
3,477 |
$ |
5,684 |
$ |
330,241 |
$ |
335,925 |
Total |
$ |
6,055 |
$ |
3,871 |
$ |
9,926 |
$ |
557,233 |
$ |
567,159 |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-19
A loan is considered impaired, in accordance with the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based on current information and events, it is probable the Corporation will be unable to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans but also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings.
The following table summarizes the impaired loans by loan type as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
December 31, 2013 |
Unpaid Contractual |
Recorded investment |
Recorded Investment with allowance |
Total Recorded |
Related |
Average |
Interest |
Interest A |
||||||||||||||
Commercial |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ |
2,190 |
$ |
1,338 |
$ |
234 |
$ |
1,572 |
$ |
16 |
$ |
1,620 |
$ |
23 |
$ |
134 |
||||||
Non-farm, non-residential real estate |
3,236 |
1,155 |
1,551 |
2,706 |
282 |
2,819 |
157 |
168 |
||||||||||||||
Construction and development |
461 |
461 |
- |
461 |
44 |
556 |
30 |
30 |
||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
3,834 |
3,310 |
178 |
3,488 |
- |
3,704 |
225 |
241 |
||||||||||||||
Commercial total |
9,721 |
6,264 |
1,963 |
8,227 |
342 |
8,699 |
435 |
573 |
||||||||||||||
Retail |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Single family residential |
1,121 |
568 |
419 |
987 |
118 |
1044 |
52 |
55 |
||||||||||||||
Other retail |
11 |
- |
11 |
11 |
11 |
11 |
|
|
||||||||||||||
Retail total |
1,132 |
568 |
430 |
998 |
129 |
1,097 |
52 |
55 |
||||||||||||||
Total |
$ |
10,853 |
$ |
6,382 |
$ |
2,393 |
$ |
9,225 |
$ |
471 |
$ |
9,796 |
$ |
487 |
$ |
628 |
||||||
December 31, 2012 |
Unpaid Contractual |
Recorded investment |
Recorded Investment with allowance |
Total Recorded |
Related |
Average |
Interest |
Interest |
||||||||||||||
Commercial |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ |
2,036 |
$ |
1,076 |
$ |
328 |
$ |
1,404 |
$ |
103 |
$ |
3,483 |
$ |
74 |
$ |
259 |
||||||
Non-farm, non-residential real estate |
3,613 |
2,417 |
- |
2,417 |
- |
1,606 |
83 |
78 |
||||||||||||||
Construction and development |
682 |
- |
682 |
682 |
118 |
682 |
35 |
40 |
||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
3,124 |
3,124 |
- |
3,124 |
|
3,520 |
126 |
279 |
||||||||||||||
Commercial total |
9,455 |
6,617 |
1,010 |
7,627 |
221 |
9,291 |
318 |
656 |
||||||||||||||
Retail |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Single family residential |
1,237 |
402 |
613 |
1,015 |
82 |
638 |
39 |
64 |
||||||||||||||
Retail total |
1,237 |
402 |
613 |
1,015 |
82 |
|
39 |
64 |
||||||||||||||
Total |
$ |
10,692 |
$ |
7,019 |
$ |
1,623 |
$ |
8,642 |
$ |
303 |
$ |
9,291 |
$ |
357 |
$ |
720 |
||||||
December 31, 2011 |
Unpaid Contractual |
Recorded investment with no allowance |
Recorded Investment with allowance |
Total Recorded |
Related |
Average Recorded Investment |
Interest |
Interest |
||||||||||||||
Commercial |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
$ |
5,839 |
$ |
738 |
$ |
5,678 |
$ |
5,446 |
$ |
601 |
$ |
5,069 |
$ |
193 |
$ |
337 |
||||||
Non-farm, non-residential real estate |
4,378 |
2,986 |
2,115 |
4,573 |
307 |
5,232 |
35 |
70 |
||||||||||||||
Construction and development |
870 |
- |
870 |
870 |
203 |
941 |
39 |
45 |
||||||||||||||
Other commercial |
3,238 |
- |
- |
1,498 |
- |
1,527 |
190 |
310 |
||||||||||||||
Commercial total |
14,325 |
3,724 |
8,663 |
12,387 |
1,111 |
12,769 |
457 |
762 |
||||||||||||||
Retail |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Single family residential |
1,388 |
142 |
1,075 |
1,217 |
131 |
1,269 |
44 |
68 |
||||||||||||||
Retail total |
1,388 |
142 |
1,075 |
1,217 |
131 |
1,269 |
44 |
68 |
||||||||||||||
Total |
$ |
15,713 |
$ |
3,866 |
$ |
9,738 |
$ |
13,604 |
$ |
1,242 |
$ |
14,038 |
$ |
501 |
$ |
830 |
||||||
* Interest income received is recognized interest income and approximates cash basis.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-20
Non-accrual loans, segregated by class of loans, were as follows at December 31, 2013 and 2012:
2013 |
2012 |
|||
Commercial and industrial |
$ |
1,649 |
$ |
1,595 |
Nonfarm, nonresidential real estate |
737 |
1,372 |
||
Construction and development |
68 |
50 |
||
Commercial real estate |
6 |
126 |
||
Other commercial |
1,248 |
1,379 |
||
Consumer |
21 |
11 |
||
Single family residential |
1,667 |
3,541 |
||
Total |
$ |
5,396 |
$ |
8,074 |
Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are certain loans that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions. Modifications of terms for our loans and their inclusion as troubled debt restructurings are based on individual facts and circumstances. Loan modifications that are included as troubled debt restructurings may involve either an increase or reduction of the interest rate, extension of the term of the loan, or deferral of principal and/or interest payments, regardless of the period of the modification. All of the loans identified as troubled debt restructuring were modified due to financial stress of the borrower. In order to determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed to determine the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future with the modification. This evaluation is performed under the Corporations internal underwriting policy.
When the Corporation modifies loans in a troubled debt restructuring, the Corporation evaluates any possible impairment similar to other impaired loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan or lease agreement, or use the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. If the corporation determined that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance. In periods subsequent to modification, the Corporation evaluates all troubled debt restructuring, including those that have payment defaults, for possible impairment and recognize impairment through the allowance.
As of December 31, 2013, the Corporation did not have any commitments to extend additional funds to borrowers with loans modified and included as a troubled debt restructuring.
During 2013, certain loans were modified in troubled debt restructurings, where economic concessions were granted to borrowers consisting of reductions in the interest rates, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, and forbearances. Presented below, segregated by class of loans, are troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
Post - Modification |
Net Charge-offs |
Post -Modification |
Net Charge-offs |
||||||||
Number of |
Outstanding |
Resulting from |
Number of |
Outstanding |
Resulting from |
||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
Loans |
Balance |
Modifications |
Loans |
Balance |
Modifications |
|||||
Commercial: |
|||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
1 |
$ |
8 |
$ |
- |
|
Nonfarm nonresidential |
- |
- |
- |
1 |
361 |
- |
|||||
Retail: |
|||||||||||
Consumer |
3 |
8 |
- |
1 |
3 |
- |
|||||
Single family residential |
3 |
167 |
6 |
3 |
237 |
- |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total trouble debt restructurings |
6 |
$ |
175 |
$ |
6 |
6 |
$ |
609 |
$ |
- |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-21
Loans retain their accrual status at the time of their modification. As a result, if a loan is on nonaccrual status at the time it is modified, it stays as no-accrual status, and if a loan is on accrual status at the time of the modification, it generally stays on accrual status. Commercial and consumer loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default. If loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring subsequently default, the Corporation evaluates the loan for possible further impairment. The allowance for loan losses may be increased, adjustments may be made in the allocation of the allowance, or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan. The Corporation considers a loan in default when it is 90 days or more past due or transferred to nonaccrual.
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Corporation did not have any loans that were modified in troubled debt restructurings during the past twelve months that have subsequently defaulted.
Credit Quality Indicators. As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Corporations loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including trends related to (i) the weighted-average risk grade of commercial loans, (ii) the level of classified commercial loans, (iii) net charge-offs, (iv) non-performing loans and (v) the general economic conditions in the State of Tennessee.
The Corporation uses a risk grading matrix to assign a risk grade to each of its commercials loans. Loans are graded on a scale of 1 8. A description of the general characteristics of the 8 risk grades is as follows:
General Characteristics:
Substantially risk free.
Federal, state, or municipal subdivisions with acceptable investment grade credit rating.
Large national, regional, or local entity with proven access to capital markets.
Diversity in its line of business with stable and diversified sales base.
Borrower is considered to be an industry leader with many consecutive years of strong profits and exhibits a financial condition, equity position, liquidity, and debt service capacity far exceeding industry norms.
Borrower has an abundance of unpledged financeable assets coupled with superior cash generation capabilities.
Industry conditions and trends are positive and strong.
Borrower has strong management with evidence of management succession.
Credit rating by Moodys, Standard & Poor, or other qualified rating agency that is grade A or higher.
A cash secured loan with the cash on deposit in our bank or a guaranty from the Federal government also warrants this risk rating.
General Characteristics:
Borrower shows strong profitability, liquidity, and capitalization better than industry norms and a strong market position in the region.
Borrower may have limited access to public markets for short-term needs or capital requirements, but has ready access to alternative financing.
Loans may be unsecured based on the financial strength of the borrower or secured by collateral that is considered liquid and marketable.
Borrower has a proven history of profitability and financial stability.
Borrower has a strong market position in its industry and has an abundance of financeable assets available to protect the banks position.
Proven and steady management with good management succession.
Borrower can withstand major market instabilities of short duration.
Credit rating by Moodys, Standard & Poor, or other qualified rating agency that is grade BAA or higher.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-22
General Characteristics:
Borrower shows a stable earnings history and financial condition in line with industry norms with indications that these trends will continue.
The credit extension is considered sound, however elements may be present which suggest the borrower may not be free from temporary impairments in the future.
Liquidity and leverage is in line with industry norms.
Good management with acceptable management succession.
Under most economic and business conditions has access to alternative financing but limited or no access to capital markets for short-term or capital needs.
Borrower may be an individual with a sound financial condition and liquidity with proven historical income to repay the debt as scheduled.
Credit extensions are generally secured by acceptable collateral.
General Characteristics:
Credit is to a borrower with smaller margins of debt service coverage and with some elements of reduced financial strength.
Borrower is generally in a lower average market position in its industry.
Borrower shows satisfactory asset quality and liquidity, good debt capacity and coverage, and good management in critical positions.
Management is of unquestioned character but management succession may be questionable.
Borrower can obtain similar financing from other financial institutions.
Interim losses or moderately declining earnings trends may occur, but the borrower has sufficient strength and financial flexibility to offset these issues.
Credit may be to individuals with a moderately leveraged financial condition, but with satisfactory liquidity and income to cover debt repayment requirements.
Business borrowers may have moderate leverage, but must have historically consistent cash flow to cover debt service and other operating needs.
Business borrowers may also have erratic or cyclical operating performances but should demonstrate strong equity positions to support these profitability swings.
Asset-based loans that have stabilized and proven performance with the financial capacity to provide for annual clean up may qualify for this rating.
Borrower has no access to capital markets, but would be financeable by another financial institution or finance company.
Credit extensions are generally secured by acceptable collateral.
General Characteristics:
Loans considered for this risk rating require a heightened level of supervision.
A) Transitional, Event Driven This category of risk rated 5 loans captures responses to early warning signals from a relationship and, therefore, signifies a specific, event-driven, transitional credit grade. The event is generally something unplanned or unexpected such as a death, a disaster, the loss of a major client, product line, or key employee; divorce, or health condition of the owner or key management person. The Risk Rating 5 category may be used in transitional upgrades as well as transitional downgrades of credit relationships. Under these criteria, the risk rating 5 necessitates a plan of action to either upgrade the credit to a Pass rating (Risk Rating 1-4), downgrade the credit to a criticized asset, or exit the relationship within six months.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-23
B) Ongoing Supervision Warranted - This risk rating may also be utilized to identify loans having inherent characteristics which warrant more than the normal level of supervision. Loans meeting these criteria may include larger, more complex loans with unusual structures. Loans, which, due to structure or nature of the collateral require above average servicing, may also be considered for this risk rating. Unlike other criteria listed previously for the Pass / Watch risk rating, these particular characteristics tend not to be one-time or transitional in nature; therefore, these loans may be expected to remain in this risk rating category longer than six months. A loan might remain in this risk rating category for its life or until the characteristic warranting the Pass / Watch rating can be eliminated or effectively mitigated.
Borrowers may exhibit declining earnings, strained cash flow, increasing leverage, or weakening market positions that indicate a trend toward an unacceptable risk.
Borrowers liquidity, leverage, and earnings performance is below or trending below industry norms.
Interim losses and other adverse trends may occur, but not to the level that would impair the banks position.
Borrower may be a newly formed company or in a new line of business or may be an established business with new or unproven management. Borrower should be adequately capitalized, but may not yet have achieved stabilized cash flow.
Borrower generally has a small market position in its industry.
Borrower may be engaged in an industry that is experiencing an economic downturn or is particularly susceptible to uncontrollable external factors.
Management is of good character although some management weakness may exist, including lack of depth or succession.
Borrowers generally have limited additional debt capacity and modest coverage, and average or below-average asset quality, margins, and market share.
Borrowers ability to obtain financing from other financial institutions may be impaired.
Credit to individuals with marginal financial condition and liquidity, but with income still sufficient to service the debt.
A special mention asset has potential weaknesses that deserve managements close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institutions credit position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.
General Characteristics:
Cash flow may not be sufficient to fund anticipated cash needs.
Sufficiently or modestly sufficiently financeable assets are available to protect the banks position.
Adverse trends in operations/profits or unbalanced position in the balance sheet, but not to the point where repayment is in jeopardy.
Borrower generally shows limited liquidity or high leverage.
Borrowers financial position is in the lower quartile of industry norms.
Business exhibits a deteriorating market position in the industry.
Management lacks depth and succession.
Business is unable to withstand temporary setbacks without affecting repayment capability.
Borrower is not financeable by another bank but possibly by a finance company or specialized lender.
A substandard asset is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-24
General Characteristics:
The primary source of repayment no longer provides satisfactory support and repayment is dependent on secondary sources.
A substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any.
Normal repayment from the borrower is impaired although no loss of principal is envisioned.
A partial loss of interest or principal will occur if the deficiencies are not corrected.
Cash flow is generally not sufficient to fund anticipated cash needs.
Financeable assets may not be sufficient to protect the banks position.
Adverse trends in operations that jeopardized debt repayment may require the borrower to undertake a significant reorganization of financing or the business.
Borrower shows poor liquidity and high leverage impairing the repayment of the debt in accordance with agreed upon terms.
Management lacks depth and succession; may be inexperienced or of questionable character.
Borrowers market position in the industry is deteriorating.
Borrower is not financeable by another bank or finance company.
Risk Rating 8: Doubtful
An asset classified doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.
General Characteristics:
Inadequate primary source of repayment. Assumes a less than satisfactory secondary source of repayment on a most-likely case basis. There may be an adequate secondary source of repayment on a best-case basis.
Borrowers have the same weaknesses found in Substandard borrowers.
Loss probability is extremely high but because of certain important and reasonably specific factors that may work to strengthen the loan, its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until a more exact status may be determined.
Pending factors may include proposed merger or acquisition; liquidation procedures; capital injections; perfecting liens on additional collateral; and refinancing plans.
Cash flow is insufficient to fund cash needs.
Financeable assets are insufficient to protect the banks position.
Source of debt repayment is dependent on liquidation of assets with a probable loss.
Borrower may no longer be a going concern, or may not exist as a going concern for the foreseeable future.
No alternative financing sources exist.
The following table presents risk grades and classified loans by class for year ending December 31, 2013 and 2012:
December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||
Commercial Loan Portfolio: Credit risk profile by internally assigned grade |
Commercial
|
Non-Farm,
Non- |
Construction
|
Commercial
Loans |
All
Other |
Commercial
|
||||||
Pass |
$ |
92,155 |
$ |
170,585 |
$ |
29,463 |
$ |
26,516 |
$ |
24,131 |
$ |
342,850 |
Special Mention |
836 |
3,883 |
- |
- |
179 |
4,898 |
||||||
Substandard |
635 |
1,745 |
475 |
424 |
1,023 |
4,302 |
||||||
Doubtful |
1,076 |
- |
- |
- |
1,249 |
2,325 |
||||||
TOTALS |
$ |
94,702 |
$ |
176,213 |
$ |
29,938 |
$ |
26,940 |
$ |
26,582 |
$ |
354,375 |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-25
Retail Loan Portfolio: Credit risk profiles based on delinquency status classification |
Consumer
|
Single-Family
|
All
Other |
Retail
|
|||||||||
Performing |
$ |
10,9366 |
$ |
212,096 |
$ |
27,643 |
$ |
250,675 |
|||||
Nonperforming* |
21 |
1,667 |
28 |
1,716 |
|||||||||
TOTALS |
$ |
10,957 |
$ |
213,763 |
$ |
27,671 |
$ |
252,391 |
|||||
December 31, 2012 |
|||||||||||||
Commercial Loan Portfolio: Credit risk profile by internally assigned grade |
Commercial |
Non-Farm,
Non- |
Construction
|
Commercial |
All
Other |
Commercial
|
|||||||
Pass |
$ |
81,560 |
$ |
164,290 |
$ |
35,543 |
$ |
21,660 |
$ |
22,857 |
$ |
325,910 |
|
Special Mention |
269 |
815 |
98 |
398 |
- |
1,580 |
|||||||
Substandard |
726 |
2,460 |
682 |
1,925 |
187 |
5,980 |
|||||||
Doubtful |
1,076 |
- |
- |
- |
1,379 |
2,455 |
|||||||
TOTALS |
$ |
83,631 |
$ |
167,565 |
$ |
36,323 |
$ |
23,983 |
$ |
24,423 |
$ |
335,925 |
|
Retail Loan Portfolio: Credit risk profiles based on delinquency status classification |
Consumer
|
Single-Family
|
All
Other |
Retail
|
|||||||||
Performing |
$ |
11,610 |
$ |
192,808 |
$ |
23,131 |
$ |
227,549 |
|||||
Nonperforming* |
11 |
3,541 |
133 |
3,685 |
|||||||||
TOTALS |
$ |
11,621 |
$ |
196,349 |
$ |
23,264 |
$ |
231,234 |
|||||
*Loans are classified as nonperforming loans and are automatically placed on nonaccrual status once they reach 90 days past due. For purposes of this table all loans graded substandard or below are including in nonperforming.
**Single-family residential loans includes primary liens, closed-end secondary liens, residential construction loans, and home equity lines of credit.
NOTE 5 ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
Allowance for Possible Loan Losses. The allowance for possible loan losses is a reserve established through a provision for possible loan losses charged to expense, which represents managements best estimate of probable losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans. The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan losses and risks inherent in the loan portfolio. The Corporations allowance for possible loan loss methodology includes allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 310, Receivables and allowance allocations calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 450, Contingencies. Accordingly, the methodology is based on historical loss experience by type of credit and internal risk grade, specific homogeneous risk pools and specific loss allocations, with adjustments for current events and conditions. The Corporations process for determining the appropriate level of the allowance for possible loan losses is designed to account for credit deterioration as it occurs. The provision for possible loan losses reflects loan quality trends, including the levels of and trends related to nonaccrual loans, past due loans, potential problem loans, criticized loans and net charge-offs or recoveries, among other factors. The provision for possible loan losses also reflects the totality of actions taken on all loans for a particular period. In other words, the amount of the provision reflects not only the necessary increases in the allowance for possible loan losses related to newly identified criticized loans, but it also reflects actions taken related to other loans including, among other things, any necessary increases or decreases in required allowances for specific loans or loan pools.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-26
The level of the allowance reflects managements continuing evaluation of industry concentrations, specific credit risks, loan loss experience, current loan portfolio quality, present economic, political and regulatory conditions and unidentified losses inherent in the current loan portfolio. Portions of the allowance may be allocated for specific credits; however, the entire allowance is available for any credit that, in managements judgment, should be charged off. While management utilizes its best judgment and information available, the ultimate adequacy of the allowance is dependent upon a variety of factors beyond the Corporations control, including, among other things, the performance of the Corporations loan portfolio, the economy, changes in interest rates and the view of the regulatory authorities toward loan classifications.
The Corporations allowance for possible loan losses consists of three elements: (i) specific valuation allowances determined in accordance with ASC Topic 310 based on probable losses on specific loans; (ii) historical valuation allowances determined in accordance with ASC Topic 450 based on historical loan loss experience for similar loans with similar characteristics and trends, adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the impact of current conditions; and (iii) general valuation allowances determined in accordance with ASC Topic 450 based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Corporation.
The allowances established for probable losses on specific loans are based on a regular analysis and evaluation of problem loans. Commercial loans are classified based on an internal credit risk grading process that evaluates, among other things: (i) the obligors ability to repay; (ii) the underlying collateral, if any; and (iii) the economic environment and industry in which the borrower operates. This analysis is performed at the relationship manager level for all commercial loans. When a loan has a calculated grade of 7 or higher, a special assets officer analyzes the loan to determine whether the loan is impaired and, if impaired, the need to specifically allocate a portion of the allowance for possible loan losses to the loan. Specific valuation allowances are determined by analyzing the borrowers ability to repay amounts owed, collateral deficiencies, the relative risk grade of the loan and economic conditions affecting the borrowers industry, among other things.
Historical valuation allowances are calculated based on the historical loss experience of specific types of loans and the internal risk grade of such loans at the time they were charged-off. The Corporation calculates historical loss ratios for pools of similar loans with similar characteristics based on the proportion of actual charge-offs experienced to the total population of loans in the pool. The historical loss ratios are periodically updated based on actual charge-off experience. A historical valuation allowance is established for each pool of similar loans based upon the product of the historical loss ratio and the total dollar amount of the loans in the pool. The Corporations pools of similar loans include similarly risk-graded groups of commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, consumer real estate loans and consumer and other loans.
The components of the general valuation allowance include (i) the additional reserves allocated to specific loan portfolio segments as a result of applying an environmental risk adjustment factor to the base historical loss allocation and (ii) the additional reserves that are not allocated to specific loan portfolio segments including allocations for groups of similar loans with risk characteristics that exceed certain concentration limits established by management.
There is an inherent imprecision in calculating the specific portion of the allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL). Therefore, a factor has been added to the allocation of each of the identified segments of the loan portfolio to account for the imprecision.
Included in the general valuation allowances are allocations for groups of similar loans with risk characteristics that exceed certain concentration limits established by management. Concentration risk limits have been established, among other things, for certain industry concentrations, large balance and highly leveraged credit relationships that exceed specified risk grades, and loans originated with policy exceptions that exceed specified risk grades.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for the losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Managements periodic evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on the Corporations past loan loss experience, know and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to change. The Corporation uses a rolling eight quarters historic loss period for all segments when estimating the historic charge off rates calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 450 and incorporates environmental factors for various components such as economic conditions, trends in delinquencies, loan review assessments, credit concentrations and level of underperforming ratios.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-27
General valuation allowances are based on general economic conditions and other qualitative risk factors both internal and external to the Corporation. In general, such valuation allowances are determined by evaluating, among other things: (i) the experience, ability and effectiveness of the banks lending management and staff; (ii) the effectiveness of the Corporations loan policies, procedures and internal controls; (iii) changes in asset quality; (iv) changes in loan portfolio volume; (v) the composition and concentrations of credit; (vi) the impact of competition on loan structuring and pricing; (vii) the effectiveness of the internal loan review function; (viii) the impact of environmental risks on portfolio risks; and (ix) the impact of changes to interest rates on portfolio risk. Management evaluates the degree of risk that each one of these components has on the quality of the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis. Each component is determined to have either a high, moderate or low degree of risk. The results are then input into a general allocation matrix to determine an appropriate general valuation allowance.
Included in the general valuation allowances are allocations for groups of similar loans with risk characteristics that exceed certain concentration limits established by management. Concentration risk limits have been established, among other things, for certain industry concentrations, large balance and highly leveraged credit relationships that exceed specified risk grades, and loans originated with policy exceptions that exceed specified risk grades.
Loans identified as losses by management and internal loan review are charged-off. Furthermore, consumer loan accounts are charged-off automatically based on regulatory requirements.
The following table summarizes the allocation in the allowance for loan losses by loan segment for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
December 31, 2013 |
Commercial |
Residential
|
Consumer
and |
Totals |
Beginning Balance |
$ 7,528 |
$ 1,109 |
$ 172 |
$ 8,809 |
Less: Charge-offs |
222 |
27 |
49 |
298 |
Add: Recoveries |
53 |
2 |
29 |
84 |
Add: Provisions |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Ending Balance |
$ 7,359 |
$ 1,084 |
$ 152 |
$ 8,595 |
December 31, 2012 |
Commercial |
Residential
|
Consumer
and |
Totals |
Beginning Balance |
$ 6,895 |
$ 2,113 |
$ 192 |
$ 9,200 |
Less: Charge-offs |
1,690 |
176 |
19 |
1,885 |
Add: Recoveries |
364 |
2 |
8 |
374 |
Add: Provisions |
1,959 |
(830) |
(9) |
1,120 |
Ending Balance |
$ 7,528 |
$ 1,109 |
$ 172 |
$ 8,809 |
December 31, 2011 |
Commercial |
Residential
|
Consumer
and |
Totals |
Beginning Balance |
$ 7,011 |
$ 2,001 |
$ 408 |
$ 9,420 |
Less: Charge-offs |
3,353 |
52 |
147 |
3,552 |
Add: Recoveries |
103 |
- |
104 |
207 |
Add: Provisions |
3,134 |
164 |
(173) |
3,125 |
Ending Balance |
$ 6,895 |
$ 2,113 |
$ 192 |
$ 9,200 |
The following tables detail the amount of the ALLL allocated to each portfolio segment as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, disaggregated on the basis of the Corporations impairment methodology:
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-28
December 31, 2013 |
Commercial |
Residential
|
Consumer
and |
Totals |
Loans individually evaluated for impairment |
$ 342 |
$ 118 |
$ 11 |
$ 471 |
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment |
7,017 |
966 |
141 |
8,124 |
Ending Balance |
$ 7,359 |
$ 1,084 |
$ 152 |
$ 8,595 |
December 31, 2012 |
Commercial |
Residential
|
Consumer
and |
Totals |
Loans individually evaluated for impairment |
$ 221 |
$ 82 |
$ - |
$ 303 |
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment |
7,307 |
1,027 |
172 |
8,506 |
Ending Balance |
$ 7,528 |
$ 1,109 |
$ 172 |
$ 8,809 |
December 31, 2011 |
Commercial |
Residential
|
Consumer
and |
Totals |
Loans individually evaluated for impairment |
$ 1,111 |
$ 131 |
$ - |
$ 1,242 |
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment |
5,784 |
1,982 |
192 |
7,958 |
Ending Balance |
$ 6,895 |
$ 2,113 |
$ 192 |
$ 9,200 |
The following table shows loans as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 related to each balance in the allowance for possible loan losses by portfolio segment and disaggregated on the basis of the Banks impairment methodology:
December 31, 2013 |
Commercial |
Residential
|
Consumer
& |
Totals |
|||||
Loans individually evaluated for impairment |
$ |
8,227 |
$ |
987 |
$ |
11 |
$ |
9,225 |
|
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment |
346,148 |
212,776 |
38,617 |
597,541 |
|||||
Ending Balance |
$ |
354,375 |
$ |
213,763 |
$ |
38,628 |
$ |
606,766 |
|
December 31, 2012 |
Commercial |
Residential
|
Consumer
& |
Totals |
|||||
Loans individually evaluated for impairment |
$ |
7,627 |
$ |
1,015 |
$ |
- |
$ |
8,642 |
|
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment |
328,298 |
195,334 |
34,885 |
558,517 |
|||||
Ending Balance |
$ |
335,925 |
$ |
196,349 |
$ |
34,885 |
$ |
567,159 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
Commercial |
Residential
|
Consumer
& |
Totals |
|||||
Loans individually evaluated for impairment |
$ |
12,387 |
$ |
1,217 |
$ |
- |
$ |
13,604 |
|
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment |
268,536 |
221,365 |
14,297 |
504,198 |
|||||
Ending Balance |
$ |
280,923 |
$ |
222,582 |
$ |
14,297 |
$ |
517,802 |
|
NOTE 6 PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT
The following table presents the Corporations assets by category at December 31, 2013 and 2012:
2013 |
2012 |
|||||
Land |
$ |
8,223 |
$ |
9,003 |
||
Premises |
22,765 |
22,717 |
||||
Furniture and equipment |
9,367 |
9,401 |
||||
Leasehold improvements |
1,095 |
1,319 |
||||
41,450 |
42,440 |
|||||
Less allowance for depreciation and amortization |
(16,582) |
(16,023) |
||||
|
|
$ |
24,868 |
|
$ |
26,417 |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-29
NOTE 7 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Certain related parties (primarily directors and senior officers of the Corporation or the Bank, including their affiliates, families and companies in which they hold 10% or more ownership) were customers of, and had loans and other transactions with, the Bank in the ordinary course of business. An analysis of the activity with respect to such loans for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is shown in the table below (dollars in thousands). These totals exclude loans made in the ordinary course of business to other companies with which neither the Corporation nor the Bank had a relationship other than the association of one of its directors in the capacity of officer or director. These loan transactions were made on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable loans to other persons. They did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. No related party loans were charged off in 2013 or 2012.
Activity for related party transactions during 2013 and 2012 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
2013 |
2012 |
|||
Related party extensions of credit, beginning of period |
$ |
3,831 |
$ |
3,829 |
New loans |
1,116 |
745 |
||
Repayments |
(1,125) |
(743) |
||
Related party extension of credit, end of period |
$ |
3,822 |
$ |
3,831 |
The aggregate balances of related party deposits at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $15,724 and $15,984, respectively.
The aggregate balances of related party repurchase agreements at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $9,079 and $8,694, respectively.
The Corporation and Bank utilize various services and purchased good provided by certain related parties. Significant services provided by a director during 2013 totaled $38, which was for consulting services. For 2012, these services totaled $1,105, which was for building contractor services.
NOTE 8 LEASES
Real property for four of the Banks office locations and certain equipment are leased under noncancelable operating leases expiring at various times through 2028. In most cases, the leases provide for one or more renewal options of five to ten years under the same or similar terms. In addition, various items of office equipment are leased under cancelable operating leases. Total rental expense incurred under all operating leases, including short-term leases with terms of less than one month, amounted to approximately $18, $12 and $13 for equipment leases and approximately $264, $283 and $236 for building leases in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Future minimum lease commitments as of December 31, 2013 under all noncancelable operating leases with initial terms of one year or more are shown in the following table:
Year |
Lease Payments |
2014 |
$ 336 |
2015 |
347 |
2016 |
320 |
2017 |
290 |
2018 |
290 |
Thereafter |
3,942 |
Total |
$ 5,525 |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-30
NOTE 9 FEDERAL AND STATE INCOME TAXES
The following table presents components of income tax expense attributable to continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||
Current |
$ |
915 |
$ |
2,256 |
$ |
1,960 |
Deferred |
1,950 |
(340) |
(1,216) |
|||
Total provision for income taxes |
2,865 |
1,916 |
744 |
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
Deferred Tax Effects of Principal Temporary Differences |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
|||
Allowance for possible loan losses |
$ |
3,309 |
$ |
3,392 |
$ |
3,519 |
Deferred compensation |
2,516 |
2,420 |
2,234 |
|||
Write down of other real estate |
314 |
1,152 |
1,621 |
|||
Deferred gain on OREO sale |
188 |
202 |
- |
|||
Amortization of core deposit intangible |
(272) |
423 |
575 |
|||
Recognition of nonaccrual loan income |
111 |
152 |
66 |
|||
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities |
6,613 |
(2,212) |
(1,892) |
|||
Post retirement benefit obligation |
1,849 |
1,733 |
1,643 |
|||
Accelerated depreciation |
(822) |
(630) |
(562) |
|||
Amortization of goodwill |
(2,591) |
(2,376) |
(2,152) |
|||
Alternative Minimum Tax |
- |
402 |
422 |
|||
Dividend Income - F&M West |
(372) |
(219) |
(241) |
|||
Prepaid Expenses |
(178) |
(185) |
- |
|||
Other |
(304) |
(368) |
(360) |
|||
Net deferred tax asset |
$ |
10,905 |
$ |
3,884 |
$ |
4,872 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Reconciliation of Total Income Taxes Reported with the Amount of Income Taxes Computed at the |
||||||
Federal Statutory Rate (34% Each Year) |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
|||
Tax expense at statutory rate |
$ |
4,332 |
$ |
3,238 |
$ |
2,632 |
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from: |
||||||
Tax exempt interest |
(1,144) |
(1,275) |
(1,533) |
|||
Nondeductible interest expense |
18 |
29 |
45 |
|||
Employee benefits |
(196) |
(240) |
(244) |
|||
Other nondeductible expenses |
||||||
(nontaxable income) - net |
11 |
32 |
55 |
|||
State income taxes net of federal tax benefit |
- |
41 |
(40) |
|||
Dividend income exclusion |
- |
(1) |
(52) |
|||
Other |
(156) |
92 |
(119) |
|||
Total provision for income taxes |
$ |
2,865 |
$ |
1,916 |
$ |
745 |
|
|
|
|
|||
Effective tax rate |
22.4% |
20.1% |
9.6% |
The Corporation and one of its subsidiaries file consolidated income tax returns with the Internal Revenue Service and State of Tennessee. The Corporation is not subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2010. There was no valuation allowance for deferred tax assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Management believes it is more-likely-than-not that all of the deferred tax assets will be realized because they were supported by recoverable taxes paid in prior years.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-31
NOTE 10 BORROWED FUNDS
The Bank is a party to the Blanket Agreement for Advances and Security Agreement (the Blanket Agreement) with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati (the FHLB). Advances made to the Bank under the Blanket Agreement are collateralized by the FHLB stock and qualifying residential mortgage loans totaling 150% of the outstanding amount borrowed. These collateralization matters are outlined in the Blanket Agreement dated June 20, 2006 between the Bank and the FHLB. Outstanding advances at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were $0 and $10,100, respectively.
Stock held in the FHLB totaling $3,009 at December 31, 2013 is carried at cost. The stock is restricted and can only be sold back to the FHLB at par.
The Bank has a Cash Management Advance Line of Credit Agreement (the CMA) dated June 21, 2010, with the Federal Home Loan Bank. The CMA is a component of the Blanket Agreement. The purpose of the CMA is to assist with short-term liquidity management. Under the terms of the CMA, the Bank may borrow a maximum of $40 million selecting a variable rate of interest for up to 90 days or a fixed rate for a maximum of 30 days. There were no borrowings outstanding under the CMA as of December 31, 2013.
Short-term borrowings included the following at December 31:
|
2013 |
2012 |
|
|
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements |
$ 18,095 |
$ 17,068 |
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase consist of obligations of the Bank to other parties. The obligations are secured by investment securities and such collateral is held by in safekeeping by a third party. The maximum amount of outstanding agreements at any month end during 2013 and 2012 totaled $22,359 and $22,598, respectively, and the monthly average of such agreements totaled $19,052 and $18,657 for 2013 and 2012, respectively. The agreements at December 31, 2013, mature January 2, 2014.
NOTE 11 SIGNIFICANT ESTIMATES, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require disclosure of certain significant estimates and current vulnerabilities due to certain concentrations. Estimates related to the allowance for loan losses are reflected in the footnote regarding loans. Other significant estimates and concentrations not discussed in those footnotes include:
General Litigation
The Corporation is subject to claims and lawsuits that arise primarily in the ordinary course of business. It is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate resolution of such claims and lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Corporation.
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Obligations
The Corporation has a noncontributory defined benefit postretirement health care plan whereby it agrees to provide certain postretirement benefits to eligible employees. The benefit obligation is the actuarial present value of all benefits attributed to service rendered prior to the valuation date based on the projected unit credit cost method. It is reasonably possible that events could occur that would change the estimated amount of this liability materially in the near term.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-32
Current Economic Conditions
The current protracted economic decline continues to present financial institutions with circumstances and challenges, which in some cases have resulted in large and unanticipated declines in the fair values of investments and other assets, constraints on liquidity and capital and significant credit quality problems, including severe volatility in the valuation of real estate and other collateral supporting loans.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared using values and information currently available to the Corporation.
Given the volatility of current economic conditions, the values of assets and liabilities recorded in the financial statements could change rapidly, resulting in material future adjustments in asset values, the allowance for loan losses and capital that could negatively impact the Corporations ability to meet regulatory capital requirements and maintain sufficient liquidity. Furthermore, the Corporations regulators could require material adjustments to asset values or the allowance for loan losses for regulatory capital purposes that could affect the Corporations measurement of regulatory capital and compliance with the capital adequacy guidelines under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
Commitments and Credit Risk
The Corporation grants agribusiness, commercial and residential loans to customers throughout the state. The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Bank has in those particular financial instruments.
Commitments to Originate Loans
Commitments to originate loans are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since a portion of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each customers creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on managements credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, commercial real estate and residential real estate.
Mortgage loans in the process of origination represent amounts that the Corporation plans to fund within a normal period of 30 to 90 days, and which are intended for sale to investors in the secondary market. Total mortgage loans in process of origination were $407 and $9,488, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Total mortgage loans held for sale amounted to $327 and $2,456, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Standby Letters of Credit
Standby letters of credit are irrevocable conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Financial standby letters of credit are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements, including commercial paper, bond financing and similar transactions. Performance standby letters of credit are issued to guarantee performance of certain customers under nonfinancial contractual obligations. The credit risk involved in issuing standby letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Should the Corporation be obligated to perform under the standby letters of credit, the Corporation may seek recourse from the customer for reimbursement of amounts paid.
The Corporation had total outstanding standby letters of credit amounting to $11,384 and $9,070, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, with terms ranging from seven days to 23 years.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-33
Lines of Credit
Lines of credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Lines of credit generally have fixed expiration dates. Since a portion of the line may expire without being drawn upon, the total unused lines do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each customers creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary, is based on managements credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, commercial real estate and residential real estate. Management uses the same credit policies in granting lines of credit as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.
At December 31, 2013, the Corporation had granted unused lines of credit to borrowers aggregating approximately $79,150 and $44,318 for commercial lines and open-end consumer lines, respectively. At December 31, 2012, unused lines of credit to borrowers aggregated approximately $64,455 for commercial lines and $45,302 for open-end consumer lines.
NOTE 12 REGULATORY MATTERS
The Corporation and the Bank are subject to federal regulatory risk-adjusted capital adequacy standards. Failure to meet capital adequacy requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material adverse effect on the operating results and financial condition of the Corporation and the Bank. The applicable regulations require the Bank to meet specific capital adequacy guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital classification is also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Corporation and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total Capital and Tier I Capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier I Capital to average assets. Actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the table below (dollars in thousands). Management believes, as of December 31, 2013, that the Corporation and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.
For Minimum Capital |
For Minimum Regulatory |
||||||||
(Dollars in Thousands) |
Actual |
Adequacy Purposes |
Compliance Purposes |
||||||
As of December 31, 2013 |
Amount |
Ratio |
Amount |
Ratio > or = |
Amount |
Ratio > or = |
|||
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted |
|||||||||
Assets) Consolidated |
$ |
110,276 |
15.3 % |
$ |
57,632 |
8.0 % |
$ |
- |
- |
Bank |
107,392 |
15.0 % |
57,248 |
8.0 % |
71,560 |
10.0% |
|||
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted |
|||||||||
Assets) Consolidated |
101,681 |
14.1 % |
28,816 |
4.0 % |
- |
- |
|||
Bank |
98,797 |
13.8 % |
28,624 |
4.0 % |
42,936 |
6.0% |
|||
Tier I Capital (to Average |
|||||||||
Assets) Consolidated |
101,681 |
9.4 % |
43,358 |
4.0 % |
- |
- |
|||
Bank |
98,797 |
9.1 % |
43,358 |
4.0 % |
54,198 |
5.0% |
|||
As of December 31, 2012 |
|||||||||
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted |
|||||||||
Assets) Consolidated |
$ |
109,011 |
15.8 % |
$ |
55,265 |
8.0 % |
$ |
- |
- |
Bank |
106,075 |
15.5 % |
54,890 |
8.0 % |
68,613 |
10.0% |
|||
Tier I Capital (to Risk Weighted |
|||||||||
Assets) Consolidated |
100,338 |
14.5 % |
27,603 |
4.0 % |
- |
- |
|||
Bank |
97,402 |
14.2 % |
27,418 |
4.0 % |
41,127 |
6.0% |
|||
Tier I Capital (to Average |
|||||||||
Assets) Consolidated |
100,338 |
9.7 % |
41,505 |
4.0 % |
- |
- |
|||
Bank |
97,402 |
9.4 % |
41,492 |
4.0 % |
51,865 |
5.0% |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-34
The Corporation is subject to certain restrictions on the amount of dividends that it may declare without prior regulatory approval. At December 31, 2013, approximately $15,022 of retained earnings were available for dividend declaration without prior approval.
NOTE 13 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
The fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability. Fair value measurement must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. In estimating fair value, the Corporation utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC Topic 820) establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
Recurring Measurements
The following table summarizes financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and by the level within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:
December 31, 2013
Available-For-Sale Securities |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
||||
U.S. Government agencies |
$ |
- |
$ |
105,072 |
$ |
- |
$ |
105,072 |
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage backed securities |
- |
157,423 |
- |
157,423 |
||||
States and political subdivisions |
- |
46,337 |
- |
46,337 |
||||
Corporate bonds |
- |
20,882 |
- |
20,882 |
||||
Total assets at fair value |
$ |
- |
$ |
329,714 |
$ |
- |
$ |
329,714 |
December 31, 2012 |
||||||||
Available-For-Sale Securities |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
||||
U.S. Government agencies |
$ |
- |
$ |
144,017 |
$ |
- |
$ |
144,017 |
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage backed securities |
- |
133,718 |
- |
133,718 |
||||
States and political subdivisions |
- |
50,579 |
- |
50,579 |
||||
Corporate bonds |
- |
17,404 |
- |
17,404 |
||||
Total assets at fair value |
$ |
- |
$ |
345,718 |
$ |
- |
$ |
345,718 |
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. There have been no significant changes in the valuation techniques during the year ended December 31, 2013.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-35
Available-for-Sale Securities
Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, the Corporation obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service, such as Interactive Data, which utilizes pricing models to determine fair value measurement. The Corporation reviews the pricing quarterly to verify the reasonableness of the pricing. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bonds terms and conditions, among other factors. U.S. government agencies, state and political subdivisions, U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds are classified as Level 2 inputs.
Nonrecurring Measurements
The following table summarizes financial assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, by the level within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2013 |
||||||||
|
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
||||
Impaired loans (collateral-dependent) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
2,214 |
$ |
2,214 |
Other real estate owned |
- |
- |
208 |
208 |
||||
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2012 |
||||||||
|
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
||||
Impaired loans (collateral-dependent) |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
4,840 |
$ |
4,840 |
Other real estate owned |
- |
- |
3,385 |
3,385 |
Impaired Loans (Collateral-Dependent)
The estimated fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans is based on the appraised fair value of the collateral, less estimated cost to sell. Collateral-dependent impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Corporation considers the appraisal or evaluation as the starting point for determining fair value and then considers other factors and events in the environment that may affect the fair value. Appraisals of the collateral underlying collateral-dependent loans are obtained when the loan is determined to be collateral-dependent and subsequently as deemed necessary by the Chief Credit Officer. Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency by the Chief Credit Officer. Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management. The appraised values are reduced by discounts to consider lack of marketability and estimated cost to sell if repayment or satisfaction of the loan is dependent on the sale of the collateral. These discounts and estimates are developed by the Chief Credit Officer by comparison to historical results. Fair value adjustments were approximately $79 at December 31, 2013 and $3,300 at December 31, 2012.
Loans considered impaired under ASC 310-35, Impairment of a Loan, are loans for which, based on current information and events, it is probable that the creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect (1) subsequent partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral or (2) the full charge-off of the loan carrying value.
Other Real Estate Owned
Other real estate owned (OREO) is initially recorded at fair value at the time of acquisition, as determined by independent appraisal or evaluation by the Corporation, less costs to sell when the real estate is acquired in settlement of loans. Quarterly evaluations of OREO are performed to determine if there has been any subsequent decline in the value of OREO properties. Estimated fair value of OREO is based on appraisals or evaluations, less costs to sell. OREO is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. OREO assets are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect subsequent partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral. Fair value adjustments were approximately $395 at December 31, 2013 and $1,200 at December 31, 2012.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-36
Appraisals of OREO are obtained when the real estate is acquired and subsequently as deemed necessary by the Chief Credit Officer. Appraisals are required annually and reviewed for accuracy and consistency by the Chief Credit Officer. The appraised values are reduced by discounts to consider lack of marketability and estimated cost to sell. Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.
Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs
The following table presents quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
|||||
December 31, 2013 |
Fair Value |
Valuation |
Unobservable |
Range |
|
Impaired loans (collateral-dependent) |
$ |
2,214 |
Market |
Marketability |
5.0% - 10.0% (7%) |
Other real estate/assets owned |
$ |
208 |
Market |
Marketability |
5.0% - 10.0% (7%) |
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements |
|||||
December 31, 2012 |
Fair Value |
Valuation |
Unobservable Input |
Range (Weighted Average) |
|
Impaired loans (collateral-dependent) |
$ |
4,840 |
Market |
Marketability |
5.0% - 10.0% (7%) |
Other real estate/assets owned |
$ |
3,385 |
Market |
Marketability |
5.0% - 10.0% (7%) |
ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities, including those financial assets and liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:
Cash and due from banks The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Interest bearing deposits in other banks The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Federal funds sold The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Securities held-to-maturity Fair values are based on quoted market prices, if available. If a quoted price is not available, fair value is estimated using quoted prices for similar securities. The fair value estimate is provided to management from a third party using modeling assumptions specific to each type of security that are reviewed and approved by management. Quarterly sampling of fair values provided by additional third parties supplement the fair value review process.
Loans held for sale The fair value is predetermined at origination based on sale price.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-37
Loans (net of the allowance for loan losses) The fair value of fixed rate loans and variable rate mortgage loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. For other variable rate loans, the carrying amount approximates fair value.
Federal Home Loan Bank stock The carrying value of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the FHLB.
Federal Reserve Bank stock The carrying value of Federal Reserve Bank stock approximates fair value based on the redemption provisions of the Federal Reserve Bank.
Accrued interest receivable The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Deposits The fair value of fixed maturity time deposits is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. For deposits including demand deposits, savings accounts, NOW accounts, and certain money market accounts, the carrying value approximates fair value.
Repurchase agreements The fair value is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current rates.
Advances from FHLB The fair value of these fixed-maturity advances is estimated by discounting future cash flows using rates currently offered for advances of similar remaining maturities.
Accrued interest payable The carrying amount approximates fair value.
Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit The fair value of commitments to originate loans is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair values of letters of credit and lines of credit are based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date. The fair values of these commitments are not material.
The following tables present estimated fair values of the Corporations financial instruments as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and indicate the levels within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques:
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 Using |
||||||||
|
Carrying
|
Quoted
Prices |
Significant
|
Significant
|
||||
Financial assets |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ |
20,391 |
$ |
20,391 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
25,167 |
25,167 |
- |
- |
||||
Federal funds sold |
9,850 |
9,850 |
- |
- |
||||
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock |
3,879 |
- |
3,879 |
- |
||||
Securities available-for-sale |
329,714 |
- |
329,714 |
- |
||||
Securities held-to-maturity |
27,839 |
- |
28,595 |
- |
||||
Loans held for sale |
327 |
327 |
- |
- |
||||
Loans, net |
598,171 |
- |
- |
607,113 |
||||
Accrued interest receivable |
4,183 |
- |
4,183 |
- |
||||
Financial liabilities |
||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
179,823 |
179,823 |
- |
- |
||||
Interest bearing deposits |
777,514 |
- |
778,682 |
- |
||||
Repurchase agreements |
18,095 |
- |
18,095 |
- |
||||
Accrued interest payable |
663 |
- |
663 |
- |
||||
Off-balance sheet credit related instruments: |
||||||||
Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit |
|
- |
- |
- |
||||
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-38
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using |
||||||||
|
Carrying
|
Quoted
Prices |
Significant
|
Significant
|
||||
Financial assets |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ |
23,443 |
$ |
23,443 |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks |
31,953 |
31,953 |
- |
- |
||||
Federal funds sold |
15,000 |
15,000 |
- |
- |
||||
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock |
3,879 |
- |
3,879 |
- |
||||
Securities available-for-sale |
345,718 |
- |
345,718 |
- |
||||
Securities held-to-maturity |
31,755 |
- |
33,420 |
- |
||||
Loans held for sale |
2,456 |
2,456 |
- |
- |
||||
Loans, net |
558,350 |
- |
- |
572,277 |
||||
Accrued interest receivable |
4,060 |
- |
4,060 |
- |
||||
Financial liabilities |
||||||||
Non-interest bearing deposits |
169,136 |
169,136 |
- |
- |
||||
Interest bearing deposits |
763,713 |
- |
766,043 |
- |
||||
Repurchase agreements |
17,068 |
- |
17,068 |
- |
||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
10,100 |
- |
10,215 |
- |
||||
Accrued interest payable |
754 |
- |
754 |
- |
||||
Off-balance sheet credit related instruments: |
||||||||
Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit |
|
- |
- |
- |
||||
NOTE 14 QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
The following table presents unaudited quarterly interim financial information for the Corporation for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
First |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
||
2013 |
Quarter |
Quarter |
Quarter |
Quarter |
Total |
Interest income |
$ 9,223 |
$ 9,523 |
$ 9,328 |
$ 9,287 |
$ 37,361 |
Interest expense |
834 |
751 |
679 |
643 |
2,907 |
Net interest income |
8,389 |
8,772 |
8,649 |
8,644 |
34,454 |
Provision for possible loan losses, net |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Noninterest income |
3,329 |
2,620 |
2,509 |
2,658 |
11,116 |
Noninterest expenses |
8,105 |
8,165 |
8,322 |
8,237 |
32,829 |
Income before income taxes |
3,613 |
3,227 |
2,836 |
3,065 |
12,741 |
Income taxes |
557 |
842 |
779 |
687 |
2,865 |
Net income |
$ 3,056 |
$ 2,385 |
$ 2,057 |
$ 2,378 |
$ 9,876 |
Basic earnings per share |
0.59 |
0.46 |
0.40 |
0.47 |
1.93 |
Weighted average shares outstanding per quarter |
5,178,759 |
5,133,051 |
5,086,469 |
5,046,833 |
5,110,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
First |
Second |
Third |
Fourth |
||
2012 |
Quarter |
Quarter |
Quarter |
Quarter |
Total |
Interest income |
$ 9,065 |
$ 9,095 |
$ 9,114 |
$ 9,110 |
$ 36,384 |
Interest expense |
1,071 |
979 |
917 |
874 |
3,841 |
Net interest income |
7,994 |
8,116 |
8,197 |
8,236 |
32,543 |
Provision for possible loan losses, net |
600 |
520 |
- |
- |
1,120 |
Noninterest income |
3,379 |
3,360 |
2,276 |
2,616 |
11,631 |
Noninterest expenses |
7,754 |
8,424 |
8,145 |
9,207 |
33,530 |
Income before income taxes |
3,019 |
2,532 |
2,328 |
1,645 |
9,524 |
Income taxes |
690 |
451 |
373 |
402 |
1,916 |
Net income |
$ 2,329 |
$ 2,081 |
$ 1,955 |
$ 1,243 |
$ 7,608 |
Basic earnings per share |
0.44 |
0.39 |
0.37 |
0.23 |
1.43 |
Weighted average shares outstanding per quarter |
5,330,000 |
5,330,000 |
5,328,002 |
5,332,893 |
5,315,634 |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-39
NOTE 15 DEPOSITS
The Bank does not have any foreign offices and all deposits are serviced in its 16 domestic offices. Maturities of time deposits of $100 or more at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
2013 |
2012 |
|
Under 3 months |
$ 31,514 |
$ 28,504 |
3 to 12 months |
$ 63,429 |
64,639 |
Over 12 months |
$ 27,834 |
27,018 |
Total |
$ 122,777 |
$ 120,161 |
|
|
|
The following table presents maturities of interest-bearing time deposits as of December 31, 2013:
2014 |
$ 185,687 |
2015 |
$ 25,422 |
2016 |
$ 14,712 |
2017 |
$ 7,120 |
2018 |
$ 5,893 |
Thereafter |
$ - |
Total |
$ 238,834 |
|
|
NOTE 16 CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION OF THE CORPORATION
The following tables present the condensed balance sheets, statements of income, comprehensive income, and cash flows of the Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, |
||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||
Cash |
$ |
23 |
$ |
61 |
Investment in bank subsidiary |
99,695 |
111,655 |
||
Investment in credit life insurance company |
54 |
54 |
||
Investment in other securities |
17 |
17 |
||
Dividends receivable from bank subsidiary |
2,058 |
1,917 |
||
Cash surrender value - life insurance |
4,409 |
4,395 |
||
Total assets |
$ |
106,256 |
$ |
118,099 |
Liabilities |
||||
Accrued liabilities |
$ |
1,820 |
$ |
1,686 |
Dividends payable |
1,858 |
1,917 |
||
Total liabilities |
3,678 |
3,603 |
||
Shareholders' equity |
|
|
||
Common stock - $10 par value, 8,000,000 shares authorized; |
||||
5,021,012 and 5,180,000 shares issued and outstanding, |
||||
as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively |
50,210 |
51,800 |
||
Retained earnings |
61,369 |
57,366 |
||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
(9,001) |
5,330 |
||
Total shareholders' equity |
102,578 |
114,496 |
||
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity |
$ |
106,256 |
$ |
118,099 |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-40
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years ended December 31, |
||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||
Operating income |
||||||
Dividends from bank subsidiary |
$ |
7,663 |
$ |
7,289 |
$ |
6,974 |
Other dividend income |
15 |
18 |
15 |
|||
Other |
65 |
135 |
130 |
|||
Operating expenses |
(238) |
(218) |
(199) |
|||
Income before equity in undistributed net |
||||||
income of bank subsidiary |
7,505 |
7,224 |
6,920 |
|||
Equity in undistributed net income of bank subsidiary |
2,371 |
384 |
76 |
|||
Net Income |
$ |
9,876 |
$ |
7,608 |
$ |
6,996 |
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2013 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
||||
Net Income for common shareholders |
$ |
9,876 |
$ |
7,608 |
$ |
6,996 |
||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
||||||||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax expense (benefit) of ($8,507), $1,204, and $2,960 |
(13,589) |
1,923 |
4,728 |
|||||
Reclassification
adjustment for realized gains included in net income, net of taxes of |
(510) |
(1,411) |
(897) |
|||||
Change
in unfunded portion of postretirement benefit obligations, net of tax of ($146),
|
(232) |
1,610 |
1,940 |
|||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
(14,331) |
2,122 |
5,771 |
|||||
Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
$ |
(4,455) |
$ |
9,730 |
$ |
12,767 |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-41
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, |
||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||
Operating activities |
||||||
Net income for the year |
$ |
9,876 |
$ |
7,608 |
$ |
6,996 |
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash |
||||||
provided by operating activities |
||||||
Equity in undistributed net income of bank subsidiary |
(2,371) |
(384) |
(76) |
|||
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance contracts |
(65) |
(135) |
(130) |
|||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
(90) |
56 |
(1,972) |
|||
Decrease in payables |
84 |
127 |
126 |
|||
Total adjustments |
(2,442) |
(336) |
(2,052) |
|||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
7,434 |
7,272 |
4,944 |
|||
Investing activities |
||||||
Purchase of single premium life insurance policy |
- |
(310) |
- |
|||
Net cash used by investing activities |
- |
(310) |
- |
|||
Financing activities |
||||||
Payment to repurchase common stock |
(3,722) |
(3,400) |
(3,011) |
|||
Cash dividends paid |
(3,800) |
(3,944) |
(1,991) |
|||
Advance from subsidiary |
50 |
- |
- |
|||
Net cash used by financing activities |
(7,472) |
(7,344) |
(5,002) |
|||
Decrease in cash |
(38) |
(382) |
(58) |
|||
Cash at beginning of year |
61 |
443 |
501 |
|||
Cash at end of year |
$ |
23 |
$ |
61 |
$ |
443 |
NOTE 17 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Bank contributes to a qualified profit-sharing plan covering employees who meet participation requirements. To be eligible to participate, employees must complete 1,000 hours of service within the twelve month time period following their date of hire. Employees must be age twenty or older. The amount of the contribution is at the discretion of the Banks Board of Directors, up to the maximum deduction allowed for federal income tax purposes. Contributions to the plan, which amounted to approximately $1,596, $1,019 and $874 in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, are included in salaries and employee benefits expense.
The Bank formalized a nonqualified salary continuation plan for certain key officers. In connection with this plan, the value of the single premium universal life insurance policies (approximately $975 at December 31, 2013 and approximately $963 at December 31, 2012) purchased in 1993 to fund the plan and the related liability (approximately $49 at December 31, 2013 and $59 at December 31, 2012) were included in other assets and other liabilities, respectively. The principal cost of the plan is accrued over the anticipated remaining period of active employment, based on the present value of the expected retirement benefit.
The Corporation and Bank implemented a deferred compensation plan that permits directors to defer their directors fees and earn interest on the deferred amount in the amount of the wall street journal prime rate plus three percent. The agreements provide for a lump sum payment or 120 month payments of deferred fees plus accrued interest after retirement, separation from service, or death. The liability accrued for this plan totaled $6,487 and $6,226 at December 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The charge to expense for the agreements was $722, $853 and $711 for the years ended December 31 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-42
NOTE 18 POST RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLAN
Effective July 1, 2013, the Corporation revised its retiree medical benefit plan for employees who were hired before March 27, 2007. Newly retiring employees will no longer be offered medical, dental or life insurance coverage. Instead, qualified retirees will receive a post retirement bonus. The Corporation will pay a post retirement bonus equal to $20,000 to employees (i) who were hired prior to March 20, 2007; (ii) who retire on or after July 1, 2013; (iii) who are at least age 59 ½ at the time of retirement; and (iv) who have at least twenty-five years of service to the Corporation as of retirement. The bonus will be paid in a lump sum cash payment (subject to applicable tax withholding requirements) within 60 days after the employees retirement, provided such retirement constitutes a separation from service under section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The Corporation still sponsors a defined benefit post-retirement health care plan for retirees who retired prior to July 1, 2007. Under this plan, premiums paid by retirees and spouses depend on date of retirement, age and coverage election.
The Corporation funding policy is to make the minimal annual contribution that is required by applicable regulations, plus such amounts as the Corporation may determine to be appropriate from time to time. The Corporation expects to contribute $145 to the plan in 2014.
The following table provides further information about the plan:
Post-Retirement Benefits |
|||||
2013 |
2012 |
||||
|
|
||||
Change in benefit obligation |
|||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
$ |
7,421 |
$ |
4,572 |
|
Service cost |
138 |
91 |
|||
Interest cost |
292 |
351 |
|||
Plan participants contribution |
77 |
(81) |
|||
Expected benefits paid |
(343) |
(128) |
|||
Actuarial (gain) loss |
(5,220) |
2,616 |
|||
Amendments |
(52) |
- |
|||
Benefit obligation at end of year |
$ |
2,313 |
$ |
7,421 |
|
Change in fair value of assets |
|||||
Fair value of plans assets at beginning of year |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
|
Employer contribution |
77 |
(209) |
|||
Plan participants' contributions |
266 |
(105) |
|||
Benefits paid |
(343) |
(314) |
|||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
|
Reconciliation of funded status to benefit costs recognized |
|||||
Projected benefit obligation, end of year |
$ |
(2,313) |
$ |
(7,421) |
|
Fair value of assets, end of year |
- |
- |
|||
Funded status, end of year |
(2,313) |
(7,421) |
|||
Unrecognized prior service cost |
(52) |
- |
|||
Unrecognized net loss/(gain) |
(2,490) |
2,920 |
|||
Prepaid/(accrued) benefit cost |
(4,855) |
(4,501) |
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income not yet recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost consist of:
2013 |
2012 |
||||
Unrecognized net actuarial gain/loss |
$ |
2,490 |
$ |
2,920 |
|
Unrecognized prior service cost |
52 |
- |
|||
$ |
2,542 |
$ |
2,920 |
Amounts recognized in statement of financial position are as follows:
2013 |
2012 |
||||
Current Liability |
$ |
183 |
$ |
266 |
|
Noncurrent liability |
4,672 |
4,235 |
|||
Total |
$ |
4,855 |
$ |
4,501 |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-43
A reconciliation of other comprehensive income is as follows:
Post-Retirement Benefits |
||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income beginning of year |
$ |
2,920 |
$ |
305 |
$ |
(2,849) |
||
Less: loss/(gain) recognized in current year |
(190) |
- |
205 |
|||||
Plus: loss/(gain) incurred in current year |
(136) |
2,615 |
- |
|||||
Plus: prior service cost established in current year |
(52) |
- |
- |
|||||
Other comprehensive income/(loss) |
(378) |
2,615 |
2,950 |
|||||
Ending balance (before tax effects) |
$ |
2,542 |
$ |
2,920 |
$ |
305 |
||
Post-Retirement Benefits |
||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit cost: |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
|||||
|
|
|
||||||
Service cost |
$ |
138 |
$ |
91 |
$ |
24 |
||
Interest cost |
292 |
351 |
139 |
|||||
Recognized net actuarial (gain) loss |
190 |
- |
(205) |
|||||
Net periodic benefit cost (income) |
$ |
620 |
$ |
442 |
$ |
(42) |
||
The estimated net gain for the defined benefits postretirement plan that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year is $188.
Post-Retirement Benefits |
|||
Weighted-average assumption used to determine benefit obligation: |
2013 |
2012 |
|
Discount rate |
5% |
4% |
|
Rate of compensation increase |
NA |
NA |
Post-Retirement Benefits |
|||
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit costs: |
2013 |
2012 |
|
Discount rate |
4% |
8% |
The following table gives the Health Care Cost Trend, which is applied to gross charges, net claims and retiree paid premiums to reflect the Corporations past practice and stated ongoing intention to maintain relatively constant cost sharing between the Corporation and retirees:
Health care trend rate |
2013 |
2012 |
|
Initial |
|||
Pre-65 |
11% |
11% |
|
Post-65 |
7.50% |
8% |
|
Ultimate (pre and post-65 |
5.00% |
5% |
|
Years to ultimate |
|||
Pre-65 |
6 |
6 |
|
Post-65 |
5 |
6 |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
F-44
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid, net of participant contributions:
FYE |
Company Benefits |
2014 |
$ 183 |
2015 |
167 |
2016 |
178 |
2017 |
169 |
2018 |
191 |
2019-2025 |
935 |
|
$ 1,823 |
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
1-Percentage-Point
|
1-Percentage-Point
|
|
Effect on total of service and interest cost |
$ 29 |
$ (16) |
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation |
212 |
(109) |
All dollar amounts are reported in thousands except share and per share data.
PART IV
Item 15. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules. |
|
(a) |
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedules and Exhibits: |
|
|
(1) |
Consolidated Financial Statements: See Item 8 under Part II, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. |
|
(2) |
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedules: All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes in this report. |
|
(3) |
Exhibits: |
|
3.1 |
Charter. (1) |
|
3.2 |
Articles of Amendment to Charter. (1) |
|
3.3 |
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended. (2) |
|
4 |
Specimen Stock Certificate. (1) |
|
10.1 |
Profit Sharing Plan. (3)* |
|
10.2 |
First Amendment to Profit Sharing Plan. (3)* |
|
10.3 |
Second Amendment to Profit Sharing Plan. (3)* |
|
10.4 |
Executive Salary Continuation Agreement by and between First Farmers and Merchants National Bank and Waymon L. Hickman, dated as of December 1, 1992. (3)* |
|
10.5 |
Benefits Agreement by and between First Farmers and Merchants Bank and Thomas Randall Stevens, the Banks and the Corporations Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, dated as of January 26, 2007. (4)* |
|
10.6 |
Benefits Agreement by and between John P. Tomlinson, III, the Banks and Corporations Chief Administrative Officer, dated as of January 29, 2007. (4)* |
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
Form of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Agreement.(5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
First Amendment to the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Agreement with John P. Tomlinson, III, dated as of December 18, 2007. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
Form of First Farmers and Merchants Bank Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Agreement. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
First Amendment to the First Farmers and Merchants Bank Director Deferred Compensation Agreement with Thomas Randall Stevens, dated as of January 5, 2007. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
First Amendment to the First Farmers and Merchants Bank Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Agreement with John P. Tomlinson, III, dated as of December 18, 2007. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
Form of First Farmers and Merchants National Bank Director Split Dollar Agreement. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
Form of Amendment to the First Farmers and Merchants National Bank Director Split Dollar Agreement. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
First Farmers & Merchants Bank Group Term Carve-Out Plan, dated as of March 27, 2007. (5)* |
|
|
|
3
10.15 |
First Farmers and Merchants National Bank Group Term Carve-Out Plan, dated as of July 23, 2002. (5)* |
|
|
||
10.16 |
Amendment to the First Farmers and Merchants National Bank Group Term Carve-Out Plan, dated as of July 23, 2002. (5)* |
|
|
||
10.17 |
First Farmers & Merchants Bank Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement, dated as of January 7, 2008. (5)* |
|
|
||
10.18 |
Form of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Director Deferred Compensation Agreement. (5)* |
|
|
||
10.19 |
Form of First Farmers and Merchants Bank Director Deferred Compensation Agreement. (5)* |
|
|
||
10.20 |
First Farmers and Merchants Bank Director Deferred Compensation Agreement with Tim E. Pettus, dated as of March 5, 2008. (5)* |
|
|
||
10.21 |
First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Director Deferred Compensation Agreement with Tim E. Pettus, dated as of March 5, 2008. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
13 |
Selected sections from Annual Report to Shareholders. (6) |
|
|
|
|
21 |
List of Subsidiaries. (6) |
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
Certification of the Treasurer (principal financial officer) of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
32 |
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer) of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
101 |
Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, the following financial information from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, is formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) interactive data files: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011; and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. (6) |
|
|
|
|
* |
Indicates a compensatory plan or arrangement. |
(1) Incorporated by reference to the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2004 (File Number 000-10972).
(2) Incorporated by reference to the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2011 (File Number 000-10972).
(3) Incorporated by reference to the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2004 (File Number 000-10972).
4
(4) Incorporated by reference to the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2007 (File Number 000-10972).
(5) Incorporated by reference to the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2009 (File Number 000-10972).
(6) Included in the Original Filing under the captions Comparative Performance and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION |
By: /s/ T. Randy Stevens |
T. Randy Stevens |
Chief Executive Officer |
Date: September 9, 2014 |
6
EXHIBIT INDEX
FIRST FARMERS AND MERCHANTS CORPORATION
|
3.1 |
Charter. (1) |
|
3.2 |
Articles of Amendment to Charter. (1) |
|
3.3 |
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, as amended. (2) |
|
4 |
Specimen Stock Certificate. (1) |
|
10.1 |
Profit Sharing Plan. (3)* |
|
10.2 |
First Amendment to Profit Sharing Plan. (3)* |
|
10.3 |
Second Amendment to Profit Sharing Plan. (3)* |
|
10.4 |
Executive Salary Continuation Agreement by and between First Farmers and Merchants National Bank and Waymon L. Hickman, dated as of December 1, 1992. (3)* |
|
10.5 |
Benefits Agreement by and between First Farmers and Merchants Bank and Thomas Randall Stevens, the Banks and the Corporations Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, dated as of January 26, 2007. (4)* |
|
10.6 |
Benefits Agreement by and between John P. Tomlinson, III, the Banks and Corporations Chief Administrative Officer, dated as of January 29, 2007. (4)* |
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
Form of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Agreement.(5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
First Amendment to the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Agreement with John P. Tomlinson, III, dated as of December 18, 2007. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
Form of First Farmers and Merchants Bank Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Agreement. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.10 |
First Amendment to the First Farmers and Merchants Bank Director Deferred Compensation Agreement with Thomas Randall Stevens, dated as of January 5, 2007. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.11 |
First Amendment to the First Farmers and Merchants Bank Amended and Restated Director Deferred Compensation Agreement with John P. Tomlinson, III, dated as of December 18, 2007. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.12 |
Form of First Farmers and Merchants National Bank Director Split Dollar Agreement. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.13 |
Form of Amendment to the First Farmers and Merchants National Bank Director Split Dollar Agreement. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
10.14 |
First Farmers & Merchants Bank Group Term Carve-Out Plan, dated as of March 27, 2007. (5)* |
|
|
|
10.15 |
First Farmers and Merchants National Bank Group Term Carve-Out Plan, dated as of July 23, 2002. (5)* |
|
|
||
10.16 |
Amendment to the First Farmers and Merchants National Bank Group Term Carve-Out Plan, dated as of July 23, 2002. (5)* |
|
|
||
10.17 |
First Farmers & Merchants Bank Life Insurance Endorsement Method Split Dollar Plan Agreement, dated as of January 7, 2008. (5)* |
|
|
||
10.18 |
Form of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Director Deferred Compensation Agreement. (5)* |
7
10.19 |
Form of First Farmers and Merchants Bank Director Deferred Compensation Agreement. (5)* |
|
|
||
10.20 |
First Farmers and Merchants Bank Director Deferred Compensation Agreement with Tim E. Pettus, dated as of March 5, 2008. (5)* |
|
|
||
10.21 |
First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Director Deferred Compensation Agreement with Tim E. Pettus, dated as of March 5, 2008. (5)* |
|
|
|
|
13 |
Selected sections from Annual Report to Shareholders. (6) |
|
|
|
|
21 |
List of Subsidiaries. (6) |
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
Certification of the Treasurer (principal financial officer) of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
32 |
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer) of First Farmers and Merchants Corporation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
101 |
Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, the following financial information from the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, is formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) interactive data files: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders Equity for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011; and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. (6) |
|
|
|
|
* |
Indicates a compensatory plan or arrangement. |
* Indicates a compensatory plan or arrangement.
(1) Incorporated by reference to the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2004 (File Number 000-10972).
(2) Incorporated by reference to the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2011 (File Number 000-10972).
(3) Incorporated by reference to the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 19, 2004 (File Number 000-10972).
(4) Incorporated by reference to the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 30, 2007 (File Number 000-10972).
(5) Incorporated by reference to the First Farmers and Merchants Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 13, 2009 (File Number 000-10972).
(6) Included in the Original Filing under the captions Comparative Performance and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
8