e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-34693
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
27-1200777 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
50 Cocoanut Row, Suite 216
Palm Beach, Florida
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
33480
(Zip Code) |
(561) 802-4477
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. o Yes þ No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o | |
Accelerated filer o | |
Non-accelerated filer þ | |
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at May 9, 2011 |
Common Shares of Beneficial Interest ($0.01 par value per share)
|
|
|
13,820,854 |
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
3 |
|
Item 2.
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
15 |
|
Item 3.
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
|
|
23 |
|
Item 4.
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
24 |
|
Item 1A.
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
24 |
|
Item 2.
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
24 |
|
Item 3.
|
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
|
|
24 |
|
Item 4.
|
|
Removed and Reserved
|
|
|
24 |
|
Item 5.
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
24 |
|
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
24 |
|
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements. |
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December, 31 |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in hotel properties, net |
|
$ |
211,709 |
|
|
$ |
208,080 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
30,916 |
|
|
|
4,768 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
3,411 |
|
|
|
3,018 |
|
Hotel receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of approximately $4 and $15, respectively) |
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
Deferred costs, net |
|
|
4,072 |
|
|
|
4,710 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
252,492 |
|
|
$ |
222,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
$ |
12,252 |
|
|
$ |
50,133 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
5,119 |
|
|
|
5,248 |
|
Distributions payable |
|
|
2,464 |
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
19,835 |
|
|
|
57,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized and unissued at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized;
13,820,854 and 9,208,750 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
239,861 |
|
|
|
170,250 |
|
Unearned compensation |
|
|
(1,040 |
) |
|
|
(1,162 |
) |
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(6,878 |
) |
|
|
(4,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
232,081 |
|
|
|
164,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling Interest in Operating Partnership |
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
232,657 |
|
|
|
165,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
252,492 |
|
|
$ |
222,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Consolidated Statement of Operations
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
Room |
|
$ |
12,139 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
12,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
Hotel operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
Room |
|
|
2,994 |
|
Other operating |
|
|
4,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total hotel operating expenses |
|
|
7,908 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,444 |
|
Property taxes and insurance |
|
|
1,032 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,268 |
|
Hotel property acquisition costs |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
11,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
750 |
|
Interest and other income |
|
|
6 |
|
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred fees |
|
|
(773 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss before income tax expense |
|
|
(17 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per Common Share Basic: |
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders (Note 11) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per Common Share Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders (Note 11) |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
11,800,771 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
11,800,771 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(In thousands, except share data)
(unaduited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Interest in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Unearned |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Shareholders |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Partnership |
|
|
Equity |
|
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
|
|
9,208,750 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
170,250 |
|
|
$ |
(1,162 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,441 |
) |
|
$ |
164,739 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
165,164 |
|
Issuance of shares pursuant to Equity Incentive Plan |
|
|
12,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
Issuance of shares, net of offering costs of $4,153 |
|
|
4,600,000 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
69,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,447 |
|
Amortization of share based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
Dividends declared on common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,418 |
) |
|
|
(2,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,418 |
) |
Distributions declared on LTIP units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2011 |
|
|
13,820,854 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
239,861 |
|
|
$ |
(1,040 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,878 |
) |
|
$ |
232,081 |
|
|
$ |
576 |
|
|
$ |
232,657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
1,431 |
|
Amortization of deferred franchise fees |
|
|
13 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing fees included in interest costs |
|
|
307 |
|
Share based compensation |
|
|
243 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Hotel receivables |
|
|
(312 |
) |
Deferred costs |
|
|
355 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(446 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
Improvements and additions to hotel properties |
|
|
(4,235 |
) |
Restricted cash |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(4,628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
Payments of secured debt |
|
|
(37,800 |
) |
Payments of debt |
|
|
(81 |
) |
Payment of financing costs |
|
|
(37 |
) |
Payment of offering costs |
|
|
(4,153 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of common shares |
|
|
73,600 |
|
Distributions-common shares/units |
|
|
(1,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
29,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
26,148 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
4,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
30,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
447 |
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing information: |
|
The Company has accrued distributions payable of $2,464. These
distributions were paid on April 15, 2011. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company issued 12,104 shares to its independent Trustees pursuant
to the Companys Equity Incentive Plan as compensation for services performed in 2010.
Accrued share based compensation of $210
was included in Accounts payable and accrued expense as of
December 31, 2010. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(unaudited)
1. Organization
Chatham Lodging Trust was formed as a Maryland real estate investment trust on October 26,
2009 and intends to elect to qualify as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for U.S. federal
income tax purposes beginning with its short taxable year ended December 31, 2010. We are
internally-managed and were organized to invest primarily in premium-branded upscale extended-stay
and select-service hotels.
We completed our initial public offering (the IPO) on April 21, 2010. The IPO resulted in
the sale of 8,625,000 common shares at $20.00 price per share, generating $172.5 million in gross
proceeds. Net proceeds, after underwriters discounts and commissions and other offering costs,
were approximately $158.7 million. Concurrently with the closing of the IPO, in a separate private
placement pursuant to Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities
Act), we sold 500,000 of our common shares to Jeffrey H. Fisher, our Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer, at the public offering price of $20.00 per share, for proceeds of $10.0 million.
On February 8, 2011, we completed a public offering that resulted in the sale of 4,600,000
common shares at $16.00 per share, generating $73.6 million in gross proceeds. Net proceeds, after
underwriters discounts and commissions and other offering costs, were approximately $69.4 million.
We had no operations prior to the consummation of the IPO. Following the closing of the IPO,
we contributed the net proceeds from the IPO and the concurrent private placement, together with
the proceeds of our February 2011 offering, to Chatham Lodging, L.P. (the Operating Partnership)
in exchange for partnership interests in the Operating Partnership. Substantially all of our assets
are held by and all of our operations are conducted through the Operating Partnership. Chatham
Lodging Trust is the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership and owns 100% of the common
units of the limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership. Certain of our executive
officers hold unvested long-term incentive plan units in the Operating Partnership, which are
presented as noncontrolling interests on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
As of March 31, 2011, we owned 13 hotels with an aggregate of 1,650 rooms located in 9 states.
To qualify as a REIT, we cannot operate the hotels. Therefore, the Operating Partnership and its
subsidiaries lease the hotels to wholly owned lessee subsidiaries of our taxable REIT subsidiaries
(TRS Lessees). Each hotel is leased to a TRS under a percentage lease that provides for rental
payments equal to the greater of (i) a fixed base rent amount or (ii) a percentage rent based on
hotel room revenue. The initial term of each of the TRS leases is 5 years. Lease revenue from each
TRS Lessee is eliminated in consolidation. Our TRS Lessees have entered into management agreements
with third party management companies that provide day-to-day management for our hotels. Island
Hospitality Management Inc. (IHM), which is 90% owned by Mr. Fisher, manages 5 hotels, Homewood
Suites Management LLC (IAH Manager), a subsidiary of Hilton Worldwide Inc. (Hilton) manages 6
hotels and Concord Hospitality Enterprises Company (Concord) manages 2 hotels.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements and related notes have been prepared
in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and in conformity with
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) applicable to interim
financial information. These unaudited consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of
management, include all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the
consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of operations, consolidated statements of
equity, and consolidated statement of cash flows for the periods presented. Interim results are not
necessarily indicative of full year performance due to seasonal and other factors.
The consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in
consolidation. The accompanying unaudited
7
consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP, and the
related notes thereto as of December 31, 2010, which are included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the balance
sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
3. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 2010, the FASB issued updated accounting guidance to clarify that pro forma
disclosures should be presented as if a business combination occurred at the beginning of the prior
annual period for purposes of preparing both the current reporting period and the prior reporting
period pro forma financial information. These disclosures should be accompanied by a narrative
description about the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments. The new
accounting guidance is effective for business combinations consummated in periods beginning after
December 14, 2010, and should be applied prospectively as of the date of adoption. Early adoption
is permitted. We have adopted the new disclosures as of January 1, 2011. We do not believe that
the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
4. Acquisition of Hotel Properties
Acquisition of Hotel Properties
No acquisitions were completed in the three months ended March 31, 2011. The Company
incurred acquisition costs of $85 during the three months ended March, 31, 2011.
5. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts at a level believed to be adequate to
absorb estimated probable losses. That estimate is based on past loss experience, current economic
and market conditions and other relevant factors. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $4
and $15 as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
6. Investment in Hotel Properties
Investment in hotel properties as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
24,620 |
|
|
$ |
24,620 |
|
Building and improvements |
|
|
176,670 |
|
|
|
176,354 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
6,301 |
|
|
|
6,138 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
8,084 |
|
|
|
3,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215,675 |
|
|
|
210,617 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(3,966 |
) |
|
|
(2,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in hotel properties, net |
|
$ |
211,709 |
|
|
$ |
208,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Debt
Each of the Companys mortgage loans is secured by a first-mortgage lien on the underlying
property. The mortgages are non-recourse to the Company except for fraud or misapplication of
funds. Mortgage debt consisted of the following as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in
thousands):
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Outstanding as of |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Collateral |
|
Rate |
|
|
Date |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Courtyard by Marriott Altoona, PA |
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
April 1, 2016 |
|
$ |
6,881 |
|
|
$ |
6,924 |
|
Springhill Suites by Marriott Washington, PA |
|
|
5.84 |
% |
|
April 1, 2015 |
|
|
5,371 |
|
|
|
5,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,252 |
|
|
$ |
12,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company estimates the fair value of its fixed rate debt by discounting the future
cash flows of each instrument at estimated market rates. Rates take into consideration general
market conditions and maturity. The estimated fair value of the Companys debt as of March 31, 2011
and December 31, 2010 was $12,461 and $12,574, respectively.
On October 12, 2010, we entered into a senior secured revolving credit facility to fund future acquisition,
redevelopment and expansion activities. At March 31, 2011, we had no outstanding borrowings under this credit
facility. At March 31, 2011, there were eleven properties in the borrowing base under the credit agreement and the
maximum borrowing availability under the revolving credit facility was $67.1 million.
As of March 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants.
Future scheduled principal payments of debt obligations as of March 31, 2011 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
253 |
|
2012 |
|
|
354 |
|
2013 |
|
|
375 |
|
2014 |
|
|
398 |
|
2015 |
|
|
4,958 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
5,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
8. Income Taxes
The Companys TRSs are subject to federal and state income taxes. The Companys TRSs are
structured under one of two TRS holding companies that are treated separately for income tax
purposes (TRS 1 and TRS 2, respectively). The consolidated income tax expense is solely
attributable to the taxable income of TRS 2. TRS 1 has future income
taxable deductions of $1.0
million related to accumulated net operating losses and the gross deferred tax asset associated
with these future tax deductions is $0.4 million. TRS 1 has recorded a valuation allowance equal
to 100% of the gross deferred tax asset due to the uncertainty of realizing the benefit of this
asset due to the TRSs limited operating history and the taxable losses incurred by TRS 1 since its
inception.
The components of income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The tax effect of each type of temporary difference and carry forward that gives rise to the
deferred tax asset as of March 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Deferred tax assets: |
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards |
|
$ |
406 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Dividends Declared and Paid
The Company declared common share dividends of $0.175 per share and distributions on LTIP
units of $0.175 per unit for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The dividends and distributions
were paid on April 15, 2011 to common shareholders and LTIP unitholders of record on March 31, 2011. The Company paid
dividends declared for the fourth quarter of 2010 on January 14, 2011.
10. Shareholders Equity
Common Shares
The Company is authorized to issue up to 500,000,000 common shares of beneficial interest
(common shares), $.01 par value per share. Each outstanding common share entitles the holder to
one vote on all matters submitted to a vote of shareholders. Holders of the Companys common shares
are entitled to receive dividends when authorized by our board of trustees.
Preferred Shares
The Company is authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 preferred shares, $.01 par value per
share.
Operating Partnership Units
When issued, holders of Operating Partnership common units will have certain redemption rights, which
will enable the unit holders to cause the Operating Partnership to redeem their units in exchange
for, at the Companys option, cash per unit equal to the market price of the Companys common
shares, at the time of redemption or for the Companys common shares on a one-for-one basis. The
number of shares issuable upon exercise of the redemption rights will be adjusted upon the
occurrence of share splits, mergers, consolidations or similar pro-rata share transactions, which
otherwise would have the effect of diluting the ownership interests of our limited partners or our
shareholders. As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were no Operating Partnership common units
held by unaffiliated third parties. At March 31, 2011, an aggregate of 257,775 LTIP units are held by
executive officers. The LTIP units are entitled to receive per unit distributions equal to the per share
distributions paid on common shares.
The Company completed a public offering of common shares on February 8, 2011. The offering
resulted in the sale of 4,600,000 common shares at a $16.00 price per share generating $73.6
million in gross proceeds. Net proceeds were approximately $69.4 million after underwriters
discounts and commissions and other offering costs paid to third parties. As of March 31, 2011,
13,820,854 common shares were outstanding.
11. Earnings Per Share
The following is a reconciliation of the amounts used in calculating basic and diluted net
loss per share (in thousands, except share and per share data):
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
Dividends paid on unvested restricted shares |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Undistributed earnings attributable to unvested
restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders excluding
amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares |
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares basic |
|
|
11,800,771 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted shares (1) |
|
|
|
|
Compensation-related shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares diluted |
|
|
11,800,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Earnings per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
per weighted average common share excluding
amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Common Share: |
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders
per weighted average common share excluding
amounts attributable to unvested restricted shares |
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Anti-dilutive for all periods presented. |
12. Equity Incentive Plan
The Company maintains the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan to attract and retain independent
trustees, executive officers and other key employees and service providers. The plan provides for
the grant of options to purchase common shares, share awards, share appreciation rights,
performance units and other equity-based awards. Share awards under this plan generally vest over
three to five years, though the independent trustees share compensation includes shares granted
that vest immediately. The Company pays dividends on unvested shares and units. Certain awards may
provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control. In January 2011, the Company
issued 12,104 common shares to its independent trustees as compensation for services performed in
2010. A portion of the Companys share-based compensation to the Companys trustees for the year
ended December 31, 2011 will be distributed in January of 2012 in the form of common shares. The
quantity of shares will be calculated based on the average closing prices for the Companys common
shares on the NYSE for the last ten trading days preceding the reporting date. The Company would
have distributed 4,621 common shares had the liability classified award been satisfied as of March
31, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, there were 211,730 common shares available for issuance under the
2010 Equity Incentive Plan.
Restricted Share Awards
The Company measures compensation expense for restricted share awards based upon the fair
market value of its common shares at the date of grant. Compensation expense is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period and is included in general and administrative expense
in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company will pay dividends on
nonvested restricted shares.
11
A summary of the Companys restricted share awards for the three months ended March 31, 2011
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted - |
|
|
Number of |
|
Average Grant |
|
|
Shares |
|
Date Fair Value |
Nonvested at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
76,550 |
|
|
$ |
19.04 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2011 |
|
|
76,550 |
|
|
$ |
19.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, there were $1.1 million and $1.2 million,
respectively, of unrecognized compensation costs related to restricted share awards. As of March
31, 2011, these costs were expected to be recognized over a weightedaverage period of
approximately 2.1 years. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company recognized
approximately $0.1 million, in expense related to the restricted share awards. This expense is
included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
Long-Term Incentive Plan Units
LTIP Units are a special class of partnership interests in the Operating Partnership which may
be issued to eligible participants for the performance of services to or for the benefit of the
Company. Under the Equity Incentive Plan, each LTIP Unit issued is deemed equivalent to an award of
one common share thereby reducing the availability for other equity awards on a one-for-one basis.
The Company will not receive a tax deduction for the value of any LTIP Units granted to employees.
LTIP Units, whether vested or not, will receive the same per unit profit distributions as other
outstanding units of the Operating Partnership, which profit distribution will generally equal per
share dividends on the Companys common shares. Initially, LTIP Units have a capital account
balance of zero, and will not have full parity with common Operating Partnership units with respect
to liquidating distributions. The Operating Partnership will revalue its assets upon the occurrence
of certain specified events and any increase in valuation will be allocated first to the holders of
LTIP Units to equalize the capital accounts of such holders with the capital accounts of the
Operating Partnership unit holders. If such parity is reached, vested LTIP Units may be converted,
at any time, into an equal number of common units of limited partnership interest in the Operating
Partnership (OP Units), which may be redeemed, at the option of the holder,
for cash or at the Companys option, an equivalent number of the Companys common shares.
On April 21, 2010, the Companys Operating Partnership granted 246,960 LTIP Units to the
Companys executive officers pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan, all of which are accounted for
in accordance with FASB Codification Topic (ASC) 718, Stock Compensation. The LTIP Units
granted to the Companys executive officers vest ratably over a five-year period beginning on the
date of grant. On September 9, 2010, the Companys Operating Partnership granted 26,250 LTIP units
to the Companys new CFO and 15,435 LTIP units granted to the Companys former CFO were forfeited.
The LTIP Units fair value was determined by using a discounted value approach. In determining
the discounted value of the LTIP Units, the Company considered the inherent uncertainty that the
LTIP Units would never reach parity with the other OP Units and thus have an economic value of zero
to the grantee. Additional factors considered in reaching the assumptions of uncertainty included
discounts for illiquidity; expectations for future dividends; no operating history as of the date
of the grant; significant dependency on the efforts and services of our executive officers and
other key members of management to implement the Companys business plan; available acquisition
opportunities; and economic environment and conditions. The Company used an expected stabilized
dividend yield of 5.0% and a risk free interest rate of 2.33% based on a five-year U.S. Treasury
yield.
The Company recorded $0.2 million in compensation expense related to the LTIP Units for the
three months ended March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, there was $3.2 million of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to LTIP Units. This cost is expected to be recognized over
4.1 years, which represents the weighted average remaining vesting period of the LTIP Units. As of
March 31, 2011, none of the LTIP Units have reached parity.
13. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
The nature of the operations of the hotels exposes the hotels, the Company and the Operating
Partnership to the risk of claims and litigation in the normal course of their business. The
Company is not presently subject to any material litigation
nor, to the Companys knowledge, is any litigation threatened.
12
Hotel Ground Rent
The Altoona hotel is subject to a ground lease with an expiration date of April 30, 2029 with
an extension option of up to 12 additional terms of five years each. Monthly payments are determined by the
quarterly average room occupancy of the hotel. Rent is equal to approximately $6 per month
when monthly occupancy is less than 85% and can increase up to approximately $20 per month
if occupancy is 100%, with minimum rent increased on an annual basis by two and one-half percent
(2.5%).
In connection with the New Rochelle hotel, there is an air rights lease and garage lease that
expire on December 1, 2104. The lease agreements with the City of New Rochelle cover the space
above the parking garage that is occupied by the hotel as well as 128 parking spaces in a parking
garage that is attached to the hotel. The annual base rent for the leases is the Companys
proportionate share of the citys adopted budget for the operations, management and maintenance of
the garage and established reserves fund for the cost of capital repairs. Total lease payments for
the three months ended March 31, 2011 were $29.
The following is a schedule of the minimum future obligation payments required under the ground
lease (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
$ |
151 |
|
2012 |
|
|
203 |
|
2013 |
|
|
205 |
|
2014 |
|
|
207 |
|
2015 |
|
|
210 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
11,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14. Related Party Transactions
Mr. Fisher owns 90% of Island Hospitality Management, Inc. (IHM), a hotel management
company. The Company has entered into hotel management agreements with IHM to manage five of its
hotels. Management and accounting fees paid to IHM for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were
$0.2 million.
15. Subsequent Events
On May 3, 2011, a joint venture between Cerberus Capital Management and Chatham Lodging LP
(JV) was selected as the winning bidder in a bankruptcy court auction related to 64 of Innkeepers
USA Trusts (the Sellers) hotels. Under the terms of the winning bid, the JV will be the plan sponsor
to acquire the hotels for a total purchase price of approximately $1.125 billion, including the
assumption of debt through a plan of reorganization. The Company will fund its investment in the
joint venture with available cash and borrowings under Chathams secured revolving credit facility.
Completion of these transactions is pursuant to the Sellers Plan of Reorganization for the
joint venture and contingent upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including the entry of the
Confirmation Order by the Bankruptcy Court with respect to such plan.
Also, on May 3, 2011, the Company was selected as the winning bidder in a bankruptcy court
auction related to five additional hotels owned by affiliates of the
Seller. The Company has
executed a purchase agreement with the Seller to acquire the following five hotels, comprising 764
rooms in the aggregate, for $195 million, or $255,000 per room:
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel |
|
Rooms |
Residence Inn Anaheim Garden Grove, CA |
|
|
200 |
|
Residence Inn San Diego Mission Valley, CA |
|
|
192 |
|
Residence Inn Tysons Corner, VA |
|
|
121 |
|
Doubletree Guest Suites Washington D.C. |
|
|
105 |
|
Homewood Suites San Antonio Riverwalk, TX |
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The five-hotel acquisition will be funded through the assumption of five individual loans
aggregating $134.2 million at a weighted average interest rate of 6 percent and maturity dates in
2016 with the remainder funded from borrowings under the Companys secured revolving credit
facility. The five loans will amortize based on a 30-year amortization period, other than the loan
related to the hotel in Garden Grove which will be interest only for the first two years after
closing.
13
Completion of these transactions is pursuant to the Sellers Plan of Reorganization for the five
hotels and contingent upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including the entry of a
Confirmation Order by the Bankruptcy Court with respect to such plan. The Seller will file a
motion with the Bankruptcy Court seeking the approval of the break-up fees and expense
reimbursements totaling $2.5 million which would be payable to the Company, if, among other
reasons, the Seller terminates the purchase agreement. The Seller has scheduled a hearing to
approve the Plan of Reorganization for June 23, 2011, and assuming the Confirmation Order is
entered into at such time, the Company would expect to close shortly thereafter.
All but one of the 69 hotels to be owned by the joint venture or the Company will continue to be
managed after closing by Island Hospitality Management, a hotel management company 90 percent-owned by Jeff
Fisher.
The
Company also amended its $85 million secured revolving credit facility effective May 2011. The amendment
provides for an increase to the allowable consolidated leverage ratio to 60 percent through 2012,
reducing to 55 percent in 2013; and a decrease to the consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio from
2.3x to 1.7x through March 2012, increasing to 1.75x through December 2012 and 2.0x in 2013.
Subject to certain conditions, the credit facility still has an accordion feature that provides the
Company with the ability to increase the facility to $110 million, subject to Lender approval.
14
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition. |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
The following information contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements
include information about possible or assumed future results of the lodging industry, our business,
financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, cash flow and plans and objectives. These
statements generally are characterized by the use of the words believe, expect, anticipate,
estimate, plan, continue, intend, should, may or similar expressions. Although we
believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon
reasonable assumptions, our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the
forward-looking statements. Some factors that might cause such a difference include the following:
the current global economic downturn, increased direct competition, changes in government
regulations or accounting rules, changes in local, national and global real estate conditions,
declines in the lodging industry, seasonality of the lodging industry, our ability to obtain lines
of credit or permanent financing on satisfactory terms, changes in interest rates, availability of
proceeds from offerings of our equity securities, our ability to identify suitable investments, our
ability to close on identified investments and inaccuracies of our accounting estimates. Given
these uncertainties, undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no
obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements
that may be made to reflect future events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of
unanticipated events. The forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risk factors
identified in the Risk Factors section in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2010, as updated elsewhere in this report.
Overview
We are a self-advised hotel investment company organized in October 2009. Our investment
strategy is to invest in premium-branded upscale extended-stay and select-service hotels in
geographically diverse markets with high barriers to entry near strong demand generators. We may
acquire portfolios of hotels or single hotel transactions. We expect that a significant portion of
our portfolio will consist of hotels in the upscale extended-stay or select-service categories,
including brands such as Homewood Suites by Hilton®, Residence Inn by
Marriott®, Summerfield Suites by Hyatt®, Courtyard by Marriott®,
Hampton Inn® and Hampton Inn and Suites®.
We focus on
premium-branded, select-service hotels in high growth markets with high barriers to entry
concentrated primarily in the 25 largest MSAs. We believe the opportunities to acquire our target
hotels are very attractive based on the belief that we are in the early stages of a lodging
recovery.
In February, we completed a $73.6
million follow-on common share equity offering, adding further strength and flexibility to our
balance sheet. With the funds we have available for investment, we have developed an active
pipeline with well over $200 million in potential acquisitions.
Our goal is to maintain our long-term leverage at a ratio of net debt to investment in hotels
(at cost) at less than 35 percent. However, at this early stage of the lodging cycle recovery, we
may temporarily increase our leverage to take advantage of available opportunities.
In the 2011 second quarter, our Board of Trustees approved the increase in our targeted leverage to
less than 55 percent.
Future growth through acquisitions will be funded by both issuances of common and preferred shares,
draw-downs under our credit facility, as well as the incurrence or assumption of individually
secured hotel debt at interest rates which we believe are at historically low levels.
We believe 2011 and beyond will be excellent growth years for the industry and for Chatham.
We intend to acquire quality assets at attractive prices, improve their returns through
knowledgeable asset management and seasoned, proven hotel management while remaining prudently leveraged.
15
We intend to elect to qualify for treatment as a real estate investment trust (REIT) for
federal income tax purposes. In order to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended (the Code), we cannot operate the hotels that we acquire. Therefore, our operating
partnership, Chatham Lodging, L.P. (the Operating Partnership), and its subsidiaries will lease
our hotel properties to lessee subsidiaries (TRS Lessees) of our taxable REIT subsidiaries
(TRS), who will in turn engage eligible independent contractors to manage the hotels. Each of
these lessees will be treated as a taxable REIT subsidiary for federal income tax purposes and will
be evaluated for consolidation within our financial statements for accounting purposes. However,
since we will control both the Operating Partnership and the TRS Lessees, our principal source of
funds on a consolidated basis will be from the operations of our hotels. The earnings of the TRS
Lessees will be subject to taxation as regular C corporations, as defined in the Code, reducing the
TRS Lessees cash available to pay dividends to us, and therefore our funds from operations and the cash
available for distribution to our shareholders.
Financial Condition and Operating Performance Metrics
We measure financial condition and hotel operating performance by evaluating financial metrics
such as:
|
|
|
Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR), |
|
|
|
|
Average Daily Rate (ADR), |
|
|
|
|
Occupancy percentage, |
|
|
|
|
Funds From Operations (FFO), |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted FFO, |
|
|
|
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), and |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA. |
We evaluate the hotels in our portfolio and potential acquisitions using these metrics to
determine each hotels contribution toward providing income to our shareholders through increases
in distributable cash flow and increasing long-term total returns through appreciation in the value
of our common shares. RevPAR, ADR and Occupancy are hotel industry measures commonly used to
evaluate operating performance. RevPAR, which is calculated as total room revenue divided by total
number of available rooms, is an important metric for monitoring hotel operating performance.
Please refer to Non-GAAP Financial Measures for a detailed discussion of our use of FFO,
Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA to net income or loss, a GAAP measurement.
Results of Operations
Industry outlook
We believe that the hotel industrys performance is correlated to the performance of the
economy overall, and with key economic indicators such as GDP growth, employment trends, corporate
profits and consumer confidence improving, we expect a rebound in the performance of the hotel
industry. As reported by Smith Travel Research, after 19 consecutive months of declining year over
year RevPAR, monthly RevPAR has been higher year over year since March 2010. As reported by Smith
Travel Research, RevPar in 2010 was up 5.5% and up 9.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
RevPar at our hotels was up 3.3% in 2010, which includes periods prior to our ownership and was
down 1.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as five of our 13 hotels were undergoing
significant renovations.
While the U.S. hotel industry has shown improvement since the time of our IPO and we are
encouraged by these improvements, industry operating performance remains significantly below
peak pre-2008 levels. Hotel industry operating performance historically has correlated with U.S. GDP
growth, and a number of economists and government agencies currently predict that the U.S. economy
will grow over the next several years. We believe that U.S. GDP growth, coupled with limited supply
of new hotels, will lead to increases in lodging industry RevPAR and hotel operating profits.
Three months ended March 31, 2011
Results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 include the operating
activities of the 13 hotels owned at March 31, 2011 and are not indicative of the results we expect
when our investment strategy has been fully executed. We did not own any hotels at March 31, 2010
and had no operations during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
16
During the first quarter of 2011, we had a net loss of $19 thousand, or a loss of $0.00 per
diluted share. For the quarter, FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA were $1.4 million,
$1.5 million, $2.2 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
Revenues
Total revenue was $12.5 million for the quarter. Since all of our hotels are select service or
limited service hotels, room revenue is the primary revenue source as these hotels do not have a
meaningful food and beverage revenue or large group conference facilities. As such, room revenue was
$12.1 million for the quarter, which revenue comprised 97% of total revenue for the quarter. Other
operating revenue, comprised of meeting room, gift shop, in-room movie and other ancillary
amenities revenue, was $0.4 million for the quarter.
Since room revenue is the primary component of total revenue, our revenue results
are dependent on maintaining and improving occupancy, ADR and RevPAR at our hotels. Occupancy, ADR,
and RevPAR results are presented in the following table based on the period since our acquisition
of the hotels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
ADR |
|
$ |
114.45 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
71.4 |
% |
RevPar |
|
$ |
81.75 |
|
Hotel Operating Expenses
Hotel operating expenses were $7.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. As a
percentage of total revenue, hotel operating expenses were 63% for the three months ended March 31,
2011. Rooms expenses, which are the most significant component of hotel operating expense, were
$3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. Other direct expenses, which include
management and franchise fees, insurance, utilities, repairs and maintenance, advertising and
sales, and general and administrative expenses, were $4.9 million for the three months ended March
31, 2011.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense was $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011. Depreciation is recorded on our hotel buildings over 40 years from the date of acquisition.
Depreciable lives of hotel furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally three to ten years
between the date of acquisition and the date that the furniture, fixtures and equipment will be
replaced. Amortization of franchise fees is recorded over the term of the respective franchise
agreement.
Real Estate and Personal Property Taxes
Total property tax and insurance expenses were $1.0 million for the three months ended March 31,
2011.
Corporate General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses principally consist of employee-related costs, including
base payroll and amortization of restricted stock and awards of long-term incentive plan (LTIP)
units. These expenses also include corporate operating costs, professional fees and trustees
fees. Total corporate general and administrative expenses were $1.3 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2011. Payroll related costs were $0.4 million and share based compensation was $0.3
million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.
Hotel Property Acquisition Costs
We incurred hotel property acquisition costs of $0.1 million for the three months ended March,
31, 2011. These expenses represent costs associated with potential hotel
acquisitions. These acquisition-related costs are expensed when incurred in accordance with GAAP.
17
Interest Income
Interest income on cash and cash equivalents was
$6 for the three months ended March
31, 2011.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was
$0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011. In connection
with the acquisition of two hotels we assumed two loans with principal balances aggregating
approximately $12.3 million. The weighted average interest rate of the two fixed rate loans is 5.9%
annually. Interest expense includes amortization of deferred financing fees of $0.3 million.
Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense was $2 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. Our TRS are
subject to income taxes and this expense is based on the taxable income of one of our two TRS
holding companies at a tax rate of approximately 40%. Our other TRS holding company had a net loss
for the year and income tax expense was zero since we established a valuation allowance for the
deferred tax asset associated with the net loss.
Material Trends or Uncertainties
We are not aware of any material trends or uncertainties, favorable or unfavorable, that may
be reasonably anticipated to have a material impact on either the capital resources or the revenues
or income to be derived from the acquisition and operation of properties, loans and other permitted
investments, other than those referred to in the risk factors identified in the Risk Factors
section of our annual report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We consider the following non-GAAP financial measures useful to investors as key supplemental
measures of our operating performance: (1) FFO, (2) Adjusted FFO, (3) EBITDA, and (4) Adjusted
EBITDA. These non-GAAP financial measures could be considered along with, but not as alternatives
to, net income or loss as a measure of our operating performance prescribed by GAAP.
FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent cash generated from operating
activities as determined by GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income or
loss, cash flows from operations or any other operating performance measure prescribed by GAAP.
FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of our liquidity, nor are FFO,
Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs,
including our ability to make cash distributions. These measurements do not reflect cash
expenditures for long-term assets and other items that have been and will be incurred. FFO,
Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may include funds that may not be available for
managements discretionary use due to functional requirements to conserve funds for capital
expenditures, property acquisitions, and other commitments and uncertainties.
We calculate FFO in accordance with standards established by the National Association of Real
Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), which defines FFO as net income or loss (calculated in
accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of real estate, items classified by
GAAP as extraordinary, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles, plus depreciation
and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs), and after adjustments for
unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. We believe that the presentation of FFO provides
useful information to investors regarding our operating performance because it measures our
performance without regard to specified non-cash items such as real estate depreciation and
amortization, gain or loss on sale of real estate assets and certain other items that we believe
are not indicative of the performance of our underlying hotel properties. We believe that these
items are more representative of our asset base and our acquisition and disposition activities than
our ongoing operations, and that by excluding the effects of the items, FFO is useful to investors
in comparing our operating performance between periods and between REITs that report FFO using the NAREIT definition.
We further adjust FFO for certain additional items that are not in NAREITs definition of FFO,
including hotel property acquisition costs and costs associated with the departure of our former
chief financial officer which are referred to as Other charges included in general and
administrative expenses below. We believe that Adjusted FFO provides investors with another
financial measure that may facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and
between REITs that make similar adjustments to FFO.
18
The following is a reconciliation between net loss to FFO and Adjusted FFO for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 (in thousands, except share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Funds From Operations (FFO): |
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
Depreciation |
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
FFO |
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel property acquisition costs |
|
|
85 |
|
Other charges included in general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted FFO |
|
$ |
1,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares |
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
11,800,771 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
11,800,771 |
|
We calculate EBITDA as net income or loss excluding: (1) interest expense; (2) provision
for income taxes, including income taxes applicable to sale of assets; and (3) depreciation and
amortization. We believe EBITDA is useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance
because it helps investors compare our operating performance between periods and between REITs by
removing the impact of our capital structure (primarily expense) and asset base (primarily
depreciation and amortization) from our operating results. In addition, we use EBITDA as one
measure in determining the value of hotel acquisitions and dispositions.
We further adjust EBITDA for certain additional items, including hotel property acquisition
costs, amortization of non-cash share-based compensation and costs associated with the departure of
our former chief financial officer, which are referred to as Other charges included in general and
administrative expenses below and which we believe are not indicative of the performance of our
underlying hotel properties. We believe that Adjusted EBITDA provides investors with another
financial measure that may facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and
between REITs that report similar measures.
The following is a reconciliation between net loss to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the three
months ended March 31, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, 2011 |
|
Earnings Before Interest, Taxes,
Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA): |
|
|
|
|
Net loss attributable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
773 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotel property acquisition costs |
|
|
85 |
|
Share based compensation |
|
|
393 |
|
Other charges included in general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA |
|
$ |
2,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
Although we present FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because we believe they are useful to
investors in comparing our operating performance between periods and between REITs that report similar measures, these measures
have limitations as analytical tools. Some of these limitations are:
|
|
|
FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect our cash expenditures, or
future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
|
|
|
|
FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect changes in, or cash
requirements for, our working capital needs; |
19
|
|
|
FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect funds available to
make cash distributions; |
|
|
|
|
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash
requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debts; |
|
|
|
|
Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being
depreciated and amortized may need to be replaced in the future, and FFO, Adjusted FFO,
EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; |
|
|
|
|
Non-cash compensation is and will remain a key element of our overall long-term
incentive compensation package, although we exclude it as an expense when evaluating our
ongoing operating performance for a particular period using Adjusted EBITDA; |
|
|
|
|
Adjusted FFO and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect the impact of certain cash charges
(including acquisition transaction costs) that result from matters we consider not to be
indicative of the underlying performance of our hotel properties; and |
|
|
|
|
other companies in our industry may calculate FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted
EBITDA differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as a comparative measure. |
In addition, FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent cash generated
from operating activities as determined by GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net
income or loss, cash flows from operations or any other operating performance measure prescribed by
GAAP. FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures of our liquidity. Because of
these limitations, FFO, Adjusted FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. We
compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using FFO, Adjusted
FFO, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA only supplementally. Our consolidated financial statements and the
notes to those statements included elsewhere are prepared in accordance with GAAP.
Sources and Uses of Cash
Our principal sources of cash include net cash from operations and proceeds from debt and
equity issuances. Our principal uses of cash include acquisitions, capital expenditures, operating
costs, corporate expenditures, debt repayments and distributions to equity holders.
For the three months ended
March 31, 2011, net cash flows provided by operations were $0.9
million, as our net loss of $19 was due in significant part to non-cash expenses,
including $1.7 million of depreciation and amortization and $0.2 million of share-based
compensation expense. In addition, changes in operating assets and liabilities due to the timing of
cash receipts and payments from our hotels resulted in net cash outflow of $1.0 million. Net cash
flows used in investing activities were $4.6 million, which represents additional improvements to
the thirteen hotels of $4.2 million and $0.4 million of funds placed into escrows for lender or
manager required escrows. Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $29.9 million,
comprised primarily of proceeds generated from the February common share offering net of underwriting fees and
offering costs paid or payable to third parties of $69.4 million, offset by payments on our secured
credit facility of $37.8 and distributions to shareholders of $1.7 million.
As of March 31, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $30.9 million. On
April 15, 2011, we paid $2.5 million in first quarter dividends on our common shares and
distributions on our LTIP units. We intend to use available cash and borrowings under our revolving
secured line of credit to fund the cash requirements related to our six pending hotel acquisitions
as well as our pending joint venture investments.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We intend to limit the outstanding principal amount of our consolidated indebtedness, net of
cash, to not more than 35% of the investment in our hotel properties at cost (defined as our
initial acquisition price plus the gross amount of any subsequent capital investment and excluding
any impairment charges) measured at the time we incur debt, and a subsequent decrease in hotel
property values will not necessarily cause us to repay debt to comply with this limitation. Our
board of trustees may modify or eliminate this policy at any time without the approval of our
shareholders. At this early stage of a lodging cycle recovery, we may temporarily increase our
leverage. In the 2011 second quarter, our Board of Trustees approved the increase in our targeted
leverage to less than 55 percent.
20
We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements generally through net cash provided by
operations, existing
cash balances and, if necessary, short-term borrowings under our credit facility. We believe
that our net cash provided by operations will be adequate to fund operating obligations, pay
interest on any borrowings and fund dividends in accordance with the requirements for qualification
as a REIT under the Code. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements, such as hotel
property acquisitions and debt maturities or repayments through additional long-term secured and
unsecured borrowings and the issuance of additional equity or debt securities.
On October 12, 2010, we entered into a senior secured revolving credit facility to fund future
acquisition, redevelopment and expansion activities. At March 31, 2011, we had no outstanding
borrowings under this credit facility. At March 31, 2011, there were eleven properties in the
borrowing base under the credit agreement and the maximum borrowing availability under the
revolving credit facility was $67.1 million.
The credit agreement contains representations, warranties, covenants, terms and conditions
customary for transactions of this type, including a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio and minimum net worth financial covenants, limitations on (i) liens, (ii) incurrence
of debt, (iii) investments, (iv) distributions, and (v) mergers and asset dispositions, covenants
to preserve corporate existence and comply with laws, covenants on the use of proceeds of the
credit facility and default provisions, including defaults for non-payment, breach of
representations and warranties, insolvency, non-performance of covenants, cross-defaults and
guarantor defaults. The two mortgage loans we assumed contain financial covenants concerning the
maintenance of a minimum debt service coverage ratio. The loan encumbering the Altoona Courtyard
hotel requires a minimum ratio of 1.5x and our ratio is 1.95x. The loan encumbering the Washington
SpringHill Suites hotel requires a minimum ratio of 1.65x and our ratio is 2.45x. We were in
compliance with all covenants at March 31, 2011.
On February 8, 2011, we completed a public offering of 4.6 million common shares, raising net
proceeds of $69.4 million. We used $42.8 million to pay down debt outstanding on the revolving
credit facility.
Subsequent
to March 31, 2011, we amended our $85 million
secured revolving credit facility. The amendment provides for an increase in the
allowable consolidated leverage ratio to 60
percent through 2012, reducing to 55 percent in 2013; and a decrease in the consolidated fixed
charge coverage ratio from 2.3x to 1.7x through March 2012, increasing to 1.75x through December
2012 and 2.0x in 2013. Subject to certain conditions, the line of credit still has an accordion
feature that provides the Company with the ability to increase the facility to $110 million.
We
will use available cash and borrowings under our secured revolving credit facility to fund
the cash requirements related to pending and future hotel acquisitions as well as our pending joint
venture investment.
We intend to continue to invest in hotel properties only as suitable opportunities arise. In
the near-term, we intend to fund future investments in properties with the net proceeds of
offerings of our securities including the February 8, 2011 common share offering. Longer term, we intend to
finance our investments with the net proceeds from additional issuances of common and preferred
shares, issuances of units of limited partnership interest in our operating partnership or other
securities or borrowings. The success of our acquisition strategy may depend, in part, on our
ability to access additional capital through issuances of equity securities and borrowings. There can be no
assurance that we will continue to make investments in properties that meet our investment
criteria.
Dividend Policy
Our current policy on common dividends is generally to distribute, annually, 100% of our
annual taxable income. The amount of any dividends will be determined by our Board of Trustees. On
February 9, 2011, our Board of Trustees declared a dividend of $0.175 per common share and LTIP
unit. The dividends to our common shareholders and the distributions to our LTIP unit holders were
paid on April 15, 2011 to holders of record as of March 31, 2011.
Capital Expenditures
We intend to maintain each hotel property in good repair and condition and in conformity with
applicable laws and regulations in accordance with the franchisors standards and any agreed-upon
requirements in our management and loan agreements. After we have acquired a hotel property, in
certain instances, we may be required to complete a property improvement plan (PIP) in order to
be granted a new franchise license for that particular hotel property. PIPs are intended to bring
the hotel property up to the franchisors standards. Certain of our loans require that we make
available for such purposes, at the hotels collateralizing these loans, amounts up to 5% of gross
revenue from such hotels. We intend to cause
21
the expenditure of amounts in excess of such obligated
amounts, if necessary, to comply with any reasonable requirements and otherwise to the extent that
we deem such expenditures to be in the best interests of the hotel. To the extent that we spend
more on capital expenditures than is available from our operations, which is the case with respect
to the PIPs we are required to complete during 2011, we intend to fund those capital expenditures
with available cash and borrowings under the
revolving credit facility.
For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we invested approximately $4.2 million on capital
investments in our hotels. We expect to invest approximately $13 million on capital improvements
in 2011 on our hotels.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of March 31, 2011, and the
effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods (in
thousands). We had no other material off-balance sheet arrangements at March 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
One to Three |
|
|
Three to Five |
|
|
More Than |
|
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total |
|
|
One Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Five Years |
|
Corporate office lease |
|
$ |
169 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Revolving credit facility, including interest (1) |
|
|
1,063 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ground lease |
|
|
12,847 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
11,871 |
|
Property Loans, including interest (1) |
|
|
15,162 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
12,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,241 |
|
|
$ |
1,285 |
|
|
$ |
3,329 |
|
|
$ |
12,756 |
|
|
$ |
11,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Assumes no additional borrowings under the revolving credit facility
and interest payments are based on the interest rate in effect as of
March 31, 2011. See Note 7, Debt to our consolidated
financial statements for additional information relating to our property loans. |
In addition, we pay management fees to our hotel management companies based on the revenues of our hotels.
On January 31, 2011, we entered into a contract to purchase a hotel located in the greater
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania area for a total purchase price of approximately $24.9 million, which
includes the assumption of approximately $7.3 million in debt on the property. The acquisition of
this hotel is subject to customary closing requirements and conditions. The Company
can give no assurance that the transaction will be completed within the expected time frame or at
all.
Inflation
Operators of hotels, in general, possess the ability to adjust room rates daily to reflect the
effects of inflation. However, competitive pressures may limit the ability of our management
companies to raise room rates.
Seasonality
Demand in the lodging industry is affected by recurring seasonal patterns. Generally, we
expect that we will have lower revenue, operating income and cash flow in the first and fourth
quarters and higher revenue, operating income and cash flow in the second and third quarters. These
general trends are, however, expected to be greatly influenced by overall economic cycles and the
geographic locations of the hotels we acquire.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP, which
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and
liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. While we do not believe the reported amounts would be
materially different, application of these policies involves the exercise of judgment and the use
of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these
estimates. We evaluate our estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. We base our estimates on
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. All of our significant accounting policies, including certain critical accounting
policies, are disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In December 2010, the FASB issued updated accounting guidance to clarify that pro forma
disclosures should be presented as if a business combination occurred at the beginning of the prior
annual period for purposes of preparing both the
22
current reporting period and the prior reporting
period pro forma financial information. These disclosures should be accompanied by a narrative
description about the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments. The new
accounting guidance is effective for business combinations consummated in periods beginning after
December 14, 2010, and should be applied prospectively as of the date of adoption. Early adoption
is permitted. We have adopted the new disclosures as of January 1, 2011. We do not believe that
the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. |
We may be exposed to interest rate changes primarily as a result of our assumption of
long-term debt in connection with our acquisitions. Our interest rate risk management objectives
are to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings and cash flows and to lower overall
borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we will borrow primarily at fixed rates or variable
rates with the lowest margins available and, in some cases, with the ability to convert variable
rates to fixed rates. With respect to variable rate financing, we will assess interest rate risk
by identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate exposures that may adversely impact expected
future cash flows and by evaluating hedging opportunities.
At March 31, 2011, our consolidated debt was comprised only of fixed interest rate debt. The
fair value of our fixed rate debt indicates the estimated principal amount of debt having the same
debt service requirements that could have been borrowed at the date presented, at then current
market interest rates. The following table provides information about our financial instruments
that are sensitive to changes in interest rates (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floating rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Average interest rate (1)
|
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
354 |
|
|
$ |
375 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
4,958 |
|
|
$ |
5,914 |
|
|
$ |
12,252 |
|
|
$ |
12,461 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.85 |
% |
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
|
5.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
LIBOR floor rate of 1.25% plus a margin of 3.25% at March 31, 2011. The one-month LIBOR rate was 0.25% at March 31, 2011. |
23
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures. |
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as
of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures
were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in
reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Legal Proceedings. |
We are not currently involved in any material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any
material litigation pending or threatened against us.
There have been no material changes in the risk factors described in Item 1A of the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. |
None.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
None.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Removed and Reserved |
|
|
|
Item 5. |
|
Other information. |
None.
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Agreement
of Purchase and Sale, dated as of January 28, 2011, by and among
Chatham Lodging Trust, as purchaser, and Schenley Center Associates,
L.P., as Sellers, for the Residence Inn by Marriott Pittsburgh, PA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
24
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHATHAM LODGING TRUST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 10, 2011
|
|
/s/ DENNIS M. CRAVEN
Dennis M. Craven
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
25