nvcsrs
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-05597
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
|
|
|
522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York |
|
10036 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip code) |
Randy Takian
522 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10036
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: 212-296-6990
Date of fiscal year end: May 31, 2010
Date of reporting period: November 30, 2009
Item 1 Report to Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT
|
|
|
Welcome,
Shareholder:
In this
report, youll learn about how your investment in
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
performed during the semiannual period. We will provide an
overview of the market conditions, and discuss some of the
factors that affected performance during the reporting period.
In addition, this report includes the Funds financial
statements and a list of Fund investments.
Market forecasts provided in this report may not necessarily
come to pass. There is no assurance that the Fund will achieve
its investment objective. The Fund is subject to market risk,
which is the possibility that market values of securities owned
by the Fund will decline and, therefore, the value of the
Funds shares may be less than what you paid for them.
Accordingly, you can lose money investing in this Fund.
Income earned by certain securities in the portfolio may be
subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT).
Fund Report
For the six months ended November 30, 2009
Market
Conditions
The municipal bond market continued to perform strongly during
the six-month period, supported by robust demand for municipal
bonds and ongoing improvement in both credit conditions and the
economy. Investors continued to seek higher yields by investing
in lower-quality, riskier bonds, which led the high-yield
segment of the municipal market to outperform the
investment-grade sector, although both posted solid gains for
the period. For the six-month period ended November 30,
2009, the high-yield municipal bond market gained
11.81 percent, as measured by the Barclays Capital High
Yield Municipal Bond Index (the Index), with credit
spreads tightening back toward long-term averages, while
investment grade municipals (as measured by the Barclays Capital
Municipal Bond Index) gained 4.75 percent. Over the course of
the period, the yield spread between these two indexes
contracted from 506 basis points to 394 basis points. Although
yields declined across the municipal yield curve, the long end
of the curve declined more so than the front end and therefore,
longer maturity issues outperformed.
With regard to municipal bond market sectors, the largest
sectors within the Index were industrial development
revenue/pollution control revenue
(IDR/PCR),
hospitals and special tax districts. For the six-month period,
the IDR/PCR sector (i.e., corporate-backed bonds) outpaced the
Index with a 14.05 percent return. The hospital sector also
outperformed the Index, returning 12.62 percent, while the
special tax district sector lagged slightly with a return of
11.30 percent.
After experiencing net outflows for much of 2008, municipal bond
funds enjoyed net inflows of approximately $65 billion
year-to-date
as of November 30, 2009. Total new issue supply
year-to-date through November 30 was $373 billion, a
one percent increase over the same period in 2008. As a result,
issuance of
tax-exempt
paper year-to-date through November totaled $298 billion,
approximately eight percent lower than for the same period in
2008.
Performance
Analysis
For the six-month period ended November 30, 2009, the net
asset value (NAV) of Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust (OIA) increased from $5.90 to $6.52 per
share. Based on this change plus reinvestment of tax-free
dividends totaling $0.21 per share, the Funds total NAV
return was 14.38 percent. OIAs value on the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) moved from $5.67 to $6.28 per share during
the same period. Based on this change plus reinvestment of
dividends, the Funds total market return was
14.64 percent. OIAs NYSE market price was at a
3.68 percent discount to its NAV. Past performance is no
guarantee of future results.
Monthly dividends for December 2009 were unchanged at $0.035 per
share. The dividend reflects the current level of the
Funds net investment income. OIAs level of
undistributed net investment income was $0.052 per share on
November 30, 2009 versus $0.034 per share six months
earlier.1
The Funds positioning in several areas contributed to its
strong performance for the reporting period. The Fund continued
to emphasize high-yield bonds, which
2
represented approximately
two-thirds of portfolio assets. This was additive to returns as
the high-yield segment outperformed higher-quality,
investment-grade issues. A focus on the long end of the
municipal yield curve was also advantageous. With regard to
sectors, an emphasis on the health care sector, including both
life care and hospital bonds, helped boost returns.
Additionally, an overweight in the housing sector contributed to
performance.
Other positions, however, were less advantageous. The Fund had a
limited exposure to the airline sector, which held back returns
as this was one of the better performing sectors, returning
roughly 12.3 percent for the six-month period. Holdings of
pre-refunded bonds also dampened performance somewhat. These are
high-quality securities with shorter maturities and therefore,
did not benefit from either the credit spread tightening that
occurred during the period or the outperformance of the long end
of the municipal yield curve. Finally, an underweight in the
IDR/PCR sector held back returns as these credits continued to
perform well as spreads tightened.
The Funds procedure for reinvesting all dividends and
distributions in common shares is through purchases in the open
market. This method helps support the market value of the
Funds shares. In addition, we would like to remind you
that the Trustees have approved a share repurchase program
whereby the Fund may, when appropriate, purchase shares in the
open market or in privately negotiated transactions at a price
not above market value or net asset value, whichever is lower at
the time of purchase.
Performance data quoted represents past performance, which is
no guarantee of future results, and current performance may be
lower or higher than the figures shown. Investment return, net
asset value and common share market price will fluctuate and
Fund shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their
original cost.
There is no guarantee that any sectors mentioned will
continue to perform as discussed herein or that securities in
such sectors will be held by the Fund in the future.
1
Income earned by certain securities in the portfolio may be
subject to the federal alternative minimum tax (AMT).
3
|
|
|
|
|
TOP FIVE SECTORS as of 11/30/09
|
|
|
Life Care
|
|
|
23
|
.6%
|
Special Tax Districts
|
|
|
16
|
.3
|
Hospital
|
|
|
13
|
.8
|
IDR/PCR*
|
|
|
12
|
.7
|
Tobacco
|
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM CREDIT ANALYSIS as of 11/30/09
|
|
|
Aaa/AAA
|
|
|
6
|
.3%
|
Aa/AA
|
|
|
5
|
.7
|
A/A
|
|
|
3
|
.9
|
Baa/BBB
|
|
|
11
|
.6
|
Ba/BB or Less
|
|
|
8
|
.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Rated
|
|
|
64
|
.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS BY STATE CLASSIFICATION as of
11/30/09
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
16
|
.1
|
%
|
Illinois
|
|
|
8
|
.1
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
7
|
.9
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
6
|
.6
|
|
Missouri
|
|
|
6
|
.2
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
5
|
.2
|
|
New York
|
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
California
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Arizona
|
|
|
3
|
.0
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
2
|
.9
|
|
New Hampshire
|
|
|
2
|
.8
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
|
2
|
.7
|
|
Hawaii
|
|
|
2
|
.2
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
2
|
.1
|
|
Michigan
|
|
|
1
|
.9
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
1
|
.8
|
|
Washington
|
|
|
1
|
.8
|
|
Nevada
|
|
|
1
|
.7
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
1
|
.6
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
1
|
.5
|
|
Iowa
|
|
|
1
|
.5
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
1
|
.4
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
1
|
.4
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
1
|
.3
|
|
North Dakota
|
|
|
1
|
.2
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
0
|
.9
|
|
Utah
|
|
|
0
|
.8
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
0
|
.7
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
|
0
|
.7
|
|
District of Columbia
|
|
|
0
|
.6
|
|
Idaho
|
|
|
0
|
.6
|
|
Kansas
|
|
|
0
|
.6
|
|
West Virginia
|
|
|
0
|
.6
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
|
0
|
.5
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
|
0
|
.3
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
|
0
|
.2
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
0
|
.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-Term Investments
|
|
|
103
|
.2
|
|
Short-Term Investment
|
|
|
0
|
.6
|
|
Liability for Floating Rate Note and Dealer Trusts
Obligations
|
|
|
(5
|
.6
|
)
|
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities
|
|
|
1
|
.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
100
|
.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subject to change daily. Provided for informational purposes
only and should not be deemed as a recommendation to buy or sell
the securities mentioned or securities in the sectors shown
above. Top five sectors are as a percentage of total investments
and long-term credit analysis are as a percentage of total
long-term investments. Summary of investments by state
classification are as a percentage of net assets. Securities are
classified by sectors that represent broad groupings of related
industries. Morgan Stanley is a full-service securities firm
engaged in securities trading and brokerage activities,
investment banking, research and analysis, financing and
financial advisory services. Rating allocations based upon
ratings as issued by Standard and Poors and Moodys,
respectively.
|
|
|
*
|
|
Industrial
Development/Pollution
control
|
4
For More
Information About Portfolio Holdings
Each Morgan Stanley fund provides a complete schedule of
portfolio holdings in its semiannual and annual reports within
60 days of the end of the funds second and fourth
fiscal quarters. The semiannual reports and the annual reports
are filed electronically with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on
Form N-CSRS
and
Form N-CSR,
respectively. Morgan Stanley also delivers the semiannual and
annual reports to fund shareholders and makes these reports
available on its public web site, www.morganstanley.com. Each
Morgan Stanley fund also files a complete schedule of portfolio
holdings with the SEC for the funds first and third fiscal
quarters on
Form N-Q.
Morgan Stanley does not deliver the reports for the first and
third fiscal quarters to shareholders, nor are the reports
posted to the Morgan Stanley public web site. You may, however,
obtain the
Form N-Q
filings (as well as the
Form N-CSR
and N-CSRS filings) by accessing the SECs web site,
http://www.sec.gov.
You may also review and copy them at the SECs public
reference room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation
of the SECs public reference room may be obtained by
calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. You can also request
copies of these materials, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by
electronic request at the SECs
e-mail
address (publicinfo@sec.gov) or by writing the public reference
section of the SEC, Washington, DC
20549-1520.
5
Investment Advisory Agreement
Approval
Nature, Extent
and Quality of Services
The Board reviewed and considered the nature and extent of the
investment advisory services provided by the Investment Adviser
(as defined herein) under the advisory agreement, including
portfolio management, investment research and equity and fixed
income securities trading. The Board also reviewed and
considered the nature and extent of the non-advisory,
administrative services provided by the Funds
Administrator (as defined herein) under the administration
agreement, including accounting, clerical, bookkeeping,
compliance, business management and planning, and the provision
of supplies, office space and utilities at the Investment
Advisers expense. (The Investment Adviser and the
Administrator together are referred to as the
Adviser and the advisory and administration
agreements together are referred to as the Management
Agreement.) The Board also compared the nature of the
services provided by the Adviser with similar services provided
by non-affiliated advisers as reported to the Board by Lipper
Inc. (Lipper).
The Board reviewed and considered the qualifications of the
portfolio managers, the senior administrative managers and other
key personnel of the Adviser who provide the advisory and
administrative services to the Fund. The Board determined that
the Advisers portfolio managers and key personnel are well
qualified by education and/or training and experience to perform
the services in an efficient and professional manner. The Board
concluded that the nature and extent of the advisory and
administrative services provided were necessary and appropriate
for the conduct of the business and investment activities of the
Fund. The Board also concluded that the overall quality of the
advisory and administrative services was satisfactory.
Performance, Fees
and Expenses of the Fund
The Board reviewed the performance, fees and expenses of the
Fund compared to its peers, as determined by Lipper, and to
appropriate benchmarks where applicable. The Board discussed
with the Adviser the performance goals and the actual results
achieved in managing the Fund. When considering a funds
performance, the Board and the Adviser place emphasis on trends
and longer-term returns (focusing on one-year, three-year and
five-year performance, as of December 31, 2008, as
applicable). When a fund underperforms its benchmark and/or its
peer group average, the Board and the Adviser discuss the causes
of such underperformance and, where necessary, they discuss
specific changes to investment strategy or investment personnel.
The Board noted that the Funds performance was better than
its peer group average for the one-, three- and five-year
periods. The Board discussed with the Adviser the level of the
advisory and administration fees (together, the management
fee) for this Fund relative to comparable funds advised by
the Adviser and compared to its peers as determined by Lipper.
In addition to the management fee, the Board also reviewed the
Funds total expense ratio. The Board noted that the
management fee and total
6
expense ratio were lower than the peer group average. After
discussion, the Board concluded that the Funds management
fee, total expense ratio and performance were competitive with
the peer group average.
Economies of
Scale
The Board considered the size and growth prospects of the Fund
and how that relates to the Funds total expense ratio and
particularly the Funds management fee rate, which does not
include breakpoints. In conjunction with its review of the
Advisers profitability, the Board discussed with the
Adviser how a change in assets can affect the efficiency or
effectiveness of managing the Fund and whether the management
fee level is appropriate relative to current and projected asset
levels and/or whether the management fee structure reflects
economies of scale as asset levels change. The Board considered
that, with respect to closed-end funds, the assets are not
likely to grow with new sales or grow significantly as a result
of capital appreciation. The Board concluded that economies of
scale for the Fund were not a factor that needed to be
considered at the present time.
Profitability of
the Adviser and Affiliates
The Board considered information concerning the costs incurred
and profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates during
the last year from their relationship with the Fund and during
the last two years from their relationship with the Morgan
Stanley Fund Complex and reviewed with the Adviser the cost
allocation methodology used to determine the profitability of
the Adviser and affiliates. The Board has determined that its
review of the analysis of the Advisers expenses and
profitability supports its decision to approve the Management
Agreement.
Other Benefits of
the Relationship
The Board considered other benefits to the Adviser and its
affiliates derived from their relationship with the Fund and
other funds advised by the Adviser. These benefits may include,
among other things, float benefits derived from
handling of checks for purchases and sales, research received by
the Adviser generated from commission dollars spent on
funds portfolio trading and fees for distribution and/or
shareholder servicing. The Board reviewed with the Adviser each
of these arrangements and the reasonableness of its costs
relative to the services performed. The Board has determined
that its review of the other benefits received by the Adviser or
its affiliates supports its decision to approve the Management
Agreement.
Resources of the
Adviser and Historical Relationship Between the Fund and the
Adviser
The Board considered whether the Adviser is financially sound
and has the resources necessary to perform its obligations under
the Management Agreement. The Board also reviewed and considered
the historical
7
relationship between the Fund and the Adviser, including the
organizational structure of the Adviser, the policies and
procedures formulated and adopted by the Adviser for managing
the Funds operations and the Boards confidence in
the competence and integrity of the senior managers and key
personnel of the Adviser. The Board concluded that the Adviser
has the financial resources necessary to fulfill its obligations
under the Management Agreement and that it is beneficial for the
Fund to continue its relationship with the Adviser.
Other Factors and
Current Trends
The Board considered the controls and procedures adopted and
implemented by the Adviser and monitored by the Funds
Chief Compliance Officer and concluded that the conduct of
business by the Adviser indicates a good faith effort on its
part to adhere to high ethical standards in the conduct of the
Funds business.
General
Conclusion
After considering and weighing all of the above factors, the
Board concluded that it would be in the best interest of the
Fund and its shareholders to approve renewal of the Management
Agreement for another year. In reaching this conclusion the
Board did not give particular weight to any single factor
referenced above. The Board considered these factors over the
course of numerous meetings, some of which were in executive
session with only the Independent Board members and their
counsel present. It is possible that individual Board members
may have weighed these factors differently in reaching their
individual decisions to approve the Management Agreement.
8
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Portfolio of
Investments - November 30, 2009
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds (103.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama (0.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
Colbert County-Northwest Alabama Health Care Authority, Helen
Keller Hospital Ser 2003
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
%
|
|
06/01/27
|
|
|
|
$
|
949,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arizona (3.0%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
Navajo County Pollution Control Corp., Ser B
|
|
|
5
|
.50
|
|
|
06/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
1,617,347
|
|
|
1,225
|
|
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Constelllation
Schools Ser 2008
|
|
|
7
|
.00
|
|
|
01/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
1,063,178
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Water &
Wastewater Global Water Resources LLC Ser 2007 (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.55
|
|
|
12/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
745,344
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Pinal County Electrical District #4, Electric System
Ser 2008
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
12/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
394,056
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,819,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California (4.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,760
|
|
|
California County Tobacco Securitization Agency, Gold County
Settlement Funding Corp. Ser 2006 (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
06/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
215,899
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
California Municipal Finance Authority Educational Facility,
High Tech High-Media Arts Ser 2008 A (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
07/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
284,723
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority,
California Baptist Universty, Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.50
|
|
|
11/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
760,250
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
California Statewide Communities Development Authority, Thomas
Jefferson School of Law Ser 2008 A (b)
|
|
|
7
|
.25
|
|
|
10/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
403,964
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
Daly City Housing Development Finance Agency, Franciscan Mobile
Home Park Third Tier Refg Ser 2007 C
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
|
|
12/15/47
|
|
|
|
|
825,739
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Golden State Tobacco Securitization Corp., Enhanced Asset Backed
Ser 2007 A-1
|
|
|
5
|
.125
|
|
|
06/01/47
|
|
|
|
|
1,949,400
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
Quechan Indian Tribe of Fort Yuma, Indian Reservation
Ser 2008
|
|
|
7
|
.00
|
|
|
12/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
431,055
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Santa Ana Unified School District, Unified School District
Community Facilities, District # 2004-1, California,
Central Park Ser 2005
|
|
|
5
|
.10
|
|
|
09/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
701,970
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
Silicon Valley Tobacco Securitization Authority, Santa Clara
Tobacco Securitization Corp. Ser 2007 C (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
06/01/56
|
|
|
|
|
140,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,713,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado (4.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Christian Living
Communities Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
01/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
762,940
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Colorado Health Facilities Authority, Christian Living
Communities Ser 2009 A
|
|
|
9
|
.00
|
|
|
01/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
538,545
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
Colorado Housing & Finance Authority, 1998 Ser D-2
(AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.35
|
|
|
11/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
282,166
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Copperleaf Metropolitan District #2, Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.95
|
|
|
12/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
660,920
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
9
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Portfolio of
Investments - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
Elk Valley Public Improvement Corporation, Ser 2001 A
|
|
|
7
|
.35
|
%
|
|
09/01/31
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,816,980
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Northwest Metropolitan District #3, Ser 2005
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
12/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
1,499,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,561,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Connecticut (0.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
Standard Life Legend Canadian Equity Pool,
Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.125
|
|
|
10/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
930,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
District of Columbia (0.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
District of Columbia, Refg Ser 2009 B (c)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
12/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
593,790
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, District of Columbia
& Virginia, CaterAir International Corp. Ser 1991
(AMT) (d)
|
|
|
10
|
.125
|
|
|
09/01/11
|
|
|
|
|
216,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
810,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florida (16.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Alachua County Florida Industrial Development Revenue, North
Florida Retirement Village Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
11/15/17
|
|
|
|
|
473,350
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
Beacon Lakes, Community Development District,
Ser 2003 A
|
|
|
6
|
.90
|
|
|
05/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
1,717,990
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
Bellalago Educational Facilities Benefits District, Bellalago
Charter School Ser 2004 B
|
|
|
5
|
.80
|
|
|
05/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
710,020
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
Brevard County Health Facilities Authority, Buena Vida Estates,
Inc. Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
01/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
556,608
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
County of Alachua Industrial Development, North Florida
Retirement Village Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
11/15/36
|
|
|
|
|
647,720
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
|
County of Broward Professional Sports Facilities, Civic Arena
Refg Ser 2006 B (CR) (FSA & AMBAC Insd) (c)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/23
|
|
|
|
|
3,099,165
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
|
County of Escambia, Pensacola Care Development Centers
Ser 1989 (e)
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
07/01/11
|
|
|
|
|
1,933,783
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
County of Escambia, Pensacola Care Development Centers
Ser 1989 A (e)
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
|
07/01/11
|
|
|
|
|
450,882
|
|
|
980
|
|
|
Fiddlers Creek Community Development District #1
Ser 2005 (f)
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
05/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
532,650
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Fountainbleau Lakes Community Development District
Ser 2007 B
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
05/01/15
|
|
|
|
|
274,105
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Grand Bay at Doral Community Development District
Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
05/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
388,425
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Lee County Industrial Development Authority, Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.375
|
|
|
06/15/37
|
|
|
|
|
714,750
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
Miami Beach Health Facilities Authority, Mount Sinai Medical
Center Refg Ser 2004
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
11/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
494,052
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Midtown Miami Community Development District, Parking Garage
Ser 2004 A
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
05/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
833,860
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Orange County Health Facilities Authority, Orlando Lutheran
Towers Inc. Ser 2005
|
|
|
5
|
.70
|
|
|
07/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
418,675
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Orange County Health Facilities Authority, Orlando Lutheran
Towers Inc. Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.50
|
|
|
07/01/32
|
|
|
|
|
1,547,960
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Orange County Health Facilities Authority, Westminister
Community Care Services, Inc. Ser 1999
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
04/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
936,070
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
Pinellas County Health Facilities Authority, Oaks of Clearwater
Ser 2004
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
06/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
604,206
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
10
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Portfolio of
Investments - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
950
|
|
|
Renaissance Commons Community Development District, 2005
Ser A
|
|
|
5
|
.60
|
%
|
|
05/01/36
|
|
|
|
$
|
668,515
|
|
|
2,860
|
|
|
South Miami Health Facilities Authority, Baptist Health South
Florida Obligated Ser 2007 (c)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
08/15/32
|
|
|
|
|
2,769,338
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Split Pine Community Development District, Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
05/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
305,205
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
Tolomato Community Development District, Special Assessment
Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.55
|
|
|
05/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
492,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,570,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia (1.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
City of Atlanta, Eastside Ser 2005 B
|
|
|
5
|
.60
|
|
|
01/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
1,756,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawaii (2.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Hawaii State Department of Budget & Finance, 15 Craigside
Project Ser 2009 A
|
|
|
8
|
.75
|
|
|
11/15/29
|
|
|
|
|
426,812
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Hawaii State Department of Budget & Finance, Kahala Nui
Ser 2003 A
|
|
|
8
|
.00
|
|
|
11/15/33
|
|
|
|
|
1,071,080
|
|
|
1,220
|
|
|
State of Hawaii, Ser 2008 DK (c)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
05/01/23
|
|
|
|
|
1,346,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,844,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Idaho (0.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
Idaho Health Facilities Authority, Valley Vista Care Corp Refg
Ser 2007 (e)
|
|
|
6
|
.125
|
|
|
11/15/27
|
|
|
|
|
809,761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois (8.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Bolingbrook, Will & Dupage Counties Special Service
Area #2005-1 Ser 2005
|
|
|
5
|
.90
|
|
|
03/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
575,033
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
City of Chicago, Lake Shore East Ser 2002
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
12/01/32
|
|
|
|
|
1,814,520
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
City of United City of Yorkville, Cannonball/Beecher Road
Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
03/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
821,380
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Hampshire Special Service Area #18 Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
03/01/44
|
|
|
|
|
372,555
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Elmhurst Memorial Healthcare
Ser 2008 A
|
|
|
5
|
.625
|
|
|
01/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
924,940
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Landing at Plymouth Place
Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
05/15/37
|
|
|
|
|
789,030
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Luther Oaks Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
08/15/39
|
|
|
|
|
797,640
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
Illinois Finance Authority, Montgomery Place Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
05/15/38
|
|
|
|
|
1,328,547
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority, 2008 Ser B (c)
|
|
|
5
|
.50
|
|
|
01/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
1,277,196
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
Lincolnshire Special Service Area No. 1, Sedgebrook Ser 2004
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
03/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
565,159
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Village of Bolingbrook, Sales Tax Ser 2005
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
01/01/24
|
|
|
|
|
489,700
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
Will-Kankakee Regional Development Authority, Senior Estates
Supportive Living Ser 2007 (AMT)
|
|
|
7
|
.00
|
|
|
12/01/42
|
|
|
|
|
549,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,305,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana (0.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
County of St Joseph, Holy Cross Village at Notre Dame
Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
05/15/26
|
|
|
|
|
250,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Iowa (1.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Iowa Finance Authority, Bethany Life Communities Refg
Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.55
|
|
|
11/01/41
|
|
|
|
|
727,540
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Iowa Finance Authority Health Care Facilities, Madrid Homes
Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.90
|
|
|
11/15/37
|
|
|
|
|
591,593
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
11
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Portfolio of
Investments - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
785
|
|
|
Jefferson County Iowa Hospital Revenue, Jefferson County
Hospital Project Ser C
|
|
|
5
|
.95
|
%
|
|
08/01/37
|
|
|
|
$
|
628,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,947,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas (0.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
City of Olathe, Catholic Care Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
11/15/38
|
|
|
|
|
739,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana (1.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
Lakeshore Villages Master Community Development District,
Special Assessment Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
07/01/17
|
|
|
|
|
654,677
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
Louisiana Public Facilities Authority, Lake Charles Memorial
Hospital Refg Ser 2007 (b)
|
|
|
6
|
.375
|
|
|
12/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
510,438
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Parish of St John Baptist, Marathon Oil Corp.
Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.125
|
|
|
06/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
438,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,604,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland (1.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Marlyland Economic Development Corp., Chesapeake Bay Conference
Center Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
12/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
603,110
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
King Farm Presbyterian Community Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.30
|
|
|
01/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
518,295
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Maryland Health & Higher Educational Facilities Authority,
Washington Christian Academy Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.50
|
|
|
07/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
407,024
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Maryland Industrial Development Financing Authority, Our Lady of
Good Counsel High School Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
05/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
439,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,967,789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Massachusetts (2.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Linden Ponds, Inc.
Facility Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
11/15/42
|
|
|
|
|
294,274
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, Loomis Communities
Ser 1999 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
07/01/23
|
|
|
|
|
1,403,250
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, New England Center for
Children Ser 1998
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
11/01/18
|
|
|
|
|
1,360,643
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency, The Groves in Lincoln
Facility Ser 2009 B-2
|
|
|
7
|
.75
|
|
|
06/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
391,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,449,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan (1.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Dearborn Economic Development Corp., Henry Ford Village, Inc.
Refg Ser 2008
|
|
|
7
|
.00
|
|
|
11/15/28
|
|
|
|
|
456,580
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Michigan Strategic Fund, Limited Obligation Revenue
Ser 2003 A-1 (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
12/01/28
|
|
|
|
|
425,608
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority
Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
06/01/48
|
|
|
|
|
1,528,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,410,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
12
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Portfolio of
Investments - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota (1.4%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
450
|
|
|
City of Brooklyn Park, Prairie Seeds Academy Ser 2009 A
|
|
|
9
|
.25
|
%
|
|
03/01/39
|
|
|
|
$
|
494,906
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
City of Minneapolis Health Care System, Fairview Health Services
Ser 2008 A
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
11/15/32
|
|
|
|
|
668,640
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
City of North Oaks, Presbyterian Homes of North Oaks
Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.125
|
|
|
10/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
685,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,849,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mississippi (0.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Mississippi Business Finance Corp., System Energy Resources,
Inc. Ser 1998
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
04/01/22
|
|
|
|
|
397,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri (6.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Branson Hills Infrastructure Facilities Community Improvement
District, Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.50
|
|
|
04/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
630,015
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Branson Regional Airport Transportation Development District
Ser 2007 B (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
07/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
321,555
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
City of Des Peres, West County Center Ser 2002
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
04/15/20
|
|
|
|
|
1,855,140
|
|
|
3,850
|
|
|
City of Fenton, Gravois Bluffs Redevelopment Ser 2001 A
|
|
|
7
|
.00
|
|
|
10/01/11
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
4,305,070
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
St Louis County Industrial Development Authority, Ranken-Jordan
Refg Ser 2007
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
11/15/22
|
|
|
|
|
206,730
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
St Louis County Industrial Development Authority, St Andrews
Resources for Seniors Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.375
|
|
|
12/01/41
|
|
|
|
|
619,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,937,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nevada (1.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
City of Henderson, Local Improvement District #T-18
Ser 2006 (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.30
|
|
|
09/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
179,987
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
City of Sparks, Local Improvement District #3 Ser 2008
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
|
|
09/01/20
|
|
|
|
|
576,198
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Director of the State of Nevada, Department of Business &
Industry, Las Vegas Monorail 2nd Tier Ser 2000 (g)
|
|
|
7
|
.375
|
|
|
01/01/40
|
|
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Las Vegas Redevelopment Agency Ser 2009 A
|
|
|
8
|
.00
|
|
|
06/15/30
|
|
|
|
|
560,245
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
Mesquite Special Improvement District No 07-01, Local
Improvement- Anthem at Mesquite Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
08/01/23
|
|
|
|
|
854,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,179,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampshire (2.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
New Hampshire Business Finance Authority, Huggins Hopsital
Ser 2009
|
|
|
6
|
.875
|
|
|
10/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
392,984
|
|
|
5,355
|
|
|
New Hampshire Housing Finance Authority, Single Family
Residential 1983 Ser B (a)
|
|
|
0
|
.00
|
|
|
01/01/15
|
|
|
|
|
3,171,338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,564,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey (5.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Franciscan Oaks
Ser 1997
|
|
|
5
|
.70
|
|
|
10/01/17
|
|
|
|
|
991,950
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Lions Gate
Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
01/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
573,473
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, Seashore Gardens
Living Center Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.375
|
|
|
11/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
527,527
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
13
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Portfolio of
Investments - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, The Presbyterian Home
at Montgomery Ser 2001 A
|
|
|
6
|
.375
|
%
|
|
11/01/31
|
|
|
|
$
|
862,000
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
New Jersey Economic Development Authority, United Methodist
Homes of New Jersey Ser 1998
|
|
|
5
|
.125
|
|
|
07/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
1,678,940
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Financing Authority, Raritan
Bay Medical Center Ser 1994 (e)
|
|
|
7
|
.25
|
|
|
07/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
1,809,020
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
Tobacco Settlement Financing Corp., Ser 2007-1 A
|
|
|
4
|
.625
|
|
|
06/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
224,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,667,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York (4.7%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
Brookhaven Industrial Development Agency, Woodcrest Estates
Ser 1998 A (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.375
|
|
|
12/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
2,451,300
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
Nassau County Industrial Development Agency, Continuing Care
Retirement Community Revenue, Amsterdam at Harborside Project
Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
|
|
01/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
580,594
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, 7 World Trade
Center LLC Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
|
|
03/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
1,403,115
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
New York City Industrial Development Agency, Polytechnic
University Refg Ser 2007 (ACA Insd)
|
|
|
5
|
.25
|
|
|
11/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
430,805
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
New York Liberty Development Corp., National Sports Museum,
Ser 2006 A (b)(i)
|
|
|
6
|
.125
|
|
|
02/15/19
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Suffolk County Industrial Development Agency, Medford Hamlet
Ser 2006 (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.375
|
|
|
01/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
1,162,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,027,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina (0.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
North Carolina Medical Care Commission Health Care Facilities,
Pennybyrn at Maryfield Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
6
|
.125
|
|
|
10/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
292,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North Dakota (1.2%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
City of Grand Forks, Valley Square Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.30
|
|
|
12/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
1,081,005
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
County of Ward, Trinity Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.125
|
|
|
07/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
470,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,551,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio (2.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
|
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Asset-Backed
Ser 2007 A-2
|
|
|
5
|
.875
|
|
|
06/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
1,600,218
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
City of Centerville Health Care, Bethany Lutheran Village
Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
11/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
506,544
|
|
|
850
|
|
|
County of Cuyahoga Health Care & Independent Living
Facilities, Eliza Jennings Senior Care Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
05/15/27
|
|
|
|
|
711,186
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
County of Tuscarawas Hospital Facilities, The Twin City Hospital
Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.35
|
|
|
11/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
396,900
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, Pollution
Control-Firstenergy Ser 2009
|
|
|
5
|
.625
|
|
|
06/01/18
|
|
|
|
|
426,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,641,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
14
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Portfolio of
Investments - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
|
|
|
|
Oklahoma (0.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
|
Chickasawa Nation Health Systems Ser 2007 (b)
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
%
|
|
12/01/32
|
|
|
|
$
|
640,647
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Citizen Potawatomi Nation, Ser 2004 A
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
|
|
09/01/16
|
|
|
|
|
487,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,127,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pennsylvania (6.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Allegheny County Hospital Development Authority, West Penn
Allegheny Health Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.375
|
|
|
11/15/40
|
|
|
|
|
1,427,480
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
Bucks County Industrial Development Authority, Anns Choice
Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
6
|
.125
|
|
|
01/01/25
|
|
|
|
|
1,340,295
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Chester County Health & Education Facilities Authority,
Jenners Pond Inc. Ser 2002
|
|
|
7
|
.625
|
|
|
07/01/12
|
|
(h)
|
|
|
1,178,820
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Harrisburg Authority, Harrisburg University of Science &
Technology Ser 2007 B
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
09/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
669,682
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Montgomery County Industrial Development Authority, Whitemarsh
Community Ser 2005
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
|
|
02/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
705,890
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Economic Development Financing Authority, Reliant
Energy, Inc. Ser 2001 A (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
12/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
989,950
|
|
|
1,230
|
|
|
Pennsylvania Intergovernmental Cooperative Authority,
Philadelphia Funding Project Ser 2009 (c)
|
|
|
5
|
.00
|
|
|
06/15/21
|
|
|
|
|
1,349,667
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
Washington County Redevelopment Authority, Victory Centre/Tanger
Outlet Redevelopment Authority Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.45
|
|
|
07/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
746,688
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,408,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina (1.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
City of Myrtle Beach Tax Increment, Myrtle Beach Air Force Base
Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.30
|
|
|
10/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
801,687
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
County of Georgetown, Environment Improvement Revenue,
International Paper Co. Ser 2000 A
|
|
|
5
|
.95
|
|
|
03/15/14
|
|
|
|
|
311,799
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority, Wesley
Commons Ser 2006
|
|
|
5
|
.30
|
|
|
10/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
549,450
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
South Carolina Jobs-Economic Development Authority, Woodlands at
Furman Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
11/15/37
|
|
|
|
|
439,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,102,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee (2.1%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
Johnson City Health & Educational Facilities Board,
Mountain States Health Alliance Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.50
|
|
|
07/01/31
|
|
|
|
|
790,992
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Shelby County Health, Educational & Housing Facilities
Board, Trezevant Manor Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
09/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
424,955
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
Shelby County Health, Educational & Housing Facilities
Board, Village at Germantown Ser 2003 A
|
|
|
7
|
.25
|
|
|
12/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
697,567
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
15
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Portfolio of
Investments - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
Shelby County Health, Educational & Housing Facilities
Board, Village at Germantown Ser 2006
|
|
|
6
|
.25
|
%
|
|
12/01/34
|
|
|
|
$
|
394,768
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Trenton Health & Educational Facilities Board, Ser 2009
|
|
|
9
|
.25
|
|
|
04/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
412,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,720,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas (7.9%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Alliance Airport Authority, Federal Express Corp. Refg
Ser 2006 (AMT)
|
|
|
4
|
.85
|
|
|
04/01/21
|
|
|
|
|
478,590
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Austin Convention Enterprises, Inc., Convention Center Hotel
Ser 2006 B (b)
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
01/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
1,532,760
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Brazos River Harbor Navigation District, The Dow Chemical
Project Ser 2002 A #4 (AMT)
|
|
|
5
|
.95
|
|
|
05/15/33
|
|
|
|
|
395,008
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Decatur Hospital Authority, Wise Regional Health
Ser 2004 A
|
|
|
7
|
.125
|
|
|
09/01/34
|
|
|
|
|
972,470
|
|
|
1,250
|
|
|
HFDC Central Texas, Inc., Legacy at Willow Bend,
Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
5
|
.75
|
|
|
11/01/36
|
|
|
|
|
972,100
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
HFDC of Central Texas, Inc., (Series A)
|
|
|
7
|
.75
|
|
|
11/15/44
|
|
|
|
|
390,344
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
Houston Airport System Special Facilities, Continental Airlines,
Inc. Ser 2001 E (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
07/01/21
|
|
|
|
|
387,107
|
|
|
425
|
|
|
Houston Airport System Special Facilities, Continental Airlines,
Inc. Ser 2001 E (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.75
|
|
|
07/01/29
|
|
|
|
|
375,126
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Lubbock Health Facilities Development Corp., Carillon
Ser 2005 A
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
|
|
07/01/26
|
|
|
|
|
893,720
|
|
|
450
|
|
|
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corp.,
Northwest Senior Housing Corp. Edgemere
Ser 2006 A
|
|
|
6
|
.00
|
|
|
11/15/36
|
|
|
|
|
388,499
|
|
|
3,305
|
|
|
Texas Department of Housing & Community Affairs,
Ser 2007 B (AMT) (c)
|
|
|
5
|
.15
|
|
|
09/01/27
|
|
|
|
|
3,358,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,144,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utah (0.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
County of Emery Environmental Improvement, Pacificorp
Ser 1996 (AMT)
|
|
|
6
|
.15
|
|
|
09/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
981,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia (1.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Peninsula Ports Authority of Virginia, Baptist Homes
Ser 2006 C
|
|
|
5
|
.40
|
|
|
12/01/33
|
|
|
|
|
1,222,220
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
Peninsula Town Center Community Development Authority
Ser 2007
|
|
|
6
|
.45
|
|
|
09/01/37
|
|
|
|
|
581,651
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Virginia Small Business Financing Authority, Hampton
Ser 2009
|
|
|
9
|
.00
|
|
|
07/01/39
|
|
|
|
|
516,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,320,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington (1.8%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
King County Public Hospital District No. 4, Snoqualime Valley
Hospital Ser 2009
|
|
|
7
|
.25
|
|
|
12/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
411,952
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
Port of Seattle Industrial Development Corp., Northwest
Airlines, Inc. Ser 2001 (AMT)
|
|
|
7
|
.25
|
|
|
04/01/30
|
|
|
|
|
574,164
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Washington Health Care Facilities Authority, Seattle Cancer Care
Alliance Ser 2008
|
|
|
7
|
.375
|
|
|
03/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
549,700
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
Washington Housing Finance Commission, Skyline at First Hill
Ser 2007 A
|
|
|
5
|
.625
|
|
|
01/01/38
|
|
|
|
|
741,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,277,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
16
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Portfolio of
Investments - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT IN
|
|
|
|
COUPON
|
|
MATURITY
|
|
|
|
|
THOUSANDS
|
|
|
|
RATE
|
|
DATE
|
|
|
|
VALUE
|
|
|
|
|
West Virginia (0.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
825
|
|
|
West Virginia Hospital Finance Authority, Thomas Health System,
Inc. Ser 2008
|
|
|
6
|
.50
|
%
|
|
10/01/38
|
|
|
|
$
|
736,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin (0.5%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
Wisconsin Health & Educational Facilities Authority,
ProHealth Care, Inc. Ser 2009
|
|
|
6
|
.375
|
|
|
02/15/29
|
|
|
|
|
650,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds
(Cost $151,034,237)
|
|
|
|
|
132,020,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds (0.6%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colorado (0.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
Colorado Educational & Cultural Facilities Authority
(Demand 12/01/09)
|
|
|
0
|
.24
|
(j)
|
|
02/01/35
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota (0.3%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
Minneapolis & St. Paul Housing & Redevelopment
Authority, Allina Health Systems, Ser B-1 (Demand 12/01/09)
|
|
|
0
|
.26
|
(j)
|
|
11/15/35
|
|
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Short-Term Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds
(Cost $700,000)
|
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (Cost $151,734,237) (k)(l)
|
|
103.8%
|
|
|
|
|
132,720,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets in Excess of Liabilities
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
2,346,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating Rate Note and Dealer Trusts Obligations Related to
Securities Held
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes with interest rates ranging from 0.27% to 0.32% at
November 30, 2009 and contractual maturities of collateral
ranging from 06/15/21 to 01/01/33
(See Note 1D) (m)
|
|
(5.6)
|
|
|
|
|
(7,161,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
$
|
127,905,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMT
|
|
Alternative Minimum Tax.
|
CR
|
|
Custodial Receipts.
|
(a)
|
|
Capital appreciation bond.
|
(b)
|
|
Resale is restricted to qualified institutional investors.
|
(c)
|
|
Underlying security related to inverse floater entered into
by the Fund (See Note 1D).
|
(d)
|
|
Joint exemption.
|
(e)
|
|
Illiquid security.
|
(f)
|
|
Illiquid security. Resale is restricted to qualified
institutional investors.
|
(g)
|
|
Illiquid security. Security in default.
|
(h)
|
|
Prefunded to call date shown.
|
(i)
|
|
Non-income producing security; Bond in default.
|
(j)
|
|
Current coupon of variable rate demand obligation.
|
(k)
|
|
Securities have been designated as collateral in connection
with inverse floating rate municipal obligations.
|
(l)
|
|
The aggregate cost for federal income tax purposes
approximates the aggregate cost for book purposes. The aggregate
gross unrealized appreciation is $3,144,573 and the aggregate
gross unrealized depreciation is $22,158,162 resulting in net
unrealized depreciation of $19,013,589.
|
(m)
|
|
Floating rate note obligations related to securities held.
The interest rates shown reflect the rates in effect at November
30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bond Insurance:
|
ACA
|
|
ACA Financial Guaranty Corporation.
|
AMBAC
|
|
AMBAC Assurance Corporation.
|
FSA
|
|
Financial Security Assurance Inc.
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
17
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Financial
Statements
Statement of
Assets and Liabilities
November 30, 2009
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in securities, at value (cost $151,734,237)
|
|
$
|
132,720,648
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
89,625
|
|
Receivable for:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
2,698,318
|
|
Investments sold
|
|
|
111,227
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
12,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
135,631,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate note and dealer trusts obligations
|
|
|
7,161,000
|
|
Payable for:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments purchased
|
|
|
393,767
|
|
Investment advisory fee
|
|
|
54,428
|
|
Administration fee
|
|
|
8,708
|
|
Transfer agent fee
|
|
|
1,343
|
|
Accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
|
106,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
7,726,101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
127,905,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in-capital
|
|
$
|
169,657,267
|
|
Net unrealized depreciation
|
|
|
(19,013,589
|
)
|
Accumulated undistributed net investment income
|
|
|
1,014,281
|
|
Accumulated net realized loss
|
|
|
(23,752,145
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
$
|
127,905,814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Asset Value Per Share
19,620,474 shares outstanding (unlimited shares
authorized of $.01 par value)
|
|
|
$6.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
18
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Financial
Statements continued
Statement of
Operations
For the six months ended
November 30, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
$
|
4,941,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Investment advisory fee
|
|
|
304,144
|
|
Administration fee
|
|
|
48,663
|
|
Interest and residual trust expenses
|
|
|
30,917
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
29,798
|
|
Shareholder reports and notices
|
|
|
21,262
|
|
Listing fees
|
|
|
9,463
|
|
Transfer agent fees and expenses
|
|
|
6,891
|
|
Trustees fees and expenses
|
|
|
4,797
|
|
Custodian fees
|
|
|
2,744
|
|
Other
|
|
|
10,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
469,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
|
|
|
4,471,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized Loss
|
|
|
(685,429
|
)
|
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation/Depreciation
|
|
|
12,456,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Gain
|
|
|
11,770,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase
|
|
$
|
16,242,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
19
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Financial
Statements continued
Statements of
Changes in Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE SIX
|
|
FOR THE YEAR
|
|
|
MONTHS ENDED
|
|
ENDED
|
|
|
NOVEMBER 30, 2009
|
|
MAY 31, 2009
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
4,471,885
|
|
|
$
|
8,830,285
|
|
Net realized loss
|
|
|
(685,429
|
)
|
|
|
(4,298,657
|
)
|
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation
|
|
|
12,456,247
|
|
|
|
(24,456,017
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
16,242,703
|
|
|
|
(19,924,389
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to shareholders from net investment income
|
|
|
(4,120,301
|
)
|
|
|
(9,086,766
|
)
|
Decrease from transactions in shares of beneficial interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165,626
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
12,122,402
|
|
|
|
(29,176,781
|
)
|
Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
115,783,412
|
|
|
|
144,960,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of Period
(Including accumulated undistributed net investment
income of $1,014,281 and $662,697, respectively)
|
|
$
|
127,905,814
|
|
|
$
|
115,783,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements
20
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Notes to
Financial Statements - November 30, 2009
(unaudited)
1. Organization
and Accounting Policies
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income Opportunities Trust (the
Fund) is registered under the Investment Company Act
of 1940, as amended, as a diversified, closed-end management
investment company. The Funds investment objective is to
provide a high level of current income which is exempt from
federal income tax. The Fund was organized as a Massachusetts
business trust on June 22, 1988 and commenced operations on
September 19, 1988.
Morgan Stanley announced on October 19, 2009 that it has
entered into a definitive agreement to sell substantially all of
its retail asset management business to Invesco Ltd.
(Invesco), a leading global investment management
company. As a result, the Investment Adviser expects to propose
to the Board of Trustees of the Fund that the Board approve,
among other things, a new investment advisory agreement with an
affiliate of Invesco. If approved by the Funds Board, the
new agreement would be submitted to the Funds shareholders
for their approval.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies:
A. Valuation of Investments
(1) portfolio securities are valued by an outside
independent pricing service approved by the Trustees. The
pricing service uses both a computerized grid matrix of
tax-exempt securities and evaluations by its staff, in each case
based on information concerning market transactions and
quotations from dealers which reflect the mean between the last
reported bid and ask price. The portfolio securities are thus
valued by reference to a combination of transactions and
quotations for the same or other securities believed to be
comparable in quality, coupon, maturity, type of issue, call
provisions, trading characteristics and other features deemed to
be relevant. The Trustees believe that timely and reliable
market quotations are generally not readily available for
purposes of valuing tax-exempt securities and that the
valuations supplied by the pricing service are more likely to
represent the fair value of such securities; (2) futures
are valued at the latest sale price on the commodities exchange
on which they trade unless it is determined that such price does
not reflect their market value, in which case they will be
valued at their fair value as determined in good faith under
procedures established by and under the supervision of the
Trustees; (3) interest rate swaps are
marked-to-market
daily based upon quotations from market makers; and
(4) short-term debt securities having a maturity date of
more than sixty days at time of purchase are valued on a
mark-to-market
basis until sixty days prior to maturity and thereafter at
amortized cost based on their value on the 61st day. Short-term
debt securities having a maturity date of sixty days or less at
the time of purchase are valued at amortized cost, which
approximates market value.
B. Accounting for Investments Security
transactions are accounted for on the trade date (date the order
to buy or sell is executed). Realized gains and losses on
security transactions are determined by the identified cost
method. Discounts are accreted and premiums are amortized over
the life of the respective
21
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Notes to
Financial Statements - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
securities and are included in interest income. Interest income
is accrued daily except where collection is not expected.
C. Futures A futures contract is an agreement
between two parties to buy and sell financial instruments or
contracts based on financial indices at a set price on a future
date. Upon entering into such a contract, the Fund is required
to pledge to the broker cash, U.S. Government securities or
other liquid portfolio securities equal to the minimum initial
margin requirements of the applicable futures exchange. Pursuant
to the contract, the Fund agrees to receive from or pay to the
broker an amount of cash equal to the daily fluctuation in the
value of the contract. Such receipts or payments known as
variation margin are recorded by the Fund as unrealized gains
and losses. Upon closing of the contract, the Fund realizes a
gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the
contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it
was closed.
D. Floating Rate Note and Dealer Trusts Obligations Related
to Securities Held The Fund enters into
transactions in which it transfers to Dealer Trusts
(Dealer Trusts), fixed rate bonds in exchange for
cash and residual interests in the Dealer Trusts assets
and cash flows, which are in the form of inverse floating rate
investments. The Dealer Trusts fund the purchases of the fixed
rate bonds by issuing floating rate notes to third parties and
allowing the Fund to retain residual interest in the bonds. The
Fund enters into shortfall agreements with the Dealer Trusts
which commit the Fund to pay the Dealer Trusts, in certain
circumstances, the difference between the liquidation value of
the fixed rate bonds held by the Dealer Trusts and the
liquidation value of the floating rate notes held by third
parties, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The
residual interests held by the Fund (inverse floating rate
investments) include the right of the Fund (1) to cause the
holders of the floating rate notes to tender their notes at par
at the next interest rate reset date, and (2) to transfer
the municipal bond from the Dealer Trusts to the Fund, thereby
collapsing the Dealer Trusts. The Fund accounts for the transfer
of bonds to the Dealer Trusts as secured borrowings, with the
securities transferred remaining in the Funds investment
assets, and the related floating rate notes reflected as Fund
liabilities under the caption floating rate note and
dealer trusts obligations on the Statement of Assets and
Liabilities. The Fund records the interest income from the fixed
rate bonds under the caption interest income and
records the expenses related to floating rate note and dealer
trusts obligations and any administrative expenses of the Dealer
Trusts under the caption interest and residual trust
expenses on the Statement of Operations. The floating rate
notes issued by the Dealer Trusts have interest rates that reset
weekly and the floating rate note holders have the option to
tender their notes to the Dealer Trusts for redemption at par at
each reset date. At November 30, 2009, the Funds
investments with a value of $13,794,635 are held by the Dealer
Trusts and serve as collateral for the $7,161,000 in floating
rate note and dealer trusts obligations outstanding at that
date. The range of contractual maturities of the floating rate
note and dealer trusts obligations and interest rates in effect
at November 30, 2009 are presented in the Portfolio of
Investments.
22
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Notes to
Financial Statements - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
E. Interest Rate Swaps Interest rate swaps
are contractual agreements to exchange periodic interest payment
streams calculated on a predetermined notional principal amount.
Interest rate swaps generally involve one party paying a fixed
interest rate and the other party paying a variable rate. The
Fund will usually enter into interest rate swaps on a net basis,
i.e., the two payment streams are netted out in a cash
settlement on the payment date or dates specified in the
instrument, with the Fund receiving or paying, as the case may
be, only the net amount of the two payments. The Fund accrues
the net amount with respect to each interest rate swap on a
daily basis. This net amount is recorded within realized
gains/losses on swap contracts on the Statement of Operations.
Swap agreements are not entered into or traded on exchanges and
there is no central clearing or guaranty function for swaps.
Therefore, swaps are subject to the risk of default or
non-performance by the counterparty. If there is a default by
the counterparty to a swap agreement, the Fund will have
contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the
transaction. Counterparties are required to pledge collateral
daily (based on the valuation of each swap) on behalf of the
Fund with a value approximately equal to the amount of any
unrealized gain. Reciprocally, when the Fund has an unrealized
loss on a swap contract, the Fund has instructed the custodian
to pledge cash or liquid securities as collateral with a value
approximately equal to the amount of the unrealized loss.
Collateral pledges are monitored and subsequently adjusted if
and when the swap valuations fluctuate. For cash collateral
received, the Fund pays a monthly fee to the counterparty based
on the effective rate for Federal Funds.
F. Federal Income Tax Policy It is the
Funds policy to comply with the requirements of Subchapter
M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated
investment companies and to distribute substantially all of its
taxable and non-taxable income to its shareholders. Therefore,
no federal income tax provision is required. The Fund files tax
returns with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, New York State
and New York City. The Fund recognizes the tax effects of a tax
position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return only if
it is more likely than not to be sustained based solely on its
technical merits as of the reporting date. The
more-likely-than-not threshold must continue to be met in each
reporting period to support continued recognition of the
benefit. The difference between the tax benefit recognized in
the financial statements for a tax position taken and the tax
benefit claimed in the income tax return is referred to as an
unrecognized tax benefit. There are no unrecognized tax benefits
in the accompanying financial statements. If applicable, the
Fund recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax
benefits in interest expense and penalties in other expenses in
the Statement of Operations. Each of the tax years in the four
year period ended May 31, 2009, remains subject to
examination by taxing authorities.
The Fund purchases municipal securities whose interest, in the
opinion of the issuer, is free from federal income tax. There is
no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
will agree with this opinion. In the event the IRS determines
that the issuer does not comply with relevant tax requirements,
interest payments from a security could become federally taxable.
23
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Notes to
Financial Statements - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
G. Dividends and Distributions to
Shareholders Dividends and distributions to
shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
H. Use of Estimates The preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (GAAP)
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
I. Subsequent Events The Fund considers
events or transactions that occur after the date of the
Statement of Assets and Liabilities but before the financial
statements are issued to provide additional evidence relative to
certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional
disclosure. Subsequent events have been evaluated through
January 22, 2010, the date of issuance of these financial
statements.
2. Fair Valuation
Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that the Fund would receive
to sell an investment or pay to transfer a liability in a timely
transaction with an independent buyer in the principal market,
or in the absence of a principal market the most advantageous
market for the investment or liability. GAAP utilizes a
three-tier hierarchy to distinguish between (1) inputs that
reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing
an asset or liability developed based on market data obtained
from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable
inputs) and (2) inputs that reflect the reporting
entitys own assumptions about the assumptions market
participants would use in pricing an asset or liability
developed based on the best information available in the
circumstances (unobservable inputs) and to establish
classification of fair value measurements for disclosure
purposes. Various inputs are used in determining the value of
the Funds investments. The inputs are summarized in the
three broad levels listed below.
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 unadjusted quoted prices in active
markets for identical investments
|
|
|
|
Level 2 other significant observable inputs
(including quoted prices for similar investments, interest
rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.)
|
|
|
|
Level 3 significant unobservable inputs
(including the Funds own assumptions in determining the
fair value of investments)
|
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not
necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing
in those securities and the determination of the significance of
a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety
requires judgment and considers factors specific to each
security.
24
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Notes to
Financial Statements - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of
November 30, 2009 in valuing the Funds investments
carried at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AT NOVEMBER 30, 2009 USING
|
|
|
|
|
UNADJUSTED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUOTED PRICES IN
|
|
SIGNIFICANT
|
|
SIGNIFICANT
|
|
|
|
|
ACTIVE MARKET FOR
|
|
OTHER OBSERVABLE
|
|
UNOBSERVABLE
|
|
|
|
|
IDENTICAL INVESTMENTS
|
|
INPUTS
|
|
INPUTS
|
INVESTMENT TYPE
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
(LEVEL 1)
|
|
(LEVEL 2)
|
|
(LEVEL 3)
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds
|
|
$
|
132,020,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
132,020,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Tax-Exempt Municipal Bonds
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
132,720,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
132,720,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Derivative
Financial Instruments
A derivative financial instrument in very general terms refers
to a security whose value is derived from the value
of an underlying asset, reference rate or index.
The Fund may use derivative instruments for a variety of
reasons, such as to attempt to protect the Fund against possible
changes in the market value of its portfolio or to generate
potential gain. All of the Funds portfolio holdings,
including derivative instruments, are
marked-to-market
each day with the change in value reflected in unrealized
appreciation/depreciation. Upon disposition, a realized gain or
loss is recognized accordingly, except when taking delivery of a
security underlying a contract. In these instances, the
recognition of gain or loss is postponed until the disposal of
the security underlying the contract. Risk may arise as a result
of the potential inability of the counterparties to meet the
terms of their contracts.
Summarized below are specific types of derivative financial
instruments used by the Fund.
Futures To hedge against adverse
interest rate changes, the Fund may invest in financial futures
contracts or municipal bond index futures contracts
(futures contracts). These futures contracts involve
elements of market risk in excess of the amount reflected in the
Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Fund bears the risk of
an unfavorable change in the value of the underlying securities
Risks may also arise upon entering into these contracts from the
potential inability of the counterparties to meet the terms of
their contracts.
There were no futures transactions for the six months ended
November 30, 2009.
Interest Rate Swaps The Fund may enter
into interest rate swaps and may purchase or sell interest rate
caps, floors and collars. The Fund expects to enter into these
transactions primarily to manage interest rate risk, hedge
portfolio positions and preserve a return or spread on a
particular investment or portion of its portfolio. The Fund may
also enter into these transactions to protect against any
increase in the price of securities the Fund anticipates
purchasing at a later date. Interest rate swap transactions are
subject to
25
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Notes to
Financial Statements - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
market risk, risk of default by the other party to the
transaction, risk of imperfect correlation and manager risk.
Such risks may exceed the related amounts shown in the Statement
of Assets and Liabilities.
There were no transactions in interest rate swaps for the six
months ended November 30, 2009.
4. Investment
Advisory/Administration Agreements
Pursuant to an Investment Advisory Agreement with Morgan Stanley
Investment Advisors Inc. (the Investment Adviser),
the Fund pays the Investment Adviser an advisory fee, calculated
weekly and payable monthly, by applying the annual rate of 0.50%
to the Funds average weekly net assets.
Pursuant to an Administration Agreement with Morgan Stanley
Services Company Inc. (the Administrator), an
affiliate of the Investment Adviser, the Fund pays an
administration fee, calculated weekly and payable monthly, by
applying the annual rate of 0.08% to the Funds average
weekly net assets.
Under an agreement between the Administrator and State Street
Bank and Trust Company (State Street), State
Street provides certain administrative services to the Fund. For
such services, the Administrator pays State Street a portion of
the fee the Administrator receives from the Fund.
5. Security
Transactions and Transactions with Affiliates
The cost of purchases and proceeds from sales of portfolio
securities, excluding short-term investments, for the six months
ended November 30, 2009 aggregated $6,158,388 and
$5,475,188, respectively.
The Fund has an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension
plan covering certain independent Trustees of the Fund who will
have served as independent Trustees for at least five years at
the time of retirement. Benefits under this plan are based on
factors which include years of service and compensation. The
Trustees voted to close the plan to new participants and
eliminate the future benefits growth due to increases to
compensation after July 31, 2003. Aggregate pension costs
for the six months ended November 30, 2009, included in
trustees fees and expenses in the Statement of
Operations amounted to $3,001. At November 30, 2009, the
Fund had an accrued pension liability of $59,392, which is
included in accrued expenses and other payables in
the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
The Fund has an unfunded Deferred Compensation Plan (the
Compensation Plan) which allows each independent
Trustee to defer payment of all, or a portion, of the fees he or
she receives for serving on the Board of Trustees. Each eligible
Trustee generally may elect to have the deferred amounts
credited with a return equal to the total return on one or more
of the Morgan Stanley funds that are offered as investment
options under the Compensation Plan. Appreciation/depreciation
and distributions received from these investments are recorded
with an offsetting increase/decrease in the deferred
compensation obligation and do not affect the net asset value of
the Fund.
26
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Notes to
Financial Statements - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
6.
Dividends
The Fund declared the following dividends from net investment
income subsequent to November 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DECLARATION
|
|
AMOUNT
|
|
RECORD
|
|
PAYABLE
|
DATE
|
|
PER SHARE
|
|
DATE
|
|
DATE
|
December 8, 2009
|
|
$0.035
|
|
December 18, 2009
|
|
December 24, 2009
|
7. Shares of
Beneficial Interest
Transactions in shares of beneficial interest were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PAID IN
|
|
|
|
|
PAR VALUE
|
|
EXCESS OF
|
|
|
SHARES
|
|
OF SHARES
|
|
PAR VALUE
|
Balance, May 31, 2008
|
|
|
19,649,675
|
|
|
$
|
196,496
|
|
|
$
|
173,556,456
|
|
Shares repurchased (weighted average discount 13.98%)+
|
|
|
(29,201
|
)
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
(165,334
|
)
|
Reclassification due to permanent book/tax differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,930,059
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, May 31, 2009
|
|
|
19,620,474
|
|
|
|
196,204
|
|
|
|
169,461,063
|
|
Shares repurchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, November 30, 2009
|
|
|
19,620,474
|
|
|
$
|
196,204
|
|
|
$
|
169,461,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Trustees have approved a share repurchase program whereby
the Fund may, when appropriate, purchase shares in the open
market or in privately negotiated transactions at a price not
above market value or net asset value, whichever is lower at the
time of purchase.
|
|
|
+
|
|
The Trustees have voted to retire
the shares purchased.
|
8. Expense
Offset
The expense offset represents a reduction of the fees and
expenses for interest earned on cash balances maintained by the
Fund with the transfer agent and custodian. For the six months
ended November 30, 2009, the Fund did not have an expense
offset.
9. Purposes of
and Risks Relating to Certain Financial Instruments
The Fund may invest a portion of its assets in inverse floating
rate municipal securities, which are variable debt instruments
that pay interest at rates that move in the opposite direction
of prevailing interest rates. These investments are typically
used by the Fund in seeking to enhance the yield of the
portfolio. Inverse floating rate investments tend to
underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising
interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for
fixed rate bonds when interest rates decline or remain
relatively stable. Inverse floating rate investments have
varying degrees of liquidity. Inverse floating rate securities
in which the Fund may invest include derivative instruments such
as residual interest bonds (RIBs) or tender option
bonds (TOBs). Such instruments are typically created
by a special purpose trust that holds
27
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Notes to
Financial Statements - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
long-term fixed rate bonds (which may be tendered by the Fund in
certain instances) and sells two classes of beneficial
interests: short-term floating rate interests, which are sold to
third party investors, and inverse floating residual interests,
which are purchased by the Fund. The short-term floating rate
interests have first priority on the cash flow from the bonds
held by the special purpose trust and the Fund is paid the
residual cash flow from the bonds held by the special purpose
trust.
The Fund generally invests in inverse floating rate investments
that include embedded leverage, thus exposing the Fund to
greater risks and increased costs. The market value of a
leveraged inverse floating rate investment generally
will fluctuate in response to changes in market rates of
interest to a greater extent than the value of an unleveraged
investment. The extent of increases and decreases in the value
of inverse floating rate investments generally will be larger
than changes in an equal principal amount of a fixed rate
security having similar credit quality, redemption provisions
and maturity, which may cause the Funds net asset value to
be more volatile than if it had not invested in inverse floating
rate investments.
In certain instances, the short-term floating rate interests
created by the special purpose trust may not be able to be sold
to third parties or, in the case of holders tendering (or
putting) such interests for repayment of principal, may not be
able to be remarketed to third parties. In such cases, the
special purpose trust holding the long-term fixed rate bonds may
be collapsed. In the case of RIBs or TOBs created by the
contribution of long-term fixed income bonds by the Fund, the
Fund will then be required to repay the principal amount of the
tendered securities. During times of market volatility,
illiquidity or uncertainty, the Fund could be required to sell
other portfolio holdings at a disadvantageous time to raise cash
to meet that obligation.
The Fund may also invest in private placement securities. TOBs
are presently classified as private placement securities.
Private placement securities are subject to restrictions on
resale because they have not been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or are otherwise not readily
marketable. As a result of the absence of a public trading
market for these securities, they may be less liquid than
publicly traded securities. Although these securities may be
resold in privately negotiated transactions, the prices realized
from these sales could be less than those originally paid by the
Fund or less than what may be considered the fair value of such
securities.
10. Federal
Income Tax Status
The amount of dividends and distributions from net investment
income and net realized capital gains are determined in
accordance with federal income tax regulations which may differ
from GAAP. These book/tax differences are either
considered temporary or permanent in nature. To the extent these
differences are permanent in nature, such amounts are
reclassified within the capital accounts based on their federal
tax-basis treatment; temporary differences do not require
reclassification. Dividends and distributions which
28
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Notes to
Financial Statements - November 30, 2009
(unaudited) continued
exceed net investment income and net realized capital gains for
tax purposes are reported as distributions of
paid-in-capital.
As of May 31, 2009, the Fund had temporary book/tax
differences attributable to post-October losses (capital losses
incurred after October 31 within the taxable year which are
deemed to arise on the first business day of the Funds
next taxable year) and book amortization of discounts on debt
securities.
11. Accounting
Pronouncement
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
new guidance related to Transfers and Servicing. The new
guidance is intended to improve the relevance, representational
faithfulness and comparability of the information that a
reporting entity provides in its financial statements about a
transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a
transferors continuing involvement, if any, in transferred
financial assets. The new guidance is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2009 and earlier application is
prohibited. The recognition and measurement provisions of this
guidance must be applied to transfers occurring on or after the
effective date. Additionally, the disclosure provisions of this
guidance should be applied to transfers that occurred both
before and after the effective date. The impact of this new
guidance on the Funds financial statements, if any, is
currently being assessed.
29
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Financial
Highlights
Selected ratios and per share data for a share of beneficial
interest outstanding throughout each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE SIX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MONTHS ENDED
|
|
FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31,
|
|
|
NOVEMBER 30, 2009
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected Per Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, beginning of period
|
|
|
$5.90
|
|
|
|
|
$7.38
|
|
|
|
$8.28
|
|
|
|
$8.02
|
|
|
|
|
$8.00
|
|
|
|
|
$7.67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from investment operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment
income(1)
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
|
|
(1.46)
|
|
|
|
(0.87)
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income (loss) from investment operations
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
|
|
|
(1.01)
|
|
|
|
(0.41)
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less dividends from net investment income
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.47)
|
|
|
|
(0.49)
|
|
|
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
|
|
(0.50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anti-dilutive effect of acquiring treasury
shares(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
(2)
|
|
|
0.00
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value, end of period
|
|
|
$6.52
|
|
|
|
|
$5.90
|
|
|
|
$7.38
|
|
|
|
$8.28
|
|
|
|
|
$8.02
|
|
|
|
|
$8.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market value, end of period
|
|
|
$6.28
|
|
|
|
|
$5.67
|
|
|
|
$7.87
|
|
|
|
$9.68
|
|
|
|
|
$8.76
|
|
|
|
|
$7.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Return(3)
|
|
|
14.64%(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(22.15)
|
%
|
|
|
(13.65)
|
%
|
|
|
16.99
|
|
%
|
|
|
17.04
|
|
%
|
|
|
20.12
|
|
%
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses (before expense offset)
|
|
|
0.77%(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
%(4)
|
|
|
0.95
|
%(4)(5)
|
|
|
0.80%(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
%
|
Total expenses (before expense offset, exclusive of interest and
residual trust expenses)
|
|
|
0.72%(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.73
|
%(4)
|
|
|
0.72
|
%(4)(5)
|
|
|
0.72%(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
%
|
|
|
0.83
|
|
%
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
7.33%(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
|
|
5.89
|
%
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
%
|
|
|
6.78
|
|
%
|
|
|
6.76
|
|
%
|
Rebate from Morgan Stanley affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%(6)
|
|
|
0.00
|
%(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets, end of period, in thousands
|
|
|
$127,906
|
|
|
|
|
$115,783
|
|
|
|
$144,960
|
|
|
|
$163,002
|
|
|
|
|
$157,928
|
|
|
|
|
$157,594
|
|
|
Portfolio turnover rate
|
|
|
4%(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
|
%
|
|
|
19
|
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The per share amounts were
computed using an average number of shares outstanding during
the period. |
(2) |
|
Includes anti-dilutive effect of
acquiring treasury shares of less than $0.005. |
(3) |
|
Total return is based upon the
current market value on the last day of each period reported.
Dividends and distributions are assumed to be reinvested at the
prices obtained under the Funds dividend reinvestment
plan. Total return does not reflect brokerage
commissions. |
(4) |
|
The ratios reflect the rebate of
certain Fund expenses in connection with investments in a Morgan
Stanley affiliate during the period. The effect of the rebate on
the ratios is disclosed in the above table as Rebate from
Morgan Stanley affiliate. |
(5) |
|
Does not reflect the effect of
expense offset of 0.01%. |
(6) |
|
Amount is less than
0.005%. |
(7) |
|
Not annualized. |
(8) |
|
Annualized. |
See Notes to Financial
Statements
30
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Shareholder
Voting Results (unaudited)
On December 11, 2009, an annual meeting of the Funds
shareholders was held for the purpose of voting on the following
matter, the results of which were as follows:
Election of
Trustees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
For
|
|
Withheld
|
|
Abstain
|
Kathleen A. Dennis
|
|
17,593,641
|
|
|
754,645
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Manuel H. Johnson
|
|
17,581,703
|
|
|
766,583
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Joseph J. Kearns
|
|
17,571,830
|
|
|
776,456
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Fergus Reid
|
|
17,378,780
|
|
|
969,506
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
31
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Revised
Investment Policies (unaudited)
The Fund has amended and restated its policy on derivatives to
permit it to invest in the derivative investments discussed
below.
The Fund may use derivative instruments for a variety of
purposes, including hedging, risk management, portfolio
management or to earn income. Derivatives are financial
instruments whose value is based on the value of another
underlying asset, interest rate, index or financial instrument.
A derivative instrument often has risks similar to its
underlying instrument and may have additional risks, including
imperfect correlation between the value of the derivative and
the underlying instrument, risks of default by the other party
to certain transactions, magnification of losses incurred due to
changes in the market value of the securities, instruments,
indices or interest rates to which they relate, and risks that
the transactions may not be liquid. The use of derivatives
involves risks that are different from, and possibly greater
than, the risks associated with other portfolio investments.
Derivatives may involve the use of highly specialized
instruments that require investment techniques and risk analyses
different from those associated with other portfolio
investments. Certain derivative transactions may give rise to a
form of leverage. Leverage associated with derivative
transactions may cause the Fund to liquidate portfolio positions
when it may not be advantageous to do so to satisfy its
obligations or to meet earmarking or segregation requirements,
pursuant to applicable SEC rules and regulations, or may cause
the Fund to be more volatile than if the Fund had not been
leveraged. Although the Investment Adviser seeks to use
derivatives to further the Funds investment objective,
there is no assurance that the use of derivatives will achieve
this result.
Following is a description of the derivative instruments and
techniques that the Fund may use and their associated risks:
Futures A futures contract is a standardized
agreement between two parties to buy or sell a specific quantity
of an underlying instrument at a specific price at a specific
future time. The value of a futures contract tends to increase
and decrease in tandem with the value of the underlying
instrument. Futures contracts are bilateral agreements, with
both the purchaser and the seller equally obligated to complete
the transaction. Depending on the terms of the particular
contract, futures contracts are settled through either physical
delivery of the underlying instrument on the settlement date or
by payment of a cash settlement amount on the settlement date. A
decision as to whether, when and how to use futures involves the
exercise of skill and judgment and even a well conceived futures
transaction may be unsuccessful because of market behavior or
unexpected events. In addition to the derivatives risks
discussed above, the prices of futures can be highly volatile,
using futures can lower total return, and the potential loss
from futures can exceed the Funds initial investment in
such contracts.
Swaps A swap contract is an agreement between
two parties pursuant to which the parties exchange payments at
specified dates on the basis of a specified notional amount,
with the payments calculated by reference to specified
securities, indexes, reference rates, currencies or other
instruments. Most swap
32
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Revised
Investment Policies
(unaudited) continued
agreements provide that when the period payment dates for both
parties are the same, the payments are made on a net basis
(i.e., the two payment streams are netted out, with only the net
amount paid by one party to the other). The Funds
obligations or rights under a swap contract entered into on a
net basis will generally be equal only to the net amount to be
paid or received under the agreement, based on the relative
values of the positions held by each counterparty. Swap
agreements are not entered into or traded on exchanges and there
is no central clearing or guaranty function for swaps.
Therefore, swaps are subject to credit risk or the risk of
default or non-performance by the counterparty. Swaps could
result in losses if interest rate or foreign currency exchange
rates or credit quality changes are not correctly anticipated by
the Fund or if the reference index, security or investments do
not perform as expected.
Inverse Floaters. Inverse floating rate
obligations are obligations which pay interest at rates that
vary inversely with changes in market rates of interest. Because
the interest rate paid to holders of such obligations is
generally determined by subtracting a variable or floating rate
from a predetermined amount, the interest rate paid to holders
of such obligations will decrease as such variable or floating
rate increases and increase as such variable or floating rate
decreases. Like most other fixed-income securities, the value of
inverse floaters will decrease as interest rates increase. They
are more volatile, however, than most other fixed-income
securities because the coupon rate on an inverse floater
typically changes at a multiple of the change in the relevant
index rate. Thus, any rise in the index rate (as a consequence
of an increase in interest rates) causes a correspondingly
greater drop in the coupon rate of an inverse floater while a
drop in the index rate causes a correspondingly greater increase
in the coupon of an inverse floater. Some inverse floaters may
also increase or decrease substantially because of changes in
the rate of prepayments.
Inverse Floating Rate Municipal
Obligations. The inverse floating rate municipal
obligations in which the Fund may invest include derivative
instruments such as residual interest bonds (RIBs)
or tender option bonds (TOBs). Such instruments are
typically created by a special purpose trust that holds
long-term fixed rate bonds and sells two classes of beneficial
interests: short-term floating rate interests, which are sold to
third party investors, and inverse floating residual interests,
which are purchased by the Fund. The short-term floating rate
interests have first priority on the cash flow from the bond
held by the special purpose trust and the Fund is paid the
residual cash flow from the bond held by the special purpose
trust.
Inverse floating rate investments are variable debt instruments
that pay interest at rates that move in the opposite direction
of prevailing interest rates. Inverse floating rate investments
tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising
interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for
fixed rate bonds when interest rates decline or remain
relatively stable. Inverse floating rate investments have
varying degrees of liquidity.
The Fund generally invests in inverse floating rate investments
that include embedded leverage, thus exposing the Fund to
greater risks and increased costs. The market value of a
leveraged inverse floating
33
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Revised
Investment Policies
(unaudited) continued
rate investment generally will fluctuate in response to changes
in market rates of interest to a greater extent than the value
of an unleveraged investment. The extent of increases and
decreases in the value of inverse floating rate investments
generally will be larger than changes in an equal principal
amount of a fixed rate security having similar credit quality,
redemption provisions and maturity, which may cause the
Funds net asset value to be more volatile than if it had
not invested in inverse floating rate investments.
In certain instances, the short-term floating rate interests
created by the trust may not be able to be sold to third parties
or, in the case of holders tendering (or putting) such interests
for repayment of principal, may not be able to be remarketed to
third parties. In such cases, the trust holding the long-term
fixed rate bonds may be collapsed. In the case of floaters
created by the Fund, the Fund will then be required to repay the
principal amount of the tendered securities. During times of
market volatility, illiquidity or uncertainty, the Fund could be
required to sell other portfolio holdings at a disadvantageous
time to raise cash to meet that obligation.
34
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
Portfolio
Management (unaudited)
As of the date of this report, the Fund is managed by members of
the Morgan Stanley Municipals team. The team consists of
portfolio managers and analysts. Current members of the team
jointly and primarily responsible for the
day-to-day
management of the Funds portfolio are William D.
Black, Mark Paris, James D. Phillips and Robert J. Stryker,
each an Executive Director of the Investment Adviser.
Mr. Black has been associated with the Investment Adviser
in an investment management capacity since 1998 and began
managing the Fund in December 2009. Mr. Paris has been
associated with the Investment Adviser in an investment
management capacity since 2002 and began managing the Fund in
December 2009. Mr. Phillips has been associated with the
Investment Adviser in an investment management capacity since
1991 and began managing the Fund in December 2009.
Mr. Stryker has been associated with the Investment Adviser
in an investment management capacity since 1994 and began
managing the Fund in September 2007.
35
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
An Important
Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy Policy (unaudited)
We are required by federal law to provide you with a copy of our
privacy policy (Policy) annually.
This Policy applies to current and former individual clients of
certain Morgan Stanley closed-end funds and related companies.
This Policy is not applicable to partnerships, corporations,
trusts or other non-individual clients or account holders, nor
is this Policy applicable to individuals who are either
beneficiaries of a trust for which we serve as trustee or
participants in an employee benefit plan administered or advised
by us. This Policy is, however, applicable to individuals who
select us to be a custodian of securities or assets in
individual retirement accounts, 401(k) accounts, 529 Educational
Savings Accounts, accounts subject to the Uniform Gifts to
Minors Act, or similar accounts. We may amend this Policy at any
time, and will inform you of any changes to this Policy as
required by law.
We Respect Your
Privacy
We appreciate that you have provided us with your personal
financial information and understand your concerns about
safeguarding such information. We strive to maintain the privacy
of such information while we help you achieve your financial
objectives. This Policy describes what
non-public
personal information we collect about you, how we collect it,
when we may share it with others, and how others may use it. It
discusses the steps you may take to limit our sharing of
information about you with affiliated Morgan Stanley companies
(affiliated companies). It also discloses how you
may limit our affiliates use of shared information for
marketing purposes. Throughout this Policy, we refer to the
non-public
information that personally identifies you or your accounts as
personal information.
|
|
1.
|
What Personal
Information Do We Collect About You?
|
To better serve you and manage our business, it is important
that we collect and maintain accurate information about you. We
obtain this information from applications and other forms you
submit to us, from your dealings with us, from consumer
reporting agencies, from our websites and from third parties and
other sources.
For
example:
|
|
|
We collect information such as your name, address,
e-mail
address, telephone/fax numbers, assets, income and investment
objectives through application forms you submit to us.
|
|
|
We may obtain information about account balances, your use of
account(s) and the types of products and services you prefer to
receive from us through your dealings and transactions with us
and other sources.
|
|
|
We may obtain information about your creditworthiness and credit
history from consumer reporting agencies.
|
36
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
An Important
Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy Policy
(unaudited) continued
|
|
|
We may collect background information from and through
third-party vendors to verify representations you have made and
to comply with various regulatory requirements.
|
|
|
If you interact with us through our public and private Web
sites, we may collect information that you provide directly
through online communications (such as an
e-mail
address). We may also collect information about your Internet
service provider, your domain name, your computers
operating system and Web browser, your use of our Web sites and
your product and service preferences, through the use of
cookies. Cookies recognize your computer
each time you return to one of our sites, and help to improve
our sites content and personalize your experience on our
sites by, for example, suggesting offerings that may interest
you. Please consult the Terms of Use of these sites for more
details on our use of cookies.
|
|
|
2.
|
When Do We
Disclose Personal Information We Collect About You?
|
To provide you with the products and services you request, to
better serve you, to manage our business and as otherwise
required or permitted by law, we may disclose personal
information we collect about you to other affiliated companies
and to
non-affiliated
third parties.
A. Information We Disclose to Our Affiliated
Companies. In order to manage your account(s)
effectively, including servicing and processing your
transactions, to let you know about products and services
offered by us and affiliated companies, to manage our business,
and as otherwise required or permitted by law, we may disclose
personal information about you to other affiliated companies.
Offers for products and services from affiliated companies are
developed under conditions designed to safeguard your personal
information.
B. Information We Disclose to Third
Parties. We do not disclose personal information
that we collect about you to
non-affiliated
third parties except to enable them to provide marketing
services on our behalf, to perform joint marketing agreements
with other financial institutions, and as otherwise required or
permitted by law. For example, some instances where we may
disclose information about you to third parties include: for
servicing and processing transactions, to offer our own products
and services, to protect against fraud, for institutional risk
control, to respond to judicial process or to perform services
on our behalf. When we share personal information with a
non-affiliated
third party, they are required to limit their use of personal
information about you to the particular purpose for which it was
shared and they are not allowed to share personal information
about you with others except to fulfill that limited purpose or
as may be required by law.
|
|
3.
|
How Do We Protect
the Security and Confidentiality of Personal Information We
Collect About You?
|
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural security
measures to help safeguard the personal information we collect
about you. We have internal policies governing the proper
handling of client information. Third parties that provide
support or marketing services on our behalf may also receive
personal information about you, and we require them to adhere to
confidentiality standards with respect to such information.
37
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
An Important
Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy Policy
(unaudited) continued
|
|
4.
|
How Can You Limit
our Sharing Of Certain Personal Information About You With Our
Affiliated Companies for Eligibility Determination?
|
We respect your privacy and offer you choices as to whether we
share with our affiliated companies personal information that
was collected to determine your eligibility for products and
services such as credit reports and other information that you
have provided to us or that we may obtain from third parties
(eligibility information). Please note that, even if
you direct us not to share certain eligibility information with
our affiliated companies, we may still share your personal
information, including eligibility information, with those
companies under circumstances that are permitted under
applicable law, such as to process transactions or to service
your account. We may also share certain other types of personal
information with affiliated companies such as your
name, address, telephone number,
e-mail
address and account number(s), and information about your
transactions and experiences with us.
|
|
5.
|
How Can You Limit
the Use of Certain Personal Information About You by our
Affiliated Companies for Marketing?
|
You may limit our affiliated companies from using certain
personal information about you that we may share with them for
marketing their products or services to you. This information
includes our transactions and other experiences with you such as
your assets and account history. Please note that, even if you
choose to limit our affiliated companies from using certain
personal information about you that we may share with them for
marketing their products and services to you, we may still share
such personal information about you with them, including our
transactions and experiences with you, for other purposes as
permitted under applicable law.
6. How Can You
Send Us an Opt-Out Instruction?
If you wish to limit our sharing of certain personal information
about you with our affiliated companies for eligibility
purposes and for our affiliated companies use in
marketing products and services to you as described in this
notice, you may do so by:
|
|
|
Calling us at
(888) 421-4015
Monday-Friday between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m. (EST)
|
|
|
Writing to us at the following address:
Morgan Stanley Closed-End Privacy Department
Harborside Financial Center, Plaza Two, 3rd Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07311
|
If you choose to write to us, your written request should
include: your name, address, telephone number and account
number(s) to which the opt-out applies and should not be sent
with any other correspondence. In order to process your request,
we require that the request be provided by you directly and not
through a third party. Once you have informed us about your
privacy preferences, your opt-out preference will remain in
38
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income
Opportunities Trust
An Important
Notice Concerning Our U.S. Privacy Policy
(unaudited) continued
effect with respect to this Policy (as it may be amended) until
you notify us otherwise. If you are a joint account owner, we
will accept instructions from any one of you and apply those
instructions to the entire account. Please allow approximately
30 days from our receipt of your opt-out for your
instructions to become effective.
Please understand that if you opt-out, you and any joint account
holders may not receive certain Morgan Stanley or our affiliated
companies products and services that could help you manage
your financial resources and achieve your investment objectives.
If you have more than one account with us or our affiliates, you
may receive multiple privacy policies from us, and would need to
follow the directions stated in each particular policy for each
account you have with us.
Special Notice to
Residents of Vermont
This section supplements our Policy with respect to our
individual clients who have a Vermont address and supersedes
anything to the contrary in the above Policy with respect to
those clients only.
The State of Vermont requires financial institutions to obtain
your consent prior to sharing personal information that they
collect about you with affiliated companies and non-affiliated
third parties other than in certain limited circumstances.
Except as permitted by law, we will not share personal
information we collect about you with
non-affiliated
third parties or other affiliated companies unless you provide
us with your written consent to share such information
(opt-in).
If you wish to receive offers for investment products and
services offered by or through other affiliated companies,
please notify us in writing at the following address:
Morgan Stanley Closed-End Privacy Department
Harborside Financial Center, Plaza Two, 3rd Floor
Jersey City, NJ 07311
Your authorization should include: your name, address, telephone
number and account number(s) to which the opt-in applies and
should not be sent with any other correspondence. In order to
process your authorization, we require that the authorization be
provided by you directly and not through a
third-party.
39
Trustees
Michael Bozic
Kathleen A. Dennis
James F. Higgins
Dr. Manuel H. Johnson
Joseph J. Kearns
Michael F. Klein
Michael E. Nugent
W. Allen Reed
Fergus Reid
Officers
Chairperson of the
Board
Randy Takian
President
and Principal
Executive Officer
Kevin Klingert
Vice President
Carsten Otto
Chief Compliance
Officer
Stefanie V. Chang Yu
Vice President
Francis J. Smith
Treasurer
and Chief Financial
Officer
Mary E. Mullin
Secretary
Transfer Agent
Computershare
Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, RI 02940-3078
Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
Two World Financial Center
New York, New York 10281
Legal Counsel
1095 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Counsel to the Independent
Trustees
Kramer
Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
1177 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10036
Investment Adviser
Morgan
Stanley Investment Advisors Inc.
522 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10036
The financial statements included herein have been taken from
the records of the Fund without examination by the independent
auditors and accordingly they do not express an opinion thereon.
(c)
2010 Morgan Stanley
INVESTMENT
MANAGEMENT
Morgan
Stanley
Municipal
Income Opportunities Trust
NYSE : OIA
Semiannual
Report
November 30,
2009
OIASAN
IU10-00101P-Y11/09
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 6.
(a) Refer to Item 1.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable for semiannual reports.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Applicable only to reports filed by closed-end funds.
Item 9. Closed-End Fund Repurchases
REGISTRANT PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total |
|
Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or |
|
Dollar Value) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units) |
|
of Shares (or |
|
|
(a) Total |
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
Units) that May |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be |
|
|
Shares (or |
|
(b) Average |
|
Announced |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Units) |
|
Price Paid per |
|
Plans or |
|
Under the Plans |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
Share (or Unit) |
|
Programs |
|
or Programs |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
mo-da-year
mo-da-year
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
N/A |
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) The Trusts/Funds principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded
that the Trusts/Funds disclosure controls and procedures are sufficient to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the Trust/Fund in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms, based upon such officers evaluation of these controls and procedures
as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of the report.
2
(b) There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
(a) Code of Ethics Not applicable for semiannual reports.
(b) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the registrant are attached hereto as part of EX-99.CERT.
3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Morgan Stanley Municipal Income Opportunities Trust
/s/ Randy Takian
Randy Takian
Principal Executive Officer
January 21, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company
Act of 1940, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and
in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ Randy Takian
Ronald E. Robison
Principal Executive Officer
January 21, 2010
/s/ Francis Smith
Francis Smith
Principal Financial Officer
January 21, 2010
4