e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2011
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number 001-11462
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
         
Delaware   (302) 478-5142   13-3427277
(State or other jurisdiction of   (Registrant’s telephone number,   (I.R.S. Employer Identification
incorporation or organization)   including area code)   Number)
     
1105 North Market Street, Suite 1230, P.O. Box 8985, Wilmington, Delaware   19899
 
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days:
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files):
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting entity. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting entity” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of July 29, 2011, the Registrant had 49,263,977 shares of Class A Common Stock
and 5,753,833 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding.
 
 

 


 

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND OTHER INFORMATION
         
    Page  
       
 
       
       
 
       
    3  
 
       
    4  
 
       
    5  
 
       
    6  
 
       
    7  
 
       
    22  
 
       
    30  
 
       
    30  
 
       
       
 
       
    31  
 
       
    31  
 
       
    32  
 
       
    32  
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
 EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
 EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

-2-


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            (Restated)             (Restated)  
Revenue:
                               
Premium and fee income
  $ 385,012     $ 352,566     $ 761,411     $ 700,329  
Net investment income
    83,191       78,234       175,485       162,284  
Net realized investment gains (losses):
                               
Total other than temporary impairment losses
    (7,775 )     (21,659 )     (15,314 )     (48,932 )
Portion of other than temporary impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income
    2,432       826       953       5,101  
 
                       
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings
    (5,343 )     (20,833 )     (14,361 )     (43,831 )
Other net realized investment gains
    6,466       6,959       13,512       14,851  
 
                       
 
    1,123       (13,874 )     (849 )     (28,980 )
Loss on early retirement of senior notes
          (212 )           (212 )
 
                       
Total revenues
    469,326       416,714       936,047       833,421  
 
                       
 
                               
Benefits and expenses:
                               
Benefits, claims and interest credited to policyholders
    273,163       244,687       544,428       491,008  
Commissions
    23,967       23,794       46,535       45,190  
Amortization of cost of business acquired
    19,025       16,848       37,986       33,911  
Other operating expenses
    78,145       75,818       156,054       150,688  
 
                       
 
    394,300       361,147       785,003       720,797  
 
                       
 
Operating income
    75,026       55,567       151,044       112,624  
 
Interest expense:
                               
Corporate debt
    6,007       8,264       12,017       15,587  
Junior subordinated debentures
    3,248       3,248       6,490       6,489  
 
                       
 
    9,255       11,512       18,507       22,076  
 
                       
Income before income tax expense
    65,771       44,055       132,537       90,548  
Income tax expense
    15,762       9,385       32,157       19,297  
 
                       
Net income
    50,009       34,670       100,380       71,251  
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
    582       8       729       73  
 
                       
Net income attributable to shareholders
  $ 49,427     $ 34,662     $ 99,651     $ 71,178  
 
                       
 
                               
Basic results per share of common stock:
                               
Net income attributable to shareholders
  $ 0.88     $ 0.63     $ 1.78     $ 1.29  
 
                               
Diluted results per share of common stock:
                               
Net income attributable to shareholders
  $ 0.87     $ 0.62     $ 1.75     $ 1.28  
 
Dividends paid per share of common stock
  $ 0.12     $ 0.10     $ 0.23     $ 0.20  
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

-3-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
(Unaudited)
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2011     2010  
            (Restated)  
Assets:
               
Investments:
               
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale
  $ 6,181,482     $ 5,717,090  
Short-term investments
    228,486       334,215  
Other investments
    614,180       498,678  
 
           
 
    7,024,148       6,549,983  
Cash
    90,271       72,806  
Cost of business acquired
    140,872       149,325  
Reinsurance receivables
    357,010       360,255  
Goodwill
    93,929       93,929  
Other assets
    337,274       311,577  
Assets held in separate account
    126,213       123,674  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 8,169,717     $ 7,661,549  
 
           
 
               
Liabilities and Equity:
               
Future policy benefits:
               
Life
  $ 338,545     $ 331,816  
Disability and accident
    822,360       812,258  
Unpaid claims and claim expenses:
               
Life
    54,362       53,763  
Disability and accident
    462,648       457,642  
Casualty
    1,420,822       1,314,910  
Policyholder account balances
    1,884,029       1,753,744  
Corporate debt
    375,000       375,000  
Junior subordinated debentures
    175,000       175,000  
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
    55,342       55,342  
Other liabilities and policyholder funds
    774,815       673,270  
Liabilities related to separate account
    126,213       123,674  
 
           
Total liabilities
    6,489,136       6,126,419  
 
           
 
               
Equity:
               
Preferred Stock, $.01 par; 50,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
           
Class A Common Stock, $.01 par; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 56,676,218 and 56,463,776 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
    567       565  
Class B Common Stock, $.01 par; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 5,981,049 shares issued and outstanding
    60       60  
Additional paid-in capital
    692,696       682,816  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    78,231       30,932  
Retained earnings
    1,100,128       1,013,369  
Treasury stock, at cost; 7,761,216 shares of Class A Common Stock, and 227,216 shares of Class B Common Stock
    (197,246 )     (197,246 )
 
           
Total shareholders’ equity
    1,674,436       1,530,496  
Noncontrolling interest
    6,145       4,634  
 
           
Total equity
    1,680,581       1,535,130  
 
           
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 8,169,717     $ 7,661,549  
 
           
 
               
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

-4-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)
                                                                         
                            Accumulated                                    
                            Other                                    
    Class A     Class B     Additional     Comprehensive                     Total     Non-        
    Common     Common     Paid in     Income     Retained     Treasury     Shareholders’     controlling     Total  
    Stock     Stock     Capital     (Loss)     Earnings     Stock     Equity     Interest     Equity  
Balance, January 1, 2010
  $ 560     $ 60     $ 661,895     $ (33,956 )   $ 927,706     $ (197,246 )   $ 1,359,019     $ 3,546     $ 1,362,565  
Cumulative effect adjustment
                            (60,002 )           (60,002 )           (60,002 )
 
                                                     
Adjusted balance January 1, 2010
    560       60       661,895       (33,956 )     867,704       (197,246 )     1,299,017       3,546       1,302,563  
 
                                                                 
Net income
                            71,178             71,178       73       71,251  
Other comprehensive income:
                                                                       
Increase in net unrealized appreciation on investments
                      62,715                   62,715             62,715  
Decrease in other than temporary impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income
                      3,930                   3,930             3,930  
Decrease in net loss on cash flow hedge
                      473                   473             473  
Change in net periodic pension cost
                      102                   102             102  
 
                                                                 
Comprehensive income
                                                    138,398       73       138,471  
Net distribution to noncontrolling interest
                                              (2,237 )     (2,237 )
Issuance of deferred and restricted shares and exercise of stock options
    2             5,741                         5,743             5,743  
Stock-based compensation
                3,428                         3,428             3,428  
Cash dividends
                            (11,054 )           (11,054 )           (11,054 )
 
                                                     
 
Balance, June 30, 2010
  $ 562     $ 60     $ 671,064     $ 33,264     $ 927,828     $ (197,246 )   $ 1,435,532     $ 1,382     $ 1,436,914  
 
                                                     
 
Balance, January 1, 2011
  $ 565     $ 60     $ 682,816     $ 30,932     $ 1,013,369     $ (197,246 )   $ 1,530,496     $ 4,634     $ 1,535,130  
 
                                                                 
Net income
                            99,651             99,651       729       100,380  
Other comprehensive income:
                                                                       
Increase in net unrealized appreciation on investments
                      44,462                   44,462             44,462  
Decrease in other than temporary impairment losses recognized in other comprehensive income
                      2,682                   2,682             2,682  
Change in net periodic pension cost
                      155                   155             155  
 
                                                                 
Comprehensive income
                                                    146,950       729       147,679  
Net contribution from noncontrolling interest
                                              782       782  
Issuance of deferred and restricted shares and exercise of stock options
    2             9,116                         9,118             9,118  
Stock-based compensation
                764                         764             764  
Cash dividends
                            (12,892 )           (12,892 )           (12,892 )
 
                                                     
 
Balance, June 30, 2011
  $ 567     $ 60     $ 692,696     $ 78,231     $ 1,100,128     $ (197,246 )   $ 1,674,436     $ 6,145     $ 1,680,581  
 
                                                     
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

-5-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in Thousands)
(Unaudited)
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30,  
    2011     2010  
            (Restated)  
Operating activities:
               
Net income attributable to shareholders
  $ 99,651     $ 71,178  
Adjustments to reconcile net income attributable to shareholders to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Change in policy liabilities and policyholder accounts
    149,619       84,646  
Net change in reinsurance receivables and payables
    (4,016 )     (11,574 )
Amortization, principally the cost of business acquired and investments
    16,626       24,624  
Deferred costs of business acquired
    (45,230 )     (34,273 )
Net realized losses on investments
    849       28,980  
Net change in federal income taxes
    25,534       (5,473 )
Other
    (45,373 )     (25,398 )
 
           
Net cash provided by operating activities
    197,660       132,710  
 
           
 
               
Investing activities:
               
Purchases of investments and loans made
    (1,574,882 )     (936,660 )
Sales of investments and receipts from repayment of loans
    1,002,719       494,984  
Maturities of investments
    171,331       176,718  
Net change in short-term investments
    105,729       55,689  
Change in deposit in separate account
          (2,965 )
 
           
Net cash used by investing activities
    (295,103 )     (212,234 )
 
           
 
               
Financing activities:
               
Deposits to policyholder accounts
    252,096       122,809  
Withdrawals from policyholder accounts
    (129,235 )     (54,905 )
Proceeds from issuance of 2020 Senior Notes
          250,000  
Principal payments under bank credit facility
          (222,000 )
Early retirement of senior notes
          (5,000 )
Cash dividends paid on common stock
    (12,892 )     (11,054 )
Other financing activities
    4,939       2,095  
 
           
Net cash provided by financing activities
    114,908       81,945  
 
           
 
               
Increase in cash
    17,465       2,421  
Cash at beginning of year
    72,806       65,464  
 
           
Cash at end of period
  $ 90,271     $ 67,885  
 
           
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

-6-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note A —Significant Accounting Policies
The financial statements of Delphi Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company,” which term includes the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise) included herein were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The information furnished includes all adjustments and accruals of a normal recurring nature, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods. Certain reclassifications have been made in the June 30, 2010 consolidated financial statements to conform to the June 30, 2011 presentation. In addition, as discussed below under the caption “Accounting Changes,” certain 2010 financial information has been restated as a result of the Company’s adoption of a new accounting principle. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2011. For further information refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “2010 Form 10-K”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings ascribed to them in the 2010 Form 10-K.
Accounting Changes
The Company defers certain costs relating to the acquisition of new insurance business, such as commissions, certain costs associated with policy issuance and underwriting and certain sales support expenses, when incurred. On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted, on a retrospective basis, guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) limiting the extent to which an insurer may capitalize costs incurred in the acquisition of an insurance contract. The guidance provides that, in order to be capitalized, such costs must be incremental and directly related to the acquisition of a new or renewal insurance contract. Insurers may only capitalize costs related to successful efforts in attaining a contract and advertising costs may only be capitalized if certain direct response advertising criteria are met. As a result of adopting this guidance, the Company made an after-tax reduction to its retained earnings at January 1, 2010 in the amount of $60.0 million, net of an income tax benefit of $32.3 million, which represents the net reduction in deferred policy acquisition cost included in cost of business acquired on the consolidated balance sheet, and net income attributable to shareholders was reduced by $0.04 per diluted share and $0.06 per diluted share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. This adoption also resulted in the restatement of certain other financial information for 2010.
On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted new guidance issued by the FASB clarifying that an insurance company should not consider any interests of its separate accounts in an investment to be the insurer’s own interests and should not combine those interests with any interest of its general account in the same investment when assessing the investment for consolidation. Insurance companies are also required to consider a separate account as a subsidiary for purposes of evaluating whether the application of specialized accounting for investments in consolidation is appropriate. The adoption of this guidance did not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted new guidance issued by the FASB requiring additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. The guidance applies to all entities that are required to make disclosures about recurring or nonrecurring fair value measurements and requires separate disclosure of the activity in the Level 3 category related to purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. The requirement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In December 2010, the FASB issued guidance providing clarification relating to the testing of goodwill for impairment for entities carrying goodwill as an asset which have one or more reporting units whose carrying amount for purposes of performing the first step of the goodwill impairment test is zero or negative. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

-7-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note A —Significant Accounting Policies — (Continued)
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance regarding fair value measurements in order to have a common fair value measurement and disclosure requirement for purposes of both GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. This guidance further elaborates upon techniques used in measuring fair value. It does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company has not yet determined the impact, if any, that the adoption of this guidance will have on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance regarding the presentation of comprehensive income. This guidance eliminates the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity and requires that all changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The guidance does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or the calculation or presentation of earnings per share. This guidance is effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011 with early adoption permitted. Because the new guidance affects financial statement presentation only, it will have no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Note B Investments
At June 30, 2011, the Company had fixed maturity securities available for sale with a carrying value and a fair value of $6,181.5 million and an amortized cost of $6,027.7 million. At December 31, 2010, the Company had fixed maturity securities available for sale with a carrying value and a fair value of $5,717.1 million and an amortized cost of $5,650.6 million. Declines in market value relative to such securities’ amortized cost which are determined to be other than temporary pursuant to the Company’s methodology for such determinations and to represent credit losses are reflected as reductions in the amortized cost of such securities, as further discussed below.
The amortized cost and fair value of investments in fixed maturity securities available for sale are as follows:
                                         
    June 30, 2011  
            Gross Unrealized        
                            Other Than        
    Amortized                     Temporary     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Impairments     Value  
    (dollars in thousands)  
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 640,888     $ 42,324     $ (1,158 )   $     $ 682,054  
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
    777,566       68,734       (19,865 )     (20,555 )     805,880  
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
    83,492       977       (1,078 )     (61 )     83,330  
Corporate securities
    1,701,008       87,531       (20,374 )     (390 )     1,767,775  
Collateralized debt obligations
    232,771       7,993       (19,012 )     (1,628 )     220,124  
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government guaranteed securities
    129,348       4,709       (1,385 )           132,672  
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities
    109,853       213       (1,309 )           108,757  
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and political subdivisions
    2,352,794       57,326       (29,230 )           2,380,890  
 
                             
Total fixed maturity securities
  $ 6,027,720     $ 269,807     $ (93,411 )   $ (22,634 )   $ 6,181,482  
 
                             

-8-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note B — Investments — (Continued)
                                         
    December 31, 2010  
            Gross Unrealized        
                            Other Than        
    Amortized                     Temporary     Fair  
    Cost     Gains     Losses     Impairments     Value  
    (dollars in thousands)  
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 626,494     $ 38,586     $ (1,379 )   $     $ 663,701  
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
    800,380       77,742       (27,518 )     (24,896 )     825,708  
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
    35,863       300       (3,020 )     (139 )     33,004  
Corporate securities
    1,466,561       81,919       (18,761 )           1,529,719  
Collateralized debt obligations
    199,594       3,652       (26,337 )     (1,725 )     175,184  
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government guaranteed securities
    269,264       6,001       (3,362 )           271,903  
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities
    113,446       107       (2,012 )           111,541  
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and political subdivisions
    2,138,994       36,421       (69,085 )           2,106,330  
 
                             
Total fixed maturity securities
  $ 5,650,596     $ 244,728     $ (151,474 )   $ (26,760 )   $ 5,717,090  
 
                             
The following table contains information, as of June 30, 2011, regarding the portions of the Company’s investments in non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) represented by securities whose underlying mortgage loans are categorized as prime, Alt-A and subprime, respectively, and the distributions of the securities within these categories by the years in which they were issued (vintages) and the highest of their ratings from Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch. All dollar amounts in this table are based upon the fair values of these securities as of June 30, 2011. As of this date, based upon the most recently available data regarding the concentrations by state of the mortgage loans underlying these securities, the states having loan concentrations in excess of 5% were as follows: California (38.0%), New York (7.4%) and Florida (6.9%).
                                                 
    Non-Agency Prime RMBS – Fair Value  
                                    BB and        
Vintage   AAA     AA     A     BBB     Below (1)     Total  
                    (dollars in thousands)                  
2001 and prior
  $ 1,861     $     $     $     $     $ 1,861  
2002
    8,186       187       3,892             603       12,868  
2003
    67,561       1,404       2,528       3,152       10,154       84,799  
2004
    25,029       16,006             4,739       6,013       51,787  
2005
    11,639       5,893       1,511       17,970       67,131       104,144  
2006
    14,367       564                   22,836       37,767  
2007
    5,085                         69,900       74,985  
2008
    820                         487       1,307  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 134,548     $ 24,054     $ 7,931     $ 25,861     $ 177,124     $ 369,518  
 
                                   
 
(1)   The securities enumerated in this column include securities having a total of $160.2 million in fair value that have received the equivalent of an investment grade rating from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (the “NAIC”) under its process which takes into account, among other things, the discounts at which the Company originally purchased the securities and modeling of the potential losses with respect to the securities’ underlying loans.

-9-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note B — Investments — (Continued)
                                                 
    Non-Agency Alt-A RMBS – Fair Value  
                                    BB and        
Vintage   AAA     AA     A     BBB     Below (1)     Total  
                    (dollars in thousands)                  
2001 and prior
  $     $     $     $ 1,679     $     $ 1,679  
2002
    176       1,551                         1,727  
2003
    44,466                         1,100       45,566  
2004
    19,835       1,892       1,413             1,810       24,950  
2005
    7,083       17,811             1,039       43,840       69,773  
2006
    11,377                   7,808       78,954       98,139  
2007
    275                         126,219       126,494  
2010
                3,875                   3,875  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 83,212     $ 21,254     $ 5,288     $ 10,526     $ 251,923     $ 372,203  
 
                                   
 
(1)   The securities enumerated in this column include securities having a total of $191.0 million in fair value that have received the equivalent of an investment grade rating from the NAIC under its process which takes into account, among other things, the discounts at which the Company originally purchased the securities and modeling of the potential losses with respect to the securities’ underlying loans.
                                                 
    Non-Agency Subprime RMBS – Fair Value  
                                    BB and        
Vintage   AAA     AA     A     BBB     Below (1)     Total  
                    (dollars in thousands)                  
2003
  $ 10,511     $     $ 1,096     $     $     $ 11,607  
2004
    9,912                   184       3,347       13,443  
2005
    18,087                         17,672       35,759  
2006
                      1,411       820       2,231  
2007
                            1,119       1,119  
 
                                   
Total
  $ 38,510     $     $ 1,096     $ 1,595     $ 22,958     $ 64,159  
 
                                   
 
(1)   The securities enumerated in this column include securities having a total of $19.9 million in fair value that have received the equivalent of an investment grade rating from the NAIC under its process which takes into account, among other things, the discounts at which the Company originally purchased the securities and modeling of the potential losses with respect to the securities’ underlying loans.
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity securities available for sale at June 30, 2011, by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations, with or without prepayment penalties.
                 
    Amortized     Fair  
    Cost     Value  
    (dollars in thousands)  
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 640,888     $ 682,054  
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
    777,566       805,880  
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
    83,492       83,330  
 
               
Other fixed maturity securities:
               
One year or less
    116,999       112,272  
Greater than 1, up to 5 years
    628,028       652,335  
Greater than 5, up to 10 years
    1,127,762       1,146,070  
Greater than 10 years
    2,652,985       2,699,541  
 
           
Total
  $ 6,027,720     $ 6,181,482  
 
           

-10-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note B — Investments — (Continued)
The gross unrealized losses and fair value of fixed maturity securities available for sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are as follows:
                                                 
    June 30, 2011  
    Less Than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  
            Gross             Gross             Gross  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
                    (dollars in thousands)                  
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 60,682     $ (1,142 )   $ 227     $ (16 )   $ 60,909     $ (1,158 )
Non-agency residential mortgage- backed securities
    74,521       (2,694 )     204,665       (37,726 )     279,186       (40,420 )
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
    23,141       (582 )     4,484       (557 )     27,625       (1,139 )
Corporate securities
    381,991       (12,129 )     45,576       (8,635 )     427,567       (20,764 )
Collateralized debt obligations
    82,560       (1,703 )     68,710       (18,937 )     151,270       (20,640 )
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government guaranteed securities
    47,236       (1,385 )                 47,236       (1,385 )
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities
    54,455       (1,309 )                 54,455       (1,309 )
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and political subdivisions
    741,361       (19,413 )     62,611       (9,817 )     803,972       (29,230 )
 
                                   
Total fixed maturity securities
  $ 1,465,947     $ (40,357 )   $ 386,273     $ (75,688 )   $ 1,852,220     $ (116,045 )
 
                                   
                                                 
    December 31, 2010  
    Less Than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  
            Gross             Gross             Gross  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
                    (dollars in thousands)                  
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 52,300     $ (1,329 )   $ 233     $ (50 )   $ 52,533     $ (1,379 )
Non-agency residential mortgage- backed securities
    56,290       (1,584 )     230,655       (50,830 )     286,945       (52,414 )
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
    12,500       (447 )     5,188       (2,712 )     17,688       (3,159 )
Corporate securities
    301,150       (9,005 )     61,904       (9,756 )     363,054       (18,761 )
Collateralized debt obligations
    5,451       (587 )     130,104       (27,475 )     135,555       (28,062 )
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government guaranteed securities
    81,442       (3,362 )                 81,442       (3,362 )
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities
    61,277       (2,012 )                 61,277       (2,012 )
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and political subdivisions
    1,169,724       (57,589 )     65,337       (11,496 )     1,235,061       (69,085 )
 
                                   
Total fixed maturity securities
  $ 1,740,134     $ (75,915 )   $ 493,421     $ (102,319 )   $ 2,233,555     $ (178,234 )
 
                                   

-11-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note B — Investments — (Continued)
Net investment income was attributable to the following:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (dollars in thousands)  
Gross investment income:
                               
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale
  $ 86,895     $ 80,500     $ 173,007     $ 161,183  
Mortgage loans
    1,348       1,405       1,581       3,318  
Short-term investments
    47       17       95       37  
Other
    2,534       2,095       16,696       11,347  
 
                       
 
    90,824       84,017       191,379       175,885  
Less: Investment expenses
    (7,633 )     (5,783 )     (15,894 )     (13,601 )
 
                       
 
  $ 83,191     $ 78,234     $ 175,485     $ 162,284  
 
                       
Net realized investment gains (losses) arose from the following:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (dollars in thousands)  
Credit related other than temporary impairment losses:
                               
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale
  $ (4,996 )   $ (9,395 )   $ (14,014 )   $ (26,962 )
Mortgage loans
          (10,210 )           (15,101 )
Other investments
    (347 )     (1,228 )     (347 )     (1,768 )
 
                       
 
    (5,343 )     (20,833 )     (14,361 )     (43,831 )
 
                       
 
                               
Other net realized investment gains:
                               
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale
    4,832       5,628       11,631       11,746  
Mortgage loans
    53       345       290       419  
Other investments
    1,581       986       1,591       2,686  
 
                       
 
    6,466       6,959       13,512       14,851  
 
                       
Total
  $ 1,123     $ (13,874 )   $ (849 )   $ (28,980 )
 
                       
Proceeds from sales of fixed maturity securities during the first six months of 2011 and 2010 were $701.5 million and $257.5 million, respectively. Gross gains of $20.0 million and gross losses of $8.4 million were realized on the 2011 sales and gross gains of $16.3 million and gross losses of $4.6 million were realized on the 2010 sales. Proceeds from sales of fixed maturity securities during the second quarters of 2011 and 2010 were $181.5 million and $153.9 million, respectively. Gross gains of $9.4 million and gross losses of $4.6 million were realized on sales during the second quarter of 2011 and gross gains of $6.9 million and gross losses of $1.3 million were realized on sales during the second quarter of 2010. Net realized investment gains and losses on investment sales are determined under the specific identification method and are included in income. The change in unrealized appreciation and depreciation on investments, primarily relating to fixed maturity securities, is included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss.
The Company regularly evaluates its investment portfolio utilizing its established methodology to determine whether declines in the fair values of its investments below the Company’s amortized cost are other than temporary. Under this methodology, management evaluates whether and when the Company will recover an investment’s amortized cost, taking into account, among other things, the financial position and prospects of the issuer, conditions in the issuer’s industry and geographic area, liquidity of the investment, the expected amount and timing of future cash flows from the investment, recent changes in credit ratings of the issuer by nationally recognized rating agencies and the length of time and extent to which the fair value of the investment has been lower than its amortized cost to determine if and when a decline in the fair value of an investment below amortized cost is other than temporary. In the case of structured securities such as RMBS, commercial mortgage-backed

-12-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note B — Investments — (Continued)
securities and collateralized debt obligations, the most significant factor in these evaluations is the expected amount and timing of the future cash flows from the investment. In the case of fixed maturity securities, in instances where management determines that a security’s amortized cost will be recovered during its remaining term to maturity, an additional component of this methodology is the Company’s evaluation of whether it intends to, or will more likely than not be required to, sell the security before such anticipated recovery.
If the fair value of a fixed maturity security declines in value below the Company’s amortized cost and the Company intends to sell, or determines that it will more likely than not be required to sell, the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, management considers the security to be other than temporarily impaired and reports its decline in fair value as a realized investment loss in the income statement. If, however, the Company does not intend to sell the security and determines that it is not more likely than not that it will be required to do so, a decline in its fair value that is considered in the judgment of management to be other than temporary is separated into the amount representing credit loss and the amount related to other factors. Amounts representing credit losses are reported as realized investment losses in the income statement and amounts related to other factors are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of the related income tax benefit and the related adjustment to cost of business acquired. Declines in the fair value of all other investments below the Company’s amortized cost that are considered in the judgment of management to be other than temporary are reported as realized investment losses in the income statement.
In the case of structured securities such as RMBS, commercial mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations as to which a decline in fair value is judged to be other than temporary, the amount of the credit loss arising from the impairment of the security is determined by discounting such security’s expected cash flows at its effective interest rate, taking into account the security’s purchase price. The key inputs relating to such expected cash flows consist of the future scheduled payments on the underlying loans and the estimated frequency and severity of future defaults on these loans. For those securities as to which the Company recognized credit losses in 2011 as a result of determinations that such securities were other than temporarily impaired, representative default frequency estimates ranged from 2.4% to 5.3% and representative default severity estimates ranged from 45.8% to 62.6%.
In the case of corporate securities as to which a decline in fair value is determined to be other than temporary, the key input utilized to establish the amount of credit loss arising from the impairment of the security is the market price for such security. For each such security, the Company obtains such market price from a single independent nationally recognized pricing service. The Company has not in any instance adjusted the market price so obtained; however, management reviews these prices for reasonableness, taking into account both security-specific factors and its knowledge and understanding of the pricing methodologies used by the service. The credit loss for such security is determined to be equal to the excess of the Company’s amortized cost over such market price, as measured at the time of the impairment; as such, the entirety of the depreciation in market value is deemed to be reflective of credit loss.
During the first half of 2011, the Company recognized $10.0 million of after-tax other than temporary impairment losses, of which $9.3 million was recognized as after-tax realized investment losses in the income statement related to credit losses and $0.7 million was recognized, net of the related income tax benefit, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on the balance sheet related to noncredit losses. Impairment losses were offset by $8.8 million of after-tax other realized investment gains, resulting in a net of $0.6 million after-tax realized investment losses being recognized during the period.

-13-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note B — Investments — (Continued)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of other than temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities held by the Company for which a portion of the other than temporary impairment was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (dollars in thousands)  
Balance at the beginning of the period
  $ 80,174     $ 86,092     $ 79,602     $ 89,658  
Increases attributable to credit losses on securities for which an other than temporary impairment was not previously recognized
    1,013       3,377       1,745       10,364  
Increases attributable to credit losses on securities for which an other than temporary impairment was previously recognized
    3,984       5,710       11,650       13,211  
Reductions due to sales, maturities, pay downs or prepayments of securities for which an other than temporary impairment was previously recognized
    (9,577 )     (12,023 )     (17,403 )     (30,077 )
 
                       
Balance at the end of the period
  $ 75,594     $ 83,156     $ 75,594     $ 83,156  
 
                       
The gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2011 are attributable to 912 fixed maturity security positions, with the largest unrealized loss associated with any one security equal to $4.0 million. At June 30, 2011 approximately 34.9% of these aggregate gross unrealized losses were attributable to fixed maturity security positions as to which the unrealized loss represented 10% or less of the amortized cost for such security. Unrealized losses attributable to fixed maturity securities having investment grade ratings by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization comprised 40.9% of the aggregate gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2011, with the remainder of such losses being attributable to non-investment grade fixed maturity securities.
At June 30, 2011, the Company held approximately $834.9 million of insured municipal fixed maturity securities, which represented approximately 12% of the Company’s total invested assets. These securities had a weighted average credit rating of “A” by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations at June 30, 2011. For the portion of these securities having ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations without giving effect to the credit enhancement provided by the insurance, which totaled $785.2 million at June 30, 2011, the weighted average credit rating at such date by such organizations was “AA”. Insurers of significant portions of the municipal fixed maturity securities held by the Company at June 30, 2011 included National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. ($303.8 million), Assured Guaranty ($265.1 million), Ambac Financial Group, Inc. ($157.1 million), Financial Guaranty Insurance Company ($32.9 million) and Radian ($25.3 million). At June 30, 2011, the Company did not have significant holdings of credit enhanced asset-backed or mortgage-backed securities, nor did it have any significant direct investments in the guarantors of the municipal fixed maturity securities held by the Company.
Note C — Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures its assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet based on the framework set forth in the GAAP fair value accounting guidance. This framework establishes a fair value hierarchy of three levels based upon the transparency and availability of information used in measuring the fair value of assets or liabilities as of the measurement date. The levels are categorized as follows:
Level 1- Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 1 fair value is not subject to valuation adjustments or block discounts.
Level 2 — Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active. In addition, a company may use various valuation techniques or pricing models that use observable inputs to measure fair value.

-14-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note C — Fair Value Measurements — (Continued)
Level 3 — Valuation is generated from techniques in which one or more of the significant inputs for valuing such assets or liabilities are not observable. These inputs may reflect the Company’s best estimates of the various assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the financial assets and financial liabilities.
For these purposes, the Company determines the existence of an active market for an asset or liability based on its judgment as to whether transactions for the asset or liability occur in such market with sufficient frequency and volume to provide reliable pricing information. If the Company concludes that there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for an investment in relation to normal market activity for such investment, adjustments to transactions and quoted prices are made to estimate fair value.
The Company’s investments in fixed maturity securities available for sale, equity securities available for sale, trading account securities, assets held in the separate account and its liabilities for securities sold, not yet purchased are carried at fair value. The methodologies and valuation techniques used by the Company to value its assets and liabilities measured at fair value are described below.
Instruments included in fixed maturity securities available for sale include mortgage-backed and corporate securities, U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government guaranteed securities, securities issued by U.S. government-sponsored enterprises, and obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and political subdivisions. The market liquidity of each security is taken into consideration in the valuation technique used to value such security. For securities where market transactions involving identical or comparable assets generate sufficient relevant information, the Company employs a market approach to valuation. If sufficient information is not generated from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets, the Company uses an income approach to valuation. The majority of the instruments included in fixed maturity securities available for sale are valued utilizing observable inputs; accordingly, they are categorized in either Level l or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy described above. However, in instances where significant inputs utilized are unobservable, the securities are categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
The inputs used in the valuation techniques employed by the Company are provided by nationally recognized pricing services, external investment managers and internal resources. To assess these inputs, the Company’s review process includes, but is not limited to, quantitative analysis including benchmarking, initial and ongoing evaluations of methodologies used by external parties to calculate fair value, and ongoing evaluations of fair value estimates based on the Company’s knowledge and monitoring of market conditions.
The Company uses various valuation techniques and pricing models to measure the fair value of its investments in residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities, including option-adjusted spread models, volatility-driven multi-dimensional single cash flow stream models and matrix correlation to comparable securities. Residential mortgage-backed securities include U.S. agency securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. Inputs utilized in connection with the valuation techniques relating to this class of securities include monthly payment and performance information with respect to the underlying loans, including prepayments, default severity, delinquencies, market indices and the amounts of the tranches in the particular structure which are senior or subordinate, as applicable, to the tranche represented by the Company’s investment. A portion of the Company’s investments in mortgage-backed securities are valued using observable inputs and therefore categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The remaining mortgage-backed securities are valued using non-binding broker quotes. These methodologies rely on unobservable inputs and thus these securities are categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Corporate securities primarily include fixed rate corporate bonds, floating and variable rate notes and securities acquired through private placements. Inputs utilized in connection with the Company’s valuation techniques relating to this class of securities include recently executed transactions, market price quotations, benchmark yields, issuer spreads and, in the case of private placement corporate securities, cash flow models. These cash flow models utilize yield curves, issuer-provided information and material events as key inputs. Corporate securities are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, other than securities acquired through private placements, which are categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Collateralized debt obligations consist of collateralized loan obligations. The Company’s valuation techniques relating to this class of securities utilize non-binding broker quotes as the key input. As this input is generally unobservable, collateralized debt obligations are categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

-15-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note C — Fair Value Measurements — (Continued)
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government guaranteed securities include U.S. Treasury bonds and notes, Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (“TIPS”) and other U.S. government guaranteed securities. The fair values of the U.S. Treasury securities and TIPS are based on quoted prices in active markets and are generally categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Inputs utilized in connection with the Company’s valuation techniques relating to its investments in other U.S. government guaranteed securities, as well as its investments in U.S. government-sponsored enterprise securities, which consist of medium term notes issued by these enterprises, include recently executed transactions, interest rate yield curves, maturity dates, market price quotations and credit spreads relating to similar instruments. These inputs are generally observable and accordingly, these securities are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and political subdivisions primarily include bonds or notes issued by U.S municipalities. Inputs utilized in connection with the Company’s valuation techniques relating to this class of securities include recently executed transactions and other market data, spreads, benchmark curves including treasury and other benchmarks, trustee reports, material event notices, new issue data, and issuer financial statements. These inputs are generally observable and these securities are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Other investments held at fair value primarily consist of equity securities available for sale and trading account securities. These investments are primarily valued at quoted active market prices and are therefore categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. For private equity investments, since quoted market prices are not available, the transaction price is used as the best estimate of fair value at inception. When evidence is believed to support a change to the carrying value from the transaction price, adjustments are made to reflect expected exit values. Ongoing reviews by Company management are based on assessments of each underlying investment and the inputs utilized in these reviews include, among other things, the evaluation of financing and sale transactions with third parties, expected cash flows, material events and market-based information. These investments are included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Assets held in the separate account represent funds invested in a separately administered variable life insurance product for which the policyholder, rather than the Company, bears the investment risk. These assets are invested in interests in a limited liability company that invests in funds which trade in various financial instruments. This limited liability company, all of whose interests are owned by the Company’s separate account, utilizes the financial statements furnished by the funds to determine the values of its investments in such funds and the carrying value of each such investment, which is based on its proportionate interest in the relevant fund as of the balance sheet date. As such, these funds’ financial statements constitute the key input in the Company’s valuation of its investment in this limited liability company. The Company concluded that the value calculated using the equity method of accounting on its investment in this limited liability company was reflective of the fair market value of such investments. The investment portfolios of the funds in which the fund investments are maintained vary from fund to fund, but are generally comprised of liquid, publicly traded securities that have readily determinable market values and which are carried at fair value on the financial statements of such funds, substantially all of which are audited annually. The amount that an investor is entitled to receive upon the redemption of its investment from the applicable fund is determined by reference to such security values. These investments are included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Other liabilities measured at fair value consist of securities sold, not yet purchased. These securities are valued using the quoted active market prices of the securities sold and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

-16-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note C — Fair Value Measurements — (Continued)
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet on a recurring basis are summarized below:
                                 
    June 30, 2011  
    Total     Level 1     Level 2     Level 3  
            (dollars in thousands)          
Assets:
                               
Fixed maturity securities, available for sale:
                               
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 682,054     $     $ 672,476     $ 9,578  
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
    805,880             771,536       34,344  
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
    83,330             81,925       1,405  
Corporate securities
    1,767,775             1,652,791       114,984  
Collateralized debt obligations
    220,124             666       219,458  
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government guaranteed securities
    132,672       81,205       43,620       7,847  
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities
    108,757             104,721       4,036  
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and political subdivisions
    2,380,890             2,377,979       2,911  
Other investments
    228,859       222,964             5,895  
Assets held in separate account
    126,213                   126,213  
 
                       
Total
  $ 6,536,554     $ 304,169     $ 5,705,714     $ 526,671  
 
                       
 
                               
Liabilities:
                               
Other liabilities
  $ 85,254     $ 85,254     $     $  
 
                       
The following table provides reconciliations for Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Transfers into and out of Level 3 are recognized as of the end of the quarter in which they occur.
                                                                         
    Three Months Ended June 30, 2011  
                    Total Gains                                              
                    (Losses)                                              
    Balance at
Beginning
    Total Gains
(Losses)
Included in
    Included in
Other Com-
prehensive
                            Transfers
Into
    Transfers
Out of
    Balance
End of the
 
    of Quarter     Earnings     Income     Purchases     Issuances     Settlements     Level 3     Level 3     Period  
    (dollars in thousands)  
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 10,199     $ (19 )   $ 77     $ 365     $     $ (1,044 )   $     $     $ 9,578  
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
    40,065       132       (888 )                 (1,090 )           (3,875 )     34,344  
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
    1,172       (1 )     (20 )     396             (142 )                 1,405  
Corporate securities
    73,024       1,228       411       57,462             (5,337 )           (11,804 )     114,984  
Collateralized debt obligations
    181,832       1,581       (2,348 )     44,257             (5,864 )                 219,458  
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government guaranteed securities
    8,115       (21 )     (79 )                 (168 )                 7,847  
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities
    29,318       129       19       4             (25,063 )           (371 )     4,036  
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and political subdivisions
                3       1,606                   1,302             2,911  
Other investments
    5,564                   331                               5,895  
Assets held in separate account (1)
    129,428       (2,546 )           7,225             (7,894 )                 126,213  
 
                                                     
Total
  $ 478,717     $ 483     $ (2,825 )   $ 111,646     $     $ (46,602 )   $ 1,302     $ (16,050 )   $ 526,671  
 
                                                     
 
(1)   Because the positive or negative investment performance of these assets accrues to policyholders, who bear the investment risk of these assets, net investment income and capital gains and losses arising from these assets are not included in the Company’s consolidated investment earnings. In addition, purchases and settlements relating to the separate account are not included in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows.

-17-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note C — Fair Value Measurements — (Continued)
                                                                         
    Six Months Ended June 30, 2011  
                    Total Gains                                              
                    (Losses)                                              
    Balance at
Beginning
    Total Gains
(Losses)
Included in
    Included in
Other Com-
prehensive
                            Transfers
Into
    Transfers
Out of
    Balance
End of the
 
    of Year     Earnings     Income     Purchases     Issuances     Settlements     Level 3     Level 3     Period  
    (dollars in thousands)  
Agency residential mortgage-backed securities
  $ 11,266     $ (38 )   $ 17     $ 365     $     $ (2,032 )   $     $     $ 9,578  
Non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities
    37,520       271       (1,172 )     3,873             (2,273 )           (3,875 )     34,344  
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
    1,327       (1 )     (34 )     396             (283 )                 1,405  
Corporate securities
    60,968       1,203       (652 )     76,037             (8,910 )     1,645       (15,307 )     114,984  
Collateralized debt obligations
    175,184       3,783       11,796       44,255             (15,560 )                 219,458  
U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government guaranteed securities
    9,015       (24 )     (870 )                 (274 )                 7,847  
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise securities
    4,020       135       10       23,272             (25,064 )     2,033       (370 )     4,036  
Obligations of U.S. states, municipalities and political subdivisions
    2,855             (60 )     1,606                   1,302       (2,792 )     2,911  
Other investments
    6,449             65       334                         (953 )     5,895  
Assets held in separate account (1)
    123,674       3,839             23,203             (24,503 )                 126,213  
 
                                                     
Total
  $ 432,278     $ 9,168     $ 9,100     $ 173,341     $     $ (78,899 )   $ 4,980     $ (23,297 )   $ 526,671  
 
                                                     
 
(1)   Because the positive or negative investment performance of these assets accrues to policyholders, who bear the investment risk of these assets, net investment income and capital gains and losses arising from these assets are not included in the Company’s consolidated investment earnings. In addition, purchases and settlements relating to the separate account are not included in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows.
The carrying values and estimated fair values of certain of the Company’s financial instruments not recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are shown below. Because fair values for all balance sheet items are not required to be disclosed, the aggregate fair value amounts presented below are not reflective of the underlying value of the Company.
                                 
    June 30, 2011     December 31, 2010  
    Carrying     Fair     Carrying     Fair  
    Value     Value     Value     Value  
            (dollars in thousands)          
Assets:
                               
Short-term investments
  $ 228,486     $ 228,486     $ 334,215     $ 334,215  
Other investments
    385,321       385,321       351,678       351,678  
 
Liabilities:
                               
Policyholder account balances
  $ 1,801,139     $ 1,892,500     $ 1,662,932     $ 1,761,795  
Corporate debt
    375,000       408,058       375,000       402,618  
Junior subordinated debentures
    175,000       169,381       175,000       161,541  
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
    55,342       71,858       55,342       70,046  
Liabilities related to separate account
    126,213       126,213       123,674       123,674  
The carrying values for short-term investments approximate fair values based on the nature of the investments. Other investments primarily include investment funds organized as limited partnerships and limited liability companies and real estate investments held by limited liability companies, which are reflected in the Company’s financial statements under the equity method of accounting. In determining the fair values of such investments for purposes of this footnote disclosure, the Company concluded that the values calculated using the equity method of accounting was reflective of the fair market values of such investments. The investment portfolios of the funds in which the fund investments are maintained vary from fund to fund, but are generally comprised of liquid, publicly traded securities that have readily determinable market values and are carried at

-18-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note C — Fair Value Measurements — (Continued)
fair value on the financial statements of such funds, substantially all of which are audited annually. The amount that an investor is entitled to receive upon the redemption of its investment from the applicable fund is determined by reference to such security values. The Company utilizes the financial statements furnished by the funds to determine the values of its investments in such funds and the carrying value of each such investment, which is based on its proportionate interest in the relevant fund as of the balance sheet date. The carrying values of all other invested assets and separate account liabilities approximate their fair value.
The fair values of policyholder account balances are net of reinsurance receivables and the carrying values have been decreased for related acquisition costs of $74.2 million and $82.1 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Fair values for policyholder account balances were determined by estimating future cash flows discounted at a current market rate.
The Company believes that the fair value of its variable rate long-term debt is equal to its carrying value, since the variable rates of interest on this debt are reflective of market conditions in effect from time to time. The fair values of the 7.875% Senior Notes due 2020, the outstanding borrowings under the Company’s Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, and a group of lenders and the 7.376% fixed-to-floating rate junior subordinated debentures due 2067 are based on the expected cash flows discounted to net present value. The fair values for fixed rate advances from the FHLB were calculated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the interest rates for the advances at the balance sheet date.
Note D — Segment Information
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
            (dollars in thousands)          
Revenues:
                               
Group employee benefit products
  $ 421,287     $ 386,872     $ 842,580     $ 773,163  
Asset accumulation products
    33,162       30,490       67,274       62,087  
Other (1)
    13,754       13,438       27,042       27,363  
 
                       
 
    468,203       430,800       936,896       862,613  
Net realized investment gains (losses)
    1,123       (13,874 )     (849 )     (28,980 )
Loss on early retirement of senior notes
          (212 )           (212 )
 
                       
 
  $ 469,326     $ 416,714     $ 936,047     $ 833,421  
 
                       
Operating income:
                               
Group employee benefit products
  $ 73,082     $ 65,320     $ 149,160     $ 134,388  
Asset accumulation products
    9,628       11,316       19,331       21,728  
Other (1)
    (8,807 )     (6,983 )     (16,598 )     (14,300 )
 
                       
 
    73,903       69,653       151,893       141,816  
Net realized investment gains (losses)
    1,123       (13,874 )     (849 )     (28,980 )
Loss on early retirement of senior notes
          (212 )           (212 )
 
                       
 
  $ 75,026     $ 55,567     $ 151,044     $ 112,624  
 
                       
 
(1)   Primarily consists of operations from integrated disability and absence management services and certain corporate activities.
Note E — Comprehensive Income
Total comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders is comprised of net income attributable to shareholders and other comprehensive income, which includes the change in unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, the change in other than temporary impairments recognized in other comprehensive income and the change in net periodic pension cost. Total comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders was $147.0 million and $138.4 million for the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $86.5 million and $79.0 million for the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net unrealized gains on securities available for sale increased $44.5 million and $62.7 million in the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

-19-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note F — Stock-Based Compensation
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expenses of $4.0 million and $4.5 million in the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively, of which $1.8 million and $2.3 million was recognized in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The remaining unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested awards at June 30, 2011 was $17.4 million and the weighted average period of time over which this expense will be recognized is 3.1 years.
The fair values of options were estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
                 
    Six Months Ended
    June 30,
    2011   2010
Expected volatility
    44.7 %     43.0 %
Expected dividends
    1.5 %     1.8 %
Expected lives of options (in years)
    5.8       6.1  
Risk-free rate
    2.4 %     2.7 %
The expected volatility reflects the Company’s past monthly stock price volatility. The dividend yield is based on the Company’s historical dividend payments. The Company used the historical average period from the Company’s issuance of an option to its exercise or cancellation and the average remaining years until expiration for the Company’s outstanding options to estimate the expected life of options granted in 2011 and 2010 for which the Company had sufficient historical exercise data.
The Company used the “simplified method” to estimate the expected life of certain options granted in 2011 and 2010 for which sufficient historical data was not available. The risk-free rate is derived from public data sources at the time of each option grant. Compensation cost is recognized over the requisite service period of the option using the straight-line method.
Option activity with respect to the Company’s plans, excluding the performance-contingent incentive options referenced further below, was as follows:
                                 
                    Weighted        
            Weighted     Average     Aggregate  
    Number     Average     Remaining     Intrinsic  
    of     Exercise     Contractual     Value  
Options   Options     Price     Term     ($000)  
Outstanding at January 1, 2011
    3,989,995     $ 29.10                  
Granted
    592,389       30.58                  
Exercised
    (181,891 )     23.82                  
Forfeited
    (10,800 )     24.20                  
Expired
    (8,952 )     35.27                  
 
                             
Outstanding at June 30, 2011
    4,380,741       29.52       6.6     $ 10,529  
 
                             
 
                               
Exercisable at June 30, 2011
    2,449,698     $ 30.53       5.5     $ 5,168  
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the first half of 2011 and 2010 was $11.95 and $8.22, respectively, and during the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 was $11.05 and $10.18, respectively. The cash proceeds from stock options exercised were $4.1 million and $1.0 million in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the first half of 2011 and 2010 was $1.3 million and $2.3 million, respectively. The Company’s actual benefits from the tax deductions realized in excess of recognized compensation cost were $0.8 million and $0.5 million in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and are included as a component of additional paid in capital.
At June 30, 2011, 4,296,250 performance-contingent incentive options were outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $25.49, a weighted average contractual term of 3.9 years and an intrinsic value of $17.2 million. 3,603,250 of such options with a weighted average exercise price of $25.32, a weighted average contractual term of 3.1 years and an intrinsic value of $15.2 million were exercisable at June 30, 2011. At June 30, 2011, a total of 251,029 performance-contingent restricted shares were outstanding.

-20-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Note G Computation of Results per Share
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted results per share:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
    June 30,     June 30,  
    2011     2010     2011     2010  
    (amounts in thousands, except per share data)  
Numerator:
                               
Net income attributable to shareholders
  $ 49,427     $ 34,662     $ 99,651     $ 71,178  
 
                       
 
                               
Denominator:
                               
Weighted average common shares outstanding
    56,091       55,287       56,006       55,224  
Effect of dilutive securities
    777       478       795       387  
 
                       
Weighted average common shares outstanding, assuming dilution
    56,868       55,765       56,801       55,611  
 
                       
 
                               
Basic results per share of common stock:
                               
Net income attributable to shareholders
  $ 0.88     $ 0.63     $ 1.78     $ 1.29  
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted results per share of common stock:
                               
Net income attributable to shareholders
  $ 0.87     $ 0.62     $ 1.75     $ 1.28  
 
                       

-21-


Table of Contents

DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
The Company, through its subsidiaries, underwrites a diverse portfolio of group employee benefit products, primarily long-term and short-term disability, life, excess workers’ compensation insurance for self-insured employers, large casualty programs including large deductible workers’ compensation, travel accident, dental and limited benefit health insurance. Revenues from this group of products are primarily comprised of earned premiums and investment income. The profitability of group employee benefit products is affected by, among other things, differences between actual and projected claims experience, the retention of existing customers, product mix and the Company’s ability to attract new customers, change premium rates and contract terms for existing customers and control administrative expenses. The Company transfers its exposure to a portion of its group employee benefit risks through reinsurance ceded arrangements with other insurance and reinsurance companies. Accordingly, the profitability of the Company’s group employee benefit products is affected by the amount, cost and terms of reinsurance it obtains. The profitability of those group employee benefit products for which reserves are discounted, in particular, the Company’s disability and primary and excess workers’ compensation products, is also significantly affected by the difference between the yield achieved on invested assets and the discount rate used to calculate the related reserves.
In recent years, the Company has benefited from the stable market conditions prevailing for its excess workers’ compensation products as to pricing and other contract terms. However, because pricing in the primary workers’ compensation market has been increasingly competitive, the demand for excess workers’ compensation products has not significantly increased. In addition, the downward pressure on employment and wage levels exerted by the recent recession has negatively affected premium levels for insurance products which are based upon employers’ payrolls, such as the Company’s excess workers’ compensation products. This effect has been ameliorated by the Company’s emphasis on municipalities, hospitals and schools; sectors whose payroll levels generally have been less adversely affected by the recent recession. The Company has enhanced its focus on its sales and marketing function for these products. During the first six months of 2011, the Company achieved significantly improved levels of new business production, as well as improvements in pricing, for these products.
For its other group employee benefit products, the Company is continuing to experience challenging market conditions from a competitive standpoint. These conditions, in addition to the continuing effects of the recent recession on employment and wage levels have, in recent years, adversely impacted the Company’s ability to achieve higher levels of new business production and growth in premiums for these products. For these products, the Company is continuing to enhance its focus on the small case niche (insured groups of 10 to 500 individuals), including employers which are first-time providers of these employee benefits, which the Company believes to offer opportunities for superior profitability. During the first six months of 2011, the Company achieved significantly improved levels of new business production, as well as improvements in pricing, for these products. The Company is also emphasizing its suite of voluntary group insurance products, which includes, among others, its group limited benefit health insurance product. The Company is generally marketing this product with a fixed indemnity benefit structure that is exempt from certain of the requirements of the federal health care reform legislation; however, it is uncertain whether this product can be effectively marketed once the minimum medical coverage requirements of the legislation become effective in 2014, since this product’s coverage will not satisfy these requirements. The Company markets its other group employee benefit products on an unbundled basis and as part of an integrated employee benefit program that combines employee benefit insurance coverages and absence management services. The integrated employee benefit program, which the Company believes helps to differentiate itself from competitors by offering clients improved productivity from reduced employee absence, has enhanced the Company’s ability to market its other group employee benefit products to large employers.
The Company also operates an asset accumulation business that focuses primarily on offering fixed annuities to individuals. From time to time, the Company acquires blocks of existing SPDA and FPA policies from other insurers through indemnity assumed reinsurance transactions and issues funding agreements. The Company believes that annuity reinsurance arrangements and funding agreements enhance the Company’s asset accumulation business by providing alternative sources of funds for this business. The Company’s liabilities for annuity reinsurance arrangements and funding agreements are recorded in policyholder account balances. Deposits from the Company’s asset accumulation business are recorded as liabilities rather than as premiums. Revenues from the Company’s asset accumulation business are primarily comprised of investment income earned on the funds under management. The profitability of asset accumulation products is primarily dependent on the spread achieved between the return on investments and the interest credited with respect to these products. The Company sets the crediting rates offered on its asset accumulation products in an effort to achieve its targeted interest rate spreads on these products, and is willing to accept lower levels of sales on these products when market conditions make these targeted spreads more difficult to achieve.

-22-


Table of Contents

The management of the Company’s investment portfolio is an important component of its profitability. In recent years, the Company has repositioned its investment portfolio to reduce its holdings of those investments whose changes in value, positive or negative, are included in the Company’s net investment income, such as investment funds organized as limited partnerships and limited liability companies, trading account securities and hybrid financial instruments; in particular, those investments whose performance had demonstrated the highest levels of variability. As part of this effort, the Company increased its investments in more traditional sectors of the fixed income market such as mortgage-backed securities and municipal bonds. In addition, in light of the market conditions of recent years, the Company had been maintaining a significant proportion of its portfolio in short-term investments, which totaled $228.5 million and $334.2 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company has made progress in its recent efforts to deploy a significant portion of these short-term investments into longer-term fixed maturity securities which offer more attractive yields. However, since the recent market environment, in which low interest rates and tight credit spreads have been prevailing, continues to be challenging from the standpoint of making new investments on attractive terms, no assurance can be given as to the timing of the completion of these efforts or their ultimate outcome.
The Company achieved significantly improved levels of investment income in its repositioned investment portfolio in 2010 and in the first six months of 2011. However, market conditions may worsen and may result in significant fluctuations in net investment income, and as a result, in the Company’s results of operations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance as to the impact of the Company’s investment repositioning on the level or variability of its future net investment income. In addition, while the levels of the Company’s realized investment losses from declines in market value relative to the amortized cost of various securities that it determined to be other than temporary decreased significantly in the first half of 2011 as compared to 2010 and 2009, investment losses may recur in the future and it is not possible to predict the timing or magnitude of such losses.
The following discussion and analysis of the results of operations and financial condition of the Company should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in this document, as well as the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “2010 Form 10-K”). Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings ascribed to them in the 2010 Form 10-K. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management, in some instances, to make judgments about the application of these principles. The amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period could differ materially from the amounts reported if different conditions existed or different judgments were utilized. A discussion of how management applies certain critical accounting policies and makes certain estimates is contained in the 2010 Form 10-K in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and should be read in conjunction with the following discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition of the Company. In addition, a discussion of uncertainties and contingencies which can affect actual results and could cause future results to differ materially from those expressed in certain forward-looking statements contained in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations can be found below under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements And Cautionary Statements Regarding Certain Factors That May Affect Future Results,” in Part I, Item 1A of the 2010 Form 10-K, “Risk Factors”.
Results of Operations
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Summary of Results. Net income attributable to shareholders was $99.7 million, or $1.75 per diluted share, for the first half of 2011 as compared to $71.2 million, or $1.28 per diluted share, for the first half of 2010. Net income in the first half of 2011 and 2010 included net realized investment losses, net of the related income tax benefit, of $0.6 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, and $18.8 million, or $0.34 per diluted share, respectively. Net income in the first half of 2011 as compared to the prior period benefited from growth in income from the Company’s core group employee benefit products, an increase in net investment income and decreases in the levels of realized investment losses and interest expense. Net realized investment losses in the first half of 2011 and 2010 included losses, net of the related income tax benefit, of $9.3 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, and $28.5 million, or $0.51 per diluted share, respectively, due to credit loss-related impairments in the values of certain investments. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to the early retirement of the 2033 Senior Notes.
The Company believes the non-GAAP financial measure of “operating earnings” is informative when analyzing the trends relating to the Company’s insurance operations. Operating earnings consist of net income attributable to shareholders excluding after-tax realized investment gains and losses, losses on early retirement of senior notes and results from discontinued operations, as applicable. The Company believes that because these excluded items arise from events that are largely within management’s discretion and whose fluctuations can distort comparisons between periods, a measure excluding their impact is useful in

-23-


Table of Contents

analyzing the Company’s operating trends. Investment gains or losses are realized based on management’s decision to dispose of an investment, and investment losses are realized based on management’s judgment that a decline in the fair value of an investment is other than temporary. Early retirement of senior notes occurs based on management’s decision to redeem or repurchase these notes prior to maturity. Discontinued operations result from management’s decision to exit or sell a particular business. Thus, these excluded items are not reflective of the Company’s ongoing earnings capacity, and trends in the earnings of the Company’s underlying insurance operations can be more clearly identified without the effects. For these reasons, management uses the measure of operating earnings to assess performance and make operating plans and decisions, and the Company believes that analysts and investors typically utilize measures of this type as one element of their evaluations of insurers’ financial performance. However, gains or losses from the excluded items, particularly as to investments, can occur frequently and should not be considered as nonrecurring items. Further, operating earnings should not be considered a substitute for net income attributable to shareholders, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, as an indication of the Company’s overall financial performance and may not be calculated in the same manner as similarly titled measures utilized by other companies.
Operating earnings were $100.2 million, or $1.76 per diluted share, in the first half of 2011 compared to $90.2 million, or $1.62 per diluted share. This increase is primarily due to growth in income from the Company’s core group employee benefit products, an increase in net investment income and a decrease in interest expense.
The following table reconciles the amount of operating earnings to the corresponding amount of net income attributable to shareholders for the indicated periods:
                 
    Six Months Ended  
    June 30,  
    2011     2010  
Operating earnings
  $ 100,203     $ 90,153  
Net realized investment losses, net of taxes (1)
    (552 )     (18,837 )
Loss on early retirement of senior notes (2)
          (138 )
 
           
Net income attributable to shareholders
  $ 99,651     $ 71,178  
 
           
 
               
Diluted results per share of common stock
               
Operating earnings
  $ 1.76     $ 1.62  
Net realized investment losses, net of taxes (1)
    (0.01 )     (0.34 )
Loss on early retirement of senior notes (2)
          (0.00 )
 
           
Net income attributable to shareholders
  $ 1.75     $ 1.28  
 
           
 
(1)   Net of an income tax benefit of $0.3 million and $10.1 million, or $0.01 per diluted share and $0.18 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The tax effect is calculated using the Company’s statutory tax rate of 35%.
 
(2)   Net of an income tax benefit of $0.07 million or $0.00 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The tax effect is calculated using the Company’s statutory tax rate of 35%.
Premium and Fee Income. Premium and fee income for the first half of 2011 was $761.4 million as compared to $700.3 million for the first half of 2010, an increase of 9%. Premiums from core group employee benefit products, which include disability, life, excess workers’ compensation, travel accident and dental insurance, limited benefit health insurance and assumed workers’ compensation and casualty reinsurance, increased 8% to $725.9 million for the first half of 2011 from $671.1 million for the first half of 2010, reflecting higher new business production, price increases and improved persistency. New business production for the Company’s core group employee benefit products increased 23% to $148.0 million in the first half of 2011 from $120.7 million in the first half of 2010. Premiums from excess workers’ compensation insurance for self-insured employers increased 11% to $153.9 million in the first half of 2011 from $138.8 million in the first half of 2010. Excess workers’ compensation new business production, which represents the annualized amount of new premium sold, was $31.5 million in the first half of 2011 as compared to $19.7 million in the first half of 2010, an increase of 60%. Premiums from assumed workers’ compensation and casualty reinsurance increased 49% to $34.7 million in the first half of 2011 from $23.4 million in the first half of 2010. Assumed workers’ compensation and casualty reinsurance production was $12.1 million in the first half of 2011 as compared to $8.5 million in the first half of 2010, an increase of 42%. In its important July 2011 renewal season, the results of which are not reflected in the Company’s results for the first half of 2011, rates on excess workers’ compensation policies increased 4% and SIRs were on average up 3% on new and renewal policies. The Company’s retention of its existing excess workers’ compensation customers remained strong in the first half of 2011.

-24-


Table of Contents

During the first half of 2011, premiums from the Company’s other core group employee benefit products increased 6% to $537.3 million in the first half of 2011 from $508.9 million in the first half of 2010. Premiums from the Company’s group life products increased 7% to $207.6 million in the first half of 2011 from $193.8 million in the first half of 2010. Premiums from the Company’s group disability products increased 5% to $283.3 million in the first half of 2011 from $271.1 million in the first half of 2010. Premiums from the Company’s turnkey disability business were $24.4 million during the first half of 2011 compared to $25.2 million during the first half of 2010. New business production for the Company’s other core group employee benefit products increased 13% to $104.4 million in the first half of 2011 from $92.5 million in the first half of 2010. The level of production achieved from these products reflects the Company’s focus on the small case niche (insured groups of 10 to 500 individuals). The Company continues to implement price increases for certain group disability and group life insurance customers; in particular, where warranted in particular instances due to adverse claims experience. In addition, the Company has increased pricing levels for new long-term disability insurance customers as a result of the decrease in the discount rate for its disability reserves that was implemented in 2010. The payments received by the Company in connection with LPT’s, which are episodic in nature and are recorded as liabilities rather than as premiums, were $37.0 million in the first half of 2011 as compared to $6.9 million in the first half of 2010.
Deposits from the Company’s asset accumulation products were $246.6 million in the first half of 2011 as compared to $116.8 million in the first half of 2010, an increase of 111%. This increase reflects the continuation during the first half of 2011 of the advantageous conditions for the Company in the fixed annuity marketplace which emerged during the second half of 2010. Deposits from the Company’s asset accumulation products, consisting of new annuity sales and issuances of funding agreements, are recorded as liabilities rather than as premiums. The Company is continuing to maintain its discipline in setting the crediting rates offered on its asset accumulation products in 2011 in an effort to achieve its targeted interest rate spreads on these products. The Company’s funds under management increased 24% to $1,856.4 million at June 30, 2011 from $1,501.7 million at June 30, 2010.
Net Investment Income. Net investment income in the first half of 2011 was $175.5 million as compared to $162.3 million in the first half of 2010, an increase of 8%. This increase reflects a 14% increase in average invested assets to $6,678.0 million in 2011 from $5,852.3 million in 2010, a higher level of investment income from the Company’s fixed maturity security portfolio and improved performance on the part of the Company’s investments in investment funds organized as limited partnerships and limited liability companies and trading account securities. The tax equivalent weighted average annualized yield on invested assets was 5.7% and 6.0% in for the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Net Realized Investment Losses. Net realized investment losses were $0.8 million in the first half of 2011 as compared to $29.0 million in the first half of 2010. The Company monitors its investments on an ongoing basis. When the fair value of a security declines below its amortized cost, the decline is included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of the related income tax benefit and adjustment to cost of business acquired, on the Company’s balance sheet. In the case of a fixed maturity security, if management judges the decline to be other than temporary, the portion of the decline representing credit losses is recognized as a realized investment loss in the Company’s income statement and the remaining portion of the decline continues to be included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. For all other types of investments, the entire amount of the decline is recognized as a realized investment loss. The Company recognized $15.3 million and $48.9 million of losses in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively, due to the other than temporary declines in the fair values of certain fixed maturity securities and other investments, of which, respectively, $14.4 million and $43.8 million was recognized as credit-related realized investment losses and $1.0 million and $5.1 million remained as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company’s investment strategy results in periodic sales of securities and, therefore, the recognition of realized investment gains and losses. During the first half of 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized $13.5 million and $14.9 million, respectively, of net gains on sales of securities.
The Company may continue to recognize losses due to other than temporary declines in security fair values in the future, and such losses may be significant. The extent of such losses will depend on, among other things, future developments in the United States and global economies, financial and credit markets, credit spreads, interest rates, expected future cash flows from structured securities, the outlook for the performance by the security issuers of their obligations and changes in security values. The Company continuously monitors its investments in securities whose fair values are below the Company’s amortized cost pursuant to its procedures for evaluation for other than temporary impairment in valuation. See Note B to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the section in the 2010 Form 10-K entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” for a description of these procedures, which take into account a number of factors. It is not possible to predict the extent of any future changes in value, positive or negative, or the results of the future application of these procedures, with respect to these securities. For further information concerning the Company’s investment portfolio, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources — Investments.”

-25-


Table of Contents

Benefits and Expenses. Policyholder benefits and expenses were $785.0 million in the first half of 2011 as compared to $720.8 million in the first half of 2010. This increase primarily reflects the increase in premiums from the Company’s group employee benefit products discussed above. The combined ratio (loss ratio plus expense ratio) for group employee benefit products was 94.5% and 94.6% in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The weighted average annualized crediting rate on the Company’s asset accumulation products was 3.8% and 3.9% in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was $18.5 million in the first half of 2011 as compared to $22.1 million in the first half of 2010. This decrease primarily reflects a decrease in interest expense resulting from the early retirement of the 2033 Senior Notes during 2010, partially offset by an increase in interest expense associated with the 2020 Senior Notes, which were issued by the Company in the first quarter of 2010, as well as increased interest paid on the Company’s new bank credit facility.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $32.2 million in the first half of 2011 as compared to $19.3 million in the first half of 2010. This increase primarily reflects the decrease in the income tax benefit resulting from realized investment losses, as well as a higher level of taxable income. The Company’s effective tax rate was 24.4% and 21.3% in the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Summary of Results. Net income attributable to shareholders was $49.4 million, or $0.87 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $34.7 million, or $0.62 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2010. Net income in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 included net realized investment gains (losses) (net of the related income tax expense (benefit)) of $0.7 million, or $0.01 per diluted share, and $(9.0) million, or $(0.17) per diluted share, respectively. Net income in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the prior period benefited from growth in income from the Company’s core group employee benefit products, an increase in net investment income and decreases in the levels of realized investment losses and interest expense. Net realized investment gains (losses) in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 included losses, net of the related income tax benefit, of $(3.5) million, or $(0.06) per diluted share, and $(13.5) million, or $(0.24) per diluted share, respectively, due to credit loss-related impairments in the values of certain investments. The decrease in interest expense primarily reflects a decrease in interest expense associated with the 2033 Senior Notes, which were redeemed during 2010.
The Company believes the non-GAAP financial measure of “operating earnings” is informative when analyzing the trends relating to the Company’s insurance operations. Operating earnings consist of net income attributable to shareholders excluding after-tax realized investment gains and losses, losses on early retirement of senior notes and results from discontinued operations, as applicable. The Company believes that because these excluded items arise from events that are largely within management’s discretion and whose fluctuations can distort comparisons between periods, a measure excluding their impact is useful in analyzing the Company’s operating trends. Investment gains or losses are realized based on management’s decision to dispose of an investment, and investment losses are realized based on management’s judgment that a decline in the fair value of an investment is other than temporary. Early retirement of senior notes occurs based on management’s decision to redeem or repurchase these notes prior to maturity. Discontinued operations result from management’s decision to exit or sell a particular business. Thus, these excluded items are not reflective of the Company’s ongoing earnings capacity, and trends in the earnings of the Company’s underlying insurance operations can be more clearly identified without the effects. For these reasons, management uses the measure of operating earnings to assess performance and make operating plans and decisions, and the Company believes that analysts and investors typically utilize measures of this type as one element of their evaluations of insurers’ financial performance. However, gains or losses from the excluded items, particularly as to investments, can occur frequently and should not be considered as nonrecurring items. Further, operating earnings should not be considered a substitute for net income attributable to shareholders, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, as an indication of the Company’s overall financial performance and may not be calculated in the same manner as similarly titled measures utilized by other companies.
Operating earnings were $48.7 million, or $0.86 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $43.8 million, or $0.79 per diluted share. This increase is primarily due to growth in income from the Company’s core group employee benefit products, an increase in net investment income and a decrease in interest expense.

-26-


Table of Contents

The following table reconciles the amount of operating earnings to the corresponding amount of net income attributable to shareholders for the indicated periods:
                 
    Three months Ended  
    June 30,  
    2011     2010  
Operating earnings
  $ 48,697     $ 43,818  
Net realized investment gains (losses), net of taxes (1)
    730       (9,018 )
Loss on early retirement of senior notes (2)
          (138 )
 
           
Net income attributable to shareholders
  $ 49,427     $ 34,662  
 
           
 
Diluted results per share of common stock
               
Operating earnings
  $ 0.86     $ 0.79  
Net realized investment gains (losses), net of taxes (1)
    0.01       (0.17 )
Loss on early retirement of senior notes (2)
          (0.00 )
 
           
Net income attributable to shareholders
  $ 0.87     $ 0.62  
 
           
 
(1)   Net of an income tax expense (benefit) of $0.4 million and $(4.9) million, or $0.01 per diluted share and $(0.09) per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The tax effect is calculated using the Company’s statutory tax rate of 35%.
 
(2)   Net of an income tax benefit of $0.07 million or $0.00 per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The tax effect is calculated using the Company’s statutory tax rate of 35%.
Premium and Fee Income. Premium and fee income for the second quarter of 2011 was $385.0 million as compared to $352.6 million for the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 9%. Premiums from core group employee benefit products, which include disability, life, excess workers’ compensation, travel accident and dental insurance and assumed workers’ compensation and casualty reinsurance, increased 9% to $366.5 million for the second quarter of 2011 from $337.7 million for the second quarter of 2010, reflecting higher new business production, price increases and improved persistency. New business production for the Company’s core group employee benefit products increased 5% to $65.5 million in the second quarter of 2011 from $62.2 million in the second quarter of 2010. Premiums from excess workers’ compensation insurance for self-insured employers increased 12% to $79.0 million in the second quarter of 2011 from $70.8 million in the second quarter of 2010. Excess workers’ compensation new business production, which represents the annualized amount of new premium sold, was $12.4 million in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $6.3 million in the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 97%. Premiums from assumed workers’ compensation and casualty reinsurance increased 46% to $17.5 million in the second quarter of 2011 from $11.9 million in the second quarter of 2010. Assumed workers’ compensation and casualty reinsurance production was $4.8 million in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $3.4 million in the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 40%. Rates increased 3% in the second quarter 2011 on excess workers’ compensation renewals and self-insured retentions are on average up 6% in second quarter 2011 on new and renewal policies. The Company’s retention of its existing excess workers’ compensation customers remained strong in the second quarter of 2011.
During the second quarter of 2011, premiums from the Company’s other core group employee benefit products increased 6% to $270.0 million in the second quarter of 2011 from $255.0 million in the second quarter of 2010. Premiums from the Company’s group life products increased 9% to $104.2 million in the second quarter of 2011 from $95.9 million in the second quarter of 2010. Premiums from the Company’s group disability products increased 4% to $142.5 million in the second quarter of 2011 from $136.7 million in the second quarter of 2010. Premiums from the Company’s turnkey disability business were $12.2 million during the second quarter of 2011 compared to $11.9 million during the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 3%. New business production for the Company’s other core group employee benefit products were $48.3 million in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $52.5 million in the second quarter of 2010. The level of production achieved from these products reflects the Company’s focus on the small case niche (insured groups of 10 to 500 individuals). The Company continues to implement price increases for certain group disability and group life insurance customers; in particular, where warranted in particular instances due to adverse claims experience. In addition, the Company has increased pricing levels for new long-term disability insurance customers as a result of the decrease in the discount rate for its disability reserves that was implemented in 2010. The payments received by the Company in connection with LPT’s, which are episodic in nature and are recorded as liabilities rather than as premiums, were $12.0 million in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2010.
Deposits from the Company’s asset accumulation products were $149.0 million in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $78.0 million in the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 91%. This increase reflects the continuation during the second quarter of 2011 of the advantageous conditions for the Company in the fixed annuity marketplace which emerged during the second half of 2010. Deposits from the Company’s asset accumulation products, consisting of new annuity sales and issuances of funding agreements, are recorded as liabilities rather than as premiums. The Company is continuing to maintain its discipline in setting the crediting rates offered on its asset accumulation products in 2011 in an effort to achieve its targeted interest rate spreads on these products.

-27-


Table of Contents

Net Investment Income. Net investment income in the second quarter of 2011 was $83.2 million as compared to $78.2 million in the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 6%. This increase reflects a 14% increase in average invested assets to $6,836.7 million in 2011 from $5,992.8 million in 2010, a higher level of investment income from the Company’s fixed maturity security portfolio resulting from the portfolio repositioning. This increase was partially offset by unfavorable performance of the Company’s investments in investment funds organized as limited partnerships and limited liability companies and trading account securities. The tax equivalent weighted average annualized yield on invested assets was 5.3% and 5.6% for the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Net Realized Investment Gains (Losses). Net realized investment gains (losses) were $1.1 million in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $(13.9) million in the second quarter of 2010. The Company monitors its investments on an ongoing basis. When the fair value of a security declines below its amortized cost, the decline is included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of the related income tax benefit and adjustment to cost of business acquired, on the Company’s balance sheet. In the case of a fixed maturity security, if management judges the decline to be other than temporary, the portion of the decline representing credit losses is recognized as a realized investment loss in the Company’s income statement and the remaining portion of the decline continues to be included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. For all other types of investments, the entire amount of the decline is recognized as a realized investment loss. The Company recognized $7.8 million of losses in the second quarter of 2011 due to the other than temporary declines in the fair values of certain fixed maturity securities and other investments, of which $5.3 million was recognized as realized investment losses related to credit losses and $2.4 million remained as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on the balance sheet related to non-credit losses. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company recognized $21.7 million of losses due to the other than temporary declines in the fair values of certain fixed maturity securities and other investments, of which $20.8 million was recognized as realized investment losses related to credit losses and $0.8 million remained as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on the balance sheet related to non-credit losses. The Company’s investment strategy results in periodic sales of securities and, therefore, the recognition of realized investment gains and losses. During the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized $6.5 million and $7.0 million, respectively, of net gains on sales of securities.
The Company may continue to recognize losses due to other than temporary declines in security fair values in the future, and such losses may be significant. The extent of such losses will depend on, among other things, future developments in the United States and global economies, financial and credit markets, credit spreads, interest rates, expected future cash flows from structured securities, the outlook for the performance by the security issuers of their obligations and changes in security values. The Company continuously monitors its investments in securities whose fair values are below the Company’s amortized cost pursuant to its procedures for evaluation for other than temporary impairment in valuation. See Note B to the Consolidated Financial Statements and the section in the 2010 Form 10-K entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” for a description of these procedures, which take into account a number of factors. It is not possible to predict the extent of any future changes in value, positive or negative, or the results of the future application of these procedures, with respect to these securities. For further information concerning the Company’s investment portfolio, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources — Investments.”
Benefits and Expenses. Policyholder benefits and expenses were $394.3 million in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $361.1 million in the second quarter of 2010. This increase primarily reflects the increase in premiums from the Company’s group employee benefit products discussed above. The combined ratio (loss ratio plus expense ratio) for group employee benefit products was 93.8% and 94.6% in the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The weighted average annualized crediting rate on the Company’s asset accumulation products was 3.8% and 3.7% in the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Interest Expense. Interest expense was $9.3 million in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $11.5 million in the second quarter of 2010. This decrease primarily reflects a decrease in interest expense associated with the 2033 Senior Notes, which were redeemed during 2010, partially offset by an increase in interest expense associated with the Company’s new bank credit facility.
Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense was $15.8 million in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $9.4 million in the second quarter of 2010. This increase primarily reflects the decrease in the income tax benefit resulting from realized investment losses, as well as a higher level of operating income. The Company’s effective tax rate was 24.2% and 21.3% in the second quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

-28-


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
General. The Company’s current liquidity needs include principal and interest payments on outstanding borrowings under its bank credit facility and interest payments on the 2020 Senior Notes and 2007 Junior Debentures, as well as funding its operating expenses and dividends to stockholders. The 2007 Junior Debentures will become due on May 15, 2037, but only to the extent that the Company has received sufficient net proceeds from the sale of certain specified qualifying capital securities. Any remaining outstanding principal amount will be due on May 1, 2067. The 2020 Senior Notes and 2007 Junior Debentures are not subject to any sinking fund requirements and contain certain provisions permitting their early redemption by the Company. For descriptions of these provisions, see Notes E and H to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2010 Form 10-K.
In December 2010, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent and a group of banking institutions (the “Credit Agreement”) providing for a revolving loan facility of $175 million which matures on December 22, 2013 and a term loan facility of $125 million which matures on December 22, 2015. Concurrently with the consummation of the Credit Agreement, the Company terminated the Prior Credit Agreement, which was scheduled to expire in October 2011. On June 7, 2011, a new lender was added to the revolving loan facility and its amount was increased to $205 million. Interest on borrowings under the Credit Agreement is payable, at the Company’s election, either at a floating rate based on LIBOR plus a specified margin which varies based upon the specified ratings of the Company’s senior unsecured debt, as in effect from time to time, or a base rate equal to the highest of Bank of America’s prime rate, LIBOR plus a specified margin or the federal funds rate plus a specified margin. The Credit Agreement contains various financial and other affirmative and negative covenants, along with various representations and warranties. The covenants include, among others, a maximum Company consolidated debt to capital ratio, a minimum Company consolidated net worth, minimum statutory risk-based capital requirements for RSLIC and SNCC, and certain limitations on subsidiary indebtedness. As of June 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance in all material respects with the financial and various other affirmative and negative covenants in the Credit Agreement. At June 30, 2011, the Company had $125 million of outstanding borrowings, and $205 million of borrowings remaining available, under the Credit Agreement.
As a holding company that does not conduct business operations in its own right, substantially all of the assets of the Company are comprised of its ownership interests in its insurance subsidiaries. In addition, the Company had approximately $139.9 million of financial resources available at the holding company level at June 30, 2011, primarily comprised of short-term investments and investments in investment subsidiaries whose assets are primarily invested in investment funds organized as limited partnerships and limited liability companies. Other sources of liquidity at the holding company level include dividends paid from subsidiaries, primarily generated from operating cash flows and investments, and borrowings under the Credit Agreement. During 2011, the Company’s insurance subsidiaries will be permitted, without prior regulatory approval, to make dividend payments totaling $100.8 million, in addition to the dividend payments of $51.0 million made during the first six months of 2011. However, the level of dividends that could be paid consistent with maintaining the insurance subsidiaries’ RBC and other measures of capital adequacy at levels consistent with its current claims-paying and financial strength ratings from rating agencies is likely to be substantially lower than such amount. In general, dividends from the Company’s non-insurance subsidiaries are not subject to regulatory or other restrictions. In addition, the Company is presently categorized as a well known seasoned issuer under Rule 405 of the Securities Act. As such, the Company has the ability to file automatically effective shelf registration statements for unspecified amounts of different securities, allowing for immediate, on-demand offerings.
During the first quarter of 2006, the Company issued $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate funding agreements which had maturities of three to five years in connection with the issuance by an unconsolidated special purpose vehicle of funding agreement-backed notes in a corresponding principal amount. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company repaid the remaining $65.0 million in aggregate principal amount of fixed rate funding agreements at their maturity.
On August 3, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.12 per share, which will be paid on the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock on August 31, 2011.
The Company and its subsidiaries expect available sources of liquidity to exceed their current and long-term cash requirements.
Share Repurchase Authorization. On August 3, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized repurchases of the Company’s outstanding Class A Common Stock in a total amount of up to $50 million. Such repurchases may be effected in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, including Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Repurchases pursuant to this authorization will depend upon management’s assessment of market and business conditions, the Company’s stock price, alternative uses of capital and other factors. The authorization replaces an existing share repurchase authorization which had 1.0 million shares remaining.
Investments. The Company’s overall investment strategy emphasizes safety and liquidity, while seeking the best available return, by focusing on, among other things, managing the Company’s interest-sensitive assets and liabilities and seeking to minimize the

-29-


Table of Contents

Company’s exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. The Company’s investment portfolio, which totaled $7,024.1 million at June 30, 2011, consists primarily of investments in fixed maturity securities, short-term investments, mortgage loans and equity securities. The Company’s investment portfolio also includes investments in investment funds organized as limited partnerships and limited liability companies and trading account securities which collectively totaled $330.4 million at June 30, 2011.
During the first six months of 2011, the market value of the Company’s available for sale investment portfolio, in relation to its amortized cost, increased by $88.2 million from year-end 2010, before the related decrease in the cost of business acquired of $15.7 million and a decrease in the federal income tax provision of $25.4 million. At June 30, 2011, gross unrealized appreciation and gross unrealized depreciation, before the related income tax expense or benefit and the related adjustment to cost of business acquired, with respect to the fixed maturity securities in the Company’s portfolio totaled $269.8 million (of which $220.0 million was attributable to investment grade securities) and $116.0 million (of which $47.5 million was attributable to investment grade securities), respectively. During the first six months of 2011, the Company recognized pre-tax net investment losses of $0.8 million. The weighted average credit rating of the securities in the Company’s fixed maturity portfolio having ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations, based upon the highest of the ratings assigned to the respective securities, was “A” at June 30, 2011. While ratings of this type are intended to address credit risk, they do not address other risks, such as prepayment and extension risks.
See “Forward-Looking Statements and Cautionary Statements Regarding Certain Factors That May Affect Future Results,” and Part I, Item 1A of the 2010 Form 10-K, “Risk Factors”, for a discussion of various risks relating to the Company’s investment portfolio.
Cash Flows. Operating activities increased cash by $197.7 million and $132.7 million in the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. Net investing activities used $295.1 million and $212.2 million of cash during the first six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively, primarily for the purchase of securities. Financing activities provided $114.9 million of cash during the first six months of 2011, principally from deposits to policyholder accounts, partially offset by the repayment of $65.0 million in aggregate principal amount of fixed rate funding agreements at their maturity. During the first six months of 2010, financing activities provided $81.9 million of cash, principally from the issuance of the 2020 Senior Notes, partially offset by the full repayment of the then outstanding borrowings under the Prior Credit Agreement.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in the Company’s exposure to market risk or its management of such risk since December 31, 2010.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Forward-Looking Statements And Cautionary Statements Regarding Certain Factors That May Affect Future Results
In connection with, and because it desires to take advantage of, the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company cautions readers regarding certain forward-looking statements in the above “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in any other statement made by, or on behalf of, the Company, whether in future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission or otherwise. Forward-looking statements are statements not based on historical information and which relate to future operations, strategies, financial results, prospects, outlooks or other developments. Some forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of terms such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “judgment,” “outlook,” “effort,” “attempt,” “achieve,” “project” or other similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive and other uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the Company’s control and many of which, with respect to future business decisions, are subject to change. Examples of such uncertainties and contingencies include, among other important factors, those affecting the insurance industry generally, such as the economic and interest rate environment, federal and state legislative and regulatory developments,

-30-


Table of Contents

including but not limited to changes in financial services, employee benefit and tax laws and regulations, changes in accounting rules and interpretations thereof, market pricing and competitive trends relating to insurance products and services, acts of terrorism or war, and the availability and cost of reinsurance, and those relating specifically to the Company’s business, such as the level of its insurance premiums and fee income, the claims experience, persistency and other factors affecting the profitability of its insurance products, the performance of its investment portfolio and changes in the Company’s investment strategy, acquisitions of companies or blocks of business, and ratings by major rating organizations of the Company and its insurance subsidiaries. These uncertainties and contingencies can affect actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company. Certain of these uncertainties and contingencies are described in more detail in Part I, Item 1A of the 2010 Form 10-K, “Risk Factors”. The Company disclaims any obligation to update forward-looking information.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
A putative class action, Moore v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company, was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi in July 2008 against the Company’s subsidiary, RSLIC. The action challenges RSLIC’s ability to pay certain insurance policy benefits through a mechanism commonly known in the insurance industry as a retained asset account and contains related claims of breach of fiduciary duty and prohibited transactions under the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The parties have entered into an agreement to settle this litigation, and the settlement has been preliminarily approved by the court. It is not anticipated that this settlement will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
In addition, the Company is a party to various other litigation and proceedings in the course of its business, primarily involving its insurance operations. In some cases, these proceedings entail claims against the Company for punitive damages and similar types of relief. The ultimate disposition of such litigation and proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The following discussion, which supplements the significant factors that may affect our business and operations described in Part I, Item 1A of the 2010 Form 10-K, “Risk Factors”, updates and supercedes the discussion contained therein relating to these risk factors.
     The Company’s financial position and results of operations may be adversely impacted by changes in accounting rules and in the interpretations of such rules.
The Company’s financial position and results of operations are reported in accordance with GAAP, in the case of the Company, and in accordance with statutory accounting principles, in the case of the statutory financial statements of its insurance subsidiaries. Changes in the applicable GAAP or statutory accounting rules, or in the interpretations of such rules, may adversely affect the Company’s and such subsidiaries’ reported financial positions and results of operations.
On January 1, 2011, the Company adopted, on a retrospective basis, guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board limiting the extent to which an insurer may capitalize costs incurred in the acquisition of an insurance contract. The guidance provides that, in order to be capitalized, such costs must be incremental and directly related to the acquisition of a new or renewal insurance contract. Insurers may only capitalize costs related to successful efforts in attaining a contract and advertising costs may only be capitalized if certain direct response advertising criteria are met. As a result of its adoption, the Company made an after-tax reduction to its retained earnings at January 1, 2010 in the amount of $60.0 million, net of an income tax benefit of $32.3 million, which represents the net reduction in deferred policy acquisition cost included in cost of business acquired on the consolidated balance sheet, net income attributable to shareholders was reduced by $0.04 per diluted share and $0.06 per diluted share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. This adoption also resulted in the restatement of certain other financial information for 2010.

-31-


Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits
  11.1   Computation of Results per Share of Common Stock (incorporated by reference to Note G to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein)
 
  31.1   Certification by the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
 
  31.2   Certification by the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Periodic Report Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)
 
  32.1   Certification of Periodic Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
  101.   The following financial information from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL: (i) Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; (ii) Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010; and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
         
 
  DELPHI FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.    
 
       
 
  /s/ ROBERT ROSENKRANZ
 
Robert Rosenkranz
   
 
  Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    
 
  (Principal Executive Officer)    
 
       
 
  /s/ STEPHAN KIRATSOUS
 
Stephan Kiratsous
   
 
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    
Date: August 9, 2011

-32-